HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-25-94I/
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
J(REUENX9PA1lJ<1~9t91a91~1~k1~JDAM(IFA~~R1Mf1c9(~~fIE~E
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File # ~O ~ - G C
Date: MAY 2, 1994 Res. # C-~PIa - 303 -~4
By-Law #
Report#: wn-~S-oe File#: R-~~-tF-O1
Subject: DELEGATION FROM KRISTA DALES - PETITION FOR FENCE ALONG C.P.R.
RAILWAY TRACKS, BOWMANVILLE
Reco~meidstlore'spectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-25-94 be received;
2. THAT the staff be authorized, FORTHWITH, to call tenders for
the supply and erection of a 6 foot chain link fence on the
south side of the C.P.R. tracks, as illustrated on Attachment
No. 2 to Report WD-25-94;
3. THAT the required funds, estimated to be $17,000, be obtained
from the Lot Levy Reserve Fund, Account No. 1110-00157-X; and
4. THAT Rrista Dales be advised of Council's decision and be
provided with a copy of Report WD-25-94.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. 1: Petition dated Monday, April 25, 1994 - Proposal
for Fencing Along Railway Tracks on Old Bighway
No. 2
No. 2: Key Map
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 At a regular meeting of Council held on Monday, April 25,
1994, Rrista Dales appeared as a delegation to advise Council
of her concerns about the need for a fence on the south side
fLP"t-~L.x~
~.oE °®~U. ~....
REPORT NO.: WD-25-94 PAGE 2
of the C.P.R. tracks (north side of Old Bighway No. 2) from
Rhonda Boulevard to Waverly Road. Ms. Dales also provided
Council with a petition signed by residents of .the area
(Attachment No. 1).
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 Location of the Fence
The location of the proposed fence referred to in the petition
is illustrated on Attachment No. 2. The existing chain link
fence shown on the drawing was constructed by and paid for by
the developer of the plan of subdivision to the south
(Sagewood).
3.2 Validity of Concern
'When one examines the area referred to by Ms. Dalea, it is
easy to understand her concern about the safety of the
children as it relates to the C.P.R. tracks.
3.3 Cost Estimate
The estimated cost to construct a 6 foot link fence, as
illustrated on Attachment No. 1 is $17,000.
3.4 Responsibility
The responsibility as it relates to the construction of the
fence would be very difficult to determine and would also take
considerable time. It is highly unlikely that the C.P.R. will
acknowledge responsibility for the construction of the fence.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 The concern about safety expressed by Ms. Dales and the
residents of the area is valid. It is therefore recommended
that a fence be erected as requested. The .required funds,
estimated to be $17,0.00, can be obtained from the Lot Levy
Reserve Fund, Account No. 1110-00157-X.
,~~2
REPORT NO.: WD-25-94 PAGE 3
4.2 Since this is a safety issue, it is recommended that. the
approval be given FORTHWITH.
Respectfully submitted,
Walter A. Evans, P.Enq.,
Director of Public Works
Respectfully submitted,
'-'C/!
Marie Marano, H.BSc.,AMCT.,
Treasurer
WAE/lw
April 26, 1994
Attachments
pc Ms. Krista Dales
29 Wrenn Boulevard
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 4N1
Reviewed by,
W.H. Stockwell,
Chief Administrative Officer
1 x)03
Monday April 25, 1994
Proposal for Fencing Along Railway Tracks on
Old Hwy #2
We the residents of the Sagewood Subdivision (at
Waverly and Hwy #2) request that fencing be established
along the railroad tracks along Old Hwy # 2. This stretch
of open field goes from Rhonda Blvd. to Waverly Road.
Although this area may not be directly in the subdivision,
it is adjacent to it. Many of us have to walk to the area
to receive our mail.
The petition for this fence was started in late fall of
1993 by the writer (Krista Dales). As both a parent and a
caregiver she was concerned about the safety of our
children. Train tracks have always been an interesting place
for play, flatten coins, wander, or ride bikes upon. The
area in which these tracks lie have also been used as a
short cut to Hwy #2 to go to school or catch the bus. The
above noted are all potentially dangerous and life
threatening, and toc easily accessible.
The petition had been put to the wayside until the
recent tragic death of our neighbour.
But even more important and vital is that this incident
has made the tracks a large area of interest for our older
children. The noise of the trains can be heard by all ages,
but do they have the concept of how close that train is and
of the speed at which it is approaching? Numerous trains
pass through day and night, and we feel that the potential
for danger is too great for this matter to be ignored.
Some of us have phoned various people in town to find
out of any plans for the fence to be built. We have in turn
received many different responses. We have heard that there
are no plans for a fence at all. We have also heard that it
was to be completed last summer. We also have heard it is
CNCP that is responsible. So we are now approaching council
in hopes of getting the correct answers and a prompt
solution.
Who is responsible?
When will it be done?
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
Sincerely,
~~ ~~, ~ ATTACHMENT N0. 1
REPORT N0. WD-25-94
Municipality of Clarington
Attn: 1. PUBLIC WORKS
... PLANNING DEFT.
We as parents and caregivers in the newly existing and
developing area. of Sagewood are concerned about dt1 unsafe
area in our subdivision.
~Jld Hwy # 2,
to tite railroad
several trains
neighbourhood, wi
there should be
our children from
between Rhonda and Waverly is an open area
tracks. These tracks are well used attd
pass through each day. As a young
th a number of small children, we feel that
some sort of fencing established to keep
the dangers of such a tempting play area.
We would be interested to here of any plans or by-laws
concertiing this type of construction.
Yout°s Truly
The residents of the Sagewood subdivision.
1'f'~5
-~-
Wrenn Blvd. Rhonda McCrimmon
# Name i # Name ~ # Name
~, ~ i - l5~
d' ~ ~ L
~ ~ ~.. ~ rz t~,~s~.ca~~ ~~r.£~7~ R ~J ~c,~..~ ~ ~peu,~ ~~1~ /- / c,
~ - ~~~~' P ~ ~Y ~ 1 ~ P ~~
J <, ~~ / ,
~n, ~ I ~ ~~ ~~ -~~ ~
I ~.~ r ~~,in ~~~gi~;' ,~ i LaCl~ C .~
' f ~ f'+`t R µ-UN ~~ g~~ ~~
I [~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ' L ` /~L.~~ i. ~ .4 ~ ~' t'~O 1.i Of'1 f~ i,i.~ ~ . (~~ ~ ~ "11^.? ~ - l~ ~
} _ :~.Ik~. I ~ ;~o ~ ~~~1*~0~ ~cl~~ ~~?3 ~ ~~ivt Q~(~t,c/
q 1 r/i~,2~ ~~ ~ u ~ rs ^ tt1~ ~~ I L }" l_o..~, ~-~ ~~ }U ~ ~ ~ 1 °~^ "~
~~C<9~12rny<<-~C~ -'T i 3 3 /1/ L~/'~ d Cti ~~ v~ (/ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
` ~,,~~-u/ ~~ V
~ ~ r~~
- ~ ~~~
. ~~L ~ ~~
C~~ ~(\/~L\/~ 9~i~2r7~ /1/,E~~~ i S q ~. ~~ ~ (_ £'_ /1-e hiU~
w~ (~eo-~.> i 2~- .%/~~~~
i
/33 ~~~~ ā~, 1 ~ ~J 5
,~
i
/,. ~ ~
n n
.~' //i'u-~u~hycl~ ~1lā¢11IC~i .Sc~,c`G'7~,~5.& ! (9 KNc,,~!_,o,e 1~~,,~/J.
i'='~/~"~-~ _ __-:~;'tY31'.C"__yc;i:~t`~L~_ _1?3._~_~c_u~a__~tJ~~
_~- r i ,~ ___.. --
{ /':: ~ j
his,-. ,yr..~b _: ___ _ i j , '~4 . ~. _ ~i ~,r,:
;_
__
- - - -
-- -
~~ ~~
__
l"
f _ - - - -
' _ 4 C ci c a p a.i s~ u.
- - -- - -
__ ā .
_ -- - -';- - - - -- ---- -~f~1
-
;.~ ~ ~ ~~,1~, "~ I ~ 95 ~ ~([~,2 /r, c 4 (ors -
--
_ - __ __ rite.
... Existing 6 foot chain link fence
Proposed 6 fool chain link fence
® Proposed gates for existing entrances
HIGHWAY N0. 2 -KING STREET
210 +/- metr
y>,Py
OF ~ 2
~yG~
RP~~y N\GNwp`l
P~\E\~ 0~0
\P~ ao
~y
o,G
09
o GRF'SC~a~ ~
o ~c~(i\!Ta`~~ ~ ~ ROE.N\GK
~ o
~~o
o0
o ~
a o
~ o0
~s~~~ ~ `-""' ~ C: ATTACHS BOWMAN SAGEFNCE.DW
Qd ~ o ~ DRAWN BY: JM DATE: APRII, 1994
T~ ATTACHMENT N0. z
KEY A REPORT N0. WD-25-94