HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-03-14 AgendaClar*wn
Council
Post -Meeting Agenda
Date: March 14, 2022
Time: 6:30 p.m.
Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of the Public (MS
Teams)
Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for
accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Michelle Chambers,
Administrative Assistant to the Clerk, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2101 or by email at
mchambers@clarington.net.
Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
AudioNideo Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio and video record of Council
meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a Council meeting, the Municipality will be
recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality's
website, www.clarington.net/calendar.
Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or
placed on non -audible mode during the meeting.
Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net
*Late Item added or a change to an existing item after the Agenda was published.
Pages
1. Call to Order
2. Moment of Reflection
3. Land Acknowledgement Statement
4. Declaration of Interest
5. Announcements
6. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
6.1. Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated February 14, 2022 5
7. Presentations / Delegations
7.1. Linda Gasser, Regarding Item 8.1, Report PDS-016-22 Update and Next 21
Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham York Energy Centre
Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
7.2. Wendy Bracken, Regarding Item 8.1, Report PDS-016-22 Update and 31
Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham York Energy Centre
Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
8. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations
8.1. PDS-016-22 Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the 45
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to
160,000 Tonnes per Year
*8.1.1. Gioseph Anello, M. Eng., P.Eng., PMP, Director, Waste 57
Management Services, and Laura McDowell, P.Eng., Director,
Environmental Promotion and Protection, Regarding DYEC
Throughput Increase Response to the Municipality of
Clarington's Comments
9. Consideration of Minutes
9.1. Advisory Committee Minutes
9.1.1. Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated February 78
10, 2022
Page 2
9.1.2. Minutes of the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Management 82
Advisory Committee dated February 8, 2022
9.1.3. Minutes of the Newcastle Arena Board dated February 8, 2022 86
9.1.4. Minutes of the Accessibility Advisory Committee dated February 88
2, 2022
9.1.5. Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee dated February 93
15, 2022
9.1.6. Minutes of the Clarington Active Transportation and Safe Roads 99
Advisory Committee dated March 2, 2022
9.2. Standing Committee Minutes
9.2.1. Minutes of the General Government Committee dated February 105
28, 2022
9.2.2. Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee dated 121
March 7, 2022
10. Communications
11. Staff Reports and Staff Memos
*11.1. Memo-012-22 Connection to Farewell Creek Trail across 43 Darlington 133
Boulevard
(Second Last Paragraph has been Updated)
12. Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion
13. Unfinished Business
14. Confidential Items
14.1. Verbal Update from Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative
Services/Municipal Solicitor, and Rosalind Cooper, Specialist in
Environmental Law, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Regarding the
Anaerobic Digestor
Page 3
15. By-laws
15.1. 2022-012 - Being a By-law to establish lay out and dedicate certain
lands as public highways, to assume certain streets within the
Municipality of Clarington as public highways in the Municipality of
Clarington, and to name them
(Item 8.1.1 of the General Government Committee Minutes)
15.2. 2022-013 - Being a By-law to establish lay out and dedicate certain
lands as public highways, to assume certain streets within the
Municipality of Clarington as public highways in the Municipality of
Clarington, and to name them
(Item 8.1.2 of the General Government Committee Minutes)
15.3. 2022-014 - Being a By-law to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, the
Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington
(Item 9.1 of the Planning and Development Committee Minutes)
15.4. 2022-015 - Being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive
Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
(Item 9.2 of the Planning and Development Committee Minutes)
15.5. 2022-016 - Being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive
Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
(Item 9.5 of the Planning and Development Committee Minutes)
16. Procedural Notices of Motion
16.1. Tennis Courts (Councillor Neal) 136
17. Questions to Department Heads / Request for Staff Report(s)
18. Confirming By -Law
19. Adjournment
Page 4
•
Cbrington
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Council Minutes
Date: February 14, 2022
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of
the Public (MS Teams)
Members Present: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper,
Councillor J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill,
Councillor M. Zwart
Staff Present: M. Dempster, G. Acorn, S. Brake, R. Maciver, T. Pinn, R. Windle,
M. Perini, J. Gallagher, M. Chambers
1. Call to Order
Mayor Foster called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
2. Moment of Reflection
Councillor Jones led the meeting in a moment of reflection.
3. Land Acknowledgement Statement
Councillor Jones recited the Land Acknowledgement Statement.
4. Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at the meeting.
5. Announcements
Members of Council announced upcoming community events and matters of
community interest.
6. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meetings
6.1 Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated January 24, 2022
6.2 Minutes of the special meeting of Council dated January 28, 2022
Resolution # C-032-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the minutes of a regular meeting dated January 24, 2022, be approved; and
That the minutes of a special meeting dated January 28, 2022, be approved.
Carried
Page 5
ClaringtonFebruary 14, 2022
Council Minutes
7. Presentations / Delegations
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-033-22
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to add Wendy Bracken as a delegation
to the Agenda regarding Agenda Item 9.2.3.1.
Carried
Wendy Bracken's delegation was heard following Item 9.1.6.1, later in the meeting.
8. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations
9. Consideration of Minutes
9.1 Advisory Committee Minutes
9.1.2 Minutes of the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Management Advisory Committee
dated January 11, 2022
9.1.3 Minutes of the Newcastle Arena Board dated January 11, 2022
9.1.4 Minutes of the Clarington Diversity Advisory Committee dated January 27,
2022
9.1.5 Minutes of the Heritage Committee dated January 18, 2022
Resolution # CC-034-22
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Advisory Committee Report Items 9.1.1 to 9.1.6, be approved with the
exception of Items 9.1.1. & 9.1.6.
Carried
9.1.1 Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated January 13, 2022
Resolution # C-035-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated January 13, 2022,
be approved.
Carried
2
Page 6
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
9.1.6 Minutes of the Accessibility Advisory Committee dated December 1, 2021,
January 12 and February 2, 2022
Resolution # C-036-22
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the Minutes of the Accessibility Advisory Committee dated December 1, 2021,
January 12 and February 2, 2022, be approved.
Carried
9.1.6.1 Motion for Inclusive Communities Grant Program Submission
Resolution # C-037-22
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Neal
Whereas the Municipality of Clarington engages with its Accessibility Advisory
Committee on matters surrounding accessibility in the community;
And whereas on November 6, 2017, through Resolution #GG-456-17, the
Municipality of Clarington endorsed Clarington's Multi -Year Accessibility Plan 2018-
2023;
And whereas the Multi -Year Accessibility Plan 2018-2023 commits the Municipality
to exploring ways to increase accessibility beyond the minimum requirements of the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA);
And whereas more people are participating in outdoor activities as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic and utilizing open public spaces;
And whereas sensory gardens provide a unique experience for both people with
disabilities and seniors to explore their senses through outdoor spaces;
And whereas the Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility has launched an Inclusive
Communities Grant Program that supports 100% of eligible costs up to $60,000 for
programs that create more accessible environments for people of all ages, abilities
and backgrounds;
Now therefore be it resolved that the Council of the Municipality of Clarington direct
Staff to submit an application to the Inclusive Communities Grant Program for the
purpose of creating an accessible sensory garden on the outdoor grounds of the
Sarah Jane Williams Heritage Centre and the Shaw House Properties.
Carried
3
Page 7
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
7.1 Wendy Bracken regarding Item 9.2.3.1 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal
Comments on the Durham York Energy Throughput Increase from 140,000 to
160,000 Tonnes per Year (PDS-008-22)
Wendy Bracken was present regarding Item 9.2.3.1 - Update and Next Steps:
Municipal Comments on the Durham York Energy Throughput Increase from
140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year (PDS-008-22). W. Bracken stated that the
staff recommendations contained in the report should be strengthened with
additions. The following points were highlighted:
• Important to Incorporate Dillon Slide Recommendations into Body of
Consolidated Report In addition to Providing PowerPoint
• Inconsistencies Between Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) and March
2011 Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modeling (ESDM) That Supports
Environment Compliance Approval (ECA)
• Regions' Air Impact Study (AQIA) is Inadequate "Low Bar": AQIA is NOT a
Health Assessment
• Air Quality/Health Concerns Found/Registered at time of Environmental
Assessment (EA)
• Health Concerns Found/Registered at time of EA
• Ministry Toxicologist Comments on EA Limited To 140,000 TPA
• Numerous Ambient Air Exceedances for Respiratory Irritants; Also one for
Dioxins/Furans
• AQIA Shows Elevated Levels of Respiratory Irritants
Resolution # C-038-22
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow the delegation of Wendy
Bracken to be extended for an additional five minutes.
Carried
Wendy Bracken continued by highlighting the following points:
• Excerpts From Host Community Agreement: Time to Act is NOW For Better
Available Control Technology (BACT), Better Monitoring & Reporting
• Clarington Must Ask for BACT, Improved Emission Limits, Monitoring, Reporting
Wendy concluded by making the following requests of the Members of Council:
1. Pursue the Flow Error. Point to Dillon Slides In Staff Comment.
2. Pursue Implications to 2011 ESDM, ECA Air Permit, Source Tests.
0
am:
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
3. Request Regions to provide updated health assessment, toxicologist and
medical opinions on proposal. Only have engineering opinions now.
4. Pursue better monitoring and reporting, including for AMESA.
Wendy Bracken answered questions from the Members of Council.
Alter the Agenda
Resolution # C-039-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the Agenda be altered to consider Item 9.2.3.1, at this time.
Carried
Item 9.2.3.1 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham
York Energy Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
(PDS-008-22)
Resolution # C-040-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PDS-008-22 be received;
That Report PDS-008-22, including the consolidated list of requests recommended
in Attachment 4 of PDS-008-22 and the February 7, 2022 presentation by Dillon
Consulting, be adopted as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the
Durham York Energy Centre throughput increase (from 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes
per year) Environmental Screening Process;
That Staff be directed to continue discussions with the Region of Durham and
Region of York to address the Municipality's comments for the purpose of resolving
concerns prior to March 14, 2022;
That the Municipality's comments and notice of the agreement with the Region to
continue the discussions be submitted to the Director of the Environmental
Assessment and Approvals Branch;
That Staff report back at the March 14, 2022 Council meeting; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-008-22 and any delegations be
advised of this report.
Carried as Amended, see following motions
5
Page 9
ClaringtonFebruary 14, 2022
Council Minutes
Resolution # C-041-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the foregoing Resolution #C-040-22 be amended with the following changes to
Recommendation #6 of Attachment 4 to Report PDS-008-22:
That "250,000 tonnes" be changed to "160,000 tonnes"; and
That the HHERA include the south Clarington airshed as a whole, and
include a toxicological assessment and a satisfactory opinion from the
Medical Officer of Health for Durham Region.
That the following be inserted after the words" nitrogen dioxide" in
Recommendation #7 of Attachment 4 to Report PDS-008-22:
"sulfur dioxide and benzopyrene"
Carried
The foregoing Resolution #C-040-22 was then put a vote and carried as amended.
9. Consideration of Minutes
9.2 Standing Committee Minutes
9.2.1 Minutes of the Special General Government Committee dated January 28,
2022
Resolution # C-042-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the recommendations contained in the Special General Government
Committee Minutes of January 28, 2022 be approved on consent.
Carried
9.2.2 Minutes of the Special General Government Committee dated January 31 and
continuing on February 4, 2022
Resolution # C-043-22
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the recommendations contained in the Special General Government
Committee Minutes of January 31, 2022 and continuing on February 4, 2022 be
approved on consent, with the exception of Item 7.2, the budget resolution, which
was amended as per the following resolutions.
Carried
n
Page 10
ClaringtonFebruary 14, 2022
Council Minutes
Item 7.2 FSD-008-22 - 2022 Operating and Capital Budgets
Recess
Resolution # C-044-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Council recess for 10 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 11:10 a.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
9.2.2.1 Memo-007-22 - Whistle Cessation Update & Remainder of Whistle
Cessation Process — Cobbledick Road & Bennett Road
Resolution # C-045-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Memo-007-22 - Whistle Cessation Update & Remainder of Whistle Cessation
Process — Cobbledick Road & Bennett Road, be received for information.
Carried
9.2.2.2 Memo-008-22 - Questions Arising from 2022 Budget Deliberations
Resolution # C-046-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Memo-008-22 - Questions Arising from 2022 Budget Deliberations, be
received for information.
Carried
9.2.2.3 PDS-009-22 - - Cost of Courtice Shores Drive Tunnel
Item (p) -Minutes of the Special General Government Committee dated
January 31 and continuing on February 4, 2022
Resolution # C-047-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
Whereas the Courtice Waterfront is currently undergoing a secondary plan which
will enable future residential development in the area;
And whereas the Courtice Shores Drive grade crossing would represent an
ingress/egress point to that development for emergency services and residents of
the area;
7
Page 11
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
And whereas the Council of the Municipality of Clarington deems the expansion of
the Courtice Shores Drive crossing to be growth -related and intended to be funded
by Development Charges;
Now therefore be it resolved:
That Staff be directed to amend the Development Charge Study, at the
appropriate time, to include the Courtice Shores Drive grade crossing
improvements; and
That the 2022 Capital Budget be amended to add the Courtice Shores Drive
Grade Crossing Improvements in the amount of $7,000,000 to be funded
from Development Charges — Roads and Related.
Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones,
Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart
Carried on a recorded vote (7 to 0)
9.2.2.4 Report FSD-012-22 - Update for Council Budget Ratification
Meeting
Resolution # C-048-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report FSD-012-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the 2022 Operating Budget be amended to reduce the grant to the John
Howard Society (Firehouse Youth) by $58,699 to $289,841; and
That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-012-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried as Amended, see following motions
Resolution # C-049-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the foregoing Resolution #C-048-22 be amended and added as follows:
That the words "and funded from the Streamline Development Approval
Fund if Clarington receives the funds." be deleted from the following
resolution:
That the staffing requests, for the Planning and Development Services
Department, to add a Clerk II and an additional Senior Planner in the
Development Review Division be approved and funded from the
Streamline Development Approval Fund if Clarington receives the
funds.
n.
Page 12
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
Yes (6): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones,
Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart
No (1): Councillor Neal
Carried on a recorded vote (6 to 1)
The foregoing Resolution #C-048-22 was then put a vote and carried as amended.
Item (q) - Minutes of the Special General Government Committee dated
January 31 and continuing on February 4, 2022
Resolution # C-050-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the budget for Materials and Supplies for Street Lighting be reduced by
$80,000; and
That the budget for Contracted Services for Street Lighting be reduced by $20,000.
Carried
9.2.2.5 Item 7.2 - 2022 Operating and Capital Budgets - Main Motion As
Amended
Resolution # C-051-22
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report FSD-008-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That Council approves the 2022 Operating and Capital Budgets, including "external
agencies" as outlined in the 2022 Draft Budget Book, at an estimated tax levy
impact of 2.11 per cent, exclusive of tax policy impacts, as directed in
FSD- 008- 22;
That the 2022 Draft Budget Book be amended to reflect the required tax levy
request from the Historic Downtown Bowmanville Business Improvement Area, and
that Council approves the 2022 Budget for the Bowmanville BIA outlined in Report
FSD-007-22;
That Staff request the 2022 budgets for the Orono BIA and the Newcastle BIA for
approval at a subsequent meeting prior to the striking of the tax rates;
That the reserve and reserve fund contributions and any new reserve/reserve funds
be approved as shown in the 2022 Draft Budget Book;
That the Draft Operating By-law be amended to increase Wages Temp FT
($25,000) and Wages Temp PT ($50,000) in the Municipal Elections sub -
department (100-19-193) with a corresponding increase in the transfer from the
Municipal Elections Reserve;
9
Page 13
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
That the financing of capital projects, as outlined in the 2022 Draft Budget Book, be
approved;
That $6,402,000 be added to the 2022 Capital Budget for Newcastle and Orono
arena improvements with funding from a proposed debenture, per Resolution
#GG- 012-22;
That any cash flow shortfall in the Development Charges Reserve Funds be interim
financed by the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund and General Municipal
Reserve Fund, to be repaid with interest, as cash flow permits;
That subject to Council approval of the Newcastle and Orono arena improvements,
per #GG-012-22, identified to be funded by debenture financing, that the Director of
Financial Services/Treasurer be authorized to make application to the Region of
Durham for the necessary debenture, such terms at the discretion of the Director of
Financial Services/Treasurer;
That Report FSD-008-22 be adopted by resolution in accordance with provisions of
Ontario Regulation 284/09 of the Municipal Act, 2001;
That the Director of Financial Services/Treasurer is authorized to fund projects
which have been previously approved in the 2018 to 2021 budgets and not
completed with funding to be from the appropriate reserve or reserve fund;
That the appropriate by-laws to levy the 2022 tax requirement for Municipal, Region
of Durham and Education purposes be forwarded to Council for approval, once final
tax policy information is available;
That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-008-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision;
That the amendments to the 2022 Operating and Capital Budgets be approved as
follows:
That the new staff positions be considered as "Additional Items for Council
Consideration", formerly the "B List";
That the 2022 Budget be amended to increase Supplemental Taxation to
$1,000,000;
That the Communications Division budget of the Office of the CAO (sub -department
170) be adjusted to remove $15,000 in revenue and reduce postage expense by
$900;
That the Municipal Election Revenue be adjusted from $4,000 to ($4,000), and the
corresponding adjustment of $8,000 be made in the transfer from the Municipal
Elections Reserve;
That the proposed net staffing impact in Legislative Services be reduced by
$35,100 and funded by the Municipal Election Reserve, the funding from the
reserve to be adjusted accordingly;
10
Page 14
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
That the Community Development (sub -department 427) Salaries, Wages and
Benefits be decreased by $50,834 to reflect a reduced need in Inclusion Services
part time wages;
That increase for Contracted Services for the printing of the Council Quarterly
Update, be a one-time only expense and that this be required to be approved by
Council for 2023 and beyond;
That the two Part -Time Municipal Law Enforcement positions and the Temporary
Clerk II position, be included in the 2022 Budget;
That the Human Resources Associate Position, be included in the 2022 Budget;
That the management vacancy (Supervisor, Client Application/Service) be
converted into a Solutions Analyst Position and a Support Technician Position;
That the Financial Analyst Position - Asset Management, be included in the 2022
Budget;
That the position of the Financial Analyst position for Asset Management — be time
limited to as long as OCIF funds it (or another Provincial or Federal funding source)
at which time, an extension would require Council approval.";
That the Director of Financial Services/Treasurer be authorized to transfer
$2,000,000 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund to be transferred to
reserve funds to be determined by the Director for the purposes of capital asset
replacement or non -development charge capital acquisition;
That the 2022 Capital Budget be amended to include $1,484,000 for Cobbledick Rd
railway crossing improvements including the $750,000 previously identified from the
Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund and $734,000 to be funded from the Road
Reserve Fund, if the funding request to Transport Canada is not approved;
Whereas, the Courtice Waterfront is currently undergoing a secondary plan which
will enable future residential development in the area;
And whereas, the Courtice Shores Drive grade crossing would represent an
ingress/egress point to that development for emergency services and residents of
the area;
And whereas, the Council of the Municipality of Clarington deems the expansion of
the Courtice Shores Drive crossing to be growth -related and intended to be funded
by Development Charges;
Now therefore be it resolved:
That Staff be directed to amend the Development Charge Study, at the appropriate
time, to include the Courtice Shores Drive grade crossing improvements; and
That the 2022 Capital Budget be amended to add the Courtice Shores Drive Grade
Crossing Improvements in the amount of $7,000,000 to be funded from
Development Charges — Roads and Related.
11
Page 15
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
That the budget for Materials and Supplies for Street Lighting be reduced by
$80,000; and
That the budget for Contracted Services for Street Lighting be reduced by $20,000;
That an additional $300,000 for Snow Clearing Equipment, to be financed through
the Tax Levy, be added to the 2022 Budget;
That the Utility Locates Technician position be included in the 2022 Budget;
That GIS and Asset Management Technologist position be included in the 2022
Budget;
That staff be directed to recruit the Public Works summer students;
That the Park, Material & Supplies, one-time cost of $98,400, for separating
concrete and steel at Depot 42, be deleted;
That the 2022 Budget be amended to include user fee revenue for Financial
Services in the amount of $200,000; and
That Staff be directed to bring the appropriate by-law to Council to reinstate the
user fees for "New Ownership Changes" ($30), "Arrears Notices" ($30), and
"Statements" ($10);
That, further to a previous resolution about the Municipality taking over the snow
plowing for hall/boards facilities, the Visual Arts Centre (VAC) 2022 budget be
reduced by the amount of snow plowing that the Municipality will be responsible for;
That Council amends the 2022 Capital Budget to include the construction of a
South Bowmanville Arena for a pool and twin pad arena, including a
gymnasium/walking track and associated administrative space (exclusive of a
library, wellness/fitness facility, and multi -purpose community space) to be built in a
single phase, to be debentured;
That $315,000 be added to the 2022 levy and be directed to the Community
Services Building Refurbishment Reserve Fund for the purpose of funding the
proposed facility; and
That the $315,000, added to the levy in 2021 and directed to the Community
Services Building Refurbishment Reserve Fund, be identified as a funding source
for the proposed South Bowmanville Arena;
That Facility Corp. Admin Travel be reduced by $3,400 to a total of $9,600;
That Facility Mtnce R/M Buildings be reduced by $6,150 to a total of $36,000;
That Facility ASC Waste Disposal be reduced by $1,510 to a total of $2,190; and
That Municipal Admin Centre, Waste Disposal be reduced by $1,660 to a total of
$2,140;
That the $23,927 for the Newcastle Hall Board be included in the budget from the
Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund;
12
Page 16
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
That the Customer Service Assistant Coordinator be upgraded to full time position
and included in the 2022 Budget;
That the Heritage Incentive Grant in the amount of $11,500 be included in the 2022
Budget and be funded through the Tax Levy;
That the 2022 Operating Budget be amended to add $120,000 to "Consulting in
Planning" for the purposes of expediting the Courtice Waterfront Design Study
identified in the 2020 Development Charges Background Study; and
That the abovementioned Study be funded from the Development Charges —
General Government Reserve Fund or, if not sufficient, that Staff work with local
developers on a front -ending agreement to fund the Study;
That the staffing requests, for the Planning and Development Services Department,
to add a Clerk II and an additional Senior Planner in the Development Review
Division be approved;
That the Plans Examiner Position and Building Inspector Position, be included in
the 2022 Budget;
That the annual contribution to the Fire Equipment Reserve fund be reduced by
$100,000 to a total of $400,000 annually;
That the four existing Class 1 Firefighters being promoted to the rank of Captain
and the four new Class 5 Firefighter positions, be included in the 2022 Budget;
That $150,000 of the total cost for the new positions and promotions be funded by
the Future Staffing Reserve Fund;
That the Training Officer position, be included in the 2022 Budget; and
That the 2022 Operating Budget be amended to reduce the grant to the John
Howard Society (Firehouse Youth) by $58,699 to $289,841.
Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones,
Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart
Carried as amended on a recorded vote (7 to 0)
The foregoing Resolution #C-051-21 was then put to a vote and carried as
amended on a recorded vote thus resulting in an estimated tax levy impact of 2.11
per cent and when blended with the Region of Durham an estimated tax levy impact
of 1.99 per cent.
9.2.3 Minutes of the Joint General Government and Planning and Development
Committees dated February 7, 2022
Resolution # C-052-22
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Neal
13
Page 17
ClaringtonFebruary 14, 2022
Council Minutes
That the recommendations contained in the Joint General Government and
Planning and Development Committees Minutes of February 7, 2022, be approved
on consent, with the exception of item 7.1 which was considered immediately
following the delegation portion of the agenda.
Carried
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-053-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting until 12:10 p.m.
Carried
9.2.3.1 - PDS-009-22 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the
Durham York Energy Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000
Tonnes per Year (PDS-008-22)
PDS-009-22 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham York
Energy Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year (PDS-008-
22) was considered earlier in the meeting, immediately following the delegation
portion of the agenda.
10. Communications
11. Staff Reports and Staff Memos
12. Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion
12.1 Reconsideration of Resolution #GG-127-21 regarding Tennis Courts and
Pickleball Courts
Councillor Neal chaired this portion of the meeting.
Resolution # C-054-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the following Resolution #GG-127-21 passed at the Special General
Government Committee meeting of February 1-2, 2021, approved at the February
8, 2021 Council meeting, be reconsidered:
That the expansion of the Stuart Park tennis courts for pickleball courts be
included in DC charges as directed by the Director of Financial Services; and
That Courtice Secondary School courts be included at the discretion of the
Director of Public Works of up to $50,000 to be financed by the Tax Rate
Stabilization Reserve Fund.
14
Page 18
Clarington
February 14, 2022
Council Minutes
Yes (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Traill,
and Councillor Zwart
No (2): Councillor Jones, and Councillor Neal
Carried (5 to 2)
Resolution # C-055-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the following resolution be approved to replace the first paragraph of
Resolution #GG-127-21, to give direction to Staff and time to tender the project:
That $150,000 be directed, at the discretion of the Director of Financial
Services, for the construction of two tennis courts at the South Courtice
Arena; and
That the Stuart Park refurbishment plan be amended to convert the existing
tennis courts to pickleball courts and that any surplus be directed to the cost
of the new tennis courts at the South Courtice Arena.
Yes (4): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, and Councillor
Zwa rt
No (3): Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill
Carried (4 to 3)
Mayor Foster assumed the Chair.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-056-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting to 12:15 p.m.
Carried
13. Unfinished Business
14. Confidential Items
14.1 Confidential Memo-001-22 -Questions Arising from 2022 Budget
Deliberations
Confidential Memo-001-22 - Questions Arising from 2022 Budget Deliberations,
was considered as part of Item 9.2.2 - Minutes of the Special General Government
Committee meeting dated January 31, 2022 and continuing on February 4, 2022.
15. By-laws
15
Page 19
ClaringtonFebruary 14, 2022
Council Minutes
16. Procedural Notices of Motion
17. Questions to Department Heads / Request for Staff Report(s)
Councillor Anderson asked Stephen Brake for an update on the sidewalks adjacent
to Guildwood Park.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-057-22
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting until 12:20 p.m.
Carried
18. Confirming By -Law
Resolution # C-058-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That leave be granted to introduce By-law 2022-011, being a by-law to confirm the
proceedings of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington at a regular meeting
held on the 14th day of February, 2022; and
That the said by-law be approved.
Carried
19. Adjournment
Resolution # C-059-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the meeting adjourn at 12:19 p.m.
Carried
16
Page 20
To Clarington Council - Report PDS-016-22 & DY
Responses dated 11.03.22- update re Clarington
Comments to DYEC EA Screening
By Linda Gasser
March 14, 2022
Page 21
Recall
— NO Clarington
submission
to 2009 DYEC
Individual
EA -
important
there is
one NOW
• Decisions of past Councils have constrained Clarington's ability to protect
their residents and municipal corporation's interests
• Current EA Screening — important opportunity for Clarington to get
concerns on the record with MECP and Regions.
• The EA Screening process is proponent driven —inadequate and what they
care about is getting approvals.
• Regions made DELIBERATE decision NOT to consult the public/Clarington
between last PIC in December 2019 and Dec. 20.21 when ESR released.
• An Elevation Request is NOT an act of opposition —it's requesting the level
of study & review required to protect YOUR residents & municipality
Page 22
DY Responses to Clarington -March 11-22
• Based on what is written in PDS -016 and DY Responses, NO evidence
or verifiable information provided that would address Clarington
concerns has been provided.
• Unlike earlier Individual EA 2009, Regions did NOT release draft AQIA
for public consultation, though a Sept. 2021 draft was provided to
M EC P.
• Had there been consultation around draft AQIA, Clarington &others
could have done review, submitted concerns, which the Regions
would be required to document with their responses prior to release
of Notice of Completion and ESR —that did not happen.
• Region blindsided all interested parties including Clarington.
Page 23
Regions assert that SSHHERA contemplated 400,000 tpy scenario.
June 23, 2009 Memo: Barry' Lubek, Supervisor, Human Toxicology,
Standards Development Branch — note limitations of regulatory review
PROBLEM FORMULATION
1. The proponent assumed 'for the purpose of this risk assessnient" that the initial processing
capacity of the facility would be 140,000 tomies of caste/yr. All risl,,-,s modelled (including
traffic)in this report apply to a 140,000 tonne/ yr. However, in Section 3.1.1 (page 11) the
proponent i-tifornis that the proposed facility is expected to process up to 400,000 tonnes of
waste/yr for 30 years. This HHRA will not suffice for a facility with increased production
since the risk of adverse effect to human health from exposure to containinants from the
140,000 tonneslvear capacity facility is unlikely to be the same as that for 400,000
tonnes/year capacity facility.
Page 24 4
DY response re Waste Composition(pg 17/19)-inadequate - Higher Heat
Value =more emissions toair/less ash. Increased GHGs and
unidentified changes to Air Emissions —Need updated Emiss. Inventory
1.7 The Municipality should confirm with the Region that no change in the waste stream
composition is expected. Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
• At this time, there are no changes to the waste composition anticipated. The future development
of the Mixed Waste Pre-sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility will remove organics and non -
combustibles from the waste, providing a more stable fuel source, and waste
materials/composition incoming from York Region, and Regional Waste Management Facilities
will not change. It is important to note that waste composition is generally assumed to change
over time; as new packaging materials are being developed, new policies are developed and
implemented, and residents' habits change. An example of this is the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic; we did see a change in waste composition as the number of single -use plastics (i.e.
gloves and masks), packaging materials (i.e. Amazon boxes and home delivery food kits), and
overall volume of waste increase as residents were on lockdown. Due to these factors the DYEC is
generally designed and operated to handling changes in material composition. The approximate
30, 000 tonnes removed through the Mixed Waste Pre-sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility may allow
the opportunity for the Region to pickup from municipally owned buildings (including recreational
centers, schools and municipal office buildings etc.); material picked up from these locations will
not go through the Mixed Waste Pre-sort. While removing organics from residential waste will
cause the material to have an altered energy content the change is not anticipated to result in
changes to facility operations
Page 25
Regions did NOT respond adequately to potential
changes to waste composition in EA Screening
• A lot has chan ed since 2009 studies for Individual EA-13 years ago, identification
of chemicals ot concern, emissions inventory etc.
• Regions have not addressed PFAs aka "forever chemicals" —emerged as major
pu lic health concern since last EA. (Clarington has 2 submissions from Dr. P.
Connett to re St. Marys- very relevant —also attach to PPT)
• Regions have not addressed ultrafine particulate (nanoparticles) —citizens
identified in earlier EA. Dismissed -more known now incl. health risks.
• Removal of Organics and Non combustibles by Mixed Waste Presort —WILL be
displaced with more plastic &other problematic materials and WILL impact
emissions —not studied in 2009 EA nor in current EA Screening Report
• More halogen (chlorine, bromine, fluorine) content in waste burned =more
problematic emissions which also deposit on soil and water (See Dr. Connett's
submissions)
Page 26
January 11.2010 Memo from MECP
Regulatory Toxicologist
PROVISO
The comments and conclusions presented in this review assume that the site description, facility
description, and modelled air concentrations used in the site -specific risk assessment are accurate
and appropriate and have been deemed satisfactory by other members of the review team, unless
specifically noted. Our comments and conclusions apply only to the current or proposed use of
the site, and to the receptors, exposure scenarios, and chemicals of concern assessed in this
screening level risk assessment. New developments in toxicology and environmental
sciences not available at the time of this review, inconsistencies raised by other MOE review
team members, or changes in the selection of site use, receptors, or chemicals of concern may
alter the comments and conclusions presented here.
Page 27
Option 1-will NOT protect your residents &
municipal corporation
• Option 1—Ministry Request That staff be directed to request the Ministry
of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP)
• iJ confirm their review and acceptance of the air quality modelling
methodology, data inputs, and Air Quality Impact Assessment completed as
supporting documentation to the Environmental Screening Process, and
• ii) respond to concerns regarding elevated levels of nitrogen dioxide,
sulphur dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene in the local airshed and the relative
contributions of the DYEC; and further Staff be directed to prepare a
briefing document on planned future development in the South Courtice
Area to support DYEC emissions dispersion modelling considerations by the
Regions and MECP during the subsequent Environmental Compliance
Approval Amendment process.
Page 28
Please support Option 2 — submit an
elevation request —prudent and necessary
• The Regions have not committed to do anything they would not already
do/or might consider for an ECA application.
• When I asked, Durham staff would NOT commit to posting the application
on the Registry or whether or not they would seek exemption.
• Multiple issues —many more than those identified in Option 1 must be
addressed via an Individual EA, PRIOR TO ECA permit applications.
• In Individual EA, there is a review process conducted by qualified
government review team experts in including toxicologists — right now you
only have the opinions of Engineers — completely inadequate.
• Recall MECP responses re health effects from 2009-10 were limited to
140,000 tpy scenario.
• MASS LOADING of additional 201000 tpy NOT considered
Page 29
Please support Option 2 — Please Submit an
Elevation Request to MECP
THANK YOU and QUESTIONS?
• Nanoparticles: Ambient UFPs may represent a previously
unrecognized risk factor for incident brain tumors in adults. Future
studies should aim to replicate these results given the high prevalence
of UFP exposures in urban areas.
httas://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.Rov/amc/articles/PMC7004474/
• PFAs https://www.nrdc.org/protect-people-toxic-pfas-chemicals
• Attached:
Dr. Connett April
&May 2021
submissions to ERT re SMC
Page 30
Delegation to Clarington Council
March 14th, 2022
8.1. PDS-016-22 Update and Next Steps: Municipal
Comments on the
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase
from 140,000 to
160,000 Tonnes per Year
Page 31
The Regions' Responses do not resolve key issues.
Detailed technical and health assessment needed
which only an Individual EA will provide.
1. Pursue claim that concentrations decrease.
2. Pursue Implications to 2011 ESDM, ECA Air Permit, Source Tests.
3. Request Regions to provide updated health assessment,
toxicologist and medical opinions on proposal. Only have
engineering opinions now.
4. Mass loading to environment— 20,000 more tonnes for an
unspecified number of years cannot be ignored —and it has not
been assessed.
5. Pursue better monitoring and reporting, including for AMESA.
Page 32
Fair Comparison:
2011 ESDM (140,000 TPA case which supports ECA) to 2021 AQIA (160,000 TPA case)
Maximum Modelled POI Concentrations Due to DYE[.
Pollutant
2011 ESDM
140100
TPA*
L 'Rml
2021 AQIA
1601000
TPA**
LL ,-Roil
Percent
Increase
PM2.5 24h)
0.987
1.06
7.4 %
Dloxins/Furans
0.00244
pg/Rml
0.003
R-tn'
23.0 %
NOx/NO21-h
29.7
40.63
36.8%
NOx/NO2 24h
5.04
6.06
20.2%
Cadmium
0.000284
0.0004
40.8%
Mercury
0.000626
0.0008
27.8%
S02 1-h
8.62
15.32
77.7%
* Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report to support DYEC ECA Application, (larch 2011, Golder
Associates, (March 2011 ESD ), Table I Emission Summary Table — Maximum EmissiOns under Scenario A, 110!
MCR, 140,000 TPA
** Air Quality Impact Assessment, December (AQIA), Golder Associates Ltd., Table 15 Maximum
Concentrations at all Receptors for Futu re Maximum Operating Conditions (160,000 tea), pages 44-48,
https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/facilit)t
M
But the AQIA Conclusions show the opposite
Overall, the results of the inoBelli g assess iij ent indicate that the 160, 0 0 0 fp a woaid
result in a s overall decre as in the m aximumpredicted con centration ,for all
contaminants and the change in cumula&ve concentrations would be even less
s ignifi can t. Th c decrease is attrib uted to in crc ased sta ek gas temperature an dflowrate
which improve the dispersion characteristics ofthefacllix, "_ 0
Page 34 4
2021 AQIA uses a 140,000 TPA Scenario which appears to be artificially high, gives a
case that doesn't exist, is a mix and match of data; uses theoretical 2011 high volumetric flow rate,
at the same time using 2020 source test data;
Maximum Modelled POI Concentrations Due to DYEC
Pollutant
2011 ESDM
140,000
TPA*
Rnl3
2021 AQIA
1601000
TPA**
L /R171'
Percent
Increase
2021 AQIA
1401000
TPA***
3
Percent
Change
PM2.5 24h)
0.987
1.06
7.4 %
1.10
-3.6%
Dioxins/Furans
0.00244
'i113
0.003
{RM3
23.0 %
0.003
3
No change
NOx/NO2(1-h)
29.7
40.63
36.8%
41.26
-1.5%
NOxINQ2 2411
5.04
6.06
20.2%
6.09
-0.5%
Cadmium
0.000284
0.0004
40.8%
0.0004
No change
Mercury
0.000626
0.0008
27.8%
0.0008
No change
S02 1-h
8.62
15.32
77.7%
17.20
-10.9%
* Emission Summary and Dispersion Modeifing Report to support DYEC ECA Appfication, March 2011, Golder
Associates, (March 2011 ESDM), Table I Emission Summary Table — Maximum Emissions under Scenario A, 110%
MCR, 140,000 TPA
"Air CQuafity Impact Assessment, Decernber2021 (AQIA), Golder Associates Ltd., Table 15 Maximum
Concentrations at all Receptors for Future Maximum Operating Conditions (160,000 tpa), pages 44-48,
https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/faciIitlt
a D Drova Islresourcesf Documentsl2021%24Envi ron menta 1%20Scree ni n2%20Reno rt1ADDe n d ix%20D%20A
i r%20Qua Iity%201 m pact%20Assess m ent_Dece mbe r%202021F1 NAL.pdf
* * * Ibid, Table 13 Maximum Concentrations at all Receptors for Future M yrg�Dperat ing Conditions
(140,000 tpa), pages 40-43
Did the ECA examine the maximum emission scenario? Detailed technical review
needed.
2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION
DYEC operates two identical combustion trains, each of which are designed to process a nominal 218 tonnes per
day of MSW referenced at 13 MJ1kg specific energy content. This amounts to a total heat release of
approximately 118 GJ)hour or 33.64 tonneslhour of steam. This is defined as the maximum continuous rating
(MCR) of the units. However, since the refuse will have continuously varying characteristics, the control system
adjusts throughput to maintain the heat release necessary to attain a target steam production rate. The mass and
heat input range of each grate is represented in the Solid Waste Refuse Firing Diagram below {figure 1).
tan REFUSE FIRING DIAGRAM E! 0IMN T-
13{
12{
CL�
2
� ty{
0
W
� lU{
d
LLJ v
Q
W
W 8(
tY
H
W
2
$0 230 28D
REFUSE THROUGHPUT (TonnesIDAY)
Figure 1 . Base facility Refuse Diagram
Page 36 6
Regions'Air Impact Study (AQIA) is NOT a Health Assessment
No assessment of health and ecological risks/impacts for 160,000 TPA
• AQIA compared modelled air concentration to air standards/benchmarks;
many air standards are outdated and not protective of health; air benchmarks
are not health -based, but rather pollution targets at given time
• Air standards don't exist for some pollutants of highest concern ex. PM2.5
• 0. Reg 419/05 requires modelled emission concentrations from Facility alone
to meet standards for individual pollutants - "sacrifice zones" can happen; an
updated HHERA would look at bigger picture —total loading, multi -pathways
• 0. Reg 419/05 does not consider chemical mixtures — i.e. where pollutants
have additive effects — ex. Respiratory Irritants — but an updated HHERA would
• ESR and AQIA are done by engineers
Regions did not provide opinions from their Medical Officers of Health nor Toxicologists.
Clarington Council must speak up and demand health assessment and medical opinions.
Page 37
Air Quality/Health Concerns Found/Registered at time of EA
These Concerns Need To be Assessed for 160,000 TPA
• Potential risks to human health (Concentration Ratio (CIS) values > 1) were identified in
the EA for N 2, Respiratory Irritants and PM2.5 in the Baseline Traffic and 140,000 tp
scenarios'.
• reviewers expressed concerns that 901h percentile values for pollutants (including N 2,
2, PM2.5 and CO.) were used instead of inaxinititil identified concentrations which
could have underestimated C s.
• Numerous experts (Ministry, reviewer for the Municipality of Clarington, doctors,
citizens) raised concerns that ambient air quality criteria (AA Cs) -air benchinarl s not
necessarily health -based -were used to characterize health risk.
• At time of the EA, Dr. Raymond Copes of Public Health Ontario, advised Dr. Kyle that
using air benchmarks to characterize Duman health risk for PM2.5, a non -threshold
pollutant, was inappropriate.
• Yet, in 2021 A IA, PM2.5 air benchmarks used again So risk due to PM2.5 exposure not
properly assessed.
• 2021 A IA, the consultants also used 901h percentile vat -Lies to represent the background
PM2.5 concentrations though PM2.5 AAQC is a 981h percentile standard, underestimating
maximum exposure
'Site -Specific Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment —Technical Study Report (HHERA), Durham York
Residual Waste EA Study, December 10, 2009, Stantec, Tables 7-11, 7-13, 7-2111�age 173, 179, 206
2 Ministry Review, Health Canada comments by Allison Denning, October 13, 2009, page 16
AQIA Shows
Elevated Levels
of Respiratory Irritants
See
below
excerpts
from
Dillon's
Presentation
to Joint
Ctee on
February
7, 2022
• The summary of monitoring data shows that several indicator compounds are at levels
Io a to, or exceeding, the air quality criteria without the influence of DYEC
• P 11c, P1 2.5, Benzene, Phosphorous, Chloroform, and Sulphur Dioxide all have elevate
background concentrations (50% of the criteria)
Benzo[a]pyrene exceeds the relevant annual criter� ithout the influence of D EC
* The AQIA approprMa e Y con a ua �zes t is y stating that exceedances of the relevant criteria for
Benzo[a]p rene is "typical of urban settings in Southern Ontario"
Both Nitrogen Dioxide and Benzo[a]pyrene are predicted to exceed the relevant criteria
,nder both the existing and proposed scenarios.
61
December2021 19117255
Table 13: Scenario 1A - Maximum Concentrations at all Receptors for Current Maximum Operating Conditions (140,000 tpa)
( Benzene
71-43-2
4.92E-05 Annual
0.45
0,00M03
ai% 0.40 0.40
Benzene
71-43-2
4.92E-05 24-hour
2.3
0.00006
c1% 0.62 0.62
27°/°
Benzo(a)anthrace ne
56-55-3
2.07E-07 24-hour
0.1
0.00000024
cl% 0.DO01 0.0001
°
Benzo(a)fluorene
238-84-6
2.07E-07 24-hour
0.1
❑DD00002
cl% 0.0002 0.0002
Benzo(a)pyrene [as a surrogate of
total Polycyclic Aromatic
50-32-8
2.07E-07
Annual
0.00001
fl.00000001
cl%
OD00026
0.000026
25696
Hydrocarbons [PAHs]]
Benzo(a)pyrene [as a surrogate of
total Polycyclic Aromatic
50-32-8
2.07E-07
24-hour
0.00005
0,0000002
<1%
0.000058
0,000058
116°%
Hydrocarbons (PAHs)]
Dioxins, Furans and Dioxin- like NIA -6 2.56E-03 24-hour 0A pg TEQ/m' 0.003 pg TEQIm' 3% 0.021 0.024 pg TEQ/m' 24°/°
PCBs
PM10
NIA -3
2.06E-01 24-hour
50
1.17
2% 24.48 25.65
51 %
PM2.5
NIA -4
1.95E-01 24-hour
27
1.10
4% 13.22 14.32
53%
P102.19
NIA-4
1.95E-01 Annual
8.8
0.06
<1% 8.12 8.18
93°I°
Sulphur Dioxide
Sulphur Dioxide
7446-09-05
7446-09-05
1.49E+00 10-minute
1.49E+00 1-hour
178
106
28.39
17.20
16% 19.41 47,80
16% 11.75 28.96
271/o
27%
Sulphur Dioxide
7446-09-05
1.49E+00 24-hour
150
1.76
1 % 12.64 14.40
°
Sulphur Dioxide
7446-09-05
1.49E+00 Annual
10.5
0.09
<1% 5.26 5.35
51%
Nitrogen Dioxides
Nitrogen Dioxides
10102-44-0
10102-44-0
5.16E+00 I 1-hour
5.16E+00 24-hour
79
200
41.26
6.09
52% 30.00 71.26
3% 22.28 28.37
90%
14%
Nitrogen Dioxides
10102-44-0
5.16E+00 I Annual
22.5
0.31
1°% 14.04 14.36
64%
Page 40 10
Numerous Ambient Air Exceedances for
Respiratory Irritants; Also one for Dioxins/Furans
For Example see 2020 Exceedances Alone Pasted Below
2020 DYEC ECA Annual Report pages 34 -35
https://www. du rha myo rkwaste.ca/ en/operatio ns-
documents/resources/2020/20210330 RPT 2020 DYEC ECA Annual ACC-pdf
Manual for Air Quality Monitoring in Ontarlo (Ministry of Environment and Climate Change.
2018). The 2020 Annual Ambient Air Monitoring report is due to the MECP by May 15th. 2020.
All reports are publicly available on the DYEC website in accordance with ECA Condition
7(4X.c). All contaminants were below their applicable PotECP criteria as well as applicable
Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) heaftfrbased standards with exceptions listed below
in Table 13.
Table 13: Ambient Air Monitoring Quarterly Summary of Exceedances
Benza(a)pyrene
1 1
Sulphur Dioxide
1
10 minute
-
Sulphur Dioxide
4
1 hour
-
Benzo{a}pyrene
2 1
Sulphur Dioxide
20 a
10 minute
Sulphur Dioxide
13 4
1 hour
Benzo(a }pyrene
1 1
Sulphur Dioxide
10 minute
2 1
Sulphur Dioxide
2 1
1 hour
Benzo{a}pyrene
1 2
Sulphur Dioxide
1
10 minute
-
Sulphur Dioxide
t hour
-
Page 41
Excerpts below From Host Community Agreement:
Time to Act is NOW For BACT, Better Monitoring & Reporting
4, Facility Size
4.1 Durham is seeking approval from the Ministry of the Environment to construct and
operate an EFW Facility with a total processing capacity of up to 400,000 tonnes per year of
municipal solid waste.
4.2 The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that EFW Facility will not immediately be
Ganstructed to the ultimate capacity. Durham will be seeking an initial Certificate of Approval for
the construction and operation of a facility for approximately 140,000 tonnes per year, The
Capacity of the EFW Facility may be expanded, as required by Durham and York, up to the
maximum permissible capacity set forth by the Ministry of the Environment in the Certificate of
Approval which may be amended from time to time. The EFW Facility may not be expanded in
excess of 400,000 tonnes per year.
4.3 At the time of any expansion, Durham will give consideration to improvements to the
emission control system to meet the then current MACT standards and shall apply for a new or
amended Certificate of Approval if required by the Province of Ontario.
4.4 Durham will not construct a transfer station for [Cl waste in Clarington without the
agreement of Clarington.
3.3 Durham shall ensure that, where technically possible, the EFW Facility utilizes 2417
monitoring systems for such parameters as are deemed appropriate by the Ministry of the
Environment. The results of such monitoring systems shall be made accessible to the public on
a website or programmable display board designed for such purpose. In addition, Durham shall
ensure that the operator monitors the ambient air in the immediate vicinity of the EFW Facility
for a three year term commencing upon the commencement of operations.
Page 42 12
Clarington Must Ask for BACT, Improved
Emission Limits, Monitoring, Reporting
• ESR Did Not Assess Impact of Increased Throughput on Operational Parameters/Conditions Affecting
Emissions and Did Not Discuss Best Control Practices
• How have the Regions demonstrated that the existing unit will be able to conform to the design and
operation requirements in MECP Guideline A-7 and that to ensure best available control efforts are
continually being demonstrated, how have Regions shown they conform with the best available pollution
control requirements in leading jurisdictions (including U.S,)?
• Continuous monitoring of Particulate Matter and Mercury in A-7
• More Ambient monitoring, including for VOCs
• Environmental monitoring, including local eggs, dairy
• Fully transparent AMESA monitoring —fulfill all Clarington requests
• Monitoring for Ultrafine Particulates
Page 43
Clarington Must Make an Elevation Request
• An individual EA would address this issue by requiring an updated human health and ecological risk
assessment to assess the impacts of the project as well as review by Ministry experts (including
toxicologists) as well as outside agencies (Health Canada) and Medical Officers of Health
• An individual EA would address this issue by requiring a team of technical experts at the Ministry to
review and determine whether the Facility's ECA complies with the Ontario Regulation 419/05 and
Section 10, 11, and 12 requirements to assess emissions for highest concentration/maximum
emissions/testing across all operating scenarios. This would also determine whether the Air Quality
Impact Assessment (AQIA) supporting the project was done in accordance with O. Reg 419/05.
• An updated HHERA would provide assessment of Process Upset scenarios
• An individual EA could provide a more thorough up to date assessment of greenhouse gas impacts as
well as review by experts that are climate scientists. Such review is sorely needed. Durham is touting
this project - which emits more greenhouse gas emissions - as having net benefits to climate change, but
their assessment is outdated and employs inappropriate assumptions and comparisons.
• An individual EA would be able to identify potential risks of the project and what additional
monitoring, reporting and mitigation measures should be implemented to protect the community.
Page 44
Clarftwn
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To:
Date of Meeting:
Submitted By:
Reviewed By:
File Number:
Report Subject:
Council
March 14, 2022
Report Number: PDS-016-22
Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services
Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number:
PLN 33.22 Resolution#:
Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham York Energy
Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Recommendation:
1. That Report PDS-016-22 and any related communication items be received;
2. That the responses from the Regions of Durham and York (Regions) to the
Municipality's comments on the Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC) throughput
increase (from 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year) Environmental Screening Process
be received;
3. That Council direct Staff to undertake Option as identified in Report PDS-016-22:
Option 1 — Ministry Request
That staff be directed to request the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks
(MECP)
i) confirm their review and acceptance of the air quality modelling methodology,
data inputs, and Air Quality Impact Assessment completed as supporting
documentation to the Environmental Screening Process, and
ii) respond to concerns regarding elevated levels of nitrogen dioxide, sulphur
dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene in the local airshed and the relative contributions
of the DYEC; and further
Staff be directed to prepare a briefing document on planned future development in the
South Courtice Area to support DYEC emissions dispersion modelling considerations by
the Regions and MECP during the subsequent Environmental Compliance Approval
Amendment process.
Page 45
Municipality of Clarington
Resort PDS-016-22
Option 2 — Elevation Request
Page 2
That staff be directed to submit an Environmental Assessment elevation request to the
Director of the Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch, MECP.
4. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-016-22 and any delegations be advised
of Council's decision.
Page 46
Municipality of Clarington
Resort PDS-016-22
Report Overview
Page 3
PDS-016-22 responds to Council Resolution #C-040-22 regarding the Municipality's
comments on the Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase (140,000 to 160,000
tonnes per year) Environmental Screening Process. In accordance with Council's direction
Planning and Development Services staff and representatives of the Regions project team
have engaged in discussions regarding the Municipality's comments, to work towards
resolution of concerns by the March 14, 2022 Council meeting. This report outlines the
outcomes of these discussions and seeks Council's direction on next steps. Final comment
responses are being prepared by the Region and will be submitted to the Municipality,
separately.
1. Background
1.1 The Regions of Durham and York (Regions) are seeking environmental permissions to
increase the processing capacity at the Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC) by 20,000
tonnes to 160,000 tonne per year. As a first step in the permitting process, the Region
has undertaken an Environmental Screening Process (ESP) under the Environmental
Assessment Act.
1.2 Report PDS-008-22 presented Clarington staff's comments and recommendations on
the ESP, prepared with technical assistance from Dillon Consulting. On February 14,
2022, Council approved Resolution #C-040-22 providing direction on the submission of
the Municipal comments and further discussions with the Regions for the purposes of
resolving concerns prior to the March 14, 2022 Council meeting.
1.3 In response to the concerns of delegations that appeared before Council on February 7
and 14, 2022, Resolution #C-040-22 included amendments by Council. A consolidated
list of the requests of the Municipality is provided as Attachment 1.
1.4 Mutual agreement notices from the Regions and the Municipality to continue
discussions beyond the 60-day review period established for the ESP were submitted to
the Director of the Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch (EAAB), Ministry
of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) on February 18, 2022 (see Memo-
010-22).
1.5 The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the Regions' responses to the
Municipality's comments and seek Council's direction on next steps.
2. Discussion
Discussion of Municipal Comments
2.1 The following timeline summarizes the sequence of consultation with the Regions in
response to the Municipality's comments on the project:
Page 47
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Page 4
Timeline
Action
Dec. 20, 2022
Region issued ESP Notice of Completion
Feb. 7, 2022
Municipal comments to Planning and Development Committee
(Report PDS-008-22)
Feb. 8, 2022
Preliminary meeting with the Region of Durham to request
agreement on a mutually acceptable time period to review the
Municipality's comments and attempt to resolve concerns.
Feb. 11, 2022
Meeting with the Regions and Municipality/Regions consultants
to review and discuss the Municipality's comments.
Feb. 14, 2022
Update to Council (PDS-009-22) and direction to submit the
necessary notice to MECP regarding continuation of
discussions with the Region beyond the 60-day review period.
Feb. 15, 2022
Final Municipal comments, as amended by Council in response
to the concerns of community members about the project,
submitted to the Regions.
Feb. 18, 2022
Separate notices of agreement to on -going discussions
submitted to the MECP by the Municipality and Regions.
Feb. 18, 2022
Draft Municipal comment responses received from the Regions
(for discussion purposes).
Feb. 24, 2022
Meeting with the Regions and Municipal/Regions consultants to
seek clarity and additional information in response to the draft
Municipal comment responses
Mar. 4, 2022
Revised draft Municipal comment responses received from the
Regions (for discussion purposes).
Mar. 7, 2022
Update to Planning and Development Committee (Memo-010-
22).
Mar. 7-9
Additional questions and information requests submitted to the
Regions.
2.2 At the time of writing this report, the Regions were working to address the additional
questions submitted by staff and preparing a final response to the Municipality's
comments on the Project. The following sub -section summarizes key elements of the
consultation to date from the perspective of staff, based on discussions with the Region.
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Comment Responses
Page 5
2.3 In response to several of the Municipality's comments relating to the modelling
methodology, data inputs, and emissions calculations, the Regions have provided
further explanation and re -stated the involvement of the MECP in the review and
approval of the modelling approach and parameters, and in the review of the air quality
impact assessment (AQIA) that was undertaken. Copies of documentation to confirm
the MECP review and approval of the modelling approach/parameters and
meteorological and terrain (MET) data were provided. Comments from the MECP on
the September 2021 (draft) Air Quality Impact Assessment (Golder Associates) and the
Regions responses were included in Record of Consultation Summary Report (Dec.
2021), provided as Appendix G to the Durham York Energy Centre Environmental
Screening Report (Dec., 2021). No final confirmation of the MECP's acceptance of the
emissions estimates / AQIA has been received.
2.4 Notably, the ESP is a proponent -driven, self assessment process; there is no
requirement for formal approval by the MECP. The Municipality's consultant has
advised staff that the documents provided by the Regions confirm the MECP
acceptance of the modelling approach. However, to Staffs knowledge, acceptance of
the Regions comments on the September 2021 draft AQIA could not be verified at the
time of writing this report. Dillon Consulting recommends that the Municipality request
that the MECP confirm that the emissions estimates and AQIA are appropriate and
reasonably conservative.
2.5 The Regions have made commitments to address requests made by the Municipality,
including the following:
• Review of the location of sensitive land uses above ground level permitted by
current zoning within the Energy Park as part of the Environmental Compliance
Approval (ECA) Amendment process that will be undertaken upon completion of the
ESP;
• The inclusion of additional receptors representative of elevated receptors within the
Courtice MTSA as part of the ECA Amendment process;
• Re -modelling of worst -case scenario odour emissions from the DYEC under the
160,000 tonne per year scenario as part of the ECA Amendment process;
• Assessment of air quality during process upset conditions, including start-up, shut-
down and operating upset conditions as part of the ECA Amendment process;
• Provision of all supporting documents to the ECA Amendment process, including
the updated ESDM report, to the Municipality for review and commenting;
Page 49
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Page 6
• Completion of an update to the Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment
(HHERA) as part of the future expansion to 250,000 tonnes per year of capacity;
and
Participation in discussions with local area stakeholders regarding Council's request
for the establishment of a real-time air monitoring network, with any potential
contributions being subject to discussion and Regional Council approval.
2.6 In summary, based on the discussions to date, the Regions have also indicated the
following with the respect the remaining Municipal comments, which will be further
elaborated on in the Region's final (pending) comment responses:
• The Region of Durham continuously monitors best practices relating to the
operation and monitoring of thermal waste treatment facilities; no changes to
emissions control system are being proposed at this time; and
Changes to the portion of the waste stream to be processed in the future at the
Region of Durham's proposed pre-sort facility before being sent for final disposal at
the DYEC will not have a significant effect on the overall waste composition
processed at the DYEC; as a result, the waste composition scenario and
corresponding emissions profile remains unchanged for the purposes of modelling.
2.7 In response to concerns of Council and members of the public, the final Municipal
comments approved by Council were amended to include the request that an updated
HHERA be undertaken for the proposed increased in throughput capacity to 160,000
tonnes per year, and that "the HHERA include the south Clarington airshed as a whole
and include a toxicological assessment and a satisfactory opinion from the Medical
Officer of Health for Durham Region." In response, the Regions have re -affirmed to
staff that the original HHERA completed in 2009 as a component of the Environmental
Assessment for the DYEC considered up to the maximum design capacity of 400,000
tonnes per year. Further, the Regions have committed to completing an update to the
HHERA as part of the future expansion of the DYEC to 250,000 tonnes per year, not as
part of the current project.
2.8 Council's amendments to Municipal comments also sought to address concerns
respecting already elevated background concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, sulphur
dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene and to mitigate for any additional contributions from the
DYEC. The Regions have re -affirmed that the results of the cumulative assessment
demonstrate that maximum predicted concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and sulphur
dioxide are below the applicable provincial air quality standards and that emissions of
these compounds are continuously monitored. In addition, the Regions have stated that
emissions from the DYEC contribute less than 1 % to the total ambient benzo[a]pyrene
concentrations for all scenarios assessed as part of the AQIA and ambient
concentrations are generally attributed to already elevated background concentrations
in the area.
Page 50
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Environmental Screening Process
Page 7
2.9 The Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Waste Management
Projects (MECP, 2007) outlines the process for undertaking an ESP, where applicable.
In accordance with ESP guidance, the Regions carried out the required minimum 60-
day public review period from December 20, 2021 to February 18, 2022.
2.10 The ESP is a proponent -driven process where comments and concerns with the project
are to be directly addressed with proponents (i.e the Regions). Where there are
outstanding concerns, interested parties (including local municipalities) may submit a
request to the Director of the EAAB, MECP for elevation of the project to an individual
Environmental Assessment during the 60-day review period. In this case, where the
Municipality and Regions agreed to a discussion period extending beyond the 60-day
review period, any request to the MECP for elevation of the project must be submitted
within a further 7-days following the additional discussion period agreed to (i.e. by
March 21, 2022). Once elevation requests are withdrawn or resolved (if received), the
proponent files a final Statement of Completion and can proceed with the project,
subject to any other required approvals.
2.11 Staff understands that several requests for elevation of the project to an individual
Environmental Assessment have been submitted by others to the MECP. As a result of
these requests and the on -going discussions with the Municipality, the Regions cannot
proceed further with the project until a decision on those elevation requests has been
issued by the MECP.
2.12 As stated in the ESP guidance, "the submission of an elevation request does not
preclude the proponent from attempting to continue efforts to resolve concerns directly
with the requester(s)." The Regions have previously indicated that responses to the
comments of delegates appearing before Clarington Council on February 7 and
February 14, 2022 will be prepared and documented in the final consultation summary
report for the project and submitted to the MECP. Staff have requested the Regions
confirm how they will respond to the elevation requests that have been submitted. In
addition, the Director's decision on each elevation request received must state the
reasons for the decision made.
Next Steps
2.13 Staff and consultants from the Municipality and Regions have reviewed and discussed
the Municipality's comments on the proposed DYEC throughput increase. With the
mutually agreed to timeframe for discussions concluding on March 14, there are two
possible next steps for Council's consideration as outlined in the Report
Recommendations:
Page 51
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Page 8
• Option 1 — Request the Province confirm their acceptance of the Regions Air Quality
Impact Assessment; and
Option 2 — Request the Province elevate the project to an individual Environmental
Assessment.
Option 1: Ministry Request
2.14 Council could direct staff to submit a request to the MECP to confirm the air quality
modelling methodology, data inputs, emissions estimates, assessment and AQIA were
appropriate and acceptable to the MECP and that all MECP comments have been
addressed. The MECP could also be requested to respond to concerns regarding
elevated levels of nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene in the local
airshed and the relative contributions of the DYEC.
2.15 Regarding Municipal comments on known surrounding future land uses in the area (i.e.
Clarington Energy Park, Courtice Major Transit Station Area and Courtice waterfront
area), it is staff's opinion that there should be some certainty that future development,
including the Municipality's ability to meet Regional and Provincial policy, will not be
negatively impacted by DYEC operations. To support the Region and MECPs
understanding and consideration of this area during the ECA Amendment process, staff
can prepare a briefing document on planned future development in the South Courtice
Area, including criteria and parameters that would support the development of inputs for
updated Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) reporting. Much of this
work would be supported by information being compiled in response to Council's
request for an individual Environmental Assessment for the Region of Durham's
proposed pre-sort and anaerobic digestion facility.
2.16 As summarized in section 2.5, the Regions have made commitments to the Municipality
to address concerns raised. In accordance with the ESP guidance, the Regions are
required to notify the Director of the EAAB, MECP of the commitments made and to
implement the project in accordance with all such commitments.
2.17 An updated ESDM Report will be prepared by the Regions as supporting documentation
for the ECA Amendment process that the Regions are also required to undertake. The
Regions have committed to provide the ECA Amendment application and supporting
documents, including the updated ESDM Report, to the Municipality as part of the ECA
Amendment process.
2.18 Due to the specialized expertise required, a third party consultant would be needed to
assist Council and Staff in a technical review of the air quality components of the ECA
application. Given the questions and comments of Council and members of the public
brought forward to the Municipality, a comprehensive peer review would be necessary
to fully respond to the concerns raised, if necessary and desired by Council. Staff could
Page 52
Municipality of Clarington
Report PDS-016-22
Page 9
provide an update to Council and outline the cost and budget options available for a
peer review options available, if necessary, pending the issuance of decisions by the
Director on the elevation requests submitted.
Option 2: Elevation Request
2.19 Should the concerns of Council not be addressed, an alternate option for Council's
consideration is to simply direct staff to submit an elevation request to the MECP, in
accordance with the requirements set out in the Guide to Environmental Assessment
Requirements for Waste Management Projects (MECP, 2007). Such a request must
include the following:
• Name of the project and proponent;
• Name of the project and proponent;
• Basis of the request;
• Request that the project be elevated to an individual environmental assessment;
• Nature of the specific environmental concerns that remain unresolved;
• Benefits of requiring the proponent to undertake an individual environmental
assessment;
• Information about any efforts to discuss/resolve these concerns/environmental
effects with the proponent;
• Details of any correspondence between the person and the proponent; and
• Any other matters considered relevant by the requesting person.
2.20 The Municipality would have until March 21, 2022 to prepare and submit the elevation
request. With limited time available, Staff would package the comments received from
our consultant, members of the public and the responses provided by the Regions and
provide them to the MECP as the elevation request.
3. Concurrence
Not Applicable.
4. Conclusion
It is respectfully recommended that Council provide direction to staff on which option
they would prefer and any additional reasoning for supporting this request that could be
provided to the MECP.
Staff Contact: Amy Burke, Senior Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2423 or aburke@clarington.net.
Page 53
Municipality of Clarington Page 10
Report PDS-016-22
Attachments:
Attachment 1 — Consolidated List of Municipal Comments/Requests
Interested Parties:
The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision:
Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste Management Services, Region of Durham
Andrew Evans, Project Manager, Waste Planning & Technical Services, Region of Durham
Celeste Dugas, Manager, York Durham District Office, MECP
Philip Dunn, Senior Environmental Officer, York Durham District Office, MECP
Jeff Butchart, Issues Project Coordinator (Acting), York Durham District Office, MECP
Wendy Bracken
Linda Gasser
Kerry Meydam
Clarington Clear c/o Karrie Lynn Dymond
Page 54
Attachment 1 to PDS-016-22
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase (from 140,000 to 160,000
tonnes per year) Environmental Screening Report (December 2021)
Consolidated List of Municipality of Clarington Comments / Requests:
That the Region of Durham and Region of York (Regions) and Ministry of
Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) review the agreed to modelling
methodology / data inputs to confirm their appropriateness, taking into consideration
Recommendation #1, #2, #3, #4 and #8 from Dillon Consulting, as described in
Attachment 2 to PDS-008-22.
2. That the Regions and MECP review the Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA)
(Golder Associates, December 2021) to confirm that all appropriate, reasonably
foreseeable future activities have been included (see Dillon Consulting
Recommendation #5).
3. That the Regions and MECP include the Courtice Major Transit Station Area in the
AQIA and assess whether the proposal may have potential negative effects on the
future development of this area and the Municipality's ability to achieve provincial
and regional land use policy requirements.
4. That the Regions and MECP consider the current waste composition scenario and
the future "pre-sorted" waste composition scenario as part of the demonstration of
compliance with air quality limits that the Regions are required to undertake to
support their Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) Amendment application for
the proposed throughput increase.
5. That Durham confirm how it has addressed the applicable requirements of the Host
Community Agreement.
6. That the Site -Specific Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment (HHERA) be
comprehensively updated as part of the supporting studies to expand the DYEC to
process 160,000 tonnes per year, including that the scope of the update consider
the effect of DYEC upset conditions at this significantly increased capacity and that
the HHERA include the south Clarington airshed as a whole, and include a
toxicological assessment and a satisfactory opinion from the Medical Officer of
Health for Durham Region.
7. That the Regions and MECP undertake additional technical studies as a component
of the ECA Amendment application to verify that the no increase in odours is
expected from the proposal (see Dillon Recommendation #6).
8. That the Region identify and implement mitigation measures to prevent the risk of
nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene exceedances identified in the
AQIA, where practicable.
9. That the Regions and MECP commit to public consultation as a component of the
ECA Amendment process to provide the Municipality and the Public opportunity to
Page 55
review and provide comment on the application, including all supporting technical
studies and other documents.
10. That the Regions and MECP confirm that all stack parameters and emission rates
have been appropriately characterized.
Page 56
If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact The Regional Municipality of
Durham at 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3560.
77OD)) 1 + 1
DURHAM
REGION
March 11, 2022
Mayor Foster and Members of Clarington Council
c/o June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk
Clerk's Department
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario 1_1 C 3A6
Attention: Mayor Foster and Members of Clarington Council
RE: Durham York Energy Centre
Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington
Comments — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
The Regional Municipality of Durham and the Regional Municipality of York (Regions) have
received Staff Report: PDS-008-22 (Staff Report) containing comments and recommendations
from the Municipality of Clarington (Clarington) regarding the ongoing Environmental Screening
Process for the Durham York Energy Centre's (DYEC) throughput increase. Following receipt of
Clarington's Staff Report by the DYEC Project Team, a meeting was held on February 11, 2022,
between the Regions and Clarington Municipal staff with support from the Regions' Technical
Consultants. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the comments in the Staff Report ahead
of the DYEC Project Team preparing draft responses, as well as to set a preferred path forward for
the parties to resolve the comments, given the closure of the 60-day review period on February 18,
2022. A comment -response table has been developed and a draft copy was provided to Clarington
staff ahead of the February 18 comment closure period.
Given the nature of the comments and the timeline of the current process, both parties
acknowledged that the issues were unlikely to be resolved prior to the closure of the comment
period. Given the impending process timeline, and with the understanding that the responses will
be provided by Clarington staff to their Council, the parties agreed that it would be acceptable to
continue the discussions, with the intention of finalizing resolutions prior to Clarington's March 14,
2022, Council meeting. Additionally, it was agreed that the Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks would be advised of the ongoing commitment between the parties to
address concerns identified within the Staff Report.
Page 57
Mayor Foster and Members of Clarington Council
DYEC Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington
Comments - Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
March 11, 2022
Page 2 of 2
Please accept this letter as a confirmation that the DYEC Project Team has received Clarington's
comments and has provided responses to the concerns identified in the Staff Report in keeping
with the approach described above and has provided those comments and commitments to the
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks as part of the ongoing screening process.
Given that all of Clarington's concerns have been formally addressed, the Regions look forward to
Clarington's continued support of the development and operation of the DYEC in accordance with
Clarington's commitments in the Host Community Agreement.
Sincerely,
1�1\w
Gioseph Anello, M.Eng., P.Eng., PMP
Director, Waste Management Services
The Regional Municipality of Durham
905-668-7711 extension 3445
Gioseph.Anello@durham.ca
J(
"Laur McDowell, P.Eng.
Director, Environmental Promotion
and Protection
The Regional Municipality of York
905-830-4444 extension 75077
Laura. McDowell@york.ca
C. M. Dempster, Chief Administrative Officer, Municipality of Clarington
R. Windle, Director, Planning and Development Services, Municipality of Clarington
F. Langmaid, Manager, Planning and Development Services, Municipality of Clarington
A. Burke, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, Municipality of Clarington
J. Henry, Regional Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Durham Region
E. Baxter-Trahair, Chief Administrative Officer, Durham Region
S. Siopis, Commissioner, Works, Durham Region
E. Mahoney, Commissioner, Environmental Services, York Region
A. Evans, Project Manager, Waste Planning and Technical Services, Durham Region
M. Farid, Contract Management Engineer, Environmental Services, York Region
Attachment #1: Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000
Tonnes per Year: Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Responses to
Municipality of Clarington Comments in Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Page 58
Attachment #1
Page 1 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments
(March 11, 2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.1 Review of the ESR has been supported by Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon).
The Municipality retained Dillon in 2020 to assist Council and staff to
understand and comment on the technical air quality components, regulatory
requirements, and cumulative impact of the DYEC proposal to increase
throughput, as well as St. Mary's Cement's 2020 ECA Amendment application
for the expanded use of Low Carbon Alternative Fuels (previously completed).
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.2 The review completed by Dillon on the DYEC proposal is provided as
Attachment 2. Dillon has provided recommendations which are intended to
support further consultation with the Regions and MECP in the review of this
proposal. The comments and recommendations outlined below consider the
advice of the Municipality's consultant, as well as public comments
communicated directly to Clarington staff, prior to writing this report.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.3 In summary, Dillon's review of the AQIA finds that the Regions' assessment
has generally followed good industry practice, is aligned with provincial
guidance, and has generally taken a conservative approach.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.4 Dillon provides several recommendations to confirm the appropriateness of
specific modelling and data inputs used by the Regions, ensuring the modelling
is appropriately characterized and conservative. These inputs include:
The data selected to represent background conditions, confirming the approach to
selecting background concentrations was sufficiently conservative;
• The identification of receptor locations for modelling, ensuring they sufficiently
considered sensitive uses permitted by current zoning for the Energy Park;
• The assumptions relating to the stack flow and stack temperature increase; and
Page 59
Attachment #1
Page 2 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
• The absence of an assessment of process upset conditions.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request that the Regions and MECP review the agreed to
modelling methodology / data inputs to confirm their appropriateness, taking
into consideration Recommendation #1, #2, #3, #4 and #8 from Dillon, as
described in Attachment 2.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The modelling/methodology approach was approved by the MECP prior to it
being administered by Golder Associates. Upon completion of the testing, the
MECP conducted a comprehensive review of the AQIA (September 2021 draft)
and provided comments. All comments were adequately addressed by the
Region and Golder Associates.
1.5 The AQIA uses ambient monitoring data to represent background conditions.
The data period used considered all available data up to and including 2019.
The background air quality concentrations are carried forward to the cumulative
air quality assessment. The data period selected does not account for the
expanded use of Low Carbon Alternative Fuels at the nearby St. Mary's
Cement — Bowmanville Site.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request that the Regions and MECP review the AQIA to
confirm that all appropriate reasonably foreseeable future activities have been
included (Dillon Recommendation #5).
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The modelling/methodology approach was approved by the MECP prior to it
being administered by Golder and Associates. The Region will continue to
adhere to all applicable MECP guidelines and regulations in regard to current
and future operations at the DYEC. Additionally, as part of St. Mary's modelling
process, the results of the draft AQIA were included with their baseline
assessment.
1.6 The DYEC is situated in close proximity to multiple new development areas
being planned by the Municipality. These include the Courtice Waterfront and
Energy Park Secondary Plan and the Courtice Employment Lands and Major
Transit Station Area (MTSA) Secondary Plan. Both Secondary Plan areas are
envisioned to undergo significant transformation from their current
predominantly agricultural use into thriving neighborhoods with amenities,
Page 60
Attachment #1
Page 3 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
opportunities for recreation, and residential uses. In accordance with provincial
and regional policy, this includes planning to achieve transit supportive
densities and a diverse mix of uses in the Courtice GO MTSA. Policy requires
that the Municipality plan to accommodate a minimum overall density target of
150 people and jobs per gross hectare in the Courtice GO MTSA.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.7 It is unclear in the ESR or AQIA whether the dispersion of indicator compounds
that may be achieved by the proposed increase in throughput will potentially
impactthese developments and the Municipality's ability to meet provincial and
regional land use policy requirements for transit -oriented development. It is
noted that a Land Use Compatibility Study by the Courtice Waterfront
Landowners is underway and will be subject to review and acceptance by the
Region.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request the Regions and MECP include the Courtice
MTSA in the AQIA and assess whether the proposal may have potential
negative effects on the future development of this area and the Municipality's
ability to achieve provincial and regional land use policy requirements.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The modelling/methodology approach was approved by the MECP prior to it
being administered by Golder Associates. Upon completion of the AQIA, the
MECP conducted a comprehensive review of the results and provided
comments. All comments were adequately addressed by the Region and
Golder Associates. If further requests are made by the MECP regarding the
ESR and or AQIA, the Region will review and act accordingly. As per previous
discussions, the modelling to be completed for the ESDM report update and
ECA application process, can include additional receptors representing future
elevated air intakes within the MTSA.
The receptors included in the modelling include a grid of at -grade receptors,
this would cover the Courtice MTSA at -grade locations. Elevated receptors
could be used to assess the locations of air intakes on the Courtice MTSA
buildings once design plans are available. The locations of air -intakes at
proposed developments can typically be factored into the design of a new
development to reduce the potential for air quality impacts.
Page 61
Attachment #1
Page 4 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.8 The ESR indicates that the MECP requires an updated Emissions Summary
Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) report as supporting documentation for a future
ECA Amendment application, demonstrating that the proposal will be compliant
with Ontario Regulation 419/05: Air Pollution — Local Air Quality. Dillon's review
notes that changes to the composition of the DYEC waste stream have the
potential to affect the assumptions made within the AQIA, thereby potentially
effecting its results.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The Region will provide all supporting documents to the ECA and the ESDM to
Clarington as part of the ESDM process. At this time, there are no changes to
the waste composition anticipated, materials received from York Region, as
well as materials from Durham Regions waste management facilities will not be
processed within the proposed facility. While the future development of the
Mixed Waste Pre-sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility will remove organics and
non -combustibles from the waste, providing a more stable fuel source as a
result of a higher heating value for the portion of material that passes through
that facility, as the boilers are designed to accommodate variability in received
waste streams. It is important to note that waste compositions are expected to
generally evolve over time as new packaging materials are being developed,
and residents' habits change. An example of this is the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic; we did see a change in waste composition as the number of single -
use plastics
(i.e. gloves and masks), packaging materials (i.e. Amazon boxes and home
delivery food kits), and overall volume of waste increased as residents were at
home.
1.9 The Region of Durham (Durham) is currently in the procurement process for
the future establishment of a waste pre-sort and anaerobic digestion facility.
Staff understand that commissioning of the facility is targeted for 2026. Pre-
sorting post -diversion waste collected by Durham is intended to remove organic
waste and non -diverted recyclables prior to final disposal at the DYEC. Durham
reports that nearly 50% of post -diversion waste collected and destined for the
DYEC is organics suitable for anaerobic digestion, while approximately 4% is
blue box recyclables.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
Page 62
Attachment #1
Page 5 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.10 Council and staff appreciate the beneficial contribution of the pre-sort and
anaerobic digestion facility to delay future expansions of the DYEC beyond
160,000 tonnes per year. Durham is the majority owner of the DYEC,
contributing roughly 78% of the current approved annual capacity. Council may
consider seeking clarity from the Region on the potential effect of waste
composition change due to pre-sorting on the emissions from the DYEC or the
potential effects to air quality.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request the Regions and MECP review the AQIA to
confirm that the future "pre-sorted" waste composition scenario has been
appropriately considered (Dillon Recommendation #7).
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
As noted in the response to 4.8, there is no change anticipated in the overall
waste composition. The future development of the Mixed Waste Pre-
sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility will remove organics and non -combustibles
from the waste, providing a more stable fuel source, and waste
materials/composition incoming from York Region and Durham's Waste
management Facilities will not change. It is important to note that waste
compositions are expected to change over time; as new packaging materials
are being developed, and changes to policies and residents' habits will change,
the facility as designed is able to accommodate those changes as part of their
operations.
1.11 The Host Community Agreement (HCA) for the DYEC sets out criteria and
processes that are to be considered when expansions to the waste capacity
occur. Durham committed that "at the time of any expansion, Durham will give
consideration to improvements to the emission control system to meet the then
current MACT standards...". "MACT" stands for Maximum Achievable Control
Technology. The commitments on air emission technology and the waste
sources and composition asset out in the EA remain applicable. The current
proposal for increased tonnage will not trigger other clauses about building
expansion and site plan amendments, as the existing boiler units can address
the increase in tonnage. Clarington, for its part committed, in the HCA, to not
oppose the development or operation of the facility.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request Durham confirm how it has addressed the
applicable requirements of the Host Community Agreement.
Page 63
Attachment #1
Page 6 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The increase from 140,000 metric tonnes to 160,000 metric tonnes does not
require an expansion or alteration of the current equipment or operations but is
instead seeking to optimize operations and reduce periods where boilers are
slowed or shutdown to comply with permit limits. The Regions through review
of documentation, and through expertise from industry representatives do
monitor advances in monitoring technology and changes to best practices
related to the operation and provided an update to Durham Regional Council
during 2020 (#2021-INFO-35). No changes to emission control systems are
being proposed at this time.
1.12 As indicated in the ESR, the potential for the proposal to have environmental
effects on air quality exists because of stack emissions. On multiple occasions,
Staff and Council have heard concerns respecting the potential risk of
bioaccumulation as a result of the emissions from the DYEC. A Site -Specific
Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment (HHERA) was completed for
the facility as part of the 2009 EA and was peer reviewed by the Municipality's
consultants (SENES). The peer review concluded that the HHERA for the
DYEC considering the 140,000 tonne per year scenario was comprehensive
and conformed to risk assessment guidance. It was recommended that the
HHERA be updated when the facility expands to 250,000 and 400,000 tonnes
per year, as was envisioned at the time.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The results of the human health risk assessment and the ecological risk
assessment (HHERA) undertaken in 2009, indicate that emissions from the
DYEC under normal operating conditions would not lead to any adverse health
or ecological impacts to local residents, farmers, other receptors or species at
risk under either the initial design capacity of 140,000 tonnes up to the
maximum design capacity of 400,000 tonnes. Updated emissions modeling
confirming no adverse impact for the 160,000 tonne scenario is included in the
Screening Report. Air quality standards and emissions limits do consider risk
thresholds within the establishment of these limits, and as a result HHERA's
are not a typical requirement of environmental permitting processes, including
individual Environmental Assessments. The Region adheres to all MECP
requirements and regulations in the daily operations of the DYEC and will
continue to do so in all future improvements to the facility. The inclusion of
the entire South Clarington Airshed goes well below the limits of the project
scope and would need to consider impacts of numerous other emitters beyond
the Facility. The proponents have committed to completing an update to the
HHERA as part of the future expansion to 250,000 tonnes per year of capacity.
Should Clarington wish to undertake an assessment considering all emission
sources within the airshed the facility could make any required data available.
Page 64
Attachment #1
Page 7 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.13 There were comments and suggestions for improvement in the HHERA
modelling based on operational information. Also, given the age of the HHERA,
updating of air emissions standards, changes to baseline conditions existing in
the area and significant new development underway, the peer review
comments continue to provide valuable guidance.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality reaffirm its previous request to the Region and MECP that
the Site -Specific HHERA be comprehensively updated as part of the supporting
studies for the EA to expand the DYEC to process 250,000 tonnes per year,
including that the scope of the update consider the effect of DYEC upset
conditions at this significantly increased capacity.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The Region adheres to all MECP requirements and regulations in the daily
operations of the DYEC and will continue to do so in all future improvements to
the facility. Comprehensive updates would include assessments of upset
conditions but would also need to consider the facilities operating record and
the appropriate level of conservatism as part of the development.
1.14 Dillon's review of the ESR confirms that odour management practices currently
in place at the DYEC reflect good industry practice. However, a concern is
raised regarding whether sufficient justification is provided to confirm the
conclusion that the proposed increased throughput will not contribute to odour
concerns. Potential odour emissions for current DYEC operations were
originally assessed using modelling as part of the initial ECA Amendment
application for the facility. Verification by means of on -site sampling was
subsequently undertaken in 2015.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request that the Regions and MECP undertake additional
technical studies as a component of the ECA Amendment application to verify
that the no increase in odours is expected from the proposal (Dillon
Recommendation #6).
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
Page 65
Attachment #1
Page 8 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.15 The results of the cumulative assessment completed as a component of the
AQIA indicate that the maximum predicted concentrations of nitrogen dioxides
would exceed the relevant air quality criteria during testing of the standby
emergency diesel generator. This testing occurs for up to a one -hour period,
once per week. The assessment approach was considered to be very
conservative, using worst case meteorological conditions. The exceedance was
relative to the more stringent Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQs)
of 79 ug/m3 in comparison to the Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC)
of 400 ug/m3. Notwithstanding, no mitigation measures were proposed. While
neither the CAAQs or Ontario AAQCs are regulatory compliance limits,
minimizing or eliminating the risk of exposure where feasible is requested.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request the Region identify and implement mitigation
measures to prevent the risk of nitrogen dioxide exceedances identified in the
AQIA, where practicable.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
In the 2011 ESDM report, worst case odour emissions were assessed during
upset conditions when both trains are offline for an extended period and the pit
is at its capacity. Under this scenario, the fans would still be operating, drawing
air through the combustion system and releasing uncombusted odorous air into
the atmosphere. The maximum predicted 10-minute averaged concentration
was approximately 12% of the odour guideline at 0.12 OU/m3. No change is
proposed to the maximum amount of waste in the pit on a 1-hour basis and no
change is proposed to the combustion air fans. As such, no change is
proposed to the maximum odour scenario, and it was not considered further in
the ESR. This scenario will be re -modelled as part of the ECA Amendment
application, as required.
1.16 In addition to nitrogen dioxides, the AQIA cumulative assessment indicated that
exceedances of air quality criteria were also predicted for benzo(a)pyrene. The
concentration of benzo(a)pyrene was reported to already be in exceedance of
the standards in background (i.e. before any additional contribution from DYEC
operating at increased capacity is added). Multiple exceedances of
benzo(a)pyrene and sulphur dioxide over the applicable Ontario AAQCs at both
the Courtice and Rundle ambient air monitoring stations are noted in the ESR.
Page 66
Attachment #1
Page 9 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The modelling/methodology approach was approved by the MECP prior to it
being administered by Golder Associates. Upon completion of the AQIA, the
MECP conducted a comprehensive review of the results and provided
comments. All comments were adequately addressed by the Region and
Golder Associates. The DYEC as modeled within the AQIA is not a significant
contributor of benzo(a)pyrene, and exceedances are generally attributed to the
high background levels which exist across the area. Nitrogen dioxide levels are
associated with the operation of the emergency generator and will be further
assessed during ECA development. Although the generator was considered as
a source to be conservative, there are further guidelines on how these systems
are addressed within models to reflect the nature and frequency of their
operation, which will be further refined during the modelling for the facility ECA
application.
The impact of DYEC emissions were evaluated individually and cumulatively
and compared to the relevant ambient air quality criteria. The cumulative
assessment of emissions (i.e. the contribution of multiple sources) have been
evaluated. The ultra -conservative scenario assumes that the meteorological
conditions which result in the greatest ground level concentrations from DYEC
occur at the same time as the maximum on -site activities take place, and
during a period when ambient air quality conditions are at the 90th percentile.
The likelihood of all these factors occurring concurrently is low.
Nitrogen oxide emissions from DYEC were calculated based on the Ontario A-7
emission limits, which is conservative as source testing data has historically
been less. Predicted concentrations were compared to the Canadian Ambient
Air quality criteria of 79 pg/m3 on a 1 hour averaging period. The Ontario
Ambient Air Quality Criteria is 400 fag/m3 over the same 1 hour averaging
period and is still used as an indicator of good air quality. The maximum
predicted cumulative concentrations of Nitrogen dioxide are below the relevant
Ontario AAQC for all modelled scenarios. Similarly, maximum predicted
cumulative concentrations of sulphur dioxide are below the relevant provincial
and federal AAQC. Emissions of these contaminants are measured constantly
through CEMS to confirm the emissions are less than the A-7 emission limits
with data available online. The Courtice and Rundle stations also continuously
measure concentrations of these contaminants with summary reports published
online once a quarter.
As identified in the AQIA, Emissions from DYEC contribute less than 1 % to the
total ambient benzo(a)pyrene concentration for all assessed scenarios. Levels
of benzo(a)pyrene around the DYEC have remained steady, suggesting the
DYEC is not a significant source of benzo(a)pyrene. Typically, benzo(a)pyrene
is emitted as a product of incomplete combustion, particularly in car exhaust,
Page 67
Attachment #1
Page 10 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
therefore initiatives related to local traffic would be more beneficial to reduce
ambient benzo(a)pyrene levels than actions at DYEC. Concentrations of
Benzo(a) pyrene are measured at the Courtice and Rundle ambient stations.
Summary reports of the ambient data are published online once a quarter.
1.17 The ESR attributes already elevated background concentrations of
benzo(a)pyrene and sulphur dioxide to other nearby sources, including
transportation emissions from Highway 401 and other industrial sources.
Members of Council and the public have raised questions and concerns with
respect to the state of the local airshed, and the potential cumulative effect of
the industrial operations along Clarington's waterfront and the adjacent 400-
series transportation network on local airshed quality.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The impact of DYEC emissions were evaluated individually and cumulatively
and compared to the relevant ambient air quality criteria. The cumulative
assessment of emissions (i.e. the contribution of multiple sources) have been
evaluated. The ultra -conservative scenario assumes that the meteorological
conditions which result in the greatest ground level concentrations from DYEC
occur at the same time as the maximum on -site activities take place, and
during a period when ambient air quality conditions are at the 90th percentile.
The likelihood of all these factors occurring concurrently is low.
Nitrogen oxide emissions from DYEC were calculated based on the Ontario A-7
emission limits, which is conservative as source testing data has historically
been less. Predicted concentrations were compared to the Canadian Ambient
Air quality criteria of 79 pg/m3 on a 1 hour averaging period. The Ontario
Ambient Air Quality Criteria is 400 pg/m3 over the same 1 hour averaging
period and is still used as an indicator of good air quality. The maximum
predicted cumulative concentrations of Nitrogen dioxide are below the relevant
Ontario AAQC for all modelled scenarios. Similarly, maximum predicted
cumulative concentrations of sulphur dioxide are below the relevant provincial
and federal AAQC. Emissions of these contaminants are measured constantly
through CEMS to confirm the emissions are less than the A-7 emission limits
with data available online. The Courtice and Rundle stations also continuously
measure concentrations of these contaminants with summary reports published
online quarterly.
As identified in the AQIA, Emissions from DYEC contribute less than 1 % to the
total ambient benzo(a)pyrene concentration for all assessed scenarios. Levels
of benzo(a)pyrene around the DYEC have remained steady, suggesting the
DYEC is not a significant source of benzo(a)pyrene. Typically, benzo(a)pyrene
is emitted as a product of incomplete combustion, particularly in car exhaust,
therefore initiatives related to local traffic would be more beneficial to reduce
'�
Attachment #1
Page 11 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
ambient benzo(a)pyrene levels than actions at DYEC. Concentrations of
benzo(a)pyrene are measured at the Courtice and Rundle ambient stations.
Summary reports of the ambient data are published online quarterly.
1.18 Based on the recommendation of the Municipality's consultant following their
review of of St. Mary's Cement's ECA Amendment application to expand the
use of Low Carbon Alternative Fuels at the Bowmanville Site, Council directed
that staff work with MECP and industry (e.g. St. Mary's Cement and DYEC) to
set up a real-time air quality monitoring network within the Municipality
(Resolution #C-449-20). The conclusion of Dillon's review reaffirms their
recommendation regarding the establishment of a real- time monitoring network
in their review of the current DYEC proposal to increase throughput.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
Please see Response to Dillon 's comment #2.
1.19 The regulation and monitoring of overall air quality in Ontario is the
responsibility of the MECP. Council has previously been made aware of the air
quality review completed by the MECP in July 2018 for the south Clarington
area, which indicated that "analysis shows that air quality in Durham Region is
similar to that of other urban settings in southern Ontario and the Greater
Toronto Area." As an initial step in considering Council's request, MECP have
agreed to update this summary. Additional monitoring with TAGA units in
Clarington was conducted in the summer of 2021. Based on recent discussion
with the MECP, staff anticipate that the updated air quality review will be
provided within the first half of 2022. The mayor and staff have also engaged
local industry on Council's request. The updated air quality review will be
informative for this on -going work and is valuable to share with the community.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
Regarding the DYEC, the Region currently monitors the operation of the facility
in real-time and is in full compliance all regulatory standards and requirements.
If a Municipal monitoring network is proposed and accepted by all stakeholders,
the Region may be willing to contribute to such a network subject to
discussions and Council approval.
Page 69
Attachment #1
Page 12 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.20 Following the ESP, the Regions are required to apply for approval from the
MECP to amend the existing ECA to permit the increase in annual processing
capacity from 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year. While these applications are
typically subject to requirements for posting for public comment on the
Environmental Registry, there are limited opportunities for exemption where an
equivalent public participant process has already been carried out for a
proposal. It is not known at this time whether the consultation process carried
out by the Regions as part of the ESP would warrant an exemption, or whether
the Regions would seek the exemption. Further, the updated ESDM requested
by the MECP has not yet been made publicly available.
Dillon Consulting Recommendation:
That the Municipality request the Region and MECP commit to public
consultation as a component of the ECA Amendment process to provide the
Municipality and the public opportunity to review and provide comment on the
application, including all supporting technical studies and other documents.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.21 Several of the public comments reported in the ESR Record of Consultation
Summary Report (December 20, 2021) raised questions and concerns relating
to the potential effect of the proposal on waste reduction and diversion. The
ESR outlines long term waste management planning activities underway by the
Regions, which seek to maintain a focus on reducing the quantity of waste
requiring disposal at the DYEC. Durham Region Council approved the 2022 —
2040 Long -Term Waste Management Plan and its first five-year action plan on
January 26, 2022. The focus of the new LTWMP is on maximizing the diversion
of materials from waste and recovering waste as resources to optimize its
existing and planned disposal and processing infrastructure and minimize the
need for disposal.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
To date, the Region has adhered to all applicable MECP guidelines and
regulations during the Environmental Screening Process and will continue to do
so during the ECA application process in consultation and direction from the
MECP. The Region believes formal EBR posting of the ECA application may
not be required as a result of going through the screening process, however the
Region is committed to provide all supporting documents to the ECA
amendment process, including the updated ESDM report, to the Municipality for
review and commenting.
Page 70
Attachment #1
Page 13 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.22 Municipal staff were involved throughout the development of the Region's new
Long- Term Waste Management Plan. On -going consultation with Local Area
Municipalities, municipal Councils, and specific Municipal Departments on the
implementation of actions was requested. The comments also underlined
Council's Strategic Plan 2019 — 2022 goal to "advance waste reduction
initiatives by promoting the four Rs: Refuse, Reduce, Reuse and Recycle." The
development of an updated Long -Term Waste Management Plan by the
Region supports the commitment made by the Region in the DYEC Host
Community Agreement to the continuous implementation of a comprehensive
waste management strategy.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.23 The ESR states that "industrial property values are anticipated to increase with
the district heating potential and road infrastructure provided as part of the
DYEC construction." One of the major advantages attributed to the DYEC in its
EA and Host Community Agreement is its district energy potential. However,
the necessary infrastructure beyond the east wall of the DYEC has not been
implemented to encourage / promote and utilize the district heating and cooling
potential of the DYEC.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
1.24 In 2021, a collaboration between the Municipality and Durham was initiated to
assess viable options to provide a District Energy System (DES) to serve the
Clarington Waterfront, Energy Park and surrounding secondary plan areas. A
pre -feasibility study assessing the economic and carbon emission reduction
potential of DES options for the area is anticipated to be completed in the
coming weeks, the results of which will be presented to Durham and Clarington
Councils with a request for direction on whether to proceed with a complete
feasibility study.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
No Response Required.
Page 71
Attachment #1
Page 14 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.25 It is respectfully recommended that Council authorize staff to immediately notify
the Region and MECP of our interest to have the comments set out herein
addressed, and that a mutually agreeable time period to try to resolve concerns
be established and communicated to the Director of the MECP prior to the end
of the public review period. In order to keep Council informed and to have an
opportunity to seek further direction from Council, it is recommended that staff
report back with an update at the February 14, 2022, Council meeting.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
A meeting between Clarington and Regions was held on February 11, 2022, to
review comments submitted by Dillon. From this meeting, it was agreed upon
that the conversation regarding the ESR will remain open beyond February 18,
2022, and the comments will be presented in Clarington's March 14, 2022,
Council meeting.
1.26 That the Municipality of Clarington request that the Regions and MECP confirm
that all stack parameters and emission rates have been appropriately
characterized.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The Regions, MECP and Consultants have reviewed and confirmed that all
stack parameters and emission rates have been appropriately characterized
and are outlined in the ESR. The details on rejected waste can be found in the
DYEC Annual reports which are posted on the website. Information that was
provided in the ESR was based on the ESR MECP preparation guidance
documents.
Page 72
Attachment #1
Page 15 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
Dillon Consulting Ltd. Recommendations on the Environmental Screening Report
1.1 The Municipality should request that the Regions and MECP review the data
selected to represent background conditions to confirm the assessment is
appropriately conservative.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
MECP reviewed the monitoring data used in the AQIA and provided comments,
which were addressed.
No monitoring station can ever be 100% upwind or downwind of a facility. The
two stations were sited in consultation with MECP in 2013, to represent
"typical" upwind and downwind location from DYEC, using the prevailing wind
direction. Background air quality data used in the AQIA was taken from the
Courtice Station where available, as this station was sited to be upwind of
DYEC for the prevailing wind direction and would therefore reduce the
likelihood of double counting emissions from existing operations. The Rundle
station is predominantly downwind of DYEC and would be less representative
of background conditions in the absence of any impacts from DYEC. It would
include a greater amount of monitoring periods that include a contribution from
the existing operations of DYEC.
As a result, the use of the 90%ile of monitored data from Courtice Station to
represent background air quality is considered to be representative, while still
conservative as the air quality concentrations have historically been lower than
these concentrations, 90% of the time.
1.2 The Municipality should request that the Regions and MECP review and
confirm that elevated concentrations at the Rundle monitoring station have
been appropriately attributed and that potential impacts from DYEC have been
considered
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
Ambient air quality reports for Courtice and Rundle monitoring Stations have
been prepared quarterly since 2013 and are submitted to MECP for review.
Copies of these reports are available publicly on DYEC website. The Rundle
Station is located closer to Highway 401 than the Courtice station, which is
anticipated to be the source of elevated Benzo(a)pyrene concentrations due to
emissions from vehicles. Studies by the US EPA have found that roadways
generally influence air quality within a few hundred metres downwind of a
heavily travelled road. The actual distance varies by location, time of day, year,
prevailing meteorology, topography and traffic patterns (US EPA 2014).
Page 73
Attachment #1
Page 16 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
Highway 401 is one of the most heavily travelled roads in North America and is
located upwind of Rundle monitoring station and downwind of Courtice
monitoring station, based on the prevailing wind direction. This explains the
higher Benzo(a)Pyrene concentrations observed at the Rundle Station.
1.3 The Municipality should work with the Regions and MECP to request that all
"locations of interest" allowable under current zoning by-laws be included in the
AQIA and all subsequent studies as appropriate.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
There are no existing high-rise residential developments within 2.5 km of
DYEC. Discrete receptors were located at lands zoned to allow future use, at
grade. Without site plans, no information is available on the heights of
proposed future uses and/or the location of their future air intakes to accurately
represent them in the model in a realistic manner. Additionally, it is understood
that future developments located within close proximity to DYEC and any other
existing industrial use within the Park proposing sensitive uses would be
required to submit an air quality study as part of their site plan application to
confirm that they will not impact the ability of existing facilities to operate within
the conditions of their air/noise approval. The location of elevated receptors will
be reviewed when the ECA amendment application is filed, no changes to the
AQIA modelling are required.
In addition, the Region of Durham owns two properties zoned for sensitive uses
and understand the above noted requirements. The two other properties with
zoning permissions for sensitive uses include a brand-new industrial building
(East Penn Canada), and the other is under active site plan for a future parking
lot to support OPG's new headquarters. Lastly, the Municipality is currently
undergoing an update to the Courtice Waterfront and Clarington Energy Park
Secondary Plan with a focus on business and energy related uses. As part of
the implementation of the new Plan, the future zoning by-law should reflect the
current uses in this area and eliminate incompatible uses which do not comply
with the existing facilities in the area.
1.4 The Municipality should request that the Regions and MECP review the
justification for an increased stack temperatures and request adjustments to the
air dispersion modelling accordingly.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
A copy of the emission calculations is provided in Appendix D of the AQIA.
Emission rates were calculated with the aid of in -stack measured emission
concentrations from the Fall 2020 source testing data or in -stack emission
limits (provided in mg/Rm3). The concentrations were multiplied by the
Page 74
Attachment #1
Page 17 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
volumetric flowrate (in Rm3/s) to generate the equivalent mass emission rates
for the corresponding Scenario.
For the 140,000 tpa Scenario: the volumetric flow rate (at reference
conditions) was taken from the 2011 Emission Summary and Dispersion
Modelling (ESDM) Report for DYEC (Golder, 2011) and is based on an
operating condition of 100% Maximum Continuous Rating (MCR).
For the 160, 000 tpa Scenario: the volumetric flow rate (at reference
conditions) was taken from the Fall 2018 Source Testing campaign
(ORTECH, 2018) and pro -rated by the ratio of the steam production from
the boilers operating at 110% MCR (which would be required to process
160,000 tpa), to the steam production rate at the time of the Fall 2018
Source Testing (Equivalent to a factor of 1.13). To operate at a capacity
of 160, 000 tpa, DYEC would need to operate at 110% Maximum
Continuous Rating (MCR), rather than 100% MCR, which is required for
140,000 tpa capacity. The exhaust temperature of the equipment
operating at 110% MCR was provided by Covanta, based on the
manufacturers' documentation.
This approach was reviewed by the MECP. No adjustments to the air
dispersion modelling are required.
1.5 The Municipality should request that the Regions and MECP review the AQIA
to confirm that all appropriate reasonably foreseeable future activities have
been included.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
Presented in a Public Meeting on February 3, 2022, it was announced that the
ACLF at SMC will not result in a change in the local air quality and emissions
from SMC are anticipated to be captured within the background monitoring
data. Therefore, no further modelling is required as it has been already as part
of historical operations and emissions as it was already an existing facility.
1.6 The Municipality should consider requesting that the Regions and MECP
require additional technical studies be completed to verify the conclusion that
no increase in odours is expected from the capacity increase at DYEC.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
In the 2011 ESDM report, worst case odour emissions were assessed during
upset conditions when both trains are offline for an extended period and the pit
is full of waste. Under this scenario, the fans would still be operating, drawing
air through the combustion system and releasing uncombusted odorous air into
Page 75
Attachment #1
Page 18 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
the atmosphere. The maximum predicted 10-minute averaged concentration
was approximately 12% of the odour guideline at 0.12 OU/m3. No change is
proposed to the maximum amount of waste in the pit on a 1-hour basis and no
change is proposed to the combustion air fans. As such, no change is
proposed to the maximum odour scenario, and it was not considered further in
the ESR. This scenario will be re -modelled as part of the ECA Amendment
application, as required.
1.7 The Municipality should confirm with the Region that no change in the waste
stream composition is expected.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
At this time, there are no changes to the waste composition anticipated. The
future development of the Mixed Waste Pre-sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility will
remove organics and non -combustibles from the waste, providing a more
stable fuel source, and waste materials/composition incoming from York
Region, and Regional Waste Management Facilities will not change. It is
important to note that waste composition is generally assumed to change over
time; as new packaging materials are being developed, new policies are
developed and implemented, and residents' habits change. An example of this
is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; we did see a change in waste
composition as the number of single -use plastics (i.e. gloves and masks),
packaging materials (i.e. Amazon boxes and home delivery food kits), and
overall volume of waste increase as residents were on lockdown. Due to these
factors the DYEC is generally designed and operated to handling changes in
material composition. The approximate 30, 000 tonnes removed through the
Mixed Waste Pre-sort/Anaerobic Digestion facility may allow the opportunity for
the Region to pickup from municipally owned buildings (including recreational
centers, schools and municipal office buildings etc.); material picked up from
these locations will not go through the Mixed Waste Pre-sort. While removing
organics from residential waste will cause the material to have an altered
energy content the change is not anticipated to result in changes to facility
operations, and the removal of material for disposal provides the Regions with
the flexibility to use this additional processing capacity when available. This in
turn would reduce the quantity of waste requiring alternate disposal at facilities
outside the Regions' borders.
Page 76
Attachment #1
Page 19 of 19
Regional Municipalities of Durham and York Response to Municipality of Clarington Comments (March 11,
2022) — Municipality of Clarington Report #PDS-008-22 (February 7, 2022)
Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per Year
Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Environmental Screening Report
1.8 The Municipality should request that the Regions and MECP require an
assessment of all potential operating conditions, including process upset
conditions.
Regional Municipality of Durham and Municipality of York Response:
The proposed increase in tonnage does not impact the start-up, shut down or
upset conditions, therefore these scenarios were not considered in the ESR.
They will be assessed in the ECA amendment application as required.
End
Page 77
p 'Subject to Advisory Committee Approval'
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Meeting
Thursday, February 10, 2022
Members Present: Eric Bowman Don Rickard Henry Zekveld
Brenda Metcalf John Cartwright Jennifer Knox
Tom Barrie Jordan McKay Ryan Cullen
Councillor Zwart
Regrets: Ben Eastman
Staff: Amy Burke, Faye Langmaid - Planning & Development Services
Guests: Tracey Webster, Planning & Development Services; Brandon
Hebor, Boreal Greens Co.; Heide Kraus
Observers: Sarah Parish, Planning & Development Services; Carolyn
Puterbough, OMAFRA
Due to COVID 19 restrictions and to ensure social distancing, participation in the
meeting was electronic (using Microsoft Teams) and by conference call.
Eric welcomed all to the meeting, with introductions of Committee members.
Declarations of Interest
None
Adoption of Agenda
022-006 Moved by Don Rickard, seconded by Tom Barrie
That the Agenda for February 10, 2022 be adopted.
Carried
Approval of Minutes
022-007 Moved by Henry Zekveld, seconded by Brenda Metcalf
That the minutes of the January 13, 2022 meeting be approved.
Carried
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Claringtor�age 78 February 10, 2022
'Subject to Advisory Committee Approval'r*'r
Presentation
Vertical Farming: Brandon Hebor, Founder and CEO of Boreal Greens Co., presented
an overview of the vertical farming. Brandon explained that vertical farming is the
integration and use of multi -layered or `tower' equipment to cultivate plants in high
densities using either hydroponic or aquaponic approaches. It can range in scale from
tabletop gardens to converted shipping containers to an industrial scale. Highlights of
the presentation included:
• Brandon's journey into vertical farming and urban agriculture;
• Food and agricultural awareness and education opportunities that vertical
farming can provide;
• Fundamentals of vertical farming operations (infrastructure, environment,
equipment);
• Common products grown and emerging research and technology to diversify the
industry; and
• Key considerations (finance, planning, market, design, regulatory).
Brandon explained that vertical farming is not unlike greenhouse operations in terms of
susceptibility to disease/pest and the importance of disease/pest management.
Brandon also advised that this emerging field of agriculture is experiencing uptake in
Ontario and nationally. OMAFRA has dedicated efforts to build the industry, supporting
education and data aggregation efforts. Funding support for the industry typically stems
from agri-innovation, agri-research and development, agri-business opportunities.
Zone Clarington Second Draft Zoning By-law: Amy Burke and Tracey Webster,
Planning and Development Services, presented an update on the Municipality's
comprehensive zoning by-law review project. Staff reviewed current status of the
project, including the introduction of a proposed second draft zoning by-law to Council it
November 2021, the resulting direction of Council, and initial next steps for public
consultation. Staff also provided a focused outline of agricultural and agriculture -related
zoning proposed in the second draft zoning by-law:
• Terms and definitions;
• Minimum Distance Separation;
• Agricultural Zone Category permitted uses; and
• Updated provisions relating to farm related commercial and industrial
establishments, home industries and home businesses, farm worker
accommodations, and shipping/cargo containers.
Additional agriculture -related considerations identified by the project team were
reviewed with the Committee; these related to farm worker accommodations, private
airfields, farm product sales and farm related commercial uses. The Committee was
invited to provide feedback on the second draft zoning by-law and topics identified for
further review.
Delegations
Heide Kraus regarding On -Farm Diversified Uses: Heide Kraus indicated her
concern that the storage of recreational vehicles is being overlooked, in her opinion,
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Claringtor�age 79 February 10, 2022
'Subject to Advisory Committee Approval'r*'r
during discussions of on -farm diversified uses. Ms. Kraus provided a presentation
reviewing Council direction in response to the Recreation Vehicle and Trailer Storage
Study (Resolution #PD-207-21) and recommendation 3 from the RV and Trailer Parking
and Storage Study Final Report (D.M. Wills, June 2021). Ms. Kraus also reviewed
components of the Guidelines on Permitted Uses in Ontario's Prime Agricultural Areas
(OMAFRA, 2016) Ms. Kraus expressed the concern that while the Municipality has
recognized the broader Provincial definition of OFDU, it has limited OFDUs to those
directly related to the farm operation based on the current policy direction of the Durham
Region Official Plan. The delegation raised concern about a perceived lack of
conformity with Provincial direction, which she hopes the AACC's OFDU Sub -committee
will address.
Business Arisina from Minutes
AACC 2021 Accomplishments Update: AACC Chair, Eric Bowman, presented the
2021 annual update to the Municipality's Planning and Development Committee on
January 17, 2022. Eric provided an overview of the Committee's 2021 activities and
accomplishments. Committee extended gratitude to the Committee for their time and
efforts and invited AACC input on how Council can provide help to ensure the efficient
and safe arrival of Temporary Foreign Workers for the upcoming season. The
presentation was received with thanks.
Correspondence, Council Items and Referrals
DAAC 2021 Annual Report and 2022 Work Plan (#2022-P-2): A copy of the Durham
Agricultural Advisory Committee's 2021 Annual Report and 2022 Work Plan was
circulated to all prior to the meeting.
National Farmers Union — Proposed Anaerobic Digestion Facility: A copy of the
National Farmers Union — Ontario letter, dated February 7, 2022, was circulated to all
prior to the meeting.
Liaison Resorts
Durham Agriculture Advisory Committee: Planning is underway for the 2022 Annual
Farm Tour. This year's event is seeking to return to an in -person format, subject to
public health guidelines and restrictions. The next DAAC meeting is scheduled for
March 8, 2022.
Durham Region Federation of Agriculture: None. DRFA is in the process of
determining their new DRFA representative to the AACC.
Durham Farm Connections: Barn Quilt Trail project in Durham Region is on -going. To
learn more about the project and/or to participate, email
info@durhamfarmconnections.ca. Planning is set to begin for the 2022 Celebrate
Agriculture Gala. This year's Gala is seeking to return to an in -person format, subject to
public health guidelines and restrictions.
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Claringtorbage 80 February 10, 2022
'Subject to Advisory Committee Approval'
Clarington Board of Trade: Staff shared an update provided by CBOT. The first round
of the Shop Where you Live campaign was a great success. CBOT, in partnership with
the Durham Boards/Chambers, are looking at ways to continue with this promotion.
CBOT's COVID rapid antigen rapid test kit program continues. To date, CBOT has
distributed approximately 60,000 tests to over 500 businesses. A recent shipment of
20,000 test kits has been used to fill outstanding orders, while another 20,000 test kits
will be on -hand soon. To participate in the program, place orders at
www.cbot.ca/rapidscreening.
On -Farm Diversified Uses (OFDUs) Sub -Committee: None. The next OFDU Sub -
Committee meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2022.
New Business
Durham Region Agriculture & Rural Economic Development Workshops: Staff
shared a list of upcoming agriculture sector webinars and video series provided by
Durham Region. Contact Stacey Jibb, Manager — Agriculture and Rural Economic
Development, Region of Durham, for more information (Stacey.jibb@durham.ca; 905-
668-7711).
Ontario Agricultural Hall of Fame: Eric Bowman shared this week's announcement of
the 2022 inductees to the Ontario Agricultural Hall of Fame. The inductees include
James Rickard of Clarington. Eric extended congratulations to James, to his brother
and AACC member, Don Rickard, and the Rickard family for this outstanding
achievement and the significant contributions James has made to agriculture, locally
and beyond.
John Cartwright moved to adjourn.
Next Meeting
Thursday, March 10, 2022 @ 7:30 pm (Virtual Meeting)
Karen Yellowlees, Durham Region Federation of Agriculture to introduce the Farmer
Wellness Program
Stacey Jibb and Allison Brown, Region of Durham Agriculture and Rural Economic
Development with an update on the Durham Agri -Food Action Plan
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Claringtor�age 81 February 10, 2022
Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Management Advisory Committee
(SWNAMAC)
Minutes
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Date: February 8, 2022
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Held Virtually via Microsoft Teams
Present: Tom Hossie, Leo Blindenbach, Kate Potter, Patrick Bothwell, Rod McArthur,
Leah Bourgeois, Kristin Brent, Ken Mercer ( Staff ), Meg
Vanden brink,Carmen Aeillo,Brian Reid
Regrets: Corinna Traill
1. Call to Order
2. Additions to the Agenda - Leo requested that we have some discussion re
the Butterfly Rangers initiative of the David SuzukiFoundation
3. Adoption of the Agenda - moved by Leo Blindenbach, seconded by Meg
Vandenbrink that the agenda, with the above addition, be adopted. Carried.
4. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s)
Moved by Kate Potter
Seconded by Tom Hossie
That the minutes of the meeting of January 11, 2022 be approved.
Carried
5. Status Reports/Updates
5.1 Winter Trail Maintenance — Ken - ongoing based on weather
5.2 Silt Fencing along Waterfront Trail — Ken
5.3 Mowing of Wildflower Area along Waterfront/Lakeshore Drive — Ken
5.2 and 5.3 cannot be undertaken until the level of snow in the affected
areas has gone down considerably
Page 82
SWNAMAC Minutes February 8, 2022
5.4 Signage re Bridge Surfaces and Re Cyclists/Hikers
Ken reported that the various signs in question have been received and will
be installed by staff as soon as possible.
5.5 Trail Markers through old growth forest
Additional 4' marker signs have been ordered. Ken will advise Brian when
they have been received. He and Carmen have agreed to install them
thereafter.
5.6 Treatment Plant Study
Brian reported that the submission to the Region had been acknowledged. The
regional staff person said that the project team was working on responses to our
questions. Further, they are also looking at possible datesfor a virtual meeting
with the committee to discuss the project.
5.7 Traffic/Usage Survey
Considerable discussion took place on this topic. Kate has been in contact with
GRCA who will send information on how it has conducted such surveys in the past.
Brian reported that he has reviewed the survey format that was used by SWNA in
2012 . He and Kate will work together to develop an up to date format and bring it
back to the whole committee at our March meeting. It was noted that such surveys
can be very labour intensive. It was suggested that our manual survey could run
parallel to an on-line survey. It was also noted that it would probably be best to
conduct the survey in each of the four seasons to establish a broader data base and
to identify seasonal patterns.
5.8 Calendar/Chart of Activities
Kate presented the chart ( previously sent out to members ) as a guideline for
keeping our various activities etc organized... Some changes were made andKate
will send out a revised copy to members. It was noted that changes can be made at
any time.
5.9 Interpretative Signage/QR Codes Project
Tom reviewed the details of this project on behalf of the subcommittee struck at our
last meeting ( Brian, Kristin, Tom and Meg ) In simplest terms, QR codes willbe
posted at various locations throughout the SWNA allowing persons with smart
phones to access information pertaining to various subjects relating to the nature
area. Several subjects have been chosen as a starting point for this initiative.
Preparation of a narrative relating to each of these will be done by committee
members and circulated for comment and review.. Thereafter, Tom will set upthe
QR codes for each . Additional subjects may be added going forward.
Page 83
SWNAMAC Minutes
February 8, 2022
At present, the subjects and committee members assigned to each are as follows:
Salmon ecology/life history - Brian
The wonderful word of moths - Tom
Emerald Ash Borer - Tom
Monarch Butterfly/Conservation./ Life History - Meg
Native Pollinators - Kristin
Living Alongside Wildlife - Kate
Cultural Heritage - Kate
6. Items on Hold:
6.1 Storm Drainage Pond
6.2 Butternut Tree Planting
6.3 Scouting Bird House Project
7. Other Business
Leo noted that the David Suzuki Foundation has a programme called
Butterfly Rangers which aims to engage people in doing much of what we have
been doing at SWNA for the past several years in protecting and enhancing
monarch habitat, planting native plants etc. Leo has circulated information about
the programme on the Port of Newcastle /Friends of
Samuel Wilmot Facebook pages. This is seen as an excellent way to complement
our own activities.
Ken reported that he had ordered this year's monarch tags.
Ken reported that the municipality hopes to have a compost giveaway day on May
14th, 202.
SWNAMAC Minutes
February 8, 2022
8. Round table
Leo reported that a coy wolf has been seen on a regular basisin and
around the east end of the Port. Brian reported having seen a coyote only
a couple blocks from his home in northeast Bowmanville . Tom has
noticed a number of social media comments about coyote sighting and
was pleasantly surprised that they were not negative. This highlights the
need to coexist with wildlife. Meg and Kate continue to walk in the SWNA
almost daily. Leah has spent time walking in the nature area since our last
meeting. Carmencommented on how much he enjoyed the virtual
presentation on owls put onrecently by the Durham Region Field
Naturalists.
9. Next Meeting -Tuesday March 8,2022 ( Virtual or in person TBD)
10.Adjournment
Moved by Kate Potter
Seconded by Patrick Bothwell
That themeeting be adjourned.
Carried.
Page 85
Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board
Municipality of Clarington
Minutes of Meetinz — Tuesday, February 8, 2022
Not vet approved by the Board)
In Attendance — Dave Bouma - Chair Bryan Wiltshire — Arena Manager
Shea -Lea Latchford, Todd Taylor, Jim Vison, Sue White, Councillor Margaret Zwart (cell)
Regrets — Councillor Granville Anderson, Shane Armstrong, Gary Oliver
Meeting opened at 7:00 p.m. with the Land Acknowledgement
1. Agenda - Motion #22-005
Moved by Todd Taylor, seconded by Jim Vision THAT: The Agenda be accepted
as proposed.
CARRIED
2. Acceptance of Minutes - Motion #22-006
Moved by Sue White, seconded by Todd Taylor THAT: The minutes of January 11, 2022, be
approved with the revision of the Risk Management Report.
CARRIED
Manager's Report — Safety: Staff are up to date on the vaccine passport requirements to
enter the facility. Risk Management: An inspection will be performed in the coming week.
Rentals/ Revenue: All user groups have booked ice until the end of March, and many are
looking to extending their contracts into April to make up for the lost ice time in January due
to the shutdown. The outstanding issues with Futuresign are still unresolved, however,
payment has been received from Tim Hortons.
Repairs/Maintenance: All the paint touch ups have been completed as well as a deep clean
of the arena. A new door for the dressing hallway has been installed by Rivett. A leak in
the compressor room roof was found and will be repaired by the Municipality. The Manager
(Bryan) will follow up with the Municipality to see if the roof should have the shingles
replaced rather than patched. Staff: The staff have been recalled and have been instructed
on the QR Code verification. Inspections/Municipal Operations: No inspection due to the
lockdown. Other: Facebook and the website have been updated. Beacon Heights have
expressed an interest in advertising in the Arena. Bryan will follow up with pricing.
'�
2.
Financial Report - Motion # 22-007
Todd Taylor presented the budget for 2022. Moved by Dave Bouma seconded by Sue White
THAT: The budget be accepted as presented.
CARRIED
3. Risk Management —The minutes from January 11, 2022, were revised to reflect the Board's
concerns related to the Staff Report CDS-002-22 submitted by George Acorn that
recommends a budget of $3,684,000 be allocated to correct deficiencies identified in the I.B.
Storey assessment of the arena. A walk through will be scheduled within the next week.
4. New Business - Covid Update — A device will be purchased to scan the QR Code as one
enters the arena. Council Meeting Update — Councillor Zwart advised the report will be
presented at the budget meeting this week. Olympia — Deferred until the floor is replaced.
5. Round Table — A round table discussion followed.
6. Discussion — A `In Camera" discussion was held to develop a Covid-19 Vaccination Policy
for the arena.
7. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 8:35 p.m.
Next Board Meeting — Tuesday, March 8, 2022
Page 87
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee
Minutes for the meeting of
February 2, 2022 6:30 p.m.
Via Microsoft Teams
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Present: Shea -Lea Latchford, Chair
Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer, Vice -Chair
Tim Van Leeuwen
Pinder DaSilva
Sarah Taylor
Deb Kalogris
Marina Ross
Councillor Janice Jones
Also Present: Erica Mittag, Community Development Coordinator — Diversity and
Inclusion
Jeannette Whynot, Accessibility Coordinator
Regrets: Sarah McConaghy
Catherine McConaghy
1. Call to order
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Declaration of Interest
None
3. Review of Previous Meeting Minutes
Moved by Deb Kalogris; seconded by Sarah Taylor
That the minutes of the meeting of January 12, 2022 be approved.
Carried
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes — February 2, 2022
4. Guest Speaker: Erica Mittag, Community Development
Coordinator — Diversity and Inclusion
Re: Creation of Municipal Civic Awards
Erica presented information about the Municipality's intention to create a Civic Awards
Program. Over the years, the Municipality has received numerous requests over the
years to recognize people in community doing great work and having a positive impact
on the community. Currently there are recognition programs in place, but nothing as
formal as a Civic Awards Program.
As staff are developing a framework for the program, it became clear that the AAC
needed to be consulted. Currently the Committee nominates a
business/person/organization for the Durham Accessibility Award and then holds a
separate event to recognize everyone who was nominated but did not win. With the
creation of the Civic Awards Program there is an opportunity to include "Accessibility" as
a category, which would overlap with the current Accessibility Award and nominations
being recognized.
A brief discussion of potential options going forward were discussed. Staff suggested
that knowing the Committee is supportive of including Accessibility as an award
category in the Civic Awards Program is a great first step. From here, staff will come
back to the Committee with additional recommendations for their consideration and
approval.
Moved by Pinder DaSilva, Seconded by Sarah Taylor,
That the Accessibility Advisory Committee supports the establishment of the Civic
Awards Program and the inclusion of an Accessibility Award as part of that program.
Carried
5. Business Arising from Previous Meeting Minutes
5.1 2021 Annual Status Update
Moved by Deb Kalogris, seconded by Sarah Taylor
That the Accessibility Advisory Committee accept the 2021 Annual Status Update
Carried
5.2 National AccessAbility Week 2022: Brainstorming
Committee is encouraged to continue brainstorming ideas and determining what they
would like to help organize.
Page 2 of 5
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes — February 2, 2022
To interview with the newspaper, a staff member will need to be part of the interview.
The Client Services Manager is aware and will help ensure a staff member is able to
support this initiative while Jeannette is on parental leave. With it being budget approval
season, Jeannette advised that this can be done in the early spring.
Staff are supportive of the contest ideas. Sarah Taylor volunteered to help develop the
contests, both the art and scavenger hunt.
6. New Business
6.1 Inclusive Community Grant
Once again the Inclusive Community Grant is open for applications. Last time we
applied we received just under $60,000 to install the mobility device charging stations.
Jeannette requested the Committee share ideas for projects we could apply for. Ideally,
projects would benefit both seniors and people with disabilities.
The Committee came up with the following suggestions:
• Installation of automatic sliding doors
• Tactile plates at road crossings
• Installation of more accessible swings in parks
• Installation of picture communication signage in parks
• Creation of a sensory garden
o Sensory gardens have features that touch on all five senses through a
variety of mediums.
• Raised community garden beds
• Sensory additions to our pools
Given the short window for applications, Jeannette advised that she would take these
ideas back to staff and determine the best one to move forward with. Once an idea was
secured, Jeannette advised she would work with the Committee Chair to create a letter
of support from the Committee. Additionally, she would work with Councillor Jones to
gain Council's support for the project and application.
The Committee mutually agreed this was an appropriate course of action given the
short timelines.
6.2 Re -applying for the Accessibility Advisory Committee post -election.
Reminder it's an election year. After the October election there may not be any
meetings from Oct -Dec. Towards the end of the year there will be calls committee
members.
Per the Terms of Reference, Committee members can only serve 2 terms in a row; can
still apply but Council would have to give approval for additional terms.
Page 3 of 5
Page 90
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes — February 2, 2022
6.3 Mobility charging stations moving forward
To date, there are 6 installed in parks and public spaces. The Municipality intended to
install a solar powered option in a more remote area that does not have electricity
available, however this has proven to be a large challenge. The technology to support
the batter size we need does not exist. Therefore, we are shifting our approach and will
re -allocate the money to add 6-8 more hard -wired stations at indoor and outdoor
locations.
Staff have identified the following locations:
• Rickard Arena
• Allan Strike Centre
• Orono Library (currently not accessible but a major accessibility upgrade is
scheduled for later this year)
• Newcastle Area
• Bowmanville Mall
• Newcastle Community Hall
• Memorial Park (if appropriate infrastructure is available, staff to double check)
• Clarington Fields
Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer requested that the site plan sub committee include requesting
charging stations in their site plan comments. Additionally, the Committee asked why
locations in North Bowmanville weren't on this list right now. Staff explained that
charging stations can be incorporated into park development, but right now there's not
enough infrastructure to support them.
Moved by Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer, Seconded by Deb Kalogris
Whereas mobility device charging stations have proven to be a successful addition to
the Clarington community and local neighborhoods ;
And whereas accessibility considerations should be brought forward as early in the
planning stages as possible and;
And whereas Clarington has the opportunity to be a leader in offering mobility device
charging stations throughout its community;
Now therefore be is resolved that the Accessibility Advisory Committee shall
recommend the inclusion of mobility device charging stations in new commercial builds,
where appropriate and that the Municipality of Clarington includes mobility device
charging stations in new municipal facilities and outdoor spaces, where appropriate.
Carried
Page 4 of 5
Page 91
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes — February 2, 2022
7. New Business
Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer spoke about the new electronic price tags on shelves at Metro —
signs appear to be different sizes & not very accessible. Other Committee members
agreed to check out the signs and also provide feedback at the next meeting.
Sarah Taylor will be meeting with Jennifer from the newspaper tomorrow morning to talk
about accessibility
Pinder DaSilva invited everyone to the Abilities Centre lunch and learn on February 22.
Information on the latest information from the National Disability Survey will be
presented. Jeannette advised she would send everyone information about it through
email.
8. Adjournment
Moved by Sarah Taylor, Seconded by Deb Kalogris
That the meeting be adjourned
Carried
Meeting adjourned at 7:53 pm
Next meeting: Wednesday March 2, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. via Microsoft
Teams
Page 5 of 5
Page 92
Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
arbgtoa February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval**
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee held via Microsoft Teams on February
15, 2022, at 7:00 PM.
Members Present: Peter Vogel, Victor Suppan, David Reesor, Councillor Ron
Hooper, Myno Van Dyke (NVDHS alternate), Ron Sproule,
Katharine Warren (Museum), Bob Malone (NVDHS), Steve
Conway, Heather Graham
Regrets: Jason Moore (ACO), Noel Gamble
Staff Present: Faye Langmaid, Sarah Allin, Andrew Payne Planning and
Development Services
Guests: None
1 Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
2 Land Acknowledgement Statement
P. Vogel read aloud Clarington's Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3 Adoption of Agenda
22.04 By Consensus
That the Agenda be adopted.
"Carried"
4 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
22.05 By Consensus
That the minutes of the January 18, 2022 Clarington Heritage Committee
meeting be adopted.
"Carried"
5 Delegations/Presentations: None
6 Business Arising
6.1 Red Oak Tree at 21 Beech Avenue
Page 9� -
Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
Clar;wgtoa
February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval"
Staff provided an update that approved works to preserve the Red Oak tree will
begin this week. The arborist's team will be on site to do the required pruning the
week of February 15t". The cabling and support system will be installed the
following week.
Committee members discussed the direction from Council to reconsider the
designation of the Red Oak tree under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act,
following a recent delegation by R. McEachern and receipt of an online petition
signed by approximately 5000 persons requesting the protection of the red oak
tree.
Committee members discussed the request for reconsideration. The Committee's
recent evaluation of the cultural heritage value and interest of the tree in
accordance with criteria for designation under Regulation 9/06 found there was
insufficient cultural heritage value or interest to warrant individual designation. The
Red Oak tree has current status as a significant landscape feature within the
Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District. The Committee also considered the
ongoing Municipal efforts and funding to protect and preserve the tree.
22.06 Moved by D. Reesor, seconded by V. Suppan
That the Committee has undertaken an evaluation of the Red Oak tree at 21
Beech Avenue and did not find the tree to have individual cultural heritage value or
interest above and beyond what is currently recognized in the Beech Avenue
Heritage Conservation District, within which it is already protected.
"Carried"
6.2 B/A Gas Station, Newtonville
Members of the Committee discussed reaching out to the property owners again
once the pandemic situation improves, as they had previously indicated they were
open to learning more about the federal designation process. To apply for federal
designation agreement of the owner must be part of the submission.
Councillor Hooper, V. Suppan, and S. Conway expressed interest in being
involved in a meeting with the property owners at an appropriate time.
6.3 2656 Concession Road 4, Darlington
The Municipality acquired the property earlier this year. The house on the
property is designated. Committee members visited the property in December
2021 to undertake an evaluation. Council recently agreed to allow the house to be
moved from the property in response to a resident's request, provided the CHC
also supports the relocation.
The sub -committee summarized its evaluation looking at the contextual heritage
value of the property and the potential impact of relocating the dwelling, including
Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
Clar;wgtoa
February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval"
the loss of the barns and the uniquely constructed stone foundation. It was noted
moving the dwelling outside of the historic hamlet of Salem would be particularly
detrimental to the cultural heritage value and interest of the property. Overall, the
sub -committed indicated the preference would be that the dwelling be retained in
situ. If retaining the dwelling in situ is not possible, the recommendation from the
sub -committee is (i) that the dwelling be relocated within the historical hamlet of
Salem, and (ii) the designated by-law be updated to include additional heritage
features identified through the sub -committee's recent evaluation of the property.
Committee members discussed the sub -committee's report, inquired about
potential alternatives to moving the dwelling that may better conserve its heritage
value. This item is further addressed under Item 9.1 of the agenda.
A proposal to move the dwelling would be subject the applicable approvals
process under the Ontario Heritage Act. No application has been filed at this time.
6.4 4511 Courtice Road
Although the demolition permit has been issued, the dwelling has not yet been
taken down. J. Moore reached out to contacts at ACO and is awaiting a response
relating to any potential leads on alternatives that might conserve the stone
structure in some manner. Committee members efforts towards a conservation
solution are appreciated.
6.5 Harvey Jackson Memorial Park
The Committee received a request from residents of Kendal to designate the Park.
The Municipal Inventory/Register sub -committee evaluated the property and
summarize its findings and recommendation to designate Harvey Jackson
Memorial Park and its entrance gates to recognize the lovely tribute to First World
War Veteran Harvey Jackson from the small village of Kendal.
The sub -committee identified Robert Patton as another World War One Veteran
from Kendal. Committee members discussed how Robert Patton's contributions
might also be recognized. Committee members will seek to gather information in
this regard and bring the matter back to the Committee at a subsequent meeting.
This item is further addressed under Item 9.1 of the agenda.
6.6 Camp 30 Update
F. Langmaid advised the cafeteria building has now been turned over to the
Municipality. The Jury Lands Foundation is working to secure charitable status to
begin to raise funds to begin to stabilize the building, which has suffered
vandalism, and begin planning for its adaptive reuse.
6.7 Fletcher Tree (Standing Item): No update
7 Correspondence and Council Referrals: None
Paces 95
Clarftwn
8 Reports from other Committees:
Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval'*
8.1 Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono CIPs — The 2022 winter meetings will take
place in February. An update will be reported at the March Committee meeting.
8.2 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), Clarington Branch — The next
meeting is scheduled for February 22na
8.3 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) — The Annual General
Meeting will take place on February 17t". There are Director openings for those
looking for volunteer opportunities. The Digitization Project is continuing; the hope
is that it can be completed this year, after which the information can be made
available. The Society is looking to reschedule a Municipally funded heritage tea
party event that had been cancelled in 2020 due to the pandemic. Planning is
underway for celebrations for the 100t" year anniversary of Newcastle Community
Hall in 2023.
8.4 Museum — Meetings take place quarterly; a meeting is coming up next week. The
Museum continues to operate at low capacity; by appointment only.
8.5 Heritage Conservation District — No report. Committee members confirmed the
dates of the 21 Beech Avenue Oak Tree preservation works.
8.6 Wilmot Creek Heritage Park — Members of the Committee met with Clarington's
Landscape Architect (A. Johnson) in December to go over the developer's
proposed design and provide the Committee's input on the cultural heritage
components. V. Suppan reached out to Chief Mowat after the meeting to invite
additional input on the design and is awaiting reply. B. Malone will also reach out.
Staff will continue to work with Committee members as the park design evolves. S.
Conway brought forward an example of a plaque that could be considered to
display indigenous heritage information within the park.
9 Project Reports
9.1 Municipal Inventory/Register:
2101 Townline Road — The dwelling at this property was recently demolished.
The property was originally the Thompson farm. The dwelling was a 1 '/2 storey
Ontario farmhouse that had been heavily altered. Staff confirmed the property
was not identified on the Cultural Heritage Resources List.
48 [44] King Avenue East — This the former dwelling of Joseph Atkinson, the
founder of the Toronto Star. The dwelling has been modified, however could
warrant some research given its historical associations.
22.07 Moved by M. Van Dyke, seconded by R. Sproule
• Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
�� � February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval**
That the sub -committee evaluate cultural heritage value or interest of the property at
48 [44] King Avenue East, Newcastle.
"Carried"
2656 Concession Road 4, Darlington: The sub -committee evaluated the
designated property in consideration of a possible future proposal to relocate the
dwelling.
22.08 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by D. Reesor
That the Clarington Heritage Committee does not oppose the relocation of the
designated dwelling located at 2656 Concession Road 4, in principle, however
recommends for Council's consideration that if the dwelling must be moved (i)
consideration be given to the loss of the unique stone foundation (ii) that the dwelling
should be relocated within the boundaries of the historic hamlet of Salem, and (iii) the
designated by-law be updated to include additional heritage features identified through
the sub -committee's recent evaluation of the property..
R. Hooper abstained from voting on Motion 22.08.
"Carried"
• Harvey Jackson Memorial Park: See Item 6.5, above.
22.09 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by S. Conway
That the Clarington Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the Harvey
Jackson Memorial Park, located at 6690 Regional Road 18, Kendal, be considered for
designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act to recognize the tribute to a World
War One veteran from the small community of Kendal, and that the entrance gates be
specifically identified as part of the list of attributes having cultural heritage value or
interest.
"Carried"
22.10 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That consideration be given to also recognizing a veteran named R. Patton, who was
also from Kendal.
"Tabled"
Motion tabled to undertake additional research on this matter.
9.2 Outreach/Education Sub -committee:
Pa9S 97
Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes
Clar;wgtoa
February 15, 2022
** Subject to Advisory Committee Approval"
Heritage Information Station Project: Discussions about plaque design continue.
Information is being generated to populate the webpage for each property that will
link to the QR code on the plaque. Committee Members discussed including
Harvey Jackson Memorial Park to the list of sites.
Heritage Barn Project: Draft content for a letter, webpage, and social media was
circulated to the project team. This initiative will be the focus of Heritage Week
Feb. 21-25t"; social media posts will be released throughout the week to promote
the project.
10 New Business:
10.1 Heritage Week: Runs Feb. 21-25t". Heritage Barn Project will be promoted.
10.2 National Trust Heritage Property Owner Survey: V. Suppan noted the survey
intended to gather information about insurance for heritage homes. Encourage
anyone who owns a heritage home to complete the survey, which closes February
17t". S. Conway summarized correspondence to date with Minister's office
regarding organizing a meeting with a group of Clarington residents to discuss the
challenges of insuring a heritage home. This matter will be added to the agenda
for the next meeting for further discussion.
10.3 Affordable Housing Task Force Report: The Province's Affordable Housing Task
Force released its Recommendation Report earlier in February. The Report makes
recommendations relating to cultural heritage. Staff will send links to the Report.
10.4 Budget: Council approved increased funding for the Heritage Incentive Grant
program as part of the 2022 Budget. V. Suppan appeared as a delegation before
Council in support. Committee members thanked V. Suppan, and Councillor
Hooper for bringing the matter forward during budget deliberations.
10.5 Trinity Church: Committee members inquired as to whether the property is
designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. Staff confirmed the property is
identified on Clarington's Cultural Heritage Resources List but is not currently
designated.
10.6 81 Scugog: Committee members asked for an update on the property standards
matter. Staff will request an update from Municipal Law Enforcement staff.
Adjournment: 9:35 p.m.
Next Meeting: March 15, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
Clarington
Meeting: Active Transportation and Safe Roads Advisory Committee
Date: February 3, 2022
Time: 7:00 pm
Location: Microsoft Teams Meeting
Minutes
Draft minutes not yet approved by Committee
Present: Rick Stockman, Jim Boate, Bart Hawkins Kreps, Phil Haylock,
Connor Houston, Bruce MacDonald (guest presenter), Arnold
Mostert, Richard Oldfield, Jeanne Winters, Councillor Janice Jones,
Councillor Joe Neal
Regrets: Connie Kobelka
Staff Present: Rob Brezina, Andrew Johnson, Catherine Verhoog
1. Agenda
Moved to approve by Bart, seconded by Jeanne
Carried
2. Minutes of October 21, 2021
Moved to approve by Arnold, seconded by Jim
Carried
3. Presentations
3.1. Bruce MacDonald — Bike Friendly Application
Bruce is a member of the Durham Region Cycling Commission and Whitby
Active Transportation Safe Roads Committee. In 2016 he was involved with
an application by Whitby to the Share the Road Cycling Coalition for bike
friendly status and they were successful in achieving a bronze designation.
Bruce reviewed the twelve -page application submitted by Whitby with the
committee and explained the significant parts to pay attention to.
Approximately 95% of the form is completed by municipal staff, and the
committee would review the application, and other cyclists would be able to
sign up as reviewers as well.
Page 99
Bruce introduced the Strava Global Heatmap which is a worldwide interactive
map used by Share the Road to evaluate applications. The map shows routes
that cyclists and others have reported as using and tracks them. He believes
that Clarington is close to bronze, but at the very least a solid honourable
mention.
Speak to experienced cyclists and ask for their opinions. All networks and
support systems are included in the assessment including trails, on -road,
commuter routes, transit systems that allow bikes on them, bicycle storage
locations etc.
4. Discussion Items
4.1. Bike Friendly Community Application Update — Jim/Connor
Connor explained that it is a collaborative application between the committee
and Clarington, and Region of Durham amenities such as the DRT being
bicycle friendly can be included. The application deadline is the Fall of 2022.
Jim expressed the need for buy -in from municipal staff, and the need to work
with one member of staff to help identify things like signs and education that
need to be spruced up. Andrew will speak to senior management to confirm
who will be the committee's staff liaison for this project.
Need staff liaison to assist. Andrew to confirm who. Janice — collaboration
with tourism/corporate communications/Planning. Motion required from the
committee to Council to get the Municipality on board? Andrew would run the
request past senior management to see how they would like to proceed. Rick
— email to Andrew summarizing what committee has discussed and where
they would like to go with it, or a whereas motion — Rick to send email to
Andrew. Connor and Jim to draft email.
Members in favour of continuing with initiative and continuing with email.
Janice — timeline for moving forward, when is deadline for application —
Connor - fall of 2022, twice a year application.
Whereas the Municipality of Clarington created the Active Transportation and
Safe Roads Advisory Committee in 2018; and
Whereas a key mandate of the committee is to prompt active transportation
including cycling; and
Whereas the committee are investigating the feasibility of applying for a Bike
Friendly Community designation for the Municipality of Clarington; and
Whereas the Bike Friendly Community application process involves an audit
of municipal infrastructure supporting cycling;
E
Page100
The committee recommends to Council their endorsement to proceed with
the application for Bike Friendly Community status with the help of municipal
staff, and that any costs associated with the application be borne by the
Municipality.
Moved by Jim, seconded by Jeanne.
Motion carried.
4.2. Trail Signage Update & Budget — Jim/Bart
Jim to follow up with Slav in Operations regarding the report that the
committee submitted last year about requested safety, etiquette and
wayfinding signs for the trails and if there is a budget for those to be
completed. Rob suggested that committee members travel all of the major
trails and make a map of what signs they would like where to help assist
Operations. Signs would include those imposing speed limits at the busier
sections of the trail, directional signage as to where paths lead, walk on the
right and pass on the left, blind corner etc.
4.3. Document Sharing and Collaboration in MS Teams Follow Up — Andrew
Andrew to circulate an offline response to committee members.
4.4. 2022 Cycling Month Events Subcommittee Update — Connor
Subcommittee has met twice since the last meeting. The Region of Durham
has offered to provide coordination and support to the municipalities for Bike
Month. There is a brainstorming session being held next week where more
information will be provided on what will be offered and how the
municipalities can collaborate and partner together. Bart has updated the
handout already and has reached out to Tourism for their assistance. Other
members are approaching groups in the area to gauge their interest in
participating, but firm plans cannot be made at this time due to the unknown
of what Covid restrictions will be in place in June.
4.5. Bike Racks — Connor
Additional bike racks have been located throughout the municipality that the
committee was unaware of, and the Clarington Board of Trade has
expressed their support in helping promote bike racks with the downtown
businesses.
Rob provided an update on the Great Lake to Greenbelt Bike Rack
Installation project initiative. They are currently looking for recommendations
for a couple of locations where bike racks could be installed. The group will
fund the racks and they are asking the municipality to fund the installation
component and for downtown businesses to assist with possibly having the
Page 101
racks located on their property due to property constraints in the downtown
cores. Committee members are to email Rob with any location suggestions
as soon as possible, especially ones with pavers that could make the install
easier.
4.6. West Beach Road Safety Concerns — Jim
Rob to follow up with Slav on whether or not the white lines delineating the
bike friendly section on West Beach Road have been installed, as well as
signs indicating the bike crossing.
4.7. Durham Region Active Transportation Update — Connie
Postponed to next meeting due to Connie's absence.
4.8. Winter Maintenance Bowmanville Trail Extension Motion Update — Staff
The stretch from Cobbledick Road over to Toronto Street has been cleared,
but the Bowmanville trail extension from Baseline Road to the parking lot is to
be costed for the next winter season.
4.9. Multi -Use Path Hwy 2 — Maple Grove to Roenigk — Richard
A good east -west connection through Bowmanville between Bowmanville
Avenue and Maple Grove Road along Highway 2 is needed. There are
issues with spatial constraints due to property ownership and the area
needed for sidewalks, illumination, fire hydrants, utility locations etc.
Development of the corridor is still ongoing, and improvements can be made
within the undeveloped sections, but utility relocation and commercial
property acquisition within the built -out area is extremely expensive. The
urban boundary terminates at Boswell Drive and allocation of tax levy funds
as well as justification to implement multi -use paths west of Boswell Drive
would be needed.
5. Other Business
5.1. 2022 Construction Forecast Update — Rob B
All projects are pending budget approval in order to proceed. The first project
is the Toyota Trail extension from Haines Street to Soper Creek Trail. The
contractor started construction in December with completion hopefully at the
end of the summer.
The design is being finalized and they are getting ready to go to tender for
enhancements to the Lions Trail from King Avenue (Highway 2) to the
existing fully paved pedestrian trail. Construction is scheduled to start in the
Spring and conclude by September and will include a paved asphalt trail,
M
Page102
erosion remediation, relocation of the trail farther from the creek, and a
pedestrian crossover at Edward Street.
Jim asked Rob to follow up with the Region on the possibility of a pedestrian
crossing at King Avenue (Highway 2) to provide access to the newly installed
path on the north side.
Phase 3 of the Soper Creek Trail is currently under budget consideration for
2022. If approved, the design and public information process would proceed
towards the end of the summer
A road diet is proposed on King Street East from Liberty Street to just west of
Haines Street to accommodate cycling facilities. It will be a shared facility
from Liberty Street to Frank Street, and then open up to a continuous two-
lane section with a dedicated cycling lane from Frank Street until just west of
Haines where the current four lane roadway ends.
In 2024 the Region is considering construction of an improvement project on
Liberty Street from Highway 2 to Baseline Road for a dedicated left-hand turn
lane. The Municipality is requesting that an Multi -Use Path (MUP) be
implemented at the same time wherever spatially feasible. West of Liberty will
be looked at for an MUP when future pavement improvement is scheduled.
Several members expressed concern with the safety of cyclists at the
intersection of Highway 2 and Mearns Avenue, and a crossing on the east
side of the intersection was suggested. Rob will bring their comments to the
attention of the Region's designer for the intersection. He also indicated that a
permanent solution will be looked at when the old Bowmanville Zoo lands are
developed.
Connor mentioned that there was a notice that a new secondary plan is being
created in the area of Concession Road 3 and Mearns Avenue and asked if
there was any further information on the incorporation of active transportation
in the plan. Rob stated that all secondary plans are to include active
transportation considerations, but he will reach out to Planning for the
members to see if there is any information that he can relay to the Committee
by email.
Rick asked Rob to provide an update on the acquisition of lands at the old
training school, and what active transportation plans are proposed, at the next
meeting.
Darlington Boulevard in Courtice is currently going through the design
process for road rehabilitation which will target building an MUP type facility
or dedicated cycling lanes. The public information centre should be held this
spring and it will provide more detail. The Farewell Creek Trail is still currently
under construction as it was delayed due to contractor having difficulties with
ril
Page103
getting an approved bridge design. They are hoping to resume in the spring
with completion hopefully in July after paving.
The Region is looking at reconstructing Liberty Street from Longworth Avenue
onwards to Concession Road 3 and including an MUP facility on the west
boulevard. This would allow the continuation of existing facilities on
Longworth and Concession Road 3. This work will probably go to tender later
in the year.
In 2022 the Region is constructing a trunk sanitary sewer extension from
Basel ine/Courtice Road east to Trulls and north on Trulls to Bloor. The
Municipality is taking the opportunity to do an urbanization of Baseline Road
in the industrial area in conjunction with the Region's project because of the
GO Station planned in the area. This will include dedicated cycling facilities.
The Region is completing a major reconstruction of the intersection of
Bowmanville Avenue and Highway 2 from Stevens Road to the CPR bridge,
and the east and west legs of Highway 2. The Municipality is taking this
opportunity to construct an MUP facility from Bowmanville Avenue to Roenigk
Drive to connect to the Bowmanville Valley Trail. The Region will also be
construction an MUP from Highway 2 to Stevens Road in the west boulevard.
This is the first part of the three phase project which will see the widening of
Bowmanville Avenue to four lanes down to Baseline Road and an MUP
extension will be built down to Baseline Road which will provide connectivity
to the Bowmanville Creek Trail and Waterfront Trail. Phase three, in 2027 or
2028, will see a continuation of the same four lane section with an MUP from
Stevens all the way up to Longworth Avenue.
6. Next Meeting
6.1. The next regular meeting is to be determined.
7. Adjournment
7.1. Moved by Jim Boate seconded by Arnold Mostert.
That the meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM
Carried
I:
Page104
Cbrington
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
General Government Committee
Minutes
Date: February 28, 2022
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of
the Public (MS Teams)
Members Present: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper,
Councillor J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill,
Councillor M. Zwart
Staff Present: M. Dempster, J. Gallagher, L. Patenaude, G. Acorn, S. Brake, R.
Maciver, T. Pinn, M. Perini
Other Staff Present: C. Hodgson, B. Radomski, L. Reck
1. Call to Order
Mayor Foster called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement Statement
Councillor Neal led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3. Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
4. Announcements
Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of
community interest.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # GG-100-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to add the following items to the
Agenda:
• New Business Item regarding Trudeau Drive Walkway (Councillor Traill)
• Delegation of Nik Papanikolas, Regarding New Business - Trudeau Drive
Walkway
1
Page105
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
• Delegation of Dave Zakos, Regarding New Business - Trudeau Drive
Walkway
Yes (6): Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor
Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart
No (1): Mayor Foster
Carried on a recorded vote (6 to 1)
5. Presentations/Delegations
5.1 Delegation by Carion Fenn and Genelle Pollydore, Carion Fenn Foundation,
Durham Black Network, Regarding Black History Month
Carion Fenn and Genelle Pollydore, Carion Fenn Foundation, Durham Black
Network, were present regarding Black History Month. They played a video
introducing members in the Durham Black Network. Committee had a moment of
silence for 52 seconds, to honour the passing of Sparky Terry Johnson, a
Member of the Carion Fenn Foundation. Genelle provided the background,
mission, and vision of the Durham Black Network. Carion displayed a video of
the Black Lives Matter rally in the Town of Ajax and explained the personal
experience of systemic anti -black racism. Genelle outlined the Foundation's
programs and stated that The Carion Fenn Foundation is a recipient of the
Supporting Black Canadian Community Initiative Grant, which will strengthen
their organization so that the Durham Black Network can run various programs.
Carion explained their Equity and Equality challenge and stated that a t-shirt can
be purchased through their website. Genelle noted a quote from Barack Obama
and stated that they are working at implementing a meaningful change for the
community. Carion explained that the Durham Black Network is comprised of
70% black community members and 30% non -black community members.
Carion requested that Council support initiatives and programs that encourage
equity and equality in the community and workplace. Carion and Genelle
answered questions from Members of Committee.
Resolution # GG-101-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the Delegation of Carion Fenn and Genelle Pollydore, Carion Fenn
Foundation, Durham Black Network, Regarding Black History Month, be received
with thanks.
Carried
2
Page106
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
5.2 Delegation by Wendy Bracken, Regarding Item 6.1, New Business - Bottom
Ash
Wendy Bracken was present regarding the New Business Item - Bottom Ash.
Wendy Bracken requested that Committee support Councillor Zwart's motion and
add the words "and/or plastics and/or other waste materials in Clarington" at the
end of the last sentence. Wendy explained that the pilot project using incineration
and/or plastics in road construction is obscene and noted that the incinerator
industry has two major problems which are incineration emissions and incinerator
ash. W. Bracken expressed concerns regarding Federal Gas Tax and public
funds, and bottom ash having highly toxic residues and outlined concerns
contained in Linda Gasser's correspondence. Wendy stated other countries are
going away from using ash due to the environmental impacts and answered
questions from Members of Committee.
Alter the Agenda
Resolution # GG-102-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Agenda be altered to consider Item 6.1, New Business - Bottom Ash, at
this time.
Carried
6. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations
6.1 New Business - Bottom Ash (Councillor Zwart)
Resolution # GG-103-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
Whereas the Region of Durham proposes to run a pilot project using Durham
York Energy Centre waste in Phase 2 of the reconstruction of Regional Road 18
(Newtonville Road);
And whereas this is not a proven technology;
And whereas the Municipality of Clarington wishes to protect the health of the
environment and our residents;
And whereas the Municipality of Clarington is fast becoming a "dumping ground"
for the Region of Durham's waste;
3
Page107
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Now therefore be it resolved that the Municipal of Clarington is vehemently
opposed to the Region of Durham's proposal to run a pilot project using
incinerator ash and/or plastics and/or other waste materials anywhere in
Clarington.
Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor
Jones, Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart
Carried on a recorded vote (7 to 0)
5. Presentations/Delegations
5.3 Delegation by Len Healey, Clarington Slo-Pitch, Regarding Report CSD-
004-22 Outdoor Permit Rates and Fees 2022
Len Healey, Clarington Slo-Pitch, was present regarding Report CSD-004-22
Outdoor Permit Rates and Fees 2022. Len explained that the organization
agrees with the recommendations contained in the Report.
5.4 Delegation by Nik Papanikolas, Regarding New Business - Trudeau
Walkway
Nik Papanikolas was present regarding New Business - Trudeau Walkway. Nik
expressed concerns regarding large groups of students, smoking, and
harassment and stated the situation has been getting worse. Nik Papanikolas
noted that the matter was brought forward years ago and requested that
Committee support Councillor Traill's motion to close the walkway. Nik answered
questions from Members of Committee.
Recess
Resolution # GG-104-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Committee recess for 5 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 10.43 a.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
5.5 Delegation by Dave Zakos, Regarding New Business - Trudeau Walkway
Dave Zakos was present regarding New Business - Trudeau Walkway. Dave
agreed with the concerns raised by Nik Papinokolas. Dave Zakos stated that
numerous residents are walking in the area and the students will not move,
forcing the residents to walk on the road. Dave expressed concerns regarding
traffic and harassment from students and answered questions from Members of
Committee.
4
Page108
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Alter the Agenda
Resolution # GG-105-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Agenda be altered to consider Item 8.1.6, New Business - Trudeau
Drive Walkway, at this time.
Carried
8. Staff Reports, Staff Memos and New Business Consideration
8.1 Public Works
8.1.6 New Business - Trudeau Drive Walkway (Councillor Traill)
Resolution # GG-106-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
Whereas residents in the vicinity of the Trudeau Drive walkway have been
subjected to vandalism, graffiti, crime, smoking and swearing; as a result of
teenagers gathering on the street at the beginning of the school day, the end of
the school day and during the school day;
And whereas residents on Trudeau Drive may experience slower emergency
response times from ambulance and fire due to personal vehicles of parents
dropping off children causing congestion in the street before and after school;
And whereas Council has been attempting to fix this issue for approximately ten
years, including holding several meetings with two principals of Bowmanville
High School, holding a public meeting with Staff and residents and the School
Board at Bowmanville High School, canvassing the neighbourhood in December
2012 and a Council resolution to install No Stopping signs and Miovision
cameras in an effort to address the ongoing issues without closing the walkway;
and
And whereas the problems not only persist but have gotten worse in recent
years, resulting in at least one resident moving away from the neighbourhood
and another resident being too afraid to speak up for fear of retaliation by
students with student massing continuing in the walkway and adjoining street at
all hours of the day and night;
And whereas young children who currently use the walkway to access the Duke
of Cambridge can access the elementary school via Liberty Street which is a
minor detour, and will have a safer walk to school with less exposure to cigarette
smoke and bullying by teenagers in the walkway;
5
Page109
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Now therefore be it resolved:
That Staff, Durham Region Police Service, and any interested members of
Council, meet with Scott Johnson, Bowmanville High School principal, and
members of the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board to discuss a
potential resolution of the Trudeau Drive Walkway issue, including (but not
limited to): moving the smoking section to another location on school
property and prohibiting of pick-ups and drop-offs from Trudeau Drive; and
That a survey (online and paper) be conducted, of all residents on
Marchwood Crescent and Trudeau Drive, on whether residents support:
a) closure of the walkway, or
b) keeping the walkway open but prohibiting pick-ups and drop offs on
Trudeau Drive and moving the smoking section from the walkway
to another area on school property (i.e. at the east end of the field
or in the parking lot of Bowmanville High School).
Referred
Later in the meeting, see following motions.
Recess
Resolution # GG-107-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Committee recess for 5 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 11:45 a.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # GG-108-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting until 12.15
p.m.
Carried
6
Page110
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Resolution # GG-109-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Item 8.1.6, regarding New Business - Trudeau Walkway, be referred to Staff
to report back at the March 21, 2022, General Government Committee meeting,
for options on how to proceed on addressing the issues with the Trudeau Drive
Walkway.
Carried as Amended Later in the Meeting
See following motion.
Resolution # GG-110-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to
speak to the foregoing Resolution #GG-109-22 for a second time.
Carried
Resolution # GG-111-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the foregoing Resolution #GG-109-22 be amended by replacing the words
"March 21" with the words "April 11".
Carried
Main Motion as Amended:
Resolution # GG-112-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Item 8.1.6, regarding New Business - Trudeau Walkway, be referred to Staff
to report back at the April 11, 2022, General Government Committee meeting, for
options on how to proceed on addressing the issues with the Trudeau Drive
Walkway.
Carried
The Committee recessed for their one hour scheduled break in accordance with
the Procedural By- law.
The meeting reconvened at 1:10 p.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
7
Page111
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
6. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations
Item 6.1, New Business — Bottom Ash was considered after item 5.2.
6.2 CSD-004-22 Outdoor Permit Rates and Fees 2022
Resolution # GG-113-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report CSD-004-22 and any related communication items be received;
That the proposed rates for January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, in
Attachment 1 to Report CSD-004-22, be approved;
That subsequent Outdoor Permit Rates and Fees be incorporated into
Community Services rates and fees moving forward;
That the current 10% non-resident surcharge for Community Services be applied
to outdoor permit rates and fees; and
That all interested parties listed in Report CSD-004-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
7. Communications
Resolution # GG-114-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Communication Items 7.1 to 7.3, with the exception of 7.2, be received for
information.
Carried
7.1 Minutes of the Newcastle Village Community Hall Board dated December
12, 2021
Resolution # GG-115-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Communication Item 7.1, Minutes of the Newcastle Village Community Hall
Board dated December 12, 2021, be received for information.
Carried
8
Page112
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
7.3 Patrick McNeil, Chair, Elexicon Corporation, Regarding Elexicon Financial
Information Request
Resolution # GG-116-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Communication Item 7.3, Patrick McNeil, Chair, Elexicon Corporation,
Regarding Elexicon Financial Information Request, be received for information.
Carried
7.2 Wendy Bracken, Regarding a Request for an Environmental Assessment
Resolution # GG-117-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Communication Item 7.2, Wendy Bracken, Regarding a Request for an
Environmental Assessment, be received for information.
Carried
8. Staff Reports, Staff Memos and New Business Consideration
8.1 Public Works
Councillor Hooper chaired this portion of the meeting.
Resolution # GG-118-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Reports PWD-003-22 and PWD-004-22 be approved on consent, in
accordance with the agenda.
Carried
8.1.1 PWD-003-22 Northglen West Phase 3 Subdivision, Plan 40M-2606
Assumption By -Law
Resolution # GG-119-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report PWD-003-22 be received;
That the draft By-law (Attachment 2), assuming certain streets within Plan 40M-
2606 and adjacent plan 40M-2560 (Attachment 1), be approved; and
9
Page113
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
That all interested parties listed in Report PWD-003-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
8.1.2 PWD-004-22 Brookhill Phase 3 Subdivision, Plan 40M-2580 Assumption By -
Law
Resolution # GG-120-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report PWD-004-22 be received;
That the draft By-law (Attachment 2), assuming certain streets within Plan 40M-
2580 (Attachment 1), be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PWD-004-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
8.1.3 PWD-005-22 Sidewalk Snow Clearing
Resolution # GG-121-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Report PWD-005-22 and any related communication items, be received;
and
That all interested parties listed in Report PWD-005-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
8.1.4 New Business - Future Connection for the Farewell Creek Trail (Councillor
Neal)
Resolution # GG-122-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Staff be directed to complete the future connection for the Farewell Creek
Trail near Darlington Blvd. in 2022.
Carried
Later in the meeting, see following motion.
10
Page114
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Resolution # GG-123-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to
speak to the foregoing Resolution #GG-122-22 for a second time.
Carried
The foregoing Resolution #GG-122-22 was then put to a vote and carried.
8.1.5 New Business - Snow Clearing on Highway 2 from Townline Road to
Courtice Road (Councillor Neal)
Resolution # GG-124-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Staff be directed to clear snow and ice from all sidewalks on Highway 2
from Townline Road to Courtice Road.
Referred
Resolution # GG-125-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the foregoing Resolution #GG-124-22 be referred to Staff to include in the
upcoming snow clearing report.
Carried
Resolution # GG-126-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to
speak to the foregoing Resolution #GG-125-22 for a second time.
Carried
That the foregoing Resolution #GG-125-22 was then put to a vote and carried.
Item 8.1.6, New Business — Trudeau Walkway was considered after item 5.5.
8.2 Community Services
Councillor Traill chaired this portion of the meeting.
11
Page115
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
8.2.1 CSD-005-22 2021 Annual Accessibility Update
Resolution # GG-127-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report CSD-005-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That Report CSD-005-22 be placed on the Municipal website; and
That all interested parties listed in Report CSD-005-22 be notified of Council's
decision.
Carried
8.3 Legislative Services
Councillor Jones chaired this portion of the meeting.
8.3.1 LGS-003-22 2022 Municipal Elections — Accessibility Plan
Resolution # GG-128-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That Report LGS-003-22 be received; and
That all interested parties listed in Report LGS-003-22, and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
8.4 Financial Services
Councillor Neal chaired this portion of the meeting.
Resolution # GG-129-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Reports FSD-005-22 and FSD-006-22 be approved on consent, in
accordance with the agenda.
Carried
12
Page116
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
8.4.1 FSD-005-22 2021 Annual Commodity Hedging Compliance Report
Resolution # GG-130-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report FSD-005-22 be received for information.
Carried
8.4.2 FSD-006-22 2021 Annual Leasing Report
Resolution # GG-131-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report FSD-006-22 be received for information.
Carried
8.4.3 FSD-010-22 2021 Council Remuneration
Resolution # GG-132-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report FSD-010-22 be received for information.
Carried
8.4.4 FSD-011-22 Roof Remediation at Courtice Community Complex and Garnet
B. Rickard Recreation Complex
Resolution # GG-133-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report FSD-011-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the Industrial Roofing Services Inc. with a bid amount of $736,803.00
(excluding HST) being the lowest bidder meeting all terms, conditions and
specifications of tender CL2021-36 be awarded the contract for the work required
to complete the roof remediation at Courtice Community Complex and Garnet B.
Rickard Recreation Complex as requested by the Community Services
Department; and
13
Page117
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
N
10
10.1
That the funds required for this project in the amount of $736,803.00 (excluding
HST) is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from
the following account:
Description
2020 CCC — Building
Improvements
Canada Community Building Fund
R/F
2021 — Facility Roof Replacements
Municipal Capital Works R/F
Account Number Amount
110-42-421-84249- $545,798
7401
557-00-000-00000- 47,095
7418
110-42-421-84285- 91,600
7401
511-00-000-00000- 52,310
7418
That all interested parties listed in Report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
Carried
Unfinished Business
Questions to Department Heads/Request for Staff Report(s)
Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting.
Improvements to Parking Lot at Tooley's Mill Park (Councillor Neal)
Resolution # GG-134-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Staff report back at the March 21, 2022, General Government Committee
meeting on improvements that need to be made to the parking lot at Tooley's Mill
Park, including the surface, signage, and the date when the Municipality will
assume control of the parking lot.
Carried
14
Page118
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
10.2 Anaerobic Digestor (Councillor Neal)
Resolution # GG-135-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Director of Legislative Services/Municipal Solicitor report back at the
March 14, 2022, Council meeting on the anaerobic digestor arbitration and next
steps.
Referred
Resolution # GG-136-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the foregoing Resolution #GG-135-22 be referred to the end of the agenda
in Closed Session.
Carried
Members of Committee asked questions of Department Heads.
11. Confidential Items
11.1 PWD-002-22 Potential Property Acquisition
Closed Session
Resolution # GG-137-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as
amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing two matters
(Report PWD-002-22 Potential Property Acquisition and an Update on the
Anaerobic Digestor) that deal with:
• a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or
local board; and
• litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative
tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board.
Carried
Rise and Report
The meeting resumed in open session at 2:58 p.m.
15
Page119
General Government Committee Minutes February 28, 2022
Mayor Foster advised that two items were discussed in "closed" session in
accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and one resolution
was passed to provide direction to Staff.
Anaerobic Digestor
Resolution # GG-138-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Director of Legislative Services/Municipal Solicitor report back at the
March 14, 2022, Council meeting on the anaerobic digestor arbitration and next
steps.
Carried
12. Adjournment
Resolution # GG-139-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the meeting adjourn at 3:03 p.m.
Carried
16
Page120
•
Cbrington
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Planning and Development Committee
Minutes
Date: March 7, 2022
Time: 6:30 p.m.
Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of
the Public (MS Teams)
Members Present: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper,
Councillor J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill,
Councillor M. Zwart
Staff Present: M. Dempster, J.P. Newman, R. Windle, T. Pinn, F. Langmaid, K.
Richardson, M. Chambers
Other Staff Present: A. Burke, B. Rice, T. Rubino, R. Warne, N. Zambri, A. Van Dyk
1. Call to Order
Councillor Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgment Statement
Councillor Traill led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3. Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
4. Announcements
Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of
community interest.
5. Public Meetings
5.1 Public Meeting for a Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law
Amendment
Toni Rubino, Planner II, made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic
presentation.
Beverly Carby and Michael Carby, spoke in support of the application. Beverly
feels that the land should be developed to allow access to the private property and
avoid future trespassing. Beverly believes the application should be approved as
proposed and the project should move forward.
Bindu Purohit was called upon and was not present.
Page 121
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
Farzana Sajjad was present in support of the application. Farzana thanked staff
and developers for the opportunity to participate in the public process. F. Sajjad
was aware that the vacant land was to be developed when moving into the area.
Farzana explained there has been wildlife and campers using the vacant land and
believes a road and walkway will increase safety in the community. F. Sajjad
believes this application aligns with planning policy for the Municipality of
Clarington. Farzana stated that the petition has misleading information including
that there will be no sidewalks, sharp turns, decreased property values and that
these will be multi -family homes. Farzana explained that the vacant land is used as
a shortcut and that developing a path will provide a safer option for the
neighbourhood. F. Sajjad believes property values will increase and this
development will serve the community and should be supported and approved.
Anum Anjum, Courtice Team, was present in support of the application and made
a verbal and electronic presentation. Anum explained that the Courtice Team are
private property owners looking to use local developers and builders to build
homes on the property. Anum added they are working with D.G. Biddle and
Associates. Anum believes this development will create safe access to the
neighbouring parks. Anum explained that a walkway will be constructed on land
donated by the property owners to the municipality. Anum added that the donated
land will be used to create a walkway which will be maintained by the municipality.
Anum concluded by noting that this development will create access to the
residents, allow for increased snow removal and discourage trespassing and the
potential for squatters on the vacant land. Anum answered questions from the
Members of Committee.
Matt Sullivan was present in support of the application and had no additional
comments to add.
Zia Rehman was called upon and was not present.
Maryam Rehman was present in support of the application. Maryam stated that
this development will provide access, increased safety and more access to
services such as snow clearing. Maryam noted the petition contained incorrect
information and the development will include sidewalks and will not include multi-
family homes. M. Rehman concluded by explaining that the development will add
to the current infrastructure and be beneficial to the Courtice residents. Maryam
answered questions from the Members of Committee.
Kulsoom Rehman was present in support of the application. Kulsoom believes this
development will provide increased access to the neighbourhood and surrounding
parks and assist with snow clearing access in the winter. K. Rehman stated this
vacant land is subject to trespassing and squatters. Kulsoom added that this
development will include a sidewalk, not have a sharp turning road or include multi-
family households. K. Rehman concluded by noting this development will support
the local economy and create growth.
2
Page122
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
Tim Williams was present in opposition to the application. Tim stated that at the
previous public meeting the residents made it clear that they do not support this
application. Tim noted that the delegates speaking tonight are not currently area
residents. Tim answered questions from the Members of Committee.
Libby Racansky was present and spoke to the application. Libby stated that these
comments apply to both public meeting applications on tonight's agenda. L.
Racansky had the following requests as noted in the correspondence and photos
provided. Libby requested that all residents living between Townline Road to
Green Road be notified of all upcoming development applications. L. Racansky
also requested that no developments proceed prior to the upgrade of the Courtice
Water Pollution Control Plant. Libby answered questions from the Members of
Committee.
Shafiq Anjum was present in support of the application. Shafiq believes this
development will support economic development and growth in the municipality.
Shafiq answered questions from the Members of Committee.
Eric Richter was present in opposition to the application. Eric is concerned with
increased traffic at the Nash Road traffic lights and believes Dale Park Drive will
become a detour. Eric expressed additional concern with parking and safety for the
children in the area. E. Richter stated that there are no issues with squatters or
snow clearing and the photos used by the previous speaker were taken to look
intentionally negative. Eric is the owner of the trailer in the photos and explained
there is an arrangement with the property owner, and it can be moved if necessary.
E. Richter is concerned with going through another major construction project in
the area and the majority of the previous speakers do not currently live in the area.
Sara Haider was present in support of the project and made a verbal and
electronic presentation. Sara noted that both Dale Park Drives were always
intended to be connected. S. Haider advised that the original property owners
refused to sell the land for over 30 years and now all six property owners have
agreed to sell so the project can proceed. Sara advised that a portion of the land
will be donated to construct a walkway for community access. Sara believes the
development will allow for proper snow clearing and the municipality will be
responsible for maintaining the roads and sidewalks. S. Haider added that this will
not affect any natural heritage, a walkway will be constructed and will benefit the
community.
Kinza Haider, Kinza Law Office, was present on behalf of a client, in support of the
application and made a verbal and electronic presentation. Kinza noted that Dale
Park Drive was always intended to be connected. K. Haider explained that the
property owners have agreed to sell, and the development can now move forward.
Kinza explained that the homes will be in line with the existing homes and include
roads, sidewalks, and lighting. Kinza added that this will create growth and assist
with meeting the demand for housing in Clarington. Kinza explained that the client
owns property at the end of Dale Park Drive has been restricted from development
3
Page123
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
as this is where the snow is piled during the winter months and would block the
proposed driveway. K. Haider concluded that the property owner has been waiting
for 10 years to develop this property and now can move forward with the intended
use.
Michael Fry and Ashlee Prescott, D.G. Biddle, were present on behalf of the
applicant. Ashlee thanked staff and provided the background of the application.
Ashlee noted the lands have been vacant for many years and is not identified as a
natural heritage area. A. Prescott explained there will be detached and semi-
detached homes which are compatible with the surrounding land use, promote
intensification and provide access to municipal services. Ashlee added that this
land was always intended to be connected and will be reviewed by Engineering
Staff. Ashlee stated there will be no on -street parking, will include sidewalks and
will improve snow clearing and garbage collection access. Michael and Ashlee
answered questions from the Members of Committee.
5.1.1 PDS-005-22 - Dale Park Drive Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to
Permit 9 Residential Units Consisting of 4 Semi -Detached Dwellings and 1
Single Detached Dwelling
Resolution # PD-010-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That Report PDS-005-22 and any related communication items, be received for
information only;
That Staff receive and consider comments from the public and Council with respect
to the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment applications; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-005-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
5.2 Public Meeting for a Proposed Plan of Subdivision
Nicole Zambri, Senior Planner, made a verbal presentation to accompany an
electronic presentation.
Rachel Shewan was called upon and was not present.
Libby Racansky was present and had no further comments.
Mallory Nievas, Weston Consulting, was present on behalf of the applicant and
made a verbal and electronic presentation. Mallory reviewed the subject property
and surrounding area, the planning framework, the current zoning and highlighted
the proposed development and site plan. Mallory highlighted the landscaping
plans, proposed elevations, and listed the supporting studies for the applications.
0
Page124
Cladiwa March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
The Public Meeting concluded at 8:44 p.m.
5.2.1 PDS-010-22 -Draft Plan of Subdivision Proposal for 10 Townhouse Units at
2591 Trulls Road, Courtice
Resolution # PD-011-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PDS-010-22 and any related communication items, be received for
information only;
That Staff receive and consider comments from the public and Council with respect
to the subdivision application; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-010-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
6. Presentations/Delegations
6.1 Delegation by Ron Diskey, Regarding Request for Access to Rundle Road
Property
Ron Diskey was present regarding a request for access to their Rundle Road
Property. Ron thanked the Members of Committee for considering the request. R.
Diskey reviewed the property location and would like to build and live on the
property. Ron addressed access to the property and explained that it is currently
by road allowance. R. Diskey wanted to pursue a boundary adjustment but
explained that the neighbours are not willing to go forward with that option at this
time. Ron provided an overview of the four options which included:
1. Improving the road allowance to a municipal standard
2. Leasing the road allowance
3. Determine the road allowance as surplus and sell it
4. Provide an easement without a request for additional services
Ron noted that they prefer Option 4. R. Diskey stated that Option 2, 3 and 4 will not
result in any increased costs to the Municipality. Ron believes that allowing access
will benefit the municipality once the property is built and understands that gaining
access is only the first step in the process. Ron answered questions from the
Members of Committee.
5
Page125
C►ariQgton
Resolution # PD-012-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Jones
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
That Item 7.1, Memo-011-22 - Access to Rundle Road Property, be received for
information; and
That the matter be referred to Staff to report back on possible solutions for Ron
Diskey's request.
Carried
7. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations
7.1 Memo-011-22 - Access to Rundle Road Property
Item 7.1 was considered immediately following Item 6.1, the delegation of Ron
Diskey.
Recess
Resolution # PD-013-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the Committee recess for 10 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m. with Councillor Anderson in the Chair.
8. Communications
9. Staff Reports and Staff Memos
Resolution # PD-014-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That Reports PDS-006-22, PSD-007-22 and PDS-011-22 be approved on consent,
in accordance with the agenda as follows:
9.1 PDS-006-22 - Zoning By-law Amendment for 14 Jack Potts Way, Courtice
Resolution # PD-015-22
That Report PDS-006-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the By-law attached to Report PDS-006-22, Attachment 1, be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-006-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
0
Page126
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
9.2 PDS-007-22 - An Application to Remove the (H) Holding Symbol to Permit the
Development of a Single Detached Dwelling on a Vacant lot Created as Part
of a Lot Line Adjustment Application (LD2021/102) for 1 Granary Lane,
Courtice
Resolution # PD-016-22
That Report PDS-007-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the By-law attached to Report PDS-007-22, Attachment 1, be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-007-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
9.3 PDS-011-22 - Official Plan Amendment to Facilitate the Severance of a
Surplus Farm Dwelling at 40 Station Street
Resolution # PD-017-22
That Report PDS-011-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report PDS-011-22, Attachment 1,
be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-011-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
9.4 PDS-012-22 - Building Activity Update January 1 to December 31, 2021
Resolution # PD-018-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PDS-012-12 be received for information.
Carried
9.5 PDS-013-22 - An Application for Zoning By-law Amendment to Facilitate the
Creation of a New Lot for One Single Detached Dwelling at 3301 Trulls Road
in Courtice
Resolution # PD-019-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report PDS-013-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That the By-law attached to Report PDS-013-22, as Attachment 1, be approved;
7
Page127
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
That the Region of Durham Planning and Economic Development Department and
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report
PDS-004-22 and Council's decision; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-013-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
9.6 PDS-014-22 - Development Applications — 2021 Annual Report
Resolution # PD-020-22
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PDS-014-22 and any related communications, be received for
information.
Carried
9.7 PDS-015-22 - Clarington Corporate Climate Action Plan, Annual Update to
March, 2022
Resolution # PD-021-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report PDS-015-22 and any related communications be received for
information.
Carried
9.8 FSD-013-22 - Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan — Single
Source Courtice Waterfront Park Design
Resolution # PD-022-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Report FSD-013-22 and any related communication items, be received;
That Staff single -source the procurement of design services for the Courtice
Waterfront Design Plan, as part of the Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan project;
and
That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-013-22 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Carried
Page128
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
9.9 Memo-010-22 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham
York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per
Year
Resolution # PD-023-22
Moved by Councillor Traill
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That Memo-010-22 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham
York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per
Year and any related correspondence, be received for information;
That clarification be provided whether or not Clarington should be requesting a
bump up; and
That the questions outlined in Wendy Bracken's correspondence be addressed.
Motion Withdrawn, later in the meeting, see following motions
Recess
Resolution # PD-024-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Committee recess for 5 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 9:51 p.m. with Councillor Anderson in the Chair.
Resolution #PD-023-22 was then withdrawn by the mover.
Resolution # PD-025-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That Memo-010-22 - Update and Next Steps: Municipal Comments on the Durham
York Energy Centre Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes per
Year be received for information; and
That the correspondence from Wendy Bracken be referred to Staff to be included
in the report being presented at the March 14, 2022, Council meeting.
Carried
0
Page129
C►ariQgton
10. New Business - Consideration
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
10.1 New Business -Support Transition to Electric Vehicles to Reduce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Ontario (Mayor Foster)
Resolution # PD-026-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
Whereas the Municipality of Clarington is committed to protecting our economy,
ecosystems, and community from climate change;
Whereas the Municipality of Clarington strives to maintain a healthy environment
and foster a heathy community to nurture the wellbeing of residents and provide a
high quality of life;
Whereas the Durham Community Energy Plan demonstrates that the
transportation sector is responsible for 47 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions in
Durham Region;
Whereas the majority of Ontario's electricity is produced from low carbon sources;
Whereas investment in domestic EV production has the potential to create mitigate
carbon emissions and create well -paid jobs for residents of Durham;
Now therefore be it resolved that the Municipality of Clarington, respectfully
request that the Provincial government take the following actions to support
municipalities, businesses, and the public to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in
the transportation sector:
• Support research and development of battery and energy storage technologies
with applications for use in EVs and renewable energy storage;
• Provide subsidies to for residents, businesses, and municipalities to install
public and private EV charging infrastructure in new and existing
developments;
• Provide subsidies to residents, businesses, and municipalities to incentivize the
purchase of EVs;
• Support mandatory minimum EV charge station -ready parking spots in new
commercial and residential developments;
That this resolution be forwarded to the Honourable Erin O'Toole, MP (Durham),
Honourable Philip Lawrence MP (Northumberland -Peterborough South), Lindsey
Park, MPP (Durham), David Piccini, MPP (Northumberland -Peterborough South);
and
That this resolution be forwarded to the Region of Durham and Durham area
municipalities for endorsement;
10
Page130
C►ariQgton
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
That this resolution be forwarded to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities
(FCM) and the Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) for circulation to
municipalities with a request for endorsement.
Carried
10.2 New Business - Clarington Energy Park (Councillor Traill)
Councillor Traill withdrew the motion under New Business Item 10.2.
11. Unfinished Business
12. Questions to Department Heads/Request for Staff Reports
13. Confidential Items
Resolution # PD-027-22
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended,
the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing a matter that deals with a
proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local
board.
Carried
13.1 Verbal Update from Faye Langmaid, Manager of Special Projects, Regarding
Potential Property Acquisition
Rise and Report
The meeting resumed in open session at 10.30 p.m.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # PD-028-22
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting for an additional
5 minutes.
Carried
Councillor Anderson advised that one item was discussed in "closed" session in
accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and one resolution was
passed to provide direction to staff.
11
Page 131
Clarftwn
14. Adjournment
March 7, 2022
Planning and Development
Committee Minutes
Resolution # PD-029-22
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That the meeting adjourn at 10:33 p.m.
Carried
12
Page132
Clarington
MEMO
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: General Government Committee
From: Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works
Date: March 21, 2022
Memo #: Memo-012-22
File No.: PA. FarewelICreekTraiIPhase 2.1 (CL2021-2)
Re: Connection to Farewell Creek Trail across 43 Darlington Boulevard
As requested by Council at the March 28, 2022 General Government Meeting, staff have
reached out to the landowner of 43 Darlington Boulevard to discuss the possibility of
constructing a connecting link to Phase 2 of the Farewell Creek Trail that is currently
under construction. The developer was receptive to the request and has agreed to allow
the connection to move forward should the Municipality choose to proceed.
However, it should be noted that the current property has no development approvals and
any trail constructed on the property will most likely be damaged or throwaway once the
lands are developed. Staff have received a concept plan as part our discussion with the
owner to minimize this risk but without going through the Planning process the concept
has no standing. In addition, a significant portion of this trail would fall under the
developer's responsibility if the Municipality were to wait until the lands move forward
through the development process. Based on the discussion staff had with the owner we
understand they will be submitting a plan shortly to Planning for draft approval.
In addition, the intention was to use the existing construction access through the 43
Darlington Boulevard property to complete Phase 3 of the Farewell Creek Trail extension
to Townline Road. Access from Townline Road would be virtually impossible due to the
steep embankment, and the City of Oshawa has not forecasted any plans to formalize a
trail from Grandview Street to Townline Road. As a result, access options to complete the
Phase 3 extension are essentially limited to the current access point at 43 Darlington
Boulevard. Completing this link now would result in future damage to the pedestrian
connection during the next phase of construction due to significant construction vehicle
impacts and will invariably generate significant throwaway dollars if completed before the
development proceeds.
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6
1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 1 info@clarington.net I www.clarington.net
Page133
Page 2
Should Council wish to proceed with the construction of the trail connection at this time
the cost estimate for the updated trail alignment, as shown in the attached map, would be
$180,000. The project would be funded through DCs, $162,000, and the Tax Rate
Stabilization Reserve Fund, $18,000.
Staff recommend deferring the construction of the proposed link until Phase 3 of the
Farewell Creek Trail is scheduled. Any segment that may not be constructed as part of the
development plan for 43 Darlington Boulevard would be included in the Phase 3 tender to
limit throwaway costs and to potentially receive more competitive pricing.
Stephen Brake
Director
Public Works
/T R
cc: T. Ricciardi, Manager of Infrastructure
K. Richardson, Manager, Development Engineering
K. Heathcote, Capital Works Supervisor
@ R. Brezina, Capital Works Engineer
The Corporation of the Municipality of Caarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6
1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 1 info@clarington.net I www.clarington.net
Page134
23 22 M 00 o INv M 00 o N M Sg 23
-yp
28
li 18 _
- 103
104
N
S�
w
102
27
N �9
24 �i
2
�o cn � CD — W ( W chi, 101
_
100
J CO W W W CA) w cn �' `T`5` 7
20
73
_ - _
m w 7
78
11
98
7 13
5A 17
76
14
9
7
N NNNNW WWWW-P�.A��Cn
p N4�,CAC0ON4�-CAooON�CACbO
96
7
5 6 9 10 5 94
8� 3 92
3 4 S 6
W, Cn 1 2 73 4 � Cn cn� cn cn rn rn rn rn � � � v v oD 90
_ --4 W � �1 C.0 -� Cn �I CD — W Cn �I CO_ 88
FOX HUNT T�FRAIL 8
6
jl Cb O N N) C3) N) O O N W W W � � � � .p Cn Cn Cn Ci) O O 0) p J -4 Cb 0o �
00 [� pD O N� O Cb O N 00 O N � p W O N O Cb O N
I I 1 D 05 1L.. L d .6 1 1 - . y I 1, 1 11 1 L I- L 1.
1427
a
5
3 qr—, � -11�
Cn p p W W W W N N - N N �:
00 1 N O Cb C3) P N O (b CA N O N N O (b . CA N O (b
&— ME)ARLING]ON BOULEVARD
cn cn Ul 41, -P:,
v W O U1 Wco CWn W N N N N
v �Cn W _, v T W
Legend
f
J
1465
/d t
r I
1471
�j6, NO: DATE BY ISSUES/REVISIONS
38
40
1475 3� GafilW11
41
r� 42 DRAWING:
43 43 DARLINGTON BOULEVARD
44 45 PROPOSED TRAIL CONCEPT
46 - DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT No:
/ n7a
/ ro DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY: DRAWING NO:
CT - -
SCALE: DATE: 1
1:1,200 MAR 2022
KEY PLAN
l�.
�..---•.aaa111
Page 135 :♦
1495
1461
I 1463
1485
1428
Attachment 1 to
Memo-012-22
Proposed Trail
l �
1451 1450 ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing Farewell Creek Trail
N -- Farewell Creek
1457
. Z � !tl ,l • —•
_ 2
C9
145 = '��� Hai
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COUNCIL
DATE March 14, 2022
MOVED BY Councillor Neal
SECONDED BY Councillor Jones
RESOLUTION #
That, in accordance with subsection 10. 12.18 of the Procedural By-law, the
following Resolution #C-055-22, previously adopted by Council on February 14,
2022:
That the following resolution be approved to replace the first paragraph of
Resolution #GG-127-21, to give direction to Staff and time to tender the
project:
That $150,000 be directed, at the discretion of the Director of
Financial Services, for the construction of two tennis courts at the
South Courtice Arena; and
That the Stuart Park refurbishment plan be amended to convert the
existing tennis courts to pickleball courts and that any surplus be
directed to the cost of the new tennis courts at the South Courtice
Arena.
Be amended by adding the following words to the end of the first paragraph:
"including the installation of lights with the estimated cost of $75,000 to be
funded from Development Charges"
Page136