HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/21/1999
..
,-
,-
;# -
'" -
1
)
~.
'" -
3.
... -
- 4.
..
_CJlari;'gt(Jn
~ ~HAR!O
GENERAL PURPOSE A.ND /\DMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE:
JUNE 21, 1999
TIME:
9: 3 0 /~l.Iv1.
PLACE:
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ROLL CALL
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
MIN UTES
(a)
.\1inutes of a Regular Meeting of June 7, 1999
3(
DELEGA TIONS
(a)
....
(b)
".-
(c)
--
(d)
--
(e)
-.,.
(0
-'"
(g)
--
(h)
---
(i)
- ...
_M
..
-
Fred Horvath and Kathe Groen, Co-Chairs, Joint Health and
Safety Committee - Health and Safety Week
Umberto Sapone, Sapone and Cautillo, 3200 Dufferin
Street, Suite 201, Box 17, Toronto, M6A 2T3 - Report PD-66-99
Janet Hayman, 22 Jane Avenue, Courtice, L 1 E 2H9 - Report
PD-69-99
Stan Racanskv, 3200 Hancock Road, Courtice, L 1 E 2.'A 1
Report PD-69-99
Bill Creamer and Glenn Genge, D.G. Biddle and Associates,
96 King Street East, Oshawa, L 1 H 1 B6 - Report PD-69-99
Norm Monaghan, 15 Westmore Street, Courtice, L 1 E 2H8
- Reports PD-69-99 and PD-70-99
William Bowden, 4 Glenview Road, Courtice, L 1 E 2H9 - Reports
PD-69-99 and PD-70-99
Raymond Shepherd, 32 Jane Avenue, Courtice, L 1 E 2H9
- Report PD-70-99
Kelvin Whalen, 1029 McNicol1 Avenue, Scarborough, M1 W 3W6
- Report PD-S4-QQ (Principles of Understanding 1138337 Ontario Inc \
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
4 0 '" M PER A NeE S T R E E T . 8 0 W MAN V ILL E . 0 N TAR I 0 . LIe J A 6 . I 9 0 5! 6 2 J . 3 3 7 9 . FAX 6 2 3 . . 1 6 9 ..
-
G.P.& A. Agenda
- 2 -
June 21, 1999
-
(j) Laurie Ovenden. 44 Davids Crescent, Orono. LOB 1 ;"'\0 and
'lick VanSeggelen, 21 Rhonda Boulevard, Bowmanville, L 1 C 3W3
on behalf of the .--\nimal ,-\dvisorv Committee - Report CO-20-99
-,
(k) Suzanne \Nilsdon. 95 Foster Creek Drive. Newcastle. L 1 B 1 GS
Report CD-20-99
..
(I) Lauren Christensen, 41 Farncomb Crescent, Bowmanvi lie
L 1 C 4L8 - Report CD-20-99
-.
im) Pauline Bryan, i -; Mull Crescent. Courtice. L 1 E 2CCl - Report CD-20-99
-.
in) Craig Brown. Chair, (]arington Public Library Board, 62 Temperance
Street, Bowmanvli Ie, L 1 C 3M3 - Report ADMI N-20-99
-..
). PUBLIC ,"'1EETINCS
-..
ic1)
Rezoning /\pplicatlon, Part Lot 30, Concession 3, Former
Township of Darlington
REPORT PD-61-99 - 1249981 ONTARIO LTD.
~..
(b)
Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications, Part Lots
2Cl and 30, Concession 2, Former Township of Darlington
REPORT PD-62-99 - CLARINGTON FIELDCREST
DEVELOPMENTS LTD.
-....
-....
Ic)
Rezoning /\pplication. Part Lut 16, Concession 1, Former
fownship of Darlington
REPORT PD-63-99 - CLARINGTON PLACE LTD.
-.
5<
h.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
-.
(a)
PD-61-99
Rezoning and Proposed Plan of Subdivision
Appl ications, 1249981 Ontario Ltd.
Part Lot 30, Concession 3. Former Township
of Darlington, (East of Trulls Road and North
of the George Reynolds Extension)
.......
/
-....
(b)
PD-62-99
Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision
Applications, Clarington Fieldcrest
Developments Limited, Part Lots 29 and 30
Concession 2, Former Township of
Darlington - Courtice
--
~
--
--
-
-
G.P.& A. Agenda
- 3 -
June 21,1999
IC)
PD-63-99
Rezoning Application, Clarington Place Ltd.
Part Lot 16, Concession 1, Former TO\\flship
of Darlington.
61
,'"
4 -
I,d)
PD-64-99
Removal of Holding - 364069 Ontario Inc.
Part Lot 27, Concession 1, Former Vi Ilage
of Newcastle
62
" -
Ie)
PD-63-99
,\ionltoring of the Decisions of the Committee
of /-\djustment for the Meeting of June 10, 1 Cl99
62
" -
In
PD-66-99
Status Report, Part Lots 17 and 18. Concession 3,
Oarlington, 3 King Street, Hampton.
.\;1r. Wavne Conrad
63
oM -
19) PD-68-99 Request for School Crossing Cuards
.- Lvdia Trull Public School, Avondale Orlve and
Trulls Road South 66
.- (h) PD-69-99 Neighbourhood Design Plan - C lenvlew
Neighbourhood, Part Lots 29 and 30, Concessions
2 and 3, Former Township of Darlington 67
..-
Ii) PD-70-99 Rezoning and Plan of Subdivision .Applications
.- Black Creek Developments Limited, Part Lots
29 and 30, Concession 3, Former Township
of Darlington 68
.- II! PD-iPJ9 Rezoning ,Application, Robert and Helen Sherman
Part Lot 29, Concession 2, Former Township
-- of Clarke, 684 Regional Road 17. '1ewcastle
Village 71
6. CLERK'S DEP!\RTMENT
--
(d) CD-20-99 Responsible Pet Owners' By-law 70
--
(b) CD-21-99 Animal Services Monthly Report for Month
of May, 1999 --'1
I ~
--
7. TREASURY DEPARTMENT
_i"- (a) TR-24-99 List of Applications for Cancellation, Reduction
and Refund of Taxes 8C
-- (b) TR-34-99 Tender CL99-3, Orono Arend Addition 8C
.-
G.P.& A. Agenda
- -t -
June 21, 1999
-.
Ic)
Id)
Ie)
It)
TR-35-99
Transfers to Reserves and Reserve Funds - Year
End 1998
TR-36-99
Cash r\CtiVltv Report - March. 199Cl
TR-37-99
Cash Activitv Report -April, 1999
TR-38-99
Update on the Final Billings for 1999 Property
Taxes
8. FIRE DEPARTMENT
i a)
FD-13-99
Tiered Response
9. CO\~MUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
1<1)
CS-09-99
Orono .Arena Expansion Project
10. PUBLIC \VORKS DEPARTMENT
la)
Addendum
WD-24-99
r\mendments to Traffic By-law 91-S8
(b)
vVD-27-99
.Appl ication for Encroachment Agreement
')3 King Street East, Bowmanville, Boville
Holdings (1997) (Thomas White)
Ie)
\ VD-28-99
\pplicJtion from 542985 Ontario Limited
lB. Vanandel) to Stop-up and Close a Portion
of Gaud Cate \Part 1, Plan 40R Plan)
To establish a 0.3 m (1 foot) Reserve at the
EL1sterly End of Gaud Gate \Part 1, Plan 40R
Plan)
To Divert the Highway shown as Old Scugog
Road and the Intersection with Regional Road
')7 to a Location Approximately 55 m (177 feet)
North of the Existing Intersection
(d)
WD-29-99
Quit Claim for Mr. Michael Patrick, Southerly
1.5 metres of Part 6 on Plan 10R-1792
(e)
WD-30-99
Soper Creek Park, Bowmanvi lie
-,
8.
8
-
83:
- ~
83
-
9
- -
l'e' ..
-..
-.
rr.
...
....
-.
-.
-..
-..
11
-..
......
-
,-
G.P.& A. Agenda
- :.J -
June 21,1999
11. -\DMINISTR,'\TION
,"
ia) .'\DMIN-20-99-
Bowmanvi lie Main Branch Librarv
1 2.
'" -
ib) .-\DMIN-22-99-
Confidential Report re: Personnel Matter
(to be distributed under separate cover)
!II -
iC) ,--\DMIN-23-99 -
Confidential Report re: Property Matter
(to be distributed under separate cover)
.. ..
Id) ,-\DMliN-24-99 -
Confidential Report re: Property Matter
lto be distributed under separate cover)
..-
12.
L'IFINISHED BUSINESS
13. OTHER BUSINESS
.-
.,,-
(d) Letter from Hamiltons Insurance Services Ltd., 5334 Main Street
Box 309, Orono, LOB 1 MO - Parade on July 1. 1999, Canada Day
14. ,--\DJOURNMENT
".-
..-
.~
-""""
.~....
..----
--
-...-
--
--
..
..
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee
June 7. 1999
..
Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and
.\dministration Committee held on Monday.
June 7. 1999 at 9:30 a.m.. in the Council
Chambers.
..
ROLL CALL
-
Present Were:
Acting Mayor J. Schell
Councillor 1. Mutton
Councillor M. Novak (attended at 10: 10 a.m.)
Councillor J. Rowe
Councillor T. Young
..
Absent:
Mayor D. Hamre (on municipal business)
Councillor C. Trim
-
A Iso Present:
Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu
Director of Community Services, 1. Caruana
Fire Chief. M. Creighton
Director of Planning and Development, D. Crome
Solicitor, D. Hefferon (until 10:55 a.m.)
Treasurer, M. Marano
Director of Public Works, S. Vokes
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight Stanley
..
..
..
Acting Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
..
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
Councillor Rowe indicated that she would be disclosing a pecuniary interest with
respect to Reports WD-23-99 and WD-25-99.
..
MINUTES
-
Resolution #GPA-290-99
Moved by Councillor Mutton. seconded by Councillor Rowe
..
THA T the minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration
Committee held on May 17, 1999, be approved.
..
"CARRIED"
..
-
..
..
Jul
G.P. & A. Minutes
DELEGA nONS
')
June 7.1999
..
iii
(a)
Ken Irving, 2689 Concession Road 4, Bowmanville. LIC 3K6 re: Report PD-55-99
circulated a copy of his presentation dated June 7. 1999. and correspondence dated
June 6. 1999. from A. Richards. Mr. Irving expressed opposition to the proposal for ..
the following reasons:
additional noise;
detrimental effect on the value of real estate;
additional traffic;
loss of privacy. peace and enjoyment:
pollution: and
interference with television signals on satellite dish.
iii
..
Mr. Irving suggested the proposed building should be on the far west side of the
property rather than so close to his patio and living room. He also noted that the
building should be sound proof and that the trees which are planted should be mature
trees which will not take 20 years to grow to full size.
iii
..
(b)
George Khouri, 3841 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville, LIC 3K6 re: Report
PD-55-99 - suggested that the proposed building be sited further to the west which is
closer to his house as this would have a less negative impact on Mr. and Mrs. Irving's
home. He suggested that sufficient tree planting be undertaken to camouflage the iii
proposed building. He expressed a concern pertaining to the levels of noise which will
be generated if the windows in the building are left open during the woodworking
operation. iii
(c)
Eric Cameron, 2681 Concession Road 4, Bowmanville, LIC 3K6 re: Report
PD-55-99 - reiterated his comments made on Oecember 7, 1998. He advised that he
has planted approximately 100 trees and will continue planting some 400 more trees. IIIlIi
He noted that his business is seasonal and that he is willing to purchase an air
conditioning unit if this is needed so that his windows will remain closed during the
operation of his business. Acoustical reports have been made and. in his estimation, hltlllll
has adequately addressed the municipality's and the neighbour's concerns.
(d)
Cord Carveth. 612 Mill Street South. Newcastle, LIB I L9 re: Report PD-54-99 _
advised prior to the meeting that he would not be in attendance. fill
(e)
.John Campbell, 250 Baldwin Street. Newcastle, LI B I Cl re: Report PD-54-99 _
noted that he is delighted with Council's choice of alternative "A" which requires the ..
reconstruction of the existing Mill Street CN rail grade separation and the construction
of associated works. He seeked clarification on the reduction of the amount of mon ies
to be paid by the developer to $625,000.
..
(t)
Erskine Duncan, 27 Boulton Street, Newcastle, LIB IL9 re: Report PD-54-99-
asked the following questions:
..
.
Under the new Development Charges By-law would a developer nonnally be
exr 'cted to cover the costs of major infrastructure improvements necessitated b'
a ,rticular development?
[fthe new development charges would not nonnally cover such major
infrastructure costs, should they in this case? And would it not be establishing a
rather dangerous precedent? .
.
...
..
...
jut..
..
-
G.P. & A. Minutes
June 7. 1999
-
DELEGA nONS CONTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
PUBLIC MEETINGS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
He noted that waiting for the construction of approximately 300 houses before any
major work is undertaken by the developer is totally unacceptable. He suggested that.
lIntil such time as the development traffic on "A" street exceeds the traffic on Mill
Street South, a stop sign be installed on Street "A". He suggested that the municipality
request the Kaitlin Group to donate the Graham Creek Valley Lands to the
municipality and congratulated Council. staff and the Kaitlin Group for the
negotIations which resulted in the lands being donated to the municipality.
(g) Jackie Lake, 254 Baldwin Street, Newcastle, LIB ICI re: Report PD-54-99-
advised prior to the meeting that she would not be in attendance.
(h) Jack Crosby, Robinson Ridge Developments Inc., 60 Centurian Drive, Suite 219,
Markham, L3R 8T6 re: Report PD-56-99 - was called but was not present.
(i) Barry Jones, 76 Baldwin Street, Newcastle, ~IB IHI re: Report PD-58-99-
appeared on behalf of the applicant and noted that the concerns of all agencies have
been addressed. He was present to answer questions from Members of the Committee.
Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting.
Pursuant to the Planning Act, the Council of the Municipality of CIa ring ton,
through its General Purpose and Administration Committee, is holding Public
Meetings for the following applications:
(a) Rezoning Application - Part Lot 9, Concession 2, in the former Town of
Bowmanville - Lawrence Wesson on behalf of Schickedanz Bros. Ltd.
(b) Rezoning Application - Part Lot 17, Concessions I and 2, fonner Township of
Darlington - Green Martin Properties Ltd.
< c) Proposed Plan of Subdivision - Part Lot 35, Concession 2, former Township of
Darlington - Durham Capital Management
The Deputy Clerk advised that public notices were sent by first class mail on or
before May 7, 1999, to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject
properties in accordance with the latest municipal assessment records. In addition,
notices were also posted on the sites prior to May 7, '1999. This notice procedure is
in compliance with the Ontario Regulation made under the Planning Act.
The Clerk's Department sent public notice for the proposed plan of subdivision
application by tirst class mail on or before May 7, 1999, to all property owners
within 120 metres of the subject property in accordance with the latest municipal
assessment records. In addition, notices were also posted on the site prior to
May 7, 1999. This notice procedure is in compliance with the Ontario Regulation
made under the Planning Act.
The Chairman announced that the Director of Planning and Development would
describe the purpose and effect of the proposed amendments, then the objectors
would be heard, followed by the supporters and the applicant.
Ju3
Cl.P. & A. Minutes
- .4 -
June 7. 1999
..
PUBLIC MEETINGS CONTD
...
(a) Report PD-50-98 - Lawrence Wesson on behalf of Schickedanz Bros. - the
purpose of the application is to permit the creation of three (3) lots for single
detached dwellings with a minimum frontage of 12 metres and to allow an
additional parcel to be melded with other lands for the creation of another lot.
...
No one spoke in opposition to or in support of this application.
..
Larry Wesson, #710 - 40 Sheppard Avenue West, North York, M2N 6K9-
advised that the severances have all been approved and that he will satisfy the
concerns of the Conservation Authority pertaining to the drainage ditch.
-
(b) Report PD-52-99 - Green Martin Properties Ltd. - the purpose and effect of the
application is to permit the continued use of a golf driving range on a
temporary basis for a period up to three (3) years.
..
No one spoke in opposition to or in support of this application.
Kelvin Whalen, Vice-President, Land Development, Kaitlin Group Ltd.,
1029 McNicol! A venue, Scarborough, Ml W 3W6 - appeared on behalf of the
applicant and was present to answer questions from Members of the Committee.
..
..
(c) Report PD-53-99 - Durham Capital Management - purpose and effect of the
application is to permit the extension and completion of Bridle Court with an
additional eight (8) single detached dwelling lots. ..
No one spoke in opposition to or in support of this application.
Debbie Clarke, Valiant Property Management, 177 Nonquon Road, 20th Floor,
Oshawa, LlG 3S2 - advised that Valiant Property Management is owner of a plaza
which abuts the proposed development and requested that the following three
clauses be registered on title for the properties to be purchased:
..
..
I) the shopping plaza is a dynamic entity and changes will occur over the years
2) the grade is significant and must be maintained: and
3) holes or gates cannot be made a part of the fence as this is not a privacy fence
but an acoustical fence which must be left "as is".
..
She advised that she is not opposed to or in support of the application.
-
John Winters, Durham Capital Management Inc., 2631 Bayview Avenue,
Toronto, M2L IB6 - was present to answer questions from Members of the
Committee and noted that he is willing to address all of the concerns. Wording, as
suggested by Ms. Clarke has already been included in the documentation.
..
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Rezoning
Application
Schickedanz Bros.
DI4.ZBA.99.016
..
Resolution #GPA-29 1-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Mutton
..
THA T Report PD-50-99 be received:
II1II
..
5u4
..
-
(J.P. & .\. \1inutes
- :; -
June 7. 1999
-
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTD
-
-
-
-
-
Rezoning
Application
Green-Martin
Properties Ltd.
DI4.ZBA.99.015
-
-
-
..
Plan of Subdivision
Durham Capital
Management Inc.
DI2.18T.99005
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
THA T rezoning application ZBA 99-016 submitted by Lawrence Wesson on behalf
of Schickedanz Bros. Ltd. be approved and that the amending by-law contained in
Attachment No.3 to Report PD-50-99 be forwarded to Council for approval:
THA T a by-law to remove the Holding (H) symbol be forwarded to Council at such
time that all the conditions for the related severance have been fulfilled:
THA T a copy of Report PD-50-99 and Council's decision be forwarded to the
Region of Durham Planning Department: and
THAT all interested parties listed in Report PD-50-99 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-292-99
Moved by Councillor Rowe. seconded by Councillor Young
THA T Report PD-52-99 be received;
THA T the application to amend Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the fonner
Town of Newcastle, submitted on behalf of Green-Martin Properties Ltd. be
referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent
report following the receipt of the outstanding agency comments; and
THA T all interested parties listed in Report PD-52-99 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-293-99
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Rowe
THA T Report PD-53-99 be received;
THA T the application for a proposed plan of subdivision, submitted by Durham
Capital Management Inc. be referred back to staff for further processing and the
preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all outstanding comments;
THA T, within 15 days of the Public Meeting, the Commissioner of Planning for the
Region of Durham be advised and provided, by sworn declaration from the Clerk.
the following:
i) that the Municipality held a Public Meeting in accordance with Section 51
(21.1) of the Planning Act for the subject subdivision application;
ii) a copy of the minutes of said meeting;
iii) a copy of all written submissions received by the Municipality; and
iv) a list of all persons and public bodies, including their mailing addresses, that
made oral submissions at the public meeting or written submissions; and
)UJ
G.P. & A. Minutes
- b -
June 7. ] 999
..
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTD
Request for Street
Name Change
T06.GE
..
THA T all interested parties listed in Report PD-53-99 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision
..
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-294-99
..
Moved by Councillor SchelL seconded by Councillor Young
THAT Report PD-51-99 be received;
...
THAT By-law 86-112, being a by-law to establish a Street Name Map and Street
Name Inventory in the Municipality of Clarington, be amended to change that
portion of "Old Scugog Road" located approximately south of the mid point of
Lot 2 on Registered Plan IOM-755 within Part of Lot 15, Concession 3 of the
fonner Township of Darlington to "Old Scugog Court";
..
THA T Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a by-law to amend
By-law 86-112 being a by-law to establish the Street Name Map and Street Name
Inventory in the Municipality of CIa ring ton; and
..
..
THA T the land owner fronting onto that portion of Old Scugog Road and all
interested parties listed in Report PD-51-99 and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
...
"CARRIED"
Proposed Principles Resolution #GPA-295-99
of Understanding
1138337 Ontario Inc. Moved by Councillor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Rowe
Rezoning
Application
Eric Cameron
o 14.DEV .98.061
..
THA T Report PD-54-99 be received;
..
THA T Council approve the Principles of Understanding contained in Attachment
No.3 to Report PD-54-99;
...
THA T a by-law be passed to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the
Principles of Understanding on behalf of the Municipality; and
..
THA T the interested persons listed in Report PD-54-99 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
..
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-296-99
..
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
THA T Report PD-55-99 be received;
..
THA T the rezoning application DEV 98-061 submitted by Eric Cameron be
approved and that the amending by-law contained in Attachment No.3 to Report
PD-55-99 as amended, to include a Holding symbol, be forwarded to Council for
adoption; .
..
..
/
)UD
..
-
G.P. & A. Minutes
June 7. 1999
-
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CON'TD
-
-
-
Rezoning
Application
Robinson Ridge
Developments
DI4.ZBA.99.007
-
-
-
-
-
-
Official Plan
Amendment
Fialka
D09.COPA.98.006
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
THA T a copy of Report PD-55-99 and Councirs decision be forwarded to the
Region of Durham Planning Department: and
THA T the interested parties listed in Report PD-55-99 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-297-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
THA T Report PD-56-99 be received;
THA T the rezoning application ZBA 99-007 submitted by Robinson Ridge
Investments Inc., be approved and that the amending by-law as contained in
Attachment No.2 to Report PD-56-99 be forwarded to Council for adoption;
THA T the Ontario Municipal Board be advised that the Municipality of Clarington
recommends that the conditions of Draft Approval to Plan of Subdivision
18T-89037 be amended as contained in Attachment No.3 to Report PD-56-99 to
implement the requested zoning by-law amendment and Council supported parking
requirements; and
THA T the Durham Region Planning Department, all interested parties listed in
Report PD-56-99 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-298-99
Moved by Councillor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Young
THA T Report PD-57-99 be received:
THA T the Official Plan Amendment application filed by Dave Passant. on behalf of
John and Geraldine Fialka, (COPA 98-006) be approved as Amendment #16 to the
Clarington Official Plan: that the necessary by-law to adopt the Official Plan
Amendment be passed and further that the amendment be forwarded to the Region
of Durham:
THA T the revision to the proposed amendment presented at the public meeting be
deemed minor in nature and that a new Public Meeting be deemed not necessary:
THA T the rezoning application DEV 98-067 submitted by Dave Passant on behalf
of John and Geraldine Fialka be approved and that the amending by-law attached
to Report PD-57-99 be forwarded to Council for adoption:
THA T a By-law to remove the (H)-Holding Symbol be forwarded to Council at
such time as the mitigation measures contained in the EIS have been completed to
the satisfaction of the Conservation Authority prior to the issuance of a building
permit: and
)u7
G.P. & A. Minutes
- 8 -
June 7,1999
..
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONTD
Clarington Official
Plan Amendment
Sotiriadis
D09.COPA.97.004
Committee of
Adjustment
May 20, 1999
DI3.CO
..
THA T all interested parties listed in Report PD-57-99 and any delegation be
forwarded a copy of Report PD-57-99 and be advised of Council's decision.
..
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-299-99
..
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Mutton
THA T Report PD-58-99 be received;
..
THA T the Regional Municipality of Durham be advised that the Municipality
recommends the denial of the Regional Official Plan Amendment application
(ROPA 97-006), as submitted by Barry Jones on behalf of Peter, Matina, John and
Spero Sotiriadis, to permit a golf driving range and mini putt;
..
THA T the application to amend the Clarington Official Plan, as amended,
subm itted by Barry Jones on behalf of Peter, Matina. John and Spero Sotiriadis, to
permit a golf driving range and mini putt be denied;
..
THA T the application, as revised, to amend the Municipality of Clarington Zoning
By-law 84-63, as amended, to permit a golf driving range and mini putt be
approved pursuant to Section 39 of the Planning Act, and that a Temporary Use
By-law be forwarded for adoption upon the applicants entering into a Site Plan
Agreement with the Municipality;
..
..
THA T whereas the previous Public Meeting has been held and the proposed use for
Zoning By-law Amendment has not changed, it is deemed that an additional Public
Meeting is not required; and
..
THA T Durham Region Planning Department, all interested parties listed in Report
PD-58-99 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision.
..
"CARRIED"
..
Resolution #GPA-300-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Mutton
...
THA T Report PD-59-99 be received;
THA T Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
May 20,1999 for Applications A99/014 to A99/018, inclusive; and
..
THA T staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for Applications A99/014 to
A 99/018, inclusive in the event of an appeal.
..
"CARRIED"
..
..
..
j:jd
..
..
G.P. & A. Minutes
- q -
June 7. 1999
..
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONT'D
..
Application Fees
Planning &
Development
Resolution #GPA-301-99
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Schell
THA T Report PD-60-99 be received: and
-
THA T the by-law amendment attached to Report PD-60-99 detailing the specitlc
amendments to By-law 96-032. as amended. be approved.
..
"CARRIED"
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
..
Acting Mayor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting.
..
Parking Enforcement Resolution #GPA-302-99
Monthly Report
April. 1999 Moved by Councillor Rowe. seconded by Councillor Novak
-
THA T Report CD-17-99 be received for infonnation: and
THA T a copy of Report CD-17-99 be forwarded to the Bowmanville Business
Centre for their infonnation.
..
"CARRIED"
..
Councillor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
..
Supply and
Delivery High
Perfonnance
Cold Mix
FI8.QU
Resolution #GPA-303-99
-
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Schell
THA T Report TR-28-99 be received;
..
THA T the G.H. Company, Mississauga, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of
$61.200.00 (including applicable taxes), being the lowest responsible bidder
meeting all tenns, conditions. and specifications of Tender CL99-15, be awarded
the contract to supply High Perfonnance Cold Mix on an "as required" basis. to the
Municipality of Clarington; and
..
THA T the funds expended be provided from the 1999 Public Works Road
Maintenance, Pavement Patching Account #7208-00411-0169, FORTHWITH.
-
"CARRIED"
-
-
-
-
,)'0 '1
G.P. & A. Minutes
- 10-
June 7. 1999
..
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONTD
Plumbing
Services
FI8.QU
Mechanical
Equipment
Contract
FI8.Qu
Fire Department
Tanker Truck
FI8.QU
..
Resolution #GPA-304-99
Moved by Councillor Novak. seconded by Councillor Rowe
..
THA T Report TR-29-99 be received:
THA T Jack Burgess Plumbing, Bowmanville. Ontario. with bid prices of $32.00
per hour for Journeyman Plumber and $20.00 per hour for Journeyman Plumber's
Apprentice be awarded the contract to provide Plumbing Services. as required by
the Municipality of Clarington: and
..
...
THA T the funds expended be drawn from the various Current Budget Accounts.
"CARRIED"
..
Resolution #GPA-305-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
..
THA T Report TR-30-99 be received:
..
THA T Tri-Air Systems, Scarborough, Ontario, with a total bid of $5.182.50 (plus
G.S.T.) for Part "A" and a Journeyman hourly rate of $6 1.50, be awarded Part "A"
of the Mechanical Equipment Maintenance Contract, as required by the
Municipality of Clarington;
II1II
THA T Jack Burgess Plumbing and Heating, Bowmanville, Ontario, with a total bid
price of$914.00 (plus G.S.T.) for Part "B" and a Journeyman hourly rate of$43.00
be awarded Part "B" of the Mechanical Equipment Maintenance Contract, as
required by the Municipality of Clarington; and
..
THA T the funds expended be drawn from the respective facilities Mechanical
Equipment Maintenance Accounts.
II1II
"CARRIED"
..
Resolution #GPA-306-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
II1II
THAT Report TR-31-99 be received;
..
THA T Almonte Fire Trucks Ltd., Carlton Place, Ontario. be awarded the contract to
supply and deliver one ( I) only tanker truck, for a total bid amount of $154,292.93
($144,199.00, plus G.S.T.); and
wi
THA T Purchasing By-law 94-129, Station 5, paragraph 5.06, be waived for this
transaction.
..
"CARRIED"
..
..
j J
...
-
G.P. & A. Minutes
- I I -
June 7.1999
-
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D
-
Co-op Tender Resolution ItGPA-307-99
Granular Shouldering
and Hot Mix Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Schell
Paving
F 18.QU THAT Report TR-32-99 be received;
-
THA T Contract No. 099-12. tendered jointly with the Region of Durham for
Granular Shouldering and Hot Mix Paving, tendered by Miller Paving Limited. be
approved; and
-
-
THAT the funds in an amount of$606,580.36 (including G.S.T.. Engineering and
Supervision and Sundry work by Region), (accounts as identified on Schedule "8"
attached to Report TR-32-99). be drawn from the 1999 Public Works Capital
budget, FORTHWITH.
"CARRIED"
-
Acting Mayor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
-
Industry Canada
Radio Requirements
Resolution #GPA-308-99
-
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Mutton
THAT Report FD-II-99 be received for information.
-
"CARRIED"
-
Monthly Fire
Report
May, 1999
Cll.FD
Resolution #GPA-309-99
Moved by Councillor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Young
THAT Report FD-12-99 be received for information.
-
"CARRIED"
-
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
-
Councillor Young chaired this portion of the meeting.
-
Councillor Rowe indicated a disclosure of pecuniary interest with respect to Report
WD-23-99; vacated her chair and refrained from dis~ussion and voting on the
subject matter. Councillor Rowe's spouse is a partner in Clinic Buildings
referenced in Report WD-23-99.
-
-
-
-
Sl
G.P. & A. Minutes
- 12-
June 7. 1999
..
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Building Permit
Activity Report
ApriL 1999
Amendments
to Traffic By-law
..
Resolution #GPA-31 0-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Novak
..
THA T Report' I/D-23-99 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
..
Resolution #GPA-31 1-99
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Novak
...
THA T Report WD-24-99 be received;
..
THA T the existing temporary parking prohibition on the east and south side of
Toronto Street, Newcastle, be included in the Traffic By-law;
THA T parking be prohibited on the west side of Bernard Street, Bowmanville;
...
THA T the existing temporary parking prohibition on both sides of 6275 Liberty
Street North, adjacent to Archibald Orchards Estate Winery, be included in the
Traffic By-law;
..
THA T existing angle parking in front of Vincent Massey Public School,
Bowmanville, and Hampton Junior Public School, Hampton, be included in the
Traffic By-law;
...
THA T the existing temporary stopping and parking prohibitions in the
Bowmanville West Central Area be made permanent by including in the Traffic
By-law:
...
A) stopping be prohibited on the east side of CIa ring ton Boulevard from
Highway No.2 (King Street) to Uptown Avenue;
...
B) stoppmg be prohibited on the south side of Uptown A venue from Clarington
Boulevard to the east limited of Uptown A venue;
..
C) parking be prohibited on both sides of Clarington Boulevard from its northerly
limit to the south limit of Cia ring ton Boulevard;
...
D) parking be prohibited on the north side of Bowmanville Boulevard from
Green Road to Clarington Boulevard;
..
THA T where official signs to that effect are displayed, parking be prohibited on any
curve or hill where vision is reduced or traffic is obstructed;
...
THA T where official signs to that effect are displayed, stopping be prohibited on
any highway so as to interfere with the movement of traffic by obstructing a travel
or turn lane which is clearly defined by pavement markings;
..
THA T by-laws affecting heavy vehicles be amended to:
A) exempt Queen Street, between Ontario Street and King Street, Bowmanville,
from spring weight restrictions;
...
..
)'2
-
-
(i.P. & A. Minutes
- 13 -
June ;. 1999
-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTD
..
..
..
..
-
..
..
-
-
...
..
Building Permit
Activity Report
May, 1999
...
..
Application to
Stop-up and
Close
..
..
..
..
B) exempt Ontario Street between Queen Street and King Street. Bowmanville.
from spring weight restrictions:
C) remove the year round weight restrictions on Darlington Concession Roads 6.
7 and 10 between Regional Road 57 and Regional Road 34 (Enfield Road):
and
THA T the by-laws attached to Report WD-24-99 be passed by Council.
"SEE FOLLOWING MOTIONS"
Resolution #GPA-3 12-99
Moved by Councillor Novak. seconded by Councillor Schell
THA T the recommendations contained in Report WD-24-99 be divided to allow for
consideration of recommendation 6 separately.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-313-99
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillo.r Mutton
THA T recommendation 6 of Report WD-24-99 be referred back to staff for
preparation of a report to be submitted to the General Purpose and Administration
Committee.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-311-99 was then put to a vote and "CARRIED AS AMENDED".
Councillor Rowe indicated a disclosure of pecuniary interest with respect to Report
WD-25-99; vacated her chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the
subject matter. Councillor Rowe's spouse is a partner in Clinic Buildings
referenced in Report WD-25-99.
Resolution #GPA-314-99
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Mutton
THA T Report WD-25-99 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-3 1 5-99
Moved by Councillor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Schell
THA T Report WD-26-99 be received;
)1)
G.P. & A. Minutes
- ; -+ -
June I. 1999
..
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTD
ADMINISTRA TION
OshawalClarington
Association for
Community Living
..
THA T Parts l. 2 and 3. Plan 40R-190 13 ( Attachment No. I to Report WD-26-99).
being parts of the unopened road allowance between Lots 2 and 3. Concession 4.
fonner Township of Darlington, be declared to be surplus property:
"'"
THA T staff be authorized to advertise a public hearing required by the Municipal
Act to stop-up, close and convey the unopened portions of the road allowance as
follows:
"'"
Parts 1 and 2. Plan 40R-190 13 Crooked Creek Golf Club Limited
Part 3. Plan 40R-190 13 Peter and Joan Tax
..
THA T the total selling price of the surplus lands (Parts l. 2 and 3. Plan 40R-19013)
be established at $12.075. Parts I and 2 to be sold to Crooked Creek Golf Club
Limited for $11,525 and Part 3 be sold to Peter and Joan Tax for $550. plus all costs
associated with the above transactions:
,.,
THAT if. following the public hearing, Council approves the by-law to stop-up,
close and convey Parts 1.2 and 3, Plan 40R-190 13, the Mayor and Clerk be
authorized to execute the necessary documents to complete the transaction;
..
THA T the Clerk obtain written approval of the by-law to close and convey Parts I,
2 and 3. Plan 40R-190 13, by registered mail. from the Region of Durham; and
..
THA T Katrien Darling, Tunney Planning (representing Crooked Creek Golf Course
Limited and Peter and Joan Tax) and Debra-Lei Nixon be advised of Council's
decision.
WIlli
"CARRIED"
WIlli
Acting Mayor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting.
"",
Resolution #GP A-316-99
..
Moved by Councillor Mutton. seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT Report ADMIN-18-99 be received;
-
THA T the Lease Agreement (Attachment # I to Report ADMIN-18-99) with the
OshawalClarington Association for Community Living in the amount of $ I 0,385.00
per annum for 2 years be approved;
I11III
THA T the Lease Agreement (Attachment #2 to Report ADMIN-18-99) with the
John Howard Society in the amount of $1 0.385.00 per annum for 2 years be
approved; and
"",
THA T the By-laws marked Attachment #3 and Attachment #4 to Report
ADMIN-18-99 be approved authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the
necessary agreements. .
..,
"CARRIED"
fIII/JIl
-
3i4
""'"
..
(i.P. & A. Minutes
- i 5 -
-
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
-
OTHER BUSINESS
-
ADJOURNMENT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
There were no items considered under this section of the agenda.
There were no items considered under this section of the agenda.
Resolution #GPA-317-99
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Novak
THA T the meeting adjourn at 11 :20 a.m.
"CARRIED"
June 7. 1999
MAYOR
3;5
DEPUTY CLERK
REPORT: PD-63-99
Clarington Place Ltd.
-
\ OUQI<)rg
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
-
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the MuniCipality of Clanngton will hold a public
meeting to consider a proposed zonIng by-law amendment under Section 34 of the Planning Ad.
-
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
MONDAY, JUNE'21,1999
9:30 A.M.
-
Council Chambers, Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario
-
The proposed zoning by-law amendment, submitted by Clanngton Place Limited would change the "Genera
CommerCial Exception (Cl-15) Zone" on a 1.0 hectare parcel of land located in Part Lot 16, Concession 1
former Township of Darlington (as shown on the reverse) to Increase the range of retail commercial use~
permitted.
-
The lands In question are also subject to the follOWing applications: OffiCial Plan Amendment (COPA 97-o0~
and COPA 99-001).
-
-
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in suppor
of or in opposition to the proposal. Please note that the time listed above reflects the time at which th(
General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences, not necessarily when this item will b(
considered.
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of Clarington Council in respect of th(
proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions tc
the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed Zoning By-law is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Boare
may dismiSS all or part of the appeal.
-
-
-
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. anc
4:30 p.m. (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning Department, 4(
Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario or by calling Richard Holy at 623-3379.
-
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY
OF CLARI TON
-
MAY 1999
------
. t-<..<<J
-
-
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontano L 1 C 3A6
PLANNING FILE:
ZBA 99-01 7
...
CLERK'S FILE: D14.ZBA 99-017
-
:J.JJ
.,;
-
_ SUBJECT SITE
LOT 1 6
/
,
---./
o
<(
o
a::
z
w
w
a::
<.!)
LOT 15
, ----...
! "-
i '
I
"-... I'
"'~. \
"~--
I
I ,
,
I
U5QWNI AVE.
BOWMANVILLE
KEY MAP
.
c
:J
CD
..
r!'!}
'!If
1" N
I!I!!Ii
o
~(
~
1 ~ ,x /;:~
~"i . " /1"'
~\CJ ,/ \//~ ' //}==
t...CJ~ . . .,/ .' / t--
<?r /~. -v/ ' ~
~tr~ / .,/ ~
~tr<V " / /' I
CJ~/' //> /
// ,/' /'
ZBA. 99-017
J-.JO
..;
z..
o
-
(f)
(f)..
W
U
z....
o.
u
..
..
..
~
z"
o
-
(f)..
(f)
W
U
z.
o
u
...
..
~!/~
III
..
..
(-ORPORA TION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT: PD-62-99
Clarington Fieldcrest
Developments Limited
- NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
TAKE NOTICE that a rezoning application has been received by the Municipality of Clarington, pursuant to Section 340
- the Planning Act. as amended and an application for approval of a plan of subdivision has been received by the Regiona
Municipality of Durham, pursuant to Section 51 of the Planning Act 1990, as amended.
-
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
MONDAY, JUNE 21, 1999
9:30 A.M.
-
Council Chambers, Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario
-
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting t,
consider a proposed rezoning and plan of subdivision under Sections 34 and 51 of the Planning Act 1990, as amended.
-
The proposed zoning by-law amendment submitted by Clanngton Fieldcrest Developments Limited would change th
zone category on a 534 m2 parcel of land located in Part Lot 29, Concession 2, former Township of Darlington ("
shown on Reverse) from "Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Zone" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)Rl
Zone" to permit the development of 4 semi-detached link dwelling units.
-
The proposed plan of subdivision, as submitted by Clarington Fieldcrest Developments Limited, is located on a 1.41 h
parcel of land in Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 2, former Township of Darlington and would permit the developmer
of 2 single detached dwelling units and 28 semi-detached/link dwelling units as well as reserving a block for a futur
road (as shown on reverse).
-
-
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or'make written or verbal representation either in support of or i
opposition to the proposal. In that Staff can not confirm the precise time at which the Public Meeting portion of th
agenda will be heard, it is noted for your information that the start time listed below reflects the time at which th
General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences.
-
-
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of the Region of Durham as the approval authority, 1
respect of the proposed rezoning and plan of subdivision, does not make oral submissions at the public meeting, or mak
written submissions to the Region of Durham before the proposed plan of subdivision is approved or refused, the Ontan
Municipal Board may dismiSS the appeal.
-
If you Wish to be notified of the deCision of the Region of Durham in respect of this proposed plan of subdivision, yo
must make a written request to the Region of Durham, Planning Department, 1615 Dundas Street East, 4th Floor, Lan
Tower, West Building, P.O. Box 623, Whitby, Ontario, L 1 N 6A3.
-
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (8:0
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning Department, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanvilh
Ontario or by calling Richard Holy at 623-3379.
-
-
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
THIS 18 9~YO May 1999
. '\
~J
-
-
7
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3A6
)'J j
PLANNING FILE: ZBA 99-012
18T-99006
CLERK'S FILE: D12.18T-99006 and D14. ZBA. 99-012
-
-
-
....
LOT 30
LOT 29
\
--\ ,-- -~-"~-._ _ i
\ '., "-1
_' ORrV~,=j
.. ~ /' ~____ c..
~""\~_______-_ _~__ .___ --""""----.J !
~~'0/ ,_________
~~/' /
~t>--~;/;1 /
~ \ .
, \ /
\ \ \ V'
--\ \ \ Vy
,~
------1 I
I i'~-'
---~ I I
-~ l-~-'
--'
"
)
"
-
0 N
<(
0 z-
a::
0
-
en-
en.
W~
0 w O.
U z~
-l .....
W
LL a:: Ot
~] ~
W 0 Ow
> u
a::
0
...
; i I i
II
i $1I"1\t3 e:M~ST[RI
...
, .
/
. ,
....
(
...
il!!fI
COURTICE
KEY MAP
C=:J 1 aT -99006
_ ZBA. 99-012
,.
t
l1li
5u4
...
REPORT: PD-61-99
1249981 Ontario Ltd.
..
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
REVISED
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
(Please note revised meeting date)
..
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will hold a public
meeting to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the Planning Act,
1990, as amended, and a proposed plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act, as
amended.
..
..
DATE:
TIME:
PlACE:
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
9:30 A.M.
..
Council Chambers, Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario
..
The applications, submitted by 1249981 Ontario Limited, would change the zone category of a 1.847
ha parcel of land located in Part Lot 30, Cone. 3, former Township of Darlington (as shown on the
reverse) from" Agricultural (A)" and "EnVironmental Protection (EP)" to permit the development of
20 single detached dwelling lots, with a minimum frontage of 12.0 metres within a plan of
subdivision.
-
..
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in
support of or in opposition to the proposal. Please note that the time listed above reflects the time at
which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences, not necessarily
when this item will be considered.
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of Clarington Council in respect of
the proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written
submissions to the Municipality of C1arington before the proposed Zoning By-law is adopted, the
Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal.
..
..
..
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning Department,
40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario or by calling Carlo Pellann 623-3379.
..
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
1999
..
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L 1 C 3A6
..
PLANNING FILE:
CLERK'S FILE:
ZBA 99-013 & 18T-99007
D14.ZBA 99-13 D12.18T 99007
-
-
.J v
..
. SUBJECT SITE
LOT 30
..
..
LOT 29
~~
-,
x
~
I
,
- ~
-
I
l$l ~ L GEORGE
~ \~O[])~ 1: RH/I~
L ~~...: }:=
_ ~~(J) ~ ~
~ ~ b.-. ~ l..-J- J- ~ r
/--; ~ () -r- fi
---L ~:J ~ ~
Ii 9-e ~ fi
~ ~g ... ~
~ a.. () I--
IJI (ffi ! II \
-
J
~
y
(-
K
[7
~
~
-~
J----.-'O-
i--
f-
~ I I
~
~
I ~ 1
..
I.-
!
I 1
1
IIIlf
C..
I ..
r
11..
I--
I _f---
ItJ r-- - ..
r ~
-
Ie _
i g =r i'u.
'3=
I ~ _ 1
I~
T -= f--
I
I
I
'^ E~ T~tO ~E1 rT. I ...
T fll ITR
Tl(
-/
/NASH! ROAD
COURTICE
KEY MAP
,..
..
ZBA. 99-013
1 aT -99007
JU~
IIiI
iIIIIl
..
REPORT PD-61-99
PAGE 5
...
...
8.3
...
...
8.4
...
...
...
heritage resource assessment will be required as a condition of draft approval.
Regional Works has advised that municipal services are available for the site. The
applicant is required to submit geotechnical soils reports to Regional Works staff for
approval
The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board advised that the proposed
applications will yield 7 students to Courtice North Public School. Said school is
currently over capacity with eight (8) portables. The Board has no objections to this
application.
9. STAFF COMMENTS
9.1 The proposed applications would facilitate the development of 20 single detached
dwellings with 12.0 metre, minimum frontage lots on a cul-de-sac. In addition,
Block 21 is a 0.274 ha Park block and Block 22 is a 0.38 ha Open Space block.
9.2 The land owner is involved in another rezoning and proposed plan of subdivision
application within the neighbourhood. As a result of the other applications, an
environmental impact study (EIS) was completed for a portion of the neighbourhood
including the lands subject to this application. A report supporting the
recommendations to the EIS was previously prepared and considered by Committee
May 4, 1998 (PD-59-98). The neighbourhood plan is expected to be finalized to the
satisfaction of Staff and the various commenting agencies shortly and information
report dealing with the Neighbourhood Design Plan will be forwarded to
Committee.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
-
-
...
9.3
In accordance with Council's decision of May 10, 1999, it is Staff's intention to
incorporate the requirement for two outdoor parking spaces in the rezoning on
these lands.
6<"r
\j)
REPORT PD-61-99
PAGE 6
..
,'I
10. CONCLUSION
10.1 The purpose of this report is to facilitate the Public Meeting as required by the
Planning Act, to provide Committee and Council with some background on the
application submitted and for Staff to indicate issues or areas of concern regarding
the subject application. It is recommended the application be referred back to Staff
for further processing and subsequent report upon resolution of an issues and
receipt of all outstanding comments and required revisions.
r
I
..
~
..
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
!"II
.
.
David J rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning & Development
c)~wJLQ- ~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
..
..
CP*DJC*cc
June 15, 1999
..
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No.2
Key Map
Proposed Plan of Subdivision
..
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
..
Glen Genge
D. G. Biddle & Associates
96 King Street East
Oshawa, Ontario
L1 H 1 B6
~
..
1249981 Ontario Limited
Attention: H. T. Halminen
1 748 Basel i ne Road
Courtice, Ontario L 1 E 2T1
."
LJ
-
-
..
...
..
.. (
6~..) 0
..
REPORT PD-61-99
PAGE 3
..
5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
5.1 Within the Durham Region Official Plan the subject lands are designated Living
Area with Environmentally Sensitive Areas. The predominant use of land within the
Living Area designation shall be for housing purposes. Development within or
adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas requires an environmental impact study
to be undertaken in consultation with the respective area municipality and at the
expense of the applicant.
5.2 Within the Clarington Official Plan the subject lands are located within the
Glenview Neighbourhood of the Courtice Urban Area and are designated Urban
Residential and Environmental Protection Area. The predominant use of land within
the Urban Residential designation shall be for housing purposes. The
Environmental Protection Areas identify the Municipality's natural environment.
The ecological function of the Environmental Protection Areas is to be preserved
and protected. Map C - Natural Features and Land Characteristics identifies the
parcel as being traversed by a cold water stream, containing portions of a Tableland
Woodlot and within the Lake Iroquois Beach. The policies of Section 4 of the Plan
require an environmental impact study be undertaken where development is within
or adjacent to any of the above features.
f;
..
t
II1II
...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.3
-
-
-
.-
-
-
-
An environmental impact study was recently completed for the subject natural
features in association with other land use applications in the neighbourhood. The
Official Plan requires the preparation of Neighbourhood Design Plans prior to
consideration of a proposed plan of subdivision. Such a plan has also been
completed and is expected to be approved shortly. The application is consistent
with the plan.
6.
6.1
ZONING BY-LAW PROVISIONS
The subject lands are zoned "Agricultural (Al" and "Environmental Protection (EP)".
The Environmental Protection Zone appears to affect thE' north west corner of the
6\J 3
8.
8.1
8.2
REPORT PD-61-99
PAGE 4
It
...'
;ri
site, where a tributary to the Farewell Creek traverses the property. The tableland
portion of the site is zoned "A". The "A" zone is used as holding category, prior to
development in parts of the Courtice and Bowmanville urban area. Neither zone
would permit the development of the proposed 20 single detached dwelling units.
-I
-I
J
.
7.
7.1
PUBLIC MEETING AND SUBMISSION
"~
Public Notice was given by mail to each landowner and tenant within 120 metres of
the subject lands and a public notice sign was installed on the lands.
..
..
7.2
Staff received one call with respect to the applications. The caller wished to ensure
this application did not compromise the future park (Block 34 of 40M-1945) on the
north side of George Reynolds Drive, opposite Pidduck Street (abutting to the west
of the proposed development). He also wanted confirmation on the timing of the
park development. The future park is proposed to be enlarged by 0.274 ha through
the development of the subject applications.
..
,.
...
AGENCY COMMENTS
...
In accordance with departmental procedures, the applications were circulated to
obtain comments from other departments and agencies. As of the writing of this
report a number of agency comments remain outstanding. The following
departments/agencies in providing comments offered no objection or concerns with
the application as filed:
Clarington Fire Department;
Ontario Hydro.
...
..
..
L
..
Comments received from the Region of Durham advised that the subject lands are
designated Living Area in the Durham Regional Official Plan with an indication of
an environmentally sensitive area. The lands designated Living Area shall be
primarily used for housing purposes. The applicant has <;ubmitted an Environmental
Impact Study for the lands, which is currently being revll..:wed. In addition, the site
has bPI ~n identified as having high archeologK.C1; potential. Therefore r cultural
...
L
..
ilI>l
..
;;,.
6 ij 4
...
1.:".
..
REZONING & PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
APPLICANT: 1249981 ONTARIO LTD.
PART LOT 30, CONe. 3, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON (EAST
OF TRULLS RD. NORTH OF GEORGE REYNOLDS DRIVE EXTENSION)
FILE NO.: ZBA 99-013 & 18T-99007
Recommendations:
...
..
...
Meeti ng:
Date:
..
Report #:
..
Subject:
..
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETING
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
PD-61-99
File #: ZBA 99-013; 18T-99007
By-law #
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
..
1. THAT Report PD-61-99 be received;
2.
..
..
3.
-
..
..
...
-
-
-
..
THAT application to amend Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former
Town of Newcastle, as amended, submitted by D. G. Biddle & Associates Limited
on behalf of 1249981 Ontario Limited be referred back to Staff for further
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all
outstanding comn).ents;
THAT within 15 days of the Public Meeting, the Commissioner of Planning for the
Region of Durham be advised and provided, by sworn declaration from the Clerk
the following:
i) that the Municipality held a Public Meeting in accordance with Section 51
(21.1) of the Planning Act for the subject subdivision application;
ii) a copy of the minutes of said meeting; .
iii) a copy of all written submission received by the Municipality; and
iv) a list of all persons and public bodies, including their mailing addresses, that
made oral submissions or written submissions at the public meeting; and
4.
THAT the Durham Region Planning Department and all interested parties listed in
this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision.
1.
APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: 1249982 Ontario Ltd.
1.2 Agent: D. G. Biddle & Associates Limited
oG\
REPORT PD-61-99
PAGE 2
. 2.
2.1
3.
3.1
4.
4.1
4.2
...
1.3
Rezoning: From "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)"
To an appropriate zone to permit 20 - 12.0 m minimum frontage
single detached dwelling lots.
Proposed Plan of Subdivision:
to permit the development of a cul-de-sac with 20 single detached
dwelling lots, a 0.247 ha Park block and a 0.38 ha Open Space block.
Area: 1.847 ha
lII!II
Alii
1
1.4
~
j
..
1.5
LOCATION
~
..
The subject lands are located In Part Lot 3D, Concession 3, former Township of
Darlington. The lands are further described as being north of George Reynolds
Drive and east of Trulls Road. The subject property is located immediately behind
(east of) the Courtice Fire Station.
..
..
...
BACKGROUND
..
On March 23, 1999, the Municipality of Clarington Planning Department received
the referenced Zoning By-law Amendment application. The Region of Durham
forwarded a request for comments on the proposed Plan of Subdivision application
of March 30, 1999. The subject lands are part of the Glenview Neighbourhood in
the Clarington Official Plan. Said neighbourhood has been subject to a
Neighbourhood Design Plan, which is expected to be approved shortly.
Furthermore, in accordance with the policies of the Official Plan an Environmental
Impact Study has been undertaken for various environmental features contained
within the neighbourhood.
..
..
...
~~
~
1..1
..
EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
Existing Uses: The subject land is currently vacant
Surrounding Uses: East vacant wooded land
West - Fire Station and existing residential fronting on
Trulls Road
South - Existing residential on Meredith Court and
Pidduck Street
North - vacant wooded land
...
...
..
.Iii
6 :.j 2
..
1
1
1
1
1 =
1
1
,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. SUBJECT SITE
LOT 30
... ...-.............. I~U. I
LOT 29
~~ -'"
~ ~ .~
-
-
=f S;EORGE
~o \L O~DS 0lRl'1~ /
~'T'.u . Ie--
~----1- lZ-
_ /1"" \: en ~ ~
~ "'Il~ to. ~
--(;t) ~.;;;.;o ~ ~ I..-J:-" .........
~ ~ ~ () ---;;;
~ ~ ~8 -~ ~ I
1ft . .. =- I-- a.. () I--
IJI nlll m 11 \---- I
~
~
R
Z7
~
I
rw
-~
~
w
~
1
-
~
~
r ~ I
INASH ROAD
.
V, E~ T~K-O RE
Tlr
ZBA. 99-013
1ST -99007
COURTICE
KEY MAP
...
OJ!
...
I
I
I
.
c
I
\ \w e-
~ f---
<(
Q f----
---0 -
n >--f----
~
-
~.
- I---
T.l I
I TII
I
to
o
<(
Oz
0::0
-
w(J)
u(J)
'-w
gso
Oz
Uo
o
I (
!
"'< '- f./ / ',-:'1.'<)<: /
"'" V /' N 70.44 I 10' "~ ~
j 135.201 m --- "-
//> 107. I
/----..-_../ .../
,.
\"-SLOCK 22
)/
PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN
PART OF LOT 50.CONCESSION 5
FORMERLY IN THE TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
NOW IN THE
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
R GI NAL MUNI I A Y OF URHAM
,
/
/
// "
I
:?J
(,21'
,~
...'"
4
L1 I
.. ,',
, , I
( 'I;
_J? Ili/
. "J
" I';
" I,
"\J( f !
1;1111 \
I I .
IJ I ,
" I '"
''11
) /h./
~'
-L
POSSIBLE FUTURE
CIL OF ROAD
I}LOCK 2\)
t ARK ARE~
I .
\, A .I
.... // ./
'/ ,,/
/"/' ../
\ ,.
I /
II
" "
:,/
"'- --;22.6
r"---'
'::.
EXISTINe
elL OF ROAD
~. .. --- ............
. .v.
/:/,
.....,/
,
,
!
1
1
".
,
-,"""
",
.""
1
.."",
.'
..
*
{
(,I;
!
i,))
~;p
,
o
N
,./">
32.0
.{.Ie
....'" ......'
,-
,
...../
I11III
o
<J>
..,
13
(
S5.7
(
A .")
,........
.__..u""......\. .J"
I11III
I
L
o
N
14
..
,.
~
.
0
0
,.;
N
.
ex)
0
... Z
till
-
.../' ...
~
...
SO 6
~ ,.,
y~ .
1'., ,
../7) '1;:'
...
r
f :;~.:1 :-,
: ....
...
...
I
000
...
CAD FILE, ax I I DP2
PLOT DATE' MARIO/99
SUBMISSION'
HORZ' 1'1000 ...
SCALE' l.
DRAWN BY' B.B.
DESICN BY' W.G.C.
CHECKED BY. W.G .C: ..
,
.,.
DATE, MAY . 1998
PROJECT NO. 98025
IIIliI
L
DRAWl NC NO.
F I GURE tIIIlIi
11
..
D. G. Biddie Q ABBaclat:e. Llmlt:ed
consulting engineers
9G KING STREET EAST OSHAWA.ON LIH IBG
PHONE (905)576-8500 . FAX (905)576-97~0
REPORT PD-62-99
PAGE 5
..
..
. The stormwater drainage works and facilities necessary for this development
must be constructed in accordance with the approved Robinson Creek Master
Drainage Study.
. The applicant must prepare a Master Grading and Drainage Plan for the
subdivision. All drainage must be conveyed from the lands through the storm
sewer system.
. Depending on the timing of construction, the applicant may be limited to one
construction access.
..
-
8.3
The Clarington Public Works Department - Parks Division has no objections
provided that the applicant provides an appropriate cash-in-lieu of parkland
dedication.
-
-
-
8.4 The Durham Regional Public Works Department has provided the following
comments.
-
. Municipal water and sanitary sewer services are available to the site.
. Servicing of lands east of Block 17 will not be permitted because this area lies
within a different drainage area. Servicing for this area also relies on
establishment of the new water pollution control plant in South Courtice.
-
-
8.5
The Central Lake Ontario Conservation has no objections to the subdivision
proposal. Previously approved stormwater management reports for these two
subdivisions have already included the subject area. While conformity to the
approved stormwater schemes will have to be demonstrated by the developer, this
can be achieved through a condition of draft approval.
-
-
-
9. STAFF COMMENTS
9.1 A Phase 1 environmental site assessment was submitted with the proposal. The
results indicated that there was no evidence of contamination on the site.
..
-
9.2 As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for the Public Meeting
under the Planning Act, and taking into consideration all of the comments received,
it is respectfully requested that this report be referred back to Staff for further
-
-
-
bi:S
-
REPORT PD-62-99
PAGE 6
-1
~
..
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
i
..
lit
. David. rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
. Direct of Planning & Development
---) . ~ ;) /) ~^
'-- J /r c~ \(____ --.-J ~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
...
..
RH*DJC*cc
June 9, 1999
..
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No.2
Key Map
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
..
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
..
Mr. Glenn Genge
D. G. Biddle & Associates
96 King Street East
Oshawa, Ontario
L1 H 186
..
....
Mr. Wayne Jeffrey
Clarington Fieldcrest Developments Limited
58 Rossland Road West
Oshawa, Ontario
L 1 G 2V5
...
...
..
...
...~
..
~
III
..
614
iL....
..
REPORT PD-62-99
PAGE 3
...
...
III
3.2
..
-
3.3
..
..
-
..
-
4.
4.1
4.2
-
..
..
-
-
-
-
-
..
property. The draft plan of subdivision would permit development of 28 semI-
detached units, 2 single detached dwelling units and a block for a future roadway.
The proposal represents an infill subdivision that would link up both portions of
Fieldcrest Avenue. Kiddicorp Investments Limited (Halminen Homes) has built the
southern portion of Fieldcrest Avenue while 290572 Ontario Limited (Jeffrey
Homes) has constructed the northern portion of Fieldcrest Avenue.
The subject lands were assembled through the severance process and contain a
woodlot. As a condition of approval for the severances, the applicant provided a
letter of undertaking indicating that a tree preservation would be approved prior to
issuance of conditions of draft plan approval. The tree preservation plan and a
preliminary lot grading and drainage plan are being reviewed by the Public Works
Department.
EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
Existing Uses:
Surrounding Uses:
Vacant land containing a woodlot
East Agricultural lands
North - Urban Residential
South - Urban Residential
West - Urban Residential
5.
5.1
OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan.
Residential development is permitted within this designation. The application
conforms to the policies.
5.2 Within the Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated "Urban
Residential". Residential development consisting of single detached, semi-detached
6 1 1
7.
7.1
REPORT PD-62-99
PAGE 4
-I
i
.,
link, and duplex dwelling types are permitted. The proposed development density
falls between the permitted range of 10 to 30 units per net residential hectare. The
proposal conforms to the development pol icies.
6.
6.1
ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
Although the majority of the property is zoned "Holding - Urban Residential Type
One ((H)R 1)"/ a triangular portion of the subject lands must be rezoned from
"Holding - Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to "Urban Residential Type One
((H)R 1)" to allow the subdivision to proceed.
..
..
...
PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION
...
Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject
site and two public meeting notice signs were installed on the lands.
-
7.2 As of the writing of this report, one only general telephone inquiry has been
received.
...
-
8.1
8. AGENCY COMMENTS
-
8.2
The application was circulated to solicit comments from other relevant agencies.
The Clarington Fire Department, Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board, and
Ontario Hydro have no objection to the application.
-
L
The Clarington Public Works Department - Engineering Division has no objections
to the proposal subject to the following conditions:
· All utilities must be located underground.
· The future street intersecting Fieldcrest Avenue must be preserviced for water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer services. The portion of this street, shown on
the application as Block 17/ must be constructed in order that building permits
can be issued for the lots flanking the area.
· All temporary turning circles must be removed and the road developed to full
municipal standards.
III
I..
...
...
...
<.
..
..
,
61L.
..
-
-
-
Meeti ng:
Date:
-
Report #:
-
. Subject:
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETING
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Monday, June 21,1999
Res. #
PD-62-99
File #: ZBA 99-012 & 18T-99006
By-law #
REZONING AND DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
APPLICANT: CLARINGTON FIELDCREST DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
PART LOTS 29 & 30, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF
DARLINGTON - COURTICE
FILE NO.: ZBA 99-012; 18T-99006
-
"
Recommendations:
-
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.
THAT Report PD-62-99 be received;
2.
THAT the rezoning application as submitted by D. G. Biddle and Associates
Limited, on behalf of Clarington Fieldcrest Developments Limited, be referred back
to Staff for further processing and preparation of a subsequent report pending receipt
of all outstanding comments, taking into consideration all of the comments
received;
3.
THAT the application for draft plan approval of a draft plan of subdivision as
submitted by D. G. Biddle and Associates Limited, on behalf of Clarington Fieldcrest
Developments Limited, be referred back to Staff for further processing and
preparation of a subsequent report pending receipt of all outstanding comments,
taking into consideration all of the comments reviewed;
4.
THAT within 15 days of the Public Meeting, the Commissioner of Planning for the
Region of Durham be advised and provided, by sworn declaration from the Clerk,
the following: .
. That the Municipality held a Public Meeting in accordance with Section 51
(21.1) of the Planning Act for the subject subdivision application;
. A copy of the minutes of the said meeting;
. A copy of all written submissions received by the Municipality;
O~1
REPORT PD-62-99
PAGE 2
5.
..
· A list of all persons and public bodies, including their mailing addresses, that
made oral submissions at the public meeting or written submissions; and
· A copy of the report and the Council decision; and,
..
, .
THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
1%
1.1 Applicant:
1.2 Agent:
.. 1.3 Rezoning:
1.4
1.5
2.
2.1
3.
3.1
1. APPLICATION DETAilS
~
Clarington Fieldcrest Developments Limited
D. G. Biddle & Associates Limited
To rezone a portion of the subject lands from "Holding - Urban
Residential Type Two ((H) R2) Zone" to "Holding - Urban Residential
Type One ((~)R1) Zone" to permit the proposed draft plan of
subdivision.
..
...
..
~-.
Draft Plan of Subdivision:
To develop a draft plan of subdivision containing 28 semi-detached /
link dwelling units, 2 single detached dwelling units and a block for a
future road extension.
..
..
Site Area:
1.4 hectares (3.48 acres)
..
lOCATION
..
The subject lands are located in the southeast area of Courtice. The proposal would
complete Fieldcrest Avenue, a street that has been partially completed through two
separate subdivision plans. The applicant's land holdings total 1.41 hectares (3.48
acres). The property in legal terms is located in Part Lots 29 and 30, Concession 2,
in the former Township of Darlington.
..
..
..
BACKGROUND
On March 15, 1999, D. G. Biddle and Associates Limited, on behalf of Clarington
Fieldcrest Developments Limited, submitted rezoning and draft plan of subdivision
applications to the Municipality of Clarington. The rezoning application ,....ould
rezone a triangular portion of land to match thp zon,,)p on the remaindet uf the
..
\.-----'..
If
..
-
...
e;:
010
..
LOT 30 LOT 29
l J L ~lJjBJ
~~ I I ~I ~ I
I
S~~ (-::-/ I $' ~,.~ '1,1 ~ :.t<1
~<v (~~E~qE \Jl
~~ ~
;y ~,.lr-S" 4~
-' ~,:!,l ~t.
.~ Q~ ~
- &.~ ~
~ ~ J ST AG Er,,~ [1" it:.K
-1'~~
-f'~ '"",
... ..... "'-0":4 / T T
~ ;:'V/,: I : II- 1'-111 0 N
I' I T r T r <(
'~,,',":" 0
.L<'c\'i"i. ""ii .':", Z
- ~tvM~'; \~. ii, i . . ~
"" 0
>. 7 -
... fKi. ....\\'j en
~~ en
... w
J w 0
0 () Z
....J ~
... w
i:i: 0
..J ::J
W j ~. w 0 0
z
... 0 ~ ()
t;; I- ~
~~ KI ~I~) ~ 0
- <'
II~n~R. I-
-
...
-
COURTICE
KEY MAP
{/)';''-'/\':;;''',''I
.......,..............,..
',}"-i::~< :;~.:t;::;:>.::<~:{<....
IillIIIll
1ST -99006
ZBA.99-012
I
-
-
Oi]
-
~
'\
;j ~ 11":1 ~I
~ ~ ~ I 11'"1
~!l u J I I
51 !' I:"I~! I
~ ~ , ! HII".I !
~ ~ I! ~ ':h i I I
h It ( l!! I Ii
~~ ~~I" ~ I' fi
~~ dh~ I ~ :!I!~I I
i~ ,nlul ~ ,li,121IE !
)h~!t ~ -I ~~. ! I I
ON! 0 IOU
- z'" I- ~ ,.,
I/)o'i oi 0'.
;: a i ~ ~ :J: :;~
, - 11/ 0 cr 1- II
I 0!5 ~\!; · O.
lD"'\!; oJ CO
a~~!: Ul: oj:
I l:l .. ~ LL- .'
. f LL ~ I! 0: ; ~I
i 00 ... >- U . - '.
! f z I! III ~ I- i I 0 it
& ~ s ~ If ::i. I; (!
i \!;! :11 0 ,J
I- ~... -li II ~ -,
LL L I U- dol
4( -~
cr'" ZI!
00... ~
.il .
~ - .
zl ~ .
~! ~ ; ! ;
\:Ii ~ 5 i i
i
..
'"
- -.
. t
I I
!
';'IJ I
I : L I; tt Ii
.,0
o~
I,;
II
1I0]S3/1]
\::
~
."
...
\\
\ \\/
\ \ 'y/
" \>-
. " /
~....... /
I .......
. ,4- --1
/ \
--::.
-
\
Y'" \ \
--- t..- ----' "
.,- r\~\ \ "
/\5T\~\\ )
, ~~ \/ /'"
~'/ /'" \
.l- /"" \
. ""/
_';r-; ,( \ " \/
T \ \ \ \ \ \ )/
I \ \) \ \v'y
I_L(--1/
r---
~- \::
t--
~- ~
...
1--- ~ '"
'"
h- ~
"" .,
'. '"
'----
h- '"
'" ...
'" .-
I- _ - ~
~- '" ~ '" '"
'" ~ CiJ
~
r:-~-
.,
'"
lo:
is
\
,
""'0 -t., "'" \
o .~ \.
-/-..- () ,
.d.'.fl.,C'. :\
)., 0'
.~~ -7, :-.
~~ . c;~: ~.
....A .:~\' ''\
*:<;-)
010
-
. i i
i ill.
It
~b
!~I
,
,
1
..
,..
..
...
i
...
..
-
..
..
.,..
-
-
..
..
..
iC
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
REPORT
...
PUBLIC MEETING
Meeting:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
...
Date:
Monday, June 21,1999
Res. #
By-law #
...
Report #:
PD-63-99
File #: ZBA 99-017
Subject:
REZONING APPLICATION - APPLICANT: CLARINGTON PLACE LTD.
PART LOT 16, CONCESSION 1, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FI LE NO.: ZBA 99-017
..
..
Recommendations:
..
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
..
1.
THAT Report PD-63-99 be received;
2.
THAT the rezoning application submitted by Martindale Planning Services on behalf
of Clarington Place Limited be referred back to Staff for further processing and
preparation of a subsequent report pending receipt of all outstanding comments,
taking into consideration all of the comments reviewed; and
-
...
3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
...
1. APPLICATION DET AI LS
.. 1.1 Applicant: Clarington Place Limited
1.2 Agent: Martindale Planning Services
... 1.3 Rezoning: To modi'fy Section 16.5.15 c) xiv) in the "General Commercial
Exception (Cl-15) Zone" by deleting references to "clothing
... store, jewelry store, shoe store, fashion accessory store, yarn
and fabric store, hardware store, furniture store, and home
...
furniture store".
1.4 Site Area: 1.0 hectare (2.5 acres)
...
-
-
bil
-
3.2
3.3
4.
4.1
REPORT PD-63-99
PAGE 2
...
2.
2.1
LOCATION
.,
The subject lands are located at the northwest corner of Highway 2 and Clarington
Boulevard in the Bowmanville West Main Central Area. The applicant's land
holdings total 1.0 hectare (2.5 ac). The property in legal terms is known as Part Lot
16, Concession 1 in the former Township of Darlington.
I
..
~
3.
3.1
BACKGROUND
..
,;
Section 5.2.1 a) (ii) of the Bowmanville West Main Central Area Secondary Plan's
commercial policies currently does not permit clothing, shoe, jewelry fashion
accessory, yard and fabric, hardware, furniture, and home furnishing stores on the
Clarington Place Ltd. lands. This policy was the result of the decision of the Ontario
Municipal Board in 1994 based on the retail market evidence submitted by the
owner's retail consultant. The report indicated that sufficient market would be
available by 1998 to support these uses on the Clarington Place lands. As the
timeframe has elapsed, the applicant is requesting that this policy be deleted to
allow Clarington Place to attract an increased array of uses.
..
..
ioo.
1
...
-
The Municipality initiated an official plan amendment (COPA 99-001) that among
other things, deleted a similar restriction in the C1arington Official Plan in Section
5.2.1 a) (ii).Council approved Amendment #15 to the Clarington Official Plan on
May 31, 1999. Once the Durham Region Planning Department approves the
amendment, zoning on the property may be amended to implement this change.
..
..
or'
On April 13, 1999, Martindale Planning Services, on behalf of Clarington Place
Limited, submitted a rezoning application to the Municipality of Clarington. The
applicant proposes to increase the range of retail uses on the property.
..
...
EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
..
Existing Uses:
Vacant lands
?;
..
, .-,
010
..
:...;
..
REPORT PD-63-99
PAGE 3
..
4.2 Surrounding Uses: East: Theatre and restaurants
North: Vacant land
West: Residential and vacant land
South: Commercial
-
..
..
5.
5.1
..
-
OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
The lands are designated "Main Central Area" within the Durham Region Official
Plan. Retail commercial uses are permitted within this designation. The application
conforms to the pol icies.
5.2 Within the Bowmanville West Main Central Area Secondary Plan, the subject lands
are designated "Retail Commercial". Once the Official Plan Amendment # 15 is
approved, the proposal will conform with the policies.
6. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned "General Commercial Exception (Cl-15)
Zone", which limits the range of commercial uses on the property. In order to
increase the range of commercial uses permitted on the property, a rezoning
appl ication was submitted for consideration.
-
-
-
..
..
7. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION
7.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject
site and two public meeting notice signs were installed on the lands.
-
-
..
..
8.
-
8.1
-
-
-
7.2 As of the writing of this report, no telephone inquiries or written submissions have
been received.
AGENCY COMMENTS
The Clarington Publi'c Works Department has no objections to the proposal.
619
REPORT PD-63-99
PAGE 4
.,
8.2
No comments have been received from the Durham Region Planning and Durham
Region Public Works Departments.
,.
l'
9.
9.1
CONCLUSIONS
As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for the Public Meeting
under the Planning Act, and taking into consideration all of the comments received,
it is respectfully requested that this report be referred back to Staff for further
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report.
,.
~
....
....
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
...
D~.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning & Development
d J,r a~ _ ~0--<--
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
..
..
RH*DJC*cc
...
June 8, 1999
Attachment No. 1
Key Map
..
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
...
L
Mr. Glenn Willson
Clarington Place Limited
140 Bond Street
P.O. Box 488
Oshawa, On L 1 H 7L8
r-
..
Mr. Robert Martindale
Martindale Planning Services
23 Elizabeth Street
Ajax, On L1T 2X1
..
III
...
r-. .' J
\J L_ "
t'
..
.. - SUBJECT SITE
-
LOT 16 LOT 15
-
- ,...... N
(:) Z
- (:) ~ 0
<( -
0 en
'0::: en
W
- z U
w Z
W
0::: 0
- (!) U
-
-
- .
(:) ~
~ Z
m
- 0
-
en
en
- w
U
\ Z
- 0
U
- C~\CJ
~~
- ~\~
CJ~~~ I
!
-
BOWMANVILLE ZBA. 99-017
KEY MAP
-
- 0[1
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
..
REPORT
-
Meeti ng:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Date:
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
-
Report #:
PD-64-99
FILE #: ZBA 99-021 and
ZBA 99-022
By-law #
-
Subject:
REMOVAL OF HOLDING - 564069 ONTARIO INC.
PART LOT 27, CONCESSION 1, FORMER VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE
FILES: ZBA 99-021 AND ZBA 99-022
-
-
Recommendations:
-
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
1.
THAT Report PD-64-99 be received;
2.
THAT the rezoning application submitted by Tensin Gyaltsan, on behalf of 564069
Ontario Inc., requesting the removal of the Holding "H" symbol from the subject
lands be APPROVED and that the amending By-law attached hereto be forwarded to
Council for approval;
-
-
3. THAT a copy of this report and the amending By-law be forwarded to the Region of
Durham Planning Department; and,
-
4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
-
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
-
1.1
Applicant:
564069 Ontario Inc.
-
Tenzin Gyaltsan
1.2 Agent:
-
1.3 Rezoning:
-
1.4 Site Plan Application:
-
Removal of Holding "H" symbol
To construct a parking lot to serve the adjacent
'upermarket and former Massey building.
-
022
-
..
REPORT NO.: PD- 64-99
PAGE 2
2.
2.1
2.2
3.
3.1
3.2
..
BACKGROUND
On May 28, 1999/ Tenzin Gyaltsan submitted applications on behalf of 564069
Ontario Inc. for site plan approval and removal of the Holding "H" symbol. The
subject lands are located on the east side of the former Massey building and south
of the newly constructed IGA supermarket in Newcastle Village. They are legally
described as Part Lot 27/ Concession 1, in the former Village of Newcastle.
..
..
..
..
The removal of the Holding (H)" symbol would permit development of a parking lot
serving the adjacent supermarket and former Massey building.
..
;.
..
L
STAFF COMMENTS
The lands are currently zoned "Holding - General Commercial Exception ((H)C1-
24)" and "Holding-General Commercial Exception ((H)Cl-25)". The Holding "H"
symbol can be removed upon Council being satisfied that the development will be
adequately serviced, have proper access, will be used for the purposes intended
under the Zoning By-law.
IIllII
IIllII
..
The site plan application has been circulated to the appropriate agencies and
remains subject to various conditions of approval. Development issues will be
addressed through the site plan agreement. These agreements with the Municipality
must be executed to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development
and the Director of Public Works prior to construction of the parking lot.
..
L'
..
"-
.-
lo.
..
3.3 Based on previous comments from abutting property owners, Staff will ensure that
the parking area is sufficiently screened from adjacent residential properties. The ..
applicant will maintain a minimum 3.0 metre landscaping buffer around the
perimeter of the parking lot. A 1.8 metre fence will also be required around the ..
entire parking lot.
.
623
p
..
..
REPORT NO.: PD- 64-99
PAGE 3
..
3.4
..
-
3.5
..
..
..
4.
4.
..
..
..
-
-
..
-
..
-
-
-
-
The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority has approved a stormwater
management plan for the parking lot. All stormwater will be conveyed from the site
through storm sewers.
Pursuant to Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act, a Zoning By-law Amendment to
remove the Holding "H" symbol is not subject to the normal appeal period
applicable to standard rezoning applications, and therefore shall be deemed final
and binding should Council grant its approval.
RECOMMENDATION
In consideration of the comments noted above, Staff would have no objection to the
removal of the Holding "H" symbol as shown on the attached By-law.
Reviewed by,
. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
or of Planning & Development
c)v~~~~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer.
RH*DC*df
4 June 1999
Attachment #1 - Key Map
Attachment #2 - Amending by-law
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Mr Tenzin Gyaltsan
564069 Ontario Inc.
15 King Street West
NEWCASTLE, Ontario
L1 B 1 K9
62 Lt
I-
en
....J
....J
-
~
. ... .. ~'-'I IIWIL-I. I I "V. I
~ SUBJECT SITES
LOT 29
GEORGE ST E
=l I I n
. . ./ ----. I~
I I I I . . .
l:tl] Jtl
~
.= ...... )
~ ..7> )8-
:7 1/ /17
I- ~
~
e:
en
/
/
ffi / t-
-
I--- ~
- n I ~I v- ~ KING.. STRE:::tT EAS
~, "-
U .~ I ~ I
I ~
..
~ ~ )
~
I"-
en 7
~
"'--
~
~
~
I I
I
LOT 28
NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
KEY MAP
ZBA.99-021
OJ L~I
..
...
...
..
IIIi
,....
.
z
0 ..
- ""-
en
en
w ~
u
z
0 III
U
..
I
! III
III
fill
..
BY-LAW NUMBER 99-
..
being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the
former Corporation of the Town of Newcastle
-
-
WHERERAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of
Newcastle to implement application ZBA 99-021 and ZBA 99-022 to permit the
development of a parking lot to serve the adjacent supermarket and former Massey
building;
-
...
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
-
1.
Schedule "5" to By-law 88-64, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing
the zone designation from:
-
"Holding - General Commercial Exception ((H)C1-24) Zone" to "General
Commercial Exception (C1-24) Zone" and "Holding-General Commercial Exception
((H)C1-25) Zone" to "General Commercial Exception (C1-25) Zone" as shown on
the attached Schedule "A" hereto.
-
-
2. Schedule" A". attached hereto shall form part of this By-law.
...
3.
This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the
provisions of Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act.
-
-
BY-LAW read a first time this
day of
1999.
-
BY-LAW read a second time this
day of
1999.
-
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
1999.
-
-
MAYOR
-
CLERK
-
OLa
-
This is Schedule"A" to By-law 99- ,
passed this day of , 1999A.D.
A1'NC STREET EAST
36.957
1.957
/ 79.026
~
~
~ Ol
N
t'l
N
~
~ 78.346
~ III
t'l
~ N
ci
<0
37.588
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM "(H)C1-25" TO "C1-25"
~ZONING CHANGE FROM "(H)C1-24" TO "C1-24"
Moyor
o
P"'\.__ -
25m 0
50m
I
25
~ SUBJECT SITES
LOT 29
GEORGE ST. E.
LOT 28
~.
~
'j'
~- Iii
-'
~
-"
i"'''-. '
'v~ N
~/ Z
~ 0
(i)
Vl
W
U
Z
o
U
".. ...
. 'v~
. I
i .------i~/
'I ~/.
~_.
! ;
i :
NEWCASTLE ~- ~
VILLAGE -----, I
COI
OLI
Clerk
z
o
(i)
Vl
W
U
Z
o
u
'1
..
~
I'
-
~.
...
...
...
...
..
...
."
"
-
L.
~
..
-
t
..
..
!If
..
-
..
Meeting:
Date:
..
Report #:
-
Subject:
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
REPORT
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
PD-65-99 FILE #: A99/009, A99/019 - A99/023, inclusive
By-law #
MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1999
FILE NO'S.: A99/009, A99/019 TO A99/023, INCLUSIVE
-
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
1.
..
2.
-
3.
-
- 1.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
THAT Report PD-65-99 be received;
THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
June 10, 1999 for applications A99/009, A99/019 to A99/023, inclusive; and
THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A99/009, A99/019 to
A99/023, inclusive in the event of an appeal.
In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.5.0. 1990, all applications
received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within
30 days of being received by the Secretary Treasurer. The decisions of the
Committee are detailed below.
2.
Applications A99/009, previously tabled from the April 22, 1999 meeting, was
APPROVE 0 as per the revised appl ication with a front yard setback of 2.16 metres
and an exterior side yard setback of 3.4 metres, conditional that the approval is only
for the current project and is subject to the site plan application receiving approval.
3.
Application A99/019 was DISMISSED as it was established to the satisfaction of
Committee that the dwelling and its addition were constructed prior to the passing
of the Vill:.ge of Newca~tl( Zoning By-law 73-15, and thus have legal non-
complyi' Ig status.
628
..
REPORT NO.: PD-65-99
PAGE 2
..
4.
Application A99/020 and A99/022 were APPROVED as applied for.
...
5.
Application A99/021 was TABLED to the next Committee meeting, June 23, 1999,
as the agent for the application was forced to send regrets that he was unable to
attend the meeting.
..
...
-
...
6.
Application A99/023 was for a reduction in the exterior side yard and an increse in
the total lot coverage by accessory buildings. Committee APPROVED only the
reduction in exterior side yard to permit the construction of an in-ground pool.
..
..
"'!
Comm ittee TAB LE D the portion of the appl ication regard i ng the increase in total lot
coverage by accessory buildings pending the conclusion of a zoning investigation
currently ongoing for the subject lot.
J'I
II1II
..
7.
The purpose of each minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are
detailed in Attachment No.1.
...
8.
Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that the applications
which received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent
with the intent of the Zoning By-law and minor in nature and desirable.
..
...
9. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in
order to afford staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event
of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
-
'"
I
-
,...
..
0v~
-
Da J. rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Direct of Planning & Development
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
..
SL *LDT*DJC*cc
1 5 June 1999
Attach.
..
629
...
..
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
...
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
-
PERIODIC REPORT
-
FILE NUMBER: A99/009
********************
...
APPLICANT: C/O FRED SIMKINS
AGENT: R. W. BRUYNSON INCORPORATED
...
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
...
1437 HIGHWAY 2
PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
...
PLAN NUMBER:
...
ZONING: C5
...
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
-
-
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 15 METRES (49.2 FT) TO 2
METRES (7 FT) AND TO REDUCE THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10
METRES (32.8 FT) TO 3.4 METRES (11.2 FT).
...
...
-
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW AND IS MINOR & DESIRABLE, THE
APPLICTION BE APPROVED FOR THE CURRENT PROJECT ONLY AND IS SUBJECT
TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
-
...
...
630
...
..
'..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
,.
;
'.,
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
r
".
,.
FILE NUMBER: A99/019
********************
III
r
APPLICANT: SIMS, MIKE & KIMBERLEY
...
AGENT:
..
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
r-:
l
627 SUNSET BLVD.
..
PART LOT: 30 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: NEWCASTLE
.,
PLAN NUMBER:
ZONING: Rl
..
..
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: DISMISSED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
.
..,
'7'+
MINOR VARIANCE:
. TO RECOGNIZE THE LOCATION OF AN EXISTING DWELLING BY REDUCING THE ~
" REQUIRED WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 1. 2 METRES (3.94 1
,'FT) TO 0.9 METRES (3 FT) _
"
...
~
~
-
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE DISMISSED, AS IT WAS ESTABLISHED TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT THE DWELLING HAS LEGAL NON-
COMPLYING STATUS.
!'l
:
..
!'1
..
..
631
..
III
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
-
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
-
PERIODIC REPORT
-
FILE NUMBER: A99/020
********************
-
APPLICANT: BIGGS, JAMES & EILEEN
AGENT:
-
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
-
556 CHURCH STREET
..
PART LOT: 28 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: NEWCASTLE
PLAN NUMBER:
..
ZONING: R1-1 & EP
...
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: APPROVED
-
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
...
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO REDUCE THE EXT. SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 M (19.7') TO 1.2 M
(3.94') TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING & TO
REDUCE THE EXT. SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 M TO 3.94 M (111) TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DWELLING
-
..
-
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND
DESIRABLE, THAT THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK BE REDUCED TO 1.2 M
FOR THE GARAGE AND 3.4 M FOR THE DWELLING.
...
-
-
632
-
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
..
..
FILE NUMBER: A99/021
********************
APPLICANT: MELANSON, GARY
..
AGENT: HENLEY, MIKE
...
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
1449 TAUNTON ROAD
...
PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 4
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
..
PLAN NUMBER:
ZONING: RC
""
...
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
tit
MtNOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE WITH AN EXTERIOR
-SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 4 METRES (13.12 FT), INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED
10 METRE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD. .
..
",
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO THE NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING AS
THE AGENT AND APPLICANT DID NOT ATTEND THE MEETING.
..
..
..
633
..
..
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
-
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
-
-
FILE NUMBER: A99/022
********************
-
APPLICANT: SIMS, RON
AGENT:
-
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
-
13 HOOPER SQUARE
PART LOT: 9 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
-
PLAN NUMBER:
-
ZONING: R2
--
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
-
..
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK WHICH WOULD INCREASE THE LOT
COVERAGE TO 42.2%, INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM 40%.
..
-
-
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS MINOR ANn DESIRABLE, THAT
THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AT 42.2% LOT COVERAGE.
-
-
-
634
-
.,
..
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
.
PERIODIC REPORT
-
l''i
FILE NUMBER: A99/023
********************
..
!."..~
APPLICANT: MCPHERSON, SEAN & ST. PIERRE, MONIQUE
-
AGENT:
..
1 TAUNUS COURT
'~
;
I
-
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
~
PART LOT: 15 CONCESSION: 3
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
..
PLAN NUMBER:
till
ZONING: RE
..
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
..
MINOR VARIANCE:
~TO REDUCE THE EXT. SIDE YO SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 15 M TO 4 M
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN IN-GROUND POOL IN THE EXT. SIDE
-YD & TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BLDG THAT WILL fIIIJI
INCREASE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF ALL ACC. BLDGS. TO 57%
..
..
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION FOR REDUCTION IN EXTERIOR SIDE YARD
SETBACK TO 4 M IS MINOR & DESIRABLE & IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW, THAT IT BE APPROVED.
....
'-'
-
..
6jJ
..
III
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
-
PERIODIC REPORT
-
FILE NUMBER: A99/023
********************
-
APPLICANT: MCPHERSON, SEAN & ST. PIERRE, MONIQUE
AGENT:
....
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
-
1 TAUNUS COURT
PART LOT: 15 CONCESSION: 3
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
-
PLAN NUMBER:
-
ZONING: RE
-
HEARING DATE: 10-Jun-99
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 30-Jun-99
-
..
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO REDUCE THE EXT. SIDE YD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 15 M TO 4 M
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN IN-GROUND POOL IN THE EXT. SIDE
YD & TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BLDG THAT WILL
INCREASE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF ALL ACC. BLDGS. TO 57%
-
-
....
REASON FOR DECISION:
FURTHER, THAT CONSIDERATION OF THE INCREASE IN SIZE IN ACCESSORY
BUILDINGS BE TABLED UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE ZONING
INVESTIGATION.
-
-
-
636
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
-
REPORT
-
Meeting:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Date:
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
-
Report #:
PD-66-99
FILE #: 010-120-18805
By-law #
...
Subject:
STATUS REPORT
PART lOTS 17 & 18, CONCESSION 5, DARLINGTON
3 KING STREET, HAMPTON
MR. WAYNE CONRAD
PROPERTY lOCATION FilE: 010-120-18805
-
-
Recommendations:
-
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
1. THAT Report PD-66-99 be received for information.
-
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Council, at their May 31, 1999 meeting, received a letter dated May 6, 1999, from
Mr. Umberto Sapone who lives at 15 King Street, Hampton, and referred it to the
Director of Planning for a report. Mr. Sapone advises he has lived in this location
since 1989 and is the neighbouring property owner to the new Conrad residence
being constructed on the corner of Taunton Road and King Street, 3 King Street,
Hampton (Attachment No.1).
-
...
..
-
1.2 Wayne Conrad, the owner of the referenced property, currently resides at 27 King
Street, Hampton. He has completed a number of additions to the residence at 27
King Street, including a large garage. Mr. Conrad is currently constructing a new
residence at 3 King Street.
-
..
-
1.3 Mr. Sapone's letter (Attachment No.2) speaks to his "concerns and suspicions about
a 'monstrous' 33,000 square foot building (allegedly a house) being constructed on
a two acre lot" adjacent to his residence at 15 King Street. The issues include:
-
-
637
-
....
--
REPORT NO.: PD-66-99
PAGE 2
-=
--
i)
the building permit was issued without notice to adjoining property owners;
.
..
ii)
the height and depth of the building creates an impairment to the enjoyment
of his property, especially the back yard; and
III
..
i i i)
the new building is an eyesore adversely affecting the residential character of
Ki ng Street.
~
-
His suspicions are that the building being erected will be used for business
purposes. Mr. Sapone's suspicions are based on:
..
i)
the design of the building which includes a hangar;
..
ii) the square footage of the building; and
i i i)
the owner's past record of using his present family dwelling at 27 King Street
to conduct a business.
..
2. ZONING REGULATIONS
..
2.1
The subject property is a 2.3 acre (0.93 ha) parcel zoned "Residential Hamlet (RH)"
in the Municipality's Zoning By-law. As the parcel is a corner lot, the defined
frontage is on King Street and the flankage or exterior side yard is on Taunton Road.
The following provides a comparison of the RH zone provisions and the building
permit application as filed and reviewed in December 1998.
..
"""
~
..
~
RH Provisions
Proposed
-
--
~. .~
Front Yard
Exterior Side Yard
Interior Side Yard
Rear Yard
Floor Area
6.0 m (min)
6.0 m (min)
2.0 m (min)
10.0 m (min)
110 sq/m (min)
19.8 m
34.7 m
6.1 m
38.5 m
2225.14 sq/m
*(23952 sq/ft)
12.4%
10.5 m
-
..
Lot Coverage
Building Height
30%
10.5 m (max)
..
*
as calculated by the Building Division ba5eu un the Building Permit
application of Wayne Conrad ..
..
6.58
...
-
REPORT NO.: PD-66-99
PAGE 3
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
-
3.
3.1
-
-
-
The building permit complied with all applicable zone requirements and all rooms
were identified as 'typical' residential uses. Due to the large lot size, the lot
coverage permits a large residence to be constructed.
The RH zone limits the use of the property to a single detached dwelling and a
home occupation. A home occupation is limited to a maximum of 25% of the total
floor area of the dwelling. Furthermore, it is limited to members of the family
residing in the dwelling unit plus a maximum of one additional person and includes
a professional and administrative office.
BUILDING PERMIT
Through the building permit review process, the Building Division staff questioned
Mr. Conrad, his designer and his contractor with regard to the proposed use of
portions of his building for business purposes. Building staff were repeatedly
advised that the building is to be used exclusively for dwelling purposes.
3.2 In consideration of this, Building staff classified the structure as a single detached
dwelling. Any changes to this will require a 'change of use' permit and possible
upgrades to accommodate the proposed use. In addition, further approvals could
be required from the Planning Department, the Fire Department and the Regional
Health Department if a change in use was introduced.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.3
A building permit in compliance with the Municipality's Zoning By-law does not
require a "public process" under the Building Code, therefore no notice to
neighbouring property owners was required or provided.
3.4
Public Works Department have reviewed the contents of this report and concur
with the statements and conclusions put forward.
639
-
REPORT NO.: PD-66-99
PAGE 4
~
4. LETTER FROM WAYNE CONRAD
4.1 In response to a request from the Director of Planning, Mr. Conrad forwarded a
letter dated May 28, 1999, providing details of his new home, his existing home
and his business. Mr. Conrad subsequently forwarded a more detailed letter to the
Mayor and Members of Council dated May 29, 1999 (Attachment No.3).
. 4.2 Mr. Conrad advised that the issues raised by his neighbour surprised him, as he had
not previously been made aware of the concerns. The May 29th letter addresses the
issues raised by Mr. Sapone, in addition Attachment No. 1 to his May 29 letter
contains the signatures of nine neighbours stating they have no objection to the size
or aesthetics of the new home being constructed.
4.3
5.
5.1
..
"
i
Q
...
r
~
-
fit
~
"
-
~
..
p
,
..
..
From the correspondence and discussions with Mr. Conrad staff have been advised
that in addition to his wife and three children, his parents, a brother, and a friend,
all live at 27 King Street, Hampton. His parents and friend will continue to live at
27 King Street after the new house is constructed. His business partners include his
brother, his uncle, and the above-noted friend. From a zoning compliance
perspective, it appears his uncle is the only other person currently working in the
home who does not reside there. In addition it would appear that Mr. Conrad's
business qualifies as a professional office, a permitted home-occupation use.
..
..
..
-
f1
"
..
CONCLUSION
While the new Conrad residence is a very large home, there are no zoning
regulations contravened regarding the size or location of the proposed house. Mr.
Conrad has indicated that the use of the building at 3 King Street will be for a
residence with a personal office which may be used for a home-occupation use.
Subsequent to his letter of May 29, 1999, Mr. Conrad has advised that he is
withdrawing a proposed amendment to his building permit which was to contain a
larger area for his home occupation use.
..
~'"
,
..
~
I
..
..
640
.
III
-
REPORT NO.: PD-66-99
PAGE 5
-
-
5.2 In addition, Mr. Conrad has advised he currently rents two locations for his business
needs elsewhere in the Municipality. He is currently looking for an industrially
zoned parcel in the Municipality to commercialize a number of consumer products
and will not be carrying on a business use at his future home at 3 King Street.
-
-
. Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
-
d {I' &Jli2- ~~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer.
-
Davi . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Acting Director of Planning & Development
-
cp* DC*df
22 June 1999
-
Attachment No. 1 - Key Map
Attachment No.2 - Letter from Umberto Sapone
Attachment No.3 - Letter from Wayne Conrad (May 29, 1999)
-
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
-
-
Umberto Sapone
Sapone & Cautillo
Barristers and Solicitors
3200 Dufferin Street
Suite 201, Box 17
TORONTO, Ontario
M6A 2T3
..
-
Wayne Conrad
27 King Street
HAMPTON, Ontario
LOB 1JO
-
-
-
-
641
-
_ 3 KING STREET, HAMPTON
LOT 18
LOT 17
N ROAD
,~
o
a:::
z
w
w
a:::
C>
HAMPTON
KEY MAP
I
, )
n . "
.~ -t ~
...~:..
...
...
...
'!I
..
.
..
~
l.()
..
z
o
-
en
en
w
<..>
z
o
<..>
f!
,
...
..
..
...
..
,~,
;
..
fi
.q-
i
..
.
Z
o
<..>
..
..
-
..
..
..
S.APO~E & C.L-\.UTILLO
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
..
MARIO CAUTILLO. B.A.. B.S.W.. LL&r I B 2 28 PH '99
UMBERTO SAPONE. B.A., LL.B.
!3200 DUFFERIN ST., SUITE 201. BOX 17
TORONTO, ONTARIO M6A 2T3
-
-
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 3A6
TELEPHONE (416) 789-2689
:' il ;: ,,; ;~: ;1 if11~ ~ t- ~ 'rb~tiffi;'1 f~'~ '!"i,\
Ii U ",,,w 10:- jI'ilru a ~ i 1,'" I ~~ I q. ' \\'1 \ ~t ;""
:--. ..r:r.' ;f~~I-~V:'--V.~~-t~ . ~'!!~:"!::~ . -~ -'- ''; ~->:.U
.. ~"'J, 'ft' . .~' '. \ ,.: ',\:oi i {(j . .
;i'U .1, '.; _,-\..1. '-'~~1;T;
~ ).)..!.-';i n'_ -~ I ~1/W 1 7. 1999
\ ,of '1- ., o\r~Qn
i tJ,' -, ~ i U 1... v ~
. r': r"I. .
\
'. ,:hu:,;!C.~?;\LJiY iJ~ C-~~\~iNG'~O:~
,..
May 6th, 1999
,,',.-.
~,:;:\ ','Oirs OFFiCE
-
. .
., _P-
-
Attention: The Mavor and Counselors
Your Worship and Counselors:
-
My wife and I purchased a house on a one acre lot at 15 King Street, Hampton, Ontario, in 1989. The
said house, located on a residential street, alongside other homes ranging between 3000 to 5000 square
feet, has been our home for the past nine years.
-
This letter is to bring to your attention my concerns and suspicions about a"monstrous" 33,000.00
square feet building (allegedly a house) being erected on a two acre lot adjacent to our home, on the
north east comer of King Street and Taunton Road in Hampton.
-
-
My concerns, expressed to Carlo Pellarin, senior Planner, and Gregg Powless, Building Permit
Department, are that, in addition to a building permit having been issued without notice to any of the
owners of adjoining properties, the height and depth of the said building creates a serious impairment
on the enjoyment of our property, especially our back yard, and is an eyesore adversely affecting the
residential character of King Street.
-
My. suspicions based on the design (there is a hangar on the far East side of the building to allegedly
build an Airplane - as a hobby), the square footage of the building and the owner's past record of
extending and them using his present family dwelling on King Street to conduct business, is that the
building in question is being erected and will be used for business purposes. . '. ';:.-:-;: ::.,.~- -:-- :' - . - '-. ....- .
\ l..I t _.' , .. . . " '-' . ...
I would ask that you. be kind enough to advise what action(s) and/or measute(~f,P1f an ," e' '---.
M~~ipali~ of Clarington proposes to take in order to addr~s my concerns anf1 ie>>Sili'e that.. .~. ....
buddtng WIll not be used for bustness purposes. i OF::', ,'. ':/.4..~
Thank you for you anticipated prompt attention to this matter. ~<. .~
: . .f1--'
tuJitJ./.
-
-
-
,..
-
-
r) " "\
.v '"t J
-nO' . n-z;
I lO' LT.,~_.
,..
>III
Saturday, May 29, 1999
..
.
Attn:
The Mayor and members of Council
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario LIC 3A6
BY HAND
Wayne Conrad, 27 King Street, Hampton.
Home being constructed at the comer of King Street and Taunton Road
Mr David Crome, Acting Director of the Planning Department
..
.
..
From:
Re:
cco
~
lIllIl
~,
..
. My wife and I are active members of the community in Hampton. Ourthree
children attend school in Hampton. Over the past year we have spoken to virtually all of
our neighbors regarding our plans to build a new home on a two acre lot at the comer of
King Street and Taunton Road in Hampton across from M.l Hobbs school and adjacent to
the works department. In fact, only four weeks ago my father Helmut and I were
approached by Mr Sapone when we were walking to the construction site and he asked to
tour the house. My father, Helmut Conrad and I gave him a tour of the home as built and
we explained our landscaping plans to him. Mr Sapone gave us no indication that he had
any issues with the house. In fact, I was unaware of any complaint until Mr Crome and
Council Member Mary Novak asked to tour the home on Wednesday May 26, 1999 at
which time they asked a series of questions. I have prepared written answers to a number
of these questions in the following paragraphs. On Friday May 28, 1999 I was surprised
that it was Mr Sapone who wrote a letter to the Municipality of Clarington on May 6,
1999 to express his concerns as he had not expressed these concerns with me directly. I
have therefore prepared this letter to answer questions posed to me by Mr Crome and
Council Member Mary Novak and to address Mr Sapone's concerns expressed in his
letter dated May 6, 1999.
...
.
...
r
..
..
..
..
I was asked "Have you spoken with your neighbors about your building plans
and have they expressed any concerns?" My reply was immediately and emphatically
"No I". I was unaware of any comrlaints or concerns and was surprised when I received
a copy ofMr Sapone's letter. I therefore undertook to visit all of my neighbors this past
weekend to confirm that they do not object to the fact that we are building the house and
that they do no object to the size or aesthetics of the new house. The street numbers on
King Street increase in increments of 6. Our new home is the first on the street number 9
with Mr Sapone's beside our new home being number IS. I visited the residents of21,
33,39,45,51, and 57 King Street as well as Mr Rossi at 2297 Taunton Road who lives
kitty comer to the new house. All of the people I spoke with had no concerns or
objections and all of them have signed a letter attached hereto as Exhibit "1" confirming
that they do not object to the size or aesthetics of the house that we are building.
..
..
..
lIllIl
..
..
o~4
filii
...
-
I was also asked "Why there are so many cars in the driveway of our current
home at 27 King Street and who comes and goes during the day?". I will begin by
stating that our household is a very busy one. My wife and I, our three children, my
parents Helmut and Ruth, our close friend Ted, and Carol's nephew all live at 27 King
Street. My brother also stays with us from time to time. My wife's parents often visit
with us for 2-4 weeks at a time from Europe as do her two brothers and three sisters.
This often accounts for 1-2 rental cars in our driveway around Chrismas and in the
middle of summer. We recognize that we have a busy household.
...
-
-
My wife and I adopted our three children from Russia over the past eighteen
months. These children were age 3, 6, and 7 at the time of their adoptions., We therefore
hired a housekeeper and a registered nurse/social worker to assist us with the children to
ensure that their special needs in terms of an accelerated education to allow them to catch
up to their age peers would be met. We also have on staff a driver as Carol does not
drive and six security personnel as my work frequently takes me away from home.
-
-
-
The first car arrives at 830 hrs. This is usually our child care assistant who takes
two or three.ofthe children (based on schedule rotation) to school. At approximately
0900 hrs the housekeeper, grounds keeper, the daytime security person, and driver anive.
Some mornings, the security supervisor also comes in. When my brother Scott is not
staying with use, he also anives at approximately 0900 hrs to work with me. In future, he
will work with me at 9 King Street. My uncle Ken comes to work with me 2-4 days per
week to do the accounting. Therefore, five to nine cars arrive every morning at
approximately the same time as the traffic to the school across the road, MJ. Hobbs
occurs. Our housekeeper Angela usually picks up the mail in the morning. At 1145 hrs
our child care assistant, Linda, picks the kids up from school, gives them lunch, and
returns ~hem to school at 1300 hrs. At approximately 1530 hrs our child care assistant,
Linda, picks the kids up from school. Between 1630 hrs and 1830 hrs most of the cars
leave other than those of the household and the evening security persons. As my brother
and I collect cars and have 18 (as of today) between us. We do not resell cars. We have
sold only one car in the last three years. There are therefore often 2 to 4 of my cars in the
driveway in addition to that of my parents.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I was specifically asked "Whose cars were parked on my driveway on
Wednesday May 26, 1999?" The vehicles present that day included:
...
Wayne Conrad
Helmut and Ruth Conrad
Scott Hamilton
Ken Rogers
Maid/housekeeper, Angela
Registered Nurse/child care assistant, Linda
Driver (as my wife does not drive), Martyn
Grounds maintenance person, Dave
Visitor to Wayne, Philip Mendes DaCosta, Attorney
Visitor to my parents, Werner Dietrich.
Visitor to my parents, Bill Hart.
3 vehicles
2 vehicles
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
1 vehicle
resident of the home
resident of the home
brother of Wayne Conrad
Uncle of Wayne Conrad
...
-
-
-
o-+J
-
.,
.
In addition, my wife and I entertain 2-10 guests at least twice per week in the
afternoons and early evenings. This often accounts for an additional 2-6 cars in the late
afternoon or early evening which stay until the late evening.
...
--
i
I
...
I was also asked "Why are you building such a large home?". Simply stated
our needs for entertaining, household staff parking, catering staff parking (often retained
when we entertain), parking for my car collection (mostly in off site storage now) cannot
be met without such a large home. In addition, my brother, father and I intend to build a
four place aircraft over the next three or four years to which end we created a ''high bay"
garage in the new house. This aircraft is not being built as a commercial venture. My
father worked with DeHavilland Aircraft of Canada Limited for over 35 years of his 48
year career in the aircraft industry. My father and I each learned to fly at age 15. My
father.and I have been active with the Royal Canadian Air Cadets for the past 23 years
and have a deep interest in aviation. My father was a pilot for many years, and my
brother and I are both pilots. Each year we sponsor two Gliding Scholarships for 151
Chadbum Squadron, Oshawa which is an important youth organization also sponsored by
the Rotary Club ofOshawa. My father wishes to leave an experimental aircraft as part of
his legacy. My father, three mends and I have already restored a 1929 single-seat wood
and fabric "Gronau baby" aircraft as a hobby from 1977 to 1980. Since that time we
have talked about building a four seat aircraft as a hobby. I believe that such a hobby
will help keep my 74 year old father young as it will keep him busy and active.
~
j
...
.
'.
..
f-'1
..
..
~.
t-
..
..
I was also asked "What will become of our current home?" We plan that my
parents, Helmut and Ruth Conrad and our family friend Ted will continue to live at 27
King. Street. A housekeeper and grounds keeper will be hired to maintain the home.
Thus two to three people in addition to my uncle Ken will continue to go to the house at
27 King Street on most days. Thus the cars parked at 27 king street will be reduced to an
average of 4-6 in the future while the driveway capacity is 12 cars.
..
..
$
I was also asked "What is the nature of my business." I am a scientist and
inventor with approximately 250 granted and pending patents in my name. My brother is
an industrial designer and mechanic. My father is an aeronautical engineer. Our business
is to develop new concepts and technologies. We primarily develop concepts for new
electrica4~electronic and mechanical systems. The companies with which I am affiliated
all have laboratory and manufacturing rp.sources to commercialize the various products
that we have conceived. Fantom Technologies Inc, for instance, has both manufacturing
and research facilities in Wellan~ Ontario where approximately 400 people are
employed. We also work as consultants to various Allgheny Teledyne companies located
throughout the United States. My work at home involves new concept development,
extensive computer simulations and the construction of small scale models typically
smaller than 18" x 18" x 18". My brother and I intend to work together in the new
building at 9 King Street. We have a small computer network and several
supercomputers to accomplish this task.
..
~
~
...
f1
\
.
..
t"_~
..
. /
QLtO
..
f" ~
..
filii
,
'\ ...
..
..
Some of our more notable projects over the past few years have included:
. the design of the ozone water treatment system for the international space station in
conjunction with Teledyne Brown Engineering.
. The development of new superalloy manufacturing concepts with Teledyne Allvac
and Alegheny Teledyne Rodney Metals.
. The development of 15 new products for Fantom Technologies Inc which employs
approximately 400 people in Weiland, Ontario and 50 people in North Carolina.
. The development of means to reduce pesticide use agriculture.
. The development of means to remove pesticides from fruits and vegetables for baby
. food manufacturing.
. The development of improved hydroponic methods using ozone instead of pesticides.
..
..
-
-
We do not offer our services to the public at large. We do not advertise nor do we
have'any signage to indicate our presence. Our business telephone number is unlisted.
Our clients know what our technical capabilities are and how to reach us. We typically
have two to three visits per month from our clients to review the status of the work. Our
business currently employs 28 people in the local area. Most of these people provide
CAD design and Engineering services working from their homes. We maintain a local
off site office with 8 staff and two off site laboratory and experimental areas. Weare
currently in the process of purchasing a local building site or an existing building to
expand our research and development activities.
..
-
-
..
A concern raised by Mr Sapone in his letter dated May 6th, 1999 is that "the
house is a "monsterous" 33,000 square feet". As already built, the outside area (floor
plate) of the house is actually only 10,362 square feet including the six garage bays and
the indoor swimming pool area. The total interior floor area of the home excluding
the basement and garages is 10,761 square feet. This area is comprised of8,190
square feet on the main floor including the bedroom area which is the upper side-split
area and 2,571 square feet on the second floor as outlined in Attachment 2 hereto
prepared by our architect, Russ Gibson. The living space as defined under the Ontario
building code under which our health department permit was issued confirms that the
living space is only 9,000 square feet when the area allotted for hallways and stairways is
deducted from the total internal area. Thus the real square footage is less than 1/3 of the
"33,000 square feet claimed by Mr Sapone. Thus, this house has a floor area less than
double that of other homes in the area. My private study and model room where I will
work account for only 1,056 square feet of this area which is only 9.8% of the total
interior floor area of the home which is much less than the 40% maximum allowed for
home businesses under the municipal bylaws.
-
-
..
-
-
Furthermore, the garages are attached to the rear of the home and are thereby
hidden from view such that the apparent size of the building is reduced as can be seen
- from Photographs 1,2,3 and 4 attached hereto as Attachment 3. Figures 3 and 4 also
show Mr Sapone's home. In photographs 3 and 4 it can be seen that the side split area of
our new home is designed to compliment the garage attached to Mr Sapone's home. We
- ensured that the positioning of our home would compliment the position of his home on
his lot relative to King Street.
-
-
O ' 7
"il
..
j
',ll;;
Another concern raised by Mr Sapone is that "the house creates an eyesore
which detracts from the residential character of the neighborhood". I do not believe
this to be the case as the outside veneer of the home will be a Grey Ariscroft
manufactured limestone similar to that currently used on six of the neighboring houses
including Mr Sapone's. Furthermore, as can be seen in photograph 4, the frontal area of
the home as viewed from King Street is only 300.10 larger than Mr Sapones home next
door. Mr Sapones home has a 25% larger frontal area along King Street than does his
neighbor to the north at 21 King Street. I do not believe that these proportions materially
effect the residential character of the neighborhood nor do any of our other neighbors. W
also positioning of our home on our lot so as to compliment the position of his home on
his lot relative to King Street. As per attachment 1, our neighbors do not object the size
or aesthetics of the home that we are building.
..
~
-
..."
..
!JI
..
. Another issue raised by Mr Sapone in his letter dated May 6, 1999 is that "the
height and depth of the building is a serious impairment on his enjoyment of his
property, particularly his back yard." My wife and I carefully considered the design
of the home so as to address such concerns. We realize and respect that our neighbors
wish to enjoy a quiet private home life. As we I ~uire a substantial in-home staff and
given that we are considering the adoption of further children, we designed our new
home and landscaping to maintain privacy both for ourselves and for our future neighbor
to the north, Mr Sapone. We took the following steps to ensure Mr Sapone's our privacy
and the full enjoyment of his property:
.
\
..
~,
~
..
..
· We designed a "T" shaped home, similar to our current home at 27 King Street,
Hampton. Our driveway is to the south side of the home away from our neighbor to
the north, Mr Sapone. This driveway is hidden from view by the landscaping and the
building as shown in Attachment 4. When we constructed an addition to our existing
home at 27 King Street a number of years ago we did so in a "T" configuration. Our
neighbor to the North at 27 King Street, Mr & Mrs Martin have often said that our
building addition and the trees that we have planted have improved their enjoyment
of their back yard rather than detract from it as indicated in their letter, Attachment 5
hereto. We have duplicated the concept of our T shaped addition extending eastward
and westward from our original home in the concept of our new home. This T shaped
construction will minimize the view between our patios and yard and that of our
neighbor Mr Sapone and provide him with rrivacy.
..
.
..
..
..
· We located the east/west portion of the home is located some 20 feet from the
property line to allow us to plant a row of32 large mature trees between our home
and Mr Sapone's property. These trees would each have a height of 20-3 0 feet and
would be planted along the northern boundary of our property so as to totally obscure
our building from Mr Sapones view with beautiful mature trees as shown in
Attachment 4. This will effectively screen our home and yard from the view ofMr
Sapone and visa versa.
..
.
..
~
..
..
O'r\
't~
"
..
tIliI
-
· We designed the layout of the house such that the entertaining area, specifically the
kitchen, great room, sitting room with bar, dining room with balcony and the home
theatre are all situated in the wing extending southwards away from Mr Sapones
house. In addition, the east/west portion of the home blocks all northern exposures
towards Mr Sapones property hence our balconies do not even look out over Mr
Sapone's yard. Thus, our entertaining in the afternoons and evenings should not
detract from anyone else enjoying their yard and their privacy.
-
-
-
· The outside veneer of the home will be a Grey Ariscroft manufactured limestone
similar to that currently used on six of the neighboring houses. Thus the exterior
aesthetic of the home will blend in well with the neighboring homes.
-
· A further consideration in our plans was that the home which we are constructing
borders on Taunton Road and is across from MJ Hobbs school and as such is not a
particularly quiet area. Our landscaping plan includes a bunn towards Taunton Road
and over 300 trees of which 136 are mature 20":30 foot tall trees. This will
dramatically reduce the road noise from Taunton Road for us, for Mr Sapone, and for
all King Street residents and will enhance the natural beauty of our King Street.
-
;,:-1
-
-
My wife and I believe that we have done everything possible to take into
considerations the residential aesthetic of our street in designing our home and its
landscaping. My home occupation creates no noise, odor, or other nuisance to my
current neighbors as attested by their letter attachment 5 hereto. As I will only be
employing my brother to work with me in the new house I believe that my use falls
within the municipal bylaws.
-
-
I therefore respectfully submit to the Mayor and Counselors of the Municipality of
Clarington that no action is required on your part and that I will undertake to do my best
to maximize the beauty of our home to ensure my neighbors enjoyment of his propery.
-
Sincerely,
-
-
4}~
-,
-
Wayne Conrad
-
-
-
-
O~1
-
(..
..
Index of Attachments:
Attachment 1:
Attachment 2:
Attachment 3:
Attachment 4:
Attachment 5:
.
Letter from 9 of our neighbors on King Street including my parents
who will stay at 27 King Street indicating that none of them have
any objections to the size or aesthetics of our new home.
...
.
i
..
Letter from Russ Gibson stating the square footage of the home
which includes area calculations and top view drawings of each
floor of the house.
.
..
.
4 Photographs of the house as built some of which include Mr
Sapone's house taken May 30, 1999.
....
.
Large tree landscaping plan for the 2 acre property.
.
....
Letter from Mr & Mrs Randy Martin of 33 King Street indicating
that our current ''T'' shaped house design and my working at home
does not disturb them nor does it detract from their enjoyment of
their yard.
~
I
i
....
:T7'O
..
...
....
..
...
!r:l
..
~
..
w{
..
.t;
..
..
,-- "j
O]J
7
..
..
...
Attachment 1:
-
-
-
-
..
..
..
..
-
-
..
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
Letter from 9 of our neighbors on King Street including my parents
who will stay at 27 King Street indicating that none of them have
any objections to the size or aesthetics of our new home.
~. 1
Oji
R
The Mayor and Members of Council
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BowmanviIIe, Ontario
LIC 3A6
Mr David Crome, Acting Director of Planning
Home being constructed at the comer of King Street and Taunton Road
May 29, 1999
Attn:
ce.
Re:
"
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
This letter is to confirm that we the undersigned are aware that Wayne Conrad and Carol
II;
..
. Quinn are constructing a large home at the comer of King Street and Taunton Road. in
Hampton, Ontario. We do not object to the size or aesthetics of the home.
Printed name
;;? #7 A><'//A!
(3 ~~ L,..J\ L.s 6;l
A./6?LAr \
....
II
Address
..
s;
33 K/r-r 4' $0- 1.:I~/+TcfAl '
..
~
'5/ FN& 57
H f+ ~ f7C::,;J
..
~/!!/1JC-- sr.,lhNp1TO/V.
..
~.C7~~_ . b.Ca..W1.e.~. 3q kl~ ~+.) \~ /4-IY\P T<J f(J .
~ ~'~M.~..) "C:...\ ~. -..J ~ S '\" L ~ ~?{'O...J f
:57 c/(//}fj SV--: '/JaM[TJ 1.
I/. co ~ flA!) d,I X fir- 4 ~f, Ii A fA. (71-01--
C. RDSS'~
..
....
2Z <1 7 ~(./.v"17J,..) RD.
..
.--
)t If~&
..
J7?
K.lA-- r
~
..
..
...
~. )
[1 J (
..
..
..
Attachment 2:
..
..
..
..
..
-
..
..
..
-
..
-
-
..
..
-
-
-
Letter from Russ Gibson stating the square footage of the home
which includes area calculations and top view drawings of each
floor of the house.
~ "\
bj~
Q
~~I
011
..
Hull Drafting & Development
Commercial. Industrial and Residential Drafting
.
...
....
..
Saturday, May 29, 1999
AUn:
The Mayor and Council Members
Munici pality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario LIC 3A6
BY HAND
Home being constructed at the comer of King Street and Taunton Road
Mr David Crome, Acting Director of the Planning Department
..
.
..
a
Re:
cc.
.,
.
I am the designer of the home being constructed at the comer of King Street and
Taunton Road. The interior living space area of the home is 10, 761 square feet. This
area is comprised of 8, 190 square feet on the main floor including the bedroom area
which is the upper side-split area and 2,571 square feet on the second floor. The
calculations for this area are attached hereto.
tilt
v-
..
..
If you have further questions please feel free to call me.
...
Sincerely,
...
...
'J
tilt
..
...
...
..
5~ i 0 Old Scugug Rd Hampton Ont LOB 1 JO
Phone [9'JS: 2SJ4%>? Fu: (gaS' G?'l 71. 7[::
, 1
o )--t
...
..
Revised Area Calculation for 9 King Street Home
.. Prepared May 29. 1999; Center Wing Additional Floor Only Page 1/2
Conversion from square feet to square meters 10.764
-
Executive Summary
Total Interior floor area 10761 999
.. Main Floor 8190 761
Second Floor 2571 238
.. Area.less hallways and stairways 9000 836
Bedroom Area 753 70
West Wing Main Floor 547 51
- Center Wing Main Area 3363 312
Center Wing Upstairs 2185 203
East Wing Main Floor 1774 165
.. Bathrooms 379 35
Detailed Analysis of Area Length Width Area Area
- feet feet sq feet sq meters
Bedroom Area 753 69.9
.. Master Bedroom 12.5 26.0 325 30.2
Bedroom 2 11.6 12.0 139 12.9
Bedroom 3 11.8 11.6 137 12.7
.. Bedroom 4 13.8 11.0 152 14.1
West Wing Main Floor 547 50.8
Living Room irregular 547 50.8
-
Center Wing Main Floor 3363 312.4
Entry 9.3 10.0 93 8.6
- Den less stairs to third floor 30.0 24.0 664 61.7
Kitchen 17.0 18.0 306 28.4
Sitting Room 24.2 19.3 467 43.4
.. Great Room 24.6 25.6 630 58.5
Dining Room 12.0 25.6 307 28.5
Telephone Room 3.0 6.0 18 1.7
- Pantry irregular 101 9.3
Laundry Room 8.3 6.5 54 5.0
Theatre 24.1 30.0 723 67.2
.. Center Wing Upstairs 2185 203.0
Wayne's Private Study 12.0 46.0 552 51.3
Wayne's Model Area 12.0 42.0 504 46.8
.. Study Area 24.6 25.6 630 58.5
Upstairs Library 12.0 25.6 307 28.5
Theatre Gallery 24.0 8.0 192 17.8
-
-
..
OJ]
-
;E,..
..
Revised Area Calculation for 9 King Street Home
Prepared May 29; Center Wing Additional Floor Only Page 2/2
..
East Wing Main Floor 1n4 164.8
Toy Storage and halfway 30.C 20.0 600 55.7 ..
Piano/Music Room 24.0 14.0 336 31.2
Craft Room 24.6 10.0 246 22.9
Computer Room 18.3 14.0 256 23.8 ..
Model Room 24.0 14.0 336 31.2 I
Bathrooms 379 35.2
Bathroom 1 - Master Bathroom 11.0 11.0 121 11.2 ..
Bathroom 2 - Bedroom 2 7.0 5.0 35 3.3 I
Bathroom 3 - Bedrrom 3 7.0 5.0 35 3.3
Bathroom 4 - Bedroom 4 7.0 5.0 35 3.3 ...
Bathroom 5 - Center Wing Main floor 5.0 5.0 25 2.3 I
Bathroom 6 - Center Wing Main floor 5.0 5.0 25 2.3
Bathroom 7- East Wing Main floor 3.5 7.0 25 2.3 ..
Bathroom 8 - Center Wing Upper floor 8.0 6.0 48 4.5
Bathroom 9 - Center Wing Upper floor 5 6 30 2.8
...
..
..
..
~~
..
fl
...
,.-
\" ';.
..
...
~
..
..
OJO
..
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I--
lL.
C
""
\D
lJ1
lf1
C\J
;:= (X)
(X)
(1\
I-- II
u..
'"
C3 ~
~ U
(I) v ~
0 0
" -1
~ .... j):l \D
'= \D C\J ....
" ~ "
..... (X)
~ II II
(Y) W
0 0:::: t=l 0::::
...... W ...... W
""
II I-- Z I--
W ...... W
<I: :L '"" ~
...... <I: ......
W 0:::: W 0::::
0:::: W 0:::: W
;:::: <I: CL <I: CL
0:::: 0:::: 0:::: 0::::
W W W W
I-- I-- Z Z
~ ~ Z Z
0 0 ...... >-<
II II
f- f-
Z
Z I--i
W W ~
2::: LJ~O-
W <[Of-
(/)~~OD
<[Z<[-.JD
P=l<[LJLLLL
-,
OJI
0:::
ZD
t-lD
I<[-.--J
Lu...
I
0:::
ZD
t-lD
<[-.J
L:L..
ST AIR
+'
~
0-
If'l
(Y)
(\J
CX)
."
L[)
+'
t+-
O-
If'l
f'..
\D
(Y)
"'
(\J
f-
L..
C!l
(I)
o
o
(]\
.....
0)
II
Q::
......
<[
f-
(I)
I=l
Z
<[
I=l
W
I
U
f-
<[
I ~
(I)
(I) (Y)
W (lJ
-1 <.D
<[ II
W
Q:: Q::
<[ W
f-
W W
I=l L
...... ......
(I) Q::
Z W
...... 0..
..
..
III
IIlIii
III
..
,
..
~
..
r-
..
IIlIii
III
..
..
..
..
" .
IIlIii
11
..
...
o::Jd
...
lIIIII
..
..
.. l-
lL.
C!S
VJ
....
.. r--
It)
nJ
II
.. Q
W
:c
u
I-
<t
.. :c
VJ
VJ
W
-1
.. <t
W
~
<t
W
.. Q
.....
CI?
Z
.....
-
~
- D..--l
q 0"""" _
Z-llf1csl-
(\Jlt..(\J(/.)lt..
..
..
-
..
..
-
-
-
-
0:: :..)
.J I
Attachment 3:
4 Photographs of the house as built some of which include Mr
Sapone's house taken May 30, 1999.
boJ
"t
....
.
....
I
....
I
lIIII
!1
..
...
....
lIIII
....
..
..
~
:j ~
..
n
..
~...
lIIII
...
-
..
10
...
lIIII
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
- I
I
I
I
- I
\
- \
I
I
- I
I
I
- I
I
I
- I
I
I
- I
I
I
- I
-
-
061
Attachment 4:
"'l:
Large tree landscaping plan for the 2 acre property.
..
.
...
I
..
"
-
f,;;
..
..
~
~.~
..
r"
..
..
..
..
..
t;:
..
r
..
..
~.
..
..
062
11
..
..
,.
-
-
-
..
888888
88
88
8
888
88
-
..
-
Z
<l:
....J
Il..
I-
=:l
o
>-
<l:
....J
W
W
0::
I-
W
N
~
CIl
....J
....J
=:l
u..
..
..
-
o
8
.. ++ + 88888
8888888
/
-
KING ST.
..
-
-
-
-
-
. 7...
oC -
Attachment 5:
Letter from Mr & Mrs Randy Martin of33 King Street indicating
that our current "'1' shaped house design and my working at home
does not disturb them nor does it detract from their enjoyment of
their home and yard.
...
.
..
.
..
...
..
~
..
~
...
~
i
..
~
...
..
..
..
..
f ~
j
..
..
...
-
..
"1
(1 Q '+
l'
..
..
May 29, 1999
-
AUn:
The Mayor and Members of Council
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 3A6
Mr David Crome, Acting Director of Planning
Occupancy of27 King Street by Wayne Conrad and Carol Quinn
-
..
cc.
Re:
-
-
We are the direct neighbors of Wayne Conrad and Carol Quinn who reside at 27
King Street, Hampton, Ontario. We live directly north of Wayne and Carol at 33 King
Street. We are aware that Wayne is a research scientist and inventor and that he works at
home. Wayne's work at home does not disturb us. In fact, we never know if they are
home or not unless we see Carol or the Children. Wayne and Carol's "T" shaped home
at 27 King Street and the many trees completely isolate our yards. This allows us to
enjoy our home and yard with peace, quiet and privacy.
-
-
-
...
We are also aware that Wayne and Carol are constructing a large home at the
comer of King Street and Taunton Road in Hampton, Ontario. We do not object to the
size or aesthetics of the home.
-
-
Sincerely,
~.?
-
-
..
..
-
-
-
D c<~
-
--
Meeting:
-
Date:
-
Report #:
-
Subject:
-
--,
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Ceneral Purpose and Admlrllstratlon Cmnmlttee
File #
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
IJD-68-99
FILE #: CG1.5
By-law #
REQUEST FOR SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS
LYDIA TRULL PUBLIC SCHOOL
LOCATION: AVONDALE DRIVE AND TRULLS ROAD SOUTH
FILE: CG1.5
-
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
-
1 . THAT Report PD-68-99 be received;
.,
-
-
3.
-
-
4.
-
TH.AT the Director of Planning and Development be authorized to hire an Adult
School Crossing Guard to be in place by September 7, 1999 on Avondale Drive east
of Brownstone Crescent which has exceeded the required 50% delay factor for the
Adult Crossing vVarrant Study;
THAT the Director of Planning and Development be authorized to hire an Adult
School Crossing Guard to be in place by September 7, 1999 on Trulls Road south of
Sandringham Drive on the grounds it has shown a steady increase in traffic volume
with delay factors starting from 29% in September 1998 and increasing to 43% by
June 1999 derived from Adult Crossing Guard Warrant Studies;
THAT the funds for the Adult School Crossing Guards for 1999 in the amount of
approximately $5,000.00 be charged to Account #7240-X-6 with the resulting
budget overrun in this account being drawn from the accumulated surplus for 1999;
5. THAT the Director of Public Works arrange for the installation of school crossing
signs, pavement markings and required sidewalk extensions for the crossings;
-
6. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
-
-
-
-
-
666
--
REPORT NO.: PD- 68-99
PAGE 2
....
1.
1 . 1
2.
2.1
ta._
BACKGROUND
The request for an Adult Crossing Guard for Trulls Road to service Lydia Trull Public
School on Avondale Drive began in April 1998. Studies during September
1998 indicated a delay factor of 29% instead of the 50% required and the request
was denied by Council.
"'lIiI
.....
...-...
REVIEW AND COMMENT
Municipalitv of Clarington Crossing Cuard Policy
The standard method to determine the need for an Adult Crossing Guard in an
unbiased and consistent method was developed by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers and is used by many municipalities throughout North America. The
technique involves the use of a stop watch to determine the length and quantity of
safe gaps between vehicles.
-..
'lIiI
...
lIiI
In 1991 the Municipality of Clarington adopted a "50% delay" as the threshold for
the introduction of an Adult School Crossing Guard. ..
2.2
Background Information for Avondale Drive Request
The principal of Lydia Trull Public School and concerned parents requested a study
be done on Avondale Drive near the schoo\. The large number of motorists,
including parents driving to the school has qualified Avondale Drive for an Adult
School Crossing Guard.
..
..
-
Study Results on Avondale Drive
Date
-
Period
% Delay
60.8%
71.0%
-
June 3, 1999
June 3, 1999
a.m.
p.m.
June 8,1999
June 8, 1999
60.8%
N/A
..
a.m.
p.m.
...
667
...
lIiI
...
REPORT NO.: PD- 68-99
PAGE 3
...
2.3
Background Information for Trulls Road Request
Public Works Staff have continued to monitor the unsupervised Trulls Road crossing
to record any increased difficulty for children crossing. The parents in the area have
been active in monitoring this location for safety and have borrowed the Radar
Message Board in an attempt to slow vehicle speeds. They have reserved the Radar
Message Board again for September to encourage motorists to obey the posted
speed limit of 50 km/hr. Many parents feel the road is unsafe due to speeding
motorists and walk with their children, but many others drive to the school.
...
...
...
...
...
Progressive Studv Results on Trulls Road
Date Period % Delay
September 29, 1998 a.m. 19.5%
September 29, 1998 p.m. 29.2%
December 2, 1998 a.m. N/A
December 2, 1998 p.m. 36.3%
February 11, 1999 a.m. N/A
February 11, 1999 p.m. 37.6%
April 8, 1999 a.m. N/A
April 8, 1999 p.m. 38.1 %
June 2, 1999 a.m. 39.3%
June 2, 1999 p.m. 43.2%
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
As per Municipal Policy, a 50% delay is required before an Adult School Crossing
Guard is considered warranted. 'The studies performed between September 1998
and June 1999 indicate increasing difficulty in crossing Trulls Road. Additional
development is continuing both north and south of this crossing location and
difficulty is expected to increase again by September 1999. The average speed is
approximately 60 km/hr during the crossing periods and although the Radar
Message Board was used and Police have been. requested to provide enforcement,
...
...
-
-
6bo
...
REPORT NO.: PD- 68-99
PAGE 4
..
..
parents are still concerned about the increasing volumes of traffic and difficulty for
their children.
....
3.
CONCLUSIONS
....
3.1 From the above it is concluded, that based on the study results, an Adult School
Crossing Guard is presently required on Avondale Drive.
....
3.2
That the level of difficulty for children crossing Trulls Road has continued to
increase prompting Council's proactive consideration of an Adult School Crossing
Guard placement for September.
....
...
3.3
The Director of Public Works and the Deputy Treasurer have reviewed this report
and concur with its contents.
...
...
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
..
dv~-~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer.
...
D v' J. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning & Development
..
DC*df
14 June 1999
...
Attachment No.1 - Key Map Showing Crossing Locations
.,
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Mrs. Pat Adams, Principal
Lydia Trull Public School
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 3C2
Mrs. Tina Vendrasco
36 Bushford Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2X 1
-
..
III
6 b Cj
..
..
ATTACHMEN NO.1
...
...
~.
L-l
--~--------~ ------.------
----: ".- - ----
': ------------- - -------~-
Vi f ~. ----,
<: -J
~ c-
<S . I
i ~
~
,.~
i k
!,~~ ~-i
!~~[ _I
Q:
e
't:
l0
:::, --
Cl:J
~-
-
-
c'QURT/CE NORTH I
PUBLIC
ELEMENTARY
,'CHOOL
COURT/CE PUBLIC
SECONDARY ':01001.
-
lJJS
-
COURTlCE
COMMUNITY
COMPLEX
...
-
-
-
-
CJ
G
ct
-
-
-
-
...
..
_~1
-
{, 7 ;1
...
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 3
3.1.2 Open space corridors are provided along the Black Creek and associated tributaries
within this neighbourhood. These corridors promote dispersion of species by
providing opportunity for wildlife to move along these corridors. The forested area
north of the George Reynolds extension is an important component of the wildlife
corridor linking the Bowmanville Creek Valley with the Black/Farewell Creek
Valley. Connections to these forested lands are important in maintaining species
diversity.
3.1.3 There are 3 parks within this neighbourhood. A large community park is located
adjacent to the Courtice Community Complex, Courtice North Public School and
Courtice High School. Two other parks are found adjacent to the open space
corridors north of Nash Road. These parks are 0.62 and 0.48 ha in size. Trails are
proposed on the lands between Nash Road and Highway #2. The trails will utilize
the riverine corridors in part to connect the valleylands to the Courtice Community
Complex, local schools and parks.
-
3.
- 3.1
3.1 .1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GLENVIEW NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN DETAILS
Open Space and Environmental Areas
This neighbourhood has a number of environmental features within its limits. An
Environmental Impact Study (EIS) examining the existing environmental conditions
including ground and surface water, vegetation and wildlife was prepared by
Gartner Lee and Associates. The study focused on the area subject to plan of
subdivision 18T-95029 and incorporated findings from previously completed
studies in addition to gathering information from the surrounding lands within the
Neighbourhood.
3.2 Traffic and Roads
3.2.1 An important component in the design of a neighbourhood is ensuring the efficient
movement of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Higher volumes of traffic, travelling at
673
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 4
..
...
a higher rate of speed, utilize arterial roads which are located on the outer limits of
the neighbourhood. The local roads convey traffic within the neighbourhood and
support a lower volume of traffic travelling at a reduced speed. Transit stops are
located on arterial roads generally in proximity to major intersections.
....
....
3.2.2 A traffic study was prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited. The traffic
study provided many recommendations including keeping Westmore Street open
and extending George Reynolds Drive easterly to Courtice Road. The road pattern
identified on Map 7 of the Clenview Neighbourhood Design Plan provides good
connections between the local road network and the arterial roads, promotes a grid
system which complies with Official Plan transportation policies, and results in
lower traffic volumes along Fourth Street in the vicinity of the elementary school.
....
...
...
...
3.2.3 The traffic study made the following conclusions and recommendations:
-
.
the additional traffic generated by further development will not have any
operational impact on the existing local road intersections and road
improvements will not be required at the Trulls Road/Nash Road or Trulls
Road/George Reynolds Drive intersections;
-
...
...
.
reconstruction of Fourth Avenue from Nash Road to Westmore Street is required
as is the reconstruction of the Fourth Avenue and Westmore Street intersection;
-
.
reconstruction of Jane Avenue from the Fourth Avenue extension to the northern
limit of the existing neighbourhood and the reconstruction of the Jane Avenue
and Fourth Avenue intersection will be required;
...
-
.
sidewalks are to be constructed on Jane Avenue from George Reynolds Drive to
the intersection of the Fourth Avenue extension, on Fourth Avenue, from Fourth
..
..
674
..
-
-
-
Meeti ng:
-
Date:
Report #:
-
Subject:
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #
Monday, June 21, 1999
Res. #
PD-69-99
FILE #: PLN 31..5.2
By-law #
NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN PLAN - GLENVIEW NEIGHBOURHOOD
PT. LOTS 29 & 30, CONe. 2 & 3, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FILE: PLN 31.5.3
-
Recommendations:
-
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
-
1 .
THAT Report PD-69-99 be received;
-
2. THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to all interested parties.
-
1.
1 .1
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
-
....
PURPOSE OF THE PREPARATION OF A NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN PLAN
The Clarington Official Plan requires the preparation of a Neighbourhood Design
Plan prior to consideration of any plan of subdivision in a neighbourhood not
having a Design Plan. These plans do not require Council approval but are to be
utilized by staff in reviewing subdivision applications for the specific
neighbourhood. They are also valuable documents in which to illustrate to existing
residents and perspective purchasers the intended land uses proposed in a
neighbourhood.
1.2
The design plans are to detail the following:
. locations of schools, parks and open space blocks, including stormwater
management blocks;
.
lotting patterns and residential densities;
671
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 2
2.
2.1
.....
.
road alignments within a neighbourhood, including right-of-way widths and
required widenings;
....
.
walking or cycling trail systems, as well as future transit routes.
......
BACKGROUND
The Official Plan requires Neighbourhood Design Plans to be prepared by
development proponents. Subdivision application 18T-95029, submitted by D.G.
Biddle and Associates on behalf of Black Creek Developments, precipitated the
preparation of a Neighbourhood Design Plan for Glenview Neighbourhood in
Courtice. (Attachment No. 1 shows the limits of Glenview Neighbourhood).
Report PD-139-97 to the October 6, 1997 Committee meeting advised that a draft
Neighbourhood Design Plan for Glenview Neighbourhood had been submitted by
the applicant, and that a Public Information Centre was to be held on October 15,
1997.
......
......
-
-
....
...
2.2
Staff directed the applicant to concentrate the neighbourhood design efforts on the
lands subject to the subdivision application, including access to the northern
portion of the neighbourhood at the easterly and westerly limits of the
neighbourhood. The reasons for this are as follows:
-
.....
.
the considerable amount of existing development within the neighbourhood;
-
.
the number of draft approved and registered plans of subdivision in the
neighbourhood;
.....
.
the north central area of the neighbourhood IS predominantly designated
"Environmental Protection".
-
...
...
672
....
..
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 5
-
-
Avenue (at Jane) to the Nash Road intersection and on George Reynolds Drive,
from the western extent of the proposed development to Courtice Road; and,
-
.
all heavy construction vehicles shall not utilize any portion of Westmore Street
or the southern portion of Jane Avenue from Fourth Avenue to Westmore Street
during construction of the proposed subdivision.
-
-
3.2.4 The status and alignment of Adelaide Avenue is subject to further study which was
identified to be beyond the scope of the neighbourhood design plan.
-
-
3.2.5 Sidewalks and the proposed trail system provide for the movement of pedestrians to
transit stops, schools, retail businesses and parks. A couple of walkways have been
provided to allow pedestrians an option to take shorter walking routes to schools
and the future commercial site. The walkways also facilitate pedestrian movement
within the ne,ighbourhood providing residents with the opportunity to walk/ride
along local roads as opposed to arterial roads.
-
-
-
3.3 Population and Housing
3.3.1 Table 9.2 in the Municipal Official Plan identifies the housing target for this
neighbourhood (1135 units) allocated as follows:
-
-
.
550 low density units;
535 medium density units, including 110 units in the Local Central Area; and
50 intensification units.
.
-
.
-
-
The neighbourhood design plan has provided for 568 low density units, 512
medium density units, for a total of 1130 residential units. The number of low
density units slightly exceeds the numbers given in the Official Plan and the total
numbers of medium density units falls just below the stated objectives. The
-
-
675
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 6
..
...
population as allocated in the Official Plan is based in part on density allocations in
the former Town of Newcastle Official Plan and existing development approvals. In
consideration of the number and size of the environmental features within this
neighbourhood, Staff recognize that the unit count and density allocations may vary
slightly from the objectives contained within the Official Plan.
-
..
...
3.3.2 Staff note that there are some lands still available for development within this
neighbourhood. The neighbourhood design plan allocates 156 units to these lands
and provides guidance to the future design and density of development. The
population targets identified in the neighbourhood design plan are generally the
same as that within the Official Plan. This provides some flexibility as the density
of a new development may, in part, be determined through the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Study.
....
...
...
...
3.3.3 The Official Plan requires that a mix of housing types be provided. In this
neighbourhood, an adequate mix is provided in that there are condominium units, ...
townhouse units, semi-detached units, and single detached units with frontages
ranging from 12 metres to 17 metres. ...
4.
4.1
AGENCY COMMENTS
The neighbourhood design plan was revised a couple of times and was circulated to
obtain comments from various other departments and agencies.
...
...
4.2 The Durham Region Works Department had no objection to the neighbourhood ...
design plan.
-
4.3
The Municipality of Clarington Fire Department requested that on-street parking be
limited to one side of the street to enable access of fire apparatus.
..
...
676
..
...
....
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 7
-
-
4.4
-
-
-
-
4.5
..
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Municipality or Clarington Public Works Department had a number of
comments and concerns upon review of the original plans. More information was
required with respect to stormwater management issues, location of sidewalks,
phasing of development, reconstruction of Jane Avenue and Fourth Avenue to urban
standards, other external road improvements, and the need for a traffic report. The
Clarington Public \,yorks Department are satisfied that all their concerns have been
add ressed.
The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority notes that the proposed land uses
located between Nash Road and the future extension of George Reynolds Drive
accurately reflects the findings of the Environmental Impact Study conducted by
Gartner Lee Associates (1997). The Authority also notes that the delineation of the
"Open Space'! lands associated with the valley/flood plain lands and the wet forest
block between the elementary and secondary schools is accurate. With respect to
the lands located between George Reynolds Drive and the future Adelaide Avenue,
the Authority notes that a forested wetland unit dominates these lands. This unit is
currently being considered by the Ministry of Natural Resources for inclusion in the
Provincially Significantly Black-Farewell Wetland Complex. With respect to
stormwater, CLOCA notes that the stormwater management concept is consistent
with the objectives of the over-all Courtice Stormwater Management Strategy and
includes the environmental protection and impact mitigation recommendations of
the Gartner Lee EIS.
4.5
The Durham Region Planning Department has noted that the neighbourhood design
plan conforms to the Durham Region Official Plan and complies with the
Environmental Impact Study.
677
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 8
.....
S.
5.1
5.2
...
STAFF COMMENTS
It should be noted that the neighbourhood design plan is not subject to appeal. The
neighbourhood design plan does not replace the approval of a plan of subdivision
or rezoning, nor will it remove any resident's rights to object to subsequent
subdivision or rezoning applications under the Planning Act.
.....
-
...
The neighbourhood design plan has been refined in light of the recommendations
of the Environmental Impact Study, the recommendations of the traffic study,
comments from circulated agencies, resident's comments, and Councils' resolution
regarding parking in residential areas.
...
...
5.3
A special notation has been placed on the plan with respect to draft approved plan
18T-91005. This plan of subdivision was draft approved many years ago and was
recently identified as one of the plans of subdivision that will be requested to be
revised in order to address Council's resolution (CPA 270-77 to 289-99 inclusive)
regarding parking in residential areas.
-
....
...
6.
6.1
CONCLUSION
Staff have prepared this report to inform Council and members of the public that the
neighbourhood design plan has been completed and approved by the Directors of
Planning and Public Works.
...
....
...
...
...
..
...
678
.
..
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 9
--
--
-
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
--
. Crome, M.CI.P., R.P.P.
or of Planning & Development
o 1I'~--L&
Franklin Wu, M.CI.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer.
.....
-
HB*DC*df
14 June 1999
-
Attachment No.1 - Limits of Glenview Neighbourhood
Attachment No.2 - Map 1 - Land Use Plan: Glenview Neighbourhood Design Plan Design
Attachment NO.3 - Map 7 - Transportation Network Plan: Glenview Neighbourhood
Design Plan
Attachment No.4 - Map 9 - Open Space and Public Facilities Plan: Glenview
Neighbourhood Design Plan
-
-
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
-
Liza Developments
30 Wertheim Court
RICHMOND HILL, Ontario
L4B 1 B9
Ray Sheppard
32 Jane Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9
-
..
Pam Callus
3452 Courtice Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L1 E 2L6
Jose Goncalo Ferreira
Donna Frances Ferreira
6041 Middle Road
R.R.#l
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L 1 C 3 K2
--
Carlo Aloe
48 Westmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L1 E 2H7
..
-
Black Creek Developments Limited
1 748 Basel i ne Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2Tl
Mr. & Mrs. Gebelhoff
29 Westmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H8
-
-
679
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99 PAGE 10 ...
....
Marg Ellis Matthew and Jessie Scott
8 L ynwood A ven ue 17 Jane Street
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario ....
L 1 E 2H8 L 1 E 2H9
Dave Unwin Ivan Perun ...
47 Westmore Street R.R.#l
COURTICE, Ontario HAMPTON, Ontario
L 1E 2H7 LOB lJO ....
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Marsh Kerrj and Mike Novak
51 Westmore Street 7 Jane Avenue ....
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7 L 1 E 2H7
...
Ronald and Olive Munro Elwin White
24 Lynwood Avenue 10 Fourth Street
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario ...
L 1 E 2H9 L 1 E 2H7
George and Lesley Maguire Dineen Leger ...
11 Jane Avenue 12 Glenview Road
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario ..
L 1 E 2H9 L 1 E 2H9
D.G. Biddle and Associates D. Cowie
...
96 King Street East 43 Westmore Street
OSHAWA, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 H 1 B6 L 1 E 2H7
-
Robert D. McKenna W. D. Manson
18 Fourth Street 20 Clematis Road -
COURTICE, Ontario WILLOWDALE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7 M2J 4X2
...
Stanley Simmons J. A. Hayman
3260 Courtice Road R. J. Howes
COURTICE, Ontario 22 Jane Avenue ....
L1 E 2L7 COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9
Helen and John Jozkowski ....
11 Lynwood Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H8 -
680
...
..
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99 PAGE 11
-
Stan Racansky Linda and Julie Walsh
3200 Hancock Road 25 Jane Avenue
- COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1E 2M 1 L 1 E 2H9
- \Nilliam Bowden
Kerry Meydam
4 Glenview Road 3828 Trulls Road North
- COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9 L 1 E 2L3
Janet Sikora Bill Bickle
-
34 Lynwood Avenue 7 Glenview Road
COURTICE, Ontario L 1 E 2H9 COURTICE, Ontario
- L 1 E 2H9
Nancy Whitehead
8 Jane Avenue Mary Martinelli
- COURTICE, Ontario 60 Westmore Street
L 1 E 2H9 COURTICE, Ontario L 1 E 2H7
- Peter Bramton Gordon Heard
21 Jane Avenue 18 Jane Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
- L 1 E 2H9 L 1 E 2H9
Christine Lowe LesJagoda
- 12 Jane Avenue 569 Townline Road North
COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9 L1 E 2J4
-
Carole Seysmith L. Little
Friends of the Second Marsh 3075 Trulls Road
- 100 Whiting Avenue Group B, Compo 10
OSHAWA, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 H 3T3 L 1 E 2L1
-
Edward Zavitsky Joe Caiata
32 Lynwood Avenue 4380 Courtice Road
- COURTICE, Ontario COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9 L 1 E 2H8
- Joe McKenna
1 3 Poolton Crescent
COURTICE, Ontario
- L 1 E 2H4
-
681
-
REPORT NO.: PD-69-99
PAGE 12
..
...
Ted Mosolanczki
4 Fourth Street
COURTICE, Ontario ....
L 1 E 2H7
E. Nowasad ...
3732 Courtice Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2 L5 ....
Teresa and Roy Palonen
55 Westmore Street ...
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7
....
Nei I Ryan
39 Westmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario ...
L 1 E 2H7
Ken Livingston ....
12 G lenview Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9 -
Walter Kranzl
289 Huntingwood Drive -
OSHAWA, Ontario
L1 J 7C6 -
...
-
....
....
..
682
..
...
ATTACHMENT NO_ ~
--
...
--
-
--
--
--
-
--
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
...
I
I
LOT 31
o
- -- u --<f'
- -- ----- --- .-;:
----- \..J
..~
U1 '
~~;,~-
~.;j;.~I~ I
~ R1:YNOUJS
~ ~- 1\
,I L
rm ~'
-1~ "
Vir - 8\ ! I
iLQK / smrrr
,SllLv (~ptq:L
li!'!~'~
/tk~c==J~ ~
~.nrrj 'v~t:4Jlrtt L
~*' f- ~f-
f~ U~;~:I
:-->~ I J./
L/ '~" 'l. L. ! / I ~
L</ ,~ ~ I
h'i?\ ' ~
-1
Il~~lri~
I ==1 ~r-;
~,,;~ t:J -
__" 1~ =f-'~ -
_ " .J'V_~{J_
-- --
,_-I iU --- .=<
~- --j -- --- ---:r-'
I ~- //n~~- ~ -
i"=mti~~- ~ l-j
LOCATION MAP
LOT 30 LOT 29
/
~"""" ,"" '"" '" '" '"" ~
""""""""""'1'" ....
,~
~,",","'
LOT 28
Cl
<(
o
a:::
'--w
-(:)
t:-:
u.1
c--3J
.~ 0
U
~
r<)
_L__ - - Z
- - .- - 0
-
(f)
/ (f)
( / W
'-'
I Z
, 0
\ '-'
\-----
I
~
,
=
8- "
~~ ~d1
<Cr(FOOND CRfS. )--
i I ! I I I \
~I -.---'--
>-
. ~
. ~
j \
[W RG'J) " _-
\ \ ---{~ =- ,
~
ti H ~
t
l I
NA <H RCWJ
I It;:) l;;r~
Ii (j t---,~-
f ~ ~-
~~I:=~~
-'(""~
M:~~ -~
\ \ Cj
\ \ \\ \\ \ "
11\';\" Go:;~~\ ,~
J \ \~\'\ \l.LL
~ \ \ \\ ~
tL~ S\-.. ~r
- Iflv(Y~~\lM0
~~
(/l/TT
I
N
Z
o
-
(f)
(f)
W
'-'
Z
o
'-'
COURTICE
KEY MAP
~~:::::~ ~kf~~~~RHOOD
_ LANDS SUBJECT TO BIRCHDALE
mmm. VILLAGE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY
u_
/ I
"
!."--=~
" - -~-------------=~--~
.. / ._---~---------~
/ ,
/ ,
f-
W STA
NO_ .
FOUND "-
if:
l<}- ~
~
~ ~f--m ~
~ ~
... " ,
~ >--~f-- h --
J~ _.J
--- ~
i ~
, __ ; W'STlJOfIf: SmEIT
, /_-~_ I
r IIA- ~ i!: i ..
,I _ II ~ ....'~:L 1 T II I II ~
/ ~:
I~~
I aZM"""
SCHOOL
-
I
~
COURT/Cf PvfJUC ~
seCONDARY SCHOO< ~"
~
._----....
="(
~
~
~
~ ~
\1\1\\ \ I ~
-.-...,~
~~.~'
~"'II.
HIG~~ ~ ~
~r'i~ ~ <~
-Lt-l~1 \ I I 11
98-01 7
ATTACHMENT NO.2
..)TE
: ~,.&,TUS AND AL iGN\jENT Ijr::
il.LELA I DE WENJE IS S,,;8JECT
-; '.;RTHER STillY
...
- -..j.- - - - - -
I
.-or 'v""':"
_. _ __2-1
~9 _ _
-1
1
~ T~ ~..f
,,-
I
r
...
I
1
i
~
....
------<
~
LEGEI'D
....
_ I NE I CHBOLllHOOO
BOUNDARY
0 6.0 II STREET
TOWNHOUSE
!R(F'[R TO I-<<)TE II
~ 120. SINGLE ....
DEl ACHED
~ 15.0 . SINCLE
OET ACHED
~ 180. SEW I
DETACHED
. ~~~~g~~~oo ....
0 PLAN REC I STEREO
. DRAfT PLAN
APPROVED
~ ....
~~~, DRAfT PLAN
III FUTURE
OEVELOPWENT
c,"05SleL[ Lonu'
AARAHC;ElIOfT l
ill AREA SUBJECT T
~E REV I EI ....
[B ~vm~Al FIRE
0 ENY I RO~ENT AL
PROTECT ION ARE
...
. . @ Pt.llLlC ElEIlENTARY
~ SCHOOL
~ . . (~ PtalC SECONOA
i SCHOOl
. . Ell
~ PARKETTE -
. .
. B COI.lt-lUNl TV PARK
. .
e STOR~ lATER
"ANACEJ,IENT
FACILITY
. EXISTING -
BUILDINCS
I
I
~
I
I
--
I' CIUFT I'\.Nol ~ IIT""OOS 15 I
$1.a..(tT TO C.,."'. R[SOlUT1OM
zro-" TO m." lHCl..l.IS IV(.
....
...
I
'"
..
I
F1LIltl-'IOOlICllUl"TI'UH.III'l'ltOVGllltU(lIlTOIlOT[IIItO
GLENVIEW
LAND
h
I GHBOURHOOI
PL AN ...
'll.1lll-!JI!lOCJ1I~l.'II: .
~1'OlM.11"llClf"06(l)0f't'(l0f'1llJfT1
lOT
..
"
-'TI
~
....., ,,500<) 9404E
'1\0
"'t(tAlI'lllICT~'J'
1l(T{WS1"1tA.10lil~JtTI
~TOlolll lrv'lUl( tJ(Vo..Of'llO(f'
r01M.\.III'C1lI.IlT~lnllll'~
MAP-
..
1iZ
'"
'"
''''
CMaD n.
OlLCoetJI ItM
t.IoeflU.'t."
==:1=~lIlm'..
(' 1
h'\ L
...
ATTACHMENT NO 3
, I
~ '-yr_~L ~j+
II
I '10TE . SHTUS .'.NO AlICMr.lENT
~DELAjDE A.VE~ is
, I TO FURTH'ER ST1..X)y
_-"T_ '.2 ~ _ L/'- _ _ _ _~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ b..OT_2~
\ //'''/) "
- I
-
I
..l~U ~
,
"
,,-
I
-
~.
~
.. ____ .. ...-..-r-.-,.;;..;
~--L-----i
....
,j
f--- -
~---1
-1
I' -
1=
-I --1
I~
/
/
/
I
.
.
-
.
=:J
LEGEND
-
- NE I CHSOLllHOOO
BOUNDARY
@ P~LIC ELElolENH
SCHOOL
@ P~L1 C SECOlllAR
SCHOOl
IV P ARKETYE
8 COWWNI TY PARK
e STORW lATER
WANACElolENT
FACILITY
. EX I ST I NC
BUILOINCS
.
-
;-1 I.
--".-I
.JJJ
h
I--
-
iTl r 11 r i . /--
~ L3== ( / ~~" ~/
~l- ~~;i\f J \ //
L! :,,,...\.:'-i1 ;.:l.~.~_;m=r':'_: "'___..
I II Yd! ~[ ~~ _' ....'.~if~~:~~J:~.:{4@ / 'f-ri~ .. n
I<<mi~g.- - I'\~' ~
\ -1/ ~ ~I~! ~~ i ~= -~., 0 ~ 3";':":~i.""""--'i"I'''' tJ - - - - ARTERIAL RO
r=N\ r=:: ~ ~ II~~ ~ + - - I J /, \\~ '..:::::. f ...::j I I I , TYPE 'C'
i-- 0 c-4 ~ . * - /.- . .J~
==i:::! a -- EE l---' ",=,~ o.
=\ U \ III C::i",;: = =-. ~.._ ~.~ =' H I -I I! ri ~ --i---: .-.-....... COllECTOR RO
/'~~III ~:'~'..~I:I'I~li/lJV1irn! .n~'..< ~~:'-:': ; i 'nn \nr.'~
~! · -....? DRAFT APPROVE 8 \ \
-1 ... .c..-: f '11 illIIIIII!l1In ",,-' . ....
N I \ ~ ~ ~. ! r i ~ I JIIllliII1III!lIIJ . If: r-;- · · · -.- ~ i~:~~ T STOP'
~u ~ f' ili~i j'r',ilrl!wt :".1 Tr:J"~:;::!: :!: : w
~-~. ~ \- 1-- ~ l. . ~. . ~
, J ~~:':=:. ~.. · .1. · . . . 'lQTES
r ) ~ '--. "''"-C'~T - "~::~:"=':~T
hit'T -r'''''" . 1-. ........... _ :g.:,~:,::~"""v,,,,,,
III1 \ ~~o:.J."N. --... . .I~~.-i~. .... .1..1.~~.I.I.:o.~. -
"---
~ ;(,W~i~~ L~:":<,,..,, ~l I ~lr----c-rrng ..,
~~~'I,~,;~ L, I ~,,..,,,...,-q<-- i
J ~ \',~"i' c.C;) (;i\) I] J
: :-0 ;,)~ \ee ..@m.
(,~ 7': ",._1 \ ~
-;- ~J ~---1r:" .~ ~~ JJY--
-'l:' Z P,fR.\'~ e ~m ["onG '; f- jHif
_...~o lOR, "..... r 0 I .
- ~~ -~.......,~/~ I .~ _/j ·
-r- -~ '::.,..,"! . ~:--.." ",,~~\:c:~ ril\1 ~
~= I-- :s ~ ~" / ,~('d tfi\~U (_'::~"""",
f--I ~,'" ~ C_J't.'k~~l ~~,...""'..
~f= I-- ~~~~;:~\ICHTS ~ ~.: · " gG'-~Y? I r--v flC"7I7'JJ':""'U'"
=S =~ ~~ or-" "''"~'::-:5m~ D~ ~~'''' ,
~f- ~ fIlIIITIDll :M1 G [:J =~ '",'::'::: -I<. :-//11
_~LLJ L XIS IIIC TRAfFIC LICHTS .. ~
~ I1Tl 1mmTTTlli-,..-...--"--L.L ,~o,;::..'.":~.. GLENV I EVI Nt I GHBOURHOOD
~ II ~ ~IIII~ '\ -- TRANSPORTATION
NETWORK PLAN
..r-
.
.
.
cr
.
~
t-!---
~
-
.
.
-
ARTER I AL RO
TYPE 'A'
- - - ARTERIAL RO
TYPE 'B'
-
-
EXISTINC
51DEIALK
- - - - POTENTIAL TR
5YSTEJ,1
-
EXISTINC
TRANS I T STOP"
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
~.....
Of1'......
.,., ,..... 94046
, -.or:
MAP - i
-
'-=>0.
.. D.1I..lddl. . A......'.. Uml...d
I'JD D " . U I 1I I "Q ." gin - . ,. .
~~~~-:::: ..~.~.::..~~~.;.::
"
Ice
"'c~
01111\..1.11..,....
""-11"",.........
.He ...tMl.'
~QL.,
-
i I // i NOTE . STATUS AND AI. I GNljENT OF
I r / i ~gE~~~~~~V~~yIS SUBJECT
_ ~L3L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J.O.l _30_(~~_ _ _ _ f-.r- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J.Ql ;;'9 _ _ _ ~
_. F ._
IJ f3= I
I '--!---.
='i.=J n- I
j~i
=p; g;~ I
;c-~
~-~-I
~,L, ,~ ..I,,, I J ...... ~ ~
~ 1IJlIJ@ =-
LLULLYi ~ ~=
~~I ~!a!! : i~~ -
~~ ='111 -~ BEl'
.~ iffir ~~~ 18T9
~~r--';~
~ (-- ~ ~ DRAFT APPROVED
N \~; HI i ~itllillJ
f:::3 I i /ii! f---- ~ ~ PLAN 18T-910D5
HtiB t=' ~_~: ~ =:j U
/ f-->!', .,,"\.
0~ ~~r
)'~!:.~\
mri -(;
l/
~
-~~
!!I_
t! ----'
$:):
i I r--
'-- '-- ~
~,-'
r---' _ ~
E
;-
1r~lTffi
~
NASH ROAD
= 1fD 'U
_Tlo4C(lIII.WI1'1
....."
"
@
cU @
I
,,000'0
.. ~\,-l-_1:'\
_ 1= f\o\'-
~"I '4~:-;;
- -"",,,.
...
_on
--
-
--
==
~-
--
=-
--
_r- - =
-'-- --
~c-- ~
='- .-U
llrn
==
THE:
KINC.s
HICHrt
~~ NO.
<
-
,. _ ; . .'if
'~ ---... ..-^ ,
~:.-
J.Ol~
!
t:=: I~
L-I=
I~
I
11m hi- i
I 111:0
III I, I
o
I I I 11I~---,
I tj I
--
=
i=
-f-
CLDNlh Il.O
>-
'"
=>
o
u
F
!
~ ;
't::t:J ;u
R-
"-
R-
,~
Ii
~S"'n:T
I, :111 II II
u
~1
oJ<:.l- 004
~II~ oJ.,!,o
11\'0(,0
.
!
!~
l=rnt
1-illY:
I.~ APPROVED
.~ftD , """"" . IWtltc
AN I#PL TI A I'I.....IIN 1/11
-~~~''''".. T
v~~A
~ kK(T~-
I 4- 01.(1'. f6 Nll.IC 1'Ofl:KS / - T
.An' ~ 1$"/11
I
~
ATTACHMENT NO.4
d
l-
T
T
LEGEND T
_I ~EIGH801.RHOOO
BOUNDARY
PUlllIC ELEilENTA~
SCHOOl T
PUlllI C SECON>ARY
SCHOOl
STORM 'ATER
MANACE\IENT
FACILITY
@
@
e
I
II
II
.
~
T
COMloUIITY PARK
P ARKETTE
tullCIPAL FIRE
STAT ION
T
ENV I ROlIENT AL
PROTECT I ON AREA .,.
POTENT I AL TRA I L
SYSTEloI
i
T
-
....
-
-
-
GLENVIEW N~IGHBOJRHOOD
OPEN SPACE AND
PUBLIC FACiliTIES PLAN
~~I. O-D. _.ddl. a A..aal._.. Llml..d
,-aan.ultI,nG engln..,...
_ lI{I".. .,.".~ ......-T. _...........OH \"1'" I_
I"_ ._...,.....~ . ~.... '-.o.'.".~e?"WO
/ ~ 1 /
h'" ""I
K..... """ "0000 94046
caAlNn' .... UI'U\'I"!!!,
on,...' ,." ,. MAP - s..
ac~rr ,'c
DAft- OECIJeD; I",
CM '1\'&. 1 hl""l. 1
==1::':'~1I"~
/
..
...
-
'v'eeti ng:
-
Date:
-
Report #:
\ubJect:
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
General Purpose and lA..dministration Committee
File #
i'v'onday , June 21,1999
Res. #
PD-70-CJ9
Fi Ie #: DEV 95-020 & 18T-95029
By-law #
REZONING AND PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
APPLICANT: BLACK CREEK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
PART LOTS 29/30, CONe. 3, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FI LE NO.: DEV 95-020; 18T-95029
-
Recoin IllPlldatlolls:
-
It is respectfullv recornrnended that the Ceneral Purpose and Administration Committee
r'ecommend to Council the tollowing:
-
1.
-
-
3.
-
-
..t.
-
s.
THAT Report f)D-70-99 be received;
THAT the draft plan of subdivision application 18T-95029 filed by D. G. Biddle and
,A..ssociates Oil behalf of Black Creek Developments be recornmended for approval to
Durham Region fJlanning Depal1ment subject to the conditions contained in
Attachment No.3 of this report;
THAT the rezollillg application DEV 95-020 submitted by D. G. Biddle and
Associates on behalf of Black Creek Developments be APPROVED and that the
amending by-lay\! attached hereto be forwarded to Council for adoption;
THAT a by-law to remove the (H) Holding Symbol be forwarded to Council at such
time as the conditions of draft approval have been satisfied; and
THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council/s decision.
-
1.
1 .1
-
-
-
-
-
APPLICATION DET AI LS
Appl icant:
D. G. Siddle and Associates
Black Creek Developments Limited
From - Urban Residential Type One, Holding - Urban Residential
Type Four ((H)R4), Agricultural (A), Agricultural Exception (A-8) and
Environmental Protection (EP).
1.2
Owner:
1.3
Rezoning:
,
, f
",-' ,-,i j
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 2
...
...
1.4
Area:
To - a zone appropriate to permit the development of 115 residential
units comprising of 38 - 15 metre single fami Iy detached units, 39 -
12 metre single detached units and 38 semi-detached units. In
addition, a block for parkland (0.48 ha) has been provided as well as
an open space block (4.77 ha)
14.32 ha
...
...
...
2.
LOCATION
...
2.1 The subject lands are located in Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 3, former
Township of Darlington. The municipal address of the propertv is 3200 Courtice
Road. The lands are situated just north of Jane Avenue, Glenview Road and
\,ytestmore Street in Courtice (Attachment No. 1 I. To the west of the subject
property is a registered plan of subdivision 18T-91 006.
...
...
...
3. BACKGROUND
...
3.1 On March 28, 1995 Staff received an application (DEV 95-020) to amend the
Municipality's Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit this residential
development. On /\pril 5, 1995 the Municipality received correspondence from the
Region of Durham stating that a subdivision appl ication (18T-95029) had been
submitted for the subject lands.
...
....
...
3.2 The original application comprised 144 medium density units, 10 - 15 m single
detached units, 34 - 12 m single detached units and 28 - 9 m detached units for a ...
total of 216 units. The original application did not have any dedicated parkland and
had 3.14 ha of open space/valley lands. Numerous revisions have been made to
the plan of subdivision and the plan now reflects the recommendations of the
Environmental Impact Study, the traffic study, public input and Council Resolution
"GPA 270-99 to 289-99" dealing with "Parking in Recidential Areas". Generally,
-
-
..
'I
OJ:")
..
...
~
REPORT PD-70-Q9
PAGE 3
-
-
with Pdcll rpiteration of the plan or subdivision more open space dllc1 parklclnd was
provided and fewer residential units were proposed.
).3 Numerous I"esidents spoke out at the original public meeting held on July 10, 1995
and at <;ubsequent public meetings. iv\any of the concerns t'xpressed at these
mpetlllgs ,He detailed in Spctlon 7.2 uf this Report.
-
-
)...t
-
-
-
..t.
-
..,
..,
-
Due to tll(' C'11VI romnentai sensitivity of the lands, the site was subject to an
EnVironmental Impact Study. The study has been completed and the results have
been expressed in Staff Report PD-59-98 heard on May 4, 1998. Section 9.1 of this
repor1 brieflv summarizes some of the key elements of this EIS.
EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
Existing Uses:
Vacant
Surrounding lIses: East
'Nest -
Vacant and existing residential
Registered Plan of Subdivision 1 BTJ) 1006 and
existing residential
Woodlot and existing residential
Existing residential
North -
South -
-
5.1
5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
..,
-
-
-
-
-
The subject I,lnds are designated "Living Area" in the Durham Region Official Plan.
VVithin the C1arington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated "Urban
Residential", "Medium Density Residential" and "Environmental Protection Area".
Lands designated "Urban Residential" shall not exceed a density of 30 units per net
hectare. Lands Designated "Medium Density Residential" shall not exceed a density
of 60 units per net hectare. The density identified in the Clarington Official Plan
largely recognized the higher density allocated to the lands in the previous Town of
Newcastle Official Plan. In consideration of the environrnental sensitivity of the
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 4
"""
lands and tllP reVISions Illdcie to the pian to meet the new "reSidential parking area"
requirements, the medium demltv component of this application has been removed
frorn the plan of subdivision. The tributary and adjacent lands possess the
designation of "Environmental Protection". Development including structures, other
them flood control structures dre Ilot permitted on lands so designated.
lJevplopnlPnt located Within or ,ldjacent to a natural feature identified on Map C of
the Ufficial 1)lan must complete ,lIl 1~llVironmental Impact Study lEIS). Information ...
IIIIlII
...
IIIIlII
with respect to the EIS it; provided in Section 9.2.
...
G. ZONING BY-LAW PROVISIONS
h.l
rhe t;ubject lelllds clre lCmed "llrban Residential Type One (R 1)", "Holding - Urban
Residential Tvpe Four (1I--IIR4)", Holding - Urban Residential Type Two Exception
((Hl R2-3), ~gncultural~), r\gricultural Exception (A-8) and Environmental
Protection ([PI, Lamls lOlled '1\4' sh,1I1 be for apartments, lands zoned 'R2-3' will
onlv allow single detached (l\wllings and lands zoned '1\1' shall allow single and
senli-detached residential units. Agriculturally zoned lands shall be used for farm
and farm related purposes. The 'A-I)' zone allows a golf course in addition to
agricultural operations. The 'EP' zone allows conservation and forestation.
...
...
...
...
...
-
I .
PUBLIC MEETING
-
7.1 ,~s noted parlier in the repori, a number of residents provided comments when the
original application was submitted. The concerns expressed by the public at the
July 10, 1995 Public Meeting and at subsequent meetings, and those concerns
identified in various letters, can be summarized into a number of issues.
...
....
· Environment - Residents expressed concerns about the impact this proposed
development would have on the environment, in particular the woodlot that
now exists. They were also concerned with a loss of green space, removal of
trees, impact on groundwater and irnpact on air quality.
....
...
· Wells - The homes in the area are currently on private services (well and septic).
Residents are concerned that the proposed development will have a negative
impact 0'1 their wl'll water. If wells are impacted, residents want assurance !hat _
..
'---,I ; '-,
...
REPORT PD-70-ljlj
PAGE")
..
I)()fdbie \\dfl'I' \\ Iii he' provldecj wltll 110 flllaflClell hLHc1l'll placl'll on tIlem
-
-
. fraific - f\e~idents helve pxpressed d sreat dedi of (OllCern with the post
development traffic and the construction traffic thelt wouid 1)(' generated by this
developrnerH. iheir concerns are Itemized below:
thC' \olunw of traffic;
II! till' c.;atetv ot the children In dreas wnerc tllere (urrently exist 110
>Idewalb:
thC' ,lbilitv (It the I'xisting condition of the Iwighbollrhood roads to
Withstand elll Increase in traffic;
\\ IW wiil pay for the cost of ill1provements Il1dde to till'lr qre('t;
'Irohihit the ('xtension of lane Avenue:
,II) IlOt ,1IImv tile extcnsion of Fourtll Street;
(onstructlon traffic be restricted from travellillg 1ile roads in their
iwighbourhood:
( ourtice High School and Courtice North Puhl ic jchool dre both located
{111 Nasll RUdll. \Vhat is the impact Oil traffic \olllnwc.; on Nash Road if
tl11S development is approved;
I ('qlll'sted a traffic study be conducted.
:11 '
-
-
1\ '
\. "
-
\1
\ II
-
Villi
-
1\'
-
. Compatibility - Some residents \vpre concerned that the proposl'd development
IS 1101 in keeping with the existing nelghbourhood, Tlwv do IlOt want this
developnH'nt to impdct upon the integrity of the area. Tlll'v would like to see
the construction of homes on lots with similar lot sizes to the ones existing
tocJav. Thev dre opposed to the highcr density components of this proposal.
-
-
. School Capacity- Some r('sidents have noted that the Ilcarbv schools dre
accommodating students in pOltables dnd question whether the schools can
c.;upP011 [IWI'!' students.
-
-
. Emergency Services - A concern was raised that emergency c.;ervices are limited
dlHI that lIew development would further compromise tll(' delivery of emergency
'.,('rvices such tiS lire alld police protectioll.
-
. Property Tax - MallY were concerned that this developmellt would have an
impact on their property taxes. They do not feel that they should contribute any
further to the tax base of an increase need for educational and municipal
c.;ervices generated by this development.
-
-
. Park and Fencing - Residents have asked that a parkette be provided in the
f1eighbourhood Jnd thJt fencing be erected at the rear of all existing abutting
homes prior to Oil-site construction.
-
-
-
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 6
I/111III
(). AGENCY COMMENTS
...
(3.1 In accordance with departmental procedures, the clpplication was circulated to
obtain comments tmm other departments and agencies. The tollowlng agencies
were circulated: I\;~unicipalitv ot Clarington Public Works Departrnent; Municipality
ot Clarington Fire Department; Ontario Hydro; Peterborough Victoria
Northumberland Uarington Separate School Board, I<awartha Pine Ridge District
School 13oard; Central Lake Ontario Conservation i-\uthority; Durham Region
....
...
....
Pldnning l)epclrtment; dnd Durham Region Works Department.
...
n.2 The Municipality elt Clarington Public \-\forks Department has no objection to the
appl ication. The Works Department is satisfied with the trdffic studv and agree to ....
the recommendations dnd conclusions contained within that studv. The tollowing
clre conditions which must be satisfied:
...
· That the n.3 metre reserves be granted to the Municipality free and clear of any
enc u m brancf-s;
....
· No development wi II be permitted on Fourth Avenue unti I the road is physically
connected with Jane ,Avenue. The developer is responsible tor 100% of the
costs associated to provide the required road connections. The cost shall
include any works on existing road allowances external to this draft plan which
are necessary to accommodate the proposed development traffic.
...
...
· Prior to the authorization to commence the construction ot a phase subsequent
to phasel, the developer shall be prepared to construct George Reynolds Drive
to an urban collector standard from the east limit of this plan of subdivision to
Courtice Road. or the developer has satisfied the Director of Public Works that
he has made every reasonable etf0l1 to construct the extension of George
Reynolds Drive.
...
...
...
· That George Reynolds Drive and Street G be constructed to the cast limit of the
subdivision. Lot 45 will remain frozen until such time that George Reynolds
Drive is extended easterly beyond the limits of the plan of subdivision.
...
· The Developer is responsible for the construction of Jane Avenue to an urban
road standard from Fourth Avenue northerly to the south I imit of this plan of
subdivision in order to facilitate the servicing of Lot 25 and phase 2 and phase 3.
...
..
.,
'J ,
fIt/IfI
IIlIIIIIl
REPOR r PD-70-99
PAGE 11
-
-
iiw l()St of mad Improvements external to this plan or cubdlvision will he
illCorporated within a development charge bv-l<1w.
...
-
'i.-+ rhe subrnission <1nd approval of a neighbourhood design plan is a requirement of
the Official Plan. The Ileighbourhood design plan has been approved bv the
Din'ctor of Pbnnlng and the Director of f)ublic Works. Staff Repor1 PD-69-99
-
provides information regarding the approved neighbourhood design plan.
-
lU.
STAFF COMMENTS
10.1 The application conforms to both the Durham Region Official Plan and the
- C!,lrIngton Official f)lan. The pmposal is \vell within the densities permitted and it
pmvicles a suitable mix of housing types.
-
1 ()..2
Revisions to the Proposal
rhls application has been revised signiricantlv since it was origin<1lly submitted. The
applicant has reduced the total number of units by! 01. There are no longer any
11wdium densitv units. This plan proposes a 0.48 hectare park and the open space
component has increJsed to 4.77 hectares. The revisions have reflected the
(onclusions or the Environmental Impact Study, the Traffic Study, comments from
the f)ublic, and Council's resolution with respect to parking in residential areas.
-
-
-
-
-
1 D,) Response to the Public's Concerns
\'\fith respect to the Public's concerns regarding this proposal Staff have the
followi ng comments.
-
...
. Environment - The residents concerns regarding the environmental impact have
been addressed through the environmental impact study. The results of this
study have been briefly summarized in Section 9.2 of this report.
-
. Wells - The Regional Well Interference Policy ensures that where a residents
well has been adversely impacted upon by a residential development, the
resident will either have their well problems corrected or be connected to
rnunicipal water supply. However, the Region does not cover the cost of
-
-
,
J , I
-
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 12
-
hringing the wdter conllectlon from the rodd to edch individual home. Mr.
f-jalminen has stated that if wells dre impacted, he will cover this cost. This is in
dccordance with municipal policy dnd would be incorporated into the
~ubdivision dgreement. Hence the homeowner does not face any financial
burden for providing himself or herself with potable water.
..
...
· Traffic - .-'\ traffic qudv has been conducted. The results of this study are
hilighted in S('ction 9..3 of this report. Prohibiting the extension of Jane Avenue
,1Ild Fourth "treet would not be in conformitv with the Official Plan which
promotes grid street pdtterns and discourages the establ ishment of cul-de-sacs.
...
..
· Compatibility - Residents want to see large lots sinlilar to their own within the
proposed development. Tlw existing lots located dlong Jane r\venue, Westmore
Street, Fourth Street and Glenview Road are serviced by private services hence
requiring a larger lot size. fhe proposed development will be serviced by
municipal water (lIld ~ewer services and as ~uch, larger lots are not a
requirement. The applicant has proposed to locate 50 foot single dwelling lots
adjacent to the eXisting lots rather than build homes on smaller lots. These lots
will be c,ubject to d special lone exception whereby onlv single detached
clwellillgs will be permitted. In dddition, the applicdnt hds removed the medium
density (Onlponent enti relv from this plan.
..
..
..
..
· School Capacity - The School Boards do not have dllV objections to the
approval of this plan of subdivision.
..
· Emergency Services - The Clarington Fire Department has stated that they have
no objection to this application. The fire station is located close to this site and
24 hour fire service is being implemented
..
· Property Tax - Taxes are based upon the need of the Municipality as a whole.
Taxes are not bas(:,d on proximity, and the development of one subdivision will
not have a direct irnpact on the property taxes of adjacent landholders.
-
..
· Park and Fencing - The Municipality does not require fencing to be erected
between residential uses. The Planning Department does not believe that
separation or privacy in the form of fencing is needed between land uses that are
the same. This does not apply between residential uses parks and open space
blocks. In this case, the protection of the environmental features and the
encroachment warrant fencing.
..
-
10.4 Zoning
Staff are recommending that the by-law contained within Attachment No.4 to this
report be clpproved. In light of residents concerns, Staff have proposed a sppcific
..
lllIIi
) / ')
..
..
REPOR r PD-i'O-99
P AG E i'
,<II _
,.-
· No development will be permitted ulltll such time as the adjacent drat! plan of
,-ubdivision 18T-91006 has been constructed in a manner which provides a road
connection to Trulls Road via Ceorge R.eynolds Drive.
.,.-
. The development cannot proceed until the Municipalitv has approved the
P\penditure of funds for the provision of road construction and installation of
"iclewalks on Jane Avenue, Fourth Avenue or Westmore Street, as well as any
other e\ternal works or services which have been included in the Municipality's
Development Charge Bv-Iaw and have been deemed necessarv bv the Director
of Publ ic \Norks to service this development.
.-
.-
...-
. .~II stornlwclter management works are to be constructed to the satisfaction of the
Conservation Authority and the Director of Public Works.
.-
. I~ Stormwater Management Implementation Report shall be provided by the
(1ppl icant for the sequential construction of the stormwater management works
11ecessary for the entire watershed and the report shall address the Impacts of
developing this plan of subdivision in the absence of the balance of the
watershed. Development of this plan of subdivision will not be permitted until
till oversized downstream WCHks I1Pcessarv to accommodate drainage from the
,-ui*'ct draft plan have been constructed in a manner satisfactory to the Director
of Publ ic Works.
... -
--
...-
. ,~Master Crading and Drainage plan be prepared detailing the configuration of
the on-site storm sewer system and the conveyance of the overland flow from
this subdivision.
. ...
. ,~walkwav shall be constructed on Block 99 to provide a pedestrian connection
betv'/een Block 98 and the adjoining subdivision to the south.
..-
""-
. That Block 1 00 (park area) and Block 99 be dedicated free and clear of any
encumbrances to the Municipalitv.
..~
8.3 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority has no objection to the
application. They have stated that the application conforms to the provisions of the
Environmental Impact Study and development of the subdivision must follow the
recommendations of the EIS and fulfi I the requirements of mitigation. Permits will
be required and the design of the extension of Ceorge Reynolds Drive will be
subject to CLOCA approval. The detailed design of the storm water system shall he
completed to the satisfaction of the Authority.
.-
....
.-
...-
.-
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 8
B.4
B.S
8.6
-..
The Durham Region Planning Depar1ment stated that the application conforms to
the EIS dnd to all relevant policies contained within the Durham Region Official
Plan.
-.
-.
The Durham Region Works Department requested that a number of conditions be
included within the subdivision agreement. The conditions include among other
things, the financial obligation of the applicant, completion of sanitary sewer and
water services design to the satisfaction of the Works Department, and the
acquisition and future dedication of all required easements for servicing. These
conditions will be incorporated in the Region's conditions of subdivision approval.
-..
-.
-.
-.
The School Boards have no objection to the application, however they request that
sidewalks be provided and that the walkways be completed within the first phase of
the subdivision.
-.
-.
9.
9.1
BACKGROUND STUDIES
In conjunction with this application, two background studies were conducted. The
first study being the environmental impact study as required by the Official Plan.
The second study is a traffic study. A neighbourhood design plan has also been
completed in accordance with the Clarington Official Plan.
-.
-.
-.
9.2
Environmental Impact Study
A four season environmental impact study was conducted for the lands. The study
determined that the lands are subject to a high water table and that 7 rare vegetative
species were found. Provisions have been incorporated in the draft conditions of
approval to ensure the preservation of the rare vegetative species. Extensive
hydrogeological work was done and the results of that study determi ned that the site
is a drainage basin in itself and well interference will not occur. The study also
concluded that the site does not contribute groundwater directly to Black Creek.
-..
-.
-..
-.
-.
..J ,
-...
-.
!~EPORT PD-70-Y9
PAGE 9
--
..
The ~(c'v recomnWflClatic)I1 or this ~tudv was that development mav proceed provided
that lands below the elevation or13-l metres remain undeveloped. The report also
recomrnended that onlv tile developable portion or the Plan or Subdivision wi II be
subject to the removal of trees. More information regarding the process and
tindirw;s or the environmental impdct study is available III Report PIJ-59-98.
f1w EIS made a Ilumber <if recommendations With respect to methods of mitigation
to protect the Ildtural feJtures trom the proposed development. Included within
--
-
-
-
thes(c' mitigation rnetl10ds IS the staking dnd relocation or the 7 rare plant species, an
('nvl ronmental cOllStructioll management plan, and a planting plan for the edge of
the stormwater pond. The report also recommended the use of trench plugs, the
-
establishrm"nt Of d third pipe dnd foundation weepers, the use of root leaders and
multiple dowllSpouts to ellSure the preservation of ground and surface water tIO\'\I.
The movement ot water under the extension of Ceorge Reynolds Drive shall be
-
-
tclcllitated through the use of '-mall horizontal culverts. :\Iso a homeowner
education program will be established to educate landowners about the unique
sensitives associated With the IJnds. The program will include policies regarding
the disposal of gardpn rpfuse and swimming pool water.
-
-
-
C)..3 Traffic Study
The applicant conducted a traffic study. The traffic study examined .3 scenarios with
I'espect to the Impact of future traffic numbers and volumes when the proposed
development is bui It to it's full extent.
-
-
Scenario 1 - Ceorge Reynolds Drive is built onlv to Jane Avenue, Jane Avenue
extends from Ceorge Reynolds to Westmore Street and the existing access from
\Vestmore Street to Courtice Road remains open.
-
-
Scenario 2 - Jane Avenue extends from George Reynolds Drive to vVestmore Street,
the Westmore Street access to Courtice Road remains open, and George Reynolds
-
-
'" ,
)
-
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 10
."
Urivl' 1<': oppn from Trulls Road to CourtlCl' Road.
..,
Scenario 3 - lane ,Avenue is open from Ceorge Reynolds Drive to Westmore Street,
Ceorge Reynolds Drive is built from Trulls Road to Courtice Road and the access
from Westmore Street to Courtice Road is eliminated.
..,
willi
The consultant has determined that Scenario 2. results in better compliance with the
transportation polic:ios of the C1arington Official Plan and results in lower traffic
volunws along Fourth Avenue. In addition, Scenario 2 results in better connections ..
...
between the local road network and the boundary roads and provides for a grid
qreet <;vstem.
..
The cOrlSultants found that Scenario 1 would be acceptable asan interim condition.
..
The traffic studv mad(' the following conclusions and recommendations
lIIIIl
· The <ldditional traffic will not have any operational impact on the existing local
IOdd intorsoctions and IlO road improvements will be required at the Trulls
Road/Nash Road or Trulls Road/Ceorge Reynolds Drive intersections.
lIIIIl
· Reconstruction of Fourth Avenue from Nash Road to Westmore Street and the
reconstruction of the Fourth :\venue and \Vestmore Street intersection is
required.
lIIIIl
lIIIIl
· Reconstruction of Jane Avenue from the Fourth Avenue extension in the
northern limit of the existing Iwighbourhood and reconstruction of the Jane
Avonue and Fourth Avenue intersection will be required.
lIIIIl
· Sidewalks are to be constructed on Jane Avenue from George Reynolds Drive to
the intersection of the Fourth Avenue extension, on Fourth Avenue, from Fourth
Avenue (at Jane) to the Nash Road intersection and on George Reynolds Drive,
from the western extent of the proposed development to Courtice Road.
lIIIIl
...
· All heavy construction vehicles shall not utilize any portion of Westmore Street
or the southern portion of Jane Avenue from Fourth Avenue to Westmore Street
during construction of the proposed subdivision.
..
IIlII
J ; U
...
..
/\ r fACHMEN r 1
...
...
_ SUBJECT SITE
-
LOT 30
LOT 29
LOT 28
...
-
0
0 <{
<{ 0
.. 0 0::
0::
W
(f) U
- --l I-
--l
. ::) 0::
0:: ::) I"')
.. I- 0
U Z
0
-
- GEORGE (f)
------~~- (f)
REYN OLDS--O R. w
... U
Z
0
- U
- :
-
...
-
WESTMORE STREET
-
-- - ----
NASH ROAD
...
COURTICE
KEY MAP
DEV. 95-020
1 aT -95029
/
I)
-
-
-
"
, . .i,.< I
!:r:: I '
I_..:a:: I
'g, i
:: ~.o(
-~
3-
~ _ il! ~ ~
~'" S
~ '" ~
~ 15 . ~
'!~ /I~~ ~
~~ ~ o~ ;
~u _ ~_ .
;:\Ij ~t;~~ ~~
~ o~~c ~~
~~h ~~
.... -,
---+ ~-------~ -t-
~ ~ I . ~~ i
~5
~~
i3..
~ i ~
'" ;;~
, 1~ a
~ ~ ~~ ~.
:;i ~i n
~ ~
<I ~ ~
-~
"
;;; .
I
: 8 cog o~
.___l__
~~~ ..
<I
~ ~ 8; i
~~,,!~~w~
i 5d ~~ ~ ~o
Q
Z
<,
L-
00
t [17'. 0
i L.!Jli .
--J1--L .. ---X-
~':;MT:J:; ::;-~N'. Y I';
., 'Zret....,. ,-
,. ~,\.-". -----l
I I
ill I i n _
~ ! L_{J
li
of -_.~
J..,.....1~
.[!]
g'
~i
i i
[:J
1;
f ..
" ~ ,~~
"2.,
~ I
:<
:~
I ~~ ~
~;~
If
-t-,..
N
'--.,..
,~-
('
.....
,:/ j), 1'8 '
'i )1)
'I:,
"'<:J -J
I...........
------"--..
All ACHMl:::.N I #L
'I ~I (~
_ 1:,:
: B '~g"
. ~ ~ .
! ~ J ~ I
la
,1 5 ~ ~.
:.~.:!:I ~ ~~ ~; t
;~~"~ t-(j)u oc(u- :ICJ
il, 'j" LL N ~:5 .J 0 ! 1 '
!' ~o~~~u~ ill
, !~~~~~~~~I~
I r~ I <nt-~~~ ~!:
, I ~ z r- N~Z _ ~ -I
t::i~i; O<X)~1- -.J:2 ~I;
~'''''1'' --Oz <_..1.'
~; ~I Ul ~ - ~ ~ -
00 > a ~ ~! ~
: i a::: U U DI..
~'~:l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
_il
. ;(;,.../3.1 ~ _': i ~i41:".( I
z ~: z '.
I ~ I
! '0 I
"'
i
\ , ..
'" -4-
I
]fW.JI:,. :iN"!
i'i
~
~
!Ii e t,.:
_ .J~; 1= ,- i I
~ li\i~!:. f!
~ Ii -, ~ 'I
~! ~;I~~ ~~: '~I
~ I,jgj,~,: '
~ ~"ol! .'
~ ~;cif~'C~
. .
Vi: ON ,.]'-0:1
':'3!i GroCi 3)/J.~/iv)
In.
cD
:. 3.
~!~ Ol; 6
i I'
ii' J'
! I! ~ i ~
...
till
till
..
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
"
"
~
"
..
..
..
~3
j~ \
\.
...
'jl;
.. "j 'I I
,I z
...
till
..
...
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 13
-
--
lone regulation permitting onlv single detached dwellings dnd horTle occupations
on the lots located on the extension of Fourth Avenue and on the south portion of
the Jane r\venue extension. In addition, it incorporates the recommendation
regarding parking in residential areas adopted by Council on May 1 0, 1999.
-
-
1 1. CONCLUSION
-
11,1 Staff recommend to Durham Region, that the dpplication for draft plan of
subdivision (18T-95029) be approved subject to the conditions of draft plan
approval as contained in Attachment No.3 to this report. Staff also recommend that
rezoning application (DEV 95-020) be approved and the accompanying by-law be
passed.
-
..
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
..
...,(.- '-
..
/pL,
David J Come, M.CI.P., R.P.P.
Director f Plzlflning & Development
, .
L\...._
Franklin VVu, M.CI.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
-
HB*DjC*cc
June 17, 1999
-
..
Attachment No.1
,A-ttachment No.2
Attachment No.3
Attachment No.4
Key Map
Proposed Plan of Subdivision
Draft Conditions of Approval
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Forwarded Separately)
..
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
..
Liza Developments
30 Wertheim Court
RICHMOND HILL, Ontario
L4B 1 B9
Pam Callus
3452 Courtice Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1E 2L6
..
..
Carlo Aloe
48 Westmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7
Black Creek Developments Limited
1748 Baseline Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2Tl
..
..
U /
..
REPORT PD-70-99
PAGE 14
.,
RelY Sheppard
32 Jane Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L H 2H9
D.G. Biddle and Associates
C)6 King Street East
OSHAWA, Ontario
L 1 H 1 B6
Jose Goncalo Ferreira
Donna Frances Ferreira
6041 Middle Road
R.R.#l
130WMANVI LLE, Ontario
Ll C 3K2
Robert D. McKenna
18 Fourth Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L H 2H7
Stanley Simmons
3260 Courtice Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2L7
Mr. & Mrs. Cebelhoff
29 \~estmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H8
Helen and John Jozkowski
11 Lynwood Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L H 2H8
Marg Ellis
8 Lynwood ;\venup
COURTICE, Ontario
LH 2H8
Matthew and Jessie Scott
1 7 Jane Street
C:OURTICE, Ontario
L H 2H9
Dave Unwin
47 Westmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7
Ivan Perun
R.R.#l
HAMPTON, Ontario
LOB 1 JO
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Marsh
51 VVestmore Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7
Kerri and Mike Novak
7 Jane Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L1E2H7
Ronald and 01 ive Munro
24 Lynwood Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9
Elwin White
10 Fourth Street
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H7
George and Lesley Maguire
11 Jane Avenue
COURTICE, Ontario
L H 2H9
Dineen Leger
12 Glenview Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L 1 E 2H9
'~
~ lj
...
."
."
..
..
lIlIlI
lIlIlI
...
..
...
lIIIIi
..
..
-
..
-
",
....
...
-
-
-
-
-
....
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A fTACHMt:N r #3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
PLAN IDENTIFICATION
I.
That this elpprovell elpplies to draft Plelll of Subdivision 18T-CJ5020 prepared by D. G.
Biddle elnd ;\ssociates dated (revised) lelnUcHY 1999, showing Lots 1 ~ 29, 39 - 45,
52 - ')3 \\ith 1 ') m lot frc)Iltage>s, Lots 3D - JB, 46 - 51, 54, 66 - 1.37, 92 with 12 m
lot frontelges ellld Lots ')5 - 65, 138 - 91, (J3 - 96 for semi-detached or linked
dwpllings, 1310ck 100 for el 0.48 ha pelrk, Block 99 for 4.77 ha of Opell Space, Block
101,102 ellldl0J to be> retained by the applicant, and various blocks for reserve,
road widenillg, site triangle dlld walkways.
FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
That elll stl-eets within the IJleln of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway
and shown dS such on the fillal plan.
)
,).
That all streets shall be named to the sdtisfaction of the Municipality of (]drington
and shown on the final plan.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
4.
That the Owner shall retain el qUdlified landscape architect to prepare dnd submit a
Landscaping IJlan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and
Development for rpvlew and approval. The Landsca.ping Plan shall reflect the design
criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time.
S. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare dnd submit a Master
Drainage and Lot Crading Plan to the Director of Public \Vorks for rpview dnd
dpproval. ;\11 plans dlld drawings mllst conform to the Municipality's Design Criteria
as dnwnded fmm tlnw to tinw.
...
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
..
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
...
h, That thp (h\IlC'I' c;lldlllPtalll a quallTipd COll"ultallt to prepare a gpneral plan showing
iJuTTPlc; <llld tlr'(' 1('ll10Vd! alea" to till' !)irector oT Planning dlld Developllwllt Tor
..
reVI('\\ <lllel dpprm,li. fh(' plall c;l1,lilldr'lltltv thoc;p dl"('aS to iJe pr('"el'ved ,tIld T('need
...
to prevent Illtnl"IOll (ll l1<'dV\' !11,1(llil1<'I'\'. TI"('(''- ,-hall (lIllv 1)(' 1"('l1lov('d withm the
.11'1'.1 dlrectlv qdll('ct to till' f('"idplltldl c;uhdivic;iclIl.
...
,-\11 dpparpnt POPUldtillll'- ot the '-eVPll '-pecicH; of region;lllv c;iglliTIGtIlt plants shall be
l1lal'kl'd ,-tak(,tI, dllel Indppc'd dUllng tht' Qllllll1<'I, -\11 oT tl1<' perennial plants
d('('llll'd to 1)(' r,llp dlHi Ir)Cdtecl \\'Ithlll (Ill alea of proposed vpgetation clearing
,-hould hi' du\..', ',Ill ,,1)(1 l,ll('tuil\ tr,lIl-,pldllted illtO qlltdl)le 1111(Tohahitat locations
..
...
wlthlll the dl('d 01 IOf(H;t I ('(pllti(lIl. rill' '-Oil qllrounding till' I'(lre annual plants
....
locatc'd Wlthlll <111 dlpd 01 pmplN'd vpgptatlon clc'a,ing, can he 11l0ved to suitable
I11lcmh;lhitat IOCdlioll'- within till' drp,1 oT fore<;t I"('tpntion, ,-\Iso, till' seed capsules ..
Trol11 thpse "pecip" ,-hould Ill' collpctpd, opelwd and the seeds GIn be randomly
c;pr('dd near till' ,,10n11Wdtpl' pond dnd in the fOI"(,,;t rptention area,
<III
H,
That d planting plan be dpveloppd for tll(' pdges of the "tormwater management
pond ,lIlcl for tll(' w('(land I'C'11111dlll ddl,KPnt to Cc'orge Rc'vnolds Drive incorporating
..
the tr,lnspldnting dlld ,,('('ding of thp "ignifictllt pl,lIlt species identified in Section
...
5,2 oT the ErwirClIlllWlltallmpact "tudv,
-
I), Thdt dn Envirol1llwntal Constructic)Il Management Plan be prepared taking into
dccoLlnt dll l'pcol1ll11('ncJatiollS of the ElwironnwntJI Il1lpact Study preparE'c1 by
Cartrwr LeE' ,1I1d ,-\s<;ocit1tes (1 qq[)),
-
-
10,
Th,lt tlw ()\'Iwr shall dl'dicate' nlocks q() ,1Ild 1()0 to the' Municipality free ane! cl'lr
of ,111 I'IH ,mhl'dll((>c; 10 ,ldl'l I" "IH)"PS, I-;Iock 100 shall be Llsed Tor park purr' Jses,
""
wi
..
Ie'"
)
) ..
_r'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
~IREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
....,..
w,-
11. No development will be permitted ulltil such time as the adjacent draft plan of
'-lI\)(iivisicm 1 err-C) 1 006 to the west has been constructed ill a manner which
...
prmid(.s .I mad COllllecti(!I1 to T rulls ROdd Viti Ceorge Revnolds Drive. The
'-lIlubllitv ()f .Ill\' road connection will he subject to the approval or the Director of
hlhl ic Worb.
_to
I"':.
Till' dppllClllt must provide the Publ ic Works Department with a Storm water
.\1dllag(~nlPnt Implemf'ntation R.eport, which provides for the sequential construction
-
-
of tll(' qormwater management works necessary for the entire watershed and
,lddrpsses the Impacts of devploping this plan of subdivision in the absence of the
haldllCC' of the weltershed.
-
-
u.
rhp dpplic(lIlt will he required to submit a fJreliminary Grading and Drainage Plan
for thl' aredS ddjacent to Jane Avenue and Fourth Avenue. .AII drtllnage in these
areas must be self-contained. This requirC'd Plan must be approved prior to
approval of this drJft plan.
-
..
-
14. The applicant's engineer will be required to prepare a Master Crading and Drainage
Plan that detJils thp configurdtion of the on-site storm sewer system (minor system)
and tile' COIlVevance of th(~ overland flow (major svstem) from this subdivision.
..
-
15. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality and
agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision
,1greement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that folloyv.
-
-
-
-
....,.
-+-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
~IQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
---
....
I h, That all easements, road wldellings, dllCll'eserves as required by the I\'unicipality be
gl'anted to till' I\hlllicipalitv free and clear or all C'llCumbrances.
---
I -, The 0.3 metre I'eserves indicated on the drart plan as Blocks 104, 105 ,1lld 106 be
....
granted to the !,"'unicipalltv free and clear of dll\' encumbrallCes (lIld in (\ form
.....
~dtisfactory to the ""unicipdlitvs Solicitor.
...
Ill. rile developer 1'- reqlllred to conllect this ,-ubdiVl':;ion plan to the (~xisting road
lH'twork bv constructing f:ourth /\VellUe, f!'Om and Including the intersection of
Fourth ;\VC'11IW alld \V('stmore Street Ilorth-easterlv, Within this plan of subdivision,
to and including the intersection of Fourth /\\'('IllIP dnd Jane Avenue.
..
..
1 CJ.
Land acquisition will be requirpd to facilitate the construction of Fourth Avenue at
lane .-\vI'nue. file clpvploper is responsible forI 00% of the costs associated to
...
p!'Ovide !'Oad cOllllections between the subject draft plan and adjacent road network ..
to the south dnd west. rhe cost shall include an", works on existing road allowances
(''\ternal to this draft plan, which are necessary to accommodate the proposed
development traffic, including sufficient !'Oad width and an appropriate transition
taper to the existing pavement surface, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
..
...
Works.
..
.20. No clevelopment of any kind will be permitted on Fourth Avenue until such time as
the road is physically connected with Jane Avenue to the satisfaction of the Director
of IJubl ic \\/orks,
-
..
..
..
.J
...
-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
~EQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED ~RIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
-
-2 I , I'hat tlH' developer makes eW'IY (,ffort to <';l'cure the dpprnpriate Idllcls alld C(mqructs
-
(;eOI-gf' I<PVI10lds Drive to <111 lIrb,lIl collpctor qalldard from tlw east limit of this
pl,lll (IT >llhdl\i<';IOll I'asterh TIJ (OUltlC<' Road, ReQIOlldl Road ).t, IJrior to the
-
autl1Orllatloll to (Ol1ll11ellU' tlw C()flslructioll Of a phase' ~ubsequent to phase I, the
-
dc'velnpl'r ~ilould he prepcHc'd to COllstnlCt Ceorge ke\ll0lds DrlVl' e\tensioll, from
-
this plall Of subdivlsioll ('asterlv to Courtlce Road, Regional koad 34, or that the
IJirl'ctor of Puhlic \Yorks IS satisfied that the developer has made every reasonable
dfmt to (()Il<.;trllct the e\tellslOll of Cemgp !<pvllolds [)rI\P,
-
) )
lhdt tl)(' i!('\plop('I' I~ n'<,;pclIl<';lhlp tell' tlw COllslrllctloll 01 IdIW-\VPlllll' to all urban
-
IOdd ~tdllclanl. from founh ,-\Vl'IlLl(' 11Orthel'ly to the -.,outh Ill1lit of this plan of
subdivlSioll, 111 order to lacilitate the illternal servicing ,111d cOllnection 01 same
-
hc't\Vf'C'll phdse .z ,1Ild phdse) of this plall of suhdivision alld the servIcing of Lot 25.
-
) .l
~ ).
Ceorge Revllolds Drive' ,md StrH't B must hp cOllstructed to the east limit of the
suhdivlsion dnd Lot 45 will rel11(lln frozen ulltil '-uch time that Ceorge Revnolds
Drive IS C'\tpllded pasterlv, hevlllld the limits of this draft pldll and is constructed to
-
a fllli<.;lwd Urhc1l1 lOadwav Illcludlng Rl'giollal <.;Prvlc(''-, asphalt paving, curb and
-
gutter, sodded houlev(Hd, <.;idewalk, street trees and street lighting, for the elltire
frontage Width abutting the "frozen" lot.
-
..24.
That the north side of Ceorge Reynolds Drive he fully serviced with water, sanitary
sewer, storm sevver, hydro telephone and cable television for (lIlY developable lands
Oil tuture lots which Illay front onto the Ilorth side of Ceorge Reynolds Drive.
-
-
-
-
..
....
1,-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
..
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT KONT'O)
..
)-
- ).
1'l1dt the (OllStructloll dm! ~ervl(im; 01 thiS pldn or subdlVisiOll conrorm to the
phdslnc; pldn '-ul)ll1itted, dpprov('cl dl)(1 Oil rlit' With the l)irC'ctor or I)ublic \Vorks.
..
..:'fl. This dev(>lopllwnt (d11110t proceed ulllil ~U(ll time ds the MUlllclpalitv h;lS approved
the c>\pelldlture nf funds for the pmvi~lnll (It mad construction dlld installation ot
sidewalks 011 lalw ,-\vellLl(~, IOUI1h ,-\V(>nLll' and \Vestmore "treet, as well as any
other e\tenldl works or ~ervices which helVe been included in the Municipality's
...
-
-
[)(-'\c>!OpllH'llt ( 11dlg(> 13v-ldW and have I)('ell deenwd Iwces~clrv IN the Director or
!Jubll( \ \'oll,- t() ~el\IC(> this developll1C'lll.
-
,-
Ilw developer IS 1'('qUII'(,d to construct tlw '-tOnllwater m,lIIdgelllC'llt works required
-
tor this development and ~pC'C1ticallv, the works proposC'd III the Storm water
Drai Il,lg(' I\e'port pre'p,lred for 13i rchd,lIe Vi II,lgc' dated NovC'mber 1998 and prepared _
11V I), (;. [3IddlC' dlld.\,-qJ(iclt(>~ dlld tlw 131,lCk ('n'ek Tributarv Mdster Dr,linage 1)lan,
dated i\\,W 1 ()9] clnd pI'ep,II'('(1 bv C. M. 'lC'nldS ,Hld :\ssoclatC's. rhis work shall be ..
constructed to the '-cltlStdcticlIl ()I tll(' (Ollq'rv,!tIOll ,-\uthoritv cllld the Di rector of
I)ubl ic Works.
-
..:' ().
Developnwllt of thiS plall ot ',ubdivi~IOll \\III not he pernllttc'd until all storm water
-
()vprsi/pd dowllstreclll1 works I1('C(>SSdrv to accommodate drainage from the subject
drdtt pl,Hl have I)('('n cOl1structed ill cl malllwr scltistactorv to til(' Director ot Public
..
Works.
-
..:' ().
1310ck <)7 must align With the location ot tlw P\lstlng walkwclv in tlw subdivision to
..
the' wpst ( ] (j 1-9] OO()).
III
.,
WIll
....
-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
-
'\0.
-
-
-
31.
-
-
3:2 .
-
-
33.
-
-
...
-
-
-
35.
-
-
-
The developer is Il'spomible to construct a walkvvav on Block 9(3 and F310ck 99 to
PIOVlc!P a pedestriall connection between adjoining subdivisions to the south. The
details of this w{llkwa\ "hall ill' deternlllH'd at tile' detailed engillC'ering stage of this
plan of '-ubdivision.
The IOGltion and design details for all construction accesses to the proposed
development must be approvpd bv the Di rector of Publ ic Works.
The applicant must ('nter IIHo a development agreement with the Municipality,
which includes {111 IPquiremellts or the Public Works Departmellt regarding the
(lllgilleering alld COllstructlon of all illtemal works, and services I'elated to this plan
of subdivision.
,-\ "Staging 1)lan" shall be Included within the subdivision agreement. Any other
necessary provisions that will control the sequential development of this subdivision
and other adjacent ullCleveloped lands, shall also be included within the subdivision
{lgreement to the satisfaction of tIlE-' Director of Public \Vorks.
34.
;-\11 works allt.! services must be designed and comtructed In accordance with the
Municipality of C1arillgton Design Criteria and Standard Drawings, provisions of the
Municipality Development 13y-law # 92-015 and all applicable legislation and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
That during construction, all heavy construction vehicles shall not use any portion
of \Vestrnore Street or the southem portion of Jane !\venue from Fourth Avenue to
'vVestmore Street.
....
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
...
...
!'6. That Blocks ()7 ami ql3 ror walkwdvs he cOll5tructed in f)hase One dncl transrerred to
the MUlllcipalitv ll-ee dlld cl('ar or ,111 encumbr<.lIlcC's to the ..;atisraction or the
Di rector ot Puhllc \ VOll..;,
...
...
!'7. Thdt the Uwnel' ,-helll lullll the' IHIUII'('Ill('Ilt..; of the Elwironmpntal Impact Study as
prepared bv Cartnel' Lee dnd ,A,-..;ociates (February 1 (98) with respect to
hydrogeology including the' use or roor leaders directed toward the downhill edge of
huildings dlldllot directed to the '-torlll ~eWf'r ..;\stem.\\ultiple downspouts should
he used to spread the rlow over ,1S Wide dn arpa dS possible'. in addition, one metre
long tlellCh plugs Incat('d ('vel'V 1 () mf'tr('s shall he placed along all buriC'd services,
Includim~ servin's IUlllllng trom the IIHlividudl homes where those ..;ervicc's exceed ...
..
...
...
1() metres ill I('ngth. -\11 tl'('llCh plug,- ::-halllH' constructed within the right-or-way.
.-\ hvdrogeologist shalll'eview eme! he '-atisfied with the propospe! design.
...
)8.
That the Owner shall rulril tlw IHluireflwnts or the Environnwntal Impact Study as
prE'pared bv (;aI1ner lee dlHI :\ssuclates iFebruclry19(8) with respect to the
establishrnent or roundation \Vf'epers clnd a third pipe system shall be utilizpd to
dirC'ct groundwater dOWll"trealll. Weeper drdins (lIld third pipes shall not be
dischelrged to storm "l'wprs.
...
..
...
39. In order to ellSure the mov('ment or w<.1t('r through the wetland crossed by the
extellSion or Ceorge R.eynolds Drive. small horizontal culverts located at ground
level in cornbination with a Idrge culvert designed to accommodate storm events,
shall be illStallecl to the satisraction or till' Conservation Authority clnd the
Municip<.llitv. III clddition, tlw lIS(~ or compacted ndtive material and the lhe of
p(.rmeable bedding mcltelials under (\IHI along the lenl" of the extellSion of c.eorge ..
..
-
..
Reynolds Driv(' is leqllll'('d.
.
..
....
-
~ ( !-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
-
-to.
-
-
-
-
-
41,
-
-
4)
-
-
43.
-
44.
..
..
-
-
45.
-
-
fhat gUldel i nes be prepared to establ ish a homeowner education program to
C'ncourage stewardship of the open SpdCl~ I,wds and to educate landowners about
the ulliquC' '-C'll<.;itlvlties a<.;<.;(xiated with tile open <.;pace l,lIlds. IrlCluded ill the
guidellllCs ~h(lll be poliCies I<'garding disposal of garden refuse, allCl disposal of
~Wllllllllllg pool \\ater. ill dddition, n'sidents should be made conscious of the
impact users have on thp valleylands. The guidelines shall fw provided to all
honwowrwrs in thei r purchase and salp dgreement.
That tlw Owner shall pav to the Municipality, the development chC:Jrge III
,lccordance to the [)eveloplllent Charge f3v-law as ampnded from tinw to timc, as
wC'11 ,1S pdvI1H"nt of a portion of tront end charges pursuant to the Developrnent
ChargC' /\ct il all\' are required to be paid bv the owncr.
That the Owner shdll provide and illstall sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning
circles etc. as per thc Municipality's standards and criteria.
That the O\Vlwr shall cause all utilities, Including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc.
to be huripd underground.
That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, ,lt the time of execution of the
subdivision agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable to
the Municipality's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance
Cuarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposits as may be
required hv the Municipality.
That the ()wner shall adhere to drchitectural control requirements of the
Munlcipalitv.
..
I ()-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
-t7'. That prior to the ISSUclnG:' of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must
be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the OntJrio Building Code and, that all
wcltelTl1dllb clivi iwdrdl1h drl' fllliv q'l"viccd dnd the ()wlwr ,\grt'('s that during
COl1structlon. lire dCCPSS routc:s be m,lintaincd ,lCcording to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the
()nt,H1O hn' ( odp, "tol"clge or combustiblc' waste be l1lalntailwd ,IS. per Subspction
2.-t, 1.1 dl1d OPC'I1 bUllllng dS per Subsection 2.b.3A of the Ontell'io Fin' Code.
-th.
-tri.
-t ().
...
..
Th,lt prior to the I"SLlclncc' of bUlldil1g permits, the Ownel" c,hall, through its acoustic
c'ngineer, to fll'O\ide d certificatiol1 to tlw Director of Planning, certifving that the
Buildel"", planc, clrc 1:1 clccordance with the NOlsc' Control Report as approved by the
Ministrv of the EIWIIOllnlel1t ,1Ild the f\lunicipalitv of U,uington, if I"equired.
..
...
..
...
'WI
...
The Ownel' ,1grees that where tile well or priv,lte water sLlpplv of any person IS
intelfered With as a rcsult of construction or the developrnent of the subdivision, the
Ownel" shall at his expense, c'ither connect the affected partv to municipal water
c,upplv wsU'm or prOVide a 11ew well or private Welter c,vstel11 so that water supplied
to the affected partv shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the quality and
quantity of water c'njovec! bv the affected pal1y prior to the interference.
...
..
..
..
Thdt the Owncr satisfy the i\lunicipality of Clclrington Public \VOI-kS Department,
finclncially (lIlel/or otlwrwisl'.
-
...
-
..
""
..
..
I I
...
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQ.~LIRE''1!NTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
....
-
- I
)
-
- )
, -,
....
Thdt tlw 11Lllidc'l IllC!udl' ,I diSCIO",Url' III .111 puq)O",e cllld <;.11(, d,gIC'C'rn(:nts ddvising
IWllll' IHI\I'I~ ot IlllllWipell pdlklllg t'l>guldtlonS.
Th,lt till' ()\\Ilel' ('ll'-lII(' thdt Oll-strcet parking spaces dIe dpproprldtelv located in the
VICllllt\ of dwplling UllltS elml dre not adverselv dffected by road geometries.
-
- 1
) ).
Th.1t ,1I1 '-lllgle dptdchec! ellld serni-detaclw(Ulinkecl dwpllin,g Ulllts be constructed
-
with two '. -.:' outdoor parking spaces.
..
") -+.
Tll,d till' (h\ Iler ('I'('ct 1.-': rndre high chain lillk fellce along the ",ide and rear yards
ot .111 Il'sldentldl lots within this plall of subdivision abutting Block 9CJ and l310ck
..
1 00.
-
) :J.
The OWIWI ,H;rees to ('stablish a geodetic b(~nchmark in the vicinitv of Trulls Road
(<. ,
dllll Cl'orge RevllOlds Drive which will serve as vertical control for the Clenview
-
NC'ighbou dlOOd.
The Owner wi II be responsible for 1 ()()% of the cost of
estdblishing this bC'IlChrnark.
-
...
Sh. fhat tilE' dpplicdnt providE' the IJlallning Department, on disk in d CAD format
dcceptlble to tile' Iv\unicipality d copy of tfle' Plan of Subdivision as draft approved
dnd fillal dpproved.
-
-
-
-
-
-.
.A. TT ACHMENT #l
TO REPORT PD-70-
-:~E (:RPGRX,IC '. \~F -;-:~E \\1.. ',ICP-\UT'( ::F (~~~RI~C-;-C"
?Y-~,-\W ~lj,\\BER 00_
..
-
8elng a Bv-Iaw to amena Bv-Iaw 84-63, the Comprenenslve Zoning
Bylaw ror the Corporation or the Tormer Town aT Newcastle.
-
WHEREAS the Council of the Comoralion of the Municlpalitv of Clarington deems it
advisable to amend Bv-Iaw 84-63, as amended, or the Corporation of the iormer Town of
~ewcastle.
..
~OW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED TH,-\ T the CounCilor the Corporation or the
\iunlcipaiitv or Clarlngton enacts as follows:
-
...
~edion'l ~.4 SpeCial E.xceptlon Urban Residential iRli Zone", is herebv iurther
amended bv adding thereto. the following new Special Exception 1 ~.4.44, as follows:
-
"SECTION 12A.44 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (Rl-44) ZONE
~otwlthstandlng the provIsions of Sections 12.1 and 12.2, those lands zoned (R 1-44)
on the schedules to this By-law shall onlv be used ior a single detacned dwelling and a
nome occupation use in accordance with the provisions of Sedlon 3.11 of this Bv-Iaw,
save and except the retail sale of antiques. arts, crafts, or hobby Items. In addition,
lands zoned (Rl-44) on the schedules to thiS By-law snail also be Subjed to the
iollowlng zone regulations:
-
-
For the purposes oi thiS zone, an OUTDOOR PARKING SPACE shall mean a
parking space excluding a private garage or carport.
III
Yard Requirements (minimum)
al Front Yard
:)) Exterior Side Yard
6,0 metres to private garage or carport
4.5 metres to dwelling
6,0 metres to private garage or carport
4.5 metres to dwelling
-
-
liil
Parking Requirements
a) :2 outdoor parking spaces (mlnimuml
bl Where the l\vo outdoor parking spaces are provided side by side the
combined minimum width of the two spaces may be reduced to 4.6
metres proYlded the minimum landscaped open space within the iront
vard is 30%.
c) The minimum area of a private garage or carport shall be 18.58 square
metres and the minimum width shall be 3.0 metres.
iI) Private garages and carports mav extend a maximum or 3.0 metres in
front or the dwelling unit."
-
-
-
-
2. Sedion" 12.4 Special Exception Urban Residential (R 1) Zone", is hereby further
amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exception 12.4.45, as follows:
-
"SECTION 12.4.45 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (Rl-45) ZONE
~otwithstanding the proVisions of Section 12,2 tho,. mds zoned (R 1-45) on the
schedules to this By-law shall also be subjed tu thi' f()IIO'." il1g zone regulations:
_J
-
"_:oan ReSidential -;-'pe '='ne R1:"'0 '-ioIOmg - ;~roan r:::eslOentlJI -'.oe One
~...
~xceDtlon\H)Rl-4-iI" Jno'E::vlronmental P:otectlon ,EP'"
"Holding - L,'rban Residential Tvpe Two Exception HiR2-3i" ~o "Holding - Grban
ReSidential Type One Exception I(HlR1--i-ii"
'Holding - L'rban Residential Tvpe Four '(HIR-i," to "Holding - Lrban Residential
Tvpe One il,H)Rl)", "Holding - Urban Residential Tvpe One Exception (:,H)Rl-45)",
'Holding - Urban ReSidential Type Two Exception ((HiR2--iSi", "Environmental
Protection IEP)W and ",-\gricultural (Al"
"Environmental Protection (EP)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)Rll,
Holding - Urban Residential Type One Exception ((H)Rl-44)", "Holding _ Urban
ReSidential Tvpe Two Exception ((H)R2-24( and "-\gricultural ('A,)"
,-\gricultural Exception IA-8)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Tvpe One Exception
'HIR 1-45)" and "Environmental Protection i EP)n
..
..
III
..
....
),
Schedule "X' attached hereto shall form part or this By-law,
..
0,
ThiS By-law shall come Into ertect on tne date or the passing nereor, subject to the
prOVISions or Section 34 or the Planning-\ct.
..
III
BY-L/\W read a rirst time thiS
day or
1999.
...
BY-LAW read a second time this
day or
1999.
..
BY-L,A,W read a third time and tinallv passed thiS
day ot
1999,
...
..
MA YOR
...
..
CLERK
..
..
.
-
This is Schedule"A" to By-law 99-
passed this day of 1999 A.D.
-.
-
..
LOT 30 ' LOT 29 : LOT i \
- - '-~~""'~T\~ - - - -=- - - - - - - -i-r 28 I
rLlHrT ~ >>An ~.
..
..
_.
-
C"l
.. z
9
VI
VI
W
U
Z
... Cl
U
-
-
-
. I . I ~ , I . I
1. REG,FlLANO. j7~
I """'llOll: ST1lELT
I -
..
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
E3 ZONING CHANGE FROM
EJ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
1~~~~9 ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
mmm ZONING CHANGE FROM
[mmI ZONING CHANGE FROM
mmI ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM
~ ZONING TO REMAIN "A"
~ ZONING TO REMAIN "EP"
-
..
-
-
-
COURTICE
...
-
j
-.e..
I
UR1" TO U(H)R1-44"
"R1" TO uEP"
"(H)R2-3" TO "(H)R1-44"
U (H)R4" TO U (H)R 1 "
"(H)R4" TO "(H)R 1-45"
"(H)R4" TO "(H)R2-24"
"(H)R4" TO "A"
"(H)R4" TO "EP"
"A-8" TO "(H)R1-45"
"A-8" TO U EP"
"EP" TO "(H)R1"
"EP" TO U (H)R1-44"
"EP" TO "(H)R2-24"
"EP" TO "A"
Moyor
Clerk
. 3 -
"Urban Residential Type One R 1)" to "Holding - L:rban Residential Tvpe One
Exception ((H)Rl-44)" and "EnVIronmental ProtedJOn (EPr
"Holding - Urban Residential Type Two Exception ((H)R2-J)" to "Holding _ Urban
Residential Type One Exception ((H)Rl-44)"
"Holding - Urban Residential Type Four ((H)R4)" to "Holding - Urban Residential
Type One ((H)R1)", "Holding - Urban Residential Type One Exception ((H)Rl-45)",
"Holding - Urban Residential Type Two Exception ((H)R2-45)", "Environmental
Protection (EP)" and "Agricultural (A)"
"Environmental Protedion (EP)* to "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1),
Holding - Urban Residential Type One Exception ((H)Rl-44)", "Holding _ Urban
Residential Type Two Exception ((H)R2-24)" and "Agricultural (A)"
Agricultural Exception (A-B)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type One Exception
(H)R 1-45)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)"
5.
Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law.
6.
This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subjed to the
provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first time this
day of
1999.
BY-LAW read a second time this
day of
1999.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
1999.
MAYOR
CLERK
....
all
...
willi
WIll
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
...
...
",
..
...
IHE CORPORATION OF THE \1UNICIPALlTY OF CL\RINCTON
-
REPORT
-
\ \('l'tlllC;:
';I'lll'I,11 I) !D(J~P dllcl :\dmllll~trLltl(Jll C()mmlTtee
I~ i I p =:
-
1)<1te:
\ \ondclV, June 21, 1 qqy
Re~. =:
-
I\('port 2::
1)1)-;1 J)q
r:lLE 2:: ZBc\ C)9-006
I)\'-Iaw::::
~lIhi('ct:
REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICANT: ROBERT & HELEN SHERMAN
PART LOT 29, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLRKE
684 REGIONAL ROAD 17, NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
FI LE: ZBA 99-006
-
-
-
Rt'(n!11 111l' Ilclcltl ()11":
-
It is lespectfull\' recommended that the Celwrlll PUI'pose ,md ,-\dmllll'-tration Committee
I'('commend to COUllel1 the following:
1. TH.-\ r I\('port jJD- -1 JJC) Ill' IPcelved;
-
-
Tf-Lc\ r the I('ZOlllng llpplication Z13A C)cq)06 to amend the Zonlllg L-ly-Iaw 84-63, as
~uhmitted hv l~ewcastle Fellowship Baptist Church, on behalf of Robert dnd Helen
Sherman, to permit the development of a place of worship with (1Ilcillary uses be
-\1.JfJROVED as shown on ic\ttdchment #3 and that the appropriate bv-Idw be passed;
-
) ,
TH.c\ T a f3v-law to remove the (H)-Holding Symbol be forwarded to Council at such
time the appliczmt has entered into a site plan agreement to the satisfaction of the
\1Ulllclpalitv Of C1drlngton; ,md,
-
4. THAT dll interested parties listed in this report and any delegc1tion be advised of
C()lIncil'~ decisioll.
-
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
-
1.1
:\ppl icant:
Rober1 (Ind Helen Sherman
1.3
Rezoning:
Newcdstle Fellowship Baptist Church
To rezone the subject lands from ",'\gricultural (A) Zone"
to permit the development of a place of worship with ancillary
1.2
Agent:
-
-
uses.
-
1.4
Site ,Area:
2.30 hectares (5.68 acres)
-
-
".
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 2
...
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands are located at iJ84 Regional Road! 7 on the west side of the road,
within the Newcastle Village Urban :\rea. The applicant's land holdings total 2.30
...
-
hectares 5J)8 ac). fhe legal deSCription is Pari Lot 29, Concession 2 in the former
Township of ClarKC'.
...
3. BACKGROUND
...
3.1 On FebruarvlJ, ]LJ99, Newcastle Fellowship Baptist Church, on behalf of Robert
and Helen Sherman, submitted rezoning and site plan approval applications to the
iVhlllicipalitv ot ClcHlngton. The applicant pr'oposes to develop a place of worship
with ,1rlCi llarv uses Oil a 1.30 ha properiy. This property is located north of the
...
..
developed por1ion O! Newcastle Vi Ilage.
current facilitv at j()(J Mill StreC't NOI1h.
fhe church would relocate from their
..
3.2
The applicant had prc'viously filed a rezoning application in 1996 (DEV 96-009) on
behalf of Stephen Holliday ,1pproximately 1 km. north of the current location. For
various reasons, tlw applicant has decided to close that file dnd proceed at this
location.
...
..
..
3.3 A statutory I)ublic Meeting was held on March 29, 1999 to obtain public input from
adjacent residents. No n1l'mbc>rs of the public attended this meeting. The agent ..
made a presentation of the application to Committee. No development inquiries
have been received from the publ ic.
..
4.
4.1
EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
..
Existing Uses:
Vacant land
4.2
Surrounding Uses:
East
North -
West -
South -
Rural residential and agricultural
Rural residential
Wooded area
Rural residential
...
..
! 1 7
..
...
-
-
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
-
.J.
J.l
-
-
,- )
).-
-
-
-
-
-
PAGE 3
OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan. A
place of worship is permitted within this designation. The Region has indicated that
the applicJtion appears to conform to the policies.
\Nithin the Clarillgton Official Plan, the subject IJnds are designated "Future Urban
Residential". .-\ place of worship is permitted within an urban residential
designation. ,-\Ithough these lands are not currently required for urban residential
uses, approval of the application would not jeopardize future development in the
area subject to the conditions contained in Section 8.4 of this Report.
A rezoning clpplication (DEV 96-009) was previously submitted before the official
plan was approved. ,-\Ithough that applicJtion was not approved, it hJS been the
church's intention to proceed with an applicJtion in the area. As a result, this
proposal is deemed to conform to the Official Plan.
().1
6. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
-
-
-
6.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
The subject lands are currently zoned "Agricultural Exception (A-l)". As the
proposed use is not permitted, the applicJnt hJS submitted a rezoning application
for consideration.
Although the rear portion of the property is zoned "Environmental Protection (EP)",
no development wi II occur in this area.
..,
I .
AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1
The application was circulated to various public agencies for comment. The
Durham Region Planning Department, Ministry of Transportation, Jnd Ontario
Hydro have no objections to the proposal.
-,
--
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 4
...
- ')
The C1arington F)ublic Works (lIld I)arks Divisions have no objections to the
proposal provided that the applicant enters into a site plan agreement with the
Municipality.
...
...
7.3
Comnwnts provided by the C1aril1gton Building Division can be addressed at the
site plan approval phase. Issues include fire protection and access, location of fire
hydral1ts, and barrier-free access.
...
...
7,..t
The Clarington Fire Department has no objections provided that the turning radius
..
is il1creased to pc'rmlt access for the aerial true!.:.
...
/ ,) The Durham Region Publ ic Works Department has 110 objections to the
development provided that the following requirpments are fulfilled.
-
.
No sanitary services are available nor has an extension of sanitary services north
of the CPR railway been budgeted for in the capital works program.
..
-
.
;\ 200 mm wdtermain is aVClilable to the property. ;\ private on-site booster
pumping station and additional water storage may be required for fire fighting ..
purposes.
-
.
The entrance onto Regional Road! 7 does not meet Regional standards. The
Region requires an 8.0 III wide entrance with an entranceway radius of 9.0 m.
-
.
Regional Road 17 is designated as a Type "B" arterial road. A sufficient road
widening for a minimum of 15 III from centreline of the original right-of-way is
requ ired.
-
....
...
..
..
-
-
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 5
-
-
-
7",6
-
-
1./
-
-
.
The Region has a 7".62 m easement registered over the entrancewav to the
~- ,
property that provides access to an abandoned Regional well abutti ng the lands.
The applicant should contact the Region's Real Estate Division with respect to
the L1CG'SS easement.
The Durham Region Health UI1it requested a site servicing plan frorn the applicant
to determine septic requirements for the proposal. The Health Unit has approved a
revised servicing plan in principle.
The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority has 110 objections in principle to the
proposal. Lot grading and stormwater issues can be addressed at the site plan
approval phase.
-
8.1
8. STAFF COMMENTS
-
-
B.2
-
-
-
8.3
-
-
-
-
It has been determined that the proposed development is in excess of 50 m from the
top-of-bank of the stream located at the western extent of the property. An
environmental impact study under Section 4.3.8 of the Clarington Official Plan is
Ilot required.
The proposed Zoning By-law provides specific development standards for the
proposed use. The regulations deal with lot area and frontage, yard setbacks, and
bui Iding height. A reduced parking space size is also permitted when the space is
perpendicular to a landscaping strip that has a minimum width of 3.0 metres. The
regulations also permit a future expansion of the facility.
The Durham Region Planning Department had noted in its comments that the area
could have some potential for archaeological remains due to its proximity to Foster
Creek. An assessment would have been required to determine the site's potential
for archaeological remains. Discussions between the applicant and the Region
..
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 6
n.-J.
8.5
8.6
....
highlighted that Foster Creek is a minor watercourse. As the proposal is not in
proximity to a t'egistered archeological site or major watercourse, the Region feels
that the proposal wi II tlot ra.ise a heritage concern.
....
...
Dut' to the location of this site within the Future Urban Residential lands, a
neighbourhood design pla.n has not been undertaken. The church site forms a
barrier to connoct the future residential lands north and south of the site. The
existing strip residential development on Mill Street limits opportunities for future
road access. This could lead to servicing and access problems for the development
of the lands to the north, itl par1icular. ,Accordingly, staff requested that the Church
provide to the Municipality an option to purchase certain lands at a nominal cost for
a future road to be constructed to alCOSe; interior lands. The approximate location
of these lands aro shown on Attachment #2.
...
....
....
...
...
Representatives of tlw Church are agreeable to provide this option to the ...
Municipality provided that there would be opportunities to connect to future full
urban services installed on this road. ...
The detai Is of the option agreement would be worked out through the site plan ..
process.
-
Two easements are registered across the front driveway area of the subject lands.
These provide access to the abutting residence to the north and the Durham Region
property containing the former well. Staff will ensure that suitable access to these
properties is maintained through site plan approval.
-
..
Although the site screening questionnaire did not raise any concerns about on-site
contamination, an above-ground gasoline storage tank is located on the adjacent
property tu the north. An engineering firm conducted environmental soil sample-s
..
III
III
III
-
-
I{EPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 7
-
-
-
;).7
-
-
-
-
-
-
to determine \\Il('tlwr alW fuel had contaminated the subject lands. l3ased on
Idboratmv tests of the soil sdmples, it was determined that the future church site had
Ilot been contaminated.
rhe -;ubject lands <lI'e located withill d Future Residentidl ,-\rea for which detailed
land uses h,we Ilot been determilwcI. The j\l\unicipalitv strives to acquire lands,
through c1evelopllwllt app Ilcations, thJt are desi gnatecl E nvi ron menta I Protection.
These areas Illav 1)(' used ill conjunction with future Neighboudlood Parks and/or
trail networks.
The Munlc:ipalitv'-; parklalld dedication by-law requests the gratuitous dedication of
<III vallevlands Within ()f cldj,Kent to urban areas to the l\\unlcip,llitv free and clear
()f all (>llCumlndnces. In dddition, dn easement dcrOSS the subject lands will he
I(~quired in favour of the Municipality for maintenance purposes. The exact area
subject to dedication, illCluding the easement area, will he determined through site
plan dpprov,ll.
-
tJ.l
9. CONCLUSIONS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13ased on the comments contained in this report, it is respectfully recommended
that the by-law provided in Attachment #3 to permit the d(~velopment of a place of
worship and ,111cillarv laciliti(>s be ,-\Pf)ROVED. ThC' applicant will be required to
enter into a site pldn agreement and option agreement prior to the removal of the
iH) Holding Symbol and issuance of a building permit.
....
REPORT NO.: PD-71-99
PAGE 8
....
....
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
...
G va~J2 <~(zJ~~
Franklin Wu, M.CI.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer.
....
Da i . Crome, M.C.I.P., RY.P.
Director of Planning & Development
...
RH * DC*df
4 June 1999
...
Attachment #1 - Key Map
Attachment #2 - fJroposed Site fJlan
Attachment #3 - Zoning By-law Amendment
-
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
....
Robert and Helen Shennan
394 Glenmar Avenue
OSHA WA, Ontario
L lJ 3J8
liliiii
..
Rev. Ronn Young
Newcastle Fellowship Baptist Church
396 Mill Street
NEWCASTLE, Ontario
L1B1J3
...
-
Doug Mcl ntosh
J. David McAuley Architect
360 Woolwich Street
GUELPH, Ontario
Nl H 3W6
...
...
...
..
..
)
"'"
-
-
_ SUBJECT SITE
LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28
CONCESSION ROAD 3
-
-
-
-
-
w
>
0:::
o
o.
01
o
3:
.-.J
.-.J
W
m
~
.....-
o
<(
o
0:::
-
~
~~
~
. .-.J
<(
Z
o
:~
W
10:::
-
-
-
~~
0-GY'
-
~Sl!~
elf-
ANAD ' ! (f)
. ~N ~ !
. " 'ACIFIC ! , I
. .,RAILWAY I ~
Z
-
-
I :
I
:
i
i
1 r
I I
I I
-
-
-
NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
KEY MAP
ZBA. 99-006
SPA. 99-009
-
-
f\ I I f-\ l..- t 1 M t: i'j I If I
N
z
o
(f)
(f)
W
U
Z
o
U
I
!A
ATTACHMENT #2.-
\
,.;.; J_-~~---~- ;,,:: -';U"TJ~,._
- -"\ -'---,'
=:=:~ C: -,_~C"'-;
-----.-.-...-
-..--- -.-"'"\~ ~.. ............-;,./.-
'~,JL - -
I
0
c::(
0
a::
w
a::
:::l
f-
:::l
U.
a::
0 ,
u.
0 ,
z
c::( , ,
-J
Z , ,
0
f- , ,
0.... {,
,
0 , ,
,
, ,
'. ;~.' .'l ......n..~'-"'
"
"
"
--j 1____ "
I"'~ -:'l-- ...... ~"'..- -;.. - "'I.' ~
~~ I III
r'- ~J (,~..., ;1 l'*fJ.f '"
~r- [~I ' '. f' . '_
~,' ~-{ c:" I ;.IJ'J: 11"1",
H i .~ . It. 'I :-
..' I' "35 J C i . 1.' _ .
C=.~ t' I ,f- i-~~ l ;~! :"
f-;_JI; ~-1 I ~-, "
t-:~~L-_~l~ ~,:;, _< .it:.1o :~~ . -...._ ' ......
'~L'i ~j ~" ~~'h. ."
~,j\~~ \/....<v(.... ", "
. "'- t=-- --<" /--------
f, ~' "
r'~/./~', " " '~]
c.'. (' r;;., \ \ ! !
p=:;.~~~~lj .... .... ....~G \.;]
+-~ "'t ::-,j t II
, DOt'! ,I
~,_~,f .~. 'fl. ': .~~:: ::
.L i : 'I "t::
-.-- '. j
- j
- _! >i{i
~"
<',*
"
-.\.-
,
~};J"-
-, '\ , " , ,
; ..~. , ,
~~H '"Ji
"I "
q.', 3f
~~l~ ~!!,
\ g. l
1 ~~~
*,"Cl 3
.
. ',j .:J-,~ j.J J :..,........
-, '- ": ','j
, , ,
, , I
, .
, , .
'.
III " '.
..... .~
..J. ".,.....
'~ .~,
,,\ '..
'o-~
" ,
, ----
"
......
~ ,
:r'. I ,
-~
"
"
"
"
"
"
.
..
~'~
0: I
~.. ~j
(ij,~
,I
: !lr
;, I'
t ~ r I
: I !I,I
r ~ Ii.A
;;'LI(.~1
.---.
. - -i
<--..
. i "'11'
~'i~~~
~~.~~i
~~ i
f-
.,
'11
, '
'Iii
'11 ~
t-! ~
\J>! ~
<
'i
,Ss-
~~t~
; ~ ~ ~
\;~,.!
" l ~~,
j S I. "" J
-'::1 , :; I
~I i i- I
.: i,(.i~j.
~ ~ i ~~ i ~ 1
~~ ,'J~ ~ II I
~~111 ~~! ,I.,l[
~ ~ . ! ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 111 ~ I
a", f .. I ~ ~ l I;; ,I l,
~ <( lll-'----~~~~
~ ;
"
II
I.
Iii
~l) f ii
i !! ~
~- ;; ~
:} ;11
~ Ii:
. ) ~)
lJJ,.
~ ~ ~,~
;i;!!
"ifl
w ~'i j,
~ :~;,H
, ii:'(
~ F~!j~
""'''l
..r,_,e
k. . r, ~.
i,;
fl;j
~ I' .
i \; ~
w JH(
2 Hl;
2 i~d
:} "i'
~hl
1
11
bl I
~ 111. i
tl"1t
.:.Jh,
11m I
2 '!l"
~ " ,!.
~ -tl,,\
~ I ~ I.!i .,
i.6, J ~~l !)
..t 1; I ~ 'c, ;!:l
~(~ t--'~ r q~ i>:S
j I 0;;;; '1~ \ ,; ;:d
~ ~ J ,5; 1..J ? 1. ~' 1 ~
~~ ~.~~,~ I. l~;i
"" 'J '/,i I., ".'1'
~~!~~rj'-;':il :'~
;.....!LUdrl~.
1- ;,.r'. .--r..~.' --. '~1
r., ;,~:'~ ;. , '.
I . . ; . ~ -~ 'I, I ~
, 1 J-t.- " ";'~H'_ ,"
, · ~tj .", II
i . -'~J 'u~ I V-~,
I "'i-\;.l <'~-:?i J~/l>;.:....:
I '~';.~!'~.....~ "~'\"
1-. - -G 't=-~~--:;, ~ Y ~ h "'r
-'-'~-,. . 'I 7' :: r ~l ::_, _ ]1
-r..~ 'If'''IHf
'~ J~i;w i' , . _
- 1
~';c-~I '-.'1
\\r ;[ i" . ;:, ,f" '..~...,/,
Ii
ll. ~~~;l ~'J!
'I! I'~ 'I q'
,I "11 U
iiil ~ 1'; :llj ~J
I ~
'.:L:.
.1
11;;lll
i;jHh
""'ll
I ; ~ 1~~
IJllli
! -.-
- i
, _---.J
I~ ~\ I~
I h l'~li 'I
.II !'I\!io'
,I ! ~ 'j'l ~ J
: f' ;1 I ~: ~,
L_~
l.-~
f. ,
, I . ,
nIl:!: I II
:~;;q~
:'li(;I,
dj,~,'
,.
;i
"
u l!
:il
....11
\'Ii!
Ii
I:
H
to r
0
0
I r
0)
0)
I T
<t
m
N T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
...
."
I III ( I ) I, 1'1 JI,\ II ()...... () I 111I \ \ l '\,It II' \ I II 't I) I t I \ I, I ......1 , II )',
f-\T1 f-\CHMENT #3
III -1.\ \ \ ...... L \ \ B L R q q-
...
,,'1:1',:
i, j \\
"IIII'I!III:\
,.+ !)
'I \ ( Ii: it ': Ii ':",\" I'" {' I ,'1: 11'~
It'
-
\J[fllJ!,l:jl \[1 I Ii till' 11111"11('[ 111\\ II II; ".i'\\l tl",tl('
\\IIII\t.\'"
( (lllllCll ('I tll<'
,ldl!!)ll lJ[ 1111' \\lIlllllp,lilt\ (JI ( lc!iIIH.;I(Jll 11,"'111' I!
-
,,,h 1"li)11' Iu "I 'llll LJllIllg Ih-Ic!\\ (l-+-iJ 1, d' dllH'llded, ul the CUlpUidtlull (JI Illl' l'llllll'l
1')\\11 'It 0j('\\,
(' III dl lUIILIIlCI' \\ IfIl
IldllUll 113\ 'i'l-lIl1lJ I() P('I!iill III<' di'V,'luplll('ll1
-
I lr cl lil,_lce' or ',.'. r q''':ilP \\ltI) dliCllldt"\ u-;es:
'- ( ) '. \ 1111 1\ I i ( ) 1< E I) I 11 1,([ "0 I '. I I 1 I I 1 \ 1 I I i<' ( " III H II (I I I ill' I U IV (J I' 01 I I U I ) I >i II,,'
-
\ \llllll IPdlll\
( !dr'lrlg~(lll ('lid\... t..-:.. d'-. 11 Jilll'.\'<
-
",'lll,,1 "",j '''1'1 U \1 L \( i 1'1111......"
\1 ;I.;I( l IIIII\\L
IU'-t" I' 11"1"1'\
dllH'lld,',! 1,\ 111U(JdllUIIL~ d 11"\\ "UIJ"'ill()11 I)"!,,,II 01' lullulVs:
-
1,-+ "II \1 ;I<I( 1 L TI 1<,\1 1\(LI'TI( )'-\1,11 II )';1
,~()t\\ !;' "'[,:1:(111::2, ""qlCtl(>r)~ L I
~()!d, II. I !)._ dfHl iL), tIH),:,i_1 id!Hi') /I)!)('ll \/)()I
-
,11,111,<" i,,' lI',,'d 1(11' ,I pld(" "~I ':,(11'-1111' \\1111 ,IIi( dldl'\ LJ,I" 'UIJII'lt liJ 1111' [IIII"\\lllg
i I r( l\ I"
..
d l L 'iilliti{ )11<.,
I dllll'l ,Iplllg )llq)
-
",11.!IIIIH'dll 0111 dll',; III 1,llld \\ Itll .! 11I1Illllll1111 \\Iritll iJl ,I) 11I1't11" li'l'd
I'(}I ,111\ ()IH' (II 111(JII' (J! tli(' lliollltllH~ (JI 11l'1"" ,l1rlliJs, II(J\\('IS, ~I,I" iJl
111111'1 ilCJl1lculll1lo11 ('II'lll"II!', 'lIell ,I' decOIdtlVl' 'tUlII'\\"IIf;, 11'llCI11~ UI
-
',( rf'l_'lll[H!,.
-
i)1
1';"c;uleltl(}ll'
lot :~J('d [111[1
2.U ill'ctdllH,
II It ['IUlltolgl' '111111'
I 'i,1) I1l1'IIeS
-
iil
flllll! Ydle! 111111'
.:U,U 1111'111',
1\
Illtl'lim )ldC' Y,IIl! 111II1
iU) ml'trl'S
\ I
l:lIlldlllg Il('I~ht Illld\1
'wtbdck tr(}m II) IUI1I' 1111111
1 ':,0 l11('tl(,5
-
-'CU) metles
\ II
L ut C uveld~e (Illel \)
1 :) (~/I)
-
'. illi
LdlldsCdped Opel) )PelU' 1111111
)oo/~)
1\'
"oIlklllg )paee "Ill'
'i,-' lllelleS III 1('ll~th 1,\
-',I') Illelle;, ill width
-
Elltl.lrlCl' sl'tl),'I' I tl()m " rl'51c1erlll<l1
cldl' \ did lut lille
plovlded thell sueh ,I 'PdCl'
15 pelpendiculelr to ,I
1,1IldSlelpirlg >'IIIP
1 () ITl et Ie
-
-
-
--+ II
: 1:(' ; (11 '''I '),i\ 'I: 1 I( \[1)
IIUI,d [ illl \1 !(![li' ") 11()ldlll\~
Z()llt' '1lU\\'11 Illl lilt' elllelCIH'd "1'lll'uult' "Y' 11l'letu,
",111',1',:1(' ,,\" ,itLH [H'd ill'It'tI) ,11,111 Ii Jill) [Jel11 (II till" I'l\-Iel\\,
i :1.1" I", Id\\ '-fL.,11 I '1Ill' !11tl) t 'I]( '\t
lill 1 d,ltt' (If 1
:l I( 1\
1)1" '-..,('('~ \() ;,--t (lll)I(' 1)III'I';I~-I''; \( 1, i<,~.\) I ijlll)
IlYI-\\\ I,',iil .1111:>1 l111lt' till'
(ll
Il Y -I ,-\ \ \ I'
,,('Cl)lid :1111(' thl"
Ild\ (l)
1';'1 1\\\ ll,',ill 11\11(1 illl'i'> dll11 11il<111\ fl,
'II :1',
\\,\,),0[\
( It I\K
.....
JI
ili"I"I',l;!":
j,il
-
i 1 III ,Ii I \(, 'I 1111111 II '-\-1 ill
-
-
rHo: 1:1""(lU) '--[ill)!'('t tl) Ulj)
-
...
III
...
\(!(j(/
-
I ,~
1 ( ! I j ( ~ .
"""
...
..
...
..
...
...
...
..
lIIIIl
..
...
This is Schedule"A" to By-law 99-
passed this day of uu-' 1999 A.D.
-
-
-
;~
-
CJ
l[) c'~
cD
.,..-- \~
1--- ('J
...
...
-
..~
_l L~.
LOT 29 , CONCESSION 2
I'J72"O 1 'OO't:
....
=,
iFl'S7'10"E
228,33
G
c'~ _0
~ r-...
o ()
r'J co
, .
.'
~ ZONING CHANGE FROM ClA-1" TO II (H)A-60"
f"v"v,,1 ZONING TO REMAIN II EP"
-
-
-
1..1c'.c,r
-
-
-
-
-
-
_ SUBJECT SITE
LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28
':ONCESS:ON ROM) :\
,w
t
,~J
9
~,
1:J
.,
o
!L
N
-;
~j
:;J
~
Q~
D
w
.?='. , Ct:
r"~ ,
'i>u
,,:,,^' ~ ~)
~"""fiC'f~' ~
, ,,',\/L,' , ',',
. '.)1', l.
,j
z
o
V)
Vl
w
U
Z
o
U
NEWCASTLE
VILLAGE
-
-
J
0-
I
~
'"
~
~
~
~
~
~
L
L
L
L
L
L
I~
L
.l
L
:L
L
I
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
(:.,j
,Meeting: ,
~~! ~'*', ",1
File #
Subject:
. General Purpose and Admi~istradon Committee
Monday, June 21, 1999
CD-20-99
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERS' BY-LAW
Date: '
Res. #
Report #:
By-law #
.,'., ....,..
", '.-..'....'.
~':_-" t~;l' t'_.:;.,"".'~16~~',,~:~.::~1~,r:l:-',~
t'
;-
"J'.lt:is.i(espectfully recornmendedthat the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1 . THAT Report CD-20-99 be received;
2. THA 1 the NResponsible Pet Owners" By-law attached to Report CD-20-99 be
approved by Council; and
3. THAT all interested parties be advised of Council's decision.
i: '~~<~
1. .. ,BACKGROUND
1'"
r,
~ .
, ~}tJi>>
.. i' 'A: 1 .1 ! ',!~.It :hasbecome evidenftoiStaff thar':a new'~Responsible Pet OwnersH By-law' should 'be
"',1i'~~mp',~I~~~;f~~tne,Jellg~i,:"gre~~9sr;,}.tc' '~<,.i: ......,,:~F;
. ':'" '.,., ';;:;.,.;,:_ " ,--', '-: .>', -','F,-
,. la) 9150fUErhhheexlsting by-la~iaremorethah4ten years old and in,need of revie~
, " and,uPc,iating; . ". .
. " ...,'.... ....- " .
L. . ./. ...;') .'! ~,ttii,b,~.~~\.{#~,~~~~;om~~henS:lve~y-~~~;willp~~0~~~".~~er e~~.~f r~~~~e:~~,Jorm~T~~.
.;n:;I1'\'O Jii;t)$fnI2noq~~$ryl19f ".~l~~Q1~~l1l~,.!~tl?1.fll~,!t>I'V'~l';~"";':' ..' ....... ..'i"
, ;" "'>"",'~:'::/:_' ,", ,:-:-<,-', - :,,;t:':....:,>,.::.,-,:- '-,'" -",.. _\::/':;';:',,':::, " - .::'-:": .':.- ;":':'-,-; :':-.-.,'<;'-:: ..,,,:', ,:. ,-":' ':<-:;.-:::
;f' ~. )/,':;,' )~nninptogyJ.l ()f~the:~'o '" '~taw~~dt~olJldat&V:;and.th~;me
· 'IDgt:Oiirlat~l\1irea~'tbi~\;' .1,'.fI; . .tim~'" ...... .'.t'{.:,~>';~f'ft[i;:'
.a'.~~"f~~fj~I~~~~f.:f"'~~H!:;;,J,'.f .. . i ,,18;;]L. .' ./'..;V'i;"~
L.. .. .1.2til~M~~~~;!=t~~di.i .. ;::~nt~=:~ftf'.;~t&~.~'~f'
':':":,' , :', ' ,>-"',',<:.,, :;:, ;:<,,;,;:.-<.(;./-,,::::-:/;_>\;',' ,. '''''''' >, ,"_. ',_" ";"" ':''','-ww:;,,_,:: "".I,?*:i'--~:
.i~j!~iiNorthYorki;"aO,d Tqwnship'of S' "',S~ffhas;f9rmula~~a.Nre~der.',~' '" . "a~'.,
L' " ~;;;~g~,::~;,: ,'; ~'~'W:{~~..~t~l~t~~~~n,~;~nim:~M~lrviC~;~~~~i'i~0~!:'!:;" " .. .
L
.
L 701
Report CD.2o-99
l
J
liTO LICENSE OR NOT TO LICENSE" CATS J
:1::~~::I;:;~::~ce:~;:::7~te~:::::::i~~dl:: &om l
Attachment #3 published in the Association of Animal Shelter ,J\dministrators of -J....
Ontario journal (AASAO), describes the merits of addressing the problems associated
with free-roaming cats. J. ..
. Statistics show that, for stray cats, the odds of survival are terrible. While600f0
:~~;i;: P::~:7s~;s:::E<~'='~1hii~o:~m:~~:i*~. J
helptoresolvethis proble"1;. The following Municipalities have cat licensing J
in place:
· City of Toronto J
. City of London
· City of Oshawa l
. (P.A.W.) Pickering, Ajax, Whitby (Cat Identification Prograrp)
Dog owners see no reason why cats should not .betreated thesa~e as dogs ~
regarding licensing, and owners made 're~jidh~iblEffortheir cat'$,~a\'i*f.;~~i:6>f
, ",~R~'~,~reex"';'~:I~'licet\~~i(~;;~Ii<!y~~it'Wii
scoop, restrain Itheir Pets ""~nd; ~reHot>e~f8tll~gm~lfi6h'~.if/~n" ,fp~?:;~
.......J'... .... ...~i.. ..... '. ....... '.' .' "';:'/,~ij1t~~)' ....}...'i:i~.
tile; .~\~:"~'~~~~8~~}s9m~rlt},.whi Ie fa' <;at .l'oam~~~~~u~~:il!teunencu~'.;f~/.;,,9j~<"\i
and .no one around 10 take resporiSibj'f~icif~~~a~?~<
is~nsingart~ l'egistra~iR . JljE!;;R~P9n~i~h~e
"'ce tHE!~M~H(tipali 'I. ..iri~'i .' ,.,
"". ..hi, ;"', '.
1'<1 rtY. .". .
.2.
June 21,1999
2.
.
t
L.
l
"
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
. I
:L
L
. I
,L
'I
:L
1
L
L
L
L
Report CD-2o-99
.3-
June 21, 1999
. Animal Alliance of Canada advises there is a human health risk in letting cats
run qutdoors. In May, 1998, a4-year, olcjWC?odbridge boy required 20
stitches to his face after he had been mauled by a stray cat. About the same
time, a Richmond Hill child was attacked by a cat which wandered into his
yard. Cats defecating in gardens and children's sandboxes can be a major
health problem.
. Cats which are allowed to roam freely have also caused property damage, i.e.
pool , liners, climbed on the rafters in garages, thus causing articles to fall on
'.;;.:'~'..........",- .......
'1 ':and damage the vehicles; etc. I
Although'Staff realizes that not all cat owners will license their ~~ts' and, that the
licensing of cats will administratively be time consuming,. the advantages far outweigh
the disadvantages of cat licensing and creates a "win win" situation for the residents of
Clarington as well as for the animals.
The "Responsible Pet Owners" By-law has been reviewed by the Solicitor.
A copy of this report and attached by-law have been provided to all interested parties.
3. FEES
3.1 The following chart, depicts a. comparison of the proposed and existing Clarington
license fees, the fees charged by the City .of()shi\va ~nd the Towns of Pickering/Ajax
and Whitby (PAW). .' ',"i""" .
\' ~'.~,
L
L
Oshawa
.:;.
. (PA\
Whit
N/A-
$20.0<
;$1 Q.OC
Dog/cat with proof of altering,
rabies vaccine/microchip
- lifetime
$15.00
N/A
";.$10.OC
::~~ ."::~~':~~l;i:::/';~
'$20.OC
70:;
Local Vets -,Bo'lJ,rnanvill~ Yeterinary(:linic:
. ,cClarlhgton Animal Hospital
Durham Veterinary Clinic."
',Cou~ice Pet Clinic. .' ,:','+
....d~~~W~,,~tle Ve~E!rinaryCli~iC,
+':i~asf Qshawa Animal Hospital
,,', .... .. ! <.d' i
\,~.' '''',''';' '.. 't. ','
]
]
J
THAT the "Responsible Pet Owners" By-law attached to Report CO-20-99 be ]
approved by Counci I; and
THAT all interested parties be advised of Council's decision. ]
]
]
]
]
l
]
]
]
]
-4-
June 21, 1999 ",..~
Report CD-2D-99
, . "';~;
It is therefore reCommended:
1.THA T Report CO-20-99 be 'received;
2.
3.
Reviewed by,
(jr~-~
MPKS*PLB*hj
Attachment #1 - E-mail from Mr. Brian Gabel
Attachment #2 - Correspondence dated October 15, 1998, from L. Christensen
Attachment #3 - Article published in the Association of Animal Shelter Administrators
of Ontario journal (AASAO)
Attachment #4- "Responsible Pet Owners" By-law
Interested Parties:
704
L
L
L
L
L
L
~".",?1
L
'[
l
l
L
U
:1
L
l:
Lj
li
Li
t I
L;
L
-'~ - c;;;;;r/< . ~ 7 ~ ,
)/ Attachment #1 Page 1 o~ 1
'-) I.
.:1 1......
From: BRIAN GABEL <brian.gabel@sympatico.ca>
To: clarington. planning@sympatico.ca <c1arington.planMg"sYf,l;lpatico. ca>
Date: Tuesday, April 07,19989:31 PM IU 10 AH '98
Subject: DOG LICENSING BY LAW
ATTENTION; MAYOR HAMRE AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL
As a resident of Courtice I feel I am being discrimated against because
I am a dog owner. .
I' would like to know why cat own~rs do not have to purchase a license.
If you want to collect fees and increase revenue why are cat~ free. .,
.;J;;; 'd -, L.~~"~
. .... .',- :1 i.,....., .' .,,1'.... " .' .
Oshawa has a one time licensing fee for rnicro Chipped dogs of $15.00.
Is council consi.~~ri.ng this. .
There should be a bylaw against cats roaming free in the neighbourhood
and destroying other peoples property.
Helen Gabel
. :)","r'J it:;,'
....M:....:.... .
''',' "~
,,11 ,~"
':h'~:) .:;f,~d --- ,'- "0
1\,i"'};~;' i,"t _U~:J ~irit;J!(~t~~~'iTf
PJ'f}lftL...
'~.. ", 1. ....
4/9/98
70S
.
. 905-623-2296 _
;.......~~~~I::~-.w-~"i
J
]
J
.....J
J
J
]
J
.d]
]
]
'~'!#;<! ]
<J
AT~~C~'i<1~_
~ 1 Fam;omb Crescent. .]...
Bowmanvllle. On1ano
LIC 4L8
October 15. 1998
Ms. Marie Knight
Deputy Clerk I'
Municipality Of Clarington
Dear Ms. Knight.
I understand animal control bylaws are under review at this time and I would like to take this .
opportunity to make a plea for a couple of changes are near and dear to my hean.
First of alL. I would like to address Jhe issue of dog licensing. In Oshawa andmo now in ... ..'. .
Metropolitan Toronto. there is a a policy that if dogs are ,microchippecl. owners can pa>:a ~Iie ~
(low) licensing fee..The amount.in Osbawa is SlS,OO.>Iam not a~.ofthecostJn}o~~8sdUs .
bylaw'WaS passect. oilly just 'recently. This policy rDakes a lot en sense to me; Ifme'pfoblem of stray
..:\t:W.UU9st dogs is truly the reason behinG the licensing. then there is no better way to. identify 1l dog
:::::::(::::~~io microchip him. When a dog is microchippec1, he is equipped with a tag with a regislration
. '::~~JP.th a contact phone number. If the dog is not wearing his tags,thetc is the microchip
:}!J#lPf._. can be read by the vets and animal conttol people. Municipalli~nsing becomes
.~'_E~~~~m:g~a~
::@:~Ses. which I consider far more impottant and more useful u.an the municipal tqS..r _.'t even
.:\..:::'" :::'" . th the municipal ones. The myriad of tags my dogs "should" wear is too confusiJls for
. ".:':':8")~bo might find my dogs should they be lost. Finally, microchipped dogs are less of' a problem
. ....:..:{:~:w'liHhey are lost and taken to animal shelters as their owners Can then easily be located.'! IQOnl
:::.:).t:::if{)::people microchipped. animal shelter costs would be reduced considerably. IstrOngurse,U1Q$e<'
responsible for the bylaw changes to consider providing incentive to owners to miCl'OCl1iP~dop.
:~;s:;.:~t::':'~:*:j<
Secondly, I also. would love to see changes that would require cats to be li~an4Cc).
effectively. My.experiencebas been that dog owners tend to be far morerespp~Je. .
their pets and keeping them conttoUed than ~. Qlt owners. One of the. reaso#S.,vc.. ........ .... ..
was to keep other peoples' cats out of our fenCed backyald.Otherpeople'sq.tShave..
than one of our children 's wading pools and sandboxes. '1 feci. my young chilc1ren showel'... .vebad
. '.\ the right to have a sandbox in their own yard, but cats made this impossible forthcm. E~~ we .... '.
, bought one with a lid. we still couldn't win if the kids accidently left the lid<lfffor~... .""if' .
time. Cats have desb'Oyed m>: gardens,dr8ggedd.ead birds and mice intom>:,~fa.cl:;;
of our. pool. We are tired of incurrlngbugc expenses ~uscof ~nsibl~c;at~ ....
....wantedc8ts in Quryard. we would have one ofourown.;~i,.i.>.. .... .... i~Y:':;;:>', .,;
" :',:;,1;
,,!,~.
,~;~',~; .
~::::
I;J
'-", :<;,- ',' ,'. , ':, "" ' .
~lbank';'You for your attention and your kind ~nsiderati~ of these opinions'
S~~~lY,' .:;. " :<!;~';, " .,' ,;~,:,;,'; '.,'t' .' .
': ~. ..", .
I
:~~t~,~;.,L;~'~'f.!.. ......
706
J
J
L
ATTACHMENT 1f3
6 The AASAO Journal WlIlter 1998/Splllg 199
USUS Statement on Free-Roaming' Cats . .
(Frana Ibc p'~ic:llioa AIliIlNlI SlNllcn"l Scplanbcr.Qc:labcr 1"1, pubIisbIcI by Ibc HlIIMIlI Soc:icly of Ibc UniIed S1II&)
T, he Humane Society of the United Sta~es. P, re!,err"c,d: ", ~et. Few com m, u~ities, for example,
(HSUS) believes that every community has ~glst~r or l'c~~se cats or require that they ~ con.
a legal and ethical responsibility to address fined or supervised when outdoors. Fewer still reg.
problems associated with free-roaming domestic ulate feral cats.
cats.
Free.roaming cats--owned cats allowed to go
outside as well as stray and feral catHftenare
hit by cars or faU victim to disease, starvation, poi-
sons, attacks by other animals, or mistreatment by
humans. Free.roaming cats also prey on small mam-
mals, songbirds, and other ~ildlife, spread zoonot.
ic diseases such as rabies, defecate on other peo.
pic's property, and cause car accidents, among oth.
er problems.
, When developing approaches to address probe '
lems associated with free. roaming cats, animal care
and control agencies, policy makers, public health
officials, veterinarians. cat owners, and the public
should recognize the following:
. CATS BELONG IN HOMES. All cats deserve lov.
ing, permanent homes with responsible caregivers
\~ho keep cats safely confined and meet their spe.
cial needs. Long-term solutions developed to
respond to cat-related conflicts should foster the
responsible caretaking of cats.
. CATS ELUDE SIMPLE CATEGORIZATIONS. Free-
roaming cats arc often referred to as either stray or
fcral, but these designations do not renect the many
types of outdoor cats. Free.roaming cats can be
owned cats who arc allowed to roam; owned cats
who have become lost, previously owned cats who
have been abandoned and no longer have a home;
quasi.owned cats who roam freely and are fed by
several residents in an area but MownedM by none
of them; and so-called working cats who serve as
"mousers.M Almost every community also has feral
cats, unsocialized 'cats who may be one or more
generations removed from a home environment
and who may subsist in a colony of similar cats liv.
ing on the fringes of human existence. Because cats
exhibit varying degrees of sociability, cvenan
animal care and control profeSSional may not im-
mediately be able to tell the difference between a
feral cat and a frightened indoor-only cat who has
escaped and become lost.
. CATS ARE NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY"
LAWS. Domestic cats have been the nation's most
popular pet since the mid.1980s, and more than
60 million now live in U.S. households. But laws
and policies d~velopcd to prolectand control cals
h~ve not kept pace with their stalus as America's
L
L
y
L
L
L
"'1
L
.L
L
~ 1
:L
L
~ 'I
'L
I
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
Comprehensive cat Control Programs
Historically, communities have responded to cat.
related conflicts by using methods that rarely pro-
vide long-term solutions. For example, traditional
programs to reduce feral cat populations include
either live-trapping and euthanizing cats or live.
trapping, sterilizing, and releasing cats so that they
cannot reproduce. Neither approach, howcver( pro.
vides a long. term solution unless carried out in con-
. junction with a comprehensive cat control pro-
gram. Moreover, these approaches are labor- and
cost-intensive and may alienate feral cat caregivers
or residents not willing to tolerate free-roaming
cats in their neighborhoods:
The HSUS believe~ that communities must
develop, implement, regularly evaluate, and
update comprehensive laws, policies, and
education .programs about cats and cat care.
These must be pragmatic approaches designed
to reduce cats' suffering and also respond
to cat-rellled conflicts, yet remain acceptable
to people in the community.
Local governments must adequately fund ani.
mal care and control programs and enforce cat con-
trol ordinances, using general revenues as well as
monies collected through licensing and user fees.
Sufficient funds must be allocated to implement
prevention programs, hire and train staff, construct
or renovate animal-holding faCilities, and purchase
and maintain equipment to handle, house, and care
for cats.
The HSUS believes that community cat care and
control programs should include the following:
. Mandatory registration or licensing of cats. If a
fee is ch~rged, it should be higher for unsterilized
cats than sterilized cats (a concept termed Mdiffer-
entiallicensing").
. Mandatory identification of cats. In addition to
requiring that cats wcar collars and tags, commu.
nities should consider implementing a back.up per.
manent .identification system such as microchips.
. Mandatory rabies vaccinations for all cats more
than threelllonths of age.
. Mandatof)' sterilization of all cats adopted from
public and private animal shelters and rescue
groups.,::,:> . , .
. Mandatory sterilization of all free.roaming cats.
707
]
.. A mandatoryr.rijniT~r#~shelter holdingperlod "
for stray~~tsconsiste.ntv,ith that escablishedfoF-' i
:"stray dogs:"'nis poliCvsh~ld allow for euthanaSia v, ,,,,.'
." " df'sufferina ariimals 'p'nprt9completion of the hold-
ing pet:iod. . '. "
.. Adequate and appropriate shelter holding space,
staffing; and other resources necessary to. hold
, stray felines for the mandatory minimum holding
~riod.
· An ongoing' public-education program that pro-
motes responsible cat care.
· Subsidized sterilization servic~to encourage cat
owners to sterilize their animals.
:~i ;~
.71 ..
]
]
]
]
J
]
]
]
]
]
J
J
]
I
I
]
7ra
' J
t
~
L
L
L
L
BY-LAW 99-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
Being a by-law to licence, regulate and prohibit certain animals or classes thereof within
the limits of the Municipality of Clarington, or defined areas therein, and to repeal By-laws
87-156,87-189,88-42,88-193,91-82,93-58,93-111,96_31 and 97-167.
I
L
WHEREAS the Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. M.45, as amended, authorizes a
municipality to pass by-laws prohibiting, regulating, restricting and requiring the licensing
of certain animals and further authorizes by-laws prohibiting and abating public
nuisances;
L
L
L
l
l
AND WHEREAS the Pounds Act. R.S.O. 1990, Chap. P.17 authorizes a municipality to
impound animals found running at large;
AND WHEREAS the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington promotes and
advocates the humane treatment of animals and responsible pet ownership;
AND WHEREAS the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it desirable to
pass such a by-law.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
hereby enacts as follows:
l
PART I
SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
L
Section 1.1 SHORT TITLE: This By-law may be cited as the "Responsible Pet
Owners By-law".
.
L.
L
l
L
L
Section 1.2 For the purposes of this by-law, unless stated otherwise or the
context implies a different meaning,
a) "AL TEREO" shall mean a male or female animal that has been sterilized by
a licensed veterinarian. In the case of a female animal, where the animal
has been spayed or otherwise operated on to prevent conception and in the
case of a male animal, where the animal has been neutered or castrated.
L
/u9
Page 2
l
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
b) "ANIMAL" shall mean any member of the animal kingdom excluding
humans. Wrthout limitation, "animal" shall include mammals, dogs, cats.
birds and reptiles;
c) "ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION" shall mean the division responsible for the
enforcement of this by-law and any related animal legislation;
d) "ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER" shall include any person employed by the
Municipality of Clarington to enforce the provisions of this By-law;
e ) "CAT" means a feline of any breed of domesticated carnivore of the species
Felis familiaris that is over 12 weeks;
f) "COUNCIL" shall mean the duly elected council of the Municipality of
Clarington;
g) "DOG" shall mean a domesticated carnivore of the species Canis familiaris
that is over 12 weeks of age;
h) "HOUSEHOLD" shall mean any house, mobile home, dwelling unit or
legal apartment unit, occupied as a single housekeeping unit for residential
purposes and includes any outdoor space or accessory buildings
associated with the household;
i) "KENNELS"
(a) KENNEL: shall mean any part of a lot, building, structure or
establishment located in an area where a kennel is a permitted use
under the Zoning By-law and more than three (3) dogs are kept,
bred, boarded or trained for profit or gain;
(b) KENNEL (BREEDING): shall mean a kennel in which purebreds are
kept for the purpose of breeding, bearing or rearing for profrt or gain;
j) "LEASH" shall mean a strap, cord or chain which is fastened to the dog or
to the collar of the dog;
-/ 1 0
l
L
l
L
Page 3
k) "MUNICIPAL PROPERlY" shall mean all property owned, leased or under
the control of the Municipality of Clarington, and without limitation, this term
shall include all parks, open space, opened or unopened road allowances,
sidewalks, footpaths or bicycle trails;
L
I) "MUNICIPALllY" shall mean The Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington;
L
m) "MUZZLE" shall mean a humane device designed to fit over the mouth of a
dog to prevent the dog from biting. A muzzled dog means a dog wearing a
muzzle in the manner anticipated by the manufacturer of the muzzle;
l
L
n) "OWNER" shall mean a person who possesses, keeps or harbours one or
more animals and where the owner of the animal is a minor, the person
responsible for the custody of the minor and "own", "owns" and "owned"
shall have corresponding meanings;
L
L
l
L
L
0) "PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION" means an electronic microchip encoded
with identification information which has been implanted in an animal.
p) "PERSON" includes an individual, a sole proprietorship, a partnership, an
unincorporated association, a trust. a body corporate and a natural person.
"Persons" shall have a corresponding meaning;
L
L
L
q) "POUND" means the Clarington Animal Shelter and shall include any yard
or enclosure maintained by the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
for the safe-keeping of impounded animals;
r) "PURE-BRED" shall mean any dog registered in the registry of the
Canadian Kennel Club Incorporated or of a class designated as pure-bred
in the regulations of the Dog Licensing and Livestock and Poultry Protection
Act;
L
s) "REDEMPTION PERIOD" is a period of five (5) days exclusive of the
impound day and any day the animal shelter is closed;
L
L
. 1
J
Page 4
J
J
J
J
t) "RESIDENTIALLY ZONED LANDS" shall mean those lands designated as
Rural Cluster, Residential Estate, Residential Hamlet, Residential Mobile
Home Park, Residential Shoreline and Urban Residential Types One, Two,
Three and Four as those zones are set out and defined in the Zoning
By-law.
u) Where "RESTRAINED" is used in connection with a vicious dog at its
owner's household, it shall mean:
1. kept indoors in a manner respective of its environmental needs
which prevents the vicious dog from having contact with persons
who have not consented to contact; or
2. kept in a pen or other enclosure respective of its environmental
needs which prevents the vicious dog from,
i) leaving the owner's household
ii) coming into contact with persons who have not consented to
contact.
J
J
J
J
v) Where "RESTRAINED" is used in connection with a vicious dog at a place
other than its owner's household it shall mean a vicious dog which is
muzzled, leashed with a leash no longer than 6 feet in length and under the
care and control of a person who is at least 16 years of age;
J
w) "RUNNING AT LARGE" shall mean any animal found in any place other
than the property of the owner of the animal and not under the control of
any person;
J
J
J
x) "TRANSFER" shall mean the change of ownership of a dog/cat to the
Municipality of Clarington;
'2
J
J
J
J
J
J
y) "UNALTERED" shall mean either a male or female animal that has not
been sterilized.
z) "UNDER CONTROL" shall mean a dog that is at all times on a lead or leash
held by a person over the age of 16 years or otherwise physically
restrained;
L
L
Page 5
l
L
aa) "VICIOUS DOG" shall mean a dog which has been declared to be a vicious
dog by an Animal Services Officer in accordance with the provisions of
this By-law;
L
bb) "ZONING BY-LAW' shall mean the Municipality's By-law #84-63. as
amended, and as may be further amended or replaced from time to time.
l
Section 1.3 All words and personal pronouns relating to words contained in this
By-law shall be read and construed with the appropriate number and gender of the
person or animal referred to in each case.
l
l
Section 1.4 In the event any of the provisions of this By-law are deemed invalid
or void. in whole or in part. by any court of competent jurisdiction. the remaining terms
and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
l
L
l
Section 1.5 Schedules A. AA. B. C, and D attached to this By-law form an
integral part of it.
L
L
Schedule "A" - Dog Licence - Fee Schedule
Schedule "AA" - Cat Licence - Fee Schedule
Schedule "B" - Vicious Dog Declaration
Schedule "C" - Exceptions
Schedule "D" - List of Locations Where Dog/Cat Licences
Can Be Purchased
Section 1.6 Reference to legislation within this By-law shall be deemed to include
such legislation. as amended, including successor legislation.
L
L
l
l
L
PART II
SECTION 2 - DOG LICENSING AND REGISTRATION
Section 2.1 Every owner of a dog shall obtain an annual licence for such dog by
registering the dog with the Animal Services Division of the Municipality and paying the
prescribed fees as set out in Schedule "A". The licence may be purchased from a
location set out in Schedule "0".
L
'3
Page 6
J
J
Section 2.3 Every licence issued pursuant to section 2.1 shall expire on
December 31 of the calendar year for which it was issued.
J
J
J
Section 2.2 Every person upon becoming the owner of a dog at any time during
the calendar year shall register such dog with the Municipality and obtain a licence
therefor on an annual basis.
Section 2.6 Upon payment of the licence and registration fee, the owner of a dog
shall be furnished with a tag for each dog and the said tag shall be kept se ::urely affixed
to the dog at all times. The tag shall consist of a metallic plate or such either material
approved by the Municipal Clerk and shall indicate the licence number ancl the year for
which the licence was issued.
J
J
J
J
J
J
Section 2.4 No person shall own a dog within the Municipality without having
obtained a licence for the dog and registering the dog with the Municipality for the current
year.
Section 2.5 Each year, the Municipality shall cause to be published in a
newspaper having general circulation within the Municipality, a notice bringing to the
attention of the public the provisions of the dog licensing and registration recluirements of
this By-law.
Section 2.7 The licence shall bear a number corresponding to the rlumber under
which the dog is registered and a record shall be kept by the Animal Sel'1rices Division
showing the name and address of the owner, a description of the dog, the number of the
licence and the date on which it was issued.
J
J
-1
J
J
J
J
I
:1
I
Section 2.8 No owner shall affix or permit to be affixed a licence iSllued by or on
behalf of the Municipality for any dog other than the dog for which the licencu was issued.
Section 2.9
to any person.
The Municipality, at its discretion, may refuse to issue a dog licence
L
L
Page 7
L
PART III
SECTION 3 . CAT LICENSING AND REGISTRATION
L
Section 3.1 Every owner of a cat shall obtain an annual licence for such cat by
registering the cat with the Animal Services Division of the Municipality and paying the
prescribed fees as set out in Schedule "AA". The licence may be purchased from a
location set out in Schedule "0".
L
L
Section 3.2 Every person upon becoming the owner of a cat at any time during
the calendar year shall register such cat with the Municipality and obtain a licence
therefor on an annual basis.
L
L
Section 3.3 Every licence issued pursuant to section 3.1 shall expire on
December 31 of the calendar year for which it was issued.
l
l
L
Section 3.4 No person shall own a cat within the Municipality without having
obtained a licence for the cat and registering the cat with the Municipality for the current
year.
l
L
Section 3.5 Each year, the Municipality shall cause to be published in a
newspaper having general circulation within the Municipality, a notice bringing to the
attention of the public the provisions of the cat licensing and registration requirements of
this By-law.
L
l
L
L
L
L
Section 3.6 Upon payment of the licence and registration fee, the owner of a cat
shall be furnished with a tag for each cat and the said tag shall be kept securely affixed to
the cat at all times. The tag shall consist of a metallic plate or such other material
approved by the Municipal Clerk and shall indicate the licence number and the year for
which the licence was issued.
Section 3.7 The licence shall bear a number corresponding to the number under
which the cat is registered and a record shall be kept by the Animal Services Division
showing the name and address of the owner, a description of the cat, the number of the
licence and the date on which it was issued.
Section 3.8 No owner shall affix or permit to be affixed a licence issued by or on
behalf of the Municipality for any cat other than the cat for which the licence was issued.
I J
J
Page 8
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Section 3.9 The sections of this By-law, as they relate to the registration and
licensing of cats, shall come into force on January 1, 2000.
Section 3.10
The Municipality may, at its discretion, refuse to issue a cat licence to
any person.
PART IV
SECTION 4 - ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE
Section 4.1 No person shall permit or allow an animal to run at large within the
limits of the Municipality.
Section 4.2 No owner of an animal shall permit such animal, whether leashed or
unleashed, to trespass on private property.
Section 4.3 Every owner of a dog or person having control of a dog shall control
such dog on a leash when this dog is away from its household.
Section 4.4 Every owner of a dog shall immediately remove and dispose of all
excrement left by the dog on any property other than the dog owner's property within the
Municipality in a hygienic manner.
PART V
SECTION 5 - VICIOUS DOGS
Section 5.1 (a) The Animal Services Officer shall investigate any dog bite incident
which has been reported to the Durham Region Health Unit or to the Animal Services
Division of the Municipality.
Section 5.1 (b) Where an Animal Services Officer is satisfied that the dog has
placed a person or domestic animal at risk of physical harm the Animal Services Officer
shall declare the dog to be a vicious dog.
Section 5.1 (c) Where an Animal Services Officer is satisfied that the dog has bitten
or attacked a person or domestic animal the Animal Services Officer shall declare the dog
to be a vicious dog.
--- ~ /
/ 0
I
L
L
L
l
Page 9
l
Section 5.2 Where a dog has been declared to be a vicious dog pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, the dog owner will be served with a copy of the written
Declaration in the form set out in Schedule "B". Service shall be effected by delivering the
declaration personally to the owner of the dog or by leaving it for the owner at his last
known or usual place of abode with an inhabitant thereof who appears to be at least 16
years of age or by registered mail to the owner's last known address. Service is deemed
to be effected five (5) days after mailing.
l
Section 5.3 Where a dog has been declared to be a vicious dog, pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, the dog owner may apply to the Municipality for a hearing as to
whether or not the Declaration, in whole or in part, should be revoked. An application for
a hearing by Council shall be filed by the dog owner or the dog owner's agent, with the
Clerk of the Municipality at 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario, within ten (10)
business days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Statutory Holidays) of the date the
Declaration is served upon the owner. As soon as practicable after receipt of the appeal,
the Municipal Clerk of the Municipality shall notify the dog owner of the date, time and
location of the hearing. If an owner fails to appear at such hearing, the declaration shall
be deemed to be in full force and effect as if no appeal had been filed.
l
l
l
l
L
Section 5.4 Where a dog has been declared a vicious dog pursuant to Section
5.1 of this By-law, and no appeal has been filed, the dog owner shall have the vicious dog
licensed and registered and permanently identified by microchip implantation, at the
owner's expense, within twenty-one (21) days of the service of the Declaration. In the
event an appeal is filed, the dog owner shall comply with the terms of the Declaration, as
may be amended by Council, within seven (7) days of the date the hearing is held. Any
decision made by Council at the hearing is final.
L
l
L
L
L
Section 5.5 A dog owner who is required to licence, register and identify by
microchip implantation a vicious dog pursuant to a Declaration issued under this By-law
shall provide proof thereof to the Animal Services Division of the Municipality within thirty
(30) days of service of the Declaration when no appeal has been filed and within fifteen
(15) days of the date of the hearing, when an appeal has been filed.
L
L
L
i'7
J
Page 10
J
J
J
J
Section 5.6 Every owner of a dog declared to be a vicious dog, pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, upon relocation of his or her residence, or that of the vicious
dog, or upon ceasing to own the vicious dog, shall be required to immediately notify the
Animal Services Division of the Municipality of the change of address, or the name and
address of the new owner or the new location of the vicious dog, as the case may be.
Section 5.7 Every owner of a dog declared to be a vicious dog, pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, shall restrain the vicious dog at all times when the dog is at the
owner's household.
3
a
J
J
,
J
'.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I....'
~~
)
Section 5.8 Every owner of a dog declared to be a vicious dog, pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, shall restrain the vicious dog at all times when the dog is not at
the owner's household.
Section 5.9 Every owner of a dog declared to be a vicious dog, pursuant to
Section 5.1 of this By-law, shall permanently identify such dog with a microchip
implantation within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the Declaration of Vicious Dog.
Section 5.10 The form of the Declaration referred to in Section 5.1 shall be entitled
Vicious Dog Declaration' as set out in Schedule "B" attached hereto.
PART VI
SECTION 6 - RESTRICTION ON NUMBER OF PETS ALLOWED
Section 6.1 On any residentially zoned lands, a person shall be allowed to own
or keep up to five (5) cats if all cats have been altered, permanently identified with a
microchip implantation and are kept indoors.
Section 6.2 On any residentially zoned lands, no person shall own or keep more
than three (3) unaltered cats.
Section 6.3 On any residentially zoned lands, no person shall own or keep more
than three (3) dogs.
L
L
Page 11
L
L
L
PART VII
SECTION 7- NOISE
Section 7.1 Without derogating from Municipality of Clarington By-law 89-184, no
person shall cause, allow or permit a domestic animal owned or harboured by that person
to make any noises likely to disturb the inhabitants of the Municipality of Clarington.
L
Section 7.2 Such noises shall include, but not be limited to, persistent barking,
calling, howling, whining or crying at frequent or lengthy intervals.
l
PART VIII
SECTION 8 - KENNELS
l
l
8.1 No person shall operate a kennel in the Municipality of Clarington unless:
(a) a valid licence issued by the Municipality to operate the kennel is held by
that person;
(b) the person to whom the licence has been issued, or a member of that
person's immediate family resides on the lands upon which the kennel is
located;
(c) the kennel is operated in accordance with the provisions of this By-law;
(d) the kennel is located in an area in which it is permitted under the Zoning
By-law;
(e) at all times maintain the kennel is maintained in a sanitary, well-ventilated
condition, appropriately lit, at a healthful temperature and free from
offensive odours;
(f) all of the provisions of Sections 8.1 to 8.3 inclusive have been complied
with.
l
L
L
l
L
L
l
L
L
8.2 Every person who operates a kennel in the Municipality of Clarington shall obtain
a licence to operate the kennel. The licence shall be issued upon payment of
the prescribed fees to the Municipality of Clarington. Each application for a
licence shall be supported by a declaration by the applicant as to the name and
address of who will reside on the land upon which the kennel is located.
L
, 1
J
Page 12
J
J
J
J
8.3
Every owner or operator of a breeding kennel shall:
(a) ensure every dog in the kennel is registered and dog licences and dog tags
are issued in accordance with this By-law; and
(b) keep an ongoing and updated list of all serial numbers and dogs kept in the
kennel and provide same to the Municipality upon request.
PART IX
SECTION 9 -IMPOUNDMENT
20
J
1
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
]
1
j
I
I
Section 9.1 Every officer of the Durham Region Police Services and every
Officer of the Animal Services Division of the Municipality shall have the power to seize
and destroy, whether before or after impounding, any dog found running at large within
the limits of the Municipality contrary to the provisions of this By-law.
Section 9.2 Every officer of the Durham Region Police Services and every
officer of the Animal Services Division of the Municipality shall have the power to seize
and impound any animal found running at large within the limits of the Municipality
contrary to the provisions of this By-law.
Section 9.3 When an animal has been found running at large contrary to the
provisions of this By-law, has been seized by an Animal Services Officer and taken to
the Clarington Animal Shelter, such animal shall be impounded and held for a period of
five (5) days exclusive of the impound day and any day the animal shelter is closed.
Section 9.4 If any animal so seized and impounded is not claimed on or before
the redemption period, the Animal Services Officer may, at that Officer's discretion and
subject to the Animals for Research Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. A.22, destroy or sell the
animal. Nothing in this By-law shall prevent an Animal Services Officer from destroying
an animal which is suffering illness or injury and, in the Officer's opinion, will not
humanely sustain life.
Section 9.5 The Animal Services Division shall keep a record of all animals
seized and impounded pursuant to this By-law.
Section 9.6 Any owner claiming an animal which has been seized and
impounded shall pay to the Animal Services Division of the Municipality the fees as set
out in Schedules "An and "AA".
L
L
Page 13
l
L
L
Section 9.7 No person, resident in the Municipality, shall regain possession of a
dog or cat from the Clarington Animal Shelter without first obtaining a licence for the
dog or cat for the current year. In the event the person has already registered and
licensed the dog or cat for the current year, or is a resident of another municipality, the
person shall provide sufficient proof thereof by producing the tag or licence to the
Animal Services Officer.
l
Section 9.8 The Animal Services Officer shall accept the transfer of ownership
of a dog or cat from an owner to the Municipality of Clarington upon:
(a) receipt of a written request from the owner accompanied by
payment of the appropriate fee prescribed in Schedules "A"
and "AA" of this By-law;
(b) determination by the Animal Services Officer that the Animal
can reasonably be expected to be placed in a new home;
(c) receipt of any other information the Animal Services Officer
requests; and
(d) space being available within the animal shelter.
l
L
L
l
L
Section 9.9 Any animals destroyed under this By-law shall be disposed of in
such a manner as may be determined from time to time.
L
l
l
PART X
SECTION 10 . ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES
Section 10.1 The Council shall appoint one or more Animal Services Officers
who shall investigate animal-related complaints and enforce the provisions of this
By-law.
l
L
L
L
Section 10.2
this By-law.
Animal Services Officers shall provide all services as required by
Section 10.3 Every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law is guilty
of an offence and, upon conviction, is liable to a fine of not more than $5,000.00 as
provided for in the Provincial Offences Act.
L
/ L 1
J
Page 14
J
J
J
J
PART XI
SECTION 11 . EXEMPTIONS
Section 11.1 "SPECIAL NEEDS DOG(S)": Every person who owns a dog as a
seeing eye dog, or a hearing ear dog, shall register such dog pursuant to Sections 2.1,
2.2 or 2.3, as applicable. Upon presentation of the applicable certificate from either the
Canadian National Institute for the Blind stating the dog is being used as a seeing eye
dog, or from the Hearing Ear Dogs of Canada stating the dog is being used as a hearing
ear dog, the dog's owner will be exempted from payment of the required license fee.
_.- 2
/ L
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
]
J
J
J
I
f
Section 11.2 "VISITING ANIMAL(S)": Where the owner of the animal is a non-
resident of Clarington, and his or her animal will not be kept within Clarington for a
consecutive time period longer than thirty (30) days in anyone (1) calendar year, its
owner shall not be required to comply with Section 2.1 and/or 3.1 of this By-law if the
owner can provide proof of current registration from its own Municipality.
Section 11.3 "VETERINARIAN(S)": A licensed Veterinarian shall not be
considered an owner of an animal for the purpose of this section where the animal has
been brought upon his or her premises for care or treatment.
PART XII
Section 12- MINIMUM ANIMAL CARE REQUIREMENTS
Section 12.1 Every person who owns an animal within the Municipality shall
provide the animal or cause it to be provided with suitable food, potable water and
veterinary care as required to maintain the health and well-being of the animal.
Section 12.2 Where an animal is customarily kept out-of-doors, the owner shall at
all times provide for the use of the animal a structurally sound, weatherproof, insulated
enclosure with off-the-ground flooring.
Section 12.3 Whenever an animal is tethered on the owner's premises, the tether
shall allow for the unrestricted free movement of the animal.
L
l
l
L
L
l
L
L
t
...
Page 15
Section 12.4 Every person who owns an unaltered female animal shall, during
each period that the animal is in heat, keep it confined in a manner that will not attract
other animals.
Section 12.5 Every person who maltreats or neglects or is found to be cruel to any
animal and every person who contravenes any of the provisions of Part XII of this By-law
may be reported to a chapter of the Ontario Humane Society or the Ontario Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals or other society associated therewith.
PART XIII
SECTION 13 . MISCELLANEOUS
Section 13.1 Notwithstanding any other provision of this By-law it shall not apply in
respect of animals owned by any person which are kept on any premises listed in
Schedule .C..
l
L
L
L
l
L
L
l
L
Section 13.2 By-laws 87-156, 87-189, 88-42, 88-193, 91-82, 93-58, 93-111, 96-31
and 97-167 are hereby repealed.
Section 13.3 All fees payable under this By-law shall be made in cash, by credit
card or automated bank card debit. Personal cheques are not acceptable.
Section 13.4 None of the provisions in this By-law are intended to or shall be
deemed to derogate from the provisions of By-law 93-161.
Section 13.5 This By-law will come effect on the passing thereof with the
exception of Schedules "A" and "M" which will take effect on January 1, 2000.
By-law read a first and second time this 28th day of June, 1999.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this 28th day of June, 1999.
MAYOR
CLERK
L
L3
Dogs - $75.00
Cats - $45.00
J
J
J
J
]
SCHEDULE "A" TO MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY -LAW 99-
EFFECTIVE - JANUARY 1, 2000
ADOPTION FEES
DOG LICENCE - FEE SCHEDULE
ANNUAL FEE
~ ~m
The following discounts are available:
$13.00 off fee with proof of altering
$ 5.00 off fee with proof of microchipping
$ 2.00 off fee with proof of current rabies vaccine
$ 2.00 off fee with early purchase (December 181_ March 181)
t
1
]
,]
J
1
J
J
J
I
I
]
]
I
I
To replace a lost or destroyed tag the fee is
$ 3.00
With proof of microchipping, altering and current rabies vaccination $30.00 for lifetime
NOTE: PROOF MUST BE PROVIDED
IMPOUNDMENT
FEE
Impoundment of Dog Wearing Current Dog Licence
First Occurrence
Second or subsequent Occurrence
$40.00
$65.00
Every dog impounded is subject to an additional charge of $12.00 for every day or part
of a day after the day the animal is brought into impoundment.
i24
l
l
l
l
L
SCHEDULE NAN TO MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 99-
PAGE 2
Impoundment of Dog NOT Wearing Current Dog Licence
First Occurrence
Second or subsequent Occurrence
$50.00
$75.00
Every owner of a dog not licensed for the current year who is a resident of the
Municipality is also required to pay the licence fees in addition to the impoundment fees.
l
l
L
l
L
L
TRANSFER FEES
*The Animal Services Division can only accept animals if they can reasonably be
expected to be placed in a new home. Animals will not be accepted for euthanasia.
Pets are screened carefully to avoid placing problem animals in new homes.
Transfer of ownership of a dog or litter, brought into the Animal $45.00
Shelter
Transfer of ownership of a dog, picked up by the Animal $65.00
Services Officers. during normal working hours (excluding
Sunday and Holidays)
Transfer of ownership of a dog, picked up by the Animal $90.00
Services Officer, during hours other than the normal working
hours.
L
l
L
TRAP RENTALS
DAILY $3.00
DEPOSIT OF $35.00 REQUIRED (REFUNDABLE)
L
t
i.
L
L
L
, / 'I
/ L ~
I
J
ii,
I
I
1
l
J
1
]
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "AA" TO MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 99-
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2000
CAT LICENCE - FEE SCHEDULE
Cat
The following discounts are available:
$6.00 off fee with proof of altering
$3.00 off fee with proof of microchipping
$2.00 off fee with proof of rabies
$2.00 off fee with proof of early purchase (December 1st - March 1st)
ANNUAL FEE
$20.00
With proof of microchipping, altering and current rabies implantation $20.00 for lifetime
NOTE:
PROOF MUST BE PROVIDED
IMPOUNDMENT
FEE
Impoundment of Cat Wearing Current Cat Licence
First Occurrence
Second or subsequent Occurrence
$10.00
$15.00
Impoundment of Cat NOT Wearing Current Cat Licence
First Occurrence
Second or subsequent Occurrence
$15.00
$20.00
Every cat impounded is subject to an additional fee of $5.00 for every day or part of a
day after the day the animal is brought into the animal shelter for impoundment.
TRANSFER FEES
* The Animal Services Division can only accept animals if they can reasonably be
expected to find new homes. Animals will not be accepted for euthanasia. Pets are
screened carefully to avoid placing problem animals in new homes.
Transfer of ownership of a cat or litter, brought into the Animal
Shelter
$30.00
I i 0
L
l
SCHEDULE liB" TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 99-
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
CLARINGTON ANIMAL SHELTER.
ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION
Declaration of Vicious Dog
Pursuant to Municipality of Clarington By-law
, section 5.7
L
DECLARATION # -
This Declaration is issued to:
L
l
as owner of a dog described as:
l
An investigate of an incident involving your dog has been conducted by the Animal
Services Division of the Clarington Animal Shelter and it has been determined that your
dog has bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal or placed a person or domestic
animal at the risk of physical harm.
l
In accordance with Clarington By-law , you are hereby served with notice that the
dog described herein is declared vicious and you, as owner of the dog, are hereby required
to comply with the requirements of By-law , a certified copy of which forms part of this
Declaration and is attached hereto.
l
As the owner of a vicious dog, you shall:
L
1.
licence and register the dog within the Clarington Animal Shelter and have the dog
permanently identified by microchip implantation, at your expense, within 21 days
of receipt of this Declaration. You shall provide proof of such registration to the
Animal Services Division upon written request therefor;
l
2.
notify Clarington Animal Shelter immediately upon relocating the dog or upon
transferring ownership of the dog;
L
l
3. restrain the dog at all times, while the dog is on your own property, by keeping it
enclosing in a pen or other enclosure in such a manner as to prevent the dog from
leaving your property and to prevent contact with people and other animals;
L
4. restrain the dog at all times, while the dog is off your own property with the use of a
leash and a muzzle and under the care and control of person who is 16 years of age
or older.
L
You may apply for a hearing for Council respecting this Declaration by filing an appeal
with the Municipal Clerk at 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario within ten
business days of the date of service of this Declaration.
l
As a result of the issuance of this Declaration, you are herewith responsible for ensuring
compliance with the provisions of Clarington By-law 99- . Failure to do so will result in a
prosecution under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. P.33, as may be
amended from time to time. The maximum fine for offences under this Act is $5,000.00.
L
Issue Date:
Issued By:
Served On:
Served By:
L
, Animal Services Officer
L
/ L 7
J
J
SCHEDULE "C" TO MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 99-
EXCEPTIONS
]
.
a) on the premises of the Bowmanville Zoo, the Orono Cat World, and any other I.~
facility accredited by the Canadian Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria .
(CAZA);
b) on the premises of the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
(O.S.P.CA.);
J
c) in a veterinary hospital under the care of a licensed veterinarian;
1
d) on the premises of a university or community college, on the premises of
secondary or elementary schools, or on premises registered as research facilities
under The Animals for Research Act and in compliance with the Guidelines of
the Canadian Council on Animal Care;
J
e) on the premises of any television or film studio where such animals are being
kept temporarily for the purpose of a television production;
f) on the premises of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington;
j
g) On the premises of Pet Shops.
J,
'\
J
j
J
1
]
J
I
I
I
id
t
L
l
L
L
L
SCHEDULE "D" TO MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 99-
LIST OF LOCATIONS WHERE LICENCES CAN BE PURCHASED
L
L
L
t
l
L
l
L
L
L
l
L
L
Clarington Animal Shelter
Municipal Administrative Centre
Bowmanville Veterinary Clinic
Clarington Animal Hospital
Courtice Pet Clinic
Durham Veterinary Clinic
East Oshawa Animal Hospital
Newcastle Veterinary Clinic
Driver & Vehicle License Bureau
Michelle's Grooming
Rolph's Hardware
L
-/ 2 9
L
l
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
Monday, June 21, 1999
CD-21-99
ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF MAY, 1999
File#
Res. #
Date:
By-law #
Report #:
Subject:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council ttle following:
1. THAT Report CD-21-99 be received for information; and
2. THAT a copy of Report CD-21-99 be forwarded to the Animal Alliance of Canada and
the Animal Advisory Committee.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 For the information of Council, the table attached to 'this Report summarizes the
activities and revenues pertaining to Animal Services for the month of May, 1999.
Respectfulry s mitted, Reviewed by,
cJv~~~'
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
~
MPKS*PLB*hj
Animal Alliance of Canada
221 Broadview Avenue
Suite 101
Toronto, Ontario
M4M 2G3
Animal Advisory Committee
/30
. .
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION
ATTACHMENT NO.1
TO REPORT NO. CD- 21-99
J
I
I
If
...v.,
..,....:...1..7
I
'~'''.
.
)
~
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.........
~
I
ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT
MAY 1999
A.ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH YR. TO DATE '99 YR. TO DATE '98
PICKED UP - WILDLIFE 6 35 16
DOGS CATS DOGS CATS DOGS CATS
PICKED UP 18 24 83 64 87 39
BROUGHT IN 9 10 64 52 31 52
RETRIEVED BY OWNERS 13 2 68 7 59 7
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 13 23 70 62 51 50
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
EUTHANISED 0 2 2 12 2 5
DEAD ON ARRIVAL 1 7 7 35 6 29
QUARANTINE 0 0 3 1 0 3
WRITTEN WARNINGS 9 65 83
P.OA TICKETS 7 24 16
CONVICTIONS 3 7 5
CALL-OUTS AFTER HOURS 7 25 18
OVER TIME HOURS 21 75 54
B. REVENUES
DOGS & CATS RELEASED 0 0 327.42 87.74 254.66 77.04
LICENSES 1820.02 0 14449.88 0 13220.00 0
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 777.00 574.00 3690.75 1686.90 1618.75 697.30
DOGS REDEEMED 375.50 0 2354.00 0 1898.25 0
SUB TOTAL 2972.52 574.00 20822.05 1774.64 16991.66 756.34
TRAP REVENUE 32.04 128.16 93.49
TOTAL REVENUE 3578.56 22724.85 17841.49
EUTHANISED 1 SICK CAT
1 FERAL CAT
-/ 3 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE \IC'\ICIPALlTY OF CL\Rl:\1GTON
-.;;JE, ~'"'RP,Qg.!:.IL..'"ll.Lr...F. ~HE -..Jll.W.DF.,UE~~<;;n~
\:\-xXXXXXX_'\XX'X_~xXX_~X..'\X.l'\x.\:_\.xx'..'\x'xx~~XX
8EPORT
,1eellnq:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
=i:e fi
-:-:ate:
les, ;;
::eoon :/:
JUNE 21, 1999
,::;[8 ;;'
.:y-L2W #
:ublect:
FD-1 3-99
10.12.6
TIERED RESPONSE
Fiecommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
THAT Fire Department Report FD-13-99 be received for information purposes.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Tiered response, initiated in the 1980's, was set up to dispatch police, fire and
ambulance to what is determined to be a life threatening situation. A life
threatening situation was established as a condition that falls within the following
criteria:-
. absence of breathing
. unconsciousness
. severe bleeding
. motor vehicle accident with ambulance responding
. real or apprehended heart attack
1 .2 Recently there have been two incidents when a tiered response was not
requested. One, where a pedestrian was struck by a vehicle and the other when
a worker fell on a construction site. Both of these incidents happened in our
Station #2, Newcastle Village response area and a concern has been voiced, by
some of our part-time firefighters from that station, regarding Clarington Fire
Department not being requested to respond to these incidents.
ContinI ied.....
" r.., <<,-
"~f" ~.."~'"
..", ~ I"H"",roo:.'NJ.ll '::V'-:Lf" ,'.,', "
901
FO-13-99
1.3
1.4
2.
2.1
2.3
3.
3.1
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
The additional criteria was approved based on the lack of availability of I
ambulances in the Municipality, especially in the rural areas.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.""
In both cases. assistance from the fire department may have been warranted,
however the decision was not made, by the ambulance dispatch, to call for our
participation in a tiered response.
From time to time the criteria is reviewed and the level of participation by various
agencies has changed. For instance, the Durham Regional Police do not take an
active part in medical emergencies. The regional fire departments respond at
different levels, some responding to every medical call while others respond only
when absolutely necessary. Clarington Fire Department follows the criteria as set
out in paragraph 1.1. In addition, in the early 1990's, Council approved the
following criteria be incorporated by Clarington Fire Department's response
procedures:
.
.
.
when no ambulance is available
when it has been determined that our assistance is definitely required; or
when it is determined that fire department personnel can be on the scene
before the ambulance and able to provide needed medical assistance.
With the introduction of defibrillators into the fire service, participation in medical
calls has increased. There continues, however, to be cases where the fire
departments are not tiered when they could assist and are tiered when their
assistance is not required.
REPORT
A tiered response committee has been established to review the criteria in an
attempt to make it easier for ambulance dispatchers to make the right call. A
complete review will be undertaken over the next several moths.
Staff will continue to provide Council with any pertinent information that arises or
advise of any changes that may be recommended by the committee.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is respectfully recommended that Fire Department Report No. 13-99 be received
for information purposes.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
\
)0r.
Michael G.
Fire Chief.
'. ) ,
., . . I
(' i!
..../( __ I~ I-v' /' -=""___'-_
Creighton, AMCT(a), CMM11,
d V ~<<-!'~ - ~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer.
I
I
MC/sr
(-, I' ')
1J(
I
I
...
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
TH~uet~XIlmm(JGX~LE
REPORT
i
..
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
File #
Res. #
By-Law #
Date:
June 21, 1999
Report #: CS 09 99 File #:
Subject:
..
t
t
...
ORONO ARENA EXPANSION PROJEO
Recommendations:
..
..
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
.. 1.
2.
\
..
3.
..
..
~
~
I
..
4.
THAT Report CS-09-99 be received; and
THAT Council approve forthwith an additional $50,000 as an interest free loan
(totalling $175,000) to be drawn on as required by the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association; and
THAT the repayment plan of the loan be established at 7 annual installments of
twenty-five ($25,000) each with the first payment due December 31, 2000 and the
subsequent payments due on December 31, 2001; December 31, 2002; December
31, 2003; December 31, 2004; December 31, 2005; and the final payment due
December 31, 2006; and
THAT the required additional funds be drawn from the ImpadEscrow Reserve Fund
Account #111 0-196-X; and
THAT the Orono Amateur Athletic Association and the Orono Arena Board be
advised of action taken.
5.
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 At the February 15, 1999 General Purpose & Administration Committee meeting Report
CS-04-99 (attachment #1) was approved authorizing staff to provide an interest free loan to
the Orono Amateur Athletic Association for the purpose of expanding the facilities at the
Orono Arena and Community Centre.
1.2 Since that time, staff in conjunction with representatives of the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association have advanced the project to the tender phase. Tenders were called and
received by the municipality with the low bid of two hundred and fifty-eight thousand, four
hundred dollars ($258,400). Please refer to report TR-34-99 for details of the tender
..
\
lilt
l
,
...
,
...
i..
\
...
process.
"""" I:t\ """
P.Pfl'1~RfCYC.C
THIS IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAP[fl
1 . .
!UUI
.. ./2
REPORT CS-09-99
- 2 -
JUNE 21, 1999
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
1.3 Subsequently, attempts were made to "cut-back" on the project to meet the original budget
estimate of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), however, the tender estimate could
only be reduced by twelve thousand seven hundred dollars ($12,700) without jeopardizing
the integrity of the project.
1.4 The revised project cost is now established as follows:
. Construction $ 245,700
. Professional Fees $ 25,000
. Revised Project Cost $ 270,700
. Less approved budget $. 225,000
. TOTAL REQUIRED FUNDS .$ 45,700
1.5 A letter received from Mr. Neill Allin President of the Orono Amateur Athletic Association
(attachment #2), requesting Council approval for the additional funds and a commitment to
the re-payment plan is provided for the information of Council.
1.6 Staff is recommending a forthwith approval as the project schedule is extremely tight if the
project is to be completed prior to the commencement of the Durham Central Agricultural
Society Annual Fair in September 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
L' i' o.-C.Q. -> C~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer
JPC: dm
Attachments
J IJ 2
I
'-
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON
,
!
...
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
February 15, 1999
..
CS-04-99
...
ORONO ARENA EXPANSION PROJECT
.
..
...
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
.. 1.
2.
~.
... 3.
.. 4.
...
, 5.
}'
,
...
6.
I
...
7.
...
THAT Report CS-04-99 be received; and
THAT Council endorse the Orono Arena Expansion Project, subject to receipt of
approval from the Durham Central Agricultural Society; and
THAT Council approve an interest free loan, to an upset limit of one hundred and
twenty five-thousand dollars ($125,000.), to be drawn on as required by the Orono
Amateur Athletic Association; and
THAT a letter of intent for repayment of the loan in five annual instalments of
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.) each with the flI'St payment due December
31, 2000 and the subsequent payments due on December 31, 2001; December 31,
2002; December 31, 2003; and the fmal payment due December 31, 2004 be
received; and
THAT the required funds be drawn from the Impact/Escrow Reserve Fund
Account #1110-196-X; and
THAT the tendering process be administered by the Municipality of Clarington in
conjunction with the Orono Arena Board and the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association; and
THAT the Durham Central Agricultural Society, the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association and the Orono Arena Board be advised of action taken.
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 At the November 23, 1998 meeting of Council, a delegation by Mr. Ray Bester, President
of the Orono Amateur Athletic Association was received and referred to staff.
1.2 In his delegation Mr. Bester explained the need for an expansion to the Orono Arena
involving the addition of 2 dressing rooms, a locker room, a janitorial room and a meeting
room, with an estimated cost of two hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars ($225,000.)
for the project.
\
..
,
,
...
\
....
..
,
!
...
lUlu)
REPORT CS-04-99
- 2 -
FEBRUARY 15, 1999
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
1.3 The delegation, specifically requested assistance from the Municipality with the following:
. Assistance with Building Permits
. Verifying Building Codes
. Advice for Tendering Process
. Interim Financing
1.4 Subsequently, staff met with Mr. Bester on January 13, 1999 to discuss the project, and
devise a plan of action to accommodate the request of the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association.
2.0 DURHAM CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
2.1 Notwithstanding the existing Orono Arena is owned by the Municipality and operated by
the Orono Arena Board with the authority of the Municipality of Clarington, the land on
which the building is located is owned by the Durham Central Agricultural Society.
2.2 Through our discussions with Mr. Bester it was noted that the Durham Central
Agricultural Society is aware of and has endorsed this project, however staff is requesting
that a letter stating the Society's approval should be received prior to commencement of
the project.
3.0 BUILDING PERMITS/CODES
3.1 Recognizing that the existing structure is owned by the Municipality, a building permit is
required however the building permit fee will be waived, as is the case with all municipal
construction.
3.2 To assist the Association with issues related to the Building Code, staff has assigned a
representative of the Building Department to work directly with this project on a
consultative basis.
4.0 TENDERING PROCESS
4.1 During the meeting with Mr. Bester, it was requested that the Municipality provide
assistance with the tendering process. Through that discussion, it was decided that it
would be in the interest of both parties to have the project tendered through the
Municipality, in conjunction with the Orono Amateur Athletic Association and the Orono
Arena Board.
1 U Ij 4
\
!
..
\
r
..
...
..
...
!
..
...
\
~
\
...
..
.
,
...
\
i
...
,
1
..
..
L
I
..
...
...
..
REPORT CS-04-99
- 3 -
FEBRUARY 15, 1999
4.2 This will indemnify the Association members with respect to concerns raised related to
builders risk, as the Municipality's insurance carriers will provide this coverage under our
existing insurance policy and further it should be noted that the Municipality's liability
coverage extends to the Orono Arena Board not to the Athletic Association. As such it is
recommended that the Arena Board have a presence in the tendering process.
5.0 FINANCING
5.1 The delegation identified a preliminary goal of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.)
in commitments prior to proceeding with the project. Currently the Association has
commitments of fItly-one thousand dollars ($51,000.) and more recently has received
Council approval for a grant of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000.), through the
Advance Funding Program - Ontario Lottery Corporation totalling ninety-six thousand
dollars ($96,000.) in commitments.
5.2 During discussions with Mr. Bester a specific request for an interest free loan from the
Municipality in the amount of one hundred & twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000.)
was received and referred to the Treasurer.
5.3 Subsequently, a recommendation to provide an interest free loan to an upset limit of one
hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars was forwarded with terms established over 5
years, to be repaid with 5 equal installments of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.)
each, with the flI'St payment due on December 31,2000 and that the funds are to be drawn
from the ImpactlEscrow Reserve Fund Account #1110-196-X.
5.4 Should Council approve the interim fmancing scenario, commitments for this project total
two hundred and twenty-one thousand dollars ($221,000.). Mr. Bester expressed no
difficulty in fund-raising the additional four thousand dollars ($4,000.) to meet the total
project estimate.
6.0 CONCLUSION
6.1 With the approval of Council, staff will initiate a project team representing the required
Municipal disciplines to assist the Orono Amateur Athletic Association with this project
through its completion, including project administration.
U ,) J
REPORT CS-04-99
- 4 -
FEBRUARY 15, 1999
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
6.2 Staff are confident that with the proven track record of the Orono Amateur Athletic
Association over the past 20 years that the fmancing plan is attainable.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
Joseph P. Caruana, Director
Community Services Department
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Chief Administrative Officer
JPC:pg
1 U!) 6
I
~
..
\
1
...
\
t
..
...
\
!
...
..
r.
~,
...
~
...
I
..
t
...
I
..
~
i
...
\
t'
..
..
L
t
,
...
....
..
I
..
Orono Amateur Athletic Association "Incorporated"
P.o. Box 165, Orono, Ontario LOB IMO
June 15, 1999
pmwq
JUN 1 5 1999
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
MARKETING. TOURISM &
COMMtlNICATIONS
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance St.
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3A6
~~ r:;; !:~.''''~.. ~~~~ ri0
.. ~ 1l;E '~, r:....~. ~ :a. iJ
Attention: Fred Horvath
jt;~i J 5 l'f9~
Dear Mr. Horvath,
Re: Orono Arena Expansion
t~tlt~It.\PAutt Of ClAR1NGTO~
k~~~MUN[ti' &r~,,!crs O(PAFUMENT
-. ~............
Since there was an overrun of the estimated construction budget
for the proposed expansion of the Orono Arena, the Orono Amateur
Athletic Association is requesting an additional fifty thousand
dollars ($50,000.00) to be added to the interest free loan and
with the repayment of the loan to be made in seven annual
installments of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00).
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
:/ r:.PaL
Neil Allin
President
.J i 7
L '\
t
...
L
~
~
..
\
L.
t
..
1
'-
~
'-
~
...
I
~..
;
..
t
..
~
I'
..
L
~
t..
i
L.
i
t.
\
...
I
~
,
,
..
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRA nON COMMITTEE File #
Date:
JUNE 21, 1999
Res. #
Report No.: ADDENDUM TO WD-24-99
By-Law #
Subject:
AMENDMENTS TO TRAFFIC BY-LAW 91-58
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Addendum to Report WD-24-99 be received; and
2. THAT the revised by-law attached to Addendum to Report WD-24-99 be passed by
Council.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1: Key Map (revised)
No.2: Proposed by-law amendment for parking in various locations (revised)
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 At the General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting held on June 7, 1999, the
Council of the Municipality of Clarington reviewed Report WD-24-99, but referred
Recommendation # 6 and the associated by-law amendment, concerning parking/stopping
regulations in the Bowmanville West Central Area, back to staff for further review.
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 A meeting was held June 11, 1999 with Public Works, Planning and Fire Department staff
to review the parking/stopping regulations. A revised by-law is attached to reflect the
agreed findings.
1 'I U i
ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: WD-24-99
PAGEl
Clarington Boulevard, North of King Street:
It was agreed that the proposed ''No Stopping" restrictions in front of the cinemas could be
changed to ''No Parking" to pennit motorists to legally drop off passengers. The ''No
Parking" regulations are necessary to ensure fire access to the building and eliminate
permanent parking so as to at least reduce visual obstructions for pedestrians leaving the
cinemas. Three (3) on-street parking spaces can be provided on the west side of Clarington
Boulevard just south of Uptown Avenue.
Clarington Boulevard, South of King Street:
Although the road section from King Street to 90 metres southerly will be posted as ''No
Parking" because it is required for travel and turn lanes, on-street parking will be pennitted
on both sides of Clarington Boulevard from that point southerly.
Uptown Avenue:
Uptown Avenue will be changed from ''No Stopping" to ''No Parking" on the south side
. while parking will still be pennitted on the north side.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 From the above, it is concluded that the revised by-law provides additional on-street
parking, and pennits the dropping off of passengers while still providing the necessary sight
lines to ensure public safety.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
DUectorofPublicVVorks
;) ~-:~
Franklin VV~
Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*SA V*ce
15/06/99
1 1 G 2
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
l
;
r
I
...
~
t,
..
t
..
\
I
...
I
...
I;
..
. ~
1. a::
c:
CI)
t e
..
t
1-
L
I
I;
...
i
L.
i
..
L
~
..
~
'-
I
..
r
..
~
-
c:
.s
0)
.e
.!!
(..)
wmanville Blvd.
1, I
iu)
I
Uptown Ave
~~ I
~
LEGEND
No Parking
IV
~.~
s
i DATE:JUNE 1999
i
REVISED
J
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 99-
J
Being a By-law to amend By-law 91-58 being a By-law to Regulate
Traffic on Highways, Municipal and Private Property in the
Municipality of Clarington
J
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it desirable to
amend By-law 91-58;
J
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Municipality ofClarington enacts as follows:
1) Schedule II "No Parking" of By-law 91-58 is amended by:
A) adding the following reference:
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
Highway Side Between Prohibited Times or Davs
Toronto Street East & South South limit of Anytime
(Newcastle) Toronto Street and
east limit 0 f
Toronto Street
Bernard Street West Third Street and Anytime
(Bowmanville) South limit of
Bernard Street
Liberty Street Both North limit to Anytime
North the south limit
(Darlington) of#6275 Liberty
Street North
Clarington West 90m North of King Anytime
Boulevard Street to 90m South
(Bowmanville) of King Street
Clarington East Uptown A venue and Anytime
Boulevard 90m South of King
(Bowmanville) Street
Uptown A venue South Clarington Boulevard Anytime
(Bowmanville) and the east limit of
Uptown Avenue
Bowmanville North Green Road and Anytime
Boulevard Clarington Boulevard
(Bowmanville)
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
,
u't
ATTACHMENTNO.: 1-
ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: wn-24-9;J
\
...
I
f
i..
- 2 -
2) Schedule VI "Angle Parking" of By-law 91-58 is amended by;
't
b
..
A) adding the following reference:
t
r
...
Column 1
Highway
Column 2
Side
Column 3
Between
Church Street
North
East and West limit of
(Bowmanville) # I 0 Church
Street
"
f.
..
Onniston Street
(Hampton)
South
East and West limit of
#43 Onniston Street
...
3)
TIlls By-law shall come into force on the date that it is approved and when signs to the effect
are erected.
,
t
'-
BY-LAW read a first and second time this 28th day of June 1999.
BY -LA W read a third time and finally passed this 28th day of June 1999.
!
..
l
&..
MAYOR
I
I
...
I
..
CLERK
I
I
..
f
f
..
...
l
iI.
....
...
i
;
i..
10J
r
'-
t
lr.
'-
Meeting:
,
f
'-
Date:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File #
JUNE 21, 1999
Res. #
File #: B.01.12.49
By-Law #
!
..
Report No.: WD-27-99
Subject:
!
t
...
APPLICATION FOR ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
53 KING STREET EAST, BOWMANVILLE
BOVILLE HOLDINGS (1997) (THOMAS wmTE)
I
~
Recommendations:
I
~
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
~
l
!
L.
i
..
!
i..
,
~,
r
..
!
~
L
~
...
lr..
...
1. THAT Report WD-27-99 be received;
2.
THAT Council pass a by-law authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement,
shown as Schedule 'A' to the proposed by-law (see Attachment No.4), between the
Municipality of Clarington and Boville Holdings (1997) (Thomas White), owner of the
property, to permit parts of the building, Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-19050, to encroach onto
the road allowance known as King Street and Division Street, in the former Town of
Bowmanville;
3.
THAT the applicants be responsible for all costs, such as survey and legal costs, associated
with this agreement;
4.
THAT the Municipality's solicitor be directed to take all actions necessary to complete the
transaction; and
5.
THAT Mr. Stephen F. Shine, Solicitor, be advised of Council's decision.
1
I i U 0
REPORT NO.: WD-27-99
PAGE 2
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1: Key Map
No.2: Copy of correspondence from Stephen F. Shine dated May 6, 1999
No.3: Proposed by-law
No.4: Copy of the proposed Encroachment Agreement between the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington and Thomas White
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Boville Holdings (1997) (Thomas White) purchased the property shown as 53 King Street
East from the Municipality of Clarington in 1998.
During the review of plans submitted for a building permit, it became apparent that portions
of the building, Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-19050, were encroaching onto the road allowance
on King Street and Division Street (Attachment No.1).
Permits were issued, dated July 8, 1998, on the condition that the applicant apply for and
obtain an encroachment agreement.
The application to permit an encroachment was received on May 7, 1999.
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 The existing encroachments are on both King Street (part 1) and Division Street (part 2)
shown on Reference Plan 40R-19050 (Attachment No.1).
The King Street encroachment (part 1) consists of the eves of the building overhanging the
road allowance. The front of the building is on the property line. The extent of the
encroachment is 1.33 feet.
On Division Street, the eves overhang on the road allowance for the entire length of the
building (part 2). In addition, the actual building encroaches onto most of the Division
I
I \.J I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
I..
REPORT NO.: WD-27-99
PAGE 3
L
Street road allowance abutting the building. The encroachment (part 2) from King Street is
1.33 feet and at the southerly end of the building the encroachment is 2.70 feet.
i..
~
4.0
4.1
CONCLUSION
L
The subject encroachments have existed for a very long time. The applicant has agreed to
the conditions of the Encroachment Agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that Council
pass the by-law to permit the encroachment, provided the applicant pays all costs and
satisfies all conditions of the Encroachment Agreement.
~
~
..
~.
I
l..
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
..
;
t.
~s,~
Director of Public Works
o ft't~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
~
'-
JCO*SA V*ce
15/06/99
~
Pc:
Stephen F. Shine
231 King Street East
P.O. Box 26038
Oshawa, ON
LIH 8R4
,
..
i..
i..
lilt
...
...
...
...
I
i..JO
q,Q ~
&~ ~"
.. . .. '. . 1>~
. " .... '..l'.)..
. ':':-:-:-:.:-' ,....,-
I
1
I
PART 3 OF
40R- 19050
. . ...... . .
.::::: ~: ~:::: ~: ~: ~:: ~. ~.:
"::::::::::::::::::.:..,
00 ..... :'," . . . .
. .. ... .... . . . .
'0. . . .... . . . .
. .... ....
t-
#/
~
O~
~~
<S-
PART 2 OF
40R- 19050
PART 4 OF
40R- 19050
u
l'i
~~~
8
/
SUBJECT
SITE
~.
~>" \\
'\\ \ \
DRAWN BY: J.R.M
REPORT WD-27 -99
ATTACHMENT NO.1
DATE: JUNE 1999
1 I ,~ 1
f
t
J
Ii
J
!
J
L
L
L
L
L
231 King Street East
P.O. Box 26038
Oshawa. Ontario
LID 8R~
Telephone (905) 571-2559
Telefax (905) 579-2846
STEPHEN F. SHINE
BARRISTER & SOLICITOR
May 6, 1999
L
L
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LlC 3A6
.r...r~'ENI:.~
I
,
--.---1.
I
._-------j
I
i'tol:.~F'''_rrY "
CLAP!~rGrlRJ
H:LciVEO
~~.F:te
I D;xl.~ \,I'.;,:~~
-----.!-
l
;:t~~ Ar.;':,:,;~
Dear Ms. O'Neill:
.'
f'
I
-
.-i
I
.....-.-----1
I
I
MAY 0 7 1999
.:O!~ .' ;"1'":"" ... ...
Attention: Jan O'Neill
f"\C:-.
<J.t'I.
11~.'?;.'~'::.~:~ ~:'~...:
r - --,-
17J~.: :\.t,~..:r:(..;~~ ;~:~~....;::
I F;ie ,
Ul "" I" I' U~{~~.~
r....__._ . i.,/. .,'-...0
l
i..
RE: 53 Kina Street East. Bowmanville. Our File No. 6883
l
L
l
\..
l
L
L
As you are aware, we act as the solicitor for Boville Holdings (1997) Inc.
Please consider this correspondence as my client's formal request to enter into an
Encroachment Agreement with the Municipality of Clarington with respect to certain
encroachments that occurred on the above-noted property.
Enclosed herewith, please find a draft Reference Plan for your review and
file. This draft Reference Plan appears to be fairly straightforward. If it meets with
your approval, please telephone the writer so that we can make arrangements with the
surveyor to attend to the final registration.
My client has entered into Encroachment Agreements with the
Municipality on other properties. My client is prepared to satisfy all of the conditions
imposed by the Municipality in its standard Encroachment Agreement including, but not
limited to, obtaining insurance naming the Municipality as a loss payee, and bearing all
of the Municipality's costs in connection with the preparation and registration thereof.
Yours truly,
Dictated but not read.
i
L
SFS/af
Enc!.
cc:
STEPHEN F. SHINE
~.
L
Mr. Fred Horvath
Mr. Tom White
Ms. Gail Lupton
I
L.
I ; J
ATTACHMENT NO.: 2
REPORT NO.: WD-27-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE lYfUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
J
BY-LAW NUMBER 99-
J
Being a By-law to authorize an encroachment agreement between the
Corporation of the Municipality ofClarington and Boville Holdings
(1997) (Thomas White), Bowmanville, Ontario. for the property
located at 53 King Street East. Bowmanville, Ontario.
J
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
J
1.
THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of
the Municipality of Clarington, and seal with the Corporation Seal. an Agreement between
Boville Holdings (1997) (Thomas White) and said Corporation; and
J
2.
THAT this agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A" form part of this By-law.
J
By-law read a first and second time this 28th day of June, 1999.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this 28th day of June, 1999.
J
J
Mayor
J
J
Clerk
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
J
I I
ATTACHMENT NO.: 3
REPORT NO.: WD-27-~~
I
L
L
L
L
L
1
L.
i
L.
1
L.
L
,
i
..
L
L
I
L.
I
I..
l
L
L
f
L.
~
TillS AGREEMENT made as of~-,
BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON
(hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality')
-and-
THOMAS WHITE
(hereinafter referred to as the "Licensee")
WHEREAS:
A.
The Licensee is the registered owner of the Lands in the Municipality of Clarington
described in Schedule "A" annexed hereto, which lands are municipally known as Part of
Lot 16, Block "T' Part of King Street and Part of Division Street. all according to John
Grant's Plan. being Part of Lot 12, Concession I, all in the Town of Bowmanville.
(hereinafter referred to as "the Property");
B.
The public highway(s) known as Queen Street. forms part of the road system under the
jurisdiction of the Municipality;
C.
The Licensee has made application to the Municipality for permission to maintain an
encroachment within the road allowance known as King Street and Division Street. former
Town of Bowmanville. in the manner and to the extent as described in Schedule "B"
(hereinafter referred to as the "Encroachments");
D.
The Encroachments are to be erected and maintained in accordance with the Reference Plan
No. 40R-17466. Parts 1 and 2. prepared by Brown & Coggan Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyor.
dated April 1. 1997. and annexed hereto as Schedule "A";
E.
The Municipality has granted to the Licensee permission to erect and maintain the
Encroachments upon the condition that the Licensee enters into and executes this
Agreement, which the Licensee has agreed to do; and
F.
The making of this Agreement authorized by By-law No..assed on the t
true copy of which is annexed as Schedule "C",
, a
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the
premises, and of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Municipality hereby grants to the Licensee permission to erect and maintain the
Encroachments until such time as the removal of the Encroachments is required as
hereinafter provided (hereinafter referred to as the "Licence").
2.
The Licensee will, at his own cost. charge and expense and to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works of the Municipality (hereinafter referred to as "the Director") keep
and maintain the Encroachments in good and proper repair and condition.
1 I
")
L
ATTACHMENT NO.: 4
REPORT NO.: WD-27-99
J
- 2-
J
3.
J
the Licensee will, at his own cost. charge and expense and to the satisfaction of the Director,
alter or remove the Encroachments from King Street and Division Street forthwith after
being given thirty (30) days' notice, in writing, from the Director to do so, before the date
specified by such notice without being entitled to any compensation whatsoever for such
alteration or removal, and if the Licensee fails to alter or remove the said Encroachments as
requested by the Director, the Municipality may remove or alter the same and restore Queen
Street, all at the cost, charge and expense of the Licensee and the certificate of the Director
as to the cost of such removal or alteration or restoration shall be final and binding upon the
Licensee and the Municipality may recover the same from the Licensee in any court of
competent jurisdiction, as a debt due and owing to the Municipality.
J
J
4.
The Licensee will, from time to time and at all times hereafter, well and truly save, defend
and keep hannless and fully indemnify the Municipality and any other Corporations,
Boards, Commissions or Bodies having utilities or services which may in any manner be
affected by the erection or maintenance of the Encroachments from and against all actions,
suits, claims and demands whatsoever which may be brought against or made upon any or
all of them and from and against all loss, costs, charges, damages and expenses whatsoever
which may be sustained, incurred or paid by any or all of them, regardless or whether or not
they be parties hereto, for or by reason of or on account of the permission hereby granted to
the Licensee and/or the exercise by the Licensee of such permission and/or the erection and
maintenance of the Encroachments and appurtenances thereto and/or anything in any
manner relating thereto, including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all
actions, suits, claims and demands which may arise as a result of water dripping from the
Encroachments onto the said public sidewalk and/or highway because of the lack of action,
suit, claim or demand be. brought against or made upon the Municipality or any of its
respective officers, servants, workers or employees, the Municipality may, upon written
notice to the Licensee, and if not forbidden by the Licensee within fourteen days thereafter,
if the Municipality shall see fit, compromise any such actions, suits, claims or demands on
such tenns as the Municipality shall see fit, and the Licensee shall thereupon forthwith pay
to the Municipality the sum or sums to be paid together with such sum as shall represent the
reasonable costs of the Municipality or its solicitors in defending or settling any such
actions, suits, claims or demands, but if the Licensee forbids such compromise within the
said period, or if no such compromise be affected, then the Licensee may be made party to
such actions, suits, claims or demands and will in every case fully indemnify the
Municipality, its officers, servants, workers or employees.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
5.
The Licensee shall facilitate the repair, relocation and construction of any and all utilities
over or under the said Encroachments, as may be required from time to time by the Director
by written notice given to the Licensee.
J
6.
The Licensee shall obtain and maintain public liability insurance (personal injury and
property damage) covering the maintenance of the Encroachments in the amount of at least
One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all damages arising out of an accident or
occurrence or series of accidents or occurrences naming the Municipality as additional
named insured and containing a cross-liability endorsement all satisfactory to the Treasurer
of the Municipality. The Licensee shall deliver to the Treasurer of the Municipality, from
time to time when requested, a copy of such insurance policy certified and signed by the
insurer. The issuance of such policy or policies of insurance or the acceptance of it or them
by the Municipality shall not be construed to relieve the Licensee from responsibility for
other or larger claims for which the Licensee may be held responsible. If i) the Property is
used for residential purposes and ii) the Property is temporarily unoccupied and iii)
following the application of the Licensee to the Municipality's Treasurer, the Treasurer is of
the opinion that insurance required to be obtained pursuant to this paragraph is not
commercially available at nonnal consumer rates for home owner's insurance, the Licensee
shall not be required to maintain such insurance during the period of time that the Property
is unoccupied.
J
j
J
J
J
3
J
t
~
l
3-
i
1..
7. The Licensee shall transfer or sell the Property or any portion thereof then i) the Licensee
shall forthwith notify the Municipality in writing of such sale or transfer, together with the
name and address of the transferee or purchaser and ii) this Licence shall terminate on the
expiry of the period of thirty (30) days following such sale or transfer unless such transferee
or purchaser, within the aforesaid thirty (30) days, enters into an agreement with the
Municipality to assume the obligations of the Licensee pursuant to this Licence. On the
making of the aforesaid assumption agreement with the Municipality, the transferee or
purchaser shall be deemed to be the Licensee for the purposes of this Licence and the
transferrer or vendor of the Property shall have no further obligation under this Licence.
I
t,
i..
.
L.
i
1..
8. Without derogating from paragraph 3 hereof, if the Municipality passes regulations which
would have the effect of requiring removal of the Encroachments over King Street and
Division Street, the Licensee, upon receipt of notice in writing from the Director to do so,
will remove the Encroachments and appurtenances thereto from King Street and Division
Street and restore King Street and Division Street, all to the satisfaction of the Director
before the date specified in such notice, without being entitled to any compensation
whatsoever for such removal, and if the Licensee fails to remove the Encroachments and
appurtenances thereto and restore King Street and Division Street as herein provided, the
Municipality may remove same at the cost, charge and expense of the Licensee and the
certificate of the Director as to the cost of such removal shall be final and binding upon the
Licensee and the Municipality may recover such costs from the Licensee in any court of
competent jurisdiction as a debt due and owing to the Municipality.
,
~
f
~
,
i
..
9. The Encroachments shall be constructed, installed. occupied, and maintained in such a
manner so as to ensure that there will be no interference with pedestrian or vehicular traffic
and that the line of sight of any traffic sign or signal is not obscured.
,
..
10. The construction, installation, occupation, operation and maintenance of the Encroachments
shall comply with all applicable statutes, by-laws and regulations.
L
11. The Licensee will pay to the Municipality such fee or fees for the privilege hereby granted
to maintain the Encroachments as may be hereafter from time to time prescribed by the
Council of the Municipality to be paid by all owners of encroachments which project in
whole or in part over any public highway, street or lane in the Municipality of Clarington
for the privilege of maintaining such encroachments.
l
l
12. All such sums and costs so paid, sustained or incurred by the Municipality as aforesaid, and
all such annual fees or minimum fees, or further or other fees to be paid by the Licensee as
aforesaid, shall form and constitute a charge or lien on the property until fully discharged by
payment thereof.
I
..
13. The Municipality, its respective officers, servants, workers, employees, agents and
contractors Wlder its control or supervision or any of them shall have the right from time to
time and at all reasonable times during the currency of this Agreement, to enter in and upon
the Property and/or the Encroachments or any part thereof, with all necessary people, plant
equipment and material for the purposes of inspecting the Encroachments or removing the
same from Queen Street is hereinbefore provided; provided that such inspection shall not
free or relieve the Licensee in any way whatsoever from the liability under the covenant
hereinbefore set forth to keep and maintain the Encroachments in good and proper repair
and condition,
i
La
L
I...
L
L
1;
4
J
-4-
J
14. Any notice, request, communication or demand under this Licence shall be in writing and
shall be considered properly delivered when given or served personally or by registered
mail to the Municipality at 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario, Attention:
Director of Public Works and the Licensee at 4100 Holt Rd., Hampton, Ontario, LOB 110,
Attention: Thomas White. Such notice, request or demand shall be deemed to have been
delivered on the date it is delivered if given or served personally or on the third day
following mailing, if it is mailed. If at any time notice is delivered by mail and there is any
cessation (whether anticipated or existing) of mail service affecting the delivery of such
notice, the notice shall not be deemed to have been delivered until five (5) business days
after the date that nonnal mail service is restored.
J
J
J
15. This Agreement may be registered against title to the Property and the cost of preparation
and registration of the same shall be paid by the Licensee. The Licensee shall deliver to the
Municipality, in registerable fonn and at the Licensee's cost, postponements of any
encumbrances registered against title to the Property.
J
16. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as giving to the Licensee anything more than
pennission to erect on and attach the Encroachments to Queen Street and to maintain the
same until such time as the removal of the Encroachments from King Street and Division
Street may be required as hereinbefore provided.
J
J
17. This Agreement and everything contained herein shall enure to the benefit of and be
binding upon the parties hereto and their respective (where applicable) heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns.
J
18. This Licence shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
Province of Ontario and the parties submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the Province
of Ontario in order to enforce this Licence.
J
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Licence has been duly executed by the parties hereto as the J..,...i
day and year first above written. .
THE CORPORATION OF THE J...'
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ..
Mayor - Diane Hamre
J
By:
J
And:
Clerk - Patti Barrie
J
------------------- ) -----------------------------
WITNESS: Thomas White. Property Owner
J
Dated this l'
J
J
1 I
J
J
1
..
I
i..
L
Meeting:
,
L.
Date:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File #
JUNE 21,1999
Res. #
By-Law #
F;
L
Report No.: WD-28-99
Subject:
L
...
J.
J.'
L.
APPLICATION FROM 542985 ONTARIO LIMITED (D. V ANANDEL)
TO STOP-UP AND CLOSE A PORTION OF GAUD GATE (pART 1, PLAN
40R-XXXX)
TO ESTABLISH A 0.3M (1 FOOT) RESERVE AT THE EASTERLY END
OF GAUD GATE (pART 1, PLAN 40R-XXXX)
TO DIVERT THE IDGHWAY SHOWN AS OLD SCUGOG ROAD AND
THE INTERSECTION WITH REGIONAL ROAD 57 TO A LOCATION
APPROXIMATELY 55M (177 FEET) NORTH OF THE EXISTING
INTERSECTION
Recommendations:
l
f
l..
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
t
.. 1.
.. 2.
J..
3.
III
4.
,
J.
1..
I
~. 5.
II.
iI.
...
THAT Report WD-28-99 be received;
THAT Staff be authorized to advertise a public hearing required by the Municipal Act to
stop-up and close part of Gaud Gate, being Part 1, Plan 40R - XXXX;
THAT Part 1, Plan 40R-XXXX be established as a O.3m (1 foot) Reserve;
THAT Old Scugog Road at the intersection of Regional Road 57 be diverted approximately
55m (177 feet) north of the existing intersection in accordance with the approved
construction drawings and subdivision agreement between the Municipality and 542985
Ontario Limited;
THAT, if following the Public Hearing, Council approves the by-law to: i) stop-up and
close Gaud Gate; ii) establish Part 1, Plan 40R-XXXX as a O.3m (1 foot) Reserve; and iii)
i I I \...-i
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
PAGE 2
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
divert the intersection of Old Scugog Road and Regional Road 57; that the Mayor and Clerk
be authorized to execute the necessary documents;
6. THAT the Clerk obtain written approval of the by-law by registered mail, from the Region
of Durham; and
7. THAT Mr. Bob Annaert, D.G. Biddle and Associates Limited, the Regional Municipality of
Durham and the residents of Old Scugog Road area be advised of Council's decision.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1: Key Map
No.2: Application to Stop Up and Close Gaud Gate (542985 Ontario Limited)
No.3: Correspondence from Uldis Siksna, Regional Municipality of Durham, dated
April 4, 1997
Correspondence from the Regional Municipality of Durham dated April 21, 1998
Report WD-II-98
Petition from Keith Clarke and Joan Clarke dated May 16, 1999
No.4:
No.5:
No.6:
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Draft Plan approval was granted for DEV 87-88 (18T-87076), with conditions, on July 27,
1992. The details regarding the proposed development and a chronology of events leading
up to Report WD-11-98 (Attachment No.5), submitted to Council on February 2, 1998, are
explained in that report. Council, at its meeting of February 9, 1998, passed Resolution
GP A-83-98, as follows:
"THAT the developer's application for closure and conveyance be
withdrawn;
THAT the proposed intersection construction at Old Scugog Road and
Regional Road 57, as modified by the Region, be deemed as satisfactory to
meet the conditions of Draft Plan approval as set out in Conditions 17, 18
I i I
L REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
PAGE 3
L
and 19 in Report PD-283-89, submitted on November 6, 1989 (Attachment
No.3);
\
"
I
...
THAT Mr. Bob Annaert and Mr. Bas VanAndel be advised of Council's
decision; and
...
,
i
..
THAT the residents of Old Scugog Road and Gaud Gate be advised of
Council's decision;"
'I
1.
An application to close Gaud Gate was received on March 25, 1999.
L
2.2
Application to Close Gaud Gate
In response to the requirements and conditions of Draft Plan approval, the Region of
Durham reviewed an alternate proposal to deal with the intersection of Old Scugog
Road and Regional Road 57.
L.
..
I
I
..
Although all residents are not in support of this alternative, the majority of residents
do not object.
~
L
i
I
..
Ultimately, Gaud Gate will be stopped-up and closed by by-law at it's easterly limit
with Regional Road 57. A barricade will be installed and the intersection with
Regional Road 57 will be eliminated. A O.3m (1 foot) Reserve will be established
where Gaud Gate terminates.
t
..
,
!
,
..
The approved Draft Plan of Subdivision includes the specifications for realignment
of the intersection, reconstruction of the intersection and restoration of the property.
L
L
2.3
Establishing the O.3m (1 foot) Reserve
The Public Works Department recommends that a by-law be passed to establish a
O.3m (1 foot) Reserve to terminate Gaud Gate (Attachment No.1).
I
i..
l
I i 0
!
Ill.
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
PAGE 4
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J,
.J
J
J
1
J
J
J
J
J
2.4 Diversion of the Intersection of Old Scugog Road and Regional Road 57
Originally, as a condition of Draft Plan approval, the developer was required to
make application to close and convey a portion of Old Scugog Road and the
intersection with Regional Road 57. Gaud Gate was to be reconstructed and the
intersection improved at Regional Road 57 and Gaud Gate. As a result of objections
from residents, the alternative approved by the Region was to move the intersection
to the north as far as possible and terminate the intersection at Gaud Gate and
Regional Road 57 (Attachment No.4). Council endorsed this alternative by
approving Report WD-11-98 (Attachment No.5). It is recommended that a by-law
be passed authorizing the diversion of Old Scugog Road and the intersection at
Regional Road 57, in accordance with approved construction drawings and the
conditions of Draft Plan approval.
2.5 Traffic By-law 91-58, As Amended
Traffic By-law 91-58 will be amended in a separate report to eliminate the Gaud
Gate intersection.
2.6 Petition from Keith and Joan Clarke dated May 16, 1999
As a result of the newspaper advertisement "Amendment to the former Town of
Newcastle By-law 86-112", a petition was received from Keith and Joan Clarke
(Attachment No.6). Although the notice was dealing with a street name change, a
number of residents signed the petition that Keith Clarke and Joan Clarke have been
maintaining the comer of land which will be occupied by the diversion of Old
Scugog Road.
In discussion with Keith Clarke and Joan Clarke, they stated they had not been
informed of this change.
Numerous Public Information Meetings have been held with residents of Old
Scugog Road and Gaud Gate as follows:
1. Wednesday, September 6, 1995
2. Thursday, January 28, 1998
I I 1
i REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
...
PAGE 5
,
t..
L
1..
I
L.
l
1.
,
l
1
L.
3.0
3.1
L
,
i
t.
l
I
..
.
i
..
l
...
i
..
L
L
L
L
Notices of both meetings were hand-delivered by Municipal staff. In addition, the
results of Council's decision regarding Report WD-II-98 were mailed by the
Clerk's Department to all residents.
The developer, as a goodwill gesture, contacted Ms. Clarke and will assist with
planting cedars as screening. Mrs. Clarke and the developer have mutually agreed to
work together when the reconstruction occurs.
A copy of this report (Report WD-28-99) was hand delivered on June 11, 1999, to
all residents of Old Scugog Road and Gaud Gate.
CONCLUSION
Draft Plan approval was granted in 1989 but due to the poor market, the
development has not proceeded. The applicants are prepared to fulfil the conditions
of Draft Plan approval. Although a number of residents are opposed to the proposal
to divert the road and intersection, after several public meetings, this alternative was
the most preferred. The design is finalized and has been approved by the Region of
Durham and the Municipality. It is therefore recommended that Council approve the
recommendations to proceed to pass the necessary by-laws to stop-up and close
Gaud Gate and divert Old Scugog Road, approximately 55m (177 feet) north.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
:J VetJCQ_ (~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
JCO*SA V*ce
15/06/99
ILJ
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
PAGE 6
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Pc: Uldis Siksna
Regional Municipality of Durham
Works Department
Box 623
105 Consumers Drive
Whitby, ON
LIN 6A3
Bob Annaert
D.G. Biddle and Associates Limited
96 King Street East
Oshawa, ON
LIB IB6
Area Residents of Old Scugog Road and Gaud Gate
I L j
t
L
\
II.
l
1
'-
L
L
L
1
L
L
L
L
,
...
L
t
...
i
1..
\
1.~
!
L..
L
1
L.
I
r-
,......
It)
"0
o
o
e:::
PART 1 OF
PLAN 40R-
PRIMARY
INTERSECTION
PROPOSED
SCUGOG COURT
Concession Road 3
C:\ATTACHS\DARL\TRANSFER.DWG I
DRAWN BY: JMIIDATE: JUNE 19991
REPORT NO. WD- 28 -99 \
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 II
l I
1 ILL
POSTAL CODE:
~ M:.~ Z41 \'fJ9 I
542'965 O~\A.e.\C> L\M\,e:t7
4'2.9 L~~;:::.~~~e. ~\\J~
~-r ~y
L.~L- \Nt
PROVINCE: Ot-.1 ,\A.re\ ~ .
TELEPHONE NO. : (90S) ~Z3~~ 7 ~~ .
J
J
J
J
J
APPLICATION FOR ROAD CLOSURE AND CONVEYANCE
PART A - APPLI:CANT I:NPORMATI:ON
DATE:.
APPLICANT:
STREET:
CITY/TOWN:
RE:
MUNICIPAL ROAD ALLOWANCE/RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AND DESCRIBED AS:
Town/Township: Mu,",,\c:.\~u.'O" or n h~\~\O\--i (~\-\~~)
Concession: (1D~~SS.\~~ ":!:>.
~ \S
Being Lot(s)
~~
~etween CQRe~5D~~n(s)
J4 .;. \1.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
]
J
j
J
J
J
J
PART B - DBSCRI:PTI:ON OF LANDS
(Petitioners: Use separate sheet)
Or Block(s) According To
e"-P ~~O\,-.1W ,(..S. G,t...up ~~ Ces.\A.S~\Sws:P'
Original Plan - \- "
~ ~""t..h.~~~e~ e.y-L..,6.~ ,s:>Ilo.,e:P ,-......p\J. -', U!!!::o 7.,.,1
Ae-r ~'<O~\- ~,. r- .... s;-,.
PART C - APPLI:CATI:ON TO CLOSB OR CLOSB AND CONVBY
I/We 54-ZgeS C:~:::>..l\~O L.\",,\~. , being the owner/owners
of property ...~ 11i!!l:;, the Municipal Road Allowance/Right-of-way as described
above, do hePe y ~ request to have said road allowance closed i '.' ... 8_............ ....&E
---'-.I-a in accordance with the Municipality's Policy for Road Closures and
according to the Municipal Act, Section 297, c.M.45, R.S.O. 1990.
PART D - CONPI:RMATI:ON OP OWNERSHIP
i)
,,~c-.
I/We, the undersigned, being the owner/owners of property a8~8~tR! the
municipal lands described above, acknowledge and agree that ownership of
the lands described in Part B is vested solely in the Municipality of
Clarington.
ii) I/nl:::, \..he: uudc;,l,..,l:;,ucJ, J", 1:.........1:..1. ...",u!~...... Llu;<L I,'ll..., have: ~.dl.,puL.....1
ownersnlJ:-' ~i ....lotP 1==-nnR ;:!lht1t-r;ng t-np Rna.d Al1owanr!~J1)~~At sf tJay aas~...':Lc.a
~n t'ar~ ts.
PART B - APPLICANT'S AGREEMENT TO PAY COSTS
I/We, the undersigned, agree to pay all costs associated with the closure <ib..l/",...
liiIlsiilw.Jra BRa liiIliiIw'e) aaee prior to the passing of the by-law and in accordance with
the Municipality's Policy for Road Closure and Conveyance.
- 16 -
1i.3
ATTACHMENT NO.: 1
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
..
,
J I Regional
....rllclp.nty
T"Durham
""'1<s
t lartment
~623
05 Consumers Or.
""'itby, Ontario
U. lad a L 1 N 6A3
-j 688.7721
. : (905) 668.2051
\ A. Si\g~i1is. P,lnf.
i nmlSSloner
..Yorks
Jlease quote our ref:
1.
L
L
I
!
...
t
..
!
L.
~
I
..
!
I
..
~i
1.
L.
!
~
i..
...
~ f ;;1 r .L.t:J....;;1."- f',.'.IV wu...r....;,;J &.1""1 ,
April 4, 1.997
D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited
96 King St. E.
Oshawa, Ontario
L1H 186
Attention: Mr. R.C. Annaert
Project Manager
Dear Sir:
Re: 542985 Ontario Limited
Regional Road #57/0ld Scugog Court/Gaud Gate
Municipality of Clarington
Om" ;on ~ No . 89-C-51
Further to your letter of January 31, 1997, the Regional
Works Department has reviewed the alternatives that you
have provided with respect to the intersection .of the
proposed subdivision street/Old Scugog Court and Regional
Road #57.
, We are prepared to accept a modified version of your
recommendations as shown on the concept plan labelled,
Proposed Conditions - Alternative #2.
The intent of the original proposal was to have one
entrance onto che Regional Road #57 at the best possible
location to accommodate the proposed subdivision as well
as the existing residents. In order to accomplish this,
and taking into consideration the existing residents
concerns, the termination of Gaud Gate (removal of the
culvert and reditching of Regional Road #57) and the
construction of a new entrance is required.
The construction of the new intersection interconnecting
Old Scugog Road/Old Scugog Court and'Regional Road #57 as
shown on drawing #C-4 should be revised in the following
manner:
- Increase the paved section of the travelled
portion of the road in order to accommodate a
15.0 m turning radii
- Increase the section width of the proposed road
from 6.7 m to 8.0 m
. . .2
*
'00'Ib POI' Conlu_r
1 I L "t
ATTACHMENT NO.: 3
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
J7 '97 10:50 FR RMD WORKS DEPT
905 668 2051 TO 19056234169
P.04/04
** TOTAL PAGE.04 **
J
J
I
J
J
J
J
J
J~
"
J
J
J
]
J
J
J
J
J
J
-2-
Therefore, we are requesting that you submit revised
engineering drawings for approval to the Municipality of
Cl~rington for their review anq approval, as well as to
the Region of Durham, in order.to finalize the access
issue. .
Should you have any questions,. please contact the
undersigned.
Yours truly
d~
Uldis Siksna, P. Eng.
, Development Approvals Engineer
us/
cc: s. Vokes, P. Eng., Municipality of Clarington
B. VanAndel, 542985 Ontario Limited
S. Mayhew, Region of Durham
liJ
l
.. G0'd l~lOl
\
!
..
L
}
...
L
The Regional
MunicipalItY
of Dumam . ,
,
L
Works
Department
Bolt &23
'06 Consumers Dr.
Whitby, Ontario
Canacla L,1 N 8A3
(905) 66a.7721
Fax; (905) 568.2051
V.A. 51198111&, P.liq.
COmmissioner
of Works
L
L
Please Quote our ret:
L
l
L..
I
t.
t
~'
..
t
...
t
...
l
L
t
L.
t
!
...
...
_.
April 21, 1998
D.O. Biddle &. Associates Ltd.
96 King Street E. .
Oshawa, Ontario
LllrI IB6
Attention:
R.C. ADnaert '
Project Manager
Re:
542985 Ontario Limited, 18T-87076
Old Scugog Court
Works File: 89~C-51
The Regional Works Department has .reviewecUhe noted engineering drawings
... ' '" , .
and' wish to provide the following comments. . .' .. ,
. .
"the submined engineering tlrawings indicate our concerns and recommendations
related to the modified Alternative No.2 location of the intersection improvement
of Old .Scugog Road and Regional Road 57 and the elimination of access from
Gauds Gate to Regional Road 57.
The en~ccring drawings appear to be acceptable for the preparation of a draft
subdivision agreement. Prior to the preparation of the agreement, the engineering
drawings must be signed, MOE approval certificate for the 8toml sewer & ouifall
must be issued, M-Plari appro~ must be obtained from Regional Planning
Department and Ii detailed (lOst estimate must also be submitted.
Should you require any additional il1fonnation do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned.' . .
Yours trUly,
I ~~;.
John Molica /.
Development Approvals Division
~~~
U~L.::lU U
....----___._ -A".
~.~::..'
ATTACHMENT NO.: 4
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
1
I I L 0
1:>. 0.3.15. C:> ~
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
File #
Res. #
By-Law #
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date:
FEBRUARY 2, 1998
Report #: WD 11 5) 8 File #:
Subject: OLD SCUGOG ROAD/GAUD GATE
ROAD CLOSURE/RECONSTRUCTION (18T-87076)
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. That Report WD-11-98 be received;
2. That the developer's application for closure and conveyance be
withdrawn;
3. That the proposed intersection reconstruction at Old Scugog
Road and Regional Road 57, as modified by the Region, be
deemed as satisfactory to meet the conditions of Draft Plan
Approval as set out in Conditions 17, 18 and 19 in Report
PD-283-89, submitted on November 6, 1989;
4. That Mr. Bob Annaert and Mr. Bas VanAndel be advised of
Council's decision; and
5. That the residents of Old Scugog Road and Gaud Gate be advised
of Council's decision.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1:
No.2:
No.3:
Key Map
Correspondence received from residents
Summary of Residents' Concerns
IlIC'I'CLaD ~ .""'f"
.A"'" 'tJ::I1Il1C'I'CLI
_.' . --- -. --." ..,.- ~. ---
1 I L. I
ATTACHMENT NO.: 5 -
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
f
...
~
1.
,
!
...
..
t:
....
I
..
I
t
II.
~..
..
i
i..
\
L
i
!
..
\
~
...
~
f
..
f
..
L
L
L
i
..
...
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 2
No.4:
Correspondence received from the Regional
Municipality of Durham
2 . 0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Draft Plan approval was granted for DEV 87-88 (18T-87076),
with conditions, on July 27, 1992. The Developer is
proceeding to satisfy these conditions, one of which requires
the closure of the intersection of Old Scugog Road at Regional
Road 57, and improvements to Gaud Gate, which would become the
southerly intersection.
2.2 Recognizing the length of time which had passed since Draft
Plan approval was granted in 1992, the Public Works Department
facilitated an Information Meeting on September 6~. 1995. T~is
meeting allowed the residents in the general area to rev~ew
the proposed changes, hereafter referred to as the lIoriginal
proposalll, i.e, to stop up and close the intersection of Old
Scugog Road and Regional Road 57, and improvements to Gaud
Gate.
3 .0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 Mr. Bob Annaert, D.G. Biddle & Associates, represented the
developer and displayed the proposed -plans for the new
development and the original proposal for changes to the
subject intersections. The majority of residents who attended
the Informat~on_Meeting are opposed_to the original proposal
to close Old Scugog Road - and reconstruct Gaud Gate.
Correspondence received from residents both in support and
opposition is attached -(Attachment No.2) .
3.2 Residents Oooosed to the Prooosal
The Public Works Department summarized concerns that residents
had with the original proposal (Attachment No.3) and proposes
to address those concerns as follows:
I
ILO
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 3
J
J
1
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
3.2.1
Traffic Concerns
i) Traffic volume, speed and truck traffic using Old-
Scugog Road as an alternative to Region~l Road 57;
ii) Visibility at existing (Old Scugog Road) and
proposed (Gaud Gate) intersections;
iii) Additional stop signs at Gaud Gate will increase
noise and traffic backup;
iv) Request traffic signals at Regional Road 57 and
stop signs on Old Scugog Road at Maryleah and
Andelwood Courts;
v) Turning and acceleration lanes requested to be
installed on Regional Road 57;
vi) Traffic at Christmas due to the annual display of
lights which attracts numerous visitors.
Resoonse:
The Public Works Department is presently conducting a
traffic and radar study to determine if warrants for stop
signs, traffic signals and further speed zones are met.
The Public Works Department will liaise with the
developer and the Region of Durham regarding visibility
and the installation of turning lanes on Regional Road
57. Present proposals for intersection improvements at
either Old Scugog Road or Gaud Gate are both acceptable
to the Region of Durham. Christmas traffic was monitored
during the 1997 Christmas season to see what possible
improvements could be accomplished and staff are not
proposing any changes to traffic controls in the area at
this time.
/ ~
I L /
~
t-
..
L
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 4
L
3.2.2
l
i..
~
l
...
t
!
..
L
,
ir.
3.2.3
,
..
L
1
..
l
..
(
i
..
3.2.4
1
...
I
i.
l
f
~
!
...
...
Trees
The residents wanted a guarantee that the trees on Gaud
Gate would not be affected.
Resoonse:
The original proposal included plans to preserve all
trees, and staff were confident that the proposed
construction methods would produce acceptable results.
Residents were advised that no guarantee could be given,
but every effort would be made to preserve all trees.
Historical House on Gaud Gate
Both staff and residents agree that adoption of the
original proposal would have the greatest impact on the
residence on Gaud Gate and the res:tdences ~n the west
side of Old Scugog Road, opposite Gaud Gate. The owners
of the house on Gaud Gate purchased the house in 1995.
Reconstruction of Gaud Gate as part of the original
proposal would include surface excavation, installation
of drainage works and asphalt surface. Traffic volume
would increase on Gaud Gate if the original proposal was
implemented.
Sidewalks
Some residents felt that the construction of sidewalks
represented a solution to a safe walking area. Other
residents feel that the area is rural, in nature, and are
opposed to sidewalks, but want traffic slowed so that
walking on the road is not a danger.
Resoonse:
Sidewalks are not recommended to be included in the
design.
IJJ
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 5
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
.-
J
3.2.5
3.2.6
3.2.7
Environmental Issues (Sewaqe and Water)
Residents commented that proposed lot sizes may affect
sewage disposal or cause well interference.
ResDonse:
The Draft Plan is already approved and the lot sizes
exceed the requirements of the Municipality's by-laws.
Chanqed Conditions from When Land Purchased
The proposed changes in road configuration were felt to
compromise the conditions in which present residents
purchased their properties.
ResDonse:
Residences located within 120 m (400 feet) of the subjec~
Draft Plan were notified of the Application for Rezoning
in 1988. In addition, notices of the proposed
subdivision were properly advertised in the local
newspaper.
Two Emerqencv Exits Should Remain
Inquiries were made by residents regarding the
possibility of using "emergency exits" at Old Scugog Road
and Gaud Gate to facilitate closing both roads to through
traffic.
ResDonse:
During the rezoning and draft plan approval processes,
consideration was given to emergency access. The draft
plan was approved conditional on the closing of the
southerly intersection. Emergency exits are not recom-
mended by staff' for this location. Closure of both
intersections would require emergency vehicles, as well
as service vehicles, to travel north on Regional Road 57,
west on Concession Road 4 and then south on Old Scugog
Road in order to service residences south of Concession
1 '
Road 4. I I J I
,
~
L
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 6
L
3.2.8
Disposal of Land
Members of the public felt that the closing of Old Scugog
Road was being driven by the developer and they also felt
that the Region/Municipality wished to sell land for
further development.
~
i
...
L
~
L.
Response:
Closure of the Old Scugog Road intersection was actually
a condition of draft plan approval imposed on the
developer by the Region and the Municipality. Further,
the Public Works Department researched the highest and
best use of the land if the intersection was closed.
There is insufficient land to be of value to the
developer. There are two possibilities:
L
I
i.
L
L
i) the land remains as municipal property and the
developer would be responsible for its restoration;
or,
t
L.
ii) the lands could be offered to the abutting property
owner to the north, at a nominal cost.
)
..
t
ir.
3.3 Residents in Favour of the Proposal
Two households agreed with staff's opinions and the original
proposal for the following stated reasons:
i) Decreased speed and frequency of traffic;
,
..
L
L
ii) Less traffic on Old Scugog Road and preserve the
condition of the road;
iii) The intersection will be safer; and,
\
,
II.
iv) More
cost
efficient
to
maintain
one
(1)
intersection.
i
...
l
I
II.
, )
IJL.
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 7
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
3.4 Additional Investiqation
The original proposal called for the closure of the
intersection of Old Scugog Road at Regional Road 57, and
improvements to Gaud Gate. The majority of residents in the
area are opposed to the proposed changes. At present, unless
the changes proceed, the developer is unable to fulfil the
conditions of Draft Plan Approval and therefore is unable to
develop the subject lands.
Staff recognizes,that the developer has incurred costs for
rezoning, design and engineering and is now attempting to
satisfy the conditions as specified. Technically, these
conditions can be met. Given the residents' concerns, in an
effort to move forward with the development, the applicant has
put forward an "alternative proposal" for intersection
improvements at Old Scugog Road and Regional Road 57. This
proposal is in lieu of closure of the existing intersection,
would address the residents' concerns by leaving Gaud Gate in
its existing state, as well as addressing engineering concerns
with the existing intersection geometry.
The Region of Durham Works Department has reviewed the
applicant's alternative proposal and indicate that they are
prepared to accept a modified version of the alternative
proposal ("modified alternative"). These modifications would
include:
i) the termination of Gaud Gate at Regional Road 57
(removal of the culvert and ditching of Regional
Road 57) i
ii) minor pavement widening to increase the section
width of proposed Old Scugog Road from 6. 7 m to
8 . 0 m i and,
-,
I))
\
I
..
..
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 8
...
iii) minor pavement widening in order to accommodate a
15.0 m turning radius.
L
Regional Works recognize that the intent of the original
proposal was to have one entrance onto Regional Road 57 at the
best possible location. Taking into consideration the
existing residents' concerns, the Region's Works Department
has given conditional acceptance to the modified alternative
as outlined in the previous paragraph.
..
\
i
..
..
3.5 Second Information Meetinq
On January 28, 1998, a second Information Meeting was held to
review the contents of this report with all residents between
the bridge north of Concession Road 4 and the southerly limit
of Old Scugog Road.
..
\
'-
\
!
..
\
..
Although some residents still had concerns with existing
traffic, the majority of residents were not opposed to the
modified alternative. One resident whose property is opposite
the new Old Scugog Court/Old Scugog Road intersection is
opposed. The developer committed to provide coniferous trees
to screen vehicle lights. All residents were advised that
this report would be considered at the February 2, 1998,
General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting. In
response to traffic concerns, residents were advised that
traffic studies are already being undertaken and the results
will be included in a future report. They will be advised in
advance of the report being submitted to Council.
\
!
...
I'
i
...
I
..
-.
~
4 . 0 CONCLUSION
Although the original proposal for closure of the Old Scugog
Road intersection was originally acceptable to Public Works
Department, the applicant's alternative proposal for the
reconstruction of the existing Old Scugog Road intersection
(as modified by the Region) now represents the recommended
~
..
...
- ,
)'1
...
REPORT NO.: WD-11-98
PAGE 9
approach from our department.
this additional information,
support, the Public Works
following course of action:
Recognizing the submission of
combined with strong resident
Department would suggest the
i) the developer's application for road closure be
withdrawn;
ii) the Municipality deem that the proposed
intersection reconstruction, as modified by the
Region, will satisfy the Municipality's draft plan
conditions of approval as set out as Conditions 17,
18 and 19, in the staff report PD-283-89, submitted
to the November 7, 1989, General Purpose and
Administration Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~~Eng..
Director of Public Works
~
W.H. Stockwell,
Chief Administrative Officer
SAV: jco
Attachments
pc: B. Annaert
D.G. Biddle & Associates
96 King Street East
Oshawa, ON
L1H 1B6
F. Wu, Director of Planning
Spokesperson for Residents of Old Scugog Road
I)J
J
J
J
,J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
l f
--
,
,
I
'-
...
)). () '3. IS. O~
"'-,
i
CA'n.~~ ----.-.-
~tC_ ,U;\; I r.:":. "',' " -.~-;_"""'_'" ..___..._..
E--'a1D" .n.5d!-: ...E.:..,. ~'~.~}~:~:~F~ mttIInI~rmi1ID" ,
p.~~ t' t\ -"--. '" ;;\~~ ~IID
U' -i. ...-..... .......' .
. : ",-.." f. r .
i~-=;-- -. O' '~.:'... ;,::.. l,; 'v (Ji'T 3 1 1995
tOol . ~. , \J....
I ::j~'~~-_'- -.....-,. . ".. -'.._ .
,--.. -.'--.-.-.,.--
L ..
October 30, 1995
t
--
Mur':lGjl);~\ur( OF CLARlf~GTgN
. 'fvIAyo.U'S.OFflCE_. .:._)
Dear Mayor & Members of Council,
~
...
We, the residents
strong opposition
Regional Road 57
Our opposition is
3. Staff has suggested that the proposed changes will
improve neighbourhood safety by lowering speeds. We
disagree. Speed control is a problem on Old Scugog
Road and we would consider any realistic proposal
addressing speed control. However, this proposal only
moves the point where people slow down 100 metres up
the road. As a speed control measure the proposal
fails.
,
i
..
L
u
..
.'
!
..
..
L
~
,
ill
\
..
~
'-
f
...
t
...
of Old Scugog Road are writing to express our
to the proposed closure of Old Scugog Road at
and the proposed "improvements" to Gaud Gate.
based on the following concerns:
1.
Gaud Gate is unsafe as an entrance to the
neighbourhood. Sight-lines from Gaud Gate while
turning onto Regional Road 57 are poor and much worse
than the sight-lines at the current Old Scugog Road
access. Staff has not convinced us that the
"improvements" proposed to Gaud Gate will improve the
safety, nor do we believe any changes .can make this
entrance safe as it is on a curve on Regional Road 57.
2.
The proposal puts the trees lining Gaud Gate at extreme
risk. These trees are very large maples dating to the
last century. They provide a natural barrier between
Regional Road 57 and our neighbourhood. Furthermore
they are essential to the character of the
neighbourhood and the historical value of what was once
known as "Gaud's Corners". Staff has informed us that
they will be excavating within 10 feet of the trunks of
these trees (Which have 40 foot limb spans) and "cannot
guarantee survival of the trees". Our experience with
other trees in the neighbourhood affected by .~~
construction activity suggests that these large trees
will not survive the proposed "improvements," to Gaud
Gate.
,
1
...
In conclusion, we ask that Council reject the proposed changes to
our neighbourhood.
Respectfully,
L. The neighbours of Old Scugog Road
(see attached petition)
\
...
REPORT NO. WD~11-98
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
IJO
pi
jl,
iil
.---.
i, l
'!j
.1:
PE7/)7oN 5UNHA/Z.{/
/
7077f.L S/GI\/A!U~S
lie <-J.$cS ~I2ESGAhl:::L>
~~,
- ~8
. ..
,
.
...,'_..~;._.70mL ,rIcJ~S,._./N j'!lE/~tJLhboO - 6/
--~-_IA/(:)~ 7P t5{/jJ~~4.r)
.-:=.3 %-;;;.-d~~~~~~.~o ~:.:. 29%.
:"'
i.;
. - - ..-.....- ---' ..
,
._-~~--~._-~zj:~ ~~ .I!<;;~:~_..-
_.n ,-. ...~~ ___~, ._ , ._..... .. "",,--8_...__. ._.._.._.__.__.....,__
;;j
,.. ...~~:....._.._,- -L..o~&~LJ ,.._.GO r.L77-I ,OF.__GA<./LJ_G~,....._
'.
, ,. ...--.....~.._._, ,.......- .........,.. ..., ..... ...,. ,-.--,---.. . ._, .-,-... ...-. .., "........ ,-
-..ll1---2.&.% ._a~_.dt!.c)s€s.___~~t-./,.FD .(~e>./50.._)... '. .., "n_ .....
..__ ~ 11_~.....o~.ft>~o...__ZZ'- 777E... _s~..~/2.o?!Ps~_L...___..r..-
'II ..
~ . I .
---- .i1 . ....-- '. -.,__..... ..,...______ --....,. . , ...____. __ 00_.._..____. ..
:i
"j
III
I:!
". -. ....-.t7t--.
. .-. ._.-.......;~. .-...--....
......- ---
"I
II
,. ooOlsmTlO",",- -....,. .
CLERK . CA
. .--.---
ACK. BY .
ORIGINAl-1-
C [S T :
.'
.j
._- . _. _._-
;
_____J. ..__.
1;1
j.:
:14_
1 , !
i I ..J
I
..... ..
-.
"--'-...-
I... ---__
Jolin R. Sproule. B.A., lJ..B.
.. Maaa&iaa Lawyer
WiDiam A.D. CIad:, lJ..B.
AIIiIL Mmqiaa Lawyer
, Robert J. Baaik. B.A..lJ..B.
~. Doaaa F. WOlDliDctoIl,B.A..lJ..B.
.. JIIIICI J. Goryc:ki. B.A..M.A..lJ..B.
Dcbonh Hasliqs, lJ..B.
P. CoIIeca Bell. Lt:.B.
CAW LEGAL SERVICES PLAN
Oshawa Shoppiug Ccuue
Oshawa Executive Tower
Suite 603. King Street West
Oshawa. Ontario
LlJ 2KS
Tel: (90S) 4334242
Toll Free: 1-800-387-6592
Fax: (90S) 433-()641
...
October 2, 1995
.-,....,~...... ........- .,.. ....-.--.-... ".. -~"-'--"-"'-~'.''-':':'':'':':''':-..:..''~
Amm'lmJ .. - -, Ml.Jr.j.lC;PILfTY OF FiA; Ii; Fi;,) : _ 'i
'- 1 CL~~!!.:rrf~~~: :;'.:.. : s-,-:.'~_.... .... ':' ...~
':l!:.Q. """'C:" ....1 t J...r..J_ .. ..' . .....J
... I I.:;JI.~~_;.~,__,,____,__ .';" I
' -..,.-. ..- 1 "". i :"~:'~~'~:.!.~ : _ ._' _ :. ..~
~ gJ OCT 0 6 '';:1,) ~",,,', I~.-_; ,J..;' : I
.-..--- '"'----' .,.--- ."~.
,.........,....;-. .r!",,~..4:....~~~;:.f:.",...t . I
"', -, .... ~.: ....... .......:.._~:::.:..:...._:
,;_'~4_____ 1.... :~: 4" ,.. ./"1., 'c r_..!.",!\.. ~....._.,~..... r"'t ~ ~
'1'i....A~Dr ~BJhpL6.~::~:.J ..~...I;.KS t I..~.._~.: '" ......,...;....;1
J..I:lNIVIf~., D ," n;:-::,T I _ I ~
(SA\! ! --.. i~t. ! !
ASc..
f
..
Municipality of Oarington
Public Works Depanmem
40 Temperance Street
i.. Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 3A6
Attention: Jan O'Neill
...
Dear Madame:
~
.. RE: Gaud Gate Improvement/Oosure of
Old SCU202 Road. MuniciDalitv of Clarinltton
t,
i
.. Further to the Public Meeting which was held with respect to the above-noted matter on the 6th day of
September, 1995, we coDfirm that we represent Mr. and MIs. Black with respect to this matter. As y,ou
are aware, Mr. and Mrs. Black own the propeny which fronts on Gaud Gate and are the people who will
be most severely affected by any improvement of Gaud Gate and closure of the present entrance to Old
'- Scugog Road. The Blacks have several concerns with respect to the proposal which was presented on the
6th of September, 1995 and wish to address them as follows:
I
... CONCERNS RE: GAUD GATE IMPROVEMENT
1. While the CoDSUlting Engineers have advised that the Pian does not call for the ClJtring down of any
I of the trees now lining Gaud Gate, it may very well be that the deepening and widening of the road may
II. result in some of the roots being cut with the result that the trees eventually may die in any event. The
Blacks are concerned that although the Consulting Engineers have indicated that they have done such
i projects in the past with success there is no evidence from any Arboriculturists indicating that this plan with
.. respect to the trees is indeed feasible. If the trees were to eventually die it would destroy completely the
present atmosphere of that area of Old Scugog Road and would lead to a probable diminution of property
values.
~
...
2. The proposal of the CoDSUlting Engineers did not address in any way the possibility of ground
water contamination of the wells immediately adjoining Gaud Gate. It is very likely that sanding and
f salting operations on Gaud Gate in the future could tesuIt in salt water polluting the wells. As you are
.. aware, this bas occurred in other areas of Clarington, and throughout the Province of Ontario and has
become a very contentious issue for the parties involved.
~ 3. The Consulting Engineers report did not address in any way the issue of increased noise levels on
.. Gaud Gate as a result of increased traffic. Moreover, there were absolutely no recommendations with
~ ~espect to noise level attenuation measures ~hich could be implemented to reduce the resulting noise
; Increase. .
,
...
4. Although the Consulting Engineers indicated that it is expected that any lighting systems installed
, on the improved Gaud Gate would not interfere with the residential uses of the houses on Gaud Gate, it is
L more than likely that in the future there would be increased demands by local inhabitants, and by Municipal
. or Provincial requirements, that the lighting be improved, with a resulting detrimental effect on the
residential uses immediately adjoining Gaud Gate. 1 ' ~ 4
- I if '
... 4\ Th. r"'"....l..~"... 'C__:_____ ___ _~ ..J!.J __ . . . .
2
Regional Road No. 57 from Gaud Gate. To merge safely onto Regional Road No. 57 going south from
Gaud Gate it is very likely that a merging lane would be needed because the existing flow of traffic coming
south on Highway 57 is accelerating at the curve inunediately nonh of Gaud Gate and cars entering onto
No. 57 at Gaud Gate could conceivably pose a safety hazard for traffic going south. With respect to traffic
going nonh on 57 and entering onto Gaud Gate it is very likely that Regional Road No. 57 going north
would have to have a turning la@ and a passing lane at the entrance to Gaud Gate given the relatively short
length of Gaud Gate could result in traffic backing up Gaud Gate out to the intersection. This could very
well be a safety hazard to traffic at that intersection if such lanes are not installed and, due to the dramatic
increase in traffic in that area in the Christmas season, it is a prescient problem.
CONCERNS REGARDING TIlE PRESENT ENTRANCE TO OLD SCUGOG ROAD
1. At the present time there is probably enough land owned by the Municipality and the Region to
facilitate a reconfiguration of the present entrance so that it can be made safer. The Consulting Engineers
presentation indicated that staff had decided that this would not be a viable solution, however, there were
absolutely no reasons given for this decision and it does not appear that the issue was even investigated in
any detail.
2. If the present entrance to Old Scugog Road is closed and Gaud Gate becomes the only entrance on
to Old Scugog Road this would cause an obvious reduction of the number of entrances onto Old Scugog
Road from two to one and could create a problem in an emergency situation and could also exacerbate the
problem created by the Christmas traffic.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
1. Given that the present entrance to Old Scugog Road has apparently been deemed over the years to
be an acceptable entrance given the volume of homes which have now been constructed north on Old
Scugog Road, it is inconceivable that the mere addition of six additional residences on Old Scugog Road
should necessitate the closure of the present entrance of Old Scugog Road and.the improvement of Gaud
Gate. It appears that inadequate consideration was given, in the past, to the development of Old Scugog
Road to the north and the resulting increase in traffic and as a result the proposal to build six new homes in
the area has created the excuse to address the issue of access onto Old Scugog Road after the fact. It would
appear unduly onerous for the Blacks to bear the greatest part of the burden resulting from past inadequacy
in the planning with respect to development on Old Scugog Road.
2. At the Public Meeting it became apparent that a major problem on Old Scugog Road is speeding
and heavy vehicle traffic and that it is anticipated that the closing of the present entrance to Old Scugog
Road and the improvement of Gaud Gate may very well cut down on this traffic. Most of the individuals
attending at the meeting, who ranged from people living at the south end of Old Scugog Road to people
living at the middle to north end of Old Scugog Road, indicate that the problem of speeding is occurring
along the entire length of Old Scugog Road and the closure of the present entrance would very likely only
result in a slowing down of traffic at the extreme south end of Old Scugog Road. Although issues such as
posting of speed limits and load restrictions on Old Scugog Road were addressed it is unlikely that these
would have an effect on the speeding and heavy vehicle traffic given that there are already certain speed
restrictions on the road and load restrictions on the bridge and these apparently are not deterring the traffic
problem. It became apparent at the meeting that one potential solution to the problem would be to close the
present entrance to Old Scugog Road and Gaud Gate to all but emergency and service vehicles and to move
the main entrance onto Old Scugog Road to one of the concessions to the north. Although this issue has
not been raised in the past it may very well be that this would be the best solution to the problem given that
the entrance onto Old Scugog Road could be. moved north to an area where there are better sight lines at
the entrances to Regional Road 57 and the problem of speeding and heavy vehicle traffic on the south end
of Old Scugog Road would be diminished by the fact that the southerly portion of Old Scugog Road would
in effect be turned into a cul~e-sac. Any concerns which emergency services would have with respect to
this solution could be addressed by keeping Gaud Gate and Old Scugog Road open for emergency and
service vehicles only.
The above concerns are-being raised by the Blacks so that this issue of the closure of the present entrance
to Old Scugog Road and the improvement Gaud Gate can be addressed in a more thoughtful :mn thn"nnoh
ifJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
j
J"
"
:~
J,
1
J
l. .'. .
3
L.
William A.D. Clark
,
...
W ADClslllcw
" opeiu 343
L
t.
..
.,
$
,
...
\
!
...
...
!
lI..
f
i..
i
...
t.
I
I
...
~
..
l..
l..
i
...
!.to
.::.....~--I- --'--,....,- ..'..::;..,_.,- "'.,..-"..,..-' /3 t.: '.,." .----- --- J
~ . \. ~ i.... - ".." . ". '-"-J
. ,. '-, .-. ""'"
. !...- -., .......v -'.........: ;i;"'< J.:...
-.-. '--.-- "'~-'. . ~_ll,1 '\~.. .. ... ".. . ...... ". . . !~i~:;s,~~'~.:-l'-~~~sl}~?>
~ !-.. '" -'" .... ,-, ,~.'....~'<!1'7-...............- ,
....--.---" 'u_.. ',..,-.. -.,... '... ", . .~....-:!-z.......':-'-...J.. St.~,l,5h/~'...._./;,,:_.~::i;~:~~:::_.-.::.,~:.'! J
'- .'-. D 1:[~.C. -!QL 0 L.f..Ih.\ LQ,._~ of l<,~...___. ~';t:;:.'^' .' _ :::J-/.;;;':c;:::i.?::..~
..l. 0 \,. ^. I k C' . .1)-..... .;LJL'l. /:.,-:---:::'<':;;.. .....,. ;" J,..'
----. JerJle.n~_VO .e~__~___, ~,-'iPr..:''iL.i/;i;l:'2:..:ri;:'~d7 ..
... '''~-:-''Drr,:''~''''r l-.......J
- - .----.--,.--- ,.~ ',~7f .~_~_.
D-e.o.~M(', y~ke.s.;________,.-.:u.,.:~ _ .
- '
- . ~i ~~;:;~~r.~~i~a{~__=_.ce&d~~l_s "" 'f- -010[:'. I
. ... .s C--l::'~. ~-cd.-..C3.~<'---Of-D..:sCUGbG-.) '--J\i.\lc:..-O~
- ~r:L.. '.~d~l.l.-:.::i.o--I:c..L/Cllt--..J.<. bcf-.:I:-hci._f:b.~ce. .
--- G::::,s.1.d--c.rl:\:;s , ::.; ~b -..a.S-L...o..u.~:e...Y...:::s~c---O.Ce....-
_. -W.hol:e.ht:ttd.c.d17-tf,---f.~l\/o.uc,.43.h: cJa~o:E' J
. ------,--- ol,:L;-1ic.l;'q O-.s--=-C~Cld. :. --at_-~.i.vJa.Y-b~----.'W~-'f'Q'i_'
,---... b.~-:.(Lj-~ m.LO-or-L~1.-..,....buL...w-Ltee..L.:\: h:i nUl': J
--.o-pf.lle.~ ~t+~-=-dW~ O~~ .
---- Pe-o.:s.-\~~Is--pl.a~ ". . --. J
-, . ....:bl_C>. -1::_~-e..c.'f'c.>'\.<::.. .-'~-~Q~.ecL-h:L..:I:he_J::oCl.GL__. __ .
. -- 'fl~~~e . __:~_:_:.:~_ ... ='.':"=.===='~~___=:=~=~=~:.. =. J
.. '. -- -'Th~_ i ~'--,of'po.:;.',:\:; 6-C-~I/e....bv:ou.<;:\~ --:up_a_f -<=-vJ-- J
-'---"'- .QE-Y.1.~e(n.s_-_'v~L~___ ~Q~\d_-J1k.~~'oddv2::ss_-,So('(\~, .
---- o.f..:th~~.c.e.CVl$_)_S~ ~ which ~~,-- J
n.e.~~r'1~.a.td~n ~~~~b__
c.oki u.~'" AL+'~.i.fS-\- n:-~e.:h:n~, ~i.cL-e...n. ;su_ J
--...~i ~~~~l~~~d~'~~=~~~~. J
. ... .. W~~\o\ -b~~~o~Y~~n~2..;~~X+~~'-- J
.. .. +hl Sw a5-rf\o:t . thc.~:,:>c,. )--.+,n~t-~:\- .,\L-tD$lS:L::d
6(l . ho,~\~c>(\ :+YlIS n0DD:-u' ~'ue. . We.- f'ce~\. J
-..--J.ba\-~-t\1 e.-D~#c~._.ot. -.~Jod:'l~__~ilL..--tCtke:f~eot._
. 'ot..e. Ii) f\~us.I~~~se('ucl-~...cl' 6e,.__. J
-- _(e.e~, A,.s.-~-Q...s--sA-0.-\-~.b~~I~f vJ~_..__
C cooA C'~Ifl1'>-J 'nos. n;e.f'X1 Q.lll.~suC.~L_. "
J (\ the.. fo.~ I I if / -\.r I
/ . -- r'-'U-"--'"
f.
!
It.,
~ .-.. ...... ..... ..... ..-......-.....
r
;
j
l.. _ _ ___ .
.&2./3
- -'..-..-..- - n ._.., _.._.____n.. ____. _._. ._._ _ "_._.. .
-...-._. --- ..-.- --. .-..--- -.----...- -_.
'. , , -~,.. .--.. ..., '.. , , {;
l--- - ,-.y:\\ose:u_ou__u.s.vJ 110 o(~J--\l..lly -11I_~QYOLol-C C::t___
-- - --ls-'cQacl__Q..lo.su{'L.-Lold_~:C('9~L_Q_C-~_~ mD_O~-;-,
~~-W.h.o \1\L-e ~.Lo-Sse-sf (.:) tb 's It\tcrsCctLC
~--~.. cuJd-he-~os+__af'J-t:e..t-.edl-wd--1~__
'-- ~ceRb O-A o,f' :::\~-o-__h.c~~.s-_dcsc:::st-___~__._
--- Gr.au.!_G-ctt~~ - ~-o.n\f-__- "'-'_~.c._~,,~ d\&'C1e~- _ -o_n___
...--- -hi'L-:~_E~Q('cL.1J~~d<YlC- :tcL:\:b-€-\d'k:d;09.____
oo.1.S.1 {jto-cmed____be...L,. c...v-toQ. -1 he1-we.c-e.. --"-C_S.D_OO.G
.. .. r f' \.' -+: . !i ...j , -b :f- L '
.. O..C~_,~ G::~-:50~L~---:Cl:Ln:).p ~.~OJ'.c. \ e..n_ JJC.s~
-. cpJe._'JLe,:ar~C_f.L_ro'ti~ L ~---~O-~G.ns~_b..,__
l.. Q~L~-tb~~o.h :teeL :i:~ Ibu----woc:LG,old...5CL'f1~~o r.
~~A old iY-l-e.. -\a.h:__c~~c--t Ion of' -.3k.~~__
I.. ('\ Old S~Laad sr,ou.\cLL.(.mo..i~~eQ , 1_.
! ' ,e.....l.s:sue o,~ \Q~..::tcuc.h", -w..,.eH~_QIO?S-'i
l.. .lS~ wq~. Q,\~o-7Jirny.t\hLur--,----"'D:le.__r:noJcP .
-- f'.-tb~-s + .c a {fiLC -1::~'--'-cJ:;s} I ~ +:~ m poY:-~ -;l_d-l..Le'+<I
!. --- \1o_l.t~€-._<2_aa~~uc--ht(~Hl...~_ ,-Hou) eVe..e. +be---c-exrl~A1.o,dc..r
.. .fu.::llii.s~fD ~ IA!.....0I..LJd__---<':lLA.C:el "t-----.b-~I.l:mLn:rI:e4 _ .
L ""l-us:~ ~--Gcd:-e..--~__<1tLoA ~a:m-':e
~e-L- -(UC k.c W-OLT\aI__"fi.o0--u~Gc<!Jd___
l ~kr~~___\AJaah_(1~:tt_'tn.vc..~_
~~~~the. ~-q.o._--Q.o.rJJ~_. . us~tm\ra '~
l o...ia'(~ ~..cdTI:aef--d'---::tnL~ -\Y.a.ffu: Q 0-,-- ....
\ \r.k ~ L~\-..e COrc.:e("~ .a'D~ --\-n:c- -=-1--
.. -- -- :V (j) \ u.. tfI.{. 0. '<'d :,,\-~:e,J --~ ----\ I( 0., \C O\(L':hWS, COOC1...
L- . ---+Q~ oS i~ .u:\:n~_.__H~ 5~~~fd .. .O\~,-\5.u,:\o ~ d.
. ,\ \"ite($e~ em. \ ~ - ck \ Ico..t-- ~ c\.. 31' ..
L . - - \O\'vLQq - dO~ n:fue._ ---), ~ Ct.r:\ CJu_o:t_-~~_a:\:..o.~~-
. ~~~......L\~6. -~ Co ~Lt d_.e. -.-_CL-_,.....o......e.C ___~
L---~~g ~;~\.~~-ck~~\( :~;d~T;~-_~.
- ..\ il'-tO I
L
.: ;;.:...." , . .
. .......
."..
-- '--..- ---.-.--.-.-,.-.-. . ....-.----
- ----.-.----....----
3/.3
---,----- '. '.-'"-. ..----..,., -. '-, -...--. -.-.--'-------. ..-.. .....
-..-.... - ------. .
...
L
\
II.
'-
IlQ
~
~
:z; r&.P4
0
Eo4 0....
e" ==
Z :z;Ul
H S~ an
~ 0\
Eo4Eo4 0\
U ...
U Oz CD
P:o .. Sol
f&4 Eo4Eo4 \D oIJ
0 Ule" e:
Z:z; Sol CD
~ OH CD U
Eo4 == ~j...=
....
~ CO ZolJS....
IlQ a. 0 oIJ
.... ~P: CDOCS
U Ul p:: Sol
.... ~~ Z.. ~
~ H >. m ....
Eo4 CS "" s:::
p::f&4 ~"oIoJ""
IlQ t!J .. ~ .... .a
:z::
Eo4 8M o.a~<
f&4 02: f&4G)0r-f
0 uO :Z:~tJcs
UlH H a.
:z: Ul .. ....
0 QUl . 0
H HIlQ ~ ....
Eo4 ot) . s:::
~ :z; ~ i
f&40
0 ot) c
g: ~~ c
..
0 ~
tJ 0'"
IlQ UlE04
00
:z:: HH
Eo4 tJ
Q
IlQ
Ul
0
~
0
c:t:
~
...
....
...
..
..
L
'I
l
...
L
L
L
L
t
..
...
L
L.
~ 10 ~ -g = Sol CD
~ B >tolJ 8' I oIJ .:Ill B ~ M ~
o oIJ lIS.... >. ~ t'~ . ID Sol ~
CD.... ID ID s.c - 0. C\o & 'tJ .... Q. S:::::I
:~.~~ ~o ~~ ~;s ~~m=~ 'tJ B~
... oIJ oIJ'.Q oIJ U oIJ G::I .... s::: cs Sol s.c U CD g. :
-a............ 18 CDlDoIJ::ICDe,,::ICD e 1_
m ~e=:= ~~ 'tJ 11=~1'tJ==~.0 =oIJ
~ oIJCD 0 aCD....CD U ~ O::lCDSoISoIoIJ~ Sol
S oIJ 0 a. >. 0. oIJ. ID'-:: Sol 0 CD U cs Sol a. CD.... e: 0::1
oIJ ~ a: u e: ID CD U oIJ >. 0.... ~ e" oIJ 'tJ .... '" 0
::I a oIJ CD s:::.... oIJ ~ .... oIJ ...... ~ s::: a Sol & CD .... oIJ ~
o 0 .cCDoIJlDa.~S:::OID.....a....=CD ......QID::ICD ID
U .Q1D~oIJo.lD""S~GoIJ....a~ .-::s:::a S:::O.Q oIJCD
aGe: SoI....t40es~ .c:s::: ~ ou'tJO.Q .c::.c:
'. .... CD CD t4 CD U Sol " "'.... J.4 0 ." .... r-f U es 0..... CD oIJ
"CDoIJ~SCD' oIJ""CD 0.::1 CDCDCDJ.4::1 oIJ...." .
CDoIJlD....CD CD'tJ O~CD....o~eJ.4IDOO::l1D u....oIJ'tJ
s::: es........ & 0 U es.c: s::: 0 ~ J.4 U ~ CD ::I oIJ.c: 0 ::I.c c:: ID ID CD
SoIOt4 a:s:::oo. seso aolJ"OIDID~ ID::ICDa....
CD CD 'tJ 0. oIJ es J.4 ::I 0 .c: · ..... .... .c: .... ......... 0 Sol CD ~
u" ....c:: J.4 O"CD IDO\ oIJlD .-::CDCD....~U .........
e:::ICD::I....CDoIJCDSoI ~oIJ....mCDas:::CD oIJ~a ..... oIJ
oa.colD.cc::.c'-::CDao'-::O\.c:.c:o.c:c::aauCDO~oIJO
UOolJa::lolJCDoIJoIJ*'-::C::~"'oIJoIJp~ao=l~oIJ~a~
IlQ
2t 'm
o ,."
= N
P4 0
r&:I I
H ,."
r&:I N
E-4 \D
r&:I
Q
o
U
~.
~
Ul
o
~
Q
~
"0
a....
0J.4
Ul t4 c:; es
Ul 0 ""
IlQ UCtS:::
p:: 00
Q' s::: Ct
Q ~::I"
< 00G)
.~Ulr-f
... r-f
! <<.IS " ..-1
r-f>......
"" 0 s::: =.
:z: J.4 cs 0IIt'
,g~!itJ
ON 0"'"
C:;,."c:Q..:l
IJJ
REPORT NO. WD- 11-98
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
. '0
o s:: '=0 c:: >. 10 CD '0
~ CD 0 Qc\D CS 1-1 CD CD .= 1-1 1-1 CD
.= .... · ~ CD'= 1-1 ~ s:: CD CS c::
m~~m CD 0 CDCD~ ~.. CDCS 0'= s::
m~ 10 >o~CD U~ ~ ~CD ....~mCS
CDO~CD'O""~ U S::CSCD S::O '0 ~I-IS::~
U c::uC::m ..= CS'=I-I ....~.. CD CSe=OQc
U'O....s::CSmCDs::'O 1-1 CS ~ S::CD ~....
CSCD~O CD'=OCD ~m mCDC:: 01-1 10>.
~CSU'OU~~I-I S::m'O ~~.... '00 O~""~
~UCD CD~ Qc CDCDC:: ~CS~ S ~S::UI-I
~O~'=CDCDSEO UCS csm~ CD C::CSCDO
CS ~ ~ ,"" 0 G ~ ~... ~".Q CD .... - 0
.Q ~.... ;' >. 1-1 == . s:: iii ~ CD ~ ) 1-1 CD '" Qc
~ 0 I-I~~ ~CDCD ~ '00 ~CS.CDl-lm
CSCD~CD"CD OQcEmCD.... ....c::.. 10 ml-lOcsm
'=.Q='=)>'O~S~CD~~ 10 10 =CD~O~ .....
~ U~O CD CD~I-ICS"" 10'0 SI-IC::SCD~'=~
~~ ~CDCD'=~OQc~.Q .0........ CDCD .Qc::~s::
~ an ~ ~ 1-1 Qc~ ~ > .... 10 c:: ~ ~.= '0 CD CD CD
10 'OCS csml-lCS CD'Om= ~ C::~....>mel-le
CD ~~ U 0 U.= =.... 0 CD.... .. -.... 0., ~ Qc 0 Qc
~eom""CDCDC::O""~CS>I-I~ m~.=CDU~S::O~O
~p m~Eo ~~ ~ CDCS-CDS::~I-I" ....~ ~
=-=SCD~~=CD ~.= 1-I~~csm....CDO ~~CDCDCD
m~oocs~'Oc::.=CS~CDOC:: CDm~S~'OmCD>'O~
....I-IOI-lOCDO~I-IO.=OCSCDI-I=....OCDs::=CDCD.,CD
H==~CS~>~N~~~~~'O~cs.Q.Qm.Qcs~s'Oe'O
C7'I
o
....
CD
I
f'I')
N
\D
o
....
101
.,
~
c::
~o
$.l
tJ ..
c:: Q)
o.c:...;
to CO...;
'tlQ)..-l
.......;>....
>>.c::::z::
ca Sol' CS ....
Ccse
~:tt)
...; O...c
-<an~~
I J 1
CD
s::
CS
.... s::
~ 0
CS~
s::
'0....
C::C::
CSI-I
~~
~ -
s:: ~
..... ~
~~
10.... -....
..-l ~ ~...c ..
~ CD an "tll
CD c:: "'I
~ -:tell
~ c:: ~ 0 ::-.
o CD - '0 C1i1
m~ ~f
CDCD ~::ll
10 1-1 c:: = CI
~ ~o U,cl
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
~
10
....
....
~
an
I
f'I')
N
\D
'00
cs....
~~
~
~s::
00
0\
= ..
~OCD
>. UJ ...;
c:: ...;
U1'tl..-l
..-l...;>N
p:oc::,-,
cu....
....NE
=~:tt)
cs \D o...c
Po4rt'1~~
i)
i..
f
'-
,
L.
f
i..
0\ CD&.8 CD
G) CD CD CJc.... oIJ CD oIJ
) O\~ O....~ CDG) ~ CDCD
~ .-4 ofJ >. oIJ 0 t< = ~ t!J CD.c:: CD
'~B CD~JCOCDCD ~ ~jJ~~ golJl
CD OCD o=~ CD = CDCD= OS~
~COCD ...=....oIJoIJ~~ oIJ ~~CO=~. O.Q
=CD=CO~CD~ ~O ~ oIJ~ CO't!JCD~~O
~oIJ~~CD~t<~ CD CO~~CO oIJ~~~
~= ~ CJcCD.c::=oIJ ~ ~CDO~~.O-::! CJc
OOCOO= ~~~ 0 t<~~ ~O~CO
~CD O~~~= 4JCD oIJ~~ S~ ~
~ CO~~ =~ofJ~ COO CDCO~~ ~CD~ 0
CDCOOOofJ ~ 0 CD=O~oIJCDCDCDCD~=_~
CDCDCJc ~ .~CJc~~ oIJ oIJ~Oe~CD~.QoIJ.c::
OCD~""~=COO = ~& .c::~d~~~O ofJ~
CJcO= =~~oIJ~O CD4JCD~ O.~O~oIJ=CD
o 0 CJc~ CJcr-4 t< CD 0 Ul .~ = CD ~ ~ 0 ~~ 0 oIJ
~~ OOCJcCD....... ~=O~CD~~~ 0\ CD CO
CJc >. CJc ~&.8~ =OCD O\>=CDCD~~ CD
o 0 CD ~ 0\ r-4 ~ 0 ~ I ~ = ~ ~oIJ ~ ~ CD ~
oIJ:I=CD "'CD =oIJ 00 ~ ~ ~CD e~= .c::=
CDofJ CD ~ CD CD~ =~ r-4~oIJ CD~ ~idt!JoIJ...oIJ 0
= 0\ CD CD 0 ~ CJc.... 0 . ~ ~ = CD ~ c::.c:: .c:: 0
~~~~CDCJcCD ~oIJ~=~~CD.c::CD~ ~4J4Je
~CDCDO=O~~~ CD.Qe>=oIJoIJ>>'=~~OO
O\CDe=O~~C::~~~ CO~O~~~~~CDO~O
< = CD~~ CJc:l ~oIJan ~\D& ~.c:::I:ip. et!J~ ~~e-c
L
~.
,
'-
I
...
;;
...
I,
..
...
~
.
an
~
I
,..,
N
\0
(
It
..
~
L
L
L.
o
~
~
~
ofJ
ofJe::
J.lO
ofJ=
CO 0 ...
CDCJCD
0\ o-l
J.l >. o-l
1\3J.l..-j
=CD>r--.
ofJe::=
lOofJCO.
~=E
S:::c:Q:4CJ
..-j 0.-4
~CDc:Q~
l
I
L
L.
...
)2
.
~
CD
~
~
r-4
~
a
co
0\
S:::CD CD
~CD~~~
=CDos:::e
CDO ~.jJ
CJcoe co
o ~ 0 >.....
~oIJ~
4J ~~ ~.c::
=C::Or-4U
O~.Q~
.Q CD .Q CD
~OCD~~
~.c::lDoIJ
CDOolJ~
c:: ..... 0\
~~~ c::
CDC::~ ~
O~> .~
s::: 0\=
OCD~O~
oolJanO\
~.=O.
CDt!J>.o~~
> :lUl ~ 0
~~ = ~ co
~= ~~~
~Or-4~CD
~t!JoIJOolJUl
- -
an an \00
O.-4.-4N
0\\D..-4
-\0 -an
CD I I
eN CD CD
O.=CD
:Z::\OtQN
~
~
~
o 0
~~ ~
0J.l J.l
O\~ ~
=ofJ ~
us::: s:::
tIlO 0
ofJ'O ... ...
J.l ofJ o-l CD o-l CD
CDI\30o-l o-lo-l
e::J.l o-l ..-I.....
J.l J.l I ..-j .. o-l = ..-I
=1\3 >0 >0
E-it!).s:::ofJ....oIJl4-f~
co ID I4-f .-4
CDr-4ofJEo-l.==
e::=J.l:l..-j~UO:Z::
CO~IOOIO .OolJO
~~~c:Q::E:~~Ul..:l
rot
rot oIJ
...t ...t
)
t::t::CI).c:
oIJ~OIDoIJ
...t O...t 0 0
~'OoIJrot.Q
CI) IDO
)CI) 0.-
tJ\OtJ\...CI)CI)
t:: rot t:: CI) CI) rot
...t ID O.c: ~ tJ\
oIJ OolJ t::
ID'" ...t... CS
...tOCl)f&10
~... tJ\
Cl)t::S ...t::
~.,.. - CI)...t
.... 0 ....c: tJ\
o '0 = oIJ t::
.0Cl)CS
CI) oIJ 0 0 tJ\.c:
... =...to 00
=0.... oIJ
ID .... rot c::
OolJCSrotrotCl)
rot 0 ......t rot 0.
Ut::oIJ)CSO
o
rot
In
N
I
l'
0\
\D
oIJ
o t::
...tIDCD
....CI)ID
....CI)CI)
CS......
... o4J 0.
o6J
tJ\tJ\
Ie::e::
...t...t
~t~
Cl)CI)rot
....IDO
CSCD
ID...e::
0.0
I ...t
lo6J
ID ID
=IDCI)-
~ ~ s.:
o Ii< CI)
= "C 0
Oo6J=O
UCSCSCS
P'4
P'4
N
\D
I
M
N
\D
o6J
CS
12
CD
~
o4J
12
ell
~.9 ~
06Jmo6J
CD........
.........-4
G.s:::....
mu.Q
....
lo6Jm
G.... CD
12 l> o4J
= 0..... G
......t e:: t!I
CD.... 0
o....m"C
e::GG::S
O"'CDG
Uo4Jmo
en
~
CO
an
I
M
N
\D
CI) 0
CS .QCD...t
.......
04JCD"CCI).... &.IS
=)rot.c:GoIJ
~ 0 = 4-1 ... ::s 0.
rl.Q -. 0 4-1.Q::S
,GCD;JO -
. ~ 12 ID.... ID tJ\ c::
t-t"C = CD"",, 0 CS e:: CI)
eI CD 0 ... Ill; e...t...
m....s:::CD 4-1~~"C
ID ...t .s::: 0 0 rot
CD=G4-1 -..-404J...t...t
o t:Jt CI) CS o..s:::
CD c:: tJ\ oIJ ... CS..... 0
e:: CD c:: G = ..., m
~ ...t.s::: m CI) rot CI)....
~~"C oIJ 0 o6J = m....
O~ rot rot GOlD 0
c::~:. ...t '0 0 CI) =
= rot ... oIJ.Q tJ\
ID .QO"COO c::
...t '" \ 4-1 CS = rot ...t
""&.IS O"C 00.
IDCO CD.....-4moo.
.... CO 4-1... = e.c: 0
.s:::eno CD 0 0 caO'"
E-4.-4rot;Je::;J-nm"C
o
an
rot
an
I
M
N
\D
CI)
.Q
-
oIJ"C~
...trotID
~=...t
Cl)0'"
.s:::
tJ\m4-1
e:: eI
...tCD
4-14-1m
mcsG)
...tCJG)
~ ...
CI)"Ce-.
=
4-1CS
= CJ -
CS "C
) CD
oIJ-at
OCl)G)
=mID
OG)
o rot ...
QOo.
I
J
~
J
J
J
P'4
o
M
0\
I
M
N
\D
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
J
~
.s:::
CD +1
... G
G) .s:::
j u
0 0 0 m"Co 0
...t ...t .c: .... Cl)G...t ...t
... ... tJ ... ..::10... ...
~'OCS G G .....a::CS CI) G
OCSolJ +1 rot o4J ~ Ot ~ o oIJ
caoe:: e:: 0 = l>t oIJ e::
rotP:O 0 1-1 0 .cOO 01-10
a:l co oIJOt a:l=
Q) ... . .. U . .. co= .. 0 ..
l>t +J Q) +JCI) 4-1(1) .cOCl) Q)UQ)
'OCOr-l $.If""'! "Cl-lf""'! UCIl...-t e:: ...-t
=t!)..-l U...-t =Uf""'! ...-t co l>t...-t
ca --1 '0 ..-l co .....' CO"C..-l I-:l$.l..-l
CIl'tlI>N ..-lOtI> Ot I> : ........-tl> Q)I>
==~ CI)..-l = =..... = 00= &.IS+J=
&.IScacaM C%:caco .....csca ..... CS +JCS
=CJiu Cl)lji o4JJ.l1 I-Ioi e~i
I-IU 4-1N
Cl)00..... I> 0 ca 0 CS\DO 0 0
~""'a:l..:l f&11n!:Q :&:Mc:Q A4Mc:Q 2;M!:Q
-- 7
))
I..
I
~
I
...
Ii
...
" "
CO G)=CO::f
0) =::f~.CS 0)0"" ~~. .
0) CSO G)O ~CO::f~ COO ::fCO ~
~ .-t.Q U .t.J ~.t.J CS::f = ~ U G)" 0
oIJ>. ~~CS.t.J 0 ~OO .~::fCSUU=~
.-t =~~OCS ~~~ ~~~U~O=CS::f
~oIJ O~~ ::f~::f~co~com~ G) U
== ~OCS"~CO U 00 · N.-t""m
~ G) ~ = ~ ::2 .t.J ~ m ~ CO .t.J" c::a." Q).-t er4 G)
=~ GG ~CSer4 Q) ~~~O~ er4COG)"
~ Cl ~ CS 0 rot ~ "~Q)::2 0) . ~ 0 .t.J ) Q) c::a.rot
Cl~ ~G) ~ ~~ ~~~ue~CO CS ~COO
oIJ~ =.-t"~~.Q. O~.t.Ju-iJQ) ~~c::a.
;; ~ ~ ~ ~ G) g--; ~ ...." 0 0 i ~ ~ CS.t.J .a 8'-& 8
Cl Cl U = 0 ~. 0~.t.J 0 a = "Q) U ~ ~
aO) ~Cl~Cl~>~ c .t.JOOOQ).t.JCl~~co
oIJ an .-t ~ G) O\~ ~ U co ~ Cl.Q::f .i(
0)" Q)". ~"c:t:: .=G)~ID ~~~o oO)u
~~-~=,,= = .t.J~.QO)~.i(::fClCS ".Q~::f
" ::fc:t::~"::f"=1D a ~u .t.J"=~ ~
=" Q) = 0 .::f Q) 0 = Q) 0 co CJ..i( 0 U = ID ::2 cs ~ = ~
~::f>~.Qo\~~.QCS~~~O~~O~=Cl ~~
O)"~G)~O) ::f~ UU ~o Q)~OQ)O)Q)~
U~OUoIJc:t::~O.t.JQ)~ "Q)~Q)ou ID~U>
= CO=::f ~~::f.t.J~G)CS> .t.J1D=Q)"~ =cs
O=Q)oO=G)G)oCSQ)~OQ)~CS~O~~ooo~
uo~ucoo.-t"mo"~c:t::"~OGUCSG=~U~
L
i~
~
~
l
l
L
\D
~
\D
~
I
tt)
('II
\D
L
...
I
l
I
L.
=
o
oIJ
~
= 0
~oIJ~
~~~
~::fltl
ClO~
i:z.4tJc
o
>."
~ 0 ..
Itl 0 Q)
t!))..-l
~r-l
~ Q).,-l
,,>
Itls::c
"<Itl
@ ~ !i
1-1 0
c:Q*CIl
L.
L
I'
i.
...
l
...
1 I :) 4
~
~
~
" .
Q)"~
Q)CS.aJ
c::a.o~
coc:t::o
=
~~
O~
:>.~=
~::f~
Q)U.-t
~m.-t
cs Q)
co,,>
.-tCl
I 0 ~
oIJ
CO~
==~
~~an
G)~"
o Q) ·
= .t.J :>. -
O~~
UG)=
an
~
....
~
I
tt)
('II
\D
"0
G)Cl~
.i(.9~
~.... Cl
cu oIJ
r-l ~ s::
uoo
~
=::f ..
cuUQ)
om...-l
~ ...-I
,,~
~...-I>('II
o=~
~ CUtt)
oIJana
~CO)U
0)....0....
~tt)a1~
~
o
"
~ :>.
o U
=
~ G)'
0:::: g.
Q)~Q)
~ ).~
::f ,~
lDoIJ
O~~
.-t
UG)"
IDQ)
~::fQ)
OClc::a.
UID
~Q)
::f.Q G) .
o IDO
> ~CS~
CSOQ)~
~ ~~....
::fU.,
C::UG)~
Mm".t.J
('II
....
an
('II
I
~
0\
\D
"0
=Cl~
OO~
"ex:CU
$of oIJ
O~s::
~OO
Cl
~::f ..
Q)UQ)
ClUlr-l
o r-l
ex:,,~
...-I>
~O=
Cl
CU 0 e
s::O)
~('IIO
E-4tt)c:Q
S
1-1
....
" "0
CS ..-t
2 ;:0
-'= ...cs....
o tn.... 0 Iii 0
..-4 ..-404JCDID
~0-'="O"O91
CS4J4JC::CD..-t~CD
l-IC::caCD QlO CD
4J ..-4 c:: :> CD-'=
CS Cl 1-1 4J
::3~ CD C:::>'o 0::1
1-1 ~ 1-1..-4"0..-4 0
-'=..-4 CSIDQI.... C::CD
4J-'= oe....CD
~~QlCSCD"O
I c:: CS tJ 1-1 1-1 ) c:: .
~ ..-4 4J 4J ca"O
COO4J 4J CD P:
C"O c:: . O~.Q-
1-1 CDCOC::O CDCl
QI -'= "0 "0 1-1"0 tn 0
04J..-4 CD~4J CD "0 tn
C 1-1 ID CD ~ c:: CD..-4 ::I
o 0 CD a.':;! 0 a. 1-1 0
tJc::I-IID~OID.QC12
,...
o
,...
co
I
t'\"I
N
\0
C
ca 0
as ..-4
r-I 1-1
1-1 CS
QI 4J
'0 C
C 0
ca+J
> 1-1 ...
::3 QI
caOr-l
I-IUr-I
OJ ..-I
> t,.q> \0
..-IC::C
"'caca~
.Q~itJ
o Or-l
c:t:r-Ic:Q..:l
o 1-1 tn
...c::l C::"O.
CD.... 0 ....c..-t"O
-'=.... "O~OCD
4Jcstnepcs M
1-IC::4J4J4J...c
4J E-I...c u c:: ....
::I a.CDIDCS
o O....~)o4J
.Q · -'=.... U III
CSCD CS::l~::I
~.. 1-1"",
"OCS"OCD4JC::
CDCCD.Q O.
c:: CD CDC
1-1"0 a.~ tn "0
CD::IIIQOI-I CD
UCS c::ca.1D
C::C-O ..-t1D0
o C::..-t +J..-t
o c:: CS..-t >t::l U
o ...c c:: 0
CD CD)ca tn
I-IlDe a~o
cs CD ::S..-t 1-1 tJI
CD ..-t..-t 0 0 ::I
.!I-IO CD o.eu
..~>:CE-lIDCO
,...
\D
en
r-I
I
,...
en
\D
c::
CD
.e
u
...c"Oo
cscs...c
1-101-1
c~cs
4J
ca tn c::
..-400
:>tn
..-t::l ...
:>'OQl
tlHIl ~
~
"0"0..-4
C::~:>~
caoc::::z::
CSllll:t'
~ane
s.t~3=tJ
::IN 0...-4
Jw:;Mc:Q..:l
c:: 4J
1-1 0 CD
CD CD CD 0
1 ~~ ~ :
... ..-t.... CD ..-t 0
..-t cs CD ..-4 c::.
cs ':;!I-II-I) c::
~ 4J a. CD ...c
I-f c:: I-ICS
o CD CD "0 0 CS4J
.... ~.e c::...c c::
CD cs ~ cs 4J CD ..-4
.eCD C 0 CDCS
~c:: CD. CD oa
o "OU"O ID c::
-,=...c ::I::I~ 1-1 cao
4J ~ .. ca"O CD 1-1 4J
...c cs CD C CD tn +J 4J
)"Oc 1-10 C C::4J
c:: 0 Cl Cl"O ..-4 CD c::
CDCDIDc::>t::lCS CD
CDeCS..-4..-tOOCD ~...c
I-flaCDCD4JCI2l-1oCl-I 0
tnOl-ft)ca E-4CD...c
,CS U CD "0 CD .... ....
CD.... · I-f..-t -'= . cs .....
M I-f 0'" tno 4J N ID M CD
an
\D
o
an
I
~
N
\D
"00
ca..-4
01-1
~ca
..-t 4J
...c 0\ c:
.c::oo
c:o\
OJ::I ...
"OOQl
O\CI)~
::3 r-l
QI"o...c
I-I..-t :>
>oc:
ca
~Oe
o \D ~
...c...-40
Q~c:Q
JJ
c:
o
ID
CD
~
4J
CD
-'=
~
CD
:>
cs .
ID"O
~
4J
IDtn
00
otn
::I
..-to
..-taJ
CS't;S
4J..-t
<0
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
~
J
o
...c
s.c
ca
.4J
+JC::
1-10
U
...
C"OCD
..-IO..-t
+JO..-t
I-I~...c
ca r-l :>
:E:QlC::
"Ocs
~~I
QI 0
c:QMc:Q
L
ill.
I
W
...
~
...
Q)
U Q)
s:: ~-IJ
CS CIS.....
o !of -C 1-1 .c: t<
CIS an ~ r-t 0 Q) II Q)
....s::::s.... -C ......c:
~ Q) 0 0 o-r-t 0 Q).c: -IJ
o..c: .c: Q) II 0 ::s -IJ 1-1 -IJ
Q) ~ >. ID s:: r-t 0- 0 CIS -IJ Q)
~1:!C:; CIS<::s.c:Q) O....Q
..<r--r-t UIDS::Q)~S::
Q) an CO CIS ~ CIS Q)
.Q>t .-C. .c:r-t -CUU
CS .:>'S::ID-C~ . s::
~:- ID ) CS Q)r-t ::s: . ID >tClS
ID Q) Q) ==.c: ID 0 0 -C :>, O.c: 1-1
::s s:: Q) 0 II s:: r-t o.~ ~
Ei CS !of.... ~ 0. 0 CIS Q) 0. s::
r-t ~ ........ 1-1 -IJ O-.c:.... 0 Q)
Q) OQ)::S s:: CS . .
~ Q)" r-t C. Q) ..... ~ ID >tr-t 0-"0
CIS 0- r-l ~ U r-t .c: r-t CIS s:: Q)
~ CS 0..... CIS :>, s:: r-t o-r-- 0- ID ..... "0
~ ~ ~CS.""'anS::O-IJCIS
-C..... !of Q) Q) Q) 1-1 ~ 1-1 . 0 0. ID Sof
::s 1-1 CS ~ .... -IJ CIS: >t 1-1 0..... 0-
CSQ)Q)1-IClSCSS::1-I ~~1-It<c.
~.c: >'O.c: ID Q)~ CIS=: ID 0.. ~
,
!,
Ii
...
~
..
i..
~
I
Ii.
'!,
...
an
C\1
..,.
=
I
C\1
N
\0
K
!
...
L
I
!
..
L
l
L
o
~
!of
CS
.~
~c::
>'!ofO
Q)tJ
r-l ...
::s" Cll
COOr-l
tJOr-l
u)~
::E:r-l>
CllS::
s::" co
~~ ~
co 0
~\O~
l
L
\
...
,
i
...
~ E I-t
Sa: . 1D1-I-IJ.:>' ~>t .E
5 .-IJ.Q EiQ)....cno.o a.! ~
"O~1-ICIS IIQ)-IJCIS=O p
.1IQ).c:s:: ClSQ)-IJSofcnU. 0
... ~..... -IJ CIS S II .".... 0.C\1 " "0
o "I"'\r-t U .iJ r-t CIS c::
~ 1-1" 1I.....s:: ~ICIS~
IIr-tClSQ)Q) ~OClS.c:""'Q) 0 ......
r-t.u~ 1-1 ~ ~ r-tN.c:~
~ ..... s:: CIS .c::- 0- s:: CS II CIS 0
O)II.....~ tJoc::....o.c: -.:t
c:: Q)~ s::.....o..... 00r-t
>t 1-1 C::" -IJ ~ .IJ ~ 0 -IJ"O >t ~
r-tQ)-IJ0::S CIS ~IICIS.IJ k-1-I
r-t.c: Q) U CIS t-l CD ~ U . -IJ Q) CIS tJ
.....~Ei ~ S 0- .....Q)Q)s:::-~
- ) ~" id >. o-r-t ~ Ei CIS -C
II "'c 0 s:: Q).,..," 1-1 c:: 0...... :- II ~ 0
) c:: II U C c:: 0 > 0 CD..... o.r-t 0 CIS CIS 0
Q) 1-1.............. 1-1 tJl.Q.Q >t CIS ~::s - :t.
1IQ).c:.... EiIlQ)OOEi.... " 0 1Ir-t~
OU~....c::<Q)II~=CD.....s::r-t~>tc::c.Q)O
c:: CIS:t Q)Q) S-IJCIS::SS:: )0".....
o .SofO .1-11-1. ..0r-tOQ)....0~c::k
tJ .... ~ "0 N .IJ 0.C\1..,. 1-1 s:: o.:t II 1-t"O II < ~
"00
CIS.....
01-1
ClI:CIS
~
~ 0-=
UOO
.....0\
1-I::S ..
~UQ)
caUlr-t
~ r-t
-C ....
I-lr-t~
'cuo s::
ca ca
.c:CEi
u..,. )
.....NO
~C\1a1
1)0
CD
.&oJ
cs J.f
CI III 0
CD "0 e:: e::
CD "0 CSO O~
oIJ ::s III 0 -..4 III III -..4 0
e:: CSolJ~oIJoIJCD<6Jrot .....
CS III CI e:: -..4 e:: -..4 es.... CS 0
J.f CD CD CD "0 CD oIJ U
CS CD oIJ "O.c: e::"O J.f 0 CD tJa <6J
::S~CS-..401JO-..4CDrotoC O::S
o.oIJ III 0 III e. <6J 0. 0
CD CD e:: CD 0 e:: U::S .
e::.... ::s ~ -..4 CD ~ ~ -..4 CD -..4 U"O e::
CS 0 rot .c e. 0..... CO es 0
o CS.c: CD oIJ 4-1 CD e::.... 0 -..t
e:: > 0 Cl e:: ~ 0. es es"O J.f ID
::sO cae::IDCD-..4e::oCJ.frot.-..t
O-..4r-lOCSCDIIlCDCSOolJO~>
>t oIJ CS ~.c III CD.c.c: CD -..t
ca 0 e. 0 -..4 ~ oIJ 0 4-1.... CD e::"O
e::>-..4e. ee. OO>.Q
CD~~caCDO oIJCDe:: esca::s
.c: CD 0 .c: ~.c:.c: oC "0 CD ID
~ III oIJ e:: E-4 e. 0 ~ E-4 rot CD ~ CD
CD ID CD e -..t::s rot CD ~ ~
.~-..4.c: .0.c:0 --..te. -esCD
f""t e..c: 4-1 N 0 ~.Q'" ~ ID ~ o6J c::
e::
-..4
J.f
o
CD
lDoC
-..t4-1
o
~ -..4
o ~
-..4 CS
.&oJ qJ
m oIJ e::
O~O
:z::u
...
e::"O CD
caOr-l
COr-l
)~
c.a.-t :>
CD e::
ca"O ctl
~~~
CD 0
C~~
"OlD
CDIG
CDID~ID
.Q es o6J
oCC::-..t
J.fUO
CDJ.fIDC::
>::ses-..t
CD c, CD
c:: J.fCD
CD ::s
"O~J.frot
rot oes
::SC::-n>
OCDes
oC oC e. CD
ID~ 0.-
esesCD
CD 4-IU
4-1 . >t -..t c::
es "0 oIJ J.f es
CJCDJ.fCDJ.f
0. CD oC es
"0 c:: e. CD
::sesOCDC,
es oC J.f oC a.
CJ U C,06J es
o
-..t
J.f
es
.4-1
~c::
~O
:>'U
CD ...
r-l"OCD
::SOr-l
ctlOr-l
U)-..t
'u r-l >
'::E: CD c::
"O<<S
~~~
ca 0
C\D~
CD
.c:
.... I oIJ 0
o oIJ
CD ~
CD:> c:: oC
ID -..t -..t ID
::SolJCDID-..t
<<s.c: ::s ~
CDC::oIJ
oC ~ "0 ....
4-1 CD CD CD""
oIJCDID<<S
oIJrotlD::S4-1
::S<<S CO
o 0<6J......
.QID.&,J-..t.-t
<<S <<S ~ -..t
CDCDU
"OCD~ e::
CD +S -..4 o.::s
C::<<S.-tC::O
J.f CJ -..t U .
CD "0 4-1 -
U"O.-tID"O.-t
c:: ::s ::s -..t e::.-t
o <<S 0_ ~ IG CD
tJ CJ :J CD r-l ID
~
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
j
i
"00
<<S-..4
O~
J.fP:ca
CD .&oJ
~~c::
~oo
O~
~::s ...
UCll
. CO r-l
m r-l
.1-4 "0 -..4
:E;r-l:>
OC::
c.a ca
.~ ~
1-4'" 0
:E;C'\")~
1 i ) 1
-. -. '" ',"...
...
~ f!f7 '97 10: 49 FR f. t..m<:s DEPT
P.03/04
,.... Regiona'
. ~unlc'p.11ty
! ), DUrham
I .
~rtcs
Department
, ~623
L..C?5 Consumers Or.
-whitby, Ontarto
Canada l1 N 6A3
'9(5) 688-7721 .
li~ (905) 6.6B'2~S1
".A. SUgaiUs, P.I....
Commissioner
i f Works
L.lease qUOI~ our ref:
L
1
~
..
1:
L
l
I
L.
L
L
,
....
L
L
90S 668 2051 10 1- -..IG234169
. April 4, 1~97
D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited
96 King St. B.
Oshawa, Ontario
LlH1B6
Atteritio~: Mr. R.C. Annaert
Project ~anager
Dear Sir:
Re: 542985 Ontario Limited
Regional Road #57/0ld Scugog Court/Gaud Gate
Municipality of Claringt~n
On.,. Fi 1 P. No '. 89-C-Sl
Further to your letter of January 31, 1997, the Regional'.
Works Department has reviewed the alternatives that you
have' provided with respect to the intersection.of the
proposed subdivision street/Old Scugog Court and Regionai
Roa,d #S7. .
. We are prepared to accept a modified ver:sion of your
recommendations as shown on the 'concept plan labelled,.
Proposed Conditions - Alternativ~ #2.
The intent of the original proposal was to have one
entrance onto the Regional Road #57 at ~he best possible
location to accommodate the proposed subdivision as well
as the existing residents. In order to aceomplish this,
and taking into consideration the existing res~dents.
'concerns, the termination of Gaud Gate (removal of the
cu~vert and reditching of Regional Road #57) and the
construction of a new entrance is required. .
The construction of the new intersection interconnecting
Old Scugog Road/Old Scugog Court and'Regional Road #57 as
shown on dr.~ing #C-4 should be revi~ed in the followi~g
manner:
- Increase the paved section of the t~avelled
portion of. the road'in order to accommodate a
15.0 m turning radii
- Increase the ~ection width of the proposed ,road
from 6.7 m to 8.0 m
*
. . .:2
REPORT NO. WD-ll~8
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
'-~c--.
-1 I J 3
~ 0'7 '97 10=50 FR RJ .m<s DEFT
90S 668 2051 TO 19 234169
P.04/04
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
~
j
J
-2-
Therefore, we are reqUesting that you submit revis~d.
engineering d~awings for approval to the Municipality of
~l~rington for their review an~ ~pproval, as well.~s to
the Region of Durham, in order.to finalize the access
':issue. : .
Should you have any questions,. please contact' the
'undersigned.
, Yours truly
d~"
Uldis Siksna, P. Eng.
. ~velopment Approvals Engineer
us/
cc: S., Vokes, P. Eng., Municipality of Clarington
B~ VanAndel, 542985 Ontario Limited
S. Mayhew, Region of'Durham
-
-
i J<}
** lUTAL A=G;:.04 **
~,
(
...
I
...
i
l..
...
...
-
,
i.
...
\
I
..
I
...
..
..
t
.
...
1
r
...
...
-!\
,
L.,<..
T/L?lvl
I
..
....
\
I
...
I
i
...
LOT IS,C3.
3185 Old Scugog Road,
Bowmanville LIC 3K2.
May 16, 1999
ToWhomltMayConcem, ~L - G,2."3 -7/l1- S
I am expressing my concern regarding the new entrance
proposed on Old Scugog Road as it directly affects my property. 'fj~ - 2.730
My family and I have lived here since 1989 and that triangular piece of land adjoins our ( wDJU:.. )
property .
When we moved here that land was overgrown ,there was garbage being thrown on it ,in
fact it was treated like a dump, especially by people who fished in the nearby creek, we
picked up garbage bags of beer and pop cans and my family and I spent a whole week
clearing the land.
I had been into the office of the Municipality of Clarington on numerous occasions prior
to cleaning it up to inquire as to who was responsible for doing so and could get no
answers ,on one occasion I was told that they believed it belonged to a Mr. Keith Clarke.
We have maintained that land ever since and I am concerned that if the new road is
placed closer to my property it will depreciate our property ,as our property will then
become the fishermen and other people's dumping ground
I would also like to know what the purpose is for relocating the road
Listed below are signatures of my immediate neighbors, who have sc;en us maintaining
That land and will vouch for us.
;I{ u.., ,,, (PI UA it. .
-:s 0 ~V\.. ~,f CA.A.- h .
ADDRESSES
5cUYOJ e
Jlbo tJ~ )"""~U~ /t4
PHONE #
10'17- j'6/~
bA ~ - ,. () " ")
~ ~. SD~S
- -;:bC;J;
l; 1-7~'7'c
eo97-19fo7
NAMES
C-,t D ~t(Je(J~ ( '31'10 C
PtGl< -I ~~
v',e.F~"1~W;'-
::5=~j ~re~J"b\L,;J 5119" \;lIJ S~<-IJ"-' ~J.-
(<.~ ~~0d:1~~'
. ~ ~/F' t?~,5~7't:>J ,pI?
32.1> old S'USOj ~.
, ,
I , , ,
"
, ,
&,1 ]-5sll-
, 2J4D
o(j)
7Cvfo6b r?o
\00
ATTACHME TNO.: 6
REPORT NO.: WD-28-99
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File #
Date:
JUNE 21, 1999
Res. #
Report No.: WD-29-99
By-Law #
Subject:
QUIT CLAIM FOR MR. MICHAEL PATRICK
SOUTHERLY 1.5 METRES OF PART 6 ON PLAN 10R-1792
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-29-99 be received;
2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute on behalf of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington, a quit claim for a portion of an existing drainage easement,
identified as the squtherly 1.5 metres of Part 6 on Plan IOR-1792;
3. THAT the applicant be responsible for all costs, such as survey and legal costs, associated
with this quit claim; and
4. THAT Mr. Michael Patrick be advised of Council's decision.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. I: Correspondence received from Mr. David Salmers, solicitor for Mr. Michael
Patrick
No.2: Key Map
No.3: Proposed by-law to authorize execution of quit claim
1 I 0 1
REPORT NO.: WD-29-99
PAGE 2
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
t
I
I
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 On June 10, 1999, correspondence was received from David Salmers, the solicitor for Mr.
Michael Patrick. Mr. Patrick is requesting that the Municipality quit claim a portion of an
existing drainage easement located on his property located at 3240 Old Scugog Road. The
quit claim will facilitate the construction of a garage (refer to Attachment No.1).
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
4.1 Mr. Patrick had previously contacted staff of the Public Works Department and expressed
concern with the presence of a 4.5 metre wide drainage easement located on his property.
Mr. Patrick feels that the easement is too large for the amount of storm water drainage it
conveys and that it also encwnbers him from constructing a garage near the northerly edge
of his property.
4.2 Public Works staffhave reviewed the existing drainage works on Mr. Patrick's property and
on Old Scugog Road and have determined that a 3.0 metre wide drainage easement will be
sufficient to accommodate storm water runoff. The southerly 1.5 metres of the existing
easement is not required for the drainage channel or for maintenance access.
4.0 RECOMMENDATION
4.1 It is recommended that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute on behalf of the
Corporation, a quit claim for a portion of an existing easement, identified as the southerly
1.5 metres of Part 6 on Plan 10R-1792.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~~
Stephen 'A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
o raJLQ~ e~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
BM*SA V*ce
15/06/99
02
'-
-lUN- 113-99 THU 1121: 4 1 AI,!. SALMERS STP I KE p, F'-'PLO~~G 9l2l5 723 1 157
p.l2l2
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Salmers~ Strike and Furlong
B:mi~ters & SolicItors
A1I3n w. Fllrlnng A Al~n H Stnh. Q,C.
?~Mld it 1\1 Strik~ D3vi<l W F: "Almer!
C\lnenne L. S31mers D3n M. StriKf
~PL Y TO OSHAWA
rr~ctising in 1!!~ociMi"n. not l\ partnership
rOTJNDl:.RS: Zenovi T !'ialmef!. Q c. - O~hllwa
W. Ross Slnke (lR<l5 -191l7)- B'lWll1ftnville
June 10, 1999
BY FAX ONLY 623-4169
Clerk.
Municipality of Clarington.
40 Temperance Street,
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario,
U C 3A6.
Mr. Stephen Vokes,
Director, Public Works,
Art: Tony Cannella,
40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ont.
LiC 3A6.
Dear Sirs:
Re: Michael and Debbie Patrick,
3240 Old SCll~og Road. Bowmanville. Lot 6. Plan I OM-755~
This letter is further to my discussions with Tony Cannella and Dennis Hefferon.
We are solicitors for Mike and Debbie Patrick, the owners of the above-noted property.
The above-noted property is subject to an easement for drainage in favour of the
municipality. This easement runs over the northerly 4.5 meters of my clients' propelty, The
easement is desctibed as Part 6, Plan 10R-1792. The easement is 4.854 meters wide at the western
end, and 4.551 meters wide at the eastern end, namely Old Scugog Road. The average width 1!'l
approximately 4.5 meters.
Mr. and Mrs. Patrick wish to construct an addition to their home. The proposed
addition would encroach upon Part 6, Plan lOR-1792. The easement is wider than the easements
which are currently being taken by the municipality for drainage. Mr. Cannella and Mr. Hefferon
have advised that for drainage easements such as this, the municipality currently takes only a three
meter wide easement.
We are Connally requesting that the municipality quit claim. for nominal
consideration, to Mr. and Mrs. Pattick the most southerly 1.5 meters approximately of the easement.
In my discussions with Mr. Cannella, I understand that the staff is not opposed to this quit claim, as
it would still leave the municipality with sufficient area for the easement.
We have already contacted H. F. Grander, surveyor. to complete a reference plan
with respect to this 1.5 meter wide quit claim. It should be ready in draft form by Monday, June
14th. 1999, As SOOl1 as it is received, I will send a copy to you. If more than one copy 15 required,
please contact me immediately.
55 William Street East, McLaughlin Square
PO. 80:1: 2096. Oshawtl. Ontario, LlH 7V4
(90S) 723.1101 FAX (905) 723.1157
38 Kin~ Street West.
P,Q. Box 7. Bowmanville. Ontario LlC 3K8
(905) 623-5791 FAX (90S) 623.8331)
b3
ATTACHMENT NO.: 1
REPORT NO.: WD-29-99
_JUN-1 e-.,..,. THU 1 e: 42 AM SALI'lERS STR I KE .- FURLONG '?12I!5 723 11!57
2
I request that this matter be added to the agenda for the June 21st. 1999 meeting of
the General Purpose and Administration Committee for approval ~nd recommendation by that
committee. The constnlction season is advancing quickly. The Patricks would require their
building permit by the end of June in order to ensure that constmction is completed prior to the cold
w~ather. I would therefore also request that if the matter is approved by the General Purpose and
Administration Committee that this matter be placed before council for their approval on June 28th.
1999.
Please confilm that this matter is placed on the agenda for the General Purpose and
Administration meeting on June 21st.
Please contact me if any further documentation is required.
Yours very tIuly,
,ST KE AND FURLONG,
...
DA'
DS:!'p
64
P.03
J
I
J
J
J
I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
i
I
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
l
L
L
L
<f:
o
~
c::.
cg
(i)
~
b
4.5m WIDE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
~
III
"0
ii'
G'l
~
~
:c
g
Q,
Ii
~~~
S
c::::O
!?
DRAWN BY: J.R.M
DATE: JUNE 1999
REPORT WD-29-99
ATTACHMENT NO.2
1 .' r
,bJ
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
I
BY-LAW NO. 99-
I
Being a by-law to authorize the execution of a quit claim
transfer from the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington to Mr. Michael Patrick of the portion of an
existing stonn drainage easement in Lot 15, Concession 3.
fonner Township of Darlington
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON HEREBY ENACTS
AS FOLLOWS:
j
THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute. on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, and seal with the Corporate Seal, a
quit claim transfer of the portion of an existing stonn drainage easement in Lot 15,
Concession 3, fonner Township of Darlington, shown as the southerly 1.5 metres of
Part 6 on Plan lOR-l 792, attached hereto as Schedule "An.
I
I
BY -LAW read a first and second time this 28th day of June. 1999.
J
BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this 28th day of June. 1999.
J
J
J
MAYOR
J
CLERK
J
J
J
J
J
j
I
. I
bo
ATTACHMENTNO.: 3
REPORT NO.: WD-29-99
I
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRA nON COMMITTEE File #
Date:
JUNE 21,1999
Res. #
Report No.: WD-30-99
By-Law #
Subject:
SOPER CREEK PARK, BOWMANVILLE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-30-99 be received;
2. THAT George Latter be thanked for his suggestions regarding the safety at Soper Creek
Park and informed that his suggestions are under consideration for partial implementation;
3. THAT funds for consulting fees be set aside in the Public Works 2000 Capital Budget for
the purpose of a park evaluation study of Soper Creek Park; and
4. THAT George Latter be advised of Council's decision.
REPORT
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 On September 3, 1998, based on information provided by Public Works, Mayor Hamre
responded by letter to Mr. George Latter regarding his concerns regarding speed bumps and
pedestrian safety at Soper Creek Park.
1.2 At a Council meeting held on October 13, 1998, correspondence was received from George
Latter advising of his same concerns regarding safety problems at Soper Creek Park. The
correspondence was referred to the Public Works for a report to be submitted to the General
Purpose and Administration Committee.
1 i 67
REPORT NO.: WD-30-99
PAGE 2
I
I
I
I
J
J"
::l
J
J
J
J
J
J:
F
J
J
J
J
i
i
I
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.1
2.2
At a Council meeting held on October 26, 1998, additional correspondence was received
from George Latter expressing concerns with the height of the fence at the baseball
diamond as it pertains to safety at Soper Creek Park. Council passed Resolution #C-771-98
and then Resolution #C-772-98 and, as a result, this second piece of correspondence was
referred to the Director of Public Works for a direct reply.
This report, Report WD-30-99, addresses Mr. Latter's initial concerns regarding speed
bumps and pedestrian safety at Soper Creek Park.
REVIEW AND COMMENT
Soper Creek Park
Soper Creek Park was designed in the early 1970's. Since 1970, Bowmanville has
increased in population from approximately 6,000 to 24,000 people.
A number of concerns have been raised regarding Soper Creek Park. Some time ago, a
series of speed bumps were constructed to slow down vehicle traffic. As a result, vehicles
would drive onto the grass to avoid the speed bumps, thereby increasing the risk of injury to
pedestrians. In the summer of 1998, all but two of the speed bumps were removed so as to
encourage drivers to stay on the paved roadway. If it became apparent that the removal of
the speed bumps was not effective, Public Works intended to consider placing posts and/or
plantings along the roadway. The number of remaining speed bumps has proven to be
acceptable.
2.3
Some additional questions that require answers are:
* Could this park be utilized better?
* Is this park serving the needs and demands of the current population of
Bowmanville?
Should parking be relocated?
Do other areas of Soper Creek Park require updating?
*
*
1 I 0 d
L
L
t
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
L
L
L
l
l
l
L
REPORT NO.: WD-30-99
PAGE 3
3.0 CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the Public Works Department engage a consulting firm to prepare a
park evaluation study to determine whether the Soper Creek Park fulfils the current and
future needs of the users and residents ofBowmanville.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~d~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
o 0~_~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
GA *SA V*ce
15/06/99
:69
L
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
L
t
L
Meeting:
General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date:
June211999
Res. #
,
L
L
Report #: ADMIN 20-99
By-law #
Subject:
BOWMANVILLE MAIN BRANCH LIBRARY
i
L.
Recommendations:
L
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
L
l
L
L
1. That Report ADMIN. 20 - 99 be received;
2. That Council approve in principle to utilize the LCBO property for the purpose of
accommodating a new Bowmanville Main Branch Library as well as to provide for
additional office space for the Administration Centre;
3. That staff be authorized to take all necessary action and to bring back a detailed
report which, among other matters, shall deal with space requirements, preliminary
building configuration, financing, timing, etc., and;
t
L
4. That the Library Board be advised of Council's decision.
REPORT
L
L
l
L
l
L
L
1.
The existing Bowmanville Library was built in 1964, at the time when the
population in Bowmanville was about 7,000. Since then, Bowmanville's
population has swelled to about 25,000 and is still growing at a fairly rapid pace.
Council, Library Board and staff are aware of the current acute space deficiency, but
in recognition of other priorities over the last several years, any plan for expansion
or building a new facility has been placed on hold.
2.
In May 1999, the Library Board approved a document entitled "Building The
NETWORK" which contains several objectives. The first objective reads as follows:
"Begin planning for the building of a new Main Branch (Bowmanville) to be
completed by January 2003. Actively work with Members of Council to
further this project."
3.
T'. -...':hief Administrative (Wir::er held meetings with the Library Direr1/" dnd
1201
ADMIN. 20-99
J
J
J
J
J
PAGE 2
advises that in order for municipal staff to investigate the feasibility of locating a
new library branch, a recommendation should be made by the Library Board,
specifically with regard to a preferred location. In this regard, the Chief
Administrative Officer received a letter from the Chairman of the Library Board
(attachment #1) advising of the preference of the former LCBO property to
accommodate a new library facility for Bowmanville.
4.
The Chief Administrative Officer has been reviewing the future office space
requirements of the Municipal Administrative Centre and concluded that additional_
office space is required now, in order to relieve the congested situation within the J..
existing space. In order to meet both the short term and long term need of the
Municipality, it appears prudent to plan for the additional space now. From the
point of view of achieving optimal operating efficiency, new space should be J
closely tied to the existing Municipal Administrative Centre. In this regard,
constructing a new building to accommodate both the new Library and to provide
additional administrative office space appears to be an attractive option, which J
would be cost effective in construction as well as confirming Council's intention to
keep the major government building within the Bowmanville historical downtown 'J
Preliminary discussions with the Treasurer and the Property Manager indicate that
combining the new library and municipal office space is a viable option and
appears achievable with little or no tax implications.
5.
J
6.
In order to allow staff to move the project further, staff is requesting Council to J.'.
endorse the concept of constructing a new building on the former LCBO property,;
based on the above described scenario. A complete report, including details of
financing, building configuration, space allocation, parking, timing of construction';1
hiring of an architect, etc. will be provided some time in September 1999. I
Respectfully submitted,
J
J
J
J
I
J
i
o ~4c-LQ...:. ~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
FW:nof
1202
L
June 10. 1999
, /
... .~
., 4a.
I
Report ADMI
L
Clarington Punlic linrar~
Telephone: (905) 623-7322
Admmistrahon: (905) 623-9742 Fax: (905) 623-9905
62 Temperance Street. BowmanVlile
Ontano. Canada LlC 3Ail
~
L.
L
\1r Franklin Wu.
Chief Admmistrauve Officer.
\1unicipality of Clarington.
~O Temperance Street.
Bowmanville. Ontano
L
Dear Mr Wu:
L
~
L
I understand from our Library Director that preliminary planning has begun into the feasibility of locating a
site for the new main branch for the Clarington Public Library in Bowmanville. I also understand that
currently the preferred site is immediately to the west of the Municipal offices on the old LCBO site.
L
In the Board's newly adopted live year strategic plan, the priority ranking for all new projects is clearly
listed as: the new main branch; the completion of the current Courtice location to its tull size; the relocation
of the Newcastle Village site and a study for the need/feasibility for a northern gateway branch. The new
mam branch is identified as a top priority,
L
L
With respect to the proposed location. the major reservation which the board would express would be with
the lack of parking in the immediate vicinity. Parking has always been a concern of our patrons and the
board shares those concerns. The Library Director has informed me that Council is aware of the parking
difficulties in downtown Bowmanville and would work towards reducing this problem through the
acquisition of all suitable lots to be used for parking purposes.
L
L
On June 10. 1999 the library board met to discuss these issues and passed a motion which supports in
principle the use of the lot directly to the west of the Municipal offices (formerly the LCBO lot) for the
purposes of a new main library branch in Bowmanville with the understanding that all optIOns for parking
will be explored.
L
f
L.
I look forward to speaking with you to discuss this new project, developing plans to meet the library's
needs and look forward also to exploring all options for sharing resources and services. On behalf of the
Board, I would like to extend our appreciation to Council and Staff for conSidering the library in their
future plans.
L
L
Yours sincerely,
L
~7-
Craig Brown,
Chair, Clarington Public Library Board
L
L
12J)
05/14/1999 15:39
9059838228
HAMILTONS INS SERVIC
PAGE 01
-
Hamiltons Insurance Service Ltd.
OTHER BUSINESS
.
.
5334 MAIN STREET, BOX 309, ORONO. ONTARIO LOB 1MO PHONE: (905) 963-5115 FAX: (905) 983.8228
-
-
June 14/99
-
MUNICIPALITY OF CLRAINGTON
40 Temperance St.,
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 3A6
FAX: 623-0820
-
ATT: Patti Barrie
Clerk
-
RE: Orono BrA
Canada Day Parade
-
Dear Ms. Barrie:
-
On behalf of the BtA, I am requesting permission to have a parade
on Canada Day, July 1/99.
It would be from llAM to Noon that day, leaving the top end of
the Orono Fair Grounds, west on Centre to Main, south on Main to
Station and west again into the Fair Grounds.
-
-
I have made arrangements with the police, fire dept. and works
dept., tentative to approval from Countil.
If any further information is required, please don't hesitate
to contact me.
-
..
YO~inCerelY'
Susan M~
-
Home Phone # 983-9417
113,~...,
.. ~
1!~1-/"
-
-
-
-
-
,./1 /).;..--
( L'1 (JC,..
-
1 4 ~ 1
HANDOUTS/CIRCULA TIONS
GPA
. ,~/1 /~,Z/, /f19~
... "
......;.;.,....,.,. ....;.
....,. ",",' :." ..c.
.....,. .....,. .... 'C','
.... '" ... .. .
....... ,", ..c.;. "
......,.. .... ','
"'N' ,.. ~
'.~' .~. ...
:,:':':::, ,..,:,-,.:.:.:., ':":';';':';":' .,.'-';'::;'. ....;';';.>.;......:::. "'::" .,.:....:.:
..........- ,'," ...,..... ,....-...,.. ..... ....-. ..-.....-.....-..,.. ,"-'-' ..
...... ',', ....,. ...- ',P ,.... ...... .....:.. ".
".,..;.;, .'.',' ,",', ,'C.;"_, ,',,- ..... .,.- ..
..... .... ,'" ,.- .
"',',',',', ......... ..........
',',',',',' ',',' ,':',0' .:C.
',',',',', ,', '-',' .....-.
',"-" . .... ...'.
...,..... . -".'-' .-.....
':',',',',', ., ,',',',' ..-.....
. ..,......' " .-...... .......
. ,,'-',',', " ....,.,- _.......:.
. .... . ..... .....
....:.,.-.: ..,.... -'-'"
.:..,..... .......,.. ........-. ,':':'.'
','.' ,','''-' ",' ....... '.'-"-' .....
'.',' ,.,..... ..... ',','.' ,...... ..........
.... ... ...... ....-:'.-.....
/:,.....,:,.~. ~l t 1/ ( Jtr:or~.,/ :,Il'...l::.~ ' :~J./:II:(;II.,:,: },ill
':iilJety IS 1'1 EtCCluent
Health & Safety Week
June 21 - 25, 1999
Municipality of Clarington
Safety is NO Accident
1999
Safety Training
Monday, June 21
1:00 p.m. Workplace Inspections Training
Tuesday , June 22
1 :30 p.m. Fire Extinguisher Training
(Station # 1)
Wednesday, June 23 Annual Workplace Inspections - JHSC
1 :30 p.m. Fire Extinguisher Training
(Station # 1)
Thursday, June 24
10:00 a.m. Y2K The Personal Side
11 :00 a.m. Y2K The Personal Side
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
Safety is NO Accident
1999
Safety Message of the Day
Monday, June 21 Occupational Health and Safety Act
Tuesday, June 22 Role of Joint Health and Safety Committee
Wednesday, June 23 Job Place Orientation
Thursday, June 24 Personal Protective Equipment
Friday, June 25 Heat Stress/Heat Stroke
Frederick J. Horvath
Hcal~x:~s~~:~~;ficcrW1i.
Safety Message
Monday, June 21, 1999
The Occupational Health and Safety Act:
The Occupational Health and Safety Act came into force on October 1, 1979. Its purpose is to protect
workers against health and safety hazards on the job. The main features of the Act are described in
sections as follows:
(1) The workplace partnership;
(2) Duties of employers and other persons;
(3) Enforcement; and
(4) Regulations.
Almost every worker, supervisor, employer and workplace in Ontario is covered by the OHSA. Also
covered are workplace owners, constructors and suppliers of equipment or materials to workplaces
that are covered by the Act.
DEFINITIONS
Workplace
Any place in, on or near to where a worker works. A workplace could be a building, a mine, a
construction site, an open field, a road, a forest or even a beach. The test is: is the worker being
directed and paid to be there, or to be near there? If the answer is yes, then it is a workplace.
Employer
A person who employs one or more workers. This includes someone who contracts for a
workers service. For example, if you pay a temporary help agency for the services of workers
supplied by the agency, you are the employer of those workers while they are under your
direction.
Supervisor
A person who has charge of a workplace or authority over any worker.
For complete information on the OHSA and Regulations including WHMIS and Smoking in the
Workplace Act, please contact your local Ministry of Labour office listed in your blue pages of your
phone directory.
Health & Safety information is also available from the Ministry of Labour fax back system called
FactsLine. Dial 416-326-6546 and follow the voice prompts.
Also check on the web site at http://www.gov.on.ca/lab/main.htm
A copy of the latest edition of the OHSA should be posted in your workplace. The green colour book
current edition is dated October 1998. If there is no book and not the current edition, please contact
your workplace supervisor immediately.
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
Safety Message
Tuesday, June 22, 1999
The Role of the Joint Health and Safety Committee:
Joint Committees ensure that all health and safety concerns are brought into the open and are kept
there until they have been resolved. The Committee must be visible and accessible to every person at
the workplace (workers, supervisors, managers and elected officials).
Committees ensure that all health and safety concerns are brought forward and discussed and that
concerns are not ignored or put aside whether they arise from workers or from management.
Committees bring people of different skills and experience together in order to recommend solutions
to workplace health and safety problems.
By meeting regularly, dealing with health and safety concerns and making recommendations, Joint
Committees emphasize the importance of health and safety in the workplace.
Committees provide a mechanism for workplace inspections.
The committee is an advisory group whose members work together to actively improve and promote
workplace health and safety.
A Joint Health and Safety Committee is made up of both employer representatives and worker
representatives to form a partnership committed to safety. To function effectively, Committee
members should share the desire to learn more about the health and safety issues. Members of the
Committee must, of course, participate in a spirit of cooperation.
All efforts are aimed at improving workplace health and safety by identifying problems and then
working together to correct them.
Specific duties include:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Identifying Workplace Hazards
Conduct Regular Workplace Inspections
Investigate Accidents
Promote Health and Safety
Check your workplace bulletin board and find out who your Health and Safety Representatives are. If
a list dated June 21st is not posted, please contact your supervisor immediately.
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
Safety Message
Wednesday, June 23, 1999
Job Place Orientation
You should never take a work environment for granted. Maintaining a safe
work area is hard work and requires training in many areas of safety
unrelated to your exact job. By paying attention to basic precautions and
procedures, you can make your work environment safe for you and your co-
workers.
Each new worker or transferee should receive Employee orientation training
upon arrival at the workplace by the Supervisor. This will provide the
worker with information regarding any workplace hazards, appropriate
barriers, name of the safety representative, personal protective equipment
required etc.
A workplace orientation checklist must be initialed by the Supervisor
indicating that the worker has received the basic information and is aware of
policies and procedures of the workplace.
A worker has the right to refuse work when he/she believes that a danger to
their Health and Safety exists in the workplace.
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
bi
Safety Message
Thursday, June 24, 1999
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Personal Protective Equipment or PPE is designed to protect you from health and safety
hazards that cannot practically be removed from your work environment. PPE will not
protect you from all hazards but it could mean the difference between a bruised foot and
a crushed foot.
Personal Protective Equipment is designed to protect many parts of your body
including:
Eyes Face Head Hands Feet Ears
You should know the limitations of your PPE. It won't protect you from everything.
PPE must fit properly to protect you.
PPE must be maintained properly.
PPE must be stored appropriately.
It is the employer's responsibility to teach you what personal protective equipment y<?u
need. However, it is the worker's responsibility to wear it.
An employer shall ensure that the equipment, materials and protective devices as
prescribed are provided, maintained in good condition and are used as prescribed.
If you have any questions about the PPE you have or should have in the performance of
your duties, contact your supervisor immediately.
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
wn
Safety Message
Friday, June 25, 1999
Heat Stress/Heat Stroke
Heat stress is the extra burden hot weather places on our bodies, especially the heart and blood vessels,
the centre of the body's natural cooling system.
When the temperature reaches 900F (320C), the dangers of heat stress are very real, particularly when
the humidity is high.
The most important fact to remember is that heat illness is preventable. Heat stress can be fatal and
employees should be aware of the warning signs which means your body is losing the battle to prevent
its system from overheating.
Employees who work outdoors should avoid prolonged exposure to sunshine because of the damaging
effects of ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
The UV levels are highest in spring and summer between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. At noon on a clear
summer day, for example, it can take only 15 minutes to cause a sunburn on unprotected fair skin.
To reduce the exposure of workers to UV rays while working in direct sunlight, when UV levels are
high, the following precautions are recommended:
.. wear a hat;
.. wear tightly woven clothing on as much of the body as is practical;
.. apply sunscreen with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 15 or higher on exposed skin - the sunscreen
should be effective in filtering both UV -A and UV -B rays; and
.. wear eyeglasses that effectively filter ultraviolet rays.
Please be aware that an ultraviolet reading of over nine (9) is extreme and sunburn can result in less
than 15 minutes of exposure.
Please consult your immediate supervisor for safe procedures while working under the sun.
Frederick J. Horvath
Health & Safety Officer
Extension 225
June 19, 1999
Mayor Diane Hamre
Regional Councillor Mary Novak
Regional Councillor John Mutton
Councillor Jane Rowe
Councillor Jim Schell
Councillor Troy Young
Councillor Charlie Trim
Planning Department
Re: Report #: PD-69-99 File #: PLN 31.5.2
Report #: PD-70-99 File #: DEV 95-020 & 18T-95029
Subject: Neighbourhood Design Plan - Glenview Neighbourhood
PT. Lots 29 & 30, Cone. 2 & 3, Former Township of Darlington
File: PLN 31.5.3
Firstly, and for the record I would like to put forth an objection to the
manner in which notification of presentation of these staff reports to the
Municipality's General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting was
handled. Yes, it is true that a letter was sent out on May 31, 1999, notifying
concerned parties of the meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Monday June 21, 1999.
This letter also stated that a copy of the staff reports could be obtained from
the Planning Department one week prior to the meeting, but this was not the
case. The reports were not ready on Monday June 14, 1999 and were in fact,
not ready until Thursday June 17, 1999.
Planning staff advised that the reports are complicated documents
involving changes in zoning, and it is unfair that a layperson was
shortchanged three days for perusal of these documents. It is unsatisfactory
to me that I had only four days to study and evaluate the documents in
question and to formulate a coherent and cogent response to these
documents in order to make a presentation to the General Purpose and
Administration Committee Meeting on Monday June the 21, 1999.
I also feel that the report is incomplete. On page 6, section 8.2 refers
to 'a phase subsequent to phase 1'. This is the first time I have heard about
this development plan having more than one phase and yet there is no
documentation in the appendix of this report that illustrates what or how
many phases there actually are.
2
Secondly; in Report # PD-70-99, File # 95-020 & 18T -95029, there
are a couple of points that need clarification from a different perspective.
On page 2 of this report, section 3.1 states:
On March 28, 1995 Staff received an application (DEV 95-020) to
amend the Municipality's Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit
this residential development. On April 5, 1995 the Municipality
received correspondence from the Region of Durham stating that a
subdivision application (18T -95029) had been submitted for the
subject lands.
In the same report section 3.2 states:
The original application comprised 144 medium density units, 10-
15 m single detached units, 34-12 m single detached units and 28-9
m detached units for a total of 216 units. The original application
did not have any dedicated parkland and had 3.14 ha of open
space/valley lands. Numerous revisions have been made to the
plan of subdivision and the plan now reflects the recommendations
of the Environmental Impact Study, the traffic study, public input
and Council Resolution "GP A 270-99 to 289-99" dealing with
"Parking in Residential Areas". Generally, with each reiteration
of the plan of subdivision more open space and parkland was
provided and fewer residential units were proposed.
In 1995 D.G. Biddle and Associates on behalf of Cia ring ton
Development Corporation submitted an application DEV 95-020 (X-REF
18T95029) for rezoning of these lands under discussion. On July 10, 1995,
there was a Public meeting with the General Purpose and Administration
Committee and the subdivision plan as shown in Appendix 1 was discussed.
The outcome of that meeting was that, because this was an
environmentally sensitive area, an Environmental Impact Study was
imperative. It was as a result of the recommendations of the Environmental
Impact Study that the developer had to go back to the drawing board and
revise the subdivision plan so that it was in accordance with the new
requirements, that any new subdivision would have to meet, in order to build
on these sensitive lands. It was because of the Environmental Impact Study
that this site now has to have valley land along the creek; it was not due to
altruism on the part of the developer, he does not have a choice, the valley
land has to be there as deemed necessary by the Environmental Impact
Study.
That is why, in 1998 D.G. Biddle and Associates submitted on behalf
of Blackcreek Developments Limited, a subdivision plan DEV 95-020 that
was more realistic in terms of the requirements from the Environmental
3
Impact Study. This 1998 development plan had a total of 135 units~ the most
recent reiteration of the plan of subdivision, the 1999 version has 115 units, a
difference of only 20 units.
My point is that you can't compare apples to oranges as is done in
section 10.2 (PD 70-99) which states:
This application has been revised significantly since it was
originally submitted. The applicant has reduced the total number
of units by 101. ........
It is misleading to compare the pre-Environmental Impact Study plan
of subdivision comprising 216 units with the post-Environmental Impact
Study plan of subdivision comprising 135 units. One can only, logically,
compare the two development plans submitted after the Environmental Impact
Study was completed, and those would include the 1998 and 1999 plan of
subdivision.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly is the concern about the
consequences of increased traffic through the existing subdivision with the
proposed extension of Jane Avenue north to the proposed extension of George
Reynolds Drive.
As noted in section 7.1 (PD 70-99):
The concerns expressed by the public at the July 10, 1995
Public Meeting and at subsequent meetings, and those concerns
identified in various letters, can be summarized
into a number of issues.
- Traffic - Residents have expressed a great deal of concern
with the post development traffic ... that would be generated by
this development.
In a letter to Mayor and Council in 1995, and again in 1998 I
expressed concern with an extension of Jane Avenue. Currently on Jane
Avenue there are 13 houses. On the proposed Jane Avenue extension, the plan
of subdivision DEV 95-020 has an additional 29 new homes being added.
There could actually be more homes constructed than what is shown on this
plan since blocks 39-45, at the very north end of the proposed Jane Avenue
extension, are zoned RI-45 (in PD-69-99) which allows for single dwellings
OR semi-detached homes. Ifpeople living in these homes wish to have easy
access to Courtice Road, Highway #2 eastbound or the 401 they will take the
shortest route, down Jane Avenue to Westmore Street to Courtice Road.
Since Westmore Street is the only connection to Courtice Road all of
the traffic from the new subdivision will be funneled through the existing
neighbourhood. In the Clarington/Courtice Independent newspaper,
September 5, 1998 issue, Mayor Hamre herself has expressed concern with
4
just such an event happening in another subdivision in Clarington (Appendix
3) which does not have multiple access roads currently in place nor available in
the immediate future.
In February 1999 Marshall, Macklin and Monaghan conducted a
traffic analysis of the Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-95029 for D.G. Biddle
and Associates Limited. In my opinion there are several flaws in this study.
I have read the Addendum Traffic Analysis Report of April 8,1999
to Mr. Creamer at D.G. Biddle and Associates from Marshall, Macklin and
Monaghan. I live in this neighbourhood and I go for walks in this
neighbourhood and I know what the traffic in this neighbourhood is like. The
data collected on Tuesday February 16, 1999 does not correlate to any
observations that I have made in this neighbourbood. The comer of Trulls
Road and Nash Road is so busy now and there is so much traffic now on Nash
Road, compared to what there was even two years ago. And the traffic is not
just at peak times, it is all day. I won't even ride my bicycle along Nash Road
any more because there is so much traffic.
Sunday afternoon at 4 p.m. I went for a walk and in a two and a half
minute time frame, at the corner of Trulls Road and Nash Road there were 25
vehicles that went through that intersection. If one cared to extrapolate this to
a one hour period, that would equal 600 vehicles an hour, at a non-peak time;
the traffic study shows a total of630 vehicles for the peak hours of 16:15 to
17: 15 on a week day. This makes me question the accuracy of this study.
In section 9.3 of PD-70-99 two traffic scenarios are mentioned and
deemed to be acceptable by the consultant:
Scenario 1- George Reynolds Drive is built only to Jane Avenue, Jane Avenue
extends from George Reynolds to Westmore Street and the existing access from
Westmore Street to Courtice Road remains open.
Scenario 2- Jane Avenue extends from George Reynolds Drive to West more
Street, and West more Street access to Courtice Road remains open, and George
Reynolds Drive is open from Trolls Road to Courtice Road.
The problem that I have with both of these scenarios is that the traffic study
does not take into account the possible future development to the north and
east (Appendix 4) of development plan DEV 95-020. One might certainly
argue that any possible future development is not in the purview of the current
development plan. My rebuttal would be that it is basic common sense that
any future development will lead to more traffic funneling through the existing
subdivision on Jane Avenue. The Public Works Department and the Planning
department cannot afford to take an ostrich mentality to the impact of future
5
developments upon existing neighbourhoods, especially if one is truly intent on
making an informed decision.
Looking at Appendix 4 again you will see on the possible future
development area there is a road marked Street B. As was explained to me last
year, this road will not be allowed to make a connection with Courtice Road; it
has something to do with the Regional plan and having George Reynolds Drive
connecting to Courtice Road at some unspecified future date. Apparently there
can not be two roads connecting to a main artery in such close proximity. This
is going to affect traffic patterns. All the traffic from Street B will either go
north or south through the existing subdivision, depending upon human nature,
which does not always coincide with computer generated models of traffic
movement.
At the time that I was asking questions about this area, endeavoring to
understand the Municipality's position on traffic, I asked, why then was the
Nantucket development at the corner of Courtice Road and Highway #2
allowed to have a road accessing Courtice Road so close to the main artery of
Highway #2? The response from the planning department was that this
development 'had a long history'. Well, in my opinion DEV 95-020 has a long
history as well, and the planning department seems to agree as evidenced by
section 5.3 of report 69-99 which states:
This plan of subdivision was draft approved many years ago. . . ..
Suggestions have been made to the planning department that one
solution to the traffic concerns of the residents on existing Jane Avenue is
NOT extending Jane Avenue but to leave it as a crescent formed by the three
streets, Jane Avenue, Glenview Road and Lynwood Avenue and to have the
proposed Jane Avenue extension end in a cul-de-sac (a street closed at one
end) at the southerly limit. The Planning Department is opposed to this
because they want Clarington to use grid patterns now in constructing new
subdivisions, they are opposed to cul-de-sacs. All one has to do is to drive
around any new subdivision currently under construction and one can see cul-
de-sacs where they are warranted. Even in DEV 95-020, there is a cul-de-sac
in the form of Street A. Street A is a street closed at one end; it has only one
means by which to gain access to 38 homes. So clearly, exceptions to the rule
of 'no cul-de-sacs' are often made. All that the residents of Jane Avenue are
asking is that the planning department make an exception to the no cul-de-sac
rule in their case as well; to make an exception to accommodate a
neighbourhood that has been in existence for close to 50 years. To make an
exception to a plan of subdivision that has 'a long history'. To make an
exception to a plan of subdivision that was draft approved many years ago.
6
After all, in the minutes of the Public Meeting of May 4, 1998, Bill
Creamer ofD.G. Biddle and Associates, on behalf of the applicant 'noted his
willingness to address the concerns expressed by the residents' about the
traffic concerns. Perhaps the Planning Department should engage this
willingness and come up with a more equitable solution to the traffic
concerns.
It is truly unfortunate that, with all of the times over the years the
residents of Jane Avenue, Glenview Road, Westmore Street and Fourth Street
have expressed concerns about increased traffic in their neighbourhood that
the Planning department was not paying attention. A solution to one of the
problems plaguing this development plan for so many years is really very
simple, all it takes to solve the problem is one simple exception.
I have been told by Heather Brooks in the Planning Department that
there will be no more public meetings regarding this development plan.
Apparently, the Planning Department feels that they have devoted enough
time to this issue and they have no intention of spending any further time
trying to resolve outstanding complaints that have not been adequately
addressed in the current reports.
I would respectfully recommend that the reports be referred back to
staff for further revision and that the plan of subdivision DEV 95-020 not be
recommended for approval at the June 28, 1999 Council Meeting.
Thank you for your attention.
Respectfully,
lA. Hayman
22 Jane Avenue
Courtice
Ontario
LIE 2H9
end
c.ornrY'\ \ ttee
Append;-X .1
...
.,::t
Sl~
"'C-
....~
....Cl;
~~
i::lll
-c::.
2~
"'Co
Genero..\ Pu.....pose
Ad r'Y"'I i Y"'\ \ 5 -h- 0. -k 0 '"
fY\on~ .J U-L-,* \0) \ ~C)5
R..1~L\C N"\E'...E-TING: Po 1o-~5 oav' ~5-o2.C
----~--~_.~"~------------------
G2 ~~;-.j'1"'';(: :::.i.c:l::r+~l::::B--=7NVMCll'l ~T'1Gc ;.~ON O'(OIi:J31i O'(OIi 3JiJ.tJr/OJ
:1: -I~-- ~'~-:~~~<>"':ic~~<~ r-T-II-T-II-'T-'I
',' -00 " ''f.1' l I
: I:~; ! : i :" - - - " " - - ~ ~ ' ; 7... I ~ I I I I I I I I I I
: Ii ;" ~ ...= ~ .:r" · I ~; I I I I I I I I I I
i i~ ~ ~~~ ~. ~; '~r /i-f-+-f--+-+-+-'-1-'+-1 I
, : i: ft ~,~j : "7~o~? ~~.~ ~-; I ~ I I I I I I I I I I
:1'; i--_::: '-?"" ~ ~ :: ,. u: L_L~_.1-,_L~_1-_,L.~' I'
I I ......11. -.>>..>. ~ J ':'!' ~ t.n
" ~. '--"', ~ ' . ", .... 3nN311'( OOOI.NJ.7 I
'I: ~ _J;: ~_____~.J'oo>Z -~ ?' '~I ~ I-~-T'-'II-T'-I~l. .
?]! !;'__m'h'_~ !\_, I , I 'I-"::'-~ I I I I I I I
T "zo.".oo.,: :-~~~ ~ ~J ::5 t-+-t--l-+.-t--i I
,~.: I /<;~r+-jf~:~ ~ -i I I I 1 I I I
!y '4i"V::'Vl~;";.1 L.J_J.;...L_LJ I
, - '-, ~ -.- 1.331i1. S 3N'(r I
' ':, E.
r . iii, It It $t "' ~':::-~T:- ~._.- T ----,
, ' . .' ;~ ~ 'I' ~ ~ I ~.. I I I
' : I . _ . ~::~, ?~ ~ ~ I I"",'
: i';," ..... .~ "'" ~~ " !'-. I_~ ' I
: I /.... <~~ ~. .. Co I ~ I
J ~ .:~., N;~ ~z ' ., I
::. .. , """"c=--. '", . ~~
J.. ;; ",Sa> " _ "".~~. :.
-.:1 =: / ~ . .,~,~~~ ~ I
2'" , . i z.' .e.,/, ::~~. I' ~ I
...:S :-l, ,~ ~ I :_ "'.. . ,;1 ~
~... t t. ,:.... "-4 =; ll.J. ~ .
~;! I' . _~J I
z, : '-'-'-=:1
--~-------I--l--
,,\'-', I
; ,::Q. :~;J it.,
.~
~O, ~~
CLAR\ NG To t-J
ce:v€l..C)!l)m'- ~T
c:.OR.POQ.~T, 0 IV
,
"
"
,
,
,
,
() .1
~,., I
I'.~..~
I
,
'~__ I
\::', I
..-
,;
...
"-~
"
,F
r:
:~
! ,= ~
;
/
~~
.2~
" .
,
.,
,
--..
.
~'
1
'........
"
... -'
.
~
..,' I'
\\! ..
, . ~:lf( ....ltf.Sl>(
, ~
::"1)0,1-: .": g'.----,~).{-,.., (1]<\ oddV"~~~..:J'voG (v,_t9".
..~ - '!'"' - I' ":~ ...C: _ - r' , ,- r - I ~>""
, '_ , ,_... . _. _. J ~,
: . .;~' ' !~~~ -11N~~~~~~_ ~:;.- -~:~~~~}:~'::l~
Apfen.i/x 3
The ClaringtonlCourtice Independent, Bowmanville, Saturday, September 5, ] 998
Page J
Council Wary
Of Extending
: Subdivision
:The development of
more new housing on a
hill at the southwest side
of Bowmanville would be
"very premature," says
Clarington Mayor Diane
Hamre.
rl don't see the
rieed to rush this
thing through. II
.Mayor Hamre
She was responding
Monday to a request
before a committee of
Clarington council to
rezone lands near the cor-
ner of the unopened Green
Rd. right-of-way and
Baseline Rd.
Mayor Hamre warned
that until Green Rd. is
built, any traffic from the
new development would
be funnelled into the exist-
ing Aspen Springs neigh-
bourhood.
Clarington's general
purpose and administra-
tion committee had been
asked to approve part of
the first phase of a subdivi-
sion that would have a
total of 335 units. Much of
the land consists of a large
hill called a "drumlin."
"I can see us getting
delegations from existing
, residents," said Mayor
Hamre, in reference to the
possibility of more traffic.
"I don't see the need to
rush this thing through."
"I do think it's prema-
ture. I think we should
wait until the time is right
for this subdivision," said
Councillor John Mutton.
Clarington's. general
purpose and administra-
tion committee voted not
to approve rezoning and a
draft plan of subdivision
for the land in question. A
small' portion of the devel-
opment had, however,
received draft' plan
approval at an earlier date
and could proceed provid-
ed the developer met the
criteria of the subdivision
agreement. That phase of
the project has 146 units.
'--'-' I __
._-------------~
Appt"t6:r ~
-.
I /
"'-.. ,t.../
........ ,. 1re.oor E ;'
"-
,
" \
~ '
t
en
N
o
Z
<
CO
N
,~
/EW
G.P~.NO. 63~ .
.~ . cr:L:i ~
.~.~~
i I ~
45
\
I
~
~.Af}'- Q~ ZI/91
f eD- ~-7'J
41 Farncomb Crescent
Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 4L8
905-623-2296
email: christen@netrover.com
June 20, 1999
Ms. Marie Knight
Deputy Clerk
Municipality Of Clarington
Dear Ms. Knight,
I have read through the proposed animal control bi-laws carefully, and while I believe it is the
beginning of some positive changes, I feel it comes short of actually solving some of the problems we
face concerning domestic cats roaming neighborhoods.
First of all, the new by-law provides for the licensing of cats, but at its present state, it does no more
than provide the municipality with a new source of income.
...}t does nothing to help control animals that are allowed to wander and destroy other people's
>property. Property damage should be specifically addressed as it does go far beyond "animals
~0.g at large",
.</<:;:;:;:~.;:::::;:~:::::::::::~r!(:-::::::::Jt~~]~f@n has a problem with unwanted cats on his property, it usually would cost him more to
(':t~4t~~~ge for long enough to catch the animal than it costs for the owner to retrieve his animal
> (fQmmepound. Why is it that impoundment penalties are quadruple the cost for dogs as for
$its14have spoken to many people who state that they would sooner put out a bowl of antifreeze
I~ deal with problem cats than to be bothered with paying for traps, only to have the cat out at
w,rge again later. $10 to $15 is not enough of a deterrent to cat owners to keep their cats inside,
~##hennore, it does not seem right that a person's cat can cause a neighbor thousands of dollars
:.jlidamage (as someone's cat has done to us), yet it is up to the neighbor to have to pay to rent a
.. .... . . ...... trap, and then have to be content with the owner receiving a $10 fine! Impoundment fees should
be the same as those for dogs, and owners should be responsible for whatever trap rental fees
were required for catching an unwelcome animal. Those trying to rid their yards of other
people's pets should pay a refundable deposit on trap rentals.
I have had a cat that licked antifreeze off the floor of our car, and I can tell you that no cat
deserves to die in that fashion. If an animal causes trouble around the neighborhood, it is not the
cat's fault - it's just doing what comes naturally. It is the owner's fault. Current and proposed
by-laws do nothing to discourage injured property owners from resorting to drastic measures to
solving their problems because such measures are easier, pennanent and cheaper.
· Some breeds of dogs and cats cannot wear collars all the time because of chafing, skin or hair
problems, etc. For instance, my two Yorkshire Terriers have 3 different collars they must wear at
different times. When they are in my yard, they must wear invisible fencing collars. In the
morning and at night, they must wear anti-barking collars. When they are out for a walk, or in a
public place, they wear harnesses that have their rabies, registration and microchip tags attached.
When inside the house, they get a break from collars because any collar causes severe matting
and knotting of their long, fme hair. Because our dogs cannot wear harnesses or collars all the
time, we had them implanted with microchips so that if they got lost without identification, they
tl1at.a cat. can ilip aut.of.them iLthi:y.get caught on . . .
June 20, 1999
Page 2
something. These are designed with the cat's safety in mind. When a cat loses its collar and tags,
microchipping provides a perfect alternative for identification. Licensing fees of cats should be a
little higher to encourage more cat owners to microchip, as microchipping costs the same for cats
as for dogs.
The by-law makes no mention of microchip identification when outlining impoundment fees for
animals wearing and not wearing registration tags. It is just as easy to scan an animal for
microchip identification as it is to look up a registration number. As such, impoundment fees for
microchipped animals should not exceed those for pets wearing registration tags, as long as the
owner can produce proof of registration upon retrieval of the animal.
I do applaud the decision to include lifetime registration options for microchipped implanted animals. Tags are
cumbersome and impractical and municipalities should begin to consider microchipping as a viable alternative
to external identification which can easily be lost or damaged.
Sincerely,
,..), v '~2cJ{lkJL'l~
/ L. Christensen
!JfJIJ fl~ .:b//9?
f!.,D-(j~ - 91
"
~/
Monday, June 21, 1999
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERS BY-LAW
I am in full support of changing these by-laws to better reflect our communities needs.
As I stated in an article I wrote to the Clarington This Week in November of 1998, cats
that roam free have become a huge problem in our neighborhood. (article attached)
They are destructive and it seems as though their owners have no respect for their fellow
neighbours when asked to keep their pets indoors. I spoke to someone yesterday that
actually has "cat rage" and has tried to kill them with poison. When it gets to this point,
something needs to be done. It is not the fault of the animal but their irresponsible
owners. If they can't take care of their pet~ properly, they shouldn't be allowed to have
them.
I would like to suggest the following additions or changes to the by-law
Page 10 Section 6.2 add "that are kept indoors"
Page 10 Section 6.3 add "that are kept indoors"
Schedule "A" I think the adoption fees should be the same for dogs and cats
I think the licensing fee for dogs and cats should be the same. Dogs actually cost more to
neuter and feed.
I think the impoundment costs should be the same as well. Perhaps it would deter the
irresponsible cat owners from a) purchasing a cat or b) letting it run loose. We do not
have a dog problem in the community.
In conclusion, I would like a "cat license" person to canvas all the houses in the
neighborhood just as they do for the dogs in order to get the animals licensed and I
believe a pamphlet with the new by-laws should be handed out at that time. These
irresponsible owners should know that their animals can be trapped if left roaming free
?"anG taken to the pound and what the fines would entail.
Thank you for your attention to this problem.
Suzanne Wilsdon
v ~
., .,., r-- 00 10'1 ~. r:::.
"IIlr"l=O~r'lCllO (ij~~
f I!! ~ J~ i .j- ~; t ~ ~!Cll ] 't:lje> g
~ .- r-- ,Q r-- r- r-- ~ ~\ 't:l e:;
') III It"I .- .,., ~.,., .~ ~ ~ . (ij
L. r. ...~II -E
- =..-.......,.-.... ,-.. fI),,-.... e 3
" - It"I ._ If'> .,., ~ It"I 0 't:l
~ ~ ~ .~ e> ~ e ~ ~
-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C
z
wO
. ~ ~
c1iaZ
co>-
.5 5 u
~.s -
.~ ...J
.,., 0
Oleo
...:: .oOl CJJ~...-o" '
...,a 0': Q.. 0 ~ .s ~ \-0 0. l:: .::.""0 Vl OJ ;;..-,. ...... .E- 0
... . ,... CIl cd co ~ co ~ ~ 0 cd 0 U ~ ~ -51 0 C :a.- l::
o CO.:2 ~ CIl ::l E c E,Q.- 0. u.... 0.... .- ... cd ~ - ~
~ .Ej 0 ~ ~ ~ E'~ E ~ rg ~ fii g..~ eo Q.. :g:c 1A U E ~
o .5 "0... ~ ~ UO u- uO.c c z~:a 0. "0 ."::.!2 0. OJ)::l . E~'~
CIl....CO~.c uO CIlcd"O.... .~~... ....
.- Q.. cd 0. ~ ...... J:s... , >. ~ ~ C ::l 5] II) ~ 13 ~ 0.
.:.: "0 OJ)::l CIl '00 ~ 0 E II) .'!::' cd II) c:l -< C r-.c .... E.:2 ~
~ fii.:: e:..c.... t cd t.,,:: ~ C u Z CIl 0 ....: ';;; 0 ~ t ~ en
> _.c co L.. ~,Q.c,Q.c 1I)::l . ~ . C ~._ ~ >..:2 > 0. ~
?oell ~,QECIl ~EE~~~o.cu>~~ eIl'-
CIl t: := co en E 0 E? E E 0 .-c 0'';:: ... C .....;;; ~ -g 0 9-
._ ~,Q C cd cd CIl ell cd _ ::l II) CIl ... -
.c ~ ::l'- t ~.c ~ .c ~ 0 0 CIl ::l ell - v 0 ell cd >.... u
r-~Q..;o.Eu~u~uU-<E-<S~u~~-g~]g
I
m~1~
&Ii
C: ~ <U ~ C: ...; c c: r::: ~ ~ ~ ~ 2' ~.~ -0 == ~ .~ ~ c::: b.O~ I ~ ?:'- ~ "'0
8 "faJHr~ "fa 2'~ 15- g .s c 8 ,g.s; 2"0 - "0 .8.~ . 8.~ ~ ~ ;
~::l ~.... '2 ..... .:: .c .-:.. b.O.g ~ .g ~ ... ..... "0 'ia ~; ~ ::l ~ ~ CIl ~ ~ ~
!a 2 ~.s g 'ia ~ ~ 'c ~ gf.g !a 'ia 2..~'~ ~e ; U u c.9- ~'€ ~ -; ~ -: .E
~ 0 _ 0 0 cd ~ .- <I) b.O U ~.... ..... CIl ~ ~ ~"O ~ e = e U
~ >.... -g >.. ~.c .... U 0 c:: ::l >.. c C c ~ ~'-:a .s ~ CIl c g. g .- o;::l
,.D ..... cd f! 0 ~ ~......S b.O e'- ~ ~ U .c ..... ~.D c cd ....- ;.~ U t:
-g ~ CIl ~ >-..... gf-v;.5.<;::::.6 ~ e E B Q g,o..... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. CIl .~] ~
o -g ..... ~ ,"0 g';> -o'=: -g ~; 8 ..... ~ 0 ~ . '" ~ F< ~ ~ g -; .s "0
of: ~ .;!l"E ~ ;,Q:'= ~ ~ 8 -t"C'~ ~ ~ 8 ~..s ~ ~ B .c ~ :'o.c:; g 'ia ~ 'i
::lcd~cd~""'.c... CIl e~>""ocd~> "'~CIl~ O.D-.ccd~
~ t: U b.O ~.c co ~ 0 ~.=: 0 e ~ ~ 0 ~.~ ~.:.: co ~ .5 .c<:l ~ ..... .c "0
__ -- b.O'-.c CIl .... ~ ~ ~ >-. - - .- 0 ...... e -.c ~ 0
.c.ccdO=:"O~g _~ob""'.c_.D>."'~.cc::-"O.D_Scd""'>.;!l...
b.O _ - >-.-..... ~ 0 ..... ... ~ cd ..... ... U'-"'O "0 w ~ ~
'0 0 0 ; -g cd.D E ~ = ~ b.O'~ ~ U o..~ -:a ~:; 1Q ~ 8 CIl] s:'= US>'
c:: ~ ......5 CIl cd ~ c:: <I) B 1Q <I)...... 0.. ~.~ 0 :-:: ~ ~ 0 ';> CIl e .... ] ~ c::.s
>-.-; ..... CIl ,CIl CIl > 0 CIl .c'" c:: ::l ~ ..... ..... .-:.. ~ . >-. ~ -g ~ .: ~ :s! -;...... ::l 0-;
~g"fa~~~~]~~~~~-gj-g-gj~~o-~g~~g~~~@~
_ '';::'0 e"'O"O _ b.O"O.s ~ ~ ~.......5.c 0...s.5 ~ 8 ~ ~ a ~ 2 2] ~ g
0
~
(l) r::f.:J
S ~
.- u
~ (l)
.....c: r::f.:J
b.O ~
.- (l)
.....c: u
r::f.:J .-
-
...
~
~
~ c ~ co1;: ....."0' 1 .
..... ~.-.5 b.O ~ :; "fa e ~
e -; >-"" . 0'" O.D
.5 E ~ g g E-V; g] 5-
::l~-S~ :>. "'9-l.~
oo:-::'~.s ........~~.s
>. b.O ~ "'0 "'0 &.s
_ c:: c:: c... o?:,>B
o ~ CI) ~.- ~ ._...- _
..... U!=: ~ ..... ~.-.c:"O
O~b.Oe ~.cO~~
b.O- N C ~:- 0.. N
...5 3:.e..:: 8 -g <I) >. cd
&...<;::: 0 U t'd~., ::l~ 0 t:.c
~ ~..... ~ ~.D'......:g: 15-0:9
"Q cdOb.O~"'O' ~....t'd
Q,lE~=b.O~o;. ";:0..0
Q,lt'd ~cd.cOU~ ..c
.c: CIl .c ~eCllcd
.. - 15-"0 ~ .;!l 3...... c cd 3
~ OCOt'dO ~oogf
.. .c t'd.c u.D ' O....D._
-'" "O'(1)eIl'O'O ""(1)(1)
~iil 5~~"O[5~~"O ::3C.Q;>
(1) "":>~c eIl,,"O oOb-'eIl
>,'" b....eIl..."'~- .......c...c
~ ~ 2 ~..c.g li:: .8 ~'(3 5 0] ~ Q
~ ~ 0 c...- .::l (1) . (1)..c ~..... "0 .5
~0~....."'~t::"O'" Ub.Oo.o
~ --g "0 5.00 0 '0 (1) ~ 0 i>>'~!+=' c :; ~
~.D(1) C... ..."'.....~oCC(1)'"
; ell C (1)E"~ ~ 'ti g (';l. g .<;::: "0 g B 8:.2
1.1 t:: ..c .~ :.2'- (1).- - "0 '" '" 0 .
- = -< .- ..... c U >,.0 ~ '5- - (1) 2:l '+'0 "0 0
~ ~ c ..... ..... 'C; ell "0 .- ::3 ..c: "0 ~ "0
=.ot'd(1)~~~~~5",~""'E(1)...o
u"'~~ ~"005::3Vl'" 5(1).....
~~~.....B~Y(1)~gO~5~iil~~
o . ell _ ~ 0 ~ "0 C ~ (1) Coo ....a 0
u : U - .- .l:: ... ~ (1) eIl..c ... 0 ::3.- ~
~ ~ (1) '~"'5i '" ~ = 5 5 ~ ] ~ ~ 0 i;.....
.- .c ... ell ..c '+'0 ~ (1) ell..... (1) 0
~ :-:: ..... ..... .g -< ..c .,U ] (1) >, ~... 0 5 .....
:;j 5 ...""" ell ~ .-=:"'::3.t:i 5 1=1 "0 ~ S'c oS
c~~ ~(1)~E:.=~~~ ;>O~eIl
~ ]] ~ ~ ~.~ '0 iil [5 .~'2 E ~"2 ~
v~""''''''2:l2:l~~~~..c~~''O~-<~
"';:l~"'" 0 00", c<+::"O ~ ell....... (1) >"
~""'00~(1);:l(1)"O_(1) ........(1)C>,
~5="O ~05csoo"O(1)(1)~O~
C U ell C (1) ..... ~ ell :> "0 (1) ~ "0 'p ~
..... (1) ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ;;>._... 'Vi (1) ell I
~~O(1)""'~>''''eIl ~aellc~cCl
.00 C..c"O...c >,~ ~Co (';l
N..........CO~"O_...>,eIloU(1).....
Vl(1)"'(1)eIl~~~c~5u ",.ooc
:: .c ;:l U ... 0 0.- "0'- 0 b.O'-
..... E.5 ~ ..... E c ~ (1):> ~ '0 r- ..... c c
~ '0 (1) "';;> '" (1) (1) ell ~ ..... .~ ~ - '" '6iJ 0
3: ~ '" "0 ::3 "0 5 (1) 0 "0 00 0- C ....p
;::: iil "C ~ ell = ~ 5 ~"O g - .~ ~ ell
'::::: ~ ..... (1) 0 0 5 eIl..c e ::: '" ... = 0 (1) ,9-
;:l ~ >,:> - .- t--..... ell ~ .- .......c U
:.J ~ (1) 00;;> '"a ~ --g .......0 ~ b.O'~..... '€
~~ ~'~g :~d f~.s] ~.~~.~ 2.
-g~e~eIlu.....[5~~~(1)O~[5...
,500 00~~mou;>>,UOEE55
~
0
.~
~
~
0
~ C
~ 0
~ ~
rJ)
.-
0 ...c=
c
(].) .-
~
.D rJ)
Q)
.-
""0
en. 0
.~ 0
-
~ ~
~. C
~ ~
~
en. Q)
(].) u
...c=
S ~
0
.~ N
~
(].)
S
0
r:/)
~ Q,l
=';1
i 5
:= ~
:::Q,l
Q,lZ
=
=
t'J
N
=
~
.,:, ~
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~
]-0 V'i.J::] 0 ._o~o.....O
+-I o~.~.~-g ~~ C V'J ~ o~
...0 ~ 0 ~ c _ ._ II) 0 .... c ~ 0
..... ~ "'0 .- U ...... 0 C,) E . 0"0
CIl~ ~OC~..."O~O~E~
......t ,Q ~ C ~ .;:; t.:: ... fii ~ C ~ ..:! E
e.o...... V'J .- .c c:: "0 ~ 0 .....-
~ :9 CIl.... cd t.~.c .- C ? > 0.
:; 5 c'~ ~~ > "'Oil"'=' cd CIl
i5..c~,Q aQ......,g C 1A t:..c]~
o V'J.-::: t:i ~ 0 c.8 - ~ ton."::: r-- ...... -
8~~::lCE""i3o~~'-8~
cd~,E...cd~>-o. o~...
~;:"'O....._~cE'-O~OO::3-
f1)~;~ +-I=,~V'JV'J-5~"'O-;;
~=.co~~c:~~g~-5~o
? < >. - cd '" g 5 >.'c ~ .?;> ~ c.
.~ ....: ~ ~ t;i "'0 ..cO ~ c..o"o. ~ .~ 0... ~
t:.~ ~~...: fii 0.0 uO~ ~ OJ)~
I
..
00;:>-...";3-c::.... b.Oll......Q).OICl:l~IV)Q.)I....IO
.S"2 g e ~ cd ~ .5 al :E il e v; ..... -; ~.s'E <: ~ ~.2:f!.D-d
:3 o.s.- .::.s 0 ~ e ~ '';:: ..s S 'ia .3 v; B '.s:I: >-.::l >-. 2
.g $ f~.s f~ ~ ~ ~! ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .d ~.~ : ~ ~
cd 'i:.llcd~ .D ::lu8'8 -~c....::l eE:g~8.~v
, ~ 0 al gf b.O CIl ~ ~ z ~ c CIl 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ci:l t'd U .::: .D
~ cd d ..... e 0 c:: ~ ~ "E ~.- ~ o.s ~. 1Q <t: Co CI) .... ::l - :-'
. 0...... -'- ...... ::l, C ... _ 0 ::l C
8. ~'':: fr.~ ~ ~ "O.s e ~ '-.2 1A ~ ~ ..8 ~ 0 -g 0 -g ~ r;
cd'2 ~.li: ~.s.c g.S.... cd ~ .... CIl > CIl ~ ~ C. t'd ~ ~ ::l ~
~ Ie .~ .~ ].5 >-. 'ea.;!l] E ~ ~ g -5 ~ -5.s cd 8. ~ b.O g .c. ~
~ ::l"O ..... CI) .D b.O g ~ cd ~ o..~ ~ "0..... C '::: C "'" -; .c
~ .c.s ~'s ~ -g .]'':: ~ .... ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~:E..s..8 ~::
c:: ~._ e '" > > !: 0 ~ 0 c.c.D ~ ~'c ~ ~ 0 .... CIl "' ~
~ ~ >-. :.= t'd t: ..... ._::::; 2 ~ _ C "' 0 0 ... 0 - o:l c..::: 0
CI)CI) 0"'0 Cl)Q)CI)......~ ~~oo~-9-obo ~~-
~ ~ e - c:: ~ ..... ,- C ~ :> C CIl.c "0"0 U 0 .....
.s~ ~t'dSCllt:~~~OCll~~~~Ucc.s<:c~ct'd
~~~ .e~o'~'O ....A' ...:::... t'd0 'CI) cdu .....
~ CIl.s"'O: .::: .c ~._ ~ "<., "0 ~ o:l"'O ~ ~ ~ o:l..8 ,c,.:::..::l
oe ...~.....-CI)~>c"'og >-.O.....D b.O CIl~~.D
-; ~ 1A'0 -; ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ S e'~] ~ ~"O ~ 13 c:: a .S '0 'ia v;
'.::l.s ::l.s ~ u.s.s 0 e..::..:: b.O ~ "'O..s !:a.c t.::..s ~ ~.;;: e..s
~
.~
~
~
~
:=
U
l...
~
f}
~
:0::
o
:;::
8-
~ -. (1) Q) I ~ ~ C I ~ '- (1)..c I I
0.. ~ ~ ~ 5"0 8 13.;!J b.O$ E 'ia ,v; ~
::l g.c.c~al- 'ce.5~~~ ~""'8.
~ "'OQ,)~CIl.....;>-' ~O;>-'~CI)
~ Q,) ~ ~,g ~.,g E .;!J !2 ~ b.O-d ~ -
... .~'. ~.....,..... <: 2 c.. ~ ~.5 C ... ~
o :::~...o..''''O UQ)o_'=:CU4-_
:; en.::: g ~'N J::!:a -5 "0 ~ OJJ.~ ~ ~ 0 ~
o S U ~.9 o'~ ~ !:a:; "'0 -g ~.s ~ ~
~= ~ C ~ ..... .: -g vi:..c CI)'- !:a t'd ~ 0 ~ .s
!:a'-eo:B~o~b.O.....~~ J::~]~S
e e ~ c t'd ..... 0 ~ C 0 ~ -g b.O ... - .-
~~~~.DgSb.O~.D~..s';;;g'iaol
I .s"~ u "0 >-. CIl 0.5 ::l ~ ~ iJ:l '0 '5iJ c.s ....
.;!l'S ~ ~ !:a] ~ : !:a ~ E Eo; ~.g 11.g
c ..... ..... .c ' 0..", ~ -'" .. ~ co"' U ....
~ C::::l' l:O ~ - ';:l ~'"'O", '-::l::l "0
!ag.D:-,~~8~u ~Oo:l-got:o~
c.. U ,c._._ ~ cd >..s ;>-. E b.O t'd ... CIl U 0
.c 0 r:;:: ..... ~.c \.0',_ 0 0 ~ ::>
-g >'0"'0 cO"'::: ..... "0 ~ ..... ~ 2 ;>-. ~ "0 0 ;;>
cd] ~Ou~t'd~ ~~~~o"o C
"". ::> U '-c'- 0 ~ :> :-:: ._> ~ if: c I:;
0lJ ;;>-:: cnU_ ;;lo>CI) roQ)~ Q)
~~5;2~~-5~~
;: 'ia ] ~ e.c c::"'O.l:;
c.c > ,,- ~ ~ c '::l
0..... E~~Ocd"'O
"'0 >-."'O.g.s"'O 6h ~ 8
~::= ~ OJ).c ~ ; 3:0
~ ~ t:: .~ - 0 .....
..... ~ ~:.;:2 ~ - t'd....
2 ....::: _ f! ~ c g
0..~~~Q3.3~'"
'E~ ~ E ~"3.c g;
N ~ b.O'- ..... U ~ .s
;.::Ob.OC~ ~'O
';>"0 cd cd 0 -g..... ~
.- ~ Q,)..... cd cd .;!l .....
u"OV;.cc .cu~
., eo...... ~ ca ...... 8,..0
~'E E.:: ~.g ~ ~ ~
"'0 ~ .- ::l, 0
o .... ~ ~:-' '0 .........c
::2 ..8 ......u 5; 0...2.g ~
o~&g3~~8
_~(/)"'OOCl:l;;>CI)
c.......4-.l",o~~4-1 ....~~ ICI)~l"'"
o 0 !:a il ~ 0 !a ~ t'd.s ~.!2 ~.::: 0
c~.c . ~ g..D E5 ~ ~ .cO ~ ] ~ .;!l
o cd "0 CIl 0..'" cd ~o .....::l.....c~
v; 3 c S~"'O ~ o.s"'O ;.:.,....1Q g,~_ ~
:..cpt'd0"....]c~cC5o() 0..
~ ~ 8 ~'Q) :: 0 ~.: 13) v; ~ c ~ ~ CD
.c .c $ ~.s cd g. cd ~ ~:E b.O'- -g ~.5
..... ... ...... c b.O.s '(:3 t'd >
C ~ B ~ ::l ~ C "' CIl .... 0.."0 CIl 0'-
O.=: ~.::: 0 = ~~ u 0 g e ~ ::l S ~
tJ .5 ~ .~ .g .2.g 5 $ ~.S ~ ~ ~ I ~
cd cd ......c ~.9.:.:.... 0,5 >. U ~ 0 -
.D o.c 0...- 0 8 ......s E \.0"5. .c ~ 0
...eo .c _u ::l~:Il"':>~
':':~::l.c~b.O~~:>;8E CC~O
o > 0.":: eO:> 0.._ ~ ~ ~.- ..... >.
..st'd""'~ .....~:c~~().sEb.O~\.o
~o.c] ~~'ia~~~v;~o.5'iag
o :> ~ :>"0 CIl o...c:.o::l Il) .- cG .... ~ "'
~~~~c'-E"'" ~~._~ ..8....~
~~ ~t'd~~~uo~"O ... b.OE
U - ...: CIl.c .... b.O o:l 'C .... 0 C E"O
C s;] o.,g cd.c cd c l..s .!2::l c ~
'" ~............. ~ cd.D::l .D U C "'.-
Animal Advisory Committee Address to Clarington Council
Monday, June 21, 1999
Re: Responsible Pet Owner_s By-law - Report CD-20-99
We as Members of the Animal Advisory Committee have
worked with staff of the Municipality of Clarington for
several months and strongly support the by-law bei ng
submitted to you today.
The Animal Advisory Committee's support is being given for
the following reasons:
1. The wording of the by-law is in plain language and
designed to be easi Iy understood. It is easy for residents
to locate information they may be looking for, since the
paragraphs are relatively short and well spaced. The
by-law is divided into major headings and divided
fu rther by subsections that keep all related information
grouped together.
2. The By-law addresses areas of concern to animal
owners and the municipality relating to important
aspects of pet ownership. Its schedules clearly set out
the services provided by the Animal Shelter and the fees
for those services.
3. The by-law recommends cat licensing. Locating owners
of cats, as Council knows, is a difficult and expensive
task for all Animal Shelters. More cats are lost and
fewer cats are returned to their owners, than is the case
with dogs. Regulations relating to cat licensing, and the
ability to enforce those regulations, gives the
municipality a better chance of returning cats to their
owners by simply being able to locate that owner. Cat
licensing is a crucial aspect of responsible pet
ownership, which this by-law attempts to instil.
4. The by-law also clearly sets out the offences it creates.
From an enforcement standpoint, the by-law, with its
reader friendly format, will make the enforcement and
prosecution of subsequent offences a simpler task for
the municipality. A major improvement is the increase
in the maximum penalty for offences. The existing by-
laws set out nom i nal fi nes for offences, that in many
cases, did not reflect the seriousness of the
ci rcumstances of the offence itself. The new by-law
provides for a maximum penalty of $5,000, which is in
keeping with other municipalities in Ontario. A higher
maximum penalty will allow the Municipality of
Clarington to request a higher fine where circumstances
demand it, such as repeat offenders and for animals that
cause injuries to people or other ani~als.
In conclusion, we strongly support the contents of Report
CD-20-99 and the Responsible Pet Owners By-law. We
urge Members of Council to aeprove this By-law. To do so
wi II send a message to the residents of Clarington that good
animal care and responsible pet ownership are of paramount
importance to this Council.
Thank you
A//l- ~ 211ff~ ~/
t1 QD~ d-o-9f
Hi my name is Pauline Bryan and I'm here to
support this new by-law regarding cats. I have
written a statment and would like to read it to
you. A year ago this June my son Danny (who
was six at the time) was diagnosed with
Toxoplasmosis (which is the cats feaces disease).
My son was sick for four months before being
diagnosed with this disease. It involved a fever
up to 104, vomitting, headaches, loss of appetite,
lost four weeks of school in total days off, lack of
energy (regular children activities could not be
enjoyed), blood in his urine, and a weight loss of
SIbs. Danny had a rough couple of months. To
make a long story short, Danny was playing in
the sandbox and unknowingly picked up a piece
of clump thinking it was sand and smushed it up
in his hands. Guess what, it wasn't a sand clump
it was cat feaces, it was too late, the spores were
released into his system through his hands and
that is how he caught this disease Toxoplasmosis
(by playing innocently in a sandbox). He was
treated with a battery of drugs and on a strick
regiment (one of these drugs is used to treat
malaria). He had to have a blood test every week
for a month. (Do you know how hard it is to take
blood from a six year old when he doesn't want
to give blood?). I had to take my son out of
school once a week to take him to the doctors. I
also had to go to his schoo I everyday and give
him his afternoon pills. My doctors advised me
to go to all my neighbours and tell them the
situation my son was in and to inform them
about this disease that their childern could have
been in contact with.Ten children plus myself
were tested for this disease, (it was not a pleasant
scene for the parents, some kids fainted, some
kids vomited, some kids screamed). One child
tested postived for this disease (besides my son)
but he never got sick like Danny, and one child
tested that she had came in contact with this
disease but her antibody count was very low.
Most people have never heard of this disease
before, but it can be very harmful to a pregnant
woman's fetus and young childern. This disease
is spread by cat feaces or by raw red meat. Danny
spent five days in Sick Kids Hospital and the
Infectious Disease Doctors told us that the
toxoplasmosis had compromised his immume
system and that he had caught a nasty virus. He
also had to have his eyes tested because this
disease attacks the vision. This disease also
attacks the kindeys and the bone marrow (the
other two drugs that Danny took to protect these
organs). As parents we were concerned about
Dannys health and that is why we feel it is time
to past a by-law that wil have cats restrained into
their own backyard and that cats are also
licensed, just like dogs are. For some reason, cats
are exempted from by-laws that has cats
restrained on a leash and are allowed to roam
freely to get into our garbage, get into cat fights
under our bedroom windows., stalk and kill our
beautiful birds while feeding at our bird feeder,
and to do their business anywhere they feel like
doing it (like in our gardens and sandboxes). As
a homeowner, we can not have a vegetable
garden because if a cat defecates in the garden
and is hosting this disease, which can be
transfered to the vegetables in the garden. As a
dog owner, I must keep my dog under control at
all times and have my dog licensed every year. A
dog license clerk comes to our door every year to
see if we have got the dog licensed. When we
take our dog for a walk we scoop their poop, but
why is a cat owner not responsible for scooping
their cats poop? Do you not think that a dog
wouldn't love to roam free and do their business
anywhere they choose? I feel that some cat
owners have it easy with the old by-law because
there is no responsibility in owning a cat, so they
own more than one cat. I believe the only way to
resolve this type of situation is to change, as well
enforce, this new by-law regarding cats. By the
way, I don't own a cat and look at the situation I
was put in. Recently I was retested for
Toxoplasmosis because of my chance of being in
contact with the parasites which are released
through my sons feaces~ as I am the one who
cleans the washroom. As of right now~ Danny
still has a count of 21 0+ antibodies and the
doctors tell me it could take up to two years
before these counts come down. Danny will be
retested for Toxoplasmosis again in August to
see if his counts have come down. Danny will
have a low count of this disease for the rest of his
life and it could flare up again in the future. As
parents we hope this does not happen again and
hope that Danny has a healthy future.
Thanks
Pauline Bryan