HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-107-08Clarington
Le~rng the way
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ~ /-
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008 ~~~+~ pYl~~Pfi7 ~~D~-~~
Report #: PSD-107-08 File #: PLN 38.1 By-law #:
Subject: OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW -FIRST PHASE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
THAT Report PSD-107-08 be received for information.
Submitted by:
David J!Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning Services
Reviewed by:
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
~-~=~
LB/COS/sh
October 14, 2008
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
1.0 PURPOSE
PAGE 2
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of the results of the
Official Plan Review First Phase of public consultation that took place from June to
September 2008.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 On May 12, 2008, Council approved in principle the preliminary workplan for the Official
Plan Review. The workplan recommended extensive public participation during all the
phases of the review process. The resolution passed by Council directed staff to consider
public comments and to prepare a public engagement strategy.
2.2 The public engagement strategy will be the subject of a more detailed report later in the
year. Staff is still reviewing the results of the 2008 residential and Business Survey. In
addition, the Municipality is the process of retaining the consultants for the Growth
Management, Intensification, and Healthy and Sustainable Communities components of
the Official Plan Review process. One of the key components of the Request for Proposal
is a requirement for a detailed public participation process for these components. Staff will
report to council on the public engagement strategy once the review of the 2008 Surveys is
complete and the consultants are retained.
2.3 Since May, staff initiated the first phase of public consultation for the Official Plan Review.
This first phase consisted of:
Community sessions
o Bowmanville
o Courtice
o Newcastle
o Newtonville
o Orono
o Solina
^ Stakeholder Meetings
o Agricultural Advisory Committee
o Living Green Community Advisory Committee
o Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT)
o Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD)
o Visual Arts Centre Board
^ Community Surveys
0 400 Clarington residents
0 75 Businesses
^ Government Agencies
o Regional Planning Department
o Intra-ministry Working Group
o Ganaraska and Central lake Ontario Conservation Authorities
o School Boards
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08 PAGE 3
o Municipal Departments
^ Public Meeting May 12
0 11 presentations
0 6 written submissions
2.4 Approximately 80 residents attended the different community sessions and about 60
participated through the stakeholder meetings. About 10 submissions/presentations have
been made as part of the Special Meeting of Council. Combined with the surveys, more
than 600 residents have participated in the first round of public consultation.
3.0 KEY FINDINGS OF COMMUNITY SESSIONS
3.1 Community sessions were held in June in six communities - Bowmanville, Courtice,
.Newcastle, Newtonville, Orono, and Solina -and five stakeholder groups -Agricultural
Advisory Committee, Living Green Community Advisory Committee, Clarington Board of
Trade (CBOT), Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), and Visual
Arts Centre Board.. During each session, participants were asked to complete a
questionnaire, answering the following open-ended questions:
^ What do you enjoy about Clarington and what sets it apart from other communities?
^ How has Clarington changed in the past 10 years?
^ What changes would make Clarington even better?
^ What issues need to be addressed in this Official Plan Review?
3.2 In addition to the questionnaire, session participants were asked to complete a visioning
exercise, answering the following questions:
^ What do you like about the current vision?
^ What would you like to change?
^ What do you think is missing and would like to add to the vision?
3.3 Responses to questions from each of the sessions were combined in order to extract the
dominant themes. The tables summarizing the dominant themes are attached to this report
as Attachments 1 and 2.
3.4 A detailed report with the results of the Community and Stakeholder Group sessions is
enclosed as Attachment 3 to this report.
.'.Agricultural Advisory Committee, BILD, Visual Arts Centres Board have yet to submit their questionnaires, thus
their responses will not be included in this overview.
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 4
3.4.1 SUMMARY OF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
What do you enjoy about Clarington and what sets it apart from other
communities?
Abundance of Green Space:
As stated by residents, the Municipality of Clarington is privileged to have a vasl
natural system of green space linking its communities. Many participants state
that this wealth of green space is what they enjoy most about their community and
they also believe that it sets Clarington apart from other communities.
Urban and Rural Mix:
Respondents believe that Clarington's unique "mix of urban and rural"
communities sets it apart from many of the other municipalities in the GTA. They
enjoy the "variation from urban to rural" and the quiet, "country feeling" of
Clarington. Residents also enjoy the benefit of having a large agricultural sector
with accessible local produce, yet still remaining in "close proximity to significant
urban centres".
Cultural Heritage:
Clarington residents pride themselves on living in a community that still maintains
a rich and "unique cultural heritage as compared to the rest of the GTA".
Residents have respect for the "depth of heritage" in the area and many enjoy
living or working within walking distance of Bowmanville's historic downtown.
Community Character:
Residents credit Clarington's community character to three key attributes -small
town scale, family focus, and sense of identity. Respondents also believe that the
small town character of Clarington's individual and unique communities makes the
Municipality distinct from other areas of the GTA.
Access to Amenities:
Residents enjoy living in proximity to a rural environment, while still maintaining
access to an extensive transportation system and major economic centres.
Respondents are also quite content with the amenities that Clarington has to offer,
including shopping, local produce, healthcare services, schools, and recreational
opportunities such as green space, trail systems, and entertainmerit.
Housing Affordability:
Residents state that they are "privileged to enjoy lower priced homes of
comparable sides to those in other GTA municipalities". Being able to afford larger
homes on larger lots is something residents particularly enjoy about Clarington.
Safety and Security:
Respondents state that they "can still enjoy some measure of public safety" in
Clarington due to its feeling of small town character and the helpful and friendly
people living in the area.
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 5
Good Governance:
Some residents recognize the Municipality as being a well governed area with
open and responsive officials. They believe that the quality of governance in
Clarington distinguishes it from other communities.
ii. How has Clarington changed in the past 10 years?
When asked how Clarington has changed in the past 10 years, the majority of
respondents identify changes that they perceive as being negative.
Increased Development:
Residents most commonly mention increased development as one of Clarington's
major changes over the past 10 years. They are concerned about the. rapid growth
of residential subdivisions leading to "bedroom communities", as well as "big box'
commercial developments threatening the downtowns.
Loss of Farmland:
Respondents are concerned with the loss of Clarington's farmland due to
increased development. Some state that this has caused Clarington's air quality to
suffer.
Population Growth:
Residents identify both positive and negative aspects of the increased population.
Some see population growth as being "positive and progressive", partly due to an
expanded tax base. Other residents see the population growth of the last decade
as being responsible for a decline in Clarington's sense of community, the
crowding of schools, the loss of jobs, and a "lack of adequate social services,
especially for families in crisis".
Local Traffic Congestion:
Questionnaire respondents perceive local traffic congestion as having increased
considerably in the last decade. They are concerned about Clarington becoming
much busier, with "no significant improvements in road infrastructure".
Demographic Shifts:
Residents believe that over the last 10 years Clarington "has grown to include
more people from cities" and of increased "cultural diversity". They also observe
an aging population, which may have major implications for Clarington's
employment base, community services, and facilities.
Diminishing Community Character:
Some residents have noted that Clarington's community character has lessened
over the last decade due to the Municipality's rapid growth. They are
concerned that Clarington is "becoming more urban and beginning to lose its
identity" along with its architectural heritage. They also believe that "big box"
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 6
growth has led to the loss of small local businesses. and a lessening "sense of
community".
Improved Access to Amenities:
Of Clarington's major changes over the last decade, improved access to
amenities is perceived by residents as the most positive. This has included "better
transit throughout the Municipality", improved retail and business opportunities,
enhanced medical services, more recreational facilities and programs, and natural
trails which have opened up access to valley lands.
iii. What changes would make Clarington even better?
Planning for Sustainabilitv:
Residents suggest planning for brownfield development, eco-friendly housing,
more green space, pedestrian linkages, solar or wind power technology, and
improved access to buying local produce. Respondents also suggest "taking a
lead on sustainable living programs", such as improved recycling programs.
Controlled Growth:
Residents believe that slowing down .residential growth to allow infrastructure to
catch up will help make Clarington a better community. One questionnaire
respondent suggests that Clarington should grow at a rate that can be absorbed
by the community and not at a rate that absorbs the community. Residents desire
a "clear definition between urban and rural land use", without compromising the
existing farmland with sprawling developments.
Transportation Improvements:
Respondents suggest transportation improvements for the Municipality's road
network, as well as public transit systems, particularly the GO Train expansion to
Bowmanville.
Industry and Emplovment Opportunities:
Overall, respondents are in .support of less commuting and suggest that
Clarington "encourage more outside investment" to allow for economic growth and
new industry. They also suggest that the Municipality "develop energy and
employment parks to improve the local job and tax bases".
Preservation and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage and Community .Character:
Residents recommend that cultural heritage and community character be
preserved and further enhanced to make Clarington even better. Suggestions
include the enhancement of traditional downtown neighbourhoods and business
districts, a "focus on preserving existing community attributes", and .providing
opportunities for "more arts, culture and passive recreation". They also suggest
that "more thought should be given to appearance" -for example, the strength
and character of Clarington's individual communities should be maintained via
gateways and visual cues.
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 7
Increased Access to Amenities:
Respondents suggest that improved access to amenities would make Clarington a
better place to live. Many desire mixed use neighbourhoods that are "denser" and
"allow for easier access via foot and bike to amenities" such as shopping, school,
work, parks, and waterfront or beach areas (particularly in Courtice). In terms of
amenities, residents are interested in more "recreation, theatres, 'and parks".
Greater Housing Affordability:
Residents suggest that the Municipality should be dedicated to maintaining a
stable housing stock and housing prices. They also desire more choice in
accommodation for seniors (e.g., not for profit housing).
Safer and Healthier Communities:
In terms of safety, respondents desire provisions for "better lighting in parks",
improved "community policing", a "new fire hall in Newcastle", and the widening of
secondary roads "to allow people to walk and bicycle more safely'. Residents also
feel that healthier communities would improve quality of life in the Municipality.
They suggest better access to healthcare and more opportunities for active living.
Council Autonomy and Public Engagement:
Residents noted that Council should be more autonomous and concerned about
Provincial and Regional directives. They also desire continued publicinvolvement.
iv. What issues deed to be addressed in this Official Plan Review?
Sustainability and Growth Management:
Residents suggest that policies should be refined to better encourage sustainable
development in Clarington. They also suggest that Clarington's Official Plan
include policies for controlled growth. Other important issues to consider are the
short- and long-term impacts this type of development will have on Clarington and
respondents suggest generating "scenarios that review the way the future may
develop".
Transportation and Accessibility:
Respondents have expressed concern over automobile dependence and local
traffic congestion and they identify the need to incorporate policies that encourage
transportation that is not car dependant.
Industry and Employment:
Concerns have been raised over Clarington's lack of local employment
opportunities and suggestions include policy changes that will "attract higher
profile employers" in a variety of sectors. Residents also suggest the creation of
"scenarios for the immediate future' relating to the economy and the changing
times (e.g., impacts of General Motors shutdown and oil prices on commuting).
REPORT NO.: P5D-107-08
PAGE 8
Cultural Heritage and Community Character:
Residents suggest provisions for "keeping heritage areas intact", designing places
to work as well as live, enabling service sector opportunities, and encouraging
more community-focused events and festivals. They also suggest that the
Municipality should consider "how Clarington integrates into Southern Ontario"
and what future image is desired (i.e., traditional v. Wal-mart).
Demographic Shifts and Housing Affordability:
Respondents believe that this issue should be addressed by incorporating
appropriate provisions for mixed income housing and "senior living" facilities in
response to anticipated changes in demographics.
Governance and Public Participation:
Issues that residents feel need to be considered include "ease of access to the
politicians", the effective management of "multiple communities and multiple
servicing requirements" (e.g., fire services, libraries, recreation facilities, etc.) and
the coordination of timelines with the Regional Official Plan. They also believe that
"public input needs to be further encouraged" and actively taken into account.
3.4.2 SUMMARY OF VISIONING RESULTS
In addition to the questionnaire, session participants were asked to complete a visioning
exercise. The current Official Plan seeks to achieve a vision for Clarington as:
^ A place where each community can build on its individual character but share a
common economic base and a distinct collective image;
^ A place for people to live, work, and play in a safe, vibrant, healthy, and prosperous
environment;
^ A place where people, business, and government balances growth with protection,
management, and enhancement of the cultural and historic landscape, natural
resources and the environment.
i. What do you like about the current vision?
Individual Community Character:
Residents like that the current vision focuses on "maintaining each community's
identity".
Comprehensive and Balanced:
Respondents describe the current vision as "comprehensive', "inclusive", and "all
encompassing". They like that it balances live, work, and play, as well as
economic, social, and environmental factors.
Forward Thinkjng:
Residents believe that that current vision forward thinking and "ahead of its time
for 1996". They state that it effectively "fits current thinking".
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 9
Strong Value System:
Respondents like that the vision holds a strong value system and "caters to a
responsible image". They describe the vision as "noble", "idealistic", "hopeful", and
"people focused".
What would you like to change?
Language:
In terms of language, residents have two different views. Some believe the vision
to be "long" and "wordy" and that it should be less specific. Others think the vision
is "vague" and "elusive" and that it should be more specific and include more
detail.
Emahasis on Communities:
Participants also suggest contradictory changes in terms of the vision's emphasis
on communities. Some residents would like the vision to be more reflective of the
whole Municipality and not just individual communities, while others desire more
emphasis on the identity of each individual community.
Social. Environmental, and Economic Focus:
Residents would like to see a stronger focus on social, environmental, and
economic resources.
Implementation Tools:
A few residents reveal that they would change nothing about the vision at this
time, but rather "acquire tools, partnerships, and incentives to implement it".
iii. What do you think is missing and would like to add to the vision?
Sustainability:
Residents would like the vision to include a "statement about leadership in
sustainable living".
Transportation and Infrastructure:
Residents believe that the vision should give reference to transportation
throughout the Municipality, as well as the need for infrastructure, services, and
facilities to "keep up with the growth" and change of Clarington.
Economic Base:
Residents would like to add a statement about increasing industry and
employment opportunities in order to support the community's economic base.
Existing Assets:
Respondents feel that the current vision is missing mention of Clarington's
existing assets (e.g. "landmarks", "conservation areas", "Ganaraska Forest", "Long
Sault", "Enniskillen", "agricultural diversity", "built heritage", community identity,
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 10
etc.). They believe that these assets should be referenced in the vision as a way
to "attract people to the area" (e.g. "agri-tourism").
4.0 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDE SURVEYS
4.1 In 1993, staff undertook a community survey in preparing the first Official Plan for the
Municipality. This survey was mailed to 21,000 residences, with a return rate of
approximately 26% (5391 surveys). In 2008, Oracle Poll Research was retained by the
Municipality to execute telephone interviews, regarding the current Official Plan, with 406
randomly selected residents and 75 randomly selected business owners/managers in
Clarington. The margin of error for the residential sample was +/- 4.9%, 19/20 times.
4.2 The three surveys (1993, 2008 Residential, 2008 Business) had a number of questions in
common, which has allowed for the comparative analysis of 1993 and 2008 public
opinions.
4.2.1 Community Perceptions:
Residents in 1993 and 2008 were asked to rate their level of agreement with statements
about the community (Table 1). The 1993 and 2008 perceptions are rated in virtually the
same order, with the exception of the last two statements which are switched. In 1993,
there is slightly more agreement with each of the statements than in 2008.
4.2.2 Top of Mind Challenges:
Respondents were asked what they consider to be the most important challenge facing
Clarington as it continues to grow (Table 2). "Planning/ balancing development/ growth/
sprawl" are considered by respondents in both the residential and business community as
the most important challenges facing Clarington. Both residents and business owners
consider "traffic" as the next important challenge. The other challenges that were
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08 PAGE 11
considered important by residents and business owners alike include "roads/ maintenance/
widen roads", "infrastructure/ services", and "employment", issues that are also related
about balancing growth in the community.
4.2.3 Planning Priorities:
This question was asked on the 1993 survey, as well as the 2008 Residential and
Business surveys. Respondents were asked to rate a series of priorities for the
Municipality to consider when it plans for the future (Table 3). "Attracting more employment
opportunities", "preserving the natural environment", and "preserving agricultural lands" are
the top three priorities in 1993 and in the 2008 Residential and Business surveys. The only
difference is that 2008 residents feel that "preserving the natural environment" is more
important than "attracting more employment opportunities". It is interesting to note that
"improving public spaces and access to the watertront areas" is rated by 77% of 2008
residents and 75% of 2008 business owners as important, yet in 1993 only 54% of
residents rated it as important.
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08 PAGE 12
4.2.4 Various Neighbourhood Uses:
Residents in 1993 and 2008 were asked to rate their level of support or opposition to
having various uses in their residential neighbourhood (Table 4). The top five most
supported neighbourhood uses are the same from 1993 to 2008, though there is slightly
more support for "doctor's office" and "family restaurant" now, with less support for
"children's daycare", "home offices", and "variety store" than there was in 1993.
"Apartments in homes", "residential apartments over stores", and "group homes" are the
least supported neighbourhood uses in both 1993 and 2008.
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08 PAGE 13
4.2.5 Environmental Protection versus Development:
Residents were first asked whether they would support the protection of green spaces over
development (Chart 1). In both 1993 and 2008, residents were more in favour of green
space protection; however there is 10% more support for protection in 2008 compared to
1993. This trend continued when residents were asked whether they would support the
protection of agricultural land over development (Chart 2). Though a majority of residents
in both years support the protection of agricultural lands, approximately 10% more
residents support protection in 2008 compared to 1993.
Chart 1: "Would you support the protection of green spaces or development?"
DonY Know
Support
De~.elopment
Support
ProteCion
^ 2008
10.0 6
s.s°~ ^ 1993
12.
24.7%
8.0%
68.8°
0% 20% 40°h 60% 80% 100%
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08
PAGE 14
Chart 2: "Would you support the protection of agricultural land or development?"
Dont Know
Support
De~.elopment
Support
Protection
^ 2008
7.0%
4.s°io ^ 1993
11. /o
22.5%
83.0%
72.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4.2.6 Managing Growth and Development:
This question was asked on all three surveys. Respondents were asked how they would
rate the way that growth and development is being managed within Clarington (Chart 3).
These results are slightly more difficult to compare between the years as the 2008
respondents were given the option of choosing "Neither Poor nor Good", while the 1993
respondents were not. Many of the 2008 respondents took the liberty of choosing the
neutral option, which may have skewed the results. However, it can be generally noted
that in 2008 a much lower percentage of respondents believe that growth is "not managed
well" when compared to 1993. Overall, the 2008 business community gives the growth
management of Clarington the highest rating.
Chart 3: "Overall, how would you rate the way that growth and development is being managed
within Clarington?"
Don't Knaw /Neither Poor
nor Good
27.
10.6%
Growlh Not Managed Well
Growth Managed Well
20.3%
^ 2008 Business
^ 2008 Residential
^ 1993
42.8%
0% 10% 20°k 30% 40°k 50% 60°h
REPORT NO.: PSD-107-08 PAGE 15
4.2.7 Handling Future Growth:
This question was asked on all three surveys. Respondents were asked whether growth
should be halted or restricted, maintained at current levels or grow at a higher rate (Chart
4). The most popular answer on all surveys is that growth should be "maintained at current
levels". Residents in both 1993 and 2008 are least likely to want growth "at a higher rate",
while the 2008 business owners are more in support of growth "at a higher rate" than they
are of growth being "halted or restricted". Overall, respondents are more supportive of
growth and development now, in 2008, than they were 15 years before, in 1993.
Chart 4: "Should growth be halted or restricted, maintained at current levels or should it grow at a
higher rate?"
Other /Don't Know
Grow at a Higher Rate
Mairrtained at CurteM
Levels
Halted or Restricted
ATTACHMENTS:
4°h
3.2%
14.8
^ 2008 Business
2a°k ^ 2008 Residential
1 s. °k
12.2°k ^ 1993
9°k
53.9%
40.6%
13%
26. °~
32.4%
0°k 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70°k
Attachment 1 -Dominant Community Themes
Attachment 2 -Dominant Visioning Themes
Attachment 3 - Clarington Official Plan Review: Community and Stakeholder Groups
Consultation Summary
Attachment 1
~ ~ ~ ~ To Report PSD-107-08
W
W
2
H
~_
Z
0
U
H
Z
Q
Z_
O
D
• r ~ N
~ C f6 U
~ ~ c
• C
N
f6 f6 N
p7 L ~
C
~ O) CO ~ L U f6 d
' f0 ~ '= ~ N w O
~ ~ C ~
~
~ o ~ N - ~
_
a n
~
~
L N
Q Z, i. m 3 ~~ c
~ f6 f
/l f
A t~/1 O 7 ~ O L ~ ~ .V
• to ~ C
f6 N
U 7
- Q w
~ ~ ~
'6 O
S
• O
fnarn H ~ O
~ m O
U c°> N
o~m O
C~ a
•
• • • • • •
N
~ U
~ _
N
U
C
• O 7 U £ `O C
•
~
c C
3 f0
~ ''C
~ ~
~
r ~ m o ~ ~ ~
• C U lD f6 ~ 7 O
Q ~ ~ U Q 2 C7
• • • • • •
.-~
• ~ U E ~ ~ L
" L ~ C N O) L
+ w
• O C N N l0 O O
U U •N +
.
f6 7
O +
' N ~
L N ~ E N C f6 O N L C f6
• 01 N . N
N N C '
.
, a p O ? ~ y N~` N C N~ ~ C
C
N p O - O
fl N L '~ f6 U N N O N t= 0
~ f0 l`4 -
~ O
~ .
L U
c
~ ~
U 0
0.. N U H O d N f6 C
cG fA U
•
L N U
~
~
L f6
~
w C
f6
~ y
U ~
U
C
N C
C m
U
C L
C
•
N ~ '~ C
O ~ ~ O_
~ ~
Vl O-
'~
~ f
6
~~.,
N
al L C
UI 7
•
>
l 7
U
C
O
C
! Q. ~_ E
• C~ J d J U D D U
• • • • • •
N
N T
w
7
a ~ ~ ~ U
O
• • N
fUp
O
~
~ O
~ f
A
~
~ L
~ ` ~
• ~ rn m
,r • ..+ ~ ~ j N
U 2
C7 tY U ~ Q cA
• • • • • •
N
cW
C
W
H
Z
Z
N
Z
Q
Z
O
0
~ c
o
~
~
N
a~
~ ~ U O f0
~ O O 7 ~ ~
N f6
~
O N
(n
H ,~
~
W
W
• • • • •
U
.
~
O
C
U
N
~ N C
C
7
E
f6
c
VI
o
N O
• U O
O O
~
•
N O
W `
C f
0
C
~ .N
f6 N
- N
~
C r
~ f6 N
O U N
d
J W !n O E
• • •
N
L
U N
• • C
7 C
f6 N
+-
E ~ Y
C N
• U
~ N
L
L
" 7
t6
~
.
~ ~ N
~ ~
2 C
C O
U C
~i O
(A
Attachment 2
To Report PSD-107-08
Attachment 3
To PSD-107-08
CLARINGTON
OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS
SUMMARY
October 2008
Planning Services Department
Community Planning and Design Branch
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION SESSIONS ...............................3
TWHAT DO YOU ENJOY ABOUT YOUR COMMUNITY?T .................................. 3
THOW HAS CLARINGTON CHANGED IN THE PAST 10 YEARS?T ..................... 7
WHAT CHANGES WOULD MAKE CLARINGTON EVEN BETTER? .......................1 O
WHAT SETS CLARINGTON APART FROM OTHER COMMUNITIES? ...................15
TWHAT ISSUES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW?T18
VISION CONSULTATION SESSIONS .......................................22
TWHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE CURRENT VISION?T ................................22
TWHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO CHANGE?T ..................................................23
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS MISSING AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE VISION?T 25
CONCLUSION ............................................................................ 27
APPENDIX A: LISTING OF CONSULTATION SESSIONS....... 31
APPENDIX B: TABLE OF COMMUNITY THEMES ................... 32
APPENDIX C: TABLE OF VISIONING THEMES ...................... 33
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Clarington Open Space ................................................................................ ...................................................3
Figure 2: Bowmanville Creek .:.................................................................................... ...................................................3
Figure 3: Clarington Farmland .................................................................................... ...................................................4
Figure 4: Heritage Plaque ........................................................................................... ...................................................4
Figure 5: Heritage Mural ............................................................................................. ...................................................4
Figure 6: Downtown Bowmanville ............................................................................... ...................................................4
Figure 7: Community Festival ..................................................................................... ...................................................5
Figure 8: Shopper Drug Mart on Longworth Avenue ................................................... ...................................................5
Figure 9: Newcastle Recreation Facility ...................................................................... ...................................................5
Figure 10: Larger Homes on Larger Lots .................................................................... ...................................................5
Figure 11: Crossing Guard .......................................................................................... ...................................................6
Figure 12: Residential Development ........................................................................... ...................................................7
Figure 13: "Big Bob' Development .............................................................................. ...................................................7
Figure 14: Subdivision Encroaching on Farmland ...................................................... ...................................................7
Figure 15: Greenfeld Development ............................................................................ ............................:......................8
Figure 16: Ongoing Construction to Support Growth .................................................. ...................................................8
Figure 17: New Development to Support Growth ....................................................... ................................................... S
Figure 18: Westbound Traffic Congestion ................................................................... ................................................... S
Figure 19: Kingsway Arms Retirement Centre ............................................................ ...................................................9
Figure 20: "Big Box" Growth ....................................................................................... ...................................................9
Figure 21: Clarington Transit ...................................................................................... ...................................................9
Figure 22: Bowmanville Mall Expansion ...................................................................... ..................................................9
Figure 23: Sustainable Transportation ........................................................................ .................................................10
Figure 24: Wind Energy ..............................................................................................
.......................................
..........10
Figure 25: Solar Panels ............................................................................................... ................................................10
Figure 26: Sprawling Development .............................................................................. ................................................11
Figure 27: Protected Countryside ................................................................................ ................................................11
Figure 2S: Highway 401 ............................................................................................... ................................................11
Figure 29: Bowmanville Park and Ride ........................................................................ ................................................11
Figure 30: Clarington Toyota ....................................................................................... ................................................12
Figure 31: St. Marys Cement ....................................................................................... ................................................12
Figure 32: Rehabilitated Castle Hotel .......................................................................... ................................................12
Figure 33: Streetscaping Features ............................................................................... ................................................12
Figure 34: Visual Arts Centre ....................................................................................... ................................................13
Figure 35: Waterfront Trail ........................................................................................... ................................................13
Figure 36: Construction of Townhouses ...................................................................... ................................................13
Figure 37: Apartment Buildings .................................................................................... ................................................13
Figure 38: Curb Extension ........................................................................................... ................................................14
Figure 39: Council Chambers ...................................................................................... ................................................14
Figure 40: Access to Green Space .............................................................................. ................................................15
Figure 41: Clarington Farm .......................................................................................... ................................................15
Figure 42: Downtown Newcastle .................................................................................. ................................................15
Figure 43: Downtown Orono ........................................................................................ ................................................16
Figure 44: Prices' Country Market ................................................................................ ................................................16
Figure 45: Longworth Avenue Townhouses ................................................................. ................................................16
Figure 46: Apartment Building ..................................................................................... ................................................16
Figure 47: Clarington Municipal Administrative Centre ................................................ ................................................17
Figure 48: Renewable Energy ..................................................................................... ................................................18
Figure 49: Hydro Tower ............................................................................................... ................................................18
Figure 50: Higher Density Development ...................................................................... ................................................1 S
Figure 51: Bowmanville GO Station ............................................................................. ................................................19
Figure 52: Residential Pathway ...........................:....................................................... ................................................19
Figure 53: Darlington Nuclear ...................................................................................... ................................................19
Figure 54: Holbum Science Park ................................................................................. ................................................19
Figure 55: Orono Gateway Sign .................................................................................. ................................................2D
Figure 56: Rehabilitated King Street Bridge ................................................................. ................................................20
Figure 57: Strathaven Retirement Residence .............................................................. ................................................20
Figure 58: Aspen Springs Condominiums .................................................................... ................................................20
Figure 59: Public Meeting ............................................................................................ ................................................21
INTRODUCTION
The Municipality of Clarington has begun a review of its Official Plan. The Official Plan
is the Municipality's key planning policy document that provides a framework to guide
future land use, development, and community decisions over the next 25 years. The
Ontario Planning Act requires municipalities to determine every five years if a review of
their Official -Plan is necessary. The existing Clarington Official Plan was approved in
1996, however over the past few years changes to Provincial legislation have had
important implications for the Municipality. It is now necessary to renew the Official Plan
to reflect the community's current values and aspirations.
The Official Plan Review process is an opportunity for everyone to contribute their ideas
over the next three years towards helping shape the future of the Municipality of
Clarington. A key component of the Review process is public participation which will be
achieved, in part, through community consultation sessions. These community sessions
are aimed to inform the public about the project, get input on defining issues, confirm,
and update the current vision and encourage ongoing participation. Their purpose is to
gather ideas that will result in an updated Official Plan that will continue to:
• Ensure that current needs can be met without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs;
• Promote a healthy community and a high quality of life for residents; and
• Manage growth and development efficiently.
To date, sessions have been held in six communities - Bowmanville, Courtice,
Newcastle, Newtonville, Orono, and Solina -and two community groups -the
Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT).. and the Living Green Community Advisory
CommitteeZ. (see Appendix A for session dates). During each session, participants were
asked to complete a questionnaire, answering the following open-ended questions:
• What do you enjoy about your community?
• How has Clarington changed in the past 10 years?
• What changes would make Clarington even better?
• What sets Clarington apart from other communities?
• What issues need to be addressed in this Official Plan Review?
Each question generated a wide variety of answers from which a range of appropriate
themes are identified (see Appendix B for table of themes). This report provides a
summary of the responses received at the community consultation sessions, organized
by question and theme.
'. The Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT) provides business and economic development services in
partnership with the Municipality of Clarington.
?. The Living Green Community Advisory Committee has the purpose of developing a community strategy
that would include local actions, policies, programs, and projects for climate change, energy conservation,
clean energy alternatives, and promoting more sustainable development practices.
1
The current Official Plan seeks to achieve a vision for Clarington as:
• A place where each community can build on its individual character but share a
common economic base and a distinct collective image;
• A place for people to live, work, and play in a safe, vibrant, healthy, and
prosperous environment;
• A place where people, business, and government balances growth with
protection, management, and enhancement of the cultural and historic
landscape, natural resources and the environment.
In addition to the consultation sessions, the six communities - Bowmanville, Courtice,
Newcastle, Newtonville, Orono, and Solina -also participated in a discussion of the
vision, as stated above. The community participants were asked the following
questions:
• What do you like about the current vision?
• What would you like to change?
• What do you think is missing and would like to add to the vision?
The results from these vision consultation sessions are also summarized in this report
(see Appendix C for table of vision themes).
2
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION SESSIONS
Community consultation sessions have been held in Bowmanville, Courtice, Newcastle,
Newtonville, Orono, and Solina, with the Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT) and with the
Living Green Community Advisory Committee. Session participants were asked to
complete a questionnaire, answering the following questions:
• What do you enjoy about your community?
• How has Clarington changed in the past 10 years?
• What changes would make Clarington even better?
• What sets Clarington apart from other communities?
• What issues need to be addressed in this Official Plan Review?
Responses to questions from each of the sessions were combined in order to extract
the dominant themes.
WHAT DO YOU ENJOY ABOUT YOUR COMMUNITY?
The questionnaire began by asking participants what they enjoy about their
community. Overall, Clarington residents seem to most enjoy the green space, rural
atmosphere, cultural heritage, community character, access to amenities, housing
affordability, and safety and security of their respective communities.
~ ~:
b
4~~F ~` -.
f
~`x
~~
~ '. 'ate
,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~,
~~
ar - .,~: ~.,,~ . ra
~,': j,^
..,,
~~
:; .r
~.~ r
Figure 1: Clarington Open Space
Figure 2: Bowmanville
Green
Green spaces can be the defining features of a
community and important components to a healthy
environment. "No longer considered frills, green
spaces are integral to intellectual and physical growth"
(Hume, 2007). Thus, the Municipality of Clarington is
privileged to have a vast natural system of green
space linking its unique communities. Many
participants name open spaces as what they enjoy
most about their community. Clarington's clean, quiet,
and wide open green spaces allow residents to hear
birds and see the stars at night, while still maintaining
easy access to and from Highway 401 and local
businesses. Walking trails throughout Clarington's
parklands further enhance residents' ability to enjoy
the opportunity afforded by such an extensive system
of green space.
3
870
Rural Atmosphere
Figure 3: Clarington
"Strong rural communities are key to the health and
vitality of Ontario" (OMAFRA, 2004). The rural
atmosphere of Clarington sets it apart from many of
the other communities making up the Greater Toronto
Area (GTA). Residents report that they enjoy the
"variation from urban to rural" and the quiet, peaceful
"country feeling" that Clarington affords. Highlighted is
the benefit of having a large agricultural sector with
accessible local produce, yet still remaining in "close
proximity to significant urban centres. Many Clarington
residents place high value on living in a "close-knit"
community that offers the tranquility of "village Living",
while still being able to take advantage of the nearby
urban amenities.
Cultural Heritage
Cultural heritage means many things to many people.
It can encompass historically significant structures,
sites, streetscapes, archaeological resources,
landscapes, vistas, and ridges-lines, among other
interpretations. As revealed in many questionnaire
responses, Clarington residents pride themselves on
living in a community that still maintains a -rich and
"unique cultural heritage as compared to the rest of
the GTA". Residents have respect for the "depth of
heritage" in the area and many enjoy living or working
within walking distance of Bowmanville's beautiful and
historic downtown.
Community Character
Community character is the distinguishing physical
and social quality of an area shaped by natural,
cultural, and socioeconomic forces. A community with
character is often accompanied by strong community
spirit. Questionnaire responses suggest that residents
credit Clarington's community character to three key
attributes -small town scale, family focus, and sense
of identity.
Residents feel as though their community is "small
enough to relate to" -people actually know their
neighbours whether they live at the next house or the
next street. Residents enjoy Clarington's small town
4
$71
atmosphere, without the "hustle and bustle" of larger
urban areas. Clarington is identified as walkable and
"people sized", which allows for a strong sense of
community.
Figure 7: Community
Clarington is perceived as a family oriented community
with a charming atmosphere, friendly people, and
community involvement. Many people choose to
reside in Clarington because their families live in the
area.
A sense of identity has been achieved in Clarington
largely owing to the active downtowns of Bowmanville,
Newcastle and Orono, which have been improved
over the years and contain unique businesses with
localized personal touches. The plentiful community
events and festivals in the area further encourage
strong community spirit.
Access to Amenities
The ability of residents to easily access facilities and
services within a community is of key importance.
Questionnaire responses reveal that Clarington
residents greatly enjoy the quick access to major
economic centres without actually having to live in
them. Respondents are also quite content with the
amenities that Clarington has to offer, including
shopping, local produce, first class healthcare
services, schools, and recreational opportunities such
as green space, trail systems, and entertainment.
Some residents can even enjoy the luxury of biking to
work and walking to buy groceries.
Housing Affordability
The price of housing is a major determining factor
when choosing a community in which to reside. The
issue of affordability is an ongoing problem in the GTA
where a great number of households pay more than
30 per cent of their income on housing. Clarington
residents, however, are "privileged to enjoy lower
priced homes of comparable sizes to those in other
GTA municipalities". Questionnaire responses reveal
that being able to afford larger homes on larger lots is
something residents particularly enjoy about
Clarington.
5
872
Longworth Avenue
Figure 9: Newcastle Recreation
Facility
Figure 10: Larger Homes on
Larger Lots
Safety and Security
In order to achieve a high quality of life, it is imperative
for residents to feel safe and secure in their
communities. Questionnaire respondents state that
they "can still enjoy some measure of public safety" in
Clarington due to its feeling of small town character
and the helpful and friendly people living in the area.
6
873
HOW HAS CLARINGTON CHANGED IN THE PAST 10 YEARS?
When asked how Clarington has changed in the past 10 years, the majority of
respondents identify changes that they perceive as being negative. Such changes
include increased development, loss of farmland, population growth, local traffic
congestion, demographic shifts and diminishing community character. Identified as
a positive change, however, is improved access to amenities - a change that
occurs as a response to many of the negatively perceived changes listed above.
Development
Increased Development
According to a recent analysis of the applications for
plans of subdivision in Clarington, there were over
4,671 units in draft approved or registered plans at the
end of 2007 -this represents a five to six year supply
of housing (Municipality of Clarington, 2008). Thus, it
is not surprising that residents most commonly
mention increased development as one of Clarington's
major changes over the past 10 years. With regard to
type of development, questionnaire respondents see
residential subdivisions and "big box" commercial
strips as the dominating trend.
The rapid growth of residential subdivisions, however,
is not looked upon kindly by many Clarington
residents. They believe that "cookie cutter"
developments are closing in on existing single
dwellings and there is little new industry or
infrastructure to complement this influx of residential.
Citizens are concerned that Clarington is "becoming a
bedroom community" for commuters.
The increase of commercial development is perceived
as both positive and negative. While many residents
appreciate the increased variety of retail outlets and
amenities closer to the small hamlets, some see "big
box" developments as threatening to the downtowns
and small local businesses. In the midst of this
increased development, it is stated that Clarington has
moved "too slowly with respect to transportation,
supportable industry, and infrastructure".
Loss of Farmland
Although the Greenbelt Plan that
December 16, 2004 identifies
should not occur in order to
came into effect on
where urbanization
provide permanent
7
874
Development
Encroaching on Farmland
protection to rural areas and ecological features,
residents are still concerned with the loss of
Clarington's farmland due to increased development.
Some respondents state that significant farmland has
been sold or lost to the development of subdivisions
and, as a result, Clarington's "air quality has suffered"
considerably. Respondents also observe reductions in
trees, green spaces, and public waterfront areas.
Figure 16: Ongoing
to Support Growth
Population Growth
As stated in Ontario's Growth Plan for the Greater
Golden Horseshoe, the population in the GTA is
expected to grow from 7.4 million to 10.5 million from
2001 to 2031 - a 43% increase. For Clarington, this
means an estimated increase from the 2006
population of 77,800 to a population of 133,900 by
2031 (Durham Region, 2008). Clarington has already
experienced rapid growth in the last decade, with a
28% increase from the 1996 population of 61,000
(Municipality of Clarington, 2008).
The significant growth of Clarington is reflected in
questionnaire responses where residents identify both
positive and negative aspects of the increased
population. Some see population growth as being
"positive and progressive", partly due to an expanded
tax base. Other residents see the population growth of
the last decade as being responsible for a decline in
Clarington's sense of community, the crowding of
schools, the loss of jobs, and a "lack of adequate
social services, especially for families in crisis".
Local Traffic Congestion
"Traffic congestion in Ontario has spread from the
largest urban centres to many smaller and medium-
sized communities. No longer just a "big city" problem
it contributes to lost productivity, rising costs,
increased health and safety risks, and a reduced
quality of life for commuters" (ORBA, 2006). In
reaction to Clarington's growth, residents perceive
local traffic congestion as having increased
considerably in the last decade. Session participants
reveal that they are concerned about Clarington
becoming much busier, with "no significant
improvements in road infrastructure".
8
875
Development
Support Growth
Figure 18: Westbound Traffic
Congestion
~:
20: "Big Box" Growth
g~
y_..
~~-
~~
Bowmanville Mall
Demographic Shifts
Population growth often breeds change in the
demographic make-up of a community. Residents note
that over the last 10 years Clarington "has grown to
include more people from cities" and of increased
"cultural diversity". An aging population is also
observed in some areas of the Municipality, which may
have major implications for Clarington's employment
base, community services and facilities.
Diminishing Community Character
Rapid expansion can leave communities at risk of
lasing their identity. Some residents have noted that
Clarington's community character has lessened over
the last decade due to the Municipality's rapid growth.
Questionnaire responses reveal that Clarington is
"becoming more urban and beginning to lose its
identity" along with its architectural heritage. "Big box"
growth has led to the loss of small local businesses
and a lessening "sense of community".
Improved Access to Amenities
"Denser development leads to a much stronger
business case for both public (e.g., community
centers, parks) and private (e.g., supermarkets, coffee
shops) amenities and programs. It also fosters a public
realm that is able to generate high-quality activities
that encourage the interaction of neighborhood
residents" (Holland & Toderian, 2008). Of all
Clarington's major changes over the last decade,
improved access to amenities and programs is
perceived by questionnaire respondents as the most
positive.
Clarington's rapid growth has allowed for "better transit
throughout the Municipality", improved retail and
business opportunities, enhanced medical services,
more recreational facilities and programs, and natural
trails which have opened up access to valley lands.
"Strong growth in the energy sector and a more
positive image about nuclear energy" has also made
Clarington more appealing in recent years.
9
876
Figure 19: Kingsway Arms
Retirement Centre
Expansion
WHAT CHANGES WOULD MAKE CLARINGTON EVEN BETTER?
In response to being asked to list the changes that would make Clarington even
better, session participants identify options that include planning for sustainability,
controlled growth, transportation improvements, industry and employment
opportunities, preservation and enhancement of cultural heritage and community
character, increased access to amenities, greater housing affordability, safer and
healthier communities, and council accountability.
Planning for Sustainab
Figure 24: Wind
~'
.,,
Figure 25: Solar Panels
sustainability means meeting the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs. Environmental sustainability
seems to be of key importance to Clarington residents
who indicate that having a plan for sustainability would
make the Municipality even better. "A sustainable
community needs to be structured into complete, well-
connected, mixed-use neighbourhoods that allow
residents to work, live, play, shop, and learn within a
convenient walking or transit distance" (ibid.).
Residents' suggestions for "taking leadership as a
green community" include brownfield development
rather than greenfield, eco-friendly housing, more
green space and pedestrian linkages, the use of solar
or wind power technology, and improved access to
buying local produce through the maintenance and
enhancement of Clarington's agricultural base.
Respondents also suggest "taking a lead on
sustainable living programs", such as improved
recycling programs or educational programs to
overcome any fear of growth and change. One
respondent states their interest in the Brookhill
Neighbourhood project as it incorporates sustainable
neighbourhood principles; however there is still
concern regarding the project's depletion of farmland.
The point is raised that Clarington is currently "one of
the leading producers of cleaner energy in the GTA"
and one session participant believes that an
incinerator should not be built in the Municipality
because of its perceived negative environmental
implications.
10
877
Transportation
Controlled Growth
Controlled growth or "Smart Growth", as stated by the
Smart Growth Canada Network, encompasses "the
idea of managing urban growth to reduce
environmental impacts, make cities more socially
inclusive and more efficient to build and maintain"
(2007). This model of growth comes as a reaction to
urban sprawl, which is the term given to identify the
uncontrolled growth of urban and suburban
developments.
Residents believe that slowing down residential growth
to allow infrastructure to catch up will help make
Clarington a better community. One questionnaire
respondent cleverly suggests that Clarington should
grow at a rate that can be absorbed by the community
and not at a rate that absorbs the community.
Residents desire a "clear definition between urban and
rural land use", without compromising the existing
farmland with sprawling developments.
Transportation Improvements
As stated by Ontario's Minister of Transportation,
"safe, efficient and integrated transportation
infrastructure supports economic investment, spurs job
creation, preserves the environment and contributes to
a better quality of life" (MTO, 2001). Residents
similarly feel that an improved local transportation
system will enhance Clarington's quality of life.
Transportation improvements for the Municipality's
road network and public transit systems are suggested
by questionnaire respondents.
In response to the traffic congestion Clarington
currently experiences, residents desire better traffic
flow by means of improving the existing road
infrastructure. Suggestions include improvements to
the Highway 2 corridor, a bypass of downtown
Bowmanville, "arterial roads without schools to
facilitate easy north/south transportation across town",
and "upgraded road works for feeders to the Highway
407 extension". It is also suggested that the Highway
407 extension be built further north.
Ride
11
878
Development
Figure 27: Protected Countryside
_,
~~ ... .
;~ _
Figure 30:
In terms of public transit, questionnaire respondents
desire improvements for the local bus system, as well
as for GO Transit. Most desired is the extension of the
GO Train to Clarington, though also suggested is a
GO Bus service to Newtonville and better parking
throughout the Municipality for GO commuters. Other
forms of sustainable transportation proposed include
bike lanes and pedestrian pathways.
Industry and Employment Opportunities
According to Statistics Canada, the total population of
Clarington residents participating in the labour force in
2006 was 40,115. Of this population, however, only
11,370 (28%) worked in Clarington, leaving 25,140
(63%) residents commuting to jobs held outside of
Municipal boundaries (this excludes those 3,605_ with
no fixed workplace address) (2007). Considering this
data, it is not surprising that questionnaire respondents
believe that increased industry and employment
opportunities would make Clarington a better place to
live. Overall, respondents are in support of less
commuting and suggest that Clarington "encourage
more outside investment" to allow for economic growth
and new industry. It is also suggested that the
Municipality "develop energy and employment parks to
improve the local job and tax bases".
it
Preservation and Enhancement of Cultural
Heritage and Community Character
Clarington residents are proud to live in a community
with character and a rich cultural heritage. However,
now and in the past, new developments have replaced
historic buildings and previously open agricultural
areas, drawing activity away from the traditional town
centres. As a result, the Municipality is threatened with
losing its character. In order to make Clarington even
better, questionnaire respondents recommend that
cultural heritage and community character be
preserved and further enhanced through various
means.
Residents' suggestions include the enhancement of
traditional downtown neighbourhoods and business
districts to "protect historical values" and achieve "a
12
879
Figure 32: Rehabilitated
Hotel
Figure 33: Streetscaping
Features
thriving downtown"; a "focus on preserving existing
community attributes" such as the waterfront; and
providing opportunities for "more arts, culture and
passive recreation" through enhanced walkability and
more community squares.
Respondents also suggest that "more thought should
be given to appearance" -for example, the strength
and identifiable character of Clarington's individual
communities should be maintained via gateways and
visual cues, and the image of the Municipality from the
401 should be considered.
Increased Access to Amenities
Having amenities easily accessible within a community
is an important indicator of quality of life. Generally,
people desire "communities where housing, jobs,
schools, and shopping are all easily accessible with no
commuting required". Questionnaire respondents
suggest that improved access to amenities would
make Clarington a better place to live. Residents
would like to see well-designed, mixed use
neighbourhoods that are "denser" and "allow for easier
access via foot and bike to amenities" such as
shopping, school, work, parks, and waterfront or beach
areas (particularly in Courtice). In terms of amenities,
Clarington residents are interested in more "recreation,
theatres, and parks".
Greater Housing Affordability
The residents of Clarington are generally privileged to
enjoy affordably priced housing in a great location;
however they reveal that more affordable housing
could make their community better. Questionnaire
respondents suggest that the Municipality should be
dedicated to maintaining a stable housing stock and
housing prices. More choice in accommodation for
seniors (e.g., not for profit housing) is also desired.
Though good quality mixed residential housing (e.g.,
single, semi-detached, townhouses) is advocated for,
some residents also express their desire to keep high-
rise apartments or condominiums to a minimum.
13
880
Townhouses
Safer and Healthier Communities
Figure 39: Council
As mentioned previously, quality of life is greatly
improved when residents feel safe and secure in their
community. For Clarington residents, achieving this
feeling of safety would involve provisions for "better
lighting in parks", improved "community policing", a
"new fire hall in Newcastle", and the widening of
secondary roads "to allow people to walk and bicycle
more safely".
The residents of Clarington also feel that healthier
communities would improve quality of life in the
Municipality. This could be achieved through better
access to healthcare (e.g., "bringing back maternity
ward and hospital expansion") and more opportunities
for fitness in under serviced areas of the community
(e.g., north Bowmanville).
Council Autonomy and Public Engagement
The Municipality of Clarington's corporate mission is
"to provide essential infrastructure and quality services
to our community stakeholders through leadership,
accountability and respect". Questionnaire
respondents are interested in seeing more self
governing from Clarington's Council and concern
about the impact of Provincial and Regional directives
(e.g. intensification). Also desired is continued public
involvement in important processes such as this
Official Plan Review.
14
881
WHAT SETS CLARINGTON APART FROM OTHER COMMUNITIES?
When asked what sets Clarington apart from other communities, respondents
identify mainly positive characteristics. The dominant themes established are an
abundance of green space, an urban and rural mix, small town character, access to
amenities, housing affordability, and good governance. Many of these attributes are
previously identified as what residents enjoy most about their communities.
Abundance of Green
Space
Clarington is advantaged to enjoy a great abundance
of green space. Residents state that Clarington's
wealth of green space sets it apart from other
communities. Many of the Municipality's "significant
natural features" and agricultural lands can be found
throughout the Greenbelt and Oak Ridges Moraine
policy areas. Lake Ontario's "extensive waterfront"
also comprises some 37 kilometres of wetlands,
meadows, forests, bluffs, and beaches. These
beautiful open spaces offer residents an accessible
and clean natural environment with "less smog and
congestion" than many other areas in the GTA.
Urban and Rural Mix
Clarington's unique "mix of urban and rural"
communities allows "balanced growth" and sets it
apart from other areas in the GTA. The urban areas,
mainly found along the lakeshore, are bounded by
considerable rural and agricultural lands, yet still in
close proximity to other major economic centres.
Residents also note that the urban communities in
Clarington have "lower density neighbourhoods" than
do the rest of Durham Region's urban areas. One
questionnaire respondent, however, identified
Clarington as "neither urban, suburban nor rural",
having no traditional development pattern and thus
making it "difficult to call a community".
Small Town Character
The small town character of Clarington makes it
distinct from other places in the GTA. Particularly
unique are the small communities within the
Municipality (e.g., Bowmanville, Newcastle, Orono,
etc.) that "each have their own personality yet blend
15
882
together to make one larger community". Residents
believe that the small town feeling is brought out by
Clarington's friendly environment, cultural heritage,
community spirit, and unique festivals.
One questionnaire respondent states their belief that,
when compared to communities to the east, Clarington
has less culture -though it is also revealed that the
people of Clarington are still very involved in their
community's culture. Session participants further
mention that, unlike several other GTA municipalities,
Clarington is not yet a bedroom community - it
remains an "industry" town owing to the success of the
Ontario Power Generation Darlington site and St.
Mary's Cement.
Access to Amenities
A key characteristic that distinguishes Clarington from
other communities is its access to amenities.
Residents can enjoy a rural environment with the
perks of green space and "local produce", while still
maintaining access to an extensive transportation
system and major economic centres. Within municipal
borders, essential social facilities (e.g., schools,
healthcare, etc.), commercial and recreational
opportunities are also easily accessible.
Housing Affordability
Affordable housing is a quality that sets Clarington
apart from other communities in the GTA. According to
questionnaire respondents, Clarington offers "more
affordable homes" when compared to other
municipalities to the west. In fact, it was reported in a
Globe and Mail article in August that while Clarington's
"western neighbours -Ajax, Whitby, and Pickering -
have struggled to find new land to develop for low-rise
homes, Clarington and Oshawa remain the only
municipalities in Greater Toronto where new-home
buyers can purchase a detached house for under
$350,000" (Raymaker, 2008).
16
883
Townhouses
Good Governance
Figure 47: Clarington
Administrative Centre
Some questionnaire respondents believe that the
governance in Clarington distinguishes it from other
communities. The Municipality is recognized as being
a well governed area with open and responsive
officials. There is "willingness on everyone's part" to
make Clarington a balanced community and residents
are hopeful that through participation there will be an
opportunity for public desires to be reflected.
17
884
WHAT ISSUES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS OFFICIAL PLAN
REVIEW?
The final question asked session participants to identify the issues that they think
need to be addressed in this Official Plan Review. Major issues revealed include
sustainability and growth management, transportation and accessibility, industry
and employment, cultural heritage and community character, demographic shifts
and housing affordability, and governance and public participation.
Figure
Figure 50: Higher Density
Development
sustainability and Growth Management
In response to the negative impacts of urban sprawl
(e.g., depletion of farmland, threat to water and energy
supply, pollution, traffic congestion, big box
developments, suburbs, run-off, etc.) questionnaire
respondents identify the topics of sustainability and
growth management as being essential for
consideration in the Official Plan Review.
"sustainability must become a primary goal of public
policy if we want to ensure the long-term health of
communities" (Jepson, 2007).
Residents suggest that policies should be refined to
better encourage sustainable development in
Clarington. This would include enhanced policies for
renewable energy (i.e., source in new methods
through "changes in zoning regulation"), air quality,
public transportation, waste disposal, green building
practices, sustainable health and community service
improvements, the preservation of natural spaces
(e.g., wetlands, sensitive areas, bio-regional support
systems, waterfront, etc.), and the long-term planning
and "preservation of agriculture as a sustainable
industry".
With particular regard to growth management as a
form of sustainable planning, session participants
suggest that Clarington's Official Plan also include
policies for controlled growth, brownfield development,
intensification, high density housing in downtown
areas and less "big box" development. Some
respondents, however, are against high density
developments and request that the traditional low
density lot sizes of Clarington be maintained to avoid
creating a "large city feel" in the area. Also requested
is the removal of Greenbelt restrictions from
Bowmanville to the new Highway 407 extension and/or
18
885
f
compensation for Greenbelt land.
Other important issues to consider are the short- and
long-term impacts this type of development will have
on Clarington. Respondents suggest generating
"scenarios that review the way the future may
develop".
Transportation and Accessibility
As reported by Metrolinx, "outside of the City of
Toronto, transit use, walking, and cycling drop
markedly to less than seven per cent of all trips. Most
suburban neighbourhoods were designed on the
assumption that the car would be people's primary, or
even sole, means of getting around" (2008). Clarington
residents have reasonably expressed concern over
automobile dependence and local traffic congestion,
thus transportation and accessibility are issues that
need to be addressed in the Official Plan Review.
Questionnaire respondents identify the need to
incorporate policies that encourage the means for
transportation that is not car dependant, including
having "road allowances wide enough to allow for
sidewalks and bike lanes", pedestrian pathways, and
"improvements in local and Region wide public transit"
(e.g., GO Transit expansion). It was also suggested by
some participants that the management of Highway
407 and the access to Highway 401 be addressed
during the Review process.
Industry and Employment
"Rural and small town places across Canada face
crises as they struggle with sustainability and viability"
(Halseth, 2008). Concerns have been raised over
Clarington's lack of local employment opportunities
and questionnaire respondents clarify the need to
address the issue in the Official Plan Review.
Suggested are policy changes that will "attract higher
profile employers" in a variety of sectors (e.g., semi-
industrial, light industrial, health, science, service,
commercial, agriculture, etc.), thus encouraging
Clarington's independence and preventing the
progression of a "bedroom community". Also
suggested is the creation of "scenarios for the
immediate future" (e.g., 2 and 5 years) relating to the
19
886
Figure 51:
Station
economy and the changing times (e.g., impacts of
General Motors shutdown and oil prices on
commuting).
Figure 57:
Residence
Cultural Heritage and Community Character
As a community expands and populates, it becomes
increasingly important to preserve its heritage and
maintain a unique identity. The residents of Clarington
believe that cultural heritage and community character
are issues that should be addressed during the Official
Plan Review process. Concern has been expressed
over the loss of built and natural heritage features and
community identify. Residents recommend that
through this review process the Municipality identify
policies to ensure that community heritage and
character are respected, preserved, and enhanced.
Suggestions include provisions for "keeping heritage
areas intact", designing places to work as well as live,
enabling service sector opportunities (e.g., places of
worship, service clubs, volunteer arrangements, etc.)
and encouraging more community-focused events and
festivals. Also considered should be "how Clarington
integrates into Southern Ontario" and what future
image is desired (i.e., traditional v. Wal-mart).
Demographic Shifts and Housing
Affordability
An article in the Wall Street Journal suggests that
"rising affordability concerns in some home and rental
markets remain a challenge... but with more
immigration and people living alone, demographic
shifts are pressing developers to reconsider what's
worked in the past" (Gerencher, 2006). Questionnaire
responses reveal that demographic shifts and housing
affordability are significant issues that need to be
addressed during the Official Plan Review process.
As demographic shifts occur -particularly the aging of
the population - the changes will need to be
accommodated in the design of Clarington and,
therefore, should be reflected in Official Plan policies.
A related issue is the stress of finding affordable
housing, which is most often borne by retired seniors
and young families buying their first homes. Residents
believe that this issue should be addressed by
20
887
Street Bridge
Figure 58: Aspen Springs
Condominiums
incorporating appropriate provisions for mixed income
housing and "senior living" facilities in response to
anticipated changes in demographics.
Governance and Public Participation
Though many questionnaire respondents state that
they appreciate Clarington's current level of
governance, it is also disclosed that governance and
public participation could be further improved and,
thus, should be addressed in the Official Plan Review.
Issues that residents feel need to be considered
include "ease of access to the politicians", the effective
management of "multiple communities and
multiple/duplicate servicing requirements" (e.g., fire
services, libraries, recreation facilities, etc.) and the
coordination of timelines with the Regional Official
Plan. It is also believed that "public input needs to be
further encouraged" and actively taken into account.
21
888
VISION CONSULTATION SESSIONS
"Community visioning is simply a process through which a community imagines the
future it most desires and then plans to achieve it" (Ames, 1997). Clarington's current
Official Plan seeks to achieve a vision for the Municipality as:
A place where each community can build on its individual character but share a
common economic base and a distinct collective image;
A place for people to live, work, and play in a safe, vibrant, healthy, and
prosperous environment;
A place where people, business, and government balances growth with
protection, management, and enhancement of the cultural and historic
landscape, natural resources, and the environment.
During consultation sessions, each community was also asked to participate in a
visioning exercise, answering the following questions:
What do you like about the current vision?
What would you like to change?
What do you think is missing and would like to add to the vision?
"Through visioning, citizens come together to create a shared image of their preferred
future" (ibid). The results of Clarington's visioning sessions are summarized in terms of
dominant themes. These themes will be of great significance in improving Clarington's
current vision because residents "will be more likely to support what they help to create"
(The Planning Center, 2001).
WHAT DO YOU LIKE ABOUT THE CURRENT VISION?
According to Booher, successful visioning requires members of a community to
"build consensus on a description of the community's desired future and on actions
to help male goals for the future a reality" (2004). When asked what they like about
the current vision, session participants generally believe that the current vision
includes "good general principles" that are "not too hard to read and understand", but
"will take a lot of work to fulfill". Participants also express their appreciation for the
opportunity of public involvement. In particular, there are four main themes that
residents identify as what they like about the current vision: it recognizes individua!
community character, it is comprehensive and balanced; it is forward thinking; and it
presents a strong value system.
Individual Community Character
Many residents appreciate that the current vision recognizes the individual
character of communities within the larger Municipality of Clarington. They like
22
that there is a focus on "maintaining each community's identity", while still
allowing for "some growth in all communities".
Comprehensive and Balanced
Several session participants describe the current vision as being
"comprehensive", "inclusive", and "all encompassing". They like that the vision
"balances" live, work, and play, as well as economic, social, and
environmental factors (e.g., farmland preservation, culture and heritage,
natural resources, controlled growth, etc.)
Forward Thinkin
Respondents admire that the current vision is "forward thinking". They believe
that the vision is "ahead of its time for 1996" and that it effectively "fits current
thinking".
Strong Value System
Residents appreciate that the current vision "presents a strong value system"
and "caters to a responsible image". The vision is described by respondents
as "noble", "idealistic", "hopeful", and "people focused". They state that "all
three points have merit" and elicit a "feeling of safety" for readers.
WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO CHANGE?
This review process allows the public to have significant input in changes made to
Clarington's Official Plan. When asked what they would like to change about the
current vision, respondents indicated that they would like to see changes in the
vision's language; it's emphasis on communities; and it's social, environmental, and
economic focus. However, some residents feel that the vision doesn't need to be
changed, but rather the Official Plan's implementation tools need to be enhanced.
Language
Many session participants would like to change the language of the current
vision statement. There are, however, two conflicting views - some
respondents state that the vision is "long" and "wordy", while others see the
vision as being "vague" and "elusive".
Those who believe the vision is "wordy" desire a less specific, "simple vision
for everyone to understand". One resident states that "the third point seems
too specific for a vision statement" and suggests that "it could be a guiding
principle instead".
23
The respondents who believe that the language is too vague would like the
vision to be "more specific" and to include "more detail". One resident notes
that the points "dance around a number of buzz words" making the language
unclear and difficult to comprehend. They suggest that the wording be
corrected for everyone to understand.
Emphasis on Communities
Session participants have conflicting views regarding the vision's emphasis on
communities, and thus contradictory changes are suggested. Some
respondents desire a vision that is "more reflective of the whole" and "not just
individual communities". They suggest an enhanced focus on a united and
shared Municipality. Other respondents, however, would like to see "more
emphasis on the identity' of the "individual communities" in a vision that
focuses on the maintenance and enhancement of their unique character.
Environmental, and Economic Focus
Residents would like to see the vision changed to include a stronger focus on
social, environmental, and economic resources. In terms of social resources,
respondents desire an increased emphasis on "health" and "educational
support", "recreational facilities", lifestyle changes, and affordable housing -
especially for "young families". Respondents would also like the vision to have
a stronger emphasis on environmental and agricultural protection. Regarding
economic resources, residents would like the vision to incorporate "more
details" pertaining to "economic development", "industry', and the local
employment base.
Implementation Tools
A few residents reveal that they would change nothing about the vision at this
time; however, some feel that the current vision "only looks good on paper"
and have concerns over "how" the vision will actually be achieved. One
participant suggests that "rather than changing the vision, acquire tools,
partnerships (e.g., with organizations, builders, developers, and investors,
etc.), and incentives to implement it". Some respondents state that the
effective implementation of the current vision also requires "a responsible,
accountable, trustworthy government" and public participation in planning.
24
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS MISSING AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE
VISION?
"Successful visioning efforts address all aspects of a community, recognizing the
interrelatedness of land use, economy, community health, and so forth" (Altman &
Morse, 2008). Session participants were asked to identify what aspects they think
are missing and would like to add to Clarington's current vision. Participants indicate
that the topics of sustainability, transportation, infrastructure, economic base, and
existing assets are missing from the vision and should be added when it is
reviewed.
Sustainabil
Respondents feel that the concept of sustainability is missing from the current
vision. They believe that the vision should include a "statement about
leadership in sustainable living" touching on "long term sustainability" in the
face of global climate change, peak oil, Greenbelt, etc. Residents state that
the vision needs to "address newer ideas", including references to Brownfield
development, green building practices, "energy conservation and efficiency",
"renewable energy sources", mixed use neighbourhoods, and the concept of
"lifestyle balance". Also desired are "more specific plans to reach each goal"
(e.g. energy conservation through working from home and the issue of Internet
availability in rural areas).
Transportation
As declared by session participants, the topic of transportation is missing from
the current vision statement. Many residents feel that Clarington's vision
should include a reference to transport throughout the Municipality. "Increased
public transit", "active transportation", and "access to amenities" were listed as
important points to be considered when improving the vision.
Infrastructure
Session participants reveal that the issue of infrastructure is also missing from
the Municipality's current vision. They suggest that the vision include a
statement about the need far infrastructure, services, and facilities to "keep up
with the growth" and change of Clarington.
Economic Base
Residents believe that Clarington's current vision lacks focus on the economy
and should be improved to emphasize the need to expand the Municipality's
economic base. They suggest that the vision give reference to increasing
industry and employment opportunities in order "to support the service based
community".
25
Assets
Respondents feel that the current vision is missing mention of Clarington's
existing assets (e.g. "landmarks", "conservation areas", "Ganaraska Forest",
"Long Sault", "Enniskillen", "agricultural diversity", "built heritage", community
identity, etc.). They believe that these assets should be referenced in the
vision as a way to "attract people to the area" (e.g. "agri-tourism"). Many
residents enjoy the "small community feeling" of Clarington's individual
communities and would like to take advantage of this in creating an "identity"
for Clarington as a whole.
26
CONCLUSION
In order to make
informed. community driven decisions during the current Official Plan
Review process, me municipauty or aanngton nas neia consurcauon
communities - Bowmanville, Courtice, Newcastle, Newtonville, Orono,
two community groups -the Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT) and
Community Advisory Committee. Questionnaires were completed and
variety of answers from which a range of appropriate themes we
questionnaires reveal the following:
What do you enjoy about your community?
o Green space;
o Rural atmosphere;
o Cultural heritage;
o Community character;
o Access to amenities;
o Housing affordability; and
o Safety and security.
How has Clarington changed in the past 10 years?
o Increased development;
o Loss of farmland;
o Population growth;
o Local traffic congestion;
o Demographic shifts; and
o Diminishing community character.
What changes would make Clarington even better?
o Planning for sustainability;
o Controlled growth;
o Transportation improvements;
o Industry and employment opportunities;
sessions with six
and Soling -and
the Living Green
generated a wide
e identified. The
o Preservation and enhancement of cultural heritage and community
character;
o Increased access to amenities;
o Greater housing affordability;
o Safer and healthier communities; and
o Council accountability.
What sets Clarington apart from other communities?
o Abundance of green space;
o Urban and rural mix;
o Small town character;
o Access to amenities;
o Housing affordability; and
o Good governance.
What issues need to be addressed in this Official Plan Review?
o sustainability and growth management;
o Transportation and accessibility;
o Industry and employment;
27
o Cultural heritage and community character;
o Demographic shifts and housing affordability; and
o Governance and public participation.
The Municipality has also held visioning sessions with the six communities, generating a
number of comments about Clarington's current vision. The visioning sessions reveal
the following:
What do you like about the current vision?
o Individual community character;
o Comprehensive and balanced;
o Forward thinking; and
o Strong value system.
What would you like to change?
o Language;
o Emphasis on communities;
o Social, environmental, and economic focus; and
o Implementation tools.
What do you think is missing and what would you like to add to the vision?
o Sustainability;
o Transportation;
o Infrastructure;
o Economic base; and
o Existing assets.
The responses to these important questions will assist Municipal staff in determining
which direction Clarington will take when looking ahead to the next 25 years.
28
REFERENCES
Altman & Morse, "Creating Their Own Futures: Community Visioning and North Carolina
Local Governments," Popular Government (2008). 23.
Ames. (1997). Community Visioning.• Planning for the Future in Oregon's Local
Communities. Retrieved October 1, 2008 from:
http://www.design.asu.edu/apa/proceedings97/ames.html
Booher, "Collaborative Governance Practices and Democracy," National Civic Review
93 (2004): 36.
Durham Region. (2008). Growing Durham: Appendices -Draft Recommended Scenario
and Policy Directions Report. Retrieved September 25, 2008 from:
http://www.region.durham.on.ca/growthplan/Durham_Appendices_09.18.08.pdf
Gerencher. (2006, November 7). Generation X May Boost Sagging Real-Estate Market.
The Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch,
http://www. realestatejournal.com/buysell/markettrends/20061107-
gerencher.html?refresh=on (accessed on September 22, 2008).
Halseth. (2008). Canada Research Chair in Rural and Small Town Studies. (University
of Northern British Columbia). Retrieved September 22, 2008 from:
http://web. unbc. ca/geography/facu Ity/greg/research/research chair. htm
Holland & Toderian. (2008, April 28). The Case for Density in Sustainable Cities.
Planetizen, Community/Economic Development,
http://www.planetizen.com/node/30970 (accessed on September 22, 2008).
Hume. (2007, July 13). Why parks are important. The Toronto Star, Columns,
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/235503 (accessed on September 19, 2008).
Jepson. (2007, February 5). Incorporating Sustainability into Community Development.
Planetizen, Op-Ed, http://www.planetizen.com/node/22756 (accessed on
September 19, 2008).
Metrolinx. (2008). Sustainable Transportation: An Overview. Retrieved September, 19,
2008 from:
http://www. metrolinx. com/docs/1 /WhitePapersNVhitePaperBrochu reMay08f. pdf
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH). (2005). Greenbelt Plan.
(Government of Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario). Retrieved September 15,
2008 from: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Asset1277.aspx
Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal (MPIR). (2006). Places to Grow: Growth Plan
for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. (Government of Ontario: Queen's Printer for
29
Ontario). Retrieved September 15, 2008 from:
http://www. placestogrow.ca/images/pdfs/fplan-eng-web-all.pdf
Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO). (2001). Ministry of Transportation Business
Plan 2001-2002. (Government of Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario). Retrieved
September 17, 2008 from:
http://www. mto.gov.on.ca/eng lish/about/bplan/2001 _02. htm
Municipality of Clarington (2008). Official Plan Review: An Introductory Discussion
Paper. (Planning Services Department).
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). (2004). Growing
Strong Rural Communities - a Consultation Paper (Draft June 2004).
(Government of Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario). Retrieved September 19,
2008 from:
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/rural/rural plan/rural plan cslt.htm
Ontario Road Builder's Association (ORBA). (2006). Municipal Roads and Traffic
Congestion. Retrieved September 19, 2008 from:
http://www. orba. org/lib/db2file. asp?fileid=1086
Raymaker. (2008, August 29). Detached home prices lowest in Durham. The Globe and
Mail, Arts,
http:i/www. theg I obeand ma i I. com/servlet/story/LAC.20080829. D I GS29/TPStory/T
PEntertainment/Ontario/ (accessed on September 18, 2008).
Smart Growth Canada Network (SGCA). (2007). Useful Research. Retrieved
September 16, 2008 from: http://www.smartgrowth.ca/research_e.html
Statistics Canada. 2007. Ottawa, Ontario. (table). 2006 Community Profiles. 2006
Census. (Ottawa: Statistics Canada Catalogue).
http://www12.statcan. ca/english/census06/data/profiles/community/Details/Page.
cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=3518017&Geo2=PR&Code2=35&Data=Count
&SearchText=Clarington&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01 &B 1=All&Custom=
(accessed September 16, 2008).
The Planning Center. (2001). Growth Visioning for Sustaining a Livable Region:
Visioning Design Process. (Southern California Association of Governments:
RFQ #01-117).
30
APPENDIX A: Listing of Consultation Sessions
..
Living Green Community Advisory Committee
Open House
June 10
2008 Courtice
, O en House and Vision Consultation
June 10
2008 Clarington Board of Trade
, Open House
June 12
2008 Newtonville
, O en House and Vision Consultation
June 16
2008 Orono
, O en House and Vision Consultation
June 17
2008 Newcastle
, O en House and Vision Consultation
June 25
2008 Solina
, O en House and Vision Consultation
June 26
2008 Bowmanville
, Open House and Vision Consultation
31
s
_~
L~
Mr
W
X
Z
W
a
Q
•
a a
c ~ ~
~ 0 ~ m N O
f
6 T C
~~ .~'. C ~ ~, a C ~ 7 L~ O V
L
m E ~
~ O N
~ L ~ O"C "
~ ~ U
m ~
L o
~ o
Q N E~ n a
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Q j U f0 ~ L ~ ; .U
• ~ N
Cn ~ ~ ~ f6 ~ N U f6 U ~ (6 c`~6 ~ Q
u
• • • • • •
X
~ U
.
~ C
. ~ O N ` c
•
. C O O -~ N O N a a
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ 00
Q ~ ~ U U Q f6 = f6 (~
• • • • • •
L T
a O
L U
f6
N L
~
• ~ C O N fi0 N ~ y .O-~
•
O
`
O N
N ... f6
O) L N
U
~~
N C
7
~~` a~ °c a •- N c~
O wU ~
(6 N
p N
L N o
~` L a c6 N
~~ O
f6 N w ~
~ N .~.
a
N ~~
L-
a ~ U
N
C O p Q j ~ T O ~ U O N '
.0-., N f6 f6 7
.. C ~f6
C .L. N O
C N O
Q S N O
N R
~~
O f0
~ .
~ ... -6
~~ ~ E C
N C Q 7 Q ~ +
„ N N ~ _
d N U F-
~ C N O ~ N U U ~ t6 C~ N fn U
. U
•
a L
N O y
. .~
N
~ ~
~
U
O U
~
'~
~
~ Q O ;T
N ~ (
6 ' ~ L C N
~ O O ~ '-' ~ ~
O N O U
U >
N 3
O_
U
C~
~ C E
~ ~ (V
f6
C a J d J OU ~ ~ U U
•
• • • • • •
N
• ~ N
~
N L
Q (6
'C
• U
O N
O N w w a
• u E L c ~ ° ~ - c T
• ~ O ~ N ~ C C 'O '>' i
•
.. . N
~ w ~
U ~, ~ a~
U
7
U` ~ 7
U O t
U v Q ~
m O~
S m N
(n N
• • • • • • •
N
M
s
H
._
0
.y
0
_~
~"
vU
Z
a
a
a
•
N w
• "~' O ~ ~ N
.__ ~ Q
~ ~ ~ U O N
• ~ Q ` ~
~
(6
~
N r
~
Vl
~
C C
r+
'
N C
~ f6
`
O Vl
w
Cn H c W W
• • • • •
N ~
O C
• w
. f6
~
3 f0 V/
N O
~ O O ~
`
~ O
- o
N M C U C
f6
~ Q .U C N
J ~ ~
W Cn a
i
• • • •
N -p
U N
(p U
~
• L
U ~
~~ a
~ ~
~' ~ E
3 m
E '- Y N
• C ~
U
N
w 7
•
~
~ t
~ f6
Q L
(6
>- ~ ~ o
o
U ~ ~
. .
M
M