HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-56-95THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
DN: COFA.GPA
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File # 10 L'2' 25 ; Ll 6, `°
f
Date: Monday, June 5, 1995 Res.
Report #: PD -56 -95 File #: A95/009, A95/018 & A95/019 By-law #
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF MAY 25, 1995
FILES: A95/0091 A95/018 & A95/019
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -56 -95 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment made on May 25, 1995 save and except A95/009; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario
Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
1.1 In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990,
all applications received by the Municipality for minor
variance are scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being
received by the Secretary Treasurer. The Committee heard
three (3) applications at the May 26, 1995 meeting APPROVING
all three.
1.2 Details of each application and the Committee of Adjustment
decisions are included in the attachments. Application
A95/009 was tabled from an earlier meeting to allow the
applicant to revise the application.
1.3 A95/009 originally requested a variance from the by -law to
permit the construction of an accessory building 109.3 m2
(1176 sq. ft.). Existing accessory structures brought the
...2
X22
REPORT NO.: PD -56 -95 PAGE 2
total floor area of accessory structures to 123 m2 1320 (sq.
ft.) or 106% of the total floor area of the house. The By -law
permits 40% coverage for all accessory structures.
1.4 The applicant reduced the floor area of the accessory
structure to 99 m2 (1064 sq. ft.) for the June 5, 1995
meeting. The Committee of Adjustment approved the revised
application, although Staff did not support the application.
Given the nature of the variance, the fact no neighbouring
land owners have to date spoken in objection to the
application and the time and expense of an Ontario Municipal
Board appeal, Staff do not recommend appealing the Committee's
decision.
1.5 Staff have reviewed the balance of the Committee's decision
with respect to the above- referenced applications and are
satisfied that they conform to the general intent of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By -law.
1.6 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment
decisions is required in order to afford Staff's official
status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an
appeal of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted,
T
t,
co,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning
and Development
CP *FW *cc
*Attach.
26 May 1995
5
Reviewed by,
e d
W. H. Stockwell
Chief Administrative
officer
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A95/009
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: GRAHAM & CATHY HILL
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
2918 SOLINA RD., BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT: 25 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: RC & A
HEARING DATE: 25- May -95
APPEAL DATE: 24- Jun -95
DECISION:
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WHICH
WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REQUIREMENT OF 40% OF THE MAIN
BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS REVISED TO CONSTRUCT A 1064
SQUARE FOOD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
524
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLALINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NUMBER: A95/018
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: BARBARA CLARK
AGENT:
PERIODIC REPORT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
1075 TOWNLINE RD. N.
PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 4
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: A & EP
HEARING DATE: 25- May -95
APPEAL DATE: 24- Jun -95
DECISION:
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WHICH
WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REQUIREMENT OF 40% OF THE MAIN
BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND SITING THE
STRUCTURE AT MINIMUM OF 3 METRES FROM THE EP BOUNDARY.
525
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NUMBER: A95/019
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: JEAN H. CHAPPLE
AGENT:
PERIODIC REPORT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
14 PARKWAY ORES., BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT: 10 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE: 25- May -95
APPEAL DATE: 24- Jun -95
DECISION:
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WHICH
WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REQUIREMENT OF 40% OF THE MAIN
BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA
REASON FOR DECISION:
AS THE APPLICATION IS IN KEEPING WITH THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND THE
ZONING BY -LAW, IS CONSIDERED MINOR IN NATURE AND NOT TO HAVE A
DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBOURHOOD, THE APPL. BE
APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR, WITH THE ADDITION OF EXIST. SHED.
526