Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/05/2006 CJ�a.r111 I1 Energizing Ontario ' GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ' DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 TIME: 7:00 P.M. ' PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS ' 1. ROLL CALL ' 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. MINUTES ' (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of June 19, 2006 301 ' 4. (a) PRESENTATIONS No Presentations (b) DELEGATIONS (i) Murray Walton, Courtice Lions — Millennium Trail (ii) Richard Ward — By-law 2001-141, as amended, and motive for passing the by-law (iii) Peter Smith or Enrico Pistritto— PSD-093-06, ' Committee of Adjustment File 2006-0024 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 and Draft Plan of 501 Subdivision ' Applicant: Maria Wulczyn, First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc. and Percy Napper Report: PSD-088-06 (b) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 503 Applicant: Murray Visser 1 Report: PSD-089-06 iCORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTO 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (90.5) 623-33' G.P. & A. Agenda -2 . September 5, 2006 ' (c) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 and Draft Approved 505 ' Plans of Subdivision Applicant: Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited ' and Robert J. Stephenson Report: ` PSD-090-06 6. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-088-06— Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 601 ' To Permit Medium Density Residential Uses Applicant: Maria Wulczyn, First-Tech Mechanical ' Systems Inc., and Percy Napper (b) PSD-089-06 — Proposed Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of 609 , Subdivisions and Related Rezoning Applicant: Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 ' Ontario Limited, and Robert J. Stephenson (c) PSD-090-06 — Rezoning to Permit a Professional Office Within An 618 ' Exisiting Building Applicant: Murray Visser (d) PSD-091-06 — Amendment to Legal Agreement Regarding the 627 ' Port Hope Project (e) PSD-092-06 — Confidential Report Regarding a Property Matter ' (f) PSD-093-06 — Monitoring of the Decisions of the Committee of 643 ' Adjustment for the Meetings of July 20, August 3, August 17, 2006 (g) PSD-094-06 — Report on Site Plan Activities (January— June 2006) 657 ' (h) PSD-095-06 — Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 663 .Applicant: Kaitlin Group Ltd. (i) PSD-096-06 — Adoption of Amendment 114 to the Durham 669 , Region Official Plan 7. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT , (a) EGD-039-06 — Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for 701 , June 2006 G.P. &A. Agenda . 3 - September 5, 2006 ' (b) EGD-040-06 — Appointment of Building Inspector 706 ' (c) EGD-041-06 — Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for 710 July 2006 (d) EGD-042-06 — River Valley Estates Subdivision Phase 5, Bowmanville 715 LD-99-227-231, 'Certificate of Acceptance' and ' 'Assumption By-law', Final Works Including Roads and Other Related Works ' (e) EGD-043-06 — Provision of Consulting Engineering Services 720 Green Road — Baseline Road to Aspen Springs Drive, Bowmanville ' (f) EGD-044-06 — Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund 729 Intake Three — Port Darlington Neighbourhood, ' Secondary Access Route (g) Addendum #2 to EGD-050-04 — Port Darlington Waterfront Park 736 ' Conceptual Master Plan ' 8. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT No Reports ' 9. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' No Reports ' 10. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports ' 11. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT No Reports 12. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-044-06 — Pay Equity Review— Consultant's Findings and 1201 Phase 2 Pay Equity Plan Revision ' (b) COD-045-06— Ontario Realty Corporation Lease Agreement 1219 1 G.P. & A. Agenda .4 . September 5, 2006 (c) COD-046-06 — Confidential Report Regarding a Legal Matter ' (d) COD-047-06— Supplier Information Night 1227 ' (e) COD-048-06 — Tender Awards Summer Council Break 1231 ' 1 13. FINANCE DEPARTMENT ' (a) FND-012-06 — Annual Leasing Report-2005 1301 (b) FND-013-06 — Annual Statement for the Development Charges 1303 ' Reserve Funds for the Year Ended December 31, 2005 (c) FND-014-06— Cash Activity— Second Quarter of 2006 1309 ' 14. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT ' No Reports ' 15. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 16. OTHER BUSINESS ' 17. ADJOURNMENT ' 1 1 ' f1I'll �'t0il General Purpose and Administration Committee 1NAe,M� Minutes June 19, 2006 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on ' Monday, June 19, 2006 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL ' Present Were: Mayor J. Mutton Councillor A. Foster ' Councillor D. MacArthur Councillor P. Pingle ' Councillor G. Robinson Councillor J. Schell Councillor C. Trim ' Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu , Director, Engineering Services, T. Cannella Director of Community Services, J. Caruana Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath ' Director of Corporate Services, M. Marano Director of Finance Department, N. Taylor Director of Emergency& Fire Services, G. Weir ' Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree Clerk II, C. Tennisco Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. ' DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated for this meeting. MINUTES ' Resolution #GPA-282-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on June 5, 2006, be approved. CARRIED 301 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 PRESENTATION , Jamie Davidson, Conservation Areas Planner, Central Lake Ontario Conservation ' Authority, provided a slide presentation regarding Report PSD-078-06 - Bowmanville/Westside Marshes Conservation Area Management Plan. Mr. Davidson outlined the focus for the Management Plan on all lands owned or leased by CLOCA in , the Port Darlington Area, known as The Bowmanville/Westside Marshes Conservation Area, which include two provincially significant coastal wetlands—Westside and Bowmanville Marshes. The Management Plan goals are to identify, protect and ' enhance natural heritage features, provide the public with recreational and educational opportunities and acknowledge the cultural and heritage significance of the area based on forest and wet lands, ecological importance and sensitivity issues to disturbance. , The Development Strategy includes the following five projects: Zone 1 —Westside Marsh; Zone 2 — Upland Connector; Zone 3 — Bowmanville Marsh; Zone 4 — Lands North of Bowmanville Marsh; and Zone 5— Leased Lands. Mr. Davidson stressed the ' Management Plan ensures the marshes ecological importance which will be continuously monitored with respect to vegetation, wildlife and fisheries. ' DELEGATIONS Resolution #GPA-283-06 ' Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Foster ' THAT the agenda be altered to add Jayson Schwarz and Libby Racansky to the list of delegations. ' CARRIED Bryce Jordan, Sernas Associates, on behalf of The Remington Group Inc., appeared , before the Committee with respect to Report PSD-076-06— Proposed Plan of Subdivision, Owner. Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited. Mr. Jordan informed Council that, as a result of a number of inquiries prior to and after the Public ' Meeting, the two main areas of concern raised by the residents (being the extension of Church Street to Galbraith Court and Simpson Avenue north of King Street East and the frontage along Galbraith Court) have been alleviated. ' John Greenfield, Royal Canadian Legion Branch 178 Bowmanville, appeared before the Committee with respect to Report PSD-080-06— Poppy Symbol on Street Signs. ' Mr. Greenfield requested that a poppy be added to the street name sign "Millson Hill Drive" in Orono in recognition of a World War II Veteran, Herman Edward Millson. Mr. Greenfield believes if a poppy was placed on the sign it would not take away from the ' intent to name the street after a prominent member of the community, but rather a poppy would add significance. Mr. Greenfield requested Council to turn down the staff recommendations contained in Report PSD-080-06. ' .2 . 302 ' General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 Blair McArthur, Vice President, and Mike Kipansky, Engineer, Miller Compost, appeared before the Committee in regards to Report PSD-082-06, Organic Waste Composting ' and Wood Waste Processing Facility. Mr. McArthur advised the Committee that the facility's proposed uses would include the composting of organic materials, the processing of wood products, and the sale of compost, soil blends, sand, gravel, and soil enhancements. The materials handled will include: residential leaf and yard waste, waste wood from construction and demolition sites, and organic waste from the industrial and commercial sector. Mr. McArthur stated the operation would include the ' transporting of materials from their Pickering site, and produce high quality compost. Mr. McArthur confirmed they would not be composting the following: sewer sludge, pulp and paper sludge, septic or raw SSO. They do not expect to be offering a yard waste drop-off for residents and only plan to sell wholesale. Mr. McArthur thanked Council and staff for their comments and their commitment to the project. Fred Biesenthal, Professional Engineer, P. I. Tool, appeared before the Committee, pertaining to Report PSD-082-06, Organic Waste Composting and Wood Waste Processing Facili . Mr. Biesenthal stated concerns in regards to excessive traffic, the ' 45 degree railway)crossing, and odour being emitted from the facility. Peter Walker, Walker Nott Dragecivic Associates Limited regarding Report PSD-083-06, Applications by AYT Corporation to Amend the Durham Regional advised prior to the meeting he would not be in attendance. Ron Hooper, Bo anville BIA, appeared before the Committee with respect to Report PSD-083-06, App ications by AYT Corporation to Amend the Durham Regional Official ' Plan and the Clad ngton Official Plan. Mr. Hooper requested Council to hold their position on this m tter as it would negatively affect all businesses in Clarington. ' Mary Feehley, Walker Nott Dragecivic Associates Limited appeared before the Committee in opposition to Report PSD-083-06, Applications by AYT Corporation to Amend the Durham Regional Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. She is ' requesting staff to extend the west urban boundary to the east side of Bennett Road as she believes there is a lack of industrial lands in Clarington. Ms. Feehley thanked staff for their meetings. Dr. Ron Stead, Holbum, appeared before the Committee, with respect to Report PSD-083-06, Applications by AYT Corporation to Amend the Durham Regional Official ' Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. Dr. Stead stated Holbum is continuing to work at developing the Science Park, and he is looking forward to its expansion. This project should take 10 — 20 years to complete and they request Council and staff to stay on course. ' 3 303 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes , June 19, 2006 Jeff Stapleton, Sunnyside Acres Snowplowing & Sanding Ltd. appeared before the ' Committee with concerns regarding Report COD-031-06, Tender CL2006-3, Snow Clearing. Mr. Stapleton stated that, in his opinion, he believes the scope of work in the , Tender is too large for one contractor and the sidewalks and emergency service lots are not being cleared quickly. He further stated that the Municipality would benefit from the contract being split in two and serviced by two companies. ' Jayson Schwarz, family owned property on Holt Road, appeared before the Committee in regards to Report PSD-084-06 —to Amend the Durham Regional Official Plan ' Review. He addressed Council with respect to the emotional issues for farm owners, in the designated areas. Mr. Schwarz supports the revised recommendations regarding Report PSD-084-06, but recommended that the west to boundary/division be moved to the hydro corridor; as this corridor is a natural wider boundary. Libby Racansky appeared before the Committee in regards to the draft Hancock , Neighbourhood Plan. She stated the developer is planning physical changes to the area which will affect area residents. She feels there are more important conditions to ' be fulfilled prior to the passing of the Plan. Ms. Racansky submitted a Petition to Council requesting the protection of their natural resources and creating a liveable place for the residents. ' Resolution #GPA-284-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Committee recess for 10 minutes. , CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 10:46 a.m. ' Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. , PUBLIC MEETING (a) Subject: Development Charges By-law Amendment ' Report: FND-009-06 No one spoke in opposition to or support of Report FND-009-06. ' -4 - , 304 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting. (b) Subject: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Gill Sisters Limited Report: PSD-071-06 ' Bruce Howarth, Planner, Planning Services, provided a verbal report supported by a ' PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-071-06. No one spoke in opposition to or support of Report PSD-071-06. A representative of the Gill Sisters Limited, the applicant, was present to address any concerns of the Committee, but did not speak to Report PSD-071-06. (c) Subject: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: John Lewandowski Report: PSD-072-06 Susan Ashton, Senior Planner, Planning Services, provided a verbal report supported by a PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-072-06. Libby Racansky appeared before the Committee in opposition to Report PSD-072-06. Lisa Craig appeared before the Committee in opposition to Report PSD-072-06. Ms. Craig is concerned that the applicant proceeded to build without proper permits and is also concerned with the destruction of the trees in the area. She requested that the applicant be required to restore the property. ' No one spoke in support of Report PSD-072-06. Mr. Lewandowski, the applicant, was present to address any concerns of the Committee ' with respect to Report PSD-072-06 and advised Council he was confused by process, such as CLOCA permits and minor variances. (d) Subject: Applications to Amend the Clarington Official Plan Zoning By-law Applicant: Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Report: PSD-073-06 No one spoke in opposition to or support of Report PSD-073-06. 305 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes , June 19, 2006 (e) Subject: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 for Industrial Land on the South Side of South Service Road in Bowmanville Applicant: Municipality of Clarington ' Report: PSD-074-06 Carlo Pellerin, Manager— Development Review, Planning Services, provided a verbal , report supported by a PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-074-06. Mr. Kevin Tunney, on behalf of a property owner of 16 acres located to the west of the , land, appeared before the Committee with respect to Report PSD-074-06. Mr. Tunney stated his client's concerns regarding: the proposed holding category, proposed use, ' the setback, location of future parking and septic beds, and the requirement for 40% fagade. Mr. Tunney requested a meeting with staff to address these issues. No one spoke in support of Report PSD-074-06. ' (f) Subject: Durham Regional Official Plan Review— Supplementary Amendment ' (Part 2) Applicant: Municipality of Clarington Report: PSD-084-06 Carlos Salazar, Manager- Community Planning & Design, Planning Services, provided a verbal report supported by a PowerPoint presentation pertaining to Report PSD-084-06. , Mr. Raymond Osborne, owner of property at the intersection of Courtice Road and Bloor Street, appeared before the Committee, with respect to Report PSD-084-06. He , questioned the proposal to increase the Greenbelt Area yet a report is before the Committee with respect to a Waste/Composting Facility for the area. Mr. Osbome requested to be advised of the estimated timing with respect to Report PSD-084-06. ' Mr. Michael Montgomery, appeared before the Committee, on behalf of Mr. Jayson Schwarz, with respect to Report PSD-084-06. Mr. Montgomery requested a meeting ' with staff regarding the extension of the boundary to the Hydro corridor. Lisa Craig appeared before the Committee with respect to PSD-08406 and questioned , where the density will be changed from 20% to 40%. Linda Gasser appeared before the Committee in support of Report PSD-084-06. Ms. ' Gasser requested that when considering the Terms of Reference there be opportunity for public input and further time frames to review the Road Management Studies, due to its complexity. Ms. Gasser is concerned the recommendations in Report PSD-084-06 , may send out mixed signals and she suggested Council request Regional Council to clarify their direction on how they are planning to proceed. Libby Racansky spoke in support of Report PSD-084-06 and stated that she also supports the comments of Linda Gasser. 306 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REZONING TO PERMIT A CONVENIENCE STORE WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING APPLICANT: GILL SISTERS LIMITED ' Resolution #GPA-285-06 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Pingle ' THAT Report PSD-071-06 be received; THAT the application to amend Zoning By-law submitted by Gill Sisters Limited be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment, attached to Report PSD-071-06, be adopted by Council; and, THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-071-06 and any delegations be advised ' of Council's decision. CARRIED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT DETACHED GARAGE IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ZONE APPLICANT: JOHN LEWANDOWSKI Resolution#GPA-286-06 ' Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-072-06 be received; ' THAT the rezoning proposal for development of the subject property be referred back to Staff for further processing and preparation of a subsequent report; and, THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-072-06 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED APPLICATIONS TO AMEND THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING ' BY-LAW TO PERMIT THE CREATION OF A NEW LOT APPLICANT: CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Resolution #GPA-287-06 Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-073-06 be received; 307 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 THAT the application to amend the Clarington Official Plan submitted by Central Lake , Ontario Conservation Authority be approved and that a by-law be passed by Council to adopt Official Plan Amendment 53 to the Clarington Official Plan as contained in ' Attachment No. 2 of Report PSD-073-06; THAT the application to amend the Municipality of Ciarington's Zoning By-law 84-63, as , amended, as contained in Attachment 3, of Report PSD-073-06, be approved and that a By-law removing the Holding (H) provision be forwarded to Council for approval at such time as the conditions of approval for the consent application have been satisfied; , THAT the Region of Durham be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-073-06 and be advised of Council's decision; and ' THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-073-06 and delegations be advised of Council's decision. , CARRIED REZONING APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL LANDS ON SOUTH SERVICE ROAD , IN BOWMANVILLE OWNER: MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Resolution #GPA-288-06 Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Mayor Mutton , THAT Report PSD-074-06 be received; THAT the rezoning application, attached to Report PSD-074-06, by Municipality of , Clarington to rezone lands generally described as south side of South Service Road, east of Ontario Power Generation, west of the Fifth Wheel Truck Stop, and north of the ' CN Rail line be referred back to staff for further processing; and, THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-074-06, any delegations, and the , Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: WAVERLY ROAD PROPERTIES INC. Resolution #GPA-289-06 ' Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Trim , THAT Report PSD-075-06 be received; -8 - '308 General Purpose and Administration Committee ' Minutes June 19, 2006 THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Blocks 4 and 5 on.Plan 40M-2171 be approved and that the Part Lot Control By-law, attached to Report PSD-075-06, be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-075-06, any delegations, andthe Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION OWNER: SABINA INVESTMENTS INC. AND ANKARA REALTY LIMITED (THE REMINGTON GROUP INC.) Resolution #GPA-290-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-076-06 be received; ' THAT the application for proposed draft Plan of Subdivision S-C-2005-001, submitted ' by Semas Associates on behalf of Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited be approved, subject to the conditions as contained in Attachment 3, to Report PSD- 076-06; THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-076-06 and Council's decision; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-076-06 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. ' CARRIED PORT GRANBY PROJECT— MUNICIPAL CONSENT TO THE SUBMISSION OF A ' PREFERRED OPTION Resolution #GPA-291-06 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson ' WHEREAS on September 27, 2004, Council resolved to concur with the recommendation of the Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office that Concept II (relocation of the Port Granby waste to an engineered storage mound north of ' Lakeshore Road) should proceed through the Environmental Assessment process as the Qualified Concept for the Port Granby Project; 309 I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 AND WHEREAS the Environmental Assessment Study Report for the Port Granby , Project prepared by the Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office dated March 2006 ("EASR"), has concluded that the Qualified Concept for the Port Granby Project ' will not create any significant adverse effects on the natural, socio-economic and human health environments, and that it should be submitted to the federal decision makers as the Preferred Option for the Port Granby Project; , AND WHEREAS the Municipality's Peer Review Team has advised Council that the EASR provides a sufficiently comprehensive assessment of the environmental effects of ' the Qualified Concept for the Port Granby Project, that the measures proposed to mitigate the adverse effects of the Project on area residents are appropriate, that the Team generally agrees with the EASR's conclusions, and that the EASR is suitable for ' submission to the relevant authorities for further review; AND WHEREAS Council is confident that the relevant authorities, in their review of the , EASR and associated documentation, including the design of the Long Term Waste Management Facility, will ensure that the health and safety of area residents and the ' natural environment will be protected through all phases of the Port Granby Project; AND WHEREAS Council continues to be opposed to the acceptance or storage of any , waste, other than the waste associated with the existing Port Granby Waste Management Facility, at the new Long Term Waste Management Facility or on any of the lands to be acquired by the Government of Canada as part of the Port Granby ' Project; AND WHEREAS the Legal Agreement between the Municipality of Clarington, the , Municipality of Port Hope and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada represented by the Minister of Natural Resources dated March 29, 2001, as amended, states that a preferred option will not be submitted to decision makers without the written consent of the Municipalities to that option; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY , OF CLARINGTON resolves to give its consent to the Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office to submit to Federal decision makers, the Preferred Option for the Port Granby Project as described in Staff Report PSD-077-06; , THAT the Government of Canada and the Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office be requested to continue to consult with the Municipality and area residents on , the Environmental Assessment of the Project; THAT Report PSD-077-06 be received; ' THAT a copy of Council's decision and Staff Report PSD-077-06 be forwarded in its entirety to the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office, Natural Resources , Canada, and the Regional Municipality of Durham; and 310 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 ' THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to all interested parties indicated in Report PSD-077-06. ' CARRIED BOWMANVILLE / WESTSIDE MARSHES CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Resolution #GPA-292-06 ' Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT Report PSD-078-06 be received; THAT the Bowmanville /Westside Marshes Conservation Area Management Plan, June ' 2006, attached to Report PSD-078-06 be accepted as fulfillment of one of the roles and responsibilities as defined in the Principles of Understanding between St. Marys' Cement (formerly Blue Circle Canada Inc.), the Municipality of Clarington and the ' Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; ' THAT, at the end of each year, CLOCA provide to the Municipality a proposed Annual Capital and Operating Budget and Fund Raising Strategy to manage the Conservation Area; THAT Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority provide a mid-term report on the Implementation of the Management Plan; and THAT all interested parties in Report PSD-078-06 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION APPLICANT: PORT OF NEWCASTLE MARINA VILLAGE LTD. PART LOT 29, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE ' Resolution #GPA-293-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report PSD-079-06 be received; ' THAT the Draft Plan of Condominium application, submitted by Port of Newcastle Marina Village Ltd., be approved and that the Director of Planning Services be authorized to issue Draft Approval, subject to the conditions as contained in Attachment ' 2 to Report PSD-079-06; ' - 11 - 311 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 THAT a copy of Report PSD-079-06 be forwarded to the Durham Region Planning Department; and, THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-079-06 and any delegations be advised , of Council's decision. CARRIED , USE OF POPPY SYMBOL ON STREET SIGNS ' AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICY FOR WAR DEAD AND WAR VETERAN NAMES FOR STREETS Resolution #GPA-294-06 ' Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor MacArthur , THAT Report PSD-080-06 be referred to staff; THAT staff arrange a meeting with the Royal Canadian Legion, Bowmanville, , Branch 178 to develop a strategy for street naming; THAT staff seek input from Emergency and Fire Services; and , THAT staff report back to Council. , CARRIED MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR , THE MEETING OF JUNE 8, 2006 Resolution #GPA-295-06 , Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-081-06 be received; and , THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on , June 8, 2006 for applications A2006-0021 and A2006-0022, and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. , CARRIED 312 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 APPLICATIONS TO AMEND THE DURHAM REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW TO PERMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ORGANIC WASTE COMPOSTING AND WOOD WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY APPLICANT: MILLER PAVING LIMITED ' Resolution #GPA-296-06 Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-082-06 be received; THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham be advised that the Municipality of Clarington has no objection to the approval of the application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan (ROPA 2005-05) submitted by Miller Paving Limited to establish an organic waste composting and wood waste processing facility, and that the Municipality requests that the amendment to the Official Plan limit the permitted accessory uses to the bulk wholesale of compost and other materials produced on-site; THAT Amendment No. 49 to the Clarington Official Plan, attached to Report PSD-082-06, to permit the establishment of an organic waste composting and wood waste processing facility as proposed by Miller Paving Limited be adopted as indicated in Attachment 4, to Report PSD-082-06, that the necessary by-law contained in Report PSD-082-06, as Attachment 5, be passed and further that the amendment be forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham for approval; THAT Rezoning Application ZBA 2005-027 submitted by Miller Paving Limited be ' approved and that the Amendment to By-law 84-63, as amended, as contained in Report PSD-082-06, as Attachment 6, be adopted; ' THAT the modifications to the proposed Official Plan Amendment as reflected in Amendment No. 49 and the proposed by-law to amend Zoning By-Law 84-63, as ' amended, attached to Report PSD-082-06, be deemed to be minor and consistent with the intent of the proposed Official Plan amendment and rezoning applications considered at the statutory Public Meeting, and further that no additional Public Meeting ' to consider the revised Official Plan amendment and Rezoning Applications is required; THAT the By-laws to remove the Holding (H) symbols be forwarded to Council at such ' time as the applicant has satisfied the provisions of Section 23.4.3 of the Official Plan including the execution of a site plan agreement and the transfer of a woodlot conservation easement in favour of the Municipality; ' THAT a copy of Report PSD-082-06 be forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department; and - 13 - 313 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-082-06, any delegations, and the , Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. TABLED LATER IN THE MEETING , (SEE RESOLUTIONS #GPA-297-06 AND #GPA-329-06) Resolution #GPA-297-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Mayor Mutton , THAT Report PSD-082-06 regarding Organic Waste Composting and Wood Waste Processing Facility be referred to the end of the agenda to be considered during a , .'closed" session of Council. CARRIED ' APPLICATIONS BY AYT CORPORATION TO AMEND THE DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AND THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN TO PERMIT A LARGE , FORMAT RETAIL CENTRE ON THE NORTH-WEST QUADRANT OF HIGHWAY 401 AND BENNETT ROAD, BOWMANVILLE Resolution #GPA-298-06 ' Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Pingle , THAT Report PSD-083-06 be TABLED. CARRIED , DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW— SUPPLEMENTARY AMENDMENT (PART 2) ' Resolution #GPA-299-06 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Trim , THAT Report PSD-084-06 be received; ' THAT the Region of Durham be requested to co-ordinate the Growth Management Studies to implement the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe with the area , municipalities; and THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the interested parties listed in ' Report PSD-084-06 and any delegation. CARRIED - 14 - 314 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 ' CONFIDENTIAL REPORT PSD-085-06 REGARDING A PROPERTY MATTER Resolution #GPA-300-06 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Confidential Report PSD-085-06 regarding a property matter be referred to the end of the agenda to be considered during a "closed" session of Council. ' CARRIED Councillor MacArthur chaired this portion of the meeting. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' REQUEST FOR A STORMWATER OUTFALL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN BOWMANVILLE CREEK VALLEYLAND APPLICANT: BOWMANVILLE CREEK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED — SPA 2003-036 TORGAN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Resolution #GPA-301-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Schell THAT Report EGD-034-06 be received; THAT the Municipality of Clarington grant the transfer of an easement for the ' construction and maintenance of stormwater outfall, shown as Parts 27 and 28 of Registered Reference Plan 40R-24250, to Bowmanville Creek Developments Ltd.; THAT the by-law, attached to Report EGD-034-06, granting the easement for the construction and maintenance of a stormwater outfall be passed, at such time as the reference plan has been registered, authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the easement; THAT the Municipality's solicitor be directed to complete the transaction; ' THAT all costs associated with the transfer of the easement be borne by the applicant; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report EGD-034-06 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED - 15 - 315 I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR MAY, 2006. , Resolution #GPA-302-06 , Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Schell THAT Report EGD-035-06 be received for information. ' CARRIED PORT OF NEWCASTLE: AMENDMENTS TO PRINCIPLES OF UNDERSTANDING ' AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT RESPECTING FUNDING OF MILL STREET GRADE SEPARATION RECONSTRUCTION WORKS AND OTHER WORKS , Resolution #GPA-303-06 ' Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report EGD-036-06 be received by Council; , THAT Council approve the First Amending Agreement to the Subdivision Agreement, Attachment 1 to Report EGD-036-06, and pass the by-law contained in Attachment 3, to Report EGD-036-06, to authorize the Mayor and the Municipal Clerk to execute it on behalf of the Municipality; and , THAT Council approve the Principles of Understanding Amending Agreement contained in Attachment 2 to Report EGD-036-06, and pass the by-law contained in Attachment 4 ' to Report EGD-036-06, to authorize the Mayor and the Municipal Clerk to execute it on behalf of the Municipality. CARRIED , SERVICING AGREEMENT FOR BASELINE ROAD WORKS — BOWMANVILLE CREEK DEVELOPMENTS INC. (THE TORGAN GROUP) ' Resolution #GPA-304-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Foster ' THAT Report EGD-037-06 be received; , THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, the Servicing Agreement with Bowmanville Creek ' Developments Inc. (The Torgan Group) for the road and road related works on Baseline Road, required as a condition of site plan approval for the site development on the south side of Baseline Road east of Waverley Road; , - 16 - 316 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 THAT Council approve the by-law, attached to Report EGD-037-06, to confirm its decision to enter into the Servicing Agreement with Bowmanville Creek Developments Inc.; and THAT Bowmanville Creek Developments Inc. be noted of Council's decision and that the Servicing Agreement be forwarded to them for execution once it has been drafted to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services and the Municipality's Solicitor. CARRIED Councillor Trim chaired this portion of the meeting. ' OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT SPECIAL EVENT REQUEST RECYCLING PROGRAM Resolution #GPA-305-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report OPD-008-06 be received; THAT the Municipality request the Region of Durham to offer a Special Event Recycling Program; THAT the Municipality implement a recycling container program in the three downtown ' business areas, pending the successful completion of an agreement with the supplier; THAT any proceeds from a recycling container program be directed to a Pitch In ' Clarington Program; and ' THAT the Region of Durham, all B.I.A.'s, and Durham Agricultural Society be advised of Council's direction. CARRIED ' CEMETERY BY-LAW AMENDMENT & TARIFF RATES Resolution #GPA-306-06 ' Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report OPD-009-06 be received; THAT the Cemetery by-law amendments as outlined in the proposed draft by-law, Attachment No.1 to Report OPD-009-06, be approved; - 17 - 317 1 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 THAT the Tariff of Rates as outlined on Schedule "A", of the draft by-law, attached to t Report OPD-009-06, be approved; THAT St. George's Anglican Church be advised of Council's direction; and THAT the by-law, attached to Report OPD-009-06, be forwarded to the Ministry of ' Consumer and Business Services for approval. CARRIED 1 Councillor Pingle chaired this portion of the meeting EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORT— MAY 2006 ' Resolution #GPA-307-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson ' That Report ESD-008-06 be received for information. , CARRIED Councillor Robinson chaired this portion of the meeting ' COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT , CREATING HEALTHY ENVIRONMENTS FOR YOUTH PROGRAM , Resolution #GPA-308-06 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Schell , THAT Report CSD-011-06 be received for information. ' CARRIED 1 318 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 Councillor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. ' CLERK'S DEPARTMENT PRIVATE PARKING ENFORCEMENT Resolution #GPA-309-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report CLD-017-06 be received; 1 THAT the by-law, attached to Report CLD-017-06, to appoint parking enforcement officers for private property be forwarded to Council for approval; and THAT Chris Tendam, P.R.O. Security & Investigation Agency Inc. be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS APPOINTMENT Resolution #GPA-310-06 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report CLD-018-06 be received; and THAT the by-laws, attached to Report CLD-018-06, appointing Holly Christine Graham ' and Ashley Joanna Massey as Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the Municipality of Clarington be forwarded to Council for approval. CARRIED Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. ' CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' TENDER CL2006.3, SNOW CLEARING Resolution #GPA-311-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Pingle ' THAT Report COD-031-06, be received; - 19 - 319 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 THAT D & F Snow Removal, Bowmanville, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of ' $2,498.00 for Section I, $4,890.00 for Section 2, and $1,421.00 for Section 3, Option 1, including GST, being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and ' specifications of tender CL2006-3, be awarded the contract for Snow Clearing for the term commencing approximately December 1, 2006 and expiring on November 30, 2009; and , THAT the required funds be drawn from the respective year's operating budget for snow clearing. , CARRIED CONFIDENTIAL REPORT REGARDING A LEGAL MATTER ' Resolution #GPA-312-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Pingle ' THAT Confidential Report COD-032-06 regarding a legal matter be referred to the , end of the agenda to be considered during a "closed" session of Council. CARRIED , RFP2006-7, SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF ONE (1) ONLY TANKER Resolution #GPA-313-06 ' Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim , THAT Report COD-033-06 be received; THAT Eastway Emergency Vehicles, Ottawa, Ontario with a total bid amount of ' $167,893.62 (including trade-in value, excluding G.S.T.), being the lowest most responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Request for , Proposal RFP 2006-7, be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of one only Tanker as required by the Municipality of Clarington Emergency and Fire Services Department; and , THAT the required funds in the amount of$167,893.62 be drawn from the 2006 Capital Budget Account#110-28-388-82802-7401; FORTHWITH. ' CARRIED -20 - ' 320 1 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 TENDER CL2006-25, DRIVEWAY PAVING ' Resolution #GPA-314-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report COD-034-06 be received; THAT Melrose Paving Company Ltd., Etobicoke, Ontario, with a total bid amount of $83,680.00 (excluding G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2006-25, be awarded the contract for Driveway Paving; and THAT the funds expended be provided from the 2006 Operations and Engineering Budgets. CARRIED TENDER CL2006-24, SIDEWALK REHABILITATION, VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION, HIGHWAY#2 AND GREEN ROAD Resolution #GPA-315-06 ' Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report COD-035-06 be received; THAT Aloia Bros. Concrete Contractors Ltd., Toronto, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of$256,544.25 (Plus GST), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-24, be awarded the contract for the Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Various locations and Sidewalk Construction, Highway#2 and Green Road as required by the Engineering Department; THAT funds required in the amount of$340,252.91 ($256,544.25 tender plus contingencies, consulting and utility relocations) be drawn from Engineering 2006 Capital Budget Account# 110-32-331-83215-7401 ($200,000.00), 110-32-331-83278- 7401 ($62,709.36) and 110-32-331-83276-7401 ($77,543.55); and THAT the By-law, attached to Report COD-035-06, marked Schedule "A", authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. CARRIED - 321 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 CO-OPERATIVE TENDER T280-2006, THE SUPPLY OF SODIUM CHLORIDE , Resolution #GPA-316-06 ' Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report COD-036-06 be received; ' THAT the Canadian Salt Co., Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, with a total unit price of$58.99 ' per tonne for year one, and $61.34 per tonne for year two, being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of the Co-operative Tender T280-2006, be awarded the contract to supply Bulk Sodium Chloride to the Municipality of , Clarington, as required by the Department of Operations; THAT the contract be entered into for a two year period, and pending satisfactory service, ' pricing and agreement by the Durham Purchasing Co-operative,the contract be extended for a third and fourth year, and , THAT the funds be drawn from the Operations approved Winter Maintenance Accounts for the respective years winter season requirements. , CARRIED TENDER CL2006-13, BALDWIN STREET AND CHURCH STREET ' RECONSTRUCTION, NEWCASTLE Resolution #GPA-317-06 ' Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report COD-037-06 be received; , THAT Hand-Co Construction Ltd, Whitby, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of ' $3,187,783.00 (Plus GST), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-13, be awarded the contract for the Baldwin Street and Church Street Reconstruction, Newcastle, Ontario as required by , the Engineering Department; THAT funds required in the amount of$897,421.80 ($3,187,783.00 tender plus ' contingencies, consulting and less Region of Durham portion) be drawn from Engineering 2006 Capital Budget Accounts# 110-32-83264-7401 ($650,000.00) and 110-32-331-83290-7401 ($247,421.80) and as carried over from 2005 and 2006; ' THAT the tender award be subject to the approval of the Regional Municipality of Durham for their portion of the work; and , -22 . ' 322 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 THAT the By-law, attached to Report COD-037-06 marked Schedule "A", authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. ' CARRIED TENDER CL2006-31, TEMPERANCE STREET AND LOWE STREET RECONSTRUCTION, BOWMANVILLE Resolution #GPA-318-06 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Schell THAT Report COD-038-06 be received; THAT Miwel Construction Ltd., Stouffville, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of 1 $475,422.06 (excluding G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-31, be awarded the contract for the Temperance Street and Lowe Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville, as required by the ' Engineering Department; THAT the total funds required in the amount of $360,000.00 ($475,422.06 tender plus consulting, contingencies, utilities and less Region of Durham portion) be provided from the 2006 Engineer Services capital budget Account# 110-32-330-83295-7401; That the award be subject to the approval of the Region of Durham for their portion of the contract works; and ' THAT the By-law, attached to Report COD-038-06 marked Schedule "A", authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. CARRIED ' TENDER CL2006-33 ASPHALT RESURFACING, VARIOUS STREETS wResolution #GPA-319-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report COD-039-06 be received; ' THAT Hamden & King Construction Inc., Ajax, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $668,049.57 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, ' conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-33, be awarded the contract for the Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Locations, as required by the Engineering Department; ' THAT the total funds required in the amount of$788,700.00 ($668,049.57 tender plus contingencies, consulting and soils) be drawn from Engineering 2006 Account #110-32-331-83212-7401; -23 . 323 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes , June 19, 2006 THAT the remaining funds in the amount of$98,000.00 be re-allocated as an addition to , the second pavement contract to be tendered in the coming months; and THAT the By-law, attached to Report COD-039-06 marked Schedule "A", authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved; FORTHWITH ' CARRIED TENDER CL2006-26, FAREWELL CREEK EROSION PROTECTION, COURTICE , Resolution #GPA-320-06 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor MacArthur ' THAT Report COD-040-06 be received; ' THAT Dynex Construction Ltd., Concord, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $176,618.55 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, , conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-26, be awarded the contract for the Farewell Creek Erosion Protection, Courtice, Ontario as required by the Engineering , Department; THAT funds required in the amount of$125,000.00 be drawn from Engineering 2006 ' Capital Account#110-32-330-83288-7401; THAT additional funds required in the amount of$25,000.00 be provided from the Road ' Contribution Reserve Fund and $66,240.00 from the Development Charges Road and Related; THAT the Region of Durham be invoiced for the additional funds required in the amount , of $8,760.00; and THAT the By-law, attached to Report COD-040-06 marked Schedule "A", authorizing , the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. CARRIED ' TENDER CL2006-32, FOOTBALL FIELD, COMMUNITY PARK, BOWMANVILLE Resolution #GPA-321-06 , Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur , THAT Report COD-041-06 be received; -24 - ' 324 1 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 ' THAT Doi Turf Restoration Ltd, Bond Head, Ontario with a total revised bid in the amount of$612,061.12 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all 1 terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-32, be awarded the contract for the Football Field, Community Park, Bowmanville, Ontario as required by the Engineering Department; THAT funds required in the amount of$675,000.00 be drawn from Engineering 2006 Capital Account#110-32-325-83252-7401; ' THAT additional funds required in the amount of$255,000.00 be provided from the Development Charges for Park Development Reserve Fund in the amount of $229,500.00 and $25,500.00 from the Engineering Parks Capital Reserve Fund; and THAT the By-law attached to Report COD-041-06, marked Schedule "A", authorizing 1 the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. CARRIED ' TENDER CL2006-29, COMRIF STRUCTURES, REPLACEMENT OF THE GEO. A STEPHEN BRIDGE, CEDAR PARK ROAD BRIDGE, AND CONCESSION ROAD 6 CULVERT Resolution #GPA-322-06 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Schell THAT Report COD-042-06 be received; THAT Boyle Excavating Ltd., Bowmanville, Ontario with a total revised bid in the amount of$997,709.60 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2006-29, be awarded the contract for the COMRIF Structures - Replacement of The Geo. A. Stephen Bridge, Cedar Park ' Road Bridge and Concession Road 6 Culvert as required by the Engineering Department; THAT funds required in the amount of$764,000.00 (which includes $267,600.00 from the 2005 Capital Budget, $248,200.00 Federal Contribution and $248,200.00 Provincial Contribution) be drawn from Engineering Capital Account#110-32-330-83275-7401; THAT additional funds required in the amount of$509,000.00 from the Move Ontario Program Fund be transferred to the COMRIF Structures Rehabilitation Project; and ' THAT the By-law attached to Report COD-042-06, marked Schedule "A", authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. ' CARRIED ' -25 - 325. General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes ' June 19, 2006 FINANCE DEPARTMENT , DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BY-LAW AMENDMENT , Resolution #GPA-323-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report FND-009-06 be received; ' THAT based on a review of S10(2) of the Development Charges Act, there is no need to alter or amend the Development Charges Background Study, May 2005, prepared by Hemson Consulting Ltd.; THAT the exemption provided for in the amendment to the By-law, attached to Report , FND-009-06, be effective on July 1, 2006; and THAT the By-law attached to Report FND-009-06, amending the Development Charges , By-law 2005-108, be recommended to Council for enactment. CARRIED LIST OF APPLICATIONS FOR CANCELLATION, REDUCTION, APPORTIONMENTS ' OR REFUND OF TAXES Resolution #GPA-324-06 ' Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Foster ' THAT Report FND-010-06 be received; and ' THAT the list of applications, attached to Report FND-010-06, for cancellation, reduction, apportionments or refund of taxes be approved. , CARRIED CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT , CONFIDENTIAL REPORT ADM-003-06 REGARDING A PERSONNEL MATTER Resolution #GPA-325-06 ' Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor MacArthur , THAT Confidential Report ADM-003-06 regarding a personnel matter be referred to the end of the agenda to be considered during a "closed" session of Council. ' CARRIED -26 . , 326 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 UNFINISHED BUSINESS ' Resolution #GPA-326-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Libby Racansky be thanked for her presentation to Council and that her Petition regarding the Hancock Neighbourhood Plan, Courtice be forwarded to the Municipal Clerk. CARRIED OTHER BUSINESS Councillor Robinson announced the Newcastle Farmer's Market will open this Sunday, ' June 25th, for the season. Mayor Mutton reported that on the Artists in the Gardens event was extremely well ' attended with more than double the attendees over previous years. Councillor MacArthur, along the Commissioner of Jr. 'B' lacrosse, attended the Lacrosse Tournament over the past weekend. He was pleased to note the Commissioner stated that Clarington's Facilities and staff are the best in the league. ' Congratulations to the Director of Community Services and his staff. Councillor Trim invited residents to attend the upcoming celebration of the Newcastle ' Sesquicentennial the weekend of June 29"'— June 2nd. Councillor Foster attended the Courtice Lions Club 9th Carnival which was enjoyed by all. He also announced Friends of the Second Marsh will be hosting a dinner with the Snowbirds on Thursday, June 25"'. ' Resolution #GPA-327-06 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Schell ' THAT the meeting be "closed" to allow for consideration of Report PSD-082-06, Confidential Report PSD-085-06 pertaining to a property matter, Confidential Report ' COD-032-06 pertaining to a legal matter, and Confidential Report ADM-003-06 pertaining to a personnel matter. CARRIED ' The meeting resumed in "open" session at 1:06 p.m. ' -27 . 327 I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 19, 2006 Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. RATIFY ACTIONS ' Resolution #GPA-328-06 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the actions taken at the closed meeting be ratified. CARRIED Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting. , UNFINISHED BUSINESS , Resolution #GPA-329-06 , Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT Report PSD-082-06 be TABLED. , CARRIED ADJOURNMENT , Resolution #GPA-300-06 ' Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT the meeting adjourn at 1:08 p.m. ' CARRIED MAYOR DEPUTY CLERK , -28 . , 328 PUBLIC MEETING REPORT $ PSD-088-06 ' MARIA WULCZYN, FIRST-TECH • CORPORATION OF THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC. MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON AND PERCY NAPPER Leadingrheway NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: MARIA WULCZYN, FIRST-TECH MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC., ' AND PERCY NAPPER A N APPLICATION TO AMEND THE ZONING BY-LAW AND DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and a Draft Plan of Subdivision under Sections 34 and 51 respectively of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS ' The proposed rezoning and draft plan of subdivision application submitted by Maria Wulczyn, First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc., and Percy Napper would permit the development of nine townhouse dwelling units and three single detached dwelling units. The subject property is located at 1613 Highway 2 in Courtice as shown on reverse. Planning File Nos.: ZBA 2001-016, S-C-2001-002, LD 159/2000 and LD.159/2000 ' PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Tuesday,September 5,2006 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2nd Floor,Municipal Adndnistrative Centre, ' 40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee ' Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on ' Monday,September 11, 2006, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, September 6, 2006 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approval of the Zoning By- law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3d Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Richard Holy at (905) 623-3379 extension 332 or by e-mail at rholy®clarington.net. APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendments and Draft Plan of Subdivision to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written ' submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision are approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dated ava Municipality of Clarington this 2eday of July,2006. ' David Crome, M.C.I.P.,R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 ou I DURHAM HIGHWAY 2 i � I LOT 3 � Lo , nor z LOT vad' OK 9 IL WSW. KENNEDY DRIVE �� I LU Z > Li r. RPSIDF.MTIAL Z a I _ _ r T--T_ BF•�'LI I I i L E rip '- LOT 13 PI,fJJ IOM-e39 4 iunvr�,.mera Property Location Map(Courtice) ZBA 2001-016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT S-C-2001-002 Draft.Plan of Subdivision Owner: Marla Wulczyn and First Tech Mechanical Systems Inc. Percy and Marie Napper ' PUBLIC MEETING REPORT # PSD-089-06 CORPORA THE HURRAY VISSER ■1/, ■'inr l■1■. MUNICIPALITY LITY OF OF CLARINGTON t Leaaingtheway NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: MURRAY VISSER t AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment,under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990,as amended. ' APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Murray Visser would rezone the lands at 120 Queen Street to permit a change in use from a single-detached residential dwelling to a professional office.The subject property is located Part Lot 12, Concession 1, Former Town of Bowmanville, Lot 5, Block Plan T, Plan Grant, Bowmanville(as shown on reverse). ' Planning File No.: ZBA 2006-0020 PUBLIC MEETING n to make t The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development The public meeting will be held on: ' DATE: Tuesday,September 5,2006 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2"d Floor,Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario ' ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. ' If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday, September 11, 2006, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, September 6, 2006 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? ' I f you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2r" Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville,Ontario L1C 3A6. ' Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3'd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Glen Ferguson at(905)623-3379 extension 326 or by e-mail at gferguson@clarington.net ' APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to the ' Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved,the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal Dated 4theld li n tthis 26"'day of July,2006. vid 40 Temperance Street Directing Services Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 503 Properly Location Map(Bowmanvllle) ZBA 2006-0020 Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Murray Visser Owner: Kenneth James Lynch v 0 m ' PUBLIC MEETING REPORT # PSD-090-06 FOSTER CREEK DEVELOPMENTS, 1 �� • CORPORATION THE 2083302 ONTARIO LIMITED AND ,Jrnr MUNICIPALITY OF F CLARINGTON ROBERT J. STEPRENSON Leadu,gtheway NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited,and Robert J. Stephenson ' APPLICATIONS TO AMEND ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 AND DRAFT APPROVED PLANS OF SUBDIVISION TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and proposed amendments to Draft Approved Plans of subdivision under Sections 34 and 51 ' respectively,of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and proposed Amended Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision submitted by ' Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited, and Robert J. Stephenson would permit the development of 702 residential units (162 additional units to the 540 units draft approved). The proposed plan comprises 567 single detached houses and 135 townhouses, a public elementary school site,a neighbourhood park site and a storm water ' management pond. It is located in Part Lots 29 & 30, Concession 2, Former Village of Newcastle as shown on the reverse. Planning File Nos.: 18T-89059, S-C-2000-01 AND ZBA 2006-0015 ' PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Tuesday,September 5,2006 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2nd Floor,Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in ' opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday September 11, 2006, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, September 6, 2006 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approval of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Amendment to the Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision,you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department,2nd Floor,40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville,Ontario L1C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the ' Planning Services Department, 3`d Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Bob Russell at(905)623-3379 extension 341 or by e-mail at brussellaclarinpton.net APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of decisions for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Amendment to the Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision, to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Amendment to Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision are approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiskth all part of the ap al. Dated ici I' f Clarington this 27"' day of July,2006 vrd M.C.I.P.,R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street 311/-4 irector of Planning Services Bowmanville,Ontario ' Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 505 1 � C��1�ll�0Il g REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 ' Report#: PSD-088-06 File#: ZBA 2001=016 and By-law#: S-C-2001-002 ' Subject: REZONING AND DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS TO PERMIT MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES APPLICANT: MARIA WULCZYN, FIRST-TECH MECHANICAL ' SYSTEMS INC., AND PERCY NAPPER RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1. THAT Report PSD-088-06 be received; 2. THAT the revised rezoning and draft plan of subdivision applications submitted by Weston Consulting Group Inc. on behalf of Maria Wulczyn, First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc., and Percy Napper be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a further report following the receipt of all outstanding information and agency comments; and, 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. ^ T Submitted by: Reviewed b ' David rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. ranklin Wu, Direct of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer ' RH/CP/DJC/df 25 August 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 601 1 REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGO 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Maria Wulczyn, First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc., and Percy Napper 1.2 Agent: Weston Consulting Group Inc. t 1.3 Rezoning: To rezone the subject lands from "Holding — Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1 Zone" and "Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Zone" to permit the development of a draft plan of subdivision. 1.4 Draft Plan of Subdivision: , To develop a draft plan of subdivision containing 3 single detached dwelling units and a block with 9 townhouse dwelling units. ' 1.5 Site Area: 0.39 hectares (0.98 acres) 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The combined lands subject to these applications are'located in Courtioe at 1613 ' Highway 2 between Sandringham Drive and Trulls Road and at 33 Kennedy Drive (see Attachment 1). The property has frontage both on Highway 2 and ' Kennedy Drive. The applicants land holdings total 0.39 hectares (0.96 acres). The property is located within Part Lot 31, Concession 2, in the former Township of Darlington. ' 3.0 BACKGROUND , 3.1 Two properties are the subject of the applications. Maria Wulczyn and First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc. own the property located at 1613 Highway 2, which , fronts on Highway 2 and Kennedy Drive. A small parcel of land is required from Percy Napper at 33 Kennedy Drive immediately to the south to provide frontage for: 1 eastern-most single detached lot on Kennedy Drive; and, extension of municipal services from Kennedy Drive to the proposed townhouses. ' 2006 Weston Consulting Group Inc., on behalf of Maria Wulczyn, 3.2 On May 19, g p First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc., and Percy Napper submitted a revised draft , plan of subdivision for the subject lands. The application proposes a block for nine townhouse dwelling units fronting on Highway 2 and three single detached units fronting on Kennedy Drive. The townhouses would access Highway 2 ' through a common rear lane while the single detached lots fronting on Kennedy Drive would gain individual access from Kennedy Drive and/or the rear lane. The existing single detached dwelling on the lands is now proposed to be removed ' 602 REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGE 3 from the site (See Attachment 1). The rezoning (ZBA 2001-016) and draft plan of subdivision (S-C-2001-002) applications were initially submitted by Weston Consulting Group Inc. to the Municipality of Clarington on June 25, 2001. ' 3.3 The applicants had submitted two related severance applications in the year 2000. One application (LD 159/2000) would sever the existing single detached dwelling contained on the subject lands from the vacant property. The second application (LD 158/2000) would sever a small parcel of land from Percy Napper's property to provide Kennedy Drive road frontage. After being tabled on a number of occasions, Staff recommended that LD159/2000 be denied because ' the proposed severance did not conform to the Clarington Official Plan policies. Staff recommended that LD158/2000 be tabled for a further year. On September 14, 2004, the decisions of the Durham Region Land Division Committee were ' appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing initially scheduled for February 16, 2005 on this matter has been adjourned indefinitely. 3.4 The severance application LD 159%2000 did not conform with the Clarington Official Plan, hence the applicants filed an application on January 27, 2005 to amend the "Special Policy Area F — King Street Corridor" policies in the Clarington Official Plan to permit low and medium density residential uses as well as facilitating the severance and retention of the existing single detached ' dwelling fronting on Highway No. 2 from the subject lands. A Public Meeting was held for this application on March 7, 2005. 3.5 On February 16, 2006, the applicant appealed the rezoning (ZBA 2001-016) and subdivision (S-C-2001-02) applications to the Ontario Municipal Board. The applicant wishes to schedule a hearing date during the fall in order to receive ' approvals for these applications. As such, Council no longer has the jurisdiction to make a decision on these applications. However, in preparing for the Municipality's position on the revised proposal, it was deemed important to have input from adjacent residents. ' 4.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 4.1 The property owned by Maria Wulczyn and First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc. ' is vacant and contains some low vegetation and young trees around the perimeter. An existing single detached dwelling is located on the east side of the Highway 2 property. ' 4.2 Surrounding Uses: East - Urban residential North - Urban residential West - Courtice Motel and Scoops ice cream shop South - Urban residential r603 I REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGE 4 5.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 5.1 The Provincial Policy Statement identifies settlement areas as the focus of ' growth and promotes residential intensification of vacant and underutilized property. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy ' Statement. 6.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 6.1 The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Regional Official Plan. ' Residential uses are permitted within this designation. The application conforms to the policies. 6.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the property "Special Policy Area F - King ' Street Corridor". Medium and high density residential uses are permitted within this designation. The proposed development conforms to the medium density , housing range both in terms of density and housing mix. While there are three single detached dwellings proposed, the predominant proposed and future housing form is townhouse development. 7.0 ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY , 7.1 The lands at 1613 Highway 2 are currently zoned "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1) Zone", which does not permit the proposed housing mix. In ' order to permit the proposal, a rezoning application was submitted for consideration. 7.2 The portion of land at 33 Kennedy Drive is zoned "Urban Residential Type Two ' (R2) Zone", which recognizes the existing development. In order to permit the ' proposal, the rezoning application also covers this area. 8.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION , 8.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site and two public meeting notice signs were installed on the property's , road frontages. No general inquiries have been received on this development application. ' 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 9.1 A number of relevant agencies were circulated on this revised application for , comment. The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has no objections to ' the application. 604 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGE 5 9.2 The Clarington Emergency Services Department has reviewed the temporary 20 metre turning radius proposed by the applicant. The Emergency Services Department is prepared to accept the proposed configuration only as a temporary situation until Kennedy Drive is extended further to the west in conjunction with redevelopment of adjacent lands. 9.3 The Clarington Engineering Services Department has no objections provided that ' the following issues can be addressed. No access will be permitted to Kennedy Drive from the townhouses. The driveway to 33 Kennedy Drive (Percy Napper's property) modified to ' accommodate the driveway of the eastern-most proposed lot. • A preliminary grading and drainage plan must be submitted to show how stormwater will be conveyed from the proposal. 9.4 The Durham Region Planning and Durham Region Public Works Departments ' have no further objections to the proposal and have as such provided conditions of draft plan approval. Standard conditions that must be fulled by the applicant include preparation of a draft plan of subdivision, conveyance of road widenings ' on Highway 2, preparation of a noise report, extension of full municipal services, and preparation of a Record of Site Condition satisfactory for the Ministry of Environment. ' 9.5 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority has indicated that the applicant must provide site grading and drainage plans, servicing plans, and engineering information to demonstrate how stormwater will be conveyed from the site. 9.6 Due to the limited commenting period, comments from the separate school board have not been received to date. 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 The Highway 2 Corridor in Courtice is an area of transition from the original large ' lot single detached dwelling to an area of more intense uses to take advantage of the Regional Transit Spine. "Highway to Mainstreet: Courtice Highway 2 Corridor and Main Central Area Study" was completed in June 2001 to provide assistance ' with the transition of the area in facilitating redevelopment or infill development. The study recommended that the subject lands be designated for medium and/or high density residential uses. The proposed Secondary Plan presented in 2002 would permit low density housing fronting on Kennedy Drive as a buffer between existing low density areas and new medium or high density residential areas fronting on Highway 2. ' 10.2 On June 17, 2002, Staff forwarded a report for Committee and Council's consideration with a proposed secondary plan for the study area. A number of ' delegations requested that various policies in the plan be changed. On that ' 605 REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGE; 6 basis, Council tabled the report and directed Staff to meet with these landowners , to resolve the issues. Since Staff have not been able to revisit this study to date, , these matters remain outstanding. 10.3 During several discussions with the applicant's agent, Staff have reiterated that ' while the intensification portion of the proposal was acceptable, the proposed severance and retention of the existing single detached dwelling fronting on Highway 2 could not be supported. The proposal contains a private rear lane , that could be extended eastwards to facilitate intensification of properties located at 1615 and 1617 Highway 2. Staff have always been concerned that severing the existing dwelling would preclude an extension of this lane to the east. While , previous plans had always proposed this severance, the revised application is a significant departure from previous submissions. Staff have indicated that the revised application is now consistent with the intent of the Clarington Official Plan , and that Staff, in principle, support the proposal, provided that all technical agency issues are resolved. 10.4 The proposal shows a temporary turning circle on site to serve the proposed townhouse block, which would allow for emergency service vehicle turning movement and snow storage. Should development be extended further ' eastward, the turning circle would be replaced by two or three additional townhouse dwelling units in conjunction with adjacent development. 10.5 Since the applicant has now appealed the rezoning and draft plan of subdivision applications to the Ontario Municipal Board, Council no longer has the authority to make a decision on these applications. Once all of the final comments and ' information has been received for these applications, Staff will prepare a report for Council's approval providing direction to Staff to outline Council's position at any future Ontario Municipal Board proceedings. ' 11.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ' 11.1 As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for Public Meeting under the Planning Act, and taking into consideration all of the comments ' received, it is respectfully recommended that this report be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report. , Attachments: ' Attachment 1 - Key Map and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 606 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-088-06 PAGE 7 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's position: ' Peter Weston, Weston Consulting Inc. Gerard Borean, Parente, Borean LLP Tom Robinson ' Gordon Lund Maria Wulczyn and First-Tech Mechanical Systems Inc. Percy Napper ' Bill Clark Ontario Municipal Board it ' 607 E m D ai m vs Property Location Map(CourtNNce) DURHAM HIGHWAY 2 - - - - j xxi. urt -e a un a un a urw wx a x na D ON M UM OVM 0 ESn/l""I OURNAN NICNN' a 1 « I I Lo i nor z wr a LF L - - �- - - 1 - -I - CK 9 k> �' '" I'I - - - inb'ro ZBA 2001-016 II _-'� w�W ��nim.A �nimsima+m� ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT _____ W' � -� Lands owned by — Lands owned by First Tech S-C-2001-002 _ Percy and Marie Napper Mechanical Systems and Draft Plan of Subdivision ` Marla Wulczyn KENNEDY DRIVE \ W � , I Owner: Maria Wulczyn and First Tech :•:. ;-i_su:i't,i'mmu. \ I Z I Mechanical Systems Inc. III I o I I Percy and Marie Napper E m D ai m vs Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES ' PUBLIC MEETING ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 ' Report#: PSD-089-06 File#: 18T-89059, S-C-2000/001 By-law#: &ZBA 2006-0015 Subject: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISIONS AND RELATED REZONING ' APPLICANT: FOSTER CREEK DEVELOPMENTS, 2083302 ONTARIO LIMITED, AND ROBERT J. STEPHENSON ' RECOMMENDATIONS: ' It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1 THAT Report PSD-089-06 be received; 2. THAT the proposed Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivisions 18T-89059 and S-C- ' 2000/001 and Zoning By-law Amendment, submitted by Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited, and Robert J. Stephenson to permit the development of 676 residential units (136 additional units to the 540 units draft approved) be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report; and 3. THAT the applicants, Region of Durham, all interested parties listed in Report PSD-089-06 and any ' delegations be advised of Council's decision. ' ..l Submitted by: Reviewed by: v � D id Jtqome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Directo&6f Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer ' BR/CP/DJCfjd/df August 25, 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 609 I REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS ' 1.1 Applicants: Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited, and Robert J. Stephenson , 1.2 Proposed Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision: The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision includes - 113 Medium Density Units ' (2 blocks totalling 85 units and 28 On-Street townhouse units), 563 ' Detached Dwellings (216 10 m+frontages, 206 12 m+frontages and 141 15 m+frontages), a 2.43 hectare Public Elementary School Site, a 2.21 hectare Neighbourhood Park Site, a 1.26 hectare Storm Water Management Pond, ' and 5.06 hectares of Open Space. 1.3 Rezoning: Appropriate to Permit the Proposed Amended Plan of Subdivision , 1.4 Plan Area: 49.99 hectares 1.5 Location: The subject lands generally are located west of Foster Creek, south of the ' St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway, east of the alignment of Rudell Road and north of Given Road ' 2.0 BACKGROUND ' 2.1 On May 2, 2006, the Planning Services Department received from Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited, and Robert J. Stephenson, the subject ' applications to amend the Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision and the implementing Zoning By-law. 2.2 The subject applications deal with two draft approved plans of subdivision. The larger plan ' — 18T-89059 was draft approved for 501 units on March 24, 2004. It surrounds the smaller plan — S-C-2000-001 which was draft approved for 39 units on March 26, 2004. , The proposed Amended Draft Approved Plan for 18T-89059 incorporates the area of Draft Approved Plan S-C-2000-001. 2.3 The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision that was submitted May 2, 2006 and which was ' the subject of the public notice proposed a total of 702 units. Following discussions with staff, the proposal was modified to be in the current form, that is, as described in this , report. The major changes were: a reduction of low density (single detached) dwelling units from 567 to 563, a reduction from medium density (townhousing) dwelling units from 135 to 113, for an overall dwelling units reduction of 702 from 676, limited road ' realignment, elimination of the walkway east of the park and the increase in the north frontage of the park from 10 metres to 16 metres. 1 610 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 3 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The subject lands are mostly agricultural with some of the land being vacant. One ' dwelling is located on the subject lands. 3.2 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway and Highway 35/115 and beyond, rural, mostly agricultural lands ' South: a nursing home, existing single detached dwellings, Given Road and King Avenue West ' East: Foster Creek and existing single detached dwellings on North Street and Remi Court ' West: Rudell Road (opened and unopened alignment) and beyond, two dwellings and agricultural lands ' 4.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 4.1 Planning authorities are required to provide for a range of housing dens"dies and types, a ' 10 year supply of lands designated, and a 3 year supply of zoned and serviced lands that are in draft approved/registered subdivision plans. The increased unit count should help maintain the 3 year supply. The Provincial Policy Statement also requires the preservation ' of significant natural heritage features. ' 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan tThe lands are designated Living Area and Major Open Space. The Living Area designation permits the development of communities with defined boundaries, ' incorporating the widest possible variety of housing sizes, types and tenure. The Major Open Space designation incorporates the Foster Creek valleylands. The applications conform. ' 5.2 Clarington Official Plan The lands are designated Urban Residential Area and Environmental Protection Area in the Newcastle Village Urban Area. The lands are within the Foster Neighbourhood which in its eastern portion has an approved Neighbourhood Design Plan in accordance with ' Council-adopted policies. The application does not conform with the approved Neighbourhood Design Plan. r 611 REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 4 ' Medium density residential symbols are at the northeast comer of the King Avenue ' West/Rudell Road intersection and northwest of where Foster Creek intersects with King Avenue West. The lands also contain a public elementary school and a neighbourhood park symbol. Collector roads run east-west from existing Grady Drive, just east of Foster ' Creek to beyond Rudell Road; and north-south from the King Avenue West/Massey Drive intersection to the previously described collector road. Rudell Road itself from King Avenue West to the previously described east-west collector road is also a collector road. ' The increased density proposed by the amended subdivision plan and related rezoning conform to the housing targets for the Foster Neighbourhood as identified in the Clarington ' Official Plan. 6.0 FOSTER NORTH NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN PLAN , 6.1 The subject lands are within the Foster North Neighbourhood Design Plan and although the proposal generally conforms, small amendments will have to be made to the Plan in ' terms of unit numbers as well as street and lotting pattern. 7.0 ZONING BY-LAW COMPLIANCE 7.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-03, the lands are zoned to implement the two ' previously approved draft plans of subdivision. Revisions as envisioned in the proposed amended subdivision plan, which integrates the two draft approved subdivision plans, necessitates some revisions to the zoning for the subject lands, hence, the rezoning , application. 8.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS ' 8.1 Public Notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject lands. , Public Notice/Meeting Signs were installed at three locations: at the western terminus of Grady Lane, on the property s Given Road frontage immediately west of Fosterbrooke Long-Term Care Facility, and on the property s Rudell Road frontage a short distance , north of the intersection with Given Road. 8.2 Two neighbouring residents have expressed interest in the applications. Regarding the ' proposed amending plan, the two neighbours noted concern with the Block 580 fronting on Given Road. It was explained the block is proposed to be given to Fosterbrooke Long- Term Care Facility as additional parking area in exchange for the Facility's northerly lands ' permitting the completion of five partial lots fronting on Street G. The neighbours noted they did not want a new entrance serving Block 580 on Given Road. It was explained by ' staff that all entrance arrangements would be approved by municipal staff after all safety and functional concerns had been resolved. The neighbours were in favour of the proposed 15 metre lot frontages and increased lot depths abutting properties on Given ' Road. They requested that the Draft Approval Condition regarding fencing between the Given Road homes and these lots be kept, which staff agreed to. 612 REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGES ' 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS ' 9.1 The applications were circulated to various agencies and other departments by Planning Services. Comments received to date are as follows. ' 9.2 Veridian Connections noted electrical service is available on King Avenue West and extensions of the Corporation's plant to the subject lands is to be underground. Existing corporation plant on Rudell and Given Roads may have to be relocated/replaced at the ' Applicant's cost, and the Applicant must obtain the Corporation's speck approval for the electrical service arrangements which includes the signing of a construction agreement. Veridian Connections had no object to the proposed development subject to conditions. 9.3 Emergency & Fire Services noted turning access is to be provided for streets greater than 90 metres. ' 9.4 Engineering provided the following concerns: ' . Street B ' The intersection of Highway No. 2 and Street B must be reconstructed including the installation of traffic signals prior to the issuance of any building permits within that phase of the proposed development (under the existing phasing plan) that ' requires access from Highway 2 and Street 'B'. • Grady Drive ' The future phase which requires the construction of the Grady Drive Bridge cannot proceed until the Municipality has approved the expenditure of funds for the ' construction of the bridge. • Rudell Road ' A portion of Rudell Road is unopened road allowance. The portion located south of Street A is designated as a collector street in the Official Plan. The applicant will ' be responsible for 50% of the cost of Rudell Road infrastructure to a municipal local standard for the length which provides frontage to the lots on Rudell Road. The phase of the development which requires access from Rudell Road (Phase 1 ' under the current plan) cannot proceed until the Municipality has approved the expenditure of funds for the construction of Rudell Road. ' • Given Road Given Road is located in close proximity to the subject lands. It appears from the ' proposed draft plan that the ultimate development scenario may see portions of Given Road legally closed in the future and conveyed into private ownership. It will be necessary to resolve numerous issues pertaining to Given Road in conjunction with any approval for development in the subject neighbourhood. 613 REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 6 ' !, j All portions of Given Road designated for legal closure under the ultimate ' development scenario must be identified. The applicant must co-ordinate any road closures that are deemed necessary to facilitate development within the subject ' neighbourhood. Any proposed road closures must be approved by the Council of the Municipality of Cladngton. The applicant will be responsible for 100% of all costs, financial and otherwise, needed to meet this requirement. ' The subject development will necessitate the physical closure of Given Road at Street B during the .phase that requires the construction of Street 'B' and its , intersection with Highway 2. The developer will be responsible for 100% of the cost of any works or facilities deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services to construct a new dead end of Given Road immediately to the east of the ' intersection. These works may include land acquisition, road construction, turning circles, urbanization, storm sewers, drainage work,barricades etc. Any portions of Given Road that are designated to remain open as a travelled road may require ' upgrades or improvements. Local Streets , All continuous local streets must have a road allowance width of 20.0 metres. Local streets with a road allowance width of 18.0 metres will only be permitted in ' the following locations: Streets E, F, H, 1, 0, P and R. • Street/Lot Geometrics , All lots located on street eyebrows must have a minimum frontage of 15.0 metres. Streets cannot be aligned in a manner that creates •acute angled turning , movements. Changes to the draft plan are required on Streets N, 0 and P. • Block 584 ' No development of Block 584 or other adjacent land will be permitted until such , time as the applicant has acquired all of the lands necessary for the entire medium density development. No partial development will be permitted. All development of Block 584 and any associated lands not included within this draft plan must be ' developed with private internal road accesses. • Health Care Centre ' The intended purpose of Blocks 569-573 and 586-587 located in proximity to the existing health care centre must be clarified. The applicant must demonstrate that ' perpetual maintenance of these blocks will be possible prior to development. 614 t t ' REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 7 ' . Other Previous conditions of draft approval pertaining to roads and traffic, parking, phasing, grading and drainage, storm water management, railway, Highway 35/115, park and benchmark are still applicable. Development Charge By-Law This development cannot proceed until such time that the Municipality has ' approved the expenditure of funds for the provision of the construction of any works that have been included in the Municipality's Development Charge By-Law and that are deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services to service ■ this development. ■ 9.5 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board requests the school site remain as a 6 acre lot and that it is understood the adjacent lot is for a 5 acre park. 9.6 The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority provided conditions of draft approval as ' follows: That prior to final approval and to any site grading taking place, the Owner must prepare a detailed Storm Water Management Report in accordance with the Foster Creek ' Subwatershed Planning Study and the 2003 MOE Storm Water Management Planning and Design Manual, to the satisfaction of the Authority; the Owner must in a report detail the means whereby erosion and siltation will be minimized and contained on site both ' during and after the construction period, to the satisfaction of the Authority; the Owner must prepare an Environmental Impact Study to assess potential hydrological and biological impacts of the west pond draining to a tributary of Wilmot Creek and develop ' mitigative measures, monitoring requirements and potentially, compensatory works, to the satisfaction of the Authority; the Owner must agree in the subdivision agreement to implement the recommendations and measures contained within the above reports and ' study; the Owner agrees in the subdivision agreement to maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in good repair during construction, in a manner satisfactory to the Authority; and the Owner obtain all necessary Authority permits. ' 9.7 The Separate School Board noted they operate St. Francis of Assisi Elementary School on Rudell Road South and that many of the subdivision's future residents will utilize the ' school and therefore, the Board required accessible sidewalks with curb cuts be constructed on at least one side of each new street, and creation of open space Ianeways to shorten student walking distances would be a positive measure. ' 9.8 Comments remain outstanding from: Regional Planning and Works Departments, and St. Lawrence & Hudson Rail 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 An earlier version of the proposal showed 702 residential units of which 135 units were medium density (townhousing). Staff had concerns with these numbers and their ' implications once the same densities were applied across the neighbourhood. As a 615 REPORT NO.: PSD-089-06 PAGE 8 ' response to these concerns, the number of medium density units was reduced from 135 to ' 113, and the number of low density (single detached) units was reduced from 567 to 563. The reduction is sufficient to stay within the policy limits of the Ciarington Official Plan. The Official Plan allows for some flexibility in the interpretation of numerical standards. ' Staff has used the density yielded by the revised proposal on all remaining vacant lands within the neighbourhood and are satisfied that housing population targets for the neighbourhood will not be exceeded by more than 10%. In consideration of the direction ' of the Provincial Growth Plan, the additional density is supported. 10.2 Given that the Ruddell Road/Grady Drive will function as a "downtown by-pass" for ' residents who will in the future live in the North Village Neighbourhood (north of the railway), there are concerns that appropriate traffic calming measure be instituted in the design of the roads. An internal traffic report will be required to address this and other related issues as a condition of subdivision approval. 10.3 In consideration of the reduced right-of-way standards, staff believe it is important to ' ensure that the public realm is developed to the highest standard. Staff will be reviewing with the applicant upgraded streetscaping, neighbourhood theming and advanced development of trails. , 10.4 A primary heritage resource building at 170 Given Road, is within the proposed development. The draft plans (draft approved and proposed amended) do not address , this issue. Staff will be reviewing further the applicants plans for the house and would prefer that the house be retained and incorporated into the plan of subdivision's design and development. , 11.0 CONCLUSIONS ' 11.1 The purpose of this report is to provide information for the public meeting required under the Planning Act. Staff respectfully request that this report be referred back to staff for ' further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Location Key Map and Subdivision Plan ' List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Hannu Halminen, Foster Creek Development Ltd. ' Mike Dome Kevin Tunney, Tunney Planning Inc. David and Pearl Rickard ' 616 ' ■��e�i� ' llilr<�dn i71�� RUM . W i_... , - IA►� �I mad ` aaoo�a0000oe a cilia ac000000 �� �aoo e0000 . ao accooccoocoo acococo �. 0 0o ao aooao acc000ccc000a� � �; � o �� ° ° o0000000000Q Ka OGGG�D � 00 ooGAOOOGGGGOGGo ^ KN �aGSON �1 o a000000000000000000 00000c0000��,i�� �a000000000a o a00000000000�� ac000000000��► �;: a0000ccoco v e00000000ca o �o 00 0© a �uu��nf����= �ac000000coo�o �aoo00a000011 ca acocccccooao a000a cilia a00000000co�o accccc00000v %aoc0000000000 �000c000�QO a000000000000o a 000000000000000000 �I11f IIIIi=111 11 111 11111 �11111�11�� 1 Qgygma LeadiW REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ' Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: PSD-090-06 File #: ZBA 2006-0020 By-law#: 1 Subject: REZONING TO PERMIT A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING APPLICANT: MURRAY VISSER ' RECOMMENDATIONS: ' It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1. THAT Report PSD-090-06 be received; ' 2. THAT provided that no significant issues are raised at the public meeting, the application to amend the Zoning By-law submitted by Murray Visser be APPROVED and that the attached Zoning By-law Amendment be adopted by Council; and, ' 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: 4De, Reviewed by: ' C.I.P., R.P.P: Fra nklin Wu, Services Chief Administrative Officer ' GF/COS/DJC/df 22 August 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 618 REPORT NO.: PSD-090-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS ' 1.1 Owner: Kenneth James Lynch 1.2 Applicant: Murray Visser ' 1.3 Rezoning: from "Urban Residential Exception (R1-12) Zone"to an appropriate zone. ' to permit a professional office on the property 1.4 Location: 120 Queen Street, Bowmanville, ' Part Lot 12, Concession 1, Former Township of Darlington 2.0 BACKGROUND , 2.1 On June 27, 2006, the Planning Services Department received a rezoning application to ' allow for a professional office as a permitted use within the existing building on the site. The Applicant plans to maintain the current architectural character of the building and there are no alterations proposed to the exterior of the building. 2.2 The Applicant has also submitted a site plan approval application (SPA 2006-0017) and , appropriate detailed plan drawings demonstrating how the professional office as a use ' will be accommodated on the property. 3.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS ' 3.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject property and a public notice sign was installed by the Applicant on the Queen Street ' frontage. 3.2 As of the writing of this report, Staff has not received any objections to the proposal. ' One letter of support was received from Irwin Hamilton who stated that this rezoning application to permit a professional office would have a positive effect on the area. 4.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING AREAS t" 4.1 Located on the north side of Queen Street, the lands are occupied by a two storey ' 220m2 building (see Figure 1.0 on following page). The building is currently used as a single-detached residential dwelling with a detached two-car garage in the rear of the ' property. The site is relatively level with several large beech trees located in the front side and rear of the property. 4.2 Surrounding Uses: ' North: Downtown Commercial East: Commercial (Funeral Home) , South: Single-Detached Residential, Rotary Park and Bowmanville Senior Public School West: Single-Detached Residential, Church and Commercial ' 619 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-090-06 PAGE 3 I i � VIII i i Figure 1.0— Existing building at 120 Queen Street in Bowmanville ' 5.0 PLACES TO GROW ' 5.1 The recently introduced Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe promotes the building of compact, vibrant and complete communities. One of the features of a ' complete community according to the Plan is a good mix of land uses, as well as a good mix of job types. The rezoning of this site to permit a professional office is consistent with the policies found within the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe approved on June 16, 2006. ' 6.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 6.1 The Provincial Policy Statement identifies settlement and downtown areas as the focus ' of growth and their vitality and regeneration should be promoted. Rezoning of this site to allow for a professional office as a permitted use is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. 7.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY ' 7.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the subject property "Main Central Area." This designation is to provide an array of community, office, service and shopping, ' recreational and residential uses. This proposal for a professional office on this property conforms to the Regional Official Plan. 620 REPORT NO.: PSD-090-06 PAGE 4 , 7.2 The subject property is also designated as a "Mixed Use Area" in the Bowmanville East Main Central Area Secondary Plan. While the "Mixed Use Area" currently contains , predominately residential buildings, it is the intention of the Bowmanville East Main ' Central Area Plan to allow for the conversion or redevelopment of existing structures to enhance the character of the area. It should be noted that the Applicant intends to retain the existing fagade of the building and is proposing no additions to the existing ' structure, both of which are encouraged by these policies. This proposal for a professional office conforms to the Bowmanville East Main Central ' Secondary Plan, including recent changes made to the Clarington Official Plan as part of the recent Commercial Policy Review and associated Secondary Plans Amendments. t 8.0 ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY 8.1 The property is currently zoned "Urban Residential Exception (R1-12)" which does not ' allow for a professional office as a permitted use. As a result, the Applicant has submitted this rezoning application for consideration. ' 9.0 AGENCY COMMENTS ' 9.1 The rezoning and site plan applications were circulated to a number of agencies for comment. Clarington Emergency Services, Central Lake Ontario Conservation and the ' Durham Region Planning Department had no objections to the application. At the time of writing this Report, no comments or concerns have been received from. the Accessibility Committee, LACAC, or the Clarington Operations Department. ' 9.2 The Clarington Engineering Services Department are concerned that the topography of the subject lands and the adjacent boulevard area will not allow for the construction of a ' proper commercial entrance and driveway. They have, however, agreed that the unique character of the property means that the Applicant should be granted some relief from this requirement. ' 9.3 The Building Division will require a "Change of Use" permit or a "Building" permit to convert the existing single family dwelling to a professional office. This may also involve ' the Applicant having to pay Municipal, Regional and the two school board development charges prior to the issuance of the building permit. This determination is made by the Building Division on receipt of the building permit application and required ' accompanying detailed plan drawings. 9.4 Durham Region Works Department commented that Regional Development Charges ' will be applicable to the subject development for any proposed additions to the existing structure and due prior to issuance of a building permit by the local municipality. In addition, should the Applicant require additional or larger municipal water and sewer ' services, a detailed site-servicing drawing must be submitted to the Region for review and approval. 621 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-090-06 PAGE 5 9.5 Veridian Corporation has commented that existing services to the building may be inadequate. Details regarding a service upgrade for the building can be obtained by contacting Veridian's offices. 10.0 STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 Parking and Access ' (i) The Zoning By-Law requires that all professional office uses provide one parking space per 30 square metres of gross floor area of the building not including the basement. This will require the Applicant to provide eight parking spaces. The ' Applicant has proposed that seven parking spaces be provided. Given that on- street parking is located to the west on Temperance Street and to the east on Division Street staff have no objection to the reduction of one parking space. (ii) The new professional office use would require under the Zoning By-Law that a minimum width of 6.Om for two-way traffic or 4.5m for one-way traffic be provided for parking aisles. The existing driveway on the site does not meet either of these requirements. Staff has noted that a large Beech tree, existing retaining wall and sidewalk, as well as the location of the existing building foundation on the site is likely to result in the Applicant requiring some form of relief from these Zoning By-Law provisions (See Figure 2). The Bowmanville East Main Central Area Secondary Plan emphasizes the importance of providing redevelopment ' opportunities, while at the same time preserving local heritage character. Given the restricted use and the limited traffic anticipated, staff have no objection to the reduced lane width. Appropriate signage would be required through site plan approval. 622 I REPORT NO.: PSD-090-06 PAGE 6 ' (iii) The professional office use requires that one loading space be provided. Given ' the nature of the business, staff have no objection to this change. (iv) The Applicant also requested relief from the requirement to provide a ' handicapped parking space. Staff do not concur. 10.2 Traffic Impact ' The proposed use as a professional office with approximately eight employees does not create any significant increases in traffic counts or•concerns with other adverse traffic ' impacts along Queen Street in Bowmanville. t 11.0 CONCLUSION 11.1 The application for rezoning meets Official Plan policies. The proposed use is , encouraged and there are no foreseen parking or traffic problems. It is important that the existing character of the property, namely, the structure itself and large beech trees, ' be protected and maintained in this expansion of a local downtown business. 11.2 Based on the comments in this report and provided that no significant issues are raised ' at the public meeting, it is respectfully recommended to Council that the rezoning application submitted by Murray Visser on behalf of Kenneth James Lynch be APPROVED and that the attached Zoning By-law Amendment be adopted by Council. ' Attachments: ' Attachment 1 — Key Map Attachment 2—Zoning By-Law List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Kenneth James Lynch ' Murray Visser Irwin A. Hamilton 623 1 Hnacnmen[ 1 To Report PSD-090-06 1 - c a " ybb O C E 1 a co r� o C C N 1 ` : N e m ` a 1 � s a g� 1 1 � 1 CV ` • 1 li a� e CO �2 1 J`` a 1 1 624 Attachnne To Report PSD-09(D THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' BY-LAW NO. 2008-�_ being a by-law to amend By-law 8463,the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the ' Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington , WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable ' to amend By-law 8463, as amended, of the former Town of Newcastle in accordance with applications ZBA 2006-0020 to perk a professional office as a permitted use; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the ' Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: ' 1. By adding a new Section 16.5.51 respecting lands zoned C1-51,as follows: "16.5.51 GENERAL COMMERCIAL EXCEPTION(C1-51)ZONE , Notwithstanding Section 16.1(b), Section 3.13, Section 3.16(a), Section 3.16(a)(iii) and Section 3.16(b)(i), those lands zoned C1-51 on Schedule"A" of this By-Law shall only ' be used for one professional office and shall be subject to the following zone regulations: a) Gross Floor Area (maximum) 220 sq. metres ' b) Parking Spaces(minimum) 7 spaces c) Loading Spaces(minimum) � Nil d) Minimum Parking Aisle Width of 3.68 metres for a maximum ' length of 36.5 metres north of the Queen Street road allowance." 2. Schedule "3"to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the ' zone designation from: "Urban Residential Exception (R1-12) Zone", to "General Commercial Exception (C1-51) Zone" as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 3. Attachment"A"attached hereto shall for part of this By-law. ' 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the ' provisions of Section 34 of the Planning AcL BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2006 ' BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2006 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2006 ' 1 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L.Barrie, Municipal Clerk 625 1 1 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2006- , passed this day of , 2006 A.D. i 1 ® Zoning Change From 1 "R1-12"To"C1-51" 1 1 1 s� 1 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L Barrie, Municipal Cis* Iv , G� C 'R 1 H° It ROWY S} PARK 1 Ip sFy� 1 AR F t� Bowmanville 626 � Clarinj�V/W� /n ' Leading the Way t/ REPORT ' PLANNING SERVICES ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ' Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 ' Report#: PSD-091-06 File#: PLN 33.4 By-law#: ' Subject: AMENDMENT TO LEGAL AGREEMENT REGARDING THE PORT HOPE PROJECT ' RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-091-06 be received; 2. THAT the Agreement to amend the Agreement between the Corporation of the f Municipality of Port Hope, the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, and her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources be APPROVED; 3. THAT the By-law attached to this Report authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to sign the Agreement to amend the Legal Agreement for the Port Hope Area Initiative, be ADOPTED; and ' 4. THAT a copy of this report, Council's decision, and the signed By-law be forwarded to Natural Resources Canada and the Municipality of Port Hope. ' Submitted by: Reviewed byc� Davi . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer JAS/FUDJC/df ' 27 July 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 627 I REPORT NO.: PSD-091-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF REPORT , 1.1 The Legal Agreement that forms the basis of the Port Hope Area Initiative, which came into effect on March 29, 2001, was signed by the Municipality of Clarington, the Town of ' Port Hope, and the Township of Hope. The Agreement was based on the construction of long term storage facilities in each of the municipalities for the low level radioactive waste located within their respective boundaries. A preferred option for the long term storage of ' a municipality's waste that involves moving the waste to either of the other two municipalities requires an amendment to the Agreement. 1.2 On January 1, 2001, the Township of Hope and the Town of Port Hope amalgamated and ' became the Municipality of Port Hope. 1.3 As a result of the environmental assessment undertaken for the former Hope Township ' and former Town of Port Hope facilities (collectively identified as the Port Hope Project), the Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Office recommended to Port Hope ' Council that the wastes from the two municipalities be consolidated at one long term storage facility to be located at the existing Welcome site in the former Hope Township. In April 2005, Port Hope Council agreed to the submission of this option for federal , review. Clarington Council also provided its consent to the submission of the consolidated option in March 2005. 1.4 The original Legal Agreement must be amended in order for the Port Hope Project to ' proceed with one storage facility for the wastes from the two former municipalities. Port Hope Council approved the amendment (Amendment No. 2) to the Legal Agreement on , July 18, 2006. Amendment No. 1, which dealt with the administration of the Host Community Fee for the former Hope Township, was approved in late 2003. 1.5 The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Legal Agreement for the Port Hope Area Initiative. 2.0 OVERVIEW OF AMENDMENT 2.1 The effect of Amendment No. 2 is to replace all references in the Legal Agreement to ' separate long term storage facilities in Hope Township and the Town of Port Hope with one facility known as the "New Port Hope Waste Management Facility". Parts A and B of ' Schedule 1 are also being replaced with new Parts A and B, which has the effect of deleting the reference to the proposed facility in the former Hope Township, and inserting a description of the new conceptual design for the Port Hope Project. This concept , involves the construction of a single waste containment mound for all of the wastes from the new Municipality of Port Hope at the existing Welcome Waste Management Facility. 2.2 The description of the Clarington (Port Granby) Project is also included in Part B of , Schedule 1. However, the description of the Port Granby Project remains unchanged ' from that found in the original amendment, with one minor exception. Under the subtitle "Administrative Costs", the date from which Canada agrees to reimburse Clarington for reasonable future administrative and legal expenses has been changed from "the date of , 628 ' REPORT NO.: PSD-091-06 PAGE 3 the signing of the Project" to "March 29, 2001, the date Canada signed the Agreement" The effect of this change is only to clarify the effective date of federal reimbursement of costs. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ' 3.1 The amending agreement will also be signed by Natural Resources Canada. Once the Legal Agreement has been amended, the Port Hope Project can continue through with ' the federal review and subsequent licensing by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. ' 3.2 It is important to note that, although the description of the Port Granby Project in the Legal Agreement does not reflect the Preferred Option approved by Council in June 2006, the Legal Agreement does not need to be amended to allow the Port Granby ' Project to continue through to federal review and licensing by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. The Municipality's solicitor has advised that the Legal Agreement "commits the parties to the Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Review ' processes rather than to the Base Case as a specific project. . . ". In this regard, the in- situ management option described in the Legal Agreement is. intended to form the starting point for the federal EA process. ' Attachments: Attachment 1 - By-law Authorizing Signing of Amending Agreement List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: ' Ms. Sharon Baillie-Mato Mr. Glenn Case ' Mr. Carl Cannon Mr. Sanford Haskill 1 629 Attachme To Report PSD-091 i CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' BY-LAW NO.2006- being a by-law to enter into an amending agreement between the Corporation of the , Municipality of Clarington (Clarington), the Corporation of the Municipality of Port Hope .(Polt Hope), and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the ' Minister of Natural Resources(Canada). WHEREAS the Agreement for the cleanup and long-term safe management of low-level ' radioactive waste between Clarington, Port Hope, and Canada (Legal Agreement) must be amended in order for the Port Hope Project to proceed; , AND WHEREAS Port Hope Council approved the necessary amendment, being Amendment No. 2,to the Legal Agreement, on July 18'h,2006; ' AND WHEREAS the terms of Amendment No. 2 to the Legal Agreement are attached hereto ' as Appendix"A"; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the ' Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. THAT the Agreement to amend the Legal Agreement between Clarington, Port Hope, ' and Canada, being Amendment No. 2 and attached hereto as Appendix"A", is hereby approved; and 2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be hereby authorized and directed to sign the said ' amending Agreement and any related documentation to carry out the purpose of this by-law. ' BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2006 , BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2006 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2006 John Mutton, Mayor , Patti L.Barrie, Municipal Clerk 630 ' June 27, 2006 DRAFT AMENDMENT#2 TO ' AN AGREEMENT FOR THE CLEANUP AND THE LONG-TERM SAFE MANAGEMENT OF ' LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF PORT HOPE, THE TOWNSHIP OF HOPE and THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON AMONG ' THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF PORT HOPE, A Municipal corporation pursuant to the Ontario Municipal Act ' (hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality of Port Hope") OF THE FIRST PART THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON, A Municipal corporation pursuant to the Ontario Municipal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality of Clarington") OF THE SECOND PART AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources (hereinafter referred to as "Canada") ' OF THE THIRD PART WHEREAS the Municipality of Port Hope, the Municipality of Clarington, and the former Corporation of the Township of Hope entered into An Agreement for the Cleanup and the Long-Term Safe Management of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Situate in the Town of Port Hope, the Township of Hope, and the Municipality of ' Clarington on March 29, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the "Original Agreement"); ' AND WHEREAS, as a result of municipal restructuring in the Province of Ontario, effective January 1, 2001, the Corporation of the Township of Hope and the Corporation of the Town of Port Hope became the Municipality of Port Hope; AND WHEREAS the parties amended the Original Agreement on October 7, 2003; 631 AND WHEREAS in the context of an environmental assessment of the long-term ' management of low-level radioactive wastes in the Municipality of Port Hope, an assessment of alternative means of carrying out the project has resulted in the recommendation that wastes in the former Township of Hope and Town of Port Hope be consolidated at one site within the Municipality of Port Hope, , AND WHEREAS the Municipality of Port Hope, by resolution NO. 91/2005, ' provided written consent, as set out in Section 4.1.3 of the agreement, for the recommended consolidation option to be submitted for federal review, AND WHEREAS the consolidation requires amendment to the Original ' Agreement as set out in Section 4.1.4 of the agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, ' the Municipality of Port Hope, the Municipality of Clarington, and Canada agree to amend the Original Agreement as follows: ' 1. Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is amended as follows: In the definitions of"Element", "Facility" and "Low-Level Radioactive Waste , Management Project", the references to "New Welcome Waste Management Facility" and "New Town of Port Hope Waste Management Facility" are replaced with "New Port Hope Waste Management Facility" in each definition. , The definitions of "New Welcome Waste Management Facility" and "New Town of Port Hope Waste Management Facility" are revoked and replaced with the following definition: "New Port Hope Waste Management Facility" means the activities and structure ' contemplated in the "Description of the Preferred Option", attached as Schedule B to the Municipality of Port Hope Resolution NO. 91/2005, dated April 19, 2005." 2. Section 1.17 of the Original Agreement is amended by revising the Schedule 3 , title to read "Property for the New Port Hope Waste Management Facility". 3. Section 3.1.1 of the Original Agreement is amended by replacing the references ' to "New Welcome Waste Management Facility" and "New Town of Port Hope Waste Management Facility" with the single reference to the "New Port Hope , Waste Management Facility". 4. Section 6.1 of the Original Agreement is revoked. 5. Sections 6.2 and 6.3 of the Original Agreement are amended by replacing any ' references to "New Welcome Waste Management Facility" with "New Port Hope Waste Management Facility", and revoking Section 6.3.1 c). ' 632 6. Schedule 1 Part A and B of the Original Agreement is replaced with Schedule 1 Part A and B attached hereto. 7. Schedule 3 of the Original Agreement is replaced with Schedule 3 attached hereto. ' 8. Schedule 8 (as amended October 7, 2003) is amended by replacing any references to "New Hope Township Waste Management Facility' with "New Port Hope Waste Management Facility'. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Amendment has been executed on behalf of the Municipality of Port Hope, the Municipality of Clarington, and Canada by duly authorized representatives. ' The Municipality of Port Hope per: Rick Austin, Mayor Frances Aird, Clerk/Deputy CAO ' March_, 2006 ' The Municipality of Clarington per. John Mutton, Mayor Patti Barrie, Municipal Clerk ' March_, 2006 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada per: ' "TBD March _, 2006 �I ' 633 M A2-2 SCHEDULEI PART A , Description of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Project The Project includes all work necessary and incidental to the achievement of the ' following: (a) the completion of all socio-economic, engineering and environmental research , necessary to acquisition of an approval, permit, licence or other such authorization or the reaching of a required determination under applicable federal ' or provincial legislation; (b) the submission of the design of each Facility and the process for carrying out the Elements of the Project within the community in order to comply with the environmental assessment requirements; (c) the finalization of the design of the New Port Hope Waste Management Facility ' and the New Port Granby Waste Management Facility, and the process for carrying out the Project in order to comply with the regulatory requirements; (d) the submission of each finalized design of each new Facility and the process for carrying out the Elements of the Project within the community for applicable regulatory approvals; , (e) the acquisition of all properties necessary for the construction and operation of the new Facilities; , (f) the operation of the Welcome Waste Management Facility and the Port Granby Waste Management Facility following Canada's acquisition thereof; (g) the construction and subsequent operation of the new Facilities; (h) the Cleanup of Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste at the sites in the former ' Town of Port Hope as identified in the Port Hope LLRW Management Policy Review Committee's Report titled Report on Conceptualization of Low-Level ' Radioactive Waste Storage Facility Designs in the Town of Port Hope, dated March 1999 and the relocation of the Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste to the New Port Hope Waste Management Facility; (i) the acceptance of the Cameco Decommissioning Waste at the New Port Hope ' Waste Management Facility; 634 , ' A2-3 Q) the Cleanup of Industrial Waste at the sites in the former Town of Port Hope as hereinafter identified; and, ' (k) the completion of all surface remedial work and landscaping associated with the completion of the construction of the new Facilities. PART B ' Without limiting the generality of the above description, the Project includes all work necessary and incidental to the achievement of the components set out below. Municipality of Port Hope ' The construction of the New Port Hope Waste Management Facility. Location: ' - the Facility will be located just south of Highway 401 and west of Baulch Road at the site of the current Welcome Waste Management Facility. Materials to be accommodated: - the Facility will have a capacity of approximately 1.9 million cubic meters of Low- ' Level Radioactive Waste and non-radioactive Industrial Waste, consisting of three categories presently situated in the Municipality of Port Hope: ' 1. Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste—This type of Low-Level Radioactive Waste comprises approximately 577,500 cubic metres of material situated at licensed sites in the former Town of Port Hope ' operated by the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office, at major sites, including those identified on the table following, and at small- scale unlicensed sites. 635 A2-4 , MAJOR KNOWN SITES OF HISTORIC LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN PORT HOPE ' PORT HOPE HARBOUR ALEXANDER RAVINE HIGHLAND DRIVE LANDFILL HIGHLAND DRIVE SOUTH.RAVINE ' PINE STREET N. CONSOLIDATION PINE STREET N. STORAGE SITE* SITE* MILL STREET SOUTH WATERWORKS SITE , PINE STREET N. ROADWAY STRACHAN STREET CONSOLIDATION SITE* , CN/CP VIADUCTS SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT TEMPORARY STORAGE SITE* , HIGHLAND DRIVE ROADWAY JOHN STREET SOUTH SITE these are temporary storage sites licenced by the CNSC. ' in addition, the Facility will accommodate additional Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste located in other sites within the former Town of Port Hope ' including those identified by past or future surveys performed by LLRWMO or the FOA. 2. Cameco Waste , a) Cameco Decommissioning Waste— This type of Low-Level Radioactive ' Waste comprises Cameco-owned materials in the former Town of Port Hope and includes an inventory of 3,822 cubic metres of Low-Level Radioactive Waste materials that have been in storage at the Cameco facility since prior to 1988 and ' materials that would result from the decommissioning of Cameco-owned and/or operated processing facilities and associated properties utilized by Eldorado in the former Town of Port Hope prior to 1988. This includes Low-Level ' Radioactive Waste at the main plant site at 1 Eldorado Place and the Dorset Street East warehousing facilities (117,000 cubic meters) and at the Centre Pier property (30,000 cubic meters). The estimated total volume is approximately ' 150,000 cubic meters. b) Cameco Waste - Welcome—Approximately 620,000 cubic metres of waste ' located at the Welcome Waste Management Facility. 636 ' I ' 3. Industrial Waste— This category includes non-radioactive materials that the former Town of Port Hope identified in its proposal to the government as wastes that it wants included in the Facility. The category ' consists of(i) waste material (including sludge) at a former wastewater lagoon site at Lake Street, (ii) dried sewage sludge currently stored in an engineered facility at the Lake Street Sewage Treatment Plant, (iii) wastes from a former coal gasification plant adjacent to John Street between Park and Alexander Streets and (iv) waste from the former Crane Sanitary Company located at the Center Pier and at the Lions Recreational Centre Park. The estimated volume from these four components is approximately 51,250 cubic metres. ' Conceptual design: the conceptual design, originally described in a) the Final Report of the Port Hope LLRW Management Policy Review Committee entitled, Report on Conceptualization of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Facility Designs in the Town of Port Hope, March 15, 1999 as Approach 3, and b) the Final Report of the Township of Hope Low-Level Radioactive Waste ' Ad Hoc Committee entitled, Report on Concept Design Options for a Low- Level Radioactive Waste Storage Mound at the Welcome Site, September 10, 1998 as Conceptual Approach 1C, 1 has been revised and now involves the consolidation of the waste at a single long-term waste management facility as described in Schedule B of the Municipality of Port Hope Resolution NO. 91/2005, dated April 19, ' 2005. the conceptual design involves: ' - the construction of a waste containment mound that is partially below-grade with an appropriate liner and cover system to house all ' excavated Low-Level Radioactive Waste, marginally contaminated soils, and miscellaneous Industrial Waste - the remediation of contaminated sites and the transfer of the contaminated material to the new waste management facility ' - the integration of the waste at the Welcome Waste Management Facility into the new waste management facility ' - final designs will be completed through the detailed engineering and technical studies which commenced at the signing of this Agreement 637 Proiect costs: ' Canada agrees to pay or absorb the Project costs, including: survey for contamination and, if required, cleanup and restoration of , roadways, including infrastructure, and properties where there is reason to believe that Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste may ' exist improvements to infrastructure required for the construction and ' operation of the Facility including: all reasonable capital costs related to road improvements, , including extensions, widenings, replacements, and resurfacing of roads as a result of the development and operation of the site including transportation routes to or , from the Facility; all reasonable capital costs related to providing or improving , other services to the site including sewage, water, and lighting; development of the New Port Hope Waste Management Facility, in ' a manner consistent with the original conceptual designs, including post-closure recreational elements, the construction of which may be staged; and, t establishing an ongoing communications program to fully-inform residents about the Project ' Additional cleanup of Port Hope Industrial Waste: Canada agrees to pay the costs of removal of certain Industrial Waste ' within the Municipality of Port Hope, as earlier described in Schedule 1, the transportation of those wastes to the New Port Hope Waste ' Management Facility, the restoration, the backfilling and landscaping of the site from which the wastes were removed Administrative costs: ' Canada agrees to reimburse to the Municipality of Port Hope, reasonable ' future administrative, legal, and external communications expenses incurred from March 29, 2001, the date Canada signed the Agreement, for the duration of the Project ' 638 ' 1 - following the signing of the Agreement, Canada and the Municipality of Port Hope will establish a process whereby such administrative expenses will be identified, quantified, and paid ' Clarington The construction of the New Port Granby Waste Management Facility. ' Location: ' - the Facility will be located at or approximate to the site of the Port Granby Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility Materials to be accommodated: the Facility will accommodate approximately 500,000 cubic metres of Cameco Waste - Port Granby at the Port Granby Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility, including approximately 100,000 cubic metres of calcium fluoride, neutralized raffinate and marginally ' contaminated soils and contaminated industrial trash from the East Gorge of the current site ' - in addition, the Facility will accommodate any Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste located within the Municipality of Clarington as identified by surveys to be performed by Canada. Conceptual design: the conceptual design is described in the Final Report of the Port Granby ' Low-Level Radioactive Waste Advisory Committee entitled, Report on Conceptualization of On-Site Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Facility Designs for the Port Granby Waste Management Facility, June 28, ' 9999 as Concept Design B, Option 2 as endorsed by Clarington Council the conceptual design involves: ' - the construction of a groundwater diversion trench and perimeter barrier wall on the eastern, northern, and western perimeters of the existing Port Granby Waste Management Facility; the construction of an on-site mound for roughly 100,000 cubic ' metres of material from the East Gorge of the current site; installation of an appropriate cover on the existing waste facility; ' 639 bluff stabilization and the construction of a toe berm to retard ' further erosion final designs will be completed after the detailed engineering and technical ' studies which will commence at the signing of the Agreement Proiect costs: ' - Canada agrees to pay or absorb the Project costs, including: ' improvements to infrastructure required for the construction and operation of the new Facility including: all reasonable capital costs related to road improvements, , including extensions, widenings, replacements, and resurfacing of roads required for the development and operation of the site; ' all reasonable capital costs related to providing or improving other services to the site including sewage, water, and ' lighting; survey and, if required, cleanup and restoration of roadways and ' properties where there is reason to believe that Historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste may exist; development of the re-engineered Facility as a site that is ' appropriate for natural heritage and passive recreational uses, including the Waterfront Trail; establishing an ongoing communications program to fully-inform residents about the Project ' Administrative costs: - Canada agrees to reimburse to the Municipality of Clarington, reasonable ' future administrative and legal expenses incurred from March 29, 2001, the date Canada signed the Agreement, for the duration of the Project ' following the signing of the Agreement, Canada and the Municipality of Clarington will establish a process whereby such administrative expenses , will be identified, quantified, and paid Other conditions: 640 ' ' - in the consideration of Concept Design Option B2 as an alternative in the environmental assessment process, Canada in consultation with the Municipality of Clarington will retain consultants to examine and prepare 1 reports on, among other issues, the following: - the concentration of thorium-230 in the wastes located in the East ' Gorge; - groundwater flow through the East Gorge and contact with the ' wastes deposited in the middle till and lower sands area; - potential impacts of shoreline erosion control measures on other ' shoreline properties in the area; and, a contingency plan for the relocation of the wastes, including marginally contaminated soil, in the event of system failure 641 SCHEDULE3 , PROPERTY FOR THE NEW PORT HOPE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY ' I NOTE... THE AGREED MAP OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY WITH ' THE CORRECT SCHEDULE NUMBER AND TITLE WILL BE INSERTED IN PLACE OF THIS PAGE ' 642 , CIarington REPORT ' PLANNING SERVICES ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 ' Report#: PSD-093-06 File No's: A2006-0017 and A2006-0023 to By-law#: A2006-0028 inclusive Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETINGS OF JULY 20, AUGUST 3, AUGUST 17, 2006. ' RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to ' Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-093-06 be received; 2. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on July 20, August 3, August 17, 2006 for applications A2006-0017, A2006-0023, A2006-0025, and A2006- 0027 and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment; 3. THAT Council concurs with Staff that an appeal by the Municipality of the decision made by the Committee of Adjustment on August 3, 2006 for application A2006-0026 is not warranted; ' 4. THAT Council does not concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on August 17, 2006 for application A2006-0024 and that Council confine its support of the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board launched by Staff, and that Council authorize Staff to defend its ' original position at the Ontario Municipal Board; and 5. THAT Council concurs with Staff that an appeal by the Municipality of the decision made by the ' Committee of Adjustment on August 17, 2006 for application A2006-0028 is not warranted. However, should an appeal be lodged by another party, that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend its original recommendation. ' Submitted by: Reviewed by: Dav . Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer ' PW*SA*CP*DC*sh August 21, 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 ' 643 REPORT NO.: PSD-093-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a ' hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of the minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are detailed in ' Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are summarized below. DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ' JULY 20, AUGUST 3 AND AUGUST 17 2006 Staff Decision of ' Application Number Recommendation Committee July 20, 2006 ' A2006-0017 Approve Approved A2006-0023 Approve Approved ' A2006-0024 Deny Tabled August 3, 2006 ' A2006-0025 Approve Approved A2006-0026 Deny Approved A2006-0027 Approve Approved August 17, 2006 Approved with ' A2006-0024 I Deny modifications A2006-0028 I Deny Approved ' 1.2 Application A2006-0017 was filed to permit a reduced westerly interior side yard ' setback from 2.0 m to 0.67 m to permit construction of an attached garage with a second floor recreation room and to permit an accessory building with a reduced westerly interior side yard setback from 1.2 m to 0.243 m. Committee approved the ' reduced setback for the accessory building and tabled the portion of the application related to the attached garage for up to 30 days in order to give the applicant the chance to discuss the matter further with staff(original decision of May 25, 2006). At a subsequent hearing on July 20, 2006 the applicant revised his application to request a reduced westerly interior side yard setback from 2.0 m to 1.2 m. The revised , application was supported by staff and received approval by Committee at that time. 1.3 Application A2006-0024 was filed to permit the establishment of a seasonal farm produce retail outlet in the front yard of a residential property with predominantly ' Residential Hamlet (RH) zoning. The application further sought to permit the sale of locally grown produce instead of growing the majority of the produce from the same ' 644 ' r REPORT NO.: PSD-093-06 PAGE 3 farm operation. Staff recommended denial of this application as it was considered to be neither minor or desirable in nature, nor was it considered to conform to the intent of either the Clarington Official Plan or Zoning By-law. A court prohibition order was already in effect against the use of the property for a seasonal farm produce retail outlet and was being appealed by the applicant. Committee chose to table their decision to ' the first meeting following the August 9, 2006 court hearing of the appeal. Following the August 9, 2006 court hearing legal counsel for the Municipality informed staff that any Planning approvals (such as those provided by the Committee of Adjustment) would have the affect of cancelling the prohibition order that was currently in place on the applicant's property. At the Committee's next meeting (August 17, 2006) ' Committee approved the application, as applied for, with a series of conditions. Staff did not support the application and do not concur with the Committee's decision. The last day of appeal is September 6, 2006. In order to ensure an appeal was received within the appropriate timeframe, Staff have filed an appeal to the Committee's decision as it does not meet the four tests for a minor variance, pending Council's ' concurrence. • Within the Clarington Official Plan, the subject property is designated "Hamlet Residential". The predominant use of lands within this designation shall be single detached residential dwellings. Other uses within this designation may ' include farm-related commercial uses (i.e. grain drying, bulk storage and storage of produce, farm co-operatives, farm machinery sales and repair) but not farm produce outlets. A farm produce outlet is a defined term and is listed as a permitted use in the Agricultural designations only as it is considered an agricultural use. Therefore the proposed use does not conform to the intent of the provisions of the Clarington Official Plan. Within the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, of the former Town of Newcastle, the subject property has dual zoning: "Residential Hamlet (RH) Zone" and "Agricultural (A) Zone". A seasonal farm produce retail outlet use is permitted on land zoned "A" that is 2 ha in area or greater. The subject property is only 0.63 ha in area and the "Agricultural" zoning represents approximately one-third of the overall property. The remaining "Residential Hamlet" portion of the property, in which the applicant is proposing to locate the seasonal farm produce retail sales activities, does not permit this type of use. ' Therefore the proposed use does not conform to the intent of Zoning By-law 84- 63. • The proposed seasonal farm produce retail outlet would be operated in a residential front yard making it undesirable in nature. 645 REPORT NO.: PSD-093-06 PAGE 4 Changing the permitted uses on a property, such as permitting a seasonal farm , produce retail outlet, is a change which would not be considered minor in nature. 1.4 Application A2006-0026 was filed to recognize the construction of two accessory buildings by reducing the garden shed's rear yard setback from the minimum 1.2 metres to 0.4 metres and its easterly interior side yard setback from the minimum 1.2 metres to ' 0.4 metres and by reducing the change house/bar's westerly interior side yard setback from the minimum 1.2 metres to 0.3 metres and the setback to the existing deck from the minimum 1.2 metres to 0.58 metres. Staff recommended denial based on concerns ' regarding the drainage on the site and the effective ability to maintain the accessory buildings and fence with the reduced setbacks. Committee felt that all these matters were appropriately addressed by the applicant and also recognized several neighbours ' who came out in support of the application. After further review of the information presented at the meeting, Staff do not believe an appeal is warranted. ' 1.5 Application A2006-0028 was filed to permit a detached garage by increasing the , maximum allowable lot coverage from 40% to 80% of the main building. Staff did not support this application, as submitted. The proposed 30' x 30' detached garage was not considered minor in nature, and offered a compromise of increasing the allowable t lot coverage of the main building to 55% (permitting a 20' x 30' detached garage). The applicant argued that the reduced amount would not be sufficient to permit a large enough detached garage and Committee agreed. t Though the proposed garage permitted by this decision is larger than supported by ' staff, given the size of the property, its location within the Municipality and the proximity of the neighbouring dwellings to the proposed garage, Staff do not feel an appeal of this decision is warranted. , 2.0 COMMENTS ' 2.1 Staff reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that applications A2006- 0017, A2006-0023, A2006-0025 and A2006-0027 are in conformity with the Official Plan ' policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor in nature and desirable. 2.2 Council's concurrence with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for ' applications A2006-0017, A2006-0023, A2006-0025 through A2006-0028 inclusive, is required in order to afford Staffs official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment. 646 , REPORT NO.: PSD-093-06 PAGE 5 ' 2.3 Council's concurrence with the appeal filed by Staff for application A2006-0024 is required in order to provide Staff official status before the Ontario Municipal Board. ' 3.0 ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD DECISIONS 3.1 A written Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) settlement was received July 6, 2006 for application A2005-0042. 3.2 Application A2005-0042 was appealed by the owner to the Ontario Municipal Board. The application was "to vary the definition of accessory use and accessory building or structure to permit a non-commercial, non-agricultural building of 45 square metres and the outside storage of a maximum of 10 motor vehicles on the subject property for a period of not more than three (3) years." Staff recommended denial of this application as it did not meet the intent of the official plan or zoning by-law and was not minor or desirable. The Committee of Adjustment concurred with Staffs recommendation and the application was denied at the November 17, 2005 Committee meeting. Concurrent with the minor variance application and subsequent appeal was a court case, brought by the Municipality regarding a complaint on the property. Municipal Law ' Enforcement Staff were seeking to have the Owner plead guilty to the zoning offence, and for a complete clean-up of the property, which at times had as many as 50 vehicles stored there. 1 Discussion between the lawyers representing the Owner, Mr. Roth, and municipal staff led to a resolution to the satisfaction of the Municipality in the week prior to the hearing. ' The Owner agreed to plead guilty to the zoning offence and to completely clear the property of all buildings and structures and all vehicles, and the Municipality agreed to not seek any fine. Once this resolution was reached, the Owner withdrew his appeal of ' the minor variance. Attachments: ' Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment Attachment 2 —Ontario Municipal Board Appeal Resolution for A2005-0042 647 Attachment To Report PSD-993-4 LeadingtheWayV PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT , APPLICANT: GREGG POWLESS , OWNER: JULIAN MORGAN PROPERTY LOCATION: 15 BROWNSVILLE COURT, BROWNSVILLE , PART LOT 18, CONCESSION 1 , FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE FILE NO.: A2006-0017 PURPOSE: TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YD SETBACK FROM 2,0 M , TO 1.2 M TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE WITH 2ND FLOOR RECREATION ROOM. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: ' THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE DESIRABLE & MEETS THE OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 2.0 M TO 1.2 M TO PERMIT , CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE WITH SECOND FLOOR RECREATION ROOM. , DATE OF DECISION: July 20, 2006 , LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 9, 2006 648 ' � wiewe QV ' PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: PAUL POKORSKI OWNER: PAUL POKORSKI PROPERTY LOCATION: 1960 HIGHWAY 2, DARLINGTON PART LOT 24, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON ' FILE NO.: A2006-0023 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT AN EXISTING ACCESSORY BUILDING TO REMAIN ON A NEW PROPERTY CREATED BY LAND DIVISION (LD072-2006) BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 59% OF THE MAIN BUILDING DECISION OF COMMITTEE: THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE DESIRABLE ' & MEETS THE OP & ZBL TO PERMIT AN EXISTING ACCESSORY BLDG TO REMAIN ON A NEW PROPERTY CREATED BY LAND DIVISION BY INCREASING THE MAX LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 59% OF THE MAIN BLDG. DATE OF DECISION: July 20, 2006 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 9, 2006 ' 649 I , QLeading die Way t/ PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT , APPLICANT: BOUSFIELDS INC. ' OWNER: CONCETTO PISTRITTO PROPERTY LOCATION: 2210 HIGHWAY 2, MAPLE GROVE , PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 2 , FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON FILE NO.: A2006-0024 PURPOSE: ' TO PERMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEASONAL FARM PRODUCE RETAIL , OUTLET IN THE RESIDENTIAL HAMLET ZONE AND TO PERMIT THE SALE OF LOCALLY GROWN PRODUCE INSTEAD OF GROWING THE MAJORITY OF THE PRODUCE FROM THE SAME FARM OPERATION. , DECISION OF COMMITTEE: ' TO TABLE DECISION UNTIL THE FIRST MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AFTER THE AUGUST 9, 2006 COURT DATE. DATE OF DECISION: July 20, 2006 , LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 9, 2006 III I 650 Leading the Way v PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ' APPLICANT: BOUSFIELDS INC. OWNER: CONCETTO PISTRITTO ' PROPERTY LOCATION: 2210 HIGHWAY 2, MAPLE GROVE PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON FILE NO.: A2006-0024 PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEASONAL FARM PRODUCE RETAIL OUTLET IN THE RESIDENTIAL HAMLET ZONE AND TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ' LOCALLY GROWN PRODUCE INSTEAD OF GROWING THE MAJORITY OF THE PRODUCE FROM THE SAME FARM OPERATION. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: 1 TO APPROVE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEASONAL FARM PRODUCE RETAIL OUTLET IN THE (RH) ZONE AND TO PERMIT THE SALE OF LOCALLY GROWN PRODUCE INSTEAD OF GROWING THE MAJORITY OF THE PRODUCE FROM THE SAME FARM OPERATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SIZE 800 SQ. FT. (20'X40') • 5 M HEIGHT • TENT-LIKE STRUCTURE, NO HARD SURFACES, NO FLOORS, NO WALLS • 1.5 M FRONT SETBACK • 10 M INTERIOR SIDEYARD SETBACK • 6 PARKING SPACES (MUNICIPAL STANDARD 2.75 M X 5.7 M) • 4.0 M AISLE WIDTH ACCOMMODATING ONE-WAY TRAFFIC 1 LOADING SPACE (6 M X 3 M)TO THE WEST OF THE HOUSE • OPERATING FROM JULY 1 TO NOVEMBER 2 ANNUALLY • SELLING STRICTLY PRODUCE, NO CRAFTS I', • TENT-LIKE COVERING STRUCTURE AND ALL LIGHTING REMOVED AT END OF SEASON. DATE OF DECISION: August 17, 2006 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: September 6, 2006 651 Clar�ng�on c�,ar�the way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: ALDRED CLARKE ' OWNER: LOIS SINGLETON PROPERTY LOCATION: 125 CEDAR CREST BEACH ROAD, BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 12, CONCESSION BF , FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE FILE NO.: A2006-0025 PURPOSE: ' TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF A LEGALLY NON-CONFORMING DWELLING LOCATED PARTIALLY WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ZONE, TO ACCOMODATE A BASEMENT AND A SECOND STOREY. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: ' TO APPROVE THE EXPANSION OF A LEGALLY NON-CONFORMING DWELLING LOCATED PARTIALLY WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ZONE, TO ACCOMMODATE A BASEMENT AND A SECOND STOREY, WITH THE EXCEPTION , THAT THE DECK ON THE SOUTH SIDE (LAKE SIDE) NOT BE APPROVED AND A SITE PLAN OF THE SEPTIC SYSTEM IS PROVIDED AND APPROVED BY THE , HEALTH DEPT., AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND IT CONFORMS TO THE INTENTION OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLAN. DATE OF DECISION: August 3, 2006 ' LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 23, 2006 1 t 652 , Leading the Way 9W PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: CHRIS TUTTON OWNER: TRACEY TUTTON ' PROPERTY LOCATION: 5 FOUND COURT, COURTICE ' PART LOT 32, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON FILE NO.: A2006-0026 PURPOSE: ' TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS BY REDUCING THE GARDEN SHED'S REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.4 METRES AND ITS EASTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 ' METRES TO 0.4 METRES AND BY REDUCING THE CHANGE HOUSE/BAR'S WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES.TO 0.3 METRES AND THE SETBACK TO THE EXISTING DECK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.58 ' METRES. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS BY REDUCING ' THE GARDEN SHED'S REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.4 METRES AND IT'S EASTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.4 METRES AND BY REDUCING THE CHANGE HOUSE/BAR'S WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.3 METRES AND THE SETBACK TO THE EXISTING DECK FROM THE MINIMUM 1.2 METRES TO 0.58 METRES AS IT IS MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND IT CONFORMS TO THE INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLAN. i DATE OF DECISION: August 3, 2006 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 23, 2006 653 I Clarington � ��arRg ue wa' ' PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: R BOUMA CONSTRUCTION INC I OWNER: YVONNE AGUECI PROPERTY LOCATION: 32 PAMELA COURT, BOWMANVILLE ' PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 3 ' FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON FILE NO.: A2006-0027 PURPOSE: , TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE TO AN EXISTING , DWELLING BY REDUCING THE WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED 6 METRES TO 4 METRES. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: ' TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE TO AN EXISTING DWELLING BY REDUCING THE WESTERLY INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED 6 METRES TO 4 METRES AS IT IS ' MINOR IN NATURE, DESIRABLE AND IT CONFORMS TO THE INTENTION OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AND OFFICIAL PLAN. DATE OF DECISION: August 3, 2006 , LAST DAY OF APPEAL: August 23, 2006 654 ' i 1 Ckrle on way PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ' APPLICANT: TIM GREEN OWNER: TIM GREEN 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: 4548 CONCESSION RD 3, CLARKE 1 PART LOT 8, CONCESSION 3 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE FILE NO.: A2006-0028 1 PURPOSE: 1 TO PERMIT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 80% OF THE MAIN BUILDING. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: TO APPROVE A2006-0028 AS APPLIED AS IT MINOR AND DESIRABLE, AND 1 CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND THAT THE ACCESSORY BUILDING REMAIN SUBORDINATE IN APPEARANCE TO THE MAIN BUILDING. 1 ' DATE OF DECISION: August 17, 2006 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: September 6, 2006 1 1 1 655 ao•ar rK H1KU HM kftXL15 LLP 4415 863 1515 To *34244E6935 Attachment 2 �! To Report PSD-093-06 AIRD & Baws up ' sardsten and sogdum / Panlck J.Harringtm , / DI":418.855.3424 / E-Mit phaniagWnQakdbwHLccm July 6, 2006 File No. 86939 VIA FAX Michael Bamycz Planner Ontario Municipal Board 655 Bay Street ' Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario Dear Mr. Bamycz: Re: OMB Case Number. PLOS1258 ' OMB File Number. V05090 Bemhart and Vivian Roth 4638 and 4648 Flees Road, Municipality of Clarington ' Withdrawal of Appeal We act on behalf of Bemhart and Vivlan Roth with respect to the above-noted appeal. This letter follows up on my voice mail message of this past Tuesday. Our clients have instructed us to and we hereby withdraw the above-noted appeal. A resolution satisfactory to both our clients and the Municipality of Clarington has been achieved. This withdrawal Is on the basis that no costs will be sought against our clients. By copy, we are also advising the Committee of Adjustment of this withdrawal. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to ' contact the undersigned. Yours very truly, , AIRD &BBQERLIS LLP , trick J. Ha n , Associate (cc's on rwM page) t SM PIYCY.181 881'Street,SUIe 1800,ON 154•TWONk ON.MSJ 2r9 7416.853.7500 F41sA63.151S , www.airdaanb.eem 65s � CI�1ll Il �s��AB woy REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: PSD-094-06 File#: PLN 7.12 By-law#: Subject: REPORT ON SITE PLAN ACTIVITIES (JANUARY—JUNE 2006) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-094-06 be received for information. } , � � n �� Submitted by: Reviewed by: �/ _ "'�-�—� ' David J. r e, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BH/CP/DJC/sh/df August 24, 2006 tCORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 657 i REPORT NO.: PSD-094-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 BACKGROUND , 1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide an update on information regarding site , plan applications activity for the first six months of 2006. 1.2 The Site Plan Control By-law requires that plans and drawings for any building or , structure be approved by the Municipality prior to issuance of a building permit except for those exceptions stated in By-law 90-130. By-law 90-130 delegates the approval authority of site plan applications to the Director of Planning , Services and the Director of Engineering Services. 2.0 SITE PLAN ACTIVITY , 2.1 Attachment 1 to this report outlines all site plan applications received during the , period of January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2006. The summary table includes the following information: site plan application file number, the nature of the application, location, and current status. Attachment 2 outlines all site plan applications approved during the same time period. A condition of approval usually requires an agreement being signed by the , applicant, executed by the Mayor and Municipal Clerk and then registered. A building permit is not usually available until the agreement is signed and conditions therein satisfied. ' 2.2 Site Plan activity through (January to June 30th) 2006 is as follows: ' Applications Received 18 Applications Approved 17 Applications Withdrawn 0 , Applications Appealed to OMB 0 Applications Denied to OMB 0 , Application Files Remaining Open as of July 1, 2006 73 1 I� 658 REPORT NO.: PSD-094-06 PAGE 3 t2.3 All statistics are based from information gathered from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006. A breakdown of site plan applications submitted in 2006 by land use type is shown in the pie chart below. Chart 1 ' Site Plan Applications Received'By Type Residential Commercial 28% ' 33% ' Institutional 11% Industrial 28% ' 2.4 Site plans approved in 2006 by type are shown in Chart 2. These figures also ■ include site plans received in years previous to 2006. • chart 2 Site Plan Applications Received By Type ' Residential Commercial 26% 29% Institutional Industrial 19% 26% 659 REPORT NO.: PSD-094-06 PAGE 4 1 3.0 CONCLUSION 1 3.1 Site plan activity to June 30, 2006 follows recent trends with strong growth in the , industrial and commercial sector. Some major applications at the Torgan site and in West Bowmanville Town Centre are currently under review. ' 3.2 In the last few years, townhouse and apartment projects have become a more significant component of site plan review activities. The percentage of residential , site plans has increased.from 14% in 2002, 16 % in 2004, to 28% to the end of June 2006. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Plan Applications (January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006) 1 Attachment 2 -Approved Site Plans (January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006) 1 . 1 1 660 III m m III r m m m . m m m m m III m m m m m Site Plan 1, 2006 to June 3 W J O (D /D O CL D fn C 6 s J 489445 ONTARIO LTD.(JAMES NEWCASTLE ADDITION TO INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR SpA2005-0001 20-Jon-06 410 TORONTO ST MARSHALL) VILLAGE STORAGE 88 DETACHED DWELLINGS AND RELATED SPA2006-0002 31-Jan-M BENNETT RD RIDGE PINE PARK INC. DARLINGTON ROADS SPA200843003 07-FeD-05 3005 HIGHWAY IODS431 ONTARIO LTD CLARKE PROPANE TANK AND PAD 35! NEWCASTLE GAS BAR.RETAIL SALES AND CONVENIENCE SPA2008-0004 0&Feb-06 218 KING AVE EASTMAN HOLDING LTD. VILLAGE STORE SPA2008-M5 10-Feb-M 57 MILL ST 1004312 ONTARIO LTD NEWCASTLE VILLAGE CONVERT HOUSE INTO A RESTAURANT 20 - 2345 HIGHWAY 2 G NBE RY DEVELOPMENTS DARLINGTON 5 STOREY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SPA2008-0005 -Feb08 STORAGE FACILITY,OFFICE,AND PARKING SPA2005-0007 07-Mor-05 1987 BASELINE RD 1275502 ONTARIO LTD COURTICE AREA NEWCASTLE AMENDMENT INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SPA2008-0008 304Mr-00 275 TORONTO ST SYVAN DEVELPMENTS LIMITED VILLAGE A PARKING FOR NEW MEZZANINE ACCESSORY BUILDING PROPOSED IN THE SPA2008-0009 13-Apr-w 1780 CONCESSION JEFFERY R.BRADLEY DARLINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL HOLDING SYMBOL ON THE 10 1 OAK RIDGES MORAINE INSTALLATION OF A 80 M TALL SPA2000-0010 21-Apr-08 194 COURTICE RD DURHAM RADIO INC. COURTICE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER 27-A4)r 3180 CONCESSION JOHN SIMIANA 1 CLARKE SINGLE DETACHED HOUSE SPA2006-0011 -M 10 SPA2006-0012 164w-06 2038 NASH RD DURHAM CHRSTIAN ACADEMY BOWMANVILLE ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BUILDING SPAZ008-0013 17-L1eY-08 43 ORMISTON ST KAWARTHA PINE RIDGE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD DARLINGTON RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY SHED TEMPORARY GOLF DOME BUBBLE AND CLUB -W SPA2005 14 24-MR-00 2735 HANCOCK RD GERTRUD TOMINA - DARLINGTON MOUSE SPA20DB-0015 02—hm 0W 1700 BASELINE RD MIKE KONOPACKI CWIRTICE ADDITION TO AN INDUSTRAIL BUILDING SPA2006.0016 21JuD08 SHIPWAY AVE PORT OF NEWCASTLE MARINA NEWCASTLE VILL FOUR STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING SPA2005-W17 28Jun-05 120 QUEEN ST KENNETH JAMES LYNCH BOWMANVILLE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WEST DIAMOND PROPERTIES SPA2006-0018 28J" HIGHWAY INC&PLAYERS BUSINESS BOWMANVILLE RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PARK LTD W J O (D /D O CL D fn C 6 s J Approved Site Plans ti 19 2006 to June SPA2001-028 28-Jun-06 1287 ADAMS RD MICROCELL CLARKE TELECOMMUNICAION TOWER CONNEXIONS SPA2001-039 28Jun-08 4709 HOLT RD ROGERS WIRELESS DARLINGTON TELECOMMUNICAION TOWER SPA2003-015 6Jun-08 131 LAKE RD GB LEASING BOWMANVILLE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SPA2004-041 17-Feb-08 KING AVE TDL GROUP LTD NEWCASTLE VILLAGE RESTAURANT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENVIROTECH SPA20054)037 30Jan-08 400 WAVERLEY RD ST.MARY'S CEMENT BOWMANVILLE STORAGE BUILDING ASPEN WEST BOWMANVILLE TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL SALES SPA2005 0039 12-May-06 SPRINGS DR DEVELOPMENTS LTD. CENTRE SPA2005-0040 1a-May-06 87 MILL ST NEWCASTLE MEDICAL . NEWCASTLE VILLAGE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES SPA2005-008 6Jan-05 243 KING ST FIRST CAPITAL BOWMANVILLE EXPANSION TO A&P CANADIAN TIRE REAL 1000 SQ.M.EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING SPA2005-018 28-Apr-06 2401 HIGHWAY 2 ESTATE LTD BOWMANVILLE BUILDING SPA2005-023 17-May-08 SOUTH RD HALLOWAY HOLDINGS BOWMANVILLE FIVE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SERVICE LTD SPA2005-029 3-Jul-06 8085 HIGHWAY 1838351 ONTARIO LTD. CLARKE ADDITION TO THE DUTCH OVEN 351115 SPA2008 0003 112-Jul-06 3005 HIGHWAY 1098431 ONTARIO LTD CLARKE PROPANE TANK AND PAD 351115 SYVAN DEVELPMENTS NEWCASTLE AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SPA2008-0008 22-Jun-06 275 TORONTO ST LIMITED VILLAGE PARKING FOR A NEW MEZZANINE ASPEN DR KAITLIN GROUP N TUE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SPA2004-022 23-Jan-06 SPRINGS VILLAGE SPA2008.0012 22.1un.08 2038 NASH RD DURHAM CHRISTIAN BOWMANVILLE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING SCHOOL ACADEMY SPA2005.0021 23-Jun-48 181 KING AVE MOOLCO CAR WASH NEWCASTLE VILLAGE CAR AND DOG WASH SPA2006 0011 224un OB 3180 NONNCESSIO SIMIANA CLARKE HOUSE ON THE OAK RIDGES MORAINE 0 m � D Q : N) N N 1 C '17 �/�/�/jam/j//�/11 Leading the Woy V REPORT PLANNING SERVICES ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: PSD-095-06 File #: ZBA2006-0022 By-law y law#: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: KAITLIN GROUP LTD. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-095-06 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lot 33 on 40M-2214 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. i Submitted by:Q Review -(C"L David J. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. ed by: �r Director of Planning Services dFran Wu ' Chief Administrative Officer SA/CP/DJC/df 25 August 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0630 663 t REPORT NO.: PSD-095-06 PAGE 2 ' 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: The Kaitlin Group Ltd. 1.2 Location: Bottrell Street, Bowmanville ' 1.3 Part Lot Control Removal: Lot 33 of 40M-2214 (Attachment 1). 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On August 18th, 2006, Staff received a request from the owners of the above-noted , property for the removal of part lot control with respect to Lot 33 of 40M-2214. , 2.2 This plan of subdivision, 40M-2214, was registered on August 18, 2004. 2.3 Part Lot Control was removed for the remainder of the subdivision in January 2005. This parcel was not applied for at that time and the owner is seeking to have part lot control removed at this time to facilitate the sale of a set of semi-detached (link) ' dwellings. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 The Planning Act gives authority to a Municipality to remove part lot control in a plan of subdivision to permit a person to convey a part of any lot or block of land. 3.2 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2) to exempt the subject lands from Section , 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.3 In accordance with the procedures established in the delegation of Part Lot Control By- 1 laws, Planning Staff will forward to the Regional Planning Department the "Unit Type and Number Summary Table" (Attachment 3) along with a copy of the Part Lot Control By-law. , 4.0 RECOMMENDATION 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve this application and adopt the attached Part Lot Control By-law for Lot 33 on Plan 40M-2214. , 4.2 Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a five (5) year period, following Council approval, ending September 11, 2011. , 664 , r rREPORT NO.: PSD-095-06 PAGE 3 Attachments: Attachment 1 — Key Map Attachment 2 —Unit Type and Number Summary Table 1 Attachment 3— By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control rInterested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: The Kaitlin Group Ltd. r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 665 Attachment To Report PSD-095-Or Li3tl15 tl315MMH /y� (h CD Q ME 3NU] XMRI'IN ,w JW !i 3442 Y0 & a Gxi.�rma�' N :0, W NC 3 CL N ' IL J O N 5 C� M d In �QQQ iG n 00 0) lei IM 4 ,7 20 21 3 22 Yo M CC 8 19 23 0° AN Y 24 w 9 18 w 25 (n 26 o a ' 10 17 - m w W 27 N CY 0 N $ , °m 11 16 m 2$ o 0 29 Y O ,12 15 30 m BL 31 ,13 14 32 v YU O 33 m GREEN ROAD 666 ' 1 I Attachment 2 To Report PSD-095-06 t� Registered Plan 40M-2214 ' File: ZBA2006-0022 Lots Affected Unit Type & Number Results 1 Lot 33 Semi-detached dwelling, two units No change TOTAL 2 Units 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ' 667 Attachment- To Report PSD-095-0 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' BY-LAW NO.2006- being a by-law to exempt a certain portions of Registered Plan 40M-2214 from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Lot 33 of 40M-2214, registered at the land Titles Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the , Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law. , 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Lot 33 of 40M-2214 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in ' force for a period of five (5) years, beginning September 11, 2006 and ending on September 11,2011. 1 BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2006 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2006 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2006 , John Mutton, Mayor , Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ' 668 ' Cl i""" '. � REPORT PLANNING. SERVICES 1 . 1 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: PSD-096-06 File#: PLN 2.5.3 By-law#: Subject: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT 114 TO THE DURHAM REGION OFFICIAL PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to -'Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-096-06 be received; ' 2. THAT Council request the Region to delete Supplemental Attachment 1 — Requested Changes to the Greenbelt; 3. THAT in the event that Regional Council resolves to incorporate a Supplemental Attachment on ' the Greenbelt, any changes proposed in the Municipality of Clarington be deleted; . 4. THAT Council request the Region to postpone any decision on Future Growth Areas either by Supplemental Attachment 2 or new policies on Future Growth Areas, until the implementation and conformity exercise on the Growth Plan in order to allow the Region and area municipalities the opportunity to assess the impacts of the Growth Plan on land requirements, urban form, and the opportunities for creating transit supportive, complete communities; and 5. THAT this resolution be forwarded to the Region of Durham, area municipalities in Durham Region, the Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Renewal and Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and any interested party listed in this report. n ' Submitted by: Reviewed by: L,Davi J. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer COS*DJC*sn August 28, 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 669 REPORT NO.: PSD-096-06 PAGE 2 , 1.0 BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to provide staff comments in respect of the Region's proposed , Amendment 114 to the Regional Official Plan. This amendment is the culmination of the process undertaken by the Region to review the Regional Plan. Council has been providing comments on the different policy changes proposed by the Region since 2000. It is being , considered by Regional Planning Committee on August 2e, 2006 and subsequently by Regional Council on September 13, 2006. The Regional Planning Commissioner's report also contains the response by the Region to the , different comments provided by the Municipality as part of the Regional Official Plan Review ' Process (see Attachment 3). Many of the Region's policy options and the municipality's recommendations dealing with Population, Employment, and Urban land will be considered during the Places to Grow Plan implementation process. However, Amendment 114 contains , options dealing with Changes to the Greenbelt and Future Growth Areas that are not consistent with Council's resolutions. The proposed Amendment 414 also includes two supplemental attachments to the Regional , Official Plan (See Attachment 1 and Attachment 2): ■ Supplemental Attachment 1 — Requested Changes to the Greenbelt; and ■ Supplemental Attachment 2 — Future Growth Areas. The supplemental attachments were developed as a means of stating Regional policy but the , attachments would not be formally adopted as part of the Regional Official Plan. By remaining as separate attachments and not being approved under the Planning Act, they would not contravene Provincial policy. The Regional Solicitor concurred that this approach would not , violate either the Growth Plan or the Greenbelt Plan. More recently, the Region issued an Addendum Report 2006-P-61 which recommended a , further option for future growth areas. This option would go further by incorporating new policies and a map into the Plan to identify Future Growth Areas. The policies would recognize , the "Future Growth Areas" as the priority areas for future Urban Area boundary expansions. However, they would "not represent land use designations or actual boundary expansions." This would only occur subsequent to the Growth Plan conformity exercise. The Regional , Solicitor has also indicated that this option would not be in conflict with the Growth Plan. Clarington's Council advertised and held public meetings on these two issues. Council has passed specific resolutions dealing with both supplemental attachments. The comments and position of Clarington's Municipal Council on the changes to the Greenbelt and the Future Growth Areas are neither considered, nor mentioned in the reports, nor in the proposed , amendment. 670 ' ' REPORT NO.: PSD-096-06 PAGE 3 ' 2.0 CLARINGTON COUNCIL POSITION ON CHANGES TO THE GREENBELT On Monday May 29, 2006 Council passed the following resolution: ' Resolution # C-275-06 THAT Report PSD-061-06 be received, THAT the Municipality of Clarington advise the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Greenbelt Council and the Region of Durham that it does not support amendments to the boundaries of the Greenbelt Plan, at this time; ' THAT the Greenbelt Council be requested to review issues related to rural employment uses in the Greenbelt, THAT a copy of Report PSD-061-06 be forwarded to John Gerretsen, Minister of Municipal ■ Affairs and Housing; the Municipal Affairs and Housing, Greenbelt Group, the Greenbelt Council; the Region of Durham Planning Department and area municipalities; and 1 THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. As stated in the report, the Greenbelt Plan supports many of the goals and objectives of the ' Clarington Official Plan and provides further support for the protection of agricultural lands and the natural system helping to maintain the rural atmosphere of Clarington and preserve agriculture as a key economic force within the Municipality. ' Staff also mentioned to Council that the necessary background studies to provide any new arguments for the removal of the Courtice lands from the Greenbelt have not been carried out, nor have they been requested by Council. The sub-watershed plans and environmental studies necessary to determine the development potential of the lands have not been undertaken either. There is good evidence that the areas partially act as shallow aquifers within the Lake Iroquois Shoreline and therefore any such development would be questionable. The staff recommendation of the Durham Region Official Plan Review is to provide sufficient Iland without encroaching on the Greenbelt to the year 2031 and beyond. We also concluded that it would not be appropriate for the Region to request the inclusion of ' additional lands in the "urban separator" between Courtice and Bowmanville, south of Highway 2 within the Greenbelt Area. The area recommended for inclusion in the greenbelt by the Region may have the future Highway 407 corridor within it. This would potentially be an area ' for future employment lands in subsequent planning periods. At the public meeting held by Clarington Council on the changes to the greenbelt, the majority of speakers opposed any changes to the Greenbelt boundaries in Clarington. The Minister of Municipal Affairs has responded to the Region's submission on changes to the ' Greenbelt boundaries. He advised that there would be no changes to the Greenbelt boundary prior to the 10 year review. 671 REPORT NO.: PSD-096-06 PAGE 4 ' As a piece of advocacy with the Province, the further incorporation of a Supplemental ' Amendment 1 serves no useful purpose. The Minister has responded. If it is adopted by Council, it is not likely to stand the Ministry's approval process. In the event that it does remain, it can only serve to hinder future considerations at great prejudice to Clarington. As ' Council well knows, the Region's proposal was to add approximately 753.57 has.. of land in Clarington to the Greenbelt, largely to compensate for lands being removed in other parts of the Region. , It is recommended that Council resolve to request the Region to delete Supplemental Attachment 1. ' Failing the complete removal of the Supplemental Attachment 1, the alternative would to amend it to remove any changes affecting Clarington. ' 3.0 CLARINGTON COUNCIL POSITION ON THE FUTURE GROWTH AREAS , On Monday, June 19 2006 Council passed the following resolution: Resolution # GPA-299-06 , THAT Report PSD-084-06 be received, , THAT the Region of Durham be requested to coordinate the Growth Management Studies to implement the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe with the area municipalities; and , THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the interested parties list in Report PSD- 084-06 and any delegation. , In our report to Council, we clearly indicated that the Places to Grow Plan was to be , announced at the time Regional Council was trying to make a decision on the expansion of urban boundaries. Council adopted the position that any changes to the urban boundaries be postponed as part of the implementation of the Province's Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The Provincial Plan was unveiled on June 16, 2006 and came into effect the same day. Regional Planning population projections had indicated the need for additional future growth ' areas. However, the Provincial Plan as enacted contains population forecasts that are lower than Regional projections. As the Places to Grow Plan projections and policies are mandatory, the Region has now been ' forced to revise the proposed changes to the Regional Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Plan. , 672 ' i REPORT NO.: PSD-096-06 PAGE 6 Even though, the Provincial analysis on the additional residential lands to serve the legislated population projects has not been initiated, the Region, in similar fashion to the Greenbelt recommendations, are attaching the proposed Future Growth Areas to the Regional Official Plan as a Supplemental Attachment. In an addendum to the Regional Commissioner's report 2006-P-60 on the Regional Official ' Plan Review, regional staff puts forward another option: to add policies and a map (Future Growth Area Policy Option) to the Regional Official Plan to "recognize Council's long term vision for the future growth of the Official Plan, as context for future planning decisions." Both alternatives for Future Growth Areas - the Supplemental Attachment and the Future Growth Areas Policy Option - seem to be more designed to "lock-in" certain lands as priorities for future development. This would reduce any flexibility of both the Local and Regional Councils to work with the Province in the implementation of the Places to Grow Plan. Moreover, the Region has failed to consider Council's resolution that if they are to proceed to identify Future Growth Areas, changes were requested to reduce the proposed westerly expansion of the Bowmanville Urban Area. In Section 8.6.4 of the report, referenced in I Council's resolution, the Municipality requested amendments to the westerly expansion area to reduce the proposed expansion to Maple Grove Road. This would provide a rounding out of the Bowmanville Urban Area to a boundary which helps to mitigate the potential impacts on the t agricultural operations at the urban/rural interface. This position would apply to both the Supplementary Attachment Option and the Future Growth Area Policy Option. It is recommended that Council advise the Region of its position that Amendment 114 should not identify Future Growth Areas by either technique at this time. Until the Growth Plan ' conformity exercise is completed, the Region should not be formally adopting a policy on priorities for expansion to urban areas. It pre judges the outcome, creates uncertainty due to semi-official/partially approved status and does not represent good planning policy. Moreover, it does not consider the input by Clarington Council on this issue. 4.0 CONCLUSION Clarington Council after public consultation has resolved that future expansion of urban boundaries would be considered only as part of the implementation of the Places to Grow Plan and that no changes should made to the Greenbelt boundaries. The Supplemental Attachments and policy options for Future Growth Areas and the Greenbelt should not be part of the Regional Official Plan as they do not reflect good planning principles, are inconsistent with provincial legislation, and do not reflect the representations by the Council of the Municipality of Clarington. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Supplemental Attachment 1 — Requested Changes to the Greenbelt Attachment 2 — Supplemental Attachment 2 — Future Growth Areas Attachment 3 — Regional Staff response to Clarington's comments on the proposed Amendment 673 REPORT NO.: PSD-096-06 PAGE 6 t List of Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: ' Linda Gasser Libby Racansky , Adam Brown Bryce Jordan , Tony Biglieri Peter Walker Walter Kranzl ' Richard Ward David Rice Aleksandr Bolentenko ' Michael Montgomery Jason Swartz John Gerretson, Minister of Municipal Affairs , Greenbelt Council Victor Doyle, Ministry of Municipal Affairs Nash Road Developments Inc. ' Dunbury Homes Joanne Bruno Victor Humphreys , Regional Planning Department Kevin Tunney 1 674 1 ' Attachment 1 To Report PSD-096-06 1 ' Attachment 6 1 Supplemental Attachment 1 (Not part of the Regional Official Plan) ' Requested Changes to the Greenbelt Plan This Supplemental Attachment is included with the Regional Official Plan for information 1 purposes only and does not form part of the Plan. This Attachment confirms Regional Council's intent to pursue specific changes to the Greenbelt Plan necessary for the effective implementation of the Plan by the Region of Durham, expressed in the following resolution adopted on May 10, 2006: "a) THAT staff be directed to forward a submission to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Greenbelt Council that incorporates the Region's issues with the Greenbelt Plan, as identified in Report #2006-P-33 of the Commissioner of Planning, and the following issues as set out in parts b) through e); b) THAT the lands located between Audley Road/Lakeridge Road from ' Highway 401 to Taunton Road, in the Town of Ajax be designated future development area subject to the final alignment of the 401/407 Link and subject to removal from the Greenbelt Plan; ' c) THAT the lands located in the Townline Road area of the Municipality of Clarington which are bounded by Townline Road, Pebblestone Road and the existing Courtice Urban Area Boundary also be designated future development area subject to removal from the Greenbelt Plan; d) THAT the lands located on the north east corner of Nash Road and Hancock Road, in the Municipality of Clarington also be designated future development area subject to removal from the Greenbelt Plan; and 1 e) THAT the lands located north of Brawley Road, in the Town of Whitby, be removed from the Greenbelt Plan to reflect the draft Greenbelt Plan area 1 as shown in Attachment#5 to Report#2006-P-38 of the Commissioner of Planning." ' If and when the Province makes the necessary amendments to the Greenbelt Plan, it is Regional Council's intent to initiate amendments to the Durham Regional Official Plan to give effect to the above resolution.. 1 675 II Regional Council's requested changes to the Greenbelt Plan are further detailed as ' follows: i) Lands to be Removed from the Greenbelt Plan Area , Regional Council is concerned that the extent of the Greenbelt in Durham ' Region had increased in area by some 4,000+ hectares (10,000+ acres) with approval of the final Plan. In total the Greenbelt covers over 80% of the Region's land base. In particular, Regional Council has identified five areas that should not , have been included in the Greenbelt: 1. Pickering - Cherrywood Community the subject of a Growth Management , Study undertaken by the City of Pickering and identified as suitable for future urban expansion in Pickering. This is consistent with Regional Council's April 13, 2005 submission to the Minister of Public Infrastructure , Renewal on the Draft Growth Plan requesting that the Province remove this area from the Greenbelt and identify it as a "Designated Growth Area% 2. Ajax — Audley and Lakeridge Road area added in the Final Plan. This area ' is no longer considered a viable agricultural area by the farmers owning the ' land as a result of the advancement of nearby urban development, the diminished agricultural land base in the area and the potential impacts from the future alignment of the Highway 4011407 link currently the subject of an ' Environmental Assessment; 3. Whitby — north of Brawley Road area added in the Final Plan. This area is , the subject of an application to amend the Durham Regional Official Plan to permit a golf course and a resort/conference centre; 4. Clarington — Townline and Pebblestone Road area. These lands are ' located immediately adjacent to full municipal services in the City of Oshawa that can be easily extended to support urban development in the Courtice urban area; and 5. Clarington — Nash and Hancock Road area added to the Final Plan. This , area is the subject of a request to expand the Courtice Urban Area Boundary as part of the Regional Official Plan Review. (Refer to Illustrations 1 and 2 attached for specific locations.) ' 1 676 ' These lands should continue to be governed by the municipal official plans. ii) Settlement Area Expansions In its submission to the Province on the Greenbelt Draft Plan, the Region requested that the Plan be sensitive to the need for growth in our Towns/Villages (ie Uxbridge, Port Perry, Sunderland, Cannington and Beaverton) located within the Greenbelt. This is particularly crucial when considering expansions to accommodate employment uses in a timely fashion. The Greenbelt Plan is unnecessarily restrictive in limiting the opportunity for expansions to the 10 year review or the conformity exercise opportunity provided by policy 3.4.4.1 for these ' settlements. The Greenbelt Plan must be amended to provide opportunity for expansions to ' Towns and Villages when the need and opportunity arises. iii) Rural Employment Areas Planned rural employment areas are focal points for the rural economy. The approved Greenbelt Plan does not allow for the designation of new or expansions to existing rural employment areas. To allow for more diverse employment opportunities in rural communities, the Greenbelt Plan must be amended to permit the designation of new Rural 1 Employment Areas or the expansion of existing Rural Employment Areas, in accordance with policies contained in upper-tier official plans. iv) Servicing of Orono In its submission to the Province on the Greenbelt Draft Plan, the Region raised a concern with the policy prohibiting the extension or expansion of Great Lakes based water and sewer systems to settlement areas within the Protected Countryside, particularly Orono. The Region requested that the Plan allow the opportunity to provide lake-based services to Orono. This is consistent with the policies of the Regional Official Plan, approved by the Province in 1993, that express a long-term intent to investigate the provision of full, lake based, ' municipal services to that relatively large rural community. The absence of this opportunity in the Greenbelt Plan severely restricts the ' servicing options for that settlement area. The Greenbelt Plan must be amended to permit the further consideration of extending full, lake based, municipal services to Orono. ' 677 v) Urban Separator ' In its submission to the Province on the Greenbelt Draft Plan, Regional Council requested that Plan recognize an open space separator between the Courtice and Bowmanville urban areas including lands that have not been identified for future settlement expansion. Unlike the other Greenbelt Plan issues discussed above, the inclusion of this , area within the Greenbelt would have the effect of increasing the total Greenbelt Plan area by 750 hectares (1,860 acres) (see Illustration 2). ' Regional Council intends to pursue the above changes the Greenbelt Plan immediately and through subsequent reviews of the Greenbelt Plan by the , Province, or other means. 1 1 678 ' Supplemental Attachment 1 - Illustration 1 tAIONNTOX RD + , �� �.: •ONiNNm PD W WU�RO s, 4- _ 3g Nt MON ET MOPINIER N 9 E RD_ p �Sj 9 ' -� � _ OyiDBt tT I s GNOB�6T ' t' ♦ a 1 O � ri M04%R OO S INN NO 1 .—r.— • NEMNY a Lw N" ` GOONPMlER O COONNME6T y5,; 'J Co S YN C ♦ E •�i� � \ � C CO .....— gg . ♦ i .�•.�... rsue w- - j QA1�IIIDOE NO I 1 .i f NNEaEw N1CtEY NO •OELNE f 1 $ 4$ s f I VMWEI NMM4 NMMS x \l NEETNE.ao O Y ETNEV w' -- Y— ctxatwoaotm 1 1 RD I tE j P.00xNNO Ny,E O 1 1 N i A YDJELNE tIj \f � 1 \� � BmElxiA � VNNEEYPMMM �' N_NE.x f7 BDEl1E 9 � •S I ENELNEx oa�wo i i LNEN L . / s yDEVEx ewELNEx t%LE x //U tlOELNE EL p LINE 31 � ` 8 N b �.I• 3 r LNE J �• _ �• • Y�^fNNdPp(ERNDTO'ME.NE BCI;NEGNOINiH��NIlO 1 I t � 1 1 ' 679 Supplemental Attachment 1 - Illustration 2 ' r♦ � .• � caacssaa+nos dal $ ' 1 t '....... .... `,� l i j � 8 x li cernra in Ci of O ha a a ' uni ipality o Cl 'ng S Mao f� R 5 6 c •onus I $ S � S t 8 � Ig aGNGST `g n f '• 2 1 --=-caR Sr'--- E� ® Area to be lnduded in the UdnnAma Boundry Greenbeh Plan Am Urban Arm Deferred 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 Aroea Requested to be Re d Boundary from the Greenbelt Plan Area Murvdpel Boundary m IGloebea ' — — — ORM Boundary Greenbelt Boundary Road - vnmggcvnw..urar�ww�o.rtw;sd.ewtswpmmsxawmn.�tt 580 ' Attachment 2 To Report PSD-096-06 Attachment 5 ' Supplemental Attachment 2 (Not part of the Regional Official Plan). Future Growth Areas This Supplemental Attachment is included with the Regional Official Plan for information purposes only and does not form part of th e Plan. ' The areas shown on the accompanying illustration represent priority areas for future Urban Area boundary expansions. These areas were identified as part of the Regional Official Plan Review and presented to Planning Committee for consideration on April 25, 2006 through Commissioners Report 2006-P-39. The approval of the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe on June 16, 2006 precluded consideration of the future growth areas pending completion of the Growth Plan conformity exercise. Any expansions to the Urban Area boundaries designated in the Regional t Official Plan, may only be achieved through further amendment to the Regional Official Plan in accordance with the applicable Provincial and Regional policy. ' 681 1 ' SUPPLEMENTAL ATTACHMENT 2 FUTURE GROWTH AREAS ' r j LEGEND a >. . � oeenrureouMMww ._: ._ Mebxa¢reouxorm ' �� � Fy1WE gtNgYlMMw OAR NGfiCf MOP.VrL l -- IOYNGMY C t a F� n4 a Yi � r 1 a 1 682 1 Attachment 1 Revisions to Attachment 2 to Commissioner's Report No. 2006-P-60 Part A — Future Growth Areas ' 1. Revise Attachment 2 to Commissioner's Report No. 2006-P-60 to add the following additional sentences to Part B, Actual Amendment, Table A, Item 234: ' "The areas shown on Schedule 'F'— Future Growth Areas, recognize the priority areas for future Urban Area boundary expansions. These areas were identified in Commissioner's Report 2006-P-39 considered by Regional Planning Committee on April 25, 2006 and authorized for release for public consultation as part of the Regional Official Plan Review. This schedule is a reflection of Councils long- term vision of the Region's urban structure, but is not a land-use designation or actual urban boundary expansion. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2006 provides policy requirements for managing growth, including the conditions for expansion of settlement area boundaries. Any expansions to the Urban Area boundaries designated in the Regional Official Plan, may only be approved through further amendment to the Regional Official Plan, in accordance with applicable provincial plans and policies, including the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2006. ' 2. Revise Attachment 2 to Commissioner's Report No. 2006-P-60 to add the following new Item to Part B, Actual Amendment, Table A, after Item 903, and renumber all subsequent Items accordingly: "Exhibit'F' —Future Growth Areas referenced in Section 7.3.3, recognizing "Future Growth Areas", is not permitting any new development of the lands and ' these areas do not constitute land-use designations within the Regional Official Plan." 3. Revise Attachment 2 to Commissioner's Report No. 2006-P-60 to add the following new Item to Part B, Actual Amendment: ' "19) Add a new schedule entitled "Schedule 'F'— Future Growth Areas", as shown on Exhibit"F" attached hereto and forming part of this amendment." ' 4. Revise Attachment 2 to Commissioner's Report No. 2006-P-60 to add a new map entitled "Exhibit F" to Part B, Actual Amendment, as attached hereto. 1 683 1 1 a I, t EXHIBIT F TO REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ' NO. 114 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE ' REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY j OF DURHAM SCHEDULE 'F' FUTURE GROWTH AREAS LEGEND- :.. If VIdMMIFABgINMY _• _ tlKOH4T WUMNIY wnu�mwvrxuw ---- oucaoa�wwvre {VN : I J�,� iN t ,n Jj rllst , 1 Ni n -' 1 684 0) CD Ur M i M M M = = = = = = M = = r = Municipality of Clarington Page 90 "Permanent Agricultural Reserve"and"General Agricultural Areas"should remain as presently designated. Merging two designations reduces the flexibility of permitting additional uses in the general agricultural areas(e.g.kennels,farm-related industriallcommercial,sod farms,riding and boarding stables). Suggests amending rural area policies to encourage the conservation of prime soils for uses that require them(i.e.food production). Suggests Section 9A.2.11 be amended to permit the severance of a surplus dwelling due to the consolidation of a non-abutting farm parcel. Suggests Clarington be considered for limited new rural employment areas,specifically for uses that do not require urban services. Uses that require large areas of open storage are better situated in the rural area,whereas Employment lands should be served for more Intensive uses. The merging of the two ROP agricultural designations mm one agricultural designation,to represent the Region's prime agricultural areas will bring the ROP into conformity with the PPS and Greenbelt Plan. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs have reviewed the Region's approach, and have confirmed that most of the Region's agricultural designations represent prime agricultural areas, as defined by Provincial policy. The merged agricultural designation will permit the full range of agricultural, agriculture-related and secondary uses in accordance with Provincial definitions. The Region cannot be more permissive or more restrictive(in terms of land uses)within prime agricultural areas. According to Ministry staff,horse riding and boarding stables are considered to be agricultural uses,and therefore cannot be restricted in prime agricultural areas. The recommended Major Open Space Areas designation, would permit the same broad range of agricultural, agriculture-related and secondary uses, in addition to agri- businesses,such as feed mills,auction bams and farm markets;major recreational uses;kennels;and small-scale landscape industry uses, subject to criteria. No further changes are recommended. severances subject to certain criteria. Plan prevent the establishment of new Rural Employment Areas. Accordingly, Policy 9B.2.26 is revised to prevent the establishment of new rural employment areas. No further changes are recommended, --1 O .Z) N 0 O � D fn N v ? 03 co re rnCD 8Z Requests a justification for increasing distance for noise and vibration studies from 300m to 750m,and guidance for how it will be addressed on adjacent properties outside the ownership of the application in Section 2.3.3. Suggests Section 5.3.0 should be amended to permit the creation of new cemeteries in the rural area in poor quality soils and/or in the natural heritage system. Suggests there is a need for an arterial road network south of 401 connecting Courtice Road and Highway 57. The suggested type"C"road(South Service Road/Energy Drive)would conned major Regional employment Centres,the Darlington Generation Station,and St.Marys Cement and its harbour. width of line Identifying the roads. Suggests Green Road should be shown interchange at Highway 401. m 00 rn Page 91 the Policy 2.3.3 has been revised to reference 750 metres in response to submissions received from the railway companies. The policy requires that regard be given to noise,vibration an safety standards and that were necessary an analysis be undertaken. The scope of that analysis would be considered on a case-by-case basis. No further revisions are recommended. Policy 5.3.5 includes provisions for the restriction or new cemeteries in the Prime Agricultural Areas designation. Within the Greenbelt Plan Area,the establishment and/or expansion of cemeteries are subject to the provisions of the Greenbelt Plan. Type C arterials are generally limited to urban areas(as reflected in the criteria of Schedule E—E7). Since this proposed arterial traverses the rural area it Is suggested that a Type B Arterial be added connecting Courtice Road to Regional Road 57. In addition the designations of Courtice Road, Regional Road 57 and Holt Road should be extended south of Highway 401 to this new arterial. Street are the most significant corridors in the Region.Map C3 is intended to illustrate this higher significance. A partial interchange at Green Road does not appear to t spaced appropriately from the existing interchange for Regional Road 57, however this matter should be addressed through MTO's pending study of Highway 401 improvements east of Courtice Road. No change is recommended. M M r = M M M M M IM M M M M M M M M M Page 92 Suggests the Region retain its approval role in major commercial planning matters(exceeding 25,000 sq. metres)to ensure that floor space is allocated equitably throughout the Region and in relation to growth. Otherwise,municipalities will be competing to designate new commercial areas,potentially overbuilding to attract investment and negatively impacting weaker centres and historic downtowns. Disagrees with the policy of Section 8.3.10. Suggests the Region must retain its approval role in commercial planning matters to ensure that floor space Is allocated equitably throughout the Regan and in relation to growth. Suggests the Region should be determining whether an expansion to a Region/Local Centre is of regional Interest rather than having the local Council declare there is a regional interest. ests the policies in Section 8C be fu warehouse uses in industrial areas. Allowing retail warehouses in Employment Areas in Subsection 8C.2.18 is contradictory to both the 2005 PPS and Subsection 8C1.3,which prevents the consumption of Employment Area lands by commercial uses. Suggests removing permission of retail warehouse uses In Employment Areas be removed as it competes with employment uses increasing land costs and depleting employment land for employment uses. The general intent of the commercial policy revisions is to provide a more general policy framework to guide commercial development in the Region,while maintaining the Region's interest in substantial commercial proposals (Le 56,000 mz or larger)or where a proposal has the potential to negatively Impact the planned function of a Regional Centre. Additional policies,such as 8A.1.3, are intended to protect the form and function of existing Centres. This approach has the effect of providing more autonomy to the area municipal official plans for local commercial planning and has been supported by the majority of the majority of the area municipalities. No further changes are recommended. a Regional Interest. This will provide the flexibility for the Region or the area municipality as appropriate to determine if there is a Regional Interest. No further changes are recommended. Employment Areas by retail commercial uses. This in conjunction with Policy 8C.2.6 and 8C.2.7 are intended limit the amount of retail commercial uses occurring within Employment Areas. Suggests policies should provide direction on the relative size of Local Centres that can be designated In local Official Plans. Without floor space guidelines,the proposed commercial hierarchy becomes too subjective(e.g.Newcastle Village, Bowmanville and Downtown Oshawa are Regional Centres with clearly different roles). Disagrees with the absence of size criteria for the various commercial designations,as it makes it difficult for municipalities to designate new retail nodes. As well,the ease of access to competing Centres is a very subjective measure. With the Region limiting its responsibility to commercial centres in excess of 56,000 sq.metres,an excess of commercial space could be designated that may result In cross boundary retail demands. Suggests the policies should provide more direction on the relative sizes of Local Centres that can be designated in local Official Plans. Policy 11A.1.3 provides direction on the general size of Centres, based on their function,the population they serve, and the accessibility to Centres of equal or larger scale. This in conjunction with Policy 8A.2.2 provides guidance for further details to be included in area municipal official plans. The ROP should include specific policies to support the energy I This matter should be considered further outside of the and automotive industries in their submission to the Provincial ROP Review process. No changes are recommended. Government as part of the Places to Grow consultation process. These industries should receive priority for servicing and incentives for brownfleld redevelopment. Suggests adding to Section 2.2.5 a policy that seeks to minimize conflicts between development in urban areas and adjacent rural lands. for the expansion of urban boundaries to make use of natural or man-made features to mitigate potential conflicts between urban and agricultural uses. Questions what the implications of having policies of the ORMCP Policy 2.3.19 is revised to distinguish between the lams apply to the Greenbelt with regard to stormwater in Section located on the Oak Ridges Moraine versus the Protected 2.3.12 e). Countryside of the Greenbelt Plan. Ouestions the prohibited new or expanded agricultural uses that New or expanding agricultural uses have been remrn generate greater than five additional nutrient units that should be form the table as it is addressed through the Nutrient included in Table E-6. Management Act. rn ce OD Page 93 Page 94 M = = = = = M M r M = = = = = M M Suggests Table E-5 be revised to Indicate that warehousing,b storage of animal manure,inorganic fertilizers,agricultural pesticides,herbicides,fungicides and chemicals are permitted where associated with an active farm operation,subject to conditions such as the preparation of a contaminant management plan. Suggests the Region continue to provide some policy guidance on the appropriate location of composting sites in Section 2.3.28. Suggests that a contaminated site should only be cleaned up when:the new land use has more restrictive requirements. If a contaminated industrial site is to be used for industrial purposes, it may not be necessary to remediate the site to the parldandlresidential level(Section 2.3.33-34). Suggests adding a policy to Section 3.3.8 that allows the region to carryout and participate in lower-fier Community Improvement Projects for any Community improvement Area identified In a local Official Plan as provided for in Bill 51. suggestion. The Regional Official Plan currently has general policies dealing with compatibility of land uses. More detailed policies specific to compost operations should be contained in the area municipal official plans. No change Is recommended. The Council adopted Guidelines require the same level or decommissioning of all contaminated sites that are subject to a development proposal which includes the submission of a Record of Site Condition. No change is recommended. that CIP policies should not be included in the recommended amendment, as there is no legislative basis or authority to adopt such policies prior to Bill 51 becoming law. In accordance with Regional Council's direction of July 5,2006 the Planning Department will proceed with drafting Community Improvement policies in consultation with the Province and area municipal staff and will initiate an official plan amendment process upon passage of the enabling Provincial legislation. Page 95 Suggests adding a policy to Section 5.2 that allows culture health and community facilities in any land use type that is located In a heritage structure to be designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. Suggests adding to Section 5.2.5 that existing corridors must b considered in locating utilities and the location should minimize the constraints placed on other land uses. Suggests clarifying Section 5.2.7 regarding commercial wind turbine development that the Region has a key role to play In determining the role and locational criteria in consultation with local municipalities. Suggests there may be exceptions to Section 5.3.6 t)to allow h the creation of new cemeteries in the rural area in poor quality soils or in the natural heritage system. Locating cemeteries in certain rural areas may be more appropriate given the intensity of development in serviced urban areas. The use of the word"restore"in Section 6.1.tu regaroing Integration of the shopping function with traditional Centre functions,suggests that previous policies and planning decisions have already eroded the retailing function that historically was part of downtowns. Suggests amending Section 8.1.17 regarding employment areas to include employment diversification by modifying the policy to read,"To attract Industries and businesses that will maximize and diversify the economic and employment opportunities in the Region". Such uses are encouraged to locate in Urban Areas and Hamlets,and on the Oak Ridges Moraine,within Settlement Areas,in order to avoid land use compatibility issues In the rural area. Further,the Greenbelt Plan and Oak Ridges Moraine do not permit such uses within prime agricultural areas. Accordingly,the recommended amendment encourages such uses to locate in settlement areas, but does permit limited(municipally owned and operated) community facilities within the Major Open Space Area. Area municipalities, in undertaking future conformity excercises,can include policies in their official plans to encourage the preservation of heritage structures, in accordance with the locational guidelines established by the ROP. No further changes are recommended. Detailed locational criteria should be incorporated into area municipal Official Plans with consultation with the Region. No change is recommended. Recommended policy directs the location of new cemeteries to lands outside of designated Prime Agricultural Areas. Policy 5.3.6 includes provisions for the restriction of new cemeteries in the Prime Agricultural Areas designation. Within the Greenbelt Plan Area,the establishment and/or expansion of cemeteries are subject to the provisions of the Greenbelt Plan. i Page 96 :sts further clarification of Section 8.3.5 as to wnemer rm focuses on commercial development within Centres and ors or outside of these areas. Policy 8.3.7 serves to provide priority to designated U and Corridors,but would not prevent the location of commercial uses outside these areas,subject to local policies andfor regulations. should be strengthened in Section 8.3.9 to require an additional Growth Plan conformity exercise. mixture of uses,particularly if Section 8.3.12 requires local plans must ensure the inclusion of intensification policies. Further measures and guidelines for intensification should be included. strengthened to get the highest residential densities possible in through the Growth Plan conformity exercise. the Centres,through new development and Intensification. Similar policies should be included in the section on Corridors to reinforce the 2005 PPS and the Plan's transit supportive development. Suggests amending Subsection mi z a)and tfA.z.a or ro t Vll y vn.Lv nn rl yvl Paca x nv ovyy -_... ._ replace reference to transit ridership linked to high quality urban change is recommended. design with link to available residential density. interest in all commercial planning is crucial. Special commercial use policies should be strengthened in order that these areas are not to be used In conjunction with other commercial designations. These areas should be subject to Regional Interest policy depending on their size since they will remain part of the land use structure. Without Regional Involvement,the amalgamation of highway commercial areas with lower der commercial designations will create more problems similar to Taunton/Harmony Centre. uther definition of an-empwymem-imenuma use limit retail warehouse uses in Subsection 8C.1.2. ilicies consistent With the 2Wb Ft b mar of employment lands to commercial uses. All references fo Special Purpose Commercial uses n been removed in the recommended amendment. No further change is recommended. will be considered further through the Growth Plan conformity exercise. I Page 97 Subsection 8C.2.5 which limits business park development to Type"A"arterial roads contradicts Subsection 8C.2.10 which encourages prestige employment uses along Types"A"and"B" arterial roads. The ROP currently permits retail warehouse development to be fronting on Type"B"arterial roads,therefore business parks should also be permitted,otherwise potential business park development in Bowmanviile that would rely on future Type"B"arterial road may be prohibited. Suggest kennels be included as a permitted primary use on so! classes 47. Sod farms and riding and boarding stables do not require prime agricultural lands and should be encouraged to locate on Gass 47 soils. Subsection 9A.2.6 a)refers to industrial uses snouia mmrmrzeu the use of prime agricultural land. Questions if this refers to the Prime Agricultural land designation or defined by soil type. Suggests lot creation for fans-related commercial uses shout not be considered by amendment to the ROP in Subsection 9A.2.7 and they should not locate on Prime Agricultural land. Suggests the Region is responsible for water,sewage and neai issues,and therefore the well-contamination study should be conducted by the Region rather than municipalities as stated in Subsection 98.1.5. industrial plan of subdivision,with industrial uses of various types,therefore appropriate to require the local access road to be onto a Type A arterial. Prestige industrial refers to the type of industry,generally being a high tech or clean type of industry,which may require larger parcels. It is appropriate for the ROP policies to distinguish between them. commercial kennels to the Major Open Space Area designation,and provide for area municipal official plans to include additional criteria to address land use compatibility impacts to guide the consideration of kennels. According to Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing staff, sod farms and riding and boarding stables are considered agricultural uses. Provincial policy does not permit the ROP to be more restrictive for agricultural uses. For clarity, and in response to submissions received,sod farms and horse riding and boarding stables have been added to the ROP's definition of agricultural uses. Restructuring has served to move the policies reiateu io agri-business uses to Section 10A, Major Open Space, removing them from the Prime Agricultural Areas designation. Severances are permitted in accordance with the Greenbelt Plan. The Region is not responsible for individual private water and sewer systems and since it is the responsibility of the area municipalities to plan for their rural settlements it Is also their responsibility to assess well contamination problems. However, Policy 96.1.5 does provide for the Region to assist in such a study. M M r M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Suggests the application of an EIS requirement for development or site alteration within 120m of a key natural heritage or hydrologic feature outside Urban Areas in Subsection 10A.2.6 may be overly onerous in some circumstances in rural areas. The 120m requirement is more Importantly applied to urban areas given the intensity of development. Suggests there may be some structures that are ac the 30m vegetative protection zone in Subsection 1 Table 3(Classification Criteria)of the Arterial Corridor Guidelines document from the Transportation component is omitted from Section 11.3.3. Suggests this Table should be included in the ROP as it provides a sound premise for the new classification system and to ensure some consistency in interpretation. Questions if the technically preferred route from the previous 4w study be removed from Schedule A because it no longer has any status and likewise acknowledged in Section 11.3.8. c)to Hydro One and OPG. Pass study will be area municipality". to rO Cu Page 98 The 120m EIS requirement in Policy 2.3.16 is a Greenbelt conformity requirement,which cannot be altered. No further changes are recommended. Policy 2.3.15 and 2.3.16 is a Greenbelt conformity requirement. No further changes are recommended. as Schedule t— Highway 407 is shown conceptually on all Schedules. In addition,the recommended amendment has the effect of removing the future freeway connections and associated interchanges. Policy 11.3.8 recognizes that the location of these facilities will be dependent upon the completion of the required route planning and preliminary design studies, pursuard to the Environmental Assessment Act. suggestion. in 11.3.12 by adding that a By- Policy 11.3.14 is revised to Include a general pnrase or in 'in consultation with the respective consultation with affected stakeholders'. In some instances it may be the area municipality who is the proponent of the study. MI Schedule C-Map C4 does not show any preferred goods transport connections with the existing or proposed St. Mary's Cement harbour. Section 11.3.23 could also provide additional guidelines on restricted time for heavy/goods movement vehicles in residential and main central areas. to relevant policies. reference the need for approval under the Environmental Protection Act. Relocate symbol for Courtice Water Pollution Control Plan an( add a Waterfront Place symbol at Courtice Waterfront on Map AS. from Natural Heritage System on Map Bt. Requests the Bowmanville Quarry be excluded and Stephen's Gulch be included. Disagree with the inclusion of all wetlands in the Natr System,and prefers the previous proposal to include evaluated and unevaluated wetlands. Schedule C-Map C3 should extend the transit route network connections to the south of Highway 401. Energy Park and future industrial developments should be linked to the transit system and connected with possible public water transit port locations. rn I to -1� Page 99 Map C4 designates an interconnected regional Strategic Goods Movement Network. Not all arterials are designated. as part of this network, however it is recognized that all arterials playa role in accommodating truck traffic. As such,the South Service Road from Courtice Road to Regional Road 57 be designated as a Type B arterial. The intent of the Strategic Goods Movement Network is to be a permissive network, removing such impediments as half load restrictions. No further changes are recommended. Definition is consistent wil change is recommended. The recommended amendment uses the definition C from the EPA for waste disposal site and is deemed appropriate. No change is recommended. Regional Official Plan Is consistent with the District Park designation in Clarington Official Plan. Furtherjustfication would be required to designate this area as a Waterfront Place. The ANSI's included are in accordance with the aetanea information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Definition of wetlands is consistent with definition Greenbelt Plan. All wetlands provide important environmental functions and should be protected. This route was not recognized in either the short or long term service plans of the Durham Transit Service Strategy. It is recommended that this route be considered through the next review of the Durham Transit Service Strategy. M M M M r M M M M M M = M M M i M W M am (D cn Requests the Region identify the Chenywood Community on Schedule A-Map A4 as a Future Urban Policy Area. Suggests reallocating the surplus Ajax population to Pickering and Whtiby to support Pickering's role as the western anchor and an Urban Growth Centre. Suggests the Region revise po fi projections to reflect the Central Pickering Devel t Plan and the removal of the restriction on de on of further Living Area lands. Suggests th lation of developable land ratio for urban ex ns forresidential/commercial uses should be further adjusted downwards to 50%or lower to reflect current standards of environmental protection,and community uses. Urban land needs should be reevaluated at a lower ratio to determined whether the development of Cherrywood is required sooner. The lands in question are located in the c reenoea Area and as such cannot be considered for boundary expansion without an am nt to the Greenbelt Plan. exercise. 0252-4 Cladngton has enough designated urban Kesiaennai iano iu vrui ue wnaiuoicu ,U,.,,o Municipality of Clarington accommodate the forecasted growth until 2026. However,an implementation exercise. additional 345 hectares of residential land will be required by 2031 if growth patterns and bends continue similar to those at present. Suggests the Region's land needs anaysis will change when the Provincial Growth Plan comes Into force,resulting in the possibility of very little land required to meet Clarington's provincially-defined growth needs. Page 103 Suggests more limited urban area expansions man piupuwu ur ....... the Region since the need for additional lands occurs between implementation exercise. 2026 and 2031. Particularly,more residential land is required than minor expansions(e.g.West Bowmanville)such as the addition of the Courtice lands over to Hancock Road. It is preferable that the other expansions await more detailed information and a period of growth trend monitoring under the Growth Plan to determine how successful the Plans are at achieving more compact,transit-oriented and complete communities. I Page 104 Supports the proposed West Bowmanville Expansion Area only to include lands from the current urban boundary to Maple Grove Road. A decision on the remaining portion should be deferred until subsequent OP reviews. The urban separator between Bowmanville and Courtice should remain sufficiently large to allow agricultural uses to remain for the planning period. should not be designated for urban uses at this due to the creek that flows through the middle of these lands thus reducing its viability for industrial development. There is also lack of need for additional industrial lands. Future consideration of additional lands should be reserved for subsequent OP reviews when there Is certainty about the location of the Durham East Freeway. Suggests Clarington has serviced industrial lands. Suggests the Intensification target(20%)coul be higher in areas with Urban Growth Centres(Downtown jOshawa and Pickering)Identified in the Provincial Growth qlan. The Region should also recognize differing lakeshore urb in areas when setting intensification targets. a more recent built boundary line rather than the 1991 built line proposed in the ROP Amendment for measuring Intensification. Agree that greenfield areas should be developed at a minimum density of 17 units but would favour using 12 units per hectare for Newcastle Village Urban Area. Suggests the Region's proposed policy that requires secon plans to be developed to 75%of their capacity prior to the approval of development in another area is not an effective method to implement phasing in Clarington. Suggests the use of a minimum overall floor space maex or z.o vvin oe consiaereo rurine may be appropriate for West Bowmanville Central Area but implementation exercise. would destroy the historical character of portions of Downtown Bowmanville. s = M W W M M M = r M M M M M = W M I' M = — M M M M M ■rte M M M M M M M M M r rn rD J Expresses concern as to how"minimum overall"FSI would be applied since each project may make the case for lower densities and the"average"is never enforced.There should also be an understanding of how the proposed minimum overall FSI compares to the Province's approach of"residents and jobs per hectare". targets and how they will be monitored and extended to include the area within the proposed Urban Boundary Expansions of Court'rce and West Bowmanville. Regional Corridor;should also have more detailed policies addressing built form and development densities. The current Highway 407 East extension environmental assessment,has to date,confirmed the need for the East Durham Freeway,which should be replaced in Schedule A with a "Proposed 401/407 Link". Highway 407 is shown conceptually on an scneauies. in addition,the recommended amendment has the effect of removing the future freeway connections and associated interchanges. Policy 11.3.8 recognizes that the location of these facilities will be dependent upon the completion of the required route planning and preliminary design studies, pursuant to the Environmental Assessment Act. 0253-4 Durham Environmental Advisory Committee Suggests there is a need to address the loss of,or the quality of, existing corridors that connect the lakeshore greenspace with the Oak Ridges Moraine. Section 2, 10 and the designation or ma/or open op areas in the recommended amendment p5ootdpen space corridors connecting the wate a Oak Ridges Moraine. Suggests special consideration should be given to reaching the 2 of the recommended amendment contain polices 20%Intensification target on groundwater recharge area that protect groundwater recharge areas. that the function of those areas is not compro d� Additional considerations of intensification targets will be considered through the Growth Plan implementation exercise. 02544 Requests that a 25.75 acre property located at 4725 Anderson Will be considered further through the Growth Plan Paul Fisher Street,Con.4, Pt.Lot 22,Town of Wh",be redesignated from implementation exercise. Employment Area/Major Open Space to Living Area. Page 105 Clarin��W� )n LeadingtbeWoy�/ REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-39-06 File #: By-law#: Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY.FOR JUNE, 2006. Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT-Report EGD-39-06 be received for information. Submitted b Y: Reviewed b . A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC'RP"bb July 14, 2006 I' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-1824 701 I REPORT NO.: EGD-39-06 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND: 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of June 2006, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council ' MONTH OF JUNE YEAR TO YEAR TO % CHANGE , 2006 DATE 2006 DATE 2005 OF VALUE YTD 06-05 ' Permits Issued -129 515 624 VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION , Residential $25,010,781 $82,183,27 $55,425,241, 48.3 Industrial $1,500,00q $3,359,000 $21,60q 15450.9 Government $275,00q $1,800,000 $202,50 788.9 I Commercial $119,20q $1,207,00q $1,478,20 -16.3 Institutional $1,034,00q $1,479,841 $3,50 1 42181.3 gricultural $58,00q $491,43 $420,341 18.9° OTAL $27,996,98 $90,520,561 .$57,551,40q 57.3 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of"JUNE" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. , Historical Data for Month of"June" Historical Data"YEAR TO DATE" $160.000,000 $40,000,000 $140,000,000 ' $35,000,000 $120,000,000 $30,000,000 $100,000,000 $25,000,000 $80,000,000 $20,000,000 $60,000,000 $15,000,000 ' $40,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $5,000,000 2006 2005 2004 2006 - 2005 2004 , ®value $27,996,982 $25,484,455 $36,834,145 mvaiue 1 $90,520,561 $83,035,858 $144,441,240 702 , t REPORT NO.: EGD-39-06 PAGE 3 I i tThe following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of"JUNE" and "YEAR TO DATE". ' Dwelling Unit Type"JUNE 2006" Dwelling Unit Type"YEAR TO DATE 2006" 45 109 Single 173 Apartment r Detached Apartment 225 62% 25% 35% single Detached 20 47% Sam- Detached 11% 22 Townhouse 69 3 4% Sam- . Townhouse Detached 1 ■Single Detached 45 2% ■Single Detached 225 14% 9 Semi-Detached 20 9 Semi-Detached 69 ®Townhouse 3 m Townhouse 22 ®Apartment 109 El Apartment 173 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: APPLICANT CONSTR TYPE LOCATION VALUE Port of Newcastle Marina Apartment 55 Shipway Avenue $3,042,000 Aspen Heights II Ltd Apartment 128 Aspen Springs Dr $4,399,736 ' Aspen Heights 11 Ltd Apartment 124 Aspen Springs Dr $3,299,802 Newcastle Storage Storage Building 400 Toronto Street $ 500,000 Newcastle Storage Storage Building 400 Toronto Street $ 500,000 Newcastle Storage Storage Building 400 Toronto Street $ 500,000 Kawartha Pine Ridge Board Interior Alteration 43 Ormiston Street $ 500,000 Kawartha Pine Ridge Board Exterior Alteration 3675 Concession Rd 7 $ 499,000 Attachment#1 — Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building Permit 703 Municipality of Clarington Building Services - Monthl Activi I ReportJUNE 2006 2006 2005 , JUNE Year to Date JUNE Year to Date PERMIT FEES 71$221,757 $741,529 $174,032 $551,453 JUNE 2006 2005 ' Year to Date JUNE Year to Date Building Inspections 479 2754 763 4238 Plumbing Inspections 346 2415 543 3347 ' TOTALS 825 5169 1306 7585 2006 2005 JUNE Year to Date JUNE Year to Date , Single Detached 45 225 51 196 Semi-Detached 20 69 36 182 Townhouse 1 3 22 27 40 Apartments 109 173 37 44 TOTALS 177 489 151. 462 , YEAR: 2006 AREA (to 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 , month Bowmanville 342 307 587 468 345 312 188 184 313 423 217 Courtice 77 241 173 180 133 129 231 296 254 295 331 , Newcastle 52 202 191 123 131 76 110 78 4 5 3 Wilmot Creek 4 15 25 29 38 24 19 21 33 21 16 Orono A 1 2 1 1 Darlington 4 14 15 13 17 47 102 31 14 20 17 Clarke 7 13 10 16 15 9 17 17 12 20 10 Burketon 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , Enfield 3 Enniskillen 1 1 2 5 7 6 3 7 3 Hampton 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 , Haydon 1 1 2 Kendal 1 3 2 1 , Kirby 1 Leskard 1 1 Maple Grove 1 ' Mitchells Comers 1 Newtonville 1 4 5 3 3 3 1 2 Solina 1 3 3 3 1 1 ' Tyrone 3 9 3 TOTALSI 489 802 1015 843 701 609 679 640 636 801 601 Attachment#1 —Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building Permit 704 i l i 2006 2005 ' BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION Residential 108 $25,010,782 156 $23,755,655 Industrial 3 $1,500,000 1 $100,000 Government 2 $275,000 1 $71,000 Commercial 8 $119,200 3 $1,456,000 Institutional 3 $1,034,000 0 $0 A ricultural 2 $58,000 4 $101,800 Demolition 3 $0 1 $0 TOTAL 129 $27,996,9821 166 $25,484,455 i YEAR TO DATE 2006 2005 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION Residential 440 $82,183,275 570 $79,180,901 lIndustrial 7 $3,359,000 4 $121,600 Govemment 4 $1,800,0001 5 $273,500 Commercial 29 $1,207,005 21 $2,934,209 Institutional 5 $1,479,846 1 $3,500 A ricultural- 8 $491,435 10 $522,148 Demolition 22 $0 13 $0 TOTAL 515 $90,520,561 624 $83,035,858 1 i 1 l l Attachment#1 - Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building 705 1 (Aeading heWay REPORT the Way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday September 5, 2006 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-40-06 File #: By-law#: Subject: APPOINTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTOR RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT report EGD-40-06 be received; 2. THAT Adam Carter be appointed as Inspector for the Municipality of Clarington I effective September 12, 2006 and that his name be added to Schedule 'A' of By- Law 2005-145; 3. THAT John Preston be deleted as Inspector for the Municipality of Clarington effective September 12, 2006, and that his name be deleted from Schedule 'A' of By-Law 2005-145; j4. THAT Duane Tyte be deleted as Inspector (Fire Prevention) for the Municipality of Clarington effective September 12, 2006, and that his name be deleted from Schedule 'A' of By-Law 2005-145; and 5. THAT the appropriate by-law be forwarded to Council. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 706 REPORT NO.: EGD-40-06 PAGE 2 ' Respectfully by, Submitted by: A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: Franklin Wu nt Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer , ASC/RP/dv August 16, 2006 707 1 REPORT NO.: EGD-40-06 PAGE 3 1 � 1.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 1.1 Mr. Adam Carter has been employed as a Plans Examiner/Building Inspector 1 with the Municipality of Clarington since May 1, 2006. Mr. Carter graduated from the three year Sheridan Mechanical Engineering Technology program. He was previously employed for one year with an engineering firm that specialized in jet turbines. Mr. Carter has successfully completed the following exams from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing: • Powers and Duties of CBO-2003 • Building Services-2003 • Plumbing House-taking course in September 1.2 Mr. John Preston has resigned as an Inspector for the Municipality of Clarington. 1 1.3 Mr. Duane Tyte is no longer a Fire Prevention Officer with the Municipality of ' Clarington's Emergency Services Department. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Proposed By-Law amendment 1 1 1 1 1 1 708 ATTACHMENT NO.: 1 , REPORT NO.: EGD-40-06 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2006-XXX Being a By-law to amend By-law 2005-145, a By-law respecting the appointment of a Chief Building Official, Building Inspectors, Plumbing Inspectors and Fire Safety Inspectors. WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Clarington has approved the t recommendations contained in Report EGD-40-06. NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'A' to By-Law 2005-145 is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: Column 1 "Inspector Column 2"Adam Carter ' 2. Schedule 'A' to By-Law 2005-145 is hereby amended by deleting the following thereto: , "John Preston" "Duane Tyte' This By-law shall come into effect on the date of passing hereof. , BY-LAW read a first and second time this m day of XXXXXX,2006. , BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this m day of XXXXX,2006. John Mutton, Mayor ' Pattie Barrie, Municipal Clerk , 709 ' I'. CIlltgtoll REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-41-06 File #: By-law#: ISubject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR JULY, 2006. ' Recommendations: ' It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1. THAT Report EGD-41-06 be received for information. Submitted by: Reviewed by�� '�--'C� ' A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC*RP*bb August 15, 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-1824 710 1 REPORT NO.: EGD41-06 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND: ' 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of July 2006, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. ' MONTH OF JULY YEAR TO YEAR TO % CHANGE 2006 DATE 2006 DATE 2005 OF VALUE YTD 06-05 ' Permits Issued 92 607 761 _20,2 VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION , Residential $13,567,931 $95,771,207 $94,884,071 0.9 Industrial $1,815,000 $5,174,000 $433,600 1093.3 Government $90,000 $1,890,000 $333,500 466.7 ' Commercial $350,00 $1,557,005 $3,228,66 -51,6 Institutional $1,649,02 $3,128,871 $33,50 9239.9 ' gricultural $131,571 $623,01110 $3,482,26 -62.1 [TOTAL $17,623,5321 $108,144,09q $102,395,59 5.6 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of"JULY' ' and "YEAR TO DATE"for three year period. ' Historical Data for Month of"Jury" Historical Data"YEAR TO DATE" ,. $160,000,000 $25,000,000 $140,000,000 $20,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $15,000,000 $60,000,000 ' $10,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 ' $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 2008 2005 2004 ' 2006 2005 2004 ®value 1$17,623,532 1$19,359,741 1 $5,572,270 ■value 5108,144,093 $102,395,599 $150,013,510 711 ' REPORT NO.: EGD-41-06 PAGE 3 ' The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of"JULY" and '"YEAR TO DATE". Dwelling Unit Type"JULY 2006" Dwelling Unit Type"YEAR TO DATE 2006" Apartment 203 38% 44 Apartment e t 119TRE11111111h Single 36% 269 Townhouse Detached Single 0% 57% Detached 47% 4 Semi- Detached 22 5% Townhouse 73 ' 4% Semi. ■Single Detached 44 ■Single Detached 269 De 13% 13% ' m Semi-Detached 4 t9 Semi-Detached 73 E7Townhouse 0 13 Townhouse 22 ®Apartment 30 13 Apartment 203 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: ' APPLICANT CONSTR TYPE LOCATION VALUE Aspen Heights II Ltd Apartment 132 Aspen Springs Dr $2,912,415 W E Roth Construction Storage Facility 2385 South Service Rd $ 350,000 ' W E Roth Construction Storage Facility 2385 South Service Rd $ 350,000 Durham Christian Academy Gymnasium 2038 Nash Road $1,553,025 ' Ontario Power Generation Alt Fuel Facility 2151 South Service Rd $1,000,000 2098746 Ontario Ltd Alt Bar & Grill 1656 Nash Road $ 300,000 ' Attachment#1 — Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building Permit 712 Municipality of Clarington ' Buildin Services - Monthly Activity ReportJULY 2006 , 2006 2005 , JULY Year to Date JULY Year to Date PERMIT FEES $154,572 $896,101 $123,350 $674,803 2006 2005 ' JULY Year to Date JULY Year to Date Building Inspections 519 3273 814 5052 Plumbing Inspections 431 2846 552 3899 ' TOTALS 950 6119 1366 8951 2006 2005 JULY Year to Date JULY Year to Date ' Single Detached 44 269 34 230 Semi-Detached 4 73 44 226 ' Townhouse 0 22 1 9 49 Apartments 30 203 12 56 TOTALS 78 567 99 561 , YEAR: 2006 AREA (to 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 , month Bowmanville 393 307 587 468 345 312 188 184 313 423 217 Courtice 93 241 173 180 133 129 231 296 254 295 331 ' Newcastle 60 202 191 123 131 76 110 78 4 5 3 Wilmot Creek 4 15 25 29 38 24 19 21 33 21 16 Orono 1 1 2 1 1 Darlington 4 14 15 13 17 47 102 31 14 20 17 Clarke 10 13 10 16 15 9 17 17 12 20 10 Burketon 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Enfield 3 Enniskillen 1 1 2 5 7 6 3 7 3 Hampton 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 ' Haydon 1 1 2 Kendal 1 3 2 1 , Kirby 1 Leskard 1 1 Maple Grove 1 ' Mitchells Comers 1 Newtonville 1 4 5 3 3 3 1 2 Solina 1 3 3 3 1 1 ' Tyrone 3 9 3 TOTALS 567 802 1015 843 701 609 679 640 636 801 601 Attachment#1 —Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Histodcal Comparison of Building Permit 713 1 ' MONTH OF JULY 2006 2006 2005 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION Residential 74 $13,587,932 120 $15,703,173 Industrial 6 $1,815,000 3 $312,000 ' Government 1 $90,000 1 $60,000 Commercial 2 $350,000 6 $294,453 ' Institutional 4 $1,649,025 1 $30,000 Agricultural 2 $131,575 4 $2,960,115 Demolition 3 $0 2 $0 ' TOTAL 1 92 1 $17,623,5321 137 $19,359,741 ' YEAR TO DATE ' 2006 2005 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF VALUE OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF ' PERMITS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS CONSTRUCTION Residential 514 $95,771,207 690 $94,884,074 Industrial 13 $5,174,000 7 $433,600 ' Government 5 $1,890,000 6 $333,500 Commercial 31 $1,557,005 27 $3,228,662 ' Institutional 9 $3,128,871 2 $33,500 Agricultural 10 $623,010 14 $3,482,263 Demolition 25 $0 15 $0 TOTAL 607 $108,144,093 761 $102,395,599 1 Attachment#1 - Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building 714 1 ClJ11gt011 REPORT Leadjngtheway ENGINEERING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: EGD-42-06 File #: LD-99-227-231 By-law#: ' Subject: RIVER VALLEY ESTATES SUBDIVISION PHASE 5, BOWMANVILLE, LD-99-227-2319 'CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE' AND 'ASSUMPTION BY-LAW, FINAL WORKS INCLUDING ROADS AND OTHER RELATED WORKS iRECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-42-06 be received; 2. THAT the Director of Engineering Services be authorized to issue a 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works, which include final stage roads and other related Works, constructed within Plan 40R-19553; and ' 3. THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report EGD-42-06, assuming certain streets within Plans 40R-19553 and 40R-14228 as public highways. ' Submitted by: A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer NAC/ASC/dv August 17, 2006 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 715 REPORT NO.: EGD-42-06 PAGE 2 I' 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington entered into a Servicing Agreement, registered August 2, 2000, with Veltri And Son Limited to develop lands by plan of subdivision, located in Bowmanville and described as Plan 40R- ' 19553 (Attachment 1). The agreement required the developer to construct all roadworks, including hot-mix paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, street trees, a ' storm drainage system and streetlights, hereinafter referred to as the 'Works'. 1.2 The Servicing Agreement provides for the separation of the Works into five (5) stages: ' a) Initial Works; b) Street Lighting System; c) Final Works; d) Stormwater Management System (Not Applicable); and e) Park Works (Not Applicable) 1.3 The Initial Works and Street Lighting System were issued 'Certificates of Completion' and subsequent 'Certificates of Acceptance' by the Director of Engineering Services, as per the maintenance requirements set out in the Servicing Agreement. ' 1.4 The Final Works were issued a 'Certificate of Completion' dated March 6, 2003. , This initiated a one (1) year maintenance period, which expired on March 6, 2004. The Works were re-inspected at that time and although the Developer , experienced delays in completing the necessary repairs, all deficiencies have now been rectified to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. ' 1.5 It is now appropriate to issue a 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works. The Servicing Agreement requires Council approval prior to the issuance of the 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works. ' 716 , i ' REPORT NO.: EGD-42-06 PAGE 3 1.6 Further to the issuance of a 'Certificate of Acceptance', a by-law is required to ' permit the Municipality to assume certain streets within Plans 40R-19553 and 40R-14228 as public highways (Attachment 2). Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map tAttachment 2 - Proposed By-law 717 i River Valley Estates Phase 5 , . . FIN PLAN I 1 1 ;�--�iiiv'i/, '■ rT�ii°2 n111= iliiillllnnnnnl� nr,•••••••,•,,.... r— !rr! ? �, ■rp� —w unr nm =11111 .�_1`���� G``�.nm i? IIIIIIq linlnlm lion _,�_ nNiiiii_ ua^�,ff Jul uf�lul,Gtll = �� � ��alllllllll■ __ _= ununuulllllnr=—�= nlllwullll non �fnummlo�= � 1, ��� — =a ninlillln�= �___ =nlllumulbl II.. uollllunlnu.', 1/ �: �.�/IIIIIIIIII: �� __ Illllllnl _ -lnlllllnll 1u•� 1 ��.� • .••Ilnllnulla B. _= nlnllw _- J■ __ — nn nlnml0�� �I'Gp�� III =%11111111 111111111111 �� 1.■ IIIIII���11: ihunw nunm u�l�_ _ ■ NINE loon �r •In�lullll1111111 Q REPORT EGD42-06 ATTACHME 11■11° �=1111_ •.11111. annum —��- � ! »�_ �s,y..•nL+I!+I'llpll llllnll C ��VIII` �� IIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIL= _IIf/� q q 111111111 '' �■��_ � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI_ - c p -�I��QN�r - 111■■�—�11 ��1111111111111111= ' O �m ya 1.'1e�1/////i/tom - _ �Ii ,. , i - • p i�rl � �in�•/Ifd :111 IIIII!:=. 11��- nililllll u.— 1 ATTACHMENT NO.: 2 REPORT NO.: EGD-.42-06 1 ' THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON iBY-LAW 2006- Being a by-law to establish certain lands as public highways, assume them for public use and name them 1 The Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. THAT the following lands are hereby established as public highways, assumed by the ' Corporation for public use and assigned the names set out below: Land Established as Public Highway Name 1 (a) Part Lots 23 and 31, Block A, Hannings Plan, McFeeters Crescent designated as Part 17 on Plan 40R-19553 ' (b) Part Lots 23 and 24, Block A,Hannings Plan McFeeters Crescent designated as Part 18 on Plan 40R-19553 (c) Part Lot 24, Block A, Hannings Plan, Meams Avenue designated as Part 26 on Plan 40R-19553 (d) Part Lots 23 and 24, Block A, Hannings Plan, McFeeters Crescent designated as Part 3 on Plan 4OR-14228 1 By-law read a first and second time this day of XXXXXXXX. ' By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of XXXXXXXX. ' Mayor Municipal Clerk i 1 719 i Clar; REPORT Leading the Way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-43-06 File #: By-law#: Subject: PROVISION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES GREEN ROAD — BASELINE ROAD TO ASPEN SPRINGS DRIVE, ' BOWMANVILLE ' RECOMMENDATIONS: ' It is respectrully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1. THAT Report EDG-43-06 be received; 2. THAT the engineering services and project construction be provided through The Kaitlin ' Group and that the construction be tendered in conjunction with the development work in order to take advantage of volume pricing; 3. THAT Purchasing By-law 206-127, paragraph 15.07 be waived for this project; and 4. THAT the award of the construction be subject to satisfactory pricing being received and ' the approval of the Director of Engineering Services. ' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 720 REPORT NO.: EDG-43-06 PAGE 2 ' Submitted by: Anthony Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: Franklin Wu ' Director, Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC/BMB/dv , August 28, 2006 721 , REPORT NO.: EGD-43-06 PAGE 3 1.0 BACKGROUND In order to facilitate the development of the West Main Central area and proposed residential development south of the CP Railway crossing, the construction of Green ' Road is required from Baseline Road northerly to Aspen Springs Drive. This project includes the construction of Green Road to a 3 lane cross section with provision for the ultimate 4 lane paved surface in the future. The Municipality, along ' with TSH, is currently working on the Environmental Assessment for the proposed works. In conjunction with the adjacent residential developments and the need to provide this ' essential transportation link, the Municipality agreed to take the lead role in the project providing the remaining services through the construction of Green Road. This includes the Regional watermain and sanitary works and all other services necessary as part of our road reconstruction project. 1 The construction of Green Road will require coordination between 5 parties. This ' includes the Municipality, Durham Region, Hydro One, and each of the Developments east and west of Green Road. The services provided by each are listed below; • Hydro One will be relocating a major feeder line within the Green Road right-of- way; • The Developer's will be installing the required servicing infrastructure and grading in the road allowance to facilitate the subdivisions; Region will provide the additional servicing with respect to watermains and sanitary sewers along Green Road; Municipality will be installing the local storm sewers required and construct Green Road completing a portion to the vital link. ' As further background to the proposed construction, the Municipality is planning to begin the grade separation design and construction in 2007 as specified in the approved 2006 Capital Budget. 722 I REPORT NO.: EDG-43-06 PAGE 4 ' 2.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT D.G. Biddle &Associates Limited are the Engineering Consultants for owners of the , developments on the east and west side of Green Road. Since D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited have been actively involved in this area and already have a , database of engineering knowledge on the site and road grading, existing drainage proposals, servicing works, road design, and utility locations, it is desirable to retain this ' Engineering Consultant to carry out the design for the reconstruction of Green Road. This arrangement will eliminate any confusion and delays during the design and , construction process. As the owner of both east and west developments, The Kaitlin Group has requested a collective benefit (Attachment#2). The Kaitlin Group will relieve the Municipality of the , design and contract administration of the project in order to streamline the process thereby ensuring their development schedule. The Municipality will benefit through , reduced fees in eliminating the duplication of services currently being completed by D.G. Biddle &Associates Limited for The Kaitlin Group. t It is also suggested that the project be tendered in conjunction with the development , work in order to take full advantage of pricing based on volume. The tender process will be open to multiple bidders and acceptance of the unit prices will be subject to the , Director of Engineering approval. This assures the best interests of the Municipality are , considered. The Engineering Department has discussed the process with the Purchasing Division who concur with the ability to waive the Purchasing By-law 2006- , 127 in order to take advantage of this proposal. 3.0 CONCLUSION Our staff has dealt extensively with D.G. Biddle &Associates Limited on large , residential developments in various areas within the Municipality of Clarington, including Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle Village. We have found their performance to be ' reliable and proficient. 723 REPORT NO.: EDG-43-06 PAGE 6 ' The Municipality has a standard consulting services agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions for their consulting services to the Municipality. The agreement with D.G. Biddle &Associates Limited will be prepared on the same basis as our standard consulting agreement. Consideration of the request made by The Kaitlin Group would be advantageous to the Municipality of several levels. Beyond fiscal compensation, the proposal reduces the possibility of errors through design coordination, delays through construction coordination, liabilities of multiple contractors working within the Municipal right-of-way, 1 and avoids confusion of construction limits and the responsibilities thereof. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Key Map ' Attachment 2 — Correspondence (The Kaitlin Group) Interested party to be advised of Council's decision: D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited 96 King Street, East ' Oshawa, ON L1H 166 I I, r 724 ■■■ __ ���pu�ee�ee �sieimuu -- ' ®uui unu�► � iuuuuou_ �nuu►�����ii III �uuuunuo _��eeee��,•, Extent of Works by D.G. Biddle&Associates nmull =_ ARM _ . ,,.era ��t.■_. REPORT EGD-43-06 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 725 a1G-24-06 17:16 FROM-KAITLIN GROUP 416-495-6929 ATTACHMENT NO.: 2 REPORT NO.: EGD-43.06 The Kaitlin (;roux Ltd. 1029IycNicollAverse Scarborough. ON Ml W 3W6 Telephone(416)495-7050 Facsimile(416)495-8820 y�,C,Si11"TT T 'TA A N � TO: Bruno Bianco COMPANY NAME: ingtoa Engineering ' FAX NO: 1-905-623-9282 DATE: August 24,2006 FROM: Ketvin Whalen NUMBER OF PAGES,INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES OR FIND THAT THE COPY 1S ILLEGIBLE, PLEASE ADVISE US. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:COHFW a ALTTY CAUTION Bruno Following is the revised letter for the Green Road consulting services. I have added a new paragraph (Paragraph 3)on the second page in which I have included the contract admin and inspection services. IPthis letter is sufficient,l have signed it and you can include as official,otherwise if refinements are ' needed,please advise and we can discuss. Thanks Kelvin THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS 1 NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION IC COPYING ERROR. COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR PLEASE NOTIFY VS IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND WE WILL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE RETURN OF THE MESSAGE TO US AT OUR COST. SENT BY: TELEPHONE NO: (416)495-7050 E N 6 1 N E E R I N 6 FAX NO: (416)495-8820 AUG 2 5 2006 ' DEPARTMENT 726 i,UG-24-06 ING FROM-CAITLIN GROUP 416-495-BBZD T-631 P.D02/DD3 F-198 ' ATTACHMENT No.: 2 Tfw Kait(ia Grm f Lod. REPORT NO.: EGD-43-06 ' 1029 mdrKoll Avenge 5cerb,m&b,Onurio M1W 3W6 August 24, 2006 Telaphene(416)495-7050 Fex(416)495-8820 hap9lwwa ka1d1U9roup com Mr. Tony Cannella, C.E.T. `niei1e loe1`ai111�`�p Director of Engineering Services ' The Municipality of Clalington 40 Temperance Street ' Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 Dear Sir Re: Green Road Reconstruction 'Darlington Green' Subdivision Servicin As you are aware, detailed engineering design for the Darlington Green , subdivision plan is nearing completion, and we anticipate servicing through the Fall 2006 and Winter 2007 periods with road construction targeted for Spring 2007. ' We also understand, thr gh meetings with Staff and Totten Sims Hubicki, who are designing the Municiiality's capital works projects at Baseline Road and ' Green Road reconstructions, that a similar schedule is anticipated for the design and construction of these projects, and particularly the reconstruction of the new Green Road from Baseline Road northerly to the existing intersection with Aspen , Springs Drive. At a recent coordination meeting involving ourselves, Staff, and the respective ' consultants, it was suggested that we consider the collective benefit of undertaking the design of Green Road through our consultants, DG Biddle Associates Ltd., and relieving the Municipality of this responsibility. Upon further consideration,we wish to advise that we would be willing to , undertake this responsibility. While there would be some additional engineering , cost to do this, we anticipate that there would also be benefits as a result of the coordination and streamlining of the ensuing process. The Green Road works and the subdivision works are very much interrelated and both processes must ' be coordinated and managed jointly. In fact, much of the Green road design work has to a large degree, already been reflected in the subdivision drawings. Having two separate clients and two separate consultants and processes, would ' likely lead to conflicts or oversights to the detriment of all parties. Consequently, we advise of our willingness to undertake the detailed design work of Green Road, through our consultants, DG Biddle Associates Ltd. Please consider this , suggestion and advise if that would be agreeable with the Municipality. 727 , ' AUG-24-06 17:16 FROM-KAITLIN GROUP 416-495-BB20 T-631 P.003/003 F-130 ATTACHMENT NOS: 2 FA&FJ REPORT NO.: EGb-43-00 Furthermore, we suggest that the Municipality should also consider the advantages of including the Green Road project as part of the tender for the subdivision servicing and roadworks. The advantages would be that combining the projects..as one tender would likely resuft in economies of scale and and a lower cost for both parties, and again the coordination and management of the works would be done jointly and thereby avoid conflict and overlap. If such an arrangement was preferred, the Green Road works would be partitioned within the tender as a separate section and clearly identified as a 'Provisional' portion of the contract,with the Municipality having full latitude to opt ' out of the contract award, and tender separately. The tender form would also be structured so that various items would be described identically for both Green Road and the subdivision. In this way, an easy comparison of unit rates can be made. The Municipality would have the ability to review the unit rates and ascertain whether they represent current market conditions. This process is similar to that used by the Regional Municipality of Durham in situations where they have works undertaken through subdivision servicing. In the event that West Diamond Properties were to undertake the Green Road construction works as outlined above, the contract administration and inspection services could likewise bQ provided through our consultants, D.G. Biddle Associates, again for simplification and streamlining of the consulting services. In this way; pricing and coordination objectives can be achieved while maintaining maximum flexibility and control by the Municipality. it would be appreciated if Staff could review this proposal and advise if there would be interest in adopting this approach. ' Should you require further discussion or clarification of this matter, please do not hesitate to.contact the undersigned. Yours ve ' truly ' Kelvin Whalen, P. Eng., Vice-President, land Development 1 728 Cjpn REPORT r ceo��ng�hew«y ENGINEERING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Report#: EGD-44-06 File#: By-law#: Subject: CANADA-ONTARIO MUNICIPAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND INTAKE THREE — PORT DARLINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD, SECONDARY ACCESS ROUTE 1 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administrative Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-44-06 be received by Council; ' 2. THAT the Municipality submit an application for funding to the Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund — Intake 3; 3. THAT the works listed in the Port 'Darlington Neighbourhood, Secondary Access Route contained in Report EGD-44-06 continue to be endorsed as the Municipality's highest priority project per COMRIF Intake 2 , however modified to identify additional benefits, and included in the application; I 4. THAT this report be forwarded to the Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund Joint Secretariat; and 5. THAT the Engineering Services Department proceed with the preparation and submission of the Canada-Ontario Rural Infrastructure Fund application, including all supporting documentation. ' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 729 REPORT NO.: EDG-44-06 _ PAGE 2 1 r r Respectfully by, , Submitted by: A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: Franklin Wu , Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC/BMB/dv , August 28, 2006 r 1 r 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 730 , it REPORT NO.: EDG-44-06 PAGE 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' 1.1 The third and final intake for the Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (COMRIF) program was announced late June of 2006. The total funding amount for Intake 3 has been reduced by more than 50% of that provided with Intake 1 and 2. The Municipality has also contacted the Joint Secretariat for additional information before applying in order to receive feedback on the previous Intake application. ' Following discussion with the COMRIF officials and the office of our regional member of parliament, our department is proposing a resubmission of the COMRIF Intake 2 1 application. The information provided allows the Municipality to focus on areas that did not score well with the Intake 2 application hence providing an advantage over a new project application. I 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the Guidelines and Technical 1 Schedules for Intake 3 of the COMRIF program, specifically the sections dealing with Municipal Roads and Bridges and Related Structures. The focus of the program is to ensure that Ontaras in small urban and rural communities enjoy a quality of life that's second to none through infrastructure investments which: enhance and renew Ontario's aging public infrastructure improve the quality of the environment protect the health and safety of citizens support long-term economic growth build strong, sustainable communities by giving municipalities the tools they need The funding formula for the program would see the three levels of government, local municipality, Ontario and Canada, each paying one third of the eligible project costs. The COMRIF program also states that the priorities for project selection are: water, wastewater, local bridges and roads and solid waste management. I731 REPORT NO.: EDG-44-06 PAGE 4 ' Municipalities may only submit one project for each intake, but similar projects can be grouped together and submitted as one. Applications, supported by a municipal council , resolution, must be submitted to the COMRIF Joint Secretariat on or before 5:00 p.m. EST on September 13, 2006. , Upon review of the Application Guidebook- Intake 3, the criteria for projects eligible for ' funding under the program, and the input provided subsequent to the Intake 2 application, it was evident that for the roads and bridges sections that protection of public ' health and safety, transportation efficiency, and economic development were weighted heavily in the evaluation criteria. Projects that are considered routine maintenance or repair are not eligible for funding. Projects that are required as a result of residential development are not eligible for funding. Purchase of land for road construction is also ' not eligible. As a result of these factors it limited the eligible projects significantly. Through a review of the existing road inventory information and the advantage of our ' Intake 2 debrief, it was determined that the Municipal Roads section of the Intake 3 application would provide the Municipality with the best opportunity to submit a ' successful application for funding from the COMRIF program. The criteria under"Municipal Roads"for Intake 3 apply, essentially, to the reconstruction , of an existing road which is deficient. The criteria calls for the calculation of a "Road Sufficiency Index" within which a series of factors are established related to horizontal and vertical alignment, traffic level of service, roadside safety, drainage, etc. A"Road Sufficiency Index" greater than 75 will disqualify the project from COMRIF funding. The Municipality scored very well in this area through Intake 2 however improvements are required with Public Policy Criteria and Project Cost. 3.0 MUNICIPAL ROADS '■ 3.1 The road pattern in the Port Darlington Neighbourhood presently identifies only one road, u Port Darlington Road, which is capable of handling normal traffic operations and providing emergency access. In the interests of public safety, a second access is essential. This was highlighted by the incident of November 10, 2004 during the 732 REPORT NO.: EDG-44-06 PAGE 6 explosion and fire at the Caledon Propane Storage Yard. East Beach Road was used to evacuate approximately 500 people from the area. Should the emergency situation have occurred under other circumstances, such as during severe snow or rainstorm conditions, it is possible that East Beach Road would have been blocked or may even have experienced washout from flooding of Bennett Creek. Similarly,Port Darlington Road being in proximity to the Soper Creek flood plain could experience flooding. It also has a level crossing with CN Rail which could be blocked by ' a stopped or disabled train. In addition the road intersects a hydro corridor with twin tower transmission lines which could create problems if damaged by heavy ice, for example. ' From an economic development perspective, this road facilitates the Port Darlington Waterfront Park and the Village Commercial components thereof. It will also attract additional use of the waterfront trail to this area with the possible construction of the 'missing link' which currently exists. The transportation efficiency for the expansion and ultimate use of the water pollution control plant, currently approved to proceed, will also ' benefit from the reconstruction proposed. It is estimated that the cost to provide this secondary access route is approximately $635,000 of which the Municipality would be responsible for $225,000 to be provided for under the Engineering Services 2007 Capital Budget process. ' These are compelling reasons to revisit the opportunity to improve public safety through the provision of an improved secure two-way access and support economic development in the area. 733 � 1 �i REPORT NO.: EDG44-06 PAGE 6 , Attachments: ' Attachment 1 - Project Identification Map , 1 I i 1 1 I 1 1 1 734 i „ 1 Descdbed Area REPORT • . BOWMANiflLLE KEY MAP ATTACHMENT NO. 735 � Clarington REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday September 5, 2006 Resolution #: Report#: Addendum #2 to EGD-50-04 File #: By-law#: 1 Subject: PORT DARLINGTON WATERFRONT PARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Addendum #2 to EGD-50-04 be received; 2. THAT Committee recommend to Council approval of the revised West Beach Conceptual Master Plan for Port Darlington Waterfront Park; ' 3. THAT Committee recommend to Council approval of the cost estimate for the West Beach Conceptual Master Plan and refer it for consideration in a future Capital Budget; and 4. THAT all interested parties listed for this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 736 1 REPORT NO.: ADDENDUM #2 TO EGD-50-04 1 PAGE 2 Respectfully by, 1 Submitted by: A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Devi C e, M.C.LP, R.P.P. Director, Engineering Services Director, Planning Services 1 Reviewed by: Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer 1 ASC/PW/dv August 16, 2006 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 737 , REPORT NO.: ADDENDUM #2 TO EGD-50-04 ' PAGE 3 1.0 BACKGROUND 1 1.1 On November 1, 2004 staff presented the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan to the .Port Darlington Community Association. On INovember 4, 2004 staff presented the Plan to residents of the Port Darlington community at the Bowmanville Community Forum. During these meetings, while there were questions regarding the details, timing and cost of the land acquisition and park development there was general consensus that the park is desirable and will be a highly used municipal asset. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 As reported to General Purpose and Administration Committee in November, 2004 (attachment 1) staff had developed a conceptual Master Plan for the Port Darlington Waterfront Park. The conceptual Master Plan was approved by tCouncil at its meeting on November 8, 2004. 2.2 The East Beach portion of the Master Plan was amended by an addendum report on November 14, 2005 by Resolution #C-509-05. This addendum addressed the ' feedback staff received from the Port Darlington Harbour Company and Wiggers Custom Yachts, and citizen feedback received at public reviews in November 2004 making modifications to the conceptual layout of the park(attachment 2). 2.3 In December 2005 Council received Report PSD-146-05 which informed them of the notification the Municipality received from the Ministry of Natural Resources in November of 2005. The report alerted Council to the change in status of the Bowmanville Marsh to a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) and indicated j that staff would review the implications of this change with CLOCA and other approval agencies. 738 REPORT NO.: ADDENDUM #2 TO EGD-50-04 PAGE 4 2.4 The purpose of this report is to recommend approval of the updated West Beach Conceptual Master Plan for Port Darlington Waterfront Park (attachment 3) in light of the review by staff and comments from approval agencies in response to the PSW designation. 3.0 MASTER PLAN REVISIONS , 3.1 The park elements proposed on the original conceptual master plan were based on the information available at the time it was prepared. The first addendum to the East Beach Conceptual Master Plan addressed concerns raised by Port Darlington Harbour Company, Wiggers Custom Yachts Limited and residents. , 3.2 The park elements proposed on the original Conceptual Master Plan for the West Beach included a dune restoration area, vQll_eyball courts, sun shelters, washroom facilities, canoe and kayak launch and parking area. , 3.3 The designation of the PSW affects the proposed activities on the northern ' upland area of the West Beach plan. In addition, we have had our biologist review the sand dune area and determine a more appropriate boundary for the restoration. These factors affect the conceptual layout presented to Council in November 2004. 3.4 The plan revisions include; shifting the parking lot to the south outside of the limits of the PSW, and the elimination of the volleyball courts from this section of the West Beach while increasing the dune restoration area. The canoe and kayak launch if desired will have to be from a floating dock and may need to be shifted to another area of the marsh. The proposed walkway leading north from , the park through the marsh has also been deleted. 739 , 1 REPORT NO.: ADDENDUM #2 TO EGD-50-04 ' PAGE 5 3.5 The revised West Beach Conceptual Master Plan has allowed us to prepare a more refined cost estimate for use in a future capital budget. The estimated cost for the landscape elements proposed for the West Beach is approx. $1,300,000. This figure does not include the cost for any buildings or structures that would require a building permit, such as the concession/washroom building. ' 4.0 CONCLUSION 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve the revised West Beach Conceptual Master Plan for Port Darlington Waterfront Park, and refer the project to the Capital Budget. ' 4.2 Once the lands have been acquired and the detailed construction drawings prepared, application will be made for clearances, approvals, and permits for the floating dock, washroom/concession building, and parking lot from CLOCA, and ' other applicable approval agencies. The plan will also be subject to further public review and the site plan process. 1 Attachments: Attachment 1 -Addendum to EDG-50-04 Attachment 2- Revised East Beach Master Plan Attachment 3- Revised West Beach Master Plan ' List of Interested Parties: Port Darlington Harbour Company Wiggers Custom Yachts Limited Port Darlington Community Association tChris Williams-Aird and Berlis CLOCA 740 QdixREPORT' gµew�� ENGINEERING SERVICES ' ATTACHMENT NO.: 1 Meeting: Council REPORT NO.: ADDENDUM 2 ' TO EGD-50-04 Date: Monday, October 24, 2005 , Report#: Addendum to EGD-50-04 File #: By-law#: Subject: PORT DARLINGTON WATERFRONT PARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN , RECOMMENDATIONS: , It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the following: 1. THAT this Addendum to Report EGD-50-04 be received; , 2. THAT Council approve the revised Conceptual Master Plan for the East Beach , portion of the Port Darlington Waterfront Park; 3. THAT all interested parties listed for this report and any delegations be advised , of Council's decision. Submitted by: A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. a J. Crome, M.C.I.P.,R.P.P. Director of Engineering Services Director, Planning Services Reviewedby:�` ' Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer ASC/PWfjo ' October 19, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 , 741 ' Addendum to EGD-50-04 ' Page 2 1.0 PURPOSE ' 1.1 As reported to General Purpose and Administration Committee on November 1, 2004 (Attachment 1) staff had developed a conceptual master plan for the Port ' Darlington Waterfront Park. T he conceptual master plan, was approved by Council at its meeting of November 8, 2004. 1.2 Port Darlington Harbour Company and Wiggers Custom Yachts have indicated that all of their property on the East Beach is required for their business. In addition to the feedback from the Port Darlington Harbour Company and Wiggers Custom Yachts, the citizen feedback received during public reviews in November 2004 has assisted in the preparation of the revised plan. 1.3 The purpose of this report is to recommend an update to the east beach portion ' of the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan (attachment 2) in light of staffs review of these comments and decisions taken by Council respecting COPA#39. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 At the October 25"', 2004 meeting of Council, staff were authorized to prepare appropriate amendments to the Port Darlington Neighbourhood Secondary Plan, among other things to facilitate the creation of larger, more usable park space as a focal point on the waterfront. A statutory Public Meeting was held on November 15, 2004 at which a number of residents appeared before committee with questions as to the details of the park plan and traffic management issues. ' 2.2 On November 1, 2004, staff presented the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan to the Port Darlington Community Association. On November 4, 2004, staff presented the Plan to residents of the Port Darlington 1 community at the Bowmanville Community Forum. During these meetings, it appeared that while there are questions regarding the details, timing and cost of 742 Addendum to EGD-50-04 Page 3 the park development there is general consensus that the park is desirable and ' will be a highly used municipal asset. 2.3 On January 1r, 2005 the Municipality approved an amendment to the Port ' Darlington Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (COPA #39) which provides for the ' shifting of East Beach Road north from its present location. This will reduce the area now designated Village Commercial by the Secondary Plan which is in ' place. Two amendments have been made to COPA #39 to address objections made by Port Darlington Harbour Company, Wiggers Custom Yachts and Mr. Glen Ransom (By-laws 2005-070 and 2005-101). The revised plan recommended in this report is consistent with COPA #39. ' 3.0 MASTER PLAN REVISIONS 3.1 The park elements proposed on the original master plan for the East Beach include a large central gathering node constructed near the waters edge at the south extension of Port Darlington Road. This space would be used for special events such as concerts in the park, fireworks displays, art exhibits, etc. A nautically themed children's playground, water play area, washroom building, and concession stand are also proposed for this portion of the park. Large open ' green spaces would be provided for picnicking or informal play. All of these elements have been preserved in the revised Conceptual Master , Plan by shifting eastward the proposed park uses that encroached on the lands , owned by Port Darlington Harbour Company and Wiggers Custom Yachts. The shift does not delete any of the significant features of the Conceptual Master , Plan. The plan has also been revised to include park uses on the existing municipal ' lands on the west side of Port Darlington Road. They add approximately .64 he ' to the East Beach portion of the park. The addition of these lands to the master plan allows for the relocation of parking away from the remaining residential area ' 743 ' ' Addendum to EGD-50-04 ' Page 4 on East Beach Road. The proposed parking lot on the original master plan was ' one of the most significant concerns expressed by residents of East Beach Road. Moving it away from the residential area will free up more green space close to the lake and will also reduce vehicular traffic in the vicinity of the remaining homes on East Beach Road. The plan also illustrates the existing alignment of East Beach Road and Port Darlington Road as well as the proposed realignment of East Beach Road. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve the revised East Beach portion of the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan. ' Attachments: Attachment 1 —EGD-50-04 Attachment 2 —Revised East Beach Master Plan Interested parties to be noted of Council's decision: Glenn Ransom Maria and Alvarina DeLemos Cauchon/Abugara Port Darlington Harbour Company Port Darlington Community Association Kevin Taylor ' Rose Savage Scott Lumley Chris Williams ■ Stephen Waque ■ Shane Raymon Michael Melling 744 N D 0 M Z -- w O a— za WOQ � O PaW Q yj O i JI I L A K E i 1 I M A R S H 1 c AREA T i 1 Y W W ir 0 W J J Z Q 3 0 m ■■■ ■■■ , iw.. nIP nu ■ WEST BEACH ■ ■■■ No PORT DARLINGTON WATERFRONT PARK ■■ _nn ® CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN ■■■ MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON one an-�n�.ur m _ IlOif19-M•.n cu v r F qa{ f} 4 loll 11111 00 111 1 11 1 + iAWW PURPOSE AND OW Report E: COD 4M446 FMOME1"'FIOW- 1. THAT Report COD4M4-a6 be 2. THAT :the Review Report of ;*:4' Pity Equgy= Aly, Q & Q MxW Core M$.ba reoeiv+ed; 3. THAT ##te Chief Adn-dri ratima ePpror'ed arOWWO of $30,000 sworn, far thy° w 1i mew imp&Tw* on of revised P"ll fW.i Non-AM" Empipy"e, i 4. THAT*a CA© be eothoriud to i i+d t ert1 ;—Phne2ofttm ' Pay Equity review,by deveiopirq 5. THAT the vAperudon Of the MY �Press; �.rapwrt Ct#� 6.9-MV bs ; 6. THAT the a Pay Equity ! r praoess bt-its`. ourrerd-farm with Supervisory , by WCAO, term ttret �. revised Pay equity plan and 7. THAT during the trarrsitiatt p t+ewood pay a ty sowl i"Ni per, ° INNISDOM by the bra Ir M PAGE Y , REPORT NO.:COD444" fted 8. THAT, the recommendations put forward by the ConsulteK "' in the body of this report, be approved for incorporation as approprists in the future pay equity mairtwonce Process; , 9. THAT the CUPE President be Provided a cxrpy of this report for the P RPOW Of reviewing the content with the Union mm'nbers: 10. THAT the CAD be authorized to seek input from the Union tresidaK for the revision of the Pay Equity Plan for Unionized employees, which wil be poelad *a revised plan at the conclusion Of the review, 11. THAT the Library Executive Director be provided a COPY of and opportunity for input into the revision of the Pay Equity Pism and Pte' and to advise the Library Board of Council's actions; and 12. THAT, at the conclusion of the review,the CAO be authorized to post the revised , Non-Affiliated Pay Equity Plan as an amended Plan for Y ' Affiliated group as required under the ACT. Reviewed by :4�.G Submitted by: fray Vft Marie Macho Dtt&or Director of Corporate Services Attachment : D&G Dudar Consultarhts; MunicipaltY of Ciaringto"''Pay Eq'*Y Review Report 1 I 1202 I ,r i REPOWr Not*OOEQ4444* i IMP SAC x i 1.0 Pay Eq%ft-Review Audlark* 1.t ate: mid review of}t r � �- work eronitri with ani 9.2 The review of Pay Eqt ?;. Mpl! i #e f*vie W of Ow piers. 1.3 Report COD-1046 provided -1101 r f 'rte. closed on 1, 2006._ �if3• suktTaeWl woes to-be wi : ., Coar►ell. The selection of the CAO in-- w P 1he.Murr,err ., 2.0 DA 6 Dudw u 2.1 art Ehdar, t3 8 Dur�art x r r review of the 2.2 The r tt-jb,tom es._ _ N�rrent+�crnxrrswkFathe : �r�d � drrs. 2.3 Esserdially ,the fag r+e ut bs int�rpora� the: rn , k P�whh an ups• ' y � OVA* I *' *MN vw— P III aivaif M Timu'Oke,'toio Co tiOee to p A fo ^*W ter- r decision; r r Y f ° -.r� • • • { �.Y'.: '! i Q• Ike • i., �:S W ID'-- _ W @ 11 1 � Yl f.',V - Y �• 1 b, • a - • 1 •• I ! •=1a 11 a' 1 •. • • IJ.:..• .I'A' € to 77,F711i 7. 1777714A—i • cr • •5_ • _ b _ Wo • • 'a 4� 1 • -:b 'Q b 1 a Q" Mlla.. i.• jb '••.. _ - 0 Q :.Q :..6a' 0::'1'.i. • _ b. i13: :'S'Y. eY J = F 1 •: I Q - i � Wti Y [ I [.hb y•..tf :• > • I o •-- 1 e. ratr�= • a b c e;a.�� _ _ I t. 0.r•. Qia 1 i '_ 1'. it A+ f. • a G 1 .. IQ d •'6• a • • r •' d ' i 3.4 The ants from It* a CA4:TW is also the prmacvm theft Oft be eerrt ttta�tfas overa�•or�tiora� � j 3.3 n ' *Lift a _ in wo the'pay.ikp.Ey-�, Is. PM r.toItamerrrbe�s,,;.;. al" 3.6 16, sulr t ie to-etapkrya� ley w� tit pr l 3.7 it f& 'prbpomW, Oiat the � by scorers tbggtir let ar�lk under #* V" t�,aloattrreat to-!� be, �• 1 £I 9 i L rr 3.8 The yy p�paa�, oE Fins m � tom` � OUW" wt E � "F•M 0 All Ya. 4o TEW # 4 R k yy�. 9 • ! i d n... P ► ,a a _ w - •• i.• - i9 5• - f ! • / - t •.! •I. _.Ette q � �1 i x r •.•'b ±1 v f'. :.:ie t.a' •_ • • • ♦ :..♦ a:fil •♦.. Flo a if w•' • f• •' i f Y 8.f • • • i - s •. J :: i•- R ...i fa 6 's'... .=...a rt' _a.a'. .. !i a'. ..: ia '�i t: :: P a :. E i P • - Y i• • • • i R , , s. I Ji �041iilat ftv ems,QonwiAlM � ,w tNt ttlB artdsiae � L�4`tli� .�. ..� � G oft intr Ea R►entwition Yee* ` by the , the pay equity plan reds corpor"on would tw an.on-Ong this °MWW orgahOd impiY As rapes to-COMO,cwngtort tirne ft s,artd pvduced two Ate"= Mid try Vol" .for�woti�s and_, ; F ad�tAUnd tffs. . ZAYr�W4d jdb rdt�ea�xf no iR#�Y�+dX Ri+att - � . Wort �w�poikacl �4 r. exfsbrdact3ie oEthe ` �. � fir. ` . COUndi,tfla idar+r�s' d� ax �.�1 .. ._ rattfled by�anti the brtrgairt�g�+ =31t l#Mil� Pay equity. frotrr#wt pow fam"W4 t ton is —ftWxWWiW ,wRh th�e:few�mlaninq tl d1a;i��i9N �+ i t18nG1 wommu IT& . �r�adopprd a mvdart�+ �i�otttaa�#0 � resultse#-a AoDBadiw� _ IWO, . to tiepirii+the same 301 ibr estabi�trf 1t���Y, pos ;f4r tlsat eaf wotlasra* _ X:t` ` _ ° -. Sirroe t thtre,:Athniniotr hae� �; #tld P� � -�._ superocavainexr�new �4' irr�-�` .. :�. . �`�t'ne�evaluation of exist#gt t �� _ .ice positltttt has tirangod. TMs allows the iwt- MAK AW based 40 0*evaiuntlert rearms, ft9fy !ems The deliberammof tge as t5Mi4�k► tt�r jott tr7 wwW arnpioyem Asa result,sutdt . (using tm:okw equity job ewfuat rcr.tati M"rdtt it ootttrvt by t aundt �nrer w lMrNi In this m texk we drew the �ow,tom; 1. The curmnt pay equity eve, the have outbredt "Ir usd t W14 2, pMaM In t+tL to in e -ads"9110":#Ws a 3. 1`o ttre that C*urKA s PRY k It `: �ytti#at�e a posmom"A tu«s 3taer€a vaivatitd. r �r fir tw- RY Y W e l'= !iFoT-M�IM --_�w we.. 9 • r, a ♦.. .. d •' Is_ .. i ..�;i;n I 41.30111�1-i-1 it'll I. —1-T1111-11 ulAoLUILIUAI -1 —ALl • Y •• F. l : : •'. _ i• L 0 ..ti- i 'i ;��i fA. Y 8'i � '1 A �'... r• • . ! a wY, i I • •. i • �. tl. ii. '.: •.a :• )a a..: P '. .. :. t..'. i . 1 . q 1 - _. . e • -• 'Y -. x +aa-. ,.. � i. -..x. :. Y.. a .. ._� r i Y Bert . � •.. � e.. «. s. .. : . n.. ' ♦ •n . A . -Y MY .6 X.tl..Y • ♦ Y y • �.♦, -: a .v-,.: +. • r a• ! f ! w A-- ♦: I A ♦ k -mul 11,11MOItIVE11F.All, - [ 1 i-.- gw a � �!J VI Y-�•1 a ♦ ! `.';�'Y" • ♦ I •• d:Y.I. �LA�_...•i A..- < F e 3. 1 � gE Ij lio, " 8y ttNe.dob�t� t'� ttte 'k N R1IllP�l� *'AEA snlNi►�4tNts for :> • '�tea.�4.h�tlef ; ��anef In Rio Vie;b�if► �, and wmwwvft ow &-A beftr tlrRt#ft` �oit t Ater. 32 �. ,._ • 7tt ,kt tut enewttt f"n for edd 1L7e a the • "��+�dmmistlon,whie� � �+ I Report of the 1W fty aqu"ommftm } discretionary or mandated by statute or regttflifficn, this.rnay dad ti 4w"*Wmaciessm When new technology is inbvduad(whetiwr or,nett) thrph tbtl lR MW bah corresponding charvatAo work procmp*And, by d "NW which should lead to changes In paste and, , as tfie�>ihda of requests for (m of a poaRlon., Aryr Gouncg reula v of requa#teN l b simply too late,since, as reported above,the Oftkatim S n*refteatSthii, Iltrt>6ay are or meant to be. so, requests for evaluation of new or revised positions should be aomW4* tt by e supporting explanation of the reason,Including a ccuhf nm tlorl thiotao i 4 440nis tWbust► authorized or a necessary result of changed buwom prod or pnld loms.,I►a 4 feu managers on workflow managernent would as h MgrNkW*. Further,there are gaps that can be ktentOW In the PrINCOM of#4 300 Committee. some of these arc mtrt�of by while others are based on what practitioners have learned from t1hwiftodmOlimn,0, Pmvkww wide pay equity. The flowing points are described In greater deW ln�j{t{y "tatMs` 1. Need for Improved note keeping and ftw ovirtg the tram of istlikom . 2. sub-fad by sub-factor prooass. I The Need for banspWeney and` 4. Control of COM Impact S. Need for Dispute Resolution Room 6. The Need for Formal fay +'Mali tenenoe l 1 In fKt."m wow matt be twos O"Jar "PaN UM40411s 5 AVO pom m,in`a p wm to be d~in wig Me Vein PAY so h 9QN9LT yRePCRt of,,VW*WftY C F• i S i' 1 i i 1 i i 1 i wrt MW nd"W* MO erle br Now MEOW 4 re r Report of f hf NN t4i1r EqulEy Conw4dtoM MunfdpelitY 6� Oft "� i r i t REPCM2TOF THE PAYEW"2MIT4MUMM 9 D & GCS AR CONSWANTS e asnasn cn.«na *iax oa�vwy one.,u�ern RlpQ!'!': 1{jy�y� Ali" c wnnr�r"e� 3 The d klom 2004 a i9l e avmld �tetytflosecnrnPae�' R+ , .. �: � � f4W-.k the ot'� fllbtt 9W.4w AMWfVtYY[ _ .� � fk vahie oC 3 396 $f1d tKida @g9if 7m7rr7 re ALiTd4 tstei pip e. bla3 tti Ott '18t�+tK wo t% as Ap��Y�'i�r/tlQklt to et cages,tine meet ► . ats. no 040t bOVW A I OWAft the ra Mi On tir k of t'deer, ern tai ee , each"sw of added os st t�1R k rt tit tit'„ NOW NW. hart Of i . io Sr of ' llte{> on each� �f � 41hP WWAPW Educolitttt 01 12.596 of . t �-p T y D DUDAR r 3 ,Report of the for.Pwv E4a;lttf ConsuftsmAt . Munkhmiity of C ilst", minimum level on all sub-factors but weighs In at only 10.4% at the top rating Jovel. The corresponding levels for Experience arc 12.5%at the mWArnum-level and 5$o%4t*ho, * end. This approach t9 assigning weights was more in (avow when pey egta r was 1011 tibilly introduced, however, more recent practice has been tioVy to en sumthat S4111409tor Weights remain constant across the various possible levels. The Table below provides details of the number of steps, sub-factors paint vat srA how points are distributed across the vorlbu*so fates. Table of Distribution of SIdut Education 12 10 12.s% 42.-1- 10: 1 10.4% Experience 12 to 12.5% 85.3. 9AO% ' 160 9.S% Decision at SW in Operatisfns 12 to 12J% 95.0", 14.7% 180 10.7%, IngerKft wW GroaWlty a S 6.3% S74 919% . 170 . 14.196 IndependentJAetIon 10 3 6.3% 82.8 9.3% too 9.9% Budgets and funds 16 5 43% 874 :. 040% 170 Effort Mental Effort 9 10 12.5% " 69.3 7.i% US 7.4% Physical SWH it Effort 9 S 6.3% 274 S.1% So 3.0% Responsibility Confidentiality 9 S 6.3% S2,S' ' S..0% 100 5.9% Supervision and Start Advbs . 29 0 0.0% 139.5 13>316 235 13.9% INkmx ng otlrars it S 6.3% 304 1.!Mifr, 5s 3.3% Working Mental Stress 8c Working CmIltions U 10 12.M 60,4 GA% 110 6:5% Conditions 3. 77rere one too many*/owls an some There are multiple degree levels for most sub-factoM typically In the sf 9-12 or levels per sub-factor. This ts unkpte to the.Mdlowe3 system, W4 out of inepkrg with more common approaches which typkelty are able to evaluate the foil spodo ti.of wort within no more than seven or eight levels.' #may be that this flows from tk rfa€t that the McDowell Plan was designed for w to-wall.evaluatlons, trxiudkg a6 NO fttn.laeour through management roles, however, as explained above, ssertw to in fatreur of lower level requtrernertis. in particular, the Supervision sub-factor btta 28 separate degree 1evois, 41111 bt wmatr tt that expressly factors in the readA of the positbrt under evatuatloFi{, 4iaubor nabls or individuals advised). This model ttasteris betifd that the value 01-paw,om is r1 lid:in direct proportion to the work volume. itr od n, R mays encoursg, . 110 Viand the size of their work force, and penes those who.are smo to ellrxiMSaglr and efficiency of operation. One consequence of the multfplidty of degree levels Is that the orgo "at adopt , much narrower point bands to distinguish positions an the pay band,lr 10ch Amay employees to submit requests for re-evolusbarif since a*a few points k Mac=a W classification. PAPM OF THE PAY MM 22tO&T F . D & G DUDAR 9,ONSULTANTS " . taraat.NMerIKa91gMa4!!la oacwr.oaano,ur.acs 11 �i I - a " f AY x dt2 K .s . IN,Y , �.. � . Wob . { ) The ftr pout s to what n .and�lO,tliMi 8CC7p�S to S txJC� �a'sd ��FaOwFi�4'.fil�. SIB (�� iP��MRSe in� r fm for e" #the Oh e it WIa CYswo " �1sk Y Of haA Ot Met the sOikp . the ,ralead tha wtr (y�� on thy.� W MW M _ 3s ttm aQlr accepw t tom°1s1 i�pil tt r�maarttkhlliw# t# e d t�bit � a# rnovl to tiae nom, „ Mthw bo**.te r pediY tMf t as Zf18tt _apOR**ita<'t ft-each �? _ h air Commftw bm t� tha, y�iitlf{ i efmn of paw w ttw art cd a .. P 4n"tt�ton tfN a this sN make t iff vet d t'kw ho►eve and ttW + merrxto e s � �" Report:of the for Pay Equity ConsuRant MudldoaNty efS evaluation, further supporting the notion of whole-job ranking (althotgh i ke-na evidence that this actually occurs here In Clark*taft). 3. The need for transparency and dAwkwuA. We understand that the Committee has rxrt been comfortable with adeMlnii amployansof details arising from the job evaluation process, and pry to orgy advise the-vvN00 score. It is likely that this relates to the fact thatsub-factor definitions are atnblgiol�*&iw it would likely be difficult to explain certain dam,once made. As a consequence of Iris, when a request arrives, the employee is o*M 41000 1t*ti0110d; meaning that they have no prior evaluation result or reaso"to w1 ft to.reller. Forthit reason, while they are invites!to explain why they berme that their ► s`ehur . they will find this difficult to do. In our experience, when a request rests presented, the employe should be required to explain'how the position his' why, and how,in their view,this affects the existing evaluation. In fad, as evidenced above, It may be that the supervisor who Is present Sian evaluation of a position within his or her department troy play an undue rde in enoou t1teE a position be rated higher than is presentiy the case, the evidence notwith 11heert a no evidence that any Individual manager,Human Resources staff�#pt' IIM Mon Of the Administration team Is guilty of improper behaviour, Simply#tine permits such ambiguity and Gould lead to undue and unnecessary pnsaitrrs bath supervisors and union representatives to advocate for evaluation r tt ire act sufficiently supported by the facts. That there is no means of addresiereg matters without recourse to the Pay Equity Commission raises the stakes 00thls issue. 4. coat control Administration Is responsible for maintaining operations within the dtiectiaft?pf Caawk V which the budget Is a major element once the budget Is set, then d anggi Cdr above the.planned levels require Council approval. As set out above, pV WAt 61161of Itself IS not a rationale for exceeding budget plans; rather, changes to olmillitibit brought about by new direction of CoundtI whether discretionary or regutehxy, headcount to meet Increased service levels serve as the basis for such exciottaiw 7"014, requests for additional salary dollars are better reviewed in the c wa*of"S ssrviow . technologies, or other operational requlrex►entL Within 1111e0s approved Ilyerlw►S. Administration should be free to change�l job�' piY grade assignments whin the approved buds tart. Shilling to w to consistent with practice Inaft neighbouring mu fdpatdes- wilt r bs Aft apprised of potential cast Impacts, Including re.,gassif cation of positions, .ioorudderlrvj new initiatives. S. Need for Dispute Rusohrt?ar Process As expressed on a number of occasions earlier in this report, pay equitiy le ">O an agreed job evaluation tool to the fads of Job content. Thus,disputes liheuid be"e. It Is anticipated that such will be the cass, once an updated, and more drawly deftail job evaluation tool is add. ftIM OF THE PAY D & G DUM CONSLLTANTS err I i I RepoltA00. 06 7 ,4vstllm fn ., •° fit. the Payy #!e Tftm8i union set t theTr�. , ,ths bLoW Cnnsugitei-eider Por�rtdWlr k� thw must how tAepmoem'usad wu t the w nit, investsftdotaw fcrnplsh7Rs2MY Qvw *Y�PV (� }I'.of god yy�Cl yFi�IW ft InvoW ercpertiee both.have bmuotto ttia , In Qptne�� �(ea�or#'aCrrie u. . `��. •.. .r '. Ttrere tt6 board LD thasi W yp��y Y c �- +fir,.,,, .. t Wtft*. be#Wvftme'ttrat r10t should be made to do so(a tm, -I Sevkw , ore asoAmovwt�tra a,Wur W the 4M*M,Should this It qr exptor+r holy 3 c�aedd i►e i+tc , dww - of NOt �. comma fwthtt ptrrpoaa,as p{ y ��.,p *-M PW t LfiR4W '0" , evskoftn r eoq,w• Theraftv, whk f t " a C0[(1plikik Q aw400y"in a male # tN T, mnmkedor4,acrd, should such ham. � tdtrW be based onto Iurbdktm*pomk K Cgn�yueatly,tb►Rroa may wish to �IIRIAa1F`�a191r+7� �. �Yi _ Polley aiu3 op�radotrtl odes In resp�K; It. �Iy,MA�N't•+alsa>!/Pair. � ,;, t#>MaR The fail#the the iJrdar►floe been yF-� �a1Qat (itcaly �5c CI�rMR�ritat,''� ;ltd"bY affilm,w Morre�lar, K +iMllihllk " mol and r+elatad prowsm are out 1a�isn. Under amkcO,m bwg*"reyfrtrlr, � 1 ; M'Ias aktD , .' MSC My e*ft on a.pa bas.,for ya>drs, � conU"" prof the Sub-fact ON lily sutra " and ifrtr " a� ' 28r8 a T-1 . 1 i I • 'a k '.c-, .. ¢. 'n -a • C,: slr.. • • f • ar ,1 • _ Y r r l: • -� 1 •!J 1 . C< i - PJ inie. u Y - � : • - v 1 :+r' • .'e:n a. a :I: :. .. :: e' r n: . r,,. • f • .w: 0 Yf R e �/ . e •. a • -: R VL i. : x n'n 9: 'a Y• :, :.-. . '.1 a ei u'.a !n, • i _ - • • .� R ,i -• • - :1 tax.. : ..... .s 9 <. v 9i -r i Y 1 4 Y NIF R t+ f "MOom Daft" isityborr"5,2M l r r Subs. or#A*p4wsj JAN 4,r tt i8 mco" ridad tiled t�1! , i. IUXT ftWAC00445-M bwrom , 2. _ Tw#a tie"*marowmt 10. ii, a d 51tt tiW.104 per ow t` iemn bet 4 3. THAT to atedW&t4ow marlao ; k: 4 d submftd tt�e fk tha�` a MMLMNM �. s' s_ . r� 1V j e: REPORT NO.: C p BACKGROUND AND COMMENT The Municipality has an ods*V month to month agreement with the Ontario RM*CorporMw for the use of the court roan located at 132 Church StreK BownvvrAW Due to the limited use of the space. ( 80 days per yews sW!proposed to the tenant that they conskter the use of Courboom#2.The tenant has Advised d**isv are n0ln a position to consider arty iess.space thud Is arrendy p vAded in Courva"#1:i The proposed lease Is effective June 1, 2008, and will expire May 31 and Is bead on a per diem basis. No option to extend has been p vmw and either ply may (90)days prior written n odoe. The amount proposed for the tanartt fisctts an 48.516 xawr.the. year's rate: Attachments: Attachment 1 Schedule"A'. Leaser AWemTWt Attachment 1 -Sdtedtfe V,By4ww 1220 i is LIONUMSMSMANDAMN s AM 4f��1'CARiY#YLEa<1I+7Y `' s� O[�f 1i�Aia fl11131!IdAA�I'1� OW ONrA O w=w"b yiftDiar►I3aw�e.A�reems+iMwk�r1 ' I IM+t fioenoedidiAar�rg6nabi�rb#�leill�MsQ�e�u�.81�t , �tlie IJro�s�m�t B�Id{�ltwt(IY►�Mr�; 41*{f�' comm oft ft ae hss 1.2w am adr ift uw_$4 pa�tiwMrly daor�d��cola► pros an tlm Ib=M d 0w Ih I A.aad TWS 8awe(4,t27 a in s hutl�e s:muoidp�'lmeaem� t�8iewt�lbe Sw Paoviooe oBi�Mrdo{�o"8apde"y,umeia •A''ii1M�l1 =:�� boot Ar111<'�67E'7�ds61Caaait3iw:13431, _ � , . mddade�d�aE�a:mbr�'bredpa�a�bapa��db� � fl9Gr�lAtl7W � Q.hsr. ��� y a�oedbffitb 1'M6ioo0aMno0aa>toaeaaTr t . ANDWW=MdwOAkOWUmmmd dikLiom�c>b iii[ emwtiilf � �p�pkoft NOWTHUdWCMTMAGWAXMMfl 'm-eaAr,�o�llam4°'�'�e6w�dlsiMdbs=�, i1lt�ry�� AND���kWfOMO�l � 9 �r1flR�!•'; fr **khanbabyAOwo**ft4dWpw"b/Ob��� r 1. 36e PrdMLr�leae��EYwlat'Nmf�w ��� r j J mmmmdOgeoJuoe1,20ftmdavagonMW31.2005(dw*RutB awAmTetm*�d an anumd Soon feedTan Tbov�.Five}Im adlfo l 0,S011.001(dr"Liobw Feu"j pay"in ndvaua is equal moaft i of EI*A LLandred and Smamly- Five DoUm(5875.00)on the first dayofeuclesuelhdwbg doles=,bond coos uraef the Licensed Ana for Sixty(60)days per ymata miss ofOmHvmb dmod8evmey-Flve Dollars(5175.00)p rdq , 3. The Uceum shell coutinum,during the Firm Bormim Tarts Is have the right toommod dib Agreement or alto the wmbw of duo per amemmum Atr w!"=a of the Liamsed Am is dedpatedbwamdaatmydmedud%6 eTarm,bygivhtgiboLiwoirwNin*(90)dW , prior wd#m notice of c aoadetloo or chmgA as the cmmWbe. 4 TtieexteosioneedpunumRlotldsAermso[ tballouvueegl sod sgtxmesits uediotheLiovase.seameiwlud,rmstvsdaedaUeodud5auai�rubiieu, rotket "F�rvirammaohl14af �nu1 Mom aubutrooswbieb.w6rohesisltiu the Buildlag or the wow supplied to a in do DWWiod,or when it hi aelsuead hub ties Builftoravy part tbev4or into do water ordw amme4sawbasemment,is fte ,toCRUe, at my dmQ,material hum or degradedon to to Builaleg a sW peat t ww&at b the nauuwaavhonmentai or menial hale Is h mso ImmW mod Wetim wimoot Smbadoe. any 8amnwbl , eapbdves, radioactive arauth 1% adnsme beat pits,PCft hod , conteminaota CmdodW& wMemst limhatiak m1 by way of axaloplu, stachybotqu deartartm need other moulde)rmerwryaod kmempotawksOpmm andlle ew cbtaedeae lDD71po Y kchkwa6romaibom("t.crX (HCFCs),vol�ileorgaoiaoampoo�(YOCsLtr�e faaeahuMiudou4wdeo gas,che�slmowabtsupseaocaorrepodee�nslpado�r.DolNipste;eootami.rsr� hazardom wastes, toxic or rmxioees'subshaoes or related mteWdo6 petralum atl peouleumn profits,or(h)may substaaoa deco b be bamdm at roods under se y , Fmvhonmemd LavmumorhaeAwoomckdwpnrmiagedbyav WAv&mttokw(o) both(a)and @) S. The Liaeemr and the Liaaoees hereby moundbr cowasot and mWev that dadeeg the Fhtt ExWmi=Tam they aLell each pm%rm and obwm A of d000wenariYtt pasdwe Mal oNtedonsmthdrrapeedvopwbtobepubmwipmotutbdsslumsoftbalADO N extended and amended herab* 6. This Agmemmt"zatbebioftWmdrLia uM*bmbuesmaeormdiywm behalf Met 7. Except ar otherwise sperm'provided in this Apesmeatrall words red aspessefers , used in do Moore loll apply to and be mead ere appYeubk to do paevWm of hie 0. The providoen of this Ageeemeot shall be interposed and gowned by dw lawn at yls ProvincedOn4eio. 9. The Lioeom admowlodges,agrees and oenmposs to do wbem by the"asset"of as Agmemeut god nay iaBormslim contained havaim 10. Tbis Agreement sbstl be bmdieg opts and a to#w boett of alas aa+ceesors andlor ms%u ofdo rmpeottve pectin berew 11. IU Liawor and may of its amaoroey pamolttod iodsw diwetaR.oBipetr,t mplo}as, sgeats,servants,and Mermassadves act sagatpr haaW megoft whaar wdr SOON y oratesaaasictofi nanemaotaalorpokn&%indasdeapb*no(Awuosw w TA*t m Iicmaeortbeauacleaofsmdtberighercrol edanattAel meneorhorerm er Ilea Liceorar daS disdosu b>bee L,iaosee iu w�apdaaWtsatdeltge euy eapri arpaesgi situation dat may be reesoosi it ian:pmted se dilm•oo flM of iakspt or a po%,FAW conflict of iotaat. Y 1222 , a w WMOAi&V*,Oowftpeldaha.rtn. : COMMWAIM t1tF# Tilt AuWedr�eiiSi �r nE e • ,. ' mom MOM 4 a PWfl y F N P �J y ^+F+ z TS 3 Jy �. l 4 r �A S ,a lY 3A e I,Mrih �tL1�eu�rAna �.: cow Uma , ' x mm ; aL rs Rim • E s+�nwa � �wrsr•wMt w' • 'wnr��ww ws I� t3 r�wrr rwr a •�wwrsA A ' eotlur� t Q UK 122-4 1 1 s 5 1 1 . r 1 Ary F I Sdw e'tr THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF Ci AMtit GTON IYY-LAW 2006 Being a By-law to authortre a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and-Onimillo Realty Corporation, to enter Into agreement for the kwm space at 132 Church Street, Bcw mAnville."ON. I THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARNNGTON"HERBY Et+IfiM AS FOLLOWS. 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute. 4n beha2 of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarirgton and seal with the CoWraiics$aek a contract between, Ontario Realty Corporation, Ontario, and said Ctorpora rr; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Scheme W fmn par!d By-law read a first and second tkne this dayof" i2006. ' By-law read a third than and finally passedlihis day of '20K John Mme. GW , Patti L.Barrie, hark 11926 { , y ' e . a 4` y t. < F 6# � tf EAIZAJ� y} tMPM �: as r MeetlW WeUl.PURPOSE AtV 11�t A3 tE� 1 C 1111' ` Da*: S or'bo'e, ` S SUPPLIER,INFOPJ* _ t Rucor�ma� It is respe feCOMMWl sd 9 s #�d 11 f— recx�mmpAd�Gaw�Me�: ; a 1. T MT PAW C?-0 be +reAtll a !t ► sad mo w%ti Direct"of Coporaw CND ' fates ' MWAAB*m f 4 Y n M. r REPORT NO.: C00 WY46 PAW2 BACKGROUND AND CANT Report COD-017-06 was forwarded to Council in April, 2006 advisingoftheMunicipality of Ciarington's 0 Supplier information Hight being held on June 270', This year's event attracted approximately 100 participants and Includedpeeentabons from the Municipality of CladngW Purchasing Djvision,the Clartr*thn Pubil¢tibrm, the Durham Purchasing Co-operative and the Durham Regional P lioe, The evening provided an opportunity for staff to educes vendors°and on things such as changes to the Purchasing By4m Fair Wage Pokyj,44imiml Checks for Service Providers(CPNC),43_n idgrk .-and the avakWort prpo s a V Request for Proposals. The event was well received-with positive feedback being recelvet It is proposed that the next Supplier Information Night be hell in May at` Attachments: Attachment 1 —Schedule W, Report COD41746 1298 t iI y , ORAL PURPOSE : a IF RW mm a is nBSeFUd 1And 1. T14AT Y T t Rpat t3f�-0fT-08 BACK A ,�IENT. Quer the .}he ww s w�Kr— A g� T • m*r*lw- •' r 7'h s , motft.vf o MMUMM 4' E • • - • to 1.'. • E • P • I r C [ > � L.Y r a r n • I•. e : •..r, • • :r.• •,-e :^I r Yir :• •_: _ s e w9b : _ '.! 6 I - .PAP o - Y :e _.•.: (v Y _ o- ,I • • - ewr. • t • a r;, .: •,.• • o, : c,. .. e.:-: '.:•: . rP a y L'¢. . !� z .Y • t r r e• C.••: • Tl ML:7 • .• !• e Y MY"I'll-T 717 •�f 6. R as At, s w t } em CaENEFtN.PURPOSE Dab. TooKlay., ev *tom. C O 8.06 ,. .,....�.._ Subs .AWARD$ tl�I � Ito Rocomaaerala r�dad.ita tl i3 rateanr ta�rzz 1. TMT Rehr#COD*4 oW b* 2. ow awxhw.By-lew maftd; itf tM�M .. x suboAftd W.W. cawed ter d is � + taNieec of Attachtrs: �_ � _ -Ime/JV Attwhnloft 1 -Sd*&Oe"A - "i!LfJ w;Y L xi a ' v �u r kj 4 Ef B14CK Wlmt h In somas Wfth �=$R" t_ to July i Augwst v �. Ft FkiW��If�4sL7Yi �`4/€�.71nj..n h 1 2. Z 200644 MD z i'AIC 3. 020". Soh_. . t � : S � t78 P 0 F" Y uG "fr'�.tu, Y s4i C K i �c KK 14( n n 4'4 s� T � 'All :-.::1. • i:: t9i i - v A R ::Y:{11 ♦. a A�. . C�Y:.e�3 ..lYV Y '� � i"- ii Ja�•V3'kv�'�. i 11171=1 c az F a-I•' :k. - 4 .. �.Ht � 8 o�a S.B# Y. • n9� H.... { e �r f 'a; e - xt . r w .i,., s,. ;; t 4 ,1 € • ,3.}.9 P ' �. B a [ 0 i a n •' ��{ a •a ON : • _. a SO a � a -.'f pia Y' •'d i a R f f e3.e d:Y,pti Y- Y t 6' W �V ro ti�� ae ! p 3 a " n 2. Ci, 6•a2.Tt {j*bW*. sUM. r ' ANDSMDOt K A contract was awarded to True North QW-t Nam 91% ' amount of$18307:?A treds• vv*m'O:l"PALT.. d9w responsible bidder n 911 leans, Tenders were POW ed i k Tn*Nw& a* ab ` NoM J10, P.S.T.', in MAMOiPlft GAT.Mft � As the above noted landerprmAded tw6to iii fit" ` Operations Departruwr*bes riwnWd 11rM11Q�t eMle to recent Awcosts,arld#wFllt'Meale It is staffs opinion 1#is trafsari"s oft dump body dw plow andaarrciedt eq � # �' du"body dw Plow and— om t " ! �' Capital Sudt. Therblovo. the to K*vd*s er'irt Reps of Fleet �-Rtrads,aomiat;i�f two we maderkAolft. MEOW ithe il� �fulWsPaAr�tredin�ea�n��.�. � - ` The Director of FinSroe has m**Nd #iwrQ wdl!► recomrrrNndstions, - QwOm with lb" be directed to the Director of Opermllow-t pGC Although the low bidder hes not' �r;esr+r;tas, a the thary have Provided satisfactWmrvim for the �"�fty- fi r= " 5,a Y e yryw r1s'Yy`SFo � y �€. ' • � 1 � "3 R'[? I `A.-, °'z�P `�4 P^fi „�+'i .3 •.ai. b•. Y [ - �E (• I +.e y }ku s tbrE a' fx {s v- "-- UA I, HIM y •Yr�a .» ..: i um •'- ri v a r > �u z n � Y kb 7! r tA ff"4 qp s wwww o WW w :. �7 > 3 � z s b >* a W 1 i r r+ tr» a i s r 4WW 4W.W 4f /A f.. ;-fd WWf . y, ,,. .-'a i -.+ +. . • -. ;.: . '- v f'W-! f.9. a :5 .. ', . ::•r:, + Ica bl ♦ K � � lip I am ALI 44 � h i CL 2QD030," 4.4 R � � f " MOW A Tapp Tondavd Curt* #!. r � w Furl {$ Y � ; N . K. i L.Bkk1lN;COWW 2 _ CL 2tiD6%9AI,40MCOMRIF 1.1 We mcomw # suff award of q baw;wkft 1111m1 i, Mwtad *jr your f4m Is , yw hae wW t# t ques one :< R , r Ca vvmwn Moose,P. Erp.,Tq NiM T"W, Diradr d F s ' I:SCFiw.A�p.l6d�6.G0lARIF.Blrctrs. _ .1,l: iR.lafr. C 40TMWlM E 1 7 x{ v r r , t S Anyuat 16,2006 y�y Mr.A.&CmmelK C JLT. +16#t► Dbid.w dEr 11,11 �Smom C"w4lm8*fdw 1OWMANVUJA Otsr6e UC 3A6 h Ra Comm ftooftm Ya11 '. Tenders 1t+c the above pmjm wan epamdeErFMii " Mal A tha cf the bid:�u+eia�ad is pttirVidad isdu "M�r. ' �a:���� 3.. aV�lJ iliawsy�Il�Yf" .',:? olds Coowoal m ad ait GW ON ON Webavechecked iR bida,uwaedadto>$ r the bW vAhw noted AM Reftm a bm b Cam�setianLimited.. '$oen�e>Lp�e� 9' uillet �r H~s Whiny o&*%Vo 1 acledtta6" aiamW amps to be aat#&Wy. The pecjaet is ettimateti ao he ere-6ud6at aehea ae�pptte te4isaaa atmcwm®the `a fir' d`d �'- 1t is raooded�atllMrtsodet'•ia dr"aeraaat >��D(�4tprF� ' fob ,. Caniaa etpNtat thioddaima tr. ioi � b n, vows ► a a Ar .,M a a. nu i W� R� � r �� F f 4 w> v x i- E A t x,` 3 r v law Pi w . ., � i h x 'k. s DA )� 5 4TW y I C x ��wIF'I�v�ww " e M 4 The low Wd Womfto r / �� R. .: Cope. ft 4~0 t The ffft*AW# valk*ft finft Aot�d�t VA bod ��3 t i ra i ty - Yw'i v";1llgs i�R^rree�xp la- si :yetsmy�ygp, .«. . :_1:�.-�. SwtsJ...„„� •H {n I � e r. v . Y • S� PP4R5 ; r r NPe' 4.4 a CF f » } 5 4F •� �Y I M. . ✓. �sb' vk t n. n s X q Y 5 n f • r i m { .SFa 1 Y•�'Y rift Y V i Red d Y t i ` r WH wrahkocts plenaers Mani 4OTmwowomftw BOWMANVWAOaWick-..LIC3A6 L.5 TasdYS�br�s.i4o�e�nojsntwareapssp/, ,�if4�4IR�sR; 2aSpam;k�kot�ismosf+�ils . �Ws.3 #� t �CaINR Limited ' iifOb cm,ww";, as Ths 1oa bWOw'susin br hies � „ . �.�� ' caslmeed�ndftaunusolot's ipiM Eft%*d@1*d,wft bold illojeetiier�mUdbilE l�99000s�er3. aliflsrtindrr Miili��tOr l0118d� � #1141#RI��� 1m SbV*WfMod&Assn i ?MIMb 41 ail' � si�/�dinstoKlpfes � �'�, ip inwawradpdcuk b add tlrc - U C�lirrkbM#�ijt d� _ Tfie00lw0� A►r�lri4dwt�lMtia�r�totriiq�lR � ��iK. < public�onaNHioitSr '' aoafe&raa+adlunla�ioiieaidhye�acwtequiplac# � . conarwesbud oe I bud�tora�d100. '_�; Ceae�Na lbdi�wrt - �` comwvaflmA in wade xwirki bns�b �__ ., ` Cscw A.8tepiM�1ill� � ' AdloaMSarp{ tbreueMnt�is�fMaritlw4MrNA �e -�' cads one aataacouAldlbe is dirt. `.' n, As d►r auucw�a b�olrAcd 6s dde ew►ilrRt re+o �ie nMOrt �'�f� #t�IP *Aelthaoon~ ye . dreNdf . ("Ohni"of"T bmOMCPAUL aEftlimdripll� irr -Z�77 '1rl► 3houid eea�agr llrr�e Yewir* 3 x A r wliilE. BWL r PC zw > »ri ► y t .: g�e 4 - S1 � � e '� _ �� � .. � Y tl �. � • ` w � 1 a �' �' d ,� ��t �� "� ; �[ +� � �. �. ',, ,� � � � � � a 1 � � � .- � � �� � 1 � � � r � � l � � � � � � .�. � o R � — 4 ' �`' �a��`"{ a a 3 sav l sv4ww! i 00f1Yi6l'�wllyi % w 1� ULM" ti Port p4ft p0* ! A , 21A i 4 VAT Ow &INYWOO trek 0*" I a Yw Caporatloi siF tk4 itrf MM61 } aogMint bKw� Old. �.E � .- TNTi ,'y�•p ► y 914M moos*Am**1wd*"wft a � N ipolw wNgi d1�M t �.r 3 r r3 ; s v ' t Y i M z k Adye g _ sn i 94s i ChringREPORT zeaaRB�eway REP O FINANCE DEPARTMENT ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE i Date: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 Resolution #: ' Report#: FND-012-06 File #: By-law#: ' Subject: ANNUAL LEASING REPORT -2005 ' Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report FND-012-06 be received for information. Submitted by: 111mJ44 Reviewed by ' ncy a or, B. .A., Franklin Wu, Director 6f Fin an Chief Administrative Officer. NT/na 1301 1 REPORT NO.: FND-012-06 PAGE 2 1 BACKGROUND: i Under Ontario Regulation 266/02, the Treasurer is required to report annually to Council i details of existing material leases confirming that they comply with the lease policy, a summary of material leases, estimated cost of the material leases and the impact of i these leases on the financing arrangements and debt servicing levels of the Municipality. i As required by the Municipal Act, 2001, Council adopted a Statement of Lease i Financing Policies and Goals in report FND-021-03, on Monday, September 8, 2003. To-date, Clarington has typically chosen to purchase or debenture (if necessary), rather i 'than to use financial leases with the exception of small office equipment. All existing i leases are immaterial according to Council policy and therefore have no impact on long term financing or debt service levels of the Municipality. The total of all of Clarington's i minor leases do not exceed the threshold for a single lease to be material. CONCLUSION: i At this time, the Municipality of Clarington does not have any material leases. It is i recommended that this annual lease report be received for information in compliance i with Ontario Regulation 266/02. 1 i 1 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON i 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)6234169 1 1302 i REPORT FINANCE DEPARTMENT ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ' Date: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5; 2006 Resolution #: Report#: FND-013-06 File #: By-law #: Subject: ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 ' Recommendations: ' It is respectfully recommended the General Purpose and Administrative Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report FND-013-06 be received for information; and ' 2. THAT a copy of this report be sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Submitted by: Reviewed —"—"� -- ' Nancy M. y ylor, B. A., C.A. Franklin Wu Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer ' NMT/hjl ' 1303 REPORT NO.: FND-013-06 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND ' 1.0 In accordance with Bill 98, an Act to promote job creation and increased municipal ' accountability while providing for the recovery of development costs related to new growth, Schedule"A"attached shows the activity in the Development Charges Reserve ' Funds for the year ended December 31, 2005. 2.0 For the year ended December 31, 2005, a total of 802 residential building permits were ' issued. Approximately 770 units were anticipated for 2005 in the development charge study review and update. Also, a total of 34 capital projects have been financed by the ' Development Charges Reserve funds. Attachments: Schedule "A" - Development Charges Study Review and Update , Schedule "B"—Committed Amounts from Prior Years' Budgets/Council Approvals Schedule "C"— Capital Expenditures ' Interested Parties: ' Municipal Finance Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing ' 777 Bay Street, 13th floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 ' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON. 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F(905)623-4169 1304 ' WINW 2006 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Prevend.flm Y T,2020 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS STATEMENT FOR THE 2888 YEAR SCHEDULE •gas SdueM C "See sdre"S NOTE: Tort Development Charges oolleWd on halve rew Region 117088 8.627.165 - Less: Amounts pdd b ON Rpgr 70917091142 Toll DBVeNpmrB Chris due 20 do Rs91011 M Decamher 31.2005 3es.883 - i W 10� V. GENERAL GOVERNMENT LIBRARY. SERVICES FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INDOOR RECREATION PAW(DEV.S RELATED FACILITIES OPERATIONS ROADS AND RELATED PARKING TRANSIT STORMWATER S DRAINAGE CONTRDLSERV. TOTAL 8elancsnefDmwn6ar31 2064 488 161 mn (1,714.758) 1458 1 1617 1 155884 - - 13 5705 PLUS: SwrNgrner Charge Proceeds AcaUad interest AppoNrvnent (221,002) (5.497) (208.816) (1.131) (390.801) (18.98?) (1.427.557) (09,906) (708.868) (18.572) (347.218) (14,7T0) (2.364.233) (82.944) (5.940) (22) (4.338) (18) - - (5.728.814) (156.794) rwlm even Resxve Funs rmoder6an Capita Fund - - ramfr from Recur Fund SUBTOTAL (I 1 1 4771 (5,971) 4 5 LESS: Amount Trwm%rmd to Cep8a1 Fund • msfw to Ravenus Fund 38.648 217.096 - 425.700 207.124 - 1.400,278 1.142.330 09.634 - 2.205.810 41AN _ _ _ _ 3.861.455 2.144.961 SUBTOTAL =743 70U 207124 1 5,006,416 Closing Bakncs as of Dsornber 31 2004 481 1 (I.W-21 1441 (11204,190 1600 6971 4 (13,964 Alrnuda tram Pdr Years •• 34.342 203.700 197.373 357,793 3.818.333 - 4,810.991 Baboons Avs969N for Fukn Needs 426 1 1863 1464 1 1 11 - 6071 4 •gas SdueM C "See sdre"S NOTE: Tort Development Charges oolleWd on halve rew Region 117088 8.627.165 - Less: Amounts pdd b ON Rpgr 70917091142 Toll DBVeNpmrB Chris due 20 do Rs91011 M Decamher 31.2005 3es.883 - i W 10� V. DROCRF 2005 - P+PaG RBUUla 27.1005 SCHEDULE , MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT FOR THE 2005 YEAR ' COMMITTED AMOUNTS FROM PRIOR YEARS'BUDOETSICOUNCS.APPROVALS YEAR PROJECT/DESCRIPTION .AMOUNT 'RESERVE FUND+ D/C-GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTED 2004 OPaatktg Plamhp S/ady-Bm*W Se000dory PRn 82,002 2005 Capitol E inead /Pa"-Pon Daftaton Waterfront PorkWoolm 22M ' TOW 34 RESERVE FUND, D/C-ORE PROTECTION SERVN78 2009 Capitol CourWa fire SNOon 1,093 2006 Capita Resous vehMBPJM API.Bown WM 198.000 ' 2005 Capitol T mini room oddi8ort/Sln 65 EnnlaMlsn 68,416 ToW 209709 RESERVE FUND, D/C-PARK DEVELOPM ENT t RELATED FACDdITES 2003 Copra! Bowmarwis Watiahord RadsFMopnsrd Fwsib ty 88092 53.769 ' 20M Cephol South Condos Com umily Fork-Soccer FWM 1 44,498 2004 Capita Parktond DeveloWnwit WWkmwfttion Pton 8.619 2004 Capita Park Development-Pamir Fount Park NawcaWs 81,568 2005 Capita Park Devabpmem-Broddrmws Parkeft Newcastle 9,008 Total 7 RESERVE FUND . D/C-OPERATIONS 2004 Capita Trander stotlon home ro mOBtotlon 72.990 2005 Capita TrsrtasreWfon dome rehabWa6on 88,641 ' 2004 Capitol OpeNFNeI-.New O*dPrraat 198,680 2005 Capital. Oper/FNeI-Naw equlprwt 8.578 2005 Capital raVarta-BoamranvM Carmxn Padrlbaeeba8 Sara 68.30 Tout 987 RESERVE FUND, D/C-ROADS AND RELATED ' M02 Capita Road taoonaklw8on-Correaakn St SmartanvNs 16.448 2002 Caput ROW mcmu ru06on-Larpvm*Ave.BosmmnvBa W.m 2004 Capita Rood ro wlrudWn-L0rt9worlh AvsRJbody in Sorrgag,Bowm wft 2004 Caput Street lights-LoWworth Ave Q Hwy 667,Swmanvlle 71,28 2005 Ce0W Sudece asphak-WngwoM Avow"057 to Middle Rood,Bownww" 42,250 - 2002 Capitol Road temnatruc8on-PASbnvab Road.Coatloe - 49.887 2004 Capita Road iscanatruc5m-PrssloWele Road.CouNOs 2.172 2004 Caput Road rxmsNmtica-Scu90g WMIddle Road,BOwnmWM 128.350 , 2006 Capita Road moonskuetlon-Seugog SMddis Rood.BmmwwBS 76,194 2005 Capita Rota nmnWrmtlan-Middle RoK SammorlWla 0.114 2004 Capita Rood moonstnm9on-FouM Aw,Caurtica 19,781 2006 Capitol Road mcanatructlorr-Hat Segel,Bownmwft 15$049 2005 Capitol Rood rOCOi WuCdon-NO Strati,Newatls 1.001.204 ' 2005 Capitol Road r atvvcdw-BoNwdn Sb*K NewogM 488,452 2005 Capita Road reoonstrmtlat-CWdnglon&W.BwJrelmb.of mnNru000n cWb 86.400 2005 CROW Road recowtrwolm-BraemrvlN ROod,Newcastle - 75,166 2006 Capita ROW r000nWuedon-Jame Ave,Coa6ce 171,9113 2005 Capital Rood mcarskuCtlon-lshantors St Cantles 331,930 ' 2006 Capital .Rood mcanstrwdon-Jmm SVWooti s StlFouM Aw,Courtin 171,136 208 CROW Rood ramnstructlan-Na6t Street Nswvorals $318 M05 Capita Roma moontruclin-Great R6W,BowmrwM 109,547 2D05 Capital CPR level crosolft knpwrtwts-Maams Ave.,BmmwwN 109,707 2004 Capita EnyRoada-Wodm 6aacrlsted with development 9,710 ' 2005 CopIW EnWRwda-Warks aswdamd with dawbp wt 10,000 2004 Capitol Shea tree-PmdmvW Rood,Cdatica 6.045 2009 Capita TMfm aignale-Roardgk Drive,Sa mwwBs 84.007 2004 Capita Traffic sigcale-NeaWTm&Rood,Coufts 60.88 2005 Copra! Traflo signals-BwmanvRe Mal,tOrtg SL Bgwmwwft - 211,029 t 2004 Caput Trecaporto8wt so*.Coadcs 44.175 2005 Capita EnWSdowaks-Hwy 412"osrMld to TMla,Coa6as 04010 2004 Capital Creek Erosion Protection Sluch, 2511 rata 3 61e TOTAL COMMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS 4,670.091 ' 1306 ' 0 ' ONDCRFZa* : �. - - RwW.a:aerr.9raa,19a SCHEDULE ' MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON - DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT FOR THE 2005 YEAR D/C R/F NON O/C R CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AMOUNT FINANCING FINANCING DESCRUrnON t D/C-GENERALOOVFRNMENT Pat DakOm WMrkaa Pak 27,254 22,332 AM PAN Paks C4lP1W1 RIF Nweamoft~Lbay Bmidt Sb* IKW7 14.318 1,51" Ta WW t 43,181 3664e ' D/C•FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 8,513 Cw *m Fwe Station 097,112 173,042 715,283 Mwdcpd GepYIWaW RIF KSW Raplen aoo'alWn ' Addition-Emisk9ar Stn 95 4,ODO 3,498 504 Tar Wiry Hurst EVbadan Tod 71,750 30.587 4,413 Tax Wvy 35,750 Pmvkta a M*tftn ' .882 7390..34:602 785 D/C-PARK DEVELOPMENT l RELATED FACU TIEi Pak OmMopnad•FMwick Pwk 257.578 24,374 Public Wank L Pab CspNW RIF 13,593 DwmbW-'RrLMOn Pak Dwdopmad-Broddrm*a Pakaa 216.751 21,655 PtiBC Walt R Palo CaPkd RIF Pak Dwdopmal•Sops Cask Tn.N 222.163 22.216 Public Walt R Pakp CapiM RIF. ' Paklad OWaWpnara knplemaMbt Plan 83,477 3.013 Tai LOW Pak Developmat-Pa Faa Pak 514,858 445.919 88,939 Owdopw*wtbadWn BowmaNRS Watahord Reoevebpllad 20.478 18,sw 1.843 Tar Lavy ' South Courdw Canmuiy Pak-Sonar FWW _ 30=1 33,103 5,116 Tat Lwy 1.303.322 1,142.330 180992 D/C-OPERA77ONS Nwv Ep4pnaa Pudw 71,898 57,765 14,073 Matbpd C*pbl Waft R7F Trwww Sldlon 14,838 r8elE%4734 2,887 MWCipW Cap*d Vft t RIF BB 4 '18940 D/C-ROADS AND RELATED Rood raanaudbt-Lapwaw Ay Brkip BowmwwEe 382.916 12.972 Raab Contribution RIF 47,93D MuYNpal Cepkd WoW ' Sb*d LW&Q-LwVwoM Avenuq BwrmrwM 7,188 1,114 Tm Lwy Rood raoartrtrdbrt•Swoop Sbaw,Bp*4narNW 1,762,507 124,887 Muticpd CapRY Wake 819,176 DwalopwowlbiDdWn ' Road laanablrAWn•Hun Strad,Boemw 1,384,311 416.258 Mon Tax LWy 19400D Dar*apa mdtEdbl Rood rowndm cdon-ME StmK NawoodW 57.380 57.350 Rood raarahcOm-Bakww SbvK NeweaMW 19,407 16.909 $496 MU**W CaplW Warts Rwd reartdmdim-Jaa AVWIM Courdw 2.425 - 2,110 314 Mudcpd CgMWc t Rata nlcatbudloo-Wesaraa Sba*L Caw6a 22,249 19,550 2,099 MtrerJpY COW Wwlt ' Rood narrtruawt•Fats AVaraa Cortina 197,5m 174,432 14,792 Ts:LWy 6.388 R Cw*bAloo RIF Rood racarebuctlm-GIWft Rood,Bowm*WEa 13,685 12,453 1,232 Rom*Cw&bAm RIF ' Rood roawaw*bwt-Pm de Road.Cw rlim PM) 255 203 56 Tav Lwy . Rood raan*bucllon-PiestaNW Rood,Courdw(20M) 1,547 1,213 208 RW BIIbfiwliprt RIF 127 Gsn. Reserve ' Papatd2 1307 • it DNLORF1004 ' PnpaaR RR'Aeaa,3I04 re.r.d RwAwra,3r SCHEDULED MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT FOR THE 2005 YEAR D/C R/F NON D/C R/F CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AMOUNT FINANCING FINANCING DESCRIPTION D/C-ROADS AND XELA710)-mimed ' Rod raoawww9m-Cacuebn SVM,BowmwMY - - 11,116 3,541 2.192 Rds SubW=Ib l RIF 4,662 Roll Cw*buUon ff 763 Gan.Capita R3, RoW tacmukNabm-CPR CmukoW nAra,BowmwNW 642 493 49 Muicpal CapkW Wake '. Traft Sipr&-HooWmAs ROa4 CaLrdw _ 41,387 37,882 3,725 Tu Lwy Tri6k SpnW-King SVBewma Ws MM,ll w - A No 10.100 16.471 1,529.Ro do Ca*b bm RIF , Tmft SW W-Raenpk Drive,Baw wwft 4" 4A89 432 Tak Navy Sloswak wrYUCtlm-Hwy R2lCwialMMb TnW,Cowdw 232158 200.890 19.789 Mural Capd Wart 2307 Dwelopwoaab" Skkwa&cwwhx lbn-ErmMldkn 70.195 27.017 25.798 Tom Lwy 23.380 Pb R Ounla Roam Wakww WwRam-Fmftft woomm.Callika 87AN 89.168 5,852 Tm Lwy - 22587 Roa&Ca*U Mn RIF ' 4 3 5 2,206,819 2117 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.729,193 3,661,466 3,087,736 SUMMARY OF FINANCIM 96.546 DID-GenwM GwwanwR RIF ,. 2D7,124 DIC-Fka Pr*Waft Swba RIF 1.142330 O/C-Pak Der.&RMaad FOCIM"RA 69.534 O/C-Opwmda RIF 2206,819 D/C-ROwM WW R~RlF ' 930,379 MuidpM Cq M Waft RiF 73,166 Pubk Waft&Pwb Caput RIF 51,445 Rata CapbAOn RIF 2356 Rsle SWbftedon RIF 641.302 Tu Levy 890 Gawal Capd R3, ' 23,39D Pits&Ouarin Rn 36,750 Pmkaa=*bMbl 8,889 Room arw- , 1.019.268 DwNOpw aarwbabn TOTAL FINANCING 6,M.1931 3,691.455 3, , 38 ' 1 1 1308 I O E P RT R ' FINANCE DEPARTMENT ' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September ' 5, 2006 Resolution #: ' Report•#: FND-014-06 File#: By-law#: ' Subject: CASH ACTIVITY- SECOND QUARTER OF 2006 ' Recommendations: ' It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' 1. THAT Report FND-014-06 be received; 2. THAT in accordance with provision of Chapter 25, Section 286 of the Municipal Act, S.0.2001, the Treasurer reports the cash position of the Municipality of Clarington for the second quarter of the year 2006, as shown on the attached schedule; and 3. THAT Part"A" of the expenditures for the second quarter of the year be confirmed. Submitted by: Reviewed by tiaiicy Tayl , B.B. ., C. Franklin Wu, Director of Finan Chief Administrative Officer. ' NT/AA/na t ' 1309 REPORT NO.: FND-014-06 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT: ' The attached schedules indicate the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington's cash ' transactions for the second quarter of 2006,the cash investment position, the taxes receivable position and the comparative information for the month ending June 30, 2005. Statistical ' information is for the second quarter of 2006. Attachments: Attachment A-Analysis of Revenue and Expenditures—Second Quarter of 2006 ' Attachment B— Continuity of Taxes Receivable—As at June 2006 Attachment C— Statistical Information—As at June 2006 , Attachment D— Investments Outstanding—As at June 2006 1 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905x23-3379 F(905)623-4169 , 1310 t ' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PART OA* Analysis of Revenue and ExpendthM for dw Second Quarter of the Year 2008 ' Second Quarter Secant Quarter 2006 REVENUE RECEIVED FOR GENERAL OPERATING ' AND RESERVE FUND PURPOSES: GENERAUTAX PAYMENTS RECEIVED 43,289,235 42,475,669 ONTARIO MUNICIPAL PARTNERSHIP FUND(CRF) 0 87,000 ' DURHAM REGION-PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT 59,013 160,708 CANADIAN WASTE-RENT AND ROYALTIES 40,477 14783 PROVINCE-GAS TAX 138,669 90,999 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-MUNICIPAL 1,828,015 1,739,694 t DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-REGION 2,472,621 2,359,210 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-SCHOOL BOARD 340,025 257,835 INTEREST 1.825.82D 82IL385 j14907 48.022.077 . ' USE OF FUNDS: PAYROLL 5,041,825 ' REGION LEVY 10,691,571 SCHOOL BOARD LEVIES 6,924.290 GENERAL-INCLUDING CAPITAL EXP." 12.758.7881 11 740 806 ' 34 998 NET CASH PROVIDED(USED) 19 782 ' BANK NET CASH BAN BANK BALANCE PROVIDED NANCIAL POSITION: MAR.31 2006 /USED JUNE 2008 JUN.30 ' 5,569,032 14,427,901 21,578,072 RESERVE FUND x7551,09 469,047 1,220.158 633,482 MUNICIPAL BOND INVESTMENTS 2,712,478 27.856 2'740,534 2'890'858 '. HOST COMMUNITY FUND INTRUST 10,000A00 a 10,000.000 10,000,000 INVESTMENTS(GENERAL+RESERVE FUNDS) 44447 8,841,791 53-289,047 5035,`700 ALS 69 769112 14 907 728 81 678 898 851, 810 1 ' ERESERVE : _ APR.90 2008 APR.90 2005 MAY 31 2008 MAY 31 1&472,129 18,269,898 3,888,095 8,694,208 791,279 625,849 1,037,409 535,518 VESTMENTS 2,'12101 2 812 802 2731 102 2821 7 28 ' NOTE A: Difference in comparison between years die to fYnin9 difference In reoalpt of hods. . 1311 RPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PART'B` miry of Taxes Receivable the Second Quarter of the Year 2006 t March 31,2008 JUNE JUNE ' BEGINNING BALANCE INTEREST TAXES PAYMENT& 20D8 2005 RECEIVABLE ADDED. BILLED BALANCE ADJUST."' PREPAID TAXES ' CURRENT YEAR - TAXES (3249,052) 46,348,350 43,099298 (35,971,730). 7,127,568 7,744,753 PENALTY AND INTEREST - 20382 122.958 143.340 62 80.456 72508 ., FIRST PRIOR YEAR TAXES - 2,916,343 0 2,916,343 (578,035) 2,338,308 2289,954 PENALTY AND INTEREST 2D4.837 102,132 306.9m 92148 214 821 184.0191 t SECOND PRIOR YEAR TAXES 1,141,554 0 1,141,554 (183,486) 958,086 989,357 PENALTY AND INTEREST 166.081 40,423 206,5D4 51 155198 138 672 t THIRD 8 PRIOR YEARS TAXES 978,121 0 976,121 (92,746) 883,978 1,106,153 PENALTY AND INTEREST 322,876 33.735 1 1 (30,12m 326.486 581 ' TOT AL 2499142 2M.2481 46348 350 49,146,740 37 082 439 12,0ft 301 . 13.067.426 Includes refunds,write-oft,498'x,etc. , NOTE 1: 2006 AND 2005 Inca tm Inste9metd months: F,ebruW and April 2008 AND 2005 Final InstaDrcent=nft June and S9P Wnb9r ' 2: Current year taxes open In a negative position because they represent prepaid taxes for the Aprti kat knm'. 1312 ' CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PART"C" STATISTICAL INFORMATION ' for the Second Quarter of the Year 2006 Year to Date tax Certrficates 195 387 Number of Properties eligible for Tax Re istration see Note 1 7 "`see Note Accounts Payable Cheques Issued #076502 to#078141 1,640 3 522 Number of Births Registered 2 4 Number of Deaths/Stillbirths R istered 161 1 337 ' Note 1: Only includes those properties whose arrears are greater than$20,000. Note 2: Number of eligible properties for tax registration not applicable for year-to-date comparison. 1313 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON INVESTMENTS OUTSTANDING PART"D" ' AS'AT JUNE 30,2006 FINANCIAL INVESTMENT INTEREST #OF DAYS MATURITY MATURITY ' INSTITUTION COST RATE O/S VALUE DATE GENERAL FUND TD 1,957,803.57 4.25% 14 1,961,000.00 Jul. 6106 ' TD 4,995,950.00 425% 7 5,000,000.00 Jul. SCOTIABANK 4,988,250.00 4.30% 20 5,000,000.00 Jul.WW TOTAL GENERAL FUND ' RESERVE FUND ABC 776,152.23 4.35% 2059 986,467.00 Dec. 1/11 RBC 1,683,100.32 5.15% 2019 2,221,035.00 Sept.1 RBC ' 4,180,000.00 3.80% 365 4,180,000.00 June 30/0 ' RBC 1,379,343.63 4.65% 2085 1,787,409.00 Dec. 01 RBC 739,938.86 3.55% 1704 869,800.00 Oct. RBC ' 1,500,000.00 4.10% 1827 1,500,000.00 Dec.06/1 RBC 1,681,851.79 4.35% 1827 2,080,894.41 Mar.06M1 RBC 500,000.00 4.00% 1827 595,239.37 June 21 ' RBC 481,878.00 4.45% 1827 599,072.41 Mar. RBC ' 970,000.00 3.50% 1102 970,000.00 Mar. 19ro ' RBC ' 1,815,962.00 5.00% 1825 1,815,962.00 Feb.07/0 RBC • 1,480,000.00 4.30% 1096 1,480,000.00 Feb. 1010 RBC 208,000.00 4.35% 1830 257,351.00 May 12tO8 , RBC ' 550;000.00 4.00% 730 550,000.00 Oct. 14M RBC 1,143,285.67 3.80% 1547 1,338,742.00 Dec. 1 RBC 733,772.63 3.85% 1980 800,445.00 Jun.0211 ' RBC 499,999.38 4.00% 1182 567,343.00 Jul.2 RBC ' 2,061,000.00 4.00% 730 2,061,000.00 Dec. RBC 1,500,000.00 5.50% 1694 1,500,000.00 Dec.2 ' RBC• 906,000.00 4.10% 730 906,000.00 Sep.29 RBC 372,440.00 4.40% 1826 461,912.00 May RBC 1,520,617.00 5.35% 1826 1,973,297.00 Mar.1510 RBC 1,000,000.00 4.45% 1827 1,243,203.49 Aug.09 , HSBC 1,617,707.94 3.55% 365 1,675,136.57 Oct. ABC 3,796,000.00 3.75% 365 3,796,000.00 Jul. RBC 5,094,062.47 4.10% 1578 6,058,590.00 Oct. 1/1 , RBC 1,011,749.34 4.02% 92 1,022,000.00 Jul. RBC 659,152.80 4.40% 61 664,000.00 Aug.2 ITO1,485,030.00 4.00% 92 1,500,000.00 Jul. ' TOTAL RESERVE FUND ' ITOTAL INVESTMENTS Investment interest paid on a monthl&eml-annuaUannual bash 1314 , Handouts 1 1 rhl"�I1��0�1 Leading the Way 1 MEMO 1 1 TO: Mayor Mutton & Members of Council 1 FROM: C. Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk DATE: September 1, 2006 1 RE: General Purpose and Administration Meeting, September 5, 2006 - Update 1 Please be advised of the following amendments to the September 5, 2006 General 1 Purpose and Administration meeting: Delegations 1 1. Murray Walton will not be in attendance and has cancelled his request to speak. 1 2. Delegation (iii) should read Peter Smith AND Enrico Pistritto — PSD-093-06, Committee of Adjustment File 2006-0024 1 The following persons have also requested to speak concerning PSD-093-06, Committee of Adjustment File 2006-0024 1 • Elaine Groan • Gail Chahley 1 • Wayne Chahley • Kathy Derhak • Barbara Norton 1 3. Glenda Gies, representing the Port Darlington Community Association, has requested to speak concerning Addendum #2 to EGD-050-04 1 1 1 1 ' 2 ' Public Meetings (b) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Murray Visser Should reference Report PSD-090-06 ' (c) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 and Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision Applicant Foster Creek Developments, 2083302 Ontario Limited and Robert J. ' Stephenson Should reference Report PSD-089-06 ' Attached is correspondence we received from Veridian regarding Confidential Report COD-046-06. ' /Anne reen ree,13A, A.M.C.T. Deputy Clerk ' CAG'cd ' cc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads t CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ' 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-6506 y f PORT DARLINGTON U� _ oil COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC. c/o 117 Cove Road. Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3K3 ' September 5, 2006 tMayor John Mutton Members of Council ' Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario ' L1C 3A6 Dear Mayor Mutton: ' RE: Engineering Services Department Report Addendum#2 to EDG-50-04 ' The Port Darlington Community Association (PDCA) Board of Directors has reviewed the proposed revisions to the West Beach area of the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan,as outlined in Engineering Services Department Report Addendum # 2 to EDG-50-04. We would like to thank the ' municipality for providing the staff report and associated engineering drawing which facilitated our review. As noted in previous deputations,PDCA is generally supportive of the municipality's interest in providing a ' public beach for residents of Bowmanville. PDCA members have long appreciated the benefits of Bowmanville's Lake Ontario shoreline and encourage other members of our community to share our appreciation. ' PDCA is pleased that the Ministry of Natural Resources has designated Bowmanville Marsh as a Provincially ' Significant Wetland. PDCA generally supports the Municipality of Clarington's proposed revisions to the West Beach area of the Waterfront Park to reflect the new status. We have,however,two areas of concerns and a number of suggestions. ' We would like to draw Council's attention to two areas of concern: ' 1. Some residents of West Beach Road and Cove Road have property rights to the waterline, making their beach fronts private property. While these property owners have historically allowed their neighbours to cross their private property while walking the beach, there is concern among these t property owners that non-residents will stroll from the new West Beach park onto their private property. Should this problem develop after the park is open to the public,PDCA may,at that time, request that Clarington block off the beach at the edge of the park to prevent access to private ' property. 2. The PDCA Board is concerned regarding inappropriate use of the park for late night partying,with associated drinking, noise, traffic etc. 1 PDCA offers the following suggestions: ' • To prevent inappropriate use of the park between the hours of 11 pm and 7 am,that the road access ' to the West Beach park be closed to overnight entry; • That appropriate recycling and garbage containers be situated in the West Beach park with routine collection of bin contents as well as any litter; t • That the area within the West Beach Park running along the western edge of the Bowmanville Creek outlet be restored as part of park development; and • That the potential historical value of existing buildings in the area be explored with Mr. Charles ' Tawes of the Bowmanville Museum before any decision is taken to demolish the buildings; The PDCA Board also requests clarification of the municipality's schedule for development ofthe lake park , both on East Beach and West Beach Roads. Sincerely, ' PORT DARLINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Glenda Gies President r PORT DARLINGTON - ' COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC. c/o 117 Cove Road. -�` Bowmanville, Ontario DC 3K3 September 5, 2006 Mayor John Mutton Members of Council Municipality of Caarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 Dear Mayor Mutton: RE: Engineering Services Department Report Addendum#2 to EDG-50-04 The Port Darlington Community Association (PDCA) Board of Directors has reviewed the proposed revisions to the West Beach area of the Port Darlington Waterfront Park Conceptual Master Plan,as outlined in Engineering Services Department Report Addendum # 2 to EDG-50-04. We would like to thank the municipality for providing the staff report and associated engineering drawing which facilitated our review. As noted in previous deputations,PDCA is generally supportive of the municipality's interest in providing a public beach for residents of Bowmanville. PDCA members have long appreciated the benefits of Bowmanville's Lake Ontario shoreline and encourage other members of our community to share our appreciation. PDCA is pleased that the Ministry of Natural Resources has designated Bowmanville Marsh as a Provincially Significant Wetland. PDCA generally supports the Municipality of Clarington's proposed revisions to the West Beach area of the Waterfront Park to reflect the new status. We have,however,two areas of concerns and a number of suggestions. We would like to draw Council's attention to two areas of concern: 1. Some residents of West_Beach Road and Cove Road have property rights to the waterline, making their beach fronts private property. While these property owners have historically allowed their neighbours to cross their private property while walking the beach, there is concern among these property owners that non-residents will stroll from the new West Beach park onto their private property. Should this problem develop after the park is open to the public,PDCA may,at that time, request that Caaington block off the beach at the edge of the park to prevent access to private property. 2. The PDCA Board is concerned regarding inappropriate use of the park for late night partying, with associated drinking, noise, traffic etc. PDCA offers the following suggestions: • To prevent inappropriate use of the park between the hours of 1 I pm and 7 am,that the road access to the West Beach park be closed to overnight entry; • That appropriate recycling and garbage containers be situated in the West Beach park with routine collection of bin contents as well as any litter; • That the area within the West Beach Park running along the western edge of the Bowmanville Creek outlet be restored as part of park development; and • That the potential historical value of existing buildings in the area be explored with Mr. Charles Tawes of the Bowmanville Museum before any decision is taken to demolish the buildings; The PDCA Board also requests clarification of the municipality's schedule for development of the lake park both on East Beach and West Beach Roads. Sincerely, PORT DARLINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION � e Glenda Gies President GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 Resolution No. Moved by: / Seconded by: That recommendation 4 to PSD-096-06 be amended by inserting "with the exception of the lands on the east side of Bowmanville (Ridge Pine Park lands)" after the word "That' in the first line. °o °oo rirr 00 o 00 0� rgii� I ►llI/ � o© o0 00 0 vv v v olrnv ©fie /� / �IIII C �� 0 ��ii �; " _ op pDDDDDDDDDDDDG CDDDDDDD.o v � ■ 00 O Ia �O O 1 �� � ,.. •�� e oGOGGGGGGGr Coo ODDDDGGGo o o_s aDO��GCGCG°v o_o_ CGGG.GGG°p o �0_ �GGCC .CD oo C.G.0 o0 0 � " �� - ---.....:..--- --...............--,� n• oGGGGGGGG o0 00 0 o0 o0 oGGGGG GG�ao °o 00 00 ° d • o0 vo oINo:: rrrro v rr rrrrrrry 0 op o oO °o© °p o°Op o00 0 0 ory op po op oo p°o D�GGD �rC.D po ZBA 2006-0015 ZONING � 1 and 11 1 1 1 k4 Rr i,Jyy.S•z. 11 HIM �w•IIl 1 rii� __ __ � is i • 0 CO mCO E ° .U@.. O Qa 0 0 a m o: 0 jaddeN alJBW pue Road I I v m I � I I I :::.: :•:;;:;.:;::=; :: oul swa;sAS IeolueylN oa b m ' $ I �niaa ,�a3NN3� yoal3sal=l pue uAzolnM epow :�eump m \ - -- -- - w(zolnM epeW uolslnlpgnS;o ueld UBJG pue swels�(S IealueyoaW jaddeN aueW pue Road 200'6002'7-$ yoal3sjld Aq paumo spue-I — �(q paumo spuel 1N3WdN3WVMVI-AS ONINO2 I' �t 960-6002 vsz i 6BG _ _ 1 .t 9x _ — T- - r — zio of i I _ 1_ 3113Ntl 1111311 m 3NtlYtl15 _ �l' �� 3lINNY 9N�ltlll5 _ xd � Z AHMH9IH WVHiI(10 /. w /�/ 53 00 NMO 49f7 In NO 11NU u � �LYh ]yxN �1xV. 0 1W� ]LuN 6 1M] Y 11Nx ,up � iss N�nO 6 L r x 0 C NJOl9, I ms Z kVMHDIH WVHmna (aoivnoo)deW uogeoo-1 64jadoJd K EXHIBIT F TO REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 114 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM SCHEDULE 'F' FUTURE GROWTH AREAS LEGEND URRANAREABOUNDARY -- - GREENBELT BOUNDARY FUTURE GRO NTH AREAS --- OAK RIDGES MORAINE Fill v J . l M \ 34 � Resolution Moved by: � r1 ��� Seconded by: 1 S'i rr-, WHEREAS the Ministry of Transportation, in cooperation with the Royal Canadian Legion, offers the opportunity for an Ontario Veteran Plate to be issued to any person who has honourably: • Served in WWII or in Korea during the Korean war as a member of any of the following: the Canadian Forces, an allied force, the Merchant Navy or the Ferry Command; • Served for a minimum of three years in the Canadian Regular Forces (may still be serving) • Served for a minimum of three years of actual paid duty (1095 days) in the Canadian Reserve Forces or has been awarded the Canadian Decoration; • Served in NATO operations or as a member of the United Nations peacekeeping force as a member of any of the following: the Canadian Regular or Reserve Forces, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police or another Canadian police force, or an allied force; • Served in the Vietnam War in the forces of the United States or its allies during this war and who was a Canadian citizen at the time of such services AND WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Clarington deems it appropriate to acknowledge the services of our veterans, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT vehicles bearing a Province of Ontario Veteran's plate, shall be exempt from paying any applicable parking fees within the Municipality of Clarington; and THAT the appropriate by-law be forwarded to Council. Carr i P�.�