HomeMy WebLinkAboutFND-017-09Clarngta~
~g
Monday July 6th, 2009
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date:
Report #:
Subject:
FND-017-09 File #:
REPORT
Resolution #: r 4 p 1a ° ~{ 723 - o q
By-law
REPORT ON REVENUE SENSITIVE TO ECONOMIC CONDITIONS -
MAY 2009
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report FND-017-09 be received for information.
Submitted by:
ancy T ylor, .A., C.A.,
Director of Finance/Treasurer
Reviewed by:
Franklin Wu,
,~i~ Chief Administrative Officer.
NT/LG/hjl
REPORT NO.`. FND-017-09
1.0 BACKGROUND:
PAGE 2
1.1 At the meeting held on January 12, 2009, Council requested staff to provide by
department on a monthly reporting basis a report to Council on the variable growth
related revenue and the variable economic related revenues which could have an
adverse effect on achieving the 2009 municipal capital and current budget.
2.0 CURRENT:
2.1 This report is for the month of May 2009 including the year to date amounts along
with prior year's amounts for comparison.
2.2 This report will look at the Building Division's revenues of the Engineering Services
department such as municipal development charges and building permit fees
revenue paid, the total of Planning Services department's revenues such as Site
Plans, Rezoning, Condominium application fees and Subdivision applications fees
revenues, and the total of Community Services department's revenues.
2.3 The revenue amounts reported monthly in this report are reflected in the
municipality's general ledger when paid to the municipality, ie. on a cash basis.
There will be some differences between this report and the monthly Report on
Building Permit Activity from Engineering department due to this timing difference.
3.0 ENGINEERING SERVICES -BUILDING DIVISION REVENUE STATUS
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES -MONTH OF MA`
2009 I 2008
NITTYPE
MUNICIPAL
DEV. CHARGES
PAID
NUMBER
OF UNITS
MUNICIPAL
DEV. CHARGES
PAID
NUMBER
OF UNITS CHANGE
OF
DEV.CHGS
PAID 2009-
2008
Single/Semi-
Detached
-New construction $363,025 25 $278,908 28
-Additions $0 0 $218,375 25
Townhouse $0 0 $0 0
A artment $0 0 $0 0
Commercial $447 1 $42,115 1
A ricultural $0 0 $0 0
Government $0 0 $0 0
Institutional $0 0 $0 0
Industrial $0 0 $0 0
TOTAL $363,472 26 $539,398 54 -33.0%
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 3
3.1 In the 2008 Development Charges Amendment Study, it is forecasted that the
municipality would be collecting approximately 82 residential units on a monthly
basis for 2009 and approximately 79 residential units on a monthly basis for 2008.
For the month of May 2009, there were only 26 units of the forecasted residential
units of 82 being issued which equates to 31.7%. For the month of May 2008,
there were 54 units of the forecasted residential units of 79 being issued which
equates to 68.4%. Comparing the number of units issued in 2009 to 2008, shows
that May 2009 has collected 48% of the units issued in May 2008.
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
JANUARY TO MAY YEAR TO DATE
2009 2008
NIT TYPE
MUNICIPAL
DEV. CHARGES
PAID
NUMBER
OF UNITS
MUNICIPAL
DEV. CHARGES
PAID
NUMBER
OF UNITS CHANGE
OF
DEV.CHGS
PAID 2009-
.2008
Sin le/Semi- Detached
-New construction $1,102,087 84 $1,534,600 155
-Additions $0 0 $218,375 25
Townhouse $0 0 $0 0
A artment -$6,307 -1 $0 0
Commercial $13,411 2 $44,441 2
A ricultural $0 0 $16,041 0
Government $0 0 $0 0
Institutional $0 0 $0 0
Industrial $0 0 $0 0
TOTAL $1,109,191 85 $1,813,456 182 -39.0%
NOTE: Apartment unit in 2009 is a negative value as permit was changed from 2 apartments to 1 apartment.
3.2 Comparing the number of units issued in 2009 to 2008, shows that 2009 YTD has
collected 47% of the units issued in 2008 YTD. For the 2009 YTD, there are 85
units of the forecasted residential units of 410 being issued which equates to
20.7%. Per the 2008 DC Amendment Study, 983 residential units are forecasted
for 2009. For the 2008 YTD, there were only 182 units of the forecasted residential
units of 395 being issued which equates to 46.1 %. Per the 2008 DC Amendment
Study, 951 residential units are forecasted for 2008.
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 4
4.0 BUILDING PERMIT FEES REVENUE STATUS
4.1 The Line Graph below on building permit fees illustrates on a monthly basis the
permit fees collected for the years 2007, 2008 and year-to-date with the 2009
budget per month. The line from June 2009 to December 2009 is flat lined as the
revenues have not been received. This Line Graph accents the fluctuations on a
monthly and yearly basis for the building permit fees collected in any given year.
As you will note on the chart, the March 2007 and the June 2008 building permit
fees collected were over the $400,000.
4.2 For the month of May 2009, $37,451.00 was paid for building permit fees which
represents 32% of the 2009 budget (monthly budget is $116,666). For comparison
purposes, for May 2008, $90,371.00 was paid for building permit fees which
represented 72% of the 2008 budget (monthly budget was $125,000).
5500,000
SA50,000
s4aa,oao
S3so,ooo
5300.000
szso,oao
5zaa,aoo
5150,000
S ioa,oao
Sso,oao
so
~a~~~~ e~°`~a~ ~~cGr ~~~ ay ~~z ,~~~ P~ J~~ ~e~~et G~~ec ~~~~~c Ge~~ec
P ~` > ~ o
F h~Q a' ~o ~~
z007 Actual 2008 Actual z009 Actual z009 Budget
_-
4.3 The following Line Graph illustrates the building permit fees on an accumulated
monthly basis for the years 2007, 2008 and year-to-date with the 2009 YTD
budget. The line from June 2009 to December 2009 is flat lined as the revenues
have not been received. This Line Graph also illustrates that 2007 year had the
highest permit fees revenue. The total building permit fees revenues were as
follows for the years: 2007 - $1,685,290; 2008 - $1,348,198; and as at May 2009 -
$163,306. For comparison purposes, the 2007 permit fees of $1,685,290 was
112% of the 2007 annual budget of $1,500,000; the 2008 permit fees of
$1,348,198 was 90% of the 2008 annual budget of $1,500,000 and as of May 31,
2009 permit fees of $163,306 is 12% of 2009 annual budget of $1,400,000.
1504
BUILDING PERMIT FEES PER MONTH
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 5
BUILDING PERMIT FEES CUMULATIVE YTD
S 1,s0o,aoo
S 1,600,000
Si,4ao,0oa
Si,zao,aoo
S l,aaa,o0o
S8oo,o00
S 600, QQ0
$400,000
Szoa,oao
So
Ja(~ ~Ja~ a~~ ~Q~\ ~~`~ ~J~~ ~`~\~ ~J~~ ~~~ owe` ~°~~ '~~~
~a~ yep ~ P~ Q~~~ O~~ a,~~ ~`ecc
~~ ~ d
2007 YTD Actual 2008 YTD Actual
~°- 2009 YTD Actual 2009 YTD Budget
4.4 Due to the slower activity on new residential units, both inspectors and Clerical
staff have taken this opportunity to begin going through the large number of
imcomplete permit files that are currently open. People come in for permits for
things like addictions, etc., and go through perhaps the first and second
inspections, but delay on ever finilizing the entire thing. The reason many do this is
because the minute the final inspection is done a notification is sent through to the
assessment office and an increase in property taxes is likely to follow. For this
reason many homeowners will choose not to call for a final inspection. Staff are
surrently going through and pulling all imcomplete permits and are contacting
homeowners to set up final inspections. For clerical staff this is a considerable
amount of work going back through old files, prepairing lists, prepairing lertters and
following up. For inspection staff you will see from the monthly building permit
inspection services stats that the number of inspections is not down as much as
one might think. This activity should result in an increase in taxation revenue in
future years.
5.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES REVENUE STATUS
5.1 Community Services revenues overall are up from the same period last year and
this can be attributed to the opening of the Newcastle and District Recreation
Complex.
5.2 Community Services revenues have been divided into 4 major divisions: Facilities,
Aquatic Programs, Fitness Programs and Recreation Programs. Facilities
revenues includes ice rentals, pool rentals, multi-purpose room rentals, soccer
rentals, lacrosse rentals, skating and hockey rentals, concession sales, and
proshop merchandise sales. Aquatic Program revenues include all pool facilities
memberships and swimming activities. Fitness Program revenues include the
fitness programs and memberships offered at the Courtice Community Complex
and Newcastle and District Recreation Complex facilities. Recreation Program
1505
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 6
revenues include various recreational activities that are of interest to the pre-teens,
teenagers for after school and during school holidays such as day camps, drama
club, pre-teen dances, etc.
5.3 The below bar graph illustrates Community Services 4 major revenue groups for
the month of May and the monthly budget value with the same period last year for
comparison purposes. Comparing Community Services revenues on a monthly
basis is not a true indicator of how well its performing as its revenue is more
seasonal in nature.
5.4 The graph below shows the Facilities and Fitness Program revenues are fairly
consistent in the same monthly period to last year. The Aquatic Program revenue
in 2009 is slightly higher than 2008 due to the opening of the Newcastle and
District Recreation Complex. Its too early to see how well the Recreation Program
revenue is performing as most of its activities occur during summer school break.
53oa,oaa
s2so,ooa
5200,000
S 150,000
s1oa,0oa
Sso,ooo
Sa
^ fACIUTIES
^ ACiUATIC PROGRM
~ FITNESS PROGRM
^ RECREATION PROGRM
5.5 The following comparison table illustrates the monthly revenue received as a
percentage of the monthly budget used in the graph.
%OF %OF
MAY MAY MONTHLY MONTHLY BUDGET BUDGET
I 2009 2008
REVENUE TYPE 2009 2008 BUDGET BUDGET 2009 2008
FACILITIES $114,604 $106,909 $241,756 $230,223 47.4% 46.4%
AQUATIC PROGRM $16,602 $12,743 $65,710 $62,476 25.3% 20.4%
FITNESS PROGRM $33,535 $33,616 $47,748 $42,750 70.2% 78.6%
RECREATION
PROGRM $24,347 $35,86 ! $31,875 $34,113 76.4% 105.1%
MONTHLY REVENUE & BUDGET FOR MAY
1506
zoos zoos zoa~ zoos
BUDGET BUDGET
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 7
5.6 The following bar graph illustrates the accumulated Community Services 4 major
revenue groups for year-to-date values as of May along with the accumulated
monthly budget values with the same period last year for comparison purposes.
This YTD graph emphasizes more how well Community Services revenues are
_ _performing_ in a YTD and Budget comparison as well as a year to year comparison.
ACCUMULATED REVENUE & BUDGET AS 4F MAY
si,4oG,ooo
51,20G,000
s i,ooa,0ao
ssao,ooG
56oo,oGo
S~OO,OGa
saaG,oGG
50
^ FACILITIES
^ AQUATIC PROGRM
+~ FITNESS PROGRM
~ RECREATION PROGRM
5.7 The following comparison table illustrates the accumulated revenue received as a
percentage of the YTD budget used in the graph.
Of % Of
YTD MAY YTD MAY YTD YTD BUDGET BUDGET
2009 2008
REVENUE TYPE 2009 2008 BUDGET BUDGET 2009 2008
FACILITIES $1,226,964 $1,217,438 $1,208,780 $1,151,117 104.8% 105.8%
AQUATIC PROGRM $348,895 $282,565 $328,552 $312,382 106.2% 90.5%
FITNESS PROGRM $223,115 $242,344 $238,740 $213,750 93.5% 113.4%
RECREATION
PROGRM $115,207 $117,231 $159,375 $170,567 72.3% 68.7%
5.8 The Fitness Program revenue YTD for May 2009 is less than 2008 is attributable to
a membership special offer in March of 2008 which provided members with an
additional 3 months of membership time. These memberships are not due to
expire/renew until June of 2009.
5.9 Community Services staff noticed during the 2008 year that some of the programs
offered in the Recreation Program were not performing as well as in the past such
as its summer trip and day camps. During the 2009 budget process, the camp
revenues were reduced in recognition of this. This reduction in revenue was done
prior to the economic downturn. Community Services staff has found a similar
trend with other Regional Municipalities in addition to other local service providers
(ie Museum). Community Services staff will continue to monitor and market the
2009 line up of summer day camps and hopefully participatory numbers will
increase over the next few weeks to be reflected in a future report.
1507
2009 2009 2GG9 2GG8
BUDGET BUQGET
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 8
6.0 PLANNING SERVICES REVENUE STATUS
6.1 Planning Services individual revenue sources have been consolidated. Planning
Services revenues include Official Plan Amendment Fees, Rezoning Fees, Site
Plan Fees, Subdivision Application Fees and Subdivision/Consent application fees.
Planning fees do not reflect full cost recovery rates in contrast to those done under
Building Fee Legislation. They have been consolidated since the sum total of fees
is the key revenue number and individual types of application are difficult to
predict.
6.2 The graph below illustrates for the monthly revenue and budget for May that 2009
revenue is below 2008 year's revenue.
MONTHLY REVENUE ~ BUDGET FOR MAY
S~o,ooo
S fi0, 000
Ssa,aoo
54o,aoo
s.3o,aoo
szo,aoo
510,000
so
^ zooo
^ zaoo BUDGET
^zaas
^ 2008 BUDGET
6.3 Planning Services 2009 budget for the overall revenues is $346,000 and for 2008
budget the overall revenues were $500,000. This equates to a reduction of
$154,000 or 31 °lo decrease from 2008 to 2009 budget. The Planning Services
revenue actuals for May 2009 are $14,656 and for May 2008 were $62,370. The
May revenues as a percentage of each year's budget values: 2009 - 50.8% and
2008 - 149.7%. Planning received $51,600 in Site Plan revenue which accounts
for the high spike in May 2008 in comparison to the total revenue for April 2008 of
$13,768 or May 2009 of $14,656.
1508
zoo9 zao9 zaas zoos
BUDGET BUDGET
REPORT NO.: FND-017-09
PAGE 9
ACCUMULATED REVENUE & BUDGET FOR MAY
Szso,ooo
Szoo,000
S 1 s0,000
S 100,000
550,000
$0
^ z009
^ z009 BUDGET
^ z00s
^ 2008 BUDGET
6.4 The Planning Services accumulated revenues year-to-date as of May 2009 are
$59,289 and as of May 2008 were $100,166. The accumulated revenues as a
percentage of each year's budget values: 2009 - 41 % and 2008 - 48%. This
reflects the overall economic activity and the surplus of subdivision applications in
the draft approved or processing stages. While fees were paid several years ago,
plan review and implementation activities are ongoing.
7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS:
7.1 In comparing current year's month and previous year's month values several
aspects need to be considered such as the time of year/season; economic
conditions; weather conditions; investors long term plans, pending legislation and
appeals. It is important to keep in mind that planning fees and community services
fees are applied to the overall general fund rather than departmental. The
development plan review and implementation process involves staff from many
departments who play various roles in the process to generate the revenues
identified.
7.2 This report is submitted for information purposes. The trend reflected should it
continue into the high development season will present a sustainability concern. It
is the intention at the half-year mark, to have senior staff review possible mediation
measures both for in-year 2009 and 2010 budget purposes.
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169
1509
zooo z0oo z00s z00s
8U DGET BUDGET