Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-03Final ciffiW4017 Planning and Development Committee Agenda Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 Time: 7:00 PM Place: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Samantha Gray, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at sgray(a.clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Audio Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio record of General Government Committee meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a General Government Committee meeting, the Municipality will be audio recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality's website. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non -audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net CIarifl#oII Planning and Development Committee Agenda Date: April 3, 2018 Time: 7:00 PM Place: Council Chambers 1 Call to Order 2 New Business — Introduction Members of Committee are encouraged to provide the Clerk's Department, in advance of the meeting, a copy of any motion the Member is intending to introduce, (preferably electronic) such that staff could have sufficient time to share the motion with all Members prior to the meeting. 3 Adopt the Agenda 4 Declaration of Interest 5 Announcements 6 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting 6.1 March 12 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of March 12, 2018 Page 5 Minutes 7 Public Meetings 7.1 Public Meeting Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Page 15 Applicant: National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. Report: PSD -026-18 Location: Northeast corner of Bloor Street/Prestonvale Road, Courtice 8 Delegations No Delegations Page 2 CIarifl#oII Planning and Development Committee Agenda Date: April 3, 2018 Time: 7:00 PM Place: Council Chambers 9 Communications - Receive for Information 9.1 Agricultural Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated Page 17 Advisory March 8, 2018 Committee Minutes 10 Communications— Direction 10.1 Durham Ruth McFarlane, CEO, Durham Christian Homes, Page 20 Christian Regarding a Donation of Surplus Municipal Land Homes (Motion for Direction) 11 Presentations No Presentations 12 Planning Services Department Reports 12.1 PSD -026-18 Applications by National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. to Page 22 permit a 111 unit townhouse development at the northeast corner of Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street, Courtice 12.2 PSD -027-18 Amendment to Application Fees By-law Planning and Page 34 Development Applications 12.3 PSD -028-18 An application by Akero Developments Inc. to amend Page 64 Draft Approval to add one new lot and change various zone regulations within Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision S -C 2007-0005 in the Northglen Neighbourhood, Bowmanville. 12.4 PSD -029-18 An Application by David and Heather Brown for Removal Page 76 of (H) Holding Symbol — 20 and 22 Foxhunt Trail, Courtice 12.5 PSD -030-18 Recommendation to add 3 properties to the Municipal Page 82 Register Page 3 GariU00II Planning and Development Committee Agenda Date: April 3, 2018 Time: 7:00 PM Place: Council Chambers 13 New Business — Consideration 14 Unfinished Business None 15 Confidential Reports No Reports 16 Adjournment Page 4 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Minutes of a meeting of the Planning and Development Committee held on Monday, March 12, 2018 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Present Were: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor S. Cooke, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill, Councillor W. Woo Regrets: Councillor W. Partner Staff Present: A. Allison, D. Crome, R. Maciver, C. Pellarin, K. Richardson, A. Greentree, S. Gray, 1 Call to Order Councillor Neal called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2 New Business — Introduction There were no new business items added to the Agenda. 3 Adopt the Agenda Resolution #PD -037-18 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Cooke That the Agenda for the Planning and Development Committee meeting of March 12, 2018, be adopted as presented. Carried 4 Declarations of Interest There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting. 5 Announcements Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of community interest. -1- 5 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 6 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting Resolution #PD -038-18 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Traill That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning and Development Committee, held on February 20, 2018, be approved. Carried 7 Public Meetings 7.1 Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Highcastle Homes and Akero Developments Inc. Report: PSD -022-18 Location: North of Concession Road 3, East side of Middle Road, in the Northglen Neighbourhood of Bowmanville Cynthia Strike, Principal Planner, made a verbal and electronic presentation to the Committee regarding the application. No one was present to speak in opposition to or in support of the application. 7.2 Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Fifty Five Clarington Ltd. & Modo Bowmanville Towns Ltd. Report: PSD -023-18 Location: 51 & 55 Clarington Boulevard, Bowmanville Anne Taylor -Scott, Senior Planner, made a verbal and electronic presentation to the Committee regarding the application. Henry Wildeboer, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Wildeboer advised the Committee that he is concerned the development will cause overcrowding. He asked that the Committee think of the bigger picture and longer term. Mr. Wildeboer explained that he would like to see more parking spaces and parks in the area. He stated that he is concerned that the development will cause an increase in traffic. Mr. Wildeboer would like an effective plan to be produced for this area and for the Committee to rethink the high density application. Gina Stewart, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Stewart stated that she is not concerned with the density of the application, but rather with the parking. Ms. Stewart would like to know if there is service parking in the area in addition to the underground parking. She stated that she is concerned with the flow of traffic in the area and encouraged round -a -bouts. -2- A• Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 Laura Labine, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Labine stated that she is concerned with the density of the proposed buildings. She noted that twelve storey buildings are too high for the area. Ms. Labine stated that six storey buildings would be high enough. She concluded by advising the Committee that the twelve storey buildings would be an eye sore. Enzo Bertucci, Director of Land Development, Kaitlin Corporation was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Bertucci stated that he agrees with the Planning staff's comments. He noted that the proposed six storey buildings meets the zoning requirements for the area. Mr. Bertucci explained that the revised density of twelve storeys is consistent with the Provincial Growth Plan and Clarington's Official Plan. He stated that the buildings will have an underground parking garage as well as on grade and on-site visitor parking. Mr. Bertucci explained that a traffic study has been prepared and all reports will be reviewed through the application process. 8 Delegations 8.1 Emma West, Planner, Bousfields Inc., Regarding Report PSD -024-18, An Application by MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd for a rezoning to permit a 103 townhouses in the Bowmanville West Urban Centre Emma West, Planner, Bousfields Inc., was present regarding Report PSD -024-18, An Application by MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd for a rezoning to permit a 103 townhouses in the Bowmanville West Urban Centre. Ms. West stated that the application for a zoning by-law amendment and plan of subdivision was submitted in May 2016. She requested that the Committee approve the Zoning By-law amendment for the proposed application. Ms. West stated that the application is consistent with the Provincial Policy, the Provincial Growth Plan, the Durham Region Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. She explained that a public information centre meeting was held in May 2016, a public meeting was held on June 6, 2016, and another public meeting was held on March 13, 2017. Ms. West highlighted key points in support of the application. She explained that the plan of subdivision in this area was approved for medium density, which permits 60 units per hectare. Ms. West stated that the proposed application is for 43 units per hectare. She noted that the proposed townhouses provide a transition of height and build form type between the low density residential that exists and the proposed high density to the east at 51 and 55 Clarington Boulevard. Ms. West explained that the Growth Plan was updated in 2017, and that there is no defined direction for major transit station areas and their boundaries. She stated that it is important to look at the secondary plan and the buildings in the surrounding area. Ms. West explained that a complete and compact community provides for a variety of buildings. She stated that the application is good planning for the Municipality of Clarington. The applicant confirmed that reservations have been received for the proposed townhouse units. -3- Clarftwn Recess Resolution #PD -039-18 Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Mayor Foster That the Committee recess for 5 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 8:15 PM with Councillor Neal in the Chair. 9 Communications - Receive for Information There are no Communications to be received for information. 10 Communications — Direction 10.1 Beth Kelly, President, Valiant Rental Properties Limited - Regarding Report PSD -023-18 A Revised Application by Fifty Five Clarington Ltd. & Modo Bowmanville Towns Ltd. (Kaitlin) to rezone lands to permit two 12 -storey apartment buildings containing 434 dwelling units at 51 & 55 Clarington Boulevard, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -040-18 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Cooke That Communication Item 10.1 from Beth Kelly, President, Valiant Rental Properties Limited, Regarding Report PSD -023-18, A Revised Application by Fifty Five Clarington Ltd. & Modo Bowmanville Towns Ltd. (Kaitlin) to rezone lands to permit two 12 -storey apartment buildings containing 434 dwelling units at 51 & 55 Clarington Boulevard, Bowmanville, be referred to the Director of Planning Services to be considered as part of the application review process. Carried Councillor Hooper returned to the meeting at 8:17 PM. 11 Presentation(s) No Presentations 93 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 12 Planning Services Department Reports 12.1 PSD -022-18 An Application by Akero Developments Inc. to amend Draft Approval to add one new lot and change various zone regulations within Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision S -C 2007-0005 in the Northglen Neighbourhood, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -041-18 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Traill That Report PSD -022-18 be received; That the proposed applications for an amendment to Draft Approval and Rezoning ZBA 2017-0024 continue to be processed including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -022-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.2 PSD -023-18 A Revised Application by Fifty Five Clarington Ltd. & Modo Bowmanville Towns Ltd. (Kaitlin) to rezone lands to permit two 12 -storey apartment buildings containing 434 dwelling units at 51 & 55 Clarington Boulevard, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -042-18 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD -023-18 be received; That the revised application for Rezoning ZBA 2017-0003 continue to be processed including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -023-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried -5- E Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 12.3 PSD -024-18 An Application by MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd for a rezoning to permit 103 townhouses in the Bowmanville West Urban Centre Resolution #PD -043-18 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Woo That Report PSD -024-18 be received; That the Zoning By-law Amendment application (ZBA 2016-0010) by MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd. (Kaitlin Corporation) for 103 townhouses on lands south of the future extension of Clarington Boulevard be denied; That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD -024-18 and Council's decision; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -024-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried on the following recorded vote: Council Member Yes No Declaration of Interest Absent Councillor Neal X Councillor Partner X Councillor Traill X Councillor Woo X Councillor Cooke X Councillor Hooper X Mayor Foster X 12.4 PSD -025-18 Applications by WED Investments Ltd., Devon Daniell, MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd. for a Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to permit a Townhouse development in at 1569 and 1599 Green Road, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -044-18 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Traill That Report PSD -025-18 be received; That the application for Draft Plan of Subdivision (S -C-2017-0009) submitted by WED Investments Limited be supported subject to conditions as generally contained in Attachment 1 to Report PSD -025-18; M 10 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 That the Zoning By-law Amendment application (ZBA 2016-0010) submitted by WED Investments Limited, Devon Daniell and MODO Bowmanville Towns Ltd. be approved as contained in Attachment 2 to Report PSD -025-18; That notwithstanding Section 45(1.3) of the Planning Act, Council permits the submission of minor variances application to the Committee of Adjustment for units requiring specific setback relief from the R3-52 Zone within the subject lands; That, once the three blocks identified in Figure 1 are consolidated into one parcel and all conditions contained in the Official Plan with respect to the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; That no further public meeting is required for future application for Common Elements Condominium; That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD -025-18 and Council's decision; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -025-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 13 New Business — Consideration There were no New Business Item to be considered under this Section of the Agenda. 14 Unfinished Business 14.1 LGL -002-18 Proposed Settlement of OMB Appeals - Courtice High Street Inc. [Tabled from the February 26, 2018 Council Meeting] Closed Session Resolution #PD -045-18 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Cooke That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing a matter that deals with: x litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and x advice that is subject to solicitor -client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. Carried 7- 11 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 Rise and Report The meeting resumed in open session at 9:00 PM with Councillor Neal in the Chair. Councillor Neal advised that one item was discussed in "closed" session in accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and one resolution was passed on a procedural matter. Resolution #PD -046-18 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Mayor Foster That Confidential Report LGL -002-18 be received; That Council instruct the Municipal Solicitor to consent to the proposed settlement of the Ontario Municipal Board appeal of Zoning By-law 2017-083 on the terms described in this Report; That, notwithstanding subsection 45(1.3) of the Planning Act, Council herby permits High Street Courtice Inc. to apply for minor variances to specific zoning setback provisions for the townhouse units otherwise permitted by the zoning by-law; That by granting permission to High Street Courtice Inc. to apply for the minor variances, Council is in no way expressing an opinion regarding the planning merits of the application or any related application; and That the confidentiality of Report LGL -002-18 be waived by Council, and the report made available to the public. Carried as Amended (See following motions) Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the Agenda. Resolution #PD -047-18 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Hooper That the foregoing Resolution #PD -046-18 be divided to consider paragraph 5 separately from paragraphs 1-4. Motion withdrawn -8- 12 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 Resolution #PD -048-18 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Cooke That the foregoing Resolution #PD -046-18 be amended by adding the following: That future Lane Z be a right only exit. Carried Later in the Meeting (See following motions) Suspend the Rules Resolution #PD -049-18 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak to the matter of the foregoing Resolution #PD -048-18 a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #PD -048-18 was then put to a vote and carried on the following recorded vote: Council Member Yes No Declaration of Interest Absent Councillor Neal X Councillor Partner X Councillor Traill X X Councillor Woo X Councillor Cooke X Councillor Hooper X Mayor Foster X The foregoing Resolution #PD -047-18 was then put to a vote and carried as amended on the following recorded vote: Council Member Yes No Declaration of Interest Absent Councillor Neal X Councillor Partner X Councillor Traill X Councillor Woo X Councillor Cooke X Councillor Hooper X Mayor Foster X -9- 13 Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes March 12, 2018 15 Confidential Reports There were no Confidential Reports scheduled under this Section of the Agenda. 16 Adjournment Resolution #PD -050-18 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Cooke That the meeting adjourn at 9:20 PM. Chair Carried -10- 14 Deputy Clerk Clarbgtoa Nonce of Public Meeting A land use change has been proposed, have your say! The Municipality is seeking public comments before making a decision on applications for a proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and to amend the Zonina By-law. National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. is proposing a draft plan of subdivision to create a multi -unit residential block for 111 townhouse (condominium) units, an Open Space block, and to zone lands to permit the requested townhouse development. The subject applications are deemed complete. Location: Northeast corner of Bloor Street/Prestonvale Road, Courtice M, ea r Dr. G. J: ('MacGillivray Public School 9 Cale Avenue 4- U W L O Conventional (3 Storey) Dual Frontage (3 Storey) •StackedStorey) r� L:.■■ . • �'� Epi■ 't 1 � ■■fir R� "' ,:,df: �tliYCalL'1�1L" —_Bloor =-- Future _ Future Townhouse/ N Apartment Apartment Site Site Additional information and background studies are available for review at the Planning Services Department and on our website at clarington.net developmentproposals. Questions? Please contact Anne Taylor Scott, Senior Planner at 905-623-3379, extension 2414, or by email at ataylorscott(a_clarington.net Speak at the Public Meeting: Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 Time: 7:00 PM Place: 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 Municipal Administrative Centre Council Chambers Or write to the Planning Services Department to the attention of Anne Taylor Scott, Senior Planner. File Number: ZBA 2017-0032 and S -C-2017-0010 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act The personal information you submit will become part of the public record and may be released to the public. Questions about the information we collect can be directed to the F]UNHEDepartment at 905- 623-3379, extension 2102. Accessibility If you have accessibility needs and require alternate formats of this document or other accommodations please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Appeal Requirements If you do not speak at the public meeting or send your comments or concerns to the Municipality of Clarington before the by-law is passed: a) you will not be entitled to appeal the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board or the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, as appropriate; and b) you will not be able to participate at a hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, as appropriate unless, in the opinion of the Board or the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services /nl Three stoi-ey tow ,House Lan its Two sto rey townhouse units. C:\Users\na01WppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\Al6S-C-2017-0010 Public Meeting Notice Apr 3 2018.docx Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Meeting Thursday, March 8, 2018 Members Present: John Cartwright Brenda Metcalf Don Rickard Eric Bowman , Wendy Partner Ted Watson Les Caswell Richard Rekker Elgin Greenham, Tom Barrie, Henry Zekveld Regrets: Jennifer Knox Guests: Michael Pathak, Hydro One, Conservation Account Manager Staff: Amy Burke, Faye Langmaid, Planning Services Brenda welcomed all to the meeting, with introductions. Adoption of Agenda 018-06 Moved by John Cartwright, seconded by Eric Bowman "That the Agenda for March 8, 2018 be adopted" Carried Approval of Minutes 018-07 Moved by Eric Bowman, seconded by Ted Watson "That the minutes of the February 8, 2018 meeting be approved" Carried Presentation Hydro One representative Michael Pathak provided an overview of the incentive programs that Hydro One offers to help farms reduce their electricity use. Hydro One offers incentives for lighting upgrades, pumps, ventilation fans, and more including creep heating pads, dairy plate coolers, and livestock waterers. For more information: https://www.hydroone.com/saving-money-and-energy/business/agribusiness Hydro One is also offering a new program to upgrade submersible pumps. For more information: https://www.hVdroone.com/saving-money-and-energy/business/agripump- rebate-program Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington 17 March 8, 2018 The most important thing to remember is you must apply for the incentive and get approved before purchasing the new equipment/upgrades. As soon as you think of a project, or if you need help knowing where to start, contact Hydro One right away: saveonenergy(a hydroone.com (1-866-923-8283) Or you can contact your local Hydro One rep covering the Bowmanville/Peterborough area: Michael. Pathak(a-)_clearesult.com (705-933-9397). Mike is happy to come visit your farm to help identify savings opportunities. Michael took away some questions that he will get back to members on. On the information for the agripump program, it does talk about replacing the pump, Michael will get clarification on the submersible pump. https://www.hydroone.com/saving- money-and-energy/business/agripump-rebate-program This is the link to small business lighting. https://www.hVdroone.com/saving-money-and- energy/business/small-business-lighting Business Arising C-274Tax Bill, The bill died in committee but elements of it may come back around. The MPs will keep us informed. The resolution from Amherstburg has been overtaken by events. Emily Prosect farm field 911 numbers . DRFA have been following up on this initiative. They would like the initiative to be more of a Regional (including Northumberland) perspective. CCi BioEnergy left the group with the questions "How can we work together to develop an innovative agriculture based project in the area?" The Committee as an advisory committee to Council can support a project, it would be up to individual members to pursue a business opportunity. Correspondence and Committee Reports Durham Climate Change Task Force for Agriculture Don Rickard and Eric Bowman are willing to represent farmers on this task force. Durham Agriculture Advisory Committee: Working on DAAC Tour for September 13'. Chairperson is working with Port of Oshawa on shipping issues. Durham Region Federation of Agriculture: Farm Connections school program is happening on April 3,4, 5 they are looking for volunteers to assist with the stations. Clarinaton Board of Trade: Notices for the 2018 annual CBOT Agricultural Summit on March 23rd at Newcastle Community Hall have been sent. Please register. Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington 1.49 March 8, 2018 Webinar on Understanding the Teenage Mind: Strategies to Engage Youth in Agri - Food Careers on March 14th at 2:00 p.m. CBOT's boardroom. Any wishing to attend please let Faye or Adam Jeronimo at CBOT know. New Business Harness Racing Resolution: Committee helped write a resolution in March 2012 which was sent directly to Council and endorsed. On Monday, Councillor Partner had the resolution endorsed at Committee because of the recent threats to horse racing at Picov Downs again. Boardband Brenda indicated that reception is terrible in their area so she was unable to provide her presentation to Durham Region on Farm Connections in advance of her delegation, which she noted at the beginning of her delegation. Reception is also an issue along the lakefront. John will work on getting a speaker for the June meeting possible future presentation. 407 Implementation —Blackbird and MTO will be attending the May meeting. There are issues including stormwater and drainage issues that have affected farmers in Phase 1. Trying to address in Phase 2 prior to occurring. Please send areas of concern to Ron Albright ralbrig ht(c)_clarington.net who will attend the April meeting and review whether construction has occurred as designed in advance of the May meeting. . Green On, Reminder of funding available for energy conservation works from the Province. See the website at https://www.greenon.ca/ Trees for Rural Roads Reminder that applications are due by end of March. https://www.clarington.net/en/live-here/trees-for-rural-roads-program.asp scroll down for the application form. Ontario Farmland Trust 2018 Forum in Prince Edward County https://ontariofarmiandtrust.ca/annual-farmland-forum/2018-farmland-forum/ Future Agendas x Blackbird and MTO for May meeting x John Cartwright will look into a broadband speaker for June. x (Not yet confirmed) Barry and Mark Bragg to speak about their operation and value-added initiatives — John Cartwright to follow up. x (Not yet confirmed) Participation House - Jenni Knox to follow-up. John Cartwright moved to Adjourn. Next Meeting: Thursday, April 12, 2018 @ 7:30 pm, Kathryn Enders from Ontario Farmland Trust Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington 1.9 March 8, 2018 DURHAM CH. ius-rCAN -.H.o.M.ES l{K)uSlNG, Assis-rEU L.ot,4(_, TERM CAPE February 22, 2018 Mayor Adrian Foster 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, ON LIC 3A6 Dear Mayor Foster, 200 Glen [fill Dr s Whitby. Qh LIN 9W2 Tel: 90S • 430-1666 Fax: 1-866 862-8905 As you are aware, Durham Christian Homes purchased both Glen Hill Marnwood and Glen Hill Strathaven in March 2011 as part of our Strategic Plan to create continuums of care where residents in our community could age in place. The new 160 resident, long-term care home in Whitby and the future 224 resident, long-term care home in Bowmanville will enable us to reach this goal. While we excitedly await for the construction to begin this spring for Glen Hill Terrace, we are also turning our thoughts to the new Glen Hill Strathaven in the Bowmanville area. We were thrilled with the exciting news announced at the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex in Bowmanville on December 15th whereby the Ministry of Health and Long Term care announced its commitment to provide an additional 125 long-term care beds to Durham Christian Homes in the new Glen Hill Strathaven home. This announcement brought great excitement to Durham Christian Homes, our residents, the Clarington community, our Board, Management and staff. The new Glen Hill Strathaven will be home to 224 long-term care residents. It was truly a memorable day that solidified our commitment to the Municipality of Clarington and its residents. Durham Christian Homes has the distinction of being the sole, not-for-profit and charitable long-term care operator in Durham Region. As such, our financial stewardship focuses on the best use of every dollar raised and spent. The reason 1 am writing to you today... Mayor Foster, we are hoping that with our common goal of providing safe, individualized, resident -centered care and quality of life to our most vulnerable, you will take into account the Regional Municipality of Durham's Affordable and Seniors' Housing Task Force recommendations, notably item 2-6 which includes long- term care homes and addresses the need to "encourage area municipalities through their Annual Business Planning Process to investigate the range of financial incentives that could support the creation and /or maintenance of affordable rental and seniors' housing. Potential incentives could include providing relief from area municipal fees (e.g. reduction, deferral or waiving of municipal planning, engineering, application and/or permit fees), reviewing development charges bylaws, donations of surplus and municipal land at no cost or at reduced market value." The new site for Glen Hill Strathaven has not been determined at this time bu1ould very much appreciate', your time to discuss the possible donation of surplus municipal land. , On behalf of the residents we serve, and the Board of Directors of Durham Christian Homes, I look forward to working together to find a solution that will ensure the success of the new Glen Hill Strathaven home. 20 I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss how we can move forward and to discuss how we can work in partnership to locate the best possible home location for our newest long-term care home serving the residents of Clarington and the surrounding area. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ruth McFarlane CEO cc: Elizabeth van der Loo, Board Chair, Durham Christian Homes Councillor Willie Woo, Wards 3 and 4 Councillor Ron Hooper, Ward 2 21 Clarftwn Planning Services Public Meeting Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: April 3, 2018 Report Number: PSD -026-18 Resolution Number: File Number: S -C-2017-0010 & ZBA2017-0032 By-law Number: Report Subject: Applications by National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. to permit a 111 unit townhouse development at the northeast corner of Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street, Courtice Recommendations: That Report PSD -026-18 be received; 2. That the comments received from residents at the Public Meeting be considered in the further processing of the applications for a draft plan of subdivision (S -C-2017-0010) and rezoning (ZBA 2017-0032) submitted by National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc.; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -026-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. 22 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Report Overview Page 2 This is a public meeting report to provide an overview of the applications by National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. on a 5.158 hectare parcel at the northeast corner of Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street in Courtice. The proposed draft plan of subdivision would create 1 block (2.469 hectares) for a 111 unit townhouse block, an open space block (2.511 hectares) and blocks for road widenings. The rezoning application proposes to place these lands in appropriate zones to permit the requested townhouse development. 1. Application Details 1.1. Owner/Applicant: National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. 1.2. Agent: Weston Consulting 1.3. Proposal: Proposed draft plan of subdivision To create one block (2.469 ha) for 111 condominium townhouse units on a private lane network, an open space block and road widenings. Rezoning To place lands in appropriate residential zone to permit the requested townhouse development. 1.4. Area: 5.158 hectares 1.5. Location: Northeast corner of Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street, Courtice, Part of Lot 33, Concession 2, Former Township of Darlington 1.6. Roll Number: 1817 010 060 07000 and 1817 010 060 06810 1.7. Within Built Boundary: The site is partially within the Built Boundary 2. Background 2.1 The subject applications were deemed complete on November 30, 2017 and circulated to staff and agencies for comments. The Key Map (Figure 1) illustrates a preliminary site plan concept on a network of private lanes with two private driveways along Prestonvale Road. The proposed unit mix is: x 61 — 2-3 storey conventional townhouse units x 18 — 3 storey dual frontage townhouse units x 32 — 4 storey stacked townhouse units 23 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Page 3 2.2 The proposed draft plan of subdivision (Figure 2) proposes 1 block to accommodate the townhouse development, blocks for road widenings along both Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street, and the balance being an Open Space block (2.511 hectares) reflecting the location of Robinson Creek and valley system. 2.3 The applicant hosted a Public Information Centre at Dr. G. J. MacGillivray Public School on February 7, 2018. Staff from Clarington Engineering Services and Planning Services and the Conservation Authority were in attendance. 2.4 The following studies and reports were submitted in support of the application and are currently under review: x Planning Justification Report x Functional Servicing Report x Traffic Impact Study x Noise Study x Environmental Impact Study x Archaeological Assessment x Slope Stability Analysis x Soils Investigation x Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan x Hydrogeological Report x Urban Design Brief 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The subject lands are currently vacant, with a section of the Robinson Creek valley system running north -south along the eastern edge of the subject lands. The table lands closest to Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street are relatively flat, but then slope to the east toward the valley. Figure 1: Northeast View of subject lands from Prestonvale Road/Bloor Street 24 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Page 4 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Existing rural residential properties along Prestonvale Road South - 140 unit apartment/townhouse site, and 74 single detached units in draft approved plan of subdivision (S -C-2012-0001) East - Vacant land and the Robinson Creek Valley West - Existing residential neighbourhood; Dr. G.J. MacGillivray Public School "t - "Meadowglade Road ' " Proposed Townhouse Units 1( 010; Conventional (2 Storey) r d:"v _ Duat Frontage (3 Storey) Subject Site Stacked (4 Storey) °-,*IMacGXivray .� Public School * ,1 21 - Cale Avenue T"—C F�I Future )artme, Site Figure 2: Key Map 25 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Y _ =+rR . I f, _._ Raeidenfial R A J J� i. I i. I b • CALE AL£- 35 of rurc!F:='.k•�:ry I a a BLOCK 1 3 Residential Condominium + iip��lll, IIII '• 2-469 11a II III': _,I IIII�IIJJ�I�I �IIIIIIII `.....�I I� � I Readenual % fts I a r I BLOCK 3 1 `� ' Open 8"48 7!.514 hs 3 , OPee 51,- - 1,— Page 5 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION PALRT OF Lor 53, CONCESSION 2 FHS PART OF THE ORIGINAL ROAR ALLOWANCE 6EMEEN LOTS 32 AND 33, CONCESSION 2 (Q. -d by Inet. Nn_ DNP31711) (07, phis I .... hip & o ,g—) Ml1NICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REtlONP1 NN NCPR 9 EILQM✓fe.+ N CONSONSULTINii alenr:nq+uroen EeSyn Kffmm ewa C3Sile.eLT PfAYEPTY ,>,E I rtl�em wrmn cewu+p emip rc m pp1.w em are• prn beM �pva i_ ar�rrtuoanrrwre I hLn6rau�Hrm En eaw.lEe of uE ynee Eeiq wBdNitl rtl Mr coned nY11w+Np b Re Hymn +Y,i,JM1JswY�fl'ad wnv�iw�m lq clr� raortawreaanllae rYledn tl&�p-tl,e 31,E RB.�.1NQ,�P_l$ A oJ. eb 4W. ill- � We mlypYe `do-wEmElw ��• ..�m+.Ib+mdH .r- r". -•--. m e. +nH. n.a�uo M bwup.r ' iuYYn+W: T9 BYUatl Tv,+++ o—H+21:: 32 7 rmw* g sa a m �! TOreL ... 515p ow nwa.r u.oda :+s w. +w Wrbr„+trWy. KAP P,iliFrj,prr pvflM:3 ep,[d�+Y peu ftr„Wb q,u, --- I to WENTON w�v� COHSN LTIN9 Figure 3: Proposed draft plan of subdivision 26 I i. I b • + iip��lll, IIII '• II III': _,I IIII�IIJJ�I�I �IIIIIIII `.....�I III I IIff r.1 I'p+I Iln'Ii;' I ��`�III'iilrlll1il}Illlla',li ` fts BLOCK 2 _� g ' Open 8"48 7!.514 hs 3 , sra[L 5 i f s A t i � I 1 I Page 5 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION PALRT OF Lor 53, CONCESSION 2 FHS PART OF THE ORIGINAL ROAR ALLOWANCE 6EMEEN LOTS 32 AND 33, CONCESSION 2 (Q. -d by Inet. Nn_ DNP31711) (07, phis I .... hip & o ,g—) Ml1NICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REtlONP1 NN NCPR 9 EILQM✓fe.+ N CONSONSULTINii alenr:nq+uroen EeSyn Kffmm ewa C3Sile.eLT PfAYEPTY ,>,E I rtl�em wrmn cewu+p emip rc m pp1.w em are• prn beM �pva i_ ar�rrtuoanrrwre I hLn6rau�Hrm En eaw.lEe of uE ynee Eeiq wBdNitl rtl Mr coned nY11w+Np b Re Hymn +Y,i,JM1JswY�fl'ad wnv�iw�m lq clr� raortawreaanllae rYledn tl&�p-tl,e 31,E RB.�.1NQ,�P_l$ A oJ. eb 4W. ill- � We mlypYe `do-wEmElw ��• ..�m+.Ib+mdH .r- r". -•--. m e. +nH. n.a�uo M bwup.r ' iuYYn+W: T9 BYUatl Tv,+++ o—H+21:: 32 7 rmw* g sa a m �! TOreL ... 515p ow nwa.r u.oda :+s w. +w Wrbr„+trWy. KAP P,iliFrj,prr pvflM:3 ep,[d�+Y peu ftr„Wb q,u, --- I to WENTON w�v� COHSN LTIN9 Figure 3: Proposed draft plan of subdivision 26 ReciderrhW I+fj R.id.,dW ` sra[L Page 5 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION PALRT OF Lor 53, CONCESSION 2 FHS PART OF THE ORIGINAL ROAR ALLOWANCE 6EMEEN LOTS 32 AND 33, CONCESSION 2 (Q. -d by Inet. Nn_ DNP31711) (07, phis I .... hip & o ,g—) Ml1NICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REtlONP1 NN NCPR 9 EILQM✓fe.+ N CONSONSULTINii alenr:nq+uroen EeSyn Kffmm ewa C3Sile.eLT PfAYEPTY ,>,E I rtl�em wrmn cewu+p emip rc m pp1.w em are• prn beM �pva i_ ar�rrtuoanrrwre I hLn6rau�Hrm En eaw.lEe of uE ynee Eeiq wBdNitl rtl Mr coned nY11w+Np b Re Hymn +Y,i,JM1JswY�fl'ad wnv�iw�m lq clr� raortawreaanllae rYledn tl&�p-tl,e 31,E RB.�.1NQ,�P_l$ A oJ. eb 4W. ill- � We mlypYe `do-wEmElw ��• ..�m+.Ib+mdH .r- r". -•--. m e. +nH. n.a�uo M bwup.r ' iuYYn+W: T9 BYUatl Tv,+++ o—H+21:: 32 7 rmw* g sa a m �! TOreL ... 515p ow nwa.r u.oda :+s w. +w Wrbr„+trWy. KAP P,iliFrj,prr pvflM:3 ep,[d�+Y peu ftr„Wb q,u, --- I to WENTON w�v� COHSN LTIN9 Figure 3: Proposed draft plan of subdivision 26 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement Page 6 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement identifies settlement areas as the focus of growth. Land use patterns shall be based on densities and a mix of land uses that efficiently use land, resources and infrastructure. 4.2. Opportunities for redevelopment and intensification must be promoted. Municipalities must provide a variety of housing types and densities, and a range of housing options that are affordable to the area residents. 4.3 Healthy and active communities should be promoted by planning public streets to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social interaction and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity. Compact and diverse developments promote active modes of transportation such as walking and cycling. Provincial Growth Plan 4.4 The subject lands are partially within the defined Built Boundary of Courtice and partially designated as Greenfield Area. 4.5 Growth will be accommodated by directing a significant portion of new growth to the built up areas through intensification and efficient use of existing services and infrastructure. A minimum of 40 percent of all residential development occurring annually within each upper tier municipality will be within the built up area. 4.6 Within Greenfield Areas, the Growth Plan establishes minimum density targets for residents and jobs. The current target is 50 residents and jobs per hectare measured across the Greenfield area. 4.7 The development of complete communities is encouraged by promoting a diverse mix of land uses, a mix of employment and housing types, high quality public open space and easy access to local stores and services. New transit -supportive and pedestrian -friendly developments will be concentrated along existing and future transit routes. 5. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan 5.1 The subject lands are designated Living Area and located along a Regional Corridor. Regional Corridors are higher density mixed use areas, supporting higher order transit services and pedestrian oriented development. Corridors link Urban Growth Centres and Regional Centres, with a focus on active transportation and transit routes. 27 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Page 7 5.2 Regional Corridors shall support an overall, long-term density target of at least 60 residential units per gross hectare and a floor space index of 2.5. Built form should be a wide variety of building forms, generally mid -rise in height, with some higher buildings. 5.3 Living Areas and Corridors shall be developed based on the following principles: x Compact, higher density and transit -supportive urban form; x Urban Design to orient development to the corridor with consolidated access points; x Linkages for pedestrians and cyclists to link communities and the transit system; x Integrating new development with existing historical main streets and enhancing cultural heritage resources. 5.4 Bloor Street is identified as a Type A Arterial Road, and a designated Transit Spine. In support of existing and future transit services, development adjacent to Transit Spines shall provide for higher densities and mixed uses, building oriented toward the street to reduce walking distance to transit, facilities which support non -auto modes (bus shelters, trails, cycling facilities) and limited surface parking. 5.5 The lands are within the Built Boundary and the Greenfield area. On an annual basis, a minimum of 40 percent of all residential development is to occur through intensification inside the Built Boundary across the Region. The Clarington urban areas shall be planned to accommodate a minimum 32 percent of all residential development occurring annually through intensification within the built-up area. The target of 50 people and jobs combined per gross hectare applies to the Greenfield area. 5.6 Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features are identified on the subject lands. The location and extent are to be confirmed through appropriate studies including an Environmental Impact Study, including the required vegetation protection zone. Clarington Official Plan 5.7 The Clarington Official Plan designates the lands adjacent to Bloor Street as a Regional Corridor, with the balance of the lands considered to be internal to the neighbourhood. 5.8 Regional Corridors have a minimum net density of 85 units per hectare, with buildings heights ranging between 3 and 12 storeys. Corridors permit mixed use buildings and apartments, while internal to the neighbourhood is to be a mix of single detached, semi- detached and limited townhouse units, between 1 and 3 storeys. 5.9 Regional Corridors are identified as part of the Priority Intensification Areas which have the greatest mix of uses, heights and densities. These areas are the focus of designing the public realm and targeted for the investment in public infrastructure. Corridors are approximately 100 metres deep. WY -_7 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 5.10 Development in Corridors and Priority Intensification Areas will be designed to: Page 8 x Have buildings sited near the street line to contribute to a sense of enclosure and a strong street edge; x Recognize the historic context; x Provide active ground floor uses, with entrances directly to the street; x Good urban design with an enhanced pedestrian environment x Provide transitions in scale to areas of lower density x Optimize the use of solar energy through building orientation and design; x Minimize adverse shadow and wind impacts. 5.11 Multi -unit residential development will be developed on the basis of the following site development criteria: x Suitability of the size and shape of the site; x Gnpatibility with the surrounding neighbourhood; x Minimize impact of traffic on local streets; x Multiple and direct vehicular accesses from public streets, without reliance on easements; x Variety of unit designs; x Townhouses sited on blocks shall generally not exceed 50 units. 5.12 Natural Heritage Features, including the Robinson Creek, valley and woodlands are present on the subject lands. Studies will determine the appropriate development limit and buffers in accordance with the Official Plan. 5.13 The lands are located at the intersection of a Prestonvale Road (Type C Arterial Road is deferred by the Region of Durham) and Bloor Street (Type A Arterial Road). Arterial Roads have limitations with respect to access location and spacing. Noise generated from arterial road traffic is to be mitigated. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands Agricultural (A) Zone. A rezoning is required to place lands in appropriate residential zones to implement the draft plan of subdivision. Open space lands and their buffers would be placed in the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. 7. Public Notice and Submissions 7.1 Notice of the Public Information Centre was mailed on January 4, 2018 in advance of the meeting held on February 7, 2018 at Dr. G.J. MacGillivray Public School in Courtice. Ten area residents attended and registered as interested parties. 7.2 Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed on March 8, 2018, in addition to posting on the municipal website and in the Planning Services Department E -update. 29 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Page 9 7.3 At the time of writing this report, four individuals submitted written comments. Issues raised at the Public Information Centre, and in writing, are: x The proposal has too much density; x Development does not fit in with character of adjacent lots; provide a similar design to neighouring dwellings; taller buildings should be at rear; opposed to 4 storey stacked townhouse units; x The ability of road network and site design to accommodate traffic and parking; x ktection of open space from development; x Construction impacts to existing residents from blowing dirt, garbage and noise; x Safety will be compromised by additional traffic and population; x Impact to trees and vegetation, specific concern about trees/hedges along mutual property lines; x Loss of privacy; x Negative impact to property values; x Lack of services and amenities such as a grocery store and gas station in the area; x Request no interference with natural drainage; x Request involvement through drafting of zoning by-law amendment and site plan application related to items such as fences, on -street parking within site plan area. 8. Agency Comments Regional Municipality of Durham 8.1 The Region of Durham has confirmed the lands are within a Regional Corridor with a gross density target of 75 units per hectare, and a target floor space index of 2.5. The Region finds the density and building form, having a density of approximately 45 units per hectare, will contribute to the corridor targets. 8.2 Regional Planning has provided standard conditions related to site contamination, noise impacts and archaeological potential. 8.3 The Region acknowledges that the Conservation Authority must be satisfied on the findings and recommendations of the Environmental Impact Study prior to development 8.4 There are no constraints with respect to water and sanitary services for the development. The findings of the Functional Servicing Report are satisfactory, provided the appropriate sanitary sewer design calculations are provided. Final servicing details will be implemented at the site plan stage. 8.5 The site plan submitted must be modified to satisfy the design criteria for municipal waste pickup 8.6 The Region is generally satisfied that the findings of the Traffic Study will not have a significant impact on the Regional road network, however they have provided minor comments to be addressed in an addendum report. A regional road widening is required along Bloor Street. 30 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Page 10 8.7 CLOCA cannot support the current development limit and requires the EIS to be revised to appropriately protect the feature and provide a buffer in accordance with the Clarington Official Plan and CLOCA policies. 8.8 The Slope Stability Report indicates surface water should be kept away from the slope however the development plan shows stormwater being directed down the slope. Better coordination of future submissions and further clarification is required. 8.9 Any proposed compensation and enhancement is to occur prior to the removal of the feature itself. 8.10 Additional technical comments from CLOCA Environmental Engineering and Natural Heritage Staff have been forwarded to the applicant to address in the next submission documents. Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board 8.11 The School Board has no concerns at this time and request updates regarding changes to the proposal that may impact future school accommodation plans. Elementary students (JK to Grade 6) will attend Dr. G.J. MacGillivray Public School, while students in Grades 7 to 12 will attend Courtice Secondary School. Other Agencies 8.12 Canada Post, Enbridge, Rogers have provided standard comments and conditions of approval. 9. Departmental Comments Engineering Services 9.1 Engineering Services requests a new public street be incorporated into the subdivision design to serve the subject lands with connection to Meadowglade Road. Further discussion is required. 9.2 The development must accommodate for a future valley trail network. 9.3 A 6 metre road widening is required along Prestonvale Road. 9.4 Engineering Services is also concerned with major overland flow being conveyed down the valley slope. Revisions are required to the Storm Water Management Report. Should the storm sewer outfall be approved, it must be in the bottom of the valley and designed to meet the requirements of Clarington and CLOCA. Easements for maintenance required. The Engineering design must be further revised to eliminate retaining walls in the development. 9.5 A cash -in -lieu of parkland payment will be required. 31 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 Page 11 9.6 Standard comments are provided relating to site alteration, road occupancy, road excavation and boulevard works, on-site parking, phasing, provision of sidewalks, and financial requirements. Emergency and Fire Services 9.7 Clarington Emergency and Fire Services has no objections to the proposed draft plan of subdivision and rezoning. Detailed comments have been provided relating the designated of fire routes and turning radius, painting of private hydrants and fire route signage. These will be forwarded under separate cover to the applicant. 10. Discussion 10.1 The southerly part of this site is located along a Regional Corridor. Regional Corridors have a target of 60 units per gross hectare in the Region's Official Plan and 85 units per net hectare under the Clarington Official Plan. 10.2 Transit supportive, higher density and compact built form is directed along Corridors in Provincial, Regional and Clarington Planning documents. Bloor Street provides a direct connection to Oshawa and existing GO transit facilities to the west, and toward Courtice Road and the future Courtice GO Train site to the east. Development of the subject lands must support future transit initiatives. 10.3 Based on the polices, density and built form along the Bloor Street corridor is to be higher and taller based on the urban structure of the Clarington Official Plan, with transitions to the north. The development includes a 4 -storey stacked townhouse product along Bloor Street which provides a slight increase in density, however, the Regional Corridor policies require mixed uses and apartment dwellings. 10.4 The major issues to be resolved include: x Achieving Regional Corridor targets for density and built form; x Satisfying the Clarington Official Plan relating to multi -unit residential development including a maximum size of townhouse blocks being 50 units; x Protection of Natural Heritage and providing the buffers as required by the Clarington Official Plan: Based on comments from CLOCA and initial review of the supporting EIS document, the application does not conform to the policies of the Clarington Official Plan in terms of establishing development limits; x Introducing a new public street through the development with a potential future connection to Meadowglade Road; x Pedestrian linkages to surrounding road network and trail within the valley system; x Integration of remaining residential parcels between Meadowgalde Road and Bloor Street through a Master Block Plan process. 11. Concurrence Not Applicable. 32 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -026-18 12. Conclusion Page 12 12.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information on the proposed draft plan of subdivision and rezoning applications submitted by National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. for the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. Staff will continue processing the application including the preparation of a subsequent report upon resolution of the identified issues. 13. Strategic Plan Application Not applicable. Submitted by: David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: Andrew C. Allison, B.Comm, LL.B Chief Administrative Officer Staff Contact: Anne Taylor Scott, Senior Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2414 or ataylorscott .clarington.net The following is a list of the interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: Joe Pantalone Ryan Guetter Ed and Heather Cook Christina & Kelly Vaillancourt Don and Bev Burgess Shawn Ragoo Heidi Stephenson Desire Chepi Enid DeCoe Hugh Neill Peter Hutchinson ATS/CP/n1 IAADepartment\LDO NEW FILING SYSTEMWpplication Files\SC-Subdivision\S-C-2017\S-C-2017-0010 NE Corner Presonvale & Bloor\Staff Report\PSD-026-18 -National PM Report Apr 3 2018.docx 33 Clarftwn Planning Services Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: April 3, 2018 Report Number: PSD -027-18 Resolution: File Number: PLN 20.5 By-law Number: Report Subject: Amendment to Application Fees By-law Planning and Development Aaalications Recommendations: 1. That Report PSD -027-18 be received; 2. That the Fee By-law Amendment contained in Attachment 1 to Report PSD -027-18 be adopted; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -027-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. 34 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -027-18 Report Overview Page 2 This report recommends an update to Clarington's planning application fees. Our review of planning application fees for the Durham Region lakeshore municipalities concluded Clarington's application fees are generally lower when compared with the other Durham Region lakeshore municipalities. The majority of the application fees are proposed to be increased by approximately 3%. Select fees that are significantly lower are proposed to increase more substantially. The increase will place Clarington's application fees at the average or slightly lower than the average when compared to Durham Region lakeshore municipalities. Minor changes to how fees are collected have been proposed. Application fee increases were contemplated in establishing the 2018 Planning Services Department budget. 1. Background 1.1 Section 69 of the Planning Act allows a Municipality to pass a by-law setting out a fee schedule for processing of planning applications. The fees collected are intended to recover the "anticipated cost" to the Municipality for processing development applications. Under the current fee schedule Clarington does not fully recover the cost of processing applications when direct and indirect costs, including overhead, pre -consultation meetings, and circulation of revised submissions are included. 1.2 A survey of 2017 fees of the other four lakeshore municipalities in Durham Region (Pickering, Ajax, Whitby and Oshawa) has been completed. The average fees of the lakeshore municipalities and Clarington's existing fees are shown in Attachment 2 of this report. Clarington is within the average or below average on majority of fees. Clarington is significantly below the average for Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and Residential Subdivision applications. 1.3 The Fees By-law was last amended by Council on September 29, 2014, coming into effect on November 1, 2014. At that time Oshawa and Whitby had recently increased their fees following a major review of application fees undertaken by consultants. Major application fee reviews led by consultants examine the components of full cost recovery which include: Direct costs — labour costs; Indirect costs — operating costs associated with individuals supporting direct service departments allocated on step -cost basis to each service department; and Capital costs — capital asset replacement costs for facility space, vehicles, and IT equipment etc. 1.4 No major fee reviews are being undertaken by any of the lakeshore municipalities at this ti me. 1.5 The 2014 amendment moved the annual increase from January 1 of each year to July 1. The move avoided a rush by applicants submitting applications prior to the holiday shutdown of the Municipal Administrative Centre. The fees are proposed to continue to increase on July 1 of each year. 35 Municipality of Clarington Resort PSD -027-18 2. Revisions to Application Fees Paae 3 2.1 The majority of the planning application fees have been increased modestly. Applications including Zoning By-law Amendments, Official Plan Amendments and Residential Subdivision are increasing by larger amounts. The proposed increases generally better represent the amount of total municipal staff time spent reviewing and processing specific applications as submission requirements have become more complicated. 2.2 The Zoning By-law Amendment fee is recommended to rise substantially over a three year period. At the present time, minor rezoning applications cost $4,330 whereas the average fees in the Durham lakeshore municipalities is $8,920. It is proposed that Clarington's minor rezoning fees increase to $6,000 for 2018 and rise to $8,000 by 2020. A similar stepped approach is proposed for major rezoning application fees. This approach will prevent a sharp increase in fees for local business owners who may be in the planning stages of projects. 2.3 Official Plan Amendment applications are approximately 30-40% lower than the Durham average. The recommended fee increase would bring the fee closer to the average. 2.4 A new combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application fee is proposed. Typically, when an Official Plan Amendment is received it is accompanied by a Zoning By-law Amendment. When processed simultaneously there are efficiencies in the process as circulations and comments are reviewed at the same time. The new combined fee will offer a reduction in the Zoning By-law Amendment fee by 50% of the normal fee. 2.5 Subdivision applications have a base fee and a per unit fee. The base fee for Residential Subdivision applications are proposed to increase. Subdivision applications consume a large amount of staff time due to their technical nature and the studies required to support the applications. The per unit fee for apartments and townhouse blocks will now be collected as a fee per block. The blocks are subject to future site plan approvals where the number of units are reviewed and appropriate fees applied. 2.6 Site Plan Approval fees are proposed to increase. The base Industrial Site Plan Approval fee is proposed to increase from $1,410 to $3,000. The proposed fee will remain less than 50% of the average cost of the other lakeshore municipalities. This fee did not increase significantly in 2014 when the by-law was updated. The fee will remain significantly lower than the fees observed throughout Durham Region. 2.7 Commercial and residential site plan fees are proposed to receive modest increases to the base fees with the per unit fee for residential increasing slightly. 2.8 A new fee for pre -consultation meetings is proposed. Clarington receives a large number of requests for pre -consultation meetings. These meetings require a significant amount of staff time. Some pre -consultations do not lead to applications or require additional meetings based on substantial revisions from the initial meeting. The fee, $200, will not recover the cost of staff time for the meeting but is being proposed as part of a process to 36 Municipality of Clarington Resort PSD -027-18 Paae 4 encourage applicants provide more refined proposals. The goal is to have more detailed proposals that staff and agencies can provide better comments on and result in fewer repeat meetings. If the pre -consultation leads to an application, the $200 will be applied to the future application fees. 2.9 The fee will increase gradually each year over the next four years, by 3% annually except where noted (see Draft By-laws, Attachment 1). The fees have been rounded up or down to the nearest ten dollars. 3. Consultation 3.1 Letters were sent to BILD and the Durham Region Home Builders Association on February 12, 2018 notifying them that the Planning Services Department was undertaking a review and advising them of the proposed fees. Staff followed up with phone calls in early March to ensure the letters were received. 3.2 Durham Region Home Builders Association indicated that while they do not endorse fee increases they have reviewed the proposed fees and believe they are reasonable increases. They provided no objection to the proposed increases. 3.3 At the time of finalizing this report staff have not received any correspondence from BILD. 4. Concurrence The Municipal Solicitor has reviewed the relevant fees affecting agreements and concurs with the proposed fee increases. 5. Conclusion The proposed fees increase for planning applications will be in line with the average or be lower than other Durham lakeshore municipalities in most instances. The proposed fees increase will cover increasing municipal costs (staff time, overhead etc.) while not becoming a barrier to invest or do business in Clarington. Application fees increase were contemplated in setting the 2018 Planning Services Department budget. It is respectfully recommended that By-law 2010-142 regarding payment of fees for information and services provided by the Municipality of Clarington be amended as shown in Attachment 2 of this report. 6. Strategic Plan Application The recommendations contained in this report conform to the Strategic Plan. 37 Municipality of Clarington Reaort PSD -027-18 Submitted by: David Crome, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning Services Paae 5 z4vA� Reviewed by. Andrew C. Allison, B. Comm, LL.B CAO Staff Contact: Brandon Weiler, Planner, (905) 623-3379 ex. 2424 or bweiler@clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 - Fee By-law Amendment Attachment 2 — Comparison Chart and Staff Recommended Changes to the Fee By-law List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision is on file in the Planning Services Department. Durham Region Home Builders Association BW/CP/aw I:\^Department\LDO NEW FILING SYSTEM\PLN Files\PLN 20 Municipal Finance\PLN 20.5 Fee By-Law\2017 Review\Staff Report\PSD-027-18.Docx Municipality of Clarington Attachment to Report PSD -027-18 Corporation of the Municipality Of Clarington By -Law No. 20 Being a By-law to amend Schedule A of the Fee By-law 2010-142 WHEREAS Section 69(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, C.P13, provides that By- laws may be passed by the Council of a Municipality to prescribe a tariff of fees for the processing of applications made in respect of planning matters (PLN 20.5); WHEREAS Section 391 (1) of the Municipal Act provides for municipalities to impose fees or charges for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Commencing July 1, 2018, the fees for services provided by the Municipality under By-law 2010-142 shall be amended by the following Schedules to this By-law: Schedule "A" — Planning Services and Legal Services Department BY-LAW passed in open session on this day of , 2018 Adrian Foster, Mayor Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk 39 By-law 2010-142 Schedule "A" Planning Services/Legal Services Departments Fee Schedule Julv 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Official Plan Amendment (note 7) Minor Application $15,000.00 Major Application (note 1) $22,000.00 Aggregate Pit or Quarry $33,200.00 Regional Official Plan Amendment Review $2,770.00 Neighbourhood Design Plan Amendment $5,000.00 Zoning By-law Amendment (note 7) Minor $6,000.00 Major (note 3) $10,000.00 Removal of (H) Holding Symbol $2,600.00 Extension of a temporary use $2,210.00 Combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (note 12) Minor $20,000.00 Major $27,000.00 Draft Plan of Subdivision (note 7) Residential $16,000+$300/unit and $500/block Non -Residential $6,620.00 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement (note 5) ($4,000.00 + $520 HST) $4,520 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($1000.00 + $130.00 HST) $1,13 0.00 Recirculation Fee (note 15) 50% of the base fee Red Line Revisions to Draft Approval Plan of Subdivision (note 7) All Revisions $8,830 + $300 additional/unit and $500/block Major Revisions to Subdivision Applications Not Draft Approved (note 7) Where original application was filed prior to July 1, 2000 $14,000 + $300/unit and $500/block Where original application was filed between July 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2006 $7,000 + $300 /unit and $500/block Where original application was filed after December 31, 2006 $7,000.00 Subdivision Clearance $2,540.00 Extension of Draft Plan Approval $2,540.00 Draft Plan of Condominium (note 7) Residential and Non -Residential (note 10) $7,500.00 Application for Condominium Conversions (note 10) $8,830.00 Preparation of Condominium Agreement (note 5) ($3,650.00 + $474.50 HST) $4124.50 Preparation of Condominium Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($720.00 + $93.60 HST) $813.60 Condominium Clearance $2,000.00 Part Lot Control (note 7) ($1,000 + $60/unit) Site Plan Approval / Amendment (note 7) Telecommunications Towers $8,000.00 Residential Use $6,000 + $225/unit for the first 100 units and $150 for each unit after the first 100 units Commercial Use $5,000 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area Mixed Use Building (note 13) $4,500 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $20,000) HE Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Industrial / Other Uses $3,000 + $0.25/m2 gross floor area (maximum $10,000) Amendment - Residential Use $1,000 + $50/unit (maximum $6,000) Amendment - Commercial Use $1,800 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Mixed Use (note 13) $1,800 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Industrial / Other Use $800 + $0.20/m2 gross floor area (maximum $6,400) Minor Site Plan / Oak Ridges Moraine (note 2) $650.00 Sales Trailer / Model Home $2,000.00 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement (note 5) ($600.00 + $78.00 HST) $678.00 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($600.00 + 78.00 HST) $678.00 Landscape Inspection Fee for projects with greater than 2500 sq. m. of floor area, or 25 units or greater (0.5% of the landscape cost estimate with a minimum of $1,000) Recirculation Fee (note 15) 50% of the base fee Committee of Adjustment — Minor Variance (note 4 and 7) Accessory Buildings and Structures $570.00 Residential Minor (single, semi-detached, townhouse or proposed lot) $720.00 Residential Major (all other residential) $1,200.00 Commercial $1,700.00 Other non-residential $720.00 Tabling and Recirculation Fee (applicant initiated; $250.00 Sign Permit Permanent $200.00 Temporary $100.00 Sign By-law Variance $700.00 Amendment $1,800.00 Apartment In House Application and Registration $200.00 Registration for Applications submitted prior to January 1, 2015 $75.00 Rental Protection Act $1,290.00 Land Use Information and Compliance Letter Zoning, Building, and all other property information $150.00 Subdivision $150.00 Land Division Review Fee $650.00 Preparation of Section 53 Agreement (note 5) ($600.00 + $78.00 HST) $678.00 Peer Review (Applicant responsible for 100% Municipality's full costs of undertaking a Peer Review) Comments on Applications Under the Green Energy Act microFIT applications (10 kW or less) $150.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW (solar energy) $450.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW (other than solar) $6,100.00 Other Preconsultation (note 14) $200.00 Street Name Change Request $1200 + $50 per municipal address Activation of a dormant application not requiring a Public Meeting 25% of the initial application fee or $1,500 whichever is greater. Application Requiring An Open House or Additional Public Meeting $1,750.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting)) 41 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Application Requiring Additional Public Meeting $2,000.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting where notice is provided through the local newspaper) Application Involving Review Under EPA and/or EAA Process (additional fee) $14,500.00 Ontario Municipal Board or Land Planning Appeals Tribunals Related Administration Fee (note 8) Preparation of Development / Servicing Agreement (note 5 and note 9) Folding of drawings accompanying a submission (fee per sheet) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Notarial Fee By Municipal Solicitor ($25.00 + $3.25 HST) $28.25 Commissioners Fee By Municipal Staff ($25.00 + $3.25 HST) $28.25 Publications Small Maps ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Large Maps ($15.00 + $1.95 HST) $16.95 Aerial Photography (colour) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Official Plan Colour Map ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Clarington Official Plan ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Zoning By-law ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Street Name Index CD Format ($16.00 + $2.08 HST) $18.08 Studies: Under 40 pages ($13.00 + $1.69 HST) $14.69 40 - 100 pages ($26.00 + $3.38 HST) $29.38 100 - 200 pages ($43.00 + $5.59 HST) $48.59 over 200 pages ($60.00 + $7.80 HST) $67.80 CD ($15.00 + $1.95 HST) $16.95 Real Property Transactions For the preparation of any agreements relating to real property transactions not otherwise specifically addressed in this Fee Schedule; land transfers (e.g. right-of-ways, encroachments, leases and licensed, easements) the person requiring the agreement shall be required to pay fees and disbursements in accordance with notes 5 and 9 below. Note 1 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Major Official Plan Amendment application: - New golf courses or expansion to existing golf courses; - New waste facility or expansion to existing waste facility; - Commercial Development greater than 2,500 m2; - Deletion or addition of arterial or collector road; and/or - Any application that due to the broader policy implications for the Municipality would require the need to review or manage studies, or any application deemed to be a major by the Director of Planning Services. Note 2 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Minor Site Plan application: - A residential or agricultural site plan in the Oak Ridges Moraine as required by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 2005-109; - A dog kennel, agricultural tourism use, and similarly -scaled uses; and/or - A minor alteration to an existing site plan to revise parking, add a patio, add a storage building, revise signage, add or delete portables, etc. Note 3 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a major Zoning By-law Amendment application: -Associated with an Official Plan Amendment; - Associated with an application for proposed Plan of Subdivision; - Application involving multiple properties, except for commercial and industrial related applications; and/or - Any application that requires the review of technical support documents or studies (e.g. environmental analyses, transportation). 42 Note 4 Minor Variance applications for the construction or placement of an accessibility device to provide access to a single-detached/link or townhouse dwelling is exempt from the fee. An "accessibility device" is defined as a device including a ramp that aids persons with physical disabilities in gaining access to a dwelling unit. Note 5 Agreement preparation fee does not include the cost of registering the agreement and all related documents (e.g. Transfers, Postponements, or inhibiting orders) in the Land Registry office. The cost of such registrations is as follows: - Initial registration $250.00 plus HST, plus disbursements - All subsequent registrations $125.00 plus HST, plus disbursements. Applicants must provide the Municipality (Legal Services) with all such costs prior to registration. Note 6 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a minor application for red- line revisions to Draft Approval: - Does not require circulation to outside agencies. Note 7 Fees for all Planning applications submitted by a registered charitable organization or for a registered non-profit housing organization will be reduced by 50%. Note 8 In addition to the fees set out for Planning Act Applications, the total fees payable shall include all fees associated with supporting an applicant at any hearing where the application was approved by Municipal Council including legal fees at a rate of $180/hour and consultant/witness fees where required, but excluding the costs of the Planning Department staff. Note 9 For preparation of any development/servicing agreement other than a subdivision agreement, Section 41 agreement or a Section 53 agreement, the applicant is required to reimburse the Municipality for its legal costs. If the legal work is undertaken by the Municipal Solicitor, it will be charged at the rate of $180/hour. If the legal work is undertaken by other legal counsel, it will be charged at the legal counsel's hourly rate. The minimum fee for any such agreement shall be $475.00 plus HST. Note 10 The base fee only shall be applicable for Draft Plan of Condominium for a parcel of land which was previously subject to a Site Plan application approved within the previous 24 months of the submission of a Draft Plan of Condominium. Note 11 This Schedule "A" shall remain in effect from July 1, 2017 until June 30, 2018. In the event that a fees review is not undertaken before that date fees will be increased annually by 3%, commencing on July 1, 2018. Note 12 Where Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are submitted together a reduction of 50% of the Major Zoning By-law Amendment Fee shall apply. Note 13 The fee for a Mixed Use Building will apply when residential units are proposed and a minimum of 50% of the ground floor of a building is for non-residential purposes. Note 14 The preconsultation fee will be applied to a future application resulting from the preconsultation meeting. Note 15 Recirculation fees will be required on the 4th resubmission of application materials that require circulation to internal departments and/or external agencies. 43 By-law 2010-142 Schedule "A" Planning Services/Legal Services Departments Fee Schedule July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Official Plan Amendment (note 7) Minor Application $15,450.00 Major Application (note 1) $22,660.00 Aggregate Pit or Quarry $34,200.00 Regional Official Plan Amendment Review $2,860.00 Neighbourhood Design Plan Amendment $5,150.00 By-law Amendment note 7 -Zoning Minor $7,000.00 Major (note 3) $11,000.00 Removal of (H) Holding Symbol $2,680.00 Extension of a temporary use $2,280.00 Combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (note 12) Minor $20,500.00 Major $27,500.00 Draft Plan of Subdivision (note 7) Residential $16,480+$300/unit and $500/block Non -Residential $6,820.00 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement (note 5) ($4,120.00 + $535.60 HST) $4,655.60 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($1,030.00 + $133.90 HST) $1,163.90 Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Red Line Revisions to Draft Approval Plan of Subdivision (note 7) All Revisions $9100 + $300 additional/unit and $500/block Major Revisions to Subdivision Applications Not Draft Approved (note 7) Where original application was filed prior to July 1, 2000 $14,400 + $300/unit and $500/block Where original application was filed between July 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2006 $7,210 + $300 /unit and $500/block Where original application was filed after December 31, 2006 $7,210.00 Subdivision Clearance $2,620.00 Extension of Draft Plan Approval $2,620.00 Draft Plan of Condominium (note 7) Residential and Non -Residential (note 10) $7,730.00 Application for Condominium Conversions (note 10) $9,100.00 Preparation of Condominium Agreement (note 5) ($3,760.00 + $488.80 HST) $4,248.80 Preparation of Condominium Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($750.00 + $97.50 HST) $847.50 Condominium Clearance $2,060.00 Part Lot Control (note 7) ($1,030 + $60/unit) Site Plan Approval / Amendment (note 7) Telecommunications Towers $8,240.00 Residential Use $6,180 + $225/unit for the first 100 units and $150 for each unit after the first 100 units Commercial Use $5,150 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area Mixed Use Building (note 13) $4,640 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $20,000) Industrial / Other Uses $3,090 + $0.25/m2 gross floor area (maximum $10,000) Amendment - Residential Use $1,030 + $50/unit (maximum $6,000) MI Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Amendment - Commercial Use $1,860 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Mixed Use (note 13) $1,860 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Industrial / Other Use $830 + $0.20/m2 gross floor area (maximum $6,400) Minor Site Plan / Oak Ridges Moraine (note 2) $670.00 Sales Trailer / Model Home $2,060.00 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement (note 5) ($620.00 + $80.60 HST) $700.60 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($620.00 + $80.60 HST) $700.60 Landscape Inspection Fee for projects with greater than 2500 sq. m. of floor area, or 25 units or greater (0.5% of the landscape cost estimate with a minimum of $1,000) Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Committee of Adjustment — Minor Variance note 4 and 7 Accessory Buildings and Structures $590.00 Residential Minor (single, semi-detached, townhouse or proposed lot) $750.00 Residential Major all other residential $1,240.00 Commercial $1,760.00 Other non-residential $750.00 Tabling and Recirculation Fee (applicant initiated' $260.00 Sign Permit Permanent $210.00 Temporary $110.00 Sign By-law Variance $730.00 Amendment $1,860.00 Apartment In House Application and Registration $210.00 Registration for Applications submitted prior to January 1, 2015 $80.00 Rental Protection Act $1,330.00 Land Use Information and Compliance Letter Zoning, Building, and all other property information $160.00 Subdivision $160.00 Land Division Review Fee $670.00 Preparation of Section 53 Agreement (note 5) ($620.00 + $80.60 HST) $700.60 Peer Review (Applicant responsible for 100% Municipality's full costs of undertaking a Peer Review) Comments on Applications Under the Green Energy Act microFIT applications (10 kW or less) $160.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW (solar energy) $470.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW other than solar $6,290.00 Other Preconsultation (note 14) $200.00 Street Name Change Request $1,240 + $50 per municipal address Activation of a dormant application not requiring a Public Meeting 25% of the initial application fee or $1,500 whichever is greater. Application Requiring An Open House or Additional Public Meeting $1,810.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting)) Application Requiring Additional Public Meeting $2,060.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting where notice is provided through the local newspaper) 45 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Application Involving Review Under EPA and/or EAA Process (additional fee) $14,940.00 Ontario Municipal Board or Land Planning Appeals Tribunal Related Administration Fee (note 8) Preparation of Development / Servicing Agreement (note 5 and note 9) Folding of drawings accompanying a submission (fee per sheet) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Notarial Fee By Municipal Solicitor ($25.00 + $3.25 HST) $28.25 Commissioners Fee By Municipal Staff $25.00 + $3.25 HST $28.25 Publications Small Maps ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Large Maps ($15.00 + $1.95 HST) $16.95 Aerial Photography (colour) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Official Plan Colour Map ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Clarington Official Plan ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Zoning By-law ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Street Name Index CD Format ($16.00 + $2.08 HST) $18.08 Studies: Under 40 pages ($13.00 + $1.69 HST) $14.69 40 - 100 pages ($26.00 + $3.38 HST) $29.38 100 - 200 pages ($43.00 + $5.59 HST) $48.59 over 200 pages ($60.00 + $7.80 HST) $67.80 CD $15.00 + $1.95 HST $16.95 Real Property Transaction For the preparation of any agreements relating to real property transactions not otherwise specifically addressed in this Fee Schedule; land transfers (e.g. right-of-ways, encroachments, leases and licenced, easements) the person requiring the agreement shall be required to pay fees and disbursements in accordance with notes 5 and 9 below. Note 1 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Major Official Plan Amendment application: - New golf courses or expansion to existing golf courses; - New waste facility or expansion to existing waste facility; - Commercial Development greater than 2,500 m2; - Deletion or addition of arterial or collector road; and/or - Any application that due to the broader policy implications for the Municipality would require the need to review or manage studies, or any application deemed to be a major by the Director of Planning Services. Note 2 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Minor Site Plan application: - A residential or agricultural site plan in the Oak Ridges Moraine as required by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 2005-109; - A dog kennel, agricultural tourism use, and similarly -scaled uses; and/or - A minor alteration to an existing site plan to revise parking, add a patio, add a storage building, revise signage, add or delete portables, etc. Note 3 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a major Zoning By-law Amendment application: -Associated with an Official Plan Amendment; - Associated with an application for proposed Plan of Subdivision; - Application involving multiple properties, except for commercial and industrial related applications; and/or - Any application that requires the review of technical support documents or studies (e.g. environmental analyses, transportation). Note 4 Minor Variance applications for the construction or placement of an accessibility device to provide access to a single-detached/link or townhouse dwelling is exempt from the fee. An "accessibility device" is defined as a device including a ramp that aids persons with physical disabilities in gaining access to a dwelling unit. Note 5 Agreement preparation fee does not include the cost of registering the agreement and all related documents (e.g. Transfers, Postponements, or inhibiting orders) in the Land Registry office. The cost of such registrations is as follows: - Initial registration $250.00 plus HST, plus disbursements - All subsequent registrations $125.00 plus HST, plus disbursements. Applicants must provide the Municipality (Legal Services) with all such costs prior to registration. Note 6 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a minor application for red- line revisions to Draft Approval: - Does not require circulation to outside agencies. Note 7 Fees for all Planning applications submitted by a registered charitable organization or for a registered non-profit housing organization will be reduced by 50%. Note 8 In addition to the fees set out for Planning Act Applications, the total fees payable shall include all fees associated with supporting an applicant at any hearing where the application was approved by Municipal Council including legal fees at a rate of $180/hour and consultant/witness fees where required, but excluding the costs of the Planning Department staff. Note 9 For preparation of any development/servicing agreement other than a subdivision agreement, Section 41 agreement or a Section 53 agreement, the applicant is required to reimburse the Municipality for its legal costs. If the legal work is undertaken by the Municipal Solicitor, it will be charged at the rate of $180/hour. If the legal work is undertaken by other legal counsel, it will be charged at the legal counsel's hourly rate. The minimum fee for any such agreement shall be $475.00 plus HST. Note 10 The base fee only shall be applicable for Draft Plan of Condominium for a parcel of land which was previously subject to a Site Plan application approved within the previous 24 months of the submission of a Draft Plan of Condominium. Note 11 This Schedule "A" shall remain in effect from July 1, 2017 until June 30, 2018. In the event that a fees review is not undertaken before that date fees will be increased annually by 3%, commencing on July 1, 2018. Note 12 Where Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are submitted together a reduction of 50% of the Major Zoning By-law Amendment Fee shall apply. Note 13 The fee for a Mixed Use Building will apply when residential units are proposed and a minimum of 50% of the ground floor of a building is for non-residential purposes. Note 14 The preconsultation fee will be applied to a future application resulting from the preconsultation meeting. Note 15 Recirculation fees will be required on the 4t" resubmission of application materials that require circulation to internal departments and/or external agencies. 47 By-law 2010-142 Schedule "A" Planning Services/Legal Services Departments Fee Schedule July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Official Plan Amendment (note 7) Minor Application $15,920.00 Major Application (note 1) $23,340.00 Aggregate Pit or Quarry $35,230.00 Regional Official Plan Amendment Review $2,950.00 Neighbourhood Design Plan Amendment $5,310.00 By-law Amendment note 7 -Zoning Minor $8,000.00 Major (note 3) $12,000.00 Removal of (H) Holding Symbol $2,760.00 Extension of a temporary use $2,350.00 Combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (note 12) Minor $21,000.00 Major $28,000.00 Draft Plan of Subdivision (note 7) Residential $16,980+$300/unit and $500/block Non -Residential $7,030.00 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement (note 5) ($4,250.00 + $552.50 HST) $4,802.50 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($1,060.00 + $137.80 HST) $1,197.80 Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Red Line Revisions to Draft Approval Plan of Subdivision (note 7) All Revisions $9,380 + $300 additional/unit and $500/block Major Revisions to Subdivision Applications Not Draft Approved (note 7) Where original application was filed prior to July 1, 2000 $14,840 + $300/unit and $500/block Where original application was filed between July 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2006 $7,430 + $300 /unit and $500/block Where original application was filed after December 31, 2006 $7,430.00 Subdivision Clearance $2,700.00 Extension of Draft Plan Approval $2,700.00 Draft Plan of Condominium (note 7) Residential and Non -Residential (note 10) $7,970.00 Application for Condominium Conversions (note 10) $9,380.00 Preparation of Condominium Agreement (note 5) ($3,880.00 + $504.40 HST) $4,384.40 Preparation of Condominium Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($780.00 + $101.40 HST) $881.40 Condominium Clearance $2,130.00 Part Lot Control (note 7) ($1,060 + $60/unit) Site Plan Approval / Amendment (note 7) Telecommunications Towers $8,490.00 Residential Use $6,370 + $225/unit for the first 100 units and $150 for each unit after the first 100 units Commercial Use $5,310 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area Mixed Use Building (note 13) $4,780 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $20,000) Industrial / Other Uses $3,190 + $0.25/m2 gross floor area (maximum $10,000) Amendment - Residential Use $1,060 + $50/unit (maximum $6,000) Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Amendment - Commercial Use $1,920 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Mixed Use (note 13) $1,920 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Industrial / Other Use $860 + $0.20/m2 gross floor area (maximum $6,400) Minor Site Plan / Oak Ridges Moraine (note 2) $690.00 Sales Trailer / Model Home $2,130.00 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement (note 5) ($640.00 + $83.20 HST) $723.20 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($640.00 + $83.20 HST) $723.20 Landscape Inspection Fee for projects with greater than 2500 sq. m. of floor area, or 25 units or greater (0.5% of the landscape cost estimate with a minimum of $1,000) Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Committee of Adjustment — Minor Variance note 4 and 7 Accessory Buildings and Structures $610.00 Residential Minor (single, semi-detached, townhouse or proposed lot) $780.00 Residential Major all other residential $1,280.00 Commercial $1,820.00 Other non-residential $780.00 Tabling and Recirculation Fee (applicant initiated' $270.00 Sign Permit Permanent $220.00 Temporary $120.00 Sign By-law Variance $760.00 Amendment $1,920.00 Apartment In House Application and Registration $220.00 Registration for Applications submitted prior to January 1, 2015 $90.00 Rental Protection Act $1,370.00 Land Use Information and Compliance Letter Zoning, Building, and all other property information $170.00 Subdivision $170.00 Land Division Review Fee $690.00 Preparation of Section 53 Agreement (note 5) ($640.00 + $83.20 HST) $723.20 Peer Review (Applicant responsible for 100% Municipality's full costs of undertaking a Peer Review) Comments on Applications Under the Green Energy Act microFIT applications (10 kW or less) $170.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW (solar energy) $490.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW other than solar $6,480.00 Other Preconsultation (note 14) $200.00 Street Name Change Request $1280 + $50 per municipal address Activation of a dormant application not requiring a Public Meeting 25% of the initial application fee or $1,500 whichever is greater. Application Requiring An Open House or Additional Public Meeting $1,870.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting)) Application Requiring Additional Public Meeting $2,130.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting where notice is provided through the local newspaper) Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Application Involving Review Under EPA and/or EAA Process (additional fee) $15,390.00 Ontario Municipal Board or Land Planning Appeals Tribunal Related Administration Fee (note 8) Preparation of Development / Servicing Agreement (note 5 and note 9) Folding of drawings accompanying a submission (fee per sheet) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Notarial Fee By Municipal Solicitor ($25.00 + $3.25 HST) $28.25 Commissioners Fee By Municipal Staff $25.00 + $3.25 HST $28.25 Publications Small Maps ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Large Maps ($15.00 + $1.95 HST) $16.95 Aerial Photography (colour) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Official Plan Colour Map ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Clarington Official Plan ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Zoning By-law ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Street Name Index CD Format ($16.00 + $2.08 HST) $18.08 Studies: Under 40 pages ($13.00 + $1.69 HST) $14.69 40 - 100 pages ($26.00 + $3.38 HST) $29.38 100 - 200 pages ($43.00 + $5.59 HST) $48.59 over 200 pages ($60.00 + $7.80 HST) $67.80 CD $15.00 + $1.95 HST $16.95 Real Property Transaction For the preparation of any agreements relating to real property transactions not otherwise specifically addressed in this Fee Schedule; land transfers (e.g. right-of-ways, encroachments, leases and licenced, easements) the person requiring the agreement shall be required to pay fees and disbursements in accordance with notes 5 and 9 below. Note 1 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Major Official Plan Amendment application: - New golf courses or expansion to existing golf courses; - New waste facility or expansion to existing waste facility; - Commercial Development greater than 2,500 m2; - Deletion or addition of arterial or collector road; and/or - Any application that due to the broader policy implications for the Municipality would require the need to review or manage studies, or any application deemed to be a major by the Director of Planning Services. Note 2 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Minor Site Plan application: - A residential or agricultural site plan in the Oak Ridges Moraine as required by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 2005-109; - A dog kennel, agricultural tourism use, and similarly -scaled uses; and/or - A minor alteration to an existing site plan to revise parking, add a patio, add a storage building, revise signage, add or delete portables, etc. Note 3 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a major Zoning By-law Amendment application: -Associated with an Official Plan Amendment; - Associated with an application for proposed Plan of Subdivision; - Application involving multiple properties, except for commercial and industrial related applications; and/or - Any application that requires the review of technical support documents or studies (e.g. environmental analyses, transportation). 50 Note 4 Minor Variance applications for the construction or placement of an accessibility device to provide access to a single-detached/link or townhouse dwelling is exempt from the fee. An "accessibility device" is defined as a device including a ramp that aids persons with physical disabilities in gaining access to a dwelling unit. Note 5 Agreement preparation fee does not include the cost of registering the agreement and all related documents (e.g. Transfers, Postponements, or inhibiting orders) in the Land Registry office. The cost of such registrations is as follows: - Initial registration $250.00 plus HST, plus disbursements - All subsequent registrations $125.00 plus HST, plus disbursements. Applicants must provide the Municipality (Legal Services) with all such costs prior to registration. Note 6 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a minor application for red- line revisions to Draft Approval: - Does not require circulation to outside agencies. Note 7 Fees for all Planning applications submitted by a registered charitable organization or for a registered non-profit housing organization will be reduced by 50%. Note 8 In addition to the fees set out for Planning Act Applications, the total fees payable shall include all fees associated with supporting an applicant at any hearing where the application was approved by Municipal Council including legal fees at a rate of $180/hour and consultant/witness fees where required, but excluding the costs of the Planning Department staff. Note 9 For preparation of any development/servicing agreement other than a subdivision agreement, Section 41 agreement or a Section 53 agreement, the applicant is required to reimburse the Municipality for its legal costs. If the legal work is undertaken by the Municipal Solicitor, it will be charged at the rate of $180/hour. If the legal work is undertaken by other legal counsel, it will be charged at the legal counsel's hourly rate. The minimum fee for any such agreement shall be $475.00 plus HST. Note 10 The base fee only shall be applicable for Draft Plan of Condominium for a parcel of land which was previously subject to a Site Plan application approved within the previous 24 months of the submission of a Draft Plan of Condominium. Note 11 This Schedule "A" shall remain in effect from July 1, 2017 until June 30, 2018. In the event that a fees review is not undertaken before that date fees will be increased annually by 3%, commencing on July 1, 2018. Note 12 Where Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are submitted together a reduction of 50% of the Major Zoning By-law Amendment Fee shall apply. Note 13 The fee for a Mixed Use Building will apply when residential units are proposed and a minimum of 50% of the ground floor of a building is for non-residential purposes. Note 14 The preconsultation fee will be applied to a future application resulting from the preconsultation meeting. Note 15 Recirculation fees will be required on the 4t" resubmission of application materials that require circulation to internal departments and/or external agencies. 51 By-law 2010-142 Schedule "A" Planning Services/Legal Services Departments Fee Schedule July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Official Plan Amendment (note 7) Minor Application $16,400.00 Major Application (note 1) $24,040.00 Aggregate Pit or Quarry $36,290.00 Regional Official Plan Amendment Review $2,950.00 Neighbourhood Design Plan Amendment $5,470.00 By-law Amendment note 7 -Zoning Minor $8,240.00 Major (note 3) $12,360.00 Removal of (H) Holding Symbol $2,850.00 Extension of a temporary use $2,420.00 Combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (note 12) Minor $21,630.00 Major $28,840.00 Draft Plan of Subdivision (note 7) Residential $17,490+$300/unit and $500/block Non -Residential $7,240.00 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement (note 5) ($4,380 + $569.40 HST) $4,949.40 Preparation of Subdivision Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($1,100 + $143.00 HST) $1,243.00 Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Red Line Revisions to Draft Approval Plan of Subdivision (note 7) All Revisions $9,670 + $300 additional/unit and $500/block Major Revisions to Subdivision Applications Not Draft Approved (note 7) Where original application was filed prior to July 1, 2000 $15,290 + $300/unit and $500/block Where original application was filed between July 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2006 $7,660 + $300 /unit and $500/block Where original application was filed after December 31, 2006 $7,660.00 Subdivision Clearance $2,790.00 Extension of Draft Plan Approval $2,790.00 Draft Plan of Condominium (note 7) Residential and Non -Residential (note 10) $7,970.00 Application for Condominium Conversions (note 10) $9,670.00 Preparation of Condominium Agreement (note 5) ($4,000 + $520.00 HST) $4520.00 Preparation of Condominium Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($810.00 + $105.30 HST) $915.30 Condominium Clearance $2,200.00 Part Lot Control (note 7) ($1,100 + $60/unit) Site Plan Approval / Amendment (note 7) Telecommunications Towers $8,750.00 Residential Use $6,570 + $225/unit for the first 100 units and $150 for each unit after the first 100 units Commercial Use $5,470 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area Mixed Use Building (note 13) $4,930 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $20,000) Industrial / Other Uses $3,290 + $0.25/m2 gross floor area (maximum $10,000) Amendment - Residential Use $1,100 + $50/unit (maximum $6,000) 52 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Amendment - Commercial Use $1,980 + $1.50/m2 commercial gross floor area (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Mixed Use (note 13) $1,980 + $0.60/m2 commercial gross floor area + $60/residential unit (maximum $16,000) Amendment - Industrial / Other Use $890 + $0.20/m2 gross floor area (maximum $6,400) Minor Site Plan / Oak Ridges Moraine (note 2) $710.00 Sales Trailer / Model Home $2,200.00 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement (note 5) ($660.00 + $85.80 HST) $745.80 Preparation of Section 41 Agreement Amendment (note 5) ($660.00 + $85.80 HST) $745.80 Landscape Inspection Fee for projects with greater than 2500 sq. m. of floor area, or 25 units or greater (0.5% of the landscape cost estimate with a minimum of $1,000) Recirculation Fee 50% of the base fee Committee of Adjustment — Minor Variance note 4 and 7 Accessory Buildings and Structures $630.00 Residential Minor (single, semi-detached, townhouse or proposed lot) $810.00 Residential Major all other residential $1,320.00 Commercial $1,880.00 Other non-residential $810.00 Tabling and Recirculation Fee (applicant initiated' $280.00 Sign Permit Permanent $220.00 Temporary $120.00 Sign By-law Variance $760.00 Amendment $1,920.00 Apartment In House Application and Registration $230.00 Registration for Applications submitted prior to January 1, 2015 $100.00 Rental Protection Act $1,420.00 Land Use Information and Compliance Letter Zoning, Building, and all other property information $180.00 Subdivision $180.00 Land Division Review Fee $710.00 Preparation of Section 53 Agreement (note 5) ($660.00 + $85.80 HST) $745.80 Peer Review (Applicant responsible for 100% Municipality's full costs of undertaking a Peer Review) Comments on Applications Under the Green Energy Act microFIT applications (10 kW or less) $180.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW (solar energy) $510.00 FIT applications up to 10 MW other than solar $6,680.00 Other Preconsultation (note 14) $200.00 Street Name Change Request $1320 + $50 per municipal address Activation of a dormant application not requiring a Public Meeting 25% of the initial application fee or $1,500 whichever is greater. Application Requiring An Open House or Additional Public Meeting $1,930.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting)) Application Requiring Additional Public Meeting $2,200.00 (additional fee for each subsequent public meeting where notice is provided through the local newspaper) 53 Type of Application Fee (Credit Cards are Not Accepted) Application Involving Review Under EPA and/or EAA Process (additional fee) $15,860.00 Ontario Municipal Board or Land Planning Appeals Tribunal Related Administration Fee (note 8) Preparation of Development / Servicing Agreement (note 5 and note 9) Folding of drawings accompanying a submission (fee per sheet) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Notarial Fee By Municipal Solicitor ($25.00 + $3.25 HST) $28.25 Commissioners Fee By Municipal Staff $25.00 + $3.25 HST $28.25 Publications Small Maps ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Large Maps ($15.00 + $1.95 HST) $16.95 Aerial Photography (colour) ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Official Plan Colour Map ($5.00 + $0.65 HST) $5.65 Clarington Official Plan ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Zoning By-law ($75.00 + $9.75 HST) $84.75 Clarington Street Name Index CD Format ($16.00 + $2.08 HST) $18.08 Studies: Under 40 pages ($13.00 + $1.69 HST) $14.69 40 - 100 pages ($26.00 + $3.38 HST) $29.38 100 - 200 pages ($43.00 + $5.59 HST) $48.59 over 200 pages ($60.00 + $7.80 HST) $67.80 CD $15.00 + $1.95 HST $16.95 Real Property Transaction For the preparation of any agreements relating to real property transactions not otherwise specifically addressed in this Fee Schedule; land transfers (e.g. right-of-ways, encroachments, leases and licensed, easements) the person requiring the agreement shall be required to pay fees and disbursements in accordance with notes 5 and 9 below. Note 1 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Major Official Plan Amendment application: - New golf courses or expansion to existing golf courses; - New waste facility or expansion to existing waste facility; - Commercial Development greater than 2,500 m2; - Deletion or addition of arterial or collector road; and/or - Any application that due to the broader policy implications for the Municipality would require the need to review or manage studies, or any application deemed to be a major by the Director of Planning Services. Note 2 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a Minor Site Plan application: - A residential or agricultural site plan in the Oak Ridges Moraine as required by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 2005-109; - A dog kennel, agricultural tourism use, and similarly -scaled uses; and/or - A minor alteration to an existing site plan to revise parking, add a patio, add a storage building, revise signage, add or delete portables, etc. Note 3 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a major Zoning By-law Amendment application: -Associated with an Official Plan Amendment; - Associated with an application for proposed Plan of Subdivision; - Application involving multiple properties, except for commercial and industrial related applications; and/or - Any application that requires the review of technical support documents or studies (e.g. environmental analyses, transportation). 54 Note 4 Minor Variance applications for the construction or placement of an accessibility device to provide access to a single-detached/link or townhouse dwelling is exempt from the fee. An "accessibility device" is defined as a device including a ramp that aids persons with physical disabilities in gaining access to a dwelling unit. Note 5 Agreement preparation fee does not include the cost of registering the agreement and all related documents (e.g. Transfers, Postponements, or inhibiting orders) in the Land Registry office. The cost of such registrations is as follows: - Initial registration $250.00 plus HST, plus disbursements - All subsequent registrations $125.00 plus HST, plus disbursements. Applicants must provide the Municipality (Legal Services) with all such costs prior to registration. Note 6 The following are criteria for determining what constitutes a minor application for red- line revisions to Draft Approval: - Does not require circulation to outside agencies. Note 7 Fees for all Planning applications submitted by a registered charitable organization or for a registered non-profit housing organization will be reduced by 50%. Note 8 In addition to the fees set out for Planning Act Applications, the total fees payable shall include all fees associated with supporting an applicant at any hearing where the application was approved by Municipal Council including legal fees at a rate of $180/hour and consultant/witness fees where required, but excluding the costs of the Planning Department staff. Note 9 For preparation of any development/servicing agreement other than a subdivision agreement, Section 41 agreement or a Section 53 agreement, the applicant is required to reimburse the Municipality for its legal costs. If the legal work is undertaken by the Municipal Solicitor, it will be charged at the rate of $180/hour. If the legal work is undertaken by other legal counsel, it will be charged at the legal counsel's hourly rate. The minimum fee for any such agreement shall be $475.00 plus HST. Note 10 The base fee only shall be applicable for Draft Plan of Condominium for a parcel of land which was previously subject to a Site Plan application approved within the previous 24 months of the submission of a Draft Plan of Condominium. Note 11 This Schedule "A" shall remain in effect from July 1, 2017 until June 30, 2018. In the event that a fees review is not undertaken before that date fees will be increased annually by 3%, commencing on July 1, 2018. Note 12 Where Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are submitted together a reduction of 50% of the Major Zoning By-law Amendment Fee shall apply. Note 13 The fee for a Mixed Use Building will apply when residential units are proposed and a minimum of 50% of the ground floor of a building is for non-residential purposes. Note 14 The preconsultation fee will be applied to a future application resulting from the preconsultation meeting. Note 15 Recirculation fees will be required on the 4t" resubmission of application materials that require circulation to internal departments and/or external agencies. 55 Attachment 2 to Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -027-18 2018 Clarington Proposed Fees Update Planning Applications 56 Average 2017 Fees for Durham Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Lakeshore Municipalities Minor Minor Minor $10,830 $15,034 $15,000 Local Official Plan Amendment Major $18,400 Major $27,115 Major $22,000 Aggregate Pit or N/A Aggregate Pit or Quarry: Quarry: $32,470 $33,200 Adoption fee for $2,490 N/A Delete application submitted prior to Jan 1, 2015 Regional Official Plan $2,710 $4,911 $2,770 Amendment Review Fee Neighbourhood Design $18,070 N/A Delete Plan Neighbourhood Design $4,330 N/A $5,000 Plan Amendment or Master Block Plan N/A N/A Minor Combined Applications for OP and Zoning Amendment (includes preparation of both By- 2018 2019 2020 $20,000 $20,500 $21,000 Major 2018 2019 2020 laws) $27,000 $27,500 $28,000 Minor Minor Minor $4,330 $8,920 2018 2019 2020 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 Major Zoning By-law 2018 2019 2020 Amendment $10,000 $11,000 $12,000 Major Major $8,650 $15,110 56 Zoning By-law $2,490 Average 2017 $2,600 Amendment Removal of Fees for Durham Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Removal of $650 Lakeshore Delete Environmental Holding Municipalities Zoning By-law $2,490 $2,636 $2,600 Amendment Removal of Holding Removal of $650 N/A Delete Environmental Holding Symbol (Zoning By-law 2005-109) Covered $7,234 Covered through a minor ZBA Temporary Use By-law through a minor ZBA Temporary Use By-law $2,160 $2,671 $2,210 Extension Residential: Base Residential Residential $11,910 + $300/ $16,647 $16,000 + $300/unit and $500/ unit ($60 for block Draft Plan of apartment unit) Subdivision Application Non-residential: Base Non- Non -Residential $6,490 Residential $6,620 $11,809 ($3,570+ $5,863 ($4,000 + $520 HST) Preparation of $464.10 HST) $4,520 Subdivision agreement $4,034.10 Preparation of ($700+$91 $4,601 ($2,000 + 260 HST) Subdivision Agreement HST) $791 $2,260 - Amendment Filed prior to July, N/A Filed prior to July 1, 2000 1, 2000 $14,000 + $300/unit + $11,910+ $500/block $300/unit($60/ap artment) Filed between July 1, 2000 — December 31, 2006 $7,000 + Revisions to a Filed between $300/unit + $500/block Subdivision Application July 1, 2000 — (ie. Not draft approved, Dec 31, 2006 Filed after December 31, 2006 but requiring full $6,490+ $7,000 recirculation) $300/unit ($60/apartment Extension of draft approval $2,540 Filed after Dec 31, 2006 $6,490 57 PP Extension of draft Average 2017 plan approval Fees for Durham Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Subdivision clearance $2,490 Lakeshore $2,540 Minor Municipalities All revisions PP Extension of draft plan approval $2,490 Subdivision clearance $2,490 $2,274 $2,540 Minor Base — Minor All revisions $4,330+300 $7,551 $8,830 + 300/unit +$500/block additional/unit Revisions to a draft ($60/apartment) approved plan of Major Base — Major subdivision (ie. Red line revision) $8,650+ $9,151 300/unit ($60/apartment) Residential and $9,152 $7,500 Draft Plan of non-residential Condominium $5,950 Condominium $8,650 N/A $8,830 Conversion ($3,570+ N/A ($3,650 + 474.50 HST) $464.10 HST) $4,124.50 $4,034.10 Condominium agreement Amendment Amendment $720 + $93.60 HST) ($700+$91 $813.60 HST) $791 Condominium $1,960 $3,187 $2000 Clearance Fee Condominium Part Lot $870 + $60/unit N/A $1,000 + $60/unit Control Subdivision and $2,490 $1,630 $2,540 Condominium Extension of Draft Plan Approval PP 59 $4,000 plus a Average 2017 $6,000 plus a per unit fee as per unit fee as Fees for Durham follows: Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Lakeshore 1-100: Site Plan Approval 1-100: $210/unit Municipalities $225/unit 59 $4,000 plus a Base $6,000 plus a per unit fee as per unit fee as $6,960 follows: follows: 1-100: Site Plan Approval 1-100: $210/unit $225/unit (Residential) 100 +: $125/unit 100 +: Plans for $150/unit approval only (no agreement) $1,410 $750 + $30/unit N/A $1,000 + $50/unit to a Site Plan Amendment To a max $5,400 maximum of $6,000 (Residential) Telecom tower Telecom tower Telecom Tower $6,060.00 $6,838 $8,000 Commercial Base Fee Commercial gross floor area gross floor area $6,629 $5,000 + $1.50/square metre $4,330 + $1.50 square metres Industrial/other Base Fee Industrial / Other Uses uses $6,594 $3,000 + $0.25/square metre $1,410 + 0.20 m2 Mixed Use N/A Mixed Use Building Site Plan Approval Building $4,500 + $0.60/square metre + (Non-residential) $4,330+ $60/unit (maximum $20,000) $0.60/square metre + $60/unit (maximum $20,000) Minor Site Plan/ N/A Minor ORM Oak Ridges $650 Moraine $630 Sales $2,416 Sales trailer / model home trailer/model $2,000 home $1,300 59 Amendment Average 2017 Amendment (commercial) (commercial) Fees for Durham $1,800 + $1.50/square metre Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees $1.50/m2 Lakeshore Amendment (mixed use) commercial Municipalities $1,800 + $0.60/square metre + Amendment N/A Amendment (commercial) (commercial) $1,800 + $1.50/square metre $1,730+ $1.50/m2 Amendment (mixed use) commercial $1,800 + $0.60/square metre + gross floor area $60/unit (maximum $16,000) (max $6,000) Amendment Industrial / other Amendment use (mixed use) $800 + $0.20/square metre $1,730+ (maximum $6,400) Site Plan Approval/ $0.60/m2 Amendment (Non- commercial residential) gross floor area + $30/residential unit (maximum $16,000) Amendment (Industrial / other use) $750 + $0.20/m2 gross floor area (maximum $6,400) Plans for approval only $1,110 N/A Delete (no agreement) Preparation of section ($470+$61 N/A ($600 + $78 HST) 41 HST) $531.10 $678 Agreement/Amendment (Site Plan Agreement) Accessory N/A Accessory building and Buildings and structures Structures $570 $550 Residential Minor Residential minor Residential (minor) Committee of (single, semi- (existing building) $720 Adjustment — Minor detached, $718 Variance townhouse or proposed lot) Residential Major Residential (major) $700 (vacant land) $1,200 Residential major $1,349 (all other residential) $1,080 61 Other non- Average 2017 Other non-residential residential Fees for Durham $720 Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Commercial Lakeshore Commercial $1,630 Municipalities $1,700 61 Other non- Non-residential Other non-residential residential $1,890 $720 $700 Commercial Commercial $1,630 $1,700 Includes $388 $250 C of A Tabling fee recirculation $230 (applicant initiated) Permanent Permanent Permanent $185 $195 $200 Sign permit Temporary Temporary Temporary $93 $187 $100 Variance Variance Variance $550 $794 $700 Sign By-law Amendment N/A Amendment $1,630 $1,800 Application and $310 $200 registration $134 Registration for applications Registration for submitted prior to Jan 1, 2015 $75 applications Apartment In House submitted prior to Jan 1, 2015 $66 Rental Protection Act $1,290 Zoning, building $121 Zoning, building and all other and all other property information property $150 Land Use Information information $135 Subdivision and Compliance Letter $150 Subdivision $135 61 62 Review fee Average 2017 Review fee $550 Fees for Durham $650 Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees Land Division Section 53 Lakeshore agreement agreement Municipalities ($470 + $61 HST) $531.10 62 Review fee N/A Review fee $550 $650 Preparation of Preparation of Section 53 Land Division Section 53 agreement agreement ($470 + $61 HST) $531.10 ($470 +$61 HST) $531.10 Clearance Letter $200 N/A $257 $200 this fee would be applied Pre -consultation towards future application fees Applicant N/A Applicant responsible for 100% responsible for Municipality's full costs of 100% undertaking a peer review Peer Review Municipality's full costs of undertaking a peer review microFIT N/A microFIT applications (10 KW or applications (10 less) $150 KW or less) $135 FIT applications up to 10 MW (solar energy) $450 FIT applications Comments on up to 10 MW FIT applications up to 10 MW Applications under the (solar energy) (other than solar) Green Energy Act $430 $6,100 FIT applications up to 10 MW (other than solar) $6,060 62 63 Street name Average 2017 Street name change request change request Fees for Durham $1,200 + $50 per municipal Application Type Current Fees Region Recommended 2018 Fees municipal Lakeshore address Municipalities Reactivation after 2 years that 63 Street name N/A Street name change request change request $1,200 + $50 per municipal $1,080 + $50 per address municipal address Reactivation after 2 years that Reactivation that does not require public meeting does not require 25% of initial application fee or $1,500 whichever is greater public meeting 25% of initial Application requiring an open application fee house or additional public or $1,000 meeting whichever is $1,750 (additional fee for each greater additional meeting) Application Application requiring additional requiring an open public meeting house or $2,000 (additional fee for each additional public additional public meeting where Other meeting notice is provided through the $1,410 local newspaper) (additional fee for each additional meeting) Application requiring additional public meeting $1,960 (additional fee for each additional public meeting where notice is provided through the local newspaper) Application Involving $14,070 N/A $14,500 review under EPA and/or EAA Process (additional fee) 63 Clarftwa Planning Services Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: April 3, 2018 Report Number: PSD -028-18 Resolution Number: File Number: S -C 2007-0005 ZBA 2017-0024 By-law Number: Report Subject: An application by Akero Developments Inc. to amend Draft Approval to add one new lot and change various zone regulations within Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision S -C 2007-0005 in the Northglen Neighbourhood, Bowmanville. Recommendations: That Report PSD -028-18 be received; 2. That the proposed amendment to draft approved plan of subdivision submitted by Akero Developments Inc. to permit one additional residential lot be supported as contained in Attachment 1 of Report PSD -028-18; 3. That the proposed application for Rezoning ZBA 2017-0024 submitted by Akero Developments Inc. be approved as contained in Attachment 2 of Report PSD -028-18; 4. That once all conditions contained in the Official Plan with respect to the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; 5. That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD -028-18 and Council's decision; and 6. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -028-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. • Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 Report Overview Page 2 This report is recommending approval of an amendment to a draft approved plan of subdivision and the Zoning By-law by adding one residential lot and to permit bungalofts, and make changes to various zone regulations, including but not limited to allowing garage projections, remove covered porches from lot coverage calculations, reduce an interior side yard setback for a street townhouse block in Northglen Neighbourhood, Bowmanville. 1. Application Details 1.1. Owner: Akero Developments Inc. 1.2. Applicant: Highcastle Homes 1.3. Agent: D.G. Biddle & Associates 1.4. Proposal: Proposed Amendment to Draft Approval of Plan of Subdivision To delete the vehicular access to Block 59 from Ronald Hooper Avenue and replace with one lot for a single detached dwelling. Proaosed Zonina By -Law Amendment To amend the Zoning By -Law for the plan of subdivision to: x permit bungalofts; x remove covered porches and balconies from the lot coverage calculations; x delete three lots with 11.0 metres of frontage and one lot with 12 metres of frontage and replace with four lots with 11.3 metres of frontage; x permit garages to project from the front wall of the dwelling or covered porch projection on all lots; x reduce the interior side yard of a townhouse block from 4 metres to 1.2 metres; and x reduce the exterior side yard of lots abutting Concession Road 3 and Middle Road. 1.5. Area: 40 hectares 1.6 Gross Density 38 jobs and persons per gross developable hectare 1.7 Location: North of Concession Road 3, east of Middle Road, being Part Lots 12 & 13, Bowmanville. See Figure 1. 65 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 Page 3 1.8 Roll Numbers: 18-17-010-080-04000, 18-17-010-080-04025 1.9 Within Built Boundary: No TI ITT Delete three 11 metre lots and --- replace with three 11.3 metre lots Delete one 12 metre lot and s-_, replace with a 11.3 metre lot 3-. a Permit a single detached dwelling 4 c,, Reduce interior side yard setback L, P©5SlF)12 45 _`' from 4.5m to less than 1.84m 2 � BLOCK i2 uture b3 Reduced frontage and exterior p Al. I side yard setback S I?001 S7RrNo�� BOULEVARD 60 LL_ L 38 � �y gas �4 C� Park oa G DOUGLAS KEMP ORES U k i 9 g E o e, Draft Approved Pian of Subdivision S -C-2007-0005 RONALD HOOPER AVENUE 4\ RONALD HOOPERAVENUE V w(p ''�NWA "3 Gig W m -' 5`w O _ r 1. - N O i Ory Z A Z ] Com] m 12 m m ao a ! /t/ O _s 19 5 �3 i Concession Road 3 713A2017 0024 Figure 1: Location Map 2 Background 2.1 Highcastle Homes submitted an amendment to draft approval to delete an access to a medium density block and replace it with one lot for a single detached dwelling and a rezoning application to change the zone regulations of the lands located at the north- east quadrant of Middle Road and Concession Road 3, in the Northglen Neighbourhood referred to herein as Northglen East. These lands were draft approved with a medium density block (Block 59) with two entrances, one on Ronald Hooper Avenue and the other on Bill Hutchison Crescent, as well as five lots for single detached dwellings, (See Figure 2). 66 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 Page 4 2.2 The applicant proposes to develop Block 59 with a vehicular access from Middle Road while maintaining the access on Bill Hutchison Crescent. This eliminates the approved access on Ronald Hooper Avenue and proposes a new lot. This has the effect of changing the lot frontages on the south side of Ronald Hooper to four 12 metre lots and four 11.3 metre lots. The proposed amendment increases the number of units in the entire draft plan by only one lot, from 364 to 365 (See Figure 2). 2.3 The applicant also proposes to reduce the interior side yard of a street townhouse block 58 from 4.0 metres to 1.2 metres. Figure 2: Detail of Specific Lot Changes 2.4 Subsequent to the submission of the application by Highcastle, the owner, Akero Development Inc. advised that all the lots in Northglen East were sold to five different builders, four of which had built homes in Northglen West, the lands on the west side of Middle Road. In 2014, some of the zone regulations in Northglen West were changed to allow for the following: 67 2 0")Cr � W mit 3 4 Ronald 1H.'o.O.L'eriA0,Onue0rr W cQ O W WW O O' 7 �! N v 35 41 r 34 ? Delete three 11 metre lots and 0 C 42 m replace with three 11.3 metre lotsU, v 33 V) Delete one 12 metre lot and c 43 F= replace with a 11.3 metre lot = 32 0 New lot to perm it = 44, F— a single detached dwelling Ln Q _ m 31 O 30 45 O 29 46 n N 28 47 - ZBi: cn __ `Q �1- m r 27 4826 ^Q l , 49 Figure 2: Detail of Specific Lot Changes 2.4 Subsequent to the submission of the application by Highcastle, the owner, Akero Development Inc. advised that all the lots in Northglen East were sold to five different builders, four of which had built homes in Northglen West, the lands on the west side of Middle Road. In 2014, some of the zone regulations in Northglen West were changed to allow for the following: 67 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 Page 5 x Rgalofts; x delude covered porches and balconies from lot coverage calculations; x Ubw for greater garage widths; and x Ubw for a maximum garage projections of 2 metres beyond the front or exterior wall of the dwelling. 2.5 Bungalofts are one storey homes with a partial second floor (loft) which comprises not more than 50 percent of the ground floor area excluding the garage. 2.6 The 2014 zoning amendment was only for the plan of subdivision in Northglen West. The builders would like to use the same models as they did in Northglen West but now the models do not comply with the zoning in Northglen East, originally approved in 2008. 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 In the plan of subdivision known as Northglen East the lands are relatively flat and Phases 1 and 2 have been graded and site servicing has commenced, as shown in Figure 3. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North Vacant and draft approved for single detached dwellings (Phases 3 & 4) South Concession Road 3 and single detached dwellings East Estate Residential West Middle Road, vacant and draft approved for single detached dwellings and future medium density block Figure 3: View of subject site looking northeast along Middle Road • . Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 Page 6 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement identifies settlement areas as the focus of growth. Planning authorities are encouraged to create healthy, livable and safe communities by accommodating an appropriate range and mix of residential, employment, recreational and open space uses to meet long term needs. Land use patterns shall be based on densities and a mix of land uses that efficiently use land, resources and infrastructure. The subject applications are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Provincial Growth Plan 4.2 The lands are located in a Designated Greenfield Area within a settlement area. In the Region of Durham, the Growth Plan establishes the target of 50 jobs and residents combined per net hectare in the Designated Greenfield Area. This target is measured across the Region of Durham. The Growth Plan encourages the creation of complete communities that are compact, transit -supportive and offer a range and mix of housing types, high quality public open space and easy access to local stores and services. The subject applications are consistent with the Provincial Growth Plan. 5. Official Plans Durham Region Official Plan 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the lands as Living Areas. Lands designated Living Area permit the development of communities incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economic factors. The proposed development conforms with the Durham Region Official Plan. Clarington Official Plan 5.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the lands as Urban Residential. The subject lands are within the Northglen Neighbourhood. The Urban Residential designation shall predominantly be used for housing purposes, providing for a variety of densities, tenure and types. Neighbourhoods are to be walkable, compact, connected and create a high quality public realm. The proposed amendment to draft approval and rezoning conforms to the policies of the Clarington Official Plan. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 There are various urban residential zones in the Northglen Neighbourhood. A rezoning is required to facilitate the requested change in Northglen East medium density block and surrounding lots, and to achieve similar built form to the models in Northglen West. Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 7. Public Submissions Page 7 7.1 The Public Meeting was held on March 12, 2018, no one appeared in opposition or support on the rezoning. 7.2 As of writing this report, no comments have been received by members of the public. 8. Agency Comments Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 8.1 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority offered no objection to the proposed amendments. 9. Departmental Comments Engineering Services 9.1 The Engineering Services Department offered no objection to the proposed amendments. 10. Discussion 10.1 Four of the five builders in the proposed phases of Northglen East have built homes in Northglen West in conformity with the zoning by-law, which was updated in 2014. The builders wish to use the same models however they are not consistent with current zoning in Northglen East, which was approved in 2008. Staff do not object to using the same zone regulations as it will provide a consistent architectural style and form through the entire Northglen Neighbourhood. However, the lots on the easterly boundary have 18 metres of frontage, which is to provide a transition between the smaller lot frontages and sizes in the subdivision and the estate residential development to the east, Rills of Liberty. Although staff support the garage projections, staff do not support removing porches from the lot area calculations, as it will allow for greater building foot print. The zoning by-law also restricts the garage width to 6.4 metres which eliminates the possibility of three car garages. The larger lots were intended to also have more landscape area to help provide the transition to the existing estate lots. 10.2 The medium density block on the south side of Ronald Hooper Avenue was draft approved with an access onto that street which will be relocated off of Middle Road. The draft plan will be amended to remove the access and add one lot. The lot frontages of Lots 21 to 24 as shown on Figure 3, will be adjusted to allow 11.3 metre lots, sufficient in size to permit dwellings with two car garages. 10.3 In addition to Highcastle's acquisition of the medium density block, they have also acquired the street townhouses fronting onto Bill Hutchison Crescent. Highcastle is requesting a reduced interior side yard setback from 4.0 metres to 1.2 metres, where the block is adjacent to different zone. Staff have no objection to the request. 70 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -028-18 10.4 Taxes are paid in full. 11. Concurrence 11.1 Not Applicable. 12. Recommendations Page 8 12.1 In consideration of the comments received from the circulated agencies and based on the review of the proposal, staff recommend that the proposed amendment to draft approval and zoning by-law amendment be supported. 13. Strategic Plan Application 13.1 Not applicable. Submitted by: Reviewed by: David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Z� Andrew Allison, B. Comm, LL.B CAO Staff Contact: Cynthia Strike, Principal Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2410 or cstrike(@clarington.net CS/nl Attachments: Attachment 1: Amendment to Draft Approval Attachment 2: Zoning By-law Amendment List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: Hannu Halminen, Akero Developments Inc. Domenic Tassone, Highcastle Homes 0 L F K D H O ) U\ I% L G G O H $ V V R F L I:\^Department\LDO NEW FILING SYSTEMWpplication Files\SC-Subdivision\S-C 2007\S -C-2007-0005 Northglen East\Staff Report\PSD-028- 18 Recommendation Report.docx 71 Municipality of Clarington Attachment 1 to Report PSD -028-18 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL FILE NO.: S -C-2007-0005 (Northglen East) Issued for Review: Notice of Decision: Draft Approved: _ David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarinaton The Conditions of Draft Approval for S -C 2007-0005 as issued on May 28, 2008 and further amended on May 26, 2014 are hereby further amended as follows: Condition 1 is amended by deleting "364 single detached units" and replacing it with "365 single detached units" Page 11 72 Municipality of Clarington Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law Number 2018 - Attachment 2 to Report PSD -028-18 being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2017-0024; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 12.4.71 "URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R1-71) ZONE" is hereby amended as follows: Section 12.4.71 d i) is hereby amended by adding the words "and or Bungaloft" after the words 1 storey b) Section 12.4.71 f. is deleted in its entirety and replace with the following: f) Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch above finished grade (maximum) 1.0 metres c) Section 12.4.71 g. is deleted in its entirety and replace with the following: g) Garage Requirements i) Garage doors may project no more than 1.0 metre in front of the dwellings first floor wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection ii) The outside width of the garage (maximum) 6.4 metres 2. Section 14.6.31 "URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R3-31) ZONE" is hereby amended as follows: Section 14.6.31 b vi), (ii) is hereby amended by replacing "4.5" with 1.2" after the words "interior side yard of" 3. Schedule 3 to By-law 84-63, as amended if hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R1-70)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-54)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R1-70)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-55)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R1-70)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R1-79)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-53)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-54)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-59)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-54)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-60)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R1-97)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-60)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-53)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-60)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-54)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-60)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-55)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-62)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R1-97)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-62)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-55)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R2-62)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type ((H)R2-55)" "Holding — Urban Residential Type Exception ((H)R3-31)" to "Holding — Urban Residential Type Exception ((H) R2-54)" as illustrated on the attached Schedule 'A' hereto. 4. Schedule 'A' attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 5. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. By -Law passed in open session this day of , 2018 Adrian Foster, Mayor C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2018- , passed this day of , 2018 A.D. z !: J]a 3.: ',j_✓) i' 't r"vy:,r`.'•�-rrr J , }J ] .-K -- ��"%�%i%�•f-y JJa J]J �aaJaaJa] aJJ] ✓ Baa 'x"� -' �Kjr'^'.y„:r.}' �K �,���„r,-4 JJJa]Ja Jai 3�JJ,J7aa,]•iiJ j� K•�y�w i"�4`_'-5•f f���.. ay `,�.�':� J733 J J+J.]J � 33a3 a]], J?3r] -r �•_^w!,�r-F��s'r"�K'fY� Kx aJ.3 �} ] az]JJ ,J ,� JaJ aza r.a, K.•,�,,.�F `.--il..� !r•- .- � �t-'-� r•_ ] !3 �T .• _�;�•�:-'-Siy;~i•;�:�Y,� _ ?a]]]?!?�aaJ 9?�7i]J�mzJ.7,� j]]aa�: ��1.i• y�„""�' y �'� J �3 a]a]af]�aJJa �,i873JJz,3]a Ji :.s,,�:t `_��__y a] } Ji3->,,� J a7Ja J�] 3JJaJ3a.] '^•�”' �w�s>^�T"'tet}rr��K��f, rSJ,j]aJ3 �JJ.,,7]>J3�']jaJyj 3]a ":.�y,�=�i Yr'.'.' -L, �_yrf•-rMK�t-'�';. 1 a] a]Ja ]3 a,7 J 33J} J- 'w �,-�s»��;•�r•�� �K ''�.. mow'!• -,� az3 a�7, 3]aJ3,7 JJaa a] ��•�--.,,:-e `i �^s,� `,��,•rK -'�'y54•�`'"'sw J ��- ..��;e :.F..s r;r,-„•:-.�� •r_r7'; Jr, J] JJJ a,j)a7 JiJ j}]aa .,..,��y,��'•�--Sw:r�^r;�'"SK ��� �K� JJ7a3J>]JiJJ 'r%>";t'�4':P%� �•Kr°�w '-C w'�y, tl' �r �`,� � Zoning Change From "(H)R1-70” To "(H)R2-54" JiJ aa]•%] �-�"_�"*:� •'cYw�^---..sem; :+')7 ...�r �k.:f^,- ''?'•,C �'.�r^• Y�fi,y ,iia aa]JrJ, %'._ %'"'::�M:,�Y'°Ar�,�S<^•:`rV��`�:.'.'S.� >�]Ja�JJa as J],5; a73a J ,yJ� 3 a a,>7w. vr`-u Zoning Change From "(H)R1-70" To "(H)R2-55" J3J ZJ z>,3 a]J73 ,aJ]i �,, a]JJ .:,.��•� �-=�u�nw; J7 ,�i3 aa•' •}.a]Ja.Ja3 az r.rrw f-: �..{,_,,. '33] azaJ, .77> 33>a r,aJ,J J.v?"r:���;rf•. "°M''a; �i ] 37J 'aJ�a aaJ a7]� J 3J JJ Ni `_ Zoning Change From "(H)R1-70" To "(H)R3-53" ]J7 ] J J] •°JJ ] J ]a]aa '�•'~+rK;�=-'"tiwf- J'� J}?JaJ333]�]aJJa JJ]>j7J •`-:����ie-^vs.^'-S H H R2-53To"(H)R2-54" Zoning e From " " J J 9 Chan9 ( ) ( ) ]raJJ rJ a?Jaa�. J:'>33>aa aaJJ, '^:�r,�Pr J } J,i 37]J_J,.i•}a✓] az7J ]a •�-'K;.r.a �. Zoning Change From "(H)R2-53" To "(H)R3-53" 3J, a,7 aJJJa'a J 3 3a]J,3.JiJJ3i.,]J,r 67 a]'a�a3?] 3 y J>> -Zoning Change From "(H)R2-59" To "(H)R2-54" ,j?}a ?� �3>3 7] Ji3 �aa}'a,yJ,JJa] �3a7>a ,3j, c az,JJJaJA'%J Zoning Change From "(H)R2-59" To "(H)R3-53" 65 71 � .. aaa j,]Ja]J 7aa a,]?> 3aJ > ] J S 64 LOCK 7 Zoning Change From "(H)R2-59" To "(H)R3-54" 63 fie J''-�,]3''J'' J]a'')]•"r Zoning Change From "(H)R2-60" To "(H)R2-53" _0 57 60 O 56 w -0ti Zoning Change From "(H)R2-60" To "(H)R2-54" 55 yti Z� ti ry w m w „ Zoning Change From "(H)R2-60" To "(H)R2-55" •-� ww' ,o = Zoning Change From "(H)R2-62" To "(H)R2-55" v A O" ti 9 N u a a = Zoning Change From "(H)R3-31 To "(H)R2-54" Y q" 6 � Zoning To Remain (H)R1-71" Q' y0 OG w tis Zoning To Remain "(H)R2-53" Z9 E5 4 36 3 ^,'_� ,_ Zoning To Remain "(H)R3-31" 00 SS 2 59 % ® Zoning To Remain "R1" 58 57 aan 81 62 90 2 7s 6o e3as 2 Zoning To Remain "R1-42" 4 ° 3 µ Zoning To Remain "A-1" = a RONALD HOOPER AVENUE z ja�a'a Zoning To Remain "EP" X35 m � o �i = m p '- � .F�";W• 41 34 42 68 45 33 27 D 33 67 46 Z 34 28 A 32 43 66 47 C 25 B 44 65 48 i 36 24 8 30 45 64 49 45 63 y 37 23 � 10 47 6 OZ 38 22 11 61 C7 48 3g 12 ,yE 2e 4L 60 52 m 21 40 13 59 53 In -� 50 20 iFit1 41 /AI / I ' �� 5-�' • '+' m 42 19 144.4 17 16 Concession Road 3 Adrian Foster, Mayor Bowmanville ZBA 2017-0024 . Schedule 3 C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk Clarftwn Planning Services Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: April 3, 2018 Report Number: File Number: Report Subject: PSD -029-18 ZBA2018-0001 Resolution: By-law Number: An Application by David and Heather Brown for Removal of (H) Holding Symbol — 20 and 22 Foxhunt Trail, Courtice, Recommendations: 1. That Report PSD -029-18 be received; 2. That the application submitted by David and Heather Brown to remove the (H) Holding Symbol be approved and that the attached By-law to remove the (H) Holding Symbol be passed; 3. That Council's decision and a copy of Report PSD -029-18 be forwarded to the Region of Durham and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -029-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. 76 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -029-18 Report Overview Page 2 The purpose of this report is to recommend approval of the application to remove the (H) Holding Symbol to permit the creation of two separate lots intended for a single -detached dwelling on each lot through consent applications LD136/2017 and LD1 37/2017. 1. Application Details 1.1 Owner / Applicant: 1.4 Proposal: 1.5 Area: 1.6 Location: 1.7 Roll Number: 1.8 Within Built Boundary: David and Heather Brown Removal of the (H) Holding Symbol from the "Holding Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1) Zone" 0.1318 hectares 20 and 22 Foxhunt Trail, Courtice, Part Lot 35, Concession 2, former Township of Darlington. 1817 010 070 15700 Yes Figure 1: Subject Property 77 Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -029-18 2. Background Page 3 2.1 On September 11, 2017, the Durham Region Land Division Committee conditionally approved an application to create two lots located at 20 and 22 Foxhunt Trail, Courtice LD1 36/2017 and LD1 37/2017. 2.2 As a condition of the consent approval, the applicant submitted an application for removal of the (H) Holding and on December 15, 2017. The applicant has fulfilled all Clarington conditions for the consent. 3. Staff Comments 3.1 The (H) Holding provision on the subject property has been in place since the adoption of Zoning By-law 84-63 in 1984. At the time the Zoning By -Law was adopted, the (H) Holding Symbol was placed on urban residential lands that had yet to be serviced. 3.2 The (H) Holding Symbol is a provision enabled by the Official Plan to ensure that certain obligations have been considered prior to development and redevelopment of the lands. Council must be satisfied that the provisions of the Official Plan are met prior to removing the Holding symbol. 3.3 Both lots will be serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewerage. As a condition of the consent the applicant entered into an agreement with all financial obligations related to the new lot. The "Urban Residential Type One (R1)" permits single -detached dwellings. 3.4 All property taxes have been paid in full. 4. Concurrence Not applicable. 5. Conclusion In consideration of the comments noted above, approval of the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol on the lands identified as 20 and 22 Foxhunt Trail, Courtice, is recommended. 6. Strategic Plan Application The recommendations contained in this report conform to the Strategic Plan. Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -029-18 Submitted by: David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Page 4 Reviewed by: Andrew C. Allison B. Comm, LL.B Chief Administrative Officer Staff Contact: Carlo Pellarin, Manager of Development Review, 905-623-3379 ext. 2408 or cpellarin(o)_clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 - By-law to remove the (H) Holding Symbol The following is a list of the interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: David & Heather Brown 1494339 Ontario Ltd. Mark Foley CP/ah 79 Attachment 1 to Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -029-18 Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law Number 2018 - being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2018-001; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule `4' to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from "(Holding) Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Urban Residential Type One (R1) Zone" as illustrated on the attached Schedule `A' hereto. 2. Schedule `A' attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 and 36 of the Planning Act. By -Law passed in open session this day of 12018 Adrian Foster, Mayor C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2018- , passed this day of 2018 A. D. JJ 51 J 52 26 21 50 23 49 47 � 48 28 25 CIV CVN Z 46 n4a G ��� = 44 30 27 C\, N ^cyC3 Ir, CO C X 42 32 GRT 0 ILL40 34 33 - 38 36 36 35 34 38 32 40 37 53 ❑ 30B Of56 51 c4 N 30A 42 Q 39 52 EDINBGRGUGH 44 j 41 54 LANE 28 J 48 LLJ� 5 `n m r 26 46 m 43 46 24 48 45 � 43 25 22 42 ❑ 50 0 47 C)41 23 F_48 a 39 21 18 52 Z 49 37 '19 � 1 51 36 t!] 35 34 r w �� m r ❑ 53 Z 33 r 31 29 60 57 27 Zoning Change From'{H}R1' To'R1' N Adnan Foster, Mayor Courtice • ZBA 2018.0001 . Schedule 4 C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk Clarftwn Planning Services Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: April 3, 2018 Report Number: PSD -030-18 Resolution: File Number: PLN 34.16.21, 34.5.4.42, 34.5.4.57 By-law Number: Report Subject: Recommendation to add 3 properties to the Municipal Register Recommendations: 1. That Report PSD -030-18 be received; 2. That 11 Mabel Bruce Way, Bowmanville be added to the Municipal Register; 3. That 3347 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville be added to the Municipal Register; 4. That 45 Raynes Avenue, Bowmanville be added to the Municipal Register; and 5. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -030-18 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -030-18 Report Overview Page 2 Staff and the Clarington Heritage Committee are recommending the addition of three Bowmanville properties to the Municipal Register: 11 Mabel Bruce Way (the former Nurses Residence on the grounds of the Bowmanville Hospital), 3347 Liberty Street North and 45 Raynes Avenue (the former Goodyear site). All three properties are included on the Municipal Cultural Heritage Resource Inventory. The addition of the properties to the Municipal Register will provide additional protection for the buildings and promote Clarington's local heritage. The Municipal Register is a listing of the cultural heritage resources of the Municipality including designated buildings and buildings where further consideration is warranted. By including the buildings on the Municipal Register, the Municipality has ample time to evaluate whether a demolition permit should be issued when an application is received. 1. Ontario Heritage Act 1.1. Every municipality in Ontario, under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act, is required to maintain a Municipal Register that lists all formally designated heritage properties. In 2009 Council expanded Clarington's Municipal Register to include "non -designated" properties that it believes to be of cultural heritage value or interest. The decision to include a "non -designated" property rests with municipal council upon consultation with its municipal heritage committee. 1.2. Listing a property on the Municipal Register is a formal indication that a property has cultural heritage value. Listing a property does not provide any legal protection to the property as only the formal designation under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act can do so. Rather, the primary benefit of including a property on the Municipal Register is to provide the Municipality with up to 60 days to review a request for a demolition permit rather than the shorter timeline outlined in the Building Code Act. 1.3. This increased time allows for a more thorough evaluation of the property and time to provide Council with a recommendation on demolition or moving forward with designation of the property. The 60 days allows sufficient time to evaluate the building condition, protection options, mitigative measures, alternate development proposals, etc. and make a recommendation to Council on the cultural value of a property. 1.4. Adding the property to the Municipal Register also allows the Municipality to request a demolition permit applicant undertake a study or research to show that the property does not have significant heritage value, that mitigation measures or alternative recognition can be implemented. Municipality of Clarington Resort PSD -030-18 Paae 3 2. Properties on Clarington's Municipal Register 2.1 The Municipal Register can be used to identify properties with cultural value and interest and to help educate the community and future owners, increasing transparency about the property's cultural value. 2.2 To date, the majority of non -designated properties that have been added to the municipal register have been under threat of demolition. Examples are the buildings at Camp 30 (now designated) and properties affected by the 407 extension (now demolished). 2.3 The Clarington Heritage Committee set up a sub -committee and established a building evaluation criteria with the intention of reviewing properties on the cultural heritage resources list/inventory beginning with the primary heritage resource properties in the urban areas. The Heritage Committee members review properties from the public right of way using the evaluation criteria and make recommendations on properties to be included on the Municipal Register. 2.4 The Heritage Committee reviewed the three properties (the Nurses Residence at 11 Mabel Bruce Way, Bowmanville; 3347 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville; and the Goodyear site at 45 Raynes Avenue, Bowmanville) and recommend adding each property to the Municipal Register. A description of the properties can be found in Attachments 1, 2 and 3 of this report. 3. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2014) 3.1 The PPS 2014 provides that long-term economic prosperity should be supported by encouraging a sense of place by promoting well-designed built form and cultural planning and conserving features that help define character including built heritage resources. Furthermore, significant built heritage resources shall be conserved. 3.2 "Conserved" is defined as the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under the Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a conservation plan, archaeological assessment and/or heritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments. The Provincial Growth Plan (2017) 3.3 The Growth Plan 2017 states that cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and benefit communities. MIA Municipality of Clarington Resort PSD -030-18 4. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan Paae 4 4.1 The Regional Official Plan provides that the conservation, protection and/or enhancement of Durham's built and cultural heritage resources is encouraged. Clarington Official Plan 4.2 The Clarington Official Plan provides that when a cultural heritage resource is designated under the Ontario Heritage Act or is recognized on the cultural heritage resources list, the Municipality shall discourage the demolition or the inappropriate alteration of a cultural heritage resource. Whenever possible, built heritage resources should be retained for the original use and in their original location. Where the original uses cannot be maintained, the adaptive reuse of built heritage resources will be supported. If no other alternative exists for maintaining structures in their original location, consideration may be given to the relocation of the structure. Should a heritage resource be demolished, the dismantling, salvage and reuse of materials is encouraged. 4.3 45 Raynes Avenue is designated as a Special Study Area in the Official Plan, the Goodyear Redevelopment Area. The Official Plan recognizes the redevelopment opportunity of this site in close proximity to historic downtown Bowmanville. The Official Plan requires that a comprehensive redevelopment plan be created and integrated into the Bowmanville East Town Centre Secondary Plan. One of the considerations to be explored through the creation of the redevelopment plan is the potential for adaptive reuse of the existing buildings on the site. A review of the Bowmanville East Town Centre Secondary Plan is anticipated to commence in 2018 and will include an evaluation of the heritage resources over the entire plan area, including Bowmanville's historic downtown, the former Goodyear site and the former Nurses residence at 11 Mabel Bruce Way on the Lakeridge Health Property. 4.4 3347 Liberty Street North is within the Soper Creek Secondary Plan area. The terms of reference will include a heritage resources study for the entire area. 4.5 The Official Plan provides that development proposed on lands listed on the Municipal Register or on the Cultural Heritage Resource Inventory may be subject to a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) which would identify the heritage attributes of the resource and consider an overall conservation approach. Given that there are multiple buildings on the Goodyear site, an HIA has been requested from the property owner which will help to distinguish those buildings on the property that contain heritage value from those that may be appropriate for removal. The inclusion of this property on the Municipal Registry will help to prevent the demolition of any building on the site before a thorough understanding of the site's heritage value is gained through the HIA. Municipality of Clarington Resort PSD -030-18 5. Public Notice Paae 5 5.1 Under the Ontario Heritage Act there is no notification requirements before Council adds a property to the Municipal Register as a listed property. However, Staff, the Heritage Committee and previous Councils believed notification to property owners was important. 5.2 Lakeridge Health Corporation, the owner of 11 Mabel Bruce Way, were notified of the intention to add the property to the Municipal Register verbally on January 29, 2018 and staff met with owner representatives in February 2018 and have communicated with them since. They will be completing an HIA for the property in the future. 5.3 Staff met with the owner of 3447 Liberty Street North on March 5, 2018 to discuss the implications of adding the property to the Municipal Register. Staff also discussed how the heritage resources will be addressed as part of a background study for the Secondary Plan. 5.4 Staff met with representatives of Contitech Canada Inc. the owners of 45 Raynes Avenue, most recently in January 2018. As part of the discussion a HIA was requested. Staff were informed in March of 2018 that it is the owner's intention to complete an HIA. 5.5 Written notice was sent to all property owners indicating a staff report would be going to Planning and Development Committee recommending adding the respective properties to the Municipal Register. 6. Concurrence Not Applicable. 7. Conclusion The recommendations contained in this report conform to the Strategic Plan. L. • Municipality of Clarington Report PSD -030-18 Page 6 Submitted by: David Crome, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning Services z 1� Reviewed by: Andrew C. Allison, B. Comm, LL.B CAO Staff Contact: David Addington, Planner II, 905-623-3379 ext. 2419 or daddington@clarington.net DC/DA/nl;tg Attachments: Attachment 1 - 11 Mabel Bruce Way (the Nurses Residence) Attachment 2 - 3347 Liberty Street North Attachment 3 - 45 Raynes Avenue (Goodyear) List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision is on file in the Planning Services Department. I:\ADepartment\LDO NEW FILING SYSTEM\PLN Planning Files\PLN 34 Heritage (All Files)\PLN 34.16.21 11 Mabel Bruce Way (Nurses Residence)\Staff Report\PSD-030-18 Report To Add 3 Properties To Registry.Docx F Attachment 1 to Report PSD -030-18 11 Mabel Bruce Way (the Nurses Residence) The house at 11 Mabel Bruce Way, known as the Nurses Residence, was constructed by contractor T.E. Flaxman in 1926 and is located on the same property as the Bowmanville Hospital to the east of the existing hospital building. The Nurses Residence is a good example of a large brick Tudor Revival house. Its prominent architectural features include a recessed front door within a tudor arch of stone moulding, overhanging eaves that are adorned with dentils, the high chimney with finely detailed brickwork, the pitched side gable roof and the cross gable. A prominent Tudor feature is the semi -hexagonal bay on the ground floor with its ten narrow multi -paned casement windows. The Bowmanville Hospital property was originally a large private estate called South Park and was donated to become a hospital by J.W. Alexander, President of the Dominion Organ and Piano Company. The hospital was opened in 1913 and its first superintendent, Miss Mabel Bruce, established a training school for nurses. Mrs. Florence Smythe succeeded Ms. Bruce as superintendent in 1915 and all classes of nurses studied under Mrs. Smythe until the training program ended. The Tudor Revival Nurses Residence was built as a dedicated training school for nurses until 1941 when the training school was discontinued resulting from the adoption of new standards for teaching hospitals by the Ontario Department of Health which the hospital did not meet. Many nurses lived in the building some of whom stayed on as staff at the hospital after graduating. The Nurses Residence was later used as the Durham Regional Health Unit office, followed by an after-hours clinic and most recently as the Bowmanville Hospital Foundation. The house was designed by the architect Douglas Edwin Kertland. Mr. Kertland was a competitive rower who won a bronze medal on the eight man rowing team for Canada at the 1908 Olympics in London. He also served in the 126th Battalion in the First World War. After the war he studied architecture in England before returning to Toronto to work for John M. Lyle who is best known for designing the Royal Alexandra Theatre. In 1926, Mr. Kertland established his own Toronto practice and designed many homes in the Rosedale neighbourhood of Toronto as well as the art deco Automotive Building at Exhibition Place in Toronto 4� L Nurses Residence (circled) on Bowmanville Hospital property ! i I" ior" . .. ! i 9.�143)�� 1 � 3X3j� ___T7 +}I+l1+ # f 7 �Ilfi� �7 f .� r f t M}� F in f! �� �. } P,7;�t� SUer;l Nurses Residence (circled) on Bowmanville Hospital property Attachment 2 to Report PSD -030-18 3347 Liberty Street North The house at 3347 Liberty Street North was constructed circa 1860. The house is a very good example of a small Regency cottage built of coursed ashlar fieldstone and features a central gothic gable with a louvered vent above the front door. The rectangular transom over the front door has a simple Regency glazing pattern and the windows feature an elegant six over six pane sash. Although many similar cottages were built in Bowmanville in the mid -19th century, this was the only example to be built in fieldstone. Attachment 3 to Report PSD -030-18 45 Raynes Avenue (Goodyear) In 1905 the Durham Rubber Company received a loan from the Town of Bowmanville to purchase lands from the Raynes Estate, off of Queen Street, to establish a new manufacturing facility. The buildings were completed in 1906 and the company began producing carriage and bike tires amongst other rubber items. In 1910, The Durham Rubber Company entered into an agreement with Goodyear to start manufacturing automotive tires in Canada. The Bowmanville plant was the first Goodyear facility outside of the United States. The establishment of Goodyear in Canada meant the first pneumatic tires manufactured in Canada were produced in Bowmanville. In 1911 an addition was constructed to meet the demand of tire production. In the same year the Durham Rubber Company could not maintain the production level of their agreement with Goodyear and are bought by Goodyear. Goodyear continued to expand and employ additional workers. They recruited workers to come to Bowmanville. In order to meet the housing requirements for the new workers Goodyear purchased the Balmoral Hotel (the northeast corner of King Street and Division Street) to house workers and constructed over 50 semi-detached dwellings on Carlisle Avenue. By 1917 the plant was producing 260,000 tires a year and employed over 900 people. The original two factories, including the front addition that connect them, remain on the site today with many additional additions over the years. The Goodyear building represents one of the oldest and most important industries in Bowmanville's past. 91 The Goodyear buildings are constructed of wood and faced with brick along Raynes Avenue (a private street). The windows that once provided light into the building have been bricked. The sides of the buildings have been altered over the years as additions were built and floor space expanded. The timber in the buildings is old growth wood, the floors are planks laid on edge and the columns are over a half metre squared. The architecture of industrial buildings in the 1800 and early parts of the 1900's is very unique in today's landscape. Industrial buildings at the time had a very utilitarian nature to them that placed them lower in social and therefore aesthetic hierarchy. Buildings were generally constructed with straightforward and repetitive forms with efficiency and safety being the main goals. Buildings were generally long and narrow with windows on both sides of the building to allow as much natural lighting as possible. The narrowness allowed the natural light to penetrate to the middle of the building and usually allowed for machinery on both sides of the building with an interior walkway. The buildings were encouraged to have flat roofs and avoid attic spaces and often had separate stair corridors for fire prevention. Goodyear site showing buildings with significant heritage interest (circled), pending findings of the HIA 92 H W V iE i THE GOODYEAR FACTORY 45 RAYNES AVENUE In 1897 the Bowmanville Rubber Co. was established in a three-storey building on King Street East. Within a year it was in financial difficulties and sold out to the Durham Rubber Co. Ltd. The latter com- pany was more successful and in 1905 was ready to expand. With a loan from the Town, land near the present Goodyear plant was purchased from the Raynes estate. By 1906 the company had erected a mod- ern two-storey factory and was producing carriage and bicycle tires along with a variety of other items. The same year as the Durham Co. started in Bowmanville, the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. commenced oper- ation in an old strawboard factory in Akron, Ohio. Its thirteen employees began by making bicycle tires, horseshoe pads, and poker chips. In 1899 they added automobile tires. The company grew rapidly and, by 1910, in order to circumvent the 35% tariff on imported tires, decided to start manufacturing in Canada. Bowmanville was the ideal place as it was close to both railway lines, the McLaughlin Motor Car Co. in Oshawa, and the Goodyear sales office in Toronto. More important, it was the home of the Durham Rubber Co. which was willing to enter into a joint venture. In March 1910 Goodyear agreed to erect an addition to the Durham plant. In return, Durham would do the milling and calendering for a tire factory that Goodyear was building next to it. The demand for tires increased beyond expectation and Durham did not have, nor could it afford to buy, the machinery needed to meet its part of the bargain. It sold out to Goodyear in December. The seventy-five skilled workmen on Durham's payroll were transferred to Goodyear's. By 1916 Goodyear was employing over 700. The upper storey windows of the building, built by Goodyear to connect the two early factories, are still in place. 93 Presentations and Handouts Application By: National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to permit a 111 -unit townhouse development (Northeast corner of Prestonvale Road and Bloor Street, Courtice) Public Meeting: April 3, 2018 GALE APV, BLOCK 3 — Ri d VNdening I ��—�� Ret,d Wlden4lp 1ra 0 R 3 rr R .,e r .—Alm il— P I >o I DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION PART OF Lar 33, CONCESSION 2 AND PART OF THE ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN L015 32 AND 33, CONCESSION 2 (Cla&ed by Inst. No. DNP3411) (Geographic I.—hip & 7orington] MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REQQHA PIIIWCPAiITV 9 PL HM 00 WESTON * CONSUL71NG plarnrly - w Lan Jeskpn em .I bZ1S.EOf PRQ'ER.T px�'dG9i>'p1G4TE I atlloen vwnm Lerurtlq ddb ne b PWN..m : TF hmbfa�PffFel Ino- bmnd� dM Inri b" «eeoen re tler rode --I nrlwr� a m.�un �l.r�a�h'rH rRlnwfPrpYl, PGGTIOPv1 P1 dUN11Cft [9.o,c11 511M a Pi. PW WN Ari R&6. ,PPO, c. P.19] :VtlnBbpe 21. ffi 7.. N bI. eI.7 PI. A II- - pan CI. sn Ray Win 'b -I I,- NIM ..iT.rnM br dn. hn. IP, inpr sllmalI sane 1I- b—i— I. bo In.O....rNbu Lr d.v . 0G?OMM! 6TAI ft.h r Coldarrrk'm Fere 1S PAdb i 'Y iP tl1b fp� <,> PKk21: 37 P , tl ymulq lldX4 0..7t tMAL til 5.w 4.MRftWp 0D.I.y l481s11 ..x pPhprlw a-a+n= 4 p. kn n.e+. arald.d:7 Ep.—a M Nu 70 wl.,r.e.eu o itJ4 WESTON comae LT. �� _ Dl _ Conventional Storey) {Dual Frontage * a Stacked e* , r Public School �Y7 - MVx am 4W - may■ �,■ Cale Avenu'eNEE lima L Q.7 O) cr co A ■ IKON ez t IMF M-1 J23 ion �� /■ra:ea�fNrr�+r�r . �•4�f ThT�riT�•Y7 OF r *LULU. =, pa Slte �W 1P - • t y F} yr Wei_,. now# Public Comments I • Density & Character; DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Applicant >. • Traffic & Parking; National Homes (Prestonvale Inc. Site Location a_ • Protection of Natural E nv i ro n m e nta I Strreet/Prestonvale Road, r Courtice • Construction impacts; • Resident safety; • Respect natural drainage patterns; • Privacy; • Impact to property values; • Lack of services nearby. PROPOSAL: To permit a multi -unit residential development containing a total of 111 dwelling units: 44 - two-storey,townhouse units; 17-three-st,,,. rev townhouseunits; 18 - dual frontage townhouse units along Prestonvale Road; and 32- four -storey stacked townhouse units along Bloor Street. FILES: ZBA 2017-0032 and S -C-2017-0010 Three storey townhouse units Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7 p.m. :ouncil Chambers (2"e Floor) 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, ON UC 3A6 t r , 5 Contact the Planner Anne Taylor Scott, Sc Planner Planning Services Department 905-623-3379 ext. 2414 ® atavlorscott@clarington.net Two storey townhouse units www.clarington.net ® llldwellingunits '� Up to 4storeys rM Residential Staff and Agency Comments • Achieving Regional Corridor targets for density and built form; • Satisfying the Clarington Official Plan relating to multi -unit residential development; • Protection of Natural Heritage and providing the buffers as required by the Clarington Official Plan; • Introducing a new public street through the development; • Pedestrian linkages • Master Block Planning _ Conventional Storey) {Dual Frontage * a Stacked e* , r Public School �Y7 - MVx am 4W - may■ �,■ Cale Avenu'eNEE lima L Q.7 O) cr co A ■ IKON ez t IMF M-1 J23 ion �� /■ra:ea�fNrr�+r�r . �•4�f ThT�riT�•Y7 OF r *LULU. =, pa Slte �W 1P - • t y F} yr WESTON CONSULTING STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 3, 2018 Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA 2017-0032) AND Draft Plan of Subdivision (S -C-2017-0010) Northeast corner of Bloor Street / Prestonvale Road Courtice National Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. NATIONAL E, t e '.`J 9 k 1 e I` I f) r ❑ National Homes, founded in 1992 by Rocco Pantalone, has grown into one of the Greater Toronto ❑L D[V P R11N/XFFHWIXCD::G V F\HGXF P HEXL -WD ❑ National Homes specializes in low-rise built forms and has built over 15,000 homes. ❑ Have developed communities in Ajax, Bradford, Brampton, Newmarket, Toronto, Milton, Mississauga, Oakville, Markham and Vaughan r WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design BA G ro u p CROZIER CaNSREiING ENGINEERS NEA STRYBOS BARRON DING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE NATIONAL You are the blUeprint- TEAM MEMBERS SS WILSON ASSOCIATES 4oimdziz7�F-j;tgi leers Ak$irari & Partners Consu1ranla lAd• {,ruxcfwcal .Tc Enrironmmt&i Scrviom F.Aorim.i ft 7n1111mft6 WESTON f" CONSULTING planning + urban design WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design SUBJECT PROPERTY ,r.� � ' i � It r: . 4. '�,�;�+' �- - ..:.�;,'",: ;ate A❑o C° - _ �r-• .#� yY' 1pCUSTEASE50L11T1QNSINC RINGTOPl70.4NSPDRWiION SIERPWN, M4Y 361d '+rulk �..- . i..v . 1 L .. • WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design A Mom A m�a�w w!a �TT901 JL � eeee. Hut Lo B(Ui DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN (DROP) REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN F1 URBAN STRUCTURE: Regional Corridor, Living Areas Regional Corridor: ❑ The DROP notes that Regional Corridors are to be developed using principles of intensification. Living Areas: ❑ These areas are to be developed in a compact form through higher densities and intensification along arterial roads. WESTON CONSULTING CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN (AMENDMENT #107) planning + urban design �T MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL PLAN a LAND USE: — Regional Corridor, Urban Area, NO iv Sm�B 9Environmental Protection Area Q � S 8 -� Regional Corridor: PoE D� LCOWKK- % I T ❑ Corridors shall provide for intensification, mixed- �LR%Y REEIE7iR.1 , _ use development and pedestrian and transit supportive development. 094TRE gr661Ytn686 PRESTFYEYrhREA g a'4 KMu brw WgA_D.0 RADE wrw Urban Residential: BENEFULALARFA - Lands designated as Urban Residential shall be - R,SINEW, ARS[ SUBJECT ,,m- PROPERTY predominately used for the purposes of housing. RRpTpTlpl+u�, 9LOOR erFIEET Environmental Protection Area: WATCRFR#R Ci3lHNAY _ [ijYYIJARY0.iR1( -1 Development in this designation is largely prohibited with exception to low-intensity ,MY,Cr7.T.M}I lfilG recreation and uses related to the forest, fish and wildlife management or erosion control and ........ 9^EGIaL RgLIGY+RFa ■ stormwater management. ............ STLOI' .RG i WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design C LARI N GTO N ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 EXISTING ZONING -]AGRICULTURE WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design BLOOR STREEr �� PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Townhouse development consisting of: ❑ 19 Residential Blocks: ❑ 79 townhouse units 0 19, 6.0 -metre -wide, two-storey townhouse units; 0 26, 6.7 -metre -wide, two-storey townhouse units; 0 17, 5.2 -metre -wide, three-storey townhouse units; and o 18, dual frontage townhouse units along Prestonvale Road) ❑ 32 stacked townhouse units C 111 Total Units L Vehicular access to Prestonvale Road (Condominium road network proposed) WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (DENSITY) CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN ❑ DENSITY Regional Corridor: The Regional Corridor is planned to meet a minimum net density target of 85 units per net hectare. The intent of the policy is to be applied generally throughout the entirety of the Regional Corridor designation. Depending on how the Regional Corridor limit is measured, the proposed development could achieve a net density of approximately 75 - 81 units per net hectare. Urban Residential: (Urban Structure - Edge of neighbourhoods and adjacent to arterial roads) A minimum net density of 19 units per net hectare. Based on the criteria of this urban structure, the proposed development achieves a net density of approximately 38.70 units per net hectare. WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION: APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED A Zoning By-law Amendment application has been submitted to rezone the subject property from Agriculture to Urban Residential Type Three (R3) and Environmental Protection (EP). DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISON: A Draft Plan of Subdivision application has been submitted to create the following blocks for development: ❑ Block 1 ❑ 2.469 ha (residential condominium development) ❑ Block 2 ❑ 2.511 ha (open space block / environmental protection area) ❑ Block 3 ❑ 0.178 (road widenings - Prestonvale and Bloor) FUTURE APPLICATIONS SITE PLAN APPLICATION DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM AAAWESTON � CONSULTING planning + urban design PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT PA2 The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment seeks to rezone the lands: ❑ Urban Residential Type Three (R3) and Environmental Protection (EP) with site specific exceptions ❑ The R3 -XX zone would permit townhouse and stacked townhouse dwellings M E Reeldeealdl WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design - . Rpabarui it r BLOCK 1 Resldonliaf Condominium 2.489 ha PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION I� I i E is i BLOCK 2 GP apn- 2.577 ha "t I -- 04 --Bp- I r i i u ! BLOCK 3 Reed Wldcnirq i��! aes�dmux� • Re3eenfal BLOCK d-— Aoad W'idoning - ❑ Block 1 ❑2.469 ha (residential condominium development) ❑ Block 2 ❑ 2.511 ha (open space block / environmental protection area) ❑ Block 3 :10.178 (road widenings - Prestonvale and Bloor) —J � Mmd�rglele {Zd Bbw St C3 SUBJECT PROPERTY WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE ❑ Public Information Centre held on February 7, 2018 at the Dr. GJ MacGillivary Public School ■ ■ �' ► c Cf I ■\�' �1 11111) ■ ,. ■[�11,' 1111 I I � ■ 1'i K► �'• , D; �' 111 ■ t\�'!1 h• / I I, ❑ Summary of comments received WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design ❑ Region of Durham ❑ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority ❑ Canada Post Enbridge ❑ Kawartha Pine Ridge School Board ❑ Rogers COMMENTS RECEIVED WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design The following studies and reports were submitted in support of the applications: ❑ Environmental Impact Study; ❑ Arborist Report; ❑ Slope Stability Investigation; ❑ Soil Sampling Letter; ❑ Transportation Impact Study; ❑ Geotechnical/Slope Stability Study; ❑ Hydrogeological Report; ❑ Phase One Environmental Site Assessment; ❑ Stage I Archaeological Assessment; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Grading/Servicing Plan; SUPPORTING STUDIES ❑ Sediment/Erosion Control Plan; ❑ Functional Servicing / Stormwater Management Report; ❑ Urban Design Brief; and ❑ Planning Justification Report. WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design QUESTIONS? Ryan G u ette r Weston Consulting 905-738-8080 ext. 241 rguetter@westonconsulting.com WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design ADDITIONAL SLIDES WESTON CONSULTING SITE PLAN / 116 UNITS planning - urban design FUTURELOW-RISE 19 Residential Blocks: RESIDENTIAL F v I I ❑ 79 townhouse units FUTURE LOW�iISE RESIDENTIAL o 19, 6.0 -metre -wide, two-storey townhouse units; ®� 0 26, 6.7 -metre -wide, two-storey townhouse units; nry .-�-�� °�' '; o 17, 5.2 -metre -wide, three-storey townhouse units; gy-•, •'�' 1 ell ; and CALE AVE.. - 0 18, dual frontage townhouse units along Prestonvale Road ✓y ❑ 36 stacked townhouse units (an increase in 4 units from n 9 the submitted / circulated development concept). ry I I ❑ 116 Total Units .s NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM BOUNDARY b ❑ Regional Corridor Density = 87.35 units per net hectare. FUTURE MEDIUM - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design ARCHITECTURAL CROSS SECTION TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 77F71T W-� `o FUTUM 3 a o 1�1-4 - PARTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND °Om oM�.exs ' 3 STOREY DUAL FRONTAGE TOWNHOUSE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION NATIONAL BLOCKS D -F NP -ZONAL HONES STOxygl,E RD. GOURT E Npgryyry You are the blueprint,(M11lINIGIPALITY OF GLARING TO NJ 4BxWY1M1W. WESTON CONSULTING planning - i irhan dr -Jnr ARCHITECTURAL CROSS SECTION s TYPICAL CROSS SECTION v zo- 0 R c R PARTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND oom 3 STOREY STACKED DUAL FRONTAGE TOWNHOUSE NATIONAL TYPICAL CROSS SECTION BLOCKS C - , "LSTONVALE R0, YOU are the blueprint` N NUFALi . of cLARiNcsoN gild WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design ARCHITECTURAL CROSS SECTION TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ' II ■ ' uoonuol■n000nio�mll onn..... L� I� : �1III� onnoomo �� IIIII mmuomo IIII oonu000l '- ���i��0.1 ;L��`=:�� uol�in000nim7■■ �1III� IIIIIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIIIIIIIIII �I LEGEND oom �oMP�,.e�e 2 STOREY TOWNHOUSE NATIONAL TYPICAL CROSS SECTION "TI...LMOME. BLOCKS G-1 BLOOD ST. B —STO-- couRTicE You are the blueprint" MUNI.—LITY of oLARIRGTON) Prl- 91. P!aam id- .— 99 mi P-1 ML. PLL, it! AV-An Aml o N 11 0 'IF I'm ■ mom 19 RFL "I'm, Ile . VN 119 al r . i -4 Am I � NEW 4A ..It a Mir t WEIR. rro k.9 F � r 1 T } � � A 1 ± ■ T� � WESTON CONSULTING planning - urban design Ir M-- ffl�m �W. rw<.. II{' NATURAL HERITAGE EW"M11FFMWMMATO D "w%" ° «` [wi MN Mi11M�Mnn4 1.1J ������ 01r.i na.�,y i.w�hrt. Y.pni ap�a�a FEW"� FIGURE 1: VEG ETATION C OMMUNITI ES & CONSTRAINTS PT LOT SS, CON Z NLMICIPALITY OP CLARW7CM REGION 9F 17ulaiAn AI.RORA DISTRICy 1 v',wwiM.�.1rR,rFlMwaF �I.Ir, �FEMMMTMMY�I�I"4 RMSK"a i WA 21M RMT lY�a,c 010 ��. Ta a ua G fA Ll/9PfmR lY�a,c 010 ��. �a FJM ,o-�row. Pn� rmroc �Q A4+IP�4 wuc `F00 1:1,400 QMRCISS wa`rr�wr�w� an now voxvuLa Gd r4 ��i �rtu OVI! AM's ��F wilWrtu wAaT ENTALAwS„Sodr.p ES INC. .we.Re rrT. x �� i�li�f ��Fer� _ �', WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Em �Y Kr T5[�j D pAksllw Y rrna�x 5)mErn -_ site l v -,t 1 P-ts �L ,r Da AM PmkHour [r10) PM PeW Imo/ EABHrg TMMC B1 Ml T S"C lm WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design Pq���r7 orf a �� sill Isis �A � rsfs} ry�4 1 mlX01-as71 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES (2024) 11,51 Y r s 4� �+ "1 A'. G. J. JR9cGSl4ary w f'GMC a� Dow 1t151g � 08 1+4 site NMuta! Y lon7a{Jv tslsllff4 � n �MPmkNoorPM Pyr IFABOljl TrW% 9lpnalS" C-lvd WESTON PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CONSULTING VOLUMES (2019) planning + urban design ■ '{ Y 4 Dr G- J. MLe GNrery V NIKYTa! if -y — NY.M ] j �r ],a 5 Site Pap�•fk � S +�rparlw � � 4• s ti `ti � �fdiJ 1 f�pf Ip sl—sb-t � own `- 15151 �} 1� 0: nM P.k •io.ir S6]j Fm tveat i-teu Exebrp Tre'�o SQA+eI T 5._•p Cxitr_I WESTON PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CONSULTING VOLUMES (2024) planning + urban design — {07] NM Pg�[ Fbu E:dBHrQ TrOM 949 e1 T &np C Im WESTON CONSULTING planning + urban design D Stacked Townhouses (4 sty; 0 Dual Frontage Townhouses 0 Townhouses 5.2m (3 sty) 0 Townhouses Bm (2 sty) 0 Townhouses 6.7m (2 sty)