HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdmin 70-84CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE 2`a)
40 TEMPERANCE STREET
BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO
L7 C 3A6
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 5 1984
ADMIN. 70 - 84
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PRIORITIES 1985
TELEPHONE 623-3379
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. That Administrator's Report ADMIN. 70 - 84 be received;
2. That Council authorize staff to consider as part of the 1985 current
budget and capital forecast the following items:
a) Budgeting $67,000 in 1985 towards the Bowmanville Memorial
Hospital Renovation Expansion Fund;
b) Recommending to the incoming Council for 1986 to 1988 that similar
contributions be made in the years 1986 and 1987 for a total
contribution from the Town of Newcastle of $201,000 over three years;
c) Continuing to take maximum advantage of subsidies available through
the Ministry of Transportation and Communications;
d) Tabling any consideration in the funding of a new Bowmanville Arena
until the feasibility study is completed;
3. a) That Council establish a policy that any monies in excess of
$400,000 in the general surplus from 1984 and subsequent years
be transferred to the Administrative Improvement Reserve Fund;
b) That during 1985 Council select a preferred site for a new
administrative centre.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
Part of the preparation of the 1985 budget is to identify priorities for
1985 and beyond. Over the past three years there have.been many demands
for financial assistance. Such demands have gone far beyond the
ADMIN. 70 - 84 -2
Municipality's capability to fund same. As such, there is a need
to set priorities. Certainly the final time for setting priorities is at
the approval of budgets. However, I believe it appropriate in terms
of good corporate planning to provide some direction to staff as to what
those capital priorities might be. The list of priorities is not
intended to be exhaustive or complete but rather a highlighting of those
items of a capital nature that have not been previously or subsequently
addressed through individual reports.
Recommendations 2 (a) and (b) deal with the earlier request of the
Bowmanville Memorial Hospital Foundation which was presented to the
General Purpose and Administration Committee of January 16th 1984.
On page 6 of the submission the Foundation requests that 25% of the local
funding requirement be funded by the municipality. The directorate of the
Foundation suggested that of the $600,000 requested that $400,000 be
generated from Ontario Hydro Impact Fund and $200,000 be raised through
normal grant structures within the Municipality. The funding drive for
the Hospital improvements is scheduled to commence in November 1984.
It would therefore be an appropriate time to deal with that portion of
the request dealing with a possible municipal grant.
At this point in time, Town staff are liaising with Hospital officials to
deal with such matters as road closings, servicing and site plan. In
accordance with Council's direction, staff are also meeting with Hydro
and Hospital representatives to collect background information prior to
reporting back to the Hydro Liaison Committee on possible Hydro impact.
The earliest that a report to the Hydro Liaison Committee would be available
will be in December of this year.
The staff recommendation of a municipal grant of $201,000 over three years
is not the only contribution that the Town would be making to the project.
It is estimated that the market value of the land subject to the road
closing would exceed $50,000. In addition, staff have spent many hours
reviewing site plans and checking out other development issues. All in all
a contribution of $201,000 plus land plus staff time would represent an
investment in excess of $250,000. The suggested municipal grant plus
land and staff time would represent the direct contributions of the Town.
All servicing and site plan costs would be the responsibility of the Hospital.
ADMIN. 70 - 84
-3-
If Council adopts recommendations 2(a) and (b) this would still leave
Council free to negotiate additional financial assistance Trom Ontario
Hydro based upon the impact of the Hydro Generating Station on the
provision of services from the Hospital.
For the information of Committee members, other recent hospital expansions in the
Region have generally been supported by the local municipality.
Most recently Uxbridge provided $150,000 towards the expansion of
the Cottage Hospital (total cost $1,000,000), and Scugog Township which
contributed $175,000 towards the expansion of the Scugog Memorial
Hospital over a 3 year period (total cost of project was $3,360,000).
Recommendation 2 (c) identifies the most cost efficient approach in dealing
with the improvement of our roads system within the Town. At this point
in time, the province has not given any indication if there will be an
increase in the subsidy levels for road maintenance or capital construction.
The tabling of any consideration of funding of a new Bowmanville arena
as suggested in recommendation 2 (d) is necessary until the feasibility
study is completed.
Recommendations 3 (a) and (b) are brought forward at this time in response
to the likelihood of substantial population growth being generated in the Town.
The current facilities have just about reached or in some instances exceeded
their capacity to accommodate staff and services. From previous studies,
discussions at Council and certainly at the staff level, it is apparent that
there is a need to address this issue.
If we do not take a .corporate planning approach to this issue, the Town may be
forced into short term solutions that may prove very costly in the long run.
Currently, the Town has a balance of approximately $547,000 set aside in the
Administrative Improvements Reserve Fund. This is viewed as a first step towards
a new Administrative Centre.
Recommendation 3 (a) provides a further step towards the funding of a
new administrative centre.
ADMIN. 70 - 84 -4-
As development occurs and the municipality's services expand there
is a need to plan for the administrative future of the Town. It is
recognized that such planning takes time and requires many decisions
to be made as well as substantial financial resources. By adopting
recommendation 3 (a) any surplus above $400,000 would automatically be
directed to the Administrative Reserve Fund unless otherwise directed
by Council. The financial move suggested in recommendation 3 (a) will
not fund in itself a new administrative centre. It will, however, augment
other financial arrangements that will be necessary and stabilize the
budget process. It should be noted in recommending this approach that
any surplus from year to year has in the past been used to avoid
borrowing money to operate the municipality until tax payments are
received in the subsequent year.
Recommendation 3 (b) suggests that Council select an appropriate site
for such a Centre. The recommendation alone will not necessarily cost
the Town money. It is, however, a very important decision with respect to
the future of the Town. From the previous feasibility studies the Town
has a reasonable idea of the space requirements for Town offices.
However, until a site is identified, discussions of the specifics of a new
administrative centre will be difficult. The current Town Hall has
served the needs of the citizens since 1904.
It is hoped that with diligent planning of new facilities the future
needs of the citizens can be equally well served.
This report attempts to provide a realistic framework within which
municipal corporate planning can take place.
Respectfully submitted,
DSJ:nof David S. Johnston,
Chief Administrative Officer