Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-023-11Clarington Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: February 28, 2011 Resolution #: CPH -/b'O ~/By-law #: N/A Report #: PSD-023-11 File #: PLN 29.10 Subject: SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS IN URBAN VALLEYLANDS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: Part 1 THAT Report PSD-023-11 be received; 2. THAT FIT Fund Solar Corporation be advised that Clarington does not support their current proposal for a Class 3 Solar Project in the Soper Creek valleylands and that they be encouraged to meet with staff to consider alternate locations in Clarington for a solar energy project or projects; and 3. THAT the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, FIT Fund Solar Corporation and all interested .parties listed in Report PSD-023-11 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Part 2 THAT the following resolution be adopted by a separate resolution: "WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington supports the responsible expansion of renewable energy as a means of placing Ontario on a more sustainable path for the future; WHEREAS municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe are subject to the Growth Plan which encourages the efficient use of land and infrastructure and greater densities of urban growth; CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 2 WHEREAS unlike Class 1 and Class 2 solar installations, Class 3ground-mounted solar installations greater than 12 kW may require a significant land area and would be contrary to the policies of The Provincial Growth Plan for the efficient use of serviced land and the mandated density of development; WHEREAS urban valleylands are key ecological features that need protection from development and should be the focus of restoration efforts to enhance the ecological attributes and value to the community as outdoor amenity areas, particularly as communities are intensified; WHEREAS Regulation 359/09 as amended provides for consideration of a renewable energy project within natural heritage features, including within a significant valleyland or within 120 m of a significant valleyland if supported by mitigation measures in an environmental impact study prepared by the proponent; WHEREAS consideration of Class 3 solar facilities in urban valleylands will provide an incentive for developers to retain valleyland areas and could limit their dedication to municipalities as Open Space lands in the future; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Minister of Energy, the Minister of Natural Resources, the Renewable Energy Facilitation Office, FIT Fund Solar Corporation, and CLOCA be advised that the Municipality of Clarington does not support the consideration of Class 3 solar facilities in urban valleyland areas; and THAT this resolution be forwarded to all other municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe"; Submitted by: ,? David rome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer LB/COS/sn/df February 24, 2011 REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 e~~~ 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this staff report is twofold; to provide information to Council regarding the Provincial Renewable Energy Approvals process and to provide further information regarding a potential solar panel installation at the northeast corner of Baseline Road and Simpson Avenue in Bowmanville. These are in response to the delegation by Mr. Sebben and information item I-7 from the January 31, 2011 Council meeting. 2.0 RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVALS 2.1 According to the Ministry of Energy's website (www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/ renewable) Ontario's new approach to approving renewable energy projects offers benefits to project applicants and local communities while continuing to ensure rigorous protection of the natural environment, cultural heritage and public health and safety. Renewable energy projects include solar, wind, biomass and water projects. Many renewable energy projects in Ontario will require a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) from the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). This single approval has replaced the need for multiple Provincial Environmental Assessments, Certificates of Approval, and Permits to Take Water while introducing province-wide standards for setbacks and asix-month service guarantee for the REA review. It must be highlighted that renewable energy projects are no longer subject to municipal land use planning instruments under the Planning Act (e.g. Official Plans and Zoning By-laws). The Municipal role in renewable energy project .approval has been reduced to consultative as a result of the Green Energy Act. Solar energy projects are divided into three classifications: • Class 1 Solar installations in any location less than 12 kW (micro-solar) • Class 2 Solar installation mounted on the roof or wall of a building greater than 12 kW • Class 3 Ground-mounted solar installations greater than 12 kW Class 1 and 2 solar projects may require a building permit. Only Class 3 projects require a Renewable Energy Approval. 2.2 Key Steps in the Renewable Energy Approvals(REA) Process 2.2.1 Pre-submission Work Before submitting an application for an REA to the Ministry of the Environment, the applicant must prepare a number of reports, drawings and diagrams to describe the facility and its location. The applicant must also assess and mitigate impacts and potential environmental effects associated with the project during REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 P~C~F d construction, design and operation and decommissioning. The applicant must demonstrate how the project will meet setbacks depending on the class of project as well as engage the public, municipalities and Aboriginal communities in discussions about the project. 2.2.2 Optional Consultation on Pre-submission Work Applicants are encouraged to contact the Ministry of the Environment or the Ministry of Natural Resources to clarify the requirements for their project. In most cases, a coordinated pre-submission meeting may be appropriate and is highly recommended where a project requires multiple approvals. The Renewable Energy Facilitation Office (REPO) can help the applicant set up this meeting. Additionally, this is a good time in the process to consult with other approving authorities, such as the federal government and conservation authorities. 2.2.3 Mandatory Consultation Requirements Consultation with the general public, aboriginal groups and local municipality(s) is a component of the REA process. Public Consultation includes contact with landowners within 120 metres, a notice in the local newspaper and at least two public meetings. All. of the studies and reports required as part of the REA process must be made available for public review prior to the last public meeting. Consultation with the Municipality is required for all renewable energy projects requiring an REA except for small wind projects (however they may still require a building permit). Consultation must begin at least 90 days prior to the date of the final public consultation meeting. This must also take place before the applicant submits an REA application. The MOE provides applicants with a form to document municipal feedback on matters related to municipal services and local infrastructure. The prescribed consultation form has multiple pages of questions for the Municipality to respond to. The questions seek information regarding: 1. Roads (access, Traffic Management Plans); 2. Service Connections (location of service connections other than roads); 3. Facility Other (landscape design, emergency procedures, easements); and 4. Project Construction (site rehabilitation, locations of buried and above ground utilities, building code issues, natural and cultural heritage features). A proponent must document what was learned through public consultation, including how the project was changed in response to municipal and public input. Through the REA process, a proponent consults with the Municipality, they do not seek approval. The only exception is when a renewable energy project requires the removal and use of aggregate materials. In this case, municipal approvals are sought for the aggregate license, not the REA. REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 5 In addition, although Planning Act approvals are not required as per the Green Energy Act, proponents require permits from Conservation Authorities in regulated areas to ensure that the development does not affect the control of pollution, flooding, erosion and dynamic beaches. Legislative requirements associated with the Federal Fisheries Act also remain applicable. 2.2.4 Complete Submission The applicant provides all of the required information for provincial ministry approvals. This includes an REA application form and supporting documents and reports to the Ministry of the Environment and any documents required by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Under the REA Regulation, the different types of renewable energy generation facilities are categorized by class. Each class of project has unique requirements based on their nameplate capacity. The basic list of studies that need to be submitted in support of a REA application are: 1. Project Description Report 2. Construction Plan Report 3. Consultation Report 4. Design and Operations Report 5. Decommissioning Plan Report Additional documents will be required by the MOE depending on the project location, equipment, or technology being used to generate electricity. Also depending on the location of the project, archaeological, cultural heritage, environmental and noise studies may be required. Drafts of these documents, among others, must be made available to the public by the applicant at least 60 days prior to the date of their final public consultation meeting, which must occur prior to submission of an application for an REA. Mandatory consultation requirements must also be met for the application to be considered complete (including public meetings, municipal consultation and aboriginal groups.) 2.2.5 Public Notice to the Environmental Registrv Once an application is made for an REA, a notice of a proposal is posted on the Environmental Registry by the Ministry of the Environment so the public can review and provide comments. The Municipality may provide comments at this stage as well. REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 6 2.2.6 Decision After considering an application for the issue or renewal of an REA and all public comments received through the Environmental Registry, the Ministry of the Environment Director may do either of the following: • Issue, renew or amend REA • Refuse to issue, renew or amend REA. A third party (other than the applicant or the issuing Authority) may seek a hearing, usually to offer an objection, with respect to a renewable energy approval by making a request to the Environmental Review Tribunal. The request must be made within 15 days of the posting of the notice of the approval on the Environmental Registry. The Tribunal must hold a meeting and make a decision within six months. 3.0 POTENTIAL SOLAR INSTALLATION IN BOWMANVILLE 3.1 Property Description The FIT Fund Solar Corp and Premier Solar have announced a proposal for a 200 kilowatt solar farm at the north east corner of Simpson Avenue and Baseline Road in Bowmanville (Attachment 1). Figure 1 -Subject Site REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 7 The subject property is approximately one hectare (2.5 acres) in size. The land uses to the north and west are residential, and to the east and south open space and with some industrial. The eastern limits of the property are tree covered and the Soper Creek enters the property near the southeast corner of the property. The entire property is completely within the flood plain of the Soper Creek. The subject property is designated Major Open Space in the Durham Regional Official Plan, Environmental Protection in the Clarington Official Plan, and is zoned Environmental Protection `EP' in Zoning By-law 84-63. Clarington's Open Space System is comprised of Environmental Protection Areas, Natural Core Areas, Natural Linkage Areas, the Waterfront Greenway and Green Space. Unless otherwise provided in specific detailed policies within the Official Plan, development is discouraged within the Open Space System. More specifically, within areas designated Environmental Protection, as is the subject property; no development is permitted (the exception being low intensity recreation, forest, fish and wildlife management and erosion control or stormwater management). The natural heritage features together with their functions collectively make up the Natural Heritage System in Clarington. The mapped features include significant valleylands, streams, woodlots and wetlands. The Clarington Official Plan identifies a portion of the subject property to be located within the significant valleyland of the Soper Creek. Hazard lands are lands that exhibit one or more hazards such as poor drainage, organic soils, flood susceptibility, erosion or steep slopes. Development on these types of lands could cause loss of life, property damage or the degradation of the natural environment. The subject site is identified as being Hazard Lands (due to being within the flood plain of the Soper Creek). 3.2 The Project According to Premier Solar, the proposed nameplate capacity of the solar project at Simpson Avenue is 200 kW. Given the generation capacity it is considered to be a Class 3 facility. Generally Class 3 solar facilities are ground mounted and generate over 10 kilowatts of power. For this project (using REFO/MOE websites) we identified the following possible studies that Premier solar will need to undertake as part of the REA process. They include: • a Noise Study, • an Environmental Impact Study; and • a Flood Plain Analysis. REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 8 3.2.1 Noise Studv A noise study assesses the potential impacts at nearby noise receptors (e.g. residence) due to sound emitted by the solar facility's electrical equipment (e.g. inverters, transformers). The noise study is required to demonstrate that the facility, as designed, does not exceed a 40 decibel noise level (approximately the noise level experienced in a quiet office or library). The review engineer will assess the information submitted by the applicant to determine acceptable distance from the solar facility to the nearest residence or other receptor. 3.2.2 Environmental Impact Studv The Province requires natural heritage features, parks and conservation reserves to be protected by a setback for all elements of a renewable energy project. For most natural heritage features the prescribed setback is 120 metres. A renewable energy project must also meet a minimum setback distance of 120 metres from any nearby water body (including a permanent or intermittent stream). In general, the parts of the project related to the transmission lines and associated structures and to the roads, docks, water crossings, culverts, etc. associated with the facility may be allowed within 30 metres of a water body or within the water body itself. However, parts of the project related to the generation equipment, storage facilities and transformer stations may not (see Figure 2). If the applicant wants to locate the project within a natural feature or within the prescribed setbacks, they will have to undertake and submit an environmental impact assessment study as part of the complete application. The REA Regulation requires that an impact assessment conducted as part of an REA is prepared in accordance with procedures established by MNR. The Impact Assessment must assess the construction, installation, use, operation, changing and retiring of the renewable energy facility. It must identify and assess any negative environmental effects of the project on the natural heritage features or water bodies and must identify mitigation measures in respect of those effects. REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 9 3.2.3 Flood Plain Analysis 2 -Environmental Constraints Renewable energy projects cannot generally be located in areas subject to hazards from flooding, erosion and/or dynamic beach action, or on hazardous sites. The subject property is entirely within the flood plain of the Soper Creek. The subject proposal will require an approval from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA). In January 2011, FIT Fund Solar submitted an application to CLOCA for approval under Ontario Regulation 42/06, the Authority's Regulation of Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses. At the time of writing this report, CLOCA has not made a decision with respect to granting a permit in support of this development. In conversation a representative of FIT Fund Solar it was indicated that they have not entered into the REA process yet. They are awaiting the outcome of the permit application to the CLOCA. 4.0 STAFF COMMENTS 4.1 Although the Provincial Regulation 359/09 as amended states that a renewable energy project is not permitted within floodplains, a natural heritage features or within a prescribed area around natural heritage features, there is really only a blanket prohibition on development within a provincially significant southern wetland, a provincially significant coastal wetland or a provincial park/conservation reserve. In regards to all other features, and the setback to the above referenced wetland and parks, the Regulation provides for environmental REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 10 impact studies to assess any negative impact and identify mitigating measures that can be implemented to allow the project to proceed. This approach may be reasonable in some circumstances, for example for a wind turbine which has a highly constrained impact at the tower base. However, for a solar farm type installation (a Class 3 project), the area is blanketed with solar arrays and operating areas in between which must be maintained for ease of access by trucks and personnel. The impact is to remove and/or preclude the naturalization of the area. It would also increase hazard risk within the floodplain as the solar arrays mounts can catch material and have adam-like effect. 4.2 Under municipal planning policy, there is a Land Use Plan that identifies the appropriate areas for different land uses. Under the Province's Green Energy Act, land use policy is irrelevant. Regardless of whether the municipality designates significant valleyland areas for preclusion from development with an Open Space designation, the Act and the regulations do not necessarily take into account land use plans. Renewable energy projects should not be encouraged to locate in lands set aside for open space purposes simply because this is the most lucrative land use for these areas. While other forms of development are precluded, renewable energy projects should not be permitted to do an "end-run" around the Planning process to settle on the lands containing natural heritage features. If Class 3 solar installations are permitted in natural heritage areas and their buffer areas, developers will be reluctant to dedicate such lands to the Municipality. There are no provisions in the Planning Act to compel dedication of open space lands - it simply is the best option for developers given the lack of opportunity for alternative profit-making uses. 4.3 It should be noted that in the past, some valleyland areas were retained by developers -one in hope of getting a golf course designation; an application that has long since been withdrawn. If developers can retain urban valleyland areas for renewable energy projects, municipal objectives will again be thwarted. 4.4 Urban valleylands are significant natural features in urban areas. They are important for both their environmental benefits and their amenity benefits for residents, providing opportunities for trails, views of and access to natural areas. Even degraded sites offer opportunities for restoration of natural heritage features that are important to our quality of life. 4.5 The FIT Fund Solar project illustrates the potential for renewable energy projects to be located in inappropriate areas without strong oversight and direction. Larger Class 3 solar projects should not be located in an urban valleyland simply by default. There are other urban options for larger scale solar installations that take advantage of the large flat roofs on industrial building or recreation facilities. These types of installations are more in keeping with the Provincial Growth Plan and other planning policies which encourage the efficient use of land and infrastructure in urban areas. REPORT NO.: PSD-023-11 PAGE 11 5.0 CONCLUSION 5.1 FIT Fund Solar Corporation should be advised that the Municipality does not support the development of solar facilities in urban valleylands. However, they should be encouraged to consider other locations in the Municipality. Staff would be pleased to assist in the consideration of alternative locations. 5.2 It is also recommended that a resolution be passed to advise the Ministry of Energy of the Municipality's concern for Class 3 Solar installations in urban valleylands. This resolution can be circulated to other municipalities for support, as they could be facing the same issue. staff Contact: Lisa Backus Attachments Attachment 1 -FIT FUND Solar Power Materials Interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: Dave Sebben Mario Veltri Petr Siemans Chris Darling, CLOCA Attachment 1 to Report PSD-023-11 Durham Power Project -Municipality of Clarington FV ~ V January 11, 2011 Attention: Ron Albright, P. Eng. Manager, Infrastructure & Capital Works Renewable Energy Project -Municipality of Clarington The FIT Fund Solar Corp. is pleased to announce the Durham Power Project which will be located in the Municipality of Clarington - Town of Bowmanville. The Durham Power Project is scheduled for 200 kilowatts and will be located on a properly at the northeast corner of Simpson Avenue and Baseline Road. The Durham Power Project will provide an economic stimulus to the community, both during the construction phase, and subsequently as jobs are created to manage the ongoing facility. The initial stage consists of a new R-Plan survey to define the legal boundaries of the property, and to participate with the Municipality of Clarington in negotiating the settlement of properly transfer for their infrastruc#ure requirements. The results of this survey have been completed as of January 4, 2022, at which time copies have been provided to the Municipality. This survey has been undertaken by the landowner/solar developer at their own cost. Property Transfer Consideration It is the position of David Forbes, owner of Lot 10, Concession 1, Municipality of Clarington that the property easement required by the municipality will be transferred to the municipality without financial cost. In return for this consideration, Mr. Forbes is seeking the support of the municipality in development of this renewable energy project, and our bid to receive approval for this development from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. The FIT Fund Solar Corp. is preparing site design drawings, as well as 3D renderings to illustrate both the physical impact of the installation, as well as the visual aesthetics of the solar installation. I! is our objective to develop this property in a manner that meets the requirements of all local jurisdictions, minimize environmental impact and create value for the owner. Durham Power Fund -Municipality of Clarington -Dec. 17, 2010 Page 1 of 3 Environmental Issues The key environmental issues that we have identified and addressed are: a. Topsoil disturbance - in order to minimize topsoil, we have designed an anchoring system that consists of using drilled-in helical piles. The use of these piles forgoes the use of concrete foundations, thus avoiding any site excavation. The installation of these piles has virtually no soil disturbance. See illustration right. b. Vegetation alteration - as the site vegetation is instrumental in absorbing excess moisture, either by rainfall or overflow flooding, we have designed our site installation to circumvent virtually all existing vegetation, with exception of one tree, which may have to be removed. It is located in the center of the property, and its removal will have minimal affect on the site. All vegetation located near the creek banks will remain undisturbed. c. Flooding displacement & drainage - as this property is located in a flood plain, our structures have been designed to have virtually no displacement value. The solar arrays are anchored to.the ground with about 4" diameter rods, and mounted on 8"diameter pipes. A flood of one meter on the property would be in excess of 8,624 cu. maters of water, and the displacement of the solar mounts would be approximately 1.3 cu. meters, or less than .015 percent. Summary The Durham Power Project is a development fitting with the strong energy roots of the local community and its mandate to welcome renewable energy in all of Its development plans. The FIT Fund Solar Corp, is very sensitive to the environment impact of this project, and has worked hard to create a solar project that has minimal impact on the property. Illustrations • 3D Solar Illustration -site ~vv.rto yaw Durham Poever Fund -Municipality of Clarington -Dec. 17, 2010 Page 2 of 3 sum 3D Illustration -pole mount pedestal and land anchors I:EMIEh -a~.,~ ' P(:EM i..,~, ~'I:EMICR ~~ ..~~-~ .~.?.~ ~~ rs~x . • Top view -site layout F'RCM11I? ('hEMILI,' Durham Power Fund - Municipality of Clarington -Dec. 17, 2010 Page 3 0