HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-03-2020
Planning and Development Committee
Agenda
Date:February 3, 2020
Time:7:00 PM
Location:Council Chambers, 2nd Floor
Municipal Administrative Centre
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for
accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Samantha Gray, Committee
Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at sgray@clarington.net.
Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Audio Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio record of The Municipality of
Clarington makes an audio record of Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you make
a delegation or presentation at a Planning and Development Committee meeting, the Municipality
will be audio recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the
Municipality’s website.
Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or
placed on non-audible mode during the meeting.
Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net/archive
*Late Item added after the Agenda was published.
Pages
1.Call to Order
2.Land Acknowledgment Statement
3.New Business – Introduction
Members of Committee are encouraged to provide the Clerk’s Department, in
advance of the meeting, a copy of any motion the Member is intending to
introduce, (preferably electronic) such that staff could have sufficient time to
share the motion with all Members prior to the
meeting.
4.Adopt the Agenda
5.Declaration of Interest
6.Announcements
7.Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
7.1 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of January 13, 2020 5
8.Public Meetings
No Public Meetings
9.Delegations
9.1 Eric Bowman, Chair, and Brenda Metcalf, Past Chair, Agricultural
Advisory Committee, Regarding the Agricultural Advisory Committee –
2019 Accomplishments
9.2 Joyce Kufta, Chair, Parkview Lodge, Regarding Relocating of the East
Municipal Crosswalk
9.3 Rick McEachern, Regarding PSD-004-20 Proposed Heritage Designation
for the Fletcher Tree (2 Church Street, Bowmanville)
Planning and Development Committee
February 3, 2020
Page 2
10.Communications – Receive for Information
10.1 Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services, Municipality of
Clarington, Regarding Camp 30 Update
14
10.2 Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington dated
January 9, 2020
19
11.Communications – Direction
11.1 Joyce Kufta, Chair, Parkview Lodge, Regarding Relocating of the East
Municipal Crosswalk
23
(Motion to Refer Correspondence from Joyce Kufta, Chair, Parkview
Lodge, Regarding Relocating of the East Municipal Crosswalk, to the
CAO to Report Back)
12.Presentations
No Presentations
13.Planning Services Department Reports
13.1 PSD-003-20 Development Applications – 2019 Annual Report 25
13.2 PSD-004-20 Proposed Heritage Designation for the Fletcher Tree (2
Church Street, Bowmanville)
40
14.Solicitor's Department Reports
14.1 LGL-002-20 Status of LPAT Appeals of OPA 107 56
15.New Business – Consideration
16.Unfinished Business
16.1 PSD-005-20 Addendum to Report PSD-039-19 Exemption Request for
10 Victoria Street for Interim Control By-law
60
16.2 Confidential Report LGL-013-19 10 Victoria Street – Exemption from
Part Lot Control [Referred to Staff from the December 2, 2019 Planning
and Development Committee with Report PSD-039-19]
[Distributed Under Separate Cover]
Planning and Development Committee
February 3, 2020
Page 3
17.Confidential Reports
17.1 Confidential Verbal Report from the Acting Director of Planning
Services, Regarding Potential Property Acquisition
18.Adjournment
Planning and Development Committee
February 3, 2020
Page 4
1
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Planning and Development Committee
Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
January 13, 2020
7:00 PM
Council Chambers, 2nd Floor
Municipal Administrative Centre
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
Present Were: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper,
Councillor J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill,
Councillor M. Zwart
Staff Present: A. Allison, -, J. Gallagher, S. Gray
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
Councillor Neal called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
2. Land Acknowledgment Statement
Councillor Traill led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgment Statement.
3. New Business – Introduction
There were no new business items added to the Agenda.
4. Adopt the Agenda
Resolution # PD-001-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Agenda for the Planning and Development Committee meeting of
January 13, 2020 be adopted with the following change:
That Item 12.1, presentation from Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel,
MHBC Planning, regarding Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character
Study – Options Analysis and Recommendations be considered before
Item 8.1, Public Meeting.
Carried
Page 5
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
2
5. Declaration of Interest
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest in Item 8.1, Public Meeting, Item
12.1, Presentation from Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel, MHBC Plannin g, were
present regarding Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study – Options
Analysis and Recommendations and Report PSD-001-20, Proposed Official Plan
Amendment and Rezoning to Implement the Bowmanville Neighbourhood
Character Study.
6. Announcements
Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of
community interest.
7. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
7.1 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Planning and Development Committee
dated December 2, 2019
Resolution # PD-002-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Traill
That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning and Development
Committee meeting held on December 2, 2019, be approved.
Carried
8. Public Meetings
8.1 Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel, MHBC Planning, Regarding Bowmanville
Neighbourhood Character Study – Options Analysis and
Recommendations
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest in presentation for the Bowmanville
Neighbourhood Character Study, as it relates to his law practice. Councillor Neal
left the room and refrained from discussion on this matter. Mayor Foster chaired
this portion of the meeting.
Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel, MHBC Planning, were present regarding
Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study – Options Analysis and
Recommendations. They made a verbal presentation to accompany an
electronic presentation. Ms. Anderson defined Neighbourhood Character as
collective qualities and characteristics that distinguish a particular area or
neighbourhood. She provided the Committee with an outline of the study
purpose and the study area. Ms. Anderson noted that the study area is focused
on three established residential areas. She stated that the study process was
completed in four phases. Ms. Anderson explained that Phase 1 was a
background review, to understand context and existing conditions. She noted
that Phase 2 was a character assessment which included, walking tours, creating
an neighbourhood inventory, a public workshop, and a background study
report. Ms. Anderson explained that Phase 3 was an analysis and
Page 6
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
3
recommendations and that Phase 4 was the final recommendations. Ms. Martel
provided the Committee with an overview of the final recommendations. She
provided the Committee with a visualization of the proposed changes. Ms.
Anderson advised the Committee that they were available to answer questions.
8.2 Public Meeting for a Proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
to Implement the Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest in Report PSD-001-20, Proposed
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to Implement the Bowmanville
Neighbourhood Character Study, as it relates to his law practice. Councillor Neal
left the room and refrained from discussion on this matter.
Tracy Webster, Planner, made a verbal and electronic presentation to the
Committee regarding the application.
Ken Hoy, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Hoy advised
the Committee that he is concerned with the recommendation regarding the
garage size. He noted that a 1.5 garage on a 60 foot lot is not enough parking for
a lot that size and that this recommendation would diminish property values.
Steve Hennesey, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr.
Hennesey explained that he is concerned with Area 3 of the study and how it will
delay development. He stated that the comparison municipalities used in the
study are not consistent with the Municipality of Clarington. Mr. Hennesey noted
that the reduction in setback and area will affect property values.
James Rook, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Rook is
concerned with the recommendation regarding the size of garages. He explained
that he would like to convert his detached garage to an attached garage, and if
the recommendation is approved he would have to apply for a minor variance.
Chris Vesters, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Vesters
is concerned with that the recommendations will hinder new development on
current properties in the area.
Peggy Clark, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Clark is
concerned with how the recommendations do not mention climate change. She
would like the recommendations to include reports and consideration to potential
flooding and drainage issues.
Eileen Mapili, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Mapili is
concerned with the environmental impact of the recommendations. She noted
that all neighbourhoods have been developed around vehicles. Ms. Mapili
explained that the Municipality needs to begin to think about planning for the
future. She noted that she is concerned with the ability to provide more housing
opportunities, and that multiple homes should be allowed on larger properties.
Thorsten Koseck, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr.
Koseck explained that he is concerned with the municipalities used as
comparatives and would like to know what was adopted from those municipalities
Page 7
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
4
as best practices. He stated that he appreciated the feedback in the report but
would like to know how it aligns with the Municipality of Clarington's strategic
plan. Mr. Koseck expressed that, when sending out notices to residents that the
Municipality, the Municipality could save paper by printing double sided and in
black and white.
Patti Thompson, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms.
Thompson stated that she is concerned with the recommendations. She noted
that she would like to sever her lot in the future and the recommendations may
restrict her from doing so. Ms. Thompson explained that she would like to
preserve the heritage and culture of Bowmanville. She advised the Committee
that developers will not buy properties based on these recommendations. Ms.
Thompson is concerned that the value of her property will be reduced based on
these recommendations.
Dave Crozier, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Crozier
explained that he is concerned with the recommendations and specifically
allotted garage size. He advised the Committee that these recommendations will
not draw people into investing in the community. Mr. Crozier urged the
Committee to look at how the recommendations affect the value of residents
homes. He mentioned that the comparative municipalities seemed to be
selective and not representative of the Municipality of Clarington.
Emidio DiPalo, Durham Region Home Builders' Association (DRHBA), spoke in
opposition to the application. Mr. DiPalo stated that he is concerned with the area
coverage and garage sizes. He noted that the DRHBA was never approached to
provide feedback during the study and would like to be kept informed in the
future.
James Rook, local resident, spoke in support of the application. Mr. Rook
explained that he supports the concept of the study and that it has not been done
in isolation. He stated that the recommendations will preserve the character of
the neighbourhood.
Jon Gale, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Gale
explained that he is concerned with the fence height restrictions. He noted that
his pool is no longer private now that a tall house has been built behind them.
Alter the Agenda
Resolution # PD-003-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Agenda be altered to consider Report PSD-001-20, after the Public
Meeting portion of the Agenda.
Carried
Page 8
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
5
Recess
Resolution # PD-004-20
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Committee recess for 5 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 8:48 PM with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
8.3 PSD-001-20 - Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning to
Implement the Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest in Report PSD-001-20, Proposed
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to Implement the Bowmanville
Neighbourhood Character Study, as it relates to his law practice. Councillor Neal
left the room and refrained from discussion on this matter.
Resolution # PD-005-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Traill
That Report PSD-001-20 be received;
That the final recommendations of the Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character
Study be received for information;
That the recommendations contained in Section 6.3.1 relating to Trees be
forwarded to the Operations Department for consideration;
That the recommendations contained in Section 6.3.2 relating to Heritage be
forwarded to the Clarington Heritage Committee for consideration;
That the proposed applications for an Official Plan Amendment COPA2019 -0002
and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA2019-0019 continue to be processed
including the preparation of a subsequent report; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-001-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Carried Later in the Meeting, see following motion
Resolution # PD-006-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to
speak to the foregoing resolution for a second time.
Carried
The foregoing resolution #PD-005-20 was then put to a vote and carried.
Page 9
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
6
Recess
Resolution # PD-007-20
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Committee recess for 5 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 9:30 PM with Councillor Neal in the Chair.
9. Delegations
There were no Delegations.
Councillor Neal returned to the meeting and chaired the meeting.
Mayor Foster left the chair.
10. Communications – Receive for Information
Resolution # PD-008-20
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Communication Items 10.1 and 10.2, be received on consent.
Carried
10.1 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Region of
Durham, Regarding Authorization to Initiate a Comprehensive Review for
the Design of a Proposed Community Improvement Plan for Durham
Region
10.2 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Region of
Durham, Regarding Envision Durham - Housing Policy Planning
Discussion Paper
11. Communications – Direction
11.1 Kevin Narraway, Manager of Legislative Services/Deputy Clerk, Town the
Whitby, regarding Regional Heritage Property Tax Rebate
Resolution # PD-009-20
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Traill
That the Communication Item 11.1, be referred to the General Government
Committee of January 27, 2020.
Carried
Page 10
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
7
11.2 Bethany McMahon, Administrative Assistant, Town of Deep River,
Regarding Premiers to Develop Nuclear Reactor Technology
Resolution # PD-010-20
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the following resolution from The Town of Deep River, regarding Premiers
to Develop Nuclear Reactor Technology, be endorsed by the Municipality of
Clarington:
Be it resolved that the CBC News report entitled "Group of premiers band
together to develop nuclear reactor technology", be received, and
Whereas the Premiers of Ontario, Saskatchewan and New Brinswick have
announced their intention to work together on the development of small
modula reactors to help their provinces reduce carbon emissions and
address the challenges of climate change;
Whereas Canada has demonstrated excellence and leadership in the
nuclear industry on the world stage for more than 70 years;
Whereas the Canadian nuclear industry is one of the safest and most well-
regulated energy sectors in the world under the oversight of the Canadian
Nuclear Safety Commission;
Whereas the citizens of Ontario have enjoyed the benefits of safe, clean,
low-carbon energy produced by Ontario's nuclear industry for over 50
years;
Whereas small modular reactors have the potential to provide
municipalities, especially rural and northern municipalities, with an
innovative technology that provides a safe, \ow-carbon alternative to meet
energy demands; therefore,
Be it resolved the Town of Deep River write to the Premiers of Ontario,
Saskatchewan and New Brunswick to express support for their decision to
work together on the development of small modular reactor technology as
a safe, low- carbon energy option;
That the Town of Deep River write to the Prime Minister of Canada,
Minister of Natural Resources, and the remaining provincial premiers
asking that they support investment in the research and development of
small modular reactor technology as an innovative, safe, low-carbon
energy option; and
That this resolution be circulated to all upper and lower-tier municipalities
in Ontario, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, for their
consideration.
Carried
Page 11
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
8
12. Presentations
12.1 Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel, MHBC Planning, Regarding Bowmanville
Neighbourhood Character Study – Options Analysis and
Recommendations
The presentation from Dana Anderson and Kelly Martel, MHBC Planning,
Regarding Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study – Options Analysis and
Recommendations was considered earlier in the meeting before the public
meeting portion of the agenda.
13. Planning Services Department Reports
13.1 PSD-001-20 - Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning to
Implement the Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study
Report PSD-001-20 was considered earlier in the meeting during the public
meeting portion of the agenda.
13.2 PSD-002-20 - An Application by Bowmanville Village Inc. for a Removal of
Holding
Resolution # PD-011-20
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PSD-002-20 be received;
That the application submitted by Bowmanville Village Inc. to remove the Holding
(H) symbol be approved as contained in Attachment 1 to Report PSD -002-20;
That Council’s decision and a copy of Report PSD-002-20 be forwarded to the
Region of Durham and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-002-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
14. New Business – Consideration
15. Unfinished Business
16. Confidential Reports
Page 12
Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 13, 2020
9
17. Adjournment
Resolution # PD-012-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the meeting adjourn at 9:44 PM.
Carried
________________________________ ________________________________
Mayor Deputy Clerk
Page 13
Memo
Planning Services Department
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1C 3A6 | 905-623-3379
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
At the January 13, 2020 Planning and Development Committee meeting Mayor Foster
asked for an update on Camp 30.
The Municipal Solicitor issued a letter to Kaitlin and Fandor Homes on November 6,
2019. Kaitlin and Fandor are the owners of the lands known as Camp 30 under the
company name of Lambs Road School Property Ltd. (“LRSP”). The municipal solicitor’s
letter asked them to meet their commitments in the legal agreement, signed in July 2016
between the Municipality and LRSP.
We have not received a formal written response; however we have been informed via
emails to the Jury Lands Foundation (we were copied) and remarks made by the owners’
lawyer that they are working on the requirements for the subdivision application
regarding the southern most area such that they will be able to submit a complete
application consistent with the legal agreement.
LRSP previously submitted a zoning and subdivision application in 2009 with a public
meeting being held in June of 2010. At the time, LRSP also submitted an Official Plan
amendment to move the Community Park symbol from this parcel to the middle of the
property. This OPA application is now redundant as OPA 107 moved the park symbol to
the southeast corner of Lambs Road and Concession. Amendment 107 also introduced
a Special Policy Area F Section 16.7 in the Official Plan for Camp 30 and its surrounding
lands (the parcel bounded on the west by Soper Creek, the north by the rail line, the east
by Lambs Road and the south by Concession Street East). The Special Policy called for
an overall community vision which was presented to the public and Council in 2018 and
2019. The Report PSD-041-19 on the Special Policy was tabled indefinitely as the
owners are looking for higher density than allowed in the Official Plan and recommended
by the Special Policy.
To: Mayor and Members of Council
From: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services
Date: January 24, 2020
Subject: Camp 30 Update, PLN 34.5.2.64.1, COPA2018-0003
ZBA2009-0023, S-C-2009-003
File: PLN 34.5.2.64.1
Page 14
Page | 2
There are a number of outstanding requirements for a complete application for the
subdivision (see Attachment 1). The applicants were provided with this listing in a
meeting held on September 27, 2016. The applicant will either have to address the
requirements of the Special Policy Area F as the Official Plan is in full force and effect, or
Council could proceed with approval of PSD-041-19.
Given the amount of time that has passed since the public meeting on this application in
June 2010 another public meeting will be required.
Should you have any questions, please contact Rob Maciver or myself.
Faye Langmaid, FCSLA, RPP
Acting Director of Planning Services
/jp
Attachment 1, Requirements for Complete Application – Camp 30
Page 15
Attachment 1 Page | 1
Requirements for Complete Application – Camp 30
Copies of the Draft Plan of Subdivision 35 copies
The draft plan may include the Open Space and Parkland as blocks on the
Draft plan of subdivision as per the legal agreement; or, the limits of the draft
plan can be limited to the table lands only in area 1 and reference plans
prepared for the future dedication as per the legal agreement. Areas 2, 3 and 4
should be shown as other lands owned by applicant, without development
details.
Traffic Study 5 copies
To address changing road classifications in draft Official Plan; previous
comments from staff from 2010-2012
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Plan 7 copies
To address staff comments from 2011 and CLOCA comments
Noise Impact Study 5 copies
To reflect current development proposal
EIS Addendum 7 copies
Update Species at Risk, CLOCA Natural Heritage System, any potential
changes to the NHS as a result of proposed development and provide
justification for those changes.
Update Include current setback requirements as outlined within CLOCA Policy
and Procedural Document, section 8.4, Table 1 (I.e 10metres from dripline, 10
metres from Top of bank)
In Dec 9, 2015 letter CLOCA agreed to honour the previously agreed upon
5metre setback from dripline on the south side of Tributary 1. We will maintain
this comment, provided that no trail system is proposed through the 5 metre
setback. If a trail system is proposed in this location, it must be located outside
of the 5 metre setback.
Please have consultant explore opportunities for the protection of catalpa trees
in vicinity of development Area 1 as these tree have some historical
significance relating to the Camp 30 site.
Page 16
Attachment 1 Page | 2
Water Balance 7 copies
Through recommendations of the EIS, a Water balance for all development is
required to ensure infiltration across the sites are maintained and contributions
to tributaries
A thermal monitoring plan will be required and the program established to
monitor and assess effectiveness of the measures implemented.
Updated Scoped Subwatershed Study 7 copies
Although a comment letter dated January 30, 2012 addressed CLOCA
engineering comments sufficiently, those revisions will need to be transferred
and reflected into a Final Subwatershed Study Report such as requirements
for thermal mitigation. Further, there was an additional submission on February
15, 2012 with updates to pages 11, 12 and 13 of the report, however, a new
report was not provided, only the pages. These updates should be included in
a final version.
Update Constraints map, Fig 5 / development limits.
Given the time that has lapsed since the 2006 erosion assessment has been
completed, we will require an update to the report to ensure the hazard lands
are properly reflected on the plans with what exists on the ground today, as
well as confirmation that the toe erosion allowances recommended are still
applicable.
The required 6 metre access allowance must be added to all of the hazard
lands identified on Figure 5. This is a requirement through CLOCA Planning
and Regulation policies for hazard lands.
A full constraints map needs to be provided including all of the hazard
components and setbacks as well as all of the natural heritage features and
setbacks (current) (For at least the Phase 1 lands).
CLOCA would recommend that the recommendations in the EIS be brought
forward in the Scoped Subwatershed to ensure recommended stormwater
design measures are incorporated and as a trigger to refer to the Final EIS for
other detailed recommendations.
PDF/Digital copies of all documents required, including a CAD file for the draft
plan of subdivision.
Page 17
Attachment 1 Page | 3
Other items to note that will be included as Conditions of Draft Approval – not
intended to be a complete list
Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment
Urban Design/Community Theme Plan – To reflect overall Community Vision/Urban
Design Plan.
Other items to note relating to legal agreement
Open Space/Parkland dedication north of Area 1 will be dedicated as per
agreement but then further refined by future EIS work
Phase 1 ESA Update – Environmental Site Assessment should be prepared for the
valley system, with attention to the decommissioning of the private sewage system.
A record of site condition may be warranted.
Page 18
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington January 9, 2020
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Meeting
Thursday, January 9, 2020
Members Present: Brenda Metcalf Eric Bowman Jennifer Knox
Ted Watson Tom Barrie Ben Eastman
Richard Rekker John Cartwright Les Caswell
Henry Zekveld Councillor Zwart
Regrets: Don Rickard
Staff: Amy Burke - Planning Services
Guests: Pam Lancaster – Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority
Jamie Davidson – Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
April Stevenson – Highway of Heroes Tree Campaign
Brenda welcomed all to the meeting, with introductions.
No pecuniary interests declared.
Election of Chair
020-01 Moved by Tom Barrie, seconded by Richard Rekker
That Eric Bowman be Chair if he is willing to stand.
Eric Bowman confirmed that he is willing to stand as Committee Chair.
Carried
020-02 Moved by Tom Barrie, seconded by Richard Rekker
That John Cartwright be Vice-Chair if he is willing to stand.
John Cartwright confirmed that he is willing to stand as Committee Chair.
Carried
The Committee thanked Brenda for her leadership and dedication as Committee Chair
for the past years.
Adoption of Agenda
020-03 Moved by Tom Barrie, seconded by Brenda Metcalf
That the Agenda for January 9, 2020 be adopted.
Carried
Page 19
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington January 9, 2020
Approval of Minutes
020-04 Moved by Richard Rekker, seconded by Ted Watson
That the minutes of the December 12, 2019 meeting be approved.
Carried
Presentation:
Highway of Heroes Tree Campaign – April Stevenson provided an overview of this
new initiative. HOH aims to plant 2 million trees by 2022. Private Landowner
Partnership program offers qualified landowners planted native seedlings , with possible
savings of up to 80% on planting costs. Preference is given to sites that are at least 2.5
acres and within 30 km of the Highway 401 corridor. The program process was
reviewed, including the site assessment and survival assessment processes. For
program details or to complete an eligibility for and apply, visit www.hohtribute.ca/plp.
Clean Water – Healthy Land Financial Assistance Program – Pam Lancaster
provided an overview of the 2020 offering of this program for GRCA’s area within
Clarington. Any project on property within GRCA’s area that can improve, maintain, or
protect water quality, quantity and/or aquatic or terrestrial habitat may be eligible for
funding under the CWHLFAP. Funding must be approved before the project has begun.
A number of agricultural project categories exist, which have had good uptake. In 2019,
9 projects on 8 properties were approved for a total allocation of $11,056 in grant
funding. The total funding allocation in Clarington since the program was launched in
2007 is $226,100. CWHLFAP information is found at www.grca.on.ca.
CLOCA’s Updated Watershed Management Plans – Jamie Davidson reviewed the
purpose, history and evolution of CLOCA’s watershed management plans, the scope of
the plan updates carried out and out for public review and comment. A new evaluation
framework for evaluating watershed health is proposed that includes measurable
indicators and goals for specific attributes (e.g. forest cover). Actions to achieve these
goals distinguish responsibility for implementation (e.g. CLOCA, local municipality,
community). A component of the new proposal includes the resurrection of land
stewardship and restoration programming for landowners. The disparity of programs for
land stewardship across Clarington is a longstanding concern voiced by the Committee.
The Committee discussed the challenge facing the development and implementation of
watershed health and land use planning policy in light of a growing population;
achieving natural heritage targets needs to recognize the increasing importance of
maintaining agricultural land.
Business Arising from Minutes
Security from Trespass and Protecting Food Safety Act, 2019: Letter of support
sent to Hon. Ernie Hardeman, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, in support
of introducing legislation to protect farm families and food safety.
Line Fences Repeal Act, 2019: Prior to the meeting, Richard circulated to the
Committee Ontario Federation of Agriculture’s position letter on the proposed Act,
Page 20
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington January 9, 2020
stating OFA’s opposition to repeal as it would result in more “Red Tape”. OFA’s
position is supported by the Durham Region Federation of Agriculture.
Emerald Ash Borer Funding Assistance: Committee motion 019-26 from last meeting
endorsed by General Government Committee of Council on January 6. Final
consideration at Council on January 20.
Fireworks By-law 2015-047: Clerk’s report responding to the request for tighter
regulations to protect livestock considered by General Government Committee on
January 6. Report recommendation does not recommend by-law amendments.
Endorsed by Council. Final consideration at Council on January 20.
Correspondence, Council Items and Referrals
None.
Liaison Reports:
Durham Agriculture Advisory Committee: December meeting minutes indicate that
local municipalities have mapping of tile drain infrastructure. Matter discussed by Staff
and Clarington Engineering Services has confirmed that the Municipality does not have
information relating to tile drained lands or drainage pipe locations on private property in
Clarington.
Durham Region Federation of Agriculture: No updates.
Clarington Board of Trade: Breakfast with Mayor Foster event taking place on
January 21, 7:30am, at Bowmanville Creek Retirement Community.
Farm Connections: Annual General Meeting will be held on January 30, 7:00pm at
Blackstock Recreation Complex with guest speaker Rod Black.
New Business
Canadian Tire Motorsport Park Fly Over Support Request: CTMP applying for a
Canadian Armed Forces aircraft flyover as low as 500 feet for one of three marquee
2020 events. Flyover can consist of up to two passes of either the Canadian Snowbirds
CT-114 Tutor 7 or 9 plane fleet, or the CF-18 Demo Jet. There would also be practice
slots for the aircrafts of either 45 minutes (minimum) for the CT -114 fleet or 25 minutes
(minimum) for the CF-18. Request for letter of support from the Municipality endorsed
by General Government Committee on January 6. Final consideration at Council on
January 20. The Committee discussed the potential for spooking of livestock in the
area. Per the request of the Committee, Staff will request an update from CTMP when
a decision on CTMP’s application has been issued.
Region of Durham Broadband Strategy: Region of Durham has launched two
surveys to gather feedback and contribute to improving broadband access across the
region - one targeted to Durham residents (with additional questions for farms) and one
targeted to businesses. Visit www.durham.ca/broadband to complete surveys. Survey
Page 21
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington January 9, 2020
closes April 30, 2020. Question raised regarding broadband expansion and the
potential implications for the tax levy; Staff to discuss with Municipal Treasurer.
2020 Trees for Rural Roads Program: 2020 applications will open on January 16.
Applications available at www.clarington.net/treesforruralroads. Application deadline –
March 31, 2020.
2019 AACC Accomplishments: Brenda will present the Committee’s 2019
accomplishments to Council at the February 3, 2020 Planning & Development
Committee meeting.
Next Meeting: Thursday, February 13, 2020 @ 7:30 pm
Guest T.B.D.
Future Agendas:
Philip Lawrence, MP, Northumberland-Peterborough South
Hon. Erin O’Toole, MP, Durham
Robert Schafer re: Tyrone Mills Ltd.
Clarington Engineering and Region of Durham Works re: 2020 capital projects
Brianna Ames of Fairlife (Coca-Cola)
Clarington Engineering Services (Building Division) re: National Building Code changes
for farm structures anticipated for 2020 (once the changes have been confirmed)
Simon Gill, Durham Region Economic Development & Tourism re: an update on the
Durham Region Agricultural Strategy and Durham Region Broadband Strategy
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: February 3, 2020 Report Number: PSD-003-20
Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services
Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO By-law Number:
File Number: PLN 7.17 Resolution#:
Report Subject: Development Applications – 2019 Annual Report
Recommendation:
1. That Report PSD-003-20 be received for information.
Page 25
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PSD-003-20
Report Overview
In 2019, development application activity undertaken by the Planning Services Department,
with assistance by other Departments, included the following:
7 new or updated secondary plans; 11 currently underway
2 subwatershed studies underway
4 new draft plans of subdivision applications received proposing 470 housing units
2 plans of subdivision were issued Draft Approval comprising 514 housing units
2 extensions to Draft Plan Approval comprising 342 housing units
4 Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision registered for 259 new housing units
3 Draft Plan of Condominium application received for 226 units
3 condominium applications Draft Approved for 242 units,
3 Draft Approved Plan of Condominium were registered for 157 units
9 part lot control approvals creating 295 new dwelling units
2 official plan amendment applications received , with 1 approved
11 zoning by-law amendment applications received, with 11 approved
37 site plan applications received for 694 units, 29 approved for 371 new units
43 pre-consultation meetings held
43 minor variance applications received; 41 approved; 1 withdrawn; 1 denied
19 reports to the Durham Land Division Committee
133 permanent sign permits issued; 114 temporary sign permits issued
40 applications received for in-house apartments; 27 registered
Summary
657 new housing units approved
2,060 housing units in applications and/or draft approved
73,683 square metres of industrial and commercial space approved
92,894 square metres of industrial and commercial space in applications
Page 26
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PSD-003-20
1. Purpose
1.1 This report summarizes planning activity within the Municipality of Clarington for 2019.
This report also compares 2019 activity with previous years’ activity to assist with
identifying emerging issues and possible trends.
2. Policy Planning and Implementation
2.1 The Planning Services Department initiates and completes a wide variety of policy
documents that include secondary plans, design guidelines, and other studie s. In 2019,
there were eleven secondary plans underway. Secondary Plans detail policies, in
conformity with the Official Plan, to guide growth and development in defined areas of the
municipality where major changes are expected. Of those eleven, seven either started a
new or an update to existing Secondary Plans process in 2019. Three of these seven are
in Courtice, three in Bowmanville, and one in Newcastle. Also in 2019, two subwatershed
studies were underway. Subwatershed studies provide detailed technical information
regarding important watercourses from their headwaters to their terminus and drainage
system to inform secondary plans and appropriate land use development occurs within
those areas.
2.2 Work was underway in 2019 on two important design guidelines. The Residential
Intensification Urban Design Guidelines are being drafted for use in reviewing proposed
residential development within designated Intensification Areas in conformity with the
vision in Provincial and Municipal policy. Existing Landscape Design Guidelines are 30
years old and are being updated to ensure the continued enhancement of the urban
landscape.
2.3 The Municipality is participating in the Durham Region Official Plan Review. Staff
continue to review and provide comments on various discussion papers and help to
define the limits of the two major transit station areas. Staff also provide comments to the
Province on initiatives like Provincially Significant Employment Zones. In 2019, Planning
Services Staff have worked on addressing a number of appeals to Clarington’s Official
Plan approved by the Region in 2017. Negotiations over the year have led to resolution of
numerous appeals to Clarington’s Official Plan. There now remain only 2 appeals of the
original 22 received.
2.4 In response to changes to the Planning Act introduced by Bill 108, Clarington’s Planning
Services Department has been collaborating with the Finance Department to establish a
new Development Charges By-law and the creation of a new Community Benefits
Charge. Among other things, the community benefits charge will replace the cash-in-lieu
provisions for Parkland Dedication.
Page 27
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report PSD-003-20
2.5 In November of 2018, Planning Services Staff released the first draft of the regulations
and mapping for the rural areas for the comprehensive Zoning By-law Review known as
ZONE Clarington. This initial draft Zoning By-law was released for public input including
four information centres in January and February of 2019 as well as presentations to a
number of interest groups. By the end of 2019, there were over 800 people on the
Interested Parties list and there were hundreds who called, emailed, or came to the front
counter with enquires about the project but did not wish to be added to the IP list.
2.6 In December of 2019, Planning Services Staff released draft Official Plan policies and
zoning resulting from the Neighbourhood Character Study for central parts of
Bowmanville. Together with the consultant, Planning Services Staff hosted three walking
tours and two open houses. The draft Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendments are
proposed to be forwarded to Council for approval in early 2020.
2.7 The Planning Services Department oversees the four Community Improvement Grants
that encourage rehabilitation and revitalization of public areas. Grants totalling
approximately $78,800 were conditionally approved in 2019, of which approximately
$22,500 were issued. Another program, the Heritage Incentive Grant, assists heritage-
designated property owners with the costs of repairs and restorations. Interest in the
program remained strong in 2019 with $28,650 of grant funding issued since the
implementation of the program in 2013. In 2019 an additional three properties were
designated as heritage and another ten heritage properties listed as non-designated.
2.8 The implementation of the Process Enhancement Project (PEP) continued in 2019. The
review and approval of decks and accessory structures has been moved to the Building
Division, who issue building permits, with the intent of streamlining the process and
providing better customer service. Planning Services Staff carefully screen minor
variance applications and have streamlined Recommendation Reports. Staff have also
improved direction for a Committee of Adjustment notice. The process for minor Site Plan
Applications on the Oak Ridges Moraine has been significantly streamlined to save
residents time and money. Planning Services Staff have created a covering letter with a
check list for Final Subdivision Approval. Applicants receive a draft term of reference for
any required studies at the pre-consultation stage and information sheets are available.
2.9 Other significant projects in 2019 include obtaining a Ministerial Zoning Order to establish
a new 224-bed long-term care facility in Bowmanville, continuing the implementation of
the Orono Economic Development Strategy, renaming of King Streets in Bowmanville
and Haydon, and continuing the partnership with Conservation Authorities for the Trees
for Rural Roads Program.
2.10 For the past 4-5 years Clarington has had 3 of the top 10 infrastructure projects in Ontario
underway: Phase 2 of the 407 (complete); the refurbishment of Ontario Power Generation
(on target for 2022); and the ongoing construction of t he Port Granby Waste Management
Facility (target for topping off in 2020).
Page 28
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PSD-003-20
2.11 Ontario Power Generation has also announced its Headquarters will be moving to
Clarington. This will continue to create demand for new housing and provide other
economic benefits. Planning Services Staff have draft approved subdivisions ready to
accommodate growth. Numerous Secondary Plans are nearing completion they will
facilitate the development of a diversity of housing forms and community amenities.
3. Plans of Subdivision
3.1 The Director of Planning Services is the delegated authority to approve plans of
subdivision. However, staff prepare reports to Committee and Council on applications for
proposed draft plans of subdivision both at the public meeting stage and when approval is
recommended.
3.2 Most subdivision applications take a number of months if not years to reach draft
approval. There are usually revisions to both the proposed plan and supporting
documents before a proposed plan is recommended for draft approval. The charts in this
report do not include the applications that have been previously submitted in prior years
and are awaiting revisions or working toward approvals.
3.3 In 2019, four new subdivision applications were received proposing 470 units.
New Subdivision Applications Received By Unit Type
Urban Area
Single-detached Semi-detached Townhouse Apartment
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 20 172 29 0 0 0 115 142 111 0 0 0
Bowmanville 0 21 5 0 12 0 335 125 32 0 88 0
Newcastle 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 276 0 0 196
Orono, Hamlets
/ Rural Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 20 193 343 0 12 0 450 267 419 0 88 196
3.4 Courtice and Bowmanville continue to be the primary residential growth areas within the
Municipality of Clarington. This coincides with the provisions of the Official Plan. It is
expected that as the eleven Secondary Plans currently underway are completed,
Bowmanville and Courtice will continue to see new applications for plans of subdivision in
future years. Data concerning draft approved and extensions to draft approved
subdivisions indicate Newcastle will also experience significant growth in the coming
years. However, current servicing restrictions continue to limit growth north of the railway.
3.5 Just as in 2018, townhouse units continue to be the dominant form of housing being
applied for in subdivision applications in 2019. This is consistent with Provincial Policy
which encourages intensification as part of creating complete communities. It is expected
townhouse units will continue to represent a larger percentage of units applied for in the
coming years, although many of these will be on existing blocks and not necessarily
Page 29
Municipality of Clarington Page 6
Report PSD-003-20
within plans of subdivision. This trend is influenced by a number of factors including
Provincial Policy, the cost of housing, a shift in demographics leading to an increase in
demand for smaller, and a more affordable form of housing.
Draft Approved and Extensions to Draft Approved By Unit Type
Single-detached Semi-detached Townhouse Apartment
Urban Area 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bowmanville 47 314 174 32 0 0 62 335 284 182 0 123
Newcastle 326 0 0 0 0 0 83 12 0 105 223 0
Orono, Hamlets
/Rural Areas 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 392 365 191 32 0 0 145 347 284 287 223 123
3.6 The Planning Act allows a Municipality to impose a date by which Final Approval of a
Plan of Subdivision must be achieved. In accordance with the Planning Act, Clarington
typically provides for a three year period to meet all conditions. Some have longer
timeframes depending on the overall number of units and/or servicing constraints. When
Final Approval is not achieved within the time frame provided, the owner can make an
application for extension to the Draft Approval. This provides the Municipality and
agencies the opportunity to review the proposal and conditions to ensure the proposal still
meets current policy.
3.7 Four plans of subdivision were granted draft approval and two Draft Approved plans of
subdivision were granted extensions to Draft Approval (meaning the applicant was
granted more time to fulfil conditions of approval). In 2019, the number of Draft Approved
plans remained consistent with 2018. Draft approval and extension to draft approval
increased for single-detached dwellings and townhouses, largely due to activity in
Newcastle. In 2019, an additional 514 units were draft approved and 342 units were
granted extensions to draft approval. Once registered, this will provide an additional 837
new dwelling units. The draft approved plans provide diverse types of development,
including single-detached lots of varying frontages, townhouses, and apartment units.
3.8 In 2019 there were four plans of subdivision registered in the Municipality, totaling 259
new residential units. The registered subdivisions were all for single-detached dwellings.
It is expected that the number of units registered will remain strong in the coming years
as the number of new and draft approved subdivision units remains high and appears
able to address market demand in Clarington.
Page 30
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report PSD-003-20
4. Part Lot Control
4.1 Exemption from Part Lot Control applications allow lots and/or blocks within a registered
Plan of Subdivision where a previous planning application clearly indicated, through a
public process, that the lots or blocks would be further divided. Typically, exemption from
Part Lot Control is used where semi-detached or townhouses are to be split-up and
individually sold. It is also used to create lots, known as parcels of tied land (POTL’s) in
common element condominiums. The individual lot is created after construction has
commenced to ensure that the lot line is based on the location of footings and/or common
walls. Applications are processed by Staff, with approval delegated to the Director of
Planning Services. Nonetheless, an implementing By-law must be adopted by Council.
4.2 In 2019, a total of seven Part Lot Control applications were received, six of which were
approved. An additional three applications from 2018 were also approved in 2019. These
nine approvals created 255 townhouse lots and 40 semi-detached lots to provide 295
new dwelling units. Of these units, 261 were created in Bowmanville, with the remaining
34 in Courtice.
5. Plans of Condominium
5.1 A condominium is the form of housing tenure. Condominiums are most commonly used
for townhouses and apartment buildings. Three applications for plans of condominium
were received in 2019. If approved, these will result in 20 commercial units, 105
townhouses, and 101 apartment units. Two applications are for projects in Newcastle,
and one in Bowmanville.
5.2 In 2019, four condominium applications received Draft Approval and three received Final
Approval. One of the three receiving Final Approval was one of the four Draft Approved
in 2019. This provides for 157 townhouses and 252 apartments. Of the total of 399
dwelling units, 223 are in Bowmanville, with the remaining 176 in Newcastle.
Final Subdivision Approval By Unit Type
Single-detached Semi-detached Townhouse Apartment
Urban Area 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0
Bowmanville 240 370 531 0 102 4 0 42 324 0 42 123
Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Orono,
Hamlets /
Rural Area 19 28 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 259 398 564 0 102 4 0 42 392 0 42 123
Page 31
Municipality of Clarington Page 8
Report PSD-003-20
Condominium Application Activity
Urban Area
Applications
Received
Draft Approval Issued Final Plan Approval
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bowmanville 1 7 1 1 2 0 2 1 0
Newcastle 2 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0
Orono, Hamlets /
Rural Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3 10 1 4 2 0 3 1 0
5.3 While condominium applications decreased in 2019, draft and final approvals increased.
It is expected that the Municipality will continue to receive applications as developers
continue to propose higher density residential development which often take the form of
condominium tenure.
6. Official Plan Amendments
6.1 Planning Services Staff review and process applications to amend the Clarington Official
Plan.
Clarington Official Plan Amendment Activity
2019 2018 2017
Applications Received 2 4 12
Applications Approved 1 4 5
6.2 In 2019, two applications were received, one of which has been approved. The approved
application was to facilitate the severance of a surplus farm dwelling. The other is a
Municipal-led application as part of implementing the findings of the Neighbourhood
Character Study to add policies that address the transition between established
neighbourhoods and the Liberty Street Corridor, and to address entrances to secondary
residential units.
7. Zoning By-law Amendments
7.1 The majority of applications for rezoning accompanied proposed plans of subdivision or
consent applications. Zoning By-law Amendment applications also include By-laws for the
removal of a Holding provision, which is often used as a technique to ensure that
municipal requirements are implemented through development agreements.
Page 32
Municipality of Clarington Page 9
Report PSD-003-20
Zoning By-Law Amendment Activity
Type of Zoning By-Law Amendment
Applications Received Applications Approved
Year Year
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Removal of Holding 2 7 4 5 14 18
Rezoning 8 15 34 5 30 23
Total 10 22 38 10 43 41
7.2 There were fewer Zoning By-law Amendment applications in 2019 than in the previous
two years. Similarly, there were fewer approvals than in previous years. While nearly all
of the rezonings and removal of holdings concerned residential applications, one
rezoning was approved to allow for the future headquarters of East Penn, a large battery
distribution facility in the Clarington Energy Park.
8. Site Plans
8.1 The Clarington Site Plan Control By-law requires site plan approval for the majority of
commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi-residential developments, as well as most
development applications on the Oak Ridges Moraine. Site plan approval authority is
delegated jointly to the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering
Services.
8.2 There were 19 non-residential site plans approved in 2019, which totalled 60,134 square
metres of commercial and industrial floor space. In 2019, the Planning Services
Department received 23 non-residential site plans applications, which represents 73,683
square metres of floor space.
8.3 Two of the six industrial applications received, and two of the five industrial applications
approved were for cannabis production facilities, representing 66,000 square metres.
This means that 36% of industrial site plan activity in 2019 concerned cannabis
production.
8.4 As for residential site plan applications, the 14 received represented 694 units, while the
five approved represented 153 new dwelling units.
Page 33
Municipality of Clarington Page 10
Report PSD-003-20
Site Plan Application By Type
Land Use Type
Applications Received Applications Approved
Year Year
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Major Residential+ 9 6 9 3 7 3
Minor Residential++ 5 10 7 7 9 11
Commercial 11 8 12 6 6 7
Mixed Use 1 1 0 2 0 0
Industrial 6 12 9 5 6 4
Government/Institutional 1 3 3 1 2 0
Telecommunication Towers 1 2 7 2 1 3
Agricultural 3 1 2 3 0 1
Total 37 43 49 29 31 29
+ Major Residential uses are Residential units consisting of more than three units
++ Minor Residential uses are Residential units consisting of three or less units
8.5 In addition to this non-residential floor space and residential units, two mixed-use site
plan applications were approved in 2019. Both are in Courtice and will provide for an
additional 216 residential units and 32,760 square metres of commercial floor space.
8.6 There was an increase in the number of site plan applications received for Major
Residential and Commercial. The total number of approved site plan applications has
remained constant over the last three years.
9. Pre-Consultation Meetings
9.1 The Municipality adopted By-law 2007-192, which requires a pre-application consultation
meeting prior to the submission of most development applications. These “pre-
consultation” meetings assist in ensuring the applicant is aware of all required steps,
supporting documents, and application fees to help ensure applications are complete
when submitted. This is intended to speed up the application process and ensure the
applicant is fully aware of the process and its requirements. The details of pre-
consultation meetings are confidential, the number of pre-consultation applications
provides a general indication of future proposals.
9.2 In 2019, the number of pre-consultation meetings was similar to those held in 2018, but
the meetings for major residential projects has declined over the last two years. The
majority of the pre-consultations were for proposals in Courtice and Bowmanville, with an
increase in proposals in Newcastle. For pre-consultations for minor residential
applications, staff generally provide a detailed list of requirements for a complete
application and the process requirements to further streamline the overall process.
Page 34
Municipality of Clarington Page 11
Report PSD-003-20
Pre-Consultation Meetings By Type
Land Use Year
2019 2018 2017
Major Residential+ 7 12 23
Minor Residential++ 9 0 4
Commercial 7 10 9
Mixed Use (Commercial and Residential) 1 2 3
Industrial 8 15 11
Government/Institutional 4 4 5
Agricultural 0 0 3
Recreational 0 1 0
Telecommunication Towers 7 0 2
Undisclosed 0 2 2
Total 43 46 62
+ Major Residential uses are Residential units consisting of more than three units
++ Minor Residential uses are Residential units consisting of three or less units
9.3 Pre-consultations for mixed-use development have decreased slightly, but it is expected
that mixed-use proposals will increase in the coming years. The number of major
residential pre-consultation meetings will very likely increase when Secondary Plans for
greenfield areas in Bowmanville, Courtice, and Newcastle are complete.
10. Minor Variances
10.1 The Committee of Adjustment is appointed by Council to make decisions on minor
variances to the Municipality’s two Zoning By-laws.
10.2 The number of applications to the Committee of Adjustment was less than in previous
years. Unlike previous years, there were no variance applications from builders to
address issues with models that did not comply with zoning setback requirements or
height provisions. Only one variance application came from a builder, which was to
reduce the minimum unit size of four condo apartments. Seven applications were related
to a land division application.
Page 35
Municipality of Clarington Page 12
Report PSD-003-20
Minor Variance Applications
Application Decision 2019 2018 2017
Total number of Applications Approved 41 70 81
Total number of Applications Denied 1 1 0
Total number of Applications Withdrawn 1 2 1
Total number of Applications Tabled/On Hold 4 2 0
Total number of Applications Received 43 75 82
Total number of Applications Appealed 0 0 0
10.3 The vast majority of minor variance applications were from individual residents looking for
relief from a zoning regulation to construct structures like decks, sheds, or garages.
There were also two applications from residents seeking relief from the Interim Control
By-law that was put in place in parts of Bowmanville while the Neighbourhood Character
Study was underway.
10.4 Staff carefully review minor variance proposals before accepting applications and
payment. All four of the applications that were tabled (deferred) were from residents and
approved at a later meeting. As for the single application that was denied, the applicant
was a deck builder who chose to proceed even though he was advised before applying
that staff would recommend denying the application. The decision to deny was not
appealed.
11. Land Divisions
11.1 The Planning Services Staff provide coordinated comments for all Clarington
departments to the Durham Region Land Division Committee on consent applications.
11.2 In 2019, there was a continued decrease in land division applications. Of the total
nineteen applications, eighteen were approved and one was tabled (deferred) and will be
Comments to Land Division Committee By Type
Land Use Type Proposed New Lots Boundary Adjustments Easements
Year Year Year
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Urban Residential 6 12 42 2 0 3 1 0 2
Rural Residential 3 5 0 0 3 0 0 2 0
Commercial 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
Mixed Use 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Agricultural 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Industrial 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 12 19 43 6 4 4 1 2 6
Page 36
Municipality of Clarington Page 13
Report PSD-003-20
heard in 2020. Of these applications, six were to create new urban residential lots, three
to create rural residential lots, and one mixed use lot.
12. Apartment-in-House
12.1 The Planning Services Department coordinates apartment-in-house applications to help
ensure they are located in the appropriate residential zones and there is sufficient
parking. Registering in-house apartments also ensures the second dwelling unit is in the
Emergency and Fire Services database and conforms to the Ontario Building Code.
Apartment-In-House Activity By Geographic Area
Urban Area
Apartment-In-House
Applications Received
Apartment In-House
Registered
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 4 7 11 4 5 7
Bowmanville 34 28 33 21 17 17
Newcastle 1 1 2 1 0 1
Orono, Hamlets and Rural Areas 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 40 36 46 27 22 25
12.2 Compared to 2018, there was a slight increase in the number of apartment-in-house
applications received and registered in 2019. With the increasing cost of home ownership
along with the rise in temporary employment and income inequality, the need for
affordable rental units will increase in the future years. The apartment-in-house data does
not account for individually owned apartments (“condos”), townhouses, semi-detached, or
single-detached dwellings that are rented in their entirety.
13. Sign Permits
13.1 Sign permits, which are required for most signs within the Municipality, are divided into
two categories: permanent and temporary. The table below shows sign permit activity for
2019 based on geographic area. A total of 247 sign permits were issued.
13.2 The numbers below show permanent sign activity increased significantly in 2019,
however, a single application in Courtice for 24 permanent signs and another single
application for 12 permanent signs in Bowmanville skews the overall totals. Temporary
sign permit activity remained relatively stable.
Page 37
Municipality of Clarington Page 14
Report PSD-003-20
Sign Permit Activity By Geographic Area
Urban Area
Number of Permit Applications Received and Issued
Permanent Temporary
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Courtice 34 4 8 39 40 41
Bowmanville 76 44 66 64 63 65
Newcastle 15 14 18 10 9 18
Orono, Hamlets and Rural Areas 8 9 9 1 3 7
Total 133 71 101 114 115 131
14. Concurrence
Not Applicable.
15. Conclusion
15.1 Planning application activity in 2019 has declined when compared with the previous two
years. This decline was predicted and expected given approval of the Official Plan, the
number of Secondary Plan underway plus current market conditions. Previous years
(2015-17) saw a surge of residential applications and approvals, many of which are still
under construction. As those projects wrap up and secondary plans are completed,
applications for new subdivisions, site plans for townhouses and apartments, and other
intensification projects will continue to provide for Clarington’s growing population.
15.2 Data from recent years show that subdivision applications are no longer the sole indicator
of residential growth. Developers are increasingly turning to townhouse blocks and
apartment condominiums to provide higher-density residential neighbourhoods. While
these forms of development may be part of a larger plan of subdivision, site plan
applications and relief from Part Lot Control are increasingly important indicators of
residential growth.
15.3 It should also be emphasized that subdivision applications as well as major residential
site plan applications normally take at least a year for the applicant to fulfil all conditions
of approval. Looking at townhouses in plans of subdivision in 2018 and 2019,
applications include 717 units, while over the same time frame 492 were either draft
approved or given extensions to draft approval, though only 145 reached final approval in
2019. This suggests there will be a significant number of townhouses approved in 2020
and into 2021.
Page 38
Municipality of Clarington Page 15
Report PSD-003-20
15.4 Cannabis production facilities accounted for 36% of industrial site plan activity. This
growing industry will remain an important employer in Clarington. During 2019, the
Planning Services Department fielded an increase in enquiries about cannabis production
on agricultural lands. The growing and harvesting of cannabis is interpreted as an
agricultural crop and is permitted provided a federal license has been
approved. Processing beyond drying, trimming and bulk packaging have been
interpreted as not accessory or ancillary to a typical farm operation.
15.5 Detailed charts for each application type, identifying applications received and approved
can be obtained by contacting the Planning Services Department.
Staff Contact: Mark Jull, Planner I, 905-623-3379 extension 2426 or mjull@clarington.net.
The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision:
Region of Durham Planning and Economic Development
Page 39
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: February 3, 2020 Report Number: PSD-004-20
Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services
Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#:
File Number: PLN 34.1.1.4 By-law Number:
Report Subject: Proposed Heritage Designation for the Fletcher Tree (2 Church Street,
Bowmanville)
Recommendations:
1. That Report PSD-004-20 be received;
2. That the Clerk issue a Notice of Intention to Designate 2 Church Street, Bowmanville
as a cultural heritage resource under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act pursuant to
the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act;
3. That depending on the response to the Notice of Intention to Designate, the Clerk
either prepare the necessary by-law or report back to Council regarding objections
received; and
4. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-004-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Page 40
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PSD-004-20
1. Background
1.1. The purpose of this report is to initiate the heritage designation process for the copper
beech tree, commonly referred to as the ‘Fletcher Tree’. The Fletcher Tree is located in
the southern portion of the lands known as 2 Church Street, east of the intersection of
Church Street and St. George Street in Bowmanville, as shown on the location map
(Attachment 1).
1.2. The Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) enables Council to protect cultural heritage resources
by (i) listing property on the Municipal Register, (ii) designating an individual property
under Part IV, or (iii) designating a heritage conservation district under Part V.
Protecting heritage value under the OHA enables the Municipality to manage change to
heritage resources and conserve identified heritage attributes.
1.3. The conservation of cultural heritage resources is directed by the Planning Act; the
Provincial Policy Statement, 2014; the Growth Plan, 2019; and the Durham Region and
Clarington Official Plans.
1.4. The Clarington Heritage Committee evaluated the Fletcher Tree and made a
recommendation to designate the subject property under Part IV of the OHA at its
November 2019 meeting. Council may designate a property under Part IV if it considers
the property to meet at least one of the criteria establishing heritage value or interest in
accordance with Ontario Regulation 9/06: Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage
Value or Interest of the OHA. The criteria is based upon three overarching values
related to physical/design, associative/historical and contextual elements. The Fletcher
Tree has been evaluated as having heritage significance that merits designation, as
summarized in Section 2 below.
Report Overview
The Municipality is responsible for the identification and conservation of cultural heritage
resources. The Fletcher Tree located at 2 Church Street is a significant copper beech tree
that has been determined to meet the criteria for heritage designation under provincial
Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act. An arborist’s assessment concluded the
Fletcher Tree is in good overall health and could be expected to have a similar presence for
another 50 to 100 years with proper care and protective measures. The Clarington Heritage
Committee recommends Council proceed with the designation of the subject property under
section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to ensure the Fletcher Tree is appropriately protected
and is recognized as part of Clarington’s heritage.
Page 41
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PSD-004-20
2. Discussion
Fletcher Tree Summary of Significance
2.1. The OHA Regulation 9/06, the Heritage Committee’s evaluation, and the Planning
Services’ arborist’s assessment served as the framework and basis for the
recommendation for designation of the Fletcher Tree.
2.2. The Fletcher Tree is a cultivated variety of the European beech tree, commonly known
as a copper beech. The Fletcher Tree has a grand presence as it stands 30 metres tall
with a canopy spread almost as wide. It is estimated, the Fletcher Tree has stood for
over 200 years. It continues to be in good overall health and is reasonably expected to
have a similar presence for the next 50 to 100 years, provided adequate protection and
consideration to maintain its health, proper care and protective measures.
Figure 1: Photographs of Fletcher Tree, Planning Services, 2019
2.3. The Fletcher Tree acquired its moniker because this grand copper beech tree was
planted by Squire Alexander Fletcher in the front yard of his Bowmanville home. The
home itself is cited as one of the first brick homes in the area and was completed in
approximately 1812 with bricks that were fabricated on site. Squire Fletcher planted two
trees in the front yard of the home, one of which is the Fletcher Tree. The two trees
planted were “his and hers” trees and thought to signify love and commitment.
2.4. Squire Fletcher was among the earliest and most influential European settlers in the
area now known as Bowmanville. Subsequent to his arrival in approximately 1800, he
acquired large tracts of lands from Division Street to Mearns on both sides of King
Street. Squire Fletcher served as local magistrate for many years, was involved in the
Page 42
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report PSD-004-20
War of 1812, and was an officer in the Durham militia. Later, Squire Fletcher became
one of the first shareholders in the Port Darlington Harbour Company.
2.5. The Fletcher Tree is among the only remaining physical elements of Squire Alexander
Fletcher’s significant contribution to the establishment of the area . The brick house was
demolished in the 1970s and the second tree no longer exists
Key Heritage Attributes
2.6. For purposes of protection under section 29 of the OHA, the heritage resource to be
protected on this property is the copper beech tree (Fletcher Tree), including its root
zone.
2.7. The Fletcher Tree is a notable specimen, the character defining attributes of which
include:
The ‘Purpurea’ cultivar of its age (over 200 years), specifically selected through
cultivation, the leaves of which emerge a deep purple, and gradually turn greener
over the course of the growing season;
The general size and shape of the tree; and
The location of the tree on the property formerly inhabited by Squire Fletcher and his
family in the centre of Bowmanville, and its physical and visual relationship to its
surroundings.
The Statement of Cultural Heritage Value is included as Attachment 2 to this report.
3. Protecting Cultural Heritage Resources
Applicable Legislation
3.1. The conservation of significant architectural, historical and archaeological resources is a
matter of provincial interest identified in the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS),
and is reinforced by the Growth Plan, 2019 and the OHA itself.
3.2. Section 2 of the PPS directs that significant cultural resources, including natural
elements and cultural heritage landscapes, shall be conserved. The Province is
currently undertaking a review of the PPS. The proposed changes relating to cultural
heritage generally consist of clarification and alignment with the amendments to the
OHA recently introduced through Bill 108, and do not appear to affect the designation of
the Fletcher Tree as a significant heritage resource. The amendments to the OHA
introduced by Bill 108 are anticipated to come into force in July 2020.
Page 43
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PSD-004-20
3.3. Section 4 of the Growth Plan, 2019 identifies cultural heritage resources as valuable
assets that must be conserved in order to foster a sense of place, and benefit
communities. It is necessary to plan for growth in a manner that protects cultural
heritage resources and maximizes their benefits to make our communities unique and
attractive places to live.
Ontario Heritage Act
3.4. The OHA empowers municipalities to pass a by-law to designate a property that is of
cultural heritage significance. The Clarington Heritage Committee has made a
recommendation to designate the Fletcher Tree and its root zone.
3.5. The OHA outlines the process for designation. Should Council concur with the Heritage
Committee’s recommendation for designation, a Notice of Intention to Designate will be
published in the local newspaper. A summary description of the heritage designation
process is attached to this report as Attachment 3.
3.6. Once a property is designated under Part IV of the OHA, property owners are required
to obtain consent for proposed alterations to the identified heritage attributes or changes
to adjacent property that may impact the identified heritage resource. Impacts of any
proposed development will be addressed as part of applicable planning approvals once
a development application is received. For example, tree protection measures would be
required as a condition of site plan approval.
Region of Durham Official Plan
3.7. Section 2 of the Region of Durham Official Plan sets out goals for the preservation of
historic and cultural heritage. The Region’s Official Plan encourages Councils of the
area municipalities to use the OHA to conserve, protect, and enhance the built and
cultural heritage resources.
Clarington Official Plan
3.8. Section 8 of the Clarington Official Plan, 2018 directs the designation of cultural
heritage resources under Part IV of the OHA, with assistance from the Heritage
Committee, and the incorporation of such resources into community design and
development in support of achieving the Municipality’s cultural heritage objectives.
3.9. The subject lands are within the Bowmanville East Urban Centre Secondary Plan area
and are currently designated for Medium Density Residential development. The
designation of the Fletcher Tree will help to ensure this cultural heritage resource is
properly protected and considered as part the future development of the lands.
Page 44
Municipality of Clarington Page 6
Report PSD-004-20
Heritage Trees
3.10. The Fletcher Tree is the first tree in Clarington to be considered for designation under
Part IV of the OHA in and of itself. However, other grand trees have been identified as
part of individual designations in connection with a building and recognized as part of
the Beech Avenue Bowmanville Heritage Conservation District under Part V of the
OHA as natural elements of a cultural heritage landscape.
3.11. The protection of trees as valuable components of neighbourhood character was a
recurring theme throughout the recent Neighbourhood Character Study. The Study’s
Final Report included recommendations to (i) complete a street tree inventory for the
study area, and (ii) consider a pilot project for a tree protection by-law for individual
trees on public and private land. The Fletcher Tree is not within the Neighbourhood
Character Study area, however the recommendations demonstrate the valued
contribution of trees to a neighbourhood’s character.
3.12. The Municipal Act enables municipalities to pass by-laws that may prohibit or regulate
the destruction or injuring of trees, which can include provisions specific to heritage
trees, where defined. The Municipality of Clarington does not currently regulate or
protect individual trees on public or private property under its existing tree by-law.
Clarington’s Tree By-law 97-35 applies to the protection of woodlots with an area of 0.2
ha or greater south of Taunton Road. Similarly, Durham Region’s Tree By-law applies
to woodlots with an area in excess of 1.0 ha.
3.13. Other municipalities have designated individual trees under the OHA. The Comfort
Maple in Pelham was the first such tree designated in June 2000. Other municipalities
such as Hamilton, Oakville, Niagara Falls, Caledon, Halton Hills, and Newmarket,
among others have since then used the same provision to protect significant trees.
3.14. While there are other tools available to municipalities to protect and commemorate
trees as noted above, the proposed designation of the property under Part IV of the
OHA is appropriate in light of the identified historical and associative significance of the
Fletcher Tree and given the absence of an applicable tree protection by-law.
4. Public Notice
4.1. Notification is required under the OHA before Council passes a by-law to designate a
property. Staff has notified the property owners of the intent to designate the Fletcher
Tree property.
4.2. Correspondence with the property owners’ representatives to date has related to the
impact of the designation on the future development of the property, and specifically
the extent of the radius around the Fletcher Tree that would be subject to protective
measures. Should Council proceed with the Notice of Intent to designate the property,
Page 45
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report PSD-004-20
Planning Services staff would work with the property owners in the context of the
appropriate planning processes to establish detailed tree protection measures.
5. Concurrence
Not Applicable.
6. Conclusion
6.1. The Fletcher Tree has been evaluated and determined to have cultural heritage value.
The Clarington Heritage Committee recommends the designation of the Fletcher Tree
located at 2 Church Street as an individual designation under Part IV of the OHA.
Should no objections be received by the Municipal Clerk within 30 days of publishing
the Notice of Intention to designate, the proposed by-law designating the property
(Attachment 4) will be forwarded to Council for approval. Alternatively, if an objection(s)
is received the Clerk will provide a report to Council.
6.2. Upon designation a bronze plaque signifying the significance of the Fletcher Tree to the
community could be designed. Planning Services staff will work with the Heritage
Committee and property owners to determine how to best recognize the Fletcher Tree
and explore appropriate protection measures.
6.3. It is respectfully recommended that Council authorizes the Clerk to proceed with the
Notice of Intent to designate the Fletcher Tree.
Staff Contact: Sarah Allin, Planner II, 905-623-3379 x 2419 or sallin@clarington.net.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – Location Map; 2 Church Street
Attachment 2 – 2 Church Street; Statement of Cultural Value and Heritage Attributes
Attachment 3 – Heritage Designation Process
Attachment 4 – Proposed Draft By-law for 2 Church Street
Interested Parties:
List of Interested Parties available from Department.
Page 46
Page 47
January 2020 Attachment 2 to
Municipality of Clarington Report PSD-004-20
1
Fletcher Tree
Statement of Significance and list of Character defining Features
Description of Property
The lands upon which the Fletcher Tree grow are located at 2 Church Street, east of the
intersection of Church Street and St. George Street in Bowmanville. The lands are
currently vacant of buildings, but were occupied once by a two-storey brick house, circa
1812, which provided backdrop for this grand Fletcher Tree.
Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest
Age: 200+ years
Height: 30 metres
Circumference: 180 centimeters
The Fletcher Tree holds significant historical
and contextual value to Bowmanville.
This magnificent Tree was planted by Squire
Alexander Fletcher in the front yard of his
third Bowmanville home, which is cited as
one of the first brick homes in the area, and
was completed in approximately 1812 with
bricks made on site. At that time, Squire
Fletcher planted two trees, one of which is
the Fletcher Tree. The trees were planted as
“his and hers” trees, thought to signify love
and commitment. Squire Fletcher was one of
the earliest and most influential European
settlers in the establishment of the area now
known as Bowmanville. Subsequent to his
arrival in Darlington, Squire Fletcher acquired a large tract of land stretching from
Division Street to Mearns Avenue on both sides of King Street, among his extensive
land holdings.
Squire Alexander Fletcher served many years as a local magistrate, was involved in the
War of 1812 providing storage for canons and munition at his numerous properties
between Bowmanville and Kingston, and was an officer in the Durham militia. Later,
Squire Fletcher became one of the first shareholders in the Port Darlington Harbour
Company.
The copper beech, known as the Fletcher Tree, may be the only remaining physical
element of Squire Fletcher’s significant contribution to the establishment of the area, as
Page 48
January 2020 Attachment 2 to
Municipality of Clarington Report PSD-004-20
2
the 1812 brick house was demolished in the 1970s, and the second tree no longer
exists.
It is noted the former house later belonged to Robert Loscombe, a prominent
Bowmanville lawyer and twice Mayor of Bowmanville, at which point the house was
known as the Loscombe House.
The Fletcher Tree itself is a cultivated variety (cultivar) of the European Beech tree. It is
commonly known as purple or copper beech, and scientifically as Fagus sylvatica
‘Purpurea’. The age of the Fletcher Tree combined with its cultivar make it unique in
Bowmanville. The Fletcher Tree has a grand presence as it stands 30 metres
(approximately 100 feet) tall with a canopy spread that is almost as wide. Its leaves are
oval-shaped and glossy with wavy edges that emerge a deep purple, and gradually turn
greener towards the end of the growing season.
The Fletcher Tree has stood in this spot for over 200 years, despite the ongoing
changes and development around it, and continues to be in good health overall. It is a
grand tree representative of the early settlement of the area that would later become
Bowmanville.
Description of Heritage Attributes
Key heritage attributes that exemplify the heritage value of the Fletcher Tree include:
Age: 200+ years
Height: 30 metres
Circumference: 180 centimetres (DBH)
Other character defining elements include:
The ‘Purpurea’ cultivar of its age, specifically selected through cultivation, the leaves
of which emerge a deep purple, and gradually turn greener over the course of the
growing season;
The general size and shape of the tree, including its root system; and
The location of the tree on the property formerly occupied by the Fletcher family in
the centre of Bowmanville, and its physical and visual relationship to its
surroundings.
Page 49
1. Designation by Municipal Bylaw
(Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act)
Property listed on municipal
and provincial registers
Property listed on
Canadian Register
Notice of Designation:
1. Served on property owner
2. Served on OHT
3. Published in newspaper
Notice of Withdrawal of
Intention to Designate:
1. Served on property owner
2. Served on OHT
3. Published in newspaper
Designating bylaw passed &
registered on title
Property not designated
Property not designated
Designation proposed
Council consults with MHC
Objections within 30 days?
Notice of Intention to Designate:
1. Served on property owner
2. Served on OHT
3.Published in newspaper
Objection referred to
CRB for hearing
Notice of Hearing
published in newspaper
CRB hearing and report
Council considers CRB Report
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
Council Decision:
Designate property?
Council Decision:
Proceed with designation?
Designating Heritage Properties • Appendix: Flowcharts
34
Page 50
Attachment 4 to
Municipality of Clarington Report PSD-004-20
The Corporation of the Municipality Of Clarington
By-Law No. 2020 –XXX
Being a by-law to designate the property known for municipal purposes as 2 Church
Street, Bowmanville, Municipality of Clarington as a property of historic or architectural
value or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act, R. S. O. 1990, Chapter 0.18;
Whereas the Ontario Heritage Act, R. S. O., 1990, c.O. 18 authorizes the Council of the
Municipality to enact by- laws to designate properties to be of historic or architectural
value or interest for the purposes of the Act; and
Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington has caused to
be served upon the owner of the property known for municipal purposes at 2 Church
Street, Bowmanville and upon the Ontario Heritage Foundation, Notice of Intention to
Designate the aforesaid real property and has caused such Notice of Intention to be
published in the Clarington This Week, a newspaper having general circulation in the
area of the designation on_________ ; and
Whereas the reasons for the designation of the aforesaid property under the Ontario
Heritage Act are contained in Schedule "A" attached to and forming part of this by-law;
and
Whereas the Clarington Heritage Committee has recommended that the property known
for municipal purposes as 2 Church Street, Bowmanville, be designated as a property of
historic or architectural value or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act; and
Whereas no notice of objection to the proposed designation was served upon the
Municipal Clerk within the period prescribed by the Ontario Heritage Act;
Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington hereby
enacts as follows:
1. The property known for municipal purposes at 2 Church Street, Bowmanville
which is more particularly described in Schedule "B" which is attached to and
forms part of this by- law, is hereby designated as a property which has historic or
architectural value or interest under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, R. S.
O. 1990, c., O. 18.
2. The Solicitor for the Municipality of Clarington is hereby authorized to cause a
copy of this by-law to be registered against the title to the property described in
Schedule "B" hereto.
3. The Municipal Clerk is hereby authorized to cause a copy of this by-law to be
served upon the owner of the property described in Schedule "B" hereto and on
the Ontario Heritage Foundation. The Municipal Clerk also is authorized to cause
notice of the passing of this by-law to be published in the Clarington This Week, a
newspaper having general circulation in the area of the designation.
Page 51
By-law passed in open session this ____ day of _____, 2020
_____________________________
C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk
___________________________
Adrian Foster, Mayor
Page 52
Schedule 'A'
To By-law 2020- XXX
Statement of Significance and list of character defining features.
Description of Property
The lands upon which the Fletcher Tree grow are located at 2 Church Street, east of the
intersection of Church Street and St. George Street in Bowmanville. The lands are
currently vacant of buildings, but were occupied once by a two -storey brick house, circa
1812, which provided backdrop for this grand Fletcher Tree.
Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest
Age: 200+ years
Height: 30 metres
Circumference: 180 centimeters
The Fletcher Tree holds significant historical
and contextual value to Bowmanville.
This magnificent Tree was planted by Squire
Alexander Fletcher in the front yard of his
third Bowmanville home, which is cited as
one of the first brick homes in the area, and
was completed in approximately 1812 with
bricks made on site. At that time, Squire
Fletcher planted two trees, one of which is
the Fletcher Tree. The trees were planted as
“his and hers” trees, thought to signify love
and commitment. Squire Fletcher was one of
the earliest and most influential European
settlers in the establishment of the area now
known as Bowmanville. Subsequent to his
arrival in Darlington, Squire Fletcher acquired a large tract of land stretching from
Division Street to Mearns Avenue on both sides of King Street, among his extensive
land holdings.
Squire Alexander Fletcher served many years as a local magistrate, was involved in the
War of 1812 providing storage for canons and munition at his numerous properties
between Bowmanville and Kingston, and was an officer in the Durham militia. Later,
Squire Fletcher became one of the first shareholders in the Port Darlington Harbour
Company.
The copper beech, known as the Fletcher Tree, may be the only remaining physical
element of Squire Fletcher’s significant contribution to the establishment of the area, as
Page 53
the 1812 brick house was demolished in the 1970s, and the second tree no longer
exists.
It is noted the former house later belonged to Robert Loscombe, a prominent
Bowmanville lawyer and twice Mayor of Bowmanville, at which point the house was
known as the Loscombe House.
The Fletcher Tree itself is a cultivated variety (cultivar) of the European Beech tree. It is
commonly known as purple or copper beech, and scientifically as Fagus sylvatica
‘Purpurea’. The age of the Fletcher Tree combined with its cultivar make it unique in
Bowmanville. The Fletcher Tree has a grand presence as it stands 30 metres
(approximately 100 feet) tall with a canopy spread that is almost as wide. Its leave s are
oval-shaped and glossy with wavy edges that emerge a deep purple, and gradually turn
greener towards the end of the growing season.
The Fletcher Tree has stood in this spot for over 200 years, despite the ongoing
changes and development around it, and continues to be in good health overall. It is a
grand tree representative of the early settlement of the area that would later become
Bowmanville.
Description of Heritage Attributes
Key heritage attributes that exemplify the heritage value of the Fle tcher Tree include:
Age: 200+ years
Height: 30 metres
Circumference: 180 centimetres (DBH)
Other character defining elements include:
The ‘Purpurea’ cultivar of its age, specifically selected through cultivation, the leaves
of which emerge a deep purple, and gradually turn greener over the course of the
growing season;
The general size and shape of the tree, including its root system; and
The location of the tree on the property formerly occupied by the Fletcher family in
the centre of Bowmanville, and its physical and visual relationship to its
surroundings.
Page 54
Schedule 'B'
To By-law 2020- XXX
Legal Description:
Blocks A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I and Bowtown Court (As closed by Judges Order
Registered as N70097);
Plan 701 and Part Block 3, on the North Side of King St., C.G. Hanning’s Plan being a
Subdivision of Lot 10 Concession 1, Township of Darlington;
Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 PLAN 10R659 Except Pts 2, 3 and 4 PLAN 10R3694, Parts 1 and 2
PLAN 40R23724 and Part 2 PLAN 40R23979;
Subject to an Easement AS IN BO11379;
Subject to an Easement in Gross over Part 3 PLAN 40R23724 AS IN DR455654;
Municipality of Clarington
Regional Municipality of Durham
PIN 26629-0945 (LT)
Page 55
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: February 3, 2020 Report Number: LGL-002-20
Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Municipal Solicitor
Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO By-law Number:
File Number: L3040-36 Resolution#:
Report Subject: Status of LPAT Appeals of OPA 107
Recommendation:
1. That Report LGL-002-20 be received for information.
Page 56
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report LGL-002-20
1. Background
1.1 The last written update on the status of the OPA 107 appeals was Report LGL-015-19
that was presented to Council on November 12, 2019. At that time, it was reported to
Council that the second phase of the hearing would commence on January 13, 2020.
2. Status Update
2.1 Of the ten days scheduled for the second phase of the hearing, only two days were
required.
2.2 On the first day, several matters were settled in accordance with the direction of
Council. In addition, two of the Tooley Road subdivision appellants withdrew their
appeals following extensive discussions between those appellants and Municipal staff.
2.3 As a result, there remain three outstanding appeals of the original 22 appeals that were
submitted.
2.4 A list of the remaining appeals is included as Attachment 1 of this report.
2.5 On the second day of the hearing, the Tribunal was asked for a preliminary ruling about
the applicability of certain policies to lands adjacent to the Orono urban settlement
boundary that would permit a 10-hectare enlargement of the Orono urban area. The
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing takes the position that it is opposed to any
expansion of the Orono urban boundary. The Tribunal has not yet provided its decision
on this issue. If the Tribunal rules in favour of the Municipality, it may pave the way for a
partial approval of the Orono boundary expansion that was included in the Council-
adopted version of OPA 107.
2.6 The other two remaining appeals have been adjourned to allow the proponent s to
complete additional work and possibly to modify their applications.
2.7 I will provide with timely updates of any change in the status of the remaining appeals.
Report Overview
The second phase of the OPA 107 hearing is now complete.
Of the original 22 appeals, only three are remaining.
Page 57
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report LGL-002-20
3. Concurrence
This report has been reviewed by the Acting Director of Planning Services who concurs
with the recommendation.
Staff Contact: Robert Maciver, Municipal Solicitor, 905-623-3379 ext. 2013 or
rmaciver@clarington.net.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – OPA 107 – List of Remaining Appeals
Interested Parties:
There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision.
Page 58
Attachment 1 to Report LGL-002-20
OPA 107 - LIST OF REMAINING APPEALS
1. Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
2. Michael Zygocki Limited and Boothia Developments Limited
3. 2408406 Ontario Inc., 2408426 Ontario Inc., and 2408428 Ontario Inc.
Page 59
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: February 3, 2020 Report Number: PSD-005-20
Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services
Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#:
File Number: PLN 8.6.7 By-law Number:
Report Subject: Addendum to Report PSD-039-19 Exemption Request for 10 Victoria
Street for Interim Control By-law
Recommendations:
1. That Report PSD-005-20 be received;
2. That the request for an exemption to Interim Control By-law 2018-083 for 10 Victoria
Street be approved;
3. That the By-law contained in Attachment 1 be approved; and
4. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-039-19 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision
Page 60
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PSD-005-20
1. Background
1.1 On September 9, 2019, Committee considered PSD-039-19 which recommended denial
of a request by Ken Hoy for an exemption to Interim Control By-law 2018-083 for 10
Victoria Street. The report was tabled to September 25, October 21, November 11 and
December 2 and finally tabled until the applicant an d staff had come to a resolution.
1.2 On August 8, 2019, Ken Hoy of Stonefield Homes contacted staff and verbally requested
an exemption to Interim Control By-law 2018-083 to construct a semi-detached dwelling
at 10 Victoria Street (see Figure 1).
Figure 1 –10 Victoria Street
1.3 The semi-detached building originally proposed two dwellings with a common wall
separating a double car garage for each unit. The garages were designed to protrude in
Report Overview
Ken Hoy has requested an exemption to Interim Control By-law 2018-083. He proposes a
semi-detached dwelling at 10 Victoria Street.
Page 61
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PSD-005-20
front of the house and front porch (see figure 2). As a result of the Interim Control By-law
Mr. Hoy was advised to submit a character analysis in support of his proposed semi -
detached dwelling. On October 4th Mr. Hoy submitted his character analysis, however it
did not follow the required criteria.
Figure 2 – Original Proposed Front Elevation for 10 Victoria Street
2. Character Analysis
2.1 Following Mr. Hoy’s submission, staff undertook a Character Analysis for 10 Victoria
Street. The Character Analysis determined that the subject property is in a
neighbourhood with predominantly one-storey, single-detached dwellings with either a
single-car detached garage in the rear or no existing garage. A small proportion of the
dwellings in the assessment area of the subject property have attached garages with a
single-car garage door, typically setback from the front wall of the dwelling. The
assessment area consists of dwellings with dominant characteristics including brick and
siding materials, a front facing porch, stoop or landing with one main door facing the
street, and low-pitched gable or hip roof styles. Neighbouring properties in the character
assessment area have maintained a landscaped front yard with shrubs and trees that are
mature. Lots in this area also have frontages that are typically wider than 15 metres.
2.2 The analysis determined that the proposed semi-detached building did not meet some of
the predominant characteristics of the surrounding neighbourhood. As a result, staff
consulted, through meetings and emails with Mr. Hoy suggesting modifications to the
proposal to more suitably address the neighbourhood context.
2.3 The proposed one-storey semi-detached building is more consistent with the low-rise
character of the assessment area. The proposal generally complements the
neighbourhood and lot features described above. The proposed semi-detached building
Page 62
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report PSD-005-20
is designed to share a common wall between the garages. Following the assessment,
and through discussion with Mr. Hoy it has been agreed to revise the building elevation to
provide a single car garage door for each dwelling. The garage door remains flush with
the front wall of the dwelling but recessed from the front porch (Figure 3).
3. Discussion
3.1 The Interim Control By-law provided exemptions for properties where a development
application or building permit application was in progress. Where the regulations in the
Interim Control By-law were not met, a Character Assessment was required to be
submitted to Staff for an exemption
3.2 The subject property is 1,012.51 square metres in lot area and has a total lot frontage of
25.14 metres. The proposal for a semi-detached dwelling will require a land severance,
resulting with a 12.57 metre frontage per lot. The proposal conforms to the “R1” zone
regulations in By-law 84-63 and those contained in section 2.f of the Interim Control By-
law for the interior side yard setback, building height and roof pitch. The revised design
now has a single car garage door.
Figure 3 – Revised Proposed semi-detached dwelling for 10 Victoria Street
3.3 The semi-detached dwelling proposes a lot coverage of 43 percent which exceeds the
maximum 35 percent contained in the Interim Control By-law. The request for exemption
to the Interim Control By-law requires approval for the increased lot coverage.
3.4 The Neighbourhood Character Study was completed in December 2019 and an
amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63 and the Clarington Official Plan (COPA 2019-0002
and ZBA 2019-0019) are proposed to implement the recommendations of the Study. The
intent of the Neighbourhood Character Study is to improve the existing zoning regulations
to better reflect the existing character of the neighbourhood and permit future
development that is more compatible with the character that exists in mature and
established neighbourhoods.
Page 63
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PSD-005-20
3.5 The additional 8 % in lot coverage is an increase from the 35% maximum permitted in the
Interim Control By-law or proposed in the draft zoning for the character study. However,
the proposed 43% lot coverage complies with the 45% maximum permitted in the “R1”
zone regulations of Zoning By-law 84-63. The proposal provides an adequate amount of
rear yard space, interior side yard and front yard; and provides the required minimum
amount of landscaped open space for the property. The proposal complies with all other
regulations in the Interim Control By-law and complies with the regulations in the “R1”
zone of Zoning By-law 84-63. The applicant has worked with staff to revise the elevations
of the building to better conform to other characteristics of the surrounding
neighbourhood. The proposal for a one-storey semi-detached dwelling on 10 Victoria
Street satisfies the objectives for redevelopment in existing neighbourhoods
4. Concurrence
Not applicable
5. Conclusion
5.1 In consideration of the comments contained within this report, it is recommended that the
requested exemption to Interim Control By-law 2018-083 for 10 Victoria Street be
approved.
Staff Contact: Aibelle Babista, Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2411 or ababista@clarington.net .
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – By-law to amend Interim Control By-law
Interested Parties:
The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision:
Ken Hoy
Page 64
Attachment 1 to
Addendum Report to PSD-039-19
1
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
By-law Number 20 -
Being a By-law to amend Interim Control By-law 2018-083,
Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to amend By-law 2018-083;
Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. Section 2. e. is revised by adding the following:
“iv) 10 Victoria Street”
2. Section 2 is amended by adding a new h. as follows:
“a new semi-detached dwelling located at 10 Victoria Street with a maximum lot
coverage of 43%.”
This By-law shall come into effect on the date of its passage.
By-Law passed in open session this day of , 20
Adrian Foster, Mayor
C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk
Page 65
Presentations
and Handouts
02-04-2020 PDC
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington
2019 Accomplishments
2019 Members:
Brenda Metcalf (Chair)
Eric Bowman (Vice-
Chair)
Tom Barrie
John Cartwright
Les Caswell
Ben Eastman
Jennifer Knox
Richard Rekker
Don Rickard
Ted Watson
Henry Zekveld
Councillor Zwart
Faye Langmaid (Staff
Liaison)
Amy Burke (Staff
Liaison)
Presentations
Region of Durham - Local Food and Business Retention & Expansion Project: Lisa
Mackenzie and Nancy Rutherford provided an overview of the project. There are some
interesting findings on consumer behavior: the consumer is educating the producer on what
they want and what should be grown. The market intelligence coming out of the study provides
some emerging trends. There is a need for a commercial kitchen in Durham. Next Steps include
analysis of the information, an action plan and implementation plan. The results will feed into the
Durham Agricultural Strategy Update.
Region of Durham – Agricultural Climate Change Adaptation Strategy:
Kristy Kilbourne and Doran Hoge provided an overview of the progress the task force has made
over the past year and the recommendations they are taking back to the Durham Region
Roundtable on Climate Change. Doran and Kristy emphasized that buy-in from the agriculture
community means attending sessions, assisting with education and communication.
Region of Durham – Durham Agricultural Strategy Update:
Bronwynne Wilton spoke about the review of the Durham Agricultural Strategy. The project
involves a review of the current 2013 – 2018 Strategy, and the identification of new targets and
new initiatives for the next 5 years. There has already been some preliminary consultation and
will be more. The AACC participated in a workbook exercise to provide feedback on the vision
and objectives outlined in the current Strategy and how they could be updated and improved.
Clarington Planning Services Department - ZONE Clarington:
Amy Burke, Tracey Webster and Carlo Pellarin provided a presentation on how the
Environmental Protection land use was created in the Official Plan and the data and policies it is
based on. The zoning by-law is the implementation of the Official Plan and the Environmental
Protection designation is now being carried through into the zoning. The presentation reviewed
how the proposed environmental protection zoning in the draft zoning by-law released in
November 2018 potentially affects existing agricultural uses.
Region of Durham – Envision Durham:
Kristy Kilbourne provided an introduction to Envision Durham, the municipal comprehensive
review of the Region of Durham Official Plan. Key trends and influencing factors being
examined include the modernization and diversification of farming, rural business growth, loss of
rural land, rural/urban compatibility issues, urban agriculture, climate change and renewable
energy. Agricultural-education was identified by the AACC as a gap in the discussion paper and
in existing Regional policy. The Committee raised concern with the reporting approach for the
loss of agricultural land (1% since 2003). The AACC also had concerns about the loss of rural
land from the 407 and links being factored into that total loss of rural land. Kristy Kilbourne
informed the AACC that a land-needs assessment has been initiated as part of the MCR and
will be reported on once completed.
Clarington Engineering Services Department – Traffic Calming:
Ron Albright reviewed with the AACC the bollards installed in Enniskillen, including a
manufacturer’s video and testing undertaken by the Department with their vehicles and
firetrucks. The videos demonstrated how vehicles can drive over the pylons without incident at
high speeds. The available options and rationale for selecting the bollards was discussed. The
AACC proposed additional testing using farm equipment. The agricultural community is
concerned about that potential risk of damage to farm equipment, especially machinery with
hydraulic hoses, spray heads and tines.
Clarington Planning Services Department – ZONE Clarington and Minimum Distance
Separation:
Amy Burke, Tracey Webster and Carlo Pellarin presented on the MDS options available to the
Municipality for implementation within the zoning by-law review. The MDS formulae and
guidelines are in place to reduce conflict between farming and other land uses. The five
“implementation guidelines” that provide options to municipalities were reviewed. The AACC
participated in a workbook exercise to review and provide comment on the various options. The
Committee underlined the importance of buyers purchasing property in rural areas in proximity
to livestock and farming-related anaerobic digestion facilities being aware of the presence of the
facilities and the potential for odour as part of normal farm practice. Comments gathered from
the AACC will inform the next draft of the zoning by-law.
Gallery on the Farm – Science of Farming:
Aaron Bowman provided an informative presentation that showcased how scientific principles
and new technology supports organic crop production. This includes informing crop selection,
providing yield mapping, and increasing the precision of weed removal. Aaron also reviewed
the value that has been realized at Gallery on the Farm as a result of cover cropping for
decreasing wind and water soil erosion, decreased nutrient loss, nutrient sequestration, weed
suppression, and enhanced soil microbes, as well as the secondary benefits of providing
livestock feed and habitat for other species. The use of science in farming is contributing to the
farm’s goals of year-round coverage, reduced tillage and increased organic matter in soil.
Region of Durham Works Department – Rural Roundabouts:
Mani Rajendran and Ron Trewin consulted with the committee on the planned roundabout at
the intersection of Bowmanville Ave. and Regional Road 3 / Concession Road 8. Roundabout
construction is the preferred option identified to improve the overall safety and operations at this
high traffic intersection. The draft design considered the comments and experience the Region
had gained through two prior rural area roundabouts constructed in the Region (RR8/Brock St.
W. and Conc. 6, Uxbridge and Lake Ridge Rd and RR12/Pefferlaw). More roundabouts can be
anticipated in rural areas in the future. The Committee has asked the Region to attend
meetings on an annual basis to share information about planned capital works projects in rural
Clarington.
Clarington Operations Department – Emerald Ash Borer:
Fred Horvath, Clint Peters and Ken Mercer provided an update on the Municipality’s ash tree
removal and replacement program. Program rules were reviewed, including what private
property owners can do with the trees once they have been felled, as well as the management
of removed trees. While there are multiple funding programs for tree planting, there is a gap in
funding support to assist with the cost of tree removal on private property.
Clarington Fire Department – Burn Permits:
Chief Weir presented on burn permits. Currently there are no seasonal restrictions for burn
permits in Clarington. Local Fire Chiefs are considering harmonization of approach across the
Region. Clarington does not charge for the permits, but other Durham Region municipalities do.
EFS personal have received extra training specific to agricultural structures.
By-law Enforcement - By-law 2019-047 “Clean and Clear By-law”:
Teresa Mason reviewed the background, scope, and application for the by-law. The by-law
repeals and replaces the Lot Maintenance By-law. The Clean and Clear By-law does not
introduce any changes to how property standards are enforced on agricultural properties.
Public health concerns relating to standing water and noxious week complaints are responded
to by the Region of Durham (Public Health and Durham Week Inspector, respectively).
Consultation Feedback
CLOCA Watershed Plan Updates: Comments have been provided to CLOCA with regard to
the questions the committee has about the 46% natural cover target when the Region’s Official
Plan is 30%.
Durham Region Agriculture Sector Climate Adaptation Strategy: Committee members
commented that economic development has to concentrate on building what is here not seeking
to bring in outside expertise or property purchasers. Farmers are the stewards of the land and
they should be supported through the existing programs such as Durham Farm Fresh, Farm
Connections, Stewardship grants from the CAs, etc.
Durham Region Woodlands By-law: Staff have confirmed with the Region the proposed
amendments to the by-law do not change the ability of a farmer to carry out normal farm
practices. The by-law specifies that the removal of trees as part of normal farm practices are
exempt. Normal farm practices include the removal of trees for personal use, as well as the
removal of trees for farm-related uses (i.e. fence posts and rails). Normal farm practices in the
current by-law and in the proposed amended by-law do not include clear cutting of any kind. A
permit is required for any clear cutting.
ZONE Clarington: Members participated in the public open houses and a workshop on
Minimum Distance Separation zoning. Committee discussed with Staff the approach taken for
updating Environmental Protection zoning in the proposed zoning by-law and the potential
implications for agricultural uses and activities for consideration in the preparation of the next
draft. The influence of Provincial initiatives (i.e. 407, introduction of the Greenbelt) on the project
and public perception was discussed.
Other Municipal Matters
Service Installation in Rural Road Right-of-ways: Don reached out the Region of Durham to
discuss what measures could be taken to require utilities to contact farmers prior to undertaking
construction activities in rural roadside right of ways. There have been instances of tile
drainage discharge pipes being damaged as the utility was not aware of their location.
Cannabis Crop Production: There is discussion in the community about the growing of
cannabis as a farm crop. As set out by OMAFRA, the definition of a crop for agricultural
production is very broad and would include cannabis, subject to ensuring compliance with
Federal regulations. This is not unlike agricultural production of hemp. Typical crop drying and
cleaning is accepted as a normal farm practice much like corn and soybeans. Matters relating
to processing of cannabis to produce a salable product are subject to zoning. Council could
request staff provide further policy direction, such as fencing, etc as other municipalities have.
Resolutions
Emerald Ash Borer Funding Assistance: Resolution 019-26 endorsed the Emerald Ash Borer
Provincial funding assistance for farmers resolution.
Enforcement of Safety on Family Farms: Resolution 019-19 endorsed Warwick Township
council’s resolution regarding safety on family farms. Work is underway by DRFA to organize a
roundtable in Clarington to discuss the issue.
Other Agencies/Organizations
Agri-food Education and Event Centre: Initiative is being led by the DRFA. A feasibility study
has been completed for a permanent agricultural resource centre. Committee will continue to
track their next steps into 2020.
Doors Open Clarington 2019: Doors Open 2019 focused on agricultural heritage and featured
farm operations of multiple committee members.
Emily Project: This initiative is being led by the DRFA and continues to be monitored by the
AACC. Discussions have taken place on the development of a program. The committee
anticipates a report on a Regional approach in 2020.