Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-01-30Clar*wn Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 Minutes of a meeting of the Planning and Development Committee held on Monday, January 30, 2017 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Present Were: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor S. Cooke, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill until 10:20 PM, Councillor W. Woo Regrets: Councillor W. Partner Staff Present: C. Clifford, C. Pellarin, F. Langmaid, L. Benson, J. Gallagher, M. Chambers 1 Call to Order Councillor Woo called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. 2 New Business ❑ Introduction There were no new business items added to the Agenda. 3 Adopt the Agenda Resolution #PD -019-17 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Agenda for the Planning and Development Committee meeting of January 30, 2017 be adopted as presented. Carried 4 Declarations of Interest There were no dHFODUDWURiQterest stated at this meeting. 5 Announcements Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of community interest. - 1 - Clarbgtoa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 6 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting Resolution #PD -020-17 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Traill That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning and Development Committee, held on January 9, 2017, be approved. Carried 7 Public Meetings 7.1 Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Nathan Thomas Report: PSD -008-17 Robert Russell, Planner, made a verbal an electronic presentation to the Committee regarding the application. No one spoke in opposition to, or in support of, the application. Nathan Thomas, See Path Group, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. Mr. Thomas reviewed the existing and proposed zoning and land survey. He continued by explaining the zoning is urban residential and reviewed the civic addressing. Mr. Thomas advised the Committee that an archaeological report was conducted and it confirmed there were no significant issues. He explained that this home was built in 1887 and has had various reconstructions. Mr. Thomas added that a heritage impact assessment was also completed and determined that the existing house could be demolished as it has not retained its heritage value. He reviewed the existing house retention and provided an over view of the application. Mr. Thomas thanked the Committee and offered to answer any questions. Alter the Agenda Resolution #PD -021-17 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Cooke That the Agenda be altered to consider Report PSD -008-17, Nathan Thomas on behalf of William and Betty Irving - application to amend the Zoning By-law to facilitate the creation of three single detached lots at 6 Mann Street, Bowmanville, at this time. Carried -2- Clar*wa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 12.1 PSD -008-17 Nathan Thomas on behalf of William and Betty Irving - application to amend the Zoning By-law to facilitate the creation of three single detached lots at 6 Mann Street, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -022-17 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Cooke That Report PSD -008-17 be received; That the application for rezoning ZBA2016-0027 submitted by Nathan Thomas continue to be processed, including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -008-17 and any delegations be advised RI Iii] R[IC_FLO/ GI -FU LL] Carried 7.2 Applications for Proposed Amendments to the Clarington Official Plan, Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law Applicant: High Street Courtice Inc. Report: PSD -009-17 Anne Taylor Scott, Planner, made a verbal an electronic presentation to the Committee regarding the application. Suzanne Reiner, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. Ms. Reiner advised the Committee that she is representing a number of the residents of Darlington Boulevard, Foxhunt Trail and Kingswood Drive. She explained to the Committee that her two main concerns are with the rezoning of 13 and 15 Darlington Boulevard and with the proposed vehicular access to Darlington Boulevard. Ms. Reiner referred to the Clarington Official Plan and noted the goal of the Plan is to celebrate the history and character of Clarington and that any new development is existing neighbourhoods should respect and reinforce the physical character of the neighbourhood. She reviewed a street view photo of Darlington Boulevard and noted her family moved to the area for the character, large lots and the rural feel. Ms. Reiner continued by stating there are very few areas remaining in Courtice that have properties with large lots. She explained that she is concerned with the rezoning and that two lots will result in 24 units. Ms. Reiner does not believe that this development will conform to the existing neighbourhood design. She added that the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan has set a minimum target of 60 residential units per gross hectare along Highway 2 and this development will allow for 127 units per hectare. Ms. Reiner reviewed the definition of an R1 designation and asked if 13 and 15 Darlington Boulevard were not purchased, would this development still proceed? She added that 13 and 15 Darlington Boulevard are not included in the Courtice Main Street Improvement Plan Improvement Plan corridor and stated that these properties should remain zoned R1. Ms. Reiner explained to the Committee that the existing commercial -3- Clar*wR Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 development has an impact on the traffic in the area and asked that further traffic studies be conducted as she does not agree with the current traffic review. She added that the local business has caused parking issues, increased speeding and traffic congestion. Resolution #PD -023-17 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Hooper That the delegation of Suzanne Reiner be extended for an additional two minutes. Carried Ms. Reiner believes that the vehicular access to Darlington Boulevard will increase the traffic issues. She stated that Darlington Boulevard is being used as a short cut to Olive Street and the 401. Mr. Reiner asked for an additional traffic light to be installed on Highway 2 if this development proceed. She noted that this is a large development and it should not be rushed. Ms. Reiner concluded by asking for no access to Darlington Boulevard, a traffic light to be installed on Highway 2 and for zoning of 13 and 15 Darlington Boulevard to remain R1. Wendy Kates, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She advised the Committee that she lives just north of where the vehicle access will be on Darlington Boulevard. Ms. Kates explained that she chose her home for the lot, location, and charm. She added that any new homes that have been added to this area blend in with the existing homes in the area. Ms. Kates added that she called the municipality to confirm the R1 zoning in this area. She noted that she is surprised by the traffic in the area and believes that it needs to be decreased and not increased. Ms. Kates explained that the LCBO, Tim Hortons and Shoppers all create additional traffic and make this a dangerous intersection. She stated that this development is unfair to the existing residents, will have a detrimental impact to the area and that the remaining homeowners will be forced to sell for further development. Ms. Kates asked if the land to the east will be developed and stated that she believes the developers will continue to try and purchase and develop more high density housing. She added that she is concerned with the construction traffic as the roads are struggling to accommodate the current level of traffic. Ms. Kates concluded by stating that she believes the two entrances on Highway 2 are sufficient and that there is no need for access off of Darlington Boulevard. She asked for the Members of Committee to reconsider the development and the impact it will have on the existing owner. David Brown, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that his main concern is the environmental impact of the proposed development. Mr. Brown explained to the Committee that Farewell Creek is the largest subwatershed in Black Farewell Harmony creek systems. He continued by explaining that this area is over 3700 hectares and has been classified by the Ministry of Natural Resources as a cold water system. Mr. Brown advised the Committee that he is concerned with the area between Tooley Mill and Second Marsh. He noted that this development will be approximately 4.26 hectares and the watershed will be maintained by and underground storage system and sewers. Mr. Brown noted the Oil and Grip Clar*wn Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 Separators (OGS) are being installed and he does not believe they are adequate. He continued by explaining that they will miss many pollutants and contaminants. Mr. Brown explained that flushing water continuously in the creek will affect the water temperature. He added wildlife and the adjacent woodlands will be compromised by this development. Mr. Brown referred to a previous develop east of Farewell Creek that resulted in foundation walls being built very close to the creek. He added that there would be major consequence if these walls began to fail. Mr. Brown does not believe anyone is taking responsibility for the creek system and he advised the Committee that some of the residents are willing to help with the cleanup of the area. He concluded by asking for the ecosystem between Tooley Mill and Second Marsh needs to be protected and that development will have a negative impact to this area. Mr. Brown thanked the Committee and offered to answer questions from the Committee. David White, King Courtice Investments Inc., spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he is representing the owners of the commercial plaza containing the LCBO, CIBC, and Swiss Chalet. Mr. White explained that this location has several constraints including the slight slope of Highway 2 being between two signalled intersections. He added that this makes turning difficult and increases traffic in the area. Mr. White noted that it is unfortunate that Darlington Boulevard will be used as the main roadway to alleviate traffic for the proposed development. He added that there were concerns when the LCBO was built with Darlington Boulevard being able to sustain the additional traffic. Mr. White explained that accommodations were made at that time to assist with traffic and parking issues and concerns. He stated that he believes there were errors in the traffic study for the current development and specifically referenced the trip generation portion of the study. Mr. White noted that the additional traffic signal between Darlington Boulevard and Centerfield Drive is not ideal, that the customers in the plaza use Darlington Boulevard to exit to Highway 2 and that he does not feel that the SII turns motionwillcontinue. He concluded by stating that he does support development however he does not feel this is an ideal location for this development. Susan Rodesky, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She advised the Committee that she had previously sent a letter outlining her concerns. Ms. Rodesky added that she is not opposed to change but does not believe this proposal is acceptable. She stated that the traffic has drastically increased with the opening of the Esso Gas Station and the LCBO and that will increase with this development. Ms. Rodesky continued by stating that Darlington Boulevard is not a major road and that traffic should be kept to a minimum. She added that she is also concerned with the proposed height of the building and the speeding in the area. Ms. Rodesky concluded by advising the Committee that she is opposed to the application as it is being presented and requested that the access at Darlington Boulevard be removed. She asked the Committee to consider the environmental impact and noted that the issues of partying and garbage in the creek needs to be addressed. T -jay King, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he moved to the area for the rural setting. Mr. King added that both traffic and speeding are a concern. He stated that there were 20,000 cars in a 31 day -5- Clarftwn Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 timeframe and that is not acceptable for the area. Mr. King concluded by advising the Committee that the entrance on Darlington Boulevard will increase these issues. Jeff Dalziel, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he was here with a friend who resides near Darlington Boulevard. Mr. Dalziel explained that he recently moved from Toronto to Coldstream Drive in Oshawa. He continued by explaining that when the road was widened it resulted in more traffic in the area. Mr. Dalziel advised the Committee that he ended up moving further north to avoid added stress. He concluded by advising the Committee that he feels this development will cause added stress and asked for them to consider the wellbeing of the area residents. Jim Kozak, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he bought his home for the country setting. Mr. Kozak noted that he is concerned with the traffic and the additional stress that this development will cause the area residents. Jeff Shemilt, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he opposes the rezoning as it will not keep with the current neighbourhood design. Mr. Shemilt added that he is concerned with the Darlington Boulevard access and that the proposed parking will not be adequate for the development. Stephanie Commanda, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She stated that the access to Darlington Boulevard will be directly in line with her driveway. Ms. Commanda added that she is concerned with the lights from the cars will be shining directly into her home and those of her neighbours. Gord Hanlon, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that the traffic has increased since the LCBO was built. Mr. Hanlon stated that this development does not fit in to the existing neighbourhood design and he is concerned with the access to Darlington Boulevard. Robert Scott, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he shares the same concerns as the previous delegations. Mr. Scott explained that he previously resided on Tooley Road and moved due to the stress of the new development being built in that area. He continued be stating the traffic is a major issue and the current infrastructure cannot support any additional traffic. Mr. Scott noted that he cuts through Darlington Boulevard and Foxhunt Trail as Highway 2 is too congested with traffic. He referred to the rules and regulations of building new developments in Kanata which includes ensuring there are adequate bike and walking trails. Mr. Scott added that the trails and walkways in Clarington are insufficient, which forces cyclists and runners to use the roadways. He concluded by stating this area should be developed with low density, single detached homes. Roman Zydownyk, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised the Committee that he was speaking in addition to correspondence that he previously submitted to the Planning Department. Mr. Zydownyk noted that he is concerned with Clar*wa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 the increased traffic in the area. He asked for the Municipality to survey the area resident to determine if they would like their properties to have curbs installed. Mr. Zydownyk asked about the possibility of the Darlington Boulevard access to be gated using a transponder to enter. He noted that the access points to the 401 are Harmony Road and Courtice Road and asked for the Committee to consider requesting that the toll charge be removed from the future Highway 418. Mr. Zydownyk concluded by asking for a Courtice Central Park to be developed behind Tooley Mill Park. Jeffrey Norman, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He explained that he lives directly next to the proposed development. Mr. Norman advised the Committee that he does not feel this development is consistent with the existing area. He added that Darlington Boulevard is not meant for high density traffic. Mr. Norman asked why three high rise buildings are being developed when there is currently nothing like this in Ci RELWHM lI HLFRI-FGG-IG EEfV\L❑J TRUDUR WiINLO-idU0 NMDFI-YVCEHFFR—vUa-LFG-D❑GEI for Committee to reconsider this development. Benoit Dugas, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He advised that he moved to the area for the quiet setting and that it was a dead end street. Mr. Dugas added that, since the LCBO and Esso with the Tim Hortons were built, the traffic has increased. He added that he feels the crime has increased in this area and that this development will negatively affect property values. Mr. Dugas concluded by asking for this development to be built closer to the future Highway 418. Jim Boate, Bike Friendly, spoke to the application. He advised the Committee that he is concerned that this development will have an impact on active transportation in Clarington. Mr. Boate asked for a bike lane to be installed on Highway 2 from Townline Road to Courtice Road and for a bike path in Tooley Mill Park. He added that these bike lanes and paths can lead to the future GO Station. Mr. Boate advised the Committee that the residents should be encourage to use active transportation. He concluded by asking Council to work with the Region of Durham to reduce the speed on Highway 2 in Courtice from 60 to 50 kilometres per hour. Connie Tuck, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She explained to the Committee that she is concerned with the speeding and traffic in the area. Ms. Tuck advised the Committee that, since the LCBO was built, there has been an increase in traffic, speeding and crime and that adding more people in the area will make it worse. She added that decreasing the speed on Highway 2 will cause further problems on Foxhunt Trail. April Dushene, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She asked the Members of Committee if they had been to Darlington Boulevard. Ms. Dushene noted that there is a charm to this area and the residents are passionate about where they live. She continued by stating that this development will bring chaos, speeding and traffic to the area. Ms. Dushene explained that she lives at the end of Darlington Boulevard and people continuously use her driveway as a turn around. She added that the speeding and traffic has increased since the LCBO was built. Ms. Dushene concluded by advising -7- Clar*wa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 the Committee that originally she was not concerned with the development but now that she has received more information, she is now opposed to the development. Vito Deligio, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. He explained to the Committee that he felt very fortunate when he purchased his home. Mr. Deligio advised the Committee that he is continuously getting offers to buy his property. He stated that he does not agree with two large lots being sold and divided into 24 lot. Mr. Deligio added that this area should keep its rural feel. Louis Kaye, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She advised the Committee that her children have never been able to play on the street. Ms. Kaye added that the traffic has increased since the LCBO was built. She noted that currently the largest building in Courtice is the medical building and this proposed development is more than double that size. Sheila Costanzi, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She noted her main concern is with the traffic. Ms. Costanzi advised the Committee that she is aware of the Places to Grow Act but does not believe this small area of property on Darlington Boulevard needs to be included. She added that this development does not keep with the current neighbourhood design. Melissa Giroux, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. She noted that this area has changed drastically in recent years. Ms. Giroux advised the Committee she is concerned with health care services in the area. She explained that, if she goes to the Courtice Health Centre, she regularly has to wait two hours to see a doctor and previously it would only have been a 30 minute wait. Ms. Giroux added that she is concerned with increase crime, drinking and driving and does not believe there is a need for high density housing in this area. Sandra Buchan, spoke to the application on behalf of a friend that lives in the area. She explained that her friend often has vehicles blocking her driveway and there have been occasions where the LCBO delivery truck has nearly tipped over in front of her home. Ms. Buchan added the delivery trucks using the laneway behind the LCBO leave tracks in the grass. She concluded by advising the Committee that the lights from the plaza are a concern and the access to Darlington Boulevard will create further problems. Recess Resolution #PD -024-17 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Committee recess for 10 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 9:40 PM with Councillor Woo in the Chair. Clar*wa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 Jeff Goldman spoke in support of the application. He explained to the Committee that he is the owner of the commercial property that abuts the subject property. Mr. Goldman added that he was responsible for assembling the majority of the land for the subject property. He explained that he originally purchased these properties and the Farewell and Pointe of View lands were previously approved for high density residential development. Mr. Goldman added that he was involved with the previous rezoning applications, public meetings, and consultations. He continued by explaining that he was involved in the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan. Mr. Goldman stated that, with the exception of the Darlington Boulevard properties, the application is proposing a lower density development than is previously approved zoning permits. He added that the applicants are looking for more townhomes and fewer high rise buildings. Mr. Goldman noted that the he attended the public meetings in 2009 and the concerns with traffic and speeding are the same. He advised the Committee that he feels that curbs and sidewalks would increase the safety in the area and that some of the streets need to urbanized if this application is approved. Mr. Goldman explained that the term -apartment-]refers to the built form not a form of ownership and that the owners are proposing a high end development. He believes the homes backing onto the ravine will reduce the crime because there would be greater visibility from the residents. Mr. Goldman stated that environmental studies will need to be conducted prior to approval and the development will provide mitigation and the run off will be filtered into the creek. He questioned the efficiency of the existing septic systems and suggested that they may need to be updated. Mr. Goldman noted that Tooley Mill Park was developed and funded as part of the original application and the current application requires the valley lands to be given to the municipality as part of the approval. He noted that the purchase of the properties on Darlington Boulevard were on the advice of the municipality and required for secondary access to the development. Mr. Goldman concluded by acknowledging that the discussion of additional traffic lights needs to be discussed further. Ryan Guetter, Weston Consulting, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He thanked the members of the community and noted that there were several principals of High Street Courtice Inc. in attendance. Mr. Guetter advised the Committee that they are committed working with Staff, Council, and members of the community. He explained that the application is for an overall reduced density than the zoning permits. Mr. Guetter added that, as per provincial policy intensification must occur, in this case, in the Secondary Plan area. The Darlington Boulevard properties are not within the Secondary Plan area. However, provincial policy speaks to the intensification of all urban areas and the lands on Darlington Boulevard have the rural characteristics which would be appropriate for some intensification but not the same amount of intensification as the properties on Highway 2. Mr. Guetter addressed the issue of traffic and noted that this is why lower density homes are being proposed on Darlington Boulevard. He added that they are trying to maintain the lot lines and have proposed a transition from the lower density to the high density buildings. Mr. Guetter explained that, in addition to the density being lower than previously approved, they have proposed a reduction in the overall height of the buildings. He reviewed proposed design and streetscape, which illustrated the transition from low to high density buildings. Mr. Guetter noted that many environmental Clar*wa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 studies have been completed, and that a portion of land will be given back to the municipality and restoration work will be done. He stated that they are open to signal lights. Mr. Guetter advised the Committee that they are have received comments from Municipal Staff and they are expecting to receive comments from the Region of Durham. He added that they are committed to finding adequate solutions for the concerns. Resolution #PD -025-17 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Neal That the delegation of Ryan Guetter be extended for an additional two minutes. Carried Mr. Guetter advised they have done a review of the parking requirements and recognize the need for active transportation, and noted the slope stability is being reviewed. Mr. Guetter concluded by stating they are committed to maintaining the separation of this development. Mr. Guetter answered questions from the Committee. 8 Delegations No Delegations 9 Communications - Receive for Information There are no Communications to be received for information. 10 Communications ❑ Direction 10.1 Roman Zydownyk n Regarding Report PSD -009-17, Applications by High Street Courtice Inc. to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 442 unit residential development along Courtice Main Street Resolution #PD -026-17 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Cooke That Correspondence Item 10.1 from Roman Zydownyk, concerning the Public Meeting (Agenda Item 7.2) regarding Report PSD -009-17, be referred to the Director of Planning Services to be considered as part of the application review process. Carried 11 Presentations No Presentations -10- Clarbgtoa Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 12 Planning Services Department Reports 12.1 PSD -008-17 Nathan Thomas on behalf of William and Betty Irving - application to amend the Zoning By-law to facilitate the creation of three single detached lots at 6 Mann Street, Bowmanville PSD -008-17 was considered earlier in the meeting during the Public Meeting portion of the Agenda. 12.2 PSD -009-17 Applications by High Street Courtice Inc. to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 442 unit residential development along Courtice Main Street Resolution #PD -027-17 Moved by Councillor Cooke, seconded by Councillor Traill That Report PSD -009-17 be received; That the applications submitted by High Street Courtice Inc. for a Clarington Official Plan Amendment (COPA2016-0004) and Rezoning (ZBA2016-0024) continue to be processed including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -009-17 and any delegations be advised RI mi R[1EFL0V[G+MR1111 Carried 12.3 PSD -011-17 Year End Planning Applications Resolution #PD -028-17 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Cooke That Report PSD -011-17 be received for information. Carried Councillor Traill left the meeting at 10:20 PM. 13 New Business -]Consideration There were no New Business Item to be considered under this Section of the Agenda. 14 Unfinished Business None - 11 - Clarbgtoa 15 Confidential Reports Planning and Development Committee Minutes January 30, 2017 15.1 PSD -010-17 Disposal of 72 1/2 Scugog Street, Bowmanville Resolution #PD -029-17 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper That Confidential Report PSD -010-17 be received; That the sale of 72 1/2 Scugog Street to Kerry Property Management Ltd. be approved on the terms and conditions set out in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale (Attachment 1 to Report PSD -010-17); That all expenses incurred and paid out of the Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund to clean up the property be reimbursed from the sale proceeds; That the balance of the sale proceeds be deposited into the Municipal Acquisition Reserve minus the proportionate share owed to the Region and School Boards as per the Municipal Act, 2001 s.353; and That all interested parties listed in Confidential Report PSD -010-17 be advised of Council's decision by the Department. Carried 16 Adjournment Resolution #PD -030-17 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Cooke That the meeting adjourn at 10:25 PM. [a] TIM Carried -12- Deputy Clerk