HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-013-08
CJ!J!Jggron
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Date:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING
~50 \ utiDn -4Ird Pt-l-09 '1- 02'
Monday, February 4, 2008
Meeting:
Report#: PSD-013-08 File No's: A2007-0065 & A2007-0066 By-law #:
Subject:
MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PSD-013-08 be received; and,
2. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
January 17, 2008, for applications A2007-0065 and A2007-0066 and that Staff be
authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the
Committee of Adjustment.
Submitted by:
~-\ ~---B.Jl
Reviewed by: U
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
v J. Creme, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning Services
PW*CP*DC*sh
28 January 2008
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
REPORT NO.: PSD-013-08
PAGE 2
1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a
hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of
the minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are detailed in
Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below.
DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR
JANUARY 17, 2008
A2007-0066
A rove
Approve with
conditions
A roved with conditions
2.0 COMMENTS
2.1 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that applications
A2007-0065 and A2007-0066, are in conformity with both Official Plan policies,
consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law, are minor in nature and desirable.
2.2 Council's concurrence with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for
applications A2007-0065 and A2007-0066, is required in order to afford Staff official
status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of
the Committee of Adjustment.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment
Attachment 1
To Report PSD-013-08
ClfJl-ilJgton
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION
WILLIAM PARISH
PROPERTY LOCATION:
1855 CONCESSION RD 9, DARLINGTON
PART LOT 26, CONCESSION 9
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2007-0065
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300
METRES TO 160 METRES FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 1885
CONCESSION ROAD 9 AND FROM 300 METRES TO 265 METRES FROM THE
NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 1823 CONCESSION ROAD 9,
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 M
TO 160 M FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING AT 1885 CONCESSION
ROAD 9 AND FROM 300 M TO 265 M FROM THE NEAREST LIVESTOCK BUILDING
AT 1823 CONCESSION ROAD 9 AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE DESIRABLE AND
CONFORMS TO THE INTENT OF BOTH ZONING BY-LAWS AND BOTH OFFICIAL
PLANS,
DATE OF DECISION:
January 17, 2008
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
February 6, 2008
CltJlington
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DG BIDDLE & ASSOCIATES L TD
PATRICIA STEPHENSON
PROPERTY LOCATION:
2200 RUDELL ROAD, NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
PART LOT 31, CONCESSION 2
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
A2007 -0066
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE ENLARGEMENT OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING (DETACHED
GARAGE) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40%
TO 76% OF THE MAIN DWELLING FLOOR AREA TO A MAXIMUM OF 179 M2.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE AN EXISTING ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE
OF 76% OF THE CURRENT DWELLING HABITABLE FLOOR AREA TO A MAXIMUM OF 179
M2 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
· THAT NO ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY BE PERMITTED FOR ACCESS TO THE
ACCESSORY BUILDING; AND
· THAT NO EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE ALTERED OR ADVERSELY
AFFECTED AS A RESULT OF THIS APPLICATIONS
AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, WOULD NOT HAVE A DETRIMENTAL IMPACT UPON THE
NEIGHBOURHOOD AND CONFORMS TO THE INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND
BOTH OFFICIAL PLANS.
DATE OF DECISION: January 17, 2008
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 6,2008