HomeMy WebLinkAbout74-59REPORT N0,3
RETAIL POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
I have read Mr. Layng's report attached hereto, and I concur with his
recommendations subject to the following modifications:
lA Rather than asking each applicant to undertake his own market study,
each applicant for a major shopping centre should be required to con-
tribute in advance to the cost of the proposed retail potential ana-
lysis when the appropriate time comes to consider that aspect of the
District Plan (le, when future population distributions have been
determined), There is no point in each shopping; centre applicant
carrying out his own partisan study using different methods and no
doubt, coming to different conclusions. That would only add to the
confusion of the situation and would probably not serve the Town's
purposes very well. The municipality has already established a
policy that where consultant's reports are required in the processing
of any application, the consultant is retained by the Town at the
applicants expense. I see no reason to treat the shopping centre
applications we are presently receiving any differently in this regard,
2. The Shopping Habit Survey recommended by Mr. Layng would provide very
useful input into the overall of a type which is often not included
in such market studies. I recommend that it should be done as soon
as possible while we have student assistance available on staff and
should include a survey of shopping habits within the municipality as
well as expenditures outside the Town's boundaries.
hespect.fully submitted,
"'
,;'George Fa Howden,
Planning Director,
Report #3 to the Members of the
Planning Advisory Committee
Town of Newcastle
from: JOHN LAYNG, Planning Consultant
July 16, 1974
RE: RETAIL POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
This Report results from the listing of local, existing
material available for an analysis of potential retail sales
as directed by the Planning Advisory Committee on June 24th,
1974, in response to applications for eight shopping centres
in the Town of Newcastle. This material is identified with
the following sources: OAPADS: COJPB: Official Plan of
the Oshawa Planning Area; four Official Plan texts of the
four former municipalities of the Town of Newcastle;
Ministry of Treasury, Economics and Intergovernmental
Affairs, Report on Shopping Centre Decisions, Bowmanville
Retail Commercial Area Study, Simpson Avenue 6 King Street
proposal critique by COJPB; Durham Mall proposal; and
Bowbrook Square proposal.
THE OSHA14A AREA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STUDY (OAPADS)
commissioned several reports by a consortium of planning
consultants. From 10 reports seen, the following 4 have
an application as background material for general
population and economic projections in this area:
(1) Final Appraisal, March 1969 6 May 1970
Bowmanville, Darlington, Clarke
Economic Base Component III• -4.
(2) Appendix to Final Appraasal
Economic Base Component, March 1969
Items El to E39.
2.
(3) A Discussion of Development of Regional Government
Population and Economic Growth
Population Projects 11-7 - May 1970
(4) Preliminary Evaluation of Development, August 1970
Population and Economic Growth
The Central Ontario Joint Planning Board (COJPB) in March,
1972 published a RETAIL AND PERSONAL SERVICE INVENTORY OF
SHOPPING CENTRES AND STRIP DEVELOPMENTS in the Central
Ontario Joint Planning Area. The component municipalities
of the COJPA were: Oshawa, Bowmanville, Whitby, East Whitby
and Darlington.
Besides an Introduction, Source 8 Methods, Classification of
Types of Business, and Definitions, this Report has the
following comparative tables which apply to the former Town
of Bowmanville and Township of Darlington:
1. Total Retail & Personal Service Floor Area Space
1A. Retail Floor Space by Municipality
1B. Personal Service Floor Space by Municipality
2. Ratios of Retail & Personal Service Floor Space to Pop.
3. Summary Statistics - Retail 8 Personal Service
6. Vacant Stores by Municipality
7. Summary Statistics - Strip Retail Areas
8. Floor Space by Strip Retail Area
11. BOWMANVILLE: Retail 8 Personal Service Establishments
12. DARLINGTON: Retail 8 Personal Service Establishments
14. Number of Retail 6 Personal Service Establishments by
Municipality and Functional Classification
15. Commercial Inventory Functional Classification
This Report has also Figure 1, a Map showing Retail 8
Personal Floor Space by Basic Planning Units for the whole
of the COJPA; and Figure 2, a Map showing each vacant store
throughout the COJPA.
3.
This COJPB report and inventory is useful because it is
recent and because it goes into considerable detail about
the greater part of the commercial retail outlets of the
Town of Newcastle. It is not a complete retail potential
analysis.
THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE OSHAWA PLANNING AREA includes, on
pages 11 to 18, inclusive, and on page 26, a comprehensive
statement on the definitions, analysis and planning policies
for the commercial structure of Oshawa. This is a relevant
document for the Town of Newcastle in that it establishes
commercial growth policies which effect the whole Region of
Durham, and beyond, before demand.
Destructive competition is prevented, in Oshawa, by the
requirement of a market feasability study for each proposed
commercial development in relation to the market support
required for existing commercial areas. This protection
should now extend to other parts of the Regional Municipality
of Durham.
The 4 OFFICIAL PLAN TEXTS of the 4 former municipalities of
The Town of Newcastle each noted the status of retail trade,
and each had policy statements for commercial development.
The Village of Newcastle and the Town of Bowmanville were
the most specific in stating the projected requirements of
retail acreage and floor space. Bowmanville amplified its
general policy by stating, page 16, 5(a), the intention that
the Central Area continue to be the dominant commercial area
of the Town.
0
4.
The Ministry of Treasury, Economics and Intergovernmental
Affairs published in 1971 and 1973 a REPORT ON SHOPPING
CENTRE DECISIONS: EVALUATION GUIDES by Robert W. McCabe, a
planning consultant who has had considerable experience in
retail location. This Report is currently applicable as a
source for definitions, the impact of suburban shopping
centres on the CBD, conflicts, risks and methods of trade
area analysis. It is not specific enough to be a complete
reference for conducting a thorough retail potential analysis,
but, it does have a considerable bibliography on the subject;
and it can be used to interpret and evaluate material
submitted in support of proposed retail development.
THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL AREA STUDY, now being carried out in
the Central Business District (CBD) of Bowmanville by Robert
Greno and John Simpson, as part of their summer work for the
Planning Advisory Committee, is accumulating and
recording information on population projections, retail
floor areas, types of merchandising, parking facilities,
building conditions, land use, office space, employment
totals, owner - tenant ratios, length of occupancy, and CBD
merchants' opinions on retail problems in Bowmanville.
Some of this material will parallel, but not repeat, the
COJPB inventory in 1972. It will be most valuable in being
current, in using different means of measurement, in
extending the items for analysis and in comparing actual
to projected population growth. It can be used in any
Retail Potential Analysis as a required inventory.
5.
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTRE, SIMPSON AVENUE AND KING STREET,
BOWMANVILLE by D. M. Consultants Ltd., presented to the
Bowmanville Planning Board on June 13, 1973, was the subject
of a commissioned critique by the COJPB staff in August, 1973.
The major questions and reservations on the Report of the
developer's consultant were: excessive gross leasable floor
area; damaging competition to the Central Business District-
inaccurate designation of primary and secondary trade areas;
over - optimistic population projections, unrealistic income
levels; overestimated expenditure projections; and
grossly exaggerated market potential. This critique by
the COJPB staff is an example of the necessity to probe
shopping centre proposals thoroughly to offset the promotional
enthusiasm which disregards the impact on existing retail
stores in this Municipality.
Western Auto Parts Limited submitted a report by I. F.
MaeNaughton, Planning; Consultants, dated September 21, 1973
to the Planning Board, of the then Town of Bowmanville
presenting proposals for a community shopping facility
called DURHAM MALL. The site would be between the Base
Lane Road and Highway 401, east of Waverley Road. The
shopping centre growth would be proportioned to the
population growth of the Bowmanville area and have as its
initial major tennant a food supermarket. This Report is
not a retail potential analysis in any mathematical sense,
but a studied observation of present conditions and
restrictions and of future possibilities.
6.
It does not provide any new specific data which would assist
the Municipality in a decision for the approval of any
shopping centre at any location in the Town of Newcastle.
Geoffrey Still Associates, a division of A. E. LePage Ltd.,
Realtor, presented on October 10, 1973 to the Bowmanville
Planning Board a proposal for a shopping centre west of the
Waverley Road between the Base Line Road and Highway 401 on
34 acres of the lands of the Brookdale.•Kingsway Nurseries.
A revised presentation dated Play, 1974 calls this proposed
shopping centre BOWBROOK SQUARE. The Market Study for the
Potential Retail Commercial Development was prepared by
Henry W. Joseph, Director of Research on Planning for
Geoffrey Still Associates.
This is a serious market study using: trade area population
forecasts to 1986, estimated sales potential from income
levels and retail expenditures in the trade area, division
of retail expenditures into 7 categories of merchandise,
and the resultant estimated gross leasable floor areas. It
cannot be entirely accurate because it assumes some unknown
data.
Table 8 of the report lists the market shares of department
store merchandise (DSTM) to the Boxmlanville Central Business
District (CBD), to Oshawa, and to the proposed shopping
centre site. (40:24:36). These are estimated proportions
and, since they are critical, should be verified and extended
to Food Store Expenditures. This information is vital not
7.
only to Bowmanville but to all the surrounding hamlets and
villages in the Town of Newcastle whose stores must be kept
operative as an essential service to local customers.
CONCLUSIONS: In recognition of the facts that neither this
Municipality nor the Regional Municipality of Durham has
progressed very far in the District Plan and the Official
Plan, and from the foregoing items of information
investigated to measure the extent of a RETAIL POTENTIAL
ANALYSIS needed for the Town of Newcastle it must be
concluded that a complete analysis now would be premature.
All the elements of land use, transportation systems,
population growth, housing policies, industrial growth,
etc. besides market factors have to be considered and
decided upon before accurate recommendations could be made
or supported on the place and size of any shopping centre.
For a current evaluation of shopping centre proposals, the
single significant calculation is the proportion (possibly
500) of the total retail expenditures lost by the Town of
Newcastle to the City of Oshawa.
The developers claim that this loss is the major reason for
a new shopping centre in Bowmanville and that the benefits
of capturing a substantial portion of this lost trade would
minimize the negative impact of a new shopping centre on the
central business district (CBD). This statement would be
more valid if the true impact could be calculated.
It may be advisable to conduct, or to have conducted before
the end of August, a shopping habit survey, at about 500
households to find out the actual proportion and kinds of
expenditures within and outside of the Municipality.
The other fact to be considered is that if a proposed
shopping centre were not large enough to have a reputable
department store of some size, and other units; to
complement rather than to compete with the CBD on Kind;
Street, then such a shopping centre would not benefit the
people of the Town of Newcastle. The danger of a centre
large enough to provide these qualifications is, of course,
that it would likely equal in gross leasable area that of
the present CBD, and be detrimental to the upgrading of the
CBD.
In each case the applicant for a new shopping centre should
be required to submit a serious market study based upon
criteria established by the tunicipality, so that he will
realize the actual prospects rather than speculate, and so
that the municipality can compare such studies with its own
position.
By the end of 1974, more data on the District Plan, including
the extent and locations of HOUSING ACTION, will be available,
and at that time it should be evident what kind of RETAIL
POTENTIAL ANALYSIS should be done. The Fork Program of the
District Official Plan stated that a commercial land need
study would be made in the final Phase V of the Program.
91
R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S;
(1) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT any general Retail Potential
Analysis be deferred until the District Plan is far enough
advanced to provide essential data and to determine the
extent of such analysis.
(2) IT IS RECOMMENDFD THAT the final District Plan incorporate
a comprehensive Retail Potential Analysis adequate to establish
a policy for the appraisal of shopping centre proposals.
(3) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT each applicant for a shopping
centre be required to submit a market study based upon criteria
to be determined by the Municipality.
(4) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT a Shopping Habit Survey of about
500 households throughout the Town of Newcastle be considered
to determine what proportion and kinds of retail expenditures
are made outside of the Municipality.
Respectfully submitted,
JOHN LAYNG
PLANYING CONSULTANT
R.R. 1, ORONO
416- •786 - -2955