HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-010-07
~n
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting:
Date:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING
Monday January 22, 2007
Report #: PSD-010-07
File No's: A2006-0031,A2006-0050 ,A2006-0051
A2006-0052, A2006-0053, A2006-0054
A2006-0055 AND A2006-0056
6P/~ - OS;) - 07
By-law #:
Subject:
MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 14, 2006 AND JANUARY 4,2007.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PSD-010-07 be received;
2. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
December 14, 2006 and January 4, 2007 for applications A2006-0031, A2006-0050,
A2006-0052 to A2006-0054 inclusive, and A2006-0056 and that Staff be authorized to
appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment; and
3. THAT Council concurs with Staff that an appeal by the Municipality of the decision
made by the Committee of Adjustment on January 4,2007 for applications A2006-0051
and A2006-0055 is not warranted. However, should an appeal be lodged by another
party, that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
its original recommendation.
Submitted by:
Da . J. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning Services
Reviewed bY:U ~~ ~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
PW*SA *CP*DC*sh
January 17, 2007
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
REPORT NO.: PSD-010-07 PAGE 2
1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a
hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of
the minor variance applications and the Committee’s decisions are detailed in
Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below.
DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR
DECEMBER 14, 2006 & JANUARY 4, 2007
Application Number Staff Recommendation Decision of Committee
December 14, 2006
A2006-0050 Approve Approved
A2006-0051 Table Tabled
A2006-0052 Approve Approved
A2006-0053 Approve Approved
A2006-0054 Approve Approved
January 4, 2007
A2006-0031 Table Tabled
A2006-0051 Deny Approved
without
Approved conditions
A2006-0055 Approve with conditions
A2006-0056 Table Tabled
1.2 Due to the Christmas season and the General Purpose and Administration Committee
Meeting schedule during this timeframe staff were unable to report to Committee and
Council on the decision of the Committee of Adjustment from the December 14, 2006
meeting. These decisions were reviewed by staff however, and staff had no concerns
with any of the decisions made.
1.3 Application A2006-0051 was originally filed to permit the construction of an accessory
building by increasing the maximum permitted lot coverage from 40% to 66% of the
22
main building (By-law 84-63) and increasing the maximum size from 90 m to 114.55 m
(By-law 2005-109 Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law). The applicant wishes to retain
an existing 10.5 m2 gazebo and construct a 104 m2 storage building.
After the initial circulation of this application the applicant requested an amendment to
his application to allow for the retention of an existing shed 12.6 m2 on the property.
The recalculation of lot coverage of the main building increased from 66% to 72% and
22
from 114.55 m to 127.2 m. The applicant was informed that any increase in the
proposed variance would require a recirculation of the new information to the nearby
property owners and commenting agencies at the applicant’s expense. This was
REPORT NO.: PSD-010-07 PAGE 3
agreed to by the applicant and Staff recommended tabling the application in order to
allow for the recirculation.
Following the recirculation, a second meeting was held to consider the revised
application. It was Staff’s opinion that the increase in lot coverage and maximum size
for all accessory buildings being requested was not minor in nature nor would it be in
keeping with development in the area. As a result, Staff recommended that the
application be denied. Upon hearing favourable comments from neighbours of adjacent
properties to the east and west, the Committee disagreed with Staff’s evaluation and
chose to approve the application.
Due to the nature of the variance and the limited impact on other properties, an appeal
of this decision was deemed to not be in the best interest of the Municipality. However,
should an appeal be lodged by another party, Staff have requested that Council
authorize them to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend their original
recommendation.
1.4 Application A2006-0055 was filed to permit the construction of a single detached
dwelling by reducing the exterior side yard setback from 6 metres to 2 metres. The
proposed dwelling is intended to replace a legal non-complying dwelling that was
demolished due to fire damage.
The applicant was proposing to reposition the new dwelling on his property further back
from the front property line. In so doing, the building envelope of the new dwelling
encroached into the exterior side yard created by the unopened municipal road
allowance located to the south of the applicant’s property. As the municipality currently
has no plans to utilize this road allowance in the future, Staff supported this application
to reduce the exterior side yard to the same size as an interior side yard.
However, a site inspection of the property revealed what appeared to be an abandoned
well on the property. Since this property is serviced by municipal water it was made a
condition of Staff’s approval that the applicant have the old well properly
decommissioned buy a licensed contractor in order to ensure protection of the ground
water and prevent any accidents.
While the applicant was willing to have the well decommissioned the Committee did not
deem that condition necessary for the approval of the variance. A motion by one
Committee member to approve the variance subject to the condition of the closing of the
well was not supported and failed. A second motion to approve the variance without
any conditions passed.
REPORT NO.: PSD-010-07 PAGE 4
2.0 COMMENTS
2.1 Staff has reviewed the Committee’s decisions and are satisfied that applications A2006-
0031, A2006-0050, A2006-0052 through A2006-0056 inclusive, are in conformity with
the Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor
in nature and desirable.
2.2 No appeals were received on any of the decisions from the December 14, 2006 meeting
and these are now all final and binding. Council’s concurrence with the decisions of the
Committee of Adjustment for applications A2006-0031, A2006-0050, A2006-0052
through A2006-0056 inclusive, is required in order to afford Staff official status before
the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee
of Adjustment.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment
Attachment 1
To Report PSD-01 0-07
CkJ!:.pn
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
RANDY VAN MEER
RANDY VAN MEER
PROPERTY LOCATION:
1545 REGIONAL RD 42, CLARKE
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 4
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE
A2006-0050
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING LIVESTOCK
BUILDING BY REDUCING THE AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 METRES TO
260 METRES FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AT 1435 REGIONAL
ROAD 42 AND FROM 300 METRES TO 255 METRES FROM THE NEARE
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING LIVESTOCK
BUILDING BY REDUCING THE AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 METRES TO
260 METRES FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AT 1435 REGIONAL
ROAD 42 AND FROM 300 METRES TO 255 METRES FROM THE NEAREST
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AT 1632 REGIONAL ROAD 42 SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITION THAT AN APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT BE RECEIVED WITHIN NINETY
(90) DAYS, AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND CONFORMS TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW..
DATE OF DECISION:
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
December 14, 2006
January 3, 2007
~
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DON JOHNSON
DON JOHNSON
PROPERTY LOCATION:
1521 CONCESSION RD 9, DARLINGTON
PART LOT 8, CONCESSION 33
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2006-0051
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY INCREASING
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 72% OF THE MAIN
DWELLING (BY-LAW 84-63) & INCREASING THE MAXIMUM SIZE FROM 90 M2 TO
127.2 M2 (BY-LAW 2005-109).
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO TABLE THE APPLICATION UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT TO ALLOW FOR A RECIRCULATION OF THE APPLICATION AND A
NEW SIGN BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY.
DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 2006
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 3, 2007
q!Jl-!lJgron
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
JEFFREY BRADLEY
JEFFREY BRADLEY
PROPERTY LOCATION:
1760 CONCESSION RD 10, DARLINGTON
PART LOT 28, CONCESSION 10
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2006-0052
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY INCREASING
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 53% OF THE MAIN
DWELLING.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ACCESSORY BULDING BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT
COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 53% OF THE MAIN DWELLING AS IT IS MINOR IN
NATURE, DESIRABLE AND CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 2006
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 3,2007
CJNhJgton
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
GREG POTTER
GREG POTTER
PROPERTY LOCATION:
132 COVE ROAD, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 11, CONCESSION BF
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE
A2006-0053
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALK-OUT BASEMENT ON A DWELLING
CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION BY INCREASING THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FROM 10.5 METRES TO 11.1 METRES.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION BY PERMITTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
A WALK-OUT BASEMENT ON A DWELLING CURRENTLY UNDER
CONSTRUCTION BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT
FROM 10.5 METRES TO 11.1 METRES SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT:
. THE MATURE TREES ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE BE
PRESERVED BY THE APPLICANT;
. THAT NO EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS BE ALTERED OR
ADVERSELY AFFECTED;
AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND IT CONFORMS TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION:
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
December 14, 2006
January 3, 2007
C!NJl1gtoo
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
ARNOT WOTTEN
ARNOT WOTTEN
PROPERTY LOCATION: 5750 SOLlNA ROAD, SOLlNA
PART LOT 22, CONCESSION 5
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
FILE NO.: A2006-0054
PURPOSE:
TO REDUCE THE AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM 300 METRES TO 150 METRES
FROM AN EXISTING LIVESTOCK BARN TO A DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR UP TO
THREE (3) NEW HAMLET LOTS AND TO FURTHER REDUCE THE LOT AREA OF THE
RETAINED PARCEL FROM 31.92 HA TO 30.72 HA (REQUIRED IS 40
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO REDUCE THE AGRICULTURAL SETBACK FROM
300 METRES TO 110 METRES FROM AN EXISTING LIVESTOCK BUILDING TO A
DEVELOPED AREA FOR UP TO THREE (3) NEW HAMLET LOTS AND TO FURTHER
REDUCE THE LOT AREA OF THE RETAINED PARCEL FROM 31.92 HA TO 30.72 HA
AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN
AND ZONING BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION:
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
December 14, 2006
January 3,2007
Cl~Jngron
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
ABBOTT DRAFTING & DESIGN
VINCENT D'CRUZ
PROPERTY LOCATION:
105 CEDAR CREST BEACH ROAD, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 12, CONCESSION BF
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2006-0031
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
REDUCING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NORTH EASTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD
SETBACK FROM 3.0 METRES TO 1.8 METRES.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO TABLE THE APPLICATION FOR UP TO ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY (120)
DAYS.
DATE OF DECISION: January 4,2007
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 24, 2007
~n
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DON JOHNSON
DON JOHNSON
PROPERTY LOCATION:
1521 CONCESSION RD 9, DARLINGTON
PART LOT 8, CONCESSION 33
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2006-0051
FILE NO.:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY INCREASING
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 72% OF THE MAIN
DWELLING (BY-LAW 84-63) & INCREASING THE MAXIMUM SIZE FROM 90 M2 TO
127.2 M2 (BY-LAW 2005-109).
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY INCREASING
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 72% OF THE MAIN
DWELLING (BY-LAW 84-63) AND INCREASING THE MAXIMUM SIZE FROM 90 M2 TO
127.2 M2 (BY-LAW 2005-109) AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND
CONFORMS TO THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLAN.
DATE OF DECISION: January 4,2007
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 24, 2007
Clw:pn
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
JEFF KELSO
JEFF KELSO
PROPERTY LOCATION: 568 MILL STREET SOUTH, NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
PART LOT 28, CONCESSION BF
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE
FILE NO.: A2006-0055
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
REDUCING THE REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 METRES
TO 2 METRES.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
REDUCING THE REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 METRES
TO 2 METRES AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND CONFORMS TO
THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION: January 4,2007
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 24,2007
CJ!I!.pn
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HALMINEN URBAN COMMUNITIES INC
HALMINEN URBAN COMMUNITIES INC.
PROPERTY LOCATION: 571 LONGWORTH AVENUE, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 2
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE NO.: A2006-0056
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BLOCK OF TOWNHOUSES BY
REDUCING THE SOUTHERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED 7.5 METRES TO 4.5 METRES.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO TABLE THE APPLICATION FOR UP TO ONE (1) YEAR.
DATE OF DECISION: January 4, 2007
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: January 24,2007