HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-86-86TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT
MEETING: THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE: OCTOBER 20, 1986.
REPORT #: WD -86 -86 FILE #:
SU&ECT :
File # _
Res_ #e,
By -Law #
TRAFFIC CONTROLS - INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET & TEMPERANCE STREETS
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended:
1. That Report WD -86 -86 be received; and,
2. That the stop controls at the intersection of Church Street and
Temperance Street be reversed from Church Street to Temperance Street;
and,
3. That the painted arrows on the Church Street approach lanes be
removed; and,
4. That the curbing on the northeast and southwest corners be altered to
eliminate jogs; and,
5. That the operation of the Church Street /Temperance Street intersection
be monitored after completion of the new Administration Building
construction to re- evaluate the warrants for traffic control signals.
...2
Page 2
Report No. WD -86 -86
The safety associated with the traffic movements through the Church
Street /Temperance Street intersection has been questioned by the public,
Town staff, and some Members of Council for some time.
Staff have recently reviewed the traffic volumes, collision history, sight
lines and physical aspects of the intersection with the Region of Durham
Traffic Section. The results of our review are summarized in the September
25, 1986 letter from Mr. M.R. Bellamy of the Region of Durham (see
attached). The recommendations presented in this report are intended to
improve the safe operation of the intersection.
It is noted that if the direction of control is to be changed, a Four -Way
stop will be required for a period of three months. At the end of the three
month period, the stop signs on Church Street would be removed creating
through traffic in an east -west direction through the intersection.
Respectfully submitted,
Gordon J. Ough, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works.
GJ 0 : j co t
October 14, 1986. _.
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
Works Department
Box 623 The Corporation of the Town of Newcastle
105 Consumers Dr.
Whitby, Ontario Public Works Department
Canada, L1N6A3 Hampton, Ontario
(416) 668 -7721 LOB 1J O
W.A.TWELVETREES,P.Eng. Attention: Mr. G. Ough, P. Eng.
Commissioner of Works Director of Public Works
Please quote our ref:
Dear Sir:
TRA -GEN Re: Intersection of Church St. & Temperance St., Bowmanville
We recently completed a review of traffic operations at the
intersection of Church and Temperance Streets as requested by
the Town some time ago.
Our review included analysis of traffic count.data supplied by
the Town, a review of collision reports for the past five
years, traffic control signal warrant calculations and field
observations. The following is a summary of our findings:
Existing Conditions
The intersection is controlled by Stop signs for east -west
traffic on Church St. Church St. is 4 lanes -wide with parking
permitted on both sides of the road west of the intersection
and no parking on either side of the road east of the
intersection. The two westbound approach lanes are marked; one
for through and right turns, the other for through and left
turns. Of the two eastbound approach lanes, only the short
curb lane is marked for right turns only.
Temperance St. is the Through street. South of the
intersection it provides one traffic lane in each direction and
a parking lane on each side. To the north of the intersection
the street is wide enough for 2 lanes of traffic and parking on
the east side only.
...2
t6 r
-2-
With the exception of the 15 minute parking on the east side of
Temperance St., in front of the Post Office, all other
permitted parking is controlled by meters.
Traffic Volumes
A manual traffic count was conducted on Friday, October 25,
1985. All vehicle and pedestrian movements were recorded for
the peak 9 1/2 hours between 7:30 A.M. and 7:30 P.M. The most
significant feature of this data is that 61% of the
intersection traffic enters from Church St. compared to 39% on
Temperance St. It is obvious therefore, that the Stop signs
are on the major street and the minor street has the "through"
status.
During the 9 1/2 hours counted, 495 pedestrians crossed
Temperance St. and 676 pedestrians crossed Church St. In this
instance having the Stop control on Church St. does accommodate
the majority of pedestrians.
Collisions
Collision records provided by the Town can be summarized as
follows:
NUMBER OF RIGHT
YEAR TOTAL COLLISIONS ANGLE COLLISIONS
1982 1 5
1983 5
1984 4 3
1985 3 0
1986 (to Aug.) 2 2
Average Per Year 3 2
The number of right angle collisions is an important
consideration because this is the type of collision that can be
reduced by the installation of traffic signals. The
installation of traffic signals however can result in an
increased number of other types of collisions, e.g. rear end.
In this case, an average of 2 right angle collisions per year
does not signify a serious problem.
...3
- 3 -
Traffic Signal Warrants
Traffic signal warrants, as established by the Ministry of
Transportation and Communications, consider intersection
volumes, delay and collisions. Conditions at the intersection
of Church and Temperance Streets do not satisfy any of these
warrants.
Observations
An eastbound motorist at the Stop sign has his visibility to
the south restricted by parked vehicles. A westbound motorist
at the Stop sign has inadequate visibility, both north and
south, when parking spaces are occupied on the east side of
Temperance St. We were not able to determine if restricted
sight was a contributing factor in the intersection
collisions.
The curb radii on the northeast and southwest corners have an
irregular shape which may hamper smooth eastbound and westbound
right turns.
Recommendations
1. Reverse the Stop control from Church St. to Temperance
Street. Putting the control on the minor street will
reduce intersection delay. In addition, the sight problems
will be minimized without the removal of curb parking.
Four -way Stop control was considered but the severity of
the collision problem does not justify such a stringent
control method.
i
If the direction of control is to be changed, a 4 -way Stop
will be required for an interim familiarization period of 2
- 3 months.
2. Remove the painted arrows from the Church St. approach
lanes.
3. Replace the curbing on the northeast and southwest corners
to elimiate the jogs.
4. Recount the intersection traffic in 1987 to determine what,
if any, growth there has been. Collisions should also be
monitored. With this information, traffic control signal
warrants can be checked again.
V (0'
4
If any of the above requires further explanation, please call
me.
Yours truly,
1'1." . -- . . ,.✓
Traffic Supervisor
/rd
cc: D. McMullen