HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD-16-94~ V,,. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALTTY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #~~ • 574 M ~
Date: Monday, May 2, 1994 Res. # GPA -,~c7~--9~
By-Law #
Report#: ['n-16_44 File#:
Subject: IMPLEMENTATION OF BILL 47 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report CD-16-94 be received;
2. THAT the Committee recommend to Council that a resolution be
passed to implement the provisions of Bill 47 as required upon
the Proclamation Date or as soon as practicable;
3. That the Municipality establish a First Attendance Parking Tag
Facility;
4. That the Municipal Law Enforcement Officers be designated
pursuant to Section 20 (1) of the Act as being responsible for
administering the First Attendance Parking Tag Facility;
5. That the Ministry of the Attorney General's office be advised of
Council's actions and be requested to designate the Municipality
under Regulation
On December 14, 1993, Bill 47, "An Act to amend certain Acts in
respect of the Administration of Justice" received Royal Assent. This
Act amends the Provincial Offenses Act as it relates to Part I
Certificates of Offence and Part II Parking Tickets. The anticipated
Proclamation date for the Act is July 1, 1994. Upon Proclamation the
current system for handling Parking Tickets will cease to exist and a
new system with entirely new paperwork will have to be implemented.
Report CD-16-94 -2- May 2, 1994
The new Act is intended to decrease court backlog by ensuring trials
deal only with real issues of dispute. This decrease in court time
will result in improved trial availability for more serious matters.
The municipalities should benefit by reducing. the matters brought
before the Court and the number of issues which will be in dispute at
the time of trial. The Ministry has stated that the municipalities
should see an increase in revenue through reduction in court time for
the officers, earlier and increased prepayment of fines and the
elimination of in-absentia hearings.
On April 14 & 15, 1994, staff attended a training seminar at the
Ontario Police College. The seminar was conducted by the Ministry of
the Attorney General and was intended to familiarize municipalities.
with the requirements of Bill 47.
COMI48NTS
As previously stated the Act is intended to shift the responsibility
for parking matters from the courts to the municipalities. The
representatives from the Ministry stated that they believe the courts
and the province will be completely removed from parking matters
within five years.
In 1993, the province passed Bill 25. Municipalities were given the
option of taking over control of the collection of fines and
enforcement of licence plate denial for unpaid fines. Bill 47 is the
next logical step. It allows the municipality to become more involved
in the actual court process. The province is slowly and
systematically withdrawing from involvement in parking offenses.
The municipality has the option to opt in or out of some of the
provisions of Bill 47, however as of July 1st, 1994 all our current
Parking Tickets and related documents will no longer be valid. The
tickets and documents for a municipality which opts out will not be
the same as those for a municipality which opts in. The municipality
could choose to opt out at this time and prepare all its paperwork
accordingly only to find itself forced into opting in within the next
year. If that occurs staff would again, have to scrap all our tickets
and documents and print new ones in the prescribed forms for opted in
municipalities.
Given the Ministry's stated goal of removing itself entirely from
parking and turning it over to the local municipalities, staff believe
we must use this window of opportunity and agree to take part in Bill
47. By opting in now the municipality will be saved the cost of
changing documents a third time and the system will be spared the
additional unnecessary disruption of converting from opted out to
opted in.
~-
Report CD-16-94 -3- May 2, 1994
If the municipality chooses to opt in it must notify the Ministry of
the Attorney General of its decision by May 15, 1994 in order to
ensure that the necessary Regulations can be passed to Designate the
municipality and .appoint the people to run the Parking Tag Facility
before the Act is Proclaimed as law on July 1, 1994. If this is not
done in time, the municipality will have to either cease issuing
parking tickets until such time as the Regulations in Council are
made, or issue tickets and operate as a non designated (opted out)
municipality until the Regulations are made.
MAJOR CHANGES TO THE ACT
As of the Proclamation date it will no longer be possible for a person
to merely plead not guilty by signing the back of the Parking Ticket
and requesting a trial. This is often done as a delaying tactic. The
Defendant signs the ticket pleading not guilty knowing he has gained
an extra four to six months before the fine is due. Many such
Defendants have no intention of ever appearing for the trial.
In the Designated municipalities if the Defendant wishes to dispute
the ticket he must appear in person at the Municipal Administrative
Centre. At that time he will have to speak to one of the persons
designated to operate the First Attendance Parking Tag Facility to
discuss the ticket. As a result of the discussion the ticket can be
paid, withdrawn or a trial may be requested if the matter cannot be
resolved. At that time the Defendant fills out a Notice of Intention
to Appear in court and a court date will be set.
If the Defendant fails to appear on the court date the Justice of the
Peace will examine the ticket, if it is correct and regular on its
face he will register a conviction in the amount shown on the ticket.
This avoids the practice of Justices reducing the fine amount.
Defendants who live outside of the municipality can be handled
differently. Metro Toronto has implemented a system whereby persons
living more than 100 km from the city can phone in to speak to the
Designated person. If the matter is not resolved, a Notice of
Intention to Appear is mailed to them. It must then be returned
within 21 days, or the ticket proceeds in the same manner as if there
had been no initial contact. Staff believe this offers non-residents
a fair and reasonable access to the system.
t ~.
Report CD-16-94 -4- May 2, 1994
The person or persons designated to conduct the Parking Tag Facility
may be any member of staff with sufficient knowledge of, or experience
in enforcement. In order to avoid the appearance of bias, it should
not be one of the issuing officers. The Act provides for the
appointment of "a person or class of persons". Staff are therefore
suggesting the two Municipal Law Enforcement Officers be designated.
Staff will design a set of policies and procedures for the Facility.
CONCLIISION
The municipality will be required to change its tickets, forms and
procedures for parking on July 1, 1994. The issue now is whether or
not to opt in and be designated by Regulation, or wait until such time
as we are required to be designated. The first option means that
everything will change only once rather than twice under the second
option.
Staff recommend that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council that a Resolution be passed to implement the
provisions of Bill 47 as required upon the Proclamation Date. This
resolution will include the establishment of a First Attendance
Parking Tag Facility and the designation of the Municipal Law
Enforcement Officers under subsection 20(1)(1)(e.l) of the Act on the
Proclamation Date.
Reviewed by
Bill Stockwell
Chief Administrative
Officer
LC*PB*KM
Respectfully submitted