Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-86-99 : DN: cofagpa THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REPORT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#!))3U Date: Monday, July 5, 1999 Res. #S&" 37� � Report#: PD-86-99 FILE #: A99/021, A99/024 - A99/027, inclusive By-law # Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1999 FILE NO'S.: A99/021, A99/024 TO A99/027, INCLUSIVE Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-86-99 be received ; 2. THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on June 24, 1999 for applications A99/021, A99/024 to A99/027, inclusive; and 3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A99/021 and A991024 to A99/027, inclusive in the event of an appeal. 1. In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, all applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being received by the Secretary Treasurer. The decisions of the Committee are detailed below. 2. Applications A99/021, previously tabled from the June 10, 1999 meeting, was APPROVED as applied for. 3. Application A99/024 was TABLED for a period of 9 months until all agency comments are received and the site plan is satisfactory to all commenting agencies. 4. Application A99/025 was APPROVED as applied for subject to the applicantlagent applying for and receiving a building permit for the deck within thirty (30) days. 6 9 9 A 6 y REPORT NO.: PD-65-99 PAGE 2 5. Application A99/026 was APPROVED as applied for subject to the applicant resolving concerns with the fence, with the Planning and Building Departments - within 90 days of this decision and prior to the pool construction. 6. Application A99/027 was APPROVED as applied for. 7. The purpose of each minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are detailed in Attachment No. 1. 8. Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that the applications are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and minor in nature and desirable. 9. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order to afford staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, Ail, J rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P., Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer SL*LDT*DJC*cc 25 June 1999 Attach. 699047 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT FILE NUMBER: A99/021 APPLICANT: MELANSON, GARY AGENT: HENLEY, MIKE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1449 TAUNTON ROAD PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 4 TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: RC HEARING DATE: 24-Jun-99 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 14-Jul-99 MINOR VARIANCE : TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE WITH AN EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 4 METRES (13 . 12 FT) , INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 METRE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD. REASON FOR DECISION: THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED MINOR AND DESIRABLE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR. 699u48 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT FILE NUMBER: A99/024 ******************** APPLICANT: 1098431 ONTARIO LIMITED AGENT: MCDONALD' S RESTAURANTS OF CANADA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1000 REGIONAL ROAD 17 PART LOT: 29 CONCESSION: 2 TOWNSHIP: CLARKE PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: C4 HEARING DATE: 24-Jun-99 DECISION: TABLED APPEAL DATE: 14-Jul-99 MINOR VARIANCE : TO PERMIT A SPACING REDUCTION BETWEEN AN INTERSECTION AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS FROM THE REQUIRED 50 METRES TO 40 METRES . REASON FOR DECISION: THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED FOR A PERIOD OF 9 MONTHS UNTIL ALL AGENCY COMMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND THE SITE PLAN IS SATISFACTORY TO ALL COMMENTING AGENCIES. 699u49 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT FILE NUMBER: A99/025 APPLICANT: HARVEY JEROME GALLANT AGENT: DOUGLAS BARBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 125 ELFORD DRIVE PART LOT: 10 CONCESSION: 2 TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: R1 HEARING DATE: 24-Jun-99 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 14-Jul-99 MINOR VARIANCE : TO REDUCE THE INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 1 . 2 METRES TO 0 . 84 METRES (2 . 74 FT) TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING DECK. REASON FOR DECISION: THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW & IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR & DESIRABLE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT RECEIVING A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE DECK WITHIN 30 DAYS . 609u __ J THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT FILE NUMBER: A99/026 APPLICANT: LARRY & KIM HASLER AGENT: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 MCNAIR STREET PART LOT: 26 CONCESSION: 2 TOWNSHIP: CLARKE PLAN NUMBER: 1OM-827 -85 ZONING: R1 HEARING DATE: 24-Jun-99 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 14-Jul-99 MINOR VARIANCE: TO PERMIT THE REDUCTION OF THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 METRES TO 1 . 5M (5 FT) TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF AN INGROUND POOL. REASON FOR DECISION: THAT THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO CONFORM WITH THE 0 P & Z B-L & DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE APP. RESOLVING FENCE CONCERNS WITH THE PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT. WITHIN 90 DAYS & PRIOR TO POOL CONSTRUCTION 69go 1 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT FILE NUMBER: A99/027 APPLICANT: MICHELLE LAPOINTE AGENT: RON BAKER, QUALITY HOME IMPROVEMENTS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 89 GALBRAITH COURT PART LOT: 9 CONCESSION: 1 TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: R3 HEARING DATE: 24-Jun-99 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 14-Jul-99 MINOR VARIANCE: TO PERMIT THE REDUCTION OF THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 7 . 5 METRES TO 5 . 9 METRES TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SUNROOM. REASON FOR DECISION: THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND DESIRABLE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR. FQQi