HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-116-99
.
1
~
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee
File # 7)/5 ~D
Res. # (;jl/1-t/1 /-17
Date: Monday, October 18, 1999
Report #: PD-116-99
FILE #: A99/053 to A99/058, inclusive
By-law #
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 1999
FILE NO'S.: A99/053 TO A99/058, INCLUSIVE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
~
1. THAT Report PD-116-99 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
October 7, 1999 for applications A99/053 to A99/058 inclusive; and
3. THAT Staffbe authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the
decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A99/053 to A99/055
inclusive, A99/057 and A99/058, in the event of an appeal.
1. In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, all applications received
by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being
received by the Secretary Treasurer. The decisions of the Committee are detailed below.
2. Applications A99/053, A99/055 and A99/057 were APPROVED as applied for.
3. Applications A99/054 was TABLED to allow the applicant time to post the required
notice in accordance with the Planning Act requirements.
4. Application A99/056, an application for recognition of an existing deck having a westerly
interior side yard setback of 0.4 metres and to permit the expansion of this deck
619
.
REPORT NO.: PD.116-99
PAGE 2
maintaining the same 0.4 metre westerly side yard setback and reducing the rear yard
setback to 5.85 metres was DENIED. The existing deck is located in the interior side
yard, approximately 6 feet from a bedroom window of the abutting dwelling unit.
Privacy was the key issue that the abutting property owner wanted addressed. Lattice
screening was discussed but was not considered adequate for sound suppression. The
applicant has sufficient rear yard to construct a deck in compliance with the Zoning By-
law.
Although the approval was not consistent with staff's recommendation, it is staff's
opinion that it would not be prudent for the Municipality to appeal the application. The
applicant has the opportunity to file an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) if
they so wish. In the event of an appeal, Staff may be subpoenaed to appear at the OMB
to give Planning evidence.
The Committee of Adjustment has not always concurred with staff's recommendation. It
has not been Gouncil's practice to appeal these decisions leaving that option with the
applicant.
5. Application A99/058 was APPROVED as applied for subject to a geotechnical study
being completed by the applicant, to the satisfaction of CLOC as well as receiving
Regional Health Unit approval for the newly installed holding tank, prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
6. The purpose of each ruinor variance application and the Comruittee's decisions are
detailed in Attachment No.1.
7. Staff have reviewed the Comruittee's decisions and are satisfied that the applications
which received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with
the intent of the Zoning By-law and minor in nature and desirable.
620
REPORT NO.: PD-116-99
PAGE 3
8. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order
to afford staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an
appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
d fvJ-J2J2~c0.lL
Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
r of Planning & Development
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Chief Administrative Officer
SL *DJC*cc
12 October 1999
Attach.
621
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/053
********************
APPLICANT: ROSSI, RICK & HEATHER
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
125 COVE ROAD
PART LOT: 11 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER:
ZONING: RS & EP
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING WITH AN EASTERLY SIDE
YARD SETBACK OF 2 METRES (6.56 FT) INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 3
METRES (9.84 FT).
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS THE APPLICATION IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED
TO BE MINOR AND DESIRABLE.
622
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/054
********************
APPLICANT: PRINS, ARNOLD
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
29 WAVERLY ROAD
PART LOT: 14 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER:
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT A 47 SQ M (506 SQ FT) ACCESSORY BUILDING WHICH WOULD
INCREASE THE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING FROM THE
MAXIMUM PERMITTED 40% TO 56%.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO MEET
THE PLANNING ACT REQUIREMENT FOR NOTICE.
623
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/055
********************
APPLICANT: LENNY, ROBERT & MARILYN
AGENT: R. L. BROOKS & ASSOC. LTD.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
37 KINGSWOOD DRIVE
PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: lOM-781 -7
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT A SECOND KITCHEN WITHIN AN EXISTING SINGLE DETACHED
DWELLING
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS IT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND
DESIRABLE.
624
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/056
********************
APPLICANT: DEMPSEY, RICHARD & LINDA
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
72 TRUDEAU DRIVE
PART LOT: 10 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: 10M-800 -13L
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: DENIED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING DECK HAVING A WESTERLY SIDE YARD SETBACK
OF 0.4 M (1.29 FT) INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 1.2 M (3.94 FT), &
PERMIT EXPANSION OF THIS DECK MAINTAINING THE SAME 0.4 M SIDE YARD
SETBACK & REDUCING THE REAR YARD TO 5.8 M (19.19 FT)
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE DENIED AS IT IS NOT DESIRABLE NOR DOES IT
MEET THE INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW.
625
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99j057
********************
APPLICANT: MAJESTE, MICHAEL & DOROTHY
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
30 MCLELLAN DR.
PART LOT: 32 CONCESSION: 3
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: 10M-809 -79
ZONING: R
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING GAZEBO WITH AN EASTERLY SIDE YARD SETBACK
OF 0.46 M (1.5 FT) & AN ACCESSORY BUILDING (SHED) WITH A 0.86 M
(2.82 FT) WESTERLY SIDE YARD SETBACK, INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 1.2
M (3.94 FT) SETBACK.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS IT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED MINOR AND DESIRABLE.
626
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99j058
********************
APPLICANT: SAVAGE, BRAD & ROSE
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
79 EAST BEACH ROAD
PART LOT: 9 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER:
ZONING: RS2 & EP
HEARING DATE: 7-0ct-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 27-0ct-99
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DWELLING
WITH A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 3.5 METRES (11.48 FT), INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 8 METRES (26.24 FT) SETBACK.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS IT IS CONSIDERED IN CONFORMITY
WITH THE 0 P & ZONING BY-LAW & IS DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE,
SUBJECT TO A GEOTECHNICAL STUDY BEING DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF
CLOC, & HEALTH DEPT. APPROVAL OF HOLDING TANK INSTALLATION.
627