The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCS-35-92 ./~ . THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION File# r-=\q.3~'31.G.l\ Res. # {;jJa -bb3'- 9~~ By-Law # Date: OCTOBER 19, 1992 Report #: (,S-J~-92 File #: (Addendum to TR-89-92) BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX LANDSCAPING TENDER - PHASE I - TENDER NW92-4 Subject: Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose & Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:- 1. THAT Report No. CS-35-92 be received; 2. THAT Report TR-89-92 (Tender NW92-4 Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscaping Tender Phase I) be approved forthwith as amended through Report CS-35-92. 1.0 BACKGROUND: 1.1 At the October 13, 1992 meeting of Council, Report TR-89-92 (Bowmanville Recreation Complex Landscaping Tender Phase I) was referred to Community services staff for a detailed review and subsequent report. 1.2 The intention of the referral was for staff to review the tender documents and identify areas within the tender where items could be deleted from Phase I and deferred to a subsequent Phase with minimal impact on the original intent of the project. 1.3 Staff has completed its review of the proj ect and have identified specific details which could be deferred to a future development phase. Attachment #1 is provided as a detailed breakdown of the tender, identifying a potential of $54,547.30 which could be deferred from the original project cost of $201,687.44. ../2 RECYCLED t':%:;\ PAPIER PAPER \tJ:1 RECYCLE THIS IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER REPORT NO. CS-35-92 - 2 - OCTOBER 19, 1992 1.4 The review process included a review of all bidders for this tender. Results of this exercise maintain that Rutherford Contracting Limited, Gormley, ontario is still the lowest bidder considering revisions made as a result of the deferred items. 2.0 PROJECT DETAILS: 2.1 As the municipality grows, it is noted that the intersection of Highway #2 and Regional Road 57 will be integral to Bowmanville's Main Central Area. It is important for the Municipality to accept a shared responsibility and to set an example for the future development of this area. 2.2 The Master Plan of the Complex, as it relates to this intersection (Attachment #2) accomplishes this objective, in addition to expanding the use of the Multi Purpose Room at the Bowmanville Recreation Complex. 2.3 Attachment #3 is provided to detail specifics of the actual tender in question for the information of Council. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: 3.1 Staff through this report is requesting that Council approve Report TR-89-92 (Tender NW92-4 Bowmanville Recreation Complex Landscaping Tender Phase I) as amended by Attachment #1 to Report CS-35-92. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, Officer " '1,~ Jos~Bh P. Caruana, Director De~tment of Community Services JPC:sa ATTACHMENT #1 BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX LANDSCAPE TENDER PHASE 1 TENDER NW92-4 1992 TENDER POSSIBLE DEFERRALS Earth Workers 6,570.00 Underground Services 17,340.00 9,390.00 Paving Structures 79,857.00 Plant Material 14,845.00 Miscellaneous 4,180.00 Testing 1,500.00 Contingency 25.000.00 15.000.00 G.S.T. 8.595.44 657.30 Sub-Total 157,887.44 25,047.30 ASSOCIATED COSTS Water Relocation & Chamber 15,000.00 15,000.00 Hydro Connections 6,500.00 6,500.00 Temp. Generator 5,000.00 5,000.00 Gas Line Relocation 3,000.00 3,000.00 Landscape Architect 14.300.00 Sub-Total 43.800.00 TOTAL PROJECT VALUE $201,687.44 29.500.00 $54,547.30 ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (LESS DEFERRALS) $147,140.14 ----------- ----------- ATTACIDlENT #2 ) L. ---000@00 0 o ~5UBJECT SITE N ,) < # I ~ t \,~./ '-. I'~ 1~1~- I - T -1-- I I -1-- ---r-u- I I I ' I - .. I BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX ::'--UluR~ DUlL DII\JG ::::XA-~NSIOf'J (ICE I<,n r'Jo 2) ~'y' (T F,L,\/~C T::: .~:;;;,.:::::: oJ.COC~ S;:;::::CQ CSSOC: c: Q c: Nith .~.....'I..!-~'SQ room '" II) o a: . fa a: ~,- , . .,-....- ~r~ \'::): ~wv 2 I I ~.. \.-::v- ~>,l _---t-T..--:J~ ,.["'" '", JI / : ~- --1 -I - - ~~~---.----p -_.~ ~t=1~~~ '" -rr I ~r-- ~ _-- - I ,d= 005G'/ IW:'" ~ -cc:::'--___ '-" ~- Hn ----- ~---- r B~H ,~=1=" /~L~~~ ; 8 ~'ON"""IB,~ml~tl' 'r-'J/ __-) _-I-J--::~-:'C2'OI---~~~::~;>'" ", -~;- ~ ~ V~~I~~\\\ /// __ _ _ I I '. .::-:.. - ~ '-"I' "-jy ~ ./ I I J \ ~\",' ,'t "" i Z J I _ - -c:c~ ~,II ...('I: h I II ":::"": , _ _ _ I~" " J ';{. / _~_-)~ \ ~/ ,I' - :1 ,\' )~'t.'C.J005s-" "-, //~I~/J.j~~ Z // ~- ...... 'I. 52: ' iu' III / __~- !I I ,.,.\ ~\ \') 1 '-" Q[) ,ju // ~f ~:; l ~. I J hI . - :.--- -" I::-I~ ~ ~ / . ~\\ II !pl ~<=~~j;'k: ,>~rf<irri\ ~;1\ ~j ___ U ~~ I WA~~\I \)~\\'1~ ~\ \ ~~ / -~1ts~ -J ~g_I_-~~ \~A{~:j( \1~~ ~~ V \ ~h~~..L-/ ~\t. L_ J '4~lf'~~' cX0 ~\'M. ~ _ \~ ~~r /- ..- mj~l] r-;-, ~ j' ~ ~\ '\ \;~~~;l1 / 'I I 1~ ~ 11l9~ II ~)\ ~ ~\ __ .' ~ '\~ \~ ~ I ~ C-:C~E,. ~ I ~~ I l' (~" ~ ~ ..>r;\\k::~::~ ~ :".'\ I lD . I (f) f- I \ -( " \ \.~ r~\\\ \\;/"~:~~~ /. - I! ~;) /jC~" I/=;;Z~/) '~il;l~ ~t~/i \J ~ i![/4 d' 'I"O""""'[;j.~:O~~.: I~~F ?~_~: ~'~ 8 x'l<~ ~::..I ~ ,c:J, .} ~ Jll~ IT :D"'~ 9. I" '/ -..;;'~, /l'L. I.') WIn. ~; ,-I ,~~' . ~. ;.' '-.d... ~ ,- " \'<: :~"i "r.. lilT -'~'~ r' I I I v G I 1: '" ~ ,-, .. ~c . t+..J, . t:.....~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ B~ . ,1. ~i{l--, ,_ ..__~ -1 IJ ~ ~ ; .~~ j III:'> ~..<If~> '?7'q:y \1'\;' I I"'_n.. };~-;;~m'~~C ~'!.! .~Il"'-=....... dO ~ "'p ~ ~ ti I." ftI\' jii~ ~l lftiR _~ - O~l' '. .~s .:~ ~ ~ C\. ~ t }~, ~ R:J ~;.hn1 ~ r~~~ c-c.:;! ~~ "'-_1'\ 1@'\.J..... ~ I ;-.J!IJ'" ~ 11,' r il1~~~c I... :P~., . ~. J11 :k C\ j .~J IN ~ llil ~ ~ . j' ~ \ ", , ~;) , . r; il HR' "~ ~ Cl1 ~ ~ 1" .~ ,002 1~. 'l. ~;~~ k. ~ , '<<-r '\}l.i~~ ~ l ~ 8. ~ .- l: ;- C~'5 ~, ,I "] ""'" 1UH: 1f,_~,.,o" or,' ~., ill:~cc'c; '~,,~ 7CmL~ \ '::' "" '\}l ~ .. '\1; =.i,;nll'~'-i """. --A1 ~ '9 \'1 ;;'J1: Hi.; ,:; fl, lfJ 7ff!' "H k-j....~ '/);/ \ f\j ~~ ", ,f~: 8'11 ;..... ,.11\ i. UtLi ,r ,~<<</~ ~ t--. " . ,. . ~ V ~ \ R ~~, 11~18~ / c~-~~ ~ K'c:cJ~1 if~! 2 J~'~ If:W \ i' \ 9 . 11 I ~ \- r - I ,\,1,.. fi) - ~ ~.:::J ~ \ ~') I I L """-4 r-P'~"'r1 'i"r-"1UL~I' l=~'~'JJ' ~~ ~ ,~~ \~ ~ - . \ ~ , liJ J \9J U \ ~ ::<:'8<:::"f CCOL ...., CCCS - ~ CCC'J I '? r....,--Cp d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -: \ ~ I 0 '7 i I ~~ /i,'Y ~3~ ]~~~{ ~ @ /E~~~~ E~ ~~ W 0(58 ,,' , 8 ~J ~ ~J ~ J ~?j ~ 1: VA ~ ll. )~ S sa ~~~ ~q) I!i,~ \ Iii ~ ~~ l~~~a ~~~ ~~~~lj a~ ',', t: f-- UJ 1-1- I[ .:: ~ ~ l \)'- 3-3~ ~[3~ 5Ul~1 2~~~~ 'V ~i ~ I H -:l ~ / TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File #lf~.,1~37 '~l4.. Res. . By-law #I f'EET I t{i: DAlE: ~T #: SUB...ECf : GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE October 5, 1992 TR-S9-92 FILE #: TENDER NW92-4, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report TR-89-92 be received~ 2. THAT Rutherford Contracting Ltd., Gormley, Ontario, with a bid in the amount of $157,887.44, being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender NW92-4, be awarded the contract for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I, as required by the Department of Community Services~ and 3. THAT the total required funds in an approximate amount of $201,687.44 ($157,887.44 contract + $43,800.00 other associated cost), be drawn from Account #1110-00156-0000, as approved and carried over from the 1991 Capital Budget. BACKGROUND AND COMMENT: Subsequent to Council Resolution #GPA-688-91 (copy attached marked Schedule "A"), the tender specifications for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I were revised and re-issued. In an effort to reduce the overall project cost, the following items were deleted from the re-tendered project: portion of ledge rock site furnishings sodding supply of topsoil reduction of amount of main pedestrian walk landscaping fill to be moved " 1 -. ~. I )/ Ii . " Page - 2 - TR-89-92 TENDER NW92-4, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I Bids were received and tabulated as follows: Bidder Total Bid Amount Rutherford Contracting Ltd. Gormley, Ontario $157,887.44 Vic Priestly Contracting Limited Aurora, Ontario $188,822.21 Ron Robinson Limited Oshawa, Ontario $194,905.16 Upon review of the bid submission from Ron Robinson Limited, it was apparent that there was a pricing discrepancy for item #1.2 (removal and disposal of excess material). Their price had provided for removal of fill beyond the limit of construction which is not in accordance with the tender specifications. In order that all bids may be compared equally, the bid from Ron Robinson Limited has been credited for $11,812.80. The final bid results as reconciled will now read as follows: Rutherford Contracting Ltd. Ron Robinson Limited Vic Priestly Contracting Limited $157,887.44 $183,092.36 $188,822.21 Other associated costs are as follows: Total associated costs $ 15,000.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 14.300.00 $ 43.800.00 Regional water relocation and chamber Hydro disconnect and connect Temporary generator for two (2) days Gas relocation allowance Landscape architect The total required funds in the approximate amount of $201,687.44 ($157,887.44 contract + $43,800.00 other associated costs), will be drawn from Account #1110-00156-0000 and are within the $240,000.00, as approved and carried over from the 1991 Capital Budget. In view of the economic slowdown and the limited funds available, it is staff's recommendation that further phasing of this project be delayed for another year. This contract will complete this phase and all unexpended funds may be returned to the Lot Levy account. l / t- /ju Page - 3 - TR-89-92 TENDER NW92-4, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I The Treasurer has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Community Services. After further review and analysis of the bids by purchasing, Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects and Community Services, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Rutherford Contracting Ltd., Gormley, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I. Although the subject firm have not previously performed for the Town of Newcastle, they do come highly recommended as outlined in the attached letter from Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, marked Schedule "B". Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, l:J' -y , ./U~ M~~rano, H.B.Sc., Treasurer. -( Officer. AMCT. , ~ J. . Caruana, "rector of Community Services. LAB/hjl Attachments ) f SCHEDULE "A" Tender NW91-40 Resolution #GPA-688-91 Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Moved by Mayor Hubbard, seconded by Councillor Wotten Works - Phase I F18.257.GE THAT Report TR-I03-91 be received; and THAT Phase I - Landscape Works - Bowmanville Recreation Complex be referred back to Staff for re-tendering. "CARRIED" .:::< ~. TOWN , ...,\', <,if!:' "..'r,":(,.-". ...;.;/)ft, .:..",., .,;!t'-; File II F(g~ 'J~ 7. a, ~<h1:' Res. 'rrPfJ-~<l~ -9/ By-Law , REPORT fffTINi: DATE: ~T ,: SUB..ECT : GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE November 18, 1991 TR-103 -91 FILE #: TENDER NW91-40, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report TR-103-91 be received; 2 . THAT Andrew Timar Landscaping Ltd., Norval, Ontario, with a bid in the amount of $238,175.30 being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and sp~cifications of Tender NW91-40, be awarded the . contract for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I, as required by the Department of Community Services; and 3., THAT the total required funds in an approximate amount of $271,550.30 ($238,175.30 contract + $33,375.00 design and construction administration), be drawn from the Community Services Capital Budget, Account #7603-00001-0516. BACKGROUND AND COMMENT: Tender specifications were provided by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I. .~'/ (*\ !ii~ Page - 2 - TR-103-91 TENDER NW91-40, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I Subsequently, bids were received and tabulated as follows: Bidder Total Bid Amount Andrew Timar Landscaping Ltd. Norval, Ontario $292,359.89 Eyeview Landscaping & General Contracting Inc. Willowdale, Ontario $318,131.57 ** Ron Robinson Limited Oshawa, Ontario $345,669.68 ** Bid Amended - Extension Error Note: Mopal Construction Limited, Scarborough, Ontario was rejected due to no Agreement to Bond was included in tender submission. In an effort to include as much work as possible in this tender, for the dollars available, a provision was made in the specifications for the deletion of items, if necessary. As the low bid is substantially over the budget allocation of $275,000.00, it is proposed that the following items be deleted from the contract: Item Contract Value Concrete Platform at Summerhouse Location Concrete Block Wall Ledgerock (portion of) Site Furnishings Sodding Supply of Topsoil G.S.T. Adjustment $ 10,600.00 5,959.80 7,500.00 9,830.00 11,650.00 5.100.00 $ 50,639.80 3.544.79 $ 54,184.59 The low bidder has agreed to the deletion of these items from the contract without invalidating the unit prices for the balance of the work. The deletion of these items reduces the contract value to $238,175.30. . ,] 0 '-..;. r: (\ .. ").. . " Page - 3 - TR-103-91 TENDER NW91-40, BOWMANVILLE RECREATION COMPLEX - LANDSCAPE WORKS - PHASE I The total required funds in an approximate amount of $271,550.30 ($238,173.30 contract + $33,375.00 design and construction administration) will be drawn from the Community Services Capital Budget, Account #7603-00001-0516, as reflected on page 172 of the 1991 Capital Budget. The Treasurer has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Community Services. After further review and analysis of the bids by Purchasing, Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects and Community Services, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Andrew Timar Landscaping Ltd., Norval, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Bowmanville Recreation Complex - Landscape Works, Phase I. Although the subject firm have not previously performed for the Town of Newcastle, they do come highly recommended as outlined in the attached letter from Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, marked Schedule II A ". . Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, I g~'-;B.'SC" AMCT.. Treasurer. Officer. aruana, tor of Community Services. LAB/hjl Attachment (, '1 ~~ , - '--.J., ... t'l /08/9 1 08: 49 z: 416 475 '5930 COS GI8 02 ScrecJ u( <? A, COSBURN , GIBER~9N joJ{!/fP,{f/f7f;'/4: November 7, 1991 Town of Newcastle Community Services Department 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 Attention: Mr. J. Cameron Dear Mr. Cameron: Re: Bowmanville Recreation Complex Phase I NW - 9140 Contract Award Proiect File: 90.760 Further to our recent discussions, we are writing to confirm our recollllllendations for the selection of a contractor to carry out the above noted contract works. As you are aware, A.Timar Contracting Ltd. offered the lowest bid ($2;92,359.89) of the three acceptable bids submitted. We hav~ worked successfully with TImar on a number of occasions In the past and this experience, along with the list of references provided, gives us confidence in recommending them to perform Ule work of this' contract. We are aware of the construction budget limitations for this phase of the p~oject and we realize that the present contract price is in excess of this figure. In light of this fact we sug- gest that the folIowing modifications be made to the contract to bring it within the limits of the budget available. ' llmlmM deleted 3.2 3.6 3.10 4.0 5.6 ' 5.7 Contract~ Concrete platform at summerhouse location Concrete block wall Ledgerock (portion of) Site lurnishings Sodding Supply of topsoil Sub total GST adjustment Total amount deleted 10,600.00 5,959.80 7,500.00 9,830.00 11,650.00 5.100.00 50,639.80 3.544.79 54,184.59 $238,175.3:1 Resultant contract price " I~ 7270 Woodbln~ Avenue 11/138/91138:49 ~ 416475,59313 COS SIB 03 November 7, 1991 File: 90.760 Page 2 The scope of these deletions has been discussed with Mr. Timar and he indicates his company's will.ess to proceed with this contract inco?,orating these modifications. Once you have had an opportunity to examine the modifications su~ested, please forward your instructions and we Will prepare the contract agreement for signmg. Yours truly, CO, SBURN Gm,E~RN lANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ~ ) / ~ ' 0, '---- Bruce K. Cosburn, a.ALA. Partner. Landscape Architect BKC/blh encl. e.c." Ms. L Birkett. Town of Newcastle Mr. A. Timar, A. Timar Contracting ,1 ......l. I I ,..I ....v~;JJ. vo- ~v 11/07/1991 14144 FROM fHWRElJ C. TII1AR LTD. / TO COSBURN/BIB. ANDREW TIMAR LANDSCAPING LIMITED . .. .. Mall: P.O. Box 201. Nozvllt Ort~t LOP tKO LOCATION: 103"~ WJNSTON CHURCHILLBLVO.. BR.AMPTON., ONTARIO November 7, 1991 CosbUrn Giberson Consult(lnt. Inc. 7270 Woodbine Ave. suite 100 Markham, ontario L3R 489 Attentions Mr. Sruce.Jph~~~n, O.~.L.A~' Dear Bruce. As per your request, ple~~e: fin4 ~~~ ~o~~~win~ . . . . of major cont.ract. from t~~~ 'PCl:st ,~'~w. Y..ar~.' : If you require any furth~ information d~n't hesitate to call. . '. Yours Sincerely, .... . .. /' Frank willia.m& Supervi.or Enclosure 7~4, .....u.=. U.Lb l.1"+ P.01 Te.lq)bOno: (416) 846-2!il42 FAX:' . (416}&46-2946 1.1~:t _ . .' . . -,.; , . . ....~ ---... 11/08/91 08:50 z: 416 475 5930 CDS 618. 05 11/07/1991 14:045 F~OM RNOREW C. llMRR L1D. TO COS9URNt'G 19,' P.0~ ~ . - LIST OF MJ\JOR,CONTAAC1S WNE~ ......- 1991 --- DESC!tI.PTION: .' .. '..', ~ . :.. " . . . . .' F.oyal, , Ascot :,cAn~o. '~P:t., G~o:~9e.~o~n, renoX' TrulSt. ianulife Re41 E:state '4 :Cl;l'l\rlea' St~., 'ror~to :(Mi,null.fe C:eri.t.r~), ~ ~n~~&PC. ~p~;'A~es' ". , ,', > " ': ' Arm~~r.t.o~e ~Ret.ainj.n9 'wa11& ~t:'J~lub~~,~8,e,) Mil,to~ ~, :, . .. :' -,' ',', ' st.reet,aQaping i~G>o.d~f:,iAge , .. . ;reypt,one Golf couree ;14 R~,"l t~ :ivic Centre. Gateway propert!ea , . stre~~~o~p~rt~~and, 8to~e En~~~~~~e F&A~ures At-'~'N,n;Lc.j;P8:1 ,~f1c~,a ' " ,', :':. l\u~cu:a ..., ':<,., ' . ,',. ..' " . ..... . .,', :~~y'Qt Brampton Ple;j9.r~~~4',~'~.{.10P~~t;,I," . , s. ~~r.ke . . "':.:-::', ,,", ',"-, ..' .......,. ' . . 't. . . ": ',;" ~. '" .. . 'W'.' ."" ..~ . I.e.I. properties Y02::k ':~ni.V'.~$.~~:i. W90<11:01;." ,~e~~~~~~~~: ; '..;, . ,,' Geo~.to~'. ~l<..~~lll~~. '. i,.:;:;. .. ... ,'\y.( '.'. ~nQP~n~ pen~r:,~' ' ,",' ~', :"" ..... . . ... ..,."" " . . .. . " ' 8r~m~l.e~ Limited ~o~th~rn Telecom streetl.oapiitS, ,,' . OO'fffltGlwU.. ~\t~ll~9ton-' . . ~:'. . . ~ "~'. t . :' " . ~'. . . ~U~,~ ,;De:v.;~rm~n~~ : ~ .... '", ,. '. '. I.~' .".. " .. . ... ., . "" city of Burlington . ': :. . .- .... " ,"t- . .. - ":-.., ... " ...., . ,', ". . . ~'~"I I' .. .. '" ......... . ...' '., " -.... .......-..-.... -. .1 (' ; 1 ) .l .l" vo... ';I J. ..,< OWNER Minto ,Cqnstruction Br~~~)...~'il t"irni ted . ... AVRO Group Petis Re4lty Toronto ~rdn.it Commission Goldm.an Group :Own of ~rkhal1t So.rbare. Group ~irank.:lr1 Church loyal. Park Homes \into Construotion Iramalea LJ.mJ. tea ~ll~y Pc!rk Homes uo-.:J.L A ... 1 0 .:+ {:. ::. ~ ~,~ .. I' ...... 'i' CDS GIS 06 ", .' !990 DESCRIPTION. . . ,~ " , M.tnto' Plaza', Toronto . :... '.' '. ' . . ''L{I.u.+;6iC,l:t:lst: .ConQo~:i~i.u~s . ~rad ";" , . '.'" P~~~:~~~\lr~k~i~~tto.ua'es",':' ar~unp~9n '. _ ~~!tfl?;~~ "~E!.1:r.~Jnln9I.W~.t.ls" .!)Q~n~vi.w":'" . ,: St;re.e,tsc~~~:nd . ~e't~~'.Q.J.J19 '~14'~l~,.Pi6keri:n~1 Va.~~yV1e\f ~~t.'r-~~t;8~api:n9' ,;E.r'~..ptQn .'~ .. , .. . ...,. '. . . IncS~~~.l41~'$1.1b.4iVi.~iQn .,woOdloi Re8to~~tion,' .Wo~b.ri.d9'e ;' . . . ., . Mor.r.Laon Creek wood,lot. Re$t.oration ,'~~:~:J!11~i' . , .., . '.' ..... .., '.. ". . '. .' ,:.;. . ." , , Ill' .. 'scarboro.ugti ....G~raCJe Faciii ty .... " .... , '. r'.' 1989, .i 'Ca$tl~ H1.11:'r9wn.hom.~~, .To~o.l~tQ : Mi.~~CJY'S.u~~v.isi<?n:, ,Or~~9QV:tJ,J;e' ....- '..-.. ": ~ " " P~t'k ,,'[)Qv.lopment ' I' . 1'0 . . J lliduatral i' Street,sc;:apinq, 'Vai~han .... -'. . , ..., ... . .... ' '. , ,~ ' ... . .. ". ..... ctu1~i;h l';ro~rty,., aramp,ton,' ~. ;:' , '. . ~. , Wc?~land p.~~:~: TQ~n.h~useB, . lolid'~lssaU9a:. .. . -: ... .... . A~ t;c)11' Tow~b~'. .Conctos, S~rbO.t::'9.'~gh" ... :.:. ; . ". .:'. . s~r~et ~re~ ::.& Pa.r.~. DeV~lopm~~,!t'." PJ..cke;~:it19... .a~ ::Br~p~()ft.. . '.' . ;.... %I!.~~stri..l j~. ,qomm~;-.s~..1. :.f;>eyelqlJPtent, ;, B~mp'tc?n Li!tu..~..le.;es~::~on40~, -.!~~9~i8et' ~~~~pton'.." . Sa.le:, Cen~~.., MOdAl.'" Homes.:, "'I~.~.,ampton,. ',. . 'Pic:Jt4tri.ng anc. unlonv~.lle . . . '.. '. Str.~et Plan~in9, VaU9,~~n .. . . ~ " - "'\" K. ! " " i i~ t 1 I ~ l..U~ bltj ~ .,....v 11/07/1991 14146 F~OM ANO~EW C. TfMAR LTO. OWN.t.R Bt~\'nCllea Limi ted Valley ~ark Homes Town of Markham Sen.at.or Homes Minto Ccnatr~ctiQn Br~ma~ea Limited ~into Con~truction aillg~te Estates R. Sr~tty Group ~~ro Gosntruction ij:r.ama~Ela Limited City of 8~ampton Fou~ Seasons Homes ai-Ri~e Structures Oxville Homes Ralph B.others construction ~osset Srothers ConBtr~ction Valley Park Homes 1988 . - 1987 - 1986 - 1)( TO cosaURtuG I II.. P.9:'l O~SC.RIP'l',.tON. Vari~\.l. Mod~+.HQme,DEtv~lopm~nt~: , St'r,.it..ts,?4p.i:ng " ~ark,conGtr,~.~t.i.~.n.,: :t\;-amp,tdl I nd:u.~~r .lal~ubdi v,1 s1 on.up"g'.r~a:ing/~.rkh~ln and Bramptdn' . ~.. ., 'St:.r.e~tac::<<~~n9:', WO<x1br.ids.e .' , et..r~~ta,c~p~n9 , ~t~e'et.t;!.C&P.tllg., Au~or'~ . ... . , "0~'~~ma~ Nt'll. T~~er lt19hJ:,1., ~J.(i9s~ c. Sc.;~orough" . ". . ,.: '.: . '. / '. . .. "-rh,~,. Siel;'ra....,,~on~9.. ~pt. $~d<;:, : ; '. 4, !,I!4"or" CO,~~ci~J,.: '~'n9.~st~ri.a.l.'1 'P1:9j.Q~t9- Re~,taurant .,:o.a.mpus/Plazl;\ ',' . :. '." . ReS:...:,;' ;Subai V.1.$1o,na:~ , .'1 0.,. 1/6t.:r:.e~t&,(:;a.pi.~g" (~v~. '~~~;~~d ~1l:.:~'~c:sm.pt'9.~l' ::, ':"~':"'" . ., ,., , . " ",i' ,. , , Tw'ir\: T~W~r :ffi9hrf.~ : B;Ld9 ..;' SC~~~O;-~~<;h: . . '.. '. I:" .. ' .. - . . . ..,.. t'i' ::... ~ . . ~u~~v~'loii'~tr~~tlic~pJ:n9~: W?~~bJ;"idg~', '. c" .~ :~ . . H . ".. .,..... . . . ,'. . ~ UP~,~2;.,ljltie' :~ri~,ve,l~pn\e~~~6~~I:~~t~~ap~~9.; . Bramp.t.on, ; " ", ',' ... .:. , '. . .'. .. . . - , . - . . ~... : : , . Re...1.4,nt,ial; ~ubqiVi_sion DBV i:J:at~pto~ . .,. . .', .... .... '.' ..' ':,'. '.; .f:' . ':' . Co~rciAl,: :1~Qus'tr1a~ ,'~ :R,es,id~tiaJ;'." S u))tl ~ y ~ S ~'OfI: .t>~.~el*Pm.n t'~/.P:i.i1,ker1t19:"~~d Br~p~on . ", .. . .: . . . ~~ee~ flan'~;1'o,9 . . ' .... . , ;. , .... ," R.1J~d.entia~ ~u~i\filSiQn/Vi~U9h:tW. . . .. .' ." ." :'., . .....' ., .". , TO~bou", :~~~,j.ec.t/~.~a'rk(~~ :....:.:' . " '::. .. .' ,:'.';; . .. ~e.rnp~oOk: '.: Stc;me'ga.'~e : Re.j..~e'*'tj:.al. -$u"b.d~vis1.o.r Mo~-elHQme,s~ :&, Tim'J$.etwork/Hias.:,t,~~?\.~g~~.;~:-. ~ . .' Resi~ent141.:'Subd,i:v:i'8~~:m/MC!crkh~", , . , ... . . f ~ . . . ~ G1en~1118 ~.~nhOUS.~. DeV'~ 1(~W'9~t(o,'tffi '.. ':.::. . "Cheuybt'oqk ,'Et;ltat;elS" Resi.~ent1.e,1 S~.bdivi~;ion V~u~h~n . 1 Ii l / ... ...' t... Co, ;I... tJO...J.L A......"'" 11/07/1991 14.46 FRON ~NDREW C, TIHAR LTD. TO COSBURN/GIB,. P.004 OWNER Ci~y qf Brampton 1985 Q~SCIU PTION Parks, Developrnent/Str;ee,!- .p':ta~t~Ilg Bramalea Limited cotnme,rCi.al Tt)ree High:r:ise l)ave~opm~,nt' ttRiv.i~ra" Higha:ise Luxury Conq:oniin.i~, " cQmp~,ex/o~ 1;.a~~ CQ~~,~,Oi<<l '~~~ i:nd~striai, 81clq'~<~~,~pt~,~' " Hal,,lm~.r:k Plb.C' Condominium. D,v~./Br'amp.t9l'l , . NVWll\az;ket . Co~op Tow,nhouse Ilroj~c:t a.~m~lo~ & Asclfo~Q-Martin Ltd. 'rank J. Cox Lta. Rioe Construction Ltd. Hi-Rise St~uctures Inc. Venturon Dev. corp. suQ41vi.ion lStreet .PlaQtingli:lt:~pt.Qn..,', .',.' . .,"', ... . . . f.., Ci,ty of Brampton City of Mississauga Bramalea L1m1t.~ Street ~e~;ri~nti~9 . .-'1.. , :'" ., ,;.)::' , " 1984 - -. ....... 0' " . ..' '.,. - :. . '. . , .. .... , StZ:~e,t ,Tree.:r-J:anting ,', .: '. ~ .' .... .. ,"4. . ." ,f ., parkl~d., , . str~e~$~.e.pe,'{ " Hi9h~5:.~,~).: :$,~l.e-~ .:,..:.~''- Off't~~~ ,~nd~,~~,wnh~~s~.~:~pr-~jeQk(.~~~~~t.~~~:"'::" '.., . ". . ' .. , h ~etrO Toronto Con4o. corp. . Highrise Renov..at1ons/~Q,J:~h.. yo;rk... ,', ..' ;,-,:' ::: ';.'. .::, .f' :.: ' " ..' ..~ 6: . 6 " 1983 -- '. '. '. '~". . . Hi<3hr~.se, CC?~4omin~um, '~rlc, oe:v~::t:opment;':-. '; .an<~' ,~p~u$~ri~l" 81498 ./Bramp'tQI),~.~ . '<,.. .." . ' ..t' ,-:",_, , " 3r~malea Limited :i ty of Brampton Stre~~: ,Plant~n9 ... ',' ~: .". " ',,. . , . . . . .' '. Tenturon ~evelopment corp. Stre,~.t. Plant;~'n9 an~ 1~ ,~r~ '~~~~':~~;/'::: ......, .: Br8:cn~~on '. ~ ,,, ': ' ,;,:..." ";:' . '" . . ~ .'.. \c!lnef f '~ropertie6 ,Bram~t..~n P.4'~~:::?eve~o~eilt.,." :''':::'~, ',ictoria Woods oevelopment Corp. saieG: pa,viJ.i.~nisca:r~rO~9h i "::, .,: 1 ", ,6 '. ., .... '! .' " ~ i . . .. ~ .. . .. .' . I . . ., ,.' . - ... " 1 ' Ii (; '" ~ ---;, (19.....24/92 14: 55 ~ 416 475 5930 C05 GIE: 02 f:OSBURN ~~'J.! SCHEDULE "8" September 24, 1992 Town of Newcastle 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1C2A6 Attention: Mr. Jim Cameron Community Service Department Dear Jim: Re: Tender NW92~4 Bowmanville Recreation Complex In response to your request we have reviewed the bids received by your Purchasing Department for this project.. Our firm has first-hand knowledge of all three bidders, as each firm has constructed park facilities designed by our office. The low bidder Rutherford Contracting bas completed 30 projects for OUT firm over the past 10 years and has maintained an excellen~: record. T~e. tender itself appears to be a very competitive bid and reflects the curr<::nt market pncmg. In conclusion, COSburn/Giberson would recommend the Town award this project to Rutherford Contracting in the amount of $]57,887.44. Yours truly, / / () ff< {-, (d~~ Bruce K. Cosburn Partner, Landscape Arch. a.A.L.A. BKC:cos TNEW924.SBP 727' Woodbln. AI/eMf) Suit" 100, Merknam, O!'\tario UIR 4BQ iel.(4'6) 476-6988 Fax <175.5930 1 <' '. '1 i / ~--. -(OSBURN ~. GIBER~~J! /<J/~If'A'J/P.a:; September 24, 1992 Town of Newcastle 40 Temperance Street llowmanville, Ontario L1C 2A6 Attention: Mr. Jim Cameron Community Service Department Dear Mr. Cameron: Re: Tender NW92-4 Bowmanville Recreation Complex Tenders received for the above project have been balanced and reviewed by our firm. It is found that a pricing discrepancy for item 1.2 exists. The item called for removal and dis- posal of excess material off site. The exact scope of work was evidentl~ :rnisunders10od by the firm of ~on Robinson Limited. Their price provides for removal of fill beyond the limlt of constructlOn. \ It is therefore reconunended the Ron Robinson bid be credited $11,040.00 plus G.S.T. with respect to item 1.2. We believe this credit will equalize all bidders. The final bid results a!'i reconciled will now read as follows; Rutherford Contracting $157,887.44 Ron Robinson Contracting $183,092.36 Vie Priestly Contracting $188,822.21 J trust this explanation to be satisfactory and that the revised prices represent fair and reasonable tender analysis. Kindly telephone me should there be any questions with regard to this matter. BJG:cos l;1ClW(l\lIn.sep ! 7~ 70 Woodbine Allenuo S111181oo. Markham. OntarIo L3R 469 Tal. (416) 475.aQ88 Fe)( 475-5930 ! j'- (1 'U