HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-12-04 Report No. 14, 18, 194
RECEIVED:
DEC 5 1973
Municipal Planning Consultants CO. LTD.
400 MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD •TORONTO M45 2 B •,OYYVfY�islr+'GP1��tlN�]]
Township'..of`Clarke :Planning Board,
,P.:O:.Box''219,
ORONO, Ontario.
LOS. 1140 '.
Attention: Mr..Horace -Best,
:Clerk :
.Dear Mr.,Best: .
December 4, 1973.'
.Re: Consultants' Reports Nos. 14; 18,19,
;.Township of Clarke.
::Our File i 'PN '3530'
.We are pleased to:submit .herewith twelve (12).copies each.
of Consultants' Reports:Numbers;l4,'18, and -19, re.rezoning
applications for Stewart Wood, Tamblyn &.Beaupre, and Van Hard-
ingsveldt,.respectively.
Yours .very truly,
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.
RHF/ia Robe rt.H..F ger
Ehcls. Planner
TOWN PLANNERS • PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD., December 4, 1973.
400 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario. PN: 3530
CLARKE PLANNING BOARD
Consultants' Report No. 14
1.
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
STEWART WOOD
This application was reviewed in preliminary form in a report
dated October 11, 1973. At that time the applicant was requesting
a rezoning of a 50 -to -60 acre site to permit the use of the lands
for a trucking operation. We note that the applicant now requests
the rezoning of the 10 -acre parcel of land to be used for the erec-
tion of a garage for the storage and maintenance of gravel trunks.
2. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING PROVISIONS
3.
The proposed Official Plan designates the lands Rural, and the
Zoning By-law zones the site Agricultural (A) Zone. The Official
Plan indicates that in areas designated Rural, Industrial uses are
not permitted, while the only Commercial uses which are permitted
should be farm -oriented.
The use of these lands for the erection of a garage for the
storing and maintenance of gravel trucks does not appear to be pro-
vided for by the Official Plan. Consequently, an amendment to the
Official Plan would appear necessary in order to permit the proposed
use.
The Agricultural. Zone of the Zoning By-law does not permit a
trucking operation.
Our previous report dealt with the location and land use in
this general area, and indicated that the proposed use was in con-
formity with the Official Plan. However, a further review of this
application indicates that its conformity with the Official Plan
is questionable.
(1)
4.
On the basis of the information contained in our previous re-
port, and our re-evaluation of this application at this time, we
are of the opinion that uses such as the one proposed in this case,
should be encouraged to locate in areas which are designated by the
Official Plan as Industrial.
Should Planning Board feel that the proposed use is desirable
in this area, then we suggest that the following information should
be obtained from the applicant, and then used for the preparation
of an appropriate Official Plan and Zoning change:
(a) the total number of gravel trucks to be maintained on the lot;
(b) the nature of the operation to be carried on, both in the garage,
and on the remaining area being rezoned;
(c) the methods which the applicant proposes to employ, in order to
buffer the proposed use from the adjacent roadway and any abut-
ting uses.
If the above information indicates that the applicant proposes
a small operation involving only two or three trucks, and the con-
struction of a garage in which these trucks can be stored, then we
can see no objection to processing an application which would permit
him to carry on this operation on a parcel of land of an appropriate
size. However, we feel that it would be inappropriate to rezone a
10 -acre site for an operation of an unspecified size or nature.
RHF/ia
Respectfully submitted,
MICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.
(2)
i
Robert H Fo r
Planner
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD., December 3, 19731
400 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario. PN: 3530
CLARKE PLANNING BOARD,
Consult4:nts' Report No. 18
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
TAMBLYN & BEAUPRE LOT 24 CON. 8
1. INTRODUCTION
This application is for the rezoning of a 5 -acre site to
permit the use of the lands for a retail sales and service outlet,
specializing in the sales of motorcycles, boats, ski -door, etc.
2. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING PROVISIONS
The proposed Official Plan designates the site as Highway
Commercial, while the Zoning By-law zones the lands Agricultural
(A) Zone.
3. EXISTING LAND USE
4.
The site is located Just west of Highway No. 35 and north of
the road which runs between Concessions 7 and 8, in an area which
is predominantly rural. A use similar to that proposed in the ap-
plication is located on this site.
The applicant wishes to have this property zoned as Highway
Commercial. This request is in conformity with the Official Plan
and would appear to be appropriate, provided that the following two
conditions are met:
(a) that access be restricted to the Concession road, and not High-
way 35, and
(b) that only an area large enough to accommodate the proposed use
be zoned in the Highway Commercial category.
(1)
5. RECOMMENDATION
We recommend that this application be approved, subject to the
conditions indicated above.
Respectfully submitted,
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.
RHF/ia Robert H.
Planner
(2)
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD. December 3, 1973.
400 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario. PN: 3530
CLARKE PLANNING BOARD
Consultants' Report No. 19
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
VAN HARDINGSVELDT, LOT 9, CON. 1
1. INTRODUCTION
This application is for the rezoning of a .8 -acre site, to
permit the use of the lands for cabinet manufacturing.
2. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING PROVISIONS
The proposed Official Plan designates the site as Hamlet, while
the Zoning By-law zones the lands as Rural Residential Zone (RR).
The Official Plan indicates that quasi -industrial uses such as
this may be permitted in areas designated as Hamlet, provided that
they are placed in a separate zone classification, and that adequate
off-street parking, together with adequate buffer planting or screen-
ing are supplied where such uses abut residential zones. The Plan
also indicates that such uses should be limited to sites adjacent to
arterial or local collector roads, and that these uses should not be
obnoxious or incompatible with the basic residential function of the
Hamlet.
3. EKISTING LAND USE
Information available in this office indicates that the proposed
building would be located behind a residential dwelling situated on
the south side of Highway No. 2, west of County Road No. 8, in an
area characterized by low density residential development.
We understand that this property was previously used as a weld-
ing shop, and that the applicant proposes to change the use to
cabinet manufacturing.
(1)
4.
5.
In considering this application, the guidelines set out in the
Official Plan should be carefully reviewed. The proposed cabinet
manufacturing operation could be an incompatible neighbour to the
surrounding residential uses, because of the noise generated by
electric saws, etc. However, if the operation were to be carried
out within the proposed building it is possible that this annoyance
could be avoided.
We are of the opinion that the approval of a rezoning for the
proposed use in this location would be inappropriate, unless suitable
guarantees can be obtained from the applicant that the proposed use
will not be offensive to the surrounding uses, by virtue of the noise
which it generates.
On the basis of the information submitted, we recommend that
the zoning of this property not be changed.
Respectfully submitted,
MUNICIPAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.
RHF/ia Robert H. Fon'er
Planner
(2)