HomeMy WebLinkAbout78-85
.~._~~
,y-. ~ \-._-~.~
IREPEALED IY
8Y-LAW ,.~.1.;~
.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN
.
OF NEWCASTLE
BY -LAW NUMBER 78- 85
A By-law to amend Restricted Area By-law
Number 2111 of the former Township of Darlington
WEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle deems
it advisable to amend Restricted Area By-law Number 2111, as amended,
of the former Township of Darlington.
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle
ENACTS as follows:
1. Map 9 of Schedul e "A" to By-l aw 2111, as amended, is
hereby further amended by changing to R3 the zone desig-
nation of the lands indicated as "Z0NE CHANGE TO R3" on
. the attached Schedule "X" hereto.
2. This By-law shall come into effect on the date hereof,
subject to receiving the approval of the Ontario Municipal
Board.
BY-LAW READ a first time this. .1J.thday of... .S.ep.t.e]$.e.r........... ,A.D. 1978
BY-LAW READ a second time this. )..l.th. .day of.S.ep.t:.eJDJ>.e.r............., A.D. 1978
BY-LAW READ a third time and finally passed this..A~~~day of ?~P~~~~~~....., A.D.
1978
(Seal)
~~
G. B. RICKARD, Mayor
.
,
.. .
.i, '..
'"
.
e
.
t.e: 1.
. .
:':f
,.. :...:..::...:::::: ':::\.'.::-.: :.-::
..- .... . '. ... ... ..... ..4 ,
SW. ANGLE
LOT 14, CON. 8
N 72.0 18 40 E
N
:.:;..j ~.i :.;t.:~8E r..;i~:~:
. ,.......
. . ..
I..... .
i..::.:T :C:
SCHEDULE "X"
-0
u>
~
3:
-0
l"l
l"l
V
o
~
z
I
i i'. ..:'
I....: :
.'.
'-.
'.~
N 170 32' 50 "w N 720 18'4d' E
~I 58.50'
I
4''>6'0
~ '9~,
S II W"
. is' ""
N 72018 40 E 82.03
cv
cv
o
- C\J
0-
.2:
517.70
ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN CONCESSIONS 7 and 8
(Seal)
Zone change to tR 31
THIS IS SCHEDULE I Xl TO BY-LAW 78-...8.5...-, PASSED
THIS 11th DAY OF Sept., A.D. 1978.
Scale in feet I": 50'
A r----1 ~
~ L--...-.j
20 10 0 20 40 60 80
//d'/<7 ./9'/
.//;::"2'5 ::'~;<:.<~/i~t7"~~>r/
q, B. RIC KARD , Mayor
/j .
';,.,: -"~~
>/ ~_..,
J.M:---MC ILROY, Clerk
T
..
.
.
~~
mm!~~
~mm"
Ontario
. 78J135
Ontario Municipal Board
D DB _~a OF IeoUcm 31 of
7he Pi~.Dl~' Act. ca.l.o. 1970,
o. 34 ,
-and-
D BE DftBB or an appl1aatloa
by ft. COq.o...t.loa of Ute 'IOWA
of __U. fo.. app.val of
1b ae8vlot:e4 Ana By-1_ 78-85
DBBoaBs
D.B. JIcRODB
~"..
)
)
)
>>
.....8day, tile 7th day of
HuGh, 1t7'
HIS APPLICATION MViag oome _ 'OJ: public beU'b, _ ~
2S~ flar o! FebnIu:y, 1971 at ~ YGwa of _tl. sad afuJr
f;be __la, of ~. awl!ca~loll the BoU'd .via, naenGUi iu
4..1810ft ._U t.bb 4a,.
DB BOAaD 0IU.lI.mS td\a~ By-lav 78-85 18 1lea"eJ)y appZ'0984.
Af'~v .
fk~l 1P'1vff'
~~kw
ENTERED
o. B. No...ff.1fE..........
folio 110.... .t.. tt:.......... ..........
APR 3 1979
44
SlClIETM'. CIII1'AIII ItUIIICIPAL "',
~
Ii. Sims Morton McInerney & Brady
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
er~..n... ,
March 9th, 1979
J. M. McIlroy, A.M.C.T.,
Clerk,
Corporation of the Town of Newcastle,
40 Temperance Street,
Bowmanvil1e, Ontario
Dear Mr. McIlroy:
Re: By-law 78-85
I enclose herewith a copy of the decision of
D.H. McRobb which I believe you will find self-
explanatory.
.
Yours truly,
David J. D. Sims
DJDS:cv
Encl.
RE""r
-,~ \tbl;:~
~'/ED
c/c - Norma Forest
MAR 13 1979
TOWN OF N[",ICASTlE
-I
D.j,D. SIMS, Q.C.
R.P. MORTON
M.C. MciNERNEY
j.F. BRADY
W.M. BURCH
117 KING STREET, WHITBY, ONTARIO LlN 4Z1 BOX: 358 TELEPHONE: 668-7704
.
~~~
~5~
~~
Ontario
,;JRJ{;d-.. 14
R 783135
Ontario Municipal Board
IN THE MATTER OF Section 35 of
The Planning Act (R.S.O. 1970,
c. 349)
- and -
IN THE MATTER OF an application
by The Corporation of the Town
of Newcastle for approval of its
Restricted Area By-law 78-85
C 0 U N S E L :
D.J.D. Sims, Q.C.
for The Corporation of the
Town of Newcastle
DECISION OF THE BOARD delivered byD.H. McROBB
.
This is an application by the Town of Newcastle for
approval of By-law 78-85.
The purpose of the by-law is to rezone part of Lot 14,
Concession VIII in the Hamlet of Haydon from "Greenbelt" (G)
to "Third Density Residential" (R3) to permit the construction
of a single-family dwelling.
The site is located in the former Township of Darlington,
now the Town of Newcastle, and as indicated by Norma Forrest,
Planner for the Town, the lands designated Greenbelt in the
Darlington Official Plan were approximate, with precise
determination to be established when large topographic maps
.
are available. The major considerations in fixing their
location were to be 100 feet from the centre of the watercourse,
the t()p of the bank, or the flood limit as established by an
Ontario land surveyor - whichever is greatest. Miss Forrest
indicated that the lands to be rezoned are, outside the 100 foot
limit and the floodplain limit as shown on Exhibit 3. Therefore
it was her opinion that the site is not within the Greenbelt
designation and the proposed zoning is in conformity with the
Official Plan.
- 2 -
R 783135
.
The site is,in the Hamlet of Haydon and, in Miss
Forrest's opinion, the zoning of this site would conform to
the Hamlet policies contained in the Regional Municipality
of Durham Official Plan which permits minor internal infilling
and/or minor additions to existing development.
William Fry, resources planner for the Central Lake
Ontario Conservation Authority, indicated that as the rezoning
is above the elevation of 729.2 C.G. D. (the floodplain line)
the Authority would have no objection to development. Driveway
access to the concession road to the south will be over lands
zoned 'Greenbelt' but, in his opinion, if it is necessary to
plac€ fill in this area, the required approval would likely be
given.
.
Mr. & Mrs. Hewitt gave evidence in opposition to this
rezoning. They are the owners of the property immediately to
the east. When they purchased their property, they were told
by the real estate agent that the lands to the west (the subject
si te) were zoned 'Greenbel t' and development could not take
place. They feel that deveL9pment of this site now will limit
their privacy. Mrs., Mickle, the owner of the subject lands,
offered to sell the pl1<Dpertyto them, but because they were of
the opinion that the lands could not be developed, they declined
her offer. They are also concerned that a septic system
nearby might affect their well and the river. The Board is of
the opinion that the normal requirements of the Health Unit
will prevent such occurrences.
.
While the Board is sympathetic with the objectors' desire
to maintain their privacy, it is also of the opinion that such
should not be at the expense of the owner of'the subject lands.
Indeed the objectors had an opportunity to purchase the site
and may still be able to do so.
- 3 -
R 783135
..
.
On the evidence of the planner, this rezoning conforms
to the policies of the Darlington Official Plan and the
Regional Official Plan. The Board therefore approves By-law
78-85 of the Town of Newcastle.
DATED at Toronto, this 7th day of March, 1979.
D.H. McROBB
MEMBER
.
.
..
.
-
[tj
~1E:i!llI"
Ontario
R 783135
Ontario Municipal Board
IN THE MATTER OF Sect.ion 35 of
The Planning Act (R.S.O. 1970,
c. 349),
- and -
IN 'mE MAftER OF an applioation
by The COrporation of 'the Town
of Newcastle for approval of
its Restricted Area By-law 78-85
BEl' 0 REI
A.H. ARRBLL, Q.C.
Vice-Chaizman
- and -
D. S. COLBOURNE
Vice-Chairman
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
COMMUNICATION NO. 9
INFORMATION
Wednesday, 'the 1st day of
November, 1978
No objections t:o approval having been received
as required;
THE BOARD ORDERS 'that By-law 78-85 is
hereby approved.
~"A~ - [.1~./:; II
J(Dt.A /. !tr#J'Vtl' 'oV. - A''1cl
<.r" ...-------'
'---
SECRETARY
YJJC}(Lr
ENTERED
Q. 8. No... .R.z.r-::~.....
Folio No....d~2...........
NOV 3 1978
d~
SECRETARl'. IlfiTARIO "~~A'