Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/29/2010 • arm n Energizing Ontario GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: March 29, 2010 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. MINUTES (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of March 8, 2010 401 5. PRESENTATIONS (a) Pam Lancaster, Stewardship Technician, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Regarding Watershed Plans (b) Rob Messervey, Chief Administrative Officer, and David Pridham, Manager of Environmental and Technical Services, Kawartha Region Conservation Authority, Regarding the Lake Scugog Environmental Management Plan (c) Sheila Hall, Executive Director, Clarington Board of Trade, Regarding Quarterly Economic Development Update 6. DELEGATIONS (Draft List at Time of Publication —To be Replaced with Final 601 List) (a) Dominick Forsellino, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer (b) Rose Turner, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer (c) Ingrid Hill, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 G.P. & A. Agenda - 2 - March 29, 2010 (d) Dr. Boris Kostiuk, Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (e) Barry Morrison, B.J. Morrison & Associates, Regarding Report PSD-036- 10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (f) David Torras, F & I Gateway Investments, Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (g) Barry Johnson, B.J.C. Architects Inc., Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (h) Bob Kreasul, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches (i) Bob Currie, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches (j) Allison Woollacott, Manager Port of Newcastle Marina, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches 7. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63 701 Applicant: W. Daniell, E. Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd. Report: PSD-038-10 8. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-038-10 Proposed Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law 801 Amendment to Permit 32 Residential Units Applicants: William Daniell, Elizabeth Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd. (b) PSD-036-10 To Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties 809 to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building G.P. & A. Agenda - 3 - March 29, 2010 (c) PSD-039-10 Environmental Impact Study, Proposed Official Plan 832 Amendment, Proposed Rezoning and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision to Permit the Development of 55 Residential Units Applicant: Courtice Woods Inc. (d) PSD-040-10 Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of Zoning By-law 868 Amendment Application Applicant: Bowmanville Investments Inc. (e) PSD-041-10 Application to Amend the Clarington Official Plan and 873 Zoning By-law to Permit Agri-Tourism as an Accessory Use to a Farm Operation Applicant: Nancy Mallette (f) PSD-042-10 Dredging — Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) 888 Municipal Boat Launches (g) PSD-043-10 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Watershed 899002 Plans for Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, Ganaraska River, and Lovekin, Bouchette Point, and Port Granby Creeks (h) PSD-044-10 Port Darlington Harbour Company, Expropriation of West 899014 Beach Lands for Bowmanville Waterfront District Park— Offer of Settlement (i) PSD-045-10 Monitoring of the Decisions of the Committee of 899016 Adjustment for the Meetings of March 18, 2010 Q) PSD-046-10 Heritage Permit Application for 36 Beech Avenue, 899025 Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District (k) PSD-047-10 Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board Surplus 899033 Property Sale — Bowmanville Senior Public School 9. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD-010-10 Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for 901 February, 2010 10. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT . No Reports 11. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) ESD-004-10 Monthly Response Report— February 2010 1101 G.P. & A. Agenda - 4 - March 29, 2010 12. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports 13. MUNICIPAL CLERK'S DEPARTMENT (a) CLD-004-10 Urban "Backyard" Chicken Farming 1301 (b) CLD-008-10 Appointment of Private Parking Officer 1309 (c) CLD-009-10 2010 Municipal Elections — Special Voting Locations 1313 (d) CLD-010-10 Procedural By-law Amendment 1316 14. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-009-10 CL2010-3, Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various Locations 1401 (b) COD-010-10 Arrangements with Kobes Nursery Wholesale for 1408 Installation and Permitted Use of a Dry Hydrant . 15. FINANCE DEPARTMENT No Reports 16. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE No Reports 17. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 18. OTHER BUSINESS 19. COMMUNICATIONS 20. ADJOURNMENT QL.dI.g heWay the Way General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, March 8, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Mayor J. Abernethy Councillor A. Foster Councillor R. Hooper Councillor M. Novak Councillor G. Robinson Councillor C. Trim Councillor W. Woo Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Director of Community Services, J. Caruana Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella Acting Director of Planning Services, F. Langmaid Director of Corporate Services & Human Resources, M. Marano Director of Finance, N. Taylor Director of Emergency & Fire Services, G. Weir Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree Clerk ll, J. Gallagher Mayor Abernethy chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Abernethy announced that Councillor Novak, Councillor Trim, Councillor Woo, Councillor Foster and himself had attended the "Staples" Bowmanville store grand opening on Saturday, March 6, 2010. He noted that it was a successful opening and a great addition to the business community of Clarington. Mayor Abernethy also announced that Councillor Novak, Councillor Foster, and himself attended the opening of Comedy Royale, a new entertainment venue in Courtice, on Saturday, March 6, 2010. - 1 - 401 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 Councillor Novak announced that she had the opportunity, on Thursday, March 4, 2010, to represent the Municipality at the opening of"Crock A Doodle", a new ceramic painting business. She also announced that, on March 3, 2010, she attended the "Raging Grannies" theatrical production at the Clarington Older Adults Centre. On March 4, 2010, Councillor Novak attended the public information centre meeting regarding the Jane Street reconstruction and Flett Street sanitary sewer replacement, which had approximately 15 people in attendance. MINUTES Resolution #GPA-143-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the minutes of the special meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on February 19, 2010 and the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on February 22, 2010, be approved. CARRIED ALTER THE AGENDA Resolution #GPA-144-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the agenda be altered to allow Mr. John Pisapio to make his presentation when he arrives. CARRIED DELEGATIONS COLIN ROWE, THANKING COUNCIL FOR DESIGNATING THE CLARINGTON CONCERT BAND AS THE OFFICIAL TOWN BAND Mr. Rowe was present to thank Council for designating the Clarington Concert Band as the Official Town Band. Mr. Rowe provided the Committee with some background information on the Clarington Concert Band, which began in 1992. He noted that there are over 45 players from around the area. Mr. Rowe thanked Council, on behalf of the executive and the Clarington Town Band, for the designation and for Council's support over the years. He pledged that the Clarington Concert Band will continue to honour the trust that Council has placed in them. - 2 - 402 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 PRESENTATIONS JOHN PISAPIO, MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, REGARDING COYOTE DAMAGE Mr. Pisapio was present to address the Committee regarding coyote damage. He noted that over the past 100 years, governments have been trying to eliminate coyotes yet there are now more coyotes than ever. He indicated that the reason for this is that coyotes are highly adaptive and very productive. Mr. Pisapio reiterated that trying to eliminate the species does not work. He informed the Committee that there are different zones in Ontario, with different hybrids within each. He stated that in Clarington we have the Eastern Coyote which is between 30-35lbs for females, and 35- 45lbs for males, and look much larger because of their long legs and full coats. Mr. Pisapio provided the Committee with the life history of the coyote, which includes a 60- 63 day gestation and a litter size of 3-9. He stated that one of the reasons coyotes are such a successful species is because they eat a wide range of food, from berries to deer. Mr. Pisapio stated that the recent urban area attacks are typically tied to people feeding the coyotes. He reviewed the territory, based on radio-collared studies, which includes the Port Lands of Toronto. Regarding predation of livestock, he noted that not all coyotes kill livestock, typically it is the older adult males. Therefore, he stated that it is important to eliminate these older adult males in an area, not all coyotes. With regard to prevention, he stated that it is important to provide barns or sheds for livestock. He added that guard dogs, donkeys, llamas are cost-effective ways to protect livestock from coyotes. Mr. Pisapio informed the Committee about the compensation program for livestock losses, administered through the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, which reimburses the municipality for the compensation paid. The Ministry of Natural Resources is not involved in the program. He noted that every land owner is empowered to protect their property through capture and destruction. Mr. Pisapio stated that historical studies prove that there is an increase in coyote numbers where there have been intensive control efforts or increased harvests for pelts. Along those lines, he noted that bounties are illegal in Ontario, however he stated that there are provisions in the legislation to have a municipality approach the Ministry of Natural Resources for permission for a sanctioned harvest (similar to a bounty). Mr. Pisapio stated that effective control includes selective culling within breeding territories; promoting trapping of problem coyotes only by highly trained and Ministry approved trappers where the timing is important. He informed the Committee that there is no closed season on coyotes and therefore anyone with small game license along with a wolfe/coyote game seal can kill coyotes. Mr. Pisapio noted that there is currently no "explosion in the population" as compared to the normal population cycle despite what is reported by the media. He further stated that the population tends to be self- controlled by the mite disease called mange. Mr. Pisapio noted a number of options available to homeowners to protect their property, such as properly storing garbage, not feeding the coyotes and keeping barbeques clean. However it is important to note that a property owner cannot use poison and must use humane methods to kill coyotes. He - 3 - 403 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 informed the Committee that another option is to hire an agent, authorized by the Ministry of Natural Resources, to protect their property. Regarding live-trap and relocation, Mr. Pisapio noted that this does not work as the rules are that they can only be moved one kilometre away, which does not solve the problem. He summarized that coyotes are "here to stay" and part of the problem is caused by the changes we have made to the environment. He added that we need to learn all we can about these adaptable animals; discourage them from developed areas; and attempt to manage/ control them only when and where necessary. Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC MEETING (a) Subject: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Mr. Edgar Wilson, on behalf of Winster Investments Ltd. Report: PSD-033-10 Mitch Morawetz, Junior Planner, made a verbal and PowerPoint presentation to the Committee regarding the application. Mr. Harold Hammond spoke to ask a question. He questioned the Municipality's concern regarding the bussing requirements, given that when the school was operating as a public school the students were driven, bussed and walked. No one spoke in support of the application. (b) Subject: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Courtice Homestead Land Corporation Report: PSD-034-10 Bob Russell, Planner, made a verbal and PowerPoint presentation to the Committee regarding the application. No one spoke in opposition to the application. No one spoke in support of the application. Katrina Metzner, was present, representing Courtice Homestead Corporation, to answer questions. She confirmed that the garage projections will vary among the 18 houses. - 4 - 404 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A MONTESSORI SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN AGES 1 TO 14— 80 RHONDA BOULEVARD APPLICANT: WINTSER INVESTMENTS LIMITED Resolution #GPA-145-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD-033-10 be received; THAT the application submitted by Wintser Investments Limited continue to be processed including the preparation of a further recommendation report; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-033-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED REZONING TO PERMIT 50% OF 18 LOTS TO HAVE GARAGE DOORS THAT MAY PROJECT TO A MAXIMUM OF 1.25 METRES FROM THE DWELLING GROUND FLOOR FRONT OR EXTERIOR SIDE WALLS OR COVERED PORCH APPLICANT: COURTICE HOMESTEAD LAND CORPORATION Resolution #GPA-146-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-034-10 be received; THAT the rezoning application submitted by Courtice Homestead Land Corporation be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment, as contained in Attachment 2 of Report PSD-034-10, be adopted by Council; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-034-10, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED - 5 - 405 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 2010 Resolution #GPA-147-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD-035-10 be received; and THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on February 18, 2010 for applications A2010-0001 and A2010-0002 and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. CARRIED PROPOSED LIGHTING GUIDELINES Resolution #GPA-148-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Mayor Abernethy THAT Report PSD-037-10 be received; and THAT the "Lighting Guidelines" as provided to Committee members under separate cover, be adopted for consideration in the review and approval of new development applications and be made available to the development industry including posting on the Municipality of Clarington website. CARRIED ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. - 6 - 406 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 RECESS Resolution #GPA-149-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT the Committee recess for a 10 minute break until 11:15 a.m. CARRIED The meeting resumed at 11:15 a.m. Councillor Robinson chaired this portion of the meeting. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2010 COMMUNITY GRANTS Resolution #GPA-150-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report CSD-002-10 be received; THAT Council consider all submitted grant requests; THAT Council provide direction on the Ride4United Way request for funding; and THAT the Ride4United Way be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED (See following motions) BOWMANVILLE ECOLOGY GARDEN Resolution #GPA-151-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-01, Bowmanville Ecology Garden, be approved in the amount of$500.00. CARRIED - 7 - 407 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 COURTICE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Resolution #GPA-152-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Grant Application #10-02, Courtice Horticultural Society, be approved in the amount of$500.00. CARRIED NEWCASTLE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Resolution #GPA-153-10 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Grant Application #10-03, Newcastle Horticultural Society, be approved in the amount of$800.00. MOTION LOST Resolution #GPA-154-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-03, Newcastle Horticultural Society, be approved in the amount of$500.00. CARRIED ORONO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Resolution #GPA-155-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-04, Orono Horticultural Society, be approved in the amount of$500.00. CARRIED - 8 - 408 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 BOWMANVILLE SANTA CLAUS PARADE Resolution #GPA-156-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Grant Application #10-05, Bowmanville Santa Claus Parade, be approved in the amount of$2000.00. CARRIED CHRISTMAS IN CLARINGTON COUNTRY Resolution #GPA-157-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Grant Application #10-06, Christmas in Clarington Country, be denied. CARRIED CLARINGTON MARKETING MINDS Resolution #GPA-158-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-07, Clarington Marketing Minds, be approved in the amount of$500.00. CARRIED MUSIC NIGHT IN THE PARK Resolution #GPA-159-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-08, Music Night in the Park, be approved in the amount of $750.00. CARRIED - 9 - 409 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 NEWCASTLE ART SHOW Resolution #GPA-160-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-09, Newcastle Art Show, be approved in the amount of $1,000.00. CARRIED NEWCASTLE VILLAGE & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY Resolution #GPA-161-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-10, Newcastle Village & District Historical Society, be approved in the amount of$1,500.00. CARRIED ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVANCY OF ONTARIO CLARINGTON BRANCH Resolution #GPA-162-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-11, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Clarington Branch, be approved in the amount of$1,000.00. MOTION LOST Resolution #GPA-163-10 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Mayor Abernethy THAT Grant Application #10-11, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Clarington Branch, be approved in the amount of$2,500.00. CARRIED - 10 - 410 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 DURHAM CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL FAIR Resolution #GPA-164-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-12, Durham Central Agricultural Fair, be approved in the amount of$1,000.00. CARRIED ORONO TOWN HALL Resolution #GPA-165-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-13, Orono Town Hall, be approved in the amount of $2,500.00. CARRIED KENDAL COMMUNITY CENTRE Resolution #GPA-166-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-14, Kendal Community Centre, be approved in the amount of $2,500.00. CARRIED HAYDON COMMUNITY CENTRE Resolution #GPA-167-10 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Grant Application #10-15, Haydon Community Centre, be approved in the amount of$2,500.00. CARRIED - 11 - 411 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 SOLINA COMMUNITY CENTRE Resolution #G PA-168-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-16, Solina Community Centre, be approved in the amount of$2,500.00. CARRIED NEWTONVILLE HALL Resolution #G PA-169-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-17, Newtonville Hall, be approved in the amount of $2,500.00. CARRIED NEWCASTLE ARENA Resolution #GPA-170-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-18, Newcastle Arena, be approved in the amount of $2,500.00. CARRIED CLARINGTON NEW HORIZONS BAND Resolution #G PA-171-10 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Grant Application #10-19, Clarington New Horizons Band, be approved in the amount of$750.00. CARRIED - 12 - 412 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 CLARINGTON FIDDLE CLUB Resolution #GPA-172-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-20, Clarington Fiddle Club, be approved in the amount of $750.00. CARRIED CLARINGTON CONCERT BAND Resolution #GPA-173-10 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-21, Clarington Concert Band, be approved in the amount of $750.00. CARRIED DRIFTWOOD THEATRE Resolution #GPA-174-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Mayor Abernethy THAT Grant Application #10-22, Driftwood Theatre, be approved in the amount of $500.00. CARRIED CLARINGTON SWIM CLUB Resolution #GPA-175-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-23, Clarington Swim Club, be approved in the amount of $1,000.00. CARRIED - 13 - 413 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 ECLIPSE PERFORMING ARTS Resolution #GPA-176-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Grant Application #10-24, Eclipse Performing Arts, be approved in the amount of $500.00. CARRIED ORONO FIGURE SKATING Resolution #GPA-177-10 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Grant Application #10-25, Orono Figure Skating, be approved in the amount of $1,500.00. CARRIED NEWCASTLE SKATING CLUB Resolution #GPA-178-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-26, Newcastle Skating Club, be approved in the amount of $1,500.00. CARRIED COURTICE KIDS MULTISPORT SERIES Resolution #GPA-179-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-27, Courtice Kids Multisport Series, be approved in the amount of$1,500.00. CARRIED - 14 - 414 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 CLARINGTON PROJECT Resolution #GPA-180-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-28, Clarington Project, be approved in the amount of $1,000.00. CARRIED MENTAL HEALTH DURHAM — MAKING CONNECTIONS CLARINGTON Resolution #GPA-181-10 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-29, Mental Health Durham — Making Connections Clarington, be approved in the amount of$1,000.00. CARRIED CLARINGTON EAST FOOD BANK Resolution #GPA-182-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-30, Clarington East Food Bank, be approved in the amount of$1,000.00. MOTION WITHDRAWN Resolution #GPA-183-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-30, Clarington East Food Bank, be approved in the amount of $2,000.00. CARRIED - 15 - 415 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF PETERBOROUGH Resolution #GPA-184-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Grant Application #10-31, Learning Disabilities Association of Peterborough, be approved in the amount of$750.00. CARRIED BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF CLARINGTON Resolution #GPA-185-10 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Grant Application #10-32, Big Brothers and Sisters of Clarington, be approved in the amount of$2,000.00. CARRIED DISTRESS CENTRE DURHAM Resolution #GPA-186-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Grant Application #10-33, Distress Centre Durham, be approved in the amount of $1,000.00. CARRIED RIDE4UNITED WAY Resolution #GPA-187-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the Ride4United Way's request for funding be denied. CARRIED - 16 - 416 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 CLERK'S DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. Mayor Abernethy chaired this portion of the meeting. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT TENDER NO. CL2010-6 — ELECTRICAL SERVICES PARK & STREET MAINTENANCE Resolution #GPA-188-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report COD-007-10 be received; THAT Langley Utilities Contracting Limited, Bowmanville, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of $94,288.00 (plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2010-6, be awarded the contract for Electrical Services — Park and Street Lighting Maintenance, as required by the Municipality of Clarington, Operations Department; THAT pending satisfactory pricing and service the contract be extended for a second and third year; and THAT the funds expended be drawn from the Operations Department Annual Operating Budget(s). CARRIED FINANCE DEPARTMENT MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS' REMUNERATION AND EXPENSES FOR 2009 Resolution #GPA-189-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report FND-007-10 be received for information. CARRIED - 17 - 417 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NEWCASTLE RECYCLING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Resolution #GPA-190-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report SOL-001-10, regarding the Newcastle Recycling Proposed Settlement be moved to the end of the agenda to be considered in "closed" session. CARRIED UNFINISHED BUSINESS APPLICATION TO AMEND ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) SINGLE DETACHED LOTS FRONTING ONTO BOSWELL DRIVE APPLICANT: GREEN MARTIN HOLDINGS LTD. Resolution #GPA-191-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-027-10 be lifted from the table. CARRIED Resolution #GPA-192-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-027-10 be received; THAT the application to amend Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 be approved and that the amending By-law, contained in Attachment 3 to Report PSD-027-10,,be approved; THAT a copy of Report PSD-027-10 and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC); and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-027-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. MOTION LOST - 18 - 418 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 Resolution #GPA-193-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report PSD-027-10 be received; THAT the application to amend Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 be denied; THAT a copy of Report PSD-027-10 and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-027-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED COLIN ROWE, THANKING COUNCIL FOR DESIGNATING THE CLARINGTON CONCERT BAND AS THE OFFICIAL TOWN BAND Resolution #GPA-194-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT the delegation of Colin Rowe, regarding the Clarington Concert Band, be received with thanks. CARRIED JOHN PISAPIO, MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, REGARDING COYOTE DAMAGE Resolution #GPA-195-10 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the presentation of John Pisapio, from the Ministry of Natural Resources, regarding coyotes, be received with thanks. CARRIED - 19 - 419 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 OTHER BUSINESS REQUEST FOR REPORT REGARDING NUCLEAR `NEW BUILD' AT DARLINGTON Resolution #GPA-196-10 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the Clarington Board of Trade be requested to consult with municipal staff and report on a strategy to encourage and facilitate prompt implementation of nuclear `New Build' at the Darlington site and the costs associated with creating and implementing the strategy. CARRIED REQUEST FOR REPORT REGARDING FEDERAL FUNDING OF ROADS Resolution #GPA-197-10 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT staff be directed to prepare a report for the March 22, 2010 Council meeting regarding the opportunity of taking advantage of the recently announced federal funding of roads. CARRIED COMMUNICATIONS There were no items considered under this section of the Agenda. CLOSED MEETING Resolution #GPA-198-10 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT in accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing Report SOL-001-10: • a matter that deals with advice that is subject to Solicitor-Client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; and • a matter that deals with litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board. CARRIED - 20 - 420 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes March 8, 2010 RISE AND REPORT Mayor Abernethy reported that one item was discussed in "closed" session in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended and no resolutions were passed. NEWCASTLE RECYCLING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Resolution #GPA-199-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report SOL-001-10, regarding the Newcastle Recycling Proposed Settlement, be received for information. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA-200-10 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT the meeting adjourn at 12:56 p.m. CARRIED MAYOR DEPUTY CLERK - 21 - 421 DRAFT LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: March 29, 2010 (a) Dominick Forsellino, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer (b) Rose Turner, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer (c) Ingrid Hill, Regarding Report CLD-008-10, Regarding the Appointment of a Private Parking Officer (d) Dr. Boris Kostiuk, Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (e) Barry Morrison, B.J. Morrison & Associates, Regarding Report PSD-036- 10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (f) David Torras, F & I Gateway Investments, Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (g) Barry Johnson, B.J.C. Architects Inc., Regarding Report PSD-036-10, Regarding the Proposal to Rezone Residential and Limited Commercial Properties to Permit the Construction of a New Retail Commercial Building (h) Bob Kreasul, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches (i) Bob Currie, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches Q) Allison Woollacott, Manager Port of Newcastle Marina, Regarding Report PSD-042-10, Regarding Dredging of Bowmanville and Newcastle (Bondhead) Municipal Boat Launches 601 CORPORATION OF THE PUBLIC MEETING MUNICIPALITY OF GLARINGTON REPORT l,PSD-03 8-10 W.Daniell,E.Daniell and Green NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLI Martin Holdings Ltd. teaaingtheway PUBLIC MEETING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: W.Daniell,E.Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd. TAKE NOTICE.that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington has deemed the applications submitted for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment complete and has commenced the processing and review. AN APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT The Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, and a Draft Plan of Subdivision under Sections 34 and 51 respectively of the Planning Act, 1990. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by W. Daniell, E. Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd.would permit the development of 32 residential unit Draft Plan of Subdivision consisting of 12 single detached dwellings and 10 lots for 20 semi-detached units. The subject property is located south of Highway 2, west of Green'Road, being Part of Lot 17, Concession 1,former Township of Darlington,as shown on reverse. Planning File No.: S-C-2009-0002 and ZBA 2009-0022 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Monday,March 29,2010 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2"d Floor,Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at,which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday April.12th, 2010, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by noon Wednesday April 7th, 2010 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department,2"d Floor,40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville,Ontario L1 C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between.8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (during July and August 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.) at the Planning Services Department, 3'd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Cynthia Strike at (905) 623-3379 extension 326 or by e-mail at cstdke _clarington.net. APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and for Draft Plan of Subdivision to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved,the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this 24th day of February,2010. ktii a id Crom ,MCIP, RPP 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 cc LDO 701 m oq °EE1 oQ ; CL Q 1 C a _ ( I�1®® 0 3� o o c� o ® N T N c ® N CL 2 P ' a GREEN ROAD 5Am ROAD WDENI 'BLOCK 23 BLOCK 12-1 -.1 14 ? 13 � y, � >v 1 —R— B OC 9 B Oci H na Ae- IS ER PAN Ou 125 CONCESSION 1 O t -1= ! _ 20 RIOCK BLOCK a .IG BONATNON CRESCENT •�' / BLOCK 61 - 22 t! a I T Y BLOCK 82 AIO I ;BLOCK 60 p C B R LOT II a REGISTERED LAN OM- 07 LOT 16 LOT 10 LOT 15 LOT 9 LOT 8 RUSTWOOD STREET 2 O 702 Clarinaton Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: N/A Report#: PSD-038-10 File #: ZBA 2009-0022, S-C-2009-0002 Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT 32 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANTS: WILLIAM DANIELL, ELIZABETH DANIELL AND GREEN MARTIN HOLDINGS LTD. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and,Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-038-10 be received; 2. THAT the application for proposed Plan of Subdivision S-C-2009-0002 and Zoning By- law Amendment ZBA 2009-0022 submitted by William Daniell, Elizabeth Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd. continue to be processed including consideration of comments received at the public meeting; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in report PSD-038-10- and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. -� Submitted by:hdynag l� Reviewed by: (, Lan ma' , FSCLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer CS/CP/sn/df 19 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 801 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner: William Daniell, Elizabeth Daniell and Green Martin Holdings Ltd. 1.2 Proposal: Draft Plan of Subdivision: 32 residential unit plan of subdivision consisting of 12 single detached dwelling units and 20 semi-detached dwelling units. Zoning By-law Amendment: Change the current zoning on the lands from "Urban Residential Type (R2)" and "Agricultural (A)" Zones to an appropriate zone to permit the proposed development. 1.3 Site Area: 1.42 hectares (3.5 acres). 1.4 Location: The lands subject to these applications are generally located west of Green Road, south of Durham Highway 2, being in Part Lot 17, Concession 1, in the former Township of Darlington (see Attachment 1). 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 In December 2009, the applicant submitted an application for a proposed draft plan of subdivision and rezoning. The draft plan of subdivision proposes to develop various blocks in Plan 40M-1907, registered in 1998 and two properties situated at 1670 and 1692 Green Road for 32 residential units. 2.2 Supporting Documentation The applicants submitted the following studies/reports in support of the draft plan of subdivision: • Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment • Conceptual Servicing Plan • Noise Report • Parking Plan The reports must be completed to the Municipality's satisfaction prior to staff recommending draft approval of the Plan of Subdivision. Review of these reports has not been completed at this time. Staff will review the findings with the applicant where additional work is required. 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 3.1 The site is gently sloping in a south-easterly direction and generally consists of unmaintained grass coverage along the southern portion of the site, with sporadic coniferous and deciduous tree growth to the north. The two residential dwellings situated at 1670 and 1692 Green Road were built in 1985. 802 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 3 3.2 Surrounding Uses: North - Existing single detached dwellings fronting onto Durham Highway 2, and vacant lands for which a site plan application for multi-storey residential use had been applied for but since abandoned. South - Existing single detached dwelling and townhouse units. East - Single detached dwelling, Green Road and beyond that Loblaws. West - Existing single detached dwellings. 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The applications were reviewed in the context of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement. New development shall occur adjacent to built up areas and shall have compact form, a mix of uses and densities that allow for the efficient use of land, infrastructure and public services. Planning authorities are required to provide for a range of housing types and densities with a ten year supply of lands which are designated and a three year supply of zoned and serviced lands within draft approved and registered plans. New housing is to be directed to locations where infrastructure and public services are or will be available. A full range of housing types and densities shall be provided to meet projected requirements of current and future residents of the regional market area. Infrastructure and public services facilities shall be provided in a coordinated efficient and cost effective manner. Planning for these shall be integrated with planning for growth so that they are available to meet current and projected needs. The use of existing infrastructure and public service facilities should be optimized where feasible before considering developing new infrastructure and public service facilities. Planning authorities shall support energy efficiency and improved air quality through various means in the planning and development process. 4.2 Provincial Growth Plan The Provincial Growth Plan for The Greater Golden Horseshoe ("Growth Plan") encourages municipalities to manage growth by directing population growth to settlement areas. Growth is to be accommodated by building compact, transit- supportive communities in designated greenfield areas and by reducing dependence on the automobile through the development of mixed use, pedestrian-friendly environments. Growth shall also be directed to areas that offer municipal water and wastewater systems. Municipalities should establish an urban open space system within built up areas which may include communal courtyards and public parks. 803 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 4 The Growth Plan requires that infrastructure planning, land use planning and infrastructure investment will be coordinated to support growth. Infrastructure includes transit, transportation corridors, water and wastewater systems, waste management and community infrastructure. Community infrastructure includes land, buildings, structures for health, education, recreation, socio-cultural activities, safety and security and affordable housing, Planning for growth will take into account the availability and location of existing and planned community infrastructure so that community infrastructure can be provided efficiently and effectively. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The subject lands are designated as "Living Area" within the Durham Regional Official Plan. Lands within this designation shall be used predominantly for,housing purposes incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economic factors. A mix of uses such as certain home occupations, convenience stores, public and recreational uses which are compatible with their surroundings are permitted. Limited office development and retailing of goods and services in appropriate locations and as a component of mixed use development may also be permitted in Living Areas provided there are appropriate provisions and designations in the area municipal Official Plan. In consideration of development applications in designated Living Areas, regard shall be had for the intent of this plan to achieve the following: • A compact urban form; • The use of good urban design principles; • The provision of convenient pedestrian access to public transit, educational facilities and parks; • A grid pattern of roads; • The provision and distribution of parks, trails and pathways and educational facilities; • The types and capacities of the existing municipal services, infrastructure and the feasibility of expansion; and • The balance between energy efficiency and cost. 5.2 Clarington Official Plan In the Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated as Urban Residential, in the Bowmanville Urban Area. The lands are within the Darlington Green Neighbourhood. The population allocation for the Darlington Green Neighbourhood is 3,200 people. 804 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 5 Urban Residential uses shall be developed at 10-30 units per net residential hectare. The predominant housing form shall be single detached and semi-detached dwelling units. Green Road is a Type B Arterial Road in the Clarington Official Plan. Private accesses are limited to one access for every 80 metres of road on a Type B Arterial. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, the lands are zoned "Urban Residential Type (R2)" and "Agricultural (A)". Although the R2 zone permits single detached dwellings with lots having a minimum 12.0 metre lot frontage, a zoning by-law amendment is required in order to implement the proposed Plan of Subdivision. 7. 0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 7.1 Public Notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site and public meeting signs were installed on each terminus of Bonathon Crescent and Green Road. 7.2 As of the date of writing this report, staff has received one inquiry. An individual residing on the east-west portion of Bonathon Crescent objects to the development. The resident stated that the proposed single and semi-detached dwellings will negatively affect the value of his home which is situated on a larger lot. The resident also did not want the mature trees on the adjacent property to be destroyed. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 A number of agencies have been circulated the proposed draft plan of subdivision and rezoning application. To date, comments have not been received from the majority of the circulated agencies including the following departments and agencies: • Region of Durham Planning Department • Region of Durham Works Department • Central Lake Ontario Conservation • Bell Canada • Canada Post • Separate School Board 8.2 The Clarington Engineering Services Department advised that prior to final approval the applicant will be required to satisfy the Engineering Services Department regarding the following concerns and conditions: • Servicing Traffic Drainage Noise attenuation 805 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 6 The Engineering Services Department also notes that the applicant has been unable to purchase additional lands which would facilitate an improved horizontal road alignment on Bonathon Crescent. As such, the subject lands should be phased and actual construction and development be limited to Street"A" cul-de-sac only. Phase 2 cannot proceed until Phase 1 has been completed. 8.3 'The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has advised that the development will generate approximately 14 elementary school pupils and 4 secondary school students. These students will be attending Dr. Ross Tilley Public School and Clarington Central Secondary School respectively. Municipal sidewalks should be provided along Street "A" and Bonathon Crescent. A municipal sidewalk should also connect Street"A"with Green Road (Type "B"Arterial)to facilitate pedestrian accessibility to schools. 8.4 Clarington Emergency Services Department, Clarington Operations Department, Rogers Cable, and Hydro One Networks Inc. have offered no objection. 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 The proposed draft plan of subdivision is made up of blocks from a previous registered Plan of Subdivision and two large lots, supporting existing dwellings which front onto Green Road. The two dwellings built in 1985 will be demolished. The proposed draft plan, should it be approved, will connect two sections of Bonathon Crescent and allow for development of single and semi-detached units. 9.2 Lot Sizes The lot sizes in the existing development to the south and east are primarily 12 metre lots for single detached units and 18 metre semi-detached (link) lots. The proposed draft plan has varying lot sizes that are not consistent with the existing surrounding development. The applicant has advised they have been unable to purchase the lands at 1654 Green Road or a portion thereof. During discussions in advance of submitting these applications, staff suggested that the proposal be revised to only include the lands on the east—west portion of Bonathon Crescent, and that the originally planned straight alignment of the north — south section of Bonathon Crescent be allowed for through a future development. From staffs perspective the proposal has a negative impact on the alignment on the north-south section of Bonathon Crescent; and creates lots that have a depth of 22 metres on one side of Bonathon Crescent and in the range of 43 metres deep on the other side. This does not represent the most efficient use of land and is planning by land ownership, rather than by neighbourhood. 806 REPORT NO.: PSD-038-10 PAGE 7 Lots with 10 metre frontages are shown on the east portion of Bonathon Crescent and Street "A" and the proposed draft plan also shows semi-detached units on Street "A" having frontages of 14 metres and less. The typical zone minimum is 18 metres for semi detached/link dwellings. Previously semi-detached units have been approved by Council on lots with frontages less than 18 metres with driveways accessed to a public or private rear lane. The frontage of these units will be reviewed in more detail. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements under the Planning Act for Public Meetings and taking into consideration the outstanding agency comments, staff respectfully request that this report be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report. Staff Contact: Cynthia Strike Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Interested Parties to be advised of Council's decision: Gregory Pyatt 807 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-038-10 m � J C QI 3 N 'rn m N C p 3 _ O E C c� e 0 O Q 0 V N N ad o C? � m m V a m J N ® ® 'o D CL N d L C IL 3 O GREEN ROAD S.Om ROAD WfDENIT BLOCK 23 BLOCK 12 14 - �� ss�\� 13.9, 8eI 21 2 B OC 9 B OC 1 19.1 31.9 2 CONCESSION 1 GIS ER I Pi AN I OM 125 J5] 356 is 9' m O O O O O O �s e — I �a 21 - I u.Kl ----- - K - BLOCK 67 BONATHON CRESCENT _ �. 9 �— NI]�29'30 W$ BLOCK 61 _ g'o/ypl��Fw N P 1h BLOCK 62 - u za Qf o / NoBLOCK 60 m G m m„ m ma I LOT 11 REGISTERED / L07 16 PLAN OM-1 07 � LOT 10 ((yam LOT 9 '): LOT 15 LOT 8 RUSTWOOD STREET 2 m 808 • Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: Report#: PSD-036-10 File #: ZBA 2009-0018 Subject: TO REZONE RESIDENTIAL AND LIMITED COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RETAIL COMMERCIAL BUILDING RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-036-10 be received; 2. THAT the rezoning application submitted by F & I Gateway Investments Inc., to permit the construction of a retail commercial establishment be approved with a 'Holding (H) Symbol' and that the By-law contained in Attachment 2 to Report PSD-036-10 be passed; 3. THAT a future report will be forwarded to Council to lift the 'Holding (H) Symbol' at such time as the outstanding taxes for the subject property have been paid and the Site Plan meets the requirements of the urban design criteria contained in Section 10.7 of Report PSD-036-10; and 4. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-036-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted byhg CX Reviewed by an ai CSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer PW/COS/df/av 19 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 809 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: F & I Gateway Investments Inc. 1.2 Owners: William J. Storks; Pauline Storks; 1522724 Ontario Inc. and 1664312 Ontario Inc. 1.3 Proposal: To rezone the existing residential and commercial properties to permit the construction of a 1,407 m2 commercial building and associated parking area. 1.4 Area: 3,383 m2 1.5 Location: 5, 11, 19 King Avenue East; 57 Mill Street South; and 28 Emily Street, Newcastle. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On December 14, 2009, F & I Gateway Investments Inc. submitted an application for an amendment to the Zoning By-law (84-63) to permit the construction of a 1,407 m2 retail commercial building including a pharmacy and retail postal outlet. 2.2 The subject properties currently contain commercial buildings at 5, 11, 19 King Avenue East and 57 Mill Street. The Applicant has proposed demolishing these buildings in order to permit the construction of a new retail commercial building orientated to the southeast corner of King Avenue East and Mill Street with a parking area on the south side of the site. 2.3 One of the subject properties (28 Emily Street) contains an existing semi-detached dwelling. The Applicant proposes to sever the Emily Street property in order to maintain the existing semi-detached residential building. 2.4 The Applicant has submitted a Planning Rationale Report, a Noise Study, a Parking Study, a Phase 1 and 2 Site Assessment and a Site Servicing Letter Report in support of this application. 2.5 On February 1, 2010, a Public Meeting was held in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act. At that meeting, comments were received from at least twelve members of the public. Further discussion of these comments is included in Section 8 of this report. 2.6 In light of the public interest that was generated by this application, it was recommended by Staff that an additional public forum be provided to solicit public comments on the Applicant's proposal. On February 8, 2010, Council approved the recommendation in report PSD-015-10 to hold an Open House. The Open House was held on February 17, 810 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 3 2010, at the Newcastle Community Hall. Further discussion on the results of the Open House is included in Section 8 of this report. 2.7 The heritage status of the existing buildings on the site was discussed in Report PSD- 031-10 which was presented at the General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting on February 22, 2010. Within Report PSD-031-10, it was recommended that the properties identified as 57 Mill Street South, 15 King Avenue West, and 4 and 10 King Avenue East, be added to the Municipal Register of properties of cultural heritage value or interest. The report recommendation adopted by Council on March 1, 2010, was: "THAT Report PSD-031-10 be received; THAT the properties identified as 15 King Avenue West, 4 and 10 King Avenue East, be added to the Municipal Register of properties of cultural heritage value or interest; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-031-10 and any delegation be advised of Council's direction." ® Designated under Part IV of The Ontario Heritage Z Act. Z Added to The Municipal W Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value co or Interest. p - Buildings to be Displaced N g Q by Development. e- KING AVENUE WEST KING AVENUE EAST ;; LU �- ti O O 1— W Q co J_ �57 N EMILY STREET WEST EMILY STREET EAST 811 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 4 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The subject site comprises 3,383 m2 of land area in Newcastle Village. It is located on the east side of Mill Street between King Avenue East to the north and Emily Street to the south. The site is generally flat and is very sparsely treed. { u View of 5, 11 & 19 King Avenue East facing south November 17, 2009 At i View of 57 Mill Street facing northeast October 24, 2009 3.2 The existing buildings on the proposed development site include: • 5 King Avenue East— c.1845-1851, estimated floor area 300 m2, 7 parking spaces (4 outdoor and 3 garage) • 11 King Avenue East— c.1845-1851, estimated floor area 260 m2, 0 parking spaces 812 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 5 • 19 King Avenue East— 1957, estimated floor area 320 m2, 5 parking spaces • 57 Mill Street— c.1917, floor area 189 m2, 5 parking spaces (4 outdoor and 1 garage) 3.3 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Street-fronting Commercial South - Low-density Residential East - Street-fronting Commercial and Low-density Residential West - Street-fronting Commercial and Low-density Residential 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The purpose of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) is to promote efficient land use and development patterns in order to protect the environment, public health and safety and facilitate economic growth. Redevelopment of land is encouraged where it represents compact form, occurs within an existing settlement area, is connected to existing services and does not negatively impact the natural environment (air quality, ground water, flora and fauna). The PPS requires that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes be conserved. This development proposal is located at the four corners of downtown Newcastle Village. The buildings located at this intersection form a cultural heritage landscape. The design and siting of any future building on the subject site will need to complement the structures on the other three corners. The redevelopment of this site for a 1,407 m2 retail commercial establishment will preserve these lands for commercial employment uses while at the same time reinforce the continued vitality and viability of downtown Newcastle and the Village Centre. The proposed redevelopment will represent an intensification of the site by increasing the gross floor area from approximately 1,069 M2(the total for all existing buildings) to 1,407 m2. Development of this site will be connected to existing Municipal services resulting in no new infrastructure costs to the Municipality. This proposal is not expected to present a negative impact on public health or the natural environment. The PPS identifies settlement areas as the focus of growth. This proposal reflects efficient land use which does not directly lead to environmental or public health concerns. It is proposed that the retail commercial building will be constructed to complement the design and materials of the existing buildings on the other three corners limiting the potential impact on the cultural heritage landscape of this intersection. Approval of this application will facilitate the commercial redevelopment of the subject property in accordance with the locally-established Planning documents. 813 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 6 On the reasons listed above, this application conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement. 4.2 Provincial Growth Plan The policies of the Provincial Growth Plan promote the creation of compact, complete communities that are transit supportive and pedestrian-friendly. Part of the intent of the Growth Plan is to manage growth in a manner that will optimize existing infrastructure and support a strong economy by protecting and preserving employment areas. The first priority of growth shall be to seek to intensify within existing built up areas. Intensification shall include a diverse and compatible mix of land uses including housing and employment. Additionally, the Growth Plan directs municipalities to conserve cultural heritage where feasible during the intensification of built-up areas. The proposed redevelopment represents intensification as it increases the available floor area of the subject site from approximately 1,069 m2 to 1,407 m2. Redevelopment of this site will further meet the goals of the Growth Plan by preserving existing commercial employment within an existing settlement area on full municipal services. This proposal will not include any residential land use. However, the resulting retail commercial establishment on this site will serve as an anchor for the existing downtown core, further reinforcing the local economy of the Village Centre. A vital, centrally- located downtown core serves the Growth Plan's goals of creating complete communities which are pedestrian friendly. On the reasons listed above, this application conforms with the Provincial Growth Plan. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLANS 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject properties as "Regional Centre". These areas are to be developed as the main concentration of commercial, residential, cultural and government functions in a well designed and intensive land use form. The Applicant's proposal represents a more intensive use of the subject site than currently exists. Through the Site Plan approval process, Staff will work with the Applicant to ensure that the proposed commercial building is designed to complement existing heritage buildings at the intersection of King Avenue and Mill Street. Attention will be given to the facade materials, the layout of the rear parking area and the installation of neighbourhood sensitive elements (i.e. fencing, vegetation, lighting, street furniture, etc.) to ensure that the introduction of the Applicant's development shall be supportive of the existing commercial, residential and institutional uses in the area. This proposal conforms with the Durham Regional Official Plan. 814 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 7 5.2 Clarington Official Plan The Clarington Official Plan designates this site as "Street-Related Commercial Area" and "Mixed Use Area"within the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan (NVCSP). The Newcastle Village Centre is identified as the functional and symbolic centre of economic, social and cultural activity in Newcastle Village. The NVCSP includes policies which address matters related to commercial redevelopment, urban design and parking. The proposed land uses are permitted within both the "Street-Related Commercial Area" and the "Mixed Use" designations. The NVCSP outlines that redevelopment within "Street-Related Commercial Areas" shall encourage the consolidation of smaller land parcels, encourage joint parking arrangements and encourage the preservation, renovation and reuse of historic buildings where possible. The buildings located at 5 and 11 King Avenue East and 57 Mill Street are recorded as built heritage resources. Section 8 of the Clarington Official Plan states that the demolition of heritage resources is discouraged. In the event that demolition does occur, infill buildings are to be compatible and consistent with the surrounding buildings and streetscape in terms of building materials and design. This proposal represents the consolidation of five (5) separate properties (or portions thereof). Through the Site Plan Agreement, a condition will be applied whereby the property owner will participate in the creation of a future private laneway to provide shared access across this site to the existing and future parking areas behind the neighbouring King Avenue East properties. The existing commercial building at 57 Mill Street South is located within the "Mixed Use Areas" designation and was previously converted from residential to commercial use in 2006. The redevelopment policies within "Mixed Use Areas" state that owners shall generally attempt to convert and reuse existing residential structures. However, in order for the Applicant to maximize the size of the proposed building at the corner of King Avenue and Mill Street the existing building at 57 Mill Street South will need to either be demolished or moved off-site. The proposed plan for redevelopment of this site will further reinforce the continued presence of retail services within the traditional Village downtown and will highlight King Avenue as a main street destination location. Redevelopment of the subject properties, as proposed by the Applicant, will result in intensification of the site. Should this application be approved and proceed on through the Site Plan process, Staff will ensure that the final design of the development will contribute favourably to the cultural heritage landscape and visual significance of the intersection of King Avenue and Mill Street. This application conforms with the general intent of the Clarington Official Plan. 815 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 8 5.3 Newcastle CIP On April 21St, 2008, Council approved Newcastle Village's first Community Improvement Plan (CIP). Significant public consultation was conducted during the preparation of the CIP in order to determine what the community wished to see improved, and the features of the community its residents and business owners value. Newcastle Village's historic roots and its heritage architecture were considered to be its most valuable asset. As a result, three of the five CIP grant programs relate to the support of building and signage designs which are compatible with the historical character of the downtown. The redevelopment of this site should seek to reinforce the Council adopted Newcastle Village Community Improvement Plan by respecting the heritage streetscape along King Avenue and Mill Street. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands "General Commercial Exception (C1-33)", "General Commercial Exception (C1-49)" and "Urban Residential Type Two (R2)". 6.2 The Applicant has requested an amendment to the Zoning By-law (84-63) which would retain all of the uses already permitted in the "General Commercial Zone (Cl)" but would modify some of the applicable regulations for those uses. Specifically, the Applicant has requested: • To rezone the portion of the property zoned residential (R2) to permit a commercial retail establishment; • To rezone the portion of the property zoned commercial (C1-49) to permit a retail commercial establishment; • To increase the standard parkin �q ratios for a retail commercial establishment from one (1) parking space per 30 m of gross floor area to one (1) parking space per 55 m2 of gross floor area; • To reduce the standard loading space requirements from two (2) loading spaces (4 m x 11 m) to one (1) loading space (4 m x 11 m); • To reduce the required interior side yard setback from 1.25 metres to 0 metres; and • To reduce the setback for a driveway from the side yard lot line of a residential property from 7.5 metres to 1.25 metres. 6.3 The above-noted items are addressed in Section 10 of this report. 7.0 SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND STUDIES 7.1 One of the documents submitted by the Applicant, in support of this application, was a Planning Rationale Report. This report provided an overview of the property and the surrounding area together with a review of relevant local, Regional and Provincial Planning documents. The report highlights the point that the introduction of a prominent 816 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 9 commercial tenant to the subject site will support the existing downtown retail area and favourably contribute to the King Avenue streetscape. The Applicant's consultant suggests that the jobs created by the proposed redevelopment and the increase in tax revenue to the Municipality will provide direct economic benefits to the larger community. 7.2 The report notes that none of the existing buildings are currently designated under the Ontario Heritage Act nor are they listed on the Municipal Register. The siting, design and materials of the proposed building will demonstrate its sensitivity to the facades of existing buildings and its compatibility with the heritage nature of the existing built form at the intersection of King Avenue and Mill Street. This will be achieved by constructing the building at the street along King Avenue East, providing exclusive customer access to the building via an entrance constructed at 45 degrees to the intersection and building massing comparable to existing buildings in the area. 7.3 Parking will be allocated at the rear of the building and will provide an adequate parking supply. The Applicant's Parking Study measured parking usage from two existing Shoppers Drug Mart stores operating in other downtown locations (Kingston and Gananoque). The report indicated that, at peak shopping times, these stores experienced maximum vehicular traffic volumes of 22 personal automobiles at any one time. The Parking Study concludes that the proposed 26 on-site parking spaces will be sufficient to accommodate the parking needs of this proposal. 7.4 As noted earlier in this report, in addition to a Planning Rationale Report and Parking Study, the Applicant also submitted a Noise Study, a Phase 1 and Phase 2 Site Assessment and a Site Servicing Letter Report in support of this application. The conclusions and recommendations of these reports will be incorporated into any future Site Plan application. 8.0 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS 8.1 Public comments received at the Public Meeting held on February 1, 2010, expressed a mix of concern with and support for the Applicant's proposal. The three primary concerns repeated by those who spoke at the Public Meeting related to: • The heritage status of the existing buildings; • The design of the proposed retail commercial building; and • The impact of approving reduced parking standards and the economic impact of the proposal on the Village. These matters will be further addressed in Section 10 of this report. A variety of site specific functional and operational questions were also raised by the public. These remarks have been recorded and will be addressed through the Site Plan review process should Council deem it appropriate to approve this application. 8.2 During the Open House held at the Newcastle Community Hall on February 17, 2010, public comments received principally related to the impact of the reduced parking 817 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 10 standards, the proposed building design and signage. Discussion of these matters is included in Section 10 of this report. Staff are continuing to review the building design and signage with the Applicant. Should Council choose to approve this Rezoning application then the signage, building design and lot design matters will be finalized at the Site Plan review stage. 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 9.1 This application was circulated to the Durham Regional Planning Department, the Durham Regional Works Department, the Clarington Engineering Services Department, the Clarington Heritage Committee and Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 9.2 Clarington Engineering Services have advised that, at this time, they have difficulty in supporting the portion of this application which relates to the increase in the parking ratio and the subsequent reduction of on-site parking spaces. Additionally, Clarington Engineering Services has advised that the Applicant's request to reduce the setback of a commercial entrance from the lot line boundary of a residential zone to 1.25 metres does not comply with the Municipality of Clarington Standard Design Guidelines. The minimum suitable configuration for a commercial entrance is 6.0 metres wide complete with a 6.0 metre turning radius. Consequently, the minimum setback for a commercial entrance should be no less than 6.0 metres from a residential lot line boundary. 9.3 The Clarington Heritage Committee (CHC) have expressed concern regarding the proposed demolition of the existing buildings located at 5 and 11 King Avenue West and 57 Mill Street South. The CHC are not in support of the demolition of these structures and would like to see them incorporated into the new development. They also expressed a desire to preserve the cultural heritage landscape, comprised of the existing buildings, on the four corners of King Avenue and Mill Street. On February 22, 2010, the General Purpose and Administration Committee received and reviewed Report PSD-031-10, which considered the heritage status of the existing buildings affected by this application. On March 1, 2010, Council endorsed the following recommendation: "THAT the properties identified as 15 King Avenue West, 4 and 10 King Avenue East, be added to the Municipal Register of properties of cultural heritage value or interest." On March 2, 2010, the CHC passed a motion requesting that the proposed Shoppers Drug Mart building be constructed of a design that respects the built cultural heritage of downtown Newcastle and specifically the Community Hall building on the northwest corner of the intersection. They further requested that the proposed building fagades be reviewed by the CHC prior to site plan approval. In order to inform the Municipality's review of these fagades, the CHC recommended that a Heritage Impact Statement be 818 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 11 carried out and that the findings of this study be used to inform the design and scale of the proposed commercial development. 9.4 At the time of the writing of this report, the Finance Department confirmed that one of the properties that is the subject of this Rezoning application, had an outstanding balance owing on its property tax bill. However, the ownership of the property has not yet been transferred to the developer/applicant. 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 Suitability of the Site The subject site is bounded by King Avenue East to the north, Mill Street South to the west and Emily Street to the south. This orientation provides the Applicant with the ability to construct a street-front building along King Avenue East while still providing two (2) vehicular accesses to the property via Mill Street and Emily Street. This site is located in the centre of the existing retail area of downtown Newcastle Village. The location, size and orientation of the subject properties make the proposed land assembly appropriate and desirable in order to facilitate redevelopment. Excluding the residential lot which will be severed from the proposed redevelopment site, the total land area on the subject site is 3,383 m2. The only single commercial property in Newcastle Village which might be able to accommodate a project of this size is the southwest corner of King Avenue East and Brookhouse Drive, near the eastern limits of the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan. The Brookhouse Drive property is separated from existing retailers in the downtown core requiring this property to function autonomously without the benefit of on-street parking or other shared parking arrangements. Furthermore, locating the proposed development on the Brookhouse property would not provide any value-added benefit to the downtown shopping core as it would be located beyond a comfortable walking distance of those merchants, services and professionals. The properties to the north, east and west of the subject site are also designated "Street-Related Commercial" within the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan (NVCSP). The existing built form of the surrounding properties largely reflects this designation already. The properties south of the subject site are designated "Urban Residential' which is also reflected in their built form. Matters such as noise mitigation, refuse, landscaping, parking, illumination and building design will be further addressed through the site plan approval process and will mitigate any potential incompatibility between the commercial and residential uses. An application for site plan approval will be submitted should the Applicant be successful in rezoning the property to suit the proposed plan for redevelopment. 819 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 12 10.2 Change of Use One of the intents of the requested rezoning is to standardize the zoning requirements across all five properties that constitute the subject site. Present uses currently permitted on the site include: 5, 11 and 19 King Avenue East— Mixed-use (Commercial and residential) 57 Mill Street— Restricted commercial (Eating establishment only) 28 Emily Street— Residential The Applicant's proposal requests that the zoning of all properties that comprise the subject site be amended to permit Retail Commercial Establishments. The supporting documentation supplied by the Applicant (most notably the Parking Study) discuss and support the use of the property for Retail Commercial Establishments only. Consequently, the subsequent General Commercial Exception Zone created for this site will restrict uses on the subject site to Retail Commercial Establishments only. Should expanded commercial uses and/or ancillary residential uses be desired in the future a further examination of the suitability of those uses will be required at that time. While the intended use of the site (retail pharmacy) will not include residential uses, the presence of this business will assist in creating favourable conditions within the downtown to support the future development of mixed-use and/or high density residential uses on other properties. 10.3 Parking The current parking standards for a retail-commercial establishment require that for every 30 m2 of gross floor area, one (1) on-site parking space must be provided. The intent of this regulation is to ensure that an adequate amount of on-site parking is provided by the respective business so as to avoid off-site parking conflicts on neighbouring properties or within the Municipal road allowance. The Applicant's proposal attempts to balance the amount of built form on the property while still providing a reasonable amount of on-site parking. In 2006, a rezoning application was approved for the 57 Mill Street South property which reduced the required parking spaces for a non drive-through eating establishment (restaurant) from eight (8) spaces to five (5) spaces. At that time it was deemed that on-street parking in the vicinity was sufficient to accommodate for the deficiency of on- site parking at peak periods. In total, the properties on the subject site contain seventeen (17) existing parking spaces. The combined floor area of all existing buildings is approximately 1,069 m2 creating a current parking ratio of 1:62 m2 (one (1) parking space for every 62 m2 of gross floor area). There are two (2) on-street parking spaces along the King Avenue East frontage. Following the recent reconstruction of Mill Street there is no longer any on-street 820 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 13 parking spaces available along Mill Street. On-street parking along Emily Street is not formally identified by the Municipality. Evidence provided in the Parking Study, prepared by the Applicant's engineer, notes that Shoppers Drug Mart stores operate with a frequent turnover of customers meaning that, despite the overall volume of vehicular traffic, customer visits are short and a high number of on-site parking spaces is not necessary to accommodate vehicular traffic to the subject site. This finding is further supported by the Shoppers Drug Mart operational model which has the store open to the public for up to 16 hours a day (8:00 a.m. to midnight). With longer store hours, the local public's patronage of the proposed establishment is spread out over a longer period of time in a given day, thereby alleviating the need to provide a high parking ratio for shopping conducted during a concentrated period of time. The provision of bicycle parking, both externally for customers as well as internally for employees, is another way in which this development will address the reduction of on- site, vehicular parking spaces. External bicycle parking for customers is already a requirement of all new development within "General Commercial (Cl) Zones". To further alleviate on-site demands for vehicular parking spaces the provision of bicycle parking for,employees will also be required as part of this site specific By-law. The proposed tenant of this development, Shoppers Drug Mart, already operates in the downtown of Newcastle Village within 100 metres of the subject site. Relocating from their current site at 50 Mill Street North to the subject site will represent an increase in total floor area for this business (from 385 m2 to 1,407 m2). This will permit the business to expand the product lines they offer. However, the operations of the business itself(retail pharmacy and retail postal outlet) will remain principally the same. Therefore, the store will continue to attract customers from the same geographic area as the existing store; the Village of Newcastle and surrounding area. The plaza, in which Shoppers Drug Mart is currently located, offers twent -two (22) parking spaces for all non-residential uses. With a total floor area of 755 m , the existing plaza at 50 Mill Street North operates with a commercial parking ratio of approximately 1:35 m2(one (1) parking space for every 35 m2 of gross floor area). The subject site's central location in the downtown of Newcastle and excellent pedestrian connections means that Newcastle residents will have the option of travelling to the site by foot, cycle or by personal automobile. Being located in downtown Newcastle Village, there will likely result in a combination of intentional and impulsive visits to the store on this site. Patrons of the restaurants, services, community functions or other merchants in the downtown will also shop at the store on this site but may not park on-site. These customers may park on-street in front of other businesses or within on-site lots of the other establishments they are visiting in the downtown. Therefore, unlike isolated suburban locations, the total number of shoppers to this site may not directly relate to the amount of personal vehicle parking required on-site. 821 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 14 Despite the preceding comments it bears mentioning that the decisions made in respect of the Applicant's Rezoning application will remain in effect on the property beyond the current business' lease agreement. It is therefore necessary to consider the parking impacts that may result from redevelopment of this site in the future to accommodate a related use. To address the issue of future redevelopment of this site the Site Plan Agreement, entered into between the Municipality and the Applicant, will include clauses for the parking area on this site to be designed to provide future parking connection and laneway access to abutting properties as they redevelop over time. This will serve to create a system of private parking areas, between King Avenue East and Emily Street, which are accessed via mutual drive aisles. Over time, this will increase the number of parking spaces available throughout the block. The proposed increase to the parking ratio, will result in an overall reduction in the number of on-site parking spaces provided. Despite the concerns noted by Engineering Services to the proposed increase in the parking ratio (from 1:30 m2 to 1:55 m2), the preceding discussion has outlined why the Applicant's request is appropriate for the proposed use on this site, in the downtown of Newcastle Village. 10.4 Loading For a Shoppers Drug Mart of this size, the Applicant has estimated that 18 truck deliveries will be required each week (3 deliveries per day). Of these 18 deliveries, 15 will be from independent suppliers operating small to mid-sized delivery vehicles. It is anticipated that there will be only 3 weekly deliveries from Shoppers Drug Mart's main distribution centre that will require the use of large delivery vehicles. As a result, the Applicant has stated that the need for a second loading space (4 metres x 11 metres) is surplus to the needs of the proposed development. Businesses located in traditional downtown areas are typically deficient of even a single properly sized and accessible loading space. In these circumstances, loading and unloading is,usually achieved by the parking of delivery vehicles on-street. The single, full-sized (4 metres x 11 metres), on-site loading space will be sufficient to meet both the needs of the current and any future tenants for a building of this size. This loading space should be provided at grade with the surrounding parking lot so as to maximize the current parking layout and not restrict future access between the parking area on the subject site and the abutting properties. 10.5 Building Setbacks The Applicant has requested a reduction of the required interior side yard setback from 1.25 metres to 0 metres. The intent of interior side yard setbacks for commercial buildings is to maintain a consistent definition of the built form along the streetscape, to provide adequate space for the maintenance of the respective side of the building and to provide external access to the rear of the building or lot. The existing building at 19 King Avenue East is already constructed with a 0 metre setback to the easterly, interior side lot line. The effect of reducing the current side yard setback to 0 metres would be to permit the Applicant to construct a new building, along the easterly side lot line, with the same setback as the existing building. 822 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 15 Constructing the proposed retail commercial building at a 0 metre interior side yard setback will not inhibit the abutting neighbour's ability to provide vehicular access for his customers to the parking area at the rear of his property. This is due to the setback of the neighbour's existing building together with the presence of joint access easements, across both properties, along a portion of this shared property line. The Applicant's proposed interior side yard setback reduction will replicate the building line which has existed on the subject site since at least 1957 when the current building at 19 King Avenue East was reconstructed. Future maintenance of the walls of the proposed building, constructed to a 0 metre setback, will continue to be the responsibility of the Applicant. 10.6 Entrance Setbacks The intent of the 7.5 metre setback for commercial driveways from the side yard lot line of residential zones is to avoid conflicts between the commercial and residential traffic entering the roadway in close proximity to one another. One of the two vehicular entrances to the subject site will be from Emily Street. In order to maximize the number of parking spaces on-site and allow for the optimum on-site movement of delivery vehicles, the Applicant has proposed locating the Emily Street entrance within 1.25 metres of the neighbouring residential lot which will be severed from the subject lands. In order to ensure safe operation of both the existing residential driveway and the proposed commercial driveway to Emily Street, the proposed commercial entrance should be located no less than 6.0 metres from the abutting residential lot line boundary. 10.7 Urban Design The Applicant has acknowledged that the existing buildings on the subject site will need to be demolished or removed in order to accommodate the proposed retail commercial building. While the existing buildings will be missed, careful design of the new building and the site layout will ensure that this site serves as an attractive gateway to downtown Newcastle. The Clarington Official Plan provides a list of the criteria that need to be met for buildings which are constructed in areas of the Municipality (such as the downtown of Newcastle) which possess historical built form. New buildings are to be compatible with the surrounding buildings and streetscape in relation to their height, size, scale, type and colour of their fagade materials, setbacks, roof lines and the type and sizes of their windows and doors. Additional elements on the site such as lighting, landscaping, fencing and street furniture can also play a role in integrating the site into the context of the surrounding heritage buildings and neighbouring properties. The following are a number of design criteria which would assist in blending the proposed building into the heritage streetscape: 823 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 16 • The building should be constructed as close as possible to the King Avenue East and Mill Street South lot lines. • The building height and roof line should be of a scale and massing that is reflective of the two-storey buildings located on the other three corners of the intersection. • The street facades should be constructed of materials that complement the materials and details of heritage buildings along King Avenue. • Window and door designs should be of a size and scale that is reflective of heritage buildings along King Avenue. • All glazing should include colonial window grills. • A majority of the windows along both the King Avenue East and the Mill Street South facades should be constructed of transparent glass to allow views into the store. • The northwest corner of the building should be designed to a scale and prominence which contributes to the community landmark of this intersection. This could include the design of a tower or building projection, exclusive of signage. • The street-fronting building facades should include recesses, projections and/or canopies which add depth and character to the building design. • Distinct columns or pilasters, of complementary but contrasting colours and or materials should be used to break-up each fagade to create the perception that the interior of the building is comprised of multiple tenants. • Lighting, both on the building and in the parking area, should be of a design and size that is reflective of the site's location within the Newcastle Community Improvement Area. • Signage size, materials and illumination of identification signs should be in accordance with the provisions in the Sign By-law for Heritage Resource Areas. • The Applicant shall utilize overhanging sign(s), in accordance with the Sign By-law, for the display of non-identification advertising or communication. • Where images are incorporated into the building fagade they should be historical pictures and images from Newcastle Village. • Street furniture, such as bicycle racks, benches and raised planters should be installed along the Mill Street South frontage. • A corner feature at the intersection of Mill Street South and Emily Street should be constructed out of materials that complement those used in the construction of the principal building, and include a display/signage identifying that one is entering the downtown of Newcastle Village. 10.8 Existing Buildings An independent group has approached the Applicant to inquire about the possibility of relocating the existing building at 57 Mill Street South onto a vacant lot elsewhere in Newcastle Village. The Applicant has expressed his willingness to permit interested parties to arrange the removal of the existing building from the subject site at their own cost and in a timeframe suitable to the Applicant. However, it should be noted that the condition of this building, upon the Applicant taking possession, is a matter between the current owner and the Applicant. 824 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 17 No such arrangement has been made concerning the buildings along King Avenue East. 10.9 Economic Development The expanded presence of the Shoppers Drug Mart retailer in downtown Newcastle Village will offer a strong alternative to families who are deciding where to do their shopping. Once in the downtown, these shoppers will have the opportunity to visit other downtown merchants, services and professionals. The current employment at the existing Shoppers Drug Mart store in Newcastle Village is approximately 20. The Applicant estimates that at a new, expanded location the number of jobs provided by this retailer will increase to 50. It is expected that at least half of these jobs will be part-time. With Shoppers Drug Mart's late operating hours (open till midnight) this will provide opportunities for students and parents from the community to work locally while still going to school or caring for a young family during the day. 11.0 CONCLUSIONS 11.1 In order to permit a broader, more intensive redevelopment pattern on the subject site, the Applicant has stated that it is necessary to introduce revised zoning standards which will clarify the opportunities available for redevelopment of the amalgamated site. Staff remain confident that the site specific and detail design issues presented by this application can be addressed through the Site Plan review process to mitigate impacts on the abutting properties and the surrounding area. 11.2 Taking into consideration all of the public and agency comments received, and based on a thorough review of the Applicant's proposal, it is respectfully recommended that the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, to permit the construction of a retail commercial establishment, be approved with a 'Holding (H) Symbol' and that the By- law listed as Attachment 2 to Report PSD-036-10 be passed. 11.3 A future report will be forwarded to Council to lift the 'Holding (H) Symbol' at such time as the outstanding taxes for the subject property have been paid and the Site Plan meets the requirements of the urban design criteria contained in Section 10.7 of Report PSD-036-10. 11.4 The implementation of the urban design principles contained in Section 10.7 of Report PSD-036-10 will be part of the Site Plan review process. Staff Contact: Paul Wirch Attachments: Attachment 1 — Key Map Attachment 2 — By-law 825 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 18 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: F & I Gateway Investments Inc. William J. Storks Pauline Storks 1522724 Ontario Inc. 1664312 Ontario Inc. Barry J. Morrison &Associates Ltd., c/o Barry Morrison Newcastle Business Improvement Area, c/o Valentine Lovekin Newcastle Community Improvement Plan Focus Group, c/o Isabel Little Carl Good Newcastle Village and District Historical Society, c/o Allan Kirby Newcastle / Bond Head Ratepayer Association, c/o Arthur Wynn Clarington Branch of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, c/o Clark Morawetz Clarington Heritage Committee, c/o Victor Suppan Dr. Boris Kostiuk Shelley Berezowski Allison Potts Beth Markle Ron Warne TDL Group Corp., c/o Susan Rosales Barry Jones Karen Fisher Dale Hunt Judy Powell Frances Mallon Darrell Cook Rick Westrik Theresa Vanhaverbeke Steve Lawrence Barry Johnson Ann-Marie Harley Jim Russell John Shewchuk Sid DeJong J. Hemming Helen Vatandoust Donna Eastwood Candace Parsons Dave & Pearl Rickard Karin Murphy Jane Black Dean Perrin Robert Forget Gord Lee Tenzin Gyaltsan N. Gyaltsan Murray Paterson John & Donna Oates 826 REPORT NO.: PSD-036-10 PAGE 19 Patricia Lawrence Rod and Melanie McArthur A.L. Georgieff Mike Porporo Jack Lorius 827 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-036-10 f fill CID 3�� 3nlua b3wMVN 1Mn 1�1M1A6 d� 3nwaM id d (/� g Z a 9 G �C °' a 0 a C - CC� N1MON 133b18111w H111O8138b1811W Nl(1O8133b1411M �w3 C O \Y 198b19 � b Q m in tM N c 188b18 Y133b18 NIM01181 _ IN MT a Qc v v °) a)a) E cnc g E a) 'E J U o N L0 H ... � �... Ft1T!' 9.O.M.PREM19E9 :•�':•:•....:::.:.:.:.:�;:;:;..,•:;:;:':;:;::':;:':;:;:;:;:;:;.;:•:;:;:;:........ . .... ... .. W E PROPERTY LINE LI � E„ I I I PROPERTY LINE PREMISES ;aar;S Wn 828 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-036-10 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2009-0018; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 16.5.49 GENERAL COMMERCIAL EXCEPTION (C1-49) ZONE is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: "16.5.49 GENERAL COMMERCIAL EXCEPTION (C149)ZONE Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 3.13 c., 3.16 a., i. i), 16.1, 16.3 a. ii), and d. those lands zoned "C1-49" on Schedule "A" of this By-law, shall only be used for Retail Commercial Establishments exclusive of Drive-Through Facilities: a. Definitions: Drive-Through Facility means the use of land, buildings or structures, or part thereof, to provide or dispense products or services, either wholly or in part, through an attendant or a window or an automated machine, to customers remaining in motor vehicles located in a stacking lane. A drive-through facility may be in combination with other uses such as a bank or financial institution, dry cleaning establishment, dry cleaning distribution centre, eating establishment, eating establishment drive-in, eating establishment take-out, motor vehicle fuel bar, motor vehicle service station, retail commercial establishment, service shop, light, service shop, personal, shopping centre, or supermarket. Despite the above, a drive-through facility does not include a motor vehicle wash. b. Yard Requirements: i) Front Yard (minimum) Nil ii) Front Yard (maximum) 3 metres iii) Interior Side Yard (minimum) Nil iv) Exterior Side Yard (minimum) 1.25 metres V) Exterior Side Yard (maximum) 3.25 metres C. Building Height: i) Maximum 12 metres ii) Minimum 8 metres d. Parking Requirements (minimum): One parking space for each 55 square metres of gross floor area of the building directly related to the use. e. Loading Space Requirements: i) One loading space (4 metres x 11 metres) for every 1,500 square metres of gross commercial floor area. ii) The loading space shall be provided at grade with the surrounding parking area. 829 f. For all buildings exceeding 1,200 m2 of gross commercial floor area, an indoor bicycle parking facility shall be provided for employees with a minimum capacity of six bicycles. g. No vehicular entrance to a parking area shall be permitted within 6.0 metres of the boundary of the lot line boundary of a Residential Zone." 2. Schedule '5'to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Urban Residential Type Two (R2)" to "Holding - General Commercial Exception ((H)C1-49)"; "General Commercial Exception (C1-33)" to "Holding - General Commercial Exception((H)C1-49)"; and "General Commercial Exception (C1-49)" to "Holding - General Commercial Exception ((H)C1-49)". 3. Schedule"A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 830 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2010. passed this day of 9 2010 A.D. East t: . A s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s A l i► �sisisisisisiswsiswssss lrsisisisw�lsis� • .. Emily Street v s s s!►s s s s s s�s s��s��s s s s s s s s e�o s s s s s s s�i ►s<v�sssssssssssrsssssssssssssssssssss'�i ►.A1�l,!P_CA��?►��R��*Cep`' - �Vr�r.l�dssl<IJ'r ♦sss.►ssm. ►ss�.sss4i ♦ssss►sssl ►ss��sss�� ssss♦♦sus-�. ♦sss: 1 ♦s�1 s�s�s�s�s�C�s�s�s�f t sys�s sws 1�s s�s� ssssssssssssssssst ►isisisisisisisisi� ►sss�s:ssss •- �sss♦>->sss� �isisss:�sisiss! - .ssssssss EZ] EMZoning Change M Zoning Change From"Ci-49"To"(H)Cl-49" M3Zoning To Remain"R2" Jim Abernethy,Mayor Pafti L.Barrie,Municipal Clerk -- _.� �. .�_� /I►/ ",:\I�-1111 =11111111111111 = J111111= �� � ►. �:1111111111 11111111111 O � � �=.� ► �� �\1111. .1111111. 0 Imo_ 11��1 ��= ■�i11/I i11m1 ,� �I�1��• �•mi�i��illi�iiii����■ IUj 1 0= � 1111111111111 � � 11L'I�11: III �. � _� =— 111111 :-=111111='� �1 3=.7 �_ __= _=—___— 1111111 111111111111111► � � �1�: M ='=:�.���IIC =_^—__ �.-� � ,�I � � �;�� ��.��:�_��� � _=•111111111:.. �'� 7. —= 1111111111111111���. �•+� `� �■ N 1111111� � III ��.' 111111111111: _Em ���� �.11� 11111 111111111111111111111 a►�•�u...__� '• 111� ���: ■ X1111111111 111111111 � 1111 ���� ' 1 NEWCASTLE VI LAG�� ��°�� =I■ 111111111111 = ��, ,►q�� ��_ ;::z..—■o�M�� 1��;�� �� �7 111111111111_ I�►►, • arm n Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: Report#: PSD-039-10 File #: COPA2003-014, ZBA2003-052 S-C-2003-001 and PLN17.9.28 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY, PROPOSED OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PROPOSED REZONING AND PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF 55 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: COURTICE WOODS INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT report PSD-039-10 be received; 2. THAT as the revisions to the layout of the proposed draft plan since the 2006 Public Meeting were made in response to comments from circulated agencies, municipal staff, and the completion of the Environmental Impact Study which included an open house meeting, a further public meeting for the subject applications is unnecessary; 3. THAT Amendment No. 71 to the Clarington Official Plan as submitted by Courtice Woods Inc. to delete the Public Elementary School and Medium Density Residential symbols; amend the population allocation for the Worden Neighbourhood on Map H1; and decrease the housing target for the Worden Neighbourhood in Table 9-2 as contained in Attachment 4 of PSD-039-10 be adopted and the By-law contained in Attachment 5 of PSD-039-10 be passed; 4. THAT the application for the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision, submitted by Courtice Woods Inc. to permit the development of 55 residential units be approved, subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 6 of PSD-039-10; 5. THAT the Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Courtice Woods Inc. be approved as contained in Attachment 7 of PSD-039-10; 6. THAT the By-law authorizing the entering into a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner of Draft Plan of Subdivision S-C-2003-001 and the Municipality of Clarington be approved as contained in Attachment 8 of PSD-039-10; 832 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 2 7. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-039-10 and Council's decision; 8. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-039-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision; and 9. THAT John Farrell be thanked for his effort and time as an area representative on the Environmental Impact Study Steering Committee. Submitted by+Acing'Dire ` Reviewed by: g id, FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, c or of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer ATS/CP/df 17 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, sOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO UC 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 833 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 3 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Courtice Woods Inc. 1.2 Official Plan Amendment: The applicant has submitted an application requesting the following amendments to the Clarington Official Plan: • Amend Map A2 (Land Use — Courtice Urban Area) by deleting the Public Elementary School and Medium Density Residential symbols from the subject property. • Amend Map H1 (Neighbourhood Planning Units — Courtice Urban Area) by changing the population allocation of the Worden Neighbourhood from 4000 to 3900. • Amend Table 9-2 by decreasing the housing target for the Worden Neighbourhood to reflect the following: i) 125 medium density units to 85 units; ii) Total from 1400 units to 1360 units; and iii) Amending all corresponding totals. 1.3 Proposed Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision: The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision submitted includes 55 single detached dwellings: 35 lots with 12.0 metre frontages and 20 lots with 10.0 metre frontages, two (2) Open Space blocks totalling 7.56 ha, and lands for roads and related services, including a portion of the future Adelaide Avenue extension. 1.4 Rezoning: To change the current zoning to permit the development of the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision. 1.5 Site Area: 11.45 hectares (28.3 acres) 1.6 The subject lands are located east of Old Varcoe Road, north of Centrefield Drive, being Part Lot 34, Concession 3 in the former Township of Darlington (Attachment 1). 2.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 2.1 The subject site is currently vacant. The east half of the subject property is covered with a mixed forest woodlot and wetland, and west half is covered with grasses and shrubs. Site inspections have noted that the woodlot exhibited evidence of extreme wetness; standing water and spongy ground conditions. The woodlot has been identified as part of a provincially significant wetland (PSW) complex. 834 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 4 2.2 Surrounding Uses: North — Future Adelaide Avenue extension; limited residential uses and vacant agricultural lands designated Green Space and Protected Countryside (Greenbelt Plan) South — Low density residential development East — Existing residential lots along Tooley Road West — Harmony Creek and associated valley lands; existing residential lots along Old Varcoe Road and Lawson Road 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 On November 21, 2003 Staff received applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law along with an application requesting approval of a Draft Plan of Subdivision for a 127-unit subdivision, including a block for a public elementary school. A Public Meeting was held on January 29, 2004 (PSD-011-04). Given the comments received, the requirement for an Environmental Impact Study, and the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension, the application was subsequently referred to staff for further processing. 3.2 In June 2004, the Region of Durham initiated an Environmental Assessment for the extension of Adelaide Avenue from Townline Road to Trulls Road. The Environmental Assessment Study was completed in November 2005 and assessed the need for the extension; explored various alternatives; examined impacts on the environment; and recommended a preferred route. It proposed that Adelaide Avenue be constructed as a three (3) lane urban/semi-urban road extension from Townline Road to Trulls Road with a culvert bridge crossing over Harmony and Farewell Creeks. The northerly limit of the subject draft plan, as revised, abuts the proposed right-of-way and is consistent with the proposed Adelaide Avenue alignment. 3.3 In April 2006, the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board provided confirmation that a Public Elementary School site would not be required on the subject lands as designated in the Clarington Official Plan. The subject draft plan, as revised, no longer includes a block for a public elementary school. 3.4 The original submission from 2003 lacked consideration of significant environmental features on the subject lands. This was reinforced by the designation of the Harmony- Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) in September 2005. An Environmental Impact Study (EIS) was launched in the late part of 2005 and a final version was submitted to the Municipality of Clarington in June 2009. The subject draft plan, as revised, has been modified to ensure protection of the key natural environment features on the site including the following: a PSW, significant woodland, regionally rare species, coolwater creek, amphibian breeding pools and linkages and corridors. These features, along with protective buffer areas, have been incorporated into a development constraint map (Attachment 2). 835 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 5 3.5 The resultant proposed draft plan of subdivision (Attachment 3) has been revised several times since the initial submission in 2003 as recommendations from the EIS have been incorporated and comments from staff and agencies have been taken into consideration. A second Public Meeting was held April 10, 2006. The draft plan now illustrates a total of 55 single detached dwellings, which includes: 35 lots with 12.0 metre frontages and 20 lots with 10.0 metre frontages; two Open Space blocks representing the significant natural features on the site, inclusive of buffer areas; and lands for roads and related services, including a portion of the future Adelaide Avenue extension. 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The subject applications were submitted prior to the release of the new Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) on March 1, 2005, therefore the policies of the 1997 PPS are applicable and decisions must have regard to these policies. The subject draft plan protects the PSW and other natural features on the site. The supporting EIS establishes a buffer area to ensure the protection of the features and ecological functions. Furthermore the 1997 PPS encourages a supply of lots within registered plans of subdivision on full municipal services. The subject applications have regard for policies of the applicable PPS. 4.2 Growth Plan The subject applications were submitted prior to the release of the Growth Plan on June 16, 2006, and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 311/06, as amended, are not subject to the policies of the Growth Plan. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The lands are designated as Living Area within the Durham Regional Official Plan. Lands designated as Living Area permit the development of communities with defined boundaries, incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure. The northerly limit of the subject draft plan, as revised, abuts the proposed Adelaide Avenue right-of-way, which is designated as a Type "C"Arterial. Mitigative measures, such as noise attenuation, may be required in accordance with the Plan. The proposed uses conform to the Plan. 5.2 Clarington Official Plan In the Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated Urban Residential and Environmental Protection Area. A Medium Density symbol and a Public Elementary School symbol are also identified on the subject lands. The lands are within the Worden Neighbourhood, which has a population target of 4,000 people and a housing target of 1,400 units. The extension of Adelaide Avenue is a Type "B" Arterial forming part of the Courtice Urban Boundary, and the future extension of Varcoe Road is a Collector Road. 836 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 6 Low Density residential uses shall be developed between 10-30 units per net residential hectare. The predominant housing form shall be single detached, semi-detached/link and duplex to a maximum height of 2.5 storeys. Natural heritage features have been identified on Map C1-Natural Heritage System including a wetland, significant valleylands and significant woodlands. The subject lands are adjacent to the Lake Iroquois Beach. An Environmental Impact Study (EIS) shall be undertaken for development applications located on lands within or adjacent to the Lake Iroquois Beach, or any natural heritage feature identified on Map C1. An EIS is also required where development proposals are located within 120 metres of the boundary of a wetland or a wetland complex. The expense of the study shall be borne by the proponent. The applicant is requesting an Official Plan Amendment to adjust the housing and population allocation for the Worden Neighbourhood and to delete the Medium Density and Public Elementary School symbols from the subject lands. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, the lands are zoned "Environmental Protection (EP)" and "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)". A Zoning By-law Amendment is required for the development to proceed. 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY 7.1 In October 2005, Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. was retained by the Municipality, at the expense of the applicant, to conduct an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) for the proposals submitted by Courtice Woods Inc. The consultant examined the site in the Fall of 2005 and the Spring and Summer of 2006. Additional visits were completed in 2008 and 2009 to determine the exact location of the buffer line, drip line and wetland boundary. The draft EIS findings were presented to the public at an open house on June 18, 2009 at the South Courtice Arena. 7.2 A Steering Committee for the EIS was formed including a citizen representative from the area; staff from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Region of Durham, Clarington Engineering Services and Planning Services Departments, the applicant and the EIS consultant. 7.3 The purpose of the EIS was to fulfill the requirements of the Clarington Official Plan and other applicable legislation and policies. This included identifying significant natural heritage features, how those features function, and potential impacts the proposed development may have on those features. The EIS was also to demonstrate that the development will not result in the loss of wetland function or wetland area of the Harmony-Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW), and will not 837 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 7 conflict with wetland management practices. Due to the location within the Lake Iroquois Beach, the EIS must also provide recommendations for enhancing ground water functions. 7.4 The EIS was able to be scoped by conducting a literature review and utilizing data from the Adelaide Avenue Extension Class Environmental Assessment Study, Environmental Study Report (Nov. 2005), Adelaide Avenue EA Natural Environment Report (Appendix D) (Ecoplans Limited, Nov. 2005), the Harmony/Farewell Iroquois Beach wetland evaluation and data record and mapping (Ministry of Natural Resources, Varga et al, 2005), the EIS of the Courtice Major Urban Area (Ecological Services for Planning, Aug. 1994); and the Environmental Sensitivity Mapping for the CLOCA area (Gartner Lee, 1978). 7.5 Due to the extensive data that already existed for this area, Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. was able to focus their research on data gaps that existed during early spring conditions and within the field communities for which little information was made available. Site visits were conducted to confirm the data obtained from the literature review and to collect information on species that were present over the entire property. The boundaries of the wetlands, woodlots and vegetative communities were mapped, and the condition of Harmony Creek and species of fish present were determined. 7.6 Geo-Logic conducted a hydrogeology study of the development to assess the impacts on the wetland and groundwater contributions to both the wetland and Harmony Creek. 7.7 The boundary of the PSW was confirmed by a wetland biologist using the methodology of the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Ontario Wetland Evaluation System. This system is also used by the MNR to determine the boundary and status of wetlands in Ontario. Wetlands are evaluated based on four components (biological, social, hydrological and special features). Wetlands that score over 600 points or attain a score greater than 200 points in biological or special features components, and contain pockets that are greater than 0.5 ha in area are designated as provincially significant wetlands. The boundary of a wetland is defined by the 50% rule where greater than 50% of the plants must be wetland species. This was a key factor in delineating the wetland boundary which is the basis for the buffer. 7.8 There are areas in the open field that have succeeded into wet meadows due to grading and stripping of the topsoil previously. This has resulted in poor drainage and ponding of water in the spring. Although these areas are wet, they were too small to include in the wetland evaluation as part of the complex. The rectangular boundary of the wetland is consistent with the official MNR boundary for the PSW. 7.9 The EIS concluded that there will be no negative impacts on the identified features provided the recommendations of the study are implemented. Several general recommendations provided in the EIS are standard relating to construction activities in sensitive areas and sediment and erosion control. Key recommendations include: • Establishing the development envelope having a minimum setback of 23-25 metres from the wetland boundary (20-30 metres from the woodland edge drip line) on the 838 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 8 east side as per the November 2009 draft plan, and having a minimum setback of 30 metres from Harmony Creek; • Requiring a 1.2 metre chain link fence along the rear lot lines abutting the natural feature/buffer areas; • Developing a planting plan for the buffer area adjacent to the woodland and wetland on the east side; • Prohibiting construction vehicle access along Old Varcoe Road; • Implementing the recommendations of the Geo-Logic hydrogeology report (March 2009); and, • Preparing and distributing a Homeowners' Guide to all purchasers of homes in the development area which will educate landowners about the natural features in the area and how to minimize impacts as a landowner in the area. 7.10 All recommendations of the EIS have been incorporated in the conditions of draft approval (Attachment 6). 8.0 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS AND EIS OPEN HOUSE 8.1 The subject application was considered at two (2) public meetings held on January 29, 2004 and April 10, 2006. An EIS Open House was held on June 18, 2009. Comments from general inquiries and written submissions received to date are summarized in Sections 8.2 and 8.3 below. 8.2 Comments received during the Public Meeting process are outlined as follows: Protection of the woodlot EIS complete. Recommending protection of PSW/Woodlot and buffer area. Housing form PPS calls for a range and mix of housing forms. Area suited for low density type development. Prohibit development on the Lands are within Courtice Urban Area and have vacant land altogether been designated for residential development for some time, subject to findings of EIS. Maintain connectivity of wildlife EIS determined wildlife movement is already corridors east/west linkages) limited. PSW area provides interior habitat. Encroachment of lots into EIS complete. Recommending protection of wetland PSW and buffer area. East/west linkage occurs along fencerow to the north of subdivision. School site should remain Viability of school sites determined by School Board. Regeneration of cleared lands EIS complete. Proposed development may proceed with no impact to, PSW. Extension of Adelaide Avenue Identified in Regional and Local OP as a future arterial road. Not being constructed as part of subject development. Regional undertaking. 839 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 9 8.3 Comments received at the EIS Open House are outlined as follows: Impact of development on Taxes are based on assessment of properties taxes which is impacted by many factors. Individuals may contact Municipal Property Assessment Corporation directly. Impact of development on fish Municipal Engineering staff and Conservation population given downstream Authority staff have confirmed there are no stormwater management operational issues with the downstream pond pond and outfall to Harmony which is designed to allow water to be released Creek back into Harmony Creek and to replicate the natural system. The EIS also demonstrates no negative impact to fish habitat. Wildlife corridor from the EIS determined wildlife movement is limited. creek to the PSW area provides interior habitat. East/west wetland/woodlands linkage occurs along fencerow to the north of subdivision. Concerns regarding high A key component of the EIS process was the water table, well interference, preparation of a Hydrogeologic report to and impact on wetland determine impacts on local groundwater conditions. The report confirms lands are suitable for development, subject to conditions relating to placement of silt fencing, drainage barriers (trench plugs), allowing roof leaders to drain to grassed areas, and a monitoring program to analyze stormwater, groundwater and surface water conditions in the future. Status of existing drainage Existing drainage is maintained through the patterns review of the Engineering submission. Fencing of wetland area Rear of lots abutting the valleylands and the PSW/Woodlot to be fenced (non-gated). Wetland pockets on EIS found small wet areas on the lands to be developable area developed, however not classified as part of the wetland. Understanding the criteria for Section 3.3.4 of the EIS describes in detail the wetland evaluation criteria for determining the wetland boundary. Consideration of the Adelaide A key resource in the literature review was the Avenue EA during the EIS Adelaide Avenue Extension Class EA process Environmental Study Report Nov. 2005). Future connection to Landowners may proceed to connect to municipal services municipal services should they become available. The cost of connecting would be at the landowner's expense and subject.to the requirements of the Region of Durham. Mr. Cor Eysermans, a This issue was raised during the EIS Open resident of 158 Old Varcoe, House and a subsequent meeting was held in has concerns regarding the October 2009. The E sermans, Councillors, 840 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 10 ate.. I VEER. status of his driveway when and representatives from Regional Works, Old Varcoe Road is closed Clarington Engineering and Planning Staff were upon the extension of in attendance. It was agreed during the meeting Adelaide Avenue that when the construction of Adelaide Avenue proceeds, the Region of Durham will be responsible for reconstructing the driveway such that a suitable access to Adelaide Avenue is provided. 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 9.1 Hydro One Networks Inc., the Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board, Bell Canada, and Rogers Cable Communications Inc., offered no concerns or objections on the proposal. 9.2 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. offered no concerns or objections to the proposal and asked that standard conditions be included in the conditions of draft approval. 9.3 Clarington Emergency & Fire Services requested a temporary turn around for Varcoe Road. A temporary turning circle has been provided on lands owned by the applicant and within the Adelaide Avenue extension. Once Adelaide Avenue is constructed the turning circle would be eliminated. 9.4 Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has confirmed that a new school site is no longer required on the subject lands and otherwise has no objections to the proposed plan of subdivision. 9.5 The Region of Durham Planning Department offered no objections subject to the following comments. The subject property is located within the "Living Area" designation in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The predominant use of land within the Living Area designation is for residential purposes. Policy 813.1.4 of the Regional Plan also encourages higher densities where appropriate and promotes area official plans to maximize permissible densities for vacant lands within their urban area boundaries. The "Open Space" block on this plan corresponds with the "Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Feature" indication in the Regional Official Plan. These areas are to be managed as a connected and integrated natural heritage system and shall be protected for their natural and scenic features, their roles as predominant landscape elements in the Region and the recreational opportunities they facilitate. Development or site alteration is not permitted in these features. The subject lands have been assessed as having a high archaeological potential due to the proximity of a tributary of the Harmony Creek. An archaeological assessment will be necessary. 841 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 11 The subject lands are adjacent to proposed future Adelaide Avenue, which has a potential for noise impacts from vehicular traffic. An acoustic report will be required to address all noise sources. An Environmental Impact Study has been submitted in support of the development. Any possible issues concerning stormwater management and the ecological function of the area are to be addressed to the satisfaction of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. The Region acknowledges the subject site contains significant woodlands and the Environmental Impact Study must demonstrate minimal impacts to the ecological function of the wooded area in order for the development to proceed. The subject lands are within the Zone 2 Water Pressure District of the Courtice area. Municipal water supply is available from the existing 300 mm watermain on Centerfield Drive at Varcoe Road. A 300 mm watermain will be required on the extension of Varcoe Road to future Adelaide Avenue. A 300 mm watermain will be required on the Adelaide Avenue extension from Centerfield Drive to Tooley's Road in order to provide the necessary secondary watermain feed. Without the secondary feed, the Region's Design Guidelines indicate that a maximum of 20 residential units can be serviced from a dead end water supply. The watermain on proposed Street "A" is to be sized to provide for maximum day flows plus fire protection and is to be connected to the 300 mm watermain on Adelaide Avenue. Municipal sanitary sewers are available to the subject site from the existing 250 mm sanitary sewer on Varcoe Road at Centerfield Drive. Said sanitary sewer will require an extension northerly from Centerfield Road to service this development and the lands north of Adelaide Avenue. In the Region's Water &Wastewater Master Plan, the alignment of the Courtice Trunk sanitary sewer may be located within the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension. Based on the outcome of the Class Environmental Assessment for the trunk sewer, an unobstructed corridor may be required within the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension for the trunk sanitary sewer. This application is considered to have no significant Regional or Provincial concerns. In accordance with the Regional By-law 11-2000, this application is exempt from Regional approval. Provincial and Regional issues will be thoroughly addressed as part of the amendment to the subdivision application process. The Region has provided a set of standard conditions that have been included in the proposed conditions of draft approval. 9.6 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority provided their concurrence with the final recommendations and requirements of the EIS. CLOCA has provided standard and typical conditions of draft approval, including: the preparation of a final stormwater management report; satisfying the recommendations of the EIS; approval of a landscape plan for the wetland buffer area; dedication of Open Space. blocks to the 842 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 12 Municipality of Clarington; installation of non-gated fencing along the rear of lots abutting Open Space blocks; preparation of a Homeowners' Guide relating to the natural heritage features on the site; and, the provision of a suitable warning clause regarding the rain water wells for infiltration on certain lots. All of the recommendations provided by CLOCA have been included in the conditions of draft approval (Attachment 6). 9.7 Clarington Engineering Services Department has provided comments and acknowledged that the Region should provide comments and conditions relating to the dedication and construction of the future Adelaide Avenue road allowance. The request to provide additional road widening along Varcoe Road, a local collector street, has been satisfied. Grading and drainage details will be refined during the review of the detailed engineering submission. The conditions of draft approval incorporate all standard engineering requirements. 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 The subject lands are within an area designated for urban development on full municipal services within the Durham Region Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. The proposed development has regard to the 1997 PPS. 10.2 Due to the proximity of the proposed development to the Harmony-Farewell Iroquois Beach PSW, the tableland woodlot, Lake Iroquois Beach, and Harmony Creek and its associated valleylands, an Environmental Impact Study was prepared. In response to the findings of the Environmental Impact Study, revisions were made to the original submission which served to protect the significant features in the area and to provide a protective buffer. The features and buffers are contained within Open Space blocks to be conveyed to the municipality. This has the effect of enhancing Clarington's natural heritage system and its ecological integrity which is a key goal of the Official Plan. The recommendations of the EIS and Hydrogeologic Study will be implemented through the conditions of draft approval and the subdivision agreement. 10.3 The proposed Official Plan Amendment can be supported at this time. The public school board has confirmed that a school is no longer required at this location. Deletion of the medium density block can also be supported. The recommendations of the EIS have reduced the developable area on the subject lands and as a result the proposed lotting pattern for single detached lots is logical. A medium density block would be difficult to develop given the environmental constraints, the fixed road pattern in the area, and proximity to the existing low density units. Through the Growth Plan conformity exercise and the Official Plan update, a comprehensive review of lands designated for residential development will take place in order to achieve population targets established by the Province. 10.4 Adjustments to the housing and population targets can be supported given the deletion of the medium density symbol, and reduction of developable land as a result of preservation of the environmental features and associated buffers. It is noted that the housing targets proposed by Official Plan Amendment No. 71 (Attachment 4) have been 843 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 13 adjusted slightly to be consistent with the other values in Table 9-2 which are provided in increments of 25. Based on a detailed review of population and housing targets, the values for low density units are unaffected by this development proposal. 10.5 It is recommended that the residential portion of the subject lands be placed in the "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-71) Zone" and the "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-72) Zone" to allow for the layout of the 10.0 metre and 12.0 metre lots. The zones applied reflect current standards seen in newer subdivisions with respect to lot coverage and setbacks. The Holding provision will be utilized to ensure adequate access and services prior to development and will be lifted by Council when the appropriate conditions are met. It is recommended that the PSW and woodland area to the east and the valleylands along Harmony Creek, inclusive of the protective buffers, be placed in the Environmental Protection Zone. 10.6 The Durham Regional Official Plan, designates Adelaide Avenue as an important part of the arterial road network extending to Courtice Road. The Clarington Official Plan, as approved in 1996, incorporated the Adelaide Avenue extension. The Municipality of Clarington Engineering Services Department does not require the portion of Adelaide Avenue abutting the subdivision to be constructed at this time. Furthermore, the Region of Durham has not provided any comments or requirements specific to the dedication or construction of that portion of Adelaide Avenue crossing the applicant's lands. However, the standard condition to require the Owner to dedicate the road allowances, including Adelaide Avenue, included in the draft plan as public highways on the final plan, have been included. 10.7 Prior to scheduling a recommendation report to Committee and Council on a draft plan of subdivision application, a list of the proposed conditions of draft approval were submitted to the applicant for their review and concurrence. The purpose of this exercise is to determine if there are any conditions of draft approval that the applicant does not agree with and that they be identified for further discussion purposes. The applicant has provided concurrence with the attached Conditions of Draft Approval. 10.8 All taxes owing to the Municipality of Clarington have been paid in full. 11.0 CONCLUSIONS 11.1 In consideration of the findings of the Environmental Impact Study, comments received from circulated agencies and area residents, and based on review of the proposal, staff recommends that the Official Plan Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment be approved. Staff Contact: Anne Taylor Scott 844 REPORT NO.: PSD-039-10 PAGE 14 Attachments: Attachment 1 — Location Map Attachment 2 — Development Plan and Constraints Attachment 3 — Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision Attachment 4 —Clarington Official Plan Amendment Attachment 5 —Adopting By-law Attachment 6 —Conditions of Draft Approval Attachment 7 —Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment 8 — By-law Authorizing Subdivision Agreement Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Phil Litowitz Antonio Scanga Ian Roher Linda Gasser Shawn Goldenberg Nick Mensink Bernd Hirseland Wendy Gallagher Dan Piper Natalie Nowosad and Phil Henstock Michel Roy Mario and Debbie Papov Brian Mcauley Neil and Arlene Verbeek Libby Racansky Jennifer Anderson John and Nellie Nekkers John Farrell Alice and Sharron Blacklock John O'Toole, MPP Dr. Rose-Anne Viera Mike and Sandra March Blake, Trina and Arlene Inkster Cor Eysermans Michael and Nancy Strahl Katie Wrigley Ivan and Gloria Rayner Richard K. Williamson and Anita Anastico Larry and Candice Gannon Wendy Beal Bill and Marg Todd Mr. Duvel Shard Cosburn Kathleen Brereta Pauline Bryan Peter Mallia 845 To Report PSD 039-10 2 'a Vii. ° Pt Jill ld A3 lVA C i� Nn C C w ° avoa A3lDOi d O QCO _ ca ° a 311 UUN33 b O LA C Q •a O � LL �c ''� i3ii3woH � ua� Q Ir O !CO Cn 0 AM3H O ewao Har .va N !� N O t C ai3iiH n m d N R O UVOM UVA 1° tl 30 atlA N O O U 6. N r, Q� O 1,ng1�LLHDl� m .O CO Q CO 3 N p ea Hl H avoa 3Himmoi (,� o�xv. ss.ns i b y 2 a Q v w I _ I . 9� I Q I is Q j M o I g I I I I 0 N •A \ 1 0- � isf. 1 N R N � �PRI.f'NWO! � W 1 avow 3oa8vn a-io �A:9:o °•° I Attachment 2 To Report PSD-038-10 11 Til z Mill un CO Ar IL CO Ohl 847 Attachment 3 To Report PSD-039-10 I J 2 1 < am 01 Z) A 0 NO MINIM k,z 0 M 1 I 7 1 t" I i PIN. 7 V11 N-IGIS3 :5.-J, Zi C.)z 0 -j CL m 0,6`11 LJ 2 ---------- jz, CZ) PZ JFTF 'IX 'g, ,It I 48 Attachment 4 To Report PSD-039-10 AMENDMENT NO. 71 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: To amend the Official Plan of the Municipality of Clarington to delete the Public Elementary School and Medium Density Residential symbols from the subject lands and to adjust the allocation of neighbourhood populations in the Worden Neighbourhood accordingly. LOCATION: The subject lands are located east of Old Varcoe Road, south of future Adelaide Avenue East extension,west of Tooley Road and north of Centerfield Drive and within Part of Lot 34, Concession 3, former Township of Darlington. BASIS: This amendment is based on Council's consideration of an Official Plan Amendment Application (COPA 2003-014) 'submitted by Sernas Associates on behalf of Courtice Woods Inc. for the development of 55 single detached residential units on the subject lands. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: i) By amending Map A2 (Land Use) by deleting the Public Elementary School and Medium Density Residential symbols on the subject lands as illustrated on Exhibit "A"; ii) By amending Map 1-111 by changing the population allocation of the Worden Neighbourhood from 4000 to 3900 as illustrated on Exhibit "B"; and iii) By amending Table 9-2 by decreasing the housing target for the Worden Neighbourhood to reflect the following: (a) 125 medium density units to 75 units (b) Total units from 1400 units to 1350 units; and (c) Amending all corresponding totals. IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, as amendment regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply to this amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, as amendment regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply to this amendment. 849 Exhibit "A", Amendment No. 71 To the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, Map A2, Land Use, Courtice Urban Area Delete"Medium Density .URBAN BOUNDARY Residential'Symbol F7 ;� FUTURE URBAN RESIDENTIAL ♦• URBAN RESIDENTIAL •:_ ® MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 - ' TOWN CENTRE I ® COURTICE WEST 1 SHOPPING DISTRICT ' M Delete"Public Elementary I NEIGHBOURHOOD ®O CENTRE School" Symbol , ® Y HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL M PRESTIGE _ Rp�p I EMPLOYMENTAREA M © INDUSTRIAL O � INDUSTRAAL AREA �.Ir•0��•• ., ..r 1 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA to - •.. H ',,T�� •,�• © BUSINESS PARK EJ M r 1 • O O�i�ti UTILITY M OM ENVIRONMENTAL 3 i O D PROTECTION AREA GREENSPACE M 1 O O NT OREENWAY ffi4 COMMUNITY PARK ES 1 M Q ® DISTRICT PARK M u ® NEIGHBOURHOOD 1 PARK PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL O SEPARATE SECONDARY SCHOOL M© / PUBLIC 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I © H H SEPARATE O ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 SECONDARY �© OM PLANNING AREA 1T♦� 000001 SPECIAL POUCY AREA ■eV` / � �,/ •������SPECIAL STUDY AREA 1 I• IMO GO STATION 1 o +n ao Eao TEO wl� 1 S 1 � I 1 I MAP A2 LAND USE COURTICE URBAN AREA OFFICIAL PLAN MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JANUARY 2,20D7 MIS LONBOLDANTSTON IS FRONDED FOX CONVENIENCE ONLY MID REPRE R ESiEO MOOIFIGipN9 MIO MPROV 850 Exhibit "B", Amendment No. 71 To The Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, Map 1-11, Neighbourhood Planning Units, Courtice Urban Area r-� -� 4� 1 J FAR +) 1 1 1 4 I 1 DEN HIGHLAND yy I Y 900) (4100) G 5 6 NASH Ro Change From 29oD)K you E (4000)To(3900) 1 10 1 ' DARU $ CENTTRE ceo0 I (2100) EMILY 7 1 ((6 ) S AVONDALE ,o 9 —-— URBAN BOUNDARY ' PENFOUND NEIGHBOURHOOD BOUNDARY (3940) o w (I OW) POPULATION SEE SECTION 17.6 K ,U z o BLOOR STREET 7 3' 11 I BAWEW ' ( 50 ' 40) I I N 1 1 I 1 0 200 400 800 800 m 200 m 1 BASELINE ROAD HIGHWAY I° ` 401 1� 1 cNR MAP H1 I NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING UNITS 1 COURTICE URBAN AREA OFFICIAL PLAN MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JANUARY 2. 2007 LAKE ONTARIO REFER TO SECTIONS 5 AND 9 TWIS CONSDUDATION IS PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE OIA.Y AND REPRESENTS REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS AND APPROVALS 851 mitacnmem o To Report PSD-039-10 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to adopt Amendment No. 71 to the Clarington Official Plan WHEREAS Section 17(22) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended, authorizes the Municipality of Clarington to pass by-laws for the adoption or repeal of Official Plans and Amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend the Clarington Official Plan to delete the Public Elementary School symbol and the Medium Density Residential symbol from the subject lands, and to adjust the allocation of neighbourhood population in the Worden Neighbourhood accordingly. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Amendment No. 71 to the Clarington Official Plan being the attached Explanatory Text is hereby adopted. 2. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 852 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-039-10 CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL PLAN IDENTIFICATION 1. The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of approved draft plan of subdivision S-C-2003-001 prepared by Sernas Associates identified as Project Number 03186, dated November 2003, and revised November 2009, which illustrates a total of 55 lots for single detached dwelling units, including 35 lots with 12.0 metres of frontage and 20 lots with 10.0 metres of frontage, two (2) blocks for Open Space (7.56 hectares), a 0.03 hectare parcel retained by the Owner, and additional blocks for roads and related services. FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2. The Owner shall dedicate the road allowances included in this draft plan as public highways on the final plan. 3. The Owner shall name road allowances included in this draft plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington. 4. The Owner shall prepare an Environmental Sustainability Plan, prior to final approval, for approval by the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering Services. This plan must be approved by the Municipality of Clarington, and shall identify specific measures on how development in Plan S-C- 2003-001, will ensure the protection, conservation and enhancement of air, water, and ecological features and functions, energy and other resources and heritage resources. As a minimum, the report shall address; i) Energy conservation measures for new homes, such as the construction and operation of new residential building to a minimum rating of 80 or more in accordance with Natural Resources Canada "EnerGuide for New Houses" or equivalent certification system; ii) Water conservation measures for new homes such as the Water Sense program or equivalent program; iii) Use of environmentally friendly materials or finishes in the dwellings; and iv) The preparation of a Homeowner's Guide regarding the environmentally sensitive features in the neighbourhood as described in Condition 26. 5. The Owner shall submit to the Municipality of Clarington and the Regional Municipality of Durham, for review and approval, an acoustic report (and addendum, where applicable) prepared by an acoustic engineer based on projected traffic volumes along the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension provided by the Durham Region Planning Department and recommending noise attenuation measures for the draft plan in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment guidelines. 853 6. The Owner shall obtain municipal approval of the zoning for the land uses shown on the approved draft plan in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 7. The Owner shall submit plans showing the proposed phasing to the Region and the Municipality of Clarington for review and approval if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration. The Municipality shall require the preparation of a subdivision agreement for each phase of development. 8. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Engineering Services and the Director of Planning Services for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time. 9. The Landscaping Plan required under Condition 8 shall include plantings for the buffer area adjacent to both the woodland and wetland in accordance with the Environmental Impact Study prepared by Niblett Associates Inc. dated July 2009. The Landscaping Plan as it applies to the woodland and wetland buffer area shall require the review and approval of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. The Owner shall implement the approved landscape plan prior to the removal of the (H) Holding symbol under Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended. 10. The Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Engineering Services for review and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Municipality's Design Criteria as amended from time to time. REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 11. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that they shall be 100% responsible for the cost of the future closure of Old Varcoe Road, north of Varcoe Road upon the completion of the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension. In order to facilitate this the Owner shall prepare a cost estimate, to be approved by the Director of Engineering Services, for the erection of a barricade along the width of Old Varcoe Road where it intersects with Varcoe Road. 12. All land dedications, easements, sight triangles and reserves as required by the Municipality of Clarington for this development must be granted to the Municipality of Clarington free and clear of all encumbrances and in a, form satisfactory to the Municipality's solicitor. 13. The Owner shall convey a 7.0 metre x 14.0 metre sight triangle at the intersection and corners of Varcoe Road and the proposed Adelaide Avenue extension to the Municipality of Clarington. 854 14. The Owner shall convey a 3.0 metre road widening being Block 59 to the Municipality of Clarington for the purpose of widening Varcoe Road. 15. The Owner shall convey a 5.0 metre x 12.0 metre sight triangle at the intersection and corners of Street A and Varcoe Road to the Municipality of Clarington. 16. The Owner shall terminate any deadends and/or open sides of road allowances created by this draft plan in 0.3 metre reserve(s) to be conveyed to the Municipality of Clarington. 17. The Owner shall construct a temporary turning circle at the northerly terminus of Varcoe Road and shall remain in place until such time as Adelaide Avenue is fully constructed and operational. Additional temporary turning circles may be required depending upon the phasing of the development. The need for any additional temporary turning circles and frozen lots will be determined at the engineering stage solely at the discretion of the Director of Engineering Services. 18. The Owner shall construct a 1.2 metre chain link (non-gated) fence along the rear of Lots 36 to 55, Lots 18 to 25 and Lots 30 to 35 inclusive. 19. The Owner shall convey Blocks 56 and 57, being valleylands, woodlands and portions of a Provincially Significant Wetland, and associated protective buffers, to the Municipality of Clarington. 20. The Owner shall make a cash-in-lieu of parkland payment in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act based on the value of the lands on the day before the issuance of a building permit. 21. The Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of the Hydrogeologic Investigation Report prepared by Geo-logic Inc. dated July 2006 and revised March 2009. 22. The Owner shall grant such easements as may be required for utilities, drainage and servicing purposes to the appropriate authorities. 23. The Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles etc., as per the Municipality's standards and criteria. 24. The Owner shall cause all utilities, including hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc., to be buried underground. 25. The Builder shall include a disclosure in all purchase and sale agreements advising home buyers of Municipal parking regulations, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services. 855 26. A Homeowners' Guide shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and distributed to all purchasers of lots created by the subject plan. The Homeowners' Guide shall educate landowners about the provincially significant wetland, woodlands, coldwater. creek, valleyland and wildlife in accordance with the Environmental Impact Study prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. dated July 2009. 27. The Owner shall submit a detailed tree preservation plan to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. No trees shall be removed until such time as this program has been approved except as authorized by the Municipality. 28. The Owner agrees to comply with the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Study prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. dated July 2009 as it relates to construction activities in proximity to the natural features and protective buffers, namely: a) Storage or stockpiling of vehicles or materials within 30 metres of the existing forest edge and top of slope is prohibited; b) Refuelling of vehicles or storage tanks within 30 metres of the existing forest edge and top of slope is prohibited; c) Stockpiles of topsoil or other materials shall be located a minimum of 30 metres from the setbacks and within the"northern portion of the property; d) Placement of fill, stumps, slash or other materials is prohibited within the wetland or the buffer areas; and, e) Construction vehicle access is prohibited along Old Varcoe Road. 29. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 30. The Owner shall be 100% responsible for the cost for the "Control Architect" to review and approve all proposed models and building permits, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services. 31. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building on any residential lot or block on said plan, until the exterior architectural design of each building and the location of the building on the lot has been approved by the Municipality of Clarington. 32. No residential units shall be offered for sale to the public on said plan until such time the exterior architectural design of each building has been approved by the Director of Planning Services. 856 33. The Owner agrees to submit a well monitoring/well interference report. Further, the Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the subdivision, the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party to municipal water supply system or provide a new well or private water system so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to the interference. 34. The Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality. 35. The Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in accordance to the Development Charge By-law as amended from time to time, as well as payment of a portion of front end changes pursuant to the Development Charge Act if any are required to be paid by the Owner. 36. The Owner supply on disk, in a CAD format acceptable to the Municipality a copy of the proposed Plan of Subdivision as Draft Approved and each 40M Plan proposed for registration. 37. The Owner is required to submit a signed Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of Environment (MOE). This RSC must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MOE. 38. The Owner shall engage a qualified professional to carry out to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation, an archaeological assessment of the entire property and mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. No demolition, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation confirming that all archaeological resource concerns have been met including licensing and resource conservation requirements. 39. Prior to any on-site grading or construction or final registration of the plan, the Owner shall submit and obtain approval from the Municipality of Clarington, and the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority for reports describing the following: 857 a) the intended means of conveying stormwater flow from the site, including use of stormwater techniques which are appropriate and in accordance with the provincial guidelines; b) the anticipated impact of the development on water quality, as it relates to fish and wildlife habitat once adequate protective measures have been taken; and, c) the means whereby erosion and sedimentation and their effects will be minimized on the site during and after construction in accordance with the provincial guidelines. The report must outline all actions to be taken to prevent an increase in the concentration of,solids in any water body as a result of on- site or other related works, to comply with the Canada Fisheries Act. 40. The Owner shall prepare a Sediment and Erosion Plan which shall include the installation of silt and heavy duty wire fence backing along the rear of Lots 36 to 55, Lots 18 to 25 and Lots 30 to 35 prior to any site preparation or construction activities. The fence shall extend to the property limits and must be regularly inspected and maintained until construction is completed and the soil stabilized with vegetation. 41. The Owner shall satisfy all financial requirements of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. This shall include Application Processing Fees and Technical Review Fees as per the approved Authority Fee Schedule. 42. The Owner shall agree in the Municipality of Clarington Subdivision Agreement to implement the recommended noise attenuation measures of the acoustic report required under Condition 5. The measures shall be included in the subdivision agreement and must also contain a full and complete reference to the acoustic report (i.e. author, title, date and any revisions/addenda) and shall include any required warning clauses identified in the study. The Owner shall provide the Region with a copy of the subdivision agreement containing such provisions prior to final approval of the plan. 43. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Municipality of Clarington. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington concerning the provision and installation of roads, services, drainage, other local services and all internal and external works and services related to this proposal. 44. The Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan which are required to service other developments external to this subdivision. Such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities are to be designed and 858 constructed according to the standards and requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham. All arrangements, financial and otherwise, for said extensions are to be made to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval of this plan. 45. Prior to entering into a subdivision agreement, the Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply plant capacities are available to the proposed subdivision. 46. The Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that sanitary sewer and water supply services have been installed, or shall be installed, in the abutting/adjacent plan of subdivision. 47. The Owner shall grant to the Region of Durham, any easements required for provision of Regional services for this development and these easements shall be in location and of such widths as determined by the Region of Durham. 48. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other regional services. 49. The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e. 911 Emergency Services). 50. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, to grant the appropriate utility any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing utility facilities or easements, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. 859 51. The Owner is responsible for preparing a composite utility plan that allows for the safe installation of all utilities, including required separation between utilities. 52. The Owner shall grade all streets to final elevation prior to the installation of the gas lines and provide the necessary field survey information required for the installation of the gas lines, all to the satisfaction of the appropriate utility. 53. The Owner shall ensure that all natural gas distribution systems are installed within the proposed road allowances. In the event that this is not possible, easements will be provided at no cost to the natural gas service provider. 54. The subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington shall contain, among other matters, the following provisions: a) The Owner agrees to include provisions whereby all offers of purchase and sale shall include information that satisfies Subsection 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, 1997. b) The Owner agrees to fulfill the requirements of the Master Drainage Study as they apply to this site to the satisfaction of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. c) The Owner agrees that no filling, grading or alteration to the water course shall occur on the property without the prior written approval of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. d) The Owner agrees to carry out the works referred to in Conditions 4(iv), 9, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28, 39 and 40 to the satisfaction of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. e) The Owner agrees to maintain all stormwater management and erosion and sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. f) The Owner agrees to advise the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 48 hours prior to commencement of grading or the initiation of any on-site works. g) That the Builder include a disclosure in all purchase and sale agreements advising home buyers of municipal parking regulations, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services. h) The Owner agrees to place the following in all agreements of purchase and sale between the Developer and all prospective home buyers of Lots 1-17: 860 "Homeowners are advised that as part of the approved storm water management program for the development, a rainwater well system has been installed to encourage infiltration. The rainwater well system shall be kept in good working order and at no time shall be disconnected or dismantled unless expressly authorized by the Municipality of Clarington and the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority." 55. Prior to final approval of this plan for registration, the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington shall be advised in writing by: a) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, how Conditions 4(iv), 9, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41 and 54(i) have been satisfied; b) Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., how Conditions 51-53 have been satisfied; c) Bell Canada, how Conditions 49-50 have been satisfied; and, d) Durham Regional Planning Department, how Conditions 3, 5, 7, 37, 42, and 44- 48 have been satisfied. NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL 1. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse and the file shall be CLOSED. Extensions may be granted provided valid reason is given and is submitted to the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington well in advance of the lapsing date. 2. As the Owner of the proposed subdivision, it is your responsibility to satisfy all conditions of draft approval in an expeditious manner. The conditions of draft approval will be reviewed periodically and may be amended at any time prior to final approval. The Planning Act provides that draft approval, may be withdrawn at any time prior to final approval. 4. All plans of subdivision must be registered in the Land Titles system within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 5. Where agencies' requirements are required to be included in the local municipal subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to the agencies in order to facilitate their clearance of conditions for final approval of this plan. The addresses and telephone numbers of these agencies are: a) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, 100 Whiting Avenue, Oshawa, ON, LIH 3T3, (905) 579-0411 861 b) Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., P.O. Box 650, Scarborough, ON, M1K 5E3 c) Bell Canada, Development & Municipal Services Control Centre, Floor 5, 100 Borough Drive, Scarborough, ON, M1 P 4W2 d) Durham Regional Planning Department, 605 Rossland Road East, P.O. Box 623, Whitby, ON, L1 N 6A3, (905) 668-7721 862 Attachment 7 To Report PSD-039-10 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2003-052; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 13.4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS—URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE TWO (R2) ZONE" is hereby amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exceptions 13.4.71 and 13.4.72 as follows: 13.4.71 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R2-71)ZONE Notwithstanding Sections 13.2 a), b), c) i), ii), iii), e), g), and h), those lands zoned R2-71 shall be subject to the following zone provisions: a. Lot area (minimum) 270 square metres b. Lot Frontage(minimum) i) Interior Lot 10.0 metres ii) Exterior Lot 13.0 metres C. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Front Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport 4.0 metres to dwelling 2.0 metres to porch ii) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport 4.0 metres to dwelling 2.0 metres to porch iii) Interior Side Yard With private garage or carport 1.2 m on one side, 0.6 m on the other side; Without private garage or carport 3.0 m on one side, 0.6 m on the other side d. Lot coverage(maximum) i) One Storey a) Dwelling 50 percent b) Total of all buildings and structures 55 percent ii) All other Residential Units a) Dwelling 40 percent b) Total of all buildings and structures 45 percent 863 iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: a) in the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage; b) in the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. e. Height of floor deck of enclosed porch above finished grade(maximum) 1.0 metre f. Driveway Width 4.6 metres g. Height(maximum) i) 1 Storey 8.5 metres ii) All other residential 10.5 metres h. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line that the dwelling front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection. ii) The outside with of the garage shall be a maximum of 45%of the width of the lot. 13.4.72 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R2-72)ZONE Notwithstanding Sections 13.2 a), b), c) i), ii), iii), e), g), and h), those lands zoned R2-72 shall be subject to the following zone provisions: a. Lot area(minimum) 300 square metres b. Lot Frontage(minimum) i) Interior Lot 12.0 metres ii) Exterior Lot 15.0 metres C. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Front Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport 4.0 metres to dwelling 2.0 metres to porch ii) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport 4.0 metres to dwelling 2.0 metres to porch iii) Interior Side Yard With private garage or carport 1.2 m on one side, 0.6 m on the other side; Without private garage or carport 3.0 m on one side, 0.6 m on the other side d. Lot coverage(maximum) i) One Storey a) Dwelling 50 percent b) Total of all buildings and structures 55 percent 864 ii) All other Residential Units a) Dwelling 40 percent b) Total of all buildings and structures 45 percent iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: a) in the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up. to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage; b) in the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot of coverage. e. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch above finished grade(maximum) 1.0 metre f. Height(maximum) i) 1 Storey 8.5 metres ii) All other residential 10.5 metres g. Garage Requirements All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line that the dwelling front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection." 2. Schedule "4F" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Holding—Urban Residential Type 1 ((H)R1)Zone"to"Holding—Urban Residential ((H)R2-71)Zone'; and, "Holding—Urban Residential Type 1 ((H)R1)Zone"to"Holding—Urban Residential ((H)R2-72)Zone';and, "Holding—Urban Residential Type 1 ((H)R1)Zone"to"Environmental Protection (EP)Zone", as illustrated on the attached Schedule"A"hereto. 3. Schedule"A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 865 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2010- 1 passed this day of , 2010 A.D. 0 O W W O U K D J 0 PR POSED ADELAIDE AVENUE EXTENSION `\ ® Zoning Change From(H)R1 to(H)R2-71 Zoning Change From(H)R1 to(H)R2-72 Zoning Change From(H)R1 to EP � N 0 Zoning To Remain EP Jim Abernethy,Mayor Zoning To Remain(H)R1 Patti L.Barrie,Municipal Clerk Attachment 8 To Report PSD-039-10 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to authorize entering into an Agreement with the Owner(s) of the Draft Plan of Subdivision S-C-2003-001, any Mortgagee who has an interest in the said Lands, and the Municipality of Clarington, in respect of S-C-2003-001 WHEREAS the Owner(s) of Draft Plan of Subdivision S-C-2003-001 has received Draft Approval and intends to proceed to Final Approval and enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, and seal with the Corporation's seal, an Agreement between the Owner of Draft Plan of Subdivision S-C-2003- 001. 2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to accept, on behalf of the Municipality of Clarington, the said conveyances of Lands required pursuant to the aforesaid agreement. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 867 � �n8rgQ REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: N/A Report#: PSD-040-10 File #: ZBA 2009-0016 Subject: APPEAL TO THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD OF ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT: BOWMANVILLE INVESTMENTS INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-040-10 be received; and 2. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-040-10 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted b4ctnag Reviewed by. y La n n ma' , FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer PW/COS/df 18 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 868 REPORT NO.: PSD-040-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On November 30, 2009, Bowmanville Investments Inc. (WalMart- SmartCentres) submitted an application to remove the Holding (H) symbol from all zones on the subject property and to amend the permitted uses under "Large Format Commercial Exception Zone (C8-2)" to include a motor vehicle repair garage within a large format retail store and a year-round garden centre, which abuts a large format retail store, to a maximum size of 2,150 sq.m. These changes are necessary to accommodate the operations of a Canadian Tire store. 1.2 On January 4, 2010, a Public Meeting was held for the requested Zoning By-law amendments. 1.3 No substantive objections were raised at the Public Meeting. Valiant Rental Properties Limited inquired whether Bowmanville Investments Inc. would be required to meet the Urban Design Guidelines for the area to which Staff responded in the affirmative. Council approved the rezoning request on January 11, 2010, by By-law 2010-002. 1.4 The Municipality received a letter of appeal to By-law 2010-002 on February 1, 2010, from Valiant Rental Properties Limited. 2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 The letter of appeal received on February 1, 2010, indicated that, at the time of the appeal, the appellant was concerned that the proposed development would not be held to the same design standards previously applied to the development of the Bowmanville Home Depot. 2.2 A copy of the letter of appeal is contained in Attachment 2. 2.3 The Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) has acknowledged receipt of the appeals. At this . time, a date for an OMB pre-hearing conference has not been scheduled. 2.4 As per Council policy, the applicant will be responsible for the Municipality's legal costs should the OMB hearing require the involvement of the Municipal Solicitor. 3.0 CONCLUSION 3.1 Staff recommends that Council receive the report for information. Staff Contact: Paul Wirch Attachments: Attachment 1 - Property Location Map Attachment 2 - Appeal Letter 869 REPORT NO.: PSD-040-10 PAGE 3 Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Anne Messore, Bowmanville Investments Inc. Srdjana Jaksic, Canadian Tire Corporation Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc. Maria Gatzios, Gatzios Planning + Development Consultants Inc. Beth Kelly, Valiant Rental Properties Limited 870 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-040-10 Z�Dan nvH nD V C �j N E ^U) O d d .r fn ie NO m p > 16 CD y O Q d avow R3 D N •C ca ODVON N33M0 ;c Q W V -� Q N c o ® c m a N L aWSWELL DR 3 o 2� .NR o ka C F° oQ z q� 4 0 4 \fir r J -- BOSWELL DRIVE Q 871 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-040-10 Part 5 Question 2 We are respectfully objecting to the changes made in Zoning By-Law 2010-002. The previous owners West Diamond and Players Business Park Ltd. Entered into a Principal of Understanding and Subdivision Consent Agreements with the Municipality to address financial, development and urban design matters. At this time we have no way of knowing that these agreements will be adhered to in this new zoning and site plan as we have been unable to view a site plan. Specifically we are concerned about the treatment of the proposed Canadian Tire Store. We are requesting assurances that the facade be treated in the same modern manor as the new Home Depot on Clarington Boulevard. 872 • REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: Report#: PSD-041-10 File #: COPA 2009-0004 and ZBA 2009-0017 Subject: APPLICATION TO AMEND THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW TO PERMIT AGRI-TOURISM AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A FARM OPERATION APPLICANT: NANCY MALLETTE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-041-10 be received; 2. THAT Official Plan Amendment No. 72 as contained in Attachment 2 of-PSD-041-10 be adopted and that the necessary by-law be passed; 3. THAT the application for a Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Nancy Mallette as contained in Attachment 3 of PSD-041-10 be approved; 4. That the Durham Regional Planning Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-041-10 and Council's decision; and 5. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-041-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: <c) e Lang aid, FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu cting-Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer MH/ah/df 23 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 873 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Owner: Nancy Mallette 1.2 Proposal: To amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit agri-tourism as an accessory use to a farm operation. 1.3 Area: 16 hectares 1.4 Location: 3745 Highway 2, Clarke, Part Lot 24, Concession 1, Former Township of Clarke (see Attachment 1 — Property location map) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 . On December 18, 2009, applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law submitted by Nancy Mallette, were deemed complete. The applications are to permit agri-tourism events, within a tent structure, as an accessory use to the existing nursery/garden farm operation. The applicant's intent is to host farm and horticultural tours, educational sessions and social events such as charity events and weddings. A separate washroom building and private septic system is also being proposed. During early spring, the tent will be used for the propagation of plants. 2.2 A public meeting for the proposed Official Plan amendment and rezoning was held on February 1, 2010. No one appeared in opposition to the applications and no concerns were raised by the general public. A number of agency comments were outstanding at the time the public meeting report was written, and Committee and Council approved a recommendation for Staff to continue to process both applications. All outstanding agency comments have now been received. 2.3 On February 9, 2010, an application for Site Plan Approval was submitted by Nancy Mallette. A Best Management Practice guide was prepared as part of the submission to address potential noise concerns related to the proposed use. The site plan application continues to be reviewed by Staff. 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The subject property is located just outside the eastern limits of the Newcastle Village urban boundary, at 3745 Highway 2. The 16 hectare parcel of land fronts onto the south side of Highway 2, and extends as far south as Highway 401. The existing greenhouse/nursery operation is located along the Highway 2 frontage, setback approximately 150 metres from the road allowance. Currently there exists one (1) single detached dwelling, one (1) large greenhouse, five (5) small greenhouses and multiple storage barns, a variety of gardens and a 15 metre by 20 metre concrete pad upon which a seasonal tent frame is erected. The remaining 10 hectares of land, approximately, is clear of buildings or structures. Currently there are two large ponds located at the north end of the property separating the existing 874 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 3 buildings and uses from Highway 2, as well as a watercourse tributary to Graham Creek. A second watercourse runs through the property, south of the location of the event tent structure and proposed washroom building. The location of the event tent is approximately 225 metres from the road allowance, and partially screened from the road by the existing agricultural buildings on the subject property. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - One rural residential property, and vacant land South - Highway 401 East - Rural residential properties/actively farmed land West - Actively farmed land /Canadian Pacific Railway 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) The PPS states that in rural areas development that is compatible with the rural landscape and can be sustained by rural service levels should be promoted; and that recreational, tourism, and other economic opportunities should be promoted. The PPS states that within Prime Agricultural Areas, a number of agricultural, secondary and agriculture-related uses and activities are permitted. Any new secondary uses shall be compatible with, and shall not hinder surrounding agricultural operations. Secondary uses are defined within the PPS as: uses secondary to the principle use of the property, including but not limited to home occupations, home industries, and uses that produce value-added agricultural products from the farm operation on the property. The applications for rezoning and Official Plan amendment to permit agri-tourism uses on the subject property are consistent with the PPS. 4.2 Greenbelt Plan The subject property is located within the "Protected Countryside Area" of the Greenbelt Plan. Within Prime agricultural areas of the "Protected Countryside Area", a full range of agricultural, agricultural-related and secondary uses are permitted. The applications to permit agri-tourism uses and activities on the subject property as a secondary use to the principle farm operation are in conformity with the policies of the Greenbelt Plan 2005. 4.3 Provincial Growth Plan The subject lands are within the "Greenbelt Area" in the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Lands within the "Greenbelt Area" are subject to the policies of the Greenbelt Plan. 875 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 4 5.0 OFFICIAL PLANS 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan (DROP) The subject lands are designated "Prime Agricultural Areas" within the DROP. The Prime Agricultural Area policies permit a number of uses accessory to a principal agricultural use including small scale uses secondary to an agricultural use, that produce value-added agricultural products. These uses may include agri-tourism uses such as bed and breakfast establishments, farm vacation homes and farm tours provided that such uses are directly related to, or exclusively devoted to the existing farm operation. Municipal Official Plans shall include detailed policies to limit the scale and number of secondary agricultural uses and include policies to address compatibility with surrounding uses. Severances for accessory and secondary agricultural uses shall not be granted. The proposed agri-tourism uses and activities are permitted within the Prime Agricultural Areas of the DROP. 5.2 Clarington Official Plan The subject lands are designated "Prime Agricultural Area" within the Clarington Official Plan. Prime Agricultural Areas shall only be used for farm and farm-related uses including the use of land, buildings and structures for nurseries, the growing of crops and the raising of livestock. The proposed agri-tourism uses and activities are not permitted within Prime Agricultural Areas. Currently, the Clarington Official Plan does not acknowledge or define secondary agricultural uses that produce value-added agricultural products, such as agri-tourism uses and activities. A comprehensive review of the Clarington Official Plan is currently underway, where the policies which regulate agricultural areas within Clarington will be revisited and redefined to be in conformity with the Provincial Greenbelt Plan and the Durham Regional Official Plan. Part of the review will consider policies for agri-tourism and other uses consistent with the protection of the agricultural base within Clarington. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Within Zoning By-law 84-63, the subject lands are zoned "Agricultural Exception (A-1)". Permitted uses in an "A-1" zone include uses such as a farm, a single detached dwelling, conservation and forestry. The proposed agri-tourism uses and activities are not permitted within the "A-1" zone. The application to amend the Zoning By-law will rezone the lands to permit the proposed agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to the principal farm operation. 876 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 5 7.0 SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND STUDIES 7.1 Planning Rationale Report A Planning Rationale report was submitted in support of the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments. The following arguments were made: • The site is well-equipped to accommodate a large number of parking spaces, and there will be no impact on existing traffic levels along Highway 2; • Hosting agri-tourism events on-site will provide exposure to the principal farm operation, and more generally, the "rural farm experience"; • The proposed secondary use of the property provides value added products and income to support the existing farm operation; • The location of the tent is well away from adjacent properties and dwellings; and • The agri-tourism uses will provide a greater range of choice for personal services within Clarington, and will only strengthen the local economy. 8.0 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS 8.1 A public meeting was held on February 1, 2010 and notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site. No objections were made at the public meeting and no public submissions or inquiries made on the proposed applications. 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 9.1 All outstanding agency comments have been received at this time. Clarington Engineering Services Department, Building Division, Emergency Services and Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority have no objections provided that they are given a chance to comment on the site plan application. 9.2 The Durham Region Works Department confirmed that a road widening dedication will not be required at this time, and no Regional road or entrance improvements will be required. 9.3 The Durham Region Health Department will review the engineer designed sewage system during the site plan approval process. 9.4 The Durham Region Planning Department informed staff that archaeological potential has been identified on the subject lands. The applicant was asked to engage a qualified professional to carry out, to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Culture, an archaeological assessment and mitigate impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. The applicant was successful in providing the Region with sufficient evidence to illustrate that there were no archaeological resources on site and therefore no mitigation measures would be necessary. 877 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 6 In addition, the Durham Region Planning Department has informed Staff that the proposal conforms to the Durham Regional Official Plan and is consistent with Provincial Policy. The Clarington Official.Plan and Zoning By-law amendments have no significant Regional or Provincial concerns and therefore are exempt from Regional Approval. 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 The concept of value-added agriculture and agri-tourism is a fairly new concept for many municipalities, including Clarington. For years the familiar approach to protecting prime agricultural lands was to strictly limit the minimum size of an agricultural property and the number and type of uses permitted on a property; these uses are typically described as normal farm practices including the growing of crops, raising of livestock, etc. In more recent years however, it has been determined that municipalities must not only protect the physical characteristics of the soils in prime agricultural areas, we must also protect the economic viability of our local farm operations. Value-added agriculture, which includes agri-tourism uses, is seen as a way to add value to a farm operation in a number of ways, including: providing a supplement income and reducing the farmers' economic risk, providing opportunity for farmers to sell directly into the retail market, educating the non-farm population about farming and allowing the farmer to increase brand recognition by promoting and marketing their own agricultural products. 10.2 In 2005, Council adopted Zoning By-law 2005-109 which regulates the lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Area, in compliance with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, 2002. Within Zoning By-law 2005-109, the term "agri-tourism" is defined; it is not however, listed as a permitted use within an Agricultural Zone."Agri- tourism" is defined as: "Shall mean an agricultural establishment that provides a service to promote and educate the public about farming and agricultural activities. An agri-tourism use shall be located on the same lot as a farm. An agri-tourism use may include a farm produce outlet. Agri-tourism may include the following uses: corn or hay maze; petting zoo; hay rides; sleigh rides; buggy or carriage rides; seasonal activities/events related to the farm and farm tours, but shall not include: restaurant, amusement park, special event, overnight camping or motorized recreational competition with the exception of tractor pulls." Although similar to the definition within Zoning By-law 2005-109, the proposed definition of agri-tourism within the "A-84" zone in Attachment 3 is unique in that it has been written to exclusively acknowledge and permit the type of agri-tourism uses which are being proposed by the applicant, and eliminates many other activities and uses which are included in the Zoning By-law 2005-109 definition. It is important to note that the definition used within the proposed "A-84" zone will be applicable to the subject lands only, and it is possible that a broader definition for agri-tourism will come forward as a result of the comprehensive review of the Clarington Official Plan policies relating to Agricultural Areas. 878 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 7 10.3 In light of the ongoing review of the Official Plan policies which regulate agricultural areas within Clarington, the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington was asked to comment on the idea of permitting agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to a farm operation in Prime Agricultural Areas. The overall consensus from the Committee was that although they support the idea of allowing agri-tourism uses within Clarington, staff should continue to recognize that what is truly worth protecting is the resource itself (the soil) and its production potential. Any land use that may have a negative impact on the quality of the soil should not be permitted 'as of right', and any agri-tourism uses shall be limited in scale to ensure the farm operation remains the primary use of the property. 10.4 The proposed agri-tourism uses, which include educational farm tours, charity events and wedding receptions, will serve as an accessory use to the existing garden nursery farm operation. It can be argued that by permitting farm tours and special events to occur on site, we are providing opportunity for public exposure to the primary farm operation, thereby adding value to the product (garden nursery products) which is being grown and offered for sale on site. The applicant also suggests that the multiple events that are to be held on site, will have opportunity to take advantage of the products grown on site for the use of centrepieces, bouquets, tent decorations and photography. With adequate mitigation measures in place, the proposed agri-tourism use meets Provincial/Regional policies which allow for agricultural-related uses and secondary uses to the primary farm operation, that produce value-added agricultural products. 10.5 It is acknowledged that the proposed agri-tourism uses and activities must be limited in scale to limit potential impacts relating to traffic, noise and the privacy of neighbouring properties. The proposed Official Plan amendment addresses the need for limiting agri- tourism uses, and ensuring that the impacts on surrounding properties are mitigated wherever possible. The applicant will also require site plan approval, it is through this process where Staff will review the proposed development and ensure that parking areas are well screened, noise is to be limited as much as possible and regularly monitored, the floor area used for agri-tourism uses is limited and the uses must always be secondary and accessory to the primary agricultural use of the property. 10.6 An agricultural exception zone (A-84) has been drafted to include a maximum floor area and minimum side yard setbacks. By limiting the floor area for agri-tourism uses, we are ensuring that there will be an adequate supply of parking on-site when an event is held and that the agri-tourism use will not expand in the future and will remain of a size to be considered secondary to the farm use. The "A-84" zone will only permit agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to a farm operation. This shall mean that if the primary farm operation were to ever cease, the agri-tourism uses must also cease operation. The minimum required side yard setback of 65 metres will provide a level of protection to surrounding properties from potential noise or light related to an event held on site. 10.7 Taxes for the subject property are paid in full. 879 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-10 PAGE 8 11.0 CONCLUSION 11.1 In consideration of the comments contained in the report, Staff recommends that the application for Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment as contained in Attachments 2 and 3 respectively be approved. Staff Contact: Meaghan Harrington Attachments: Attachment 1 - Property Location Map Attachment 2 - Official Plan Amendment and Adopting By-law Attachment 3 - Zoning By-law Amendment List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Nancy Mallette 880 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-041-10 _ d E OV_ON NOSN3Hd3lS E y �I- v w x ) O d p Q z S O E 01 O IL o c N R N !a A Z 0 O `m 4 ado N = V 0 O CL 3nN3AVMOHNVzl (V C .` V °W~ m 1 m w rn I \ 3 l.r'sue,e f t suep�e0 Buisix3 i �N F tC m L c o CL F O ix h W 881 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-041-10 AMENDMENT NO. 72 TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: To amend the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan to permit agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to a farm operation on the subject property, municipally known as 3745 Highway 2, Clarke. BASIS: The amendment is based on an application submitted by Nancy Mallette to permit agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to a farm operation. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended by adding a new policy to Exceptions, Section 23.14 as follows: " 23.14.10 Notwithstanding Section 13.3.2, agri-tourism uses shall be permitted as an accessory use to a farm operation on the subject property identified by assessment roll 1817- 030-020-12450 and municipally known as 3745 Highway 2, subject to Site Plan Control. Before an agri-tourism use shall be permitted, it must satisfy all of the following criteria: i) The use is small in scale and clearly associated with a farm operation on the subject property; ii) The proposed use shall not have a negative impact on the enjoyment and privacy of neighbouring properties; iii) Adequate on-site parking area is provided for the use; iv) The proposed access to the site will not cause a traffic hazard; v) Measures are in place to mitigate noise levels wherever possible; and vi) The proposed use can be serviced with appropriate water and wastewater systems. 882 For the purpose of this amendment, agri-tourism shall be defined as: Agri-tourism - means an activity or use which is small in scale, which promotes and educates public about farming and agricultural activities, and is directly related to the farm operation. Such uses may include farm tours, seasonal festivals and social events (charity events and wedding receptions) that benefit from the farm/rural setting." IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply to this amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply to this amendment. 883 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to adopt Amendment No.72 to the Clarington Official Plan WHEREAS Section 17 (22) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended, authorizes the Municipality of Clarington to pass by-laws for the adoption or repeal of Official Plans and Amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend the Clarington Official Plan by adding a new policy to section 23.14 to permit agri-tourism uses as an accessory use to a farm operation: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Amendment No. 72 to the Clarington Official Plan being the attached Explanatory Text and Map is hereby adopted; and 2. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of the passing hereof. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of. 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 884 Httacnmem s To Report PSD-041-10 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63,the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2009-0017; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 6.4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS —AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONE" is hereby amended by adding a new"Agricultural Exception (A-84)Zone" as follows: "6.4.84 AGRICULTURAL EXCEPTION (A-84)ZONE Notwithstanding Sections 6.1 and 6.3 c., those lands zoned "A-84" on the schedules to this By-law, may in addition to other uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) Zone, be used for agri-tourism subject to the following zone regulations: a. Definitions: Agri-tourism Shall mean an activity or use that is accessory to a farm operation, and which promotes and educates the public about farming and agricultural activities. Such activities shall have a direct relationship to the agricultural activities on the farm, and may include farm/educational tours, observation and participation in agricultural activities. It may also include seasonal festivals and social events (charity events and wedding receptions)that benefit from the farm/rural setting. b. Regulations for Agri-tourism Uses: i) Total Floor Area (maximum) 375 mZ ii) Interior Side yard Setback(minimum) 65 m" 2. Schedule "2A" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from "Agricultural Exception (A-1) Zone" to "Agricultural Exception (A-84) Zone" as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 885 2. Schedule"A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 24 (2)and Section 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010 I BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2010- , passed this day of , 2010 A.D. HIGHWAY 2 0 z a N HIGHWAY 401 ® Zoning Change From"A-1"To"A-84" Jim Abernethy,Mayor Patti L.Barrie,Municipal Clerk r 11 pq HIGHWAY 401 CLARKE ZBA 2009-0017 887 • n Le REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law #: N/A Report#: PSD-042-10 File #: PLN 15.2 and PLN 15.10.2 Subject: DREDGING – BOWMANVILLE AND NEWCASTLE (BONDHEAD) MUNICIPAL BOAT LAUNCHES RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-042-10 be received; and 2. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-042-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. R , Submitted by: _ h�-r� Reviewed b Y Y F y Langmai CSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu —Act'ng Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer F L/df 22 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 888 REPORT NO:: PSD-042-10 PAGE 2 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT At the Council meeting of December 14, 2009 the following motion was passed: "THAT Correspondence Item D-14 from Robert Kreasul, with respect to Port Darlington Marina, be referred to staff for preparation of a report addressing responsibility for channel dredging and associated costs." This report provides an overview of the responsibility for channel dredging and associated costs and the municipal operation of the boat launches at Bowmanville Creek north of Port Darlington (Attachment 1) and Bondhead on the west side of Graham Creek (Attachment 2). Mr. Kreasul's letter is Attachment 3. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Bowmanville Creek/Port Darlington The Port Darlington Marina was initiated and developed by the Gil family in the mid 1970's. At the time the commercial fishing fleet that had existed at the mouth of Bowmanville Creek on the east side of the channel owned by Port Darlington Harbour Company had diminished and transitioned to the sport fishing that continues to exist today. Concurrently there was also a move, by many, to pleasure boating. The Gil family obtained permission to dredge a marina and build the motel/restaurant complex and condominums which continue to exist today; now owned by Port Darlington Marina- Hotel. The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority purchased approximately 57 acres of land in 1975 and another 11 acres in 1977 and 1978. This initiated the development of the Bowmanville Harbour Conservation Area. Initially it was to protect the significant Bowmanville Marsh, and to provide area residents with access to fishing opportunities in the form of a boat launch, fish cleaning station and parking facility just north of Bobby C's and Port Darlington Marina. As part of the work that led up to Clarington's first Official Plan, the Clarington Waterfront Study (1991) was prepared along with the Port Darlington Plan Area: Background Study (1992). These documents are the basis for the policies in the Official Plan and Port Darlington Neighbourhood Secondary Plan that were adopted in 1996. By the late 1990's there had been an evaluation of the mandate of the Conservation Authority with regard to the provision of recreational amenities. The recreational mandate had in large part been eliminated in favour of a greater natural heritage focus. The boat launch area was leased to the Municipality in 2000 on a 20 year lease. Part of the reason for this shift in responsibility was the Municipality's ability to garner funds under the Millennium grant process for the development of the Waterfront Regeneration Trail. In addition, the Municipality had been instrumental in the formation of the Valleys 2000 group, which encompassed the urban portions of the Bowmanville and Soper 889 REPORT NO.: PSD-042-10 PAGE 3 Creeks with a focus on the restoration and enhancement of the creek valleys for the residents of Bowmanville. After the Municipality leased the boat launch, improvements were made in subsequent years through the grading and drainage of the parking area, construction of the Waterfront Regeneration_Trail and ea adjacent to the boat launch accommodates approximately 30 vehicles and trailers; however, it is also encumbered with hydro towers and mostly successional vegetation of low ecological importance. Council recently approved an exchange with CLOCA, which will see the Municipality become the owners of the boat launch area. 2.2 Bondhead/Graham Creek The boat launch on the west side of Graham Creek was constructed in 1991 as a response to the Recreation/Leisure Services Masterplan recommendations. The Recreation/Leisure Services Masterplan was undertaken in 1990 to determine the gaps in leisure services being provided by the Municipality. One of the major areas of demand from the surveys and public consultation was the lack of public access to the waterfront and lake. The development of the Bondhead Parkette was seen as a way to address this issue. In 2000 as part of the drafting of the Land Acquisition Strategy the lack of space for parking at the Bondhead Parkette/Boat Launch was noted as a concern and three residential properties adjacent to the parkette where identified as future acquisitions. These properties were acquired between 2000 and 2005 and the lands have been added to the parkette as green space. To date, the parking has not been enlarged. 2.3 Boat Launch Economic Spin-offs 2.3.1 The demand for boat launching ramps, mainly required to serve anglers, is projected to grow at a rate similar to that of the future household growth in Durham. Typically launching ramps are provided by marina operators and very few free launching ramps exist. 2.3.2 There is no precise data available on the numbers of persons who use the boat launch or the economic spin-off from this activity. Casual observation by maintenance staff indicates that both facilities are well used and attract anglers from outside the Durham area and province. 2.3.3 The Town of Whitby, which has a boat launch as part of their marina operation indicate there are over 1,000 launches per year. This number does not include boaters that purchase seasonal passes. 2.3.4 The economic spin-off from the tour and charter operators, boaters and casual fishermen is unknown. However; it is known that the impact can be significant. Attachment 4 is a calculator used in the tourism industry based on the known impact from boat launches. Calculations of 500, 1,000 and 1,500 launches demonstrate the spin-off benefits. 890 REPORT NO.: PSD-042-10 PAGE 4 2.4 Channel Ownership and Jurisdiction 2.4.1 The Bowmanville/Soper Creek from West Beach Road south to the southern tip of the condominiums is owned by CLOCA. From the condominiums south to the lakefront the channel is owned by the Port Darlington Harbour Company. The piers on either side of the mouth of the channel are owned by the federal government. 2.4.2 The Bondhead Parkette and municipal boat launch are owned by the Municipality, as are the breakwater structures. The Municipality took over the breakwater structures in 1999. The channel ownership could not be determined from the MPAC property fabric, a land title search at the Land Titles office would be necessary to determine ownership. 2.4.3 The provincial government has jurisdiction over the bed of streams. Approval for any works requires licenses and/or permits from the applicable conservation authority and Ministry of Natural Resources. In addition, permits are required from the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans; these include restrictions on the time of year that any in-water works are carried out to protect the fishery resource. 2.5 Channel Dredging 2.5.1 The dredging of the basin areas of the different marinas are the responsibility of the owner/operator of the marina. At one time, funding was available from Small Craft Harbour's for the maintenance and development of recreational boating harbours; however, the mandate of Small Craft Harbour's has shifted and is now focused on providing commercial fish harvesters and other harbour users with safe and accessible facilities. The mandate of Small Craft Harbour's is to keep the harbours that are critical to the fishing industry open and in good repair. The Bowmanville and Newcastle harbours are recreational harbours and do not meet the criteria set out by Small Craft Harbour's, there is no funding that they are eligible for from higher levels of government for ongoing maintenance and operation. 2.5.2 The channels in the area of the boat launches have become silted up over time. Typically when silt builds up it gets blown out in a major storm event, such as Hurricane Hazel. Many of the stormwater management and floodproofing measures that have been implemented by the Municipality in concert with the conservation authority have a modifying effect as they are designed to retain the water upstream in an appropriate facility and allow for drain down after the event. This assists in avoiding flooding throughout the lower reaches of the streams. 2.5.3 All the marina's and ports along the Lake Ontario waterfront have experience with dredging. Typically they carry out a major dredge every 10-15 years with spot dredges in between to maintain depths in specific areas. Clarington's municipal boat launches and their associated channels have not been dredged since they were built. 2.5.4 The major cost to dredge is often the disposal of the sediment. In the best case, the dredgate can be used for beach nourishment further along the shoreline. This can occur if soil testing confirms no contaminates in the sediment and the approval agencies allow for disposal of the dredgate in this manner. In these best case scenarios the 891 REPORT NO.: PSD-042-10 PAGE 5 dredging is carried out on a cost per cubic metre with the silt being sucked up and pumped through piping to its disposal site. If the dredgate is to be hauled away, there are trucking costs, plus the preparation and rehabilitation of the soil waste site. The Town of Cobourg has acquired dredging equipment and are willing to provide the service for $10.00/cubic metre if all other aspects are taken care of(e.g. dredging permits, soil testing, soil waste area). If haul away of the dredgate is included the price increases to between $25 to $30 per cubic metre depending on the length of haul, cost of the disposal, remediation of the site, etc. 2.5.5 Typically local marina operators (Cobourg, Port Hope, Newcastle, Bowmanville, and Whitby) spend between $20,000 to $40,000/annually to maintain their basin areas. Some years the costs are less; other years are higher depending on the amount of dredging required and where they are in the cycle after a major dredge. 2.5.6 The estimated cost to dredge the channel in Bowmanville Creek from the boat launch to the southern tip of the condominiums would be approximately $40,000 if the dredgate could be used for beach nourishment on the East Beach. 2.5.7 The estimated cost to dredge the channel in Graham Creek from the boat launch to the lake would be approximately $5,000 if the dredgate could be used for beach nourishment on the Bondhead parkette. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 The Municipality does not have a legal responsibility to dredge the channels in the vicinity of the boat launches. 3.2 CLOCA and Port Darlington Harbour Company are the owners of the channel in Bowmanville. 3.3 Ownership of the channel in Newcastle would have to be determined through a land titles search, it has been confirmed that it is not owned by Port of Newcastle Marina. 3.4 The Municipality could recover operation costs for the maintenance of the boat launches through the use of barriers and pay/display machines which would require payment for the parking of vehicles/trailers. Separate parking areas accessible to the general public not wishing to use the launch could be provided to allow access at both launches for non-boaters. 3.5 The Municipality benefits from the tourism that the boat launches support; however, there is no specific information available on the economic benefit. 892 REPORT NO.: PSD-042-10 PAGE 6 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Should Council wish to support the economic benefits that the boat launches help promote, specific direction to the appropriate staff will be required. Staff Contact: Faye Langmaid Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bowmanville Boat Launch site plan Attachment 2 — Bondhead Boat launch site plan Attachment 3 — Mr. Kreasul's letter Attachment 4 — Economic Spin-off Calculator Interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: Bob Currie, Port Darlington Marina-Hotel Bowmanville Andy Wiggers, Wiggers Custom Yachts Bob Kreasul Kevin Williams Kelvin Whalen, Kaitlin Group Allison Woollacott, Port of Newcastle Marina Perry Sisson, CLOCA Mark Peacock, GRCA 893 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-042-10 : .T B�Cy ROAD MOC Municipal oat Launch Llll�� J Bobby C's/ Port Darlington Hotel V. t :1 rj° ::•. Port Darlington Marina CLOCA CD '" o PDHC1Wi g9►ers MOC `•PortDarltri" .. J •,ti• MOC MOC EAST BEACH ROAD MOC r. •.is .•f: .•i: L•• `Haul..=oat�.•��:`�:=���: ���:�.�=� �'��'�-:��:•. .r •:i•• 't4•••i: •-ti: r• :3- L.. •C• nto i� ��r :l• •t. •i• .. •r .t :i 5: :1- :•t: :-1 •:i: •ti '•r :j. t'• 'r' �� xE ;�. ao ' . U11115 lid Oo NO U • o k' Q • i r oo : Attachment 2 To Report PSD-042-10 LU w SYDENHAM STREET QUEEN VICTORIA STREET DARCY STREET F o wN Port of Newcastle:Marna'` BOULTON STREET MOC Municipal Boat Launch '•r: •i• ':; aloe:::-�:0 to t•o�': � :-•:. 'G .r•; :O �p• I •t' w• ti .r. ::ti.• ��� Groh - ,i►. am k 140 .1 A i- Portof Ne castle Marina g a ; �� Mun�ic'ipal JE- oatiL"aunch .. t .� ►� ���_ mil/t 1�I�it,, � - � Lake Onta-rao tea. REPORT NO.: PSD-046-10 PAGE 5 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Location Map Attachment 2 - Original elevations Attachment 3 - Revised elevations Interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: HCD Advisory Committee Members Members of the Clarington Heritage Committee Paul King, Ministry of Culture Sarah Morrison Aaron Stoker 899029 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-046-10 a, •> d 15 NIN37 E M O O E ui 3 °0 u o a g CO ¢� 3Atl H033E L � C C O M 3 Q v ° s 0 N m N � 0 2NK M a LO M 3nN3 H33 tA4 {. f (D A Y! N Z 0 w tb u 65 t i R . a £9 ----Woo 89900 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-10 PAGE 3 3.2 The School Board had originally passed a motion to demolish the school and sell the site as vacant land. The Clarington Heritage Committee and Municipal staff toured the property with the School Board's Asset Management Coordinator on May 20, 2008. On November 26, 2009 the School Board rescinded their motion to demolish the school and have offered to sell the property as is. 3.3 On January 19, 2010 the CHC passed a motion requesting the School Board consider adding the Bowmanville Senior Public School to the Municipal Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. Staff have verbally advised the School Board's Manager of Planning Services of the CHC's request. Documentation on the history of the school will be forwarded to the Board for information along with a request that they consider having the building added to the Municipal Register. Should the School Board agree to this site being added to the Municipal Register, a future staff report will be presented to Council for consideration. 4.0 CONCLUSION 4.1 It is recommended that the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board be thanked for the notification and that the offer to purchase the Bowmanville Senior Public School be declined. 4.2 Municipal staff will work expediently with whomever purchases this property to bring the building back into function within the downtown. Staff Contact: Isabel Little Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - School Board offer List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Norman Breitner, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board Clarington Heritage Committee 899035 Mir IA y Y tx,�M es � xi Httacnment j To Report PSD-042-10 Robert G. Kreasul Phone:905-243-7711 November 26,2009 Dear Mayor Abernathy: 1 am writing this letter representing the over 150 resident boats in the Port Darlington Marina, transient boaters, residents of Wiggers Yachts Basin (winter and summer), and the users of the Clarington boat launch ramp,which,I believe,are in the thousands. We have a situation at the harbour that needs to be fixed rather urgently—there is not enough depth in the channel to the lake from September onward to float even a dingy equipped with an outboard motor.ALL users are affected by this,as it is unsafe to plough through the mud to get to the lake.We even see geese standing in what was,in the spring,a part of the channell During the summer season, unless you have local knowledge of exactly where the channel is,you WILD run aground.Our harbour is such a picturesque destination for transient boaters, and the first thing we offer them is — the certainty of running aground.......... There is a great deal of tourist income derived from the harbour, what with the over 50 Salmon Charter boats, and marine tourists travelling along the North Shore, as well.as American boaters coming across. I understand that the municipality is required to keep the channel navigable from the boat launch . ramp to the lake. This is NOT the case currently, all you need to do is ask any boater who uses our harbour.We would be happy to discuss the situation with you any time, at your convenience. I have included some maps/photos to clarify the channel into Port Darlington. I will contact you on Monday as a follow up to this letter—thanks for your attention. Robert G.Kreasul CC: Mary Novak Ron Hooper Willie Woo Charlie Trim Adrian Foster Gord Robinson 898 Attachment 4 To Report PSD-042-10 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BOAT LAUNCHES 22-Mar-10 1. 500 LAUNCHES: Economic Impact Result/Tables TABLE 1 -Economic Impacts of Trip Spending by Boats Using the Launch Site Sector/Spending category sales lobs Labor Income Value Added (oa0rs s) (ms's 6) (000's s) Direct Effects Lodging 3.4 0.1 1.5 2.4 Mariana Services 3.2 0.1 1.1 119 Restaurant 8.4 0.2 12 3.6 Recreation&Entertainment 2.2 0.0 0.8 1.3 Repair&Maurtenance - - - - Grocery Stores(Margin&Sales) 2.6 0.1 1.0 1.4 Gas Service Stations(Margin&Sales) 6.0 0.1 2.2 2.9 Sporting Goods/Equipment Retail Margins - - - - Other Retail Trade(Margins&Saies) 1.0 010 0.5 0.7 Wholesale Trade(Margins&Sales) - - - - Local Production of Goods - - - - Total Direct Effects 26.6 0.5 10.4 14.2 Secondary Effects 9.3 0.1 2.8 5.0 Total Effects 36.0 0.6 13.2 19.2 2. 1,000 LAUNCHES Economic Impact Result/Tables TABLE I-Economic Impacts of Trip Spending by Boats Using the Launch Site Sales labor Income Valise Added Sector/Spending category (000's$) Jobs (000's$) (000's$) Direct Effects Lodging 6.8 0.2 3.0 4.8 Marina Services 6.3 0.1 2.3 3.8 Restaurant 16.7 0.4 6.4 7.2 Recreation&Entertainment 4.3 0.1 1.6 2.6 Repair&Maintenance - - - _ Grocery Stores(Margin&Sales) 5.2 0.1 2.0 2.7 Gas Service Stations(Margin&Sales) 11.9 0.1 4.S 5.8 Sporting Goods/Equipment Retail Margins - - - _ Other Retail Trade(Margins&Sales) 2.0 0.0 0.9 1.3 Wholesale Trade(Margins&Sales) - _ _ Local Production of Goods - - _ _ Total Direct Effects S3.2 1.0 20.7 28.4 Secondary Effects 18.7 0.2 S.6 10.0 Total Effects 71.9 1.3 26.3 38.4 899 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BOAT LAUNCHES 22-Mar-10 3. 1,500 LAUNCHES Economic Impact Result/Tables TABLE 1 - Economic Impacts of Trip Spending by Boats Using the Launch Site Sales Jobs Labor Income Value Added Sector/Spending category (000's$) (000's$) (000's$) Direct Effects Lodging 10.2 0.2 4.5 7.2 Marina Services 9.5 0.2 3.4 S.7 Restaurant 25.1 0.6 9.6 10.9 Recreation&Entertainment 6.S 0.1 2.3 3.9 Repair&Maintenance - - - - Grocery Stores(Margin&Sales) 7.8 0.2 3.1 4.1 Gas Service Stations(Margin&Sales) 17.9 0.2 6.7 8.7 Sporting Goods/Equipment Retail Margins - - - - Other Retail Trade(Margins&Sales) 3.0 0.1 1.4 2.0 Wholesale Trade (Margins&Sales) - - - - Local Production of Goods - - - - Total Direct Effects 79.9 1.6 31.1 42.5 Secondary Effects 28.0 0.3 8.4 15.0 Total Effects 107.9 1.9 39.5 57.5 NOTE: Dollars are in USD. 899001 • 1 n Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: N/A Report#: PSD-043-10 File #: PLN 17.13.10; PLN 17.13.11, PLN 17.13.12 and PLN 17.13.13 Subject: GANARASKA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY WATERSHED.PLANS FOR WILMOT CREEK, GRAHAM CREEK, GANARASKA RIVER, AND LOVEKIN, BOUCHETTE POINT, AND PORT GRANBY CREEKS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-043-10 be received; 2. THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority be thanked and commended for its work in preparing the Watershed Plans for Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, the Ganaraska River, and Lovekin, Bouchette Point and Port Granby Creeks; 3. THAT the four Watershed Plans be received and referred to Staff for consideration during the Official Plan Review process; 4. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-043-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: !i Reviewed by: ay Langmai FSCLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, A ing Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer JAS*FL*sn*ah March 18, 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899002 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 In recent years, planners, decision makers and the public have developed a deeper understanding of the cumulative negative impact that our use of the land has on the natural environment that sustains us. This has required a fundamental shift from a focus on protecting individual natural features to protecting the entire natural heritage system and its vital ecological functions. In turn, this has resulted in an increased emphasis on incorporating consideration of the natural heritage system into all aspects of land use planning, from official plan policies through to zoning and site plan and subdivision approvals. 1.2 Watershed planning is currently recognized as one of the most effective mechanisms for the protection, management and enhancement of the natural environment. It uses a holistic approach to managing all aspects of a watershed's natural heritage system, including hydrological resources (groundwater and surface water), terrestrial resources (wildlife habitat and habitat connectivity), aquatic resources and habitat (e.g. fish, streams, wetlands), and the inter-relationships that exist between these resources. Watershed plans are also locally based and therefore reflect, and are responsive to, the unique conditions including human land use,that exist within each watershed. 1.3 Both the Durham Region and the Clarington Official Plans include policies that recognize the importance of watershed planning to the protection and wise management of natural heritage resources, and support the preparation of multi- stakeholder watershed planning studies. The Regional Official Plan, as well as area municipal official plans, require the inclusion of appropriate policies to implement individual watershed plans. 1.4 In 2002, the provincial government, through the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, directed every upper-tier and single-tier municipality to prepare watershed plans for every watershed whose streams originate on the Moraine. In response to this legislative requirement, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA), in partnership with the Region of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and other watershed municipalities, has coordinated the preparation of watershed plans for Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, and the Ganaraska River. In order to provide complete watershed coverage in Clarington, GRCA also prepared a joint watershed plan for three smaller watersheds (Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek, and Port Granby Creek) that arise south of the Oak Ridges Moraine on the Lake Iroquois Plain (see Attachment 1). 2.0 WATERSHED PLANNING PROCESS 2.1 The process for preparing a watershed plan involves eight steps, as follows: Step 1: Scoping Step 2: Characterization of the watershed system Step 3: Setting goals, objectives and working targets Step 4: Developing management alternatives Step 5: Evaluating management alternatives 899003 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-10 PAGE 3 Step 6: Selecting preferred management alternatives Step 7: Finalizing targets Step 8: Developing implementation and monitoring plans. 2.2 Step 1 (Scoping) involves choosing a study area, identifying issues of concern and information gaps, and creating a Terms of Reference for the study. Step 2 (Characterization of the Watershed) entails defining the historical and current conditions of the study area (i.e. the watershed). GRCA completed the scoping exercise and the ABC (Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural) Background Reports for each of the four subject watersheds in 2009. These background reports contain the scientific information and local knowledge necessary for the preparation of the actual Watershed Plans (Steps 3 to 8 of the process). 2.3 A successful watershed planning process is, by necessity, a cooperative process that involves a variety of governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. A Technical Review Committee was created to provide technical assistance to Conservation Authority staff in the preparation of the various watershed plans. Members on this Committee included Clarington Planning staff, Durham Region Planning staff, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the provincial Ministries of the Environment and Agriculture, and Food and Rural Affairs among others. 2.4 Community Advisory Committees were also formed, with membership drawn from interested members of the local community. The role of these committees was to promote awareness of the watershed planning process, to solicit broader public input on issues within each watershed, and to comment on the recommended goals, objectives and management actions in the watershed plans. Opportunities for public and stakeholder input on the watershed studies occurred during 2009, including public open houses in Orono, Newcastle Village and Port Hope. 3.0 OVERVIEW OF THE WATERSHED PLANS 3.1 The Watershed Plans divide the watersheds into eight separate components to facilitate the presentation of information and the discussion of issues, as follows: • Groundwater quantity • Surface water quantity • Groundwater quality • Surface water quality • Aquatic habitat and species • Terrestrial natural heritage • Public health and well-being • Community heritage. 899004 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-10 PAGE 4 3.2 Issues/Opportunities, Goals, Objectives and Management Actions 3.2.1 The discussion of each watershed component was, in turn, divided into a number of sub-categories, as discussed below. 3.2.2 Issues and Opportunities — These are current or future activities and conditions that currently or could negatively impact the watershed. For example, an issue identified with respect to Surface Water Quantity relates to the need to better understand natural flow variations in the various watercourses in the watersheds. 3.2.3 Goal — A goal statement was created for each watershed component to identify a desired outcome to be achieved through the implementation of the watershed plan. For example, the goal for Surface Water is "Maintain and improve the hydrologic function of the watershed". 3.2.4 Objectives — Objectives were created for each goal statement in order to facilitate and achieve the desired goal for the watershed component. All issues and opportunities identified in the Watershed Plan are addressed by the Objective statements. For example, one of the objectives for Surface Water Quantity is "Maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow". 3.2.5 Management Actions — Activities that need to occur were identified under each Objective in order to achieve the goal of each watershed component. Management actions are defined in four categories: Regulations and Planning, Stewardship, Education and Awareness, and Land Acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting are also listed as proposed management actions to assist in understanding how the implementation of the recommendations in the Watershed Plans is influencing the watersheds. The management actions most relevant to the Municipality are those listed under Regulations and Planning, which are primarily policies intended to be incorporated into municipal, Conservation Authority and other agency planning and regulations documentation. To a lesser extent, some of the management actions listed under Stewardship are also applicable to the Municipality — for example, encouraging the adoption of urban land uses that increase groundwater recharge. As well, the Municipality is involved with and supports the Clean Water Healthy Land Financial Assistance Program, and GRCA's stewardship program. 3.2.6 For the most part, the same Goals, Objectives and Management Actions have been identified in each Watershed Plan. These are summarized on Attachment 2 to this report. 899005 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-10 PAGE 5 4.0 CONCLUSION 4.1 The preparation of a Watershed Plan is only the first step in the ongoing process of managing and protecting the resources and ecological functions of a watershed. In order to be effective in achieving its stated goals and objectives, the management actions recommended by the Watershed Plans need to be implemented by the various stakeholders to the watershed planning process, including the Municipality of Clarington. As well as provincial legislation, the policies in the Durham Region Official Plan require the Municipality to incorporate appropriate policies into our Official Plan in order to implement watershed plans. 4.2 It is therefore appropriate that the Watershed Plans for Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, Ganaraska River, and Lovekin, Bouchette Point and Port Granby Creeks be referred to Staff for detailed consideration through the ongoing Clarington Official Plan review process. Staff Contact: Janice Szwarz Attachments: Attachment 1 - Map of Ganaraska Watersheds in Clarington Attachment 2 - Overview of Watershed Goals, Objectives and Management Actions List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority The Municipality of Port Hope The County of Northumberland Durham Region Planning Department 899006 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-043-10 w -1-I O Z H O a a ui g ui LLI zx x o � H a o O N a OC z m Q Z J � W Z O a- O. W W Z~ = `ui W W u 0 0C oc Dav = u O ILU CO Z W W W Q 'o cc O .j�� Z ° Y V uii O � z u W O Q 899007 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-043-10 WILMOT CREEK, GRAHAM CREEK, GANARASKA RIVER, AND LOVEKIN, BOUCHETTE POINT AND PORT GRANBY CREEKS WATERSHED PLANS GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS GOAL 1.0 GROUNDWATER QUANTITY PROTECT AND ENHANCE GROUNDWATER QUANTITY FOR HUMAN USE AND ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS Objective Maintain or enhance groundwater recharge and discharge for 1.1 human use and ecological functions Regulations Map groundwater features and Identify groundwater features not yet known Planning Restrict development within and in proximity to groundwater features Protect groundwater recharge rates Implement future policies recommended within the Source Protection Plan created under the Clean Water Act Set urban infiltration targets Support for current plan review mechanisms Stewardship Increase natural cover in and adjacent to groundwater features Use the natural heritage system as the primary means of protecting groundwater features Enhance and protect groundwater features through best management practices Encourage the adoption of urban land uses that increase groundwater recharge Objective Manage and avoid actions that negatively affect aquifers (artesian, 1.2 shallow and deep) and changes in groundwater flow Regulations Minimize groundwater flow alteration and Planning Minimize and manage artesian and flowing wells Objective Ensure sustainable rates of groundwater use 1.3 Regulations Restrict development needing a Permit to Take Water in groundwater and features Planning Restrict development needing a Permit to Take Water in wellhead protection areas Restrict consumptive water takings 899008 GOAL 2.0 SURFACE WATER QUANTITY MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION OF THE WATERSHED Objective Maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow 2.1 Regulations Map features contributing to natural flows in creeks and Planning Identify features not yet known that contribute to natural flows in creeks Restrict development within and in proximity to features contributing to natural stream flows Limit cumulative hard surfaces within the watershed Development setbacks from watercourses Restrict development needing a Permit to Take Water in features contributing to natural flows Restrict consumptive water takings Require urban stormwater best management practices Limit online ponds and impoundment structures Limit site alterations Direct hydropower infrastructure Support for existing legislation, review mechanisms, and existing program implementation Stewardship Increase natural vegetation using the natural heritage system throughout the watershed, in groundwater recharge areas and to compensate for changes in imperviousness Increase riparian buffers to reduce variability of overland runoff Increase water infiltration, storage and use on individual lots Restore, enhance and protect wetlands Carry out an urban stewardship program to address altered flows caused from stormwater management Increase channel stability using bioengineering in urbanized areas to mitigate erosion caused from altered flows Objective Maintain and improve the level of protection of residents, and 2.2 existing and proposed development from flooding hazards Regulations Limit cumulative hard surfaces within the watershed and Limit online ponds and impoundment structures Planning Stormwater quantity control Support for existing policies and programs Recommendation for a flood recovery program 899009 Stewardship Manage or decommission online ponds to ensure they do not pose a flood hazard risk Implement revegetation to attenuate flood flows (eg. riparian plantings, grass swales and waterways) GOAL 3.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY PROTECT GROUNDWATER QUALITY TO ENSURE SAFE DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES AND TO PROTECT ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS Objective Protect and enhance the quality of groundwater by addressing 3.1 existing pathways and contaminant sources Regulations Ensure wells or boreholes are properly abandoned or maintained and Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment Planning Recommend a septic re-inspection program Implement future policies recommended within the Source Protection Plan Objective Manage the quality of groundwater through the implementation of 3.2 best management practices throughout the watershed Regulations Map highly vulnerable aquifers and wellhead protection areas (where and applicable) Planning Identify areas not yet known that are vulnerable to groundwater contamination Restrict development in highly vulnerable aquifers Implement future policies recommended within the Source Protection Plan Support for existing legislation Stewardship Encourage best management practices within highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas GOAL 4.0 SURFACE WATER QUALITY PROTECT AND IMPROVE SURFACE WATER Objective Manage and enhance rural water quality 4.1 Regulations Set development back from watercourses and "Enhanced" level stormwater quality controls Planning Retrofit existing stormwater control structures Implement municipal salt management plans Support for existing legislation and new and existing programs 899010 Stewardship Decrease and mitigate non-point pollution sources (eg. overland runoff) Enhance, restore and properly manage riparian areas to buffer overland runoff Promote and encourage best management practices to protect water quality Increase natural cover as recommended by the natural heritage system Ensure public space management practices do not negatively impact surface water quality Ensure all public spaces management practices have a set back distance from the stream edge (eg. a natural riparian area) Create and implement a rural stream restoration and stewardship program that will benefit surface water quality Objective Manage and enhance urban water quality 4.2 Regulations Set development back from watercourses and "Enhanced" level stormwater quality controls Planning Implement municipal salt management plans Support for existing legislation and new and existing programs Stewardship Ensure public space management practices do not negatively impact surface water quality Ensure all public spaces management practices have a set back distance from the stream edge (eg. a natural riparian area) Create and implement an urban stream restoration and stewardship program that will benefit surface water quality Objective Create a spills action plan 4.3 Regulations Plan creation: spills action plan and Planning r 899011 GOAL 5.0 AQUATIC HABITAT AND SPECIES PROTECT AQUATIC HABITAT AND SPECIES Objective Protect and restore existing and native aquatic species and 5.1 communities Regulations Recommended policy: adopt the Fisheries Management Plan for the and watershed Planning Support for existing review mechanisms and programs Stewardship Encourage the removal of instream barriers and online ponds Objective Protect and enhance the form and function of instream habitat and 5.2 riparian areas Regulations Map aquatic habitats within the watershed and Planning Identify aquatic habitats within the watershed that are not yet known Restrict development within and in proximity to aquatic habitats Adopt the Fisheries Management Plan for the watershed Support for new programs and existing review mechanisms and policies Stewardship Encourage the creation of instream habitat Erosion control projects Increase natural vegetation in riparian areas GOAL 6.0 TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE MAINTAIN THE NATIVE BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE WATERSHED Objective Reduce habitat fragmentation and promote connectivity 6.1 Regulations Map terrestrial features within the watershed and Identify terrestrial features within the watershed that are not yet known Planning Reduce the impact of development on the natural heritage system and significant features Net gains within the natural heritage system Support for new programs and existing review mechanisms and policies Create a regional Terrestrial Natural Heritage System and Strategy Stewardship Increase the diversity of natural cover using the natural heritage system Increase the amount of natural cover throughout the watershed Increase and encourage sustainable land uses 899012 Objective Maintain, enhance and restore the natural diversity of vegetation 6.2 communities within the watershed Regulations Policy to encourage net gains within the natural heritage system and Support for existing by-laws Planning Objective Maintain, enhance and restore the diversity of species in the 6.3 watershed Regulations Policy to encourage net gains within the natural heritage system and Support for existing legislation Planning Objective 6.4 Mitigate and reduce negative impacts of urban and rural land use Regulations Policy to provide for net gains within the natural heritage system and Create a plan for an urban natural heritage system Planning GOAL 7.0 PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELL-BEING PROMOTE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES IN RELATION TOTHE ENVIRONMENT Objective Manage and improve the environmental quantity, quality and 7.1 social benefits of existing and future public spaces Regulations Increase public spaces and Support existing initiatives Planning Objective Encourage sustainable communities 7.2 Regulations Policy to support an increase in public transportation and Policy to support sustainable development design Planning Support existing initiatives 899013 t ciarjogtoll Leading the REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution M By-law M N/A Report#: PSD-044-10 File #: PLN 15.2.1 and RE 6.1.17 Subject: PORT DARLINGTON HARBOUR COMPANY, EXPROPRIATION OF WEST BEACH LANDS FOR BOWMANVILLE WATERFRONT DISTRICT PARK— OFFER OF SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-044-10 be received for information. �I Submitted by: � Reviewed by: y Langmai , FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu �Actlng Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer F Udf 22 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 899014 REPORT NO.: PSD-044-10 PAGE 2 1.0 REPORT 1.1 A verbal report inclosed session concerning an Offer to Settle, which was received from the Port Darlington Harbour Commission, will be provided by the Acting Director. Staff Contact: Faye Langmaid 899015 • larin n Leadin the way REPORT 8 PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: Report#: PSD-045-10 File #: A2010-0002 to A2010-0006 Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF MARCH 18, 2010 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-045-10 be received; 2. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on March 18, 2010 for applications A2010-0003 to A2010-0006 inclusive and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. 3. THAT Council concurs with Staff that an appeal by the Municipality of the decision made by the Committee of Adjustment on March 15, 2010, for application in A2008- 0002 is not warranted. However, should an appeal be lodged by another party, that Staff be authorized to defend its original position. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Z;je/LangVha_iV(�SLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, g Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer MM/CP/df/ah 23 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899016 REPORT NO.: PSD-045-10 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of the minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are detailed in Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below. DECISION OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR March 18, 2010 Approved in part with A2010-0002 Approve in part with conditions conditions A2010-0003 Approve Approved A2010-0004 Approve Approved A2010-0005 Table Tabled A2010-0006 Approve Approved 1.2 Application A2010-0002 was filed to permit the construction of a detached garage by increasing the maximum permitted height from 4.5 metres to 5 metres (By-law 84-63), by increasing the maximum permitted height from 3.7 metres to 5 metres (By-law 2005- 109) and by increasing the maximum permitted total floor area from 90 square metres to 130 square metres (By-law 84-63 and By-law 2005-109). These increases were being sought to allow the applicant to have a hoist for personal use within the proposed garage as well as storage space above a portion of the garage. This application was tabled at the February 18, 2010 Committee of Adjustment meeting. The Committee was hesitant to make a decision at that meeting without having the opportunity to review a set of detailed drawings for the proposed two-storey detached garage. The Committee tabled the application for up to 90 days to allow the applicant to prepare and submit drawings for Committee's consideration at a future meeting date. Following the meeting, the applicant did prepare drawings that were submitted to Staff and forwarded to the Committee members in advance of the March 18, 2010 meeting. Planning Services Staff recommended approval of the increase in maximum permitted total floor area and denial of the increase in maximum permitted height beyond 4.5 metres. One condition that Staff recommended was that the ceiling height of the second storey storage space within the proposed garage be limited to 1.8 metres. It is the opinion of Staff that the increase in maximum permitted height is not necessary for the hoist and that the intent of the Zoning By-law is to limit the height of accessory buildings. Staffs recommended condition to limit ceiling height on the floor above the garage to 1.8 metres would provide the applicant with space that was suitable for storage however would be too confined to be easily converted into usable space. 899017 REPORT NO.: PSD-045-10 PAGE 3 Committee members held varying opinions regarding the consistency of this application with the general intent of the Zoning By-law. After a lengthy debate, the Committee approved a height increase to 4.75 metres with a maximum ceiling height of 2 metres. The decision of the Committee can be found in attachment 1. Staff are of the opinion that the decision by the Committee to increase the maximum permitted height of the proposed garage to 4.75 metres with the condition that the maximum ceiling height of the floor space above the garage be limited to 2 metres is not consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law. The Oak Ridges Moraine By-law would limit the height to 3.7 metres while Zoning By-law 84-63 was amended recently to reduce the maximum height of accessory buildings. 1.3 Application A2010-0003 was filed to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling by reducing the minimum required exterior side yard setback from.6.0 metres to 5.75 metres. The Committee concurred with Staffs recommendation and approved the application. 1.4 Application A2010-0004 was filed to permit the construction of an (existing) attached deck by increasing the maximum permitted total lot coverage from 45% to 46.5%. The Committee concurred with Staffs recommendation and approved the application. 1.5 Application A2010-0005 was filed following the approval of a severance application to create a separate site for the hotel and for the motel located at 160 Liberty Street South in Bowmanville. On the hotel lands, variances were sought to reduce: loading spaces, parking spaces and required setbacks. On the motel lands, variances were sought to permit the existing motel use, reduced setbacks and landscape area. Comments were received from the Ministry of Transportation indicating that Liberty Street and Duke Street are both designated as Controlled Access Highways. The Ministry's minimum setback from those streets is 14 metres from the property line to any structure, drive aisle or required parking surface. Any parking located within this setback must be surplus. As a result of the Ministry's comments, the Committee concurred with Staffs recommendation and tabled the application for up to 90 days pending further discussions with the Ministry of Transportation. 1.6 Application A2010-0006 was filed to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling (existing) by reducing the required interior side yard setback from 1.2 metres to 1.12 metres. The Committee concurred with Staff's recommendation and approved the application. 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that applications A2010-0003 to A2010-0006 are in conformity with both Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law, are minor in nature and desirable. 899018 REPORT NO.: PSD-045-10 PAGE 4 2.2 Council's concurrence is required with staff's.opinion that an appeal by the Municipality on the decision made by the Committee of Adjustment on March 18, 2010 for application A2010-0002 is warranted; and Council's authorization is required in order to afford staff official status before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend its original recommendation. 2.3 Staff do not consider the variance to increase the height and floor area in keeping with the intent of the By-law. However, as none of the neighbours raised any concerns with the application and the house is a full two-storeys it is anticipated the garage will fit on the lot. Given the limited staff resources relative to the issue at dispute, an appeal by the Municipality of the Committee's decision is not warranted. Staff Contact: Mitch Morawetz Attachments: Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment (March 18, 2010) 899019 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-045-10 • Leading the Way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: DAVID OWENS OWNER: DAVID OWENS PROPERTY LOCATION: 15 VIRTUE COURT, ENNISKILLEN PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 8 FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE NO.: A2010-0002 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT FROM 4.5 METRES TO ,5 METRES (BY-LAW 84-63), BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT FROM 3.7 METRES TO 5 METRES (BY-LAW 2005-109) AND BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TOTAL FLOOR AREA FROM 90 SQUARE METRES TO 130 SQUARE METRES (BY-LAW 84-83 AND BY-LAW 2005-109) DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT FROM 4.5M TO 4.75M (BY-LAW 84-63) AND BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT FROM 37M TO 4.75M (BY-LAW 2005-109) AND; INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED FLOOR AREA FROM 90M2 TO 130M2(BY-LAW 84-63 AND 2005-109) SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) THAT THE CEILING HEIGHT OF THE SECOND STORY STORAGE SPACE WITHIN THE PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE BE LIMITED TO 2M; 2) THAT THE TOTAL GROUND FLOOR AREA OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE DOES NOT EXCEED 95 M2;AND 3) THAT THE PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE IS LOCATED A MINIMUM 4.9M AWAY FROM THE DISTRIBUTION PIPE IN THE SEWAGE SYSTEM, AS REQUIRED BY THE DURHAM REGION HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AS IT MEETS INTENT OF THE OFFICIAL PLANS AND ZONING BY-LAW, IS MINOR IN NATURE AND NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. DATE OF DECISION: March 18, 2010 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: April 7, 2010 899020 • Leading the Way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: 673666 ONTARIO LIMITED/CITY HOMES OWNER: HALLOWAY HOLDINGS LIMITED PROPERTY LOCATION: 94 GOODALL CRESCENT, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 13, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE FILE NO.: A2010-0003 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6.0 METRES TO 5.75 METRES. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6.0 METRES TO 5.75 METRES AS IT MEETS THE INTENT OF BOTH OFFICIAL PLANS AND THE ZONING BY-LAW, IS MINOR IN NATURE AND NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. DATE OF DECISION: March 18, 2010 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: April 7, 2010 899021 • arm n Leading the Way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: JOHN TAYLOR OWNER: JOHN TAYLOR PROPERTY LOCATION: 23 BAXTER STREET, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 16, CONCESSION 1 FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE FILE NO.: A2010-0004 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED DECK (EXISTING) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FROM 45% TO 46.5%. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED DECK (EXISTING) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FROM 45% TO 46.5% AS IT MEETS THE INTENT OF BOTH OFFICIAL PLANS AND THE ZONING BY-LAW, IS MINOR IN NATURE AND NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. DATE OF DECISION: March 18, 2010 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: April 7, 2010 899022 • ar.�n n Leading the Way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: DG BIDDLE & ASSOCIATES LTD OWNER: 1414012 ONTARIO INC. PROPERTY LOCATION: 160 LIBERTY STREET SOUTH, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 11, CONCESSION BF FORMER TOWN OFBOWMANVILLE FILE NO.: A2010-0005 PURPOSE: FOLLOWING THE APPROVAL OF A SEVERANCE APPLICATION TO CREATE A SEPARATE SITE FOR THE HOTEL AND FOR THE MOTEL, THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES ARE SOUGHT FOR CLEARANCE OF THE SEVERANCE AND TO REDEVELOP THE HOTEL SITE: RETAINED LANDS (HOTEL): TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK (DUKE STREET SIDE) FROM 15M TO 7.3M, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5.OM TO 0.2M, TO REDUCE THE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS FROM 2 TO 1 AND TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES ON SITE FROM 126 TO 121. SEVERED LANDS (MOTEL): TO PERMIT THE EXISTING MOTEL USE, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK (DUKE STREET SIDE) FROM 15M TO 14.6M, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5.OM TO 1.OM, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK (BASELINE ROAD SIDE) FROM 10M TO 9.9M AND TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA ON SITE FROM 10% TO 4%. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO TABLE THE APPLICATION PENDING FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION (MTO) FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO 90 DAYS. DATE OF DECISION: March 18, 2010 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: April 7, 2010 899023 • Leading the Way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: INTRACORP PROJECTS LTD. OWNER: INTRACORP PROJECTS LTD. PROPERTY LOCATION: 7 BONS AVENUE, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE FILE NO.: A2010-0006 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING (EXISTING) BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 1.2 METRES TO 1.12 METRES. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING (EXISTING) BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 1.2 METRES TO 1.12 METRES AS IT MEETS THE INTENT OF BOTH OFFICIAL PLANS AND THE ZONING BY-LAW, IS MINOR IN NATURE AND NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. DATE OF DECISION: March 18, 2010 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: April 7, 2010 899024 • arm n Leadin the Wa REPORT g y PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: Report#: PSD-046-10 File #: PLN 34.2.4.3.4 Subject: HERITAGE PERMIT FOR 36 BEECH AVENUE BEECH AVENUE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-046-10 be received; 2. THAT Heritage Permit Application HP2010-01 for 36 Beech Avenue for a two storey board and batten addition to 36 Beech Avenue be approved, with a pediment roofline as shown in the elevations included in Attachment 3 to Report PSD-046-10; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-046-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by#Acinag Reviewed by: n ai FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu, irector, P lanning Services Chief Administrative Officer IL/df 24 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899025 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 In May of 2004 Council approved the preparation of a Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Plan for the Beech Avenue block in Bowmanville. The HCD Plan was based on the legislative requirements of Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act, 2005. 1.2 In May of 2006 Council adopted the Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District Plan and it came into force in June of 2006. 1.3 As part of the Beach Avenue Heritage Conservation District Plan a heritage permit system and Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee were set- up to assist staff with the implementation of the Plan and architectural guidelines. 2.0 HERITAGE PERMIT REVIEW 2.1 For works specified in the HCD Plan property owners obtain heritage permits prior to construction. Council delegated approval for minor applications such as window or door replacement, installation of exterior cladding materials, etc. to the Director of Planning Services through the approval of the HCD Plan. All major applications are to be approved by Council 2.2 The HCD Advisory Committee was established to advise staff on major heritage permit applications. The composition of the HCD Advisory Committee was outlined in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. The Committee includes a representative from the Clarington Heritage Committee, a resident of Beech Avenue, the Executive Director of the Clarington Older Adult Association and a Clarington resident who is a member of the building industry or a design professional. 2.3 Permit applications reviewed by the HCD Advisory Committee are limited to the following areas: • construction of new buildings • additions to buildings • demolition of a portion of a building • demolition of an entire building • relocation of a building on a property • relocation of a building from outside the district • site and park function alterations at Clarington Beech Centre • streetscape improvements including road and/or utility reconstruction/installation 2.4 Demolition proposals are also reviewed by the Clarington Heritage Committee as it is a legislative requirement of the Ontario Heritage Act. 899026 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-10 PAGE 3 2.5' The HCD Advisory Committee reviews the heritage permit applications and provides their comments to staff for consideration. Major applications are then reviewed by Council as the approval authority. The heritage permit application can be approved by Council as submitted, approved with modifications, or denied. The property owner has the right to appeal the decision of Council to the Ontario Municipal Board. 3.0 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 36 BEECH AVENUE 3.1 The property owners of 36 Beech Avenue filed a heritage permit application to construct a two storey board and batten addition to the rear of the building. This house was constructed in the 1920s in a bungalow form. It has Edwardian Classicism elements which include the pediment over the front verandah that is mimicked in the front fagade roof line. 4' I ill � 'yrJl I` Front elevation Side elevation facing the Beech Centre 3.2 Attachment 2 contains the elevation drawings submitted with the application. The owners propose to construct the addition with a standard gable roofline. 3.3 Comments from the Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee include a recommendation that the roofline of the addition be amended to reflect the pediment roof of the original building. The elevation drawings were amended to depict how the building would look if constructed with a pediment roof line (Attachment 3). 3.4 Picture 1 is an example of a building with a pediment roofline on the original house with a gable roof addition in the rear, similar to what is proposed by the owner. In picture 2 is a house undergoing renovations where both the addition and original portion have pediment rooflines. 899027 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-10 PAGE 4 P RIWv'rya�fwti w Picture 1 Picture 2 4.0 STAFF COMMENTS 4.1 The addition proposed by the owner is a board and batten which meets the architectural guidelines of the HDC Plan and the Ministry of Culture's principles for additions to built heritage resources. The addition does not compete with the original building in scale or size and is an excellent example of how heritage homes can be modified so that they are viable residential structures. The proposal meets all of the guidelines of the HCD Plan save and except for the r000fline. 4.2 The owners have indicated they prefer to construct the building addition with a gable roof versus a pediment roof. In addition, they are concerned there may be additional costs to construct a pediment roof line. 4.3 The HCD Plan's architectural guidelines recommend that the roofline of additions complement the original structure. Roof trusses are manufactured specific to the building being constructed, whether they are of a gable design or a pediment design. Staff anticipate that the expense of constructing a pediment roof line versus a gable roof line will be minor or negligible. 4.4 The building addition to 36 Beech Avenue is visible from the street. The purpose of the HCD Plan is to ensure that additions or alterations are sympathetic to the architectural style of the existing homes. 5.0 CONCLUSION 5.1 Staff recommend that the heritage permit application for the two storey board and batten addition to 36 Beech Avenue be approved with a pediment roofline as shown in the revised elevations (Attachment 3). Staff Contact: Isabel Little 899028 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-046-10 13 0 El — K ME�VATION — oa — LXFT 54M FL5VAnoN — 0 — RICK 51M E�LZVA11ON — 191 ICJ — WAR ELEVATION — 899031 Attachment 3 To Report PSD-046-10 LJ.L� — PROW BLF-VATION — (Rldi/slvD mI.INWIMfl - 1. Fr 51M E I VATION - G - RIOW 5117E MrVATION - 899032 luff • n Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution M By-law M Report#: PSD-047-10 File #: RE 16.35 Subject: KAWARTHA PINE RIDGE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD SURPLUS PROPERTY SALE - BOWMANVILLE SENIOR PUBLIC SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-047-10 be received; 2. THAT the Offer from the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board to purchase the Bowmanville Senior Public School at fair market value be declined; 3. THAT the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board be thanked for offering the Bowmanville Senior Public School to the Municipality; and 4. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-047-10 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: li 41h� R eviewed by' y Langmai , FCSLA, MCIP Franklin Wu cting Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer I Udf 24 March 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899033 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.11 The Provincial Ministry of Education dictates the rules and procedures for the sale of surplus school properties within Ontario. In keeping with Ontario Regulation 444/98 (as amended), when a school site is to be sold it must be offered to all other publicly-funded school boards in the area, the Ontario Realty. Corporation, the nearest colleges and university, the upper and lower municipality in which the property is located, and Public Works and Government Services Canada (The Crown in Right of Ontario). If none of these agencies have an interest in the property it is then listed for sale on the open market. 1.2 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has contacted the Municipality in regards to sale of the Bowmanville Senior Public School site at 105 Queen Street, Bowmanville (Attachment 1). The school closed in June of 2007 and has remained vacant since. The building has been secured to deter vandalism. 1.3 The offer from the School Board is included as Attachment 2. It indicates that the property is 4.37 acres and that there is a waterline easement located on the lot in favour of an adjoining landowner.. An appraisal report has been conducted on the property, however, the appraised value has not been released. 1.4 The Municipality has 90 days from the date of the offer (January 21, 2010) to indicate to the School Board any interest in acquiring the property. 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 The various Municipal Departments have been notified of the School Board's Offer, it was also forwarded to the Clarington Library Board for review. All departments have responded indicating they have no identified public use for this site at this time. 3.0 HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES REVIEW 3.1 The Bowmanville Senior Public School is recorded in the Municipality's inventory of built heritage resources as a Heritage Merit structure. The school was originally opened as the Bowmanville High School by the Minister of Education, Hon. Geo. W. Ross, on December 12, 1890. The building was designed by A.A. Post and was constructed in the Richardson Romanesque style of architecture. The school is recorded in Bowmanville:An Architectural and Social History, 1794-1999 and historical records indicate that the structure's original tower was lost in a devastating storm in 1929. Additions were built around the original school in 1954 and 1974. Although its architectural grandeur has been disguised, the school has significant cultural heritage value to the community. 899034 Hnacnmem: F To Report PSD-047-10 U K January 21, 2010 1,1010, !4i Franklin Wu - `° __ —�! MUNICIN is'CLARINGTON Chief Administrative Officer ADMINou I I°r�► :�r,':�OFFICE Municipality of Clarington DISTRICT SCHOOL EIOAR i, 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 File: L05 SIRE Bowmanville Sr PS Re: Offer to Acquire Former Bowmanville Senior Public School Property 105 Queen Street, Bowmanville, ON Tf°S`ces' On November 26, 2009 the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board Diane Lloyd deemed the subject property as surplus to the Board's needs. (Chairperson) The Kawartha Pine Rice;;-: District School Board is offering the subject land at Angela Lloyd fair market value per . Ontario Regulation 444/98 (as amended) of the (Vice-chairperson) Education Act to the following statutory agencies: • Conseil scolaire de c:strict du Centre-Sud-Quest; Cathy Abraham • Peterborough, Victoria, Northumberland & Clarington Catholic District Steven Cooke School Board; Brian Cowie . Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre-Sud; Cyndi Dickson . Ontario Realty Corporation; GorrdooJnGichrist . Durham College; Brad Mills • University of Ontario Institute of Technology(UOIT); Verna Shackleton • Municipality of Clarington; x°y I lifong . Regional Municipality of Durham; and • Public Works and Government Services Canada. Aides Tombs (Student Trustee) Enclosed is a copy of a site plan and a 1938 waterline easement document describing an easement that is located on the subject property in favour of an adjoining landowner. The subject property is approximately 4.37 acres (1.77 ha). W R. (Rusty)Hick Ontario Regulation 444/98 (as amended) indicates that statutory agencies Director°fFd"`ar`°'z have 90 days after the ..fate of this letter to respond. If you do not respond within the 90 day period, we will assume you do not have an interest in the subject land. EDUCATION CENT RE 1994 Fisher Di-iv, P.O. Box 7,190 Aeterborough, Ontario � IC.9J 7A1 Norman J. Breitner, MCIP, RPP Manager of Planning Services (705)742-977 t 705-742-9773 ext 2370 1(87,7),741- t 1-877-741-4577 ext 2370 (toll free) io;) 1-)-J707 f 705-742-7281 - e Norma n_Breitner @kprdsb.ca .w ehrte;'Ui!lU,I;f;72:c�i U[,•i�S.i:? 899037 and an Survey by Ivan B.Wallace Wed 24th Oaober 1999 Ow y u >1- p y QUEEN STREET(ESTABLISHED BY JOHN GRANTS PLAN) 11 MGPKDDWa N 70.04'W W 27235- N 70-W' 30-W DuAS I135.W loaw�uc +a to ¢n rx I I I 3 to 1r£ mw n4Drac t6 '� wrtxocwn eru w.cncrt O W O e„r,re�a � eveaaerl ea �e owe aaw � y +ate lwH,eaar,4ro 8� � .en�u7 { O raw row """" N B 2r NST5 4 132.5-5- 2.9T 'a ins b Wef rtnx wa-teW MltlNar IA OaAw �� eaA.. W cau�uranrA W ^ .ee It AENAITM U ausa `ey- i auvn.4m O F J sr4u > wro Z Y t O � ttb O -MWLpev,re s LOT 12° Ee u ' CONCESSION 1 � $ . reua.uu :A DD�D Deae4 owas 'L $4a �t �. aw,vn rum PART 1,10R-3921 O tvm m oiraua W mew PARTS,10R-2146 aaN+Ax rsaa �— N--W401V 114.9' N 70.27'10-W 149.5 RIGHT-0F-WAY Al DESCRIBED IN INST.No.14293 PARTS,10R-2146 PART 1,4OR-14289 I REGISTERED PLAN 34-1/2 106 - Bowmanville Sr. Site Plan 899038 j .r•s�i,'*eC`h` 'sa �2`a�, '� " w�: 'P`r,.,, r ,x a -v; ,� Ii7D� �smada �anpii3 n 3e r 'a� .4,.'°'1.'"!`�•":*,y'�rAtv.�"' 3�4Y��3�c4 y�..r;i� f. n`' crx, ..E t*e-tC�n� SN!13• .'f � -L,+ yam, - r' c � �.. r ':'i'`' r '?�tqs• �i.'tz �"'k-r�it�ar�'.,.{+ ,'t`si�u°.'�y5i� � � ti z�',� x a _ 'p- 'p t4m�-.�_r p �1.r.. -�, -N�«�� �3*o`-.si,�.': ,•t•'" ` '' F N B ii 1 P SCI rl � �`4 *f'SG?^.st'Yi'�4 "/a�4 Ct�- '� ma t`v.• �-''' � 42.+.shC.� .d'�.„. tv' '74��.x"��+,<-•.a.,_�'^ S x. t �. ;t '�:aa✓�-`rte'�`k,,' `�kY a y 7H HI SCHDO i BOARL"-VS 111.i7r 1ViiMa Or iJ�IaII1G.-{7.Li�i+10 t„ hereinafter cslTed the Grantaz< `, -�a `^�s C �r�.. s _'� vr�� �i•i%`� ate.. �R 'J.IIb'1'lllS ,FX�iXx. L i � 4 � .- - F 1•. L 7� y *K y -F'a- �.`- ✓"Grr w, n>;, r•t � � a �.-.3 ,r� t;9 t r � �y*'r,,.,-�'�1x-,sx.,,s.`r�'"`'g�„r^vj'� $....?'". y"Y'. L -.. i`Nt i-�V� i L� ►7DaN1\D � '' �`,�ie-fe,�#w < I OR ., � ,K.. `s #�` J�u- _f^' .�..� r*Tom•.Sam�'y'�'•*1ir ,x'+ .cis Irv. T.� •ar "�i� St T"�Paa-� t'�--� 4�s F -r.+ �`� -r,c'<rr"t-.,yy+...� '`"'rv'� ..y".`�"�it mss. � xa. 74;, , R, '`".cr,"!•'3s „, s .,? t '"�µ f Wr ?.AS the Grantee fins regneated32ram the Grantor theta>� , •-c� #t<'xs+.5:�,,�. - v right;and privilege-of constrnatSngacross thewland8=of ths '�� �d : ,y s Grantor ea undergrannd�pipe d car water Sram�queea g4enna� 1 _ - At �, � the- So p s<jwneq oy? eei r nenvi3Z,!l�e . . -W �lOwII oa the bine��print _7_t" t`. :.r"' ."`'t ,�Sv-'�ryrvy K.."n.°{��.'.'�".."ks•�r r_?e���_+.��'� •�4s`3�� �. -_: .'S...oi` .° +C.z srT ._ ,''�-'� y *+""��.'i .`°"`•">,- -Y..- t�-r-s�51s``°'' .-..r, -`*�"' dMl QiaAt bas°SgTAed t0 grant the 88� � - 1' `� .cu.`r'r2�1.•� �' .s�,.. r�_ 1+ sT��;r w�W, � r""''��-..��5:.,��,.x* �.� �,t�' �� �•� i `'"�� .,r..y4,F 6 �. _.r •f�"' �4 '`�' ..1.�'ar Yc'r-� r`51::4'� e-rrQ .�,,,,'�'Z•,wt,�,�•'='�' � ^rights and privilege npoa Chet teams and conditions hereinaSter� !' 4i "� f- r. 4 r r ;". "',"•' 04 ,y�i x }}b+ q 7+�-� �,B z'C n ,/��::7 `p""5.kr iJ .c � i,r.— "� r. { S,F. �+!'. y 4 t� `�✓ �?-� '+}�d�_b ,,�`. •''t ezpressedr 'Xir`,k'a�• u. 'a i ,t is.� ✓` :* RN,, * - N0 THEREE''QR�i `�IJ IYt DII�7R$,i�I'�` 1iSfthBtjn DOII r� -,:';` rt _ - "-fte�ta.rsc:* r+- r�-••�,' .rL�z�"�-,��� _. - r;' � Jsiderat34n of oertaiu �aluabie oonsiderations:aa� the sn ���, < Ona I3ollar oiy laArful money oP Canada now pai8rby the"Grantee Fri .7 't '4` -..~ � ^..'l :~ :, ��...k> y!�.r��ax-.x-+•icy `°,6.�,,,�, =!-3G��A"_° '�"�"t: to the Grantor (the receipt whereof pis hereby ac�oirladged 5 � the Grantor does:hereby grant in perpetuity tothe*G.,rt�ante ,.the'.right;privilege and easement.`to cons true t,'maintain:.and _ _V operate in under, through and acrd the lands as .described s y Deed dated' the- eleventh dap of July, 1890, from Elizabeth Eaynes et: al to. the Grantor herein:and_registered in the Registry DSSice�= t for. .the Registry, Didision of the: `Nest Riding of the;County oSY Durhs ym s - R. .z i as 4880'for the Iowa of 3o�aaville and es shown oa the blue pr3at hereto.,attached, .an undergrouaa copper water Lmin ha Ing oY tyro inches and to permit. mater;to rue through the same, TO �. r;EI"nd with the right sea przvzlege to.the servants, agents, wa.a Y: z '. men.andL. employees.of the Grantee :'to. go .on the,:said:-lands t.1' •.. �'{ ...TeQ3 ,y„-..,rte r ag:� -f'".��.i�as:�ee. ��s� ""3..�'u'�`� �3�. _. t ''srt'iti�1, -t' ?{.7a.. :.='`y` .s�,-ws `r-�= �..s�y„r• '� ��, ` --•al" . '3r.•a. -G' -•r: •' . 1—lIP4 get J+r . •z+� aX` Z^Y' �&' �'n' t `� ' �'�` jxa'f ""�S "'Y -' o$ai`b'1eai=4 07 Str •r r„ �..'p'. '.:j.e u." `-�-a r' vy� y, p�9..fat cu' `akwu �'1 �'^ ylYl S"•f' ab.J 'Ye'�• -R$'+'� � lilJ�'a ,•.Yif 8 �' Q r v ,t* r�,,,�.,1.-+.r�, x" .'�c 1 7 , vilege,hereb9„rrcPTL e� 1 sy � *, _y •r- .iC, cs*`h.a }xa,�yx��,, r z,' ec�� �yrP.>;X��rd., '. �r3b ..x•- �..F-- 1=s, r✓s.•eix' --., . ,1i12f -�• `-. y � .. � �lro1ea43n$�t3�e�Wgroud,$l�vel;� 't EO t.'sl TC @I"�i3/ O N..cS:r3'i'`a. r7' ".4�."'-y •c,.• . ,n`*L -,a r•' 1'- --�• s'^�'��'x-?j" `: c. ^2,*Y�j'r'ipy�x'� -�, "s;.,,,,a �•'-.' i�.,y-1�'` '�-�*q,��•a'" '�• ,+n •<'�a`z� pp�� L•O3Id�'t'1.031•" ` 4Y 0- yY'S : . 8 II68$8IIt� t�"'� s vx- ' r r y wa �t � '`° .s. f•• r 1 "r< r ,'.arsr'","•'�°-o ''R�, - ? ' �- ''� '.fi• �'e.. ,,,� " rr e'r+v"". x��a .� a�.v.5'.',e 'i•.e"� � _- �'- `."`,,.-c_y `�z r� •--� ,.--3-s '" +x-- it"` ` � -C `'�.�'-•. P,. r `✓`.x TIER-"'^;; "' .r'-aJ,..a �s" 3-i+^ fint "a-,cac.. a. a.bs +xws^••: •� r for-T oauseci itsorporate��K than t een• l *+ t-`»" 2_7.,, r.-„• --••uK ' 7c�'�'.# Y-a-Fyne Y. �.- a2 '' -:rY�` "� �'1:�t���F�''�s8 may" "i.K.• � �.."�yy ��yykyy.� -y`",�,�y� "�aP6rrti"" O�Sicers ony its beaeZP' �F a•^�-•� ""��, Y `°'� -4 n � t�.�-�3* s �''` � z �::r'c3.4 A'�s,k''•� r a� fhJ i�x x� arra.a< z:ff"'"`i 3 ,�,r�- �r<`s� •4 r +' r � v. t '^.2 "Y-"`�-i2'r >{. S�.sLl+.r' :'�R,+,..,4v'S'xl S 3r"i• �T�rr�a �wsy 45�.."+�,i -: ..;T .. ✓ F i� c r ru '� r`F't`�' C-uE.' .fit i.7-'.'..zu. tr..,� t x s.ts' a'Lar 5,{a•�":` �.-7b+Si,s,r•t'F��E�.�'�.1t� .2 ` ��y�.. .A tr✓ Lf .!(, 4 t >'+(�JC r`1'� !y� Y .,'s y .C'a.+` W III. ,3-"• v.+ l a'-'-Y'��'•;�"�t c. ,C- '''YS'�rr:•,T .,c P✓ '' yyF.a, �r,'r +s`^ ! r- 'r'z4:,•.e die sr'Ta�.. .i� err x�IA _. .�'4.- � rav«.,.x-s'--a+�'.,:,,,.....y+•i+3� � �+..< s.�--r„aer.-�,.t'°^-r�"' F•-xr�^_ t-••,-. '� t+' 1 hwv r c+�rvnnr�4. -t�11 ^1� �a�r m�fxi�Irve. � MMtM:�+'.SQM SOM aIF,'��.a�'rlv ^,. �,y'��`s.,.,:- c 5�'r'.1. v,• '°`", r£.uzx'^"z"4 .•.c: .F, '-6 `e' .+nis.: ..-, t� V .�,,!' r �Y` "X,'er.�'s T� da•'t'' rzl r7L+ar"7+-.•ci�3t' e•g�"'"t'�l^f,<, r z ""ti ,�r 'y,[;� `°"toy * a- �S"`' v-cst'7,2•tars"'d s -E,�. ,�- '�•`x M-1 •�✓s'*.;t . �r�T,-,..e�3,. k •e.Pi'v-.. `Yzsr �''..F rF-1i Mae '�`S ag..or-' .�•r3`T1' re7 �`• w ''r.. - {`.c--•,'4.'xk'Sb z ,i^ ,�, f� z NM r+;'Y"�.ai•a •isF•- 4v •i• 'Y' I" IE `�x —r,T+ r r� h•'C- �"`-�-•.•r -^e s t°.���'�"'� �sr' .q- - s ? r� :rs,,,r-k- '` "' '' -,d'�. �a�`r+.',' u'1,,F,��"1't'"x �F,.`r''" a,. �.:� rh G 3.. - � '� -`+ .i•'-._ �ayi'xz'. ,'1'; °:w '*` •N •••�•V'rs Kw•: I x••JF "'iF; ` *-i '^'' ^J IW� .Td ..b•F- z4 7or�itaS.+.'.' >i�t•a •••� •w w .. • - t' t f` r`'Syr ,r<f" .f� �* s r: -�%3..'•~r_+-•� +LsYY`,t- ..,A�..-.L�,•.. - ,w -rax w 'Y 7'�-�'FS� ak. �.`�y.,t'yv��tru}.. ���3 a "`�+o-e,5s• y� � ,i�"'. If+,� � -�,�a.�. F.. t•'-zp a'z .�rw'��• � .� �"••4k.. Vim- ,.:r^ �W�-a ��- 'tk. �- !( `^'•c �,,..x' ycu^'yJ'•r"L'.a7-aa.>ZL3�ty�y _.+ f' .w•k• �� �3°�r 'r"S,, mac- ,�y"'s'''�'��i�`v",,���"3'r�i xi c--�`�.•�.K^�',a r�,t�i �'�aG�' ;�'?'^+�'.s s✓'�'� a.�r �rac'7a''�'�_��agq " ">ti•-�'r„f- a;± :r '��:.s.r'u n„ �''icY��,� �.s'� ��",�y^'"r�,�Fa-.t�, ,,,tai`. `-t "'�•.* ,;.,.'g a �?mx�w•. �� '""3-'..;ar'4...«'r-�.',.• � �' �,� ,�E-`•v- %r:..a,� -°t -..s' ,• ' y- „„ _ �b • •� N � xfr x c�z } scs r� �zX� � ,`"''"` y. •r t', ' •` �y ' ' "` '••r"''.s r' n � .yacy„ ir,' �” •��••f^ y';JxZ.�''r�'�`- ,ys.'4recrj'. `tk".. �.`Y'." a. 'r�c "•a"-'.t�` �t' ?x.3 '4•tr�•rV♦ S.s�Wa.w-G-s .t+:. .fy !d^ i�"r ^"r"` `r r`t 'rz '" +e�. 41c 4• �*� ';�4 �t7.,�x�+�`�,�„2��� rn.��cic� �-�(�YI "`-` •�:r, �c, ,�v �'t�'',��2�`'�'''�`Ts��''r'�" .a��`' �'�' Lam.._.�•rte r.��- �`'s' s a ,>t` . -'�`; ��.r, ...�,a,}rJ,l, z>K���za��+�'{e� -t��. �>-�'�sr����•�^'� --x.3'�3' t��s-.ey�x; xz*q-K.s. � -` ''�Z'-r�l ���.•�- e".£"�"'�-�it+ '-+.'� w-"a.�1..r`�ti•� ''c3.,� `t- ��.,,.3`+a' >'- �+r'ia�-Yx��'n:�"- 'S- .. �„_,$„��,,a, t„ .t y �..c;"x'''z-is s=t.�mr r„ r .i x v.�✓'7MSZ ., X.,�„ ,t rs-.�. "y`S�'-f ;4 t ,Yr - a ,� .,y.:�r:�-r„ .r,.r� z•r: k,� , .. f 'r ,..,.. , •.c:-a �. q �•`�".,�•Y'_',�. -;�.t`�?a,- i�,...,l "� a -�, c• arca..l-•`�''- �. ty, " � a al' .s.t7 lr ..+••m z 4 d' rr• t..'fr:�rr '3a"""I?K. ,. iYa�i�' _ '�." • M. „Z- may`iAYrt I.N. P- .FS YG' t 3-t S.a`�"'�p+ "�•r "1- Y23- t �r,r- ,�, r - �•.: r�mateyc i-•+r"•,.-"t's•n'x b'eAl v' i a,�' l ` 1- 1•�.�r `{'•5�x,.N et' Sri"'a.,�-°"'' -las�' Sre�firza7•,.YF s-p�.,a"�s�t ,-f v �,k'lo.�^ t»53�-'+�.�'a��'rpx 7=+���,6`:.r`��r�"�t�`,y. �7'n'�'1.��. «� ;y � •-�i• gt-...�y,.ac „ter t"�Y+sf svA'� .s.'� i',�a ''��a��. xs 4.�CJ� ,.F"�{ aF f-L.� .�-itl"`+cY,�1'��?�,r ," _ �:��,�•aL. tia ^.r.� 's...r.� c� Fpm �k.-r •rPY�.3 ->3.� rarsr�+_..,.�."WC-� + .� ,�+�,rn��.k� .�. �. .�... .t- .xF'a 3-°°•'z7'�,Y � . 'r.� a x r '^�' J Y G <e a,,,. t • �3' ns r<-.<,,;,_ .r" xa_ � . i.�yxx•e yt,. ..+u s i ,�.�r .'r c��, .�'•.,--,f'%'� -i' •w r^ ��`'S 3'2 -tail. a 's''S.a.� �`"-3--s-•4,�i..•»^+� r'� y3yc• � �� ui w,e.. rn"tll^ 'E..�r '•"r'"^�r��'�Y>'�'S"'sc tr x�'�'rr'?",?�ri.!- +€w��-�}�',� a- '�'.y"`�.s..•4��L.!c'��w?•��s. - u'• �- ;K� s.•a'�°r•'" �, -�`w ��"��,'�'.*.c+-'ow.-`�'^'��`%.�i S•v �s`rte'`_„o,:,.a-�4�'t �n'�.,z- � �'�"�'"'f`.r .�.r�1. �s� �������'.".".� '_ '"''� ✓�.c5fi`,p� 4+"w 's �x f ''s•.a�•y a C ',.^ ms'A' x.z-.pia- sue_,� �z- c.y -- �: �- • '�'K+i'i�.�j�f� ~` ? Mv �,-�-. -� ��"-•sue'"'"`"� � ,.r-.�%°-�+�' C-a, ,� �,g. #s r^ s,, �3�.�,�`''x�z,.. Y'��k.� , �.� r�^ ?.•�R" aa �,a Y. , '�v 'Y'�' '3'-R.v,•• y-a'•u,}-�'�: r1 .•. Y"�,.. F t z ,i r � rlx r-5v .+,s � r•.�-.c*a�e'�+-,.-e--ry�„�`•.i cv h JJ-S-l1.lSyl. at ..t Y ,s .fir �-,�...t• s ,3-s "a t 11 r y MO.zay a,. gcr < t n jl' r. •, �'� xk TAY ��..-'f.-.. -rte"a�"+'zii".,�*'t-.5'�,� � ,_•�'-'�"',�,. Z.+ ' k o t _` _ n t� �•� �' +<'.`��./y�f7�it � .� --+,«} � t � i ,s,, a,s-. t � .y�.>c�iLL _,•,T:-,.zZ,+ 7 ,�; z 4,,, T r ..ayo c� 2 'r• •+e` "'A+:' a OAa '�.�'� } � ,.L�.ys xr �' y� 'sc '��♦ a t N, n z '�. .3-�"`..t�,f,N "` �. ,•-• as ..r s� "+a s.;4�! ��i i -r - r`"go y:.-rte. '�..' �. ur s It ,Zoi 12 Gars 1, 7w�sr�p _ �:sA�haa 4� �• _ �, ,Goarrfy D�s�-fic�,�'/S'ax�in-Ta�v�afBo�vnsaiv�i// 4 t t r� t r { K� � s .Nli?. a' �p"✓ts��',I't-�'�v�,..s`-�•,;} r___ r j x,.c�.�r.k •e„ .��fik, a �{.iz �° b},� � _ - K t,. •z` ,t ,.�'OW�'lA.^r L���pD�15'Y: S(T{R. �. : �+li?S� N. 'r _+— �� � f•�"- '` �-.. ��V i1-iiM'�w -.cy., J� , - '��, R i , ClarjRVOR REPORT Leading the Way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, March 29, 2010 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-010-10 File #: By-law#: Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR FEBRUARY, 2010. Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-010-10 be received for information. Submitted by: c Reviewed by: AS. Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC*RP*bb March 10, 2010 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILL , ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-1824 901 REPORT NO.: EGD-010-10 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of FEBRUARY 2010, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2010 2009 BUILDING NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF %CHANGE OF CATEGORY PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE 2010-2009 Residential 61 $12,910,844 17 $4,555,280 183.4% Industrial 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Government 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Commercial 2 $727,900 2 $45,000 1,517.6% Institutional 1 $8,886,600 1 $20,000 44,333.00/c Agricultural 0 $0 1 $111,480 N/A Demolition 1 $0 0 $0 N/A TOTAL 65 $22,525,344 21 $4,731,760 376.0% YEAR TO DATE 2010 2009 BUILDING NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF %CHANGE OF CATEGORY PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE 2010-2009 Residential 97 $19,111,433 33 $6,419,083 197.7% Industrial 0 $0 1 $120,000 N/A Government 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Commercial 7 $1,164,400 4 $722,447 61.2% Institutional 5 $9,104,400 3 $13,737,560 -33.7% Agricultural 3 $301,500 2 $151,480 99.0% Demolition 3 $0 6 $0 N/A TOTAL 115 $29,681,733 49 $21,150,570 40.3% 902 REPORT NO.: EGD-010-10 PAGE 3 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: Owner/Applicant Construction Type Location Value ALDERGROVE ESTATES INC. Commercial Rental Units(2 258 KING EAST STREET, $627,900 Story Res/Com Bldg) BOWMANVILLE ALDERGROVE ESTATES INC. Rental Apts/Common Areas 258 KING EAST STREET, $680,400 BOWMANVILLE KAWARTHA PINE RIDGE School 195 Bons Avenue $8,886,600 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD BOWMANVILLE 903 REPORT NO.: EGD-010-10 PAGE 4 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of"FEBRUARY" and "YEAR TO DATE". Dwelling Unit Type"FEBRUARY"2010 Dwelling Unit Type"YEAR TO DATE 2010" 5 5 Apartment 6 Apartment 6 10% Townhouse 7% Townhouse 9% 12% Semi- Detached r ' 6% 2 { 38 55 Semi- Single le Sin Detached � r 4% ..._tetached � - Detached 74% ,, 78% Single Detached 38 ;P Single Detached 55 ■Semi-Detached 2 ■Semi-Detached 4 Vx Townhouse 6 �N,'Townhouse 6 M Apartment 5 ;W Apartment 5 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of "FEBRUARY" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. Historical Data for Month of ! Historical Data"YEAR TO DATE" "February" $35,000,000 _. _.._.._....... .......___.____..._.._ $25,000,000 - -- --- $30,000,000 __..___.___—_..._._...._.._....._._. $20,000,000 ___.__.. ..._..._.__ _ _.._._.__ $25,000,000 ... $15,000,000 $20,000,000 .. _ a................. .............................. ..........---_................_..._.._.._..._............._... $15,000,000 ........._.......... .......................... ............. ................ $10,000,000 .........._.._ __........._............... $10,000,000 ................ _........-I..................... ..........._................... ............... $5,000,000 . ..__ ...... ____........ l $5,000,000 ................... ..........................I.......... .........................._._...... ._..........._. o ............... i $ 50 .................. _............... 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 .......................................................................................................................................................................; ........................................................... ............................................................................................................I......_.... Value $22,525,344. $4,731,760 $6,340,279 Value l $29,681,733 $21,150,570 $18,237,372 ........................ .... ......_. .... ..............................................................._.............................................i �..........................ti............................................................_.............................._............._..................._._...._............_........................_..... 904 REPORT NO.: EGD-010-10 PAGE 5 PERMIT REVENUES 2010 2009 February Year to Date February Year to Date PERMIT FEES $ 176,484 $ 229,662 $ 31,591 $ 137,637 INSPECTION SERVICES 2010 2009 February Year to Date February Year to Date Building Inspections 296 606 381 707 Plumbing & Heating Inspections 358 767 457 926 Pool Enclosure Inspections 0 0 1 4 TOTAL 1 654 1,373 839 1,637 NUMBER OF NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS 2010 2009 February Year to Date February Year to Date Single Detached 38 55 10 14 Semi-Detached 2 4 4 4 Townhouse 6 6 0 0 Apartments 5 5 0 0 TOTAL 1 51 70 14 18 905 REPORT NO.: EGD-010-10 PAGE 6 RESIDENTIAL UNITS HISTORICAL COMPARISON 2010 YEAR: (to end of 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 AREA February) Bowmanville 30 98 340 451 609 307 587 468 345 312 188 Courtice 34 112 134 82 126 241 173 180 133 129 231 Newcastle 2 24 60 77 84 202 191 123 131 76 110 Wilmot Creek 2 9 30 16 15 15 25 29 38 24 19 Orono 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 Darlington 1 6 10 6 7 14 15 13 17 47 102 Clarke 0 11 5 11 12 13 10 16 15 9 17 Burketon 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Enfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Enniskillen 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 5 7 Hampton 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 1 1 Haydon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kendal 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 Kirby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leskard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Maple Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Mitchell Corners 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Newtonville 0 5 7 2 2 4 5 3 3 0 3 Solina 0 5 0 6 3 3 3 3 1 1 0 Tyrone 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 9 3 0 TOTALS 70 273 593 655 861 802 1,015 843 701 609 679 906 Clarington REPORT EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution #: By-law#: n/a Report#: ESD-004-10 File # n/a Subject: MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORT— FEBRUARY 2010 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report ESD-004-10 be received for information. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Gordon Weir, AMCT, CMM111 ranklin Wu, Director Emergency & Fire Services Chief Administrative Officer GW/tw CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 1101 REPORT NO: ESD-004-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Report ESD-004-10 covers the month of February and is intended to provide Council with relevant, timely information on the activity of the Emergency and Fire Services Department. 2.0 COMMENT 2.1 The Department responded to 262 calls during this period and recorded total fire losses of$175,500. Attachment 1 to Report ESD-004-10 is a breakdown of call responded to. Attachment 2 to Report ESD-004-10 is an explanation of the different types of responses. Attachment#1: Activity Report Attachment#2: Description of Types of Responses 1102 Attachment#1 to ESD-004-10 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT PERIOD: FEBRUARY 1, 2010 00:00:00hrs - FEBRUARY 28, 2010 23:59:59hrs RESPONSE TYPE REPORT FIRE STATIONS 2010 2009 RESPONSE STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION THIS TO TO SAME TO TYPE 1 2 3 4 5 PERIOD DATE DATE% PERIOD DATE FIRES EXPLOSIONS 3 3 0 1 0 7 19 3.8% 8 19 OVERPRESSURE RUPTURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 EXPLOSIONS PRE FIRE CONDITIONS 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 1.2% 2 7 BURNING 2 0 1 0 0 3 4 0.8% 0 0 (controlled) FALSE FIRE 8 0 1 0 0 9 33 6.6% 35 74 CALLS COALLS FALSE 11 3 6 0 1 21 45 9.0% 6 47 PUBLIC HAZARD 4 3 1 0 1 9 23 4.6% 10 24 CALLS RESCUE CALLS 21 5 2 7 2 37 71 14.3% 33 94 MEDICAL CALLS 84 17 9 24 3 137 264 53.0% 149 315 OTHER RESPONSES 11 3 2 1 1 18 33 6.6% 19 30 TOTALS THIS PERIOD 146 34 22 33 8 243 498 100.0% 262 611 TO DATE 278 55 39 107 19 498 THIS PERIOD 139 36 16 63 8 262 LAST YEAR TO DATE LAST 323 81 45 142 20 611 YEAR 1103 DOLLAR LOSS REPORT THIS PERIOD $175,500 2010 TO DATE $615,200 THIS PERIOD $237,100 2009 TO DATE $294,800 APPARATUS RESPONSE REPORT FOR THIS PERIOD STATION 1 PUMPER SCAT PUMPER TANKER UTILITY AERIAL RESCUE 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 THIS PERIOD 246 104 124 10 2 0 3 3 TO DATE 501 211 245 21 2 0 13 9 STATION 2 PUMPER TANKER 2 2 THIS PERIOD 35 35 0 TO DATE 61 59 2 STATION 3 PUMPER TANKER UTILITY ATV 3 3 3 THIS PERIOD 17 14 2 1 0 TO DATE 43 33 7 2 1 STATION 4 PUMPER PUMPER TANKER Aerial 4 44 4 4 THIS PERIOD 76 74 1 0 1 TO DATE 184 176 5 0 3 STATION 5 PUMPER TANKER 5 5 THIS PERIOD 11 9 2 TO DATE 24 20 4 385 TOTAL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS FOR THIS PERIOD 813 TOTAL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TO DATE-2009 1104 Attachment#2 to ESD-004-10 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT DESCRIPTION OF TYPES OF RESPONSES Fires and Explosions: Instance of destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gases which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss. Overpressure Rupture/Explosion: An explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire. Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking — smoke or steam, lightning, fireworks. Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Calls: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious/prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by person CO (carbon monoxide) False Calls: A call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency— no CO leak Public Hazard Calls: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural Gas, Propane, Refrigerant, Miscellaneous/Unknown, Gasoline or Fuel, Toxic Chemical, Radio—active Material, Power Lines Down, Arcing, Bomb, Explosive Removal, Standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or Other Public Hazard. Rescue Calls: A call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. Vehicle Accident, Building Collapse, Commercial/Industrial Accident, Home/Residential Accident, Persons Trapped in Elevator, Water Rescue, or Water/Ice Rescue. Medical/Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from Asphyxia, Respiratory Condition, Convulsions, Epileptic, Diabetic Seizure, Electric Shock, Traumatic Shock, Heart Attack, Stroke, Drug Related, Alcohol Related, Cuts, Abrasions, Fracture, Burns, Person Fainted, Nausea and pre-hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, call cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered 1105 Clai 11 REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: N/A Report#: CLD-004-10 File#: Subject: URBAN "BACKYARD" CHICKEN FARMING RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-004-10 be received; 2. THAT the request to amend the Exotic Pet By-law, By-law 93-161, to allow for raising chickens on non-agriculturally zoned lands be denied, and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD-004-10 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: X it Reviewed by: Patt ar , CMO Franklin Wu, unicip Clerk Chief Administrative Officer PLB/CAG CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1301 REPORT NO.: CLD-004-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND By-law 93-161, being a by-law to prohibit and regulate the keeping of certain animals within the Municipality of Clarington was enacted by Council on October 12, 1993. Section 4(a) establishes the restriction of only allowing the keeping of chickens on lands zoned Agricultural (A). On November 23, 2009 Council considered correspondence requesting an amendment to By-law 93-161 to permit the keeping of chickens in urban areas within the Municipality of Clarington. Council referred the correspondence to the Municipal Clerk, the Director of Planning Services and the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington for comment. 2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 Staff undertook research of this matter of urban "backyard" chicken farming, including contacting approximately 20 municipalities, and seeking input from a variety of publications, the Clarington Animal Advisory Committee and the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington. Appendix 1 to this Report is a summary of the responses from municipalities within Ontario. 2.2 In Ontario, the only municipalities that we are able to determine permitted chickens to be raised in backyards in urban areas are the Cities of Niagara Falls, Brampton and Oshawa. It is worthy to note, however, that Oshawa has indicated that when their current by-law was written, chickens were not prohibited in error. They advise that they are currently reviewing their Responsible Pet By-law and expect that chickens will, once again, be prohibited in urban areas. 2.3 The City of Vancouver is currently reviewing the issue. In March 2009, under the direction of Council, staff drafted a guideline governing the keeping of backyard hens. Essentially this guideline provides for: • Amending the by-law to permit a limited number of hens • Establishing standard size and location of hen enclosures • Establishing coop features and basic care for the hens including food, water, shelter, ventilation, veterinary care, and essential behavours • Requiring pest control, sanitation standards, and biosecurity requirements • Impoundment, enforcement and other regulations • Mandatory registration with the Animal Services on-line registry • Prohibiting backyard slaughter of hens • Prohibiting the sale of hens and eggs This matter is still under review with the City of Vancouver, and as such, backyard chickens are currently prohibited in urban areas. 2.4 The City of Toronto currently does not permit backyard chickens, despite pressure from a few select residents. As of last June, the City of Toronto was 1302 REPORT NO.: CLD-004-10 PAGE 3 considering a pilot project, although at that time, the pilot had neither been defined nor implemented. 2.5 Staff met with the Clarington Animal Advisory Committee and discussed this matter in detail. Some members were very much opposed to the concept and others supported the concept, in theory. The Committee passed the following resolution: WHEREAS, in theory, it is possible that there are some responsible people who would be willing to raise poultry; and WHEREAS the geographic landscape and availability the for organic poultry and eggs in Clarington provide viable options for the residents of Clarington; and WHEREAS there is a lack of a regulatory control in this respect; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Animal Advisory Committee believes that the Municipality of Clarington is not ready nor prepared to permit the keeping of backyard chickens in urban, non- agriculturally zoned areas within Clarington. 2.6 Staff met with the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington and the owners of a local egg farm to discuss this matter and to seek their input on the arguments put forth by the requester in her correspondence. While the members remained open to the concept of backyard farming and acknowledged that the "odd" chicken here and there in the urban communities within Clarington should not pose a problem per se, they raised a number of concerns should urban backyard chickens be permitted throughout the Municipality. Their concerns were as follows: 2.6.1 Predators —The keeping of chickens in backyards would attract predators such as raccoons, coyotes, foxes, etc. Additionally, it may attract more vermin such as mice and rats. 2.6.2 Disposal — Chickens lay for about 300 days. Once the chicken no longer lays, or when an individual loses interest, the disposal of the chickens would need to be regulated. 2.6.3 Lack of regulatory control —The Egg Farmers of Ontario (EFO) standards are enforced by the Canadian Food Drug Agency (CFDA) inspectors for commercial egg operations. There are no regulations governing "backyard" chicken operations to protect the community as well as the chickens. 1303 REPORT NO.: CLD-004-10 PAGE 4 2.6.4 Health —With the lack of regulatory control, there is a potential for spread of disease. (This issue will be discussed in more detail under section 2.7 of this report.) Chickens purchased/raised for commercial operations are vaccinated to reduce health risks. There is a potential for increased health risks when chickens are not vaccinated. 2.6.5 Noise— Chickens cluck and roosters crow. Depending on the density of the urban area, the noise from the chickens could/would quite reasonably become an issue for area residents. 2.6.6 Odour—While a single chicken or two should not produce a significant odour that would impact neighbours, depending on the density of the urban area and the degree to which the owner maintains the property the odour could/would quite reasonably become an issue for area residents. 2.6.7 Liability— Chickens are not generally friendly and should a chicken break free of the owner's property, they are extremely difficult to catch. The owner would be liable for any injuries or damages. The Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington passed the following resolution at their January 14, 2010 meeting: AACC does not support the keeping of livestock on non-agricultural properties 2.7 The Clarington Animal Services Officers, our in-house experts of animal-related activities within our community, have raised several concerns, the majority of which were raised by our Agricultural Advisory Committee (as detailed above in this Report), including predators, noise, odour, waste management, disease control, and strays. Clarington Animal Services currently comprises of one part-time and four full-time officers as well as one part-time clerical support staff person who provide the following services to our community: enforcement of animal related by-laws, sheltering of strays, adoptions, and public education. Animal Services governs primarily domestic animals (ie dogs and cats), but may also provide advice and recommendations pertaining to wildlife. At no time has Animal Services become involved in livestock related matters, with the exception of horses at large. Existing Animal Services resources would be insufficient to regulate backyard chickens. Staff would require additional training, accommodations would have to be acquired/built to house and keep stray chickens, and additional staff would be required to handle the increased workload of accepting calls, undertaking investigations, conducting inspections and routine enforcement activities. 1304 REPORT NO.: CLD-004-10 PAGE 5 2.8 Staff contacted the Region of Durham Environmental Health Division for feedback respecting backyard chickens and related community health concerns. The Region advised they currently have no existing regulations. The Manager of Health Hazards advised that should backyard chickens be permitted in urban areas they would anticipate receiving calls regarding odours, disposal of the birds, noise, vermin and blood (should there be a killing of the bird or by the bird). She further clarified though, that the only health-related matter that they would become involved in would be involving the blood. Additionally, the Manager provided links to various resource information regarding diseases and viruses relating to birds/chickens which the spread of is a concern. These include, but are not limited to the Avian influenza, exotic Newcastle disease, Mereks' disease, histoplasmosis, salmonella, and citicosis. 2.9 The CFDA is a regulatory body that, along with the EFO, regulates commercial egg producing operations. Standard regulations are set and enforced to ensure the protection of the chickens and the eggs, as well as humans either coming in contact with the eggs and chicken farming operations and those consuming the eggs. Staff contacted the CFDA for access to any regulations set for "backyard" chickens. The CFDA website does provide a "how to" on prevention and detection of diseases in backyard flocks and pet birds. They did not, however, have any regulations regarding the keeping of the flocks. The EFO is an independent, self-governing farming organization whose mandate is to provide consumers with a guaranteed supply of safe, high quality eggs at the most reasonable prices possible. The EFO developed a number of programs and practices to ensure production of safe, high quality eggs. These include an approved Code of Practice for Laying Operations (covering cage size, lighting, ventilation, water and feed, waste removal, and pest control), mandatory bacteria testing of the laying operations, standardized safety and quality programs and regular on-farm inspections. The EFO confirms that these regulations do not extend to private "backyard" chicken operations. Through contacting the EFO, staff also spoke with Dr. Mike Petrik, DVM, Poultry Veterinarian who authored urban egg farmer: top ten list of chores on behalf of the EFO. Issues raised by Dr. Petrik primarily deal with hen health, hen welfare, egg quality, and consequently human health. Through ignorance or a lack of understanding, the health of the poultry is often compromised whether it is from inappropriate protection from the elements and predators or lack of nutrition due to poor diet. Dr. Petrik further stated that he concurs with the issues raised by our Agricultural Advisory Committee but believes none of them to be insurmountable if there were a regulatory body to maintain a registry and to enforce regulations. 1305 REPORT NO.: CLD-004-10 PAGE 6 CONCLUSION A select few residents of Clarington have expressed an interest in keeping backyard chickens and claim it to be safe, educational, environmentally responsible, natural and fun. With the exception of a few select municipalities in Ontario, the keeping of chickens within urban areas is generally prohibited. 82% of Clarington is zoned Agricultural, and this geographic landscape, therefore provides an option for those residents wishing to participate in livestock activities. Research of this matter indicates that if chickens are permitted in backyards in urban areas, it must be regulated in order to manage noise, odour, conditions, and to mitigate the transmission of disease. Animal Services resources are currently maximized and we are, therefore, not able to expand our services. Currently, within the Municipality of Clarington there are several organic egg suppliers. As well, many of our local farms offer educational programs. For these reasons, it is recommended that the request to amend the Exotic Pet By-law to permit the keeping of chickens in urban areas be denied. Interested Parties: Emily Pillinger Larissa Watson Brenda and Ron Metcalf Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Clarington Animal Advisory Committee Egg Farmers of Ontario Dr. Mike Petrik, DVM 1306 Appendix 1 to Report CLD-004-10 7 O m 0 LL U W N O m U N U _j � (n Z 2 Population 578,041 1,650,455 336,539 46,000 82, 184 900, 000 12, 110 90,000 700,000 combined Do you allow chickens No No No No Yes No No No— No on lands other than exception those zoned miniature Agricultural? chickens class like pigeons. Do you have a by-law? Yes—2002 If so, how old is it? Do you do inspections No—only on on the properties of complaint people who have chickens? Are permits issued? No Who enforces this? By-law services What percentage of Only a few time is spent on this? complaints in 2009— mostly dealing with chickens not being fenced in. Is there an issue with No the poop? If yes, how is it dealt with? Do you have a No— poundkeeper? Humane Society If chickens not Yes. They have No (about 2 No No A few No Unknown Unkown allowed, is there drafted a policy calls in last requests pressure from the which will be 6 years) but not public to allow them? presented to many council in 2010. Appendix 1 to Report CLD-004-10 O X � 4 °-' o a m M CM c �O n ` O ;Z N p '(a U = O Y E m � = a m E Population 120, 800 32, 000 111, 184 60-70K 152, 000 Do you allow chickens on No(a couple are No No No Yes—but lands other than those zoned grandfathered) in error Agricultural? Do you have a by-law? If so, 1996 how old is it? Do you do inspections on the No properties of people who have chickens? Are permits issued? No Who enforces this? No one What percentage of time is Deal more spent on this? with enquiries and advised they will not be permitted in the future Is there an issue with the No poop? If yes, how is it dealt with? Do you have a oundkee er? 2 If chickens not allowed, is No No No A few Just there pressure from the public requests enquiries to allow them? real) Clarington REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: Report#: CLD-008-10 File#: Subject: APPOINTMENT OF PRIVATE PARKING OFFICER RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-008-10 be received; 2. THAT the By-law attached to Report CLD-008-10 be forwarded to Council for approval; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD-008-10 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: P tt' Ba ,v4, CMO Franklin Wu, Municipal Clerk Chief Administrative Officer PLB*LC CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1309 REPORT NO.: CLD-008-10 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 98 King Street West Bowmanville is a commercial property owned by Angelina and Dominick Forsellino. The property contains approximately 35 parking spaces. Mr. Forsellino has called the Municipality on several occasions to report vehicles parked on his property without his permission. These vehicles are often merchants and customers from the surrounding area including the flower shop to the east of his property which shares a small portion of the parking lot with him. A similar concern has been raised by Mrs. Ingrid Hill, owner of 191 Church Street Bowmanville, the property directly behind 98 King Street West. Both properties share the driveway and parking lot facilities. Rather than continue to rely on the Parking Enforcement Officers to respond to his complaints, Mr. Forsellino has requested that he be appointed as a Parking Enforcement Officer to attend to the parking concerns on his own lot and that of Mrs. Hill. Mrs. Hill has submitted a letter stating that Mr. Forsellino has her permission to ticket vehicles in her parking lot. Staff routinely receive requests from private property owners to appoint security companies to enforce parking on their lots, however it is rare for a property owner to ask for the authority to do the work themselves. The precedent for this was set in 2007 when Council granted permission to the owners of the property located at 234 King Street East to enforce their own parking lot. Since that time there have no reported problems or concerns with the enforcement of this property. Concerns have been raised by the merchant located directly east of the property as this will directly affect her customers and her ability to receive and make deliveries. Mr. Forsellino has submitted the necessary paperwork and, should he be appointed, he will receive instruction from the Municipal Law Enforcement Division on his duties and responsibilities. 1310 REPORT NO.: CLD-008-10 PAGE 3 Attachments: By-law appointing Domminick Forsellino as a Private Property Parking Enforcement Officer Interested Parties Angelina and Dominick Forsellino Ingrid Hill Rose Turner 1311 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO.2010- Being a By-law to appoint an individual as a Parking Enforcement Officer for Private Property WHEREAS Section 15(1) of the Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990 Chapter P15, authorizes a Council of any Municipality to appoint one or more persons who shall be peace officers for the purpose of enforcing the by-laws of the Municipality; and WHEREAS it is desirable to appoint Dominick Forsellino as a Parking Enforcement Officer for the sole purpose of enforcing the Traffic By-law of the Municipality of Clarington on the property located at 98 King Street West Bowmanville and 191 Church Street, in the Municipality of Clarington; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1. Dominick Forsellino is hereby appointed as a Parking Enforcement Officer for the sole purpose of enforcing the Traffic By-law of the Municipality of Clarington on the property located at 98 King Street West Bowmanville and 191 Church Street Bowmanville, in the Municipality of Clarington; 2. This By-law shall come into full force and effective immediately on the day of Final passing by Council. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2010 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2010. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2010. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1312 Clarington REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: Report#: CLD-009-10 File#: Subject: 2010 Municipal Elections — Special Voting Locations RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-009-10 be received; and 2. THAT reduced hours of voting in institutions and retirement homes on Voting Day be approved as follows: Specal.Voti.ng locatio Hours`of;Voting Whitecliffe Terrace Retirement Residence 11J:00 am — 2:00 pm Marnwood Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Fosterbrooke Long-Term Care Facility 2:00 pm —4:00 pm Strathaven Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Kingsway Arms 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Lakeridge Health Bowmanville 10:00 am — 12:00 noon 3. THAT the draft by-law attached to Report CLD-009-10 be approved by Council. Submitted by: Reviewed by: 4a . B rie, CM Franklin Wu, unici al Clerk Chief Administrative Officer PLB/cag CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1313 REPORT NO.: CLD-009-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND The Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended, requires that voting must be provided on the premises for institutions with 20 or more beds occupied by persons who are disabled, chronically ill or infirm and for retirement homes in which 50 or more beds are occupied. They locations are commonly referred to as "special voting locations". Institutions qualifying as special voting locations include: Whitecliffe Terrace Retirement Residence, Marnwood Lifecare Centre, Fosterbrooke Long-Term Care Facility, Lakeridge Health Bowmanville, Kingsway Arms, and Strathaven Lifecare Centre. Voting hours per location are based on the analysis of time required to process electors at each location, and have been established in co-operation with the Administration staff of each facility. It is recommended that election officials assigned to these special voting locations conduct the vote during the specified hours. After the close of vote, the Election officials working at the special voting locations would immediately proceed to the Municipal Clerk's Office, 2nd floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville where the ballot box and supplies will be securely stored until 8:00 pm, at which time the boxes will be unsealed by the election officials and the ballots counted. The recommended voting hours for Clarington's special voting locations are as follows: Special V,,o ',Location Hours o Voting Whitecliffe Terrace Retirement Residence 11:00 am — 2:00 pm Marnwood Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Fosterbrooke Long-Term Care Facility 2:00 pm —4:00 pm Strathaven Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Kingsway Arms 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Lakeridge Health Bowmanville 10:00 am — 12:00 noon 2.0 Attachment: Attachment 1 — Draft By-law 1314 Attachment No. 1 to Report CLD-009-10 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2010-xxx Being a By-law to provide for reduced hours of voting in institutions and retirement homes on Voting Day WHEREAS section 46(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended, provides that a municipal council may pass a by-law with respect to reduced voting hours in voting places in retirement homes or those institutions as defined in Section 45(7) of the Act, where the voting place is only for the use of the residents; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the voting places listed below shall be open during the hours specified: Special Voting,Locatioin Hours of Voting Whitecliffe Terrace Retirement Residence 11:00 am — 2:00 pm Marnwood Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Fosterbrooke Long-Term Care Facility 2:00 pm —4:00 pm Strathaven Lifecare Centre 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Kingsway Arms 10:00 am — 12:00 noon Lakeridge Health Bowmanville 10:00 am — 12:00 noon BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this day of April, 2010. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1315 Clarbgton REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: Report#: CLD-010-10 File#: Subject: Procedural By-law Amendment RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-010-10 be received; and 2. THAT the draft by-law attached to Report CLD-010-10, being a by-law to amend the Procedural By-law, be forwarded to Council for approval. Submitted by: Reviewed by: �- aft Ba e, CMO Franklin Wu, unicipa Clerk Chief Administrative Officer PLB/cag CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1316 REPORT NO.: CLD-010-10 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND At the Council meeting held on March 1, 2010, Report CAO-002-10 was approved, which authorized the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to implement in-house legal service in 2010. 2.0 GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE In implementing the recommendations of Report CAO-002-10, a new department will be created, which will report directly to the CAO. This department will submit reports to the General Purpose and Administration Committee (GPA) in the same manner as the other departments within the Municipality. In order to accommodate this on the GPA Agenda, an amendment to the Procedural By-law is required, as the by-law dictates the format of the agendas. In reviewing the agenda format and the manner in which reports are submitted to the Committee, it is recommended that a further new section be included at the end of the agenda entitled "Confidential Staff Reports". In so doing, all matters of a confidential nature will be listed under this section of the agenda and a motion to refer these matters to the end of the meeting will then be unnecessary. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS It is respectfully recommended that the draft by-law attached hereto be forwarded to Council to implement the recommendations above with respect to the format of the GPA agenda. 1317 Attachment No.1 Report CLD-010-10 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law to amend By-law 2007-227, to govern the proceedings of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington, its General Purpose and Administration Committee and Special Committees WHEREAS Section 238 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, requires Council to adopt a procedure by-law for governing the calling, place, proceeding of meetings and for public notice of meetings; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Clarington deems it desirable to amend their Procedural By-law THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: That By-law 2007-227 be amended by deleting Section 6.2.1 and replacing it with the following: 6.2.1 The Municipal Clerk shall cause to be prepared a printed agenda under the following headings for the use of the Members at the regular meetings of GPA: Meeting Called to Order Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Announcements Adoption of Minutes of previous meetings(s) Presentations Delegations Public Meetings Staff Reports • Planning Services Department • Engineering Services Department • Operations Department • Emergency and Fire Services Department • Community Services Department • Municipal Clerk's Department • Corporate Services Department • Finance Department • Solicitor's Department • Chief Administrative Office Unfinished Business Other Business Communications(referred from Council or urgent) Confidential Staff Reports Adjournment BY-LAW read a first, second and third time this 12th day of April 2010. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1318 • M wn REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: Report#: COD-009-10 File#: Subject: CL2010-3, SIDEWALK REHABILITATION, VARIOUS LOCATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-009-10 be received; 2. THAT Pencon Construction Canada Corp., Toronto, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of$177,045.00 (Plus GST), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2010-3, be awarded the contract for the Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various locations as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT the 2010 Capital Budget funds be transferred from the Frank Street project in the amount of$60,000.00 to the Baseline Road project; 4. THAT funds required in the amount of$220,851.75 which includes $177,045.00 for tendering plus contingencies, and utility relocations be drawn from the Engineering 2010 Capital Budget Accounts, as follows: Account # 110-32-331-83215-7401, Sidewalk $153,922.90 Replacement—Various Locations Account# 110-32-331-83340-7401, Nelson Street $21,475.10 Sidewalk Construction Account # 110-32-331-83341-7401, Baseline Road $45,453.75 Sidewalk Construction Total Funds Required $220,851.75 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1401 REPORT NO.: COD-009-10 PAGE 2 5. THAT the By-law attached to Report COD-009-10 marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. Submitted by: Reviewed by: arie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O., Franklin Wu, Direr of Corp to rvices Chief Administrative Officer Director of Finance/Treasurer MM\JDB\km CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1402 REPORT NO.: COD-009-10 PAGE 3 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender specifications were provided by the Engineering Department for the Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various locations. Tenders were advertised in Daily Commercial News and electronically. Subsequently, tenders were reviewed and tabulated as per the memo from the Engineering Department, Schedule "B". As noted in Schedule "B", Engineering Services Memo, the work originally budgeted at $60,000.00 and planned for Frank Street will not be proceeding. In the alternative, the 2010 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project was structured to provide for sidewalk rehabilitation on Baseline Road, Bowmanville. Accordingly, staff is recommending that the 2010 Capital Budget funds be transferred from the Frank Street Project in the amount of$60,000.00 to the Baseline Road Project. The total project cost, including Project Administration, and costing allocation is as detailed in the memo from Engineering Services marked Schedule "B" with the required funds being be provided from the following 2010 Engineering Capital Budget Accounts. Account# 110-32-331-83215-7401, Sidewalk $153,922.90 Replacement—Various Locations Account# 110-32-331-83340-7401, Nelson Street $21,475.10 Sidewalk Construction Account# 110-32-331-83341-7401, Baseline Road $45,453.75 Sidewalk Construction Total Funds Required $220,851.75 The low bidder has not worked for the Municipality of Clarington, but references provided by the contractor for similar work were satisfactory. 1403 P REPORT NO.: COD-009-10 PAGE 4 The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Engineering Department and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Pencon Construction Canada Corp., Toronto Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various locations. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Schedule "A", By-law Attachment 2 — Schedule "B", Memo from Engineering Services 1404 ATTACHMENT# 1 &9-40 REPORT# 660-009-10 Schedule "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2010- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Pencon Construction Canada Corp., Toronto, Ontario to enter into agreement for the Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various Locations. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Pencon Construction Canada Corp., Toronto, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A"form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this day of , 2010. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2010. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1405 Attachment 2-Schedule"B" ATTACHMENT# � REPORT# Li - t D • Leading the Way MEMO TO:. Jerry Barber, Purchasing Manager FROM: Ron Albright, Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works DATE: March 23, 2010 SUBJECT: 2010 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION-VARIOUS LOCATIONS CONTRACT CL2010-3, CSW.2010.1 Tenders for the above project were opened at the Municipal Offices on Thursday March 18, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. A summary of the bids as received from Purchasing is provided in the table below. All numbers are exclusive of GST. BIDDER TOTAL BID excludin GST Pencon Construction Canada Corp. $177,045.00 Toronto, ON Trisan Construction $180,748.57 Schomber , ON Aloia Bros. Concrete Contractors Ltd. $203,392.90 Toronto, ON Bennington Construction Ltd. $211,913.10 Stouffville, ON Signature Contractors $250,579.90 Windsor, ON Extension Errors Project costs based on Pencon Construction's low bid are shown on the attached Cost Apportionment. The estimated total project cost is$220,851.75 of which $21,475.10 is allocated for Nelson Street in Bowmanville, $45,453.75 for Baseline Road in Bowmanville and $153,922.90 for other various locations throug hout Clarington. In the past the sidewalk contract has drawn considerable interest from impacted residents who have requested that additional work be done to tie their driveways and lawns into the new or reconstructed sidewalk. In order to allow flexibility in this regard we have included a higher than normal contingency allowance so that municipal staff can address these issues as they arise. The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the reference check provided by your department and offers the following comments. We recommend that the tender in the amount of$177,045.00 (exclusive of G.S.T.) be awarded to Pencon Construction CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE,ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-9282 1406 Attachment 2—Schedule"B" Sidewalk& 2010 Rehab. -2- March 23, 2010 Various Local Our File: CSW2010.1 Canada Corp. This tendered value is lower than the capital budget allocations approved by Council It is recommended that the 2010 Capital Budget Item for the Frank Street Sidewalks be reallocated to the Baseline Road Sidewalk and that Frank Street sidewalks be budgeted for in a future year. In light of the changes or potential changes at the old Beer Store property it was determined that it was not wise to construct the sidewalk on Frank Street along the Beer Store property due to the uncertainty of how the property may be redeveloped. As previously discussed, we have carried a contingency amount of 15% to address interest from impacted residents. Therefore, including utility relocations as required and contingencies, the engineering department advises the following breakdown for the above referenced project exclusive of GST: Sidewalk Nelson Street Baseline Road Total Replacement— Sidewalk Sidewalk Various Location Construction Construction Account 110 32 331 110 32 331 110 32 331 83215 7401 83340 7401 83341 7401 Total Project $ 153,922.90 $21,475.10 $ 45,453.75 $220,851.75 Amount Budget $ 200,000.00 $25,000.00 $60,000.00 $ 285,000.00 Amount 2010 Due to timely approval of the 2010 Capital Budget by Council and completing the design and contract administration internally, the Engineering Department was able to tender the sidewalk replacement project in March. We therefore suggest a report to Council be moved forward based on the above apportionments. Attached for your file is the project cost apportionment. Should you have any further question, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Regards, Ron Albright, P. Eng. Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works /dv Cc Nancy Taylor, Director of Finance ec Anthony Cannella, Director of Engineering Services 1AEngAdmin\MEM0S 2010\LISINSKI\Mar.22.2010.S idewalk2010Rehab.Var.Local.CSW2010 1ContractCL2010.3rev2.doc CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE,ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-9282 1407 •Xa111 11 REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: March 29, 2010 Resolution#: By-law#: Report#: COD-010-10 File#: Subject: ARRANGEMENT WITH KOBES NURSERY WHOLESALE FOR INSTALLATION AND PERMITTED USE OF A DRY HYDRANT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-010-10 be received; 2. THAT an agreement between the Municipality of Clarington and Kobes Nursery Wholesale, Hampton, ON be approved, as proposed in Schedule "A", Attachment 1, Draft Agreement, conditional on approval by Kobes Nursery Wholesale; and 5. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "B", Attachment 2, be approved authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., Franklin Wu, C.M.O., Director of Chief Administrative Officer Corporate Servic l Nancy Ta o , .' .A., Director f Finance/Treasurer MM\JDB\km CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 1408 REPORT NO.: COD-010-10 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT The Municipality of Clarington has approached Kobes Nursery Wholesale, Hampton, Ontario about the possible installation of a dry hydrant at 6878 Regional Road 57, and the drawing of water from the pond as and when required by the Emergency and Fire Services Department. Included in the agreement is the ability of Kobes Nursery Wholesale to use the hydrant when not in use by Emergency & Fire Services. The term of the agreement is open ended and subject to termination by either party by giving ninety (90) days notice of termination in any subsequent year. A copy of the draft agreement is provided as Schedule "A", Attachment 1. The required funds needed for the installation of the dry hydrant were approved in the 2010 Capital Budget Account # 110-28-281-82835-7401 in the amount of$30,000.00. The Director of Emergency & Fire Services and the Director of Finance have reviewed this report and the agreement and concur with the recommendations. The owner of Kobes Nursery Wholesale has reviewed the agreement and was satisfied with the terms and conditions. They look forward to partnering with the Municipality of Clarington. Inquiries with respect to this agreement should be referred to the Director of Emergency and Fire Services. This report has been reviewed for recommendation by the Purchasing Manager, with the appropriate departments and circulated as follows for: Concurrence: Director of Emergency& Fire Services Director of Finance/Treasurer Attachments: Attachment 1 — Schedule "A", Draft Agreement Attachment 1 — Schedule "B", By-law 1409 ATTACHMENT 0TO AGREEMENT made this day of April,2010. REPORT# BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON (Hereafter called the Municipality) and— KOBES NURSERY WHOLESALE (Hereafter called the Nursery) WHEREAS the Nursery hereby grants to the Municipality the right to install, maintain and utilize a dry hydrant system and draw water from the pond through the hydrant system as required and as located at the Kobes Nursery Wholesale,6878 Regional Road, Hampton, Ontario,from the date hereof,on the terms and conditions contained hereafter. The Municipality to pay $2.00 per annum of lawful money of Canada, to be due and payable upon execution of the agreement and on the anniversary of the agreement thereafter. Receipt of the amount of the rent is hereby acknowledged by the Nursery. 1. The Municipality covenants with the Nursery as follows: a) To pay rent. b) To provide proof of public liability in w ce in the amount acceptable to the Director of Finance of the for its obligations in this agreement. c) To provide required mainten r t ydrant. d) To refrain from ere anent structure of whatever kind upon the adjacent land. e) To keep the properly i an and tidy condition and within reason, not permit objectionable materials of any kind to be accumulated during the permitted use. f) To permit the use of the fill station by the Nursery when not in use by the Emergency and Fire Services Department. 2. The Nursery covenants with the Municipality as follows: a) For quiet enjoyment. b) To permit the Municipality to make such improvements to the hydrant and the adjacent lands that they deem appropriate to accommodate accessing the hydrant at their cost and such improvements will be considered lease hold improvements and will become part of and remain with the lands. c) To permit the use of the driveway/access road by permitted Fire and Rescue equipment on an as required basis. 1410 3. a) The Municipality of Clarington shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any loss, injury,or damage to person or property including loss of life, by whomsoever suffered,that in any way is connected to the establishment, use or the operation of property unless caused by the negligence or the wilful act of any employee or agent of the Municipality of Clarington,while acting within the scope of his or her employment or agency respectively. This provision shall survive the termination or expiry of this agreement. b) Kobes Nursery shall be solely responsible for any claims which may arise during its use of the Dry Hydrant and hereby indemnifies and saves harmless the Municipality of and from all claims, demands, actions and costs incidental thereto, that may be made or instituted by any person or persons with respect to damages or injuries that may be sustained to person or property arising out of the use of the Fill Station. 4. Either party may terminate this agreement by giving ninety(90)days notice in writing. 5. For the purposes of this agreement any n r other document is required to be or may be given by the Nursery to the is ' or by the Municipality to the Nursery under this agreement su all be transmitted by telefax, mailed by first class prepaid mail o el iv to Municipality of 9Stre , 40 Temperanc Bowmanville,Ontario, L1C 3A6 Attention: Purchasing Manager If by telefax to:(905)623-3330 Tel.905 623-3379 Kobes Nursery Wholesale 4765 Old Scugog Road Hampton,Ontario,L1 C 3K2 Attention: Mr. Ben Kobes If by telefax to:(905)263-4431 Tel.905 263-8814 1411 6. The Municipality will not be held responsible for any levies, taxes etc. for the use of the lands as described. 7. This agreement shall enure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. THIS AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF KOBES NURSERY WHOLESALE by their authorized agent,this day of 2010. Ben Kobes,Owner Witness THIS AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON, under the seal of the Municipal Corporation and the hands of its officers, duly qualified,this day of 2010. im emethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1412 ATTACHMENT# �� 0 REPORT# Schedule "B" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2010- Being a By-law to authorize the execution by the Mayor and Clerk of an Agreement between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Kobes Nursery Wholesale Hampton, Ontario for the installation of the dry hydrant and drawing of water from pond at 6878 Regional Road 57, Hampton, Ontario. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Kobes Nursery Wholesale Hampton, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A"form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this -day of , 2010. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day.of , 2010. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 1413 HAN DO UTSM I RC U LATI O N S GPA Ganapska �►atershed Planning in RVATION the Municipality of Clarington Pam Lancaster B.Sc. Stewardship Technician Municipality of Clarington Council Monday, March 29, 2010 Watershed Plans , GCO 1, c y -C`E:, x4 . l .. ,. "., ai: �}' '• } } � ' F ' 4I h �' e t ex iR • What is a watershed Ian ? • A management docug Fa outlines recommended actions to manage, protect and enhance the features and functions of a watershed . • Recommendations are based on scientific information and community input. Watershed Plans G a as ca a TION Under the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan : • Watershed plans are required for every watershed that originates from the Oak Ridges Moraine. • The objectives and requirements of the watershed plan shall be incorporated into _ • u municipal official plans. • Conservation Authorities are primarily the organizations writing the watershed plans with municipalities because of their long scientific research on the watershed in question r = R • . ee 1 t _ p n • "' %'" Wit+ r t t��3 Sd t � r'i � • 4 Wilmot Ganaraska CONSERVATION es ar Kirby Orono Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Boundary Municipality of Clarington City of Kawartha Lakes Roads Wilmot Creek Lake Ontario Gan a pska anaras a iver RVATION Camptiellcrok Garden Hill Rossmount Elizabethville Perrytown q� Kendal / /� - Kirby � ��? Osaca Canton Dale f ® Oak Ridges Morain Planning Boundary Settlement Areas y\ ,. welcome - Municipality of Clarington Municipality of Port Hope Port Hope Township of Hamilton - City of Kawartha Lakes Township of Cavan Monaghan Roads Ganaraska River Lake Ontario GanaLraska ra am ree SERVATION Starkville i Crooked Creek 1 i Newtonville ® Oak Ridges Moraine Planning Boundary 'Newcastle. a Settlement Areas - Municipality of Clarington 0 Municipality of Port Hope Roads Graham Creek Lake Ontario IAW Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point G a n a ras Ica CONSERVATION Creek and Port Granby Creek Settlement Areas Municipality of Clarington Municipality of Port Hope Roads Streams Lake Ontario Newtonville l WesleyvilleZ, • Vi Port Granby Newcastle JBouchette Point Port Granby Watershed Boundaries G a n a 2as Ica Watershed Plans RVATION The Process REVIEW and EVALUATE MID N IDDR mid PLAN J WATERSHED PLANNING STEPS REF:..'RT i 1) Soaping IMPLEMENT 2)Characterize the watershed system 3) Set goals,objectives and working tar:ifit, 4) Develop management alternatives 5) Evaluate management alternatives 6) Select preferred management alternative 7) Finalize Targets S) Develop irnplernentatian and monitoring plan G anaraslca Watershed Plans CONSERVATION Watershed plans are a living document that are evolving in response to management activities that have been implemented , changing environmental conditions , scientific understanding or stakeholder priorities . Therefore they are reviewed every 5 or 10 years . Background Reports G a n a ras Ica CONSERVATION — History of the watershed — Terrestrial Natural — Climate Heritage — Geology • Topography • Forests • Physiology • Meadows/grasslands • Surficial geology and •Wetlands soils — Groundwater quantity — Cultural Characteristics • Recharge and • Populations discharge • vulnerability • Industry — Surface water quantity *Agriculture • Stream flows • Natural resource use • Floodplain management • Water budget Recreation — Groundwater quality — The watershed in a — Surface water quality provincial context — Aquatic Resources • Fisheries and benthics * Climate change • Stream temperature • Drinking water source • Riparian Area protection • Lake Ontario Background Reports G a n a q s ca RVATION Graham Creek Background Report: Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic,Biotic and Cultural Features Abiotic,Biotic and Cultural Features forpreparation ofthe for preparation of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan April 2009 April 2009 yr 1 Ganaraska Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conser PreparePby Ganaraska ReglmrC Ganaraska River Background Report: Lovekin Creek,Bouchette Point Creek and Abiotic,Biotic and Cultural Features Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic,Biotic and Cultural Features forpreparation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan for preparation of the Lovekin Creek,Bouchette Point March 2009 Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan April 2009 lIT �• jERO"—..- rep by g G e bo y �6�anaraska Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation A—riry Background Report Ganaraska CONSERVATION — Protecting water quantity and quality — Protecting and increase aquatic habitat and resources — Decreasing habitat (stream, forest) fragmentation and increase connectivity — Preserving cultural heritage — Future sustainable development — Create ownership and personal connection with the watershed r G anaraslca Watershed Plans CONSERVATION • Defined by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan • Consistent with other plans being prepared on the Oak Ridges Moraine (e. g . Duffins Creek and Caruthers Creek) mr, r • Ontario based planning p � (MNR and MOE defined , Conservation Authority tested ) 0 W, � Ganaqs4_ l<a Involvement in Watershed Plans RVATION • Agency, municipal and public consultation — Technical Review Committee — Community Advisory Committee — Municipal consultation — Public Open Houses — Stakeholder communication — Community and school education components Plan Components Ganaraslca CONSERVATION • Groundwater Quantit • Surface Water Quantity • Groundwater Quality • Surface Water Quality ` • Aquatic Habitat and Species • Terrestrial Natural Heritag • Public Health and Wellbeing • Community Heritage Gan a raslca Plan Components : CONSERVATION from issues to actions • Introduction to Component — What is it, why is it important to a watershed and in a planning context • Current Status and Issues — Issues (negative) and opportunities (positive) were identified through science and community input. Ganapska GOaIS Objectives , Targets • Goal — Overall statement addressing a desired outcome for the component • Objectives — Statements addressing a specific set of issues • Targets — Quantitative and qualitative - t Example : Groundwater Quality Ganaraska Goal 3.0: Protect roundwater quality t CONSERVATION g ensure safe drinking water supplies and the protection of ecological functions. • •jective 3.1 : Protect and enhance the quality of contaminant groundwater by addressing existing pathways and • Issues Targets for Success: Addressed: •A reduction in abandoned and unmaintained • Unused, poorly wells. maintained, and •A reduction of poorly maintained septic abandoned wells systems and an increase of septic inspections. * Unused, poorly •A reduction in poorly maintained fuel and maintained chemical storage facilities. septic systems -Maintenance and enhancement of • Unused, poorly groundwater quality to Ontario Drinking maintained Water Standards. fuel/chemical -implementation of beneficial management storage practices in the watershed. -No deterioration of current quality of groundwater supplies. Ganaraska Making it Work CONSERVATION Management Actions — How are we going to achieve the goals and objectives. — Short term and long term . — Input and review from the hnical Review and Community Advisory Committees. �ctiork l�t�t r�q�ir� I�� lati�n or r� uf�tian� �ifl b� used,Thee G 2ska Management Action anar—a! CONSERVATION Groupings �I�'� eti�n��u�u1� be �ie� gut ��r�u�h rnuni�ip�l � iei�f �Ian�, b}�-lex��s ar ���f�f�l�"i p�li�ie�.; �rre�,t er��f��rre pr�v�r�ei�l ar fe�ere.l arts and re��lti�ns; �r re��le.kio ns ��,rri ed gut b�the sue r�;ske ���i�� � e r��,ti eu �uth�rit�. �e nr� arena V��r�s�e�s, srnir�er , r �1 p�rser�tatinsrrd usef theaia ern I a ate than a�ress tl�� ti��t�rsh��. r . Landquiition rquir fair larda �nrmptiar�:141 Ganapska rou n wa er ua i RVATION Example Regulations and Planning Recommended Policy'. * Ensure wells or boreholes are properly abandoned or maintained Policy investigation and creation: « Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment Recommended program: Septic re-inspection program Recommended policy, implement future policies recommended within the Source Protection Plan created through the Clean WarerAcr Stewardship Through the GRCA Clean Water — Healthy Land Stewardship and partner programs accomplish the following: * Upgrade or decommission wells and boreholes • Repair septic systems and provide for septic inspections ■ Upgrade or newly construct fuel and chemical storage facilities M Support septic re-inspection program when/if developed Education and awareness initiatives to provide information regarding groundwater quality and drinking water protection Ganapska rou n wa er ua i RVATION Example Regulation and Planning Recornrnended Policy-- Ensrlre wells or h-oreholes are proped r ahancloned or maintained w Development may be considered on a lot where there is an abandoned we,II or borehole, on if the applicant demonstrates that actions have been taken to do crnmissicn the welI gar borehole in accordance- with the Ontario Water Resources ct- R tion i n- inte ratfon: This policy ensures proper abandonment or management of unLaserl viells, thereby protection groundwater gUality- This policy also benefits Sutlace water quality. Ganapska Monitorin g and Reporting ATION V CONSE • Monitoring (measuring success) — The creation and implementation of a GRCA integrated watershed Olt effectiveness/monitoring program ; — The review of watershed �L implantation to understand and .gin 1 report on the adoption and All K implementation of the watershed plan . — Special research projects to fill large scale knowledge gaps. `' r' }f J t Gana�r!aska CRVATION w"I", w"-., • Watershed Plans provided for ` information and referred to ,cv municipal staff . • m PP , R � dor se n etbyth e E n ff J -p. Municipality of Claringto'n, 'upon ' further consideration by staffrsl . and council • Consideration by GRCA Full Authorit y Ap Bo ard in ,: r a I I y R�1 ri'•r� J��'la ,1� " , ' - f' a �q#?1t��..i� ''I r 1 .. CfGI ��� f i Ganaraska CONSERVATION AL .... Pam Lancaster... ......... .................. ........ ......... ............................................................................................................ ............................ ............. ................... .............. ............ .................. ............................................................................. ...... ......... ................................. .............................................................................. ............................................ ................................................. ............ .............................. . .... .e.................................................................. Technician......... ....................................... ........................................... ...... ....................................................................................... ........................................... ...... ...................................................................................... ... ......................................... ..... ................................................................................ ...... .............. ................. ........... .............. Ganaraska Region ... ....... ...... ...... .............. .... .. .... ... ....... ........... ....... Conservation Authority 0 2216 County Road 28 , Port Hope � . ... ........ ........... 905-885-8173 x 247 . . ... ..... ... ... ........... .. ............... ................ ................... � p lancaster @grca . on . ca ... ...... .... ............ ........ ... ... ' A Ganaraska CONSMATON Background to the Watershed Planning Process in the Municipality of Clarington March 5, 2010 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority staff throughout 2009 have been in the finalization stage of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. Watershed plans are also being finalized for the Ganaraska River watershed, Graham Creek watershed, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. These watersheds are located within the Municipality of Clarington (Table 1). Results of these processes are contained on the CD provided. The focus of this backgrounder will be the Wilmot Creek watershed; however an identical watershed planning process was undertaken in the Ganaraska River watershed, Graham Creek watershed, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. Table 1: Percentage of local watersheds within the Munici alit of Clarington Watershed Plan Study Area Percentage Ganaraska River 29 Wilmot Creek 99 Graham Creek 188 Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek 1 85 The Wilmot Creek Background Report. Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features document contains the necessary scientific and local knowledge needed to create a scientifically defensible and locally accepted watershed plan. Information contained in the background document includes data collected by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority through municipal support, as well as partnership research and studies. A Background Report has also been written for the Ganaraska River watershed, the Graham Creek watershed, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. The Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, Final Draft contains all of the necessary information to focus management in the Wilmot Creek watershed and on its resources. This document was created and reviewed in partnership with members of a Technical Review Committee and a Community Advisory Committee, as well as public input through extensive consultation. Background to Watershed Planning in the Municipality of Clarington, March 5, 2010 ...2 Final draft watershed plans have also been written for the Ganaraska River watershed, the Graham Creek watershed, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds, all of which have been reviewed in partnership with members of a Technical Review Committee and Community Advisory Committee, as well as public input through extensive consultation. A watershed plan is a necessary tool for local watershed management, and is a requirement under the Oak Ridges Moraine Act. As such, a reliable and defensible watershed planning process was created using provincial based watershed planning techniques, adapted to a local scale. The following highlights the key watershed planning process steps undertaken during the development of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, Final Draft, the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, Final Draft, the Graham Creek Watershed Plan, Final Draft, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, Final Draft. Committee Review and Input Two Technical Review Committees were formed: one for the Wilmot Creek watershed, the Graham Creek, and Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds (Appendix A) and one for the Ganaraska River watershed (Appendix B) in order to achieve the following: • Review of and input into the background study • Develop and provide input into issues and alternatives • Develop the watershed plan • Review of the watershed plan • Ensure Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan legislative requirements are met • Provide watershed plan approvals and endorsements • In the future, participate in and lead aspects of the watershed plan implementation. The Technical Review Committees met five times in 2009 in order to accomplish the above tasks. Invitation to participate on the two separate Community Advisory Committees occurred in July. Press releases, newspaper ads and direct invitations were used to encourage participation. The Community Advisory Committees (Appendix A and B) were formed in early August and met six times in 2009. The role of the Community Advisory Committee was to: • Promote awareness of planning process and solicit input from broader constituency group • Provide input and advice on issues and alternatives • Provide input and advice on the watershed plan. Background to Watershed Planning in the Municipality of Clarington, March 5, 2010 ...3 A watershed tour occurred in October for the benefit of all committees to understand the watershed during a "hands on" visual experience. Public Consultation and Community Involvement Two sets of public open houses occurred in 2009 to allow for public input through consultation. Open houses were advertised through local media and held in Port Hope (Ganaraska River), Newcastle (Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek) and Orono (Wilmot Creek). Key milestones were presented at public open houses which occurred in June and October. At these open houses, feedback was received regarding the results from the Background Reports, watershed issues, goals, objectives and proposed management actions. In addition to media correspondence and hosting public meetings, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority met with local institutions, organizations and agencies. These groups included the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee, the Pier Group and the Willow Beach Field Naturalists. An educational component was developed for the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan to allow the youth to assist in the planning process. The class of Ms. Oster at the Port Hope High School provided many informative suggestions for the management of the Ganaraska River watershed. On Saturday, July 18, 2009, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority and Citizens Environment Watch hosted the annual Check Your Watershed Day in Graham Creek, Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek. This allowed local residents to engage in hands on activity to learn more about their local watersheds while collecting baseflow information. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Board and Municipal Involvement The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Board received information and updates on the watershed plan processes during the months of June, October and December 2009. The June meeting introduced the concept and framework of the watershed planning processes, and results from the Background Reports. A progress report was presented in October. December's meeting included a presentation associated with the framework for defining watershed goals, objectives, targets and management actions through actual Watershed Plan examples. The Municipality of Clarington, the Municipality of Port Hope, the Regional Municipality of Durham and Northumberland County have been involved in the creation of all four watershed plans. In addition to these four municipalities, the Township of Hamilton, the Township of Cavan Monaghan, the City of Kawartha Lakes also participated in the development of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. All municipalities participated in the Technical Review Committee, through Background to Watershed Planning in the Municipality of Clarington, March 5, 2010 4 staff involvement, either as an informal member on the committee (City of Kawartha Lakes) or an active member. During December 2009 and January 2010, one-on-one meetings with municipal planning staff at the Municipality of Port Hope, the Regional Municipality of Durham, and the Municipality of Clarington occurred to ensure that concerns with the watershed plans were shared and resolved. This included ensuring the watershed plan met the 5 year municipal official plan review requirements. Next Steps The Background Reports and Final Draft Watershed Plans for the Wilmot Creek watershed, the Ganaraska River watershed, the Graham Creek watershed, and the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds found on the CD are provided for information. Further to municipal council review, the four watershed plans developed for the Municipality of Clarington watersheds will be presented to the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Board for consideration of approval in April 2010. Once approved, implementation of the watershed plans will be the next step. Background to Watershed Planning in the Municipality of Clarington, March 5, 2010 ...5 Appendix A: Wilmot Creek, Graham Creek, Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watersheds - Committees and Members Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Ron Warne Municipality of Port Hope Christina Harvey Northumberland County Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Jacques Perreault Durham Region Health Department Atul Jain Haliburton, Kawartha Pine Ridge District Health Unit Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Central Region Amanda McLachlan Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Eastern Region Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora Dan Tallion Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Alex Cannings Resident Brian Reid Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Bruce Blight Resident Chris Cloutier Dufferin Aggregates Colin Abernethy Resident David Best Landowner, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Emily Gruyters Durham College Student Gary Vandergast Resident Hugh Beauchamp Resident Janelle Andrews Durham Sustain Ability Jim Cleland Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Jim and Corry Kamstra Landowner Jim Yaki Resident Karin Murphy Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation Background to Watershed Planning in the Municipality of Clarington, March 5, 2010 ...6 Appendix B: Ganaraska River Watershed - Committees and Members Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority David Kerr City of Kawartha Lakes Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Ron Warne Municipality of Port Hope Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Karen Ellis Township of Cavan Monaghan Doug Thompson Township of Hamilton Christina Harvey Northumberland County Meredith Carter Otonabee Conservation Atul Jain Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit Jacques Perreault Health units and departments Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Central Region Amanda McLachlan Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Eastern Region Dan Tallion Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough District Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Barry Walker Municipality Port Hope Environmental Advisory Committee Bill Crowley Resident Carole Payne Willow Beach Field Naturalists Christian Piette Resident Dan Thomey Landowner and Ganaraska Valley Fishing Club Dave Workman Resident and Cameco Corporation Doug Morgan Resident Glenda Lynch Resident Gord and Cathy Humphreys Resident Hida Manns Durham Environmental Advisory Committee Jim Waddell Resident Marion Manders Resident and Save the Ganaraska Again Mike Goleski Fleming College Student Paul Burnham Northumberland Federation of Agriculture Rob McDonald Resident Robert Mink Landowner Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan 2010 ma. s j 6 4Ganaraska CONSERVATION Ciry of KAWARTHA Iry n Carh Ihr Kaavndw s{am —+� /.eading the Way A Ganaraska CONSERVATRNJ The Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Wilmot Creek watershed and its resources. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data presented in the Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. The Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan was written by Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician and Mark Peacock, P. Eng., Director, Watershed Services with technical assistance from staff of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA). Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Magdi Widaatalla P.Geo., M.Sc., Manager, Watershed Services Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department. Brian Curran, B.Sc., GIS Technician Jeff Moxley, Manager GIS/IT Steve Nowak, B.A., GIS Technician Photo Credits: GRCA staff, Sally Walsh and Kris Vance Sompel This document was created for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Wilmot Creek watershed. Review and input into this document by the Technical Review Committee, Community Advisory Committee, stakeholders and residents occurred through the watershed planning process. Financial support for the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan was provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2010. Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan was written with review and input from members of the Technical Review Committee and Community Advisory Committee. Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority David Kerr City of Kawartha Lakes Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Jacques Perreault Durham Region Health Department Tammy Chung Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Andrew Hibma Kawartha Region Conservation Authority Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Dam Remollino Ontario Ministry of Transportation Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Alex Cannings Resident Brian Reid Resident and Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Bruce Blight Resident Chris Cloutier Dufferin Aggregates Colin Abernethy Resident David Best Landowner, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Emily Gruyters Durham College Student Gary Vandergast Resident Hugh Beauchamp Resident Janelle Andrews Durham Sustain Ability Jim Cleland Resident and Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Jim Kamstra Landowner Corry Kamstra Landowner Jim Yaki Resident Karin Murphy Resident and Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation Elk O The Wilmot Creek Watershed Executive Summa The Wilmot Creek watershed is recognized for its fisheries, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan has been developed to conserve, enhance and manage the watershed and its resources for current and future generations. The purpose of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan includes the following: • Fulfill the watershed planning requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (Appendix C). • Create community awareness and ownership of the Wilmot Creek watershed and its plan. • Provide recommendations that conserve the ecological and hydrological integrity of the watershed. • Encourage land and resource uses that maintain, improve or restore the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed. • Provide recommendations that maintain or improve the elements that contribute to the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed, including the quality and quantity of water, and aquatic and terrestrial resources. Written for the municipalities, communities, residents and resource users of the watershed, this watershed plan outlines recommended management actions required to conserve this valuable resource for current and future generations. Recommended actions have been derived from scientific data outlined in the Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features (Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2009), local knowledge, municipal and agency input and review, and public consultation. Formal processes were carried out with direct review and input from the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. As a result of a year-long initiative, management actions, targets, monitoring and reporting activities have been formulated. The foundation of management actions is based on the goals and objectives of each watershed component, defined by its associated science. Each objective addresses multiple issues or opportunities in the Wilmot Creek watershed. Management actions have been defined in terms of regulation and planning, stewardship, education and awareness, and land acquisition. A summary of goals, objectives and management actions are found below. Approval, adoption and implementation of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan are the most important steps in this initiative. Participation and co-operation by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA), the Regional Municipality of Durham, Municipality of Clarington, and City of Kawartha Lakes are needed to ensure adoption of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. In addition, participation by residents, businesses and stakeholders of the Wilmot Creek watershed is required to see the desired outcomes and successes of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. - - ------- --- --------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 i Executive Summary Summary of Goals, Objectives and Management Actions General Recommendations Regulations and Planning • Implement future policies recommended in the Source Protection Plan created through the Clean Water Act. • Implement Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan policies across the Wilmot Creek watershed. • Subwatershed level investigations • Implement future policies recommended in a Ganaraska Region Climate Change Strategy. Stewardship: implement the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs throughout the Wilmot Creek watershed. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to all aspects of the Wilmot Creek watershed. Land Acquisition: environmental features may be acquired by a public authority for protection through the purchase of land, donation of land, land rental, conservation easements and land use covenants. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. It is also important to review and report on watershed plan implementation. Groundwater Quantity Groundwater Quantity protect . enhance groundwater ecological Objective 1.1: maintain or enhance groundwater recharge and discharge for ecological functions and human use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map groundwater features. • Identify groundwater features not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to groundwater features. • Protect recharge rates. • Set urban infiltration targets. Support for: • Current plan review mechanisms Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 it Executive Summary Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural cover in and adjacent to groundwater features. • Achieve the natural heritage system as the primary means of protecting groundwater features. • Enhance and protect groundwater features through best management practices conducted on the land. • Encourage the adoption of urban land use practices that increase groundwater recharge. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to groundwater quantity. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 1.2: manage and avoid actions that negatively affect aquifers (artesian, shallow and deep) and changes in groundwater flow. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Minimize groundwater flow alteration. • Minimize and manage artesian and flowing wells. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to aquifers and groundwater quantity. Objective 1.3: ensure sustainable rates of groundwater use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Restrict development needing a Permit to Take Water in wellhead protection areas. • Restrict development in groundwater features needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and by-laws • Water conservation plan creation Education and Awareness: provide information regarding water takings. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. -------------------------------------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 III Executive Summary Surface Water Quantity Surface Water Quantity Goal i: maintain and improve the hydrologic watershed.i of the Objective 2.1: maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow of the Wilmot Creek watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map features contributing to natural flows of Wilmot Creek, • Identify features contributing to natural flows of Wilmot Creek not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to features contributing to natural stream flows. • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Wilmot Creek watershed. • Require development setbacks from Wilmot Creek • Restrict development in features contributing to natural flows in Wilmot Creek needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. • Require urban stormwater best management practices. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Limit site alterations. • Develop hydropower infrastructure. Support for: • Existing legislation • Review mechanisms • Existing program implementation. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural vegetation using the natural heritage system throughout the watershed, in groundwater recharge areas, and to compensate for changes in imperviousness of the watershed. • Increase riparian buffers to reduce variability of overland runoff. • Increase water infiltration, storage and use on individual lots. • Protect, restore and enhance wetlands. • Carry out an urban stewardship program to address altered flows caused by stormwater management. • Increase channel stability using bioengineering in urbanized areas to mitigate erosion caused by altered flows. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding surface water quantity and the protection and enhancement of the form and function of streams. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. -- ------------------ Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Iv Executive Summary Objective 2.2: maintain and improve the level of flood hazard protection for residents, and for existing and proposed development. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Wilmot Creek watershed. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Stormwater quantity control. Support for: Existing policies and programs Recommended program: • Flood recovery program Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Manage or decommission online ponds to ensure they do not pose a flood hazard risk. • Implement re-vegetation to attenuate flood flows (e.g., riparian plantings, grass swales and waterways). Education and Awareness: provide information regarding flood forecasting and warning, and emergency response. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Groundwater Quality .. . .. Objective 3.1: protect and enhance the quality of groundwater by addressing existing pathways and contaminant sources. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Ensure that wells or boreholes are properly maintained or abandoned. Policy investigation and creation: • Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment. Recommended program: • Septic re-inspection program --------- --------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 v Executive Summary Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Upgrade or decommission wells and boreholes. • Repair septic systems and provide for septic inspections. • Upgrade or newly construct fuel and chemical storage facilities. • Support septic re-inspection program. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and drinking water protection. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 3.2: manage the quality of groundwater through the implementation of best management practices throughout the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map highly vulnerable aquifers and wellhead protection areas. • Identify areas vulnerable to groundwater contamination not yet known. • Restrict development in highly vulnerable aquifers. Support for: • Existing legislation and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, encourage and provide incentives for best management practices in highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and best land use practices. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Surface Water Quality e • • . . . Objective 4.1: manage and enhance rural water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from Wilmot Creek. --------------------------------------------------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vi Executive Summary • Use "enhanced' level stormwater quality controls. • Reduce chloride concentrations. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing and new programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Decrease and mitigate non-point pollution sources (e.g., overland runoff). • Enhance, restore and properly manage riparian areas to buffer overland runoff. • Promote and encourage best management practices to protect water quality. • Increase natural cover as recommended by the natural heritage system. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding rural surface water quality. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.2: manage and enhance urban water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from Wilmot Creek. • Reduce chloride concentrations. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. • Maintain existing stormwater control structures. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Ensure public space management practices do not negatively impact surface water quality. • Ensure all public space management practices have a setback distance from the stream edge (e.g., a natural riparian area). • Create and implement an urban stream restoration and stewardship program that will benefit surface water quality. • Implement a Foster Creek pilot project to develop a community stream vision for Wilmot Creek and its tributaries in the built area of the Community of Newcastle. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding urban surface water quality. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vii Executive Summary Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.3: create a spills action plan. Regulations and Planning Plan creation: spills action plan Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Aquatic Habitat and Species Objective 5.1: protect and restore existing and native aquatic species and communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Adopt the Wilmot Creek Fisheries Management Plan. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Remove manmade instream barriers. • Remove online ponds. • Improve stream temperature. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic species. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 5.2: protect and enhance the form and function of instream habitat and riparian areas. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map aquatic habitats in the Wilmot Creek watershed. • Identify aquatic habitats in the Wilmot Creek watershed not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Adopt the Wilmot Creek Fisheries Management Plan. Support for: • New programs ------------------ — ---------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 viii Executive Summary Existing review mechanisms and policies Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water- Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Instream habitat creation • Erosion control projects • Increase of natural vegetation in riparian areas Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic habitat. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Terrestrial Natural Heritage '1111!MFMIkIFInM. 1111.11-M . . . Objective 6.7: reduce habitat fragmentation and promote connectivity. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Identify and map terrestrial features in the Wilmot Creek watershed. • Identify terrestrial features in the Wilmot Creek watershed not yet known. • Reduce the impact of development on the natural heritage system and significant features. • Produce net gains in the natural heritage system. Recommended planning strategy: Create a regional terrestrial natural heritage system and strategy Support for: • Existing plan review mechanisms Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water- Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Wilmot Creek watershed in target areas defined by the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Increase tallgrass prairie habitats. • Restore degraded sites such as Brownfields or aggregate extraction sites. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding terrestrial natural heritage. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. --------------------- - Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 ix Executive Summary Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.2: maintain, enhance and restore the natural diversity of vegetation communities in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Net gains in the natural heritage system Support for: • Existing by-laws Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Wilmot Creek watershed using the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Increase tallgrass prairie habitats. • Protect and increase cover of old growth forest Education and Awareness: provide information regarding vegetation communities. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.3: maintain, enhance and restore the diversity of native species in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Net gains in the natural heritage system Support for: Existing legislation Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed with a focus on interior habitat. • Enhance and increase specific habitat types such as wetlands, vernal pools, tallgrass prairie and old growth forest • Assist in invasive species control or removal. Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Executive Summary Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species, their status, and threats to these species. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.4: mitigate and reduce negative impacts of urban and rural land use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: Net gains in the natural heritage system Plan creation: Urban natural heritage system Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species and threats to these species. Include information on how to deal with the threats. Public Health and Well-being Well-being Public Health and t promote healthy communities in relatio • the environment. Objective 7.1: manage and improve the environmental quantity, quality and social benefits of existing and future public spaces. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Increase of public spaces Support for: Existing programs and initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, accomplish the following in public spaces: • Increase natural, native vegetation. • Increase healthy lifestyle infrastructure. • Increase educational aspects of the public space. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding public spaces. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. ----------------------------------------------- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 xi Executive Summary Objective 7.2: encourage sustainable communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Increase in public transportation Support for: • Existing initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs, increase actions around sustainable living. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding sustainable living and development for residents and local businesses. Objective 8.1; increase awareness and appreciation of our community heritage. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding cultural heritage using partner programs. ------------------------------ ----- Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 xli Executive Summary Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan October 2009 >`i ap1 1 I i r S v s .. / k Y yy 9 4;Ganaraska CONSERVATION Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Ar ?Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Wilmot Creek watershed. This document creates the foundation of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dai, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Wilmot Creek watershed. Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department, Brian Curran, B.Sc., Steve Nowak, B.A. and Jeff Moxley. This document represents the first of its kind for the Wilmot Creek watershed and complements the 1966 and 1976 Ganaraska Region Conservation Reports (Department of Energy and Resources Management 1966, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 1976). Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Wilmot Creek watershed and its resources. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2009. Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features.- The Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features documents historic and current conditions of the Wilmot Creek watershed. This document creates the foundation for the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. It is envisioned that the Wilmot Creek Background Report and the forthcoming Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the watershed and its resources. The Wilmot Creek watershed flows through the Municipality of Clarington in the Regional Municipality of Durham and has its uppermost headwaters in the City of Kawartha Lakes (Figure 1). Historic events have shaped the watershed into its present-day condition. Most notable are the effects of dams and settlement patterns caused by the location of road and rail corridors. Today, the watershed supports a population of 8,258 people, a productive agricultural community, and a mix of natural resources and recreational uses. In addition, residents depend on water from the watershed for domestic and economic use; however residents of Newcastle rely on Lake Ontario for its source of water. Shaped thousands of years ago by glacial activity, the watershed lies on Paleozoic bedrock and its topographic and hydrogeological features include the Oak Ridges Moraine, the South Slope and the Iroquois Plain physiographic regions (Figure 2). Corresponding surficial geology and soils help dictate groundwater flows, aquifer locations, and groundwater is recharge and discharge areas (Figures 3 and 4). The main branch of Wilmot Creek is joined by four other tributaries; Orono Creek, Hunter Creek, Stalker Creek and Foster Creek (Figure 5). The entire watershed is 98 square kilometers (kM2). Protection of the Wilmot Creek watershed has been influenced by surface water studies such as floodplain mapping and hydraulic studies. Regulations are also in place to protect people and property from flood waters, and to protect some of the natural features of the watershed. Flows in Wilmot Creek are generally resilient to stresses such as drought and water use, and adequately provide for aquatic habitat and human use. Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary Leskard Kirby Orono • Political Boundaries Municipality of Clarington _ City of Kawartha Lakes Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Boundary Settlement Areas Roads Wilmot Creek Newcastle� O Lake Ontario y� N 0 1.250 2.500 5,000 Meters GGanaraska 1:80.000 Figure 1: Wilmot Creek Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary A - C Physiographic Regions Oak Ridges Moraine South Slope Iroquois Plain — Roads Wilmot Greek Lake Ontario N 0 1.250 2.500 5.000 cew+.m+u..nwo+w>.wwa y..w�w �rawm�wr-w.m..w+s Meters 1:80,000 Ganaraska cw ,...ew.s.wcwns�iaawnv wn...voa corffirtrona� Figure 2: Physiographic regions Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features III Executive Summary F Potential Groundwater Recharge Areas Recharge High:420(mmtyear) , — Low:60(mrrvyear) — Roads _- — Wilmot Creek Lake Ontario N o i,3oo z.sao 5,200 . 1 M,em ..,.,a�... .� ..� �.a. ,4�(Ganaraska Figure 3: Potential groundwater recharge Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features IV Executive Summary 1 1 Potential Groundwater Discharge M. High Low — Roads Wilma Creek Lake Ontario N 0 7.250 2.500 5.000 Casnln4(My1MroMgrelp�b ro-gy'wWM 1 uu.nJMUbro[lnmbwC.MN^W tVtetel$ M.VYh4Ia� N�I.n CTw'.iw Mlxwl WVwGr tlN 1:80.000 •w.r.Ma,wwawN..1.ro'1'dN.I z: Ganaraska Figure 4: Potential groundwater discharge areas ------- ----- ------------- Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features v Executive Summary 1 Wilmot Creek Tributaries Foster Creek Hunter Creek — Orono Creek Stalker Creek — Wilmot Creek — Roads Lake Ontario M..ssa.are.wr...on we.a..r.n.p>, j N o 1,250 two saoo A Meters mrlmfse yM wMgMnyTnYrOm4pTe.IY.fMeN-pw�uMn+oYr p % �araska 7:BO.000 arc ww.ww wo.cwwwKoi...se,.,n.:a» Figure 5: Wilmot Creek tributaries Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vi Executive Summary Surface water quality as a whole in is generally good, with only localized problems. Physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and alkalinity) indicate that surface water quality can be resilient to acidification, eutrophication and chemical additions. Chloride has been increasing significantly since the 1960s and 1970s, as indicated at the long-term provincial monitoring stations. Within the Orono Creek tributary there is a difference in chloride concentrations between months dominated by rain (May to October inclusive) and months dominated by mixed precipitation and snow (November to April inclusive). Total phosphorus exceeds the Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) more often then any other nutrient, but never more than 45% of the time. Since 1964 total phosphorus has declined at the Squair Road Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN) station, and there has been a decline since 1973 at the Regional Road 2 station. Unionized ammonia has been greater than the PWQO of 0.02 milligrams per litre (mg/L) 19% of the time as sampled through the Ganaraska Region Water Quality Monitoring Network. At the Squair Road and Regional Road 2 PWQMN stations nitrate-N has been increasing since 2002, and exceeded the Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG) 36% of the time at the Squair Road station. At the Regional Road 2 PWQMN station, nitrite-N concentrations have been declining since 2002, and concentrations have never exceeded federal guidelines since 2002 when sampled through the two monitoring programs. Nutrients therefore can be considered the water quality parameter most capable of fluctuating beyond recommended guidelines; however exceedences may be related to high runoff due to storm events, or land use. Groundwater quality data is limited on a watershed scale. Information from water well records, the municipal water system and the Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network (PGMN) indicates that there are naturally occurring groundwater quality parameters that can be aesthetically unpleasing from a human consumption standpoint. However, the quality of surface water is also reflective of groundwater inputs, indicating that groundwater quality in the Wilmot Creek watershed is generally good. Wilmot Creek supports a diverse biological community. The fisheries are supported by a sustainable habitat of cold to cool water within the upper three- quarters of the watershed, with warm water communities in the lower main branch of the watershed (Figure 6). Riparian habitats provide buffering capacity to human influences in many of the stream reaches. Wilmot Creek supports a fish community dominated by Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), scuplins (Cottidae species), darters (Etheostoma species), and cyprinids. Migratory Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawn in the lower reaches. Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vii Executive Summary 0I ` Fish Communities Legend Groupings o • Groupi-Darters and Cypnnids y b • Group2-Mottled Satlpin and Rainbow Trout • G oup2i-Brook Trout . • Group4-Slimy Sculpin and Brown Trout r �I O 1'100.066 CR 3.000 1.500 0 30006 I*ft �_ ,eweuvn�,wrr..u.n•r•" IIM1Mu1X14IIXNII ws�wsa�,�N.•i+wwn.a�xw Figure 6: Fish communities within Wilmot Creek The terrestrial natural habitat of Wilmot Creek includes forest, meadows and wetlands (Figure 7). At 25%, forest cover is below the commonly used guideline of 30%. Interior forest habitat is found in only about 12% of the forested watershed, primarily in the rural landscape. Forests are primarily found in the headwaters and river valleys, and located on private and public lands, such as the Orono Crown Lands. Indicator species such as birds and frogs can indicate the health of forest and wetland habitats. Numerous species at risk may inhabit the Wilmot Creek watershed and therefore should be considered in management planning. Invasive species such as Dog-strangling Vine (Cynanchum rossicum), Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Viii Executive Summary European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) pose a threat to terrestrial habitat health. Wetland Development t% 13% r Forest 25% Savanna and Thicket Y `n Meadow/Grassland h '" 6% Agriculture 52% Figure 7: Land cover based on ecological land classification The Wilmot Creek watershed is not only an important environmental feature to the communities of the watershed; it plays an important role in a larger context. For example, Wilmot Creek contributes to the health and resources of Lake Ontario. In addition, Lake Ontario is a drinking water source for thousands of Ontario residents. However, Wilmot Creek has the potential to be influenced by future stresses such as climate change and the extension of Highway 407. The Wilmot Creek watershed is recognized for its fisheries resource, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The development of a watershed plan, which is required under the Oak Ridges Moraine Act, 2001, will aim to conserve and sustainably manage the Wilmot Creek watershed for current and future generations. ----------------------------------- Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features ix Executive Summary I Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan October 2009 ANN 2% i �Ganaraska CONSERVATION Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority f �Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Wilmot Creek watershed. This document creates the foundation of the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dai, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Wilmot Creek watershed. Maps were created by the GRCA GiS Department, Brian Curran, B.Sc., Steve Nowak, B.A. and Jeff Moxley. This document represents the first of its kind for the Wilmot Creek watershed and complements the 1966 and 1976 Ganaraska Region Conservation Reports (Department of Energy and Resources Management 1966, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 1976). Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Wilmot Creek watershed and its resources. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2009. Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Wilmot Creek Background Report: &L EM Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features The Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features documents historic and current conditions of the Wilmot Creek watershed. This document creates the foundation for the Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan. It is envisioned that the Wilmot Creek Background Report and the forthcoming Wilmot Creek Watershed Plan will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the watershed and its resources. The Wilmot Creek watershed flows through the Municipality of Clarington in the Regional Municipality of Durham and has its uppermost headwaters in the City of Kawartha Lakes (Figure 1). Historic events have shaped the watershed into its present-day condition. Most notable are the effects of dams and settlement patterns caused by the location of road and rail corridors. Today, the watershed supports a population of 8,258 people, a productive agricultural community, and a mix of natural resources and recreational uses. In addition, residents depend on water from the watershed for domestic and economic use; however residents of Newcastle rely on Lake Ontario for its source of water. Shaped thousands of years ago by glacial activity, the watershed lies on Paleozoic bedrock and its topographic and hydrogeological features include the Oak Ridges Moraine, the South Slope and the Iroquois Plain physiographic regions (Figure 2). Corresponding surficial geology and soils help dictate groundwater flows, aquifer locations, and groundwater is recharge and discharge areas (Figures 3 and 4). The main branch of Wilmot Creek is joined by four other tributaries; Orono Creek, Hunter Creek, Stalker Creek and Foster Creek (Figure 5). The entire watershed is 98 square kilometers (kM2). Protection of the Wilmot Creek watershed has been influenced by surface water studies such as floodplain mapping and hydraulic studies. Regulations are also in place to protect people and property from flood waters, and to protect some of the natural features of the watershed. Flows in Wilmot Creek are generally resilient to stresses such as drought and water use, and adequately provide for aquatic habitat and human use. Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features i Executive Summary Leskard r Kirby Orono • Political Boundaries Municipality of Clarington City of Kawartha Lakes Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Boundary Settlement Areas — Roads Wilmot Creek Newcastle Lake Ontarw N 0 1.250 2.500 5.000 j MNq YMMnAIM1 Nyrryl..4n M1iq{ Meters �Ganaraska Figure 1 : Wilmot Creek Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features i Executive Summary 1 \ Physiographic Regions Oak Ridges Moraine South Slope Iroquois Plain — Roads V Wilmot Creek Lake Ontario N 0 1.259 2.500 5.000 ,`„° Meters �Ganaraska aearr,ryrrmr�omu.eA»weraNerara.: coumr+m,ow 7:80,000 ar..ew....eA,e.,..c4py.n,a..r.ww moe Figure 2: Physiographic regions Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features 111 Executive Summary 1 F , Potential Groundwater Recharge Areas Recharge High'4201mm;year) —.. Low:60(inmtyear) <• — Roads Wilmot Creek Lake Ontario N 0 1,300 2,600 5200 YNwtlNFbeiYy,m,M,C V1MMmq �I_ Meters F.. Wc.�r.wp,re...wmernewm�e. Goanaraska 1 X0.000 Figure 3: Potential groundwater recharge Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features iv Executive Summary A 11Y Potential Groundwater Discharge High JIM Low — Roads Wilmot Creek - Lake Ontario No 1.250 2500 5.000 TM"s.,�wm.r.woo.e,h.msaww..•a. Cewn',en4Ml,+wmn.w.�Nd 1 rNgaNYl1mMm�1W-M lY mp A� Meters /Ganaraska 1:90,000 acsaW°im"a'�°m wm°'�'w cae.u,.h aiw�w.. �( cdusmwnor. meq+ma«nn,u,mA Figure 4: Potential groundwater discharge areas Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features v Executive Summary r v i Wilmot Creek Tributaries Fosler Creek i Hunter Creek — Orono Creek Stalker Creek — Wilmot Creek — Roads Lake Ontario N o 1.250 zso0 5.000y. A Meters wryMMW�nv� AM �� e•..=q�-..»�-�,..^�.4,,,..,^.:. �Ganaraska w=ac.awvr«^•°^'aaawhw..w.srw.n«w... mrnerric« Figure 5: Wilmot Creek tributaries Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic ,Biotic and Cultural Features vi Executive Summary Surface water quality as a whole in is generally good, with only localized problems. Physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and alkalinity) indicate that surface water quality can be resilient to acidification, eutrophication and chemical additions. Chloride has been increasing significantly since the 1960s and 1970s, as indicated at the long-term provincial monitoring stations. Within the Orono Creek tributary there is a difference in chloride concentrations between months dominated by rain (May to October inclusive) and months dominated by mixed precipitation and snow (November to April inclusive). Total phosphorus exceeds the Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) more often then any other nutrient, but never more than 45% of the time. Since 1964 total phosphorus has declined at the Squair Road Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN) station, and there has been a decline since 1973 at the Regional Road 2 station. Unionized ammonia has been greater than the PWQO of 0.02 milligrams per litre (mg/L) 19% of the time as sampled through the Ganaraska Region Water Quality Monitoring Network. At the Squair Road and Regional Road 2 PWQMN stations nitrate-N has been increasing since 2002, and exceeded the Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG) 36% of the time at the Squair Road station. At the Regional Road 2 PWQMN station, nitrite-N concentrations have been declining since 2002, and concentrations have never exceeded federal guidelines since 2002 when sampled through the two monitoring programs. Nutrients therefore can be considered the water quality parameter most capable of fluctuating beyond recommended guidelines; however exceedences may be related to high runoff due to storm events, or land use. Groundwater quality data is limited on a watershed scale. Information from water well records, the municipal water system and the Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network (PGMN) indicates that there are naturally occurring groundwater quality parameters that can be aesthetically unpleasing from a human consumption standpoint. However, the quality of surface water is also reflective of groundwater inputs, indicating that groundwater quality in the Wilmot Creek watershed is generally good. Wilmot Creek supports a diverse biological community. The fisheries are supported by a sustainable habitat of cold to cool water within the upper three- quarters of the watershed, with warm water communities in the lower main branch of the watershed (Figure 6). Riparian habitats provide buffering capacity to human influences in many of the stream reaches. Wilmot Creek supports a fish community dominated by Brook Trout (Salvelinus tontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), scuplins (Cottidae species), darters (Etheostoma species), and cyprinids. Migratory Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawn in the lower reaches. ------ ----- — --------------------- Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vii Executive Summary i O Fish Communities Legend Groupings o • Groupl -Darters and Cypnnids • Group2-Mottled Sculpin and Rainbow Trout • Group3-Brook Trout • Group4-Shiny Soulpin and Brown Trout 0 O P 1:100,068 't t 3. 1 3000 MebM - Figure 6: Fish communities within Wilmot Creek The terrestrial natural habitat of Wilmot Creek includes forest, meadows and wetlands (Figure 7). At 25%, forest cover is below the commonly used guideline of 30%. Interior forest habitat is found in only about 12% of the forested watershed, primarily in the rural landscape. Forests are primarily found in the headwaters and river valleys, and located on private and public lands, such as the Orono Crown Lands. Indicator species such as birds and frogs can indicate the health of forest and wetland habitats. Numerous species at risk may inhabit the Wilmot Creek watershed and therefore should be considered in management planning. Invasive species such as Dog-strangling Vine (Cynanchum rossicum), Wilmot Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Vlil Executive Summary European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) pose a threat to terrestrial habitat health. Wetland Development 1% 13% a Forest Savanna and Thicket 3% Meadow/Grassland 6% Agriculture 52% Figure 7: Land cover based on ecological land classification The Wilmot Creek watershed is not only an important environmental feature to the communities of the watershed; it plays an important role in a larger context. For example, Wilmot Creek contributes to the health and resources of Lake Ontario. In addition, Lake Ontario is a drinking water source for thousands of Ontario residents. However, Wilmot Creek has the potential to be influenced by future stresses such as climate change and the extension of Highway 407. The Wilmot Creek watershed is recognized for its fisheries resource, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The development of a watershed plan, which is required under the Oak Ridges Moraine Act, 2001, will aim to conserve and sustainably manage the Wilmot Creek watershed for current and future generations. Wilmot Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features ix Executive Summary k f ys�� �- I• e Ganaraska River Watershed Plan 2010 A: A • �Ganaraska - CONSEIIVATgN �n. umm�>.a Pon dope Township of Hamilton IF Of AdIlk kWART TOWMf NIf Oi Northumberland - CAVAnrMONAGHM ! • county -- V'eC���]Z (:ufi •.Ka�mdui y.m '�� lYwftM.RyM/wla LsudinX ehr Way Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Ganaraska River watershed and its resources. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data presented in the Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written by Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician and Mark Peacock, P. Eng., Director, Watershed Services with technical assistance from staff of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA): Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Magdi Widaatalla P.Geo., M.Sc., Manager,.Watershed Services Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department. Brian Curran, B.Sc., GIS Technician Jeff Moxley, Manager GIS/IT Steve Nowak, B.A., GIS Technician Photo Credits: GRCA staff, Sally Walsh and Kris Vande Sompel This document was created for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Ganaraska River watershed. Review and input into this document by the Ganaraska River Technical Review Committee, Ganaraska River Community Advisory Committee, stakeholders and residents occurred through the watershed planning process. Financial support for the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Port Hope. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2010. Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written with review and input from members of the Ganaraska River Technical Review Committee and Ganaraska River Community Advisory Committee. Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority David Kerr City of Kawartha Lakes Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Ron Warne Municipality of Port Hope Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Karen Ellis Township of Cavan Monaghan Doug Thompson Township of Hamilton Christina Harvey Northumberland County Meredith Carter Otonabee Conservation Atul Jain Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit Jacques Perreault Health units and departments Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Central Region Amanda McLachlan Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Eastern Region Dan Tallion Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough District Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Barry Walker Municipality Port Hope Environmental Advisory Committee Bill Crowley Resident Carole Payne Willow Beach Field Naturalists Christian Piette Resident Dan Thomey Landowner and Ganaraska Valley Fishing Club Dave Workman Resident and Cameco Corporation Doug Morgan Resident Glenda Lynch Resident Gord and Cathy Humphreys Resident Hida Manns Durham Environmental Advisory Committee Jim Waddell Resident Marion Manders Resident and Save the Ganaraska Again Mike Goleski Fleming College Student Paul Burnham Northumberland Federation of Agriculture Rob McDonald Resident Robert Mink Landowner Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation anaraska River Watershed Plani G Executive Ri Summary The Ganaraska River watershed is recognized for its fisheries, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan has been developed to conserve, enhance and manage the watershed and its resources for current and future generations. The purpose of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan includes the following: • Fulfill the watershed planning requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (Appendix C). • Create community awareness and ownership of the Ganaraska River watershed and its plan. • Provide recommendations that conserve the ecological and hydrological integrity of the watershed. • Encourage land and resource uses that maintain, improve or restore the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed. • Provide recommendations that maintain or improve the elements that contribute to the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed, including the quality and quantity of water, and aquatic and terrestrial resources. Written for the municipalities, communities, residents and resource users of the watershed, this watershed plan outlines recommended management actions required to conserve this valuable resource for current and future generations. Recommended actions have been derived from scientific data outlined in the Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features (Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2009), local knowledge, municipal and agency input and review, and public consultation. Formal processes were carried out with direct review and input from the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. As a result of a year-long initiative, management actions, targets, monitoring and reporting activities have been formulated. The foundation of management actions is based on the goals and objectives of each watershed component, which is defined by the associated science. Each objective addresses multiple issues or opportunities in the Ganaraska River watershed. Management actions have been defined in terms of regulation and planning, stewardship, education and awareness, and land acquisition. A summary of goals, objectives and management actions are found below. Approval, adoption and implementation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan are the most important steps in this initiative. Participation and co-operation by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA), the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington, the Municipality of Port Hope, the Township of Hamilton, the Township of Cavan Monaghan and the City of Kawartha Lakes are needed to ensure adoption of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. In addition, participation by residents, businesses and stakeholders of the Ganaraska River watershed is required to see the desired outcomes and successes of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. ----------------------------------------- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 i Summary of Goals, Objectives and Management Actions Regulations and Planning • Implement future policies recommended in the Source Protection Plan created through the Clean Water Act. • Implement Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan policies across the Ganaraska River watershed. • Subwatershed level investigations • Implement future policies recommended in a Ganaraska Region Climate Change Strategy. • Development of a Ward 1, Municipality of Port Hope Urban Ganaraska River Plan. Stewardship: implement the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs throughout the Ganaraska River watershed. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to all aspects of the Ganaraska River watershed. In addition, the Ganaraska Forest Centre should be used to its full educational potential. Land Acquisition: environmental features may be acquired by a public authority for protection through the purchase of land, donation of land, land rental, conservation easements and land use covenants. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. It is also important to review and report on watershed plan implementation. Groundwater Quantity ecological Groundwater Quantity Goal 1.0: protect and enhance groundwater quantity for Objective 7.7: maintain or enhance groundwater recharge and discharge for ecological functions and human use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map groundwater features. • Identify groundwater features not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to groundwater features. • Protect recharge rates. • Set urban infiltration targets. Support for: • Current plan review mechanisms ------------------------------------ Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 i Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural cover in and adjacent to groundwater features. • Achieve the natural heritage system as the primary means of protecting groundwater features. • Enhance and protect groundwater features through best management practices conducted on the land. • Encourage the adoption of urban land use practices that increase groundwater recharge. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to groundwater quantity. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 1.2: manage and avoid actions that negatively affect aquifers (artesian, shallow and deep) and changes in groundwater flow. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Minimize groundwater flow alteration. • Minimize and manage artesian and flowing wells. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to aquifers and groundwater quantity. Objective 1.3: ensure sustainable rates of groundwater use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Restrict development in groundwater features needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and by-laws • Water conservation plan creation. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding water takings. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 ill improve Surface Water Quantity Goal 2.0: maintain and . . .. of the watershed. Objective 2.1: maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow of the Ganaraska River watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map features contributing to natural flows of the Ganaraska River. • Identify features contributing to natural flows of the Ganaraska River not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to features contributing to natural stream flows. • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Ganaraska River watershed. • Require development setbacks from the Ganaraska River. • Restrict development in features contributing to natural flows in the Ganaraska River needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. • Require urban stormwater best management practices. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Limit site alterations. • Develop hydropower infrastructure. Support for: • Existing legislation • Review mechanisms • Existing program implementation. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural vegetation using the natural heritage system throughout the watershed, in groundwater recharge areas, and to compensate for changes in imperviousness of the watershed. • Increase riparian buffers to reduce variability of overland runoff. • Increase water infiltration, storage and use on individual lots. • Protect, restore and enhance wetlands. • Carryout an urban stewardship program to address altered flows caused by stormwater management. • Increase channel stability using bioengineering in urbanized areas to mitigate erosion caused by altered flows. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding surface water quantity and the protection and enhancement of the form and function of streams. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. ----- — -------- ----- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 iv Objective 2.2: maintain and improve the level of flood hazard protection for residents, and for existing and proposed development. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Ganaraska River watershed. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Stormwater quantity control. Support for: • Existing policies and programs Recommended program: • Flood recovery program Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Manage or decommission online ponds to ensure they do not pose a flood hazard risk. • Implement re-vegetation to attenuate flood flows (e.g., riparian plantings, grass swales and waterways). Education and Awareness: provide information regarding flood forecasting and warning and emergency response. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: Protect floodplains through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Groundwater Quality groundwater Groundwater Quality Goal 3.0: protect supplies drinking water o protect ecological Objective 3.1: protect and enhance the quality of groundwater by addressing existing pathways and contaminant sources. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Ensure that wells or boreholes are properly maintained or abandoned. Policy investigation and creation: • Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment. Recommended program: • Septic re-inspection program ------------ ---- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 v Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water- Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Upgrade or decommission wells and boreholes. • Repair septic systems and provide for septic inspections. • Upgrade or newly construct fuel and chemical storage facilities. • Support septic re-inspection program. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and drinking water protection. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 3.2: manage the quality of groundwater through the implementation of best management practices throughout the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map highly vulnerable aquifers. • Identify areas vulnerable to groundwater contamination not yet known. • Restrict development in highly vulnerable aquifers. Support for: • Existing legislation and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water- Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs encourage and provide incentives for best management practices in highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and best land use practices. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect vulnerable groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. ------ - -------- -- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 vi �-surface Water Quality Objective 4.1: manage and enhance rural water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from the Ganaraska River. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. • Reduce chloride concentrations. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing and new programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Decrease and mitigate non-point pollution sources (e.g., overland runoff). • Enhance, restore and properly manage riparian areas to buffer overland runoff. • Promote and encourage best management practices to protect water quality. • Increase natural cover as recommended by the natural heritage system. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding rural surface water quality. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.2: manage and enhance urban water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from the Ganaraska River. • Reduce chloride concentrations. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. • Maintain existing stormwater control structures. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Ensure public space management practices do not negatively impact surface water quality. • Ensure all public space management practices have a setback distance from the stream edge (e.g., a natural riparian area). • Create and implement an urban stream restoration and stewardship program that will benefit surface water quality. ------------------------------------------------ Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 vii Education and Awareness: provide information regarding urban surface water quality. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect surface water quality through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.3: create a spills action plan. Regulations and Planning Plan creation: spills action plan Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 5.1: protect and restore existing and native aquatic species and communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Adopt the Ganaraska River Fisheries Management Plan. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs accomplish the following: • Remove manmade instream barriers • Remove online ponds • Improve stream temperature. Support: • Corbett's Dam Fish Ladder operation Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic species. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. ---------------------------------------------------- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 Viii Objective 5.2: protect and enhance the form and function of instream habitat and riparian areas. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map aquatic habitats in the Ganaraska River watershed. • Identify aquatic habitats in the Ganaraska River watershed not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Adopt the Ganaraska River Fisheries Management Plan. Support for: • New programs • Existing review mechanisms and policies. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs accomplish the following: • Instream habitat creation • Erosion control projects • Increase of natural vegetation in riparian areas Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic habitat. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Terrestrial Natural Heritage "NIMEMINITTWIMMMM-Te WEE . .. Objective 6.1: reduce habitat fragmentation and promote connectivity. Regulations and Planning. Recommended policies: • Identify and map terrestrial features in the Ganaraska River watershed. • Identify and map terrestrial features in the Ganaraska River watershed not yet known. • Reduce the impact of development on the natural heritage system and significant features. • Produce net gains in the natural heritage system. Recommended planning strategy: • Create a regional terrestrial natural heritage system and strategy. Support for: • Existing plan review mechanisms Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Ganaraska River watershed in target areas defined by the natural heritage system. Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 Ix , r • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Increase and enhance tallgrass prairie habitats. Restore degraded sites such as Brownfields or aggregate extraction sites. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding terrestrial natural heritage. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: Protect natural heritage features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.2: maintain, enhance and restore the natural diversity of vegetation communities in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Net gains in the natural heritage system Support for: • Existing by-laws Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Ganaraska River watershed using the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Increase tallgrass prairie habitats. • Protect and increase cover of old growth forests. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding vegetation communities. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: Protect vegetation communities through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.3: maintain, enhance and restore the diversity of native species in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Net gains in the natural heritage system ------------------------------------------- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 x Support for: • Existing legislation Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed with a focus on interior habitat. • Enhance and increase specific habitat types such as wetlands, vernal pools, tallgrass prairie and old growth forest. • Assist in invasive species control or removal. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species, their status, and threats to these species. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect species habitats through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.4: mitigate and reduce negative impacts of urban and rural land use Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Net gains in the natural heritage system Plan creation: • Urban natural heritage system Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species and threats to these species. Include information on how to deal with the threats. # Public Health and Well-being Public Health and Well-being Goal 7.0: promote healthy communities in re • Objective 7.1: manage and improve the environmental quantity, quality and social benefits of existing and future public spaces. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Increasing of public spaces • Consideration of the "Float your Fanny Down the Ganny" river race. Support for: • Existing programs and initiatives — —-----------—----—--------—------------- Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 xi Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following in public spaces: • Increase natural, native vegetation. • Increase healthy lifestyle infrastructure. • Increase educational aspects of the public space. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding public spaces. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 7.2: encourage sustainable communities Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Increase in public transportation • Sustainable development design. Support for: Existing initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, increase actions around sustainable living. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding sustainable living and development for local residents and local businesses. Community Heritage : I Objective BA: increase awareness and appreciation of our community heritage. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding cultural heritage using partner programs. ------------------------------------------------------------ Ganaraska River Watershed Plan, 2010 xu Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan October 2009 j I. ,.. z iF Ganaraska CONSERVATION Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Ganaraska River watershed. This document creates the foundation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dal, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Ganaraska River watershed. Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department, Brian Curran, B.Sc., Steve Nowak, B.A. and Jeff Moxley. This document complements Richardson (1944) and the 1966 and 1976 Ganaraska Region Conservation Reports (Department of Energy and Resources Management 1966, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 1976). Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Ganaraska River watershed and its resources. --- ---- — — -- ------- Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2009. Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Executive Summary The Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features documents the historical and current conditions of the Ganaraska River watershed. This document creates the foundation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. It is envisioned that the Ganaraska River Background Report and the forthcoming Ganaraska River Watershed Plan will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the watershed and its resources. The Ganaraska River watershed flows through the Municipality of Clarington, the Municipality of Port Hope, and the Township of Hamilton. Its uppermost headwaters are found in the City of Kawartha Lakes and the Township of Cavan Monaghan (Figure 1). Historic events have shaped the watershed into its present-day condition. Most notable are the effects of dams and settlement patterns caused by the location of road and rail corridors. Today, the watershed supports a population of 11,032 people, a productive agriculture community, and a mix of natural resources and recreational uses. In addition, residents depend on water from the watershed for domestic and economic use, although the residents of Ward 1 in the Municipality of Port Hope rely on Lake Ontario for its source of water. Shaped thousands of years ago by glacial activity, the regional study area lies on Paleozoic bedrock, and its topographic and hydrogeological features include the Oak Ridges Moraine, the Peterborough Drumlin Fields, the South Slope and the Iroquois Plain physiographic regions (Figure 2). Corresponding surficial geology and soils help dictate groundwater flow, aquifer and aquitard location, groundwater, and recharged and discharged areas (Figures 3 and 4). The Ganaraska River drains a total area of 278 square kilometers (km2). The main branch of the Ganaraska River is joined by 10 other tributaries; the largest being the North Ganaraska Branch (Figure 5). Protection of the Ganaraska River watershed has been influenced by surface water studies such as floodplain mapping and hydraulic studies. Regulations are also in place to protect people and property from flood waters, such as the flood that occurred in 1980, and to protect the natural features of the watershed. Flows in the Ganaraska River are generally resilient to stresses such as drought and water use, and adequately provide for aquatic habitat and human use. Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary , At ZOak Political Boundaries �"{MumnpdrlY of GUnn9an \eme `` '.MancpalrlY of GW ncpa �' iewnknp of namro-on \ � rontwr 11. ctiv o,K.,,. lw L.., u,rn.ms,a cma Mwa]I.un -S'aMnnnlNav Itean aMVaaka aivar LW OINb M 0 1,600 ).000 BAW BWO 12.000 +'+nr..^^w..:»...wan A M.WS t:126.oW Figure 1: Ganaraska River it Physiographic Regions -OW,alG.M.- S1. ®p.gNNggh pYmlrn Flay IrypWn6lronl'ne ReWs Ganarnka Rlve, �LMa Onlxy N 0 IS00 J.OW 6000 0000 11W0 �+ra�+r��v:�.�v.^ ^• I A Matters w ry — . . . Ganaraska 1:126.OW +.-.—a...�a.�wn Figure 2: Physiographic regions Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary t a� rl ,� �, �A.� � is � .i • ��. _-��+-;�t_`�,'�,��� 1�`Vii► L=�'„ �j R` EPotential Grovoclwater Recharge — groundwater recharge Potential Groundwater Discharge HO Figure 4: {(µ Yan 4f. Potential groundwater discharge areas Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summar, Tributaries -8u Bmaoh —Po - cam SM W Brad, caa.r. R. ___jo rooe araixn t La.C .H. LNaa Ganemake BraMh Mda Branch l�nbrlh Gaivraraa Brareh -Ouapa ftarwn !�Sapa&arm Wd. m.Branch N 0 1�6 3,M 6.000 ILM 12.000 n+.«o.>.»..�.,_........ati.ar.e Af G'anataska Figure 5: Ganaraska River tributaries Surface water quality as a whole is generally good, with only localized problems. Physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and alkalinity) indicate that surface water quality can be resilient to acidification, eutrophication and chemical additions. Chloride concentrations in the Ganaraska River have increased since 1965 at the Peter Street Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN) station and since 2002 at the Osaca PWQMN station. However, concentrations at the Osaca station have never exceeded 16 milligrams per litre (mg/L) when sampled, and since 2002, concentrations at the Peter Street station have never exceeded 50 mg/L. Total phosphorus exceeds the Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) more often than any other nutrient. Since 1965, total phosphorus has declined at the Peter Street PWQMN station, and there has been a decline since 2002 at the Sylvan Glen and Osaca PWQMN stations. In addition, phosphorus is seen to increase with an increment in stream flow, potentially due to increased surface runoff. Unionized ammonia has been greater than the PWQO of 0.02 mg/L, 28% of the time, as sampled through the Ganaraska Region Water Quality Monitoring Network (GRWQMN). Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features iv Executive Summary Nitrate-N never exceeded the Canadian Water Quality Guidelines (CWQG) when sampled thorough the GRWQMN or PWQMN. Nitrite-N has only exceeded the CWQG once, and only when sampled through the GRWQMN. Nitrite-N has been declining since 2002 at the Peter Street and Sylvan Glen PWQMN stations. Nitrate-N and nitrite-N are seen to increase as flows increase, potentially due to increased surface runoff. Groundwater quality data is limited on a watershed scale. Information from water well records, the municipal water system and the Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network (PGMN) indicates that there are naturally occurring groundwater quality parameters that can be aesthetically unpleasing from a human consumption standpoint. However, the quality of surface water is also reflective of groundwater inputs, indicating the groundwater quality in the Ganaraska River watershed is generally good. The Ganaraska River supports a diverse biological community. The fisheries are supported by a sustainable habitat of cold to cool water within the upper two- thirds of the watershed, with a diverse and migratory community in the lower Main Branch of the watershed (Figure 6). Riparian habitats provide buffering capacity to human influences in many of the stream reaches. The Ganaraska River supports a fish community dominated by Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), scuplins (Cottidae species), darters (Etheostoma species), and cyprinids. Migratory Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawns in the lower reaches. Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features v Executive Summary c • 4 1 k r S 0 A • fGanaraska _ • TMs map K M Inftnrn n W,pngk ody sN ma Genaraska ,0 Fish Community Omps Region Conservation ANhway take no ie,00ro b ay for.nor <i • &oak POW aM 9Cak'n tM«�Prap.nW b,Ofn.." ftR"a Onr,.W map p M G e8 O &o,w TmdeM 4cNbm ,o,v y: JtN,Mt roof. &Wrtl R ueirp GRCA bn wovkfM by IM Minishy d NnurM Raawrwk.GRCA aIW O B, r Troawd Cyprklds alMr nr n.60 sourps,Copyright lc)Ovem's priMer.3IXY! ! • Ran Tnoot n cp nnd' o t z a e e f us aoo Figure 6: Fish communities in the Ganaraska River The terrestrial natural habitat of the Ganaraska River includes forest, meadows and wetlands (Figure 7). At 44%, forest cover is above the commonly used guideline of 30%. However, higher quality interior forest habitat is found in about 43% of the forested areas of the watershed, primarily in the rural landscape. Forests dominate the headwaters and river valleys, and are located on private and public lands. Indicator species such as birds and frogs can help us to understand the health of forest and wetland habitats. Numerous species at risk potentially inhabit the Ganaraska River watershed and therefore should be considered in management planning. Invasive species such as Dog-strangling Vine (Cynanchum rossicum), European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) pose a threat to terrestrial habitat health. Ganaraska River Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vi Executive Summary Savanna and Thicket 2% Developed 6% Meadow/Grassland 5% Welland 4% Forest 41% Agriculture 42% Figure 7: Land cover based on ecological land classification The Ganaraska River watershed is not only an important environmental feature to the communities of the watershed; it plays an important role in a larger context. For example, the Ganaraska River contributes to the health and resources of Lake Ontario. In addition, Lake Ontario is a drinking water source for thousands of Ontario residents. However, the Ganaraska River has the potential to be influenced by future stresses such as climate change. The Ganaraska River watershed is recognized for its fisheries resource, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The development of a watershed plan, which is required under the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan, 2002, will aim to conserve and sustainably manage the Ganaraska River watershed for current and future generations. ---- --- ------ Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vii Executive Summary � Y Y Y i � S �a a Watershed Graham Creek Plan 2010 Ganaraska 1 a � _ e ELi Port Hope Moon Northumberland comy Leading the Way Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Graham Creek Watershed Plan was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Graham Creek watershed and its resources. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data presented in the Graham Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. The Graham Creek Watershed Plan was written by Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician and Mark Peacock, P. Eng., Director, Watershed Services with technical assistance from staff of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA). Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Magdi Widaatalla P.Geo., M.Sc., Manager, Watershed Services Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department. Brian Curran, B.Sc., GIS Technician Jeff Moxley, Manager GIS/IT Steve Nowak, B.A., GIS Technician Photo Credits: GRCA staff, Sally Walsh and Kris Vande Sompel This document was created for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Graham Creek watershed. Review and input into this document by the Technical Review Committee, Community Advisory Committee, stakeholders and residents occurred through the watershed planning process. Financial support for the Graham Creek Watershed Plan was provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of Port Hope Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2010. Graham Creek Watershed Plan. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Graham Creek Watershed Plan was written with review and input from members of the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Ron Warne Municipality of Port Hope Christina Harvey Northumberland County Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Jacques Perreault Durham Region Health Department Atul Jain Haliburton, Kawartha Pine Ridge District Health Unit Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Central Amanda McLachlan Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Eastern Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora Dan Tallion Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Alex Cannings Resident Brian Reid Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Bruce Blight Resident Chris Cloutier Dufferin Aggregates Colin Abernethy Resident David Best Landowner, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Emily Gruyters Durham College Student Gary Vandergast Resident Hugh Beauchamp Resident Janelle Andrews Durham Sustain Ability Jim Cleland Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Jim Kamstra Landowner Corry Kamstra Landowner Jim Yaki Resident Karin Murphy Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation The Graham Creek Watershed Plan The Graham Creek watershed is recognized for its fisheries, aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The Graham Creek Watershed Plan has been developed to conserve, enhance and manage the watershed and its resources for current and future generations. The purpose of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan includes the following: • Fulfill the watershed planning requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (Appendix C). • Create community awareness and ownership of the Graham Creek watershed and its plan. • Provide recommendations that conserve the ecological and hydrological integrity of the watershed. • Encourage land and resource uses that maintain, improve or restore the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed. • Provide recommendations that maintain or improve the elements that contribute to the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed, including the quality and quantity of water, and aquatic and terrestrial resources. Written for the municipalities, communities, residents and resource users of the watershed, this watershed plan outlines recommended management actions required to conserve this valuable resource for current and future generations. Recommended actions have been derived from scientific data outlined in the Graham Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features (Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2009), local knowledge, municipal and agency input and review, and public consultation. Formal processes were carried out with direct review and input from the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. As a result of a year-long initiative, management actions, targets, monitoring and reporting activities have been formulated. The foundation of management actions is based on the goals and objectives of each watershed component, which is defined by the associated science. Each objective addresses multiple issues or opportunities in the Graham Creek watershed. Management actions have been defined in terms of regulation and planning, stewardship, education and awareness, and land acquisition. A summary of goals, objectives and management actions are found below. Approval, adoption and implementation of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan are the most important steps in this initiative. Participation and co-operation by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA), the Regional Municipality of Durham, Municipality of Clarington, the Municipality of Port Hope and Northumberland County are needed to ensure adoption of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan. In addition, participation by residents, businesses and stakeholders of the Graham Creek watershed is required to see the desired outcomes and successes of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan. --------------------------------- - - Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Summary of Goals, Objectives and Management Actions General Recommendations Regulations and Planning • Implement future policies recommended in the Source Protection Plan created through the Clean Water Act. • Implement Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan policies across the Graham Creek watershed. • Subwatershed level investigations • Implement future policies recommended in a Ganaraska Region Climate Change Strategy. Stewardship: implement the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land,Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs throughout the Graham Creek watershed. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to all aspects of the Graham Creek watershed. In addition, the Ganaraska Forest Centre should be used to its full educational potential. Land Acquisition: environmental features may be acquired by a public authority for protection through the purchase of land, donation of land, land rental, conservation easements and land use covenants. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. It is also important to review and report on watershed plan implementation. Groundwater Quantity Groundwater Quantity . .l 1.0: protect and enhance groundwater ecological functions Objective 1.1: maintain or enhance groundwater recharge and discharge for ecological functions and human use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map groundwater features. • Identify groundwater features not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to groundwater features. • Protect recharge rates. • Set urban infiltration targets. Support for: • Current plan review mechanisms Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural cover in and adjacent to groundwater features. • Achieve the natural heritage system as the primary means of protecting groundwater features. • Enhance and protect groundwater features through best management practices conducted on the land. • Encourage the adoption of urban land use practices that increase groundwater recharge. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to groundwater quantity. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 1.2: manage and avoid actions that negatively affect aquifers (artesian, shallow and deep) and changes in groundwater flow. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Minimize groundwater flow alteration. • Minimize and manage artesian and flowing wells. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to aquifers and groundwater quantity. Objective 1.3: ensure sustainable rates of groundwater use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Restrict development in groundwater features needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and by-laws • Water conservation plan creation. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding water takings. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. -------------- -------- iii Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Sufface Wat er Quantity of -• Objective 2.1: maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow of the Graham Creek watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map features contributing to natural flows of Graham Creek. • Identify features contributing to natural flows of Graham Creek not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to features contributing to natural stream flows. • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Graham Creek watershed. • Require development setbacks from Graham Creek. • Restrict development in features contributing to natural flows in Graham Creek needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. • Require urban stormwater best management practices. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Limit site alterations. Support for: • Existing legislation • Review mechanisms • Existing program implementation. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural vegetation using the natural heritage system throughout the watershed, in groundwater recharge areas, and to compensate for changes in imperviousness of the watershed. • Increase riparian buffers to reduce variability of overland runoff. • Increase water infiltration, storage and use on individual lots. • Protect, restore and enhance wetlands. • Carry out an urban stewardship program to address altered flows caused by stormwater management. • Increase channel stability using bioengineering in urbanized areas to mitigate erosion caused by altered flows. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding surface water quantity and the protection and enhancement of the form and function of streams. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 iv Objective 2.2: maintain and improve the level of flood hazard protection for residents, and for existing and proposed development. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Limit cumulative hard surfaces in the Graham Creek watershed. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Stormwater quantity control. Support for: • Existing policies and programs Recommended program: Flood recovery program Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Manage or decommission online ponds to ensure they do not pose a flood hazard risk. • Implement re-vegetation to attenuate flood flows (e.g., riparian plantings, grass swales and waterways). Education and Awareness: provide information regarding flood forecasting and warning and emergency response. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect floodplains through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Groundwater Qua -x . . Objective 3.1: protect and enhance the quality of groundwater by addressing existing pathways and contaminant sources. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Ensure that wells or boreholes are properly maintained or abandoned. Policy investigation and creation: • Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment. Recommended program: Septic re-inspection program --------------------- Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 v Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Upgrade or decommission wells and boreholes. • Repair septic systems and provide for septic inspections. • Upgrade or newly construct fuel and chemical storage facilities. • Support septic re-inspection program. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and drinking water protection. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 3.2: manage the quality of groundwater through the implementation of best management practices throughout the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map highly vulnerable aquifers. • Identify areas vulnerable to groundwater contamination not yet known. • Restrict development in highly vulnerable aquifers. Support for: • Existing legislation and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, encourage and provide incentives for best management practices in highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas. Education and Awareness:provide information regarding groundwater quality and best land use practices. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect vulnerable groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Surface Water Quality . . i • . Mlijire is MEMO Objective 4.1: manage and enhance rural water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from Graham Creek. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vi Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing and new programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Decrease and mitigate non-point pollution sources (e.g., overland runoff). • Enhance, restore and properly manage riparian areas to buffer overland runoff. • Promote and encourage best management practices to protect water quality. • Increase natural cover as recommended by the natural heritage system. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding rural surface water quality. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.2: manage and enhance urban water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from Graham Creek. • Reduce chloride concentrations. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. • Maintain existing stormwater control structures. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Work with local businesses to carryout practices that do not negatively impact surface water quality. • Ensure public space management practices do not negatively impact surface water quality. • Ensure all public spaces management practices have a set back distance from the stream edge (e.g., a natural riparian area). • Create and implement an urban stream restoration and stewardship program that will benefit surface water quality. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding urban surface water quality. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: Protect surface water quality through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vii Objective 4.3: create a spills action plan. Regulations and Planning Plan creation: spills action plan Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Aquatic Habitat and Species Objective 5.1: protect and restore existing and native aquatic species and communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Adopt the Graham Creek Fish Habitat Management Plan. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Remove man-made instream barriers. • Remove online ponds. • Improve stream temperature. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic species. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 5.2: protect and enhance the form and function of instream habitat and riparian areas. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map aquatic habitats in the Graham Creek watershed. • Identify aquatic habitats in the Graham Creek watershed not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Adopt the Graham Creek Fish Habitat Management Plan. Support for: • New programs • Existing review mechanisms and policies. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: ----------------------------------------------- Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 viii • Instream habitat creation. • Erosion control projects. • Increase of natural vegetation in riparian areas. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic habitat. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Terrestrial Natural Heritage Terrestrial Natural Heritage Goal 6.0: maintain the native biodiversity and ecological Objective 6,1: reduce habitat fragmentation and promote connectivity. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Identify and map terrestrial features in the Graham Creek watershed. • Identify terrestrial features in the Graham Creek watershed not yet known. • Reduce the impact of development on the natural heritage system and significant features. • Produce net gains within the natural heritage system. Recommended planning strategy: • Create a regional terrestrial natural heritage system and strategy Support for: • Existing plan review mechanisms Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Graham Creek watershed in target areas define by the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Increase and enhance tallgrass prairie habitats. • Restore degraded sites such as Brownfields or aggregate extraction sites. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding terrestrial natural heritage. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: Protect natural heritage features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 ix Objective 6.2: maintain, enhance and restore the natural diversity of vegetation communities in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Net gains in the natural heritage system • Harvesting of resources from wetlands Support for: Existing by-laws Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the Graham Creek watershed using the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Protect and increase cover of old growth forest. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding vegetation communities. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect vegetation communities through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.3: maintain, enhance and restore the diversity of native species in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Net gains within the natural heritage system Support for: • Existing legislation Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover within the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed with a focus on interior habitat. • Enhance and increase specific habitat types such as wetlands, vernal pools and old growth forest. • Assist in invasive species control or removal. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species, their status, and threats to these species. ----------------------------------- --- Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 x Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect species habitats through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.4: mitigate and reduce negative impacts of urban and rural land use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: Net gains in the natural heritage system Plan creation: • Urban natural heritage system Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species and threats to these species. Include information on how to deal with the threats. Public Health and Well-being relation Public Health and Well-being Goal 7.0: promote healthy communities in • the environment. Objective 7.1: manage and improve the environmental quantity, quality and social benefits of existing and future public spaces. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Increase of public spaces Support for: Existing programs and initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following in public spaces: • Increase natural, native vegetation. • Increase healthy lifestyle infrastructure. • Increase educational aspects of the public space. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding public spaces. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 e Objective 7.2: encourage sustainable communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: Increase in public transportation Support for: • Existing initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, increase actions around sustainable living. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding sustainable living and development for residents and local businesses. _ Comrgj Heritage Objective 8.1: increase awareness and appreciation of our community heritage. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding cultural heritage using partner programs. ------ ------——— ---—--—----------- -- Graham Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 A Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of Watershed Graham Creek Plan October 11 • t • • • / Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority A Ganaraska CONSE M ON The Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Graham Creek watershed, and creates the foundation of the Graham Creek Watershed Plan. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dai, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Graham Creek watershed. Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department, Brian Curran, B.Sc., Steve Nowak, B.A. and Jeff Moxley. This document represents the first of its kind for the Graham Creek watershed and complements the 1966 and 1976 Ganaraska Region Conservation Reports (Department of Energy and Resources Management 1966, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 1976). Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents has occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Graham Creek watershed and its resources. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2009. Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Port Hope, Ontario. The Graham Creek Background Report: L ."A' j,6 ,F611 [It a slim Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features;`' The Graham Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features documents historic and current conditions of the Graham Creek watershed. This document creates the foundation for the Graham Creek Watershed Plan. It is envisioned that the Graham Creek Background Report and the forthcoming Graham Creek Watershed Plan will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Graham Creek watershed and its resources. The Graham Creek watershed flows through Ward 2 of the Municipality of Port Hope in Northumberland County and Ward 4 of the Municipality of Clarington in the Regional Municipality of Durham (Figure 1). Historic events have shaped the watershed into present-day condition. Most notable are the effects of settlement patterns caused by the location of road and rail corridors. Today, the watershed supports a population of 3,538 people, a productive agriculture community, and a mix of natural resources and recreational uses. In addition, residents depend on water from the watershed for domestic and economic use, although the residents in Newcastle rely on Lake Ontario for its source of water. Shaped thousands of years ago by glacial activity, the Graham Creek watershed lies on Paleozoic bedrock, and its topographic and hydrogeological features include the Oak Ridges Moraine, the South Slope and the Iroquois Plain physiographic regions (Figure 2). Corresponding surficial geology and soils help dictate where groundwater flows, where aquifers lie, and where groundwater is recharged and discharged (Figures 3 and 4). The Graham Creek watershed drains an area of 78 square kilometers (km). Mulligan Creek is the largest tributary of Graham Creek; however other tributaries such as Crooked Creek and Lytle Creek also exist. Protection of the Graham Creek watershed has been influenced by surface water studies such as floodplain mapping and hydraulic studies. Regulations are also in place to protect people and property from flood waters, and to protect some of the natural features of the watershed. Surface water quality as a whole in is generally good, with only localized problems. Physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and alkalinity) indicate that surface water quality can be resilient to acidification, eutrophication and chemical additions. Chloride has been increasing since 1965, as indicated at a long-term provincial monitoring station. Nutrients such as total phosphorus and nitrate-N can be considered the surface water quality parameter most capable of fluctuating beyond recommended guidelines. However, there has been a decline in total phosphorus since 1965 at the long-term provincial monitoring station, and exceedances may be related to high runoff due to storm events or land use. Groundwater quality data is limited in the Graham Creek watershed, however quality is influenced by geology and land uses in the area. Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features j Executive Summary Starkville Crooked Creek Creek 1 i i Newtonville L Political Boundaries Oak Ridges Moraine Planning Boundary - -- - Municipality of Clarington Newcastle Municipality of Port Hope settlement Areas — Roads Graham Creek Lake Ontario m.p.a�.m..sww�rdM.eww.+..io� N 0 500 1,000 2000 3.000 4.000 a °�°�" ° �► A .� ga.v.rMara..wwwh¢bau �Ganaraska 1:60.000 �anw..cmnWo RMxm ��"`m'�r Figure 1: Graham Creek watershed Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary Physiographic Region Oak Ridges Moraine - South Slope Iroquois Plain Roads Graham Creek Lake Ontario N 0 500 1.000 2.000 9.000 4,000 . E. EEE MOM . GGanaska A ,80.000 W..wwruxn.vw.ow Figure 2: Physiographic regions --------------- -------------------------- Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary L l r Potential Groundwater Recharge \' High:420(mm/year) Low:60(mm/year) Graham Creek — Roads Lake Ontario mo.r us..rimwv�.v+r.,ua.o..�.tww j N 0 ass 9% 1980 2970 3,960 A rosters wa..r ma a .�ua«t om mm Ganaraska n.inva oaw q ti uwet a n..n n.wa. Oo•+wr+.mu 1:60.000 .ww,.,mpwrtmpyt imP�n rv.r.xon Figure 3: Potential groundwater recharge ----------------------------------------------- Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features iv Executive Summary :z Potential Groundwater Discharge High Low Roads Graham Creek Lake Ontario N u soo 1,000 2,000 3,000 e.060 A aawnaaHa rmma.. « .� �Ganaraska 160.000 �"^'^^�w++aM a••aaaiaw•eanawa �-- cbrcrc aw mno+r.s GAV+Kiu�nwrw.zoe carffr.�nw Figure 4: Potential groundwater discharge areas ------------------------------------------------ Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features v Executive Summary 40 species of fish have been sampled in the Graham Creek watershed. Five or 13% of the species are not native to the Lake Ontario basin. Stream quality based on Steedman's IBI calculated one site being excellent (6%), 11 sites good (69%), four sites fair (25%), and zero (0%) poor sites (Figure 5). The terrestrial natural habitat of the Graham Creek watershed includes forest, meadows and wetlands (Figure 6). At 35%, forest cover, which includes treed wetlands, exceeds the commonly used guideline of 30%. However, higher quality interior forest habitat is found in only about 23% of the watershed. In addition, much of these natural heritage features are in private ownership. Indicator species such as birds and frogs can indicate the health of forest and wetland habitats. Numerous Species at Risk may inhabit the Graham Creek watershed and therefore should be considered in management planning. Invasive species such as Dog-strangling Vine (Cynanchum rossicum), European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) pose a threat to terrestrial habitat health. The Graham Creek watershed is not only an important environmental feature to the communities of the Municipality of Clarington and Municipality of Port Hope; it also plays an important role in a larger context. For example Graham Creek contributes to the health and resources of Lake Ontario. In addition, Lake Ontario is a drinking water source for thousands of Ontario residents. However, the watershed has the potential to be influenced by future stresses such as climate change. The Graham Creek watershed is recognized for its aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage, and recreational opportunities. In addition, the watershed provides drinking water to the majority of watershed residents. The development of a watershed plan will aim to conserve and sustainably manage the Graham Creek watershed for current and future generations. Development 8% Meadays7Grasslands I 7% Open Aquatic 1% Wetlands 10% Forests 23% Savanna and Thicket 4% Agrk:ul[ure 47% Figure 6: Land cover based on ecological land classification --------------------- ---------- -------------- - Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vi Executive Summary a 011M7007 /1/ _. •GRM0803 GRMS03 GRN0103 ORM0703 ORN06W r ( `ORM1103 - 1 iS WANN ate•ae JJ � , ORM 202 Y GRM0203 Fish Community and Stream Health OPAW03. • Poor • Fair Good • Excellent Graham Creek — Roads Lake Ontario N o Soo i.000 2.000 3.000 4000 A Meters awr.mw�aarr.nu r.s MeaKw.w»�wnwKeM has eau �G'w..�r�l.� i 60.000 iv9uw.waau.Fa MU.a+Maw.+wuv ��1I�j� 1[�41RQ1�JRQ ®lCl.atlTKn/LLF e4wWKW K)OKKAYKM IIR � �'•rn+aaa'ww Figure 5: Stream quality based on Steedman's Index of Biotic Integrity Graham Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features vii Executive Summary + M =t. Ah DURHAM REGION f Ganaraska CONSERVATION The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds and their resources. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data presented in the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan was written by Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician and Mark Peacock, P. Eng., Director, Watershed Services with technical assistance from staff of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA). Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Magdi Widaatalla P.Geo., M.Sc., Manager, Watershed Services Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department. Brian Curran, B.Sc., GIS Technician Jeff Moxley, Manager GIS/IT Steve Nowak, B.A., GIS Technician Photo Credits: GRCA staff, Sally Walsh and Kris Vande Sompel This document was created for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. Review and input into this document by the Technical Review Committee, Community Advisory Committee, stakeholders and residents occurred through the watershed planning process. Financial support for the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan was provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of Port Hope. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2010. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan was written with review and input from members of the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. Technical Review Committee Mark Peacock Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Pam Lancaster Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Brian Morrison Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Janice Szwarz Municipality of Clarington Ron Warne Municipality of Port Hope Christina Harvey Northumberland County Carla Pierini Regional Municipality of Durham Jacques Perreault Durham Region Health Department Atul Jain Haliburton, Kawartha Pine Ridge District Health Unit Peter Doris Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jim Martherus Ontario Ministry of the Environment Louis Bitonti Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Central Amanda McLachlan Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Eastern Warren May Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora Dan Tallion Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough Marc Desjardins Lake Ontario Fisheries Unit Stephen Haayen Fisheries and Oceans Canada Community Advisory Committee Alex Cannings Resident Brian Reid Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Bruce Blight Resident Chris Cloutier Dufferin Aggregates Colin Abernethy Resident David Best Landowner, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Emily Gruyters Durham College Student Gary Vandergast Resident Hugh Beauchamp Resident Janelle Andrews Durham Sustain Ability Jim Cleland Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Jim Kamstra Landowner Corry Kamstra Landowner Jim Yaki Resident Karin Murphy Resident, Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee Sasha Lambrinos Caring for the Moraine, Oak Ridges Moraine Foundation Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek 1-he Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds contain important aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage and recreational opportunities. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan has been developed to conserve, enhance and manage the watersheds and resources for current and future generations. The purpose of the Watershed Plan includes the following: • Complement the watershed planning requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (Appendix C). • Create community awareness and ownership of the watersheds and the watershed plan. • Provide recommendations that conserve the ecological and hydrological integrity of the watersheds. • Encourage land and resource uses that maintain, improve or restore the ecological and hydrological functions of the watershed. • Provide recommendations that maintain or improve the elements that contribute to the ecological and hydrological functions of the watersheds, including the quality and quantity of water, and aquatic and terrestrial resources. Written for municipalities, communities, residents and resource users this Watershed Plan outlines recommended management actions required to conserve valuable resources for current and future generations. Recommended actions have been derived from scientific data outlined in the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report:Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features (Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2009), local knowledge, municipal and agency input and review, and public consultation. Formal processes were carried out with direct review and input from the Technical Review Committee and the Community Advisory Committee. As a result of a year-long initiative, management actions, targets, monitoring and reporting activities have been formulated. The foundation of management actions is based on the goals and objectives of each watershed component, which is defined by the associated science. Each objective addresses multiple issues or opportunities. Management actions have been defined in terms of regulation and planning, stewardship, education and awareness, and land acquisition. A summary of goals, objectives and management actions are found below. Approval, adoption and implementation of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan are the most important steps in this initiative. Participation and co-operation by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA), the Regional Municipality of Durham, Municipality of Clarington, the Municipality of Port Hope and Northumberland County are needed. In addition, participation by residents, businesses and stakeholders is required to see the desired outcomes and successes of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 i Executive Summary Summary of Goals, Objectives and Management Actions General Recommendations Regulations and Planning • Implement future policies recommended in the Source Protection Plan created through the Clean Water Act. • Implement Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan policies. • Subwatershed level investigations • Implement future policies recommended in a Ganaraska Region Climate Change Strategy. Stewardship: implement the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program and partner programs throughout the regional study area. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to all aspects of the watershed. Land Acquisition: environmental features may be acquired by a public authority for protection through the purchase of land, donation of land, land rental, conservation easements and land use covenants. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. It is also important to review and report on watershed plan implementation. _ Groundwater Quantity Groundwater Quantity . . ecological Objective 1.1: maintain or enhance groundwater recharge and discharge for ecological functions and human use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map groundwater features. • Identify groundwater features not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to groundwater features. • Protect recharge rates. • Set urban infiltration targets. Support for: Current plan review mechanisms Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural cover in and adjacent to groundwater features. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek—and Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 ii Executive Summary • Achieve the natural heritage system as the primary means of protecting groundwater features. • Enhance and protect groundwater features through best management practices conducted on the land. • Encourage the adoption of urban land use practices that increase groundwater recharge. Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to groundwater quantity. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 1.2: manage and avoid actions that negatively affect aquifers (artesian, shallow and deep) and changes in groundwater flow. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Minimize groundwater flow alteration • Minimize and manage artesian and flowing wells, Education and Awareness: provide information pertaining to aquifers and groundwater quantity. Objective 1.3: ensure sustainable rates of groundwater use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Restrict development in groundwater features needing a Permit to Take Water • Restrict consumptive water takings, Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and by-laws • Water conservation plan creation, Education and Awareness: provide information regarding water takings. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 Executive Summary of the watersheds. Objective 2.7: maintain and enhance the water balance and baseflow. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map features contributing to natural flows. • Identify features contributing to natural flows not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to features contributing to natural stream flows. • Limit cumulative hard surfaces. • Require development setbacks from a watercourse. • Restrict development in features contributing to natural flows needing a Permit to Take Water. • Restrict consumptive water takings. • Require urban stormwater best management practices. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Limit site alterations. Support for: • Existing legislation • Review mechanisms • Existing program implementation. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase natural vegetation using the natural heritage system throughout the watershed, in groundwater recharge areas, and to compensate for changes in imperviousness of the watershed. • Increase riparian buffers to reduce variability of overland runoff. • Increase water infiltration, storage and use on individual lots. • Protect, restore and enhance wetlands. • Carry out an urban stewardship program to address altered flows caused by stormwater management. • Increase channel stability using bioengineering in urbanized areas to mitigate erosion caused by altered flows. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding surface water quantity and the protection and enhancement of the form and function of streams. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 iv Executive Summary Objective 2.2: maintain and improve the level of flood hazard protection for residents, and for existing and proposed development. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Limit cumulative hard surfaces. • Limit online ponds and impoundment structures. • Stormwater quantity control. Support for: • Existing policies and programs Recommended program: • Flood recovery program Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Manage or decommission online ponds to ensure they do not pose a flood hazard risk. • Implement re-vegetation to attenuate flood flows (e.g., riparian plantings, grass swales and waterways). Education and Awareness: provide information regarding flood forecasting and warning and emergency response. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Groundwater Quality Objective 3.1: protect and enhance the quality of groundwater by addressing existing pathways and contaminant sources. Regulations and Planning Recommended Policy: Ensure that wells or boreholes are properly maintained or abandoned. Policy investigation and creation: • Require private sewage system upgrades during redevelopment. Recommended program: • Septic re-inspection program Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 v Executive Summary Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Upgrade or decommission wells and boreholes. • Repair septic systems and provide for septic inspections. • Upgrade or newly construct fuel and chemical storage facilities. • Support septic re-inspection program. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and drinking water protection. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 3.2: manage the quality of groundwater through the implementation of best management practices throughout the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map highly vulnerable aquifers. • Identify areas vulnerable to groundwater contamination not yet known. • Restrict development in highly vulnerable aquifers. Support for: • Existing legislation and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs encourage and provide incentives for best management practices in highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding groundwater quality and best land use practices. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. i Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vi Executive Summary i Sutlace WatorCtrfa[itjf . . - � . •ME all to 698 Objective 4.1: manage and enhance water quality. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Set development back from a watercourse. • Use "enhanced" level stormwater quality controls. Support for: • Existing legislation • Existing and new programs. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Decrease and mitigate non-point pollution sources. • Enhance and restore riparian areas to buffer against overland runoff and properly manage land use in the riparian area. • Promote and encourage best management practices for rural residential and agricultural land uses including reduction of pesticide use and livestock access restriction to watercourses. • Increase natural cover utilizing terrestrial natural heritage modeling. • Ensure public space management practices have a set back distance from the stream edge to allow for a natural riparian area. • Encourage projects that deal with urban stream use and the negative effects that result from littering, organic waste inputs, salt application, synthetic fertilizers, and discharge to streams. • Implement projects aimed at limiting erosion in an urban stream setting for the benefit of surface water quality. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding rural surface water quality. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 4.2: create a spills action plan. Regulations and Planning Plan creation: spills action plan Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 vii Executive Summary Ifblijaatnct' picles MEMO - . • Objective 5.1: protect and restore existing and native aquatic species and communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Adopt the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Fish Habitat Management Plan. Support for: • Existing review mechanisms and programs Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water–Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program,and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Remove man-made instream barriers. • Remove online ponds. • Improve stream temperature. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic species. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 5.2: protect and enhance the form and function of instream habitat and riparian areas. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Map aquatic habitats. • Identify aquatic habitats not yet known. • Restrict development within and in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Adopt the Adopt the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Fish Habitat Management Plan. Support for: • New programs • Existing review mechanisms and policies. Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water–Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs accomplish the following: • Instream habitat creation. • Erosion control projects. • Increase natural vegetation in riparian areas. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding aquatic habitat. Lowe—kin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 viii Executive Summary Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Terrestrial Natural Heritage . . - • . . 1 - . .. • .• Objective 6.1: reduce habitat fragmentation and promote connectivity. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Identify and map terrestrial features. • Identify terrestrial features not yet known. • Reduce the impact of development on the natural heritage system and significant features. • Produce net gains in the natural heritage system. Recommended planning strategy: • Create a regional terrestrial natural heritage system and strategy Support for: • Existing plan review mechanisms Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in target areas defined by the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. • Restore degraded sites such as Brownfields or aggregate extraction sites. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding terrestrial natural heritage. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.2: maintain, enhance and restore the natural diversity of vegetation communities in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: • Net gains in the natural heritage system. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 ix Executive Summary i • Harvesting of resources from wetlands. Support for: • Existing by-laws Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water— Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover using the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed. • Protect and increase cover of old growth forest. • Increase and encourage sustainable land uses. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding vegetation communities. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 6.3: maintain, enhance and restore the diversity of native species in the watershed. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: Net gains in the natural heritage system Support for: • Existing legislation Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following: • Increase the diversity of natural cover in the natural heritage system. • Increase natural cover throughout the watershed with a focus on interior habitat. • Enhance and increase specific habitat types such as wetlands, vernal pools and old growth forest. • Assist in invasive species control or removal. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species, their status, and threats to these species. Land Acquisition Recommended policy: • Protect groundwater features through land acquisition. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 x Executive Summary Objective 6.4: mitigate and reduce negative impacts of urban and rural land use. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Net gains in the natural heritage system Education and Awareness: provide information regarding native species and threats to these species. Include information on how to deal with the threats. Public Health and Well-being relation Public Health and Well-being Goal 7.0: promote healthy communities in • the environment. I Objective 7.1: manage and improve the environmental quantity, quality and social benefits of existing and future public spaces. Regulations and Planning Recommended policies: Increase of public spaces Support for: Existing programs and initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, accomplish the following in public spaces: • Increase natural, native vegetation. • Increase healthy lifestyle infrastructure. • Increase educational aspects of the public space. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding public spaces. Monitoring and Reporting: monitoring and reporting are required to continually assess environmental health and to allow for increased scientific understanding of the watershed. Objective 7.2: encourage sustainable communities. Regulations and Planning Recommended policy: • Increase in public transportation. Support for: Existing initiatives Stewardship: through the GRCA Clean Water—Healthy Land Stewardship and Financial Assistance Program, and partner programs, increase actions around sustainable living. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 xi Executive Summary Education and Awareness: provide information regarding sustainable living and development for residents and local businesses. Community Heritage . . I Objective 8.1: increase awareness and appreciation of our community heritage. Education and Awareness: provide information regarding cultural heritage using partner programs. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan, 2010 xii Executive Summary Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan October 2009 Ganaraska CONSERVATION Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority �► Ganac aska CONSERVATION The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. This document creates the foundation of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dai, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the resident communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department, Steve Nowak, B.A., Brian Curran, B.Sc. and Jeff Moxley. This document represents the first of its kind for the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds. Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents has occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds and it resources. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2009. Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Cree Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features ` The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features documents historic and current conditions of these three watersheds and the regional study area. This document creates the foundation for the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Watershed Plan. It is envisioned that the Background Report and the forthcoming Watershed Plan will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of these Lake Ontario watersheds and related resources. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds are located in Ward 4, Municipality of Clarington, and Ward 2, Municipality of Port Hope (Figure 1). Historic events have shaped these watersheds into present-day condition. Most notable are the effects on settlement patterns caused by the location of road and rail corridors. Today, these watersheds support a population of approximately 1,300 people, a productive agriculture community, and a mix of natural resources and recreational uses. In addition, residents depend on water from these local watersheds for domestic and economic use, although the residents in Newtonville rely on Lake Ontario for its source of water. Shaped thousands of years ago by glacial activity, the regional study area lies on Paleozoic bedrock and its topographic and hydrogeological features are all contained in the Iroquois Plain physiographic region. Corresponding surficial geology and soils help dictate where groundwater flows, where aquifers lie, and where groundwater is recharged and discharged (Figures 2 and 3). Bouchette Point Creek watershed is the largest at 23 square kilometers (km), followed by Port Granby Creek watershed at 13 km2, and Lovekin Creek watershed at 7 km2. Protection of these watersheds has been influenced by surface water studies such as floodplain mapping and hydraulic studies. Regulations are also in place to protect people and property from flood waters, and to protect some of the natural features of the watershed. Surface water quality as a whole in is generally good, with only localized problems. Physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and alkalinity) indicate that surface water can be resilient to acidification, eutrophication and chemical additions. Chloride when sampled during the summer is low. Nutrients such as total phosphorus and nitrite-N can be considered the surface water quality parameter most capable of fluctuating beyond recommended guidelines, however exceedances maybe related to runoff from storm events or land use. Groundwater quality data is limited in the watersheds. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary Political Boundaries Illy u�wwAy a C�Na s.�Ynw,aru... —P stern. .. i � IVe�lptl'rille. prsrl Gryrpy 1 t N G t190 x.,ax saoo -rry�s+wr..sarr•wagww.r.r. A ._ Mein r�rwe.�uY�..r�+Yrm 1L11,00a ear rr...rwwr�,wrwwa....an Figure 1: Watershed planning area Potential Groundwater Recharge H z Lax'.6U . I. _ � I a�take Pita-.a trallraltld ee,wtlrNn N A ,a Mxeo ,M.wM _o n.w..w. Figure 2: Potential groundwater recharge The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: II Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary Potential Groundwater Dishcarge - t rrr ta,. Roads Streams ( �take Or,tarro .f i whwstnd 11 u datt.. N 1.2W 2 s.aao t jo aGanaraska 1:60.000 n�..+n•r.....,,m>rwu+srdn...n.......-.s Figure 3: Potential groundwater discharge A total of 20 species of fish have been sampled in the three watersheds. Of these, two (10%) of the species are not native to the Lake Ontario basin. Stream quality based on Steedman's IBI (Figure 4.) showed six sites being good (50%), six fair (50%), and zero excellent or poor sites. The terrestrial natural habitat of the regional study area includes forest, meadows and wetlands (Figure 5). Forest cover, which also includes treed wetlands, occur the most in the Bouchette Point Creek watershed (30%), followed closely by the Lovekin Creek watershed (29%) and the Port Granby Creek watershed (21%). In the entire regional study area forest cover accounts for 24% of the landscape. Therefore forest cover is generally below the commonly used guideline of 30%. In addition, much of these natural heritage features are in private ownership. Indicator species such as birds and frogs can indicate the health of forest and wetland habitats. Numerous Species at Risk may inhabit the regional study area and therefore should be considered in management planning. Invasive species such as Dog-strangling Vine (Cynanchum rossicum), European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) pose a threat to terrestrial habitat health. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary Fish Community and Stream Health 9 POOI • Fak (:Doti • Exc enl Roads Steams OM Lake Ontario Wa1MM•BOalrrYdM N .,. ..,�...a.....a.1.m...... A D r.25D 3100 afgD � e�r�w.we+•mow w.wvvarsr..w.v. A . . f 60000 nessW.a..wa�weyuyr w.rwrr e,s.�d..s aeci. N_..nw: Figure 4: Stream quality based on Steedman's Index of Biotic Integrity 100%- _- ---- S q - i g 80% e0% 40% 20% — 0% Lovekin Craek Watershed Boudiete Point Creek Watershed Port Granby Creak Watershed Regional SWdy Area ■Forest■Wetland AgriculNre Development■Atsedo WGrasslands Savanna and Thickets Figure 5: Land cover based on ecological land classification The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: iv Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds are not only an important environmental feature to the communities of the Municipality of Clarington and Municipality of Port Hope; they also play an important role in a larger context. For example these watersheds contribute to the health and resources of Lake Ontario, which provides drinking water for thousands of Ontario residents. However, these watersheds have the potential to be influenced by future stresses such as climate change. The Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds are recognized for their aquatic habitat, terrestrial natural heritage, and recreational opportunities. In addition, the watershed provides drinking water to the majority of watershed residents. The development of a watershed plan will aim to conserve and sustainably manage the Lovekin Creek, Bouchette Point Creek and Port Granby Creek watersheds and the drainage areas in-between for current and future generations. f7-_ - he tic, Biotic ti Creek, Bou al Fe Point Creek and Port Granby Creek Background Report: v Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features Executive Summary h? u� 9 A ' l 1 I 1 } i r*r+ r � n KAWARTHA Rob Messerve Y CONSERVATION Chief Administrative Officer 1" The Importance of Lake Scugog • High importance from historical, social, recreational, economic, and personal perspectives • A driver of local and provincial economies — rough estimate of approx. $ 10- 15 million annually to local economy • A major fisheries resource — e:g. more annual fishing hours than Lake Superior • Lake Scu�gog, via the Scu�og River, is the primary source odrinking water or the Town of Lindsay KAWARTFiA CONSERVATION Lake • All lakes age naturally, becoming shallower with more aquatic plants. • The aging process can happen more quickly when there are high levels of nutrients from human activities. - • Lake Scugog is very 1( susceptible to the cumulative effects of ongoing human influences. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Issues Affectin W ate r Quality in Lake Scugog • Intensive erosion of shores and stream banks • Untreated stormwater run-off from urban areas • Leakage from septic systems around the lake • Discharges from the Port Perry sewage treatment p lant KAWARTHA CONSERVATION Issues Affectin W ate r Quality in Lake Scugog • Outdated agricultural management practices • Unrestricted access of livestock to watercourses • Contamination from recreational use I I A W .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Origin of the LSEMP • Initiated in 2004 to : — identify phosphorous sources — determine the amounts entering Lake Scugog — recommend specific measures to effectively address the accelerated aging of the lake • As part of the plan, we have : — implemented water quality monitoring — developed a management plan — recommended strategies for remediation KAWARTFiA CONSERVATION Project Steering Committee • Region of Durham • City of Kawartha Lakes • Township of Scugog • Health Departments • Durham Land Stewardship Council • Victoria Land and Water Stewardship Council • Scugog Lake Stewards • Durham Federation of Agriculture • MNR Fisheries Biologist, Peterborough District • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • OMAF RA .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION LSEMP Goal To ensure the long-term environmental and social sustainability of Lake Scueoiz and its resources KAWARTFiA CONSERVATION Lake Scugog Watershed MONITORING STATIONS N Scugog Rivet ' Outlet e k 1 1 �t sans Beach m View ke t r Gil _ Lake Scugog - Caaaarea f r - C" • O R r 6 � r � r Legend Lake Water Quality Monitoring Station A River Water Quality Monitoring Stations * Precipitation Samplor Pmd—d wby Rawanha Regan COnxrrarbn t1 Flow Monitoring Stations Aulhoriry ith Dara Supplied OMer Leenae by Members of me 0.—Geoaparia1 Oars Town Each-gs Roads 0 1 2 4 6 8 „l,�.Rwers Kilometres Lake Scugog Watershed Key Findings 9.1 to 9.6 tonnes of phosphorous enter Lake Scugog every year 1 tonne of phosphorous promotes the growth of 500 tonnes of aquatic plants Aquatic lants p that take up the phosphorous live and die in the lake — the phosphorous accumulates on-site, feeding more plants KAWARTFiA CONSERVATION Key Findings 3 .4-tonne reduction needed • Prolong the life of the lake • Improve water quality • Prevent additional aquatic plant growth • Maintain a healthy lake ecosystem .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Phosphorous Sources Natural Sources 21 .4 % Rural Road Run off 6.4 % (roads make up 1 .56 % of land use) Port Perry Sewage Treatment Plant 1 .8 % Septic: Systems 9.i '% Agricultural Runoff 23.5 % (agriculture makes up 53 % of land use) Atmospheric I Deposition Urban Runoff 18.2 % 19 % (urban areas make up 3.56 % of land use) KAWARTHA CONSERVATION r Load os o o u s SOURCE WATERSHED PHOSPHOROUS TARGET — MAX AREA LOAD . . , Urban runoff 3.56% 11713 kg (18.2% 700 kg Agriculture 53% 2,213 kg (23.5%) 1 ,100 kg Septic systems 0.76% 911 kg (9.7% 350 kg Rural road runoff 1 .56% 600 kg (6.4%) 300 kg Port Perry Sewage 1 .2% 170 kg (1.8 %) 150 kg Treatment Plant Precipitation na 11784 kg (19.o%) 11600 kg Natural Sources na 2,017 kg (21.4%) 2,017 kg KAWARTHA CONISLRVAHUN Reducing Our Phosphorous Output Six key strategies : 1 . Watershed Planning, Regulation and Enforcement Strategy; 2 . Communications and Education Strategy; 3 . Stewardship Strategy; 4. Agricultural Land Use Strategy; 5 . Urban Land Use Strategy; and 6. Monitoring and Scientific Studies Strategy. 1 KAWARTFiA CONSERVATION 2010 Early Implementation Urban and lakeshore residential : • Scugog Connections • Shoreline "Best Management Practices" Agricultural and rural residential : • Scugog WATER Fund • Development of effective partnership with Environmental Farm Plan • Funding proposals .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Action Lead Organization, Partners 1.2 Scugog Connections (Storefront) Implementing a Storefront in Port Perry downtown, which is running from mid-fall 2009 to mid-fall 2012 as a pilot project. The objective of this initiative is to become the environmental hub that creates the synergy resulting from local alliances involving traditional and new partners, volunteers and secondary school students, and resource agencies. Durham Sustain Ability, Kawartha Working together with partners, Storefront coordinator will plan and implement outreach activities, water quality Conservation,Scugog Lake Stewards enhancement projects, considering as well as the emerging issues of water and energy conservation, waste Inc., Durham Land Stewardship management and climate change. This location shall also become the local office for the community marketing aspect Council of the LSEMP—with a complete supply of information materials on water quality, aquatic habitat, and stewardship opportunities as well as other environmental issues. Dependant on the project success and community Support, the project can be extended beyond 2012. Priority: Highest Project Measurables: • A wide range of educational and stewardship activities over 3 years, according to the approved Action Plan attached to the funding proposal—note Appendix B. Through this program,well over 3000 hours youth and volunteer opportunities will be created. • Educational materials, information sessions,outreach activities,on-site stewardship demonstration projects,etc., including activities such as the "Yellow Fish Road". • Development of a"Lake Scugog Foundation", involving volunteers to actively pursuing funding for associated environmental activities. Short Term Timetable: Funding for 2009—2012 has been obtained.The official Medium/Long Term Timetable:The program will be evaluated as it progresses, opening was in November of 2009. with the intent of being sustained as needs and effectiveness are determined over the first 3 years. Estimated Cost:The initial project budget is$85,000 J year,totaling$255,000 over the period of 2009-2012 Funding Sources: • The Ontario Trillium Foundation provided a total of$225,000 that has been awarded for 3 years to cover the rental,salary and most other costs to Durham Sustain Ability, in collaboration with Kawartha Conservation,Scugog Lake Stewards and the Durham Land Stewardship Council. • The Region of Durham provided $8,000 for 2009 and 2010. • Additional funding partners will be approached to support additional program initiatives. Issues requiring attention: • Require an increased public understanding of the collective impact of individual (all) landowners on the lake water quality,and the need for their involvement in watershed stewardship • This initiative should become the primary means of implementing the"community marketing"aspect of the LSEMP in conjunction with other environmental issues • The formation of an effective fund-raising committee to access funds from local and other sources KAWARTHA CONSERVATION n l i n and Peer R Co s u tat o s Dr f Plan of at • Ministry of Natural Resources — Oct, 2009 • OMAFRA — Oct, 2009 • Township of Scugog — Nov, 2009 • Lake Simcoe Region C. A. — Nov, 2009 • Fisheries and Oceans Canada — Dec, 2009 • Region of Durham and City of Kawartha Lakes Planning staff — Dec, 2009 • Trent-Severn Waterway — Dec, 2009 • Ministry of Environment — Jan, 2010 • City of Kawartha Lakes Agricultural Advisory Committee and Environmental Advisory Committee — Jan, 2010 • Durham Agricultural Advisory Committee and Environmental Advisory Committee — Feb, 2010 • Region of Durham Planning Committee — Feb, 2010 • Open Houses: Caesarea (Mar 8), Little Britain (Mar 9), Port Perry (Mar 10) • Council Presentations: City of Kawartha Lakes (Mar 23), Municipality of Clarington (Mar 29), Township of Scugog (Apr 19) foest KAVARTHA CONISLRVAHUN I- Questions ? Study Methodology • Monitoring network includes eight stations on streams, six on the lake and one precipitation sampler. As well, there are seven flow monitoring stations. - • Water samples are collected biweekly year round on tributaries and monthly on the lake in spring and summer. • As well, stormwater samples have been collected from several sto r m wate r culverts in Port Perry. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Study Methodology • Collected hydrological, meteorological and chemical data to determine stream flow volumes, precipitation volumes and nutrient loadings. • phosphorous loadings were separated into seven major categories of sources. • Water budget of Lake Scugog has been calculated as well as phosphorous and nitrogen balances. x KAWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Watershed Planning, Regulation and Enforcement Strategy • Protection of existing natural resource features is always less expensive than rehabilitation . This must be the first priority, and requires: — Ongoing collaboration between municipal planning staff and Kawartha Conservation planning and technical staff; — Effective implementation of Regional and Municipal Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws; — Enforcement of applicable regulations to prevent and mitigate impact of developments within natural hazard areas and environmentally sensitive sites. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Urban Lands Strategy • An ob'ective for urban areas is the reduction of phosp orous input by 850 to 1 ,000 kg over the next 5 to 10 years: — Implement best management practices and restoration programs on residential properties within Cawker's Creek, William 's Creek and other urban subwatersheds. — Closely work with municipal partners, small businesses and urban golt courses for reductions of nutrient and sediment loads. — Complete and implement the Stormwater Management Plan for Port Perry and other urban areas. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Stewardship Strategy • A wide range of stewardship actions including tree planting and establishing natural cover on water edges: — Work toward a target of 30% total forest cover on suitable areas across the watershed as a long-term objective; — Increase percentage of natural cover in riparian zones to 75%; — Maintain the Shoreline Naturalization program . — Utilize Conservation Areas within the Oak Ridges Moraine as a model for effective stewardship p racti ces. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies • Activities recommended to reduce phosphorous input from septic systems by 25% over the next 5-10 years include : — Continue efforts to en age lakeshore property owners into reducing their nutrient footprint. — Develop septic system inspection programs and financial assistance for septic system upgrades. — Legislate septic upgrades, e.g. a municipal by-law requiring a certificate of approval prior to a property sale. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Agricultural Lands Strategy • Encourage nutrient management planning on farms and more widespread use of modern metho s for fertilizer application . • Minimize erosion using conservation tillage, grassy waterways, and other soil management techniques. • Minimize the input of manure nutrients into the stream by managing runoff from livestock yards, improved land application techniques, restricting livestock access to waterways and installing pasture pumps for alternate wate r i n g syste m s. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Communications and Education Strategy • Establish a comprehensive social marketing program involving communications, public education and demonstration projects that will create awareness of "best management practices" for both urban and rural landowners. • The recently established "Scu og Connections" storefront project, funded by the Ontario Trillium Foundation, is the primary facilitator of this objective, and commenced operation in October of 2009. .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION Strategies Monitoring and Scientific Studies Strategy • All management recommendations and decisions as well as remedial actions depend on sound scientific data and knowledge : — Continue regular water quality and quantity monitoring to detect trends and emerging threats, as well as to determine the effectiveness of remed iation efforts. — Continue research that will provide a better understanding and forecast of phosphorous and nitrogen movement and loading into the lake. — Analyze the assimilative capacity of the watershed . .AWAFATHA CONSERVATION G,a,Cin ,ton Board of grade BT Ranerships in Business Business Empowering Your Board Tr a e C Economic Deve lopment Activity January 09 Varies — average Calls Handled March 2010 November 09 June 09 5 per day 20-25 per day Emails handled 20-25 per day 20-25 per day 20-25 per day 78 (industrial Meetings with 10 (more extensive Corporate call existing businesses 33 26 time spent) program) Meetings with prospective businesses 17 14 13 5 24 (CoreNet) Regional leads 13 9 8 4 additional New business 26 20 14 6 Business expansion/inquirie s and moves 4 18 25 3 New jobs created 193 approximately 257 approximately 48 approximately 23 approximately Clarington Board of Trade Economic Development Activity March 10 Nov 09 June 09 Jan 09 Vacant Land Inquiries 5 6 9 5 Vacant Space Inquiries 7 9 14 7 Board Tr a e Bowmanville C The Old Newca stle House, Taps • Helping Hands Daycare - • Beer Store - 10 and Grills — 6 2 • Staples - 25 • The Discounters — 1 • Scrub `n Medical Wear- 1 • The Framing Centre — 2 • Petfood and treats - 1 • City Cottage - 1 • Comedy Royale Dinner • Under the Toad Stool -1 Theatre -8 • Yoga 101 - 3 • Shoeless Joes - 52 • Clarington's Wellness Path - 19 • Courtice Home Healthcare • Roger Plus - 5 - 2 • Smoothies & Co - 2 • Nu-life Hearing Centre - 2 • DC Contracting - 2 • Bibles for Missions - 2 • Platinum Fitness - 20 • Nothing but Fashion — 1 • Bella Donna's — 5 • Crock-a-doodle — 3 • Kings Court Pastry Boutique — 5 • Sauders Power - 6 Board Tr a e C Business Relo cations The Village Candy Shoppe(Bowmanville) Businesses Closed Timothy's Salon — Courtice Decorating Diva's — Bowmanville The Shade Tree - Bowmanville Video Gallery- Newcastle Sun Kissed Tan- Newcastle V i A '{ Discover Opportunity in CLARlNGTON CLARlNG1'O�Y � proudHome of i. f _ a aC 1 z EnOfglzjng G" �V its Canadian Nuclear Conference, Ottawa Clarington Board of Trade Canadian Nuclear Association , Ottawa February 24t", to the 26, 2010. 95 members in the Canadian Nuclear Association maximum crowd of 775 58 exhibit booths Clarington Board of Trade GLOBE 2010, Vancouver March 23rd to 26th , 2010. Joined DSEA & Regional Economic Development in the Ontario Pavillion Leaders in Environmental Business over 10, 000 professionals from 70+ countries come together at GLOBE Board Tr a e C Business Growth Business Growth Activities. . . Activities. . . Manufacturer's Roundtable — April Movement of Goods Annual General Meeting — April (Mr. Bill GTMA Robinson Executive Vice President, DSEA Nuclear Refurbishment at Darlington) 2n6 Annual Energy Summit — June UOIT/Durham College Shop Local Simply Socials Lunch and Learns Clarington Farmers Market Clarington Marketing Minds Real Estate Breakfasts EDCO Conference Clarington Board of Trade Bennett Road GammaDyna Care, is now operational in the existing building at 1100 Bennett Road . Discussions are continuing between the Healthcare/Academia and private sector partnership Clarington Board of Trade Promotional Video All five video's are now completed , We will be previewing 2 of the videos at our AGM on April 22 , The videos will be ready to go live on our websites in shortly after CBOT/ Physician Recruitment Clarington Physician Recruitment Presentation to Clarington Council March 29, 2010 Coming in 20141 .Md • Dr. A. Stal'tlflg SOOII (Contract signed with Courtice) • Dr. 6 — September • Internist — coming soon qI I Update on Provincial Designation F L • Our Understanding is. . . . . • We will no longer be considered underserviced and thus will not see grants available; however, • We will still be able to recruit IMGs who must fulfil return of service contracts. • This detail is very important to us, and so we can essentially continue to recruit as we have before • All potential doctors can apply for current funding until June 4, 2010. Board Tr a e C Thank you for supporting CBOT Economic Development and Physician Recruitment as we move forward, focusing on the responsibility for advancing community and business development through our attraction, retention and expansion efforts. A Board of Tr`�dc�CBT hips in Busin'es5