The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/25/2009 ~ GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: TIME: PLACE: May 25, 2009 9:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS i i , I 1 j I I 4. MINUTES (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of May 4, 2009 401 5. PRESENTATIONS No Presentations 6. DELEGATIONS (Draft List at Time of Publication - To be Replaced with Final List) 601 (a) Brad Arbour, Regarding Youth Centre (b) Jennifer Paczesny, Regarding Issuing of Parking Tickets (c) Richard Ward, Regarding Current Property Standards Situation ,- (d) Robert MacDonald, Regarding Proposed Development of Lots 27 & 28, Conc. 2, Clarke Township 7. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Intention to Proceed with Future Highway Closure to Close a Portion of an 701 Unopen Road Allowance Situated in Lot 27, Broken Front Concession in the Former Township of Clarke Report: EGD-020-09 (b) Application to Amend the Clarington Zoning By-law 84-63 702 Applicant: 564069 Ontario Inc. Report: PSD-046-09 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE. ONTARIO L1C3A6 T 905-623-3379 I I G.P. & A. Agenda - 2 - May 25, 2009 t , (c) Clarington Sign By-law Review 704 Report: PSD-051-09 8. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-046-09 Application by 564069 Ontario Inc. to Rezone Two 801 Properties on Beaver Street (Newcastle) for Commercial Use (b) PSD-047-09 General Amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63 Regarding 810 Aggregate Extraction Areas, Requirements for Garage Widths and Schedule Boundaries (c) PSD-048-09 Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a 9-Hole 892 Golf Course and Clubhouse Building (Stonehenge Golf Club) - 3033 Taunton Road, Former Township of Darlington Applicant: Tunney Planning (d) PSD-050-09 Amendment No. 67 to the Clarington Official Plan 899004 I. Applicant: 1559306 Ontario Ltd. ! Part Lot 20, Concession 5, Former Township of Darlington I Northeast Corner of Taunton Road and Holt Road I I (e) PSD-051-09 Clarington Sign By-law Review 899017 (f) PSD-052-09 Monitoring of the Decisions of the Committee of 899109 Adjustment for the Meeting of May 14, 2009 (g) PSD-053-09 Confidential Report Regarding Sale of Surplus Property 97 Potters Lane, Enniskillen (Distributed Under Separate Cover) 9. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD-019-09 Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for April 2009 901 (b) EGD-020-09 Confidential Report Regarding Proposal to Close and Convey an Uno pen Road Allowance Situated in Lot 27, Broken Front Concession, Former Township of Clarke (BaIT Subdivision - Bond Head) and Release of Interest in the Clarke and Bond Street Road Allowances (Distributed Under Separate Cover) (c) EGD-021-09 Intersection Improvements at Beaver Street and King 907 Avenue, Newcastle G.P. & A. Agenda - 3- May 25, 2009 (d) EGD-022-09 Mill Street Pedestrian Tunnel Construction Status - Newcastle Village 912 10. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT No Reports 11. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) ESD-008-09 Monthly Response Report - March and April 2009 1101 12. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT i (a) CSD-010-09 Schedule of Rates and Fees 2009/10 - 2010/2011 1201 (b) CSD-011-09 June is Recreation and Parks Month 1218 13. MUNICIPAL CLERK'S DEPARTMENT (a) CLD-008-09 ' Review of Refreshment Vehicle Licence Requirements 1301 (b) CLD-009-09 Request for Noise Exemption and Road Occupancy Permit 1305 (c) CLD-010-09 151 Quarter Parking Report 1308 (d) CLD-011-09 Appointment to the Samuel Wilmot Nature Management ' 1311 Advisory Committee (Confidential Attachment #1, Distributed Under Separate Cover) 14. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-036-09 Confidential Report Regarding Labour Relations and Employee Negotiations (Distributed Under Separate Cover) (b) COD-037-09 CL2009-12,SupplyandDeliveryofOne(1)Tanker 1401 (c) COD-038-09 RFP2009-4 - Architectural Services for Darlington Sports 1405 Centre Renovation (d) COD-039-09 Tender CL2008-24, Catch Basin and Manhole Repairs 1409 15. FINANCE DEPARTMENT No Reports G,P. & A. Agenda - 4- May 25, 2009 16. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE No Reports 17. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) Copy of Correspondence Item 1-5 from Council Meeting of May, 11, 2009 1701 - Referred to the Municipal Clerk for Inclusion on the General Purpose and Administration Agenda for the Meeting of May 25, 2009 - Correspondence from Sandra Kranc, City Clerk, City of Oshawa, Regarding Region of Durham's Proposed Energy-From-Waste Facility 18. OTHER BUSINESS 19. COMMUNICATIONS 20. ADJOURNMENT CIW:lyglon General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, May 4,2009 at 9:35 a.m., in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Also Present: I i i , 1 , I , I I I i j I ,I Mayor J. Abernethy Councillor A. Foster Councillor R. Hooper Councillor M. Novak Councillor G. Robinson Councillor C. Trim (left the meeting at 10:45 a.m.) CouncillorW. Woo Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Deputy Fire Chief, Emergency Services, M. Berney Director of Community Services, J. Caruana Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella Manager of Subdivision Implementation, Planning Services, L Taylor Director of Corporate Services, M, Marano Director of Finance Department, N. Taylor Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree Clerk II, E. Atkinson Mayor Abernethy chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councillor Hooper announced the Annual Maple Festival was held on Saturday, May 2, 2009 and the event was a great success. He extended his gratitude to the Operations staff for their support with this event. On Wednesday, April 28, 2009 he, along with Councillor Woo, attended the Clarington Older Adults volunteer appreciation event and this year it was a medieval theme. Councillor Hooper informed the Committee that on Friday, May 1,2009, the Visual Arts Centre held a Wall to Wall Art Auction. Councillor Novak informed the Committee the Clarington Older Adults Volunteer Appreciation event was enjoyed by all those that attended. 401 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Councillor Woo announced that he, along with Mayor Abernethy, attended the Bowmanville Zoo with a Grade 2 class where the "Point of View" discussion was on animals in captivity. He was impressed with the range of thought from these 7 and 8 year olds. The owner of the Bowmanville Zoo was on hand and they toured the Zoo to see first-hand, how the animals are cared for and therefore achieving a better appreciation for animals in captivity. Councillor Woo informed the Committee of the upcoming Car Wash fundraiser and Open House at the Orono Fire Hall scheduled for Saturday, May 9, 2009. There will be a charity auction and the new pumper will be on display. Councillor Woo reminded everyone to use good common sense and wash their hands thoroughly, be conscientious of sneezing and to follow the preventive steps promoted by the Durham Regional Health Department to minimize the risk of transfer of virus. Councillor Trim informed the Committee the construction of Mill Street in Newcastle is underway and on the weekend he was contacted by residents inquiring as to whether the sidewalks were going to be reconstructed also at this time, He reiterated that as of the last meeting apparently there were no funds set aside for sidewalk reconstruction and wondered if this wouldn't be the right thing to do. Mayor Abernethy announced the re-opening of Herbal Magic, located at the Clarington Mall, and stated this event was well attended. This location will be used as a flagship outlet for all the other 320 Herbal Magic locations across Canada. MINUTES Resolution #GPA-320-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on April 20, 2009, be approved. CARRIED PRESENTATIONS Bruce Martin, Mercer Consulting, provided the Committee with a presentation regarding the new proposed Pay Equity Plan. Mr. Martin stated Mercer Consulting is Canada's largest Human Resource Consultants and they worked with many municipalities in the Durham Region. He outlined for the Committee the background of this conversion project and the challenges of the former Pay Equity Plan such as: the system was originally designed for the manufacturing sector, and the weights did not reflect the values of the Municipality. As well he noted that some of the factors were no longer relevant, the system had ambiguous factor language, and it was difficult to interpret. Mr. Martin stated the old system had too many levels and some key evaluation criteria were missing such as Customer Services and Technical and Professional Skills. He - 2 - 402 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 outlined the process for the new system highlighting that it reflects the current best practices and is customized to Clarington's needs, Mercer Consulting's translation of the factor ratings from the old system to the new system was based on existing job information documentation and discussions with the Job Evaluation Committee. He confirmed that the new system is pay equity compliant and does have some slight design differences between the Union and Non-Affiliated tools. Out-dated factors have been removed such as Confidentiality and new factors such as Technical and Professional Skills, Customer Service, and Financial Responsibility have been added, as well, there were improvements made to the clarity of the language and differentiation between levels. This new system did not change any job grades relating to the Non- Affiliated members but five positions moved up one grade within the Union. DELEGATIONS Tim Funchion addressed the Committee regarding Addendum to Report CSD-007-09- 2009 Rotary Ribfest Mr. Funchion provided the Committee with an update regarding the meeting he had with the Durham Regional Police and the costs associated with the necessary police services provided at this event. To reduce the number of hours police services are required at the event, the event will close at 11 :00 p.m. instead of midnight He is hoping this will help reduce the cost factor for the police service, He informed the Committee the largest costs associated with this event are the police service and advertising. Other than the closing time, the event is scheduled to remain the same as it was last yeaL Mr. Funchion assured the Committee that all the proceeds from this event will be put back into the Community. Jim Stevenson and Maggie Smith addressed the Committee regarding Report EGD-018-09. Ms. Smith informed the Committee that she and her husband currently reside behind the Courtice Skate Park and that their lives have been disrupted immensely since the park opened. She expressed concerns over trees being set on fire, the noise level (especially during the evening hours), and the indecent public acts occurring at the park. Ms. Smith stated the location of the park leaves no privacy for the residents who live close by and inquired as to what could be done to give them privacy. She expressed concems with the loud vibrating music, using the skate park as a place to hang out, and verbal abuse the local residents have to endure. Ms. Smith stated that erecting a six foot fence would not solve the current problem, and she feels the residents are the individuals currently having to police the skateboard park. -3- 403 General Purpose and Administration Committee. Minutes May 4, 2009 Richard Ward addressed the Committee regarding his request for an official plan designation and amendment in zoning. Mr. Ward expressed concerns over the action taken on his previous delegation stating that he still has not received an explanation as to why he was refused this request. He stated his only dispute is with the designation of his property and he would like to have this resolved. He does not believe he has been treated fairly and requested copies of applications made from the McDonalds, PetrO Canada and the Co-Op and the two properties between the Co-Op and Hwy 115, He stated when he previously requested copies of the information he was informed that these applications could not be found. He requested an explanation as to why he is being treated differently, Resolution #GPA-321-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT the Agenda be altered to allow for the Public Meeting regarding the Gyaltsan Road Closure - Report EGD-017-09. CARRIED Councillor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC MEETING Report: Intention to Proceed with Future Highway Closing, Unopen Road Allowance Situated in Lot 27, Concession 1 in the Former Township of Clarke EGD-017 -09 (a) Subject: No one spoke in opposition to or support of Report EGD-017-09. Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting (b) Subject: Application to Amend the Clarington Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Teri Bell/Thornlea Holsteins Ltd. Report: PSD-041-09 Paul Wirch, Planner, Planning Services Department provided a verbal report supported by a PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-041-09. No one spoke in opposition to or support of Report PSD-041-09. Susan Robinson addressed the Committee on behalf of the co-applicant Thornlea Holsteins and stated the applicants are in agreement with the staff recommendations contained in Report PSD-041-09 and look forward to having the process completed. -4- 404 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 (c) Subject: Applications to Amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law Lafarge Canada Inc. PSD-042-09 Applicant: Report: Tracey Webster Planner, Planning Services Department provided a verbal report supported by a PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-042-09. Mr. Lawerence Wallace spoke in opposition to Report PSD-042-09. Mr. Wallace expressed the following concerns: the site being located so close to the hydro right of way; traffic safety along this portion of the road now and when the Highway 407 extension is completed; the possibility of air and noise pollution; well contamination from the asphalt; decreasing house value; and fumes from the asphalt. He currently has a tenant and feels he will lose this tenant if the application is approved which could impeded his ability to pay his taxes. I , I I I l' Toby Groenweld spoke in opposition to Report PSD-042-09. Ms. Groenwelld expessed the same concerns as Mr. Wallace with regards to the noise, air and possible water contamination to her well. She questioned the reason for this application stating that Miller Paving had previously been turned down for a similar request and feels this one should be turned down too. Kerry Meydam spoke in opposition to Report PSD-042-09. Ms. Meydam would like to see an air quality study performed since this application will be in such close proximity to the proposed incinerator. Ms. Meydam questioned the cumulative impact. Barb Percy spoke in opposition to Report PSD-042-09. Ms. Percy concurred with the concerns expressed from the previous delegations and inquired as to whether Lafarge was intending on processing or stock piling the product at the proposed location. She informed the Committee if this application was to be approved it would negatively impact the area residents' quality of life. She also inquired as to whether there was a by-law in place that states this type of business would not be permitted within a specified proximity to a residential area. No one spoke in support of Report PSD-042-09. David McKay, MHBC Planning, and Chris Duncan, Lafarge Canada Inc. were present to address any concerns raised. Mr. McKay informed the Committee he will review the concerns and issues raised at today's Public Meeting. The noise issue will be addressed by having the stockpiles remain between 7 and 10 meters, and the applicant will work with staff on the outstanding policy matters. Mr. McKay stated this application will be similar to the site located in Ajax, with the addition of recycling asphalt. The expected hours of operation for this site are set between at 6:00 a.m. through to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, with the possible extended hours when needed. He informed the Committee the applicant had looked at other locations within Clarington but felt this property best suited the application because of the proposed size and it's -5- 405 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 proximity to major roads. Mr. McKay stated the applicant is currently looking into options regarding access to both sides of the railway tracks by way of a tunnel or level crossing. Mr. Duncan informed the Committee he does not have the figures on hand to advise how many truck trips could be expected for the proposed site and that their Durham Road 20 pit site was not considered for this facility due to the amount of truck traveling time that would be required. He stated that Lafarge Canada Inc. takes safety concerns very seriously and agreed to meet with the residents to address the concerns raised at today's meeting. He informed the Committee that Lafarge will look at the emission level set for the Energy-From-Waste site and see if it is possible to implement the same strict emission level standards at this site. The number of employment opportunities for this proposed site is expected to be around fifteen. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO PERMIT REZONING OF A FARM PROPERTY TO PROHIBIT RESIDENTIAL USES Resolution #GPA-322-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-041-09 be received; THAT the application for Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Teri Bell be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment, attached to Report PSD-041-09, be adopted by Council; THAT the Durham Regional Land Division Committee be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-041-09 and Council's decision; and THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department, MPAC and all interested parties listed in Report PSD-041-09 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED APPLICATIONS TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW TO PERMIT AN ASPHALT PLANT AND AGGREGATE TRANSFER STATION APPLICANT: LAFARGE CANADA INC. Resolution #GPA-323-09 Moved by Mayor Abernethy, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD-042-09 be received; THAT the application continue to be reviewed to address outstanding issues and any concerns raised at the Public Meeting; and -6- 406 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-042-09 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF APRIL 16,2009 Resolution #GPA-324-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report PSD-043-09 be received; and THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on April 16, 2009, for applications A2009-0004, A2009-0005 and A2009-0006, and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment CARRIED ENERGY-RELATED STREET NAMES FOR THE ENERGY BUSINESS PARK Resolution # GPA-325-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD-044-09 be received; THAT the Energy Business Park be approved to use energy-related street names for any new streets to be established; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-044-09 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED Resolution #GAP-326-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the Committee recess for ten minutes. CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 11 :50 a.m. - 7 - 407 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Councillor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROPOSAL TO CONVEY AN UNOPEN ROAD ALLOWANCE SITUATED IN LOT 27, CONCESSION 1, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE Resolution #GPA-327-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report.EGD-017-09 be received; THAT the uno pen road allowance situated in Lot 27, Concession 1, former Township of Clarke be closed and declared surplus and that the road allowance be conveyed to 564069 Ontario Inc.; THAT the applicant's pay the appraised land value of $ 35,000.00, as well as all legal and other financial costs associated with the conveyance of the land; and THAT 564069 Ontario Inc. be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED ROB PIONTEK SKATE PARK - NOISE AND LOITERING MITIGATION MEASURES Resolution #GPA-328-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report EGD-018-09 be received; THAT Council endorse increased planting, and additional barrier railings at the Rob Piontek Skate Park to be funded from the Courtice Skate Park capital account; THAT Council endorses the use of private security patrols at the Rob Piontek Skate Park in 2009 on a trial basis up to a maximum of $2000; and THAT interested parties be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED - 8- 408 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Mayor Abernethy chaired this portion of the meeting. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT BOWMANVILLE B.I.A. HANGING FLOWER BASKETS/PLANTERS Resolution #GPA-329-09 I I I I . I I ! , , I I I I I 1 j i , Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report OPD-004-09 be received; and THAT since the Operations Department is not able to assume the responsibility without budget implications in 2009, and since it is not the Municipality's core business to provide flower watering services to the B.I.A., that the request from the Bowmanville B.I.A. be denied. CARRIED Councillor Woo chaired this portion of the meeting. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROVINCIAL NUCLEAR EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN - MASTER PLAN 2009 Resolution #GPA-330-09 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Report ESD-006-09 be received for information. CARRIED EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES - 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Resolution #GPA-331-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Mayor Abernethy THAT Report ESD-007-09 be received for information. CARRIED - 9 - 409 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Councillor Robinson chaired this portion of the meeting. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CURLING CLUB Resolution #GPA-332-09 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report CSD-008-09 be received; and THAT no further action be taken with respect to partnering with Bowmanville Golf and Country Club for the reopening of the curling facility that once operated on their property. CARRIED GRANT REQUESTS - ORONO ANTIQUE AND ARTS FESTIVAL, DURHAM GIRLS' CHOIR Resolution #GPA-333-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report CSD-009-09 be received; THAT Council consider the request for one-time funding from the Orono Antiques and Arts Festival under the Community Grant Program; THAT Council consider the request for funding from the Durham Girls' Choir under the Community Grant Program; and THAT Ms. Annette Gray, Orono Antique and Arts Festival, and Ms. Jackie Nixon, Durham Girls' Choir, be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED AS AMENDED (See following motions) Resolution #GPA-334-09 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Mayor Abernethy THAT Orono Antiques and Arts Festival be approved for a one-time grant of $750.00 under the Community Grant Program. MOTION LOST -10 - 410 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Resolution #GPA-335-09 Moved by Councillor Foster seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the Orono Antiques and Arts Festival be approved for a one-time grant of $1000.00 under the Community Grant Program. CARRIED I I I I I I ! 1 I I I I I . Resolution #GPA-336-09 Moved by Councillor Foster seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the Durham Girls' Choir be approved for a one-time grant of $500.00 under the Community Grant Program. CARRIED The foregoing Resolution #GPA-333-09 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda, Mayor Abernethy chaired this portion of the meeting. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT CL2009-7, NASH ROAD RECONSTRUCTION, COURTICE Resolution #GPA-337-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report COD-029-09 be received; THAT Hard-Co Construction Ltd., Whitby, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $732,845.95 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2009-7, be awarded the contract for Nash Road Reconstruction as required by the Engineering Department; THAT funds required to cover the Municipality of Clarington's portion of this project, in the amount of $810,000.00 (which includes tendering, consulting and contingencies) be drawn from the 2007 & 2009 Engineering Capital Account #110-32-330-83214-7401; - 11 - 411 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 THAT the tender award be subject to the approval of the Regional Municipality of Durham for Regional Infrastructure; and THAT the By-law marked Schedule "A" attached to Report COD-029-09, authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement, be approved, CARRIED CONFIDENTIAL REPORT - PAY EQUITY: CUPE LOCAL 74 UNION MUNICIPAL AND LIBRARY: MERCER PLAN AND CONFIDENTIAL REPORT - PAY EQUITY: NON AFILlATED EMPLOYEES- MERCER IMPLEMENTATION Resolution #GPA-338-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the Confidential Reports COD-033-09 and COD-034-09 be referred to the end of the Agenda to be considered in a "closed" session. CARRIED FINANCE DEPARTMENT CONFIDENTIAL REPORT -72 % SCUGOG STREET - TAX SALE PROPERTY Resolution # GPA-339-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report FND-011-09 be received; THAT the property located at 72 Yo Scugog Street, Bowmanville, Ontario deemed as a failed tax sale not be vested by the Municipality of Clarington; THAT the Director of FinancelTreasurer be authorized to write off the property taxes as uncollectible as of March 31, 2009 in accordance with the Municipal Act 2001, Section 354 (3) and that the proportionate share of the taxes be written off to the applicable upper tier and school boards in accordance with the Municipal Act 2001, Section 353 (3) including additions to the roll for weeds and water/sewer to upper tier; THAT the municipal share be charged to the Tax Write-Off Reserve; and THAT the Director of FinancelTreasurer report back to Council in three (3) years to advise if there are more viable options available for this property. CARRIED -12 - 412 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS CLARINGTON SPORTS HALL OF FAME Resolution # GPA-340-09 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT CSD-006-09 be lifted from the table; THAT Addendum to Report CSD-006-09 be received; THAT the Terms of Reference attached hereto as Attachment #1 to Addendum to Report CSD-006-09, be adopted as The Terms of Reference of the Clarington Sports Hall of Fame Selection Committee; THAT the Municipal Clerk be authorized to place an advertisement in the local media seeking applications for the Clarington Sports Hall of Fame Selection Committee; and THAT the members of the Sports Hall of Fame Steering Committee be thanked by the Mayor and Members of Council for their contribution to the development of the Clarington Sports Hall of Fame. CARRIED AS AMENDED (See following motion) Resolution # GPA-341-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the Clarington Sports Hall of Fame Committee composition consist of four members instead of five, by removing the requirement for a Member of Council to be appointed to the Committee. MOTION RULED OUT OF ORDER BY THE CHAIR Resolution #GPA-342-09 I I ! I I I i ! !. I Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Councillor Robinson be appointed as the Member of Council to sit on the Clarington Sports Hall of Fame Committee. CARRIED -13 - 413 , General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 The foregoing Resolution #GPA-340-09 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. 2009 ROTARY RIBFEST Resolution # GPA-343-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT CSD-007-09 be lifted from the table; THAT Addendum to Report CSD-007-09 be received; THAT the facilities and services as requested, and as listed in Section 2.3 of Report CSD-007-09, be approved with the total cost of services being $7,070.00; THAT Council require the Bowmanville Rotary Club to provide, for the duration of the event, general liability insurance in an amount of not less than five million dollars (5,000,000) per occurrence; THAT an original Certificate of Insurance shall be submitted to the Municipality of Clarington and shall name the Municipality of Clarington as an Additional Insured; and THAT the Bowmanville Rotary Club be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED DELEGATION - RICHARD WARD - REGARDING OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND AMENDMENT TO ZONING Resolution #GPA-344-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the delegation of Richard Ward be received; and THAT Planning Staff be directed to answer Mr. Ward's enquiry as to what were the application requirements for the Rezoning and Official Plan Designation for the following three properties: 1) McDonalds - located along Hwy 115 2) Petro Canada and Tim Hortons located along Hwy 115 3) Two properties located between the Co-Op and Hwy 115 and the Co-Op itself. CARRIED -14 - 4t4 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 OTHER BUSINESS EXPRESSION OF INTEREST TO PURCHASE TOTAL HOCKEY COLLECTION Resolution #GPA-345-09 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper Whereas the Municipality of Clarington has received an expression of interest in purchasing the Total Hockey Collection; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Municipality of Clarington would be interested in selling the collection for an amount that would not exceed the amount that was paid for the collection. MOTION LOST (See following motion) Resolution #GPA-346-09 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the foregoing resolution be amended to add the following: "THAT the selling price be reasonable or close as possible to the original purchase price, excluding the service costs." MOTION LOST The foregoing resolution #GPA-345-09 was then put to a vote and lost. REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE - MAPLEFIELD DRIVE TO RICHARD GAY AVENUE Resolution #GPA-347-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Maplefield Drive in Courtice be renamed to Richard Gay Avenue; and THAT all costs associated to this request be the responsibility of Mr. Lawson Gay. CARRIED - 15 - 415 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 Resolution #GPA-348-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the meeting be "closed" in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, for the purpose of discussing the following matters: . Confidential Report COD-033-09, as it is a matter that deals with personal matters about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees; . Confidential Report COD-034-09, as it is a matter that deals with personal matters about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees; and CARRIED The meeting reconvened in open session at 2:40 p.m. RISE AND REPORT Mayor Abernethy reported that two items were discussed in closed session in accordance with Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, and two resolutions were passed on procedural matters. CONFIDENTIAL REPORT - PAY EQUITY: CUPE LOCAL 74 UNION MUNICIPAL AND LIBRARY: MERCER PLAN Resolution #GPA-349-09 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report COD-033-09 be received in a closed meeting as it deals with personnel matters applicable to a number of identifiable individuals; THAT the verbal report by Mr. Bruce Martin from Mercer Consultants be received; THAT the Memorandum of Understanding for implementation of the revised Pay Equity Plan, signed by CUPE Local 74 on behalf of the Inside, Outside and Library Union Members of Council (Attachment #1 to Report COD-033-09) be accepted as confirmation of the Plan as a deemed approved plan for Pay Equity Purposes; THAT the Mercer Pay Equity Plan be approved by Council for implementation; THAT the recommended adjustments resulting from the Consultant's review of the pay equity process be effective at January 1, 2009; -16 - 416 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 THAT the Pay Equity banding be reviewed for updating and possible realignment if necessary, to reflect the appropriate separation between grid levels and bargaining units, at the conclusion of the three year review period; THAT, consistent with the industry norm and Municipality of Clarington practice since 2006, future recommendations by the Pay Equity Committees regarding Pay Equity adjustments to compensation be approved by the CAO; THAT the Library Board be advised of Council's decision as the Municipality is the recognized employer for Pay Equity Purposes; and THAT the Union Local 74 President be advised of Council's decision and approval of the plan as an approved plan in satisfaction of the Pay Equity Act obligations, and that they be thanked for the Union Members' contributions and participation in the revision process. MOTION LOST Resolution #GPA-350-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Confidential Report COD-033-09 be referred back to the Pay Equity Committee. CARRIED CONFIDENTIAL REPORT - PAY EQUITY: NON AFILlATED EMPLOYEES- MERCER IMPLEMENTATION Resolution #GPA-351-09 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report COD-034-09 be received in a closed meeting as it deals with personnel matters applicable to a number of identifiable individuals; THAT the verbal report by Mr. Bruce Martin from Mercer Consultants be received; THAT the Mercer Pay Equity Evaluation System be approved by Council for implementation; THAT the Pay Equity banding be reviewed for updating and possible realignment if necessary at the conclusion of the three year review period; THAT, consistent with the industry norm and Municipality of Clarington practice since 2006, future recommendations by the Pay Equity Committees regarding Pay Equity adjustments to compensation be approved by the CAO; -17 - 417 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes May 4, 2009 THAT the Library Director and the Board be advised of Council's decision as the Municipality is the recognized employer for Pay Equity Purposes; THAT the Non-Affiliated group be advised of the transition to the Mercer Plan; THAT following the 90-day waiting period, if there are no objections filed with the Commission, the revised scores under the Mercer Plan be accepted as an approved amended plan for Pay Equity Purposes; THAT all appropriate polices and procedures be amended to incorporate the revised Mercer Pay Equity evaluation system; THAT in order to maintain pay equity, Department Heads and Emergency Services Deputies be adjusted by the recognition pay value if awarded to the Fire Association employees at 3%, 6% and 9%, effective January 1, 2010, without retroactivity to prior years; and THAT the recognition pay be incorporated into the grid rate. CARRIED COMMUNICATIONS There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA-352-09 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the meeting adjourn at 2:43 p.m. CARRIED MAYOR DEPUTY CLERK -18 - 418 DRAFT LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: May 25, 2009 (a) Brad Arbour, Regarding Youth Centre (b) Jennifer Paczesny, Regarding Issuing of Parking Tickets (c) Richard Ward, Regarding Current Property Standards Situation (d) Robert MacDonald, Regarding Proposed Development of Lots 27 & 28, Conc. 2, Clarke Township Clill-!lJgton. PUBLIC MEETING REPORT # PSD-046-09 564069 ONT INC AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE CLARINGTON ZONING BY-LAW (84-63) The Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended, APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by 564069 Ontario Inc, would rezone 49 & 63 Beaver Street, which currently conlain single detached qwellings, to pennit an expansion of the existing IGA parking lot by 75 parking spaces. TAKE NOTICE that the application has been deemed complete so that it can be circulated and reviewed. The subject property is located at 131 King Avenue East, Newcastle, as shown on reverse. Planning File No.: ZBA 2009.{)003 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: th Monday, May 25 ,2009 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2'd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario DATE: TIME: PLACE: ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposaL The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. I I ,> If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday, June 1", 2009, commencing at 7:00 p,m, Shouid you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, May 29th, 2009 to have your name appear in the Agenda, COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2'd Floor, 40 Temperance Street. Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6, Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m, at the Planning Services Department, 3"' Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6, or by calling Paul Wirch at (905) 623- 3379 extension 421 or bye-mail atDwirch@c1arinqton.net. APPEAL If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Municipality of Clarington Planning Services Department before the proposed Official Plan Amendment is adopted, the person: i) is not entitled to appeal the decision of Clarington Council to the Ontario Municipal Board; and Ii) the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party, Dated at the Municipality of Cia ring ton this 14th day of April. 2009, David Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6 ./ "-.. ./ '- BEAVER STREET SOUTH "00'"".. ."l...f>. .."......... Fl".;.~~"~ (~~~(///t1' ~w ~i .,,>>:~~'~. ~ VoM'&J,oHLfLL1 _ / j~ ~~mt~ ~ W$ytih~A- ': f-- !~ .' - "" ',,' ~-L. ,b'7; , ~I ,""" ' ,., .~' I-- . ......... /-~.'Li ..'0/ :.t. · ~ " ---- . ~ iJ g-/ _L'__T _ / ~~ ~ ~ . . '. . '. , , ' '. > / ~ - "j - Y -;' /j I III . , ~~ fti / /. / ~ /. v"; . -~. . ,.- // IY: .. : . ~ · l1.::i/ftA101 V"/ ' y--/ / /./ /-v. m ; ~ ~~ ,.'.': : I IV / VI v Vj ';/ / ;.~, V :.' ~ , l . . , . I .V / IY / I'> . . i I .:g , · , : Ii' ~:/ }if. ~ / . , . ~~V. I- V/iWt ' /, ; I jji N i8"2'''' W \ ""~ )} ~ rr : . ~~ m I; #' ...;:::~ J ' i \~ ~ HI _ ! /~ i -;- /....' ,,~-'''''''''''' ': : ("'- /" : ~ [_. Ed~ / 0 (J) N ~ ... c 0 ::r .!:!: z CD Z ~ ~ CD CD t; !l QN :! tlIOJ (II ~ (J) en c. if -<> .... !II 'r-J 0 ~ >0 en CD ::e~ 0 ~ ,CD )>6 c. 3:0 :3. tlI mo 0 '< zw :; )> c ~ 3l: r "2- m c'i' z III -t ~ ... "j~EG RD "j'7 III "j_ Fe; III J . - Ill. Z---l ~ "'CI' . . '" '" '"f= I-=~= hi a I '--<--j I I I '1:1 " .. "-LEAVER ST,' SDUil< ~H I ~ '" 0 I- ~ i1 - - f= ) ~~~ g I II J)I ./ >(~\:!;: rl!lfJ ~ l;/~ ~~ j "j HAR:EEHtllillR DRIVE I ~ ~ ,~ ~. ~- 0 - I:j Z ~_ ~ C) RAFTON STREET ::u r---- ..l..Et '" '" NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROCEED WITH FUTURE HIGHWAY CLOSURE TO CLOSE A PORTION OF AN UNOPEN ROAD ALLOWANCE SITUATED IN LOT 27, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION IN THE FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE PUBLIC MEETING Repvrt # EGD-020-09 Take Notice that the General Purpose and Administration Committee of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington. at the meeting to be held, in the Council Chambers, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario on May 25. 2009, at 9:30 a.m., will consider a by-law to stop up and close a portion of an unopen road allowance situated in Lot 27, Broken Front Concession in the former Township of Clarke. now in the Municipality of Clarington and further identified as Part 2 on Registered Plan 40R-25566, And Further Take Notice that before passing the said by-law, Council or a Committee of Council shall hear in person, or by his Counsel, Solicitor or Agent, any person who claims that his land will be prejudicially affected by this by-law. 1 I ! Patti L. Barrie, CMO Municipal Clerk Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6 Y~b1Cv ~ r:/E71D -t;) 0 ,..0 J @ I I I " -s& .", d~) ---------- ------.--- ---~---------- PUBLIC MEETING REPORT #PBD-051-09 CI![fflgron CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Municipality of Clarington: Sign By-law The Council of the Municipality of Clarington will be considering a new Sign By- law. While not required, the Municipality is following the public meeting process to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments. The public meeting will be held on: Date: Time: Place: Monday, May 25, 2009 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario I I I I i , I I The proposed by-law will be available on May 15, 2009 and the background report will be available from the Planning Services Department May 22, 2009. Any person may attend the public meeting and make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the by-law. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. (!!J!ilJgtJJn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday May 25, 2009 Report #: PSD-046-09 File #: ZBA 2009-0003 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION BY 564069 ONTARIO INC. TO REZONE TWO PROPERTIES ON BEAVER STREET (NEWCASTLE) FOR COMMERCIAL USE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1, THAT Report PSD-046-09 be received; 2, THAT the application continue to be reviewed by ,Staff to address outstanding issues and any concerns raised at the Public Meeting; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations, and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: ~ nklin Wu,. Chief Administrative Officer '>>L- David rome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services ;f( PW/COS/df 20 May 2009 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 801 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 1.2 1.3 Agent: Owner/Applicant: Proposal: D.G.Biddle & Associates 564069 Ontario Inc. 1,4 1,5 Location: To permit the rezoning of two (2) residential properties, each possessing a single detached dwelling, to expand the existing IGA parking lot by 75 parking spaces. 3,407 m2 (both lots) Part Lots28, Concession 1, Former Village of Newcastle 49 & 63 Beaver Street South Area: 2.0 BACKGROUND 2,1 On September 29, 2008, Council approved a rezoning application to permit the development of a parking area expansion to support a 929 m2 addition to the existing supermarket. Subsequently, the Applicant submitted a Site Plan amendment application (SPA 2008-0017) for the supermarket addition. The addition will include an increase of interior, retail floor space as well as a reconstructed loading area on the south side of the building, Staff review of the Site Plan amendment application is ongoing. 2.2 Sobeys Inc., the parent company and franchisor of IGA supermarkets in Ontario, has chosen to rebrand most of the current IGA stores as Sobeys stores, According to the Applicant, Sobeys corporate policy requires parking ratios greater than those required by the applicable Zoning By-law in order to serve the overflow needs of its supermarket clientele. 2.3 On March 6, 2009, D,G .Biddle & Associates submitted an application, on behalf of 564069 Ontario Inc., to request the rezoning of two properties from residential to commercial use. The purpose of this request is to permit the expansion of the existing parking lot for the abutting supermarket onto these lands. 2,4 The Applicant's agent has submitted a Planning Justification Report and a Stormwater Management Report in support of the rezoning application, 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The subject properties are located south of King Avenue East, on the east side of Beaver Street, in Newcastle Village. At present, each property contains a single detached dwelling, as well as residential accessory buildings. Both properties contain a number of mature trees of various types. 802 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 3 View of 49 & 63 Beaver Street facing east 3,2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - South - East - West- High-Density Residential and Commercial (Massey Building) Low-Density Residential Supermarket Commercial Low-Density Residential 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policv Statement The intent of the Provincial Policy Statement is to guide both new development and redevelopment in a manner that maintains strong communities, a clean and healthy environment and a strong economy. Land use must be carefully managed to meet the full range of current and future needs, while efficiently using land and resources. Amongst other things, land use patterns shall be based on densities which promote a mix of housing and employment Cost-effective development standards shall minimize land consumption and servicing costs, 803 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 4 The Provincial Policy Statement promotes opportunities for redevelopment where they can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock. The proposed parking area expansion onto the subject lands, will support the continued viability of the abutting supermarket at its current location within the downtown of Newcastle. Maintaining the supermarket use, and any of its ancillary uses, through the rezoning of the subject properties promotes a concentration of land use and will not limit the potential for future intensification within the surrounding residential neighbourhood. The Provincial Policy Statement further states that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. The proposed rezoning will not directly result in development or land use which will cause environmental or public health and safety concerns. The proposed redevelopment will not directly cause a strain on existing infrastructure or public service facilities, 4.2 Provincial Growth Plan The Provincial Growth Plan seeks to maXimize the use of land within existing settlement and built-up boundaries through redevelopment and intensification and limit growth on undeveloped land. This proposed change of use from residential use to commercial parking lot results in a reduction of jobs and population. However, accommodating the expanding needs of the existing supermarket may be considered supportive of the Growth Plan's policy of developing (or maintaining) complete communities with easy access to local stores and services, The Growth Plan states that in planning lands for employment, municipalities will facilitate the development of compact built form and minimize surface parking. This application will not directly impact upon the continued conservation and protection of the natural heritage system. Municipalities are to implement strategies in support of cultural heritage resources a built-up areas are intensified. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLANS 5.1 Durham Reqional Official Plan The Durham Regional Official Plan designates these properties as "Living Areas" in proximity to a "Regional Centre". An expansion of the existing commercial use onto the subject properties is permitted by the "Regional Centre" policies within the Durham Regional Official Plan. The existing residential dwellings (49 & 63 Beaver Street) are currently connected to water supply and sanitary sewers. These services, along with all other utilities, will need to be disconnected prior to the removal or demolition of the residential dwellings. This application is not in conflict with the Durham Regional Official Plan. 804 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 5 5,2 Clarinqton Officiai Pian The Clarington Official Plan designates these lands as "Urban Residential". The subject properties are located immediately south and west of the abutting supermarket use and just outside of the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan on the edge of downtown Newcastle. While the predominant use of lands designated "Urban Residential" shall be for housing purposes other uses may be permitted which by the nature of their activity, scale and design are supportive of, compatible with and serve residential uses. The existing supermarket and the proposed supermarket addition are located within the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan, The policies of the Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan state that, aside from certain exceptions, all retail and personal service uses shall be located inside the area designated as Village Centre, It could be possible to consider the expansion of the commercial parking area behind the existing houses on Beaver Street as permissible through interpretation, provided suitable iot sizes were maintained, The application as presented does not conform to the Clarington Official Plan, 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6,1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands "Urban Residential Type Two (R2)" and "General Commercial Exception (C1-54)", The existing dwellings are located on the east side of the property within the area zoned "R2" (See Attachment 2). This application proposes to extend a commercial zoning across both properties as the "R2" zone does not permit the proposed commercial ancillary use. , , i I I I I I , 7.0 I I I 7.1 I I 7.2 The existing supermarket site already includes sufficient land area to accommodate the parking and loading needs of the existing building and the 929 m2 addition. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site. Public meeting signs were installed on each property frontage. The Municipality previously received public comments from three neighbouring residents for the earlier rezoning application (ZBA 2008-0020) which sought to permit the expansion of the existing IGA supermarket. As the current application will also result in an expansion of the supermarket use, the public comments already on file. were reviewed 'and considered for this application as well. The portion of the comments that relate to this application included questions about the landscaping, . illumination and fencing of the expanded parking area as well as connections between the parking area and the street. These matters will be addressed through the Site Plan approval process, 805 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 6 7.3 One new inquiry was received for this application. The inquiry expressed concern over the potential demolition of the two existing residential dwellings if the Applicant became unwilling or unable to relocate them. This matter is reviewed further in Section 9 of this report. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 The Clarington Emergency Services Department and the Clarington Operations Department have no objections to the application. Any conditions will be addressed through the Site Plan approval process. 8.2 The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority has no objections to the proposaL 8.3 The Clarington Engineering Services Department has stated that the subject lands contain a road allowance under the authority and ownership of the Municipality of Clarington. This proposal cannot proceed until such time as the applicant has acquired clear title to all of the subject lands. Approval for legal closure and conveyance of the road allowance must take place in accordance with the Municipal Act and will be subject to the approval of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington, The Applicant has made application for closure and conveyance of the road allowance in accordance with Municipal policy; however the matter has not received final approval from CounciL All other engineering conditions will be addressed through the Site Plan approval process. 8.4 The Clarington Heritage Committee has. expressed opposition to the proposed rezoning as they feel that replacing the existing dwellings with a parking lot will have a negative impact upon the character of the neighbourhood. The Heritage Committee further requests that Council consider adding 49 Beaver Street and 63 Beaver Street to the Municipal Register. 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 RemovallDemolition the Existino Dwellinos The proposed parking area redevelopment will necessitate the demolition or the removal of two existing dwellings. Assessment records indicate that the existing residential dwellings were constructed in 1922. According to the Newcastle Village and District Historical Society, these two-storey, cement block buildings are the only remaining buildings of this form of construction left in Newcastle. Neither of these two dwellings (or any of the accessory buildings on either property) is designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. In pre-consultation discussions held with Staff, the Applicant has stated that it is their intention to relocate the existing residential dwellings off-site rather than demolish them, At the time of the writing of this report the Applicant had still not identified a specific property(s) to which the proposed dwellings could be relocated. 806 REPORT NO.: PSD-046-09 PAGE 7 92 Expansion of the Parkinq Area The Applicant has stated that they require the increased parking area in order to meet the requirements of their corporate parking policy, Presently, the property dimensions, shaped like an inverted "L" (see Attachment 1), limit the orientation of parking spaces, drive aisles and sidewalks. The proposed rezoning would "square up" the southern limit of the supermarket site. This application would not only increase the number of total parking spaces but it would also permit a redesign of the existing parking area, Staff could consider a partial expansion through rezoning of the rear portion of the lots provided that the appropriately sized residential lots were maintained for the homes at 49 and 63 Beaver Street This would allow an additional 54 parking spaces. To remove the homes would require an Official Plan amendment. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the Public Meeting under the Planning Act, and in consideration of the comments received from circulated . agencies, it is respectfully recommended that the application to amend the Zoning By- law 84-63, as amended, continue to be reviewed by Staff for the preparation of a subsequent report. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Zoning Map I I List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Mark & Karen Kartusch Scott & Laura Morgan Geoff & Meredith Shaw Newcastle Village & District Historical. Society Clarington Heritage Committee 807 WCjl l~~ ~ rt~ Ul .. ~ Z Res 133"15 NOLJ."" ~.I ~W -B~! I I I I I \ I I:: ~81- -R"tt:IOI[[={F~~ -\.. 3^ICJO Cl3r.1HifH ~ In _ fll1JJE1 -, _ ITlIIlillB w ---l L-->.. 3AIClO Cl3l1n:J / K1 I n= I- :z w :iE c MZ Ow 0:iE 9< ~3: 0< N...J . c:(>- mlO NCl Z Z o N ~ ~ik ~~~ Q. .. :;; " o ~ u o -;'11 1:: ~lLL ll- I ~ I ~~ \. I ~ x nos z ~~l-- ~ . r ",P- ~ w z ' ~l=== I-- tn I I I-- "I 'is _ w~"3AV38 W II ~ ~ L l .Oel ";J3tJ III - /' ~ Attachment 1 To Report PSD-045-09 .. c III .~ Dl Co 0 l: Co CIl .E < () c c 0 0 >- III ";: N 10 ~ CIl III 0:: 'tl .. CIl C 0 C <( 0 I- ~ 'tl en t) 0 III It> 0 0 CIl '" 0:: '<t .- 'tl It> .lJ :l l: (ij It) C/) III Co ;.: ...J '" ... :~ CIl 'tl CIl l: l: ~ l: .s::. :l III .. 0 ...J 0 :E ~[j~ / , , i ; : I ~ n! I 4: ~ : LI! f ~n .c...:\ M.or.<I..f. \ 'I ~,~ '..0:0~,~W~~.,:::~;j.t~ ! . !:: Ii ~ " ;'im . f') I~ A /)y) , ',~ L.~ I~~ : . ~ !: Lhl0/7////fi ~V / / ~~':-1/: I !' ! ., ///, 0 w . 'f.<'j;z. / 7 / ....rf " . ffi ~; ~:\IFj/ ~ ' ,. _. . ! 1/1~ / k .; ~ " ~~/-L'''.V~A//vi',...:..:'. I<"~l ~~~ ; ~ II ~ . V;07</;t?/i;i! .. . ; i~" .' N. .; ~ ,; :; ~/~r7!V.L: '~7~ / / . .~~ ~I-..~ mmt i '/7C.. 77C:~/; ~ ~~0>:1-'I. 0: I --"'~Cf' E'//. /, / / / i/ / /~l.J .. . N""~ -0~ n, ~:. ,.I --;- / if / 7 '7 -" / ..LJ/-'J ~""~ ufl -;-, I Ii i · ~7~07'7J(4' mi~'i ~~ \~; ~ ti(;~ . ~~'y;,~ e '!t~ [!1;.. z \ I ~ I l/~/////~~/ "'I ,," s: __'m H!nOS !33H!S H3^~3B ~JlI!I'~" .. '"'" " / /' 808 .."""' . - ',_t;~':fhJ -:};.,:,. ,'" ,t': Attachment 2 To Report PSD-045-09 SOUTH '\ ..\ \ i 809 rn w ~ W 0- o ~ 0- I- () W ...., IXl ::> rn u. o (!) z z o N I- Z W ~ ~ ::> () C") o o o , O'l o o ('II <C IXl N Clf;[mgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES , , Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Report #: PSD-047-09 File #: ZBA 2008-0004 By-law #: Subject: GENERAL AMENDMENT TO ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 REGARDING AGGREGATE EXTRACTION AREAS, REQUIREMENTS FOR GARAGE WIDTHS AND SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1, THAT Report PSD-047-09 be received; 2, THAT the application to amend the Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, be APPROVED and that the by-law as contained in Attachment 4 be PASSED; 3. THAT the by-law as contained in Attachment 5 be approved in principle and brought forward for Council's approval upon confirmation from the Ministry of Natural Resources that the Aggregate licence registered to the owner of the Coombes Pit has been surrendered; 4, THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of this report and Council's decision; and 5. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: /l .(if1A/~ F nklin Wu, . Chief Administrative Officer /rti TW/CP/sh/df 20 May 2009 .' . , CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 810 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-09 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On October 27, 2008 Council adopted a general amendment to the zoning by-law dealing with recreational vehicles and accessory structures. At the same time Council adopted a resolution directing Staff to continue to review proposed changes to Aggregate Extraction Areas. 1.2 In addition to the proposed changes to Aggregate Extraction Areas, this amendment proposes two additional modifications as follows: . Provisions regulating the maximum outside width for an attached garage on a single detached dwelling in the following zone categories: o Urban Residential Exception (R2-53) o Urban Residential Exception (R2-57) o Urban Residential Exception (R2-58) o Urban Residential Exception (R2-61) . Adjustments to the Schedule boundaries to be more consistent with Urban and Hamlet boundaries and to divide the six (6) maps making up the Darlington, Clarke and Urban Area maps into a grid with multiple pages per schedule as opposed to one large map, The format of the zone schedules will be similar to the one used for Municipality of Clarington Street Index, 2.0 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS 2.1 A Public Meeting was held on February 2, 2009, No one spoke in support or opposition of the application. 2.2 A submission was received from the designer for Geranium Corporation. They are designing homes for lots zoned R2-61 and R2-58 and have requested the Municipality consider a maximum garage width of 49 percent for an interior lot and 63 percent for an exterior lot. They wish to provide double car garages on the exterior lots. 2.3 Two property owners contacted staff to determine what would be required to re- establish the aggregate extraction use on their properties in the future, The owners were advised that the Local and Regional Official Plans and the Zoning By-law would require an amendment to re-establish the use. A site plan application would also be required. The owners were advised to contact the Ministry of Natural Resources to determine provincial requirements. 2.4 One property owner inquired as to the impact on his taxes if the "Extractive Industrial (M3) Zone" is amended. The owner was provided with the underlying Official Plan designation and the corresponding zone categories. He was advised to contact the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation to determine the affect of the proposed amendment on his property taxes. 811 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-09 PAGE 3 3.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 3,1 The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was circulated to relevant agencies for comment. 3.2 Clarington Building Division, Clarington Engineering Services, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, offered no comments or objections. The Ministry of Natural Resources does not object to rezoning former Aggregate Extraction Areas provided they are no longer within a licenced area, 3.3 The Region of Durham Planning Department advised that Section 9D.2A of the Durham Regional Official Plan indicates aggregate resource extraction areas no longer licenced shall only be used for those uses permitted within 'Prime Agricultural Areas', and within the 'Greenlands System'. The section further indicates that respective zoning by-laws be appropriately amended. The aggregate extraction areas proposed to be rezoned all have their licence cancelled, surrendered, or revoked. The proposal to rezone the aggregate extraction areas to a zoning category in accordance with the underlying Clarington Official Plan conforms to the Regional Official Plan. Urban Residential zones are within the 'Living Area' designation in the Durham Regional Official Plan, The proposal to amend the maximum outside garage width requirements in certain Urban exception zones is in conformity to the Plan. The proposed boundary adjustments in the schedules of Clarington Zoning By-law 84- 63 do not propose amendments to existing zone categories, The adjustments to the zoning by-law schedules are in conformity to the Plan, This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial plan review responsibilities, There are no matters of Provincial plan review interest applicable to this proposed general amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63. 4.0 STAFF COMMENTS 4.1 Aooreoate Extraction Areas 4.1.1 Section 15.3.1 of the Clarington Official Plan indicates that the Municipality will amend the Zoning By-law to delete aggregate extraction and associated uses once the aggregate extraction license is revoked or surrendered. The policies of the Clarington Official Plan allow the Aggregate Extraction Area overlay designation to be deleted from the land uses designation, without the need for a formal amendment, leaving the underlying designation. . 4.1.2 Ten properties have had their licences surrendered or revoked and it is appropriate to rezone those properties in accordance with the corresponding Official Plan designation. The locations of the properties are contained in Attachment .1... 812 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-09 PAGE 4 4.1.3 The owner of the Coombes Pit, identified as number 5 in Attachment 1, has recently completed the necessary rehabilitation efforts on his property to have his licence surrendered by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), Once documentation is received from the MNR stating the licence is surrendered it is recommended that the By-law contained in Attachment 5 be brought forward for Council's approval. 4.2 Schedule Boundaries 4,2,1 Currently, there are nineteen Schedules attached to Zoning By-law 84-63. Two consist of the former geographic area of the Townships of Darlington and Clarke while the remaining Schedules represent Courtice, Bowmanville, Newcastle Village, Orono and thirteen hamlets. The schedules were originally adopted in September 1984 prior to the current Urban Area and Hamlet Area boundaries being adopted. With the exception of the Darlington and Clarke Schedules, the schedules follow a geometric shape rather than the actual settlement area boundary as defined in the Official Plan. 42,2 The Schedule boundaries are to be adjusted to be consistent with the Urban and Hamlet boundaries as defined in the Official Plan, The key map contained in Attachment 2 depicts the current and proposed schedule boundaries. A new Schedule is proposed for the Wilmot Creek Retirement Community. Although this area is not identified as a Hamlet, it is within the urban area boundary connecting Bowmanville and Newcastle Village and is considered a unique community. It is anticipated that the zoning for this area will become more complex with the next phase of development, making it difficult to represent on the Darlington and Clarke Schedules due to the scale in which they are produced, An additional schedule is proposed for the Hamlet of Brownsville, The Rural Cluster of Bond Head will remain on the Newcastle Village Schedule. This area is not a designated Hamlet; however, given the level of existing development it is best represented at the scale used to produce the Newcastle Village Schedule as opposed to the Clarke Schedule. 4.2.3 The Schedules for Darlington, Clarke, Bowmanville, Courtice, Newcastle, and Orono will be divided into multiple pages at a larger scale (Schedule B of Attachment 4). This will improve the legibility of the maps for the reader and allow the maps to be produced on letter size paper. Over the years there have been many new zone categories introduced, making it difficult to represent multiple zone categories in urban areas. 42.4 It will not be necessary to divide the Hamlets into a grid system as they are easily represented at a larger scale on independent schedules similar to what is currently provided in Zoning By-law 84-63. The Wilmot Creek Retirement Community will have two pages, one for the former Township of Darlington and the other for Clarke (Schedule B of Attachment 4). 813 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-09 PAGE 5 4,3 Outside GaraQe Width I I I , I I I I , I I I I i I , ! I 1 J , i I , , ~ 4.3.1 A regulation for a garage width is provided in the Urban Residential Exception (R2-53), Urban Residential Exception (R2-57), Urban Residential Exception (R2-58), and Urban Residential Exception (R2-61) zone categories as follows: "The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 40% of the width of the house." This regulation was introduced to minimize the prominence of a garage in relation to the entire fayade of a dwelling, However, it has become problematic for designers who wish to provide an attached garage for a dwelling on lots with frontages less than 10 metres. It is proposed that the Outside Garage Width be amended to read "The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 40% of the width of the lot frontage." This is consistent with terminology used in other Urban Residential Exception Zones, and will provide adequate width for a single car garage on lots with less than 10 metres, It will also ensure that the fayade of a dwelling will remain as the prominent feature, Staff do not support an increase to allow double car garages, as that was not the intent of the zone provisions in the original draft of these zone categories. 4A Transport or CartaQe Depot 4:4- 1 Report PSD-099-08 dealing with the General Amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63 regarding Recreational Vehicle Parking and Accessory Building and Structures under the same application, proposed to delete the definition of 'Transport or Cartage Depot". The proposed By-law contained in Attachment 4 includes the deletion of the definition as it was omitted in the previous amending By-law (2008-169). 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 In consideration of the comments contained in this report, Staff respectfully recommends the following: . that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment contained in Attachment 4 be passed by Council; and . that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment contained in Attachment 5 be approved in principle; and that the amending by-law be brought forward for Council's approval upon confirmation from the Ministry of Natural Resources that the Aggregate licence registered to G. Coombes has been surrendered. Attachments: Attachment 1: Location of Aggregate Extraction Areas Attachment 2: Key Map Proposed Schedule Boundaries Attachment 3: Maximum Garage Width on 9 m Lot Frontage Attachment 4: Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment 5: Zoning' By-law Amendment - G. Coombs Pit . 814 REPORT NO.: PSD-047-09 PAGE 6 List of Interested Parties to be notified of Council's decision: Arnold Buchanan St Mary's Cement Inc, (Canada) Anna Uriadka Leslie Hung Terry Timmons David Barber James Stephenson Robert Edgar 1161757 Ontario Limited Durga Persaud Alice McKeen Steve Hukari Region of Durham Planning Department Municipal Property Assessment Corporation 815 I I ; I i I I , I I j I I I i I I i.'"" I ~----- C'- ~--r ----- ,"--'1 , r _I L_~ . . . . ~ J ~+ ~p L- Attachment 1 To Report PSD-047-09 --- j-- --- T-- I i~ peo~ IIIJoI5~ I ~ ---1 I ~ ~ , : en Co r SH1SC;>IlMlj6!H <0 -------' I PWOVe:lp..InO:) 816 1. Ambrose, H. Part Lots 31/32, Concession10, Darlington Official Plan Designation: NaturClI Linkage Area, Environmental Protection and General Agricultural 2. 146329 Ontario Inc. (St Mary's Cement Inc. (Canada) Part Lots 14 to 17, Concession10, Darlington Official Plan Designation: Natural Linkage Area and Environmental Protection 3, Vriadka, M. 1722 Pebblestone Road Part Lot 29, Concession 4, Darlington Official Plan Designation: Green Space 4. Murray Holliday Aluminum Part Lot 23, Concession 3, Darlington Official Plan Designation: Green Space 5, Coombes, G Part Lot 6, Concession 4, Darlington 2899 Taunton Road East Official Plan Designation: Prime Agricultural 6, St Lawrence Cement Part Lot 32, Concession 8, Clarke 8801 Mosport Road Official Plan Designation: Natural Linkage and Environmental Protection 7. Sutherland, J, Part Lots 27/28, Concession, 7, Clarke 3548 Concession Road 7 Official Plan Designation: Prime Agricultural and Environmental Protection 8. Town of Newcastle Part Lot 16, Concession 2, Clarke 2727 Morgans Road Official Plan Designation: Green Space and Environmental Protection 9. Rigeland Holdings Part Lot 16, Concession 2, Clarke 4148 Highway 2 Official Plan Designation: Green Space and Environmental Protection 10,8107900 Ontario Inc. Part Lot 15, Concession 2, Clarke 4180 Concession Road 2 Official Plan Designation: Prime Agricultural and Environmental Protection 11. Farrow, C&G Part Lot 13, Concession 1, Clarke 4263 Highway 2 Official Plan Designation: Green Space 817 ~----- , I , ClJ I -",' Iii I ClJ U I ~ ~ ! u ~ I ::> I !'l al I Q) .<:: I ~ as I J!! E I' () e (J) LL ' ~ 2 I "'O.~ I -c ClJ I <l: Cl ' ~D"" .... I "' I "' I ~ I ,. ..' I ~# ~ I-----l-.---~_ t.:~ ---------~------------t1 i ~ i c f;;;r;;;r:0::07fdl I ~~ II' t__! ~ ~~ ~ i .---"'"i ~ ~ I '" [~~~~-~J. ~ I :::::::::::'/i:/:::):r:r4 L____________ ~. lli~Wi!ilif ----------- -_..___ .:.~..~."!i,.::l --------- -..---------- -----..-------. , " , , , J ,/ I , l/) I ,~ , ~ J ~ I a , lD .-----~ ~ . l-c , ClJ 1 "5 , (J) I -c , Q) l/) o 0- e Q. 0.. Rl ij ~ I '>- ,-I c ~ B Cl .!: -.::: I1l Cl ~ ~ Attachment 2 To Report PSD-047-09 11! ... III o N j! :l "&'l .c u III ~ [~ .. ol'\. '~ ~ ::> ~ -c ClJ ~ .<:: ::> () -c (J) J!! E () e (J) LL ~ .! :g ~ <l: Cl ~I 818 Attachment 3 To Report PSD-047-09 l . r.-:-:;:' -.. -.' -0--. ~I:;:;:-::: > -. . J'"/ J" . ,~.'~' i,/, . . "::" ' :':.' . ".., . '. . r' , , I I WL-' '_U 1 I i , I I , . I t I~ -~'~I , I , I J 'C I I I . I I { t .6b -1 " l' -~ .ff 9.00m -,,J'- Maximum Garage Width on 9m Lot Frontage 819 Attacnrnem 4 To Report PSD-047-09 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2'009- being a by-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle ~ , I I I , , WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle to implement ZBA2008-0004; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacls as follows: 1, By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: a) By deleling from Section 2, thereof, the following definilion as follows: "TRANSPORT OR CARTAGE DEPOT Shall mean a building or struclure or 101 where Iran sport vehicles are kept for hire, rented or leased, or stored or parked for remuneration, or from which transport vehicles are dispatched for hire as common carriers and may include a warehouse, but shall not include any other use or activity otherwise defined or classified in Ihis By,law." b) By deleting Sections 13A,53 f ii), 13A,57 e, ii), 13A.58 f ii), 13A,61 f ii) and replacing them as follows: ii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 40% of the width of the lot frontage, 2, Schedule "1" 10 By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extraclive Industrial (M3)" 10 "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Prolection (EP)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A-1" hereto, 3, Schedule "12" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A-2" hereh 4, Schedule "1" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illuslrated on the attached Schedule "A-3" hereto, 5, Schedule "1" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Induslrial (M3)" to "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A-4" hereh 6. Schedule "2" to By,law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illuslraled on the attached Schedule "A-5" hereto, 7, Schedule "2" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing Ihe zone designation from: 820 "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricultural Exception (A-1)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)"; "Agricultural Exception (A-1rto ':Environmental Protecti~n (EP)"; and "Environmental Protection (EP)" to "Agricultural Exception (A-1)"; as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A6" hereto,. 8, Schedule "2" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" 10 "Agricullural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A-T' hereto, g. Schedule "2" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricullural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)", as illustraled on the attached Schedule "A-8" herelo, 10, Schedule "2" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designalion from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricultural Exception (A-1)" and ."Environmenlal Prolection (EP)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A-9" hereto. 11, Schedule ."2" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designalion from: "Extractive Induslrial (M3)" 10 "Agricullural (A)" as iIIuslrated on the attached Schedule "A-10" hereh 12. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law, 13, By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: a) By deleting Schedules 1 through 19 and replacing Ihem with Schedules through 19 on the attached Schedule "B" hereto; and b) By adding Schedules 20 and 21 on the attached Schedule "B" hereto, 14. Schedule "B" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law, 15, This By-law shall come into' effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Sections 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a firsl time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2009 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 821 I This is Schedule "A-1" to By-law 2009-- , I passed this day of , 2009 A.D. J/ I ~ ~ :::F: ~ ~ ~~ '\.V\ ~ ~X\. ~ ~ \~.\(\ ~~~ ~ \ :\ 0:~. ~ LOT 33..J Y v> ~ v m5~~ ~ AX\X\~ tu ~~.X\ ~~ ~~ <i ~~p;s~ ~ "".\-\' \j; ~ ~ ~ ~>",,< ~ Q. , o ~~ Z ~:~' => :..*..~ ....,..~-;:; ~~~~~ :""I.......~...~ ~.:...'':..-:... CONCESSION ROAD 10 LOT 31 Q) Z O! - en en w u ~ (.) ii . ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" I:>6<><l Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" ld Zoning To Remain "A" ['"-~ .~~;;: Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk =.J IV "'~€ uP I~ { h h I $ I- M -6:lilCESS{ONIIROAO ,. I M m ~ N C i!' . . ~ N C . '" M ~ I' 0 ~ N f.- 0 z 3 . S <( 0 c 0 I- ~ ti c '" ~ . 0 i z " ~ "' "' - ~ z ~ " ~ ~ 0 L . ~ z ~ 0 ;: "' '" g OJ u: ~ z ~ c W . . 'I DARLINGTON I ~ 5 In n h c " I . CO~cE' IONIJ"bA~ 9 822 This is Schedule IA_2" to By-law 2009- , passed this day of ,2009 A.D, BOUNDARY ROAD ~ LOl 18 ~ LOT 17 ~ ';n 0 2. ..... ~); ~ "'02 z i 0 - z- en 0 en (5 ~ ~ w (J >?\:0( ~ Z ~~ 0 ~ (J v' ? P \ ~'--- ), PACIFIC ~ RAILWAY CANADIAN \ - \ h<'x><I Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk r- ~- ~ \ :i \\ \ I "" V ~;D 11 ~s:: ~ D\\ J \,,3~ / ~\- ~'(~ \\" \~\ -, \\ II \ \~ "" " \ CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY I 7 if I I - - Ii; ':l. ~ i \\ \t 'i b I II IV If'~~ s = BURKETON li CONC~ION ROAD 10 823 I. This is Schedule "A-3" to By-law 2009- I passed this day of ,2009 A.D. , LOT 29 ~....~:~~:c:::}.~~. :-5:'''''N'"",.,~...~-............ ~~......:'C"~~................,""........",..... ~....~~.. ~~....'"".......~. , ....~~.:.........~~ .,,~-~.*...-....,...... ~~''''~.''-.~''''t''j'' ~;'''''''''''~'' ~.:~-::...........:... ~ ~'~~?::;; a; ;::: 8 % % ;;: ;;: -.:t r--- 0 Z <( 0 0 a:: - w en u (IJ i= W a:: ::> U 0 Z u 0 u I " / PEBBLESTONE ROAD I ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" fx':xx:1 Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" t;-~-~~ Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie. M.unlclpal Clerk 824 T '117-1 L =~~ 77, Q Q - 1 --= 13 Q .~~ or " '" 0 Lr- ~ ~ >- ----j---..; ~ IF "l--l " ~I\~ IE >- or " ~ II ,'V II 1 8 =---l A-lW PEBBLE STONE ROAD 7/ llIDJ 1/ I t:=t T I I1r -,/f-- IDARLlNGTON b-----r . Q IV 13 "'~~ or " " g " z " or L l= I This is Schedule "A-4" By-law 2009- I I to , I passed this day of 2009 A.D. I , I , , ,I - ...~~~~"'....~~... ~~,"""...~$~~ - $.:'~"::""::'~~~-~~'~. .,,,",:;~~.:;-~- . ...,", ...<'....:00........""...-.....""" - ;":',::: ~~... ~-.~7:...~~~'" _,'_c_ ........ < .......... ..:;- -, ~...'......'.....~:!:'...........-.:" "'...~ l--- j%f/!;,;;';j;}:~;~~ M l--- ....j..;)? :::: lX!;!} ,:':"': ?;7 ~ - ~ ~ 0 z ~ .0: 0 0 - 0:: CfJ w CfJ "i< :;:: ...J w /T?? ~ 0 z 0 ::J tv 0:: ~ w~~ .... i ~ 8 i tJ [Ii LOT 24 ie', LOT 22 'ie"~"~,> \ Ii " r-- NASH ROAD 0- \ I I f-- l--- 1-- f-- ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" l~>~,:,:jd Zoning To Remain "A" f'>66<I Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" ~:-if.t,f~ Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy. Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk >-- >-- 0 r ~ r f- >-- w L " " 0- 15! \1 "" c q ~ >-- >- 0 "" i1 a: '-- a: ~ i=- '" . w " ~ w ~ ~ ~ 0 0 " z 0 z ih ii! l== " "" :r w - ~ .. "" = " NASH ROAD CI -l ;:: ~ I-- l Jl1~ b-, E= DARLlNGTONl: fI E::: ,I--- d --. ~ .1 ZBA 2006-0004 825 This is Schedule "A-S" to By-law 2009- passed this day of , 2009 A.D. , JI; "'~e s co 0 0 Z <C <C 0 0 0 - tr tr U) f- 0 U) tr tr W 0 "- ~ u (f) (f) z 0 w :;; --' 0 u --, LOT 33 ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" t>66<1 Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" F;~~J Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor t;: o D- O> o " Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk CARLIN TON CON RD. 8 SKELDtNG ROAD o Cl lr "' "' a o Cl lr W Z ::; Z " o w '" lr S " Z o ~ " z ::; lr Cl o ~ t; w "' CLARKE RK CON 551 N ROAD ZBA 2008-0004 A-5 826 This is Schedule "A-6" to By-law 2009- passed this day of ,2009 A.D. LOT 28 LOT 271 o <i o '" t; Ul <Xl CONCESSION ROAD 7 IV w~e s ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A.1" ~-,--,,---,'-',J Zoning Change From "EP" To "A-1" E:8ZI Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" r::::;;::;~;:~ Zoning To Remain "A-1" ~ Zoning Change From "A-1" To "EP" tfCo?f'jZoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk ~ ~ ~ 51 i . l;; ~ ROAD 7 A 2008-0004 -1 r-- z o CJ) CJ) W (J Z o (J ~ ~ ~ z o 8 827 I I I This is Schedule "A-7" to By-law 2009- , I passed this day of , 2009 A.D. I u - I I I I CONCESSION 1 ROAD 3 Ie LOT 17 LOT 16~ LOT 15 II ~ \c;"(\);l IV 1 RX;X~y W~k: ~t'~-~ '" , K0 ~ s ~ ~~~2s~",- "C c: -< ~ P\~ ~ " '<"I ~ 2 01 '\ \\~~ 0 -' z -<, OJ c: 0 0::' ~~-\ " I " , ~ - (/)1 en ;:::; ~-\I " 21 lD en (31 l!l w 0::, c: U Oi '" :::;, ~ Z I x\. .Q 0 I 0;:X~-\ <( u I "C -'(vV\. V '" i~~ ~ v-,\: 0 0:: ~ V "C " K c: " 0. '\V\. I- 0 ~ c: 1 :J ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" l>66<l Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk I I- p- eON ESSION ROAD 3 r- 1:0 ~ - ~ ~Anl- o ~ t2]1n o 0: [ (!) ~ [tr t t~ [ ( fil o < o 0: Z i2 w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Ih CLARKE r ~ ( w ~ ~ ;; z i2 ;: w ~ h 0- M o ii! ~ ~ o " -'>-li' I~ I 828 ,----- , I This is Schedule "A-8" to By-law 2009- , I passed this day of , 2009 A.D. , LOT 17 LOT'6 LOT 15 ~~ \( IV \-~~ , W~Jj; t8;~~ v' V S "' ~ C '0 C N <( ... ~ ~ <n Z 0 ~~~ (5 <( -' 0 0 '\ Y\X\ Y\. c - n:: :/ ~~~~ OJ en OJ ~Y\XW ~ en (/) Y\Y\ OJ w z ~~ <ll <( '(,) Cl OJ ~:\~ u n:: c Z 0 '" 0 :2 %~ ~ U ~~ <i '0 'l: -,\y '" 0 ~ n:: '0 ~ ,.) OJ Y c OJ p.(\X\ lK':... a. 0 K~ ~ c p.(\ ~ (\ :::J """ fr . DURHAM HIGHWAY 2 I , ( ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" l:>6<><I Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ~ f-J ;=; ~ [ I CON ESSION ROAD 3 r- '~ :-'- ~ ~a~J ~ r;~ 8 " [ w t ~ ~ ~ ~I 1 \- c < o " z o >- w ~ <L g [j n o " '" z .. c < fi1 c W a: w ~ ~ :> z o ~ ~ o :> CLARKE i [ YI I 1 M 829 l ~Ii This is Schedule "A-9" to By-law 2009- passed this day of ,2009 A.D. .~. LOT 16 o <{ o 0:: (fJ z <{ (9 0:: o ::;; IV W~l!; s DURHAM , ----r-- LOT 14 "' ~ u c <{ N ... '" 0 0 z <{ -' 0 c 0 0:: . . Q) - ~~.~.:'" Q) en ..i,.~~-" - ~ z .......~...."" Q) (/) 0 ....."'~~ m W f- .::~::~~. w . -.-~ ......~.... Q) u -' ~~~~.: " a. :-......~;:.., C Z ;::: ~*.:'" '" (....~:~~:: ~ 0 (/) ;~;:..:~. <( (,) ....: "". HIGHWAY 2 ~~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A-1" ~~;,,'''::J Zoning To Remain "A-1" k><>OI Zoning Change From "M3" To "EP" .1::) Zoning To Remain "A" ~1:'::;1:'.:'4 Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor CON $SION ROAD 3 " < w '" 0: ~ o " CLARKE Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk < 0 0 < " 0 0: < 0 Z 0: ~ " w ~ W .. 0: ;0 '" 830 ,- - I I This is Schedule "A-10" to By-law 2009- , I ! passed this day of 2009 A.D, ! 1 J . n LOT 14 LOT 13 Cl cr o~ tr---- ~~~~=;~,I I HIGHWA y 2 "" I '" -':0:;:;:.-.. ~ IV !Lit/Si/t "C W~Ji; - - c . <( ... C') ~ ~ -5 8 "C C ..J <( N C ~ ~ Q) ! '" Q) " ~ ..J I Q) ,,' c Z lil Q) l'l Q) 0 ~ c Q) ~I 111 XU lil ~ l'l <( c " X 111 W ,- ~ u I "C 1'-'" I 111 J 0 ~- z cr .f::;.., <( i:';< Vii "C 0 "C i...~ 111 Q) ...~. 0 u I c ~~~ cr Q) 0. ~~-:~ "C 0 l"<."".... Q) C ~~ c ::J ...............~ 'i, ~ I :..~~ ,~.....~ 0 "'::.:-~ j ii] c ~~~ ::J ';~:'-"'. ". II HIGHWAY OF HEROES HIGHWAY 401 I W~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" k:>jZoning To Remain "A" ~'"-@..~,j Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy. Mayor Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk ~I ~ . go ~ ~,-4 !iF ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 0 hT r In Ii! I-' ~- LUlL '" l"~' ~ ~ ~ 1h IT . !ip- - J~ z . Iii! ~ ;: "' fi' ~ Z Inl.- I ri l "' )'" i5 , / I ]( ~J g I I p= - . ~ f. 1 In . ~SSION ~ . CON ROAD 1 r Z CLARKE \. u ~. I h L , I. " . . ... BA 2008-0004 A-loll. 831 Attachment 4 To Report PSD-047-09 Schedule '8' Schedule B 832 ,----------------1-- I Schedule '12'1 ., I (Burketon) L __ I , I I I , 1 , I I Schedule '19' ,-:I (Enfield) Schedule'lE' (Darlington) ,-- ....' ( REGIONAL ROAD 3 Schedule '9' I r (Ennlskillen) ~ I. ! '-1 Schedule '8" (Solina) ,__r Schedule'le' ~""'(Darlington) ., - I t1 Schedule '6' (Mitchell Comers) TAUNTON w .__,~c I 1"<3 1-, g" , u 1"'"--1 ... DURHAM HIGHWAY 2 J I Schedule '18' (Maple Grove) , Schedule '4' ~)- , Schedule 'lA' ! (Darlington) ------, , HIGHWAY 401 I , L....._.. ,~ ---_ I ....., l --- ~'- ...........,.,- Schedule '1' (Darlington) Schedule '7' ~ (Hampton) { "1 I , ROAD REGIONAL ROAD 20 Schedule 'IF' !1q (Darlington) L. Schedule '11' (Haydon) Schedule '10' (Darlington) iO o < 1il ~ < % o (j w " " " o % >- W W " In ~ ---'W -----, "l I , 1;. 1., Schedule '3' ...........1 (Bowmanvllle) I I Schedule 'lB'! (Darlington) ! , I I , , l__-J I /---'f--~-'J.~"'-- , - J.., \.. ( '" ... CORPORATION of the MUNICIPAUTY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of NewCastle) (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON) THIS IS SCHEDULE '1' TO BY.LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 WaJ~ ~~ O...IIIClWlD.....YDR 06'UTYCl.f.RK . I , I I . I , , I I I , I , I I I , . I , I , I I I , I , Schedule "20" ilmot Creek) -- , ~" 833 lot 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 . rr IA l0 : '- I / J ~ ~ I~~ g : A-' LJ' II .~I A.;\ \ I · . "'~K P+~~A i"n\~ . c : A I : : ~ /: : : : I j(: I :A-1 rRE-7 : I I I I I I (I'J : I A: : I ~ : VI. Nc: -.: I /,y , ....., ~ , 0 ~ I MJ', : M3 I A U //// I ~ I A " A' A'" :iEPl. I I I I ' 7/' ~ I: : R~~~ J'm' A 'WB!j: 4",",c!C;EPI ,I "'" A.76 ht"'" : {f~~ J -/..'l/j ~ ~ ~ c::: , '7: l!Y: _-= ' ""."" R ~ I ~P 'A... JA:taJ 11<9"" n ~ ~<'''' , ,- ~ A : IfBi' h' 'i",,,;;Je Grove ~ I I I I~ F7:7; Y/h A I : I :A ~ RE R ~//; : r,J" r.ffi. II ~: >---, l.... ~ BLOOR~TREET ...,.-. I I I IA-32I' ~ 1fRC:jf I I I ~. R !~ ':A 'c( " , " , , , , , I I: I , , rt '''I , ~ '\C\ : : ,~' / ~I~l" ! )E~ E~ ~A '"\.':Q1 : '\\... ::: ~ ,H1GH~Y401 .~ (HI""~: :\1/ ;~ I I 1 ~ ~(H)M2 : A; :1 i : I I I I~ I I I I I .............- I). I I I~ ~ ~ r- I I "'" '" - : "'-T- ': :,A: ......... 1..~1 I ep : T : : , , ' , ~ i;;; ~I ] A4' ~: ' IA~: _ : r I I ~ , / - R~r~ I A ~" ' b ' EP A-8 .b -" EP ___ -: R"rp. EP ~cl dr ~, I~ ---%1" I I~EP ,,_ ~ ~ .Dl~: ~ ' m ~~~E?7 : i'A " RE A I ~':AJl RE : z .c : I //// /// //// :;-:/~/ Schedule '4' /(Coulii~) /// 1// -/// -///: I~ : A~'A /// /// V// //// ~~ , ( EP I '= \ >J-, , H ~A-77 H A-771 ~ . @~ ~ //// ~ """"" ~ ///: Lake Ontario IV AI, January 2009 300 eoo 1,200 ...... - - - ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' . ------ ARTERIAl. ROAD TYPE '8' EP '~ll I I 20 19 18 17 16 v: NASH ROAD I ~ -//..'l ///1 '" c o . ~ c o U ../~ c 0 !'I' OS; in 0 ;:~ s c ~;1i~~' 0 U ;ll~E ~~ .~:~ c e "- c .I! e .. ~ c 0 in . S c 0 U ~ Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule lA (Darlington) ; lC .! lA = c'S Lot 20 19 18 15 14 13 11 10 7 4 . 0 " ~ " < .. a z < a " a A " 0 rr " .~ " ~ " u " 8 EP A , 'A.1 I , , , '" " o '0; o ~ " o U A~1 A E , A-1 N " a '0; o ~ " o U -1 , , , , A-1 N . ~ c; 0:: .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " e u. " . ~ e ell " o 'i ~ c a U ~ , :A Lake Ontario tv A1 o January 2009 300 eoo 1,.200 ...... ___ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of C1arington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule lB (Darlington) 10 ~ 18 ~ 835 Lot 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 26 I I , I ~ , I , , I I iJ 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 Y : \.. \I~ H I A ~~ I A-1 I : , I \ , ~!l ) IIEP , I , , 1/ I ~G I 16 17 , , , , , < Q , . , 0 , " <I I Z 0 I a I w " A~1 , , , 16 ,...-, H, ~ 1 'I: I , I , I I I~ \. . I 11 Q '0 , , I , , , , :() i~l rl A-1: E I I r I I I I I I , I I 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 l.....ll ~ A-1: I ///1 ~ : i,: A.57 ,& t\l/ i A I \ VE&r~' , ,(~j. .~ : : ~i\~~ A~1: : I , I , I , I I : ) I , , I , , I I I lRD' I I I I A~1 I , I I I I I I 1 I 1 I , '<0 '0 Q A:'~ 'B '5 o I A-14 I I I I , E I , )1 , ~).. I . I A-1 '~ 1 ~, , A- 1 i JI : b I : ;{; Ii 1 I~ JEji: ~ : I I I I I I I , , , , '\J i II A-1 " i 'I 1 : r- I ... ~ ,.( TAUNToN RD : & i\1 B, ~\VA~1 '" ~ ~ EP. r.?l : ~ ,~": <1:1, I :::::4See V RC 1 "" Schedule',;;;: ~ ~: ~(..,itChe/~~ A ,: rL.-Corners)-' I!; , A' ~H) A ' RH : /" ,_ :/EP : A-4 ~ f- ~i ~ IiiCJ '~ Ar-R~' - A i) ~ : :=: ' EP A-8 j >'(EP ~ :Jlt"';: P ~I dr:- __ Id" ~ -+%IA E .~ I~~~:\\J -~r ~ ~.9 '""=: ;;: '" I n rl RE ~I C II I ~ I I ~E A ' 1 , ~ s!f;Zt;e '4' I~) 83 I ~ ~:i s:r% r~ ~ vSditNIUle]; I 0 -:A ~~~~~ A: I ~ 'l C3 I ~ '-- EP~: : AI/:~ EP : I I (: :i; ~ : ':----' ~II A, :.~ A,-1 ), '~.. J ~,P \ :8 , / '" A-~ ,\; 1 @., ~~ P ! v ~ _~_ ___: \ ~ K----:f : ~ EJI A J5 S::/ :A-1~ ~ 11 I I c: I I ~ 'A' , · I I I ........ ~ ~EPC: : /'~ 5 o ~ A! , ~ , ~ I ~ A-1 j REGIO 1 , , , I A~1 , I I I I I 1: Ii I ~I I I~! , ' A-t If!:1 I , , , : V\- g I I << A:IEI" ~ ~! ~'>' ~ R <</" ;; ,~ ~ : fA 'T"" ~76 W ~ I '^" 1 ' I ., I M3 A A ~ /,, , J:~~I~ L..l~ NASH ~ ~ ~ Cj EP ~ ~LSff4 ~ ~ c h, j .J'\ ~})jiJJ ~ '~~iRCl. \~p) ~o I N ~o Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule lC (Darlington) ; IE ! 1e 9 S 1A January 2009 300 8O'J 1.200 ...... - - - ARTERIA.L ROAD TYPE .,.,. ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Lot 20 0://: ) .\'- r-' , IEP : 19 18 17 Ii II , , ~ 0 , < 0 " 16 15 14 13 12 11 , ~ , 0 , a , - ~ \f ' /" ;< :A-1: f ~~A' : I , I , ' \~ ( , , , A~1 , , , E , I) : , , /:~ ( A , A: , - , A-14 ~\ I~~ '- E4 , , :A , , :\' ' :" ;; A-1 I : : ~~~ : A :') : : ~~.' ~/flr~~ _ f.chedule 7/ A'~' ' :A ~~j:j~;j:~: lEP_~: : : ~~(//, I REGIO ALROA~42 : ~-3 -r::::.. EP ~'r;;),p' : .... A: A-1', , All: ~ : i/ AU'i~' , ~ 1/ ~'A-1 ~ : y;.1 A-I . : i. ( ~A i;;.~n \"'~. A ~. .: ViA-1 ~ I~: ~.58 A C A-8 A I I I_ I I I I , , , ' --' : M3 RC~1 , A' , , , , '>: /', NASH ROAD I A EP R , EFl , 10 9 5 4 8 7 6 3 2 \Cr) A-1 I \:( A-1 (:~~~~ I~j~ " ;_ P:f:.see :/'//, v '= Scht!dui~;>~o' ~ :.~~'~ : ~:\ : ~ ~ , , , , , , , . I/~ :~ : : (~~ )IT II \\ I : : \~~: I~. : 1\(/, , , , , : ,A-1 , , , : <:: :A A-1 I :( ~~ r' ~E~J: ~ A 1 i :~... ,g, ~': ' : E: ~ \ : : A' : A-8 ~~ . ',~ (T^UNTON RbAD), A--"""" ~ ~ ( ~i ! i A: \~ : 'I M3 I\. I , , , j' , , , , A~1: -z: M3 EP ,/'P ' ftl :/-\- :~ ~/~ lJ iA : '\ r /:,: : (f, , 1---' , I , ~ , 0 : A ~ , w , ~ , 0 , - ~ I IRr. ffi m ~ ~ ~ : , , , :,-J , , , , , 'A , , , , , , , , , , , , I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I , , ~ \ ~ rl:\ A~ I ~/~ 5chifidule''3' nJ . , , A-1 , , , , , tv A, January 2009 300 600 1,200 -- ___ ARTERtAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' I Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 10 (Darlington) A: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , A-1 , , , , , 'A , , , , N , . , 0 < , 0 , " , <I , z 0 , a , w , " , , , , , , A , , , , , , , A~1 ~'q l\', \;' 1 /1 , ~ ): 1F u 10 ~ ... 18 837 ... c o ;;; . ID " " " 1'(: 10 C o _.~ B c o " ~ "' c o -"i& B c o " .. c o ;;; o B c o " ~ ~ ~ B c o " '" c o ;;; o B 8 lot 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 i~ I ,~-r !.I CP~~+~___ : i -38 -~ ------ I ------ 1 1 : A M3 I /~' L-. I I I I A~1 I I I I I I I ~{i I I - A' I i:'~ :~: 1 ~ I : : - I , " J1 I fp;::j , EP I I A-1 I:), ,~ , , , , 7q: J ,EP J:: tJ ~:_~:~ 'I'" 1 1 , , , , , , , r4-1 I ' I , I ' 'A-1: , I I I I , I , I ' : : () :'~lo/ A-1: : : I t\i :p !J , , , , , A. :rt i/e./i I I( : , I , ''\.' ' I ,~ ~ ~ ~ :i I ~ : a 1 '\\~: ~~ : \ E~ V , ~ F tv A1 o January 2009 300 600 1,200 ""'" A~1 , I : (~p 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 1 -............1 I I I ~ I I 1 --~.~CPR : 'Q' ~- " ' .~ 1 1 1 ~~ ) - ' : ..IT: ;17- :- ~ I , A-1 , I I A-1 , ~ '// , ~ : A.57 I'E~ , I '/ I : /~j;;;, ; '~~7/:t;~ ~:~ <;= , ~~ , J , I , , , , : J : - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Jj A~1 , , , I I I I I I I I I , , , A-1 21 20 19 ~ ~\ i\ I , ~: , , , , I A-1 I HR ,See Schedule '9' (En,;is~~ ~ Ar1 , I , I I I , I , , , , I ~ 18 17 16 M3 J :e c I 0 , I . , M3 ~ , c , I 0 0 , , , , , I , I , , I :) I , '" I c I , 0 , '. I w I B , I C I I 8 I I I I ~ ( , , , , '" , c 0 A~1 . . B I C I 0 , 0 :M I, ; , I , I { ... c 0 . ~ . 0 B < c ~ 0 0 " < z 0 I " , ~ ~ I , , , , , '" I C Ai ~ t 8 ~ , A-14 , ,- E( , , 'I: : ~[l: AJ 1 : g i V~'7' IN. iJi : 'm~I(}8 Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule IE (Darlington) ; Scugog ~ 1E ~ IS lC Lot 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ;: 0 0 " if, , w u " 0 0 , U , , A-7 , , , , , --r-------~---T--- -------- , , , I ':A , , , " , , " , ' , , , ' , , '\ : A , , , , '" , , , , 0 , , 0 , ' , " '~ ' , , ' , . , : [~ ' , ~ , , 0 , ' , , 8 I' : ' , , , , M314 , , , RECSIONAL R AD 20 , 'A M3 :A-1 , , , , , A: ~ 0 , 0 '. A~1 . m u 0 , A-1 0 , A-1 u EP HRH , , , '".~ EP" Schedule:9' , (Ei.niSkillen) , , , , , , , A A-1 ... 0 0 '. . ~ ~ 0 c 8 <l ~ ~ z 0 " w ~ A.1 , A' , , , , , , , , "' , , 0 , , A 0 , , , 'in , A: , . ~ , , 0 , , 0 , , u A.14 , A-1 , , , , , 'A , , , , , , A1 , '" ~-1 0 0 " !l 0 0 u AI Municipality of Clarington Scugog A January 2009 Zoning By-Law 84-63 w iF w ___ ARTERIAL ROAD TYf'E 'A' .. N 0 "'" 600 ',200 Schedule iF (Darlington) 1D ...... ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' I- i: I I , y Schedule '2E' (Clarke) ( f"'~ l' fSChedUle '14' \. _ (leskard) ,I r Schedule 'is' ,t'".~(Kirby) .u I I I I TAUNTON ROAD l/ 1 Schedule '13' J (Orono) " Schedule '2C' ,,<r , I (€Iarke) ~, ~ " <; M >- ~ I " I i ;' ----- .. - ------- Schedule '2F' (Clarke) REGIONAL ROAD 9 Schedule '16' ( (Kendal) -j , ~U!. 's.L" ~~~ca.lI. Y "\ Vill,gel) \) Schedule '20' (Wilmot Creek) ,---- -.-...... SctleCliilif'2A' L,.r- ---''', (Clarke)~ ...~... f ...................., I '-I.. "" ......................- ~- f --"""'.......... -, " ---, -' ................-........ Schedule '21' (Brownsvil~.ll I Schedule '2' (Clarke) Schedule '20' I (Clarke) ro co <( o 0: ~ <( z co " W 0: DURHAM HI ..r -~ GHWA'Y2 /Schedule'1T --(NewkinVllle) I HIGHWAY 401 ~ ~~~ . i I I I I , I I I Schedule '28' (Clarke) CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner TONn of Newcastte) (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS 'S SCHEDULE '2' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 r;8IJ~ ~w.- O.I.RICIWlD.""YOR DEFUTYCl.ERJ\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I 840 , ) ~ l~ ': .', A-a ~~ I I : ~,~ , :A, / '.> ' : ~ :__ ~//: A--8 RE , (r /'" EP , ~ ' (' l~, :l\.. se:,~ , ~ ~ Schedule '2J' I I I I : : A-1 : (TSTOWnSVilleJ I A 0 P I DURHAM HIGHW~Y 2 ~ 1-: S%1;jfe;,S: ", :(////// . '/. ':":~ I I .PA ~In..~) .:: ~. ~.r;;.; ~~ ~ .~'~A-1 ~~ .~~ -. . ~.. Rsl A >-- ~ Lot 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 A~\" ~~ C6 0 _~: , 1 : ~ If"- ;) I ~ I ,:;::: I ~ .. rc;; , : iJ A-1 U1 'Jr E~; xr Ji :A-1 :, R~~~ :;"'".,;:;J-/ , --': ~.., : _ A-1 : -I .IC6~ I : : c6-fiL i 1C4l : A-1 : ~ ~ /) " '~ ~f;I(L_ <C.: r,;/ ..,':;. ~ ,~ Trr ~ ~ ~ ': ': ( 'A-1 C4.1 i : : '><, 0, : 1}J %1 ~ A-1, ,A~1 ,- I I I It.'l>' I I ,.l.~ _~D~' , : ",G""" V~H~ I II ;::', 1iiC-'l~ .= ~ A //// ~ HIGHW~Y 401 JA-W U ' I A-1 - t; ~ I ~jYfr::. (Wi1mt1t cme~ Lake Ontario I , ,';' , I I , ~' :, /',:'" E~ I R9,. ! A. I~YIoi, ,\~. ';-A I : c( I : ' .I"": -- I I, ~ : \ , , ' :A .-J I : A..7 ':A , ' I I 27 26 25 24 23 22 A-1 21 20 19 :A , I , IA-1: I , : A-1 E , I , , , , , I " , I I , , , I I I , _~I I I EP' I , I I I I I A-11 , I I I , 18 17 16 I , I , I, A: , , I ~n: ; -lL~r" RC' I I : , ' HIG";'AY 401 r - (;6-n I : A. I I ~rf " A I , I I I I I , I ~ ~ ~ i ~ . c~ I I A I I I I , :'" I g w w ~ c o , <J , I I , I I I I E , I I. ~ ..... v---\. , A I I I I I I I I E , , f!,. I I ~ M3 '" =:J~ c 8 M3 M " , I I I I A~1 //"'" I ;... .~ a , II ~:;oo"l- A : I~E.~ _ w I ~'1 ! , " I , I :A c : ~ c I , I e , A CD 1 c I 0 I ~ ,,"-- ~ I 8 -- fit A o Janual)' 2009 300 60J 1,2(1) -- _ _ _ AAreR\AL ROAD TYPE 'A' ___ _ AATERIAL ROAD 1'Yf'E '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 2A (Clarke) . 2C ~ 2Al!l 0'+1 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 A A-1 ~ o o '. . ~ o o U A '" o o '. 1; o o U , , , , , , , , A-1 '" o o '. . ~ o o U 6- :A HIGHWAY 401 , , , , , :A , , , , , , , 'A o o '. . ~ o o U A1 o e lL ~ e OJ o o '. 1l o o U A1 Lake Ontario A E AI A January 2009 300 600 1,200 -- - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 2B (Clarke) 2D ~ 28 l o :z: LoI35 34 33 31 30 2ll 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 ~ A.7 "- I 0 0 I '0 A-7 . . A-1 E 0 A-1 c 0 I lJ --------.-- tG NARPSKA ROAD) REGIONAL RQlAD 9 I I I I I I ~ I ~ I <D ~ I 0 0 I '. A z I I . " , . u , I 0 0 , lJ I I , A:-1 N . o ~ o << " ~ z o " w << ~ o o '. . ~ o o lJ I , , I A-1 I I A-1 .. o o '. . ~ o o lJ .. I I , I I I I , , I , .4-1 , I I I , I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ z 0 IV AI January 2009 0 300 000 ,,.. -- , , I A~1 I , I I :A I I '" o o '," ~ o o lJ _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD n'PE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 2C (Clarke) Q ... 2E 2C 2A Q N Lot20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 A A (GANA SJVl. RQ '-------- - , , , , , , , , , I , , A-1 I , , I A~1 :A , , A: I I , I A-1' , I , A-7 /ll-7 --i---~-~~~~~~;D;--'-- , , , I I , IA_1i tv )j Janua/y 2009 o ~-1 ~ o < o ~ ~ < z o B w ~ , A~1 , , A: A. , , , A A A M3 ~ 300 600 1.200 "- - - - ARTERIAL ROAD lYPE 'II' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-law 84-63 Schedule 20 (Clarke) ~ 2F 2D 28 ~ c o 'w . B c o U '" o o '. . B c o U '" c o '. . B c o U ., c o 'w . B c o U '" c o '. ~ c o t) '" c o .~ c 8 I o :c Lot 35 34 33 32 31 30 2ll 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 REGIONAL ROAD 20 ,..- , ~ , , c A M3 , 0 M3 ';;; " 0 u c 0 , u , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0> , , c A-21 , g , , " . fJI. , 8 , c , 0 , u , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , --I---'----------~---- T- , , , , M3 , , A' 'I , '" c ,2 A', A-1: ~ 8 c 0 U , , , A , IJl , , , , .. , c 0 -1 , ';;; , . 8 , A.7 c ~~ , 8 , , , , , , , 1+-7 A-1 A~1 , , , , ----~-------_. (0 RAS ROAD) REGIONALR A09 , , , , , , ~ , . M '" i c 0 -;;; A . . '" B " c 8 , A-1 , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ , A-1 , A' , "' c o .,. . B A C 8 tv A Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 2E (Clarke) January 2009 300 600 1,200 ....... _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIA.L ROAO TYPE '6' o Manvers ~ 2E ~ 2C 840 . Lot 20 19 18 i I . I I , I , 1 , , , ---1------ , , , , , , A: , , , , , , , , , , , rJ[: , , , A' , , , , A-7 ------- ------------- RE IONAl ROAD 9 , I , , , , , , , , I I I I I I A:-1 I I I I I I I I I I , , I , I I I I I I I I I I tv JJ January 2009 300 eoo 1.200 ...... l1li3 , , , A-7 17 16 15 , , , , , , , , I I I , I , I I I I , , ,-------- 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 A - I-- I , , , , " C o in o ~ c o () A , , , , , , I , I , I , - -I, -- 01 C o 'in o ~ c o () , , .-------- A , , , I I , A: I I ---,------ '" C o 'in o ~ c o () EP "" C o 'in B is () , , , A I I , I , I , , I I I I I , I , :A I A~1 I , , I , , , A-1 , I I , I I I I <0 C o 'in o ~ c 8 , , I A: , , I , '" c g ~ ~ c o () E A, ~ ~ ~ J < Z o g " , , , , , A~1 - - - ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'S' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 2F (Clarke) Manversx. l!l 2F 0 20 :z: I I , I I , , I ,---=r---'--- I Schedule '3G' I j I " I (Bowmanville) I I I I , I I " ~ " '" z w w '" " ------, , I I J I I ( , ~ "'~ ~'" ;< ~ "'0 at"" t5~ Schedule '3B' ~ 0- (BowmcM~) ~"""'-""-----lT 1''' n Schedule '3C' ! __(BO.wI!1!~ville) I ......_, I -..... Schedule '3' (Bowmanville) , I , I I I , I , I ,.. ......-'1 1\ V "" , \ \\,..'\ I \ ' , , ,J ~- Schedule '3A' (Bowmanville) Schedule '31' (Boi,jina nville ) '~i i .~ , ~ ........ '" ~ w " -...... -...... -...... , Schedule '3F' (Bowmimville) o ~ o '" '" m " 5 , , I CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON (Fonner Town at Newcastle) BOWMANVILLE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON) THIS IS SCHEDULE '3' TO BY.LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 f/fiJ~ g,aRlCMllO.....'tOR ~W_ DEPUlYCl.Efa< 847 Lot 17 (H)M' I A I I I I --"" II " ~ I ---- "- ---- II c I! m ~ e I II '" M3-2 c EP 0 '. ~ II . il ~ I c 0 II t) II II I II ! il I I; II M3.1 I] EP Ii 'I I il I II II II , I ~ II I M3-' II il II I II I II II I II II I II II I Ii I II I II i I I, Lake Ontario , I i . I i I Lake Ontario I i AI Municipality of Clarington 3D I A1 January 2009 Zoning By-Law 84-63 c 3A IIlI - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' PI '" , '" '" '" Schedule 3A (Bowmanville) ",,- ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' EP Lot 12 Lol11 i t "., I EP i , EP co M2 -='-~-=----- ----- ---. ---.:-..:-..._- ..._--,.,.....-.:- : I EP M3-1 M2 I Ml ".. Ep.11 II e M3-3 e "- 0 l! I, e I' A I "' ~ 0 II 0 '0 II . ~ I ~ 0 II 8 EP A II II II II II RS I EP ., M3-1 i , Lake Ontario '00 "" .. ....... _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAl. ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 3B (Bowmanville) 3E ~ 38 ~ tv A, January 2009 tl4::l EP , . o M2 M1 At Ai ............. M1 ....... ........ ........,,:-..... ........ -::--..... ~"'''' .....:-........... ...... Lot 9 Lol8 M2 jl f' . I, ~,' ~i F A 1 SEACH 1'0,0,0 Lot 7 Lot 6 , , I " , , , , -- --- .~--- I I I I 1 I I A-1 I M2 A-1 (H)Ml ...... I .......:-...... I I ....~.... .....-=-..... ~~===..._ I -_=!!lII~ J 1IIi...=:==~ I 1 (H)M2 M1 UKEROAD il Ml 1 (H)M1 I I I I I A Lake Ontario January 2009 '" "" '" ""'" - - - ARTERIAL ROAD lYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 3C (Bowmanville) 3F ~ 3C:!l E e "- c ~ ~ e '" c o '- . 8 c 8 , \~! EP ~}~.~ III \ \ ~"2J '::]1 \ \~ \'-1. A ,I \ 'I, ,-^~"'. I \ RE~ EP /. (( R1 \1 ~ . Ii ~ ~ \ f', i ~ -; '., .' l~. , \r~- --'\ '\if' · i f..~~' ",,' ~~)-:::== i fiiiiC.;;l JC1-2~ A ~ i EP '- _ . ..~_ \ ~M~ f ~~e"2 '"Ie::"'" I (H)C.~"" ~ '~m 1V '"'\..r ')'-. EP ~r ~ C1~__ 2 , --Lf-" I A.13 ^ -J'" ~'J).... l:Z IU ..-_ I\...:::.. A-13 ('no",,- ~ ~ A ~\-__ e,.,. , ,. ./ ' ... ~09;I ~ '" { ~! ..:.---=__~~~ _ ___:::-1 -----------:::=~-~~--~ 1-- C ~ ~ ~~l- ""!~ ~---.-~~-~.I---- j~/A ~~'R1~~ --~-~~~ o A .,... ~ ~ I -,... c':~i ... C1-14 j z \., Ii:l t [C'!!". 'V~ , . _ ~(Hle'-41 A ~,:l' , "' 09 -ri-.. ~ . t &!:1 - C1-7)~ i ~'" "'~=> ~: J f \ I' , . c- -r 6 /~ ~ ~~ hI[' -l --. 'I R1 ~ \ \"8 #\\ R2 ~x R4. , ., : ~ b:..,~~-"'r"~. '( '~ ~h\~x .," R1 0 ~"'\ I ~ ;;.. R4-24 A ~ R3. ~ ," ~ \' 8 7' .. 1iO V ' ." ~ I liE- R1-43! ""I( J R1 \ '" ~~ \ . , ..\ ' ~(~'M~~~~m. R1 ~ \:9; ~_ .x 1 ~ ' , '- I " 100M i-=d~1 !. 'i ~ (H)R2 .,:'3 ,b, ~ ~ I AI R3 ~~' '1 ~ ~ ~ \ EP . I ~.... -)~ 11 ';; ~~'~J'" r \:;I;: i-' ~ R2 " ~~~,- ~~~"' ...,.. I ",~7 0 R1 ~.r~ I \ ~. I ~'Ij i ;; AOSERCREaCEW \ R1 "- A I~' "R1-41; ilcl I " 'K -" A -----=_--J __ R3 I: EP \... M.-4 J\".. I~t' <JR1 I i)l "'~ ~ - -- - -- - ________ __ --...,~ lI'I""- I - -- (H)M' \ l, ~ H)C' 1i e. 1 e7-1 I EP lot 17 Lot 16 Lot 15 Lot 14 Lot 13 I I I I I I II :' I . \E~ EP R3 ,/ ..... ~"' "' ~ R2 I I , I I l ~\ ~ '" ~ o ~ B ~ o U IV )], Municipality of Clarington 3G Zoning By-Law 84-63 :!i 3D III Schedule 3D (Bowmanville) 3A 801 Janua/y 2009 _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'p,' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' 100 200 400 ...- Lot 13 Lot 12 Lot 11 Lot 10 lol9 ~ ~''-::o-- \! I~ IJi,L ' W"W,~W II ~~1 EP \ la1' I lH'" r'-; I[ p I R4-12 ~~ ~ J! Jl- R1 ~ ~ 1_~uA~o~;:m , ..w~"~"~' J~:lIUI W"O~~ - ~ r ~~"..'" ,"" ~__~I.l ~ I '--- c_J ~ " r ~J I p/lr --1<2 ~I.J R2, : "'~ ril!ll ~ I '((:7"~""11[@~ F "'; ~ ! ~ ,! EP I REHllERAVENUE ~ r- LI II ~ ~ lVCla;RRO.lO ~ A 1"00!' 8 "\ I...., r.H R'_ /1 ~ ~ C R'(" "I I ~ iO.L ~"' ;." ~ I; A -: M2-6 ~M'" / -=; lJ ~'I R,,-!i\ ~~~"'''''' \ A ,~ ~ I R3 I ~,,~ I JL- Rl~ CONCESSION STREET EAST (H)M' ~~~"-3' - ~"""'W'~"(~'W''--''''''Iil I~" oM. i41'4:s('~'" ',!---,--Q..l ~i ""~"""' I, "'" ( ')'" ..2: ~ '" ' R' I '/ L R.., 1M... B --D 19 [j..do EP ,LR1 ~r'!io\!' 0,'..~ -I!l Id ~~~,~ - A.13 ~~;." '.15":."" II ---' ~\ . l." ________ --::'... rh .l?7. #'" ~7'7< ~ lJ i \. R'~ Tl\UOEAUORIIIE flETCH ~ 5 - :7""-' ----__._ C 3 ,~ V iiiiillI EP r R1 i R11 ~~ --::::- - ':::> . '1', .... ;:: I (~-" '-----. 'I- ~I R' ;:- I EP "::", '. "Rl f- F \ R' If II~~ 'l'l/.~~,,~ C,. ~~~ GW "~""'!~l , ~.....-.... W~" "",g<iR1-2!; (Ii;: Rl-3S 5:....,,~ : ~C"'n'" ~~::~,.,:'~~ ~~:~~' j~', } ! i1> J. ill ~~~ 'v ' C")j"~ . R (H)R3...... ."R' ~ ~ .~ 0 I R1 ~o/' 4 ~~" ,,' : 'ull' 11 + "' te",. ,,] .~~ R' r,;;w '" """' "- &1 ~ ~ R1 f~Y"' B1'1lEET ~EP i 0 ," ~I: '",,,'</ V C', ,C', J; '''r'I&1 !il,,~ ~~ ,_ ,M2.1 .....~ " ;/" .......... __ r.J..&J 0 II u: L, R4-25 (HIR4-2e......... - c o ,n ~ M2.1 " :eAJ\~ \\ '--.:: ,.,. C1-3 ~I! ~ ~ ~1lli!l\~~\ I!~ R4~~-3Cl I 0 ,~ "w I ~~ ----: - P' r- ' 1 'S' u , I". ~~, 'i t~~~i . ~ ,UI.]~=~ i ; ~ I ~ ~ \~ ~~i'" , n1Djllii ~ _~~":~ ~~I ~1';-1: ~r~'~ It?:' EP II....... v;- ~~"~~" r,;;:r , r-"'"'~ I I R:"",,_, I .~ ..:: ~ \\ ID: I d '~'R' 1-,1 ~,J ~ ! V ~ R' EP \ @;j; , ::d""" ~ ..--. M2 I ffi' ~-, Ilr'-1f-""'""" 1@[J3 I ~../ EP .....l .~ R'o 'HI ~ I "~IC' o :t: ~ U I ...,EN: -- I c: 'H~' ~ I -~~---- EP i ---- \ ~ C'4-! ~E~-- c;' - -- !~ tv ~o 100 '" "'" ...~ - - - ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 3E (Bowmanville) 3H ~ 3E:Ii 38 January 2009 Lot 9 Lola Lot 6 Lot? ~~\~1.1 IHI"2 IA ':::1 11~~. \ 1 \. ~ H II -II u T R1-10 ACIt ,...., \~ R2 r 1 D')SPRI.-C CR5scr{~...... I p)t r- '~""rfGl' R'--': l V\~( :~' ~ e: \.'-'" . .-4 ;> ~1RW2 ~ A I eo RTOM i-..."',1--" OWN 00. EP ',~1J.- ..!!!:!!.~. I ,;,"rr '" ~.,. , -:)1/1 LJ.L.r:E ~I,l ~:; R3~' \<1/// . ~ u J / IY.:.L.... I OO"'C5S'ONSTRI15TE.<5T ,~~ ~ '~M~ R1 ~ "" /1 ~.=~.~. ~.~ ~"~ IEP ~,,'m EP r R'~' ~""' ~R111 )~' 1 - ((~'"rcd":::~'iD.~li~ ~r-ir~'~':'.d ! J EJ. ~ c;...::' CR5SCENT ~ 3: '-( R1 .. ~ ~....,.> , i'S ~ ~ - ~ ~ . , ( ",",,1 ! ) EP 1 (H)R' C--:::-~~~1 'f I "'Y' 1n--.; ~ ~ 'I~ ~ EP 11 A-1 ... C1->>'t- ,- 1--') (,l ill...:: R4-25 lHIR4-26......... _I./" 4 =--= .------ -------------- __ ....... 1 EP < ~ ~ ,~~~~~I L~ . I ,,~ ,," I EP ....-.. ~ ~ .r::::-.. A" I ~\ ).1 ". ~ EP .... .-~, R1-'~~' ~) ~~~ '- _ I ~_~ R. / 1 A-13 ~ '- '"' ~ r-! ~ {fj I A.22 ~I~ ~ .-,.rm J rY II / M2 f~_______ -.; i~/EP'~ ~ ~ /.~ '~M2 "-~ ! /, M2 I ~EP ~ ---- - ~ II A-1 R1-10 CONCfSS'OMSTRfUfAST A.1 I 1 I I I 1 I A.1 1 I 1 I 1 I t i I M2 A.' . , i M2 At Al. Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 3F (Bowmanville) January 2009 _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' "'" ...- '"' 200 ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Lot 5 I 1 \ 1 \ , I I I I i , 0 I ~ I . ! A-1 -I I I I I I I I EP ~ - c o '0 . ~ 8 A.' .. p-- --- ----...'""] '1 (H}M2-17 i M2.17 r;;. I I I ! 31 1113F :!l 3C Lot 17 Lot 16 Lot 15 Lot 14 Lot 13 r-----l' --- ,"", 00 I i I ! I I I ! A , i I , I ~ I ! I , I I , I I I I '" I 6 I A .~ , a I 8 I I I I I A I I I A I I I I I I I I . , I I RE I EP N Municipality of Clarington 1D JJ January 2009 Zoning By-Law 84-63 oC 3G :x: - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' .. '" '"' 200 .. Schedule 3G (Bowmanville) 3D ""- ----...- ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '6' ,- , , lot 13 lot 12 lot 11 lot 10 LoI9 "'~ ------11. __ - ------l-------r-- iHlR2-54I. 11 t\ 1 I ~7 ~ ~!I P'" 1~-i I ~ 1 ";:.a EPm I \ I ...ti~Ir"'" V ~. i " \ - ~ ! I II tl - ~__ I ~~:.m~ ( ~ 11 \ '\ ~~::j_' ~( ~" . I A-1 \ R1 I ----.J:-j"''' -1iI ~.., ~ EP "'- " I I = R'-42 f~ 1-""" ,~ - ~ \ i \ I ~ r r I '-- ~ R1-42 _L~ - "- I S"- :;;;;;;.;;; R1"'~"=~ p;;:"," ") I \ I _ ,"1r A-1!~::l i "" '" ~ I I lKJFlM5- _ "- -!7.t~ 1 1 EP 1 \. ~ _ IiH)iiUs ~L; II; R2-e2 ' !~::: I I I'\. \ - ~ ~~.~:,I '" I " ,,- ~1~ ri' ~~-'~1NlR2...'< ( ~ (( ~O, I \ --...,t ~t-II" ........ A~tr: ..... ~ R21" A.1 ,;t;1 V g .... \ ~ RE-2 I -l '-~ .., ;r-- ' "'::',,"' i.!.~l \~ ;:c.\l:\ \: ""1.....\~- ~.., ::::tl. < I~~l.io ,~. : I ~ '- :-1rrrJi fU-63 H:W~I- f1HHtlF. !I EP ~..---Ul I ,i u~~ ~_ro I ~ . g ~.h A-1 1f.~"""..ro:lI~ \ iL...!lf\ __ I ~...~ -32 -Ltill' =A1 I ~ "- ~~ (~<Hl~t' <'l 1 """",,' := A-'ll ~t\t)R3--11.~ ~ Iln' 160 I lp= ---------------------------------------------'---- '" c o '. . 8 c o U ~ ...,,-/ ,V' I E 'Lf"'" '- A-1 ---------------------- ..----------- -------- ----- ------ ~d O~ "EJ" (H)R~ ~ h- -35 fii'T-!, 'uD ~ R1 El -r;;3 ~. M R L, ~.I ~R1 ~ R' S3 ~ '5.... 5 A 1-59'" "P. ~ w g i~ "~:" ..1(H)R2 L "","", 1"- ""'1('// '.'''-'''- }- i 0: :::: ,I I~' ~~...,,~ I "j"' W -~>~ ~~~!l""'-.;~.'I ~lIDl----............... ' =::::::Jrn ..~.. . ....., ..J! ~ R2/'/'1 ,~ , :~ .l"::-":~~ e-=:: ~~ L~ ilU-1 R'~~":'~ I ,b;c:~ r-, ~~ R _ =--:a ,... -, ~ IH)R1 \: ~ /' ~ "1"1<:'''' ;- ~ R1.... ~; I" ~\(H)R~ ~.... R', C,... o,.;;~ ' (H)R3.12 ~ (HIR! 1'\\\ f- -lOr ., P > ~\'V -- -" 1 f ni1~.~ r::: ~ \ R'~\! ~ .~~' 1:\ \ \,(~f~ A ~~ D~ ~ ~ ~ ] ,,,-- I' IH) ~ .... II~ ~ jJ -- V U ~ ~ c; ~\,.:... R>-Z' ~J ".24 R2 I!>ill!: \ ~ D >,;rt ---',. ~~,,-~~ ~ ..JI EP (H)R3 ~ C> ~ c~ r ~ ~ ,'" R11~ f)///,?'-,I ,.. ;;;?~ 90' i ~ ~ A ~ I I.-.I!J ~/.t~ - ~' R1 ~ '--'lii ,~~ E~I ,EP r G R' I A;$'" L-JM~ (H)R2 ~ ~ ....: 'e-~;::;- "\"~ I, ~~ !. ~ ,!~' L. ll' Df-:_li-- j'~:::~ - -'", '; ~ A '00 "'" .. ...- ___ ARTERIALROADTVPE'A' ______ ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 3H (Bowmanville) 10 ~3H;;; 3E _ ~:j5 tv )]0 JanualY 2009 . I I I I I I I ~ , ) I ~ I EP pi ~' - ----------- ------ I I EP I I I I I EP I I I I I , r I i , I I I , Lot 9 Lot 8 Lot 7 --------"'1'---- A A A-11 R1 A / .1.... , /' I \ lA:1 /" , I I \ l \ \ AMPINEs<;/u....e A R1 R2 ~~ H2.1S R1-42 ... " ~ R1 tv A Janual)' 2009 "'" ...~ --- ARTERIAlROADTYPE'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' '" "" EP R1.10 R1.10 Lot 6 LotS ~ c o 'in o ~ c 8 '" c o 'in Ii c o l) ........... ........... ........... ........... .. I ........... I ........... r ...........1 I ' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 31 (Bowmanville) 1D i!i 31 ~ 3F 856 r =r-l I I I I SC~~dJle -'4G:--! (Courtice)=---! b I I I I I ,...--- I I I I I I I I ..........._-----... ,~ ...... ~...... Schedule'4A' (Courtice) Schedule '4' (Courtice) o ~ o '" " ~ ~ => '" >- , / , o ~ o ~ " oj => ~ >- , I I I I Schedule '4E' , (Coul;t:ice) I I I I I I I I I \----- BASELINE ROAD Schedule '48' - (CourtlCe) o <5 '" w " ~ -- => ~...... 8 ~-- ~, "--..-- -----. I I o ~ o '" w 12 o m " o Schedule '4C' I (Courtice) ! ...-..-.....,J I I I I I I I I ----...._1 CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) COURTICE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON) THIS IS SCHEDULE '4' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 fi9J~ ~ra.a..- O.e._.W,VOR 1lEPUTY~ 857 Lot 35 Lol34 Lot 32 R:2.13 A EP A EP M2-5 M2 Lot 31 ~ c o '. . ~ c o U M2 ~ ~ I ____ I ----==:----- ----. ----. ---. ---. -----:---. ---. A A A A A Lake Ontario tv jJ, January 2009 Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 4A (Courtice) "" ....... - - - ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE ',.,' ------ ARTERlAl ROAD TYPE '8' '"' "" H)M1 (HIM2 c e "- c 11 e CD c o '. . ~ c o U ; 40 .! 4A ~ III o Lot 31 Lol30 Lot 29 Lot 28 Lot 27 A i I I I I I I M2 II ,~, --;.1-- I o o '. . ~ o 8 9A$EL"ERO.O.D I I I I I I I I M2 2-5 I =====_____ M21 ____. ____. EP I --. --. ----_====_____ I M2 A ---._.----. . I1lOHwo.~.co, -___.----____1 ------~-- ___.-:.--- _. M1 ~ ---. ---. I A -----==---~ t r---_.:-- ()M1 -. I IHIM01 I I I I Ie] COUFmCECOURT . H)M1 (H)M01 (HIM2 IHIM02.' c e "- o m ~ e <D o o '. . ~ o o <.> A E' (H)ML' Lake Ontario '00 '" "'" ..... _ _ _ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIA.L ROAD TYPE 'S' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 4B (Courtice) 4E ~4Bla! tv A January 2009 85\::l ___. M1 ---..:------ I Ml ---r--~---__ 11 -----..::------ I ---.. ---.. ----- ----.. ----.. --- 'A.--- SOurHSER\lJcEOlOAD lot 27 Lot 26 lot 25 --........-- ------ ------ EP I A (H)M2-14 M2 EP l~ ~~ COURTICECOURT B~SEllNe RW.O M2 (H)M01i (H)M02 (H)M02.1 (H)M02 ML1 (H)MLl (H)ML2 (H)ML1 (H)MU.1 ~- A A EP Lake Ontario tv ~ (H)ML2 Lot 24 Lot 23 ~-----T-----l I A I I M2 Ml A --- "'" ........ - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'J>.' ------ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 4C (Courtice) 1A , 4C :5 January 2009 '" 200 c o '. . ~ c o U c e u. c m ~ e a> c o '. ~ c <3 Lot 35 Lot 34 Lot 33 Lot 32 Lot 31 1;1 ""'- J ~ I v I c, r<1_"'J I .. 0""'..... -:1L';;!I GiGO'" Ii :f.:Jr-l ~ ! R1 ~ I !~ '~'Ro I ~ ,I-'~" :;;I ~::;:]R '\i...i!k ~, I !"'--'~II"""~~ i ! l 1::.J ~ I ~ @ \ ~ , '~\;a"~ 12 ~ ~ i ~ 17" -- Y-~/~=/--~--irt--;;-L.- \ R"" =t ~h ~/ I~~ i'lJt~~;;~ ~ ~ . \~\, fC";.H:::J -R-.1 '"L ,il :ltn ! I,;;' <...-..----J' K-~ ~ ~~)-.... z R1 "" 1 I C. R1 R2 ~ R2.2 f: I~Ri R3 1R11 t ",'I-"n-- HAlB'm I t::!f::t t-"'"'"""" EP ()!1 '/.6 <: ( """ R3 EP .,.,.. t!!!./r~ ! I ..... ( AA' / =.'_ 'M~~ ~ < IIffii'iI '---r/(l ~ ~ 1 · -~ ef' ~ (R2"~~ '1"8'" '-"''if ~",-J = ~,' Y"/ / 4S. R3-5 I I if R1 '0Uv / '80 ;- n?~';~~ ~~'l;a: L,,",~"~: 'R3" 1 ~UlOUlltllANE ~ r {HIR1J "- .. , EP I't.. ~ R2.2: I 8 " '" Ri r ~ <l . "'I 1= @Q;- ~I;;;; ~i'I -I. ~0FI1\IE YOllKVlI.LE~ I EDR Glr'-" ~~ n~ ~ o~!~ r[~"'''''' ., "I ~ ~v 0 ; ..~ - I l~ (r'" 0 U ~ . '~: /l h IHIR' ; / ,~ " L R' i\ I f I'" RI,' R3 "' Wi - ~ RZ-60a~T ~ 'iGJ ~, J~ ' 1"1" ..; .,1 ; ~ ~..~""" @N '~~V-- R.)JIHI;;D ; 1 R,4' j R1 ffi PEB8L~ R1 11 ~~:~ -' ~I -#'" -0>"\ ~ IHI"' li~ 1 R1 ~ ' ~~:::--,.~.,_ ..- ~/i/ 3 ~ \X ~ ! (HIR' """'~U- Jj .,~~ :-: ~~lj~i.'~~:\:~ "-. ~! R' :~Il ~ 'Q ~\o , A ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I k- :":~'"u"'"' _J~~ .. ' ~~" 1\ i I (HJR1 A ~(H)R'''' \1 A I .~ , ~~'-... i I ---- -------- - ~. .,., R3 r::-:,/,)" I / R u Rt"" <<i ,_ A RZo11 R3 ~ i: J JIHlR11 I .,~, ...." .,." ~~~~:-....,r;;!:j/ \ R2.12 Itt-41 R2-12 lIIZ-11 '.!/ II AYL E g R2-11 r ----r--:I/ I I~RJot2 RZ.12 fl \ TH UE llQUntFElDAVaII.E ~ I RZ.t2 RZ..12 r ~ T ~ A I ~ R2'''-r:;'''' I ~g (H)R' ~P EP "'--. -- I , I , I _________J___ I , I i , I I _ I - , ~ I , , I RI.t2 Rf.12 -I ,., A RS IW Iii ,l'o'ENilil-- ~ RWS n 1'-lQ . 11 IR11 ~ EP A I I I I I I I I i c o . B c o () ~-41 U.....EMI ~~ r R142 g (H)R1 ..., I I RZ.ZS I I8HDRHe : T RZ-2S ... \ll'fGHAMOAr-r- I~..~' JI1 ~I" :~zi EP ~ \ A A I i IV Municipality of Clarington ; 4F JJ January 2009 Zoning By-Law 84-63 III 4D III _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' .c .., 0 100 200 ... Schedule 40 (Courtice) III 4A ...... ______ ARTeRIAL ROAD TYPE "8' 0 861 Lot 31 Lot 30 Lot 29 Lot 28 Lot 27 -I (HJR'! -...._--- --- IPUNaAVEHUE I ---- , I I g {H)R1 C, C, C5-5 f R1 (HJR' , ~: ICtLEcC"<~v..[ (HJR' DRINGNAM . B" Buser I R3 r~'~ I' I ~ ~s N , 0 R2"lo , 0 , " , . YOI'tKVIllECOUR,T , I ~ , , I c I . 0 I () WillMS i . I I R3 I CRESCENT " A I I R' I I I (H)R1 j I I I I I i A i t I , I ! j I A I I -- -----~----- A-73 (H)A.13 I A I ., ., A :l ~ I j I 0 I 0 '," I 0 ~ I 0 I 0 () I I A I I I I I , i 1 AI Municipality of Clarington 4G )] January 2009 Zoning By-Law 84-63 Q 4E c , 'It 'I"l , - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' I '00 200 "'" Schedule 4E (Courtice) 48 I ...... ------ ARTERIAL ROAD tyPE '8' I , LoI35 LoI34 LoI33 Lot 32 Lot 31 , , , , , , . , , , li 8-----((-- , . , , , , , I A I) \ I I i \ ,,/JEP i !l~ I ,..__,..- ~ ---- -- II I} \ r-- (H)R1 M, (H)R1 EP \ A I~ 0= r:1 ~4 ~1'~, \'" '1, I 7 -i ,u../ i ~ ........ ___ I. EP)' (' ,,~, ~0 a{::~~'t;p1 A ~ ----,;-r I.fIRl-46 ~C::4R_/ EP ) /,~:;:m: 1 /)/R2-4 W ~ R1F12 !~:~ \- ~, ~ .AA'~'! IC~ ~::- a:P ~ L A r II ", EP ~lU_.~", "--' ~ ~~TSFELODll -ri @1. E I ~'€' ::""N' . \ ~l~~R2~:\"'N^~~' ''";;' \ ' EP~ ~ :.- ~] "^. ~~~ ~~~ R1 : =:~ ~ ~r.; lJlI. " .... ~ '~\ ,0,;!J.V. ~ A k P R2~\~ '-~) rr "" [ R1 IL .. EP l-~ L 1L--::...r--1~~'i~ \ ..It L--- I' '-- L:;--'. EP -/ R2 R2 C'-29 I C1.17 0- R: -, ~~D-' l:yJI,. - ~.jLC1'1J:W~t~1~ ~ . f/ .J' EP R1 6 ;.;:_ lCl40r'C5 [';""1 ~:'~::=::tr/ {~~l----""" @ '" (~, :~~-~~:~ I T r~ ~ EP -- R1 0 -"'_ ~"---i ,~~ ,~ i'IJ~ C1 co 1074 Ie.... r ------ _ ~ ~___ 1_~-.~IJ.-~I/I~~ ~ -.... '1;;1 ~ r;YK/ ;iO-' IL ~ ~I~ J1i .,~!M 8 ! ~ ~ '"'@J' ~ ~ '='f- ~ ~ ~ J'I' i i:~ ~ ~~7 EPI ~'. Oi I I--D """' 1. ! t:~' (! ~f7~\ I:rr ~ f;'" h, C1 I I , , , I , , i , , , , , . , , , , I , , , , , , , , , M C o . . ~ c o () A~ EP '00 "" .. ...- _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington ; lC Zoning By-Law 84-63 ~ 4F ~ Schedule 4F (Courtice) c!l 4D Ai Ao Janua!)' 2009 lot 31 Lot 30 Lot 29 Lot 28 Lol27 r--lil l "I , I " " II A , , , , , , I , , I dl I" Iii III I L I " , Ii 'I " II A ~ A.a I '" c 0 ~"" '0; ----- --.,----. 0 (H)R2.21 ~ c 0 . U ., ~ !: A I I I I A R~STRE~T " II " OUlSDR I AVE~UE i I I R1 I ~tNIEWROA I A [j R2-4 , I I WE$TfolDlOESTREET "~ I R1 I ~ A RlI.12 A I Rl I ---------------- I - ,---- R1 I . . , , I I (HIR' '" c 0 '0; (" 0 ~ C 0 , U --------------~-- C. ! tv )] '00 200 '" ...,,- --- ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 4G (Courtice) lC ~4G 4E v ""' - oC ""' January 2009 864 I . I I~ I'd, , ., . 0 Schedule '5C' '3 '" ~ (Newca'stle ffi , 0: Village) /' ,/ r-------~ \ :ii ~ , ~ , g , 0: I t'-_\ , I I Schedule 'SA' I I ~ (Newcastle '...... Village i U , .....-- -, '~ '.....- -----\ I I I I I Sche'dule '50' I (Ne~castle Village) I , , \ I ~ ~ I I HIGHWAY 401 I I I I Schedule '58' I I I (f:lewcastlel Village) I I I I , I I , '--0 CORPORATION of the MUNICIPAliTY of CLARINGTON (FormerTOW'n of Newcast1e) NEWCASTlE VILLAGE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '5' TO BY-tAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 l'IaJ~ "'"""""'...... o.I.RICIW'tD.WOYOR """"'- Schedule '5' (Newcastle Village) 865 Lot 32 Lot 31 \ \ \ \ ~P \ \ \ I \ I Lot 30 Lot 29 Lot 28 -~ ILJ EOWAROSTREETW I e'.... ROUNEST "." ieg fit] STWUilJll,II!ESSTE R1.30 LAl<E\IIfWROAc -~------------------ ~---------------- ) ~ v EP M1 !\ r--"'__...__ILWr TOIlONrOSn,EE~ M1 c o 'w 1) c o " A ! o ~ (HIM' EP (H)M1 ~ A 0 A ~ A-1 . o o Re. - - .-----+-- EP yoao ~ Lake Ontario c ~ u. c -l! ~ .. c o 'w w ~ c o " P 866 ^' A o 100 200 .. ...... - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule SA (Newcastle Village) ~ 5C iii SA III o N January 2009 Lot 27 Lot 26 Lot 25 R1 I' ~ R' I ~" , au ETBOUl-EVARD R' I EP A-1 ,~ I ------------ ---------- ---:..-------_-:.-----.:-_-.:-_-------:.::=.----- A.' OSTliEE M1 I " I g . I . EP I I ~ (H)M' " 0 I " \ I I I , \ I I A I IA-' \ I I lIETeAl-F$TAEET " . I . \1 . A.1 . . . i II YDEHN48TREE I I ~ I I A-' " ;! \ A-1 ~ RC-7 :f. A-' c g ~ e E. III c 0 I '. . ~ I .3 I A , I Lake Ontario I I RE-I tv A1 . Municipality of Clarington Zoning 8y-Law 84-63 Schedule 58 (Newcastle Village) 5D ~ 58 ~ January 2009 o "" '" .. ...- _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE '8' 867 Lol32 Lot 31 Lot 30 Lot 29 Lol28 ----r- A.' I " , f I / ~ A-j I I , I A-1 I i I i , I , I I I I , A.1 N I 1 0 A-1 0 I '. . B 0 0 , () I , A-1 I A.l I . ------ --- A.1 If UL EDWAAOSlRI!ETW [ EP o o -~ B 8 A-1 R1 8IJNB,","SOUI.E ~ ~~ R1 AI ~ IC. "'" ." ...~ - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPl: 'A' ------ ARTERtAl ROAO TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 5C (Newcastle Village) 2A ;!Ii SC 5l 5A 86 January 2009 Lot 29 Lot 28 Lot 27 Lot 26 Lot 25 A.l I \ I \ I \ A'j \ I C.'~I i I A-1 II (A-I I I ~ (~~ ' I ~7 R1;L I A.l i cr <.-\P ~~-22 : I ~IL.. u.~~ l~ Rl.' --- ~ I , \j- -~,.,==",-- - I R ~ IIH"'1.1l fEPl (H)"~7 ~:r "., ~ ~ '-i J ~---1""1 ---J IiBa. ~ ~EP , ~ ~ /"@.........::t r ~I s.:: EP J ~ _I , ( t:::---- !j.1 i;;;:;;J ...., ~ '--, ~ ~\ .'" ", l! t::j'. I h(H)"... tl<)R'~7 V IH, z. 1 i!\ ~ ~ I I-l U"' ~4'.r- EP I~'l.,_, . ft\ .. RM .-.,,~ + ~-~ IH)" .. -.= 'I I UH)R17 V R1" II .,L g IT~...yv ~ ~ 3 M2-3 " '" 11"1 I'~ .""", ,... 147 ~_._" r " ............ R1 IR1-3 jHjR1 '-4 R1 I .;. " C1 ~ I CD ~ R1 II R1 C1-37 C1 1 -33 IE _ H 1-28_ _______ _-=-..:.-. ]"!-;:: -.' ----- -' C1 .-- l\I --d"-'; C1111 R1 IX 'Ii R1 (H)R1 CS-81 EP~13 '"\ I I ""MC:7i") ..~, l~' "; ~ R2. ~ -;, 11 R2-ljll ~~ i EP \ ,,~ ~ !Rl-l ~ U I Q ...., I ...., lj;;;".. /' , ~ ~ 9' ~"," G" 1; ~ :' V- I \ _ .....~ \,~ .~ Rl~ '\P? ! ~ <=i ..!!!E!!:=1 R\H~;,....r I I .3 ~YA, RIH,)R~ ~ ~\I i ,I I ,~ J/l ~.~ Ih """" (H)R'/ .1 I J"lTT----- , VI \ / ' 1/ / , ---I .~/1 / EP , . ~ ~ I , , , , A-I N C o . 1) c o U '". ~ I 1 I ~" !I\ Rl Zo" 100 '" "'" ...- _ _ _ ARTERIAl... ROAD TYPE 'A.' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 50 (Newcastle Village) 2A ~ 5D~ 58 !:lo~ AI AI. January 2009 AI ~ January 2009 "" "'" Lot 32 Lot 31 Lot 30 -J----:H A I 1... "'" ........ ---~~- RH --- --- ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPe '8' FlANERSTREE' N ~ U TVlERSTREET RH BAADLEYBOUlEVARO I-- I ~ I ~I I...J RH :J '" C o '- 1] c o () ~ C o '- . ~ c o () CORPORATION ofllle MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON (Former Town of Newcastle) MITCHELL CORNERS (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '6' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 'BaJ~ O.8.RlClCAIIO.IAAYOR ~'8... ~- Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 6 (Mitchell Corners) U PI lC 6 lC U PI Lot 19 Lot 18 ~ c o 'W o e c o U RH RH " . . . 1 I RH CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of NewcasUe) HAMPTON (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE 7' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 WllJ~ ~W...- O___RICKIrflO,IlIA'tOfl DEPU""'o::lERI< '" "" "'" ...... ___ ARTERIAlROAOTYPE'''' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 7 (Hampton) lC/1D u 7 Q ... ... lC/1D till tv J1 January 2009 tv ~ January 2009 '''' "" Lot 25 OOR5ETSTREH ,II."'MANCT RH o , ~ HILLSIPEOR ~ "'" '"'* --- ARTERlALROAOlYPE'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' A-I Lot 24 EP RH .ItOQ(Al),OYCOURT I I RH m ~ o ';;; 8 ~ o <> '" ~ I ~ o <> CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARlNGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) SOLlNA (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '8' TO BY.LAW 84-63 PASSEO THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 'li6J~ 1il.8.l'JCMRD.IMYOl'l Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 8 (Solina) ra...t-l.-WtoajP _N_ 1C l:l 8 1C 1.1 .. Lot 20 Lot 19 \-,:- RH-3 RH CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of NewcasUe) ENN1SKILLEN (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '9' TO BY.LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 'lJ9J~ IU,RICl<.lIU)......_ ~w...... ~~- EP January 2009 ... ... lE 9 lE 873 I&. ... AI A o "" "" Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 9 (Enniskillen) "'" ..... --- ARTERIAL ROAOTYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' AI A January 2009 '" '" '" ""~ - - - ARTERIAl RO.IlD TYPE: 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE '8' CORPORATION of the MUNICIPAliTY of CLARINGTON (Former Town of Newcastle) TYRONE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '10' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 W61~ ~~ G.B._.MAYOR DePUlYClSlK Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 10 (Tyrone) 1F ~ 10 ~ 1D AI A January 2009 , '" '" '" ..... Lot 14 RH t ~ H-l '" c o ". ~ 8 c o U RH-l CORPORATION of the MUNICIPAUTY of CLARINGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) HAYDON (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '11' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 W98~ ~~ O.._MA'tCIR D!PUlY~ _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 11 (Haydon) 1F ~ 11 ~ 1F 5 AI A1 January 2009 '''' '" Lot 18 Lot 20 ...., I I A I I I i Lot 19 I ~ ~RH ! ~i N C o "' ~ . u c o U c " . . 8 a u CORPORA nON of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON (Former Town of Newcastle) MAPLE GROVE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '18' TO BY.LAW 84-83 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 'ligj~ ~~ G.B.RIa<ARll.....'I'OR I;ICPU'IYCUIlK '" ...... - - - ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 18 (Maple Grove) 1A :!i 18 ~ 1A 876 Lot 3D Lot 29 '" c - 0 ~I "' . 8 RH c ~. 0 I U COHCfSSlOHROAOD RHI RH I '" c 0 ";;; ~ '- 8 c 0 u CORPORATION ofthe MUNICIPALITY of ClARINGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) ENFIELD (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '19' TO BY.LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 fl9J~ ~'8~ Q.B.RICI<.lRO.MOlVOR ~- AI A January 2009 '" "" "'" ....~ ___ ARTERlAlROADTYt:'E'A' ______ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 19 (Enfield) 1E ~ 19 ~ 1E 877 Schedule '20A' Schedule '208' (Wilmot Creek) (Wilmot Creek) ..--...---- --.. --- ----" ~- I 1---- I r----. oJ' I --. I I _~ -. -.......",." .......~ I I ,~ I '\; I 1 I , I I , i , I I I , I I ! I I CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON i (Fonner Town of Newcastle) i WILMOT CREEK (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARUCLARKE) , I THIS IS SCHEDULE '20' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY i OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 , i Schedule '20' (Wilmot Creek) 'BWJ~ ~5_ <!.8,RICIWll)......YC1lIt ~~- 878 I Lot 4 Darlington 0- il n~--' C I 8 EP Lot 3 Darlington Lot 2 Darlington Lot 1 Darlington ------- .............---1- -.. .. .. ""'-1 Lol35 Clarke --- A CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) WILMOT CREEK (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON) THIS IS SCHEDULE '20A' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 1 Oth DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 W9J~ IUl_.lAAl'OIl ~w...... ~~- 2-4 IR2.~~1 EP Cr=J Lake Ontario IV A January 2009 '" '" "'" ....~ ___ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A,' ______ ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE 'S' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 20A (Wilmot Creek) 18 ~20A~ !:lIB Lot 2 Lot 1 Lot 35 Lot 34 lot 33 Darlington Darlington Clarke Clarke Clarke _ _ _ --;><=,"",c_ _ __ --------'--- 1~1"gJ AfA ....,,-----...-____ ; I ~ s &'. ~ R2-16 I R2.16 \ ;j~ ~', , :3 EP c:Jl] Lake Ontario 0;- -to ro Q. c o ",. ~ 8 c o U "" '" "'" """' - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPe 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD 1YPe '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 20B (Wilmot Creek) 2A ~20B~ CORPORATION of the MUNICIPAUTY of ClARlNGTON (Former Town of Newcastle) WILMOT CREEK (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '20B' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 1 Oth DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 ra9J~ ~'li....... C1.8_RlClWlD.IllAYOIl DEl'VTYQ.ERK AI JJ January 2009 ~RC N C o "' ~ 8 c o U lot 20 Lot 19 Lot 18 RC - ---,-....- ~-A ~ L::-...L _ -I <.) II: c o "' 8 c o U CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARINGTON (Former Town of NewcasUe) BROWNSV1LLE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '21' TO BY -LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 fj[jJ~ ~~ IU.RlQ(I,R[I,W\YOR DBO\JTY(;l.ERK , '" '" <DO ...~ _ _ _ ARTi.R....L ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARreRIAL ROAD TYPE 'a' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 21 (Brownsville) 2A ~ 21 ~ 2A Hts, AI A January 2009 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2009- Attachment 5 To Report PSD-047-09 being a by-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle to implement ZBA2008-0004; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule "A" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Extractive Industrial (M3)" to "Agricultural (At 2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 and 36 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2009 Jim Abernethy, Mayor 882 Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2009- passed this day of , 2009 A.D. O. <( o oc <( o (f) W I >- W <D Jim Abernethy, Mayor ~ o z W ~ . DARLINGTON TAUNTON ROAD LOT 6 ~ Zoning Change From "M3" To "A" , IV W~e s "l:t zl o - <n <n w (J z. 81 1 I LOT 7 Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk '" " W '" ~i ~ !'l 8 W 1'~ ;JiW "il; !i c ZBA 2006-0004 A 883 AI ~, January 2009 '" '" Lot 20 lot 19 RH-3 Lot 18 I W , j/ \ ;0 " o ., 11 " o U CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Former Town of Newcastle) BURKETON (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '12' TO BY-LAW 84-&3 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 WaJ~ ~'li___ O.8,RIClWIO'......YOII DEPVTYCLERK '" ...~ --- ARTERlAl RQAOTYPe: 'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD lYPE 'e' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedqle 12 (Burketon) Scugog ~ 12 ~ 1E r-\-[{[-Y~ I / . - Sch~~1'IIe;1.3B' (Orono) '1>- I w I I~ I I~ I t~ , r-J . PARK STREET ~ / sch"'eduIEr'13A' , , ' L(Orono) 'd' ~_J Schedule '13' (Orono) CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) ORONO (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON) THIS IS SCHEDULE '13' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 fJl1J~ ~w_ O.B,FIO(:l(Ml).MAI'QR D~TYctERl< 885 AI ~ January 2009 '" '" '" ...~ Lot 29 lot 28 I A I R1.2 I , , I I' , I ~" R1-2 "4-3 R1-2 R1-14 , A.6 , , J , ~;9( I - - - ARTERIAL ROAO TYPE 'A' ------~R~LR~~E~ Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 13A (Orono) Lot 27 138 ~13A~ 2C on c o ., ~ 8 c o U ... c o .~ 8 c 8 AI A January 2009 "" '" '" ....... Lot 29 Lot 28 Lot 27 I A R1-2 I I , I , , I , R1-2 I I I I ,/ I I I A-1 I A I '" c 0 ., ~ 8 0 I 8 " I R1-2 I I R1-2 R1-14 , ~... I _ _ _ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A,' ______ ARTERIAL. ROAD TYPE 'El' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 13B (Orono) '" a .1 .3 2C ~13B~ 13A 887 I ! , I I j. I AI AI January 2009 '" '" "'" ""~ Lol32 Lol31 ~ JH EP RH CONCa>5rONROACB I / I IRH I , - --... I I I L I I I -' A I CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) LESKARD (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '14' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 1 Oth DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 Wl1J~ ~'i'__ O,IL~.MA~ DEf'VTTClfJIlK ~ c o .. ~ c o U A-3' - - - ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ------ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 14 (Leskard) 2E l!I14l!1 2E C3.7 .... c 0 Lot 26 Lol25 C3 ., ~ ~ 8 c 0 l~ u RH A.' '" c . 0 ., ~ I 8 I c 0 1.--- u CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of CLARINGTON (Former TONn of Newcastle) KIRBY (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ClARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '15' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 1 Oth DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 \!i9J~ ~~ G.B,I\ICl<NIO......YOR OEf'UTYClSIK 'DO '" '" ""~ ___ ARTeRIAL ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE '8' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 15 (Kirby) 2E ~ 15 ~ 2E tltl~ AI A January 2009 Lot 10 Lot 9 RH , i ID I c ~, 0 .. I ~ 8 c 0 u \ C3 " ~ A I l-. _ ...J AI JJ 2E l!:l16l!:l 2D CORPORATION ofUle MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Fonner Town of Newcastle) KENDAL (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '16' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 W9J~ ~W-v O...RICIIAAll.......VOR DEPUTYCLe'I\ '" ...~ --- ARTERlAlRQ/lJ)TYPE'A' ------ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE'S' Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-Law 84-63 Schedule 16 (Kendal) January 2009 '" '" Lot 11 -' --- A 1...-- AI A "" '" Lot 10 Lal9 /,-- II ../' " I \ RH I RH -- -- A --1.. January 2009 A / i /' i-/ I "" ....... _ _ _ ARTERIAl ROAD TYPE 'A' ______ ARTERIAL ROAD TYPE 'B' Lat8 Lot 7 :1--1------, A-l :! N ~ 5 ~~-, "; I 8 RH b P":I'NE$CRESCENT RH-17 JONESAVE'lUE ! c o ., S c o u A RH I I EP-7 A (H)RH-17 RH-17 EP-9 EP ----- CORPORATION of the MUNICIPALITY of ClARlNGTON (Former TCM'Il of Newcastle) NEWTONVILLE (FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE) THIS IS SCHEDULE '17' TO BY-LAW 84-63 PASSED THIS 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 'BMa<<J-J ~~ a.B,lllCKAAD.......1'OR DEP\llYCI,.ERlI; Municipality of Clarington Zoning By-laW 84-63 Schedule 17 (Newtonville) 28 ~ 17 ~ 28 891 Cl~mgron " REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Report #: PSD-048-09 File #:DEV 94-061 (X-REF. COPA 98-001 By-law #: AND ROPA 95-006) Subject: PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT A 9-HOLE GOLF COURSE AND CLUBHOUSE BUILDING (STONEHENGE GOLF CLUB) - 3033 TAUNTON ROAD, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON APPLICANT: TUNNEY PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-048-09 be received; 2. THAT the rezoning application submitted by Tunney Planning, be APPROVED and that the proposed Zoning By-law contained in Attachment 3 to this Report be PASSED; and I I . , I I I I I ! 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised ot Council's decision. Reviewed by: . n linWu, Chief Administrative Officer DJ/caS/dt 11 May 2009 f CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 892 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Agent: Tunney Planning 1.2 Applicant: Stonehenge Golf Club Inc. (previously known as Crooked Creek Golf Course Ltd.) 1.3 Proposal: To permit a 9-hole golf course and club house building 1.4 Site Area: 41.96 Hectares 1.5 Location: 3033 Taunton Road, Former Township of Darlington 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 An Official Plan Amendment for the use was approved by Council through resolution #C-237-02 on April 15, 2002. A number of studies including hydro-geological, turf management and environmental impact studies were prepared in support of the amendment. Reflecting the conclusions of these reports and agency concerns regarding the impact an 18 hole golf course would have on the site's natural heritage features, the application was revised substantially, reducing the number of holes from 18 to 9 and decreasing the land area from approximately 54 hectares to approximately 42 hectares. The studies conclude that the proposed 9 hole golf course would have no significant impacts on the natural heritage features. 2.2 When approving the Official Plan Amendment, Council decided that the application for rezoning only be considered when certain conditions had been met. These included the transfer of provincially significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) lands to the Central Lake Conservation Authority as part of the Stephen's Gulch Conservation Area, agreement to the conditions of site plan approval, and agreement to conduct a post construction monitoring program. 2.3 The related amendment to the Region of Durham Official Plan was approved on October 24,2002 (Amendment #81). On December 10, 2002, Official Plan Amendment No. 26 to the Clarington Official Plan came into affect. 2.4 Due to the Greenbelt Protection Act (an act that was created for the greenbelt study and which established a moratorium that would temporarily prevent new urban uses outside existing urban boundaries on rural and agricultural lands within the study area) which came into affect in 2003 and the Minister's Zoning Order, the Municipality was not permitted to pass a zoning by-law to permit the golf course until after the Greenbelt Protection Act expired and the Minister's Zoning Order was repealed. 2.5 In 2005 the Provincial Greenbelt Plan was approved and the applicant was informed that the rezoning approval process of the golf course could again proceed. It is important to point out that since the rezoning of the relevant lands predated the 893 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 3 Minister's Zoning Order and the 1st reading of the Greenbelt Protection Act, the application is not subject to the policies of the Greenbelt Plan. 2.6 The applicant submitted a site plan application in May 2008. The site plan drawings went through numerous iterations and in April 2009 the applicant agreed in writing to the conditions of site plan approval. These conditions include the implementation of the recommendations from the approved turf management report, hydro-geological report, Environmental Impact Study and the post construction monitoring program. , L 3,0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 A 9-hole golf course and gravel parking area have already been developed on the lands, in accordance with the Golf Course Environmental Construction Management Plan and the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) recommendations. The south end and the northwest edge of the site, which forms part of the Soper Creek and Crooked Creek tributary valley lands, are in the process of being donated to Central Lake Conservation Authority (CLOCA) as part of the Stephen's Gulch Conservation Area. These provincially significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest have been buffered from the golf course in accordance with the stipulations of the EIS and the Stonehenge Golf Course Environmental Construction Management Plan, July 2003 and are reflected in the zoning schedule as "Environmental Protection". 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North: Taunton Road (immediately adjacent), agricultural lands and forested Soper Creek valley. An existing residence is located on the north side of Taunton Road across from the application site. Forested and valley lands identified as Provincially Significant ANSI Lands. Agricultural lands and a rural residential dwelling. Forested lands, Soper Creek valley and related tributaries owned by CLOCA. South: East: West: An aerial photo of the site and its immediate surroundings is enclosed as Attachment 2 to this report. 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policv Statement (PPS) The 2005 PPS states that in rural areas recreation, tourism and other economic opportunities should be promoted. The PPS also calls for the promotion of economic development and competitiveness by providing opportunities for a diversified economic base. The 9-hole golf course is expected to complement these objectives. 894 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 4 The PPS also recommends that development and site alteration shall not be permitted on adjacent lands to natural heritage features and areas unless the ecological function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on their ecological functions. The PPS also recommends that healthy and active communities should be promoted by considering the impacts of planning decisions on provincial parks, conservation reserves and natural features. These objectives have been complied with in that an environmental impact study, an environmental construction management plan and monitoring program have been prepared and approved for the 9-hole golf course. The relevant PPS policies are further acknowledged by the decision to donate the parcels of valley lands to the Central Lake Conservation Authority as part of provincially significant ANSI lands. It can be concluded that this proposal is consistent with the PPS. 4.2 Provincial Greenbelt Plan The application site is situated within the Provincial Greenbelt. However, as this rezoning application predates the Minister's Zoning Order and the first reading of the Greenbelt Protection Act, this application is not subject to the policies of the Greenbelt Plan. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Natural Resources was kept appraised of the application during the "one-window" provincial initiative at the time the Greenbelt Plan Study was underway, and a copy of the Environmental Construction Management Plan was forwarded to them for record keeping. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLANS 5.1 Durham Reaional Official Plan As was mentioned in point 2.3 of this report, through the related Regional Official Plan Amendment #81, a 9-hole golf course is permitted within the designation. The Region confirmed that the proposed zoning amendment is in compliance with the policies of the Regional Official Plan. 5.2 Clarinaton Official Plan The related Official Plan Amendment No. 26 to the Clarington Official Plan took effect in December 2002, to permit a 9-hole golf course on the lands in question. The golf course designation is marked with a symbol "G2" (Golf course) on Map A1 (Darlington) Land Use Map of the Clarington Official Plan with underlying "Green Space" and "Environmental Protection" designations. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands "Agricultural" and "Environmental Protection". The latter zoning designation permits golf courses and driving ranges exclusive of buildings, as well as conservation, forestry, wildlife reserve or other similar uses which provide for the preservation of the natural environment. The "Agricultural" 895 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 5 zone does not allow a golf course use. In order to allow the golf course and clubhouse building, a Zoning By-law amendment is required. 7.0 STAFF COMMENTS 7.1 As was alluded to in paragraph no. 2 of this report, in 2002 Council approved the Official Plan Amendment to allow the use and decided that the application for rezoning be considered when the following conditions had been met: . Arrangements are made for the transfer of provincially significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) lands to the Central Lake Conservation Authority as part of the Stephen's Gulch Conservation Area; · Agreement to the conditions of Site Plan approval that would include the implementation of: )> The turf management report; )> The hydro-geological report; )> The EIS report as consolidated by Niblett and Associates; and, · The applicant/owner agrees to conduct at least a 3 year post construction monitoring program. 7.2 A reference plan of the provincially significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (mainly two tributaries of the Soper Creek and their associated valley lands), measuring 3.054 hectares and 9.386 hectares respectively, have been deposited under the Land Titles Act. CLOCA has confirmed that the land parcels are in the process of being transferred to them for inclusion in the Stephen's Gulch Conservation Area. These parcels are located in the northwest and southwest corners of the site and have been buffered from the golf course in accordance with the EIS requirements and Stonehenge Golf Course Environmental Construction Management Plan, July 2003, in consultation with the Central Lake Conservation Authority. See Attachment 2 for more perspective. 7.3 Niblett and Associates, who peer reviewed the technical studies and EIS upon a request of the Region, consolidated the conditions of the turf management report, hydro- geological report and the Environmental Impact Study in an Environmental Construction Management Plan & Report, dated July 2003, to ensure that the conditions are implemented appropriately through the development and management of the golf course. 7.4 In April 2009, the owner agreed to the draft conditions of Site Plan approval that included the conditions set out in the foresaid studies and the Environmental Construction Management Plan & Report dated July 31, 2003. The conditions of Site Plan approval also included a requirement to conduct a 3 year post construction monitoring program in accordance with .the stipulations in the Environmental Construction Management Plan. 896 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 6 7.5 The owner indicated that they will not proceed with the construction of the proposed clubhouse at this time, and that a site plan amendment application will be submitted if they wish to proceed with it in the future. 7.6 The site specific zoning by-law is enclosed as Attachment 3. The proposed zoning changes on the site are as follows: . The southern part of the property that is zoned "Environmental Protection" remains "Environmental Protection" as this zone designation permits a golf course as well as conservation, forestry, wildlife reserve or other similar uses which provide for the preservation of the natural environment (holes 6 and 7 of the course and the provincially significant ANSI lands to be donated to CLOCA are situated within this area); . The northwest corner of the property that is zoned "Environmental Protection" remains "Environmental Protection" for the same reasons than above, but this zone is slightly expanded to incorporate a small area to the immediate east that forms part of the provincially significant ANSI lands to be donated to CLOCA; . The upper 55% of the property that is zoned "Agricultural" is rezoned as follows: > The central area of the golf course featuring a huge waterpond and valleylands, the limits of which has been determined by the EIS, from "Agricultural" to "Environmental Protection"; and, > The remainder of the lands from "Agricultural" to "Agricultural Exception (A- 8)". The latter zone exception was originally created to facilitate the Newcastle Golf Course, and is found to be suitable for this area too. The A-8 zone schedule reads as follows: "Notwithstanding Section 6.1, those lands zoned A-8 on the schedules to this By-law may, in addition to the other uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) Zone, be used for a golf course. The placement of buildings and structures shall be subject to the zone regulations set out in Section 6.3" The proposed location of the future clubhouse building, its specifications, and the existing structures on site such as the barn that is being used as a maintenance building, as well as the temporary (seasonal) washrooms and pay kiosk comply with the zone regulations in Section 6.3 and do not require any variance or amendment. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Staff are satisfied that the conditions of Council resolution C-237 -02 dated April 15, 2002 has been met. 8.2 The application has been reviewed in consideration of comments received from the circulated agencies, the policies of the Clarington Official Plan, Zoning By-law 897 REPORT NO.: PSD-048-09 PAGE 7 regulations, and the public. In consideration of the comments contained in this report, staff respectfully recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment contained in Attachment 3 be APPROVED. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Aerial photo Attachment 3 - Zoning By-law Amendment Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Central Lake Ontario Conservation Peter and Joanna Tax Stonehenge Golf Club Inc. Dave Fanthoam Tunney Planning Inc. Evelyn Stroud Debbie Nixon Libby Racansky Ministry of Natural Resources AI O'Donnell Linda Gasser Kerry Meydam Durham Region Planning Department 898 \~ \ o - Ol .= ;: CO C ~ .. E ~ o !!:. Q. .. ::;: c o :::: CO u o ...J >- 1:: .. Q. o ~ D. i~ . ~ " z ----II I II II I ~l -..- ~~~? " i~ " . ~ . U\ ! H ~l II~ Attachment 1 To Report PSD-048-09 I- Z w :E o z .....w ~:E ~Cl: CIl~ >~ w' c~ C> ~ z o N "'C - ....I o ";: III - C o -.t -.t o o ,... It) .... ;.: <Il C ~ o - 'c!lro - . ob ~( / ~ 899 Atlacnment 0 To Report PSD-048-09 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2009-_ being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend by-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle, in accordance with application DEV 94-061 to permit A 9-hole golf course and clubhouse building; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule ''1'' to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Agricultural (A)", to "Agricultural Exception (A-8)", and from "Agricultural (A)" to "Environmental Protection (EP)" as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-iaw. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 24, 34 and 36 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990. !' BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2009 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 899002 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2009- , passed this day of , 2009 A.D. L .. LOT 4 ~ .., ~:-t:",.:~ ....-;;.~~. :t....:-.:~~ ~:;$'';':~"' ~........~ ~:..~.... ......~..... ........<t("-..... ...~'"" " ...~... '" "0 c: <( ..- Jg --' c: <Il <Il ~ <Il a:l <Il U c: "' ;: .Q <.i' "0 "' o 0:: "0 <Il c: <Il 0. o c: :J ~ ~..,..'}:.~-;.;.."\11f;~~~~~. ,,:...~'.f;o,~~X".~......~......;..:::.~~.....~"'..."4..; .r..~~;.,~~~.;;.:f~:~~~.:~:~* """"".......-.::l..~~... ............ ""...~~ ~~~~"'.~~~.....~l"~"~"'~<""",,,,,,,,,,,, ~~.....~~~.~... ~,":~",,'$~~ ..........~:..~~;.,'\;.-.,.......~......":...~~;f.:;........-~... :~;;;.........~...i.....~.....~"":.c:.:r-......'":....~~ ~~ $"~~~.:~:..........;.f~...~:'''' ~;.,"'-.;:~~-:..~'$~~""""~-::.1....~......~~~... ........-.-;;:...~~.... ~:!:'...........~~...-."'-.. J~~?~~~~~~;"~~J'~: ....~1;.,...."................~.........~....:r..... ~"'~r. -...:-~.......~...~... ~~~"";...~ ~"""'~1f;.:-.~~~........~...~}.~"'.:" "'~"''ff.....;c-.~,...~1''t.."''~~....~"..:~;..'" "'~~~~-::~"'1:;:~"""""'''~:;''''~~~'''''''''' , LOT 2 TAUNTON R IV W~1t s oo:t z o - en en w u z o o ~":j Zoning Change From "A" To "A-a" ~Zoning Change From "A" To "EP" rt;-~i:4 Zoning To Remain "EP" Jim Abernethy, Mayor o ROAD '" Ii: Ii; "' ~ .. ~ DARLINGTON Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk o << li ~ "' z o '" u o 003 ~!~!ilJgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Report #: PSD-050-09 File #: COPA 2003-004, By-law #: x-ref (ZBA 2003-016; ROPA 2003-003) Subject: AMENDMENT NO. 67 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN APPLICANT: 1559306 ONTARIO LTD. PART LOT 20, CONCESSION 5, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAUNTON ROAD AND HOLT ROAD RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-050-09 be received; 2. THAT Amendment No. 67 to the Clarington Official Plan as shown on Attachment 2 to the report be ADOPTED and the necessary By-law contained in Attachment 3 be passed and that the Amendment be forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham for APPROVAL; 3. THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be forwarded a copy of PSD-050-09; and 4. . THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. ~flO Reviewed by: in Wu, f Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: David J. rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services LB'COS'sh May 15, 2009 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899004 REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: The Biglieri Group 1.2 Owner: 1559306 Ontario Limited 1.3 Official Plan Amendment: To amend the Clarington Official Plan to permit the development of a golf driving range, miniature golf course, clubhouse and storage facility and a residential dwelling. 1.4 Related Applications: . ROPA 2003-003: An application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan to permit the proposed use. . ZBA 2003-016: To amend the zoning of the subject lands from "Agriculture Exception (A-1)" to a zone appropriate to permit the proposed use. . Site plan approval will be required after the above noted applications are considered. 1.5 Land Area of Application: 16.59 ha (41.7 acres) 1.6 Location: Part of Lot 20, Concession 5 former Township of Darlington (5075 Holt Road) and is situated at the northeast corner of Holt Road and Taunton Road. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On April 24, 2003 the Bigileri Group submitted applications on behalf of Burt Beckell to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit the development of a golf driving range, miniature golf course, clubhouse and storage facility. The Region received an application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan on May 1, 2003 to permit these proposed uses. On June 27, 2003 the Municipality was informed by the consultant that ownership of the subject lands had changed and that they now belong to 1559306 Ontario Limited. 2.2 Several technical studies including a Planning Rational Report, an Agricultural Review and a Planning Rational Addendum report were submitted prior to the moratorium put on all development applications within the Greenbelt in December 2003. The moratorium did not lift until the passing of the Greenbelt Act in 2005. 2.3 Transition policies were included in the Greenbelt Act, 2005, in that planning applications made before December 16, 2004, were not required to conform to the Greenbelt Plan. As such, this application for an Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning are not subject to the provisions of the Greenbelt Plan. 899005 REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 PAGE 3 2.4 Between 2005 and the present there has been spora'dic activity regarding these planning files. During this time, the Owner has built a single family dwelling on the north-east portion of the site. I , I I I , I 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 Existing Uses: Residential and Agricultural 3.2 Surrounding Uses: East: North: West South: agricultural land, woodlands, rural residences agricultural land indoor gun club, agricultural land and a portion of the Harmony Black Farewell Creek Wetland Complex agricultural land 899006 , I j i REPORT NO,: PSD-050-09 PAGE 4 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policv Statement This application was made under the 1997 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). The intention of the agricultural policies within the PPS is, first and foremost, the protection of prime agricultural lands. However, the PPS does provide for exceptions provided several 'tests' can be satisfied including: a) a demonstrated need, b) there are no reasonable alternative locations and c) no alternative locations with lower priority agricultural lands. The applicant has satisfied these testS. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 Durham Reoional Official Plan The lands are designated "Permanent Agriculture" in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The Region's Official Plan contains criteria similar to those contained in the Clarington Official Plan, as noted below. 5.2 The Clarinoton Official Plan The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject lands "General Agricultural Area". The predominant use of lands designated "General Agricultural Area" shall generally be for agricultural purposes. Golf courses, or in this case a golf driving range, may be permitted in agricultural areas by amendment to the Official Plan provided that a number of criteria are satisfied including: a) there is a demonstrated need for such a facility in an agricultural designation; b) it is not located on high capability agricultural lands; c) it conforms with the Minimum Distance Separation Formulae; d) it does not adversely impact the ability of surrounding agricultural operations to carry on normal agricultural practices; e) it does not impact significant natural features and minimizes impacts on watercourses, groundwater resources or other environmentally sensitive features; f) it does not use quantities of ground or surface water for irrigation purposes that exceed the standards of the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources and the Conservation Authority; and g) it is individually serviced with a private sewage disposal system and private drilled well which complies with the standards of the Ministry of the Environment and the Region. The current proposal satisfies these criteria. 899007 REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 PAGE 5 5.3 ZONING BY-LAW 5.3.1 Zoning by-law 84-63 zones the subject lands "Agricultural Exception (A-1)". Permitted land uses in this zone are predominantly limited to agricultural uses. The current zoning does not permit the proposed use, hence the need for an amendment to the comprehensive Zoning By-law. 6.0 SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL STUDIES 6.1 The Region of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington have two different processes regarding the preparation of technical studies, particularly EnvironmentallnJPact Studies. The Region allows an applicant to hire its own consultant to prepare the Study, but then may require the Study to be peer reviewed, at the cost of the applicant. Conversely the Municipality of Clarington has a roster of pre-qualified consultants that would prepare the Study. Municipal staff hires the consultant and manages the process, at the client's expense. Regional and Municipal staff gave the applicant the option to follow the process of his choice; he chose the Regional Process. 6.2 The following studies were prepared and subsequently Peer Reviewed by Regionally hired consultants. Plannina Rationale Report, prepared by The Biglieri Group Ltd., dated April 2003. Addendum to Plan nino Rationale Report, prepared by The Biglieri Group Ltd., dated April 19, 2004. · These reports were reviewed by Municipal and Regional Staff. · The Plannino Rationale Report focuses on the site's proximity to the Hamlet of Hampton, Darlington Arena and the Oshawa Marksman Club, stating that this use will complement these existing uses and further reinforce and enhance the recreational activities within this area. With respect to need, the report states that the Municipality of Clarington is under serviced and can support more golf driving ranges. The report also notes that the site can easily revert back to agricultural production due to the minimal disruption proposed and the temporary nature of golf driving ranges. · The Addendum to the Plannina Rationale Report was prepared in response to concerns raised by MMAH that the original planning report did not outline how this proposal met all of the tests of the PPS. This report provided a summary of the reports that had been completed to date, and how they met the tests of the PPS. In addition, the results of a windshield survey/constraint mapping exercise were presented. · Municipal and Regional Staff reviewed these studies. Aoricultural Review of Proposed Golf Drivino Ranoe & Associated Development, Prepared by VDV Consulting, dated January 23, 2003 (submitted April 22, 2003). 899008 PAGE 6 REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 . This report was peer reviewed by DBH Soil Services Inc. . The AQricultural Assessment Report states that although the soil capability is high, there are a number of factors that must be considered to determine the agricultural potential of a property. Based on the limited area, only 14 hectares (34.5 acres) of tillable land, a lack of farm structures, the irregular shape of the property, and because of the Minimum Distance Separation requirements for new agricultural structures, this study concludes that it is unlikely that a farm operation could be viable on the subject property. . The peer reviewers agreed with the Study. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), prepared by Watershed Management Ecology, dated June 2007. . This report was reviewed by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. . The Environmental Impact Statement, evaluated the current proposal with respect to the small woodlot, and the adjacent Provincially Significant Black-Farewell Creek Wetland Complex. The EIS concluded that with the inclusion of appropriate mitigation measures including buffers, the proposed development will not negatively impact the natural heritage features identified on and adjacent to the site. . The peer reviewers agreed with the Study. Hvdro-QeoloQical Study, prepared by Mitz & Associates Inc., dated November 2006. . This report was peer reviewed by Jagger Hims Limited. . A HydroQeoloQical Study evaluated the current proposal to determine the suitability of the site for development on private services and on the potential for the development to cause adverse environmental impact. The report concluded that the site can support private servicing for the development, that there are sufficient groundwater resources to service the development, and that the shallow aquifer and adjacent wetlands will not be vulnerable as a result of this development. . The peer reviewers agreed with the Study. 7.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION 7.1 The Public Meeting for this application was held September 8, 2003. At that time only a few enquiries were received about the application. Generally, these enquiries expressed concern about establishing a golf driving range on prime agricultural land. 899009 REPORT NO,: PSD-050-09 PAGE 7 7.2 Durham Region held a Public Meeting on June 3, 2003 to consider the Durham Region Official Plan Amendment and the application was referred back to Regional Staff for consideration. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 Prior to the Greenbelt moratorium comments were received from the agencies regarding the development proposal. The majority of the agencies had no objections to the Official Plan Amendment or the Rezoning, they were concerned with site plan type details like entrance locations, grading and septic design. 8.2 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority requested the preparation of an Environmental Impact Study, which has been completed. They have since reviewed all of the technical studies and do not object the proposed official plan amendment. 8.3 The 2003 the Ministry of Municipal Affairs were concerned that the applicant had not provided information identifying that there are no reasonable alternative locations avoiding prime agricultural areas or that there are no reasonable alternative locations within the prime agricultural area having lower priority agricultural lands on which to establish this use. Since the original MMAH comments, a Planning Rational addendum was prepared and sent to MMAH (2004) for consideration. The MMAH has not expressed any concerns with the Report. 8.4 The Ministry of Transportation previously identify these lands as being within the proposed 407 East Completion Area for the East Durham Link. In 2003 the Ministry recommended that development be discouraged to locate within the Study Area until the EA is complete. Recent conversations with the MTO staff reiterates this 2003 position, but not dissimilar to previous applications within the EA area, MTO can only advise of their position regarding a development proposal if the environmental assessment is not complete and the technically preferred route has not been solidified. MTO staff did not object to the proposal but they do note there could be risks associated with proceeding with the development prior to finalization of the EA later this year. The proponent has been made aware of this. 899010 8.5 The Durham Region Planning Department is currently preparing a positive staff report for the associated Regional Official Plan Amendment. 9.0 DISCUSSION j j !- 9.1 The Clarington Official Plan, the Durham Region Official Plan and the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) all support and promote the protection of high quality agricultural land from non-agricultural development. However, each of these documents also provides 'tests' which if passed, a non-agricultural use can be permitted, which in this case, is a golf driving range, miniature golf course and associated uses. REPORT NO,: PSD-050-09 PAGE 8 9.2 Through the preparation of the numerous studies and a peer review, the various tests, to permit a golf driving range and miniature golf course, set by the Provincial Policy Statement, the Regional Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan have been met as noted in the below table. 9.3 The PPS provides opportunity for consideration of new non-residential development in a prime agricultural area subject to satisfactory justification that includes: Provincial Policv Statement ReDort Satisfied 2.1.3c)1. demonstrated need for the Planninq Rationale ReDort, prepared by The Yes designation of additional lands to Siglierl Group Ltd., dated April 2003. accommodate this use; Addendum to Plannino Rationale Report, prepared by The Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 19, 2004. These reports were reviewed by Municipai and Reoional Staff. 2.1.3c)2. that there are no reasonable Plannino Rationale Report, prepared by The Yes alternative locations on land not identified Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 2003. as prime agricultural area; Addendum to Plannino Rationale Report, prepared by The Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 19, 2004. These reports were reviewed by Municipai and Reqional Staff. 2.1.3c)3 that there are no reasonable Plannlno Rationale Report, prepared by The Yes alternative locations in prime agricultural Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 2003. areas with lower priority agricultural lands. Addendum to Planninq Rationale Report, prepared by The Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 19, 2004. These reports were reviewed by Municipal and Reqional Staff. 9.4 The Clarington Official Plan also provides that golf courses(driving ranges) may be permitted in Agricultural Areas(not on the Moraine) provided that ClariOilton Official Plan Report Satisfied a)there is a demonstrated need for such a Plan nino Rationale ReDort, prepared by The Yes facility in an agricultural designation and Siglieri Group Ltd., dated April 2003. there are no alternative sites in the Green Addendum to Plannino Rationale Report, Space or Waterfront Greenway prepared by The Slglieri Group Ltd., dated designations; April 19, 2004. These reports were reviewed by Municipal and Reoional Staff. b)it is not located on high capability Aoricultural Review of Proposed Golf Drivinq Yes agricultural lands; Ranoe & Associated Development, Prepared by VDV Consulting, dated January 23, 2003. This report was peer reviewed by DSH Soli Services Inc. c) it conforms with the Minimum Distance Aoricultural Review of ProDosed Golf Drivino Yes Separation Formulae; Ranoe & Associated Development, Prepared by VDV Consulting, dated January 23, 2003. This report was peer reviewed by DSH Soil Services Inc. 899011 REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 PAGE 9 ! I i 9.5 The subject lands are within the Highway 401 - 407 'East Durham Link' study area. I The Ministry of Transportation has stated that development of lands within the study i area should be discouraged until the EA is completed later this year. The proposed I driving range will be located approximately 400m west of the eastern extent of the link, i I and approximately 100m east of the associated road improvements to Taunton Road. Through this EA process, the Municipality has requested that Holt Road, which abuts this property to the west, be upgraded from a seasonal road to a year round. 9.6 The golf driving range is providing a recreational opportunity for not only the residents of Hampton, but to other Clarington residents as well. . 9.7 The golf driving range and mini-putt requires minimal grading and the structures can be removed should the owner want to revert the property back to an agricultural operation. 9.8 The proponent has completed the necessary steps to address the requirements of the Official Plans and the PPS. Site specific technical agency requirements will be addressed through the rezoning and the site plan approval process. d)it does not adversely impact the ability of Aoricultural Review of ProDosed Golf Drivino Yes surrounding agricultural operations to carry Ranoe & Associated Development, Prepared on normal agricultural practices; by VDV Consulting, dated January 23, 2003. This report was peer reviewed by DBH Soil Services inc. e)it does not impact significant natural Hvdro-oeolooical Stud v, prepared by Mitz & Yes features and minimizes impacts on Associates Inc., dated November 2006. watercourses, groundwater resources or This report was peer reviewed by Jagger other environmentally sensitive features; HimsLimited. Environmentallmoact Statement lEiS), prepared by Watershed Management Ecology, dated June 2007. This report was peer reviewed by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authoritv. flit does not use quantities of ground or HYdro-oeolooical Study, prepared by Mitz & Yes surface water for irrigation purposes that Associates Inc., dated November 2006. exceed the standards of the Ministry of the This report was peer reviewed by Jagger Environment, Ministry of Natural Hims Limited. Resources and the Conservation Authority; This report was also reviewed by the Central and Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. g)it is individually serviced with a private HYdro-oeolooical Stud v, prepared by Mitz & Yes sewage disposal system and private drilled Associates Inc., dated November 2006. well which complies with the standards of This report was peer reviewed by Jagger the Ministry of the Environment and the Hims Limited. Region. This report was also reviewed by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. 899012 10 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 It is Staff's opinion that this application satisfies the tests set out in the OP and that it be approved. REPORT NO.: PSD-050-09 PAGE 10 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map and Site Plan Attachment 2 - Official Plan Amendment Attachment 3 - Implementing By-law Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: 1559306 Ontario Limited The Bigileri Group Durham Region Federation of Agriculture Doug MacDuff Mr. and Mrs. Fitzgerald Libby Racansky Linda Gasser Region of Durham 899013 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-050-09 - d. - ~ C I- OVQel N33i:>8 ell C - E 0 c 'C - ell 't:I Gl Cl E M c - c - ell 'E -.:: "C 10 c Cl E c ell Cl .. Gl .... E <( ::i 0 a"'Ol::l3^O~~ 31d'tV\l 'It I E Cl M ~ Cl I 'C C 0 .. 0 <( M c 0 lU 't: E I C 0 Gl 0 ii: l'lI ~ M co 0 E N - 0 ~ c !!::. 0 ii: N <( oCt 0 0 :c u Q. N co oCt Q. IE lQ .. '0 m co 0 0 ::E oCt "T 0 IE N >. It: C') c Q. ID c Ol 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 It) :;: c Cl '61 It) .. () III c III .... " OVOl:J .llOH 0 ... ... .. 0 - >< c >< II:: i.: -' Cl 0 Gl c N E >. 'C: C 1:: co :c .. co .c Q. C3 ... 0 e --- :> II. 0 lOT -" RAN 1IJfi'--N21 PART 1 P~AN IOR-2~til -. am'"' , 9 I .._ I....... .... .. ... .. , , . , , ..... .". ..... '-'-I-I-I 11 .... · i I .... , , . ; , , . , . '0 C!i ~o::: , ~- , '2 o I- '2 b :~ I , I i ~ ~ ~ ~ '" " ~ ~ " ~ . on , i 0 .~ N . . .. . .3 .. , " u , !l . ~ u , ~ P'<>p<>""" = [jDWellin9 Un;! .......- -~ j..... - -... -. "" ," ... , , , , . . -'. rGQIIDoi''''9ROtIgOhnCrng PAR T 1, P l A N 40R-21437 GOLF DRIVING RANGE o 350, ~ '00, ,w, 2QO~ ,w, '00, I ~ , ~ ,";"'"'" /. Ace."lEgr... OO'\Ollr II 16.ffl AII"'AI/~C I - .rl,reM 'tlT$ cwr.............._~ AND 2/ ..- -. PAIi'T PlAI'I 1#11-2626 LOT 2 T ~ 899014 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-050-09 AMENDMENT NO. 67 to the MUNICIPALlTYOF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: The purpose of this Amendment to the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan is to permit the development of a golf driving range, miniature golf course, associated storage facility and clubhouse. BASIS: This amendment is based on the Hvdroqeoloqical Study, prepared by Mitz & Associates Inc., dated November 2006 and the peer reviewed by Jagger Hims Limited; the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), prepared by Watershed Management Ecology, dated June 2007 and the peer review by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; the Aqricultural Review of Proposed Golf Drivinq Ranqe & Associated Development, Prepared by VDV Consulting, dated January 23, 2003 and peer reviewed by DBH Soil Services Inc. as well as the Planninq Rationale Report, prepared by The Biglieri Group Ltd., dated April 2003 and the Addendum to Planninq Rationale Report, prepared by The Biglieri Group Ltd., dated April 19, 2004 which were reviewed by both Municipal and Regional Planning Staff. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Official Plan for the Municipality of Clarington is hereby amended as follows: "1. By adding a new policy 13.3.14 as follows 13.3.4 Notwithstanding Section 13.3.3 a golf driving range, mini- putt, associated storage facility and clubhouse, in addition to the existing residential dwelling, are permitted at the Northeast corner of Holt and Taunton Roads, known as 5075 Holt Road, Assessment No. 181701013017700 within the Municipality of Clarington." IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan as amended regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this amendment INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan as amended regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this amendment 899015 Attachment 3 To Report PSD-050-09 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2009- being a By-law to adopt Amendment No. 67 to the Clarington Official Plan WHEREAS Section 17 (22) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended, authorizes the Municipality of Clarington to pass by-laws for the adoption or repeal of Official Plans and Amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend the Clarington Official Plan to add a new policy to the Agricultural Areas Policies contained in Section 13 of the Clarington Official Plan; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Amendment No. 67 to the Clarington Official Plan being attached Explanatory Text is hereby adopted. 2. That this By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of the passing thereof. BY-LAW read a first time this 899016 day of 2009 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2009 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2009 Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti l. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ~{~mglOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday May 25, 2009 Report # PSD-051-09 File#: PLN 8.11.1 By-law #: Subject: CLARINGTON SIGN BY-LAW REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-051-09 be received; 2. THAT the draft Sign By-law contained in Attachment 6 continue to be reviewed to address any concerns raised at the public meeting; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Fi n linWu, Chief Administrative Officer David J. ome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services jt I L1FLlsn 19 May 2009 I' I , I , CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVlllE, ONTARIO l1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899017 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND The Municipality's current Sign By-law 97-157 was approved by Council on July 7th, 1997. Over the past twelve years there have been many changes in sign technology, advertising trends, and business needs for advertising and promotion. During this timeframe, litigation has helped clarify the limits municipalities can enact in Sign By-laws. Sign By-laws must not exceed the parameters established by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees the right to freedom of expression and speech set out in the Charter, subject to such reasonable limits as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. In addition, the Municipal Act has been amended since the Municipality's current Sign By-law was enacted requiring some changes to it as well. In order to address these issues the Planning Services Department conducted a comprehensive review of Sign By-law 97-157. The purpose of the review was to evaluate the Municipality's current Sign By-law and determine how all signs in Clarington should be regulated. This included signs on public and private property and dealt with sign standards such as the number, height, size and location of signs. The proposed draft Sign By-law has been crafted in such a way as to achieve the following objectives: . Promote public safety; . Facilitate aesthetic improvement of the Municipality such that signage should be integrated with the architecture and landscaping not only to identify and inform, but also to complement and enliven the streetscape; . Provide commercial and industrial enterprises adequate, fiexible means to identify themselves and their products or services, recognizing that the primary function of signage is to identify, rather than advertise; . Encourage and improve the quality of sign design; . Implement the Municipality's Official Plan policies and Urban Design Guidelines; . Recognize the special character areas of the Municipality such as, but not limited to, the historic downtowns and rural areas; . Introduce a clear and concise format which will facilitate the easy interpretation, proper administration and maintenance of the Sign By-law; . Provide a framework and guidelines for Sign By-law amendment; and . Provide provisions for the effective and efficient enforcement of the Sign By-law. 1.1 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES AND URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS The Clarington Official Plan seeks to achieve a vision for Clarington as a place where each community can build on its individual character but share a collective image. Image is a characteristic that is visually perceived. Signage is part of our visual experience; sign types, numbers, sizes, and locations unite to present a collective image of the Municipality. One of the three key principles which provide direction for the policies of the Official Plan is healthy communities. A healthy community nurtures the collective health and well- being of residents. A community's identity and urban design contributes to residents' quality of life. The Official Plan states that, in regards to community identity, a sense of place and identity will be fostered through reinforcement of neighbourhood and 899018 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 3 community life by physical and social contributions that create civic identity and pride. Excellence in urban design contributes to Clarington's sense of place and each neighbourhoOd's identity. Signage is a component of urban design. Aesthetically pleasing signage throughout the municipality will contribute to a positive sense of place and in turn help achieve a healthy community. The Official Plan contains goals and objectives for town, village and neighbourhood centres and commercial uses which state that providing people-oriented places with a high quality pedestrian environment, plus. the preservation and enhancement of the vitality and character of historic downtowns are desirable. The provision of visually pleasing signage enhances safety and maintains pedestrian flow and helps provide a high quality pedestrian environment. Signage regulations that are specific to the downtown cores maintain and enhance their individual character. In 2008 the Municipality began the process of reviewing the Clarington Official Plan. Community sessions were held in six Clarington communities, at these and in other forums, participants were asked a series of questions. Residents recommended that cultural heritage and community character be preserved and further enhanced by giving more thought to appearance. The vast natural system of green space and the quiet country feeling is highly valued by residents. The majority of people indicated that it is the small town scale community character that creates a strong sense of identity and sets the Municipality apart from other areas in the GTA. Having regard to the different areas of Clarington and setting sign regulations that are specific to those areas will contribute to what municipal residents' value. 2. SIGNAGE IN CLARINGTON Clarington's current and draft Sign By-laws are similar to other municipalities with regard to the types of signs that are regulated. Regulation of signage varies between municipalities as signage standards and regulations are based on local objectives and expectations. Clarington's current Sign By-law dates from 1997, it does not address new signage types that may be found in more recent Sign By-laws by other municipalities. The various types of signs permitted under the current Sign By-law were detailed in the Clarington Sign By-law Review Public Consultation Paper, which was available on the municipal website during the review and was distributed at the open houses, other public meetings, and was available from the Planning Services Department. 2.1 TRENDS IN SIGNS Clarington's current Sign By-law has provisions that reflect the types of signs available at that time it was written (1997). Sign production and display technologies, in the intervening years have changed. Sign materials, production techniques, and display technologies have increased the variety of sign types now available. Clarington's draft Sign By-law, addresses these trends, especially the new technologies and their application to sign production methods and displays. 899019 2.1.1 SIGN PRODUCTION METHODS A variety of materials are used in the production of signs. Long term exterior signs are generally made of plastic, acrylic, wood, or aluminium. These materials are durable and support a variety of sign printing and fabrication methods. REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 4 Short term signage uses vinyl for banners and other flexible signs. Plastic and polystyrene are used for rigid signs. These light weight materials provide businesses and individuals with inexpensive signage that is readily available from local sign or printing shops. Digital printing technology in the form of ink jet printing on large vinyl surfaces is increasingly being used to produce signs such as banners and outdoor advertising signs. Ink jet printing yields high resolution images providing four colour photographic realism for signs. The growth of digital printing technology has led to lower prices and more widespread application in conventional and new sign formats. Vinyl graphics are flexible and used in a variety of ways. Adhesive vinyl signs are applied to vehicles and in some communities entire transit vehicles are wrapped in this advertising. Wall banners in various sizes are used on buildings usually as outdoor advertising. In some cases, such banners have been used to cover a wall or the entire building with a graphic wrap. One impact of these trends has been a greater number of signs, particularly temporary signs due to the low cost of such signs and their ready availability. Digital printing technology has led to larger and more realistic signs as well as signs being applied to new surfaces such as vehicles and buildings as the cost of such signs has dropped. 2.1,2 IMAGE DISPLAY TECHNOlOGY Digital electronic image display technology is increasingly expanding into signs and replacing traditional display materials such as paper and vinyl signs. Digital displays in signs are larger scale applications of today's video and television display technology. These signs also consist of LCD (liquid crystal display) screens, plasma screens, projection systems or LED (light emitting diode) displays. Traditionally electronic copy on signs has been limited to red or amber LED displays. These changeable message boards usually contain a single colour text message or simple low resolution graphics. Time and temperature displays on signs are a common application. Advances in LED and other display technologies have made it possible to now display images on signs electronically in full colour and high resolution. These full colour video displays in signs can display graphics, text, animations and real-time video. Signs incorporating this type of image display can change their content in real time. Advertising signs are no longer limited to a static image that must be manually changed by a crew in the field. The content of electronic signs can be remotely managed and the copy can change every few seconds just like a television screen or video monitor in a home or office. The impact of this technology has been to create eye catching signs displaying high resolution images and video animation. Advertising and sign copy is no longer static but dynamic and animated. At present, the high cost of such signs appears to limit their application to outdoor advertising in high traffic locations where these signs are exposed to large numbers of people. At the same time, smaller scale applications of this sign technology are found in the digital displays installed in some elevators or in store displays. More widespread use of this technology in signs can be expected as the technology evolves and costs decrease. 899020 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 5 2.2 SIGN BY-LAW VARIANCES AND AMENDMENTS Prior to January 1, 2002 when the Municipal Act, 2001 came into effect, the Municipal Act authorized municipal councils to delegate authorization of minor variances for a Sign By-law if the general purpose and intent of the By-law was being maintained. Minor variances permitted an increase in sign area, or additional signs beyond the maximum permitted on a particular parcel of land without requiring a formal amendment being made to a Sign By-law. This provision provided flexibility in administering Sign By-law regulations so that specific situations that were not addressed within the By-law could be considered on a case-by-case basis. The implementation policies included within the current Sign By-law for minor variances have worked well: however, Council can no longer delegate the discretionary power to make minor variances, rather an amendment to the By-law is necessary. Under the current Municipal Act, 2001 delegation to the Director of Planning Services of authority to authorize a minor variance to the size and height of signs up to 10% at the time of site plan application is not permitted. These will require site specific amendments by Council. Sign variance and amendment applications can be indicators of Sign By-law standards and regulations requiring revision where recurring applications are regularly approved. The most common type of request for minor variance or amendment over the past decade has been based on visibility issues. Six of the ten applications that were approved cited that their business signs would not be clearly visible if they adhered to the regulations for size, height and placement as set out by the current Sign By-law. However, the number of minor variances and the type of request did not identify any specific issue that should be addressed in the By-law review. In reviewing the signage requirements an analysis of these exceptions, the experience of these requests and what has been allowed have been taken into account. 3. SIGNAGE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 3.1 DEPARTMENTAL ROlES The Planning Services Department is responsible for reviewing sign permit applications and issuing sign permits for permanent and temporary signs. Applications for minor variances and amendments to the Sign 8y-law are processed by Planning Services staff. Any complaints in regards to signage are addressed by the Municipal Law Enforcement Division of the Clerks Department. The Operations Department on a regular basis remove illegal signage in consultation with Clerks arid Planning Services. Municipal rights-of-way are regulated by the Road Occupancy By-law which is administered by the Engineering Services Department, again removal of items not permitted within the road right-of-way done by Municipal Law Enforcement and Operations. 3.2 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT The regulations for signage in Clarington falls under three levels of government, municipal, regional and provincial. 3.2.1 Clarington's Sign By-law regulates signs on public and private property. Generally signage is not permitted within the Municipal road right-of-way, exceptions include signs such as transit shelter signs, off-site directional tourism signs, traffic signs 899021 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 6 and signs on building facades that may encroach The Municipal Road Occupancy By- law 83-57 as amended requires that a road occupancy p'ermit be obtained for banners, signs and other similar installations, whether temporary or permanent in nature, on Municipal road rights-of-way, Road occupancy permits are reviewed and issued by the Engineering Services Department in consultation with the Operations Department. It is Engineering Service's practice to iimit approval of road occupancy permits for signs to temporary signage only. The draft Sign By-law and the Road Occupancy By-law are complementary. Portable signs, such as A-frames are allowed provided they meet certain criteria; while mobile signs are not allowed within the road right-of-way under either By-law. 3.2.2 The Region of Durham permits limited types of permanent signs within their road allowances. These would include Tourism-Oriented Directional Signage (TODS) signs for tourist attractions that meet Regional criteria, Adopt-A-Road signs, Durham Farm Fresh signs, and off site directional signs for facilities such as churches. The Region does not permit business owners to install permanent or temporary signs within Regional road rights-of-way. Signage within the Regional road right-of-way is only for regulatory, warning, temporary construction, tourism and information approved by the Region. The Region of Durham relies on Municipal Law Enforcement staff to deal with illegal signs on Regional rights-of-way. They do not employ regional sign enforcement staff. 3.2.3 The Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has a sign permit application process for the installation of signs along provincial highway corridors. They do not permit temporary signs, such as mobile signs, within their road right-of-way, only MTO sanctioned signs are allowed within the road right-of-way. MTO enforces its sign regulations in regards to signs placed within its right-of-way. In addition, an MTO sign permit is required for all permanent signs within 400 metres of the provincial right-of-way. MTO sign permits allow for first and third party advertising signs along Highway 35/115 but do not permit third party advertising signs along Highway 401. Third party signs are signs that do not relate to the use of the property. MTO's policy with regard to signs on private property within the 400 metre corridor is currently under review. 8ill 98 which was recently approved allows agricultural operations within the 400 metres of a provincial highway to have temporary signs, without the need for an MTO sign permit providing they meet the provisions of Bill 98. Regardless, agricultural operations have to comply with local Sign By-laws. 3.3 SIGN BY-LAW COMPLAINTS The most common complaints received by the Municipal Law Enforcement division in regards to signs are related to road right-of-ways. The complaints typically are about signs in the road right-of-way, signs in the sight triangle, temporary real estate signs in the right-of-way, and signs on utility poles. Other complaints include that there are too many signs and they are ugly. Inquires are often made into home occupation signs as people do not realize that certain businesses can be conducted in a residential dwelling. 899022 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 7 3.4 GRANDFATHERING All existing signs which predate the approval of a draft Sign By-law and do not comply with current Sign By-law 97-157 shall be considered illegal. All existing signs which predate the draft Sign By-law and were erected in accordance with the provisions of current Sign By-law 97-157 will be considered to conform/comply when the new By-law comes into force, regardless if the regulations have changed. 4. CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INPUT Public consultation is an important factor in determining community expectations with regard to signage. In order to foster discussion and obtain comments on the issues related to the Sign 8y-law review a public consultation paper was issued. It provided an assessment of the current Sign By-law and summarized the types and number of applications for amendments and variances in order to provide a means of identifying issues to be addressed. The consultation paper was posted on the Municipality's website and was distributed to stakeholders, ratepayers groups and the BIAs as part of the public consultation process. 4,1 OPEN HOUSES Clarington contains urban areas, small hamlets and a large agricultural land base. Opinions on signage and the need for signage varied depending on where people live and/or operate their businesses. In order to capture a variety of public input, the open houses were spread geographically throughout the municipality and held over several days in the spring of 2008 The first open house was held in Orono on April 21st, the second in Newcastle Village on April 22nd, the third in Bowmanville on April 23rd, and the fourth in Courtice on April 24th They were advertised in the Orono Times and Clarington This Week newspapers on April 9th and on April 16th. In addition, meeting notices were posted on the Municipality's website, and were included in the Clarington E-update of April 3rd Notice of the open houses were mailed to local ratepayers associations, residents associations, business associations, BIAs, the Clarington Board of Trade, municipal committees, interested parties and the sign companies that were listed in the yellow pages for the Clarington area that were know to provide sign age in Clarington. A complete listing of those notified can be found in Attachment 1. A total of 44 people attended the open houses with 10 participating in Orono, 13 in Newcastle Village, 15 in Bowmanville, and 6 in Courtice. The Municipality's consultant, Martin Rendl, gave an hour long presentation noting that the purpose of the open house was to foster public discussion on sign age issues for input into the preparation of a new Sign By-law. The topics included changes in technology and advertising trends, court decisions and changes in law, what the By-law regulates, such as number, size and height, the types of signs that are currently permitted and prohibited, and the objectives of the new Sign By-law. The proposed changes suggested in the Public Consultation Paper were included in the presentation. A Sign Preference Survey was distributed at the open houses and available on the municipal website. A question and answer session was held after the presentation and the comments made are included in Attachment 2. The key comments made in these sessions are summarized below: 899023 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 8 Aaricultural Sianaqe off-site directional signage as their business can be hard to find. the maximum size permitted per farm is too small, it was reduced in the 1997 8y- law and farmers have a hard time identifying their products on rural road with higher traffic speeds. Election sians can the number of elections signs per property be established on a fair basis given the number of candidates in local elections and the vast difference in lot sizes (agricultural to residential). some felt that heritage buildings and properties should not be allowed to have election signage. with federal and provincial ridings that cross municipal boundaries, the regulations can be different, there should be some consistency. general consensus that election signs in the road allowances create visibility problems. Heritaae Area Sianaae general consensus that animated and read-o-graph signs are not appropriate on heritage buildings, and that certain sign types are not in context with the pedestrian scale of heritage areas and should not be allowed. a flashing, animated, large billboard type sign is not appropriate in the historic downtown. downtown businesses are paying additional taxes and people are advertising businesses that are not located downtown, off-site advertising should be regulated. Billboard Sians Billboard signs should not be banned out-right, there should be regulations on where they are appropriate. some property owners rely on the monies that they receive for having billboards on their land. Mobile Sians there are too many mobile signs on Highway 2, especially in Courtice, and the number of signs per property needs to be regulated. consideration should be given to regulating colours, especially neon and fluorescent. mobile signs can dangerous in wind storms. mobile signs should not be permitted to stay on a property indefinitely. multiple mobile signs should be permitted along the highways as long as colour and regulations are adhered to. 899024 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 9 Sioht Trianoles signs should not be permitted in the sight triangles or anywhere they block views and visibility, regardless of sign type. ProDerty Identification municipal street addresses should be included on signs. By-law Consistency the Sign By-law and the Road Occupancy By-laws should be consistent. Licensino the Municipality should consider providing a licensed area for mobile signs and licensing mobile sign companies. Liability Issues concern regarding signs, such as banners, being improperly installed and coming down; or other types of signs (construction promotion) blowing in the wind. the lack of proper anchoring for signs such that they fall over. Enforcement the sign companies want good enforcement. large billboard type signs advertising housing developments and businesses are bein.g installed without permits. abandoned tractor trailers with large banners are skirting the By-law as they are billboard signs that are going up without permits. off site real estate signs are falling down they should be removed. There were a number of general questions asked during the open houses, including how to amend the Sign By-law and what types of signs require a sign permit. Specific questions were posed about how to control postering, whether a timeframe could be set for special events signs and if they could be allowed in the road right-of-way, and whether we intend to control the word content of a sign. There were several questions in regards to enforcement ranging from the need for better enforcement within the road right-of-way and whether additional by-law enforcement staff would be required for the new By-law. Liability for abandoned and signs in disrepair was also questioned. 4.2 COUNCILLOR INTERVIEWS Interviews were conducted with individual members of Council in order to obtain the feedback they were getting from .the public on signage issues. The control of mobile signs was identified as being an important issue. Concerns were raised in regards to the number of mobile signs located throughout the Municipality, the signs being located in areas where they cause visibility problems, and the use of florescent lettering. The questions asked of Councillors and a summary of responses is included in Attachment 3. 4.3 OTHER MEETINGS In addition to the open houses, staff attended the meetings of the Bowmanville and Newcastle BIA and Community Improvement Plan Liaison Group meetings in Orono and Newcastle. The proposed changes were discussed at a regular meeting of the Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington and wnh the Clarington Board of Trade staff. Staff also met with representatives of the sign industry to obtain their ideas and feedback. 899025 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 10 4.4 SIGN PREFERENCE SURVEY A sign preference survey was conducted as part of the public consultation process. This type of survey is used as a method of gathering insight into the public's thinking and attitudes towards signs. The results of the survey have been used as a basis for signage design guidelines and regulations. The survey was posted on the Municipality's website and was distributed to stakeholders, ratepayer groups and the BIAs. It was also distributed during the open houses. The survey consisted of a printed workbook with pictures of signs of different types and in different contexts. Respondents were asked to rate examples as being either: a very good sign, a good sign, a bad sign or a very bad sign, and to give a reason for their comments. In addition, the survey asked members of the public for their views on particular signage issues such as: . what is the one sign issue that should receive the greatest attention . what areas in Clarington have appropriate signage . what areas have inappropriate signage . how can the way signs are regulated be improved . what is the one thing that should be focused on to improve signage, and . the appearance of areas where there are signs The survey concluded by asking people to rank ten signage issues by their level of importance. A summary of the results set out in the booklet is Attachment 4. The top signage issue identified through a combination of top three results and the issue that should receive the most attention was mobile signage, closely followed by portable signs as in the illegal temporary signs in road rights-of-way. Other issues identified using a combination of the answers to the questions that were used when formulating the regulations are: . controls over the number of signs . control over projection signs because of their visual distraction effects . postering . placement of portable signs, such as A-frames A number of suggestions were made as to how regulations should be improved and that enforcement was required to ensure compliance. Enforcement with regard to temporary, mobile and poster signs were identified as the top enforcement issue. Responses provided to the question regarding which areas in Clarington have good or appropriate signage clearly indicated support for continuation of the policies that relate to downtown cores and entrances to downtowns. The main corridor in Courtice was specifically identified as an area for improvement, especially the commercial plazas section of Highway 2. The Sign Preference Survey concluded by asking respondents to rank ten sign issues by order of importance. The results are as follows: . 899026 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 11 Overall Comments 011 Signs PI,ease rate the importance of the following to what you think about si'gns by placing anX in the appropriate box. Then rank the issues in the last column from 1 (most important) to 10 (least important). Very S,om ow hat Not VOf~' Nol AlAI! Ovtltall li'JlpOftaJl1 Imp01tanl Importi1lnt Imj1or1ant R~nkjng (1 ~ Mo't htlportant 1 C = LeCi::=:t lif'n potU! tit) Ap~ataiiC.e ofthu jl:ig!l 93% 7% 0% {I% 3 Sh~~ 01 the sgn 61% 32% 5% 2% II HafJfIt 0:1 U~a Slgfl SOa..t 41%, 7% 2'}:~, 10 NWi'ltHll of Sti:Jll SOIl ii p1'Optlifty 86% 141,'i 0% 0% 6 Numb.f:lor sJ.fjfJS utI pro;Jrtrt:i.!:i::s 81% 17% 2% 0'~~ 4 along ttlo wead NtJnJb,(i:! or :sign'S on a btJiidiing 61% 37% 2% G% 8 How tHe sn"n tlatiiiidiS wittl tho 16'% 22% 2". O~,~ 5 ., dilSlgn o11he building Whoth4iil" 1 find the S'~fl 63% 31% 6% G% 7 distracting Whtlthel 11eoi tIla s;gn fi11ot:ls 86% 10% 4% (1% 1 pedestrian Or tl"alfllc salety How S,tgfl S e01~ttjbuta to alll 81'% 19% 0% 0% 2 &1'0 a's a p.-pe stalliOs and C1UU'8dQIf 4.5 PUBLIC MEETING The Public Meeting provisions do not apply with respect to the preparation and adoption of a Sign By-law, regardless, the process will be followed to allow for an opportunity for additional comments. to be received on the draft Sign By-law. The public meeting is scheduled for May 25, 2009. Notice of the public meeting was provided in the Orono Times and Clarington This Week on May 13 and 20,2009 (Attachment 1). The draft Sign By-law was available from May 15, 2009 for comment prior to the public meeting and continues to be available for comment. Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all interested parties, advertised on the municipal website and in the E-update. 5. DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 5 contains a comparison of the current and proposed "draft" sign standards. The reasoning for the recommended change from the current Sign By-law is included in the chart including the source of those comments, if applicable. Attachment 6 is the draft Sign By-Law which incorporates all of the changes and also has a revised format. 899027 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 12 5,1 FRAMEWORK OF DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Much effort has been put into making the draft Sign By-law concise and easy-to-use. Some aspects of the current Sign By-law (97-157) such as the basic organization have been carried forward into this By-law. There are a number of significant differences, the most noticeable is the simplification of the tables. The objective is a draft By-law that in its form and content is easy to understand, use, and administer. The format of the draft Sign By-law groups the sign regulations and requirements in categories, using tables and graphic illustrations where appropriate to make the 8y-law easy to use and to facilitate understanding of its provisions and regulations. The draft Sign By-law uses land use categories as the basis for organizing the sign regulations. The land uses are residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and agricultural. 5.2 DEFINITIONS All key terms used in the draft Sign By-law are clearly defined to minimiZe misunderstanding and reduce the need for interpretation of the meaning of terms used or the intent of the regulation. The definitions included are the same as those in the Clarington Zoning By-law 2005-109, if they appeared in that document. 5.3 GENERAL PROVISIONS There are a number of sections of the proposed By-law that set out the administrative, enforcement and general provisions for signage. These provisions include how permits will be issued and when they can be revoked. In addition, the provisions detail when the Municipality has the right to remove signs that are in contravention of this By-law. 5.4 RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO SIGN STANDARDS The changes recommended for the draft Sign By-law are based on a review by staff of the current regulations and experience with the By-law 97-157 since its passage. Staff have relied on a combination of experience, the input and knowledge provided by our consultant and the comments received from residents, business owners and signage providers throughout the public consultation process. Provisions included in the draft By- law address current and emerging trends and issues related to signs in Clarington. The following descriptions below include issue identification, discussion and the recommendation (in bold italics) to sign regulations in the draft Sign By-law. Seven sign types have been deleted from the draft Sign By-law as they have been combined with other sign types, these sign types are however, referenced below. 5.4.1 ABANDONED SIGNS These signs are defined in the current By-law as a sign left on a property 90 days after what it is identifying ceases. Abandoned signs will be added to the list of prohibited signs. 5.4,2 ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION ON SIGNS Business identification signs are generally located close to the street line and for many commercial properties are the main method for identifying the location to passing 899028 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 13 motorists. Municipal address identification would assist the public and emergency services in identifying a specific business location. All ground, pylon, and monolith signs for businesses outside of residential areas will be required to include the municipal address of the property on the sign. 5.4.3 ADULT ENTERTAINMENT SIGNS Specific regulations were provided in By-law 97-157 with regards to adult entertainment signs. Adult entertainment facilities are restricted to industrial areas and should be allowed the types of signage allowed for that land use. The regulations that related specifically to adult entertainment signs will be deleted from the By-law. 5.4.4 AGRICULTURAL SIGNS During the drafting of By-law 97-157 the size of farm signs was reduced for no apparent reason. A number of the farms with road side markets have struggled to meet the size requirements. There is a strong desire expressed by the farmers to return to the previous size of signs and especially given that traffic is going at higher speeds on the rural roads than in urban areas. The size for agricultural signs will be increased to 3.75 square metres. The Region have TODS (Tourism Oriented Destination Signs) and "Farm Fresh" programs which cater to agri-tourism businesses and farms located on Regional Roads; however, there is no similar program at the local level. The request from the local farmers is to either continue to allow off-site directional signage that directs customers to their location or provide a local TODS program that can accomplish the same goal. Provisions for off-site directional signage within the agricultural community have been included_ In December of 2008 the Province passed Bill 98, an Act to promote the sale of Ontario produced agricultural products by amending the Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act. The amendment addresses three types of signs that can be displayed within 400 metres of a highway without the need to obtain a permit from the Minister; however, a permit under our By-law will still be required. This provision will be noted in the By-law. 5.4.5 ANIMATED SIGNS Animated signs are signs which contain a video screen or any kinetic or illusionary motion of all or part of a sign, including rotations. These types of signs are prohibited under the current Sign By-law. During the past 12 months some businesses employed temporary staff to shake, twirl, or manipulate signs to attract the attention of drivers to purchase their products. "Shaker boards" are a form of animation and can be very distracting for drivers. I , I , I I I I I I I I . ~ 899029 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 14 Animation signs will be removed from the list of prohibited signs and included in the list of definitions as signs which are manually displayed by an individual for the purposes of advertising; or signs which are projected onto a display surface area by electronic means. Council may permit animated signs on a case-by-case basis as an amendment to the By-law. Banner signs are not addressed in the current Sign By-law. Typically I banners are installed on street poles or span a public street and are controlled by the Municipality through the Road Occupancy By-law. Banners in the private realm, attached to buildings, structure or fences are a signage material rather than a type of sign and can be regulated under the type of sign being requested. the current Sign By-law does not permit signs to be attached to fences, which would include banners, this regulation will continue. 5.4.6 BANNER SIGNS I ~ III 5.4,7 BILLBOARDS SIGNS The current Sign By-law prohibits billboards in Clarington. Despite the current prohibition, some billboards have been erected and others pre-date the current Sign By- law. The existing billboards are primarily located along the Highway 35/115 corridor. Other billboards have been installed without seeking the appropriate permits. During the public consultation process there was a general consensus that tractor-trailers or other vehicles with/without banners that act as billboards or other signage forms including projected images are a determinant to the community character, visual landscape and aesthetics of Clarington and should not be allowed. There is however, general acknowledgement that the billboards along the Highway 35/115 corridor are part of the tourism experience for many drivers on their way to cottage country. As such, billboards in this area were considered to be part of the community character and were considered appropriate ' provided there were controls on the number and spacing of the billboards. Billboards in other locations within Clarington were not considered to be appropriate as they did not fit in with the rural character, image and local focus that residents' desire. The Official Plan review consultation that was occurring concurrently with the Sign By- law review identified as one of the two top priorities .preservation. of the natural environment (e.g. environmental features, open space, agricultural lands)" which is considered to include the visual quality and vistas. The current lack of billboards in Clarington is one factor that contributes to the Municipalities visual and community character. The visual quality of Clarington's urban and rural communities is that of a community relatively free of large scale commercial 899030 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 15 advertising signs unrelated to the location of the sign. This community character and quality is a characteristic valued by residents. The Sign Preference survey included three examples of billboards of which two were signs in Clarington. These billboards were ranked as bad to very bad signs by 68%, 60% and 49% of respondents. These opinions together with the low degree to which billboards were cited as a signage issue in Clarington due to their relative absence at present, suggests that the municipality must carefully consider if and how it might change its current sign regulations for billboards. Generally, billboards by virtue of their size, number and distribution across a municipality can affect the visual character of the community. In a community like Clarington that currently does not permit billboards, the introduction of billboards as a new sign type permitted by the Sign By-law will alter the current character of the municipality and areas where such signs do not exist. For example, billboards tend to be the largest advertising signs in a community. The advertising industry's most common billboard size is 18 square metres in area. Other standard types of billboards used by the advertising industry can be 40 or 60 square metres in area. Billboards depend on high visibility and exposure to high volumes of consumers passing the billboard. This results in billboards seeking to locate along roads with high traffic volumes to maximize the potential for the advertising to be noticed by consumers and the public. These high visibility locations also ensure that billboards become very visible parts of the community and its visual character. In an effort to control the visual impact of billboards, municipalities that permit billboards in their community establish standards for the size and location of billboards, the same characteristics regulated for other types of signs. Quite often, municipalities require a minimum separation between billboards to avoid a concentration of billboards in an area. Some municipalities set a maximum number of billboards for a geographical area. Clarington consists of urban and rural communities, each with its own characteristics with respect to landscapes and development. These differences are relevant when considering how billboards might fit into these contexts. Clarington's countryside and rural landscape is generally devoid of commercial signage. Due to the lack of major commercial development and its associated signs, signage in rural areas is limited and small scale. It is primarily devoted to identification rather than advertising. Farms, natural areas and countryside are the major features establishing its character and visual identity. From the comments that residents have made at both the Sign 8y-law meetings and in the Official Plan review consultations Clarington should preserve this rural and countryside character by avoiding the introduction of visual clutter. Clarington's urban areas currently contain very few billboard signs. Commercial signs are largely limited to on premises signs identifying the businesses at that location. The absence of large third party advertising signs in Clarington's urban areas supports and contributes to their small town feel and visual character. This is reflected in the Sign Preference Survey responses, which tended to cite the traditional downtown areas as places in Clarington with good signage. These areas do not have billboards and most signs are in scale with their buildings and surroundings. 899031 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 16 The recommendations for billboards include a definition, size, height, number per property and location. Billboard signs shall only be permitted along the Highway 35/115 corridor from Highway 2 northward to the City of Kawartha Lakes boundary and are limited to the portions of private property that are within 400 metres of the Highway road allowance. A billboard shall not be located, erected or displayed less than 400 metres from any other billboard. A billboard sign is limited to one display surface. All billboards signs within 400 metres of Highway 35/115 shall require the approval of a sign permit issued by the Ministry of Transportation in addition to the Municipality of Clarington. 5.4.8 CANOPY SIGNS The number of canopy signs are limited based on whether a building is a single business site or part of a multiple business and whether it is a exterior lot or an interior lot. The exception in the current By-law was service stations that were considered as a different category of signage type. It is recommended that one canopy sign be permitted per entrance and window per business, except service station fueling areas which are allowed 1 per side of the fueling canopy or canopies. 5.4,9 COMMUNITY SERVICE SIGNS These signs are defined as temporary signs for the purpose of announcing a community function or event such as those sponsored by a non-profit organization. As these signs will either be portable or mobile signs all reference to them will be deleted from the By-law. 5.4,10 ELECTION SIGNS Election signs are temporary signs erected by candidates during the period of a federal, provincial or municipal election. Many of the complaints received by the Municipality have been in relation to election signs. During the open houses there was much discussion on election signs. The size and requirements for election signage are not the issue, rather it is the timing of when election signs can be installed, location and number of signs. Much of the problems have occurred as the majority of election signs have been installed on road allowances. In addition the specific clauses for campaign offices in the current By-law did not relate to the land use causing confusion. The new Sign By-law regulates the period during which election signs may be erected, the size remains the same for all areas except residential where they are limited to 0,74 sq. metres, and the locations where they are permitted are specified. 899032 REPORT NO,: PSD-051-09 PAGE 17 i) Election signs associated with a federal or provinCial election shall not be erected earlier than the date of notice of the dropping of the writ for any federal or provincial election. ii) Election signs associated with a municipal election shall not be erected or displayed any earlier than seventy (70) days before voting day, iii) Election signs shall be removed within forty-eight (48) hours after close of voting on voting day. ivy Election signs shall be erected only on private property. The owner's permission is required. v) Election signs shall not be erected in a road allowance. vi) The maximum size of a campaign office sign will be based on the type of sign being used and requested in relation to the land use. 5.4.11 ELECTRONIC MEDIA SIGNS The current Sign By-law has provisions for an electronic media sign. Such signs are defined as a sign in which a message is presented by electronic means or is computer generated. This may take the form of text, graphics or other images. The current definition could be interpreted as including animated signs as they are usually electronically changed; however, electronic animation may also include video or other electronic image display technology. Electronic media signs should be renamed to electronic message board signs and defined such that they will be limited to messages that change infrequently. Electronic media signs are currently only permitted on industrial and commercial properties, and as wall signs, and they can not be part of a group identification sign. When used as a wall sign the message area can be 3.75 square metres or 10% of the wall or window area under the current Sign By-law. It is recommended that electronic message board signs be permitted on all land use categories except in residential, agricultural and heritage resource areas. In addition, they should be permitted as part of a ground, pylon, or monolith sign. When used as a ground, pylon, or monolith sign, the message area can be 50% of the sign face. 5,4,12 GROUND SIGNS The current By-law limits the size of agricultural ground signs to 2.0 square metres, which is smaller than the ground signs allowed in other land use categories. This size reduction was introduced in the By-law 97-157 for no apparent reason. This size for agricultural signs will be increased to 3.75 square metres to correspond to the sizes permitted in commercial and industrial areas. 899033 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 18 By-law 97-157 had no height restriction for ground signs. An analysis of the heights of existing ground signs showed that there is a common standard for residential ground signs that is lower than other land use categories. A height restriction of 1 metre for residential signs and 3 metres for all other ground signs is recommended. 5.4,13 HERITAGE RESOURCE AREA SIGNS Clarington has three Heritage Resource Areas. The Heritage Resource Areas are generally the Community Improvement Areas in Orono, Bowmanville (to Liberty Street), and Newcastle Village. Specific sign regulations have been established in these areas to assist in maintaining their heritage character and visual quality. These areas were most frequently cited by the public in their comments in the Sign Preference Survey as areas with good, attractive and appropriate signage. The new Sign By-law notes that signs within the Heritage Resource Areas shall comply with the provision of any applicable Community Improvement Plan. In addition, the heritage resource area maps have been updated to reflect the current CIP boundaries in Orono and Newcastle Village and to expand the boundary to Liberty Street in Bowmanville. 5.4.14 IDENTIFICATION SIGNS AND GROUP IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs and group identification signs are permanent signs which are either ground, pylon, monolith, wall, window or canopy signs. By-law 97-157 contains regulations for identification signs and group identification signs, in addition to ground, pylon, wall, window and canopy signs. Identification signs, whether they are for a single business or a group of businesses, is the purpose of the sign rather than the signage type. The regulations should address sign type rather than purpose. To eliminate repetition, identification and group identification signs will be removed and regulated under the sign type and land use category. 5.4,15 INFLATABLE SIGNS Inflatable signs are listed as a prohibited sign in the current Sign By-law. The comments received in regards to inflatable signs were that they should only be permitted on a temporary basis and not be permitted on roofs. An application for a permit for an inflatable sign should provide information in regards to how the sign will be secured to a fixed base and satisfy the Municipality's requirements for liability insurance. Inflatable signs will be permitted on a property for seven (7 )consecutive days. A maximum of two (2) sign permits will be issued per property, for a total of fourteen (14) days, per calendar year. The maximum size will be set at 2.7 metres in height and 2,5 metres in width. All inflatable signs are to maintain a set back of 3 metres from any property line and all are to be secured to a fixed base. 5.4.16 PRE-MENU AND MENU BOARD SIGNS The arrival of drive through establishments in commercial developments has been accompanied by the installation of menu boards and pre-menu boards in the drive 899034 REPORT NO,: PSD-051-09 PAGE 19 through lanes. They are required for the customer to place an order from inside the vehicle. Pre-menu and menu board signs are not addressed in the current Sign By-law, they have been dealt with through the site plan approval process for development applications using the delegated authority for minor variances. From this experience standards have been established for these types of signs. Pre-menu boards shall have a maximum area of 2 square metres and a maximum height of 2.5 metres. Menu boards shall have a maximum area of 4.0 square metres and a maximum height of 2.5 metres. One pre-menu board and one menu board per drive thru will be allowed in commercial property uses but not in Heritage Resource Areas. 5.4.17 MOBILE SIGNS Mobile signs are generally rectangular temporary signs erected along the street line. The sign area generally consists of a text-based message advertising something related to the business using the sign. The current Sign By- '. law allows one mobile sign per property. Currently By-law 97-157 requires that mobile signs obtain a permit, which allows for 60 days installation as specified on the permit. After 60 days the sign is to be removed for 28 days and then a second permit can be issued for a mobile sign. Only three permits may be issued in a 12 month period. The current Sign By-law does not address the issue of how many mobile signs are appropriate for a commercial property such as a plaza that has multi-businesses. The dilemma is how to treat all of the businesses equitably. Currently, some business owners are installing mobile signs without obtaining a sign permit and/or the property owners' permission which has led to significant complaints about mobile signs and visual clutter. Mobile signs are cited by Clarington residents in the Sign Preference Survey as visual clutter and distracting. Seventy eight percent of respondents described a mobile sign as a bad or very bad sign. Mobile signs were also the most common response to the question asking what the top sign issue in Clarington was. Areas such as Highway 2 east of the Oshawa Townline were frequently mentioned by residents as areas with bad signage due to the proliferation of mobile signs along the roadside. This low regard for mobile signs by Clarington residents reflects the poor visual environment currently evident along the municipality's commercial thoroughfares. It is recognized that business owners wish to advertise by using mobile signs and that permitting one mobile sign per property for multi-business properties is too restrictive and not meeting the requirements of the business owners/operators. The new Sign By-law proposes that one mobile sign be permitted per single business property and that additional mobile signs be permitted for multi- business properties based on the property frontage. It is recommended at 1 sign per 50 metres of frontage, 899035 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 20 The current Sign By-law allowed for 1 mobile sign per residential property; however, experience has shown that this provision has not been used (no permits issued) and given the comments by residents about protecting the residential quality and character it is not desirable. The new Sign By-law will delete mobile signs from residential areas. The standard size of a mobile sign is 3 square metres whereas the current By-law permits 5.6 square metres. The minimum length is set at 1 metre and the minimum height is set at 1.2 metres. The new By-law will contain the industry standard of 3 square metres and set a maximum height of 2 metres including the sign support structure., no minimum length is required. During the public consultation process there were several comments in regards to the actual look of the signs, many residents find the fluorescent colours being used on mobile signs visually distracting and thus make the sign type even more offensive to them. It is recommended that fluorescent colouring of lettering, backgrounds and graphics be prohibited. Several municipalities have implemented a licensing program for mobile sign companies. Licensing provides better control over the location, removal and maintenance of mobile signs by holding the companies responsible for the multiple sites they have within the Municipality, it also provides for self-policing by the sign companies. There is public and sign industry support for implementing such a program in Clarington. The Clerks Department have agreed to undertake a review of a licensing program for mobile sign companies. 5.4.18 MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICE STATION SIGNS The current By-law provides specific regulations in regards to motor vehicle service station signs. It is recommended that these regulations be removed and that signage for these properties be addressed under the type of sign being requested. 5.4.19 OVERHANGING SIGNS These signs project at right angles from the front of a building and overhang the sidewalk. They are a type of sign that contribute to the heritage character of traditional commercial and shopping streets in historic downtown areas. The existing regulations limit the sign area for an overhanging sign to a maximum of 1.0 square metre, this size will be retained in the new By-law. Regulations will be added to address the height above the finished grade of the sidewalk, requirements for a road occupancy permit and to satisfy the municipality's requirements for liability insurance. An overhanging sign shall be at least 2.5 metres above the sidewalk. A road occupancy permit may be required as well as liability insurance. 899036 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 21 Currently, overhanging signs are only permitted within the Orono Heritage Resource Area. There was a strong desire by the Newcastle and Bowmanville BIA and Community Improvement groups to have this type of signage allowed for their downtowns as well. The new Sign By-law recommends overhanging signs be permitted in the Bowmanville and Newcastle Village Heritage Resource Areas, in addition to Orono. I I r 5.4.20 PORTABLE SIGNS Portable signs are generally small signs 1.2 metres or less in height. They include signs such as A-board, T- board, sandwich board, and menu board signs; this category of sign also includes the bag over wire frame signs and coreplast advertising signs that many companies are paid to install along streets. In the Sign Preference Survey these signs were rated among the worst; however, respondents distinguished between the A-board, and menu board type signs versus the bag and coreplast signs; the later being the least preferred. As with other temporary signs in Clarington, residents are concerned with the number of signs and their effect on community appearance. The draft Sign By-law contains restrictions on the period when a portable sign may be displayed to the hours of operation of the business it is advertising, and where the portable sign can be located on a sidewalk, it must be located in a manner that will not restrict the safe movement of pedestrians or vehicles. . j , The agricultural community have requested that portable signs for the sale of in-season produce and other farm products be allowed. Agricultural properties will be allowed to have portable signs, The existing Sign By-law contained two different portable sign sizes, dependant on the land use category; the size difference between the signs was not warranted. The size of all portable signs will be 1.0 square metre. 5.4.21 POSTER SIGNS Poster signs, commonly referred to postering, are notices commonly attached to utility poles or light standards located in the road allowance. The majority of poster signs advertise businesses and a minority consist of personal notices regarding lost pets or garage sales. Once installed, the business or individual benefiting from the sign rarely returns to remove the poster. Eighty six percent of respondents to the Sign Preference Survey rated poster signs as bad to very bad signs. Poster signs were mentioned very often as a top signage issue in Clarington requiring attention. The new Sign By-law addresses this poster sign issue by limiting the size of posters to 0,1 square metre and proposing that community poster board locations be established and maintained by the Municipality. Where community poster 899037 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 22 boards do not exist there is no maximum number of posters that can be placed on private property, however, only one poster per structure will be allowed. 5,4.22 PROMOTION SIGNS The current Sign By-law defines temporary signs announcing a sale or event as a promotion sign and that mobile signs could not be promotion signs. This restriction served little purpose with respect to mobile signs since often the purpose of erecting a temporary and mobile sign is to announce a sale or other event. Promotion signs will be removed as a sign type and be regulated as either portable or mobile signs. 5.4.23 PROMOTIONAL CONSTRUCTION SIGNS Promotional construction signs are temporary signs erected for the period of a project's construction. Previously this type of sign was not permitted on community facilities, which are now defined as institutional uses. The maximum size permitted on residential, motor vehicle service station and agricultural sites was set at 3 square metres. One sign was permitted per lot frontage. A 5 square metre maximum will apply to in all areas except Heritage Resource Areas where they will be limited to 2 square metres (the current standard). The number of signs will be limited to one per lot; and allowed for institutional uses. S.4.24 PYLON AND MONOLITH SIGNS Pylon signs are tall signs up to 7.5 metres in height. They are supported on poles that have a 2.44 metre open space between finished grade and the bottom part of the sign. Monolith signs are a new type of sign that was not addressed in the current Sign By-law. These signs are generally the same height as pylon signs but are fully enclosed to grade. The new By-law will contain a definition of a monolith sign and will note that any advertising can not be placed lower than 1.5 metres from finished grade. All current ' regulations that apply to pylon signs will also apply to monolith signs, The current Sign By-law sets a maximum size of 7.5 square metres for pylon signs. Past approvals through the site plan process and applications for minor variances have indicated that the size of these signs for multi-business properties in certain cases may be too small. The new By-law sets the size of the sign permitted based on the floor area of the building(s) , on the property. i , Multi-tenant properties with buildings from 5001 to 8000 square metres of floor area will be permitted a monolith or pylon sign of 9 square metres. Multi-tenant properties with buildings larger than 8001 square metres will be permitted a monolith or pylon sign of 11 square metres. 899038 . REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 23 Pylon signs are currently not allowed in agricultural and heritage resource areas, these regulations will continue There is public support for restricting this signage type within the Courtice West Shopping District (the west end of Highway 2 in Courtice as defined in the Clarington Official Plan). It is recommended that pylon or monolith signs not be allowed in Heritage Resource Areas and the Courtice West Shopping Districts, essentially the downtowns, or in the agricultural areas. 5.4.25 SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT SIGNS There are no regulations within the current Sign 8y-law addressing this type of signs. Subdivision development signs are signs that advertise the sale of properties within a plan of subdivision. Generally developers have applied for these sigris as part of the site plan approval process for subdivision sales offices. The regulations recommended are based on past experience. The new By-law will provide a definition and contain regulations limiting the locations of these signs to residential, industrial and commercial properties. The maximum size will be set at 10 square metres and the height at 7.5 metres. The sign can not be installed until the plan of subdivision obtains draft approval, it must be located on the subdivision site, and must be removed within 30 days after the date of the sale of the last property in the plan. 5.4.26 ROOF SIGNS Roof signs are currently prohibited except when used as a barn sign. The scale of commercial development in Clarington is generally of a low rise nature, primarily in one or two storey buildings. Roof signs are a type of sign that visually extend above the prevailing profile of buildings. Roof signs erected above the tops of buildings do not conform to the Municipality's zoning regulations which control the height and massing of buildings. No requests for roof signage were received during the public open houses and the Planning Services Department has only had one request in the past decade for such a sign. The draft Sign By-law allows businesses to erect sufficient signage to identify themselves. Should a business request a roof sign an amendment to the Bylaw would be required. 5.4,27 VEHICLE/TRAILER SIGNS This type of sign is prohibited in the current Sign By-law; however the Municipality receives complaints regarding this type of signage as there are some illegal installations that have occurred. The draft By-law provides a definition for these signs and continues with the regulation that clearly states parked trucks, trailers, or vehicles where the intended use is as a sign is prohibited. 5.4.28 WALL AND WINDOW SIGNS The current maximum area for a wall or window signage is 10% of the area of the building's wall or window on which the sign is erected. To allow for greater flexibility in the design and distribution of signs, the restriction of only permitting one wall sign will be 899039 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 24 eliminated, the area adjusted and examples included to ensure measurements are taken in a consistent manner. One storey buildings or barns will be permitted 15% of the building facade area. Two storey and ' higher buildings or barns will be permitted 10% of the building facade area. Subdivision sales offices will be permitted 40% of the building faf;ade facing the front lot line and/or exterior lot line. Window and door openings will no longer be subtracted from the area of the faf;ade as was the practice. Window signs for residential uses, including residential buildings in the Heritage Resource Areas and the Courlice West Shopping District will be set at 10% of the window area. Agricultural buildings will be allowed 10% of the window area. All other window signs can cover 50% of the window area distrib.uted across 100% of the glass. 6. OTHER ISSUES 6.1 ENFORCEMENT COSTS Clean up operations are generally conducted on the weekends. The Municipal Clerk has indicated that it is the Department's intention to designate one of the Municipal Enforcement officers as the lead enforcement officer with regards to signs. These duties will be incorporated into their regular daily routine therefore there will be no additional expenses other than the overtime required to conduct the weekend clean up. 6.2 ROAD OCCUPANCY BY-LAW Many of the complaints and comments received during the Sign By-law review came as a result of a lack of aggressive enforcement of the Road Occupancy By-law. The Municipality's Road Occupancy By-law 83-57, as amended contains regulations with regards to the placement of temporary or permanent signage within the road allowance. The draft Sign By-law indicates that in the event of a conflict the Road Occupancy By- law shall prevail. Most of the temporary signs that create the visual clutter that residents dislike can be removed under the Road Occupancy By-law. Better enforcement of the Road Occupancy By-law will help alleviate the many of the negative impacts of bad signage. In relation to the Road Occupancy By-law the draft Sign By-law proposes that for existing buildings that may encroach in the road allowance the previous provisions for wall and window signs continue and that they be allowed. Official bench signs, transit shelter signs, and off-site directional tourism signs should continue to be permitted subject to an agreement with the Municipality. When the Road Occupancy By-law is being reviewed an additional provision should be added to include signs on garbage containers. With regard to election signs, the draft Sign By-law recommends election signs be permitted on private property only. While not currently allowed, except by permission in 899040 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 25 the municipal right-of-way portable signs, which election signs are a sub-category of, this has not been enforced. Enforcement of the Road Occupancy By-law will provide better equity between candidates and cut down on the visual clutter that many residents find distracting. Portable signs allowed by the draft Sign By-law such as those put out on the sidewalks by the businesses downtown, must follow the provisions within the by-law to ensure pedestrian safety and traffic flow. Promotional construction directional signs (portable signs) such as the folding A-board signs are also allowed within the road right-of-way but again only under strict criteria. Since the Road Occupancy By-law prevails it should be determined by a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer that if any of the signs are obstructing visibility or causing pedestrian or traffic safety issues they can be removed without any recourse by the sign owner. Mobile signs are and will continue to be excluded from the road right-of-way in the Sign By-law. During the review of the Sign By-law there was much discussion at the public meetings about across road banners and street pole banners. The new Sign By-law does not address banners across or within the road allowance, rather, they are controlled under the Road Occupancy By-law. However, given the comments received it would be appropriate for the Municipality to develop a policy of how it will determine who is allowed the use of an across street banner or pole banner and whether advertising will be allowed on them. Signs such as bag signs (on wire frames) or temporary coreplast signs that advertise community events are often placed in the road allowance. During the Sign By-law review a number of not-for-profit groups made requests that this type of sign be allowed in the road right-of-way. Suggestions included requiring a deposit fee for their removal and setting out strict provisions on placement, plus limiting when the signs can go up (2-3 weeks in advance of the event) and come down (within 48 hours). Given the proliferation of this type of sign it may be easier to control them by developing a program to allow for them. 6.3 SIGNS ON MUNICIPAL LANDS Municipal Staff often receive requests to install notification signs, such as temporary mobile signs, on Municipal property. The Municipality has a policy on signage within Municipal facilities but it does not address what is permitted on municipal lands. A policy should be prepared detailing the location, size and types of signs that will be permitted and the process for obtaining approval. This policy should include community groups that wish to use Community Halls and Parks. Such a policy will require the input of all Municipal Departments. 6.4 LICENSING OF MOBILE SIGN COMPANIES As mentioned in Section 5.4.17 the licensing of mobile sign companies was a potential solution identified. Other municipalities have implemented such a license to control mobile sign companies and how they carryout their business. Licensing provides an incentive for the mobile sign companies to be self-policing. It also eliminates the need for a deposit system when obtaining a mobile sign permit for removal of the sign, making the process easier to administer. In the discussion sessions at the open houses and the meeting with the sign industry representatives there was support for implementing such 899041 REPORT NO.: PSD-051-09 PAGE 26 a licensing program. The Clerks Department have agreed to undertake a review of a licensing program for mobile sign companies. 7. CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this report and the release of the draft Sign By-law is to allow for additional public input on the provisions that have been recommended before finalization of the Sign By-law. In addition, Council may wish to consider a time lapse (two month period) between when the Sign By-law is enacted and when it comes into force to allow businesses to bring their existing signs into compliance. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Sign By-law Open House Notification and Public Meeting Notification Attachment 2 - Open House Public Comments/Questions Attachment 3 - Council Interview Questions Attachment 4 Sign Preference Survey Attachment 5 Sign By-law Comparison Attachment 6 Proposed Sign By-law Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: 899042 Sign By-law Open House Notification Courtice Business Association Courtice Area Residents Association Pebblestone Area Residents Association Tyrone Ratepayers Association South East Clarington Ratepayers Association Courtice Health Centre Bowmanville BIA I I Newcastle/Bond Head Ratepayers Association Port Darlington Community Association Orono BIA Traffic Management Advisory Committee Old Bowmanville Neighbourhood Association Newcastle BIA Clarington Board of Trade Clarington Heritage Committee Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Newcastle CIP Community Focus Group Orono CIP Community Focus Group Forsey Signs Swan Signs Pattison Sign Vortex Signs Active Mobile Signs Janie Dodds Dani and Alan Robins Greg Phillippe DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 1 To Report PSD-051-09 899043 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-051-09 CI!J!illglOn CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING I Municipality of Clarington: Sign By-law The Council of the Municipality of Clarington will be considering a new Sign By- law. While not required, the Municipality is following the public meeting process to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments. The public meeting will be held on: Date: Time: Place: Monday, May 25, 2009 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario The proposed by-law will be available on May 15, 2009 and the background report will be available from the Planning Services Department May 22, 2009. Any person may attend the public meeting and make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the by-law. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. Advertised in the Orono Times and Glarington This Week on May 13'" and May 2dh DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899044 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-051-09 Sign By-law Public Meeting Notification Courtice Business Association Courtice Area Residents Association Pebblestone Area Residents Association Tyrone Ratepayers Association South East Clarington Ratepayers Association Courtice Health Centre Bowmanville BIA Orono BIA Newcastle BIA Newcastle/Bond Head Ratepayers Association Port Darlington Community Association Traffic Management Advisory Committee Old Bowmanville Neighbourhood Association Clarington Board of Trade Clarington Heritage Committee Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Newcastle CIP Community Focus Group Orono CIP Community Focus Group Forsey Signs Swan Signs Pattison Sign Vortex Signs Active Mobile Signs Magnet Signs Cheap Mobile Signs DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899045 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-051-09 Janie Dodds Dani and Alan Robins Greg Phillippe Elva Reid Dave Rickard Dave Davidson Judy Climenhage Seird De Jong Bill VanderherBerg Marion Manders Murray Patterson Gord Whealy Rod and Melanie McArthur Joyce Kufta Ken Donaldson Robert Forget Scott Taylor Allison Hunter Vicki Tynkaluk John Mutton Nancy Mullette Jackie Nixon Erni Roberts Ted Watson Gillian Bellefontaine DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899046 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-051-09 Tom Barrie Wayne Clarke Steven Kay Phyllis Kaffko Henk Mulders Sue Weigard John Slater Karen Lowery Michael Cortellucci Jennifer McMaster Lisa Reis Barbara Tannyan Dan Hennessy John Clark Donna Donaldson Gordon Paul 899047 DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 Sign By-law Review Bowmanville Open House Public Comments/Questions April 23'd, 2008 In the presentation it said that the purpose of a sign is to identify rather than advertise. Then it was stated that temporary signs that advertise would be permitted as there is no way of prohibiting them. Temporary signs should not be able to stay up for months on end, and some do not come down at all. Would there be controls on how long a mobile sign can be up? Mobile signs have become permanent signs. They are everywhere and they look horrible. We are turning into Scarborough. Tight controls are required. My client has three tasteful mobile signs along the highway. We agree that colour should be regulated and hope that mobile signs will continue to be permitted as long as they follow the regulations, and the messages can change. Another client would like to ensure that there is no ban placed on animated signs. We are looking at twelve other locations for these types of signs. We are willing to work with the municipality and, in turn, want to know that the current location will not be banned. Oakville has tried to ban billboards and the superior court struck down that requirement. Make sure you do due diligence. We do not want to have to go through the courts. Are there inventories of signs in the municipality? High school students can review inventory. Is it possible to charge companies for installing signs? The owner of the sign at Taunton Road and Highway 57 should be paying for having it there. Are poster signs currently allowed? When the Region formed the sign by-law was revised and farms were allowed 50 to 60 square foot signs. Today it is 20 square feet. The cost comparison between signs and advertising is astounding. I just need the name of the farm on my gate but for farmers who do retail it is different. People drive at 80 kms an hour. To a certain extent it makes as difference as to how much space you have in front to put the sign. How else do you inform people that the crops are ready? Some crops begin right after the previous crop. We need signs up right away. Clarington had changed the by-law and regulations. They became more restrictive and sizes for farm signs were reduced. I don't need a big sign at my shop but for the market it's a different story. People are paying additional taxes to locate in the downtown historical area and people are advertising businesses that are not even connected to the downtown core. There going to be twelve more of them? DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899048 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 There was a big sign advertising a condo site that blew over. It's been down for quite a while. Further up Highway 57 there are big bill board signs that have been there for months. They are in driveways and have been there forever. They aren't being taken down. They can move them around because they're temporary but they don't. If we can't manage cleaning up signs what's going to change? Can't we enforce signs that went up without penn its? Will signs that have fallen over remain that way until the sign by-law review is over? Is there any websites where we can comment on anything during the process? Is there any distance requirements from the roadway? The strawberry sign isn't impeding my view so I'm ok with it. It becomes and issue when they impede sight. The municipal address should be included on a ground sign. Why isn't it required for monolith signs? How are you going to interpret some of the uniformity? How are we going to make sure that up don't have just every size one right after the other. We should find a way to make sure they create a transition between types of signs. You have to make sure you are specific with the regulations with regards to the animated signs. I can't see how a flashing sign is even close to in keeping with the theme of a downtown historic district. It can't just go up because someone paid $2500. it should keep with the nature of the area. It doesn't matter what the message is, it's a billboard. There is probably a great use for them, not so much downtown. I came here tonight because I thought there would be a total ban on mobile signs. I think they have proven to be the most affective fonn of advertising I have. I think licensing the sign companies will go a long way to cleaning it up, relying on the companies to limit the number and colour of signs. I'm glad you're not going to ban them. If we were restrictive with mobile signs we would have no way of advertising our products. If companies are limited and allowed to take up all the space that is allotted to them they will have a monopoly and will control the whole town. How will you limit the size and amounts per company? DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899049 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 Sign By-law Review Orono Open House Public Comments/Questions April 21s" 2008 The locations of agricultural businesses are hard to find. Farmers should be permitted to put up directional signage. Have only two elections signs per property is not enough. Four elected positions are available and there may be conflicting support between husband, wife and kids. More signs are required. Off site real estate signs are falling down and no one picks them up. The billboard sign at Taunton and Main faces then wrong direction and they didn't get a permit. The Orono CIP wanted a sign there and couldn't get approval from the Region. In Scugog the federal and provincial signs were in the road allowances. The Orono Town Hall board has heard that there are plans to put a neon sign in front of the Hall. Where did this come from? They would like to be informed of any plans to install a sign. We would like more election signs on agricultural lots. Should be based on frontage, especially if the property fronts on a couple of roads. Housing developers have put up billboard signs everywhere without permits. Election signs- number of days- no reference to voting day in the mail out vote- day after nomination/equivalent to dropping of the writ Abandoned vehicles - tractor trailer with banners on them skirting the by-law as billboard signs Election sign on Orono Town Hall- not appropriate in heritage areas or on heritage building Animated signs - entertainment, visual distraction, heritage areas Do yard sale signs require a permit? Election signs can cover more than one municipality - running federally - fairness issue across the federal riding and provincial riding Read-o-graph signs aren't appropriate on a heritage building There are too many temporary signs on Highway Two. There's a sign on a tractor trailer at Highway 57. Can businesses in residential areas have signs? There needs to be consistency across the by-laws (sign and road occupancy). DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899050 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 Sign By-law Review Newcastle Village Open House Public Comments/Questions April 22nd, 2008 Municipal addresses should be placed on pylon signs too. What are you going to do about grandfathering signs? Are mobile signs allowed on municipal property? Signs on parked trailers are illegal. You aren't enforcing the sign by-law because it's not enforceable. Portable signs shouldn't be in the sight triangle How are you going to regulate the poster problem? Directional signage with an arrow, a logo, and advertising a sale should be allowed. We are getting more and more portable signs between here and Bowmanville. Are we amending the by-law because we can't enforce it? Can't you send the sign companies that have their names on their signs a letter asking them to remove the sign? How and why did we start the review? Are we considering white lettering on a black background for mobile signs? Are you going to set a timeframe for special events signs? Set a licensed area for sign companies. There are too many mobile signs in Courtice. Will we be regulating what can be displayed on a billboard, for example, no ads for sunscreen. Is there a problem with enforcing the by-law? Can you enforce the by-law in the road allowance? Portable signs should not be blocking views and visibility. Oshawa bills the sign owners when they get the phone numbers. As a property owner, why not allow them to make money (for billboard signs on their property) DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899051 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 Contractors need to advertise. What is the difference between directional? What about contractors that just need people to know they are in business? There's too many temporary signs in Courtice. There are more and more portable signs since last year. How many are going to be allowed? There was a recommendation out of the Newcastle CIP about the mobile signs on Highway Two. What is the process for making recommendations to the by-law! People need exposure. Putting a logo on a sign makes it easier for directions. Town council may be able to raise revenue by licensing sign companies. DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899052 Attachment 2 To Report PSD-051-09 Sign By-law Review Courtice Open House Public Comments/Questions April 24th, 2008 What is the process involved in amending the Sign By-law? What about election signs? They can create visibility issues for drivers. Are current regulations enforced? Mobile signs are ugly and dangerous in wind storms. If someone is injured by a wind-blown sign, who is liable? How would the licensing of mobile sign companies work? I like the licensing idea. Will there be additional By-law officers hired to ensure proper enforcement of any new requirements? Right now, the first guy does not get a permit and when he does not get a fine then the next guy does not get a permit. Sign companies want good enforcement. What are the regulations for the proper installation of banners strung between utility poles across roads? What about banners being improperly installed and coming down? In other municipalities, temporary sign permits take effect at the beginning of the following month, from the first of the month until the end of the month, whether 28, 29, 30 or 31 days. 899053 DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 3 To Report PSD-051-09 APPENDIX Council Interview Questions How would you describe the state of signs in Clarington? What are the top three issues to be addressed? What areas in Clarington have good signage and why? What do you consider to be the characteristics of a good sign? What areas in Clarington have bad signage and why? What do you consider to be the characteristics of a bad sign? How would you describe Clarington's sign by-law enforcement? What comments or complaints do you receive from the public and businesses about signs and the sign by-law? What are your priorities for the new sign by-law? Any other comments or suggestions? Answers/Comments/Questions Received . Visual clutter is a problem . No problem with size of sizes . Problem with people breaking the law . The By-law should be more flexible in regards to size of signs . Lack of enforcement is a problem . Some signs have too much information on them . Promotional construction signs on back fences are unsightly . People want a permit to do what others are doing illegally . Fairness is the answer . Temporary signs have become permanent . The heritage style signs in the historic downtowns are good signs . New by-law needs to reestablish what the rules are . Need to define what is permitted on municipal property versus private property . Bag signs cause visual clutter . Posters on poles should not be permitted . There are too many election signs too close together . Mobile signs cause traffic problems as people slow down to read . The mobile signs along Highway Two are bad signs . Mobile sign fluorescent wording is an issue . Mobile signs are not aesthetically pleasing . Mobile signs cause safety issues when they interfere with visibility . Mobile signs on municipal property in Newcastle is a problem . Downtown areas should have smaller sizes than other areas . There are no issues with rural signs . Signage on future developments should fit in with the community . The by-law should be written so that it is reasonably enforceable . A roll-out period of 30 - 60 days should be given . People should be notified . Grandfathering needs to be addressed DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899054 Attachment 3 To Report PSD-051-09 . Developers are installing billboard signs on agricultural properties . A-frames on the sidewalks downtown can be in the way of pedestrians . T -bar signs have been requested for downtown Bowmanville . Businesses outside of Clarington are advertising on garbage cans . Street furniture should not advertise real estate agents . Can mobile signs be licensed . Can a permit sign be placed on a sign . Can special event banners be included in the sign by-law . Can non-profit organizations be exempt from the sign by-law . Can no fee be charged for certain agricultural signs . Can we govern taste . Can we provide guidelines for signage DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW 899055 CLARINGTON SIGN BY-LAW REVIEW SIGN PREFERENCE SURVEY Monolith Ground Group Identification Sign Sign Very Good Sign 5% Very Good Sign 41% Good Sign 58% Good Sign 40% Bad Sign 33% Bad Sign 17% Very Bad Sign 5% Very Bad Sign 2% Pylon Ground Sign Ground Sign Very Good Sign 11% Very Good Sign 58% Good Sign 61% Good Sign 33% Bad Sign 26% Bad Sign 9% Very Bod Sign 2% Very Bod Sign 0% t'\LLi::::tl,;llIllt:ml"t To Report PSD-051-09 899056 Canopy and Window Signs Very Good Sign 5% Good Sign Bad Sign 15% 35% Very Bad Sign 45% Wall Sign Very Good Sign Good Sign 26% 66% 7% Bad Sign Very Bad Sign 2% Awning and Wall Signs Very Good Sign 3B% Good Sign 55% Bad Sign B% Very Bad Sign 0% Wall Sign Very Good Sign 31% Good Sign 55% 11% Bad Sign Very Bad Sign 3% 899057 Wall and Window Signs Wall Signs Very Good SIgn 8% Very Good Sign 22% Good Sign 8% Good Sign 53% Bod Sign 42% Bad Sign 16% Very Bad Sign 43% 9% Over.t1anglng Sign Very Good Sign Good Sign Bod Sign Very Bad Sign 21% 56% 23% 0% Electric Message Board In Ground Sign Very Good Sign 11 % Good Sign 51% 80d Sign 31% Very Bad Sign 7% 899058 Posters Mobile Sign Very Good Sign 2% Very Good Sign 3% Good Sign 12% Good Sign 18% Bad Sign 32% Bod Sign 23% Very Bod Sign 54% Very Bad Sign 55% Very Good Sign Good Sign Bad Sign Very Bad Sign Portable SJgn 0% 8% 34% 58% Very Good Sign Good Sign Bad Sign Very Bad Sign Portable Signs 0% 19% 40% 40% 899059 Billboard Sign Video Sign Very Good Sign 5% Very Good Sign 10% Good Sign 27% Good Sign 31% Bad Sign 42% Bad Sign 45% Very-Bad Sign 26% Very Bad Sign 15% Bl1Iboard Sign In Rural Area Very Good Sign Good Sign Bad Sign Very Bod Sign 10% 31% 45% 15% BlIIboard Sign Very Good Sign Good Sign Bad Sign Very Bod Sign 8% 41% 39% 12% 899060 Top Sign Issue Thinking of all the signs you see across Cfarlngton. which ONE sign issue do you feel should receive the greatest attention? #1 sign issue In Clarington: Black mobile signs along Highway 2 and at Shops Mobile signs The ugly projection sign as you come into historic Bowmanville. Nothing like this should iBver be allowed in Clarington. It creates light pollution, wastes electricity, causes a visual distraction, and ruins our downtown's character. J hope it is rem eyed sooner rather than later. If not, then we should do away with any form of sign control, and go for a Las Vegas feel. Signs on leased land beside the road and maintaining consistency Availability to consumer Too many signs Number of rental signs on Highway #2 just east of Oshawa townJine Projection signs Clean professional look, sometimes historical Mobile signs litter roadways on City property Ugly biack portable signs Candidate signs, never picking up after elections Make sure they are clear to know what they mean, minimal words so drivers are not distracted too much Too many signs. Size (depending on number of businesses inVOlved) Too many on roadways, Tim's Rentals is terrible Mobile signs in bright lettering Mobile signs Mobile signs Home made signs on lamp posts Portable signs everywhere, junky, can't see around Too many mobile signs The proliferation of mobile signs Signs are not coordinated. Helter skelter appearance makes the area look cluttered/messy. Video sign distraction Video sign King & Scugog. Distraction for left turn Too many iilegal temporary signs Appearance Cluttered big box signs Roadside/strip mall mobile signs Posters Portable signs Too many signs Mobile and temporary signs Mobile signs used as permanent signs Too many different types of signs Portable signs are everywhere Large ilium inated sign above wood furniture store. Clutter. Too many signs. ~ I 899061 Another important sign issue: Third party advertising , ~usiness signs In countryside Portable signs Folding A-frames that home builders use. They are ugly, block sight lines when they ere set up/picked up trucks block traffic. They need to be banned. Consistent application and enforcement Signage appropriate to the area Affordability for business Number of signs allowed on roadside Too many yard sale signs on posts Election signs Poster signs Tacky signs in downtown core Off site directional construction signs should not be on the other side of Town The proliferation of telephone pole signs Mobile signs are everywhere, look unsightly. Make large enough lettering Credit Union building blocks all business signs behind it Location of signs on roads is distracting Location of signs Cheap "Money Mart" type Election/disposable plastic signs Mobile signs Signs to reflect small town character Election signs on public property Posters on poles Size of signs Ensuring restriction of multi-media displays Signs posted on utility poles Another important sign issue: Portable signs, restrict number, location, distance from intersection Poster signs Election signs, don't ban them. That would be the current Council giving the incumbents at all levels an unfair advantage. Number of signs allowed per location Should be submitted to municipal aesthetic committee Permanent mobile signs Op-portunities for communities to advertise events Portable signs & posters Too many advertising homes for sale, election signs not removed Portable signs Advertising everywhere Election signs up 6 weeks before vote is too long. The widespread appearance of A-frame signs impeding sidewalk users. Beer store sign also not visible coming from the west. Number of signs In one location Portable signs Community image Multiple election signs on single properties Color Mobile boulevard signs 899062 ! , I I I I What areas in Clarington do you think have GOOD or APPROPRIATE signs? ~ i . I haven't given this issue much thought . Home businesses and parts of downtown/historic areas (signs fit in with character of surroundings and appropriate in scale) . Downtown Bowanville (most buildings have nice facades) . Most of the downtown cores, with the non-illuminated historic signs i . Linen Cupboard building (Attractive, consistent look to the whole buiiding) , j . None (I've been to Sedona AZ, the oniy place with green McDonald's sign and Vermont where there I i are no billboards blighting the landscape) , I As you enter Bowmanville over bridge (historic sign) , . Newer plazas (they look pianned) 1 I . Orono downtown (most signs fit the area and feel of the area) , Entrances to Bowmanville (Historical looking, allows for events info & individual business info) i Any professional sign permitted by Clarington (No control on the mobile signs they are everywhere. Companies are advertising to advertise on the signs on City property) I . New developm ent (organized) , . The area of Clarington Blvd and Highway 2 (Gives awareness to businesses in area) I . No problem with any of them (businesses must advertise) Clarington Centre (the main sign covers the businesses in the plaza by the street while each store does identify itself) Historic areas, some signs in downtown areas Muddy's directional/coffee table outside of building (small unobtrusive and suit downtown) Downtown Bowanville store signs (traditional) Highway 2 near Zellers & CTe (Does not block view of oncoming traffic, let's you know what is there) . Canadian Tire, Clarington Place Mall (informative signs, info on one sign, not multiple signs) . Storefronts in downtown Bowmanville and Orono . Clarington Place Shopping Centre (Home Depot sign & Scotiabank signs are large and'clear) . Downtown core for the most part. New big box store areas appropriate. (You find what you are looking for if you look good enough. Most locals know where to go.) Downtown BowmanvilJe (adds to character) . Downtown (has character) . Downtown Bowmanville i , Downtown Bowmanville (CAUSE study) I . Downtowns generally and those in heritage areas (They are tasteful and suited to their I environment) I . The area around Clarington Blvd (appropriate signs for businesses and not too many "cluttern signs , (mobile & posters)) I . Historic downtown (Generally fits streetscape) I . Highway 2 in Newcastle, created by Forsey Signs. I am a customer and I work hard on designing tasteful signs. I . Main Street (Unobtrusive but make and identify the business well except for the cash advance and j some lit signs. , i . Schools, municipal centres. I . Funeral homes (In keeping with surrounding area, historic theme). i , Bowmanville and Newcastle downtown cores. ~ '. I 1 I j I I i i i 899063 What areas in Clarington do you think have BAD or INAPPROPRIATE signs? . Neighbourhood centres and along Highway 2 (It is unsightly and spoils landscape) Courtice (too many mobile signs) Any of the suburban commercial areas. Entering towns with the black neon letter signs (Looks cheap) They all do (Letting edvertisers do whatever they want. I like to buy things, not have them sold to me) Most of Clarington (looks junky, that anything goes) Highway #2 east of Oshawa town line (too many rental signs) Where there are portable signs (they tend to stay there for years) I don't think there is a problem for the most part Possibly too many A-frames on weekend Road side (no professional signs, makes city look ciuttered) BIA (no enforcement) Highway 2 and Scugog St (Tims Rentals is sometimes cluttered) If they are hard to read they should be changed Main Street and Highway 2 West (totally ugly look of them all) Loblaw's road allowance (mobiles are eyesore) In and out of Newcastle Highway 2 (mobile signs) East Side Mario's, Cineplex, McDonald's, Burger King (loa gaudy) All the little house for sale signs (get destroyed and left there) Every street corner along Highway 2 (too many portable signs, care not taken by all downtown businesses to keep signs in flavour of downtown) Plazas (each unit gets a mobile sign to advertise) The Courtice West Shopping District and Highway 2 to Bowmanville I don't like the video sign above Village Inn (I was distracted at night. May cause an accident) Side street businesses get overlooked because not well travelled (If your sign is not on a main artery pointing to its business it narrows your prospective customers, purely because of numbers) Plazas, malls (temporary neon coloured signs overpower the streetscape, distracting and hinder visibility when driving) Courtice (too many roadside, portable neon signs) Courtice (Far too many signs and most are pooriy designed) East side of downtown (looks trashy) Major traffic corridors and strip malls (cluttered and look tacky) Townline to DarlingtonNarcoe (Way too many signs, 13 mobile signs alone. Remove all mobile signs & posters and there would be a significant improvement> All roads (portable signs destroy community's image) Highway 57 (Plaza, mobile signs) Martin Road/Highway 57 (too many portable signs) Increasing existence of feral mobile .and temporary signs Baseline industrial malls (can hardly find business with just street address) West end of Town (Too many signs) Strip plaze on Highway 2 and Townline Road (Just a jumble of design styies) Signs on utility poles and mobile signs everywhere - horrible. Makes our Town look tacky - you wouldn't see this in Oakville. Courtice Highway 2. Development areas. 899064 How can the way Clarington regulates signs be improved or changed? . Hydro poles should.be for temporary signs only (e.g., yard sales) never used for advertising A sign by-law that is enforceable Consistency in legal action Regular clean-ups and proper law enforcement Drive along with a front end loader and scoop mobile signs up Banning video/projection signs, not allowing special treatment for big-box developers, and cracking down on commercial posters. Set a standard and a zone for signs. Clear sign criteria - size, specific location Check Sedona AZ by-laws and Vermont by-laws. Show permit date and number in lower right corner of sign. Create parameters for layout, size. Remove road side signs on city property and permit other mobile signs with restrictions. Control size and number in any given area. Check first before they are put up to make sure they don't distract you too much and their printing is sim pie and clear Don't allow so many. Change size (10r 2 sizes only) Fines for putting signs up without approval. Less invasive large signs. Some consistency in style. Enforce offenders. Not allowing certain signs. Society wants the biggest, quickest results by the cheapest possible price. This leads to a cheaper looking municipality. Permit no mobile signs. Just enforce the existing by-laws. Enforce by-laws. Ban portable signs. Require downtown signs to be reflective of downtown flavour. Regulate size. Regular, consistent enforcement. Clarington operations to be permitted to remove signs placed within regional road allowances. The by-law must be reasonable but then it must be rigidly enforced and politicians must not interfere with enforcement and in fact, must uphold and promote the by-laws. Otherwise the past will be repeated. Committee should make a design decision before put up a sign. Have the sign by-law easily accessible and easy to read and understand. Limit use of temporary signs and enforce the by-law. Not allowing portable temporary signs. Sign checks and orders to remove or improve. Businesses coming into Clarington must spend the proper amountof m-oney to ensure the signs fit with the historical aspect of Bowmanville and we do not become a big box suburb Lirn iting mobile sign usage Ban portable signs No signs near highways More signs (blue and white) at interchanges to advertise food, gas, lodging Regulate number and size of signs allowed. By-law should be enforced Temporary signs should be temporary License sign companies. Set standards these companies must abide by Enforce whatever by-law is adopted with no exceptions Brochure based on by-law Showing-appropriate signage with size limitations By-laws that require signs in historic downtown to be approved as being appropriate with desire image By-law change to completely disaliow signs to be nailed or taped to poles. More limited uses on public property. 00 inventory. Remove unauthorized Ticketbusters signs etc. 899065 Think about what differences in signs you would like to see in Clarington in the next three years. If you had the responsibility to regulate signs In Clarington, what Is the ONE thing you would focus on over the next'three years that you feel will do the MOST to improve the signs we see on the buildings and properties as well as the appearance of areas in Clarington where there are signs? Take visible action, not be reactive, as long as we wait for people to complain, the problem will not go away Enforce the sign by-law through regular clean-up campaigns Remove mobile signs Getting rid of video projection/electronic signs. All signs should be in good and neat order No temporary signs Remove backlit signage Encourage signs that match the age of buildings. Finding ways to combine signs but keeping high visibility and readability Enforcing by-law Confined to aesthetic standards (I know this is personal and arbitrary but I think there is a consensus out there as to what is pleasing to the eyes and what is blight) That all signs have a quality. If we are promoting historic, then have the signs appear this way and not so many. There should be uniformity within areas or plazas (size & type not colour) Signs must fit in with the character of the area Colour and size not to be invasive, over powering the background, tasteful, meet the feel of the area. Don't overlook agriculture where retail is involved. Remove individual signs along roads but replace with some sort of info sign & entrances to towns which allow space for individual businesses to advertise events, perhaps for 2 month time frames Mobile signs Yard sales must be removed after sale. Size might be more uniform. Bigger is not always better. Too many candidate signs during election. Regulate the number each candidate can put in anyone place. The signs should be clear and easy to understand Size and number of signs allowed for plazas and malls. Mobile s'igns and posters are often unsightly especially when many in one area use them. limit number of portable signs and areas where they are allowed. Time limit should be a factor. Fines im posed aod put against taxes when not taken down. Downtown would be nice with awning signs. No mobile or sandwich boards. Limited window posters. Not allowing poster and portable signs, clamping down on the cluttered looking signs and in your face signs. No temporary signs, all new business signs approved by a Board, whether BIA, Heritage or Clarington. Clear view, roads are busy, must be up to date in appearance. If they are large signs, must be a certain distance back from roads. Control the number of signs and regulate size/appearance. Don't like that video/electric sign on side of downtown Bowmanviile building by Oak Unlimited. Definitely not in keeping with downtown flavour. Too much "what will they do next?" Overloaded with signs. License temporary and mobile signs and enforce time limits. Forbid sign age on telephone and hydro poies and a lim it on "A" signs by number of metres apart and a cap on the number in an area. Focus on downtown/historic area. While this is my first priority, how difficult would it possibly be to remove all signs on posts periodically? 899066 I I I ! Think about what differences in signs you would like to see in Cla_rington in the next three I years. , I If you had the responsibility to regulate signs in Clarington, what Is the ON E thing you would I focus on over the next three years that you feel will do the MOST to improve the signs we see on the buildings and properties as well as the appearance of areas in Clarington where there are signs? , I I . Confiscate illegal mobile signs and fine the companies that install them. We may not win in court but put the onus on the sign companies to initiate the legal procedures. They'll find it too much of a I bother and simply play nice. I COMPLETE AND CONSISTENT ENFORCEMENT I Signs should be clearly visible and should blend in with the business I ~ Try not to clutter area with busy signage. Maybe have large visible signs upon approach to business I areas. Perhaps even an area cars can pull into and read what businesses are in that area and an I arrow pointing in what direction. It is not easy task to get the best method that would be most I effective for the majority. I Incentives for attractive signage in historical areas Enforcement, remove illegal signage. i Take away all temporary portable signs. Sign permits for all signs to be checked regularly. Expired I permits to have signs removed right away. Signs should not be allowed on sidewalks. . Limit the number of words/graphics on signs to simplify message. . Ban mobile & poster signs as they clutter properties as well as appear junky/tacky. , , . Regulate portable signs on the num ber that can be placed in certain areas (don't need 10-15 of the same sign in a 100 yard area) . Disallow yard sale signs being stapled or taped to posts or boxes. Owners should only use'their own stakes and have to be responsible for the collection and removal following the sale. , No signs on road sides and intersections. Commercial signs only on buildings. Make sure they are well kept and up to date. . Recently there appears to be no enforcement of distasteful signage throughout the area. . Continue to eliminate billboards. , 899067 Overall Comments on Signs Please rate the importance of the following to what you think about signs by placing an X in the appropriate box. Then rank the issues in the last column from 1 (most important) to 10 (least important). Very Somewhat Not Very NotAtAII Overall Important Important Important 1m portant Ranking (1 = Most 1m portant 10 = Least Important) Appearance of the sign 93% 7% 0% 0% 3 Size of the sign 61% 32% 5% 2% 9 Height of the sign 50% 41% 7% 2% 10 Number of signs on a property 86% 14% 0% 0% 6 Number of signs on properties 81% 17% 2% 0% 4 along the road Number of signs on a building 61% 37% 2% 0% 8 How the sign blends with the 76% 22% 2% 0% 5 design of the building Whether I find the sign 63% 31% 6% 0% 7 distracting Whether I feel the sign affects 86% 10% 4% 0% 1 pedestrian or traffic safety How signs contribute to an 81% 19% 0% 0% 2 area's appearance and character 899068 Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Clarington Sign By-law Comparison Current Sign By-law and Report Recommendations Source Comment - Reasoning Sign serves no purpose and becomes visual clutter Recommendation Add to prohibited signs list Current Standard Definition provided or Abandoned obsolete signs Will be regulated under type of sign requested Delete as a sign type Specific regulations provided Entertainment Adult Signs from regulations New sign province required not Note permit from MTO Does not include agricultura signs as defined in 8ill 98 signs provincial Animated signs to be defined and permitted by amendment only list Remove from Prohibited, excluding electronic media signs Agricultural along highway Animated Sign which flashing, or NCIP, CBOr of ease Public request; administration Not addressed in sign by- law. Addressed under Road Occupancy By-law policy to be developed No regulations provided uses animated intermittent illumination Banners on street poles and spanning road allowance Will be regulated under type of sign requested Delete as a sign type Specific regulations provided Barn Sign Permit along Highway 35/115 Public request to limitl BBIA within 400 m of highway, locations; part of tourism maintain 400 m separation experience from another billboard; use land al in Prohibited categories Billboards - ----------. ---.-... ..,"'.....IIJI.. -.....~~IAIJ AACC AClricultural Advisory Committee of ClarinClton CO Courtice Qj:len House BBIA Bowmanville Business IlTlprovement Area NCIP Newcastle Community Improvement Plan BO Bowmanville Open House NO Newcastle Open House C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House CHC Clarillgton HeritaCle Committee P Public DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW <Xl <0 <0 o OJ <0 Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source 00, BO, AACC from of Reasoning Based on comments agricultural commu~ Consolidate for ease administration Recommendation provide definition; cannot be! animated sign; limited to onel display surface; MTO permit required Permit on agricultural properties Permit one canopy sign entrance and window Continue as commercial use and permit 1 sign on each side of canopies use per Current Standard Not permitted use properties Single business sites on interior lots permitted maximum of 3 canopy signs Single business sites on exterior lots permitted maximum of 3 canopy signs Multiple business sites permitted one canopy for each business Stand alone or exterior corner units on multiple business site permitted a maximum of 3 canopy signs Motor vehiele service stations permitted 1 sign on each side of a fueling area canopy to a maximum of 9 canopy signs Sign area limited to 20% canopy area Not included agricultural on NO No comments submitted future for To allow for locations for posters More appropriate term land use nelude definition to Institutional Continue of Rename Separate category provided as a use Canopy Sign Community Bulletin Board Community Facility Comment Source AcrDnvm Glossarv AACC Aaricultural AdvisOrY Committee of Clannaton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business Imorovement Area NCIP Newcastle CommunitVlmprovement Plan BO Bowmanville ODen House NO Newcastle ODen House -- C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House CHC Clarinaton Heritaae Committee P Public DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW co <D <D o -..J o Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Source Comment Reasoning Will be regulated under mobile and portable signs Recommendation Delete as a sign type Current Standard Defined as temporary signs with specific regulations provided Not included C regulated Show area No comments submitted of limit Include map of boundary; set specific regulations Continue No comments submitted No comments submitted Continue Continue No comments submitted Continue Permitted categories No maximum per property Maximum size is 0.3 square metres (3.3 sq ft) Permitted in all land categories No maximum set per use land al in Community Service Signs Courtice West Shopping District Direction Sign Election Sign use OO,BO residential as by Clerks comments Public request Reduction for properties recommended based on received 00, BO sufficient To allow exposure time Intended to display written messages; limit timing changes for legibility Limit on residential properties to 0.74 square metres; maintain 3 square metres for all other uses; size of campaign office signs based on type of sign used and allowed Signs can be erected 70 days before votinq day Rename electronic and limit Continue square lot 3 Maximum size is metres (32.3 sq ft) Source of light pollution in residential areas. Not to message board content to written messages with timed message changes Limit to industrial, institutional and commercial Signs can be erected 6 weeks before polling day Defined as message presented by electronic means or computer generated Electronic Media Sign Only permitted on industrial, motor vehicle service station __......_.... ___.__ ..._._.. n. _.___....." MCC Aaricultural Advisory Committee of Clarinaton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business Improvement Area NCIP Newcastle Community Imorovement Plan BO Bowmanville Open House NO Newcastle Ooen House C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House CHC Clarington Heritage Committee P Public c (Xl <D <D o -..j ~ DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source Reasoning deemed appropriate for heritage resource areas or agricultural areas to maintain character Permit for ease of visibility HRA Recommendation properties outside of Current Standard and commercial properties removed Sign catego from by-law Permit for ease of visibility ry ground group face; 10% Permit on pylon/monolith Delete reference identification sign Permit as 50% of sign continue permitted as of wall or window area to ntended to display written messages; limit timing changes for legibility Rename to electronic message board and limit content to written messages with timed message changes Only permitted as wall signs Cannot be on identification signs Commercial and industrial properties permitted maximum size of 3.75 square metres (40 sq ft) or 10% of the wall or window area Defined as message presented by electronic means or computer generated group under Not permitted legislation Remove provision Size and height can be varied by 10% without amendment without Exceptions amendment No comments submitted No comments submitted Continue Continue Permitted in al land use categories _ _ _ Single industrial or commercia businesses site, or single business sites within heritage resource areas permitted maximum of 1 ground sign per lot Ground Sign -- Courtice Open House Newcastle Community Improvement Plan Newcastle Open House Orono Open House Public CO NCIP NO 00 P Comment Source Acronym Glossary _ AACC Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington BBIA Bowmanville Business Improvement Area BO Bowmanville Open House ~ Council Interviews CHC Clarington Heritage Committee CD <.0 <.0 o -..J N DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 - Reasoning Comment Source No comments submitted No comments submitted No comments submitted ~~" Recommendation Continue Continue Continue BO,AACC Requested by agricultural community ncrease to 3.75 sq metres Current Standard Multiple business sites permitted 1 ground sign as group identification sign Independent buildings on a multi-business lot not permitted to have individual ground signs Industrial and commercial properties permitted maximum size of 3.75 square metres Agricultural properties permitted maximum size of 2.0 square metres Continue No comments submitted Continue No comments submitted Based on existing sign heights in residential and commercial areas Limit residential to 1 metre maximum height; limit all others to 3 metre maximum height Address required Heritage resource areas permitted maximum size of 1.5 square metres Residential properties permitted maximum size of 0.55 square metres No height restriction set BO Public request for business location identification Will be regulated under type of sign requested type Delete as a sign Address not required Specific regulations provided Identification Group Sign _.....___.a ___.__. ___ _. ... _.__........~ AACC AQricultural Advisorv Committee of ClarinQton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business Improvement Area NCIP Newcastle Community Improvement Plan BO Bowmanville Open House NO Newcastle Open House - C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House CHC ClarinQton HeritaQe Committee P Public A, s c <Xl (0 (0 o -..j w DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source BBIA, CHC Reasoning Public request Recommendation Expand boundary to current CIP boundary in Newcastle and Orono and beyond BIA boundary to Liberty Street in Bowmanville Continue Current Standard Boundary follows BIA boundary for Orono and Bowmanville, and the 1981 BIA boundary for Newcastle Resource Heritage Areas BBIA, CHC Public request Will be regulated under type of sign requested To prevent light trespass Specific regulations included for placement, lighting, sign materials and design Specific regulations provided BO BBIA at Public request Placement determined time of site plan approval Public request type Permit only down-lighting or back-lighting Permit but not on roofs; maximum height 2.7 m, maximum width 2.5 and setback form property line; require anchor to stable base and insurance; limit display period Permit with maximum height of 2.5 metres; pre-menu board size maximum of 2.5 sq metres; menu board size maximum of 4 SQ metres Continue Delete as a sign To reflect away from adjacen properties or residential use_ Prohibited in al land use categories No regulations provided Identification Sign Illumination of signs Menu and pre-menu board signs nflatable Lack of requests for mobile signs in residential areas residential area in Not permit heritage sign 1 Not permitted in resource areas Residential permitted per property Mobile Signs CO NCIP rovement Plan NO 00 P DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW OJ (0 (0 o ..... -1>0 Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source -----i not by- \iQ-1 , C, BO, CO, NRA right to limit on Reasoning Home industries addressed in current law Public request advertise and number Recommendation Continue and include home industry not Current Standard Home occupations permitted mobile signs Continue 1 per property; permit 1 per 50 metres of store front street frontage for multi-business sites Reduce to 1 per property and 1 per 50 metres of building fayade street frontage Remove minimum length and set height at 2 m to include sign support structure Maximum 3 metres for for commercial, and sites penmitted 1 property Industrial, agricultural sign per C BO, CO, va, NRA, NCIP on mit for Public request number facility permitted 2 per Community (institutional) property not size length maximum Minimum required as set metre, at 1.2 1 Minimum length set at minimum height set metres BO, NO, P Public request sq at set size 5.6 at set Maximum size square metres C, P, BO C, CO, BO By-law of Public request Public request For ease enforcement colours licensing signs approval, Prohibit fluorescent Consider regulations Set locations for through site plan where possible No restriction on colours Licensing of sigh company not required _ No set locations for placement sign Will be regulated under type of sign requested _ _nu______ ____ __ . ._. _n on _._____ AACC AQricultural Advisorv Committee of ClarinQton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business Improvement Area NCIP Newcastle Communitv Improvement Plan BO Bowmanville Open House NO Newcastle Open House C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House .- CHC ClarinQton Heritage Committee P Public Delete as a sign type Specific regulations provided Motor vehicle service station signs OJ (0 (0 o ..... CJ1 DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source Reasoning Unnecessary Recommendation Remove from list mobile a Current Standard Prohibited, except sign No comments submitted Continue Only permitted on industrial, commercial, and agricultural properties Moving Parts Sign which moves or has moving parts Off Site Directional Sign No comments submitted No comments submitted Continue Continue 5 1 sign permitted per lot Maximum size permitted is sq metres 1 BBIA, NCIP Public request to permit in heritage resource areas; no regulation other than size currently included Permit in Bowmanville and Newcastle Village heritage resource areas; set minimum height above grade, may require road occupancy permit, encroachment permit, building permit, and liability insurance Permit on agricultural Over-hanging signs I Permitted in Orono heritage resource area Not permitted lots Residential permitted 1 per lot Industrial, commercial heritage businesses business 00, BO, AACC agricultural Request by community No comments submitted agricultural on Portable Sign BBIA support for in heritage Public continuing resource areas Continue Continue properties and area per 1 resource permitted -----.------ _....__ ..,......_.. ... _.,",~oClIY AACC AQricultural Advisorv Committee of Clarinaton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business Improvement Area NCIP Newcastle Communitv Improvement Plan BO Bowmanville aDen House NO Newcastle ODen House C Council Interviews 00 Orono ODen House CHC ClarinQton HeritaQe Committee P Public GI DRAFT SIGN BY.LAW A, s t c OJ (0 (0 o ..... OJ Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Source Comment Reasoning Maximum size will detenmine height and width For ease of administration o square Recommendation Delete 1 Maximum size of metres for all Current Standard Maximum width is 1 metre maximum height is 1.2 metres Maximum size set at 0.72 metres except set at 1.0 square square industrial metres Not permitted by exclusion NO,C Public request Limit size to 0.1 sq m and consider community poster board locations; unlimited number permitted per lot, limit to 1 per structure Continue No comments submitted use - No comments submitted Continue Continue residential No comments submitted No comments submitted land al in Continue other Permitted categories Maximum of 3 per property No maximum for any property Maximum size of 0.55 sq metres for all except industrial which is penmitted 1 sq metre public. Permit as informs Size matches others Permit on institutional (community facility) sites and set maximum size at 5 square metres Limit to 1 per lot use on Permitted in al land categories except community facility sites - - Postering - Prohibition Sign Promotional Construction Sign Size permitted is sufficient to advertise construction One sign permitted per lot frontage except limited to one per lot in heritage resource areas -_---.J --......-.... ..........w...."" _""UII III UIOti5i1 AACC CO Courtice 0 en House BBIA NCIP Newcastle Communi 1m rovement Plan BO NO Newcastle 0 en House C 00 Orono 0 en House CHC P Public c OJ (0 (0 o ..... ..... DRAFT SIGN BY.LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source Reasoning No comments submitted No comments submitted Public request Recommendation Continue ncrease to 5 square metres Public request to continue to be permitted Continue Permit as portable sign, can be displayed during office hours of subdivision sales office -- Will be regulated under mobile and portable signs type Delete as a sign technology; past through site plan New sign approvals process No comments submitted 1.5 for Permit sign copy to start metres above grade Monolith siQns. Continue for Current Standard Industrial, commercial and adult entertainment sites permitted maximum size of 5 sq. metres Residential, motor vehicle service stations and agricultural sites penmitted maximum size of 3 sq metres Heritage resource areas permitted maximum size of 2 sq metres Permitted as temporary sign within road allowance on weekends only. Set back 1 m from curb, if no curb 3 m from street Defined as temporary sign advertising sale or event and cannot be mobile sign No regulations provided Monolith signs. Promotional Construction Direction Sign Promotion signs Pylon/Monolith Signs Pylon to have 2.44 metres of open space between grade and bottom of sign Maximum size is 7.5 sq metres through Past approvals site plan process Increase size permitted to 9m2 for multi-tenant property with buildinQ(s) from 5001- CO NCIP rovement Plan NO 00 P DRAFT SIGN BY.LAW OJ (0 (0 o ..... OJ Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 SOurce Comment Reasoning Recommendation 8000m2 floor area, and 11 m2 for multi-tenant property with building(s) 8001 m2+ floor area Continue Current Standard "- No comments submitted of 7.5 metres No comments submitted Continue industria Identification and group identification signs deleted as a category; one sign permitted regardless of content of sign one sign per property Permit single site group Only permitted and commercial One sign permitted per business site Multiple business permitted one only as identification sign Maximum height on BBIA, C Official Plan defines a shopping district for Courtice which is considered the downtown. Public request No comments submitted Continue and add Courtice West Shopping District as not permitted Address required Continue No comments submitted No comments submitted Continue Continue Not penmitted on agricultural or community facility sites; not permitted in heritage resource areas Address not required Permitted in all land use categories Residential, commercial, motor vehicle service station, adult entertainment, and heritage resource areas permitted maximum 0.55 sq metres Industrial, community facilities and agricultural permitted 2.75 SQ. metre maximum Real Estate Sign --_......,.,.... .....""...."... _",.ullvrll UIUtj~i:lrv " "AACC Aoricultural Advisorv Committee of ClarinQton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business ImDrovement Area NCIP Newcastle Community ImDrovement Plan BO Bowmanville Open House NO Newcastle ODen House C Council Interviews 00 Orono ODen House CHC Clarinoton Heritage Committee P Public OJ (0 (0 o -J (0 DRAFT SIGN BY.LAW Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Comment Source Reasoning No comments submitted Public Safety issue Recommendation Continue Define as type of sign Remove provision Current Standard Permitted as a barn sign Not permitted by exclusion Roof signs Shakers Boarders No longer permitted under Municipal Act animated Sign area, number and location can be varied through site plan No regulations provided Site plan control NO,OO through Past approvals site plan process Public request Permit on residential commercial and industrial; set size and height, permit one per road frontage; require draft approval before installation; require removal after last property sold Continue and refine definition to include parked trucks, trailers or vehicles where the intended use is as a sign Continue use land al Prohibited in categories Subdivision Development Sign Vehicle/trailer signs No comments submitted No comments submitted through Past approvals site plan process Continue Permit any number of wall signs to a maximum 15% of building fayade for 1 storey buildings or barns; permit 10% of building fayade for two storey and higher buildinQs and barns; 40% of Permitted categories Wall signs cannot project more than 0.3 metres from wall One permitted per single business; size limited to 10% of wall or window area; 20% wall sign permitted for barns use land al in Wall and Window Sign CO Courtice 0 en House NCIP Newcastle Communi 1m rovement Plan NO Newcastle 0 en House 00 Orono 0 en House P Public DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW OJ (0 (0 o OJ o Attachment 5 To Report PSD-051-09 Source Comment Reasoning Recommendation the fayade facing the front and exterior lot line for subdivision sales offices; residential uses, residential buildings in CWSD and HRA, and agricultural uses are limited to 10% of 1 window area; all other uses permitted 50% of window area across 100% of glass Same as above Same as above Current Standard Where interior or corner single business has entrance on more than one wall one additional sign permitted which is 1 % of wall area or 0.4 sq metres Corner business permitted 2 wall signs Wall signs limited to 55 m2 residential use Not permitted floor of building sites No comments submitted ____n_n_ ___._.... ___._n ... _.....~...al'l AACC Aoricultural Advisorv Committee of Clarinaton CO Courtice Open House BBIA Bowmanville Business ImDrovement Area NCIP Newcastle Communitv ImDrovement Plan BO Bowmanville ODen House NO Newcastle Ooen House C Council Interviews 00 Orono Open House CHC Clarinaton Heritaae Committee p Public No comments submitted Continue Continue for ground above OJ (0 (0 o OJ ~ DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 DRAFT SIGN BY-LAW: Issued for Public Comment May 15, 2009 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. WHEREAS Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended establishes a sphere of jurisdiction of municipalities; AND WHEREAS the Table contained in Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, identifies signs as being within the non-exclusive sphere of jurisdiction of upper-tier and lower-tier municipalities; AND WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington is ii' lower-tief rnunicipality which under sub section 11.3 of the Municipal Act, 2001 has authority to passbyilaws within the sphere of jurisdiction "structures including fences and signs"; AND WHEREAS Section 391 of the Municipal Act, 2001, provides that rnunicipalities may pass by-laws imposing fees or charges on persons fOfservices or activities provided by a municipality; NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: SECTION 1- SCOPE OF BY-LAW 1.1 Short Title of By-law This By-law ;;Ind any law: thereto~fu~'lbe known as the "Clarington Sign By- 1.2 Purpose of the'~Mi'I"JI!/ The purposlilQffhi$~y"laW is to: a) reg!,llate signs plaC;liId on buildings, and other structures within the c~rporate limits ofi*h~.Municipality of Clarington; and b) t'!implement the p<illicjes of the Clarington Official Plan and Urban Design Guidelines. 1.3 LegislativeAotllg..itY This By-law is passed by the Council of The Municipality of Clarington pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended. 1.4 Area of Applicability This By-law applies to the lands in The Municipality of Clarington. 1.5 Compliance with By-law No person shall hereafter erect or display or cause or permit to be erected or displayed a sign except in confonmity with the provisions of this By-law. 899082 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 1.6 Contents of By-law All references in the By-law to sections, regulations, exceptions, Tables, figures, schedules and maps, refer to those in this By-law unless otherwise indicated. 1.7 Lawful Non-Conforming Signs The provisions of this By-law shall not apply to a sign or the use of an existing sign that was lawfully erected on or before the day this By-law comes into force if the sign is not substantially altered and the maintenance and repair of the sign or a change in the message or content displayed is deemed not in itself to constitute a substantial alteration. 1.8 1.8.1 1 I 1.8.2 I I ~ Relation to Other Government Requirements (Compliance with Other Regulations) This By-law shall not be construed so as to reduce or mitigate restrictions or regulations for any sign that are lawfully imposed by the Municipality, or by any governmental authority having jurisdiction to make such restrictions or regulations. Compliance with this By-law does not relieve a property owner from complying with: a) the requirements of the Ontario Building Code; b) the requirements of any federal, provincial, regional, or conservation authority legislation or regulations; or any By-law of the Municipality provided that in the event of a conflict between any of the provisions of this By-law and By-law 83-57, the Road Occupancy By-law, as amended, the provisions of the Road Occupancy By-law shall prevail. B99083 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SECTION 2 INTERPRETATION OF BY-LAW 2.1 The terms set out below shall have the following meanings in this By-law: "ALLOWED" means allowed by this By-law. "ALTER" means any change to a sign including the addition or removal or rearrangement of parts, but excluding the changing of copy or the replacement of similar parts for maintenance purposes. "ATTIC" means the portion of a building situated wholly or in part under a roof, but which is not a storey or a one-half storey. "BASEMENT" means the portion of a building between two floor levels that has less than 50% of its height below the average finished grade of the lot on which the building is located. The term basement shall not include a cellar. "BUILDING" means a structure used for the shelter, accommodation or enclosure of persons, animals, goods, materials or equipment that is supported by columns or walls, has one or mere floors, is covered by a roof and is permanently affixed to the land. "BUSINESS" means an establishment in which one or more persons are employed in conducting, managing, or administering a business. The tenm business includes the administrative offices of a government agency, a non-profit organization, or a charitable organization. "CANOPY" means any structure which projects from the exterior face of a building wall and extends across part or all of that exterior face of a building wall or is a self-supporting unenclosed structure. "CELLAR" means the portion of a building between two floor levels that has 50% or more of is height below the average finished grade of the lot on which the building is located. The term cellarshall not include a basement. "COMMUNITY BULLETIN BOARD" means a bulletin board erected by the Municipality for the purpose of providing a display surface for posters. "COMMUNITY FACILITIES" means such uses as post offices, places of worship, cemeteries, community centres, fire and police stations, libraries, art and cultural facilities, and day care centres. "CONSERVATION AUTHORITY" means a conservation authority having jurisdiction in the Municipality of Clarington. The tenm conservation authority shall include the Central Lake Ontario Conservation, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, the Kawartha Region Conservation Authority, and the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. "COPY" means the wording, letters, numerals, graphics, logos, and artwork of a sign, on the display surface and is either permanent or removable. "COUNCIL" means the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington 899084 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "COURTICE WEST SHOPPING DISTRICT (CWSD)" means the area identified in Schedule 2 contained in and forming part of this By-law "DISPLAY SURFACE" means the surface of the sign, upon, against, or through which the copy of the sign is displayed. "DRIVEWAY" means that portion of a lot designed to provide motor vehicle access from the lot to the traveled portion of the street, private road or lane. "ERECT" means display, attach, affix, post, alter, construct, place, locate, install or relocate. "FACADE" means the exterior wall of a building facing a street or private road. · "Principal Fa~ade" In the case of a building located on an exterior lot or a through lot, the far;ade within which the principal entrance to the building is located. . "Building Fa~ade Area" The entire surface area of the far;ade including windows and doors. "FINISHED GRADE" means the lowest of the levels of finished ground adjacent to the location of the sign, exclusive of any artificial embankment. "HERITAGE RESOURCE AREA (HRA)" means the areas identified in Schedule 1 contained in and forming part of this By-law. "HOME INDUSTRY" means a small scale industrial operation that is carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Municipality's zoning by-laws, as accessory to a permitted single detached dwelling. "HOME OCCUPATION" means an occupation or business that is carried on in accordance will all provisions of the Municipality's by-laws within a dwelling as accessory to a permitted residential use. "INSPECTOR" means any Municipal Law Enforcement Officer or any other inspector appointed by Council pursuant to a by-law. "INSTITUTIONAL" means a use that includes community facilities, parks, schools under the jurisdiction of a board, government offices and hospitals. "LANE" means a road owned by the Municipality that provides either the primary access to abutting lots or the secondary access to abutting lots where the primary accesslfrontage is available from a street. The term lane shall not include a street. "LOT" means a parcel of land within a registered plan of subdivision or any land that may be legally conveyed under the exemption provided in Section 50 (3)(b) or section 50 (5)(a) of the Planning Act, or a remnant of a lot that remains in private ownership after part of the lot has been expropriated. 899085 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 . Exterior Lot A lot situated at the intersection of and abutting upon two streets, a street, and a private road, two private roads or the same street or private road, provided that the interior angle of the intersection of the street lines is not more than 135 degrees. In the case of a curved. corner, the interior angle of the intersection shall be measured as the angle formed by the intersection of the extension of each of the street lines. STREET I PRIVATE ROAD STREET LINE ~ I.]S -1~"ru lJe(}e a, 'kkes ~ ~ "), 1> "'L .".", <!> ~ 1l ~ 0.- "^ <l ", ~ ~ BUILDING . Interior Lot A lot other than an exterior lot or a through lot. . Through Lot A lot bounded on two opposite lot lines by streets andlor private roads. A lot that qualifies as both an exterior lot and a through lot shall be deemed to be an exterior lot. "LOT LINE" means any boundary of a lot or the vertical projection thereof. . Exterior Side Lot Line A side lot line abutting a street or private road on an exterior lot . Front Lot Li ne In the case of an interior lot, a lot line dividing the lot from the street or private road shall be deemed to be a front lot line. In the case of an exterior lot, the shorter lot line abutting a street or private road shall be deemed to be a front lot line, and the longer lot line abutting a street or private road shall be deemed to be an exterior side lot line. In the case of a through lot whether or not such lot is deemed to be an exterior lot, the lot line where the principal access to the lot is provided shall be deemed to be a front lot line. . Interior Side Lot Line A side lot line that is not an exterior side lot line 899086 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 . Rear Lot Line A lot line (or point of intersection of the side lot lines) furthest from and opposite to the front lot line. . Side Lot Line A lot line other than a front lot line or a rear lot line. "MOTOR VEHICLE" means an automobile, truck, motorcycle, motor assisted bicycle and any other vehicle propelled or driven by other than muscular power. "MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT" means an agreement made with The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington. "MUNICIPALITY" means The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington. "MUNICIPALITY'S ZONING BY-LAW" means Zoning By-law 84-63 as amended and Zoning By-law 2005-109 as amended or replaced from time to time. "MURAL" means a painting, illustration, or decoration applied to a free standing sign or the exterior wall of a building and that is otherwise not a sign as defined by this By-law. "OWNER" means the registered owner of the premises upon which any sign or sign structure is located, and includes any person described on a sign or whose name or address or telephone number appears on the sign, or who has installed the sign, or who is in lawful control of the sign, or who benefits from the message on the sign, or has permitted the sign to be erected or used and for the purposes of this By-law there may be more than one owner of a sign. "PERSON" means, but is not limited to an individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, association, or corporation. "PREMISES" means a lot or a building or a part of a lot or building. "PRIVATE ROAD" means a road, the fee simple of which is owned by a single person, that is subject to one or more easements registered against title in favour of one or more abutting lots to which the easements are appurtenant. Such easements entitle the owners of the lots to use the private road for the purposes of access to and from the lots. The term private road includes a private road shown on a registered plan of condominium plan but does not include a right-of-way, a street or a lane. 899087 "PROPERTY" means a parcel of land having specific boundaries, which is capable of legal transfer. "PROVINCE" means the Province or Government of Ontario, the word "Provincial" shall have the same meaning as Province. "PUBLIC AUTHORITY" means any department or agency of the Municipality of Clarington, the Regional Municipality of Durham, a conservation authority, the Province or Government of Ontario, or the Government of Canada. "REGION" means The Corporation of the Regional Municipality of Durham, the word Regional shall have the same meaning as Region. Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "RIGHT-OF-WAY" is an area of land on which has been created and registered against the title of the lot on which it is located, perpetual easements appurtenant to one or more lots that provide access to such lots to a street. The temn right-of-way shall not include a private road. "ROAD ALLOWANCE" shall have a corresponding meaning to that of a street. "SIGN" means any visual medium used to convey information by way of words, pictures, images, graphics, emblems, or symbols, or any device used for the purpose of providing direction, identification, advertisement, business promotion, or the promotion of a person, product, activity, service, event or idea. . "A-Board Sign" means a freestanding temporary sign with no more than two faces joined at the top of the sign that is intended for temporary use during the hours of the business to which it applies and that is constructed in a manner and of materials such that it can be placed and moved manually by a person without mechanical aid. (T-Board and Sandwich Board signs have the same definition) . "Animated Sign" means a sign which contains a video screen or any kinetic or illusionary motion of all or part of a sign, including rotations; or any sign which is manually displayed by an individual for the purposes of advertising, or any sign which is projected on a display sunace by electronic means, but does not include an electronic message board sign. . "Barn Sign" means a sign affixed parallel to a wall or roof of a farm structure and which identifies the name of the occupant and/or of the farm on which said farm structure is located, but shall not be a roof sign as defined in this By-law. . "Billboard Sign" means an outdoor sign erected and maintained by a person, firm, corporation, or business engaged in the sale or rental of the space on the sign to a clientele, upon which space is displayed copy that advertises goods, products, or services not necessarily sold or offered on the property. . "Canopy Sign" means a sign which is contained within or affixed to the surface of a canopy and which does not project beyond the limits of the surface of the canopy. . "Directional Sign" means a sign erected on a property to identify an entrance, exit, or area for the purpose of directing persons andlor regulating the movement of traffic or pedestrians on a property. . "Election Sign" means a temporary sign advertising any political party or candidate participating in the election for public office. . "Electronic Message Board Sign" means a sign which has messages displayed by electronic means. . "Ground Sign" means a sign pemnanently affixed to the ground by one or more self- supporting poles or supported by a free-standing masonry structure. 899088 . Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "SIGN" Continued . "Inflatable Sign" means a sign which is designed to be inflated by air or other gas and is designed to be airborne or tethered to the ground, a vehicle, or any other structure. . "Illuminated Sign" means a sign lit by artificial light which is direct, indirect, internal or external to the sign. . "Menu Board Sign" means a sign erected as part of a drive-through facility and used to display and order products and services available from a drive-through business. . "Mobile Sign" means a temporary sign which is not permanently affixed to the ground. It is a self supporting structure, which may be attached to a trailer with or without wheels, and is designed to be able to be moved from place to place. A mobile sign is not a portable sign as defined in this By-law. . "Monolith Sign" means a sign permanently affixed to the ground by a solid continuous base that is equal to the width of the sign. . "Off-Site Directional Sign" means a sign providing directions to the site where a business or service is located. . "Off-Site Directional Tourism Sign" means a sign for the purpose of only identifying a name of a tourism destination, business or service and providing directions to the tourism destination, business or service and shall be erected in compliance with a Municipal Agreement. . "Overhanging Sign" means a sign not directly supported from the ground but generally erected perpendicular to a supporting building wall, but shall not be a waif sign as defined in this By-law. . "Permanent Sign" means a sign permanently erected on or affixed to a premises. . "Personal Sign" means a temporary sign used for a personal announcement or congratulatory message which is located on a property zoned for residential uses. . "Poster Sign" means a printed notice conveying information intended to be displayed for a temporary period of time and includes but is not limited to a bill, handbill, leaflet, notice, or placard. . "Pre-Menu Board Sign" means a sign erected as part of a drive-through facility and only used to display products and services available at the drive-through business. . "Portable Sign" means a sign not permanently attached to the ground or a permanent structure and which is designed to be moved readily and manually by one person from one location to another, and includes signs commonly referred to as A-Board, T-frame, Personal and sandwich board. 899089 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "SIGN" Continued . "Projection Sign" means a sign that is displayed on a surface, building, or structure, by the projection of a beam of light or other source of illumination. . "Promotional Construction Sign" means a sign advertising construction, reconstruction, repair, renovation andlor development and may include the name of the project, the name of firms and personnel related to the project. . "Promotional Construction Direction Sign" means a porlable sign providing direction to a construction, reconstruction, or development site. . "Public Use Sign" means a sign erected by or under the jurisdiction of a Public Authority. . "Pylon Sign" means a sign supported by one or more poles and with an open base. . "Real Estate Sign" means a sign located on a properly for the purpose of announcing the sale, lease, or rental of such properly or building or part of a building located thereon. . "Roof Sign" means a sign the entire face of which is above the lowest point at which the roof meets the building. . "Sandwich Board Sign" means a freestanding temporary sign with no more than two faces joined at the top of the sign that is intended for temporary use during the hours of the business to which it applies and that is constructed in a manner and of materials such that it can be placed and moved manually by a person without mechanical aid. (A-Board and T-Board signs have the same definition). . "Subdivision Development Sign" means a sign that advertises the sale of properties within a plan of subdivision but not the realtor's, developer's or landowner's business in general. . "Support Structure Sign" means the framework, bracing and support of a sign. . "T -Board Sign" means a freestanding temporary sign with no more than two faces joined at the top of the sign that is intended for temporary use during the hours of the business to which it applies and that is constructed in a manner and of materials such that it can be placed and moved manually by a person without mechanical aid. (A-Board and Sandwich Board signs have the same definition). . "Temporary Sign" means a sign which is erected without foundations and is not affixed to any other building, or structure on which an activity or event that is transitory or not permanent in nature is advertised. . "Traffic Control Sign" means a sign erected under the jurisdiction of the Highway Traffic Act or the manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for the purpose of regulating traffic on streets. . "Transit Shelter Sign" means a sign located in or on a transit. 899090 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "SIGN" Continued . "VehiclelTrailer Sign" means a sign which is painted on or affixed to a motor vehicle or traile'r which is parked and visible from a public right-or-way and its intended use is as a sign, unless said vehicle or trailer is used in the normal day-to-day operation of the business. · "Wall Sign" means a sign which is painted on or penmanently affixed to a single wali of a building or structure. . "Window Sign" means a sign within a building which is located within 1.0 metre of a window and is intended primarily to be visible from a street or parking area. "SIGN, ABANDONED" means a sign which located on premises which becomes vacant and unoccupied for a period of ninety (90) days or more, or any sign that pertains to a time, event, or purpose that no longer applies. "SIGN AREA" means: i) ii) in the case of a sign having one display surface, the area of the display surface; in the case of a sign having two display surfaces, which are separated by the thickness of the sign structure and the thickness is not used as a display surface, the area of one display surface; in the case of a free standing number, letter, picture, image, graphic, emblem, symbol, or shape, the smallest rectangle which will enclose the number, letter, picture, image, graphic, emblem, symbol, or shape. iii) 000 ~ O~O~D SIGN AREA MEASURED BY DISPLA Y SURFACE ~ ODD 05090 SIGN AREA. MEASURED BY FREE STANDING LETTERING, ETC. ~ 899091 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 "SIGN, HEIGHT" means the vertical distance from the ground on which the sign is erected to the highest physical point of the sign. "SIGN, LENGTH" means the horizontal distance between the extremities of the sign. "SIGN PERMIT" means a permit issued under this By-law. "STOREY" means the portion of a building, other than an attic, basement or cellar, included between any floor level and the floor, ceiling or roof next above it. A mezzanine shall be deemed to be a storey. . One-Half Storey means a storey located wholly or in part under a sloping roof in which there is sufficient space to provide a height between finished floor and finished ceiling of at least 2.3 metres over a floor area equal to at least 50% of the floor area of the storey immediately below. "STREET" means a road or public highway under the jurisdiction of the Municipality or the Region or the Province ot Ontario that is maintained so as to allow normal use by motor vehicles, or a road or public highway located within a registered plan of subdivision that has not yet been assumed by a public authority. The term street shall not include a lane. "STREET LINE" means the limit of a street, private road or lane. "STRUCTURE" means a man-made construction that is fixed to the ground or attached to another structure on a temporary or permanent basis. "USE" means the uses allowed in the Municipality's Zoning By-law and as identified in the T abies of this By-law. "VISIBILITY TRIANGLE" means a triangular-shaped area of land abutting a lane, street or private road that is required to be kept free of obstructions that could impede the vision of a pedestrian or the driver of a motor vehicle exiting onto or driving on the lane, street or private road. As illustrated, a visibility triangle shall be detenmined as follows: a) the visibility triangle adjacent to an exterior side 10Uine shall be the area enclosed by each of the street lines measured to a point specified in the applicable Municipal Zoning By-law back from the intersection of the street lines, and a diagonal line drawn between these two points: b) the visibility triangle from a driveway, lane, or right-ot-way shall be the area enclosed by the line along the limits of the driveway and the street line measured to a point 3.0 metres back from the intersection of the street lines and the limit of the driveway, lane, or right-ot- way and a diagonal line drawn between these two points. 899092 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 STlUTT i I'KII'A TF [WAD :::~~:~~:H:::~~:x:::~:f;;:::~~:::::::~:::~~;~;~:~::~~:::~::*:~~X::::::~:SID'E:WAi~iif~*:x::::::::~:~~*~~~~::~ft~~:.f4:~f;~:{:;:::~~:~~::::::::~:~~~:::~:~::~~::::~~~:*::::f.:~~~:f.i::::::::f.*~::~:*1 t-*--..l F. * 1 STR.:E'r LINE ( F.:XTERIOR SIlJE I,OT LINE) Q d ::: ~.:.;.:,.:.:. " ... ~ =t .... '" '.-......:... ~~;;.:: : !!~: ~~~i rl1 t":::c E :}::::::~::::: n _' V1SmlUTY TRIANGLE ON A CORNER LOT ~ .... :.:: ;;... - ::: .. VISIBILITY TRIANGLE ADJACENT A DRIVEWAY I'IU)f'~:RTY UN.; ;,. ... ::::. ;,.,;. ~ g .. OH.IVF:\\'A Y WM 3rn f- * VISIBILITY TRIANGLE MEASUREMENT WILL VARl' DEI'ENDING ON THE APPROPRIA TE l\fUNICIPAL ZONING HY~LA W I L J 2.2 The Tables contained in this By-law form part of this By-law. A reference in the By-law to a Table shall be deemed to be a reference to a Table contained in the By-law. 2.3 Notwithstanding Section 2.2, terms defined in this By-law are capitalized, italicized and underlined for the purposes of convenience only. If a term defined by this By-law is not capitalized, italicized and/or underlined, the definitions provided in Section 2.1 shall apply when consistent with the context. 899093 2.4 In this By-law, reference to the masculine includes the feminine and corporations regardless of which term in question appears. 2.5 In this By-law, reference to the singular includes the plural. 2.6 All measurements and dimensions in this By-law are expressed in metric. 2.7 Schedule 1 and 2 to this By-law shall be interpreted as if they are contained in the text of the By-law. Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SECTION 3 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 3.1 The Planning Services Department and the Municipal Law Enforcement Division of the Municipality shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of this By-law, respectively. 3.2 Except for signs otherwise exempted in this By-law from the requirement for a sign permit, no person shall erect, keep, or maintain a sign on any premises unless a sign permit is obtained from the Municipality prior to the erection or use of the sign. 3.3 Every person applying for a sign permit shall apply on the application form or forms as may be prescribed by the Municipality and shall submit the required plans and information and pay the applicable fees. 3.4 The Municipality shall refund the fees paid for a sign permit where the applicant in writing requests a refund and the Municipality has not commenced its review of the sign permit application for compliance with this By-law. 3.5 There shall be no refund of fees where: i) the Municipality has issued the sign permit as the result of false, mistaken, incorrect, or misleading information, statements, or undertakings on the application; or, ii) the sign for which the sign permit application is made, has been erected, located, or displayed prior to the issuance of the sign permit; or iii) where the Municipality has already completed the review. 3.6 Where the applicant for a sign permit is not the owner of the premises where the sign is to be erected, the applicant shall provide written authorization from the owner of the premises where the sign is to be erected. 3.7 A sign permit shall be refused if the proposed sign does not comply with this By-law and all other applicable law. 3.8 A sign permit may be revoked where the sign permit was issued as the result of false, mistaken, incorrect, or misleading infonmation, statements, or undertakings on the application. 3.9 Where a sign is subject to the regulations of a public authority other than the Municipality by virtue of its location or type: i) An applicant for the sign shall provide the Municipality with the written permission of the public authority having jurisdiction prior to making an application to the Municipality for a sign permit, and, Ii) Approval of the sign by a public authority does not exempt the sign from having to comply with the provisions of this By-law. 3.10 Every sign permit issued by the Municipality for a permanent sign shall expire six (6) months from the date of issuance unless the sign is erected for its intended purpose and the sign permit shall become null and void upon the removal of the sign. 899094 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 3.11 No sign permit is required to erect the following signs provided the signs otherwise comply with the applicable provisions of this By-law: i) Election signs; Ii) Real Estate signs; ili) Personal signs; ivy Portable signs; v) Promotional Construction Direction signs; vi) A sign having a sign area less than 0.10 m2 (e.g. poster). 3.12 The following signs shall be exempt from the provisions of this By-law: i) Public use signs including signs required by and approved by the Municipality to inform the public of planning applications; ii) Flags or emblems of patriotic, civic, educational or religious organizations; iii) Commemorative plaques or corner stones that do not advertise; iv) Murals that do not advertise. 4.0 ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS 4.1 Any sign erected in contravention of any provision of this By-law may be removed by the Municipality immediately without notice, if such sign is located wholly or partially on or over a road allowance or on any other lands owned by or under the jurisdiction of the Municipality. 4.2 The Municipal Law Enforcement Officer may cause a notice to be sent to any owner of a property, owner of a sign, or to both, by means of registered mail or by hand delivery where any sign is found to be in contravention of any provision of this Municipal By-law. 4.3 Any sign determined by the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer to be in contravention of any provision of this By-law may be removed without notice and such sign may be disposed of or impounded at the direction of the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer. 4.4 Any sign impounded by the Municipality shall be held for a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the Sign being impounded and at 12:01 a.m. of the thirty first (31S') day the sign, if not released to the owner upon payment of the expenses incurred by the Municipality, may be disposed of in a manner at the discretion of the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer, without compensation or notice to any person. 4.5 The reasonable expense as determined by the Municipal Clerk for the removal and disposal of any sign removed by the Municipality shall be the responsibility of the sign's owner and such costs are recoverable under the authority of the Municipal Act,2001, as amended. 899095 5. PROHIBITIONS 5.1 No person shall erect, use or maintain, or cause or permit to be erected, used or maintained any of the following signs: i) A sign located on premises which does not specifically identify or advertise a business, service, or occupant of the premises' where it is located, unless otherwise specified in this By-law; Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 ii) Roof sign, except a barn sign; iii) Vehic/errraifer sign on non-motorized vehicles where the purpose of the sign meets the definition of a sign under this By-law; iv) A sign which may cause confusion with a traffic control sign or a traffic control signal; v) A sign located above the first storey of a buifding; vi) Abandoned signs. 5.2 Prohibited Locations i) No sign or sign support structure shall be located in a manner which, in the opinion of the inspector, impedes the necessary view of a pedestrian or motorist; ii) No person shall locate a sign in a manner which obstructs or impedes any fire escape, fire hydrant, fire exit or door, any window required for natural ventilation or natural lighting or required as an emergency escape, or a fire fighter's access panel or skylight, or so as to prevent or impede free access from or to any part of a buifding; iii) No person shall erect a sign which obstructs or otherwise impedes the utilization of a parking space, loading space, driveway or aisle unless additional parking spaces or loading spaces are provided to comply with the requirements and regulations of the Municipality; iv) No person shall locate a sign which obstructs or impedes the functioning of any flue or air intake, or any exhaust system; v) No person shall nail, screw, tape or otherwise fasten a sign to a tree, fence or fence post other than a no trespass sign; vi) No person shall erect a sign less than 1.0 metre from a street line; vii) No person shall erect a sign higher than 0.75 metres within 3.0 metres of any road allowance where the sign may impede vision of an access from any improved public street to any lot, viii) No person shall erect a sign within any road allowance other than a transit shelter sign, a bench sign or garbage can sign installed by Municipal agreement, a portable sign, or an off-site directional tourism sign; ix) No person shall erect a sign within a visibifity triangle. 89909B Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SECTION 6 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR ALL SIGNS 6.1 Where a sign is illuminated, the sign and source of illumination shall be designed and located so as to prevent light trespass onto an adjacent property. Only down-lighting and back-lighting will be allowed. Down-lights shall be of a full cut-off design as defined by IESNA. 6.2 Nothing in this By-law applies to a sign that is lawfully erected on the day this By-law comes into force, provided the sign is not altered in any way. The maintenance and repair of the sign or a change in the message displayed shall be deemed not to in itself constitute an alteration. 6.3 In the event a sign that is lawfully erected on the day this By-law comes into force is altered or removed, all applicable provisions of this By-law shall apply. 6.4 In the event that an existing building is located within a road allowance, signs are allowed on the far;ade of the building within the road allowance subject to complying with all the provisions of this By-law. SECTION 7 ALLOWED SIGNS 7.1 Section 7 and Section 8 of this By-law are interdependent and shall be read together. 7.2 If a sign is specifically defined in this By-law, but not listed as an allowed sign in any table, then the sign shall not be allowed. 7.3 A sign that is listed in a Table as being allowed shall only be allowed if it satisfies all applicable provisions of this By-law. 7.4 In the Tables to this By-law, the letter "A" indicates a particular sign that is allowed. The letter "N" indicates a particular sign is not allowed. 7.5 For the purposes of this By-law, the type of sign allowed on a property is based on the use of the property. The following land uses which are permitted on particular lands by the Municipality's Zoning By-law are identified in the Tables to this By-law: RES residential IND industrial COM commercial INS institutional AGR agricultural 899097 7.6 Two special areas have been identified in Schedules 1 and 2, attached as part of this By- law, Heritage Resource Areas (HRA) and the Gourtice West Shopping District (GWSD) respectively. Table 1 also shows the sign type allowed in the HRA or GWSD, notwithstanding the use of the property or building as set out in the previous section 7.5. 7.7 The sign types listed in Column 1 of Table 1 - Signs Allowed by Property Use below, shall only be allowed in the property use category (Column 3). The section of this By-law applicable to each sign type is set out in Column 2. Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 7.8 SIGNS ALLOWED BY PROPERTY USE The sign and conditions under which they are allowed in property use categories shall be in compliance with Table 1 - Signs Allowed By Property Use. TABLE 1 - SIGNS ALLOWED BY PROPERTY USE Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 PROPERTY USE CATEGORY Sign Type Section RES IND COM INS AGR HRA CWSD (1\ (2\ Billboard Sian 8.1 N N N N A N .N Canopy Sian 8.2 A A A A A A A Directional Sian n/a A A A A A A A Election Sian 8.3 A A A A A A A Electronic Messaae Board 8.4 N A A A N N A Ground Sian 8.5 A A A A A A A Inflatable Sign 8.6 N N A N N N N Menu Board Sian n/a N N A N N N A Mobile Sian 8.7 N A A A A N A Monolith/Pylon Sian 8.8 N A A A N N N Off-Site Directional Sign n/a N A I A N A N A Overhanaina Sian 8.9 N N N N N A N . Portable Sian 8.10 A A A A A A A Poster 8.11 A A A A A A A Pre-menu Board Sian n/a N N A N N N A Promotional Construction 8.12 A A A A A A A Direction Sian Promotional Construction 8.13 A A A A A A A Sian Real Estate Sian n/a A A A A A A A Roof Sian 8.14 N N N N A N N Subdivision Development 8.15 A A A N N N N Sian Wall Sian 8.16 A A A A A A A Window Sian n/a A A. A A A A A N = Not Allowed A = Allowed 1. See Section 8.18 2. See Section 8.17 899098 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 7.9 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS The maximum number of signs aI/owed on a property shall be in compliance with Table 2 - Maximum Number of Signs Allowed on a Property. TABLE 2 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS ALLOWED ON A PROPERTY * Sign Type Number Allowed Billboard Sign 1 Canopy Sign 1 per each side of a first floor entrance andlor window 1 per side of the motor vehicle service station canopy(iesJ Directional Sign No maximum Election Sign No maximum Electronic Messaqe Board 1 as part of a ground, pylon, or monolith siqn Ground Sign 1 per property provided there is no pylon sign or monolith sign Inflatable Sign 1 Menu Board Sign 1 per drive through facilitv MonolithlPylon Sign 1 per property provided there is no ground sign Mobile Sign 1 per single business property 1 per 50 metres of store-front frontage for multi-business properties Off-Site Directional Siqn 1 Overhanging Sign 1 Portable Sign 1 Poster No maximum, 1 per structure Pre-menu Board Sign 1 per drive through facility Promotional Construction 1 Direction Sjgr1 Promotional Construction Sign 1 Real Estate Sign 1 per lot frontage Roof sign 1 Subdivision Development Sign 1 per road front1lfle of draft plan of subdivision site Wall Sign 1 per residential property Unlimited for all other uses Window Sign 1 * A maximum of 1 permanent or temporary sign is aI/owed per home occupation or home industry. 899099 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 7.10 MAXIMUM SIGN AREA The maximum area of a sign shall comply with Table 3 - Maximum Sign Area. TABLE 3 MAXIMUM SIGN AREA PROPERTY USE SIGN TYPE RES INO COM INS AGR HRA CWSO Biffboard Sian N N N N 18 ri? N N Canopy Sign 20% of the Canopy Area Directional Sign a.3m2 - Election Sign .74m2 3.0m2 Electronic Message N 50% of the area of a ground, N N 50% of Board Sign pylon, or monolith, sign the area of a ground, pylon, or monolith, sian Ground Sian a.55m2 3.75m2 1.5m2 3.75 m2 Inflatable Sian N N I 6.75 m' IN IN N N Menu Board N N 14.0m' IN N 4.0m2 Mobile Sign N 3.0m' N 3.0m2 MonolithlPylon Sign N 7.5m2 N N N 9 m2 for multi.tenant property with buildings from 5001-8000 m2 floor area 11m2 for multi-tenant rroperty with buildings 8001 m + floor area Off-Site Directional Sign N 1.5m2 N 1.5-m2 Overhanging Sian N N IN N N 1.0m2 N Portable Sian 1.0m2 Poster a.1m2 Pre-menu Board STan N IN 2.0m2 N IN N 12.0m' Promotional Construction 1.0m2 Direction Sian Promotional Construction 5.0m2 Sian Real Estate Sian O.55m' 2.75m' 2.75m' O.55m' 2.75m' 2.75m2 a.55m2 Roof Sign N N N N 20% of N N roof area Subdivision Development 10m2 10m2 10m2 N N N N Sian Wall Sign 0.55m' 15% of building ~ area for one storey building or barn 10% of building facade area for two storey and higher building or barn 40% of the building facade area facing the front lot line and/or exterior lot line for subdivision sales offices Window Sign 10% of 50% of window area distributed across 100% of the glass window residential building in. the CWSD and HRA are allowed 10% of the window area area Agricultural building are allowed 10% of the window area . N = Not Allowed 899100 Atta To Report PS 7.11 MAXIMUM SIGN HEIGHT The maximum height of a sign shall comply with Table 4 - Maximum Height. TABLE 4 - MAXIMUM HEIGHT SIGN TYPE MAX HEIGHT Bittboard Sign 7.5 m Ground Sign 3.0m' /nflatabte Sian 2.7 m Menu/Pre-menu Board Sign 2.5m Mobile S!.an 2.0m Monotith/Pyton Sign 7.5 m Portabte Sian 1.25m Subdivision Deve/opment Sign 7.5 m . Maximum height for residential ground signs is 1.0 metre. I I ! 1 I I , I ! I ! i i ~ , I I I 1 ! I , ! :i I , ~ i I i I I ! I ; chment 6 D-051-09 899101 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SECTION 8 SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS 8.1 Billboard Signs i) Billboard signs shall only be allowed along the Highway 35/115 corridor from Highway 2 northward to the City of Kawartha Lakes boundary and are limited to the portions of private property that are within 400 metres of the Highway road allowance. ii) A billboard sign shall not be located, erected or displayed within 400 metres of any other billboard sign. iii) A billboard sign is limited to one display surface only. iv) Animated signs are not allowed as billboard signs. v) All billboards signs within 400 metres of Highway 35/115 shall require the approval of a permit issued by the Ministry of Transportation in addition to the Municipality of Clarington. 8.2 Canopy Signs i) Motor vehicle service station fueiing areas may have 1 sign on each side of fueling area canopies. 8.3 Election Signs Election signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) Election signs associated with a federal or provincial election shall not be erected earlier than the date of notice of the dropping of the writ for any federal or provincial election or by-election; ii) Election signs associated with a municipal election shall not be erected or displayed any earlier that seventy (70) days before voting day; iii) Election signs shall be removed within forty-eight (48) hours after the close of voting on voting day; iv) Election signs shall be erected only on private property with the permission of the owner; v) Election signs shall not be erected in a road allowance; vi) The maximum size and number of campaign office signs will be based on the type of signs being used and allowed by this By-law. 8.4 Electronic Message Board Signs i) The minimum display time for any electronic message, without movement or change in colour, shall be thirty (30) seconds, and the intensity of the illumination shall be maintained at a constant level. 8.5 Ground Signs i) All ground signs outside of residential areas must include the municipal street address. ii) The maximum height of a ground sign on a residential property is 1.0 metre. 899102 . Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 8.6 Inflatable Signs i) Inflatable signs are allowed on a property for a maximum of seven (7) consecutive days. A maximum of two (2) sign permits will be issued per property, for a total of fourteen (14) days, per calendar year. All inflatable signs are to maintain a setback of 3.0 metres from any property line. All are to be secured to a fixed base and liability insurance may be required. ii) The maximum width of an inflatable sign is 2.5 metres. iii) Inflatable signs are not allowed on roofs. 8.7 Mobile Signs Mobile signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) A maximum of three (3) sign permits may be issued within a twelve (12) month period for the same business provided that a minimum twenty-eight (28) days has elapsed between the expiry of the last sign permit and the mobile sign has been removed; ii) A sign permit for a mobile sign shall expire sixty (60) days after the erection date specified on the sign permit. Where an erection date is not specified, the effective date for the purpose of this section shall be the date the sign permit is issued; iii) Upon expiry of a sign permit for a mobile sign, the sign must be removed within twenty-four (24) hours and the Municipality must be informed of the removal of the mobile sign. If the mobile sign is not removed in compliance with this By-law, the Municipality may remove the sign in accordance with Section 4; iv) In no case shall any person erect a mobile and portable sign at the same time; v) Mobile signs are not allowed on vacant property, vi) Home occupations or home industries are not allowed to have a mobile sign; vii) No person shall rent a mobile sign from a person that is not licensed under a by- law of the Municipality to carry on the business of renting mobile signs; viii) If the mobile sign is rented, the name and telephone number of the owner of the mobile sign must be on the sign structure and easily read; ix) Fluorescent colours are prohibited on a sign area. 8.8 MonolithlPylon Signs i) Monolith or pylon signs can be used as ground signs where ground signs are allowed. The regulations for ground signs will apply in regards to height and size. 899103 ii) All monolith and pylon signs must include the municipal street address. iii) Monolith signs shall not have a sign display area located lower than 1.5 metres . above finished grade. iv) Pylon signs shall not have a sign display located lower than 2.44 metres above finished grade. 8.9 Overhanging Signs Overhanging signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) No' overhanging sign shall be erected less than 2.5 metres above finished grade or the surface of the road allowance or public sidewalk; Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 ii) Every owner of an overhanging sign shall carry adequate liability insurance for any such sign and that insurance coverage shall also name the Municipality as an additional insured, where the overhanging sign is over a road allowance; iii) Prior to the issuance of a Sign Permit, a Road Occupancy permit will be obtained for the installation of signs overhanging a road allowance, if required; iv) An overhanging sign that weighs more than 115 kg will require a building permit. 8.10 Portable Signs Portable signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) A portable sign shall only be used and displayed during the actual hours of operation of the business that it is advertising; ii) No portable sign shall be located in a manner that restricts the free and safe movement for any pedestrian, vehicle or other conveyance on any sidewalk, path, road allowance or driveway, or in a manner which impedes vision; iii) In no case shall a person erect a portable sign and a mobile sign at the same time. 8.11 Poster Signs Poster signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) A poster sign shall be displayed for a maximum of 21 days and not more than three days after the end of an advertised event; ii) The Municipality may remove and dispose of a poster sign without notice or compensation to any person. 8.12 Promotional Construction Direction Signs Promotional Construction Direction signs shall be erected in compliance with the following: i) The sign shall only be used and displayed during the actual hours of operation of the subdivision sales office during week days; and signs may be displayed on Saturdays and Sundays provided that such signs are displayed on street boulevards only and are not located any closer than one (1.0) metre to the curb, or where there are no curbs, three (3.0) metres from the edge of the traveled portion of the street and that such signs are removed no later than 08:00 hours (8:00 a.m.) on each Monday. ii) No Promotional Construction Direction sign shall be located in a manner that restricts the free and safe movement for any pedestrian, vehicle or other conveyance on any sidewalk, path, road allowance or driveway, or in a manner which impedes vision; Iii) In no case shall a person erect a Promotional Construction Direction sign and a mobile sign at the same time. 8.13 Promotional Construction Signs i) Promotional construction signs shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the completion of the project. 8.14 Roof Signs i) Roof signs shall only be allowed as a barn sign on an agricultural use property. 899104 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 8.15 Subdivision Development Signs i) A subdivision development sign shall not be erected until the subdivision being advertised has been draft approved and must be located on the plan of subdivision site. ji) A subdivision development sign shall be removed within thirty (30) days after the date of the sale of the last property within the plan of subdivision. 8.16 Wall Signs i) A wall sign cannot project more than 0.3 metres from the wall of a building or structure. 8.17 Heritage Resource Area Signs i) Signs within the Heritage Resource Areas identified in Schedule 1 to this By-law shall comply with the provision of any applicable Community Improvement Plan. Ii) No person shall erect a sign which disfigures or conceals any significant architectural feature of a building, and no person shall erect a sign which distracts from the heritage nature of the surrounding area. iii) Preferred sign materials include wood (painted, carved or cutout letters) and metal (porcelain coated, photo or line-etched, engraved or brass letters). Alternative material may be considered, provided that they maintain the heritage character of the streetscape. The colour and design of a sign shall be sympathetic and compatible with the surrounding area. iv) Ambient, overhead, gooseneck or low-key lighting should be used for exterior lighting of all signs, regardless of the age of the building. 8.18 Agricultural Signs Along Provincial Highways A permit is not required from the Ministry of Transportation for properties within 400 metres of a Provincial highway as set out in Bill 98, regardless a municipal sign permit is required. SECTION 9 EXCEPTIONS BY AMENDMENT SECTION 10 SEVERABILITY 10.1 If a court of competent jurisdiction should declare any section or part of a section of this By-law to be invalid, such decision does not affect the validity, effectiveness, or' enforceability of the other sections or parts of the proviSions of this By-law unless the court makes an order to the contrary. 899105 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SECTION 11 DATE EFFECTIVE 11.1 This By-law shall come into force on Read a first, second and third time and finally passed this day of _ 2009. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 899106 Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SCHEDULE 1 HERITAGE RESOURCE AREAS Schedule "1" to Sign By-Law ..09 HERITAGE RESOURCE AREAS ! I i. . lifllW I I I f I. I I I I, 899107 NEWCASTLE VILLAGE Attachment 6 To Report PSD-051-09 SCHEDULE 2 COURTICE WEST SHOPPING DISTRICT Schedule "2" to SIgn By-Law -09 COURTICE WEST SHOPPING DISTRICT ,........--..- i ) ./ ,//' I O>t== - .,........,---,..= vtrfWli '111 rl i '1ci L. i !i.":;" '/: (~1 I" ...,-,'.., JJ " -SID !'.. I., JffiT -~~.cillp=.......,. TraIDJ." - ,. fu ~.. \..""[ -Wdi r- ~ e-..., , Llk,p .J .-.:::r'--\ ~.~...J.. I . I 'j :-.....~ "1~ .-; i1-'''- .. ~. l/!'-.! .;i,~ COURT _._. ',.~..,,, 11.. I. f' '''''I--- ~ '-lll!" J I" I---,,'-;,~II ,.)" r---- ~ :=J_--L i! I · --I 'ilbrrrl jZ'~~'7rr;~ ~_~ f - (;'" , ~_~~_ __ --------___, J l =it -_J --.-'r._.__-C' --~ DljR.~- -~. r.:J." ;/;. J 1- _ r-- HIGI-t/yAY.. ~-- ----;? ----. ~ - _. c I r--r ~ .\1 I -~. ~\~FOX(jj~e:<<~~. /' _ ~I I III .L ~~-.' ~r ,- ! 'i1~~a-9 F I 'Wr ~ -;t I I ""\1:>1 I..... I f- -~ I ~ BAI?f?{)# j "- ~ I -"-- ~ J\ I COURT ICE 899108 Clfll-!lJgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Report #: PSD-052-09 File No's: A2009-0008, A2009-0009 and A2009-0010 By-law #: Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF MAY 14, 2009. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-052-09 be received; 2. THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on April 16, 2009, for applications A2009-0008 and A2009-0009, and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment; and 3. THAT Council does not concur with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on May 14, 2009 for application A2009-0010 and authorizes staff to appeal the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. Submitted by: David rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: F~~ Chief Administrative Officer tI MK*MM*Cp.sh May 19, 2009 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF cLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 899109 REPORT NO.: PSD-052-09 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of the minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are detailed in Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below. DECISION OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR MAY 14, 2009 A Iication Number Staff Recommendation Decision of Committee A2009-0008 Table Tabled A2009-0009 A2009-00 10 A rove with condition A roved with condition Table A roved 1.2 Application 2009-0008 was filed to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling by reducing the minimum required agricultural setback from 300 metres to 200 metres from the nearest livestock building at 1475 Concession Road 7 and 300 metres to 170 metres from the nearest livestock building at 1506 Concession Road 7. The application was also seeking to permit the construction of a detached garage by increasing the maximum permitted height from 4.5 metres to 5.2 metres (By-law 84-63) and by increasing the maximum permitted height from 5 metres to 5.2 metres (By-law 2005- 109). Staff recommended tabling the application as all agency comments had not been received and approval would be considered premature. Committee concurred with Staff's recommendations and tabled the application for up to ninety (90) days to allow for the remaining agency co.mments to be received and to allow for time for any action required stemming from the agency comments to be undertaken. 1.3 Application 2009-0009 was filed to permit the construction of an attached deck (unenclosed) by increasing the maximum permitted total lot coverage from 40% to 41 %. Staff recommended approval of the application as there would be no negative impact on the surrounding neighbourhood in regards to drainage, maintenance of structures or privacy. Committee concurred with Staff's recommendations and approved the application subject to the condition that a building permit is issued within ninety (90) days of the decision. 899110 REPORT NO.: PSD-052-09 PAGE 3 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 1.4 Application 2009-0010 was filed to permit the construction of a barrier-free ramp allowing a wheelchair-bound resident of the household to have a safe entrance and egress to and from the dwelling by reducing the required front yard setback to 0 metres. The Clarington Engineering Services Department commented that a 0 metre setback is not suitable and that an appropriate setback to accommodate snow storage and facilitate maintenance of the structure is required. They requested that the application be tabled and that the applicant be required to undertake further discussion with the Municipality to arrive at a mutual solution. Staff recommended tabling the application based on the review of the application and the comments supplied by the Clarington Engineering Services Department. The Committee of Adjustment decided to approve a 0.2 metre front yard setback. After reviewing the decision, it is recommended that Council authorize an appeal of the Committee's decision to allow for proper maintenance of the structure and to accommodate snow storage. Should Council authorize the appeal of the variance staff will continue to meet with the applicant to try and facilitate a resolution satisfactory to both parties without need of a hearing. COMMENTS Staff have reviewed the Committee's decision and are satisfied that application A2009-0009 is in conformity with both Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law, is minor in nature and desirable. Council's concurrence with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A2009-0008 and A2009-0009 is required in order to afford Staff official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment. Staff is not in favour of the decision to approve a front yard setback of 0.2 metre setback for application A2009-0010. Council's concurrence is required with staffs opinion that an appeal by the Municipality on the decision made by the Committee of Adjustment on May 14, 2009 for application A2009-0010 is warranted; and Council's authorization is required in order to afford staff official status before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend its original recommendation. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment 899111 Attachment 1 To Report PSD-052-09 Cl~mgron PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: DINEEN LEGER RICK WILBUR FILE NO.: 1486 CONCESSION RD 7, DARLINGTON PART LOT 34, CONCESSION 7 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON A2009-0008 PROPERTY LOCATION: PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 M TO 200 M FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 1475 CONCESSION ROAD 7 & FROM 300 M TO 170 M FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 1506 CONCESSION ROAD 7 & TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FROM 4.5 METRES TO 5.2 METRES (BY-LAW 84-63) & BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FROM 5 METRES TO 5.2 METRES (BY-LAW 2005-109). DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO TABLE THE APPLICATION FOR UP TO NINETY (90) DAYS DATE OF DECISION: May 14, 2009 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: June 3, 2009 899112 Cl!1!ington PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: JAMIE BEST JAMIE BEST PROPERTY LOCATION: 11 BAXTER STREET, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 16, CONCESSION 1 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON A2009-0009 FILE NO.: PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED DECK (UNENCLOSED) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 41%. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED DECK (UNENCLOSED) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 41%, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: · THAT A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED ATTACHED DECK (UNENCLOSED) IS ISSUED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THIS DECISION, AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, MEETS THE INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLANS, AND IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD ! J' 1 DATE OF DECISION: May 14, 2009 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: June 3, 2009 899113 CflJlmgron PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: PHILIP BOURGEOIS PHILIP BOURGEOIS PROPERTY LOCATION: 49 LITTLE AVENUE, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 13, CONCESSION 1 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE A2009-0010 FILE NO.: PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BARRIER FREE RAMP BY REDUCING THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO 0 METRES. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSIBILITY RAMP BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 3 METRES TO 0.2 METRES AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, MEETS THE INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLAN AND IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NIEGBOURHOOD DATE OF DECISION: May 14, 2009 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: June 3, 2009 899114 ClfJlmgron REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Resolution #: Report #: EGD-019-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR APRIL, 2009. Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-019-09 be received for information. S"brn~ed by, ~- A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services Reviewed by: 0 ~ ~ Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer ASC*RP*bb May 05, 2009 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-1824 901 REPORT NO.: EGD-019-09 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 With respect to the Building Penmit Activity for the month of APRIL 2009, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. MONTH OF APRIL 2009 2008 . BUILDING NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF % CHANGE OF CATEGORY PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE 2009-2008 Residential 47 $6,943,440 70 $11,924,462 -41.8% Industrial 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Government 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Commercial 3 $74,000 5 $1,201,451 -93.8% Institutional 0 $0 2 $2,700,000 NIA Agricultural 1 $334,572 9 . $5,260,800 -93.6% Demolition 6 $0 0 $0 N/A TOTAL 57 $7,352,012 86 $21,086,713 .65.1% YEAR TO DATE 2009 2008 BUILDING NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF % CHANGE OF CATEGORY PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE 2009-2008 Residential 117 $16,793,610 179 $33,695,715 -50.2% Industrial 1 $120,000 0 $0 N/A Government 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Commercial 12 $1,307,924 17 $1,985,951 -34.1% Institutional 3 $13,737,560 6 $3,095,000 343.9% Agricultural 4 $660,922 11 $5,479,240 -87.9% Demolition 12 $0 8 $0 N/A TOTAL 149 $32,620,016 221 $44,255,906 -26.3% 902 REPORT NO.: EGD-019-09 PAGE 3 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: Owner I Applicant DOUG BICKLE Construction Type Location Agricultural Building 4,220 LIBERTY NORTH STREET, DARLINGTON Value $334,572 903 REPORT NO.: EGO-019-09 PAGE 4 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of "APRIL" and "YEAR TO DATE", Dwelling Unit Type "APRIL" 2009 2 Apartment 8% Dwelling Unit Type "YEAR TO DATE 2009" 3 Apartment 5% o Townhouse 0% 8 Semi- Detached 31% o Townhouse 0% 40 Single Detached 73% 16 Single Detached 61% 12 Semi- Detached 22% [J Single Detached 16 . Semi-Detached 8 Cl Townhouse 0 [JApartment 2 C Single Detached 40 . Semi-Detached 12 [JTownhouse 0 [J Apartment 3 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of "APRIL" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. Historical Data for Month of "APRIL" Historical Data "YEAR TO DATE" $70,000,000 $25,000,000 $60,000,000 $20,000,000 $50,000,000 $15,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $10,000.000 $20,000,000 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 , , . Value 904 REPORT NO.: EDG-019-09 PAGE 5 i PERMIT REVENUES 2009 2008 . April Year to Date April Year to Date PERMIT FEES $50,166 $220,219 $129,929 $299,070 INSPECTION SERVICES 2009 2008 April Year to Date April Year to Date Building Inspections 428 1,562 361 . 1,511 Plumbing & Heating Inspections 545 1,985 468 1,915 , Pool Enclosure Inspections 1 5 4 5 TOTAL 974 3,552 833 3,431 . NUMBER OF NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS 2009 2008 April Year to Date April Year to Date Single Detached 16 40 42 108 , Semi-Detached 8 12 2 22 , Townhouse 0 0 0 0 Apartments 2 3 1 2 TOTAL 26 55 45 132 905 REPORT NO.: EGD-019-09 PAGE 6 RESIDENTIAL UNITS HISTORICAL COMPARISON YEAR: 2009 (to end of 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 AREA April) Bowmanville 20 340 451 609 307 587 468 345 312 188 184 Courtice 29 134 82 126 241 173 180 133 129 231 296 Newcastle 2 60 77 84 202 191 123 131 76 110 78 Wilmot Creek 0 30 16 15 15 25 29 38 24 19 21 Orono 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 Darlington 1 10 6 7 14 15 13 17 47 102 31 Clarke 2 5 11 12 13 10 16 15 9 17 17 Burketon 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 Enfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Enniskillen 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 5 7 6 Hampton 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 Haydon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Kendal 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 Kirby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leskard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Maple Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Mitchell Corners 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Newtonville 0 7 2 2 4 5 3 3 0 3 1 Solina 1 0 6 3 3 3 3 1 1 0 0 Tyrone 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 9 3 0 0 TOTALS 55 593 655 861 802 1,015 843 701 609 679 840 906 Clfl!ington REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Report #: EGD-021-09 File#_ By-law # Subject: INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT BEAVER STREET AND KING AVENUE, NEWCASTLE Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-021-09 be received; 2. THAT improvements consisting of the construction of bump outs at the intersection of Beaver Street and King Avenue, Newcastle be approved; and 3. THAT funding in the amount of $35,000 be transferred from the unspent funds from the 2009 Capital Sidewalk Replacement Unspecified project to the intersection improvements project at Beaver Street and King Avenue, Newcastle, Respectfully by, Submitted by: ~"I../ - A.S. Cannella, C.E.T., Director of Engineering Services / S, _ on 'C2.A..-J~' Reviewed by: U ~ / ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer ASC/jb/dv May 19, 2009 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF cLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BaWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 907 REPORT NO.: EGD-021-09 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND The intersection of Beaver Street and King Avenue in Newcastle is a typical downtown environment with on street parking stalls, higher traffic volumes and increased pedestrian counts. At the request of Council and in collaboration with the Newcastle BIA staff has been working to review the parking configurations at the intersection of Beaver Street and King Avenue to look at whether improvements can be made to sight lines at this intersection. Staff has reviewed the intersection and is suggesting that improvements may be made by eliminating three parking spaces in the area of the intersection (see attachment #1). This proposal was presented in principle to the members of the Newcastle BIA on May 14, 2009 and was well received by those in attendance. At that time staff advised the members that the next step would be a report to Council to discuss next steps, associated costs and to secure the appropriate approvals and funding. 2.0 APPROACH We believe that enhanced sight lines at the intersection of Beaver Street and King Avenue can be achieved by removing three parking bays in this area. To prevent parking in these spaces it will be necessary to install a physical barrier such as may be achieved through the construction of a bump out with the installation of bollards at each of the quadrants of the intersection (see Attachment #2). Typically bump out treatments are installed as part of a much larger streetscaping enhancement project. However, in Newcastle streetscaping improvements are not currently in our forecast and so our challenge was to provide an interim solution in the most cost-effective manner possible. To achieve our objectives it is our suggestion that bollards be installed at the said intersection to delineate the outline of a bump out similar to those installed in Bowmanville within the downtown core. This treatment will provide guidance for traffic through the intersection and will be further enhanced with a painted surface and a painted guideline treatment delineating the bump out surface and the edge of the driving lane. As discussed with the Newcastle BIA, this is a very cost-effective treatment that can be implemented ahead of any major streetscaping improvements and staff is prepared to recommend these works. The estimated costs of this project are estimated to be in the order of $35,000 but an advantage of this proposal is that the bollards we would be installing are reusable in the ultimate streetscaping scenario. 908 REPORT NO.: EGD-021-09 PAGE 3 3.0 FUNDING OPPORTUNITY 3.1 This project was not originally included in the Municipality's 2009 Capital Budget and as such there is no specific funding available. For Council's consideration the funding of this project may be accommodated by utilizing the funds from another Capital project that has been awarded and came in under budget leaving unspent funds. This Capital project is the 2009 Sidewalk Replacement Unspecified project approved in Report COD-030-09 with unspent funds of $59,132.00. These funds could be redirected to fund this intersection improvement project. 4.0 RECOMMENDATION 4.1 The construction of bump outs using bollards and painted surfaces at the intersection of Beaver Street and King Avenue is a very cost effective, interim measure that may offer the improved sightlines Council has indicated they would like to see. Our recommendation is that Council approve the project as well as the funding of the project as contained in this report. 4.2 The Director of Finance has reviewed this report and concurs with the financial arrangements proposed. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Key Map List of Interested Parties: 909 ;-,----..~-~._------ " .........""'. '~,- '\ KING ST. 1/2STY. 2 STY. CONGo BLD. LAUNDROMAT .,: II) Ill:: w ~ W al ~ F. H. .. I, 1/2 STY f J NEWCASllE 1 fLOWERS '" GIfTS I ..J 1/2STY. LOST PARKING DUE TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS F. H. .---,., 55 \. '-. .' \ CP~' 2 STY. 1 STY. f. BLD. BENJAMIN MOORE . a. OLD. '7 0 ~ OJ ~ .!!ill!2 ,- =~..::-~-= ------- ---.--.--- -..--- 1S-'J5:":"'~==.:""-=-'- "' - - -,- I MOOt.! .. - .... - ..------- ---------.- ...~.:.:::.:= -----_. - CI!1rJl1gron - KING AVE. & BEAVER ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS I NEWCASTLE - IMPACTeD PARKlNO -~~ 1""7':" "' ',.,.,84 .......- ...,... - .- -- 1 - -,- -- . KING ST. 1/2STY. ~. '-,n r,"1 \.._~' ~~ '.;.j <:::;'" ,<:-' T i..) ',", i <t ..: /I) iii:: w ~ W III 1 STY. F. BLD. BENJAMIN MOORE 8 ~ ~ OJ ~ ..... - - --~.._--:' =...-..=.-=='=== =--===--=..====....:.-=..-:=.. ........ -,- I AECOM ,,""",', .,"'" =-'::._--- --- =-==~=_====."'5.:.::::- -..---.---- ----..--- -..------......- ----- CI!J!il!gfon - KING AVE. & BEAVER ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS NEWCASTLE - , , BOllARDSONLY CONCEPT = 1-.:. I-- A- .._ 12..29784 ..... --.. ~:::: 2 F, H. 49 1/2STY. F H. \ 2 STY, 8. OLD. "iG:-;, F BUMP OUT AREAS TO BE PAlNlED csv, c:J' "v ~'HW 11 1/2 STY F ..I NEWCASll..E "I FLOWERS &; GIFTS I .,J 2 " STY. CONC. BLD. LAUNDROMAT \: cp&', >',S'- PROPOSED (TYPICAL) BOLLARD "" .1", Cl!J!illglOn REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Resolution #: Report #: EGD-022-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: MILL STREET PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION STATUS. NEWCASTLE VILLAGE Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-022-09 be received; 2. THAT the Canadian National Railway be advised that the Municipality endorses the Cost Sharing Alternative A, consisting of a capital contribution towards the construction costs of the Mill Street Pedestrian Tunnel. In exchange the Municipality agrees to be responsible for the maintenance of the Mill Street Pedestrian Tunnel; 3. THAT the Municipality enter into an agreement with the Canadian National Railway for the construction of the Mill Street Pedestrian Tunnel, containing provisions for the implementation of a cost sharing component as outlined in Alternative A detailed within this report; 4. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement with the Canadian National Railway in a form satisfactory to the Municipal Solicitor; CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE. ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 912 REPORT NO.: EGO-022-09 PAGE 2 5. THAT the attached by-law authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the proposed Agreement be forwarded to Council for approval. 6. THAT a copy of this report, as well as Council's decision be forwarded to the Canadian Transport Agency, Transport Canada and the Canadian National Railway. Respectfully by, ~.. /' ? j /01't' G! Submitted by: A.S. Cannella Director of Engineering Services J..,; viewed by: Franklin Wu I ~. Chief Administrative Officer ASC/bb/jb/dv May 19, 2009 913 REPORT NO.: EGD-022-09 PAGE 3 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Engineering staff have been working with the Canadian National Railway (CNR) for some time, to obtain approvals and to secure a window for the construction of the Mill Street Pedestrian Tunnel. In early 2009, the progress of the project approvals for design and a schedule for construction was still at a standstill and it was becoming evident that again in 2009 the construction window was potentially in jeopardy. 1.2 The Engineering Department approached the Canadian Transportation Agency (CT A) recognizing that mediation and/or arbitration may be required if we were to move forward in 2009. Canadian Transportation Agency staff recommended facilitation as a first step to resolving outstanding issues and in avoiding a costly and lengthy legal process. 1.3 On May 5,2009 a meeting was convened with CTA, CN Rail, Transport Canada, Municipal Staff, and the Municipality's engineering consultant in attendance. The purpose of the meeting was to begin the facilitation process. 1.4 At the meeting all the relevant background, as well as past and present issues were discussed. As facilitators, the CTA addressed each item encouraging a resolution between the two parties. 1.5 The majority of the Municipality's issues and concerns were regarding design, construction scheduling and commitments by CN Rail for their staff involvement in the project. These issues, as well as a proposed construction schedule were agreed to and all parties committed to a construction target date commencing in or about October of 2009. 914 REPORT NO.: EGD.022-09 PAGE 4 2.0 COST SHARING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MILL STREET PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL 2.1 The cost sharing component of this project was an outstanding issue that could not be resolved at the meeting, since it required approval from Council as well as from senior management with the Canadian National Railway. 2.2 The cost sharing options debated considered two major issues; a contribution from CN toward the capital cost of the project and responsibility for the maintenance of the pedestrian tunnel. For clarification purposes, maintenance was considered to be split into two components, the structural integrity of the pedestrian tunnel and the operational aspect of the pedestrian tunnel (sidewalk, lighting, managing graffiti etc). Following several hours of debate, the two cost sharing alternatives were summarized as follows: Alternative A CN Rail would make a capital contribution towards the construction costs for the Mill Street pedestrian tunnel. The Municipality would then be responsible for the structural and operational maintenance of the tunnel. Alternative B CN Rail would not contribute towards the construction costs but would in exchange agree to assume responsibility for all future structural maintenance of the tunnel. The Municipality would still be responsible for any operational maintenance. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Upon careful consideration of the options and their long term implications regarding maintenance costs proactive management of public expectations and municipal liability, Municipal staff recommends Alternative A. 915 REPORT NO.: EGO-022-09 PAGE 5 Upon Council endorsement of Alternative A, CN staff will then present Alternative A to their senior management for approvaL Subject to approval by both parties it was agreed that CN and the Municipality would then enter into a formal agreement regarding design details, construction techniques, structural and operational maintenance of the pedestrian tunnel and cost apportionment. 3.2 The meeting on May 5,2009 with the CTA, CN Rail, Transport Canada, Municipal Staff, and the Municipality's engineering consultant allowed us to make significant progress in moving forward in the construction of the Mill Street pedestrian tunnel in Newcastle Village. We are encouraged to have arrived at a point where we can discuss a potential construction target date of October 2009 and look forward to Council's direction so that we can enter into an agreement with CN RaiL Attachments: Attachment 1 - Authorizing By-law List of Interested Parties: 916 h ,;"CHi ;~f;\'T (10,: '-; F?Oh :'JG THE CORPORATlO\ OF THE 1\.1l.1\lC1PALlTY OF CLARlNGTO:t\ BY-LAW Nl1\1BER 2009-XX being a by-law to authorize the execution on behalf of the Municipality ofClaringtoIi of an Agreement with the Canadian National Railway. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are authorized to execute on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality ofClarington and seal with the CorporationSeaI, an Agreement with the Canadian National Railway. By-law read a first and second time this 1st day of June, 2009. By-law read a third time and finally passed this 1 SI day of June, 2009. Jim Abernethy, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 917 rlr"l r;n,ofnn 'i ,- ,'.~ ,. /' _..: -< t': :-:_", _', :..' ;', .':: ',- f Leading the Way ,,-i REPORT EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Resolution#: Report #: ESD-008-09 File#:_ By-law #: Subject: MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORT - MARCH AND APRIL 2009 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: THAT Report ESD-008-09 be received for information. Submitted by: .1 J. "'" J ~. Gordon Weir, AMCT, CMM111 Director Emergency & Fire Services Reviewed byd ~~~ Franklin Wu. Chief Administrative Officer GW*Wv CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F 905)623-6506 1101 REPORT NO: ESD-008-09 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 Our report covers the month March and April 2009. It is our intent to provide Committee with information relevant to this department, in a timely manner. 2. REPORT 2.1 The department responded to 548 calls during this period and recorded total fire loss at $1,031,000. A breakdown of calls responded to follows in the table attached. Attachment: Activity Report Response Categories 1102 Attachment #1 to ESD-008-09 REPORT PERIOD: MARCH 1, 2009 OO:OO:OOhrs - APRIL 30, 2009 23:59:59hrs RESPONSE TYPE REPORT FIRE STATIONS 2009 2008 RESPONSE STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION THIS TO TO SAME TO TYPE 1 2 3 4 5 PERIOD DATE DATE % PERIOD DATE FIRES I 19 6 1 17 3 46 65 5.5% 35 50 EXPLOSIONS OVERPRESSURE RUTURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1% 0 0 EXPLOSIONS PRE FIRE 10 0 0 6 0 16 23 2.0% 3 11 CONDITIONS BURNING 5 6 2 4 1 18 18 1.5% 20 26 (controlled) FALSE FIRE 31 5 2 15 2 55 129 10.9% 75 142 CALLS CO FALSE 23 1 1 11 1 37 84 7.1% 24 84 CALLS PUBLIC HAZARD 12 5 2 8 3 30 54 4.6% 33 52 CALLS RESCUE CALLS 19 5 13 16 3 56 150 12.7% 75 177 MEDICAL CALLS 154 27 18 68 1 268 583 49.4% 197 570 OTHER 22 5 2 10 3 42 72 6.1% 47 99 RESPONSES TOTALS - THIS PERIOD 295 60 41 155 17 568 1179 100.0% 609 1211 TO DATE 618 141 86 297 37 1179 ---- THIS PERIOD 305 84 42 153 25 609 LAST YEAR TO DATE LAST 615 159 80 312 45 1211 L YEAR 1103 Attachment #1 to ESD-008-09 DOLLAR LOSS REPORT THIS PERIOD $1,031,000 2009 TO DATE $1,325,800 THIS PERIOD $3,811,600 2008 TO DATE $7,381,700 APPARATUS RESPONSE REPORT FOR THIS PERIOD STATION 1 PUMPER SCAT PUMPER TANKER UTILITY AERIAL RESCUE 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 THIS PERIOD 514 277 226 23 5 8 15 10 . TO DATE 1213 547 551 47 11 8 22 . 27 STATION 2 PUMPER TANKER 2 2 THIS PERIOD 90 70 20 TO OATE 198 152 46 STATION 3 PUMPER TANKER UTILITY ATV 3 3 3 THIS PERIOD 58 37 17 3 1 TO DATE 121 82 34 4 1 STATION 4 PUMPER PUMPER TANKER Aerial 4 44 4 4 . THIS PERIOD 240 212 17 7 4 TO DATE 478 421 37 14 6 STATION 5 PUMPER TANKER 5 5 THIS PERIOD 26 18 8 TO DATE 58 928 TOTAL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS FOR THIS PERIOD 2068 TOTAL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TO DATE - 2009 1104 Attachment #1 to ESD-008-09 DESCRIPTION OF TYPES OF RESPONSES Fires and Explosions: Instance of destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gases which mayor may not have resulted in a dollar loss. Overpressure Rupture/Explosion: An explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire. Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightning, fireworks. Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Calls: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious/prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by person CO (carbon monoxide) False Calls: A call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Calls: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural Gas, Propane, Refrigerant, Miscellaneous/Unknown, Gasoline or Fuel, Toxic Chemical, Radio-active Material, Power Lines Down, Arcing, Bomb, Explosive Removal, Standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or Other Public Hazard. Rescue Calls: A call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. Vehicle Accident, Building Collapse, Commercialllndustrial Accident, Home/Residential Accident, Persons Trapped in Elevator, Water Rescue, or Water/Ice Rescue. Medical/Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from Asphyxia, Respiratory Condition, Convulsions, Epileptic, Diabetic Seizure, Electric Shock, Traumatic Shock, Heart Attack, Stroke, Drug Related, Alcohol Related, Cuts, Abrasions, Fracture, Burns, Person Fainted, Nausea and pre-hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, call cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered 1105 ClfJ!ington REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE May 25, 2009 Report #: CSD-010-09 Date: Resolution #: File#: By-law #: Subject: SCHEDULE OF RATES AND FEES 2009/10 - 2010/2011 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CSD-010-09 be received; and 2. THAT Council approve the attached Rates and Fees Schedule for the two (2) year period, September 1, 2009 - August 31,2011. " / C/". 0' j , &' /~~ Reviewed by' "fa.,... -- . Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: Jo~ . Caruana Dj~ ctor of Community Services JPC/SM/wg CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAliTY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 1201 REPORT NO.: CSD-010-09 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 I n June 2007, Council approved Report CSO-008-07 which recommended rates and fees associated with municipal recreation programs, facilities and services for the period September 1, 2007 to August 31, 2009. 1.2 Currently, the Community Services Departme(1t completes a review and recommends increases to established rates and fees every two (2) years. Proposed rates and fees in this report are similar to previous years in that any proposed increases would be effective annually on September 1st (2009 and 2010). 1.3 In the review of current rates and fees staff have taken into account the direct costs to provide the program or service, current fees for existing similar programs and services (for new programs) and where possible, a comparison of similar programs in neighbouring municipalities. For the purpose of this report, staff did complete a review of current fees for Pickering, Ajax, Whitby and Oshawa. 2.0 SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES 2.1 Goods and Service Tax (GST) Historically the Community Services Department rates and fees have included the GST (where applicable). In order to eliminate the need to amend approved rates and fees when there is a change to either the Goods and Service Tax or Provincial Sales Tax for 2009-2011 all rates and fees have been developed exclusive of applicable taxes. Applicable taxes will be in addition to the rates and fees included in Attachment #1. 2.2 Non Sufficient Funds (NSF) The report proposes the current fee of $25 be increased to be consistent with the Municipality of Clarington Finance Department NSF fee of $35. 2.3 Learn to Run (5KM & 10 KM) The report proposes an upgrade to all learn to run programs "plus option" which would include a 10 visit pass to the Courtice Community Complex Fitness Training Facility. This option will provide participants in the "run" programs the option to visit the fitness centre at a discounted fee to provide the opportunity to run on the treadmills during inclement weather and an opportunity for individuals to introduce some variety (cross training) to compliment their running routine. In addition, the intermediate (10km) running program is proposed to increase from 12 to 18 hrs (1 hr per wk to 1.5 hrs per week). In order to off-set the additional instructor costs, the program is proposed to increase by approximately 1202 REPORT NO.: CSD-010-09 PAGE 3 10% each year for the next two (2) years and the minimum number of participants required to run the program will also be increasing. The combination of fee increase and a higher minimum number of registrants will offset the increased instructor costs. 2.4 Newcastle & District Recreation Complex (N&DRC) - Group Fitness Membership With the recent opening of the N&DRC participation rates in group fitness classes have increased significantly. Currently there are eight (8) classes offered at this facility on a weekly basis. Staff have received several requests for consideration for a "membership" for group fitness classes scheduled at the N&DRC (the Courtice Fitness Centre membership does include group fitness classes at both Courtice and N&DRC). Staff is proposing the implementation of a "group fitness" membership for the Newcastle & District Recreation Complex that would allow members unlimited access to group fitness classes on an annual or three (3) month basis for a fixed fee. 2.5 PA Dav Camp In 2007 staff introduced PA Day Camps as a safe alternative child care option for parents working outside of the home. Since the inception of this program, staff has found that while there are many inquiries about this program, the success of the program in terms of actual registrations has been limited. As a part of the review staff did review rates for similar programs and found that the current rate of $40 per child, per day was high in comparison with other providers of similar services. The report proposes that the current fee decrease to $30 per child, per day. 2.6 Squash - ClarinQton Fitness Centre Staff has been meeting with representatives of the Squash Club to identify ways of increasing the current number of squash members. Through discussions, it was agreed that there would be merit in having a "price incentive" for a 2nd family member (residing in the same household) who purchases an annual membership. This type of price incentive does exist with the Courtice Fitness Centre annual memberships. The report proposes an "additional adult, youth and senior" rate which is discounted by approximately 18%. 2.7 Personal Traininq The Municipality of Clarington currently offers personal training services (for an additional fee) to interested members. Personal training is typically a 1:1 service whereby a fitness trainer works with an individual to assist them in meeting their personal fitnessllifestyle goals. Personal training is considered an elite level of service that typically recovers all direct costs. Currently, personal training services are offered to youth and seniors with a 50% discount. With the current fees and corresponding trainer hourly wages currently this service does not operate on a break even basis for youth and seniors. When reviewing current 1203 REPORT NO.: CSD-010-09 PAGE 4 rates and fees for other municipalities, staff could not identify any other municipality currently discounting these types of services for youth or seniors. The proposed rates and fees recommend the discontinuation of the youth and senior rate for personal training services. 2.8 Newcastle & District Recreation Complex - Proqram Rooms A new rate has been created for Program Rooms 2/3 when rented together. This rate is based on the full applicable cost of one section of this room and 60% of the applicable cost of the second section. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Generally, proposed fee increases (Attachment #1) for the majority of services range between 2% and 5%. 3.2 The Community Services Department continues to focus efforts on maintaining quality services at reasonable rates, encouraging community participation and active living. In the preparation of this report staff monitored various trends in recreation programming and comparable services provided by neighbouring municipalities. 3.3 As Council is aware the Community Services Department continues to face increasing operating costs. In the preparation of this report staff has taken into account the current economic times and attempted to limit fee increases wherever possible while still recognizing known and anticipated increases to operating expenses. Attachments Attachment #1 - Schedule of Rates and Fees 2009 - 2010/2011 1204 MT Diaper Fit (1 hr/wk) Water Explorers (1 hr/wk) Aquatic Adventure 11 hr/wkl .&._- ___I~__"'I- 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks $77.14 $75.00 $75.00 $79.45 $77.25 $77.25 $81.84 $79.57 $79.57 Summer Aquafil.2/week-Senior 16 Classes $49.06 $50.53 $52.05 Summer ~uafil.2/week Aq uafil-1/week A~uafit-1/week.senior IA uafit-2/week ,Aquafit-2/week-Senior Aquafit-3/week Aquafit-3/week-Senior 16 Classes 12 Weeks 12 Weeks 12 Weeks 12 Weeks 12 Weeks 12 Weeks $98.10 $84.90 $42.45 $147.17 $73.59 $195.29 $98.10 $101.04 $87.45 $43.72 $151.59 $75.80 $201.15 $101.04 $104.07 $90.07 $45.04 $156.'i3 $78.07 $207.18 $104.07 Bronze Medallion & EFA (+ manual) Bronze Cross +rnanual Red Cross Assislant Water Safety Inslr. Red Cross/Lifesaving Society Instructor National Lifesaving Society Red Cross Instructor Recert NLS Recer! Adult Instruction Head Star! Swim Patrol ~chronjzed Swimmi'29... 4 6 . 6 - 1. ~ 1. _ 10 Weeks 10 Lessons ,+,'s<(::: Aquatic Instruction Red Cross Swim. Preschool Red Cross Swim Kids-Levels 1-4 Red Cross Swim Kids-Levels 5-10 Private Semi-PrivateJ~.E!" c1as~ Bronze Star W~k~ o Lessons o Lessons o Lessons o Lessons o Lessons o o Weeks o Weeks o Weeks $74.00 $74.00 $78.00 $227:00 $142.00 $84.00 $146.23 $133.02 $198.10 $233.96 $233.96 $66.04 $66.04 $79.25 $23.59 $78.00 $71.00 $76.22 $76.22 $80.34 $233.8i" $146.26 $86.52 $150.62 $137.01 $204.04 $24566 $236.30 $68.02 $68.02 $81.63 $24.30 Discontinue Discontinue $78.51 $78.51 $82.75 $240.82 $150.65 $89.12 $155.14 $141.12 $210.16 $257.94 $238.66 $70.06 $70.06 $84.08 $25.03 Discontinue Discontinue - Duration Ptoj:lOSilll 511pt . 1/09 - Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department 10 o C\J ~ Soccer (B/S)- perwsft Dr2E:in Soccer P.",., nf1:1 Adult Swim/Skate Youth Swim/Skate Senior Swim Skate Family/Group (Max 5, 2 adults) Swim/Skate Children 3 & under Swim/Skate Aduit Shinny Youth Shinny 'ShinnY 55 Skate 55 Parent and Tot Skate Adult Swim/Skate Youth Swim/Skate Senior Swim Skate Grouo Swim/Skate Adult Shinny Shinny 55 Youth Shinn}' ,Ticket Ice Per Visit PerVisil Per Visit PerVisil Per Visit PerVis]t Per Visit Per Visit Per Visit Per Visit ParVis!t 10 Pass 10 Pass 10 Pass 10 Pass 10 Pass 10 Pass 10 Pass Per Visit $5.7 $3.57 $2.75 $2.62 $8.81 No Charge $5.71 $4.00 $3.81 No Charge No Charge $28.30 $22.00 $20.76 $69.81 $51.43 $34.29 $36.00 $5.71 $5.71 $3.57 $2.75 $2.75 $8.81 No Charge $5.71 $4.00 $3.81 No Charge No Charge $28.30 $22.00 $22.00 $69.81 $51.43 $34.29 $36.00 $5.71 $6.66 $3.57 $2.75 $2.75 $8.81 No Charge $6.66 $5.00 $4.76 No Charge No Charge $28.30 $22.00 $22.00 $69.81 $60.00 $42.86 $45.00 $6.66 General Admissions Public Swim/Skate I~atic P'!X:!1s- You-Go Friday Fun Standard First Aid/CPR C Standard First Aid/CPR C Recert Emergency First Aid/CPR B B.OAT..Full course B.O.AT-Exam only Duration PerVisil 16 Hours e Hours 8 Hours 8 Hours Current $2.75 $79.25 $58.49 $58.49 $64.15 $33.02 $2.75 $81.63 $60.24 Discontinue $66.07 $34.01 $2.75 $84.08 $62.05 Discontinue $68.06 $35.03 Progriun or Sarvlce Proposed Sept 1/09 P,c>pc>secfSepl 1/10 Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department (0 o C\J ~ ....___ ___l:__\..l~ Municipality of Clarlngton Community Services Department Rates & Fees .. .'. '.' progrlimor Service PrQPosiid'Siipl .. proposed Sept .. i .. .' Duration Current . . 110!l . 1110 Aquafit Aquafit-Drop-In. Y outhlSenior Per Visit $3.75 $3.86 $3.98 Aouafit.Adult Per Visit $7.14 $7.35 $7.57 Memberships - Pool Only Adult Annual $141.51 $148.59 $156.01 Youth Annual $76.00 $79.80 $83.79 Senior Annual $71.70 $75.29 $79.05 Adult Monthly $36.79 $37.89 $39.03 Youth Monthly $21.00 $21.63 $22.28 Senior Monthly $19.81 $20.40 $21.02 Group, Max 2 adults & 3 children Annual $264.15 $277.36 $291.23 Groue, Max 2 adults & 3 children MonthlY $59.43 $61.21 $63.05 Memberships - SquashlPool - CFC Adult Annual $216.98 $216.98 $223.49 Family Disc - Additional Adult Annual New $184.00 $189.52 Youth/Senior Annual $108.49 $108.49 $111.74 Family Disc - Additional youth/senior Annual New $92.00 $94.76 Adult 3 Month $127.36 $127.36 $127.36 Youth/Senior 3 Month $66.04 $66.04 $54.50 . Arena Rentals - Ice (Winter) Prime Time - Adult Hour $168.87 $173.94 $179.15 Prime Time - Youth Hour $146.23 $149.15 $152.14 Non.Prime - Adult Hour $134.91 $134.91 $134.91 Non-Prime - Youth Hour $102.83 $102.83 $102.83 Non-Resident Prime Hour 10% SurcharQe 10% Surchar~e 10% Surcharae Non-Resident Non-Prime Hour 10% Surcharae 10% Surcharae 10% Surcharae Elementary / Hiqh School - Prime Hour $146.23 $149.15 $152.14 Elementary / Hiqh School- Non Prime Hour $102.83 $102.83 $102.83 P:IIna1: nf r-- o C\J ~ Prime Time - Adult Prime Time - Youth Non-Prime - Adult Non~Prime - Youth Off-Season - Flat Rate Outdoor Lacrosse - Lighted Outdoor Lacrosse - Non-LiQhted Pool Rentals Pool (2 Guards) Pool & Tot Pool (3 Guards) Pool & Slide (4 Guards) Pool/SlidefTot Pool (5 Guards) Main or Tot Pool Newcastle (2 Guards) Main/Slide - Newcastle (4 Guards) Main/SlidefTot Pool-Newcastle.l6 Guard~ Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour $121.70 $137.74 $155.66 $175.47 $121.70 $155.66 194.32 $159.43 $137.74 $131.13 $100.00 $66.04 $24.53 $15.09 $125.35 $141.87 $160.33 $180.73 $125.35 $160.33 $200.15 $164.21 $140.49 $135.06 $102.00 $66.04 $24.53 $15.09 $129.11 $146.13 $165.14 $186.16 $129.11 $165.14 $206.15 $169.14 $143.30 $139.12 $104.04 $66.04 $24.53 $15.09 P. Floor - Youth Non-Resident Exhibit Function - Community Groups Exhibit Function - Commercial Set-Up ndoor Soccer Rates and Lacrosse Bowl Hour Hour Hour Daily Daily Daily 10% $69.81 $61.32 Surcharge $896.23 $972.24 $344.34 10% $914.15 $991.68 $351.23 $71.90 $62.52 Surcha Ie $74.06 $63.80 10% Surcharge $932.44 $1,011.52 $358.25 Arena Rentals.. Ice Prime Time - Adult Prime Time - Youth Non-Prime - Adult Non-Prime ~ Youth Hockey Schools Non-Resident Arena Rentals - 01}' Floor Floor - Adult Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour hour 10% $173.58 $155.66 $139.62 $125.44 $146.23 SurcharQe 10% $178.79 $158.77 $143.81 $127.95 $146.23 Surcharge $184.15 $161.95 $148.12 $130.51 $146.23 10% Surcha.rge (Summer) _ _ .Programor.Senilce Off Ice TralnlngJRRC) (SCAl $18.85 Municipality of Clarlngton Community Services Department OJ o C\J ~ ...._~_ -__"--"1... Non-licenced-Community Group licenced-Community Group Non-Resident (all rales) Evenl10 Evenl 10 Evenl10 Event 10 Event 10 10% $154.72 $212.26 $139.62 $193.40 Surcharg.e 10% $154.72 $212.26 $139.62 $193.40 Surcharge $157.81 $216.51 $142.41 $197.27 10% Surcharge D...._ licenced-Resident Non-licenced-Community Group Licenced-Community Group Non-Resident (all rales) Half Hall Non-licenced-Resident Licenced-Resident Evenl10 Evenl10 Event 10 Evenl 10 Event 10 10% $266.98 $378.10 $242.45 $339.62 Surcharge 10% $266.98 $378.10 $242.45 $339.62 Surcharge 10% $272.32 $385.66 $247.30 $346.41 Surcharge Courlice Complex Full Hall (Monday-Thursday) Non-Licenced.Resident Newcastle Recreation Com1'lex Gymnasium - Full Adull Youth/Senior Gymnasium - Half Adult Youth/Senior Hour Hour $29.25 $19.81 $30.13 $20.40 $31.03 $21.02 Hour Hour $39.62 $29.25 $40.81 $30.13 $42.03 $31.03 School Boards Lifeguards Non-Residerlt Gymnasium Rental Rate (South Courtice Arena) Adult Youth Hour Hour $19.05 $14.29 $19.62 $14.72 $20.21 $15.16 Hour Hour Hour 10% Surch~e $53.77 $18.86 10% $54.85 $18.86 Surch~e 10% $55.94 $19.24 Surcha~e Youth Club/Swim Meet Adult Club/Swim Meet p'roBram or' Service - Hour Hour Duration Cutr!!nt - 53.77 63.20 Po'Oposed"511jl(, 1/09 $54.85 $65.10 vI'lls""",,,"ISt';' 1M; .. $55.94 $67.05 Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department OJ o (\j ~ Non-licenced-Non-Resident licenced-Nan-Resident Non-Licenced-Community Group Licenced~Communitv Group Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 10% 10% $368.87 Surcharge Surcha'1Le $240.57 $368.87 10% Surcharge 10% Surcha.'1Le $245.38 $376.25 10% Surcharge 10% Surcha.!ll..e D. Half Hall Non-licenced-Resident Licenced-Resident Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 $240.57 $266.98 $407.55 $266.98 $407.55 $272.32 $415.70 Rickard Recreation Complex Full Hall (Monday-Thursday) Non-licenced-Resident licenced-Resident Non-licenced-Community Group Licenced-Community Group Non-Licenced-Non-Resident Licenced-Nan-Resident Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 $495.28 $707.55 $445.28 $636.79 10% Surcharge 10% Surcha.'1Le $495.28 $707.55 $445.28 $636.79 10% Surcharge 10% Surcharge 10% 10% $505.19 $721.70 $454.19 $649.53 Surcharge Surch~e Licenced-Nan-Resident Licenced-Community Gro~1J_ Non-Licenced Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 $985.85 Surcharge $888.68 $888.68 $985.85 Surcharge $888.68 $888.68 $1,005.57 10% Surcharge $906.45 $906.45 10% 10% Non-licenced-Community Group Licenced-Community Group Non-Resident (all rates) Courtice Complex New Years Eve LIcenced-Resident Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 10% $183.93 $271.70 $166.04 $244.34 Surcha.'1Le 10% $183.93 $271.70 $166.04 $244.34 Surcharge 10% $187.61 $277.13 $169.36 $249.23 SurchaIll.e Non-licenced-Community Group licenced-Community Gro~ Non-Resident (all rates) Half Hall Non-licenced-Resident Licenced:'Resident Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 10% $334.91 $4a5.8s $300.94 $436.79 Surch'![ll.e 10% $334.91 $485.85 $300.94 $436.79 Surcha!E..e 10% $341.61 $495.57 $306.96 $445.53 Surcharae FUii Hall (Friday-Sunday) Non-licenced-Resident Licenced-Resident Program, or .Service Duration Current Propolielll>'llpt. 1/09., 1:"'8p~-' 1110: Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department o ~ C\J ~ .. :'ilih,gfiii11. Rickard Recreation Compiex Fuii Hall (Friday-Sunday) Non-licenced-Resident Licenced-Resident Non-licenced-Community Group Licenced-Community Group Non-Licenced-Non-Resident Licenced-Non-Resident Haif Haii Non-licenced-Resident Licence-Resident Non-Licenced-Community Group Licenced-Community Group Non-Licenced-Non-Resident Licenced-Non-Resident Rickard Complex New Year's Eve Licenced-Resident Licenced-Non-Resident Licenced-Community Group Non-Licenced Meeting Room Rate. Commurlity Groups Community Groups Resident Resident Non-Resident/Commercial Resident / Non-Resident Schools Schools Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Event 10 Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour ~ Hour 4 Hour $26.42 $70.75 $35.85 $99.06 10% Surcharge 10% Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 $26.42 $70.75 $35.85 $99.06 10% Surcharge 10% Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 $26.95 $72.17 $36.57 $101.04 10% Surcharge 10% Surcharge $20.21 $43.30 $1,943.40 10% Surcharge $1.749.06 $1,749.06 $1.943.40 10% Surcharge $1,749.06 $1,749.06 $1,982.27 10% Surchal'lle $1,784.04 $1.784.04 10% 10% $349.06 $500.00 $314.15 $450.00 Surcharge Surcharge $349.06 $500.00 $314.15 $450.00 10% Surchal'lle 10% SurchC:!!:9.e $356.04 $510.00 $320.43 $459.00 10% Surchal'lle 10% Surch~ $808.49 10% Surcharge 10% Surcharge $626.42 $898.11 $563.21 $808.49 10% Surchal'lle 10% SurcharQe $626.42 $898.11 $563.21 $824.66 10% Surcharge 10% Surchal'lle $638.95 $916.07 $574.47 Municipality of Clarington - - . PropOSli~'ml\ir I 1/011 ~,'.' ; Duration Rates & Fees Community Services Department ~ ~ C\J ~ Rickard Recreation Complex Full Hall Community Groups Community Groups Resident Resident Non-Resident/Commercial Schools Schools Rickard Recreation ComJ!!..ex Half Hall Community Groups Community Groups Resident Hour 4 Hour Hour $46.23 $113.21 $70.75 $46.23 $113.21 $70.75 $47.15 $115.47 $72.17 P.IIA Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour 10% $94.34 $283.02 $141.51 $353.77 Surcharge $71.70 $198.11 $94.34 $283.02 $141.51 $353.77 10% Surcharge $71.70 $198.11 10% $96.23 $288.68 $144.34 $360.85 Surcharge $73.13 $202.07 Schools Schools-Mon-Fri-davtime Resident Resident Non-Res./Commercial Schools Schools Half Hall Community Groups Community Groups Resident Resident Non-Resident/Commercial Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour Hour 4 Hour 10% $26.42 $70.75 $42.45 $113.21 Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 10% $26.42 $70.75 $42.45 $113.21 Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 10% $20.21 $43.30 $115.47 Surcharge $26.95 $72.17 $43.30 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour 10% $73.58 $198.11 Surcharge $38.68 $103.77 10% $38.68 $103.77 $73.58 $198.11 Surcharge 10% $75.05 $202.07 Surcharge $39.45 $105.85 Courtice Complex Full Hall Community Groups Community Groups Hour 4 Hour $49.06 $127.36 $49.06 $127.36 $50.04 $129.91 ProjJram or Service - Duration Current ProposWSlipt 1/09 Propo8liif;1lllpt 1/1'0 Municipality of Clarlngton Rates & Fees Community Services Department C\J ~ C\J ~ A~~I_ Extra Fees Kitchen-With Hall Kitchen-Catering Only Refundable Damage Deposit Bartenders Red Cross Materials (School Boards Extra Staff (Skate Patrollers Maintenance Hour 5 Wk Class Hour Hour Event Event Event $113.21 $31.13 $212.26 $18.40 $70.75 $12.10 $13.77 $113.21 ~ $218.63 $18.40 $72.87 $12.46 $13.77 $113.21 ~ $225.19 $18.95 $75.06 $12.84 $14.18 D Parking Lots CCCI RRCI SCAI NDRC DSCI CFcr BIS $467.28 $233.64 $481.30 $240.65 $495.74 $247.87 NDRC Rooms 2 and 3 Community Groups Community Groups Resident Resident Schools Schools Meeting Rooms - 400 sq ft Community Groups Community Groups Resident Resident Non-Resident/Commercial Non-Resident/Commercial Schools Schools Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour Hour 4 Hour 10% 10% $26.42 $70.75 $35.85 $99.06 Surcharge Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 10% 10% $26.42 $70.75 $35.85 $99.06 Surcharge Surcharge $19.81 $42.45 10% 10% $26.95 $72.17 $36.57 $ 'iOi":04 Surcharge Surcharge $20.21 $43.30 1 Hour 4 Hour 1 Hour 4 Hour 1 Hour 4 Hour New New New New New New $42.27 $ 'i"i3.2o $57.34 $158.50 $31.69 $67.92 $43.12 $115.46 $58.49 $161.67 $32.32 $69.28 Schools Schools 4 Hour Hour Hour 4 Hour Current $198.1 Surcharge $35.85 $84.91 $198.11 Surcharge $35.85 $84.91 $202.07 Surcharge $36.57 $86.61 Resident Non-Resident/Commercial 10% 10% 1.0% ProBram. or Service propoSiIl Sept. 1 .. Pfllp - - - _ 'Sij)f 1/09 1/10 . Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department (Y) ~ C\l ~ Dryland Trainlng(10-15 players under 18yrs"" Each additional player under 18 (up to 18 players)** Dryland Tralning(10-15 players adult 18+yrs"" Each additional player 18 yrs + (up to 18 players)"" Flex Training Package Youth Teams (10-15 player& 'neludes training session priva~te room/qym 1 Hour Per Hour 1 Hour 1 Hour 1 Hour 51.43 4.29 102.86 8.57 101.19 $51.43 . $4.29 $ 'TIi2.86 $8.57 $101.19 $51.43 $4.29 $'TIi2.86 $8.57 $101.19 Senior Annual 3 month Annual 3 month New New New New $260.00 $120.00 $130.00 $65.00 $265.20 $122.40 $132.60 $66.30 Newcastle Group Fitness Membership *unllmlted group fitness classes at NDRC Adult - Senior/Youth Family Dlscount-Add'l Adult Family Discount-Add'l Youth. Senior Post Secondary Student/Summer (May 1 Corporate/Group Membership (minimum 10 individuals) Fitness Classes Fitness Aerobics 1 hr Fitness Aerobics-Youth/Senior - 1 hr 12 Weeks 12 Weeks $50.00 $25.47 $52.00 $26.49 $54.08 $27.55 Labour D~ Annual 3 Month 1 Month Annual 3 Month 1 Month Annual Annual 4 Month Annual $433.96 $167.92 $80.19 $334.90 149.06 $70.75 $339.62 $221.70 $167.92 $339.62 $442.64 $169.60 $80.19 $334.90 149.06 $70.75 $339.62 $221.70 $167.92 $339.62 $451.49 $171.30 $80.19 $334.90 149.06 $70.75 $339.62 $221.70 $167.92 $339.62 Fitness Centre Membership. group fitness classes -fitness centre at CCC (includes swimming - all pools & squash at CFC) Adult Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees - - - Program or Service Duration Current ProposelfSept 1/09 Community Services Department Propiil.._ a!fept 1/10 '<t ~ C\J ~ Pay-as-you~go Training Club pay go Training Club pay go (senior/student) Training Club Pay-go TEN pass Training Club Pay-go TEN pass (senior/studeniL Group fitness adult pay go Group fitness pay go (seniors/youth) Group fitness adult TEN pay-Qo Grau!, fitness TEN pay-go (senior/student} Services Fitness Assessment Fitness Assessment- Youth/Senior Personal Training Personal Training- Youth/ Senior Personal Training '(5 sessions) Personal Tralnmg- Youth/ Senior Personal Training (10 sessions) Personal Training Youth/Senior Personal Training (semi 2oersons Child Supervision Child Supervision Hour Hour Hour Hour 5 Pass 5 Pass 10 Pass 10-Pass 1 Hrp/p 1.5 Hrs 15 Hrs Visit Visit 10 Pass 10 Pass Class Class 10 class 10 class $8.57 $4.52 $71.70 $35.85 $6.19 $3.10 $49.06 $24.53 $8.57 $4.52 $71.70 $35.85 $6.19 $3.10 $49.06 $24.53 $8.57 $4.52 $71.70 $35.85 $6.19 $3.10 $49.06 $24.53 $37.74 $18.87 $37.74 $18.87 $169.81 $84.90 $301.89 $150.94 $28.30 $4.00 $36.00 $38.49 Discontinue $38.49 Discontinue $173.21 Discontinue $307.93 Discontinue $28.87 $4.00 $36.00 $39.26 Discontinue $39.26 Discontinue $176.67 Discontinue $314.09 Discontinue $29.44 $4.00 $36.00 Learn to Run -5 km Basic Learn to Run -5 km Plus. includes 10 visit pass Learn to Run -10 km Learn to Run -10 km Plus. includes 10 visit pass Basic Half Marathon Half Marathon Plusjincludes Fitness Centre 1 0 visi~ to fitness centre to fitness centre 12 Hours 18 Hours $152.38 New $57.14 New $57.14 New $58.85 $95.69 $63.43 $104.29 $164.57 $199.79 $60.03 $97.60 $69.77 $106.38 $167.86 $203.79 ;.'.':'..'.:....'..'.' ; '~";' ','. . ..... :" '."'.' ::"':':"" )ii. . "P'l!~rlliri~r~ ,Ie Each additional Youth (up to a max of 18 players) Flex Training Package Youth Teams (10-15 piayers) .. Training in Multipurpose Room Only (doesn't include use of Fitness Centr~ Each additional adulU?]aver uo to 18 olavers Duration $12.70 Curren! = 6.76 190.00 $12.70 Prl!po'sed S. 1/09 $6.76 $190.00 $12.70 $6.76 $190.00 Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees Community Services Department 10 ~ C\J ~ Recrea lion Programs Babysitting Course (1.5 hr/wk) Girls Club (1 hour/week) Guitar Lessons (1 hour/week) Hip Hop Dance (1 hour/week) Creative Kids (1 hour/week) Sportball-Ages 2-3 (45 min.lweek) Sportball-Ages 3-8 (1 hr/wk) Youth Floor Hockey (1.5 hrs/wk) Youth Dodgeball (1 hr/wk) Kids in Action (1 hr/wk) Sports Club (1 hr/wk) Youth Basketball (1 hr/wk) Youth Volleyball (1 hr/wk) Junior Badminton (1hr/wk) ISalsa Babies (1 hr/wk) 'Adult Volleyball (1.5 hrs/wk) (18+) Adult Basketball (1.5 hrslwk) (18+) Aduit Floor Hockey (1.5 hrs/wk) (18+) Adult Drop-In Basketball,Volleyball,Badminton J18+ Pick-up Basketball 11.5 hrs/wk) 1.5 hrs 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks Per Visit Per Visit $46.00 $32.00 $58.00 $60.00 $43.00 $150.00 $150.00 $36.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 $34.00 $34.00 $34.00 $120.00 $57.14 $57.14 $57.14 $3.81 $2.50 $46.92 $32.64 $59.16 $61.20 $43.88 $153.00 $153.00 $36.72 $28.56 $28.56 $28.56 $34.68 $34.88 $34.88 $122.40 $58.28 $58.28 $58.28 $3.81 $2.50 $47.39 $32.97 $59.75 $61.81 $44.30 $154.53 $154.53 $37.09 $28.85 $28.85 $28.85 $35.03 $35.03 $35.03 $123.62 $58.87 $58.87 $58.87 $4.28 $2.50 D. Summer/March Break Camps Kinder Camp Day Camp Sports, Eco, Arts Camp KinderlDay/Sports PA Day Day Trip Camp Drama Camp Advanced Leadership Camp. Before & After Care Week Week Week ~ ~ Week Week 2 Weeks Hour $135.00 $135.00 $135.00 $40.00 $40.00 $185.00 $185.00 $311.32 $3.00 $139.05 $136.35 $140.40 $40.00 $30.00 $t90.55 $190.55 $311.32 $3.00 $141.83 $139.08 $144.61 $40.00 $30.00 $194.36 $194.36 $317.55 $3.00 - Program. or Servl~e' - Duration - Current PropoiGa ~S'iflI' 1/09 ' 1/,111 Municipality of Clarington Rates & Fees 'Prl Community Services Department (0 ~ C\J ~ Municipality of Clarington Community Services Department Rates & Fees Proposed Sept Proposed Sept Program or Service Duration Current 1/09 1/10 Drama Club 11.25 hours/week) 10 Weeks $140.00 $142.80 $144.23 Drama Club 11.25 hours/week) 16 Weeks . $185.00 Discontinue Discontinue Pre-Teen Dances Per Niqht $9.00 9.00 9.00 Birthday Parties 12 hours) Per Child minimum B $12.00 12.50 13.00 After Sellool Drop In Per Visit $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 After Sellool Drop In 10 Pass $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 Hiqh Five.Princioles of Healthv Child Development 7 Hours $57.14 $57.14 $57.14 Childrens dance 10 Weeks $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Youth Niqhts 3 Weeks $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 Skateboardinq 4 Weeks $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Administrative Charges / Discounts Cancellation or Refund Fee (excl fac rentals) Per Proaram $9.52 $10.00 $10.00 NSF Fee Per Trans $25.00 $35.00 $35.00 Annual Fitness Membershio Cancellation Per Member $61.90 $65.00 $65.00 Annual Sauash/Swim Membership Cancellation Per Member new $35.00 $35.00 Replacement Access Card Per Card $4.76 $5.00 $5.00 Facility Rental Cancellation Fee with notice (min 15 business days) Per Rental 10% of Total Cost 10% of Total Cost 10% of T olal Cost Facilitv Rental Cancellation Fee with 1.15 days notice Per Rental 50% of Total Cost 50% of Total Cost 50% ofT otal Cost Per Program/Membership/ Non Residents Rental 10% Surcharae 10% Surcharoe 10% Surcharoe 3rd Child & Subsequent Children 50% Reduction on 50% Reduction on 500/0 Reduction on Family Discount in Same Family Lowest Rate Lowest Rate Lowest Rate t- ~ C\J ~ Cl!!fingtoll REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Resolution #: Report #: CSD-011-09 File #: By-law #: Subject: JUNE IS RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CSD-011-09 be received; and 2. THAT the month of June 2009 be proclaimed Recreation and Parks Month. Reviewed by0jr-?~.~ Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by'/ . 1 ibseph P. Caruana L/Director of Community Services JPC/SM//CF/wg CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAliTY OF cLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 1218 REPORT NO.: CSD-011-09 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Throughout the month of June, many municipalities across Ontario will celebrate the benefits and values of recreation in everyday life by recognizing Recreation and Parks Month. 1.2 Recreation and Parks Month is an exciting way to increase awareness of the value and important benefits of recreation and parks to individuals, families and communities. It provides an opportunity to celebrate the success of recreation . and parks contributing to the quality of life in Ontario. 1.3 There are many benefits to participating in physical activity and recreational pursuits. Recreation provides personal, social, economic and ecological benefits to our residents, our communities and our Province. These benefits are significant and critical to the vitality of the Municipality of Clarington. 2.0 THE BENEFITS OF PARKS AND RECREATION 2.1 Benefits to Personal Health i) Improving personal health through sport and other forms of physical activity would significantly reduce healthcare costs. ii) A healthy individual is less likely to be sick - saving frequent medical visits, additional costs and absenteeism from the workplace. iii) Recreation provides an ideal opportunity to explore and develop a full range of abilities. iv) Sport participation develops a wide range of skills and attitudes, including teamwork, leadership, problem solving, decision making, communications, personal management and administrative skills. 2.2 Benefits to Communities i) Parks and recreation opportunities are essential for strengthening and maintaining a healthy community. Positive impacts are evident throughout the community. Recreation brings neighbours together, encourages safer, cleaner neighbourhoods and creates a livelier community atmosphere. Parks and recreational facilities also help improve a community's image, socioeconomic status and enhance the area's desirability. ii) Sport improves social cohesion. Sport participants experience a high degree of interaction with other individuals, which improves interpersonal relationships, establishes the basis for trust and builds teamwork skills that generate gains in social cohesion. 1219 REPORT NO.: CSD-011-09 PAGE 3 iii) Recreation reduces self-destructive behaviour and negative social activity in youth. iv) Recreation promotes social bonds by uniting families, building cultural tolerance and supporting seniors and individuals with disabilities. v) Recreation reduces isolation, loneliness and alienation. 2.3 Benefits to the Environment i) Open space, parks and recreation areas are ideal mediums for encouraging and developing stronger stewardship of the land. People who enjoy outdoor recreation become more familiar with natural resources and the environment. ii) Park lands and outdoor recreation facilities in municipal, regional and provincial parks provide exceptional learning opportunities for students. 2.4 Benefits to the Economy i) Household spending on sport has a significant impact on the Canadian economy; sport supports about two ( 2) percent of the jobs in Canada. Ii) Parks, open space and land conservation increase the value of nearby properties, attract businesses and employees in search of a high quality of life, attract tourists and boost recreational spending. iii) Parks and open spaces reduce obesity and health care costs by supporting exercise and recreation. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 During the month of June, the Community Services Department will be celebrating Recreation and Parks Month, and promoting the theme of "Live it everyday!" Regardless of how you define "recreation", it is important to recognize the benefits recreation provides. 3.2 To encourage community participation, a variety of community events and special promotions will be offered throughout the municipality during the month of June. A full event listing (Attachment #2) will be available at all community centres, in the Community Services Recreation and Leisure Guide and at www.clarinqton.net . Attachments Attachment #1 - Municipal Proclamation Attachment #2 - Recreation and Parks Month - June 2009 Calendar 1220 CSD-OII-09 Attachment #1 MUNICIP AL PROCLAMA nON June is Recreation and Parks Month WHEREAS, in the Municipality of Clarington, we are fortunate to have a variety of recreation and parks systems providing countless recreational opportunities for residents and visitors from around the world; and WHEREAS, recreation enhances quality oflife, balanced living and lifelong learning; helps people live happier and longer; develops skills and positive self image in children and youth; develops creativity; and builds healthy bodies and positive lifestyles; and WHEREAS, recreational participation builds family unity and social capital; strengthens volunteer and community development; enhances social interaction; creates community pride and vitality; and promotes sensitivity and understanding to cultural diversity; and WHEREAS, parks, open space and trails provide active and passive outdoor recreation opportunities, help maintain clean air and water; and promotes stewardship of the natural environment; and WHEREAS, recreation, therapeutic recreation and leisure education are essential to the rehabilitation of individuals who have become ill or disabled; or disadvantaged, or who have demonstrated anti-social behavior; and WHEREAS, the benefits provided by recreation programs, services and parks, and open space, reduce healthcare and social service costs; serve to boost the economy, economic renewal and sustainability; enhance property values; attract new business; increase tourism; and curb employee absenteeism; and WHEREAS, all levels of government, the voluntary sector and private enterprise throughout the Province participate in the planning, development and operation of recreation and parks program, services and facilities; and WHEREAS, Ontario has proclaimed that June, which witnesses the greening of Ontario and serves as a significant gateway to family activities, be designated as Recreation and Parks Month, which will annually recognize and celebrate the benefits derived year round from quality public and private recreation and parks resources at the local, regional and provincial levels: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Municipality of Clarington, in recognition of the benefits and values of Recreation and Parks, does hereby proclaim the month of June as Recreation and Parks Month. 1221 C50-011-09 ATTACHMENT #2 Recreation & parks Month - June 2009 SUNIM Y MONDAY TUESDA Y WEDNI SDAY TIlURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Live I~)I eYeryuoy. _.'""'...,...."'.......0.0 Visual Arts Centre sculpture~ lohn Dickinson May 17-lune 21 7 FREE orop-in BasketbaU 4-5:00 PM Newcastle & District Recrea~on complex ~ 14 Rickard Recreation complex 21 Fathe(s swim for FREE FREI: DroJ>:in Famiy HOOps Night 4-5 PM NewCastle Recreation complex 28 TIy Golfing! ~ 4 I Gym at the libraI)' Hosted by the clarington public libraI)' T 0 V R 8 wall Bike or Rollernlade to work or school sguash Infonna~on Night at CCC 6-8 PM . o.-..Ic;'\ ... 15 FREE Yoga class 8-9:00 PM Newcastle & District community complex (;<' ~.~ 2 Health Day .... c-. - Bp cheds~- -BOdy Fat Analysis Come for a tour - slay for a workoutl Courtice community complex 3 FREE 55+ strength Training dass 1 :3D- 2:30 PM Coultice community complex .... ,,) ';;:1 >.- ..> ...;' "<_ ,ole, ISM WEEK 9 ~IO BIG BIKE : :i1tB Latin Dancing for Heart & stroKe 12 12-1:00 PM Ilosted PM starts at KelSey'S by COM COultice community complex C.OM Senior Idol I PM Beech Centre Blood Donor dinic - Newcas1Ie To Ha1l3:3D-7:30 PM 16 Newcastle Village Concerts - EveI)' TUesday -Newcastle parkette 7-9 PM COM Bike Ride/walk Free BBQ at II AM for palticipants. Hosted by Beech Street spinners 9:30 AM-I PM '" i_ Beech centre 1?'t 23 Newcastle Village Concerts - Newcastle PaJtette 7-9 PM Look for a windy spot andflya~eJ t " 17 FREE 5S+ strength mining dass 1:30- 2:30 PM courtice commun~ complex , 4 FREI: NIA class ~ 1:30-2:30 PM ~~' courtlce . community complex V N E , - II FREE Kids NIA 4-5 PM Courtice community complex 5 FREE Fitness Fridays Courtice community '"""~ V N E 12 FREE Fitness Fridays coultice community complex ~ Concerts in RotaI)' Park . fVel)' Thurroay BowmanviDe 7-9 PM RRA, 0... 18 FREE NIA dass 1 :30-2:30 PM coultice community complex Fabulous Fifties Fest Bowmanville lune 19-21 COncerts in RotaI)' pafk Bowmanville 7-9 PM 19 FREE Fitness Fridays Coultice community comPlex~ PrNeen Video Dance atccc. 7-9PM. 6 ,) Live ,t, / everyuOy -"'-""p"'h...o"'n,c.o 7 ~Ca coultice Kids Multisport Infonnation Day 10-12 PM COultice COmr-'" . Jrt\,,",nlex ~ 20 Have a Picnic in the Pm - clarington has lots to offer_ . 22 FREE cardio sculpt 7-8 PM Newcastle & District Recreation '"""tJ fa 24 ,'25 ~ FREE NIA class ,;" FREE Kids N '<' 7-8 PM Newcastle 4-5 PM Recreation comPlex^ courtice community complex 8100d Donor clinic - Rickard Recreatio~ complex 1-7:30 PM FREE Relaxation seminar at C.OM Beech Centre 7-9 PM 26 FREE Fitness Fridays Coultice Community complex ~ 12'9 . "".. CfNJllgron REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Report #: CLD-008-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: Review of Refreshment Vehicle Licence Requirements RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-008-09 be received; 2. THAT the current 60 meter setback as required in By-law 2004-114 be maintained; and 3. THAT the interested parties listed in Report CLD-008-09 be advised of Council's decision. . ~~ Reviewed by: ankhn Wu. * Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 1301 REPORT NO.:CLD-008-09 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT At its regular meeting held on April 2ih 2009, Council directed staff to "review By-law 2004- 114, a By-law to Regulate and License Refreshment Vehicles with respect to the 60 metre setback as it relates to tenants and land owners." Currently Section 13 of By-law 2004-114 states: "No vehicle shall be used to conduct business: (a) within 60 meters of an eating establishment; (b) within 60 meters of playground equipment located in any park; and (c) within any park without prior written consent of the Director of Community Services in accordance with the Municipal Parks By-law." This section is a carry-over from its predecessor By-law 91-95. The setback was established to protect the viability of other businesses within the Municipality. Typically the Refreshment Vehicles are owned by individuals who rent space on land to conduct their business. The property must meet Zoning requirements to allow for an eating establishment. The case that brought this matter forward was that of Mr. Domenic Forsellino. The Forsellinos had applied to place a "hot dog cart" in the parking lot on the East side of their property at 98 King Street West in Bowmanville. The proposed location placed the cart within 24 meters of the Village Inn (91 King St W.) to the south and 19 meters of Rose's (84 King St W.) to the east. The Forsellinos' application was unique in that they are the landowners. Their argument was that as property owners the By-law was unfairly penalizing them by prohibiting them from using their property as they saw fit. This is not an unusual situation. Many Municipal By-laws restrict what an individual is permitted to do with their property. By making an exemption for individual property owners Council would be negating part of the Municipality's ability to restrict 1302 REPORT NO.:CLD-008.09 PAGE 3 OF 4 the locations for any Refreshment Vehicle. This would include the setback from the parks thus allowing owners of C1 zoned land adjacent to any parkland to setup a Refreshment Vehicle. OPTIONS Refreshment Vehicles can be a temporary or transient business. They may last for a few seasons and disappear. Their presence can undercut the business of property owners and merchants who have invested a considerable amount of money in developing their business. The result of exempting property owners could be a concentration of Refreshment Vehicles in the downtown core and increased levels of litter and debris resulting from the increase in pedestrian traffic. The potential intensification of use of lands within the commercial areas could result in further problems of litter in the downtown core. If the landowner is allowed to put his Refreshment Vehicle on his own property then why cannot a landowner rent out a place on his own land for a vehicle owned by another individual? In both cases the landowner is making money from the use of his property. Staff believe that granting this exemption to landowners places them at an unfair advantage over the other Refreshment Vehicle applicants. An owner could, if the exemption were to be granted, purchase and set up on his land directly across from a current eating establishment while his next door neighbour would be barred from allowing another applicant to set up. Where, if anywhere, does one draw the line? The Municipality could retain the 60 meter setback but allow for the applicant to obtain the permission of the businesses which are located within the 60 meter setback. Since they are the ones directly affected by the issuance of the licence they would be able to say whether or not they feel it is a possible impediment to their business. This would place pressure on the permanent business owners to allow a refreshment vehicle to set up near them. In extreme cases the owners may feel intimidated into giving their permission. 1303 REPORT NO.:CLD-OOS-09 PAGE 4 OF 4 The 60 meter setback also applies to other Refreshment Vehicles. There must be 60 meters between each "eating establishment". It is quite possible that one or more vehicle owners could be vying for the same location and again a possible harassment or pressure situation could exist with the permanent business owners. In reviewing options staff have consulted with neighbouring Municipalities. The Town of Whitby has a 30 meter setback regardless of ownership of the land. The City of Oshawa's setback is 60 meters, with the same conditions as Clarington. The City of Peterborough has no setback to other eating establishments but a 75 meter setback from any school, park, hospital or other public area. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff neither require nor prohibit ownership of land as a condition of licensing; only permission of land owner. But ownership does not trump other considerations. Staff do not believe it serves the best interest of the Municipality as a whole to remove or mitigate the 60 meter setback restrictions. Based on the foregoing, staff therefore recommends that the 60 meter setback as required by By-law 2004-114 be maintained. INTERESTED PARTIES Mr. Domenic Forsellino 1304 Q!J!il!gron REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Report #: CLD-009-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: Request for Noise Exemption and Road Occupancy Permit RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-009-09 be received; 2. THAT an exemption to the curfew requirements contained in Clarington Noise By-law 2007-071 be granted to the organizers of Sonfest, to be held at Holy Trinity High School 2260 Courtice Road; 3. THAT the organizers be granted a Road Occupancy Permit for their procession on Saturday August 15th, 2009 provided all the Municipality's requirements are met; and 4. THAT the interested parties listed in Report CLD-009-09 be advised of Council's decision. /! Submitted bfp i L. Barrie . Municipal Clerk PAB*LC . (j fa~_ ~'- Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 1305 REPORT NO.:CLD-009-09 Page 2 of3 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT At the regular Council meeting held on April 2th 2009, Council heard a delegation from Mrs. Iman Deal on behalf of the Youth Advisory Committee of SI. Therese Parish requesting an exemption to Clarington Noise By-law 2007-071 Section 3.1. The Committee is organizing the 6th annual SONfest on behalf of the Peterborough Diocese. The event will take place at Holy Trinity Catholic Secondary School at 2260 Courtice Road from August 13th to the 16th. Section 3.1 of Clarington Noise By-law 2007-071 referred to in the Youth Advisory Committee's request, deals with curfews but these curfews apply to only 3 specific situations: the licenced gun ranges, the operation of a licenced kennel and construction noise. All other noise falls into the general provision listed in Section 1 (b) which prohibits the following: "sound or noise from or created by a radio or phonograph, or any musical or sound- producing instrument of whatsoever kind when such radio or phonograph or instrument is played or operated in such manner or with such volume as to annoy or disturb the peace, quiet, comfort or repose of any individual in any dwelling house, apartment house, hotel or other type of residence outside the premises where the instrument is being played;" The Youth Advisory Committee intends to have religious music, preferably live, on Sunday morning August 15th at 9:00 a.m. during the religious service. At first glance Section 1 (b) would appear to eliminate any opportunity for music to be played. Notwithstanding this prohibition, however, the By-law further states: 2.1 Notwithstanding the other provisions of this By-law, the restrictions listed in sections 1.1 and 1.2 shall not apply to prevent: (a) . the use, in a reasonable manner, of any apparatus or mechanism for the amplification of the human voice or music in a public place within the limits of the Municipality; .., 1306 REPORT NO.:CLD-009-09 Page 3 of 3 (e) the sound of church bells or carillons; and..." While the section specifically refers to church bells, it is not an unreasonable stretch to include religious music in general during a religious event. Staff have met with the organizers of the event to discuss the proposed music. At present, plans have not been finalized but the intent is for quieter music, more in keeping with the religious intent of the event There are several other matters which must also be addressed before the permit can be issued by the Municipal Clerk. Among those issues is the need for a Road Occupancy Permit On Saturday morning August 15th at 8:00 a.m. there is to be a Procession from Holy Trinity north to St Therese Church at 3800 Courtice Road. This will involve approximately 250 youth walking in orderly fashion along the side of the road. The original intent had been to use Courtice Road. However, Regional Works has advised that the road will be closed for reconstruction north of Highway 2. Alternate routes are currently being explored with the Engineering Department and will be finalized in the near future. Staff are respectfully recommending that the Youth Advisory Committee's request for exemption to the Noise by-law 2007-071 be forwarded to Council for approval and that and the required Road Occupancy Permit be approved provided the organizers apply for and obtain a Road Occupancy Permit from the Engineering Services Department INTERESTED PARTIES Mrs. Iman Deal 1307 Cf!J!illgron REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Report #: CLD-010-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: 1st QUARTER PARKING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-01 0-09 be received; and 2. THAT a copy of Report CLD-01 0-09 be forwarded to the Bowmanville Business Centre for their information. Submitted by CJ ~~Arzc Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer PAB*kb CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 1308 REPORT NO.: CLD-010-09 PAGE 2 of2 BACKGROUND The following pertinent statistical information relates to Parking Enforcement activities for the months of January, February, and March 2009 and is provided herein for the information of Committee and Council. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Parking Report for the 151 Quarter of 2009 1309 PARKING ENFORCEMENT QUARTERL Y REPORT #1 - 2009 ATTACHMENT #1 to Quarterly Parking Financial Report TICKETS ISSUED AGENCY QUARTER 1, 2009 YEAR TO DA TE YEAR TO DA TE YEAR TO DA TE 2009 2008 2007 P. E. Officers 1,626 1,626 1,261 853 Police 14 14 2 6 Public Works 0 0 3 0 Group Four 22 22 34 19 Aspen Springs 6 6 14 13 243 King Sl. 0 0 0 NIA Securitas 0 0 0 0 ProSecurity 9 9 8 30 CLOCA 6 6 0 N/A Fire Services 0 0 0 0 REVENUE Fines $15,917.00 $514.15 $20,913.00 $15,917.00 $514.15 $20,913.00 $14,104.50 $864.45 $15,930.00 $16,936.00 $798.00 $12,169.00 Meters Permits MTO Chargeback $2,970.00 $2,970.00 $1,311.75 $1,814.50 1ST APPEARANCES Total Conducted 40 40 21 22 # Tickets Cancelled 35 35 13 20 # Tickets Upheld 10 10 9 4 # Requests for Trial 2 2 0 3 # Tickets Disputed 45 45 22 24 1310 Cflll-fl1gton REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 Report #: CLD-011-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: APPOINTMENT TO THE SAMUEL WILMOT NATURE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-011-09 be received; 2. THAT be appointed to the Samuel Wilmot Nature Management Advisory Committee; and 3. THAT the interested parties listed in Report CLD-011-09 be advised of Council's decision. , (~)~~C~ Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer PLB*ag CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 1311 REPORT NO.: CLD-011-09 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND In accordance with council-Appointed Advisiory Committee protocol, adopted by Council in January 2004, Mr. J. Kamstra was removed from the Samuel Wilmot Nature Management Advisory committee due to his being absent from the meetings for more than three months without being authorized to do so by resolution of the Committee. Mr. Kamstra was advised of such in writing, by the Municipal Clerk, on January 19. 2009. An advertisement was recently run in the local newspapers and on our Clarington Website seeking applications from interested parties to fill the vacancy. The deadline for filing an application was Tuesday, April 14, 2009. Applications were received from Candy Davis-Storks and Pat Mulcahy, and have been circulated under separate cover as the applications contain personal information about these two applicants. Staff recommends that Council consider the applications and appoint a replacement member to the Samuel Wilmot Nature Management Advisory Committee. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Applications (distributed under separate cover) Interested Parties: Candy Davis-Storks Pat Mulcahy 1312 "'J rf' ",,,.: '''''' .",.,J!- ('" ,,- \JidlJj1t!wlt Leading the Way ~ REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Resolution #: Report #: COD-037-09 File#: By-law #: Subject: CL2009-12, Supply and Delivery of One (1) Tanker Recommendations: It is respectfUlly recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-037 -09 be received; 2. THAT Dependable Emergency Vehicles, Brampton, Ontario, with a total adjusted bid in the amount of $197,510.00 (plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2009-12, be awarded the contract to supply and deliver one (1) 2009 Tanker, as required by the Municipality of Clarington, Emergency and Fire Services; and 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $197,510.00 (plus G.S.T.), be drawn from 2009 Capital Budget account number 110-28-388-82811-7401. S,bm'" bY' ~~o, H.B.Sc, C.M.O., Director of Corporate Services ~ CY~ _A1j~^- Nancy Taylor, B.BA, CA, ,rl Director of FinancelTreasurer Reviewed by: d~ '~:L Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer MM/JB/BH CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BaWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-3330 1401 REPORT NO.: COD-037-09 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 1.1. Tender CL2009-12 covered the purchase of one (1) Tanker. The tender was advertised and issued with bids being received as per Schedule "A" attached. 1.2. The tender document made provision for bids with an option to trade in an existing unit. Schedule "A" attached provides both an outright purchase price and an after trade price. 1.3. Several bidders provided an alternate bid. The alternate bids offered different chassis and tanks which have been outlined in Schedule "A", 2. ANALYSIS 2.1 Representatives from Emergency and Fire Services, Operations and Purchasing met to discuss the bid submission and specifications. 2.2 Fiba Canning Inc., Scarborough, Ontario submitted the low bid, Option 1. Fiba Canning, bid submission Option 1 has been rejected as it does not meet the tender specification, an aluminum tank is being quoted and the tender document requires a poly tank. As well, the weight distribution charts as per ULCS515-04 and conceptual drawings of the apparatus were not supplied in the tender documents. 2.3 The second low bid was received from Dependable Emergency Vehicles, Brampton, Ontario. The second low meets the specifications outlined in the tender. 2.4 The compliant bid was submitted by Dependable Emergency Vehicles, Brampton, Ontario. Therefore, the recommendation is to award the contract to Dependable Emergency Vehicles, Brampton, Ontario. 3. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 3.1 The purchase of one (1) Tanker, is a replacement for a fleet vehicle. The Emergency Services Department has accepted the trade-in price for Tanker #5 1987 Ford F800 MHV Tanker. 1402 REPORT NO.: COD-037-09 PAGE 3 3.2 Dependable Emergency Services' bid submission makes provision for the deletion of some NPFA 1901-2009 Options from the total bid amount by providing unit prices with the bid. The following options can be removed from the bid submission to reduce the overall cost Item Description Price Traffic Cones - Five (5) 18" high with 6" reflective collar Traffic Vests - Three (3) Heavy Duty Traffic Vest Highway Warning Device - Five (5) 360 degree high visibility "LED" flashino beaconslflare kits One (1) Phillips "Heartstart" FR2+ defibrillator with hard wall pelican case/Dedi Dad and fast reSDonse kit Total $110.00 $300.00 $489.00 $4,085.00 $4,984.00 3.3 The budget for the tanker is $200,000.00. By removing the above NPFA 1901-2009 Options in the amount of $4,984.00 the cost is reduced from $202,494.00 to $197,510.00 which is within the budgeted amount 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 To award the contract to Dependable Emergency Vehicles, Brampton, Ontario for one (1) Tanker, meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2009- 12 as required by Emergency and Fire Services and the Operations Department 5. INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES 5.1. This report has been reviewed for recommendation by the Purchasing Manager, with the appropriate departments and circulated as follows: Concurrence: Director of Emergency and Fire Services Director of Operations Attachments: Attachment 1 - Schedule "A", Bid Summary 1403 SCHEDULE "A' BID SUMMARY CL2009-12 SUPPLY & DELIVERY OF ONE (11 TANKER BIDDER . TOTAL BID TOTAL BID ALTERNATE BID ALTERNATE BID (NO TRADE) (AFTER TRADE) (NO TRADE) (AFTER TRADE) (GST Excluded) '(GST Excluded) (GST Excluded) (GST Excluded) Dependable Emergency Vehicles $208,994.00 $202,494.00" $213,324.00 $206,824.00 Brampton, ON Fiba Canning Inc. $199,415.00' $191,415.00' $219,800.00 $211,800.00 Scarbourgh, ON Carl Thibault Fire $203,031.00 NA NA NA Pierreville, PO Fort Garry Fire Trucks $223,737.00 $220,737.00 NA NA Winnipeg, MB Darch Fire $245,483.00 $243,483.00 $225,500.00 $223,500.00 Ayr, ON 'Bid did not meet specifications. "Accepted trade in for Tanker #5 a 2010 International 4440 Chassis 1987 Ford F800 MHV Tanker Dependable Emergency Vehicles offered a 2010 Freightliner M2-106 Chassis; the alternate bid is Fiba Canning Inc. offered an aluminium tank; the alternate bid is for a poly tank Darch Fire offered a 2009 URRA Star 4400 Chassis; the alternate bid is for a 2009 Kenworth T370 Chassis ~ ~ o ~ for {ll .. / J.,:arlnl!fon..: . ......../ _,-, ____': ',".' .,,'0- ..,- ";'-.. -.:.." ..... _0 REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 25, 2009 COD-038-09 File#_ By-law # Report #: Subject: RFP2009-4 - Architectural Services for Darlington Sports Centre Renovation Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-038-09 be received; 2. THAT the proposal received from Barry-Bryan & Associates LId, Whitby, Ontario being the most responsive bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Request for Proposal RFP2009-4 be accepted for the provision of Architectural Services for the Darlington Sports Centre Renovations including disbursements of $135,900.00 (excluding GST); 3. THAT the funds required be drawn from Account # 110-42-421-84267-7401; ~~&'CMO Director of Corporate Services Reviewed by: ~ Fl',mklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: t MMIJDBISMlkm CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 1405 REPORT NO.: COD-038-09 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 1.1 Request for Proposal #RFP2009-4 was issued for Architectural Services for the Darlington Sports Centre Renovation project as required by the Municipality of Clarington's Community Services Department. The RFP was advertised on the Municipality's website as well as the Ontario Public Buyers' website. In addition, a number of potential bidders were advised of the opportunity. 1.2 A total of twenty-nine (29) firms obtained a copy of this document. Five (5) submissions were received. See Appendix A for summary of bids received. 1.3 As per the Request for Proposal, these submissions were reviewed and evaluated by staff of the Community Services Department as well as Purchasing Services. 1.4 As a result of the evaluation committee's review and scoring of the submissions received two (2) firms, AECOM and Barry-Bryan Associates LId., stood out based on their overall scores. These two firms were requested to provide a presentation of their submissions to the Evaluation Committee to better illustrate their understanding of the project, as well as their methodology and approach to completing the project. 1.5 The evaluation team proceeded to interview representatives from each of these two firms in order to finalize the selection process. 2. ANALYSIS 2.1. Upon completion of the interview for both firms, Barry-Bryan Associates Limited was the top ranked finm. 2.2. Staff were impressed with the coverage of the proposed services, proponents' experience and enthusiasm for the project Reference checks for the subject finm were good. 1406 REPORT NO.: COD-038-09 PAGE 3 3. FINANCIAL 3.1. The Proposal submitted Barry-Bryan Associates Limited was in the amount of $126,900.00 (excluding GST) plus Disbursements in the amount of $9,000.00 (excluding GST) for a total of $135,900.00 (excluding GST). 3.2. The required funds are to be drawn from account # 110-42-421-84267-7401 which is within the 2009 budget allocation. 4. CONCLUSION 4.1. Staff are recommending that the proposal from Barry-Bryan Associates Limited, Whitby, Ontario be accepted. 4.2. Queries with respect to this project should be referred to the Director of Community Services. 4.3. This report has been reviewed for recommendation by the Purchasing Manager and the appropriate department and circulated as follows: Concurrence: Director of Community Services Attachments: Attachment 1 - Schedule "A", Bid Summary 1407 Schedule "A" ~i!lgron Bid Summary for RFP2009-4 Architectural Services for Darlington Sports Centre Renovation Firm . .,' '. Total incllJdingDisbutsement Barry-Bryan Associates Limited $135,900.00 + G5T Whitby, ON AECOM $125,000.00 + GST Whitby, ON Aipm-Architects Inc $205,000.00 + GST Toronto, ON Ronald Awde Architect . .$ 48,000.00 + GST Bethany, ON Paul Didur Architect Inc $104,000 + G5T Toronto, ON 1408 lr11L-, "._!""c .~'C-If-..,. <'C tJidlill" 'lOll Leading the Way ~ REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 25, 2009 Report #: COD-039-09 File#_ By-law # Subject: . TENDER CL2008-24, CATCH BASIN AND MANHOLE REPAIRS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-039-09 be received; 2. THAT Ron Robinson, Bowmanville, Ontario with a total estimated bid price of $43,000.00 (excluding G.S.T.), being the sole responsible bidder meeting all tenms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2008-24 be awarded the contract for Miscellaneous Catch Basin and Manhole Repairs for a second year; 3. THAT pending service and acceptable pricing the contract be extended for a third year; and 4. THAT the funds expended be drawn from the Department of Operations, 2009 Capital Account Catch Basin Repairs 110-36-330-83610-7401 and 2009 Current Account Catch Basin/Sewer Main!~nance - Professional Fees 100-36-380-10245-7161. ) Submitted by: Reviewed by: .fr /" ranklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer MM\JDB\BH CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 1409 REPORT NO.: COD-039-09 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 1.1 In 2008, tenders were publicly advertised and called for Miscellaneous Catch Basin Repair Works as required by the Operations Department. Subsequently, one tender was received and tabulated as per Schedule "A" attached. 1.2 The tender document makes provision to extend the contract for a second and third year provided vendor performance and proposed pricing is acceptable. 1.3 A report to award the contract was not brought to Council for year one as the annual award was anticipated to be less than $75,000.00. However, as this is a potential three (3) year contract pending satisfactory performance, service, pricing and pending agreement of the Operations Department it is appropriate to obtain Council approval for the remaining two years. 1.4 The Operations Department were satisfied with the work completed in 2008 and have requested approval to extend the contract for a second and third year. 2. ANALYSIS 2.1 The sole complaint bid was submitted by Ron Robinson, Bowmanville, Ontario. 3. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 3.1 The total funds required for Tender CL2008-24, Miscellaneous Catch Basin and Manhole Repairs are included in the Operations Department 2009 Catch Basin Maintenance and Drainage accounts. 3.2 The funds in the amount of $30,000.00 with be drawn from the 2009 Capital Account Catch Basin Repairs account number 110-36-330-83610-7401 and $13,000.00 will be drawn from 2009 Current Account Catch Basin/Sewer Maintenance - Professional Fees account number 100-36-380-10245-7161. 3.3 For the information of Council, the average unit price will be held at the 2008 rate, resulting in a zero per cent increase from the previous year. 1410 REPORT NO.: COD-039-09 PAGE 3 3.4 Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Operations. 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 After review and analysis of the bids by Purchasing, Operations and Aecom, it was mutually agreed that the contract from, Ron Robinson, Bowmanville, Ontario for the Miscellaneous Catch Basin and Manhole Repairs be extended for a second and third year. 4.2 Ron Robinson, Bowmanville, Ontario has performed the work requirements in 2008 and has undertaken catch basin repairs on an as required or emergency basis. The contractor's performance has been satisfactory. 5. INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES 5.1 This report has been reviewed for recommendation by the Purchasing Manager with the appropriate departments and circulated as follows. Concurrence: Director of Operations Attachments: Attachment 1 - Schedule "A", Bid Summary 1411 Schedule "A" Bid Summary Tender CL2008-24 2008 Work Requirements BIDDER 2008 ESTIMATED CONTRACT VALUE (Excludinll GSTI Ron Robinson Bowmanville, ON $56,037.50 2009 Work Requirements BIDDER Ron Robinson Bowmanville, ON $43,000.00 1412 . ~-"~o" h }" s a wa '(r.QflPR~~ ~,~rP.orate Services Department .~. Prepare To Be Amazed , OISTR'~UT'ON ! -L;j P" ;]:34:1 J City Cieri< ServIces , ----t REVIEWED BY I '/-.../ I (,6 . File: A-2265 _10: ./ / o COUNCIL l:( COllflCIL 0 FILE DIllfCTIOII INFORMATION COP\' 10: o MAYOR UNFINISHED BUSINESS VIA FACSIMILE o MEMBERS 0 CAO DF COUNCIL o ~ 0 CORPOllATE 0 EMERGENCY SEIMCfli SERVICES SERVICES IJ ENGIN!ERIIiG Q MUNICIPAL 0 Of'ERt.TIQIIS ~ ClERK'S 1lI""'~ !;I SOLICITOR 0 TllEASUAY SfllVlCES COpy April 20,2009 P.M. Madill, Re' al Clerk Regional Mun' Ipality of Durham 605 Rossla Road East P.O. Box 3 VVhitby, N L 1 N 6A3 ODTIlEfI IIIJNICIfW.CLERIC'SFILE C IOwE: ....:::: (y-? t:: 1\) Re. Reoion of Durham's Proposed Enerov from Waste Facility City Council considered the above rnatter at a meeting held April 20, 2009 and adopted the following recommendation of the Strategic Initiatives Cornmittee: "Whereas the Region of Durham has selected a site in the Municipality of Clarington for its proposed Energy From Waste (EFW) Facility; and, Whereas Municipality of Clarington staff and Region of Durham staff did not respond positively to Oshawa's offer to partner on a public information session on the proposed EFW Facility; and, Whereas Municipality of Cia ring ton staff have now advised it is no longer interested in partnering with the Region of Durham and other municipalities in coordinating a public meeting on the proposed EFW Facility; and, Whereas the Region of Durham intends to select a preferred proponent to build and operate the proposed EFW Facility at its Council meeting on April 22, 2009 (Covanta Energy Corporation is recommended by Regional staff and the Joint Works and Finance and Administration Committee); and, Whereas The Region of Durham will be hosting an Open House on May 12, 2009 at a location in the Municipality of Clarington on the proposed EFW Facility; and, Whereas following the selection of the preferred proponent on April 22, 2009, the Region of Durham intends to complete the following documentation associated with the proposed EFW Facility: Environmental Assessment Documentation, Environmental Protection Act (EPA) Approvals, Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) Approvals and Permits and Certificates of Approval with the Ministry of the Environment; The Corporation of the City of Oshawa, 50 Centre Street South, OShawa, Ontario l1 H 3Z7 Phone 905'436'5639 1.800'667'4292 Fax 905'436'5697 WWW.oshawa.ca 1701 .~ 2.: (/3. ',,-../ o Therefore be it resolved: "- 1. That Regional Council be requested to engage a qualified independent peer review consultant to review and independently and publicly report to Regional Council on the completeness of all of the documentation intended to now be prepared by Covanta Energy Corporation and Genivar/Jacques Whitford and other Covanta/Regional Consultants and the acceptability of any environmental and public health impacts of the proposed EFW Facility based on said documentation; -;~ That Regional Council be requested to direct the Regional Health and Social Services Department and Medical Officer of Health to review and independently and publicly report to Regional Council on the completeness of all of the documentation intended to now be prepared by Covanta Energy Corporation and Genivar/Jacques Whitford and other Covanta/Regional Consultants and the acceptability environmental and public health impact of the proposed EFW Facility based on said documentation and that Regional Council be requested to direct the Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Robert Kyle to compare and report on his professional medical opinion as to whether the process is safe or no\.; That Regional Council be requested to update the business case for the proposed EFW Facility to reflect the selection of the preferred proponent and consider and chart the implications of pending plant closures on the tax base and the resulting impact of the construction and operation of the incinerator on Regional taxes; 4. That Correspondence SIC-09-17 dated March 26, 2009 from Marissa Kata and Correspondence SIC-09-18 dated March 27, 2009 from Anne Maxwell be received for information and the correspondents be advised the EFW process is under the . control and guidance of the Region of Durham and the Region intends to hold an Open House on the proposed EFW Facility on May 12, 2009; 5. That Item 1 from the Oshawa Environmental Advisory Committee (SIC-07-51), Item 3 from Colleen Knight (SIC-08-11 and SIC-08-22), Item 4 from Paul-Andre Larose (SIC-08-15), Item 5 from Louis Bertrand (SIC-08-23), Item 6 from Rebecca Harrison (SIC-09-13) and Item 7 from Chris White (SIC-09-14) on the Strategic Initiatives Committee Outstanding Items Status Report regarding the proposed EFW Facility be lifted from the table and received for information and the correspondents be advised the EFW process is under the control and guidance of the Region of Durham and the Region intends to hold an Open House on the proposed EFW Facility on May 12, 2009; That Item 2 from the Municipality of Clarington (SIC-08-18) on the Strategic Initiatives Committee Outstanding Items Status Report be received for information; and, 6. That in the event the Region does not agree, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the Ministry of the Environment to request the Province to undertake these processes prior to any decision of an Environmental Assessment Application.. Consideration of this matter by Regional Council is appreciated. 1702 If you need further assistance, please contact our City Manager's Office at the address listed below, or by telephone at 905-436-5622. c-'\/ . ~-~~ \.._-- Sandra Kranc City Clerk c. City Manager's Office Development Services Department S. Elston, Senior Environmental Co-ordinator Oshawa Environmental Advisory Committee Marissa Kata Anne Maxwell Colleen Knight Paul-Andre Larose Louis Bertrand Rebecca Harrison Chris White 1703 HANDOUTS/CIRCULA TIONS GPA Clari~gton I eadiag the Way MEMO CLERK'S DEPARTMENT To: Mayor Abernethy and Members of Council From: Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Date: May 22, 2009 Subject: GENERAL PURPOSE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA -MAY 25, 2009 -UPDATE Please be advised of the following amendments to the GPA agenda for the meeting to be held on Monday, May 25, 2009: 6. 17 DELEGATIONS See attached Final List. (Attachment #1) UNFINISHED BUSINESS See attached Resolution that Councillor Foster intends on introducing regarding - CORRESPONDENCE -SANDRA KRANC, CITY CLERK, CITY OF OSHAWA - REGARDING REGION OF DURHAM'S PROPOSED ENERGY-FROM-WASTE FACILITY (Attachment #2) ne Gr ntree, Deputy Clerk AG/mea Enc. cc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department .Heads CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 FINAL LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: May 25, 2009 (a) Brad Arbour, Regarding Youth Centre (b) Jennifer Paczesny, Regarding Issuing of Parking Tickets (c) Richard Ward, Regarding Recent Property Standards Situation (d) Robert MacDonald, Proposed Development of Lots 27 & 28, Conc. 2, Clarke Township (e) Richard Ward, Official Plan Designation Moved by Councillor Foster: Seconded by Resolution # WHEREAS Clarington Council is unaware of any offeror refusal of such to partner on a Public Information Session on the Proposed Energy-From-Waste Facility; and WHEREAS Clarington Council may in fact be interested in exploring such an opportunity; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Municipality of Clarington requests of the City of Oshawa further information on the original offer and refusal of partnering on such a session and explore future opportunities to partner such a session; and FURTHER THAT Clarington endorse Oshawa's position: 1. That Regional Council be requested to engage a qualified independent peer review consultant to review and independently and publicly report to Regional Council on the completeness of all of the documentation intended to now be prepared by Covanta Energy Corporation and Genivar/Jacques Whitford and other Covanta/Regional Consultants and the acceptability of any environmental and public health impacts of the proposed EFW Facility based on said documentation; 2. That Regional Council be requested to direct the Regional Health and Social Services Department and Medical Officer of Health to review and independently and publicly report to Regional Council on the completeness of all of the documentation intended to now be prepared by Covanta Energy Corporation and Genivar/Jacques Whitford and other Covanta/Regional Consultants and the acceptability environmental and public health impact of the proposed EFW Facility based on said documentation and that Regional Council be requested to direct the Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Robert Kyle to compare and report on his professional medical opinion as to whether the process is safe or not.; 3. That Regional Council be requested to update the business case for the proposed EFW Facility to reflect the selection of the preferred proponent and consider and chart the implications of pending plant closures on the tax base and the resulting impact of the construction and operation of the incinerator on Regional taxes; and 4. That, in the event the Region does not agree, a copy of this resolution be sent to the Ministry of the Environment to request the Province to undertake these processes prior to any decision of an Environmental Assessment Application. DRAFT CLARINGTON SIGN BY-LAW General Purpose and Administration Committee Review Process - o Evaluated Existing Sign By-law 97-157 o Public Consultation Paper and Proposals Issued for Discussion o Meetings with Councillors o Held 4 Public Open Houses D Staff meetings with other stakeholders D Sign Preference Survey Completed by Public D Draft Sign By-law Released for Public Input BY-law Changes - 01 o Updated terms and definitions o Regulation changes based on public input o Specific sign standards for Heritage Resource Areas Courtice West Shopping District mproved by-law format tural Signs Agricu - o Ground sign area Increased from 2.0 m2 to 3.75 m2 ~ ....... a ...........al:..-.....,. Iri.M1 2Irw...~""'e.wUI rei 1m 1.877.623.9198 . - o 1.0 m2 portable sign now permitted o Off site directiona signs continue to be permitted @ 200/0 of roof 50/0 of wall 1 00/0 window of @ Roof signs Wall sign 1 Window sign o o o boards . I B - Only permitted along Highway 35/115 corridor Only within 400 m of highway road allowance Requi re MTO and Clarington approvals . . 7.5 m maximum height 18 m2 maximum sign area Single display surface . . . 400 m separation Cannot be animated . . . E ection Signs - D Located only on private property D Maximum size 0.74 m2 residential area 3.0 m2 elsewhere D Erected no earlier than 70 days before municipal voting day (increased from 45 days) to accommodate mail in ballot D Campaign office signs subject to standard sign regulations Electronic Message Board - Maximum 500/0 of the area of a ground, pylon, or monolith sign o . Not permitted in Residential, Agricultural, Heritage Resource Areas o nflatab e Signs - o Permit but not on roof o Only permitted on commercial properties o Maximum height of 2.7 metres o Maximum width of 2.5 metres o Setback 3 metres from property line o Secure to fixed base o Liability insurance may be required Mobile Signs - o Maximum size reduced from 5.6 m2 to 3.0 m2 D 1.2 m maximum height display surface o 1 mobile sign per 50 m of store-front frontage for multi-tenant properties o Not permitted on vacant property o Fluorescent colours prohibited o Licensing proposal for mobile sign companies Pre-Menu & Menu Board Signs - o Maximum sign size 1 2.0 m2pre-menu board, per drive through ~ . ~ - ~-,. '.....~ ............. _..-".ll> ~ ) ...... per 1 4.0 m2 menu board, drive through th/PYlon Sign . I Mono - Maximum sign area 7.5 m2 9.0 m2 for mUlti-tenant properties with buildings 5001 - 8000 m2 D 11.0 m2 for multi-tenant properties with bu dings over 8001 m2 nClude municipal address on Not permitted in Residentia" Agricultural, Heritage Resource Areas, Courtice West Shopping District Must . sign D D Overhanging Sign - o Permitted in Bowmanvi e, Newcastle Village, Orono Heritage Resource Areas o Maximum 1.0 m2 sign area o Minimum 2.5 m clearance above grade f o Specific requirements located over a road allowance Signs Poster - itted n al areas m2 maximum size D Perm D 0.1 D 21 days maximum display ty Municipality may remove poster sign . I o o Establish Commun Poster Board locations Signs Subdivision Development - 1 10m2 maximum area o 400/0 of fagade of subdivision sales office facing the front or exterior lot line ai, Commercia frontage of subdivison site per road o o I , o Permitted in Resident Industrial areas red requ plan subdivision approva ast sale o Draft o Removed 30 days after Wa Signs - D Maximum area 150/0 of building fagade for 1 storey building 100/0 of the building fagade for two or more storey buildings -- ,. l~ ~I ........~'~- ~....,,~~ Window Sign - o Maximum size 500/0 of window area = _ Jj ~ L-:' -- j, _I' _ _II j' - ,- J - - J J n o 1 00/0 of window area Heritage Resource Areas, Courtice West Shopping District, residential and agricultural buildings Cone usion - D Thorough program of public consultation completed o Public meeting conducted but not required by Municipa.1 Act o Draft Sign By-law made available to public for comment o Clarington staff interested in receiving feedback on draft Sign By-law