HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-108-08~Iarington
Leading the Way
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING 1i n p
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008 ~fSO~u.'1'i0'''~~jPR"S~~~Dg
Report #: PSD-108-08 File No's: A2008-0030 & A2008-0031 By-law #:
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 9, 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PSD-108-08 be received;
2. THAT Council concurs with Staff that an appeal by the Municipality of the decision
made by the Committee of Adjustment on October 9, 2008 for application A2008-0030
is not warranted. However, should an appeal be lodged by another party, that Staff be
authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend its original
recommendation; and
3. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
October 9, 2008 for application A2008-0031 and that Staff be authorized to appear
before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment.
Submitted by: ("~G~;`/<~--~ Reviewed by~ ~- ~ ~-t
David rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu,
Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer
14 October 2008
MK'sn
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
REPORT NO.: PSD-108-08
1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS
PAGE 2
1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a
hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of
the minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are detailed in
Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below.
DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR
OCTOBER 9, 2008
Staff
A lication Number Recommendation Decision of Committee
Approve in part &
A2008-0030 Den in art A roved with conditions
A2008-0031 A rove A roved
1.2 Application A2008-0030 was filed to permit the construction of an attached carport by
increasing the maximum permitted total lot coverage for all accessory structures from
40% to 64% of the existing main building total floor area and by reducing the minimum
required northerly interior side yard setback from 1.2 metres to 1 metre.
Staff recommended approval of the reduced northerly interior side yard setback from
1.2 metres to 1 metre. However, staff recommended denial of the increase in maximum
permitted total lot coverage for all accessory structures from 40% to 64% of the existing
main building total floor area. The staff report to the Committee advised that an increase
in total lot coverage for all accessory structures from 40% to 64% is not minor in nature,
and does not meet the intent of the Zoning By-law to maintain the status of the dwelling
as the dominant feature on the property.
The Committee considered staffs opinion and decided to approve the application for an
attached carport with a reduced northerly side yard setback of 1 metre, and an increase
in maximum permitted total lot coverage for all accessory buildings from 40% to 64% of
the existing main building to a maximum 65.5 m2 subject to the following conditions:
• That the applicant submit building permit applications for the existing carport and
the proposed carport addition forthwith; and
• That the proposed carport is built in conformity to Zoning By-law 84-63, where
40% of its total perimeter remains open and unobstructed.
The existing character of the neighbourhood is eclectic, and the proposed carport will
generally not be visible from the street. The proposed carport addition meets all
required setbacks, therefore allowing for proper drainage on the property and providing
sufficient space for maintenance of the existing fence and proposed carport. No one
spoke in opposition to the application. Although the Committee of Adjustment decision
is contrary to staffs recommendation, an appeal of this decision was deemed not to be
in the best interest of the Municipality as the proposed carport will have no negative
impact on existing drainage patterns or the ability of the property owner to maintain the
existing and proposed structures on the subject property. However, should an appeal be
lodged by another party, staff have requested that Council authorize them to appear
before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend their original recommendation.
REPORT NO.: PSD-108-08
PAGE 3
2.0 COMMENTS
2.1 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that application A2008-
0031 is in conformity with both Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the
Zoning By-law, are minor in nature and not detrimental to the neighbourhood.
2.2 Council's concurrence with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for application
A2008-0031 is required in order to afford staff official status before the Ontario
Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of
Adjustment.
2.3 Although staff was not in favour of the approved increase in maximum permitted total lot
coverage for all accessory structures from 40% to 64% of the existing main building
total floorarea, after further discussion, it is the consensus between staff that since the
approved total lot coverage for all accessory structures of 64% of the existing main
building total floor area will not create any significant drainage issues (the applicant is
required to comply with the Site Alteration By-law 2008-114), or have any impact on the
existing character of the neighbourhood, it would not be appropriate to appeal.
Therefore, staff believe an appeal by the Municipality for the decision made by the
Committee of Adjustment on October 9, 2008 for application A2008-0030 is not
warranted.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 -Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment
Attachment 1
To Report PSD-108-OS
~al"1~L~011
Leading dlee Way
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT: DERRICK MACLEAN
OWNER: DERRICK MACLEAN
PROPERTY LOCATION: 33 LAMBS LANE, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 12, CONCESSION 2
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE NO.: A2008-0030
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED CARPORT BY INCREASING
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FOR ALL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
FROM 40% TO 64% OF THE EXISTING MAIN BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA TO A
MAXIMUM OF 65.5 M2 & TO REDUCE THE NORTHERLY INTERIOR SIDE
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED
CARPORT BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FOR ALL
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS FROM 40% TO 64% OF THE EXISTING MAIN BUILDING TOTAL
FLOOR AREA TO A MAXIMUM OF 65.5 MZ AND TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
NORTHERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 1.2 METRES TO 1 METRE,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
• THAT THE APPLICANT SUBMIT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR THE
EXISTING CARPORT AND THE PROPOSED CARPORT ADDITION FORTHWITH;
AND
• THAT THE PROPOSED CARPORT IS BUILT IN CONFORMITY TO ZONING BY-LAW
84-63, WHERE 40% OF ITS TOTAL PERIMETER REMAINS OPEN AND
UNOBSTRUCTED
AS IT IS CONSIDERED MINOR IN NATURE, MEETS THE INTENT OF BOTH OFFICIAL
PLANS AND ZONING BY-LAW, AND IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
DATE OF DECISION: October 9, 2008
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: October 29, 2008
~al'J~iQII
Lending the Way
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
JOHN LOUWS
JOHNLOUWS
PROPERTY LOCATION: 50 BLEWETT ROAD, CLARKE
PART LOT 27& 28, CONCESSION 4
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE
FILE NO.: A2008-0031
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING
THE MIN REOD AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 M TO 153 M FROM NEAREST
LIVESTOCK BLDG AT 41 BLEWETT ROAD & FROM 300 M TO 268 M FROM NEAREST
LIVESTOCK BLDG AT 4475 HIGHWAY 35/115.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE
DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL
SETBACK FROM 300 METRES TO 153 METRES FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK
BUILDING AT 41 BLEWETT ROAD AND FROM 300 METRES TO 268 METRES FROM THE
NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 4475 HIGHWAY 35/115 AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE
MEETS THE INTENT OF BOTH OFFICIAL PLANS AND THE ZONING BY-LAW AND IS NOT
DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
DATE OF DECISION:
October 9, 2008
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: October 29, 2008