HomeMy WebLinkAboutPWD-013-21Clarington
Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: General Government Committee
Date of Meeting: February 16, 2021 Report Number: PWD-013-21
Submitted By: Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works
Reviewed By:
File Number:
Andrew C. Allison, CAO
Resolution#: GG-184-21
By-law Number:
Report Subject: Speed Limit Reduction to 40 km/h on Neighborhood Collector B Roads
Recommendations:
1. That Report PWD-013-21 be received;
2. That speed limits not be lowered to 40 km/h on all Collector roads;
3. That staff continue ongoing monitoring of the municipal road network and
researching alternate traffic management options and their suitability on individual
basis; and
4. That all interested parties listed in Resolution # C-462-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Municipality of Clarington
Report PWD-013-21
Report Overview
Page 2
In response to Council's request to investigate lowering speed limits to 40 km/h on all
neighborhood Collector B roads, staff have reviewed the existing conditions, best practices,
provincial regulations and standards, and have provided their recommendations.
1. Background
1.1 During the Council meeting held on November 23-24, 2020, Council passed Resolution #
C-462-20, directing staff to report back on reducing speed limits to 40 km/h on
neighborhood Collector B roads.
1.2 As per the Clarington Official Plan (OP) and the Clarington Transportation Master Plan
(CTMP), roads have five classifications:
• Arterial Road Type A
• Arterial Road Type B
• Arterial Road Type C
• Collector Road
• Local Road
1.3 In line with the OP and CTMP, the Municipality's Collector roadways provide connections
between Local roads within the residential / commercial areas and the Arterial road
system. Compared to Arterial roadways, Collector roads generally carry lower traffic
volumes and have lower speed limits. However, Collector roads do provide a shared
priority of property access and increased traffic movement when compared to the Local
roads. A typical Collector road in Clarington will feature 10.0 meter pavement width, with
wider boulevards and sidewalks on both sides. It is typically expected to carry up to 6,000
vehicles a day, including heavier traffic such as delivery and maintenance trucks and
transit vehicles in a more free -flow fashion than a Local road.
1.4 Figures 1-3 below show the existing and proposed Collector roads within the boundaries of
the three largest urban areas in Clarington being Bowmanville, Courtice and Newcastle.
Although most of the Collector roads are within residential areas, property uses fronting
these Collector roads vary from institutional, residential, commercial, and green space. It is
also noted that Collector roads are only a small portion of the entire road network within a
residential area.
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PWD-013-21
W -Deferred by the
Region of Durham
N9 LEVAR❑
W
MOT-2
NAG ROA'
CONCESSION IROAD3 t
I
I
4 �
'
D2-Deferred by the
Region of Durham~
w
AVENUE + t�
I
R
ILL
I
x I
�
L
w
x
D1-0eferred by the
Region of Durham
}
4
i
W
CONCESSBON STREET
w
A147-22
A
KI NG`,TRE ET
w �ti
I
�
SASE LINE ROAD P
I
Ell -Deferred
by the
--
I
Region of Durham
I
I
Lake Ontario DEFERREDSTTHE
I
REGIDN OF DNRHAM
I
URBAN AREA I RAILWKY
1y4�
}t
--J
�
FREEWAY TRANSPORTATION HUB
EXISTING }11
�
TYPE A ARTERL LL ROAD MA P J3
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
TYPE BARTERIAL ROAD TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
FUTURE
TYPE C ARTERIAL ROAD ROADS AND TRANSIT
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
COLLECTOR ROAD BOWMANVILLE URBAN AREA
EYJSTING
GRADE SEPARATION
--_--—
REGIONAL TRANSIT SPINE OFFICIAL PLAN
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
PROPOSED
* * 0 •
RAIL TRANS IT LINE JUNE. 2D16
GRADE SEPARATION
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION
Figure 1: Bowmanville Road Network
Municipality of Clarington
Report PWD-013-21
P
D1-DeFen-ed by the
Region of Durham
F
Page 4
I PERR
I�
ME RDI
J
URBAN AREA
I
FREEWAY
r
I
TYPE A ARTERIAL ROAD
f
II
TYPE B ARTERIAL ROAD
y T
TYPE C ARTERIAL ROAD
G
♦;GE R r
i
COLLECTOR ROAD
7g,
REGIONAL TRANSIT SPINE
FREEWAY BUS
i
• • ■ i
RAPID TRANSIT LINE
RAIL TRANSIT LINE
r��
RAILWAY
TRANSPORTATION HUB
YEXISTING
qF
}FREEWAY
INTERCHANGE
;
0FUTURE
FREEWAYINTERCHANGE
GLADE
ROAD
EXISTIN G
31-Deferred
by the
GRADE SEPARATION
Region of
Durham
STREET
RASELINE
vAr 4r+
❑1-Deferred by the
Region of Durham
MAP J2
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK -
ROADS AND TRANSIT
COURTICE URBAN AREA
OFFICIAL PLAN
MUNICIPALITY OF CL4RINGTON
JUNE. 2DI B
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION
PROPOSED
GRADE SEPARATION
DEFERRED SYTHE
- REGION OF DURHAM
}
* a
61-Deferred bythe
Region of Durham
Lake Ontario
07 -Deterred by the
Region of Durham
Figure 2- Courtice Road Network
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PWD-013-21
FREEWAY
TYPE A ARTERIAL ROAD
TYPE B ARTERIAL ROAD
TYPE C ARTERIAL ROAD
COLLECTOR ROAD
REGIONAL TRANSIT SPINE
i I i- RAILWAY
/ EXISTING
•Y! FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
EXISTING
- GRADE SEPARATION
0 PROPOSED
�1 GRADE SEPARATION
DEFERREDBY7HE
REGION OF OURH41A
Lake Ontario
`Y
MAP J4
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
ROADS AND TRANSIT
NEWCA5TLE VILLAGE URBAN AREA
OFFICIAL PLAN
MUNICIPALITY OF CLAIR INGTON
JUNE. 2a18
OFFICE CON�OUDA.TION
Figure 3: Newcastle Road Network
Municipality of Clarington
Report PWD-013-21
2. Discussion
Page 6
2.1 The official and statutory speed limit in Clarington is 50 km/h, unless otherwise posted, as
per the Ontario Highway Traffic Act (HTA). This statutory speed limit of 50 km/h currently
applies to the majority of Clarington's urban areas. There is no requirement for the
statutory speed limit signs to be posted, however, Clarington, similar to many other
jurisdictions, uses gateway signage at key locations to raise awareness of the existing
conditions. Where the speed limit is different than the statutory limit, signs are required to
be posted at speed dependent intervals varying from 300 meters to 900 meters and
downstream of every intersection. Speed limit signs are also required at speed transition
locations.
2.2 Many studies and best practices conclude that an effective and appropriate speed limit
should be a function of variables such as road design, road purpose, surrounding
environment, road user type and should include existing operating, or 85t" percentile,
speeds as a main component. The 85t" percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85
percent of vehicles travel. Effective speed limits incorporate and respect these criteria, as
drivers will most often operate at speeds that they are comfortable with, or at speeds that
correspond to road users' knowledge of the surrounding environment. Artificially low speed
limits rarely achieve desired results as many drivers will develop comfort levels and habits
based on their repeat experience. Inappropriately lowered speed limits also put a strain on
police agencies by increased enforcement requests and expectations from the public.
Appropriately established consistent speed limits help to ensure that expectations are met
from all road users and enforcement agencies across the surrounding area.
2.3 Statutory speed limits in some jurisdictions are being reduced to 40 km/h as a means to
respond to vehicle speeding complaints. While it is recognized that this initiative may
provide a perceived improvement, studies undertaken "before" and "after" the revised
speeds have been implemented regularly confirm that there are no significant
improvements in average speeds. Speed reductions to 40 km/h prove to have the least
effect on Collector and Arterial roads since the design and service function of these types
of roadways generally support higher comfort levels for motorists which consequently
result in higher vehicle operating speeds. A review of neighboring municipalities' practices
did not produce any evidence of support for speed reductions on Collector roads only.
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report PWD-013-21
2.4 In a scenario where only the Collector roads within a subdivision were reduced to a speed
limit of 40 km/h, the change would result in most of the local residents originating their trips
within a 50 km/h Local road zone, transferring onto a 40 km/h Collector zone for a short
distance, and then continuing onto a 50 km/h or higher speed zone when exiting the
subdivision onto an Arterial road. This approach would result in a high level of non-
compliance by local residents and potential confusion to visitors. Another unintended
consequence is the increased speed differential between the compliant and the non-
compliant driver, which decreases safety and may introduce frustration among all road
users.
2.5 The Northglen neighborhood example in Figure 4 demonstrates that Northglen Boulevard
and Edwin Carr Street are the only Collector class roads in the neighborhood. This
equates to 1.33 km, or 13% of Collectors out of the total 10.1 km of all roads within the
subdivision. This design characteristic is typical to other residential areas across
Clarington and other jurisdictions.
Balance of page left intentionally blank.
Municipality of Clarington Page 8
Report PWD-013-21
N
Henry Smi h Avenue
Bruce Cameron
Drive
ti
William Fair Dive
`a
E
pre
l ck
rrs
Ve
c m
m
2
North Ion
Boulevard
a�
aL
Robb Lane
A2
O
L
Carey Lane'
Ro
r
a � Hoo pc Ave nine
m
C�
n
Con essio
Figure 4: Northglen Subdivision Collector roads (dash lines) and Local roads (solid thick lines)
Municipality of Clarington
Report PWD-013-21
Page 9
2.6 Another significant item to consider is signage associated with speed limit changes. Using
Northglen neighborhood in Figure 5 as an example, it has been estimated that a minimum
of 26 new speed limit signs would be required to effectively carry out the speed limit
reduction within this specific area. At an average installation cost of $200 per sign
including post and hardware, the Collector speed limit conversion would result in an
approximate cost of $5,200. Staff estimate that a municipal -wide conversion of all Collector
roads to any speed limit other than the current statutory speed limit would include
approximately 1,000 sign locations with an estimated initial cost of signing the changes of
approximately $200,000. Additional costs to the municipality, including on -going sign
maintenance associated with retro-reflectivity, replacement, boulevard maintenance and
increased risks during motor vehicle collisions are also worth considering.
Balance of page left intentionally blank.
Municipality of Clarington Page 10
Report PWD-013-21
Henry Bmi[hAvenue
Bruce Cameron Drive
William Fair Drive
a �
v�
w
ca
pro, v
in-2c�
(Z -5
12
rM
North rn Boulevard.
ir
.. -0 .
Robb Lane .
°} �E;
0
Carey Laneuy�.
Rj)qipd Hooper Ave ni
Essi,05�
Ca
.
N
Figure 5: Northglen neighborhood with a 40 km/h speed limit on Collector roads only — dots
represent new speed limit sign locations required for a 40 km/h Collector speed limit change
Municipality of Clarington Page 11
Report PWD-013-21
2.7 Over the last several years, staff have also collected speed data at various locations within
the Northglen Subdivision area by using in-house data collection equipment. Radar
Message Boards (RMB) are feedback signs that display speed information to drivers and
collect data for staff to analyze. Armadillos are stealth versions of the RMB and discretely
record the speed data without displaying it to drivers. The available results were collected
at the sign icon locations shown in Figure 6 below.
a i
$d1C0�'4
mac. a
Premiu repair Sugar y` BA Courtice Computing
fltltsm Fred J -
rkman AV.
Sleeping Beautya
Lash Lounge
a
Northglen
Treasure Hill Model Home +
a dkeighbourhood Park V
O Co
ngyy yy
101.5 tloA
Highcastle Homes - nZr+a
Northgler_ IR
TheLan dscapr- Durham"a��
Landscaping Company
Abe's Auto Wreckers
�kketdlc R`re
Ck
calew A O
Figure 6: Radar Message Board data locations in Northglen Subdivision
Municipality of Clarington
Report PWD-013-21
Page 12
2.8 The RMB data indicates that average speeds along typical Local roads within the
Northglen neighborhood were 31-36 km/h and the 85th percentile speeds were 43-48 km/h.
Average speeds along Collector roads were 33-43 km/h and 85th percentile speeds were
44-53 km/h. It is worth highlighting that the data collected along William Fair Drive and
along Northglen Boulevard (prior to the All Way STOP installation at Edwin Carr Street)
were representative of their surrounding environment; William Fair Drive having average
and 851h percentile speeds lower than the Northglen Boulevard Collector road by several
km/h. These roads run parallel to each other and at the time of the data collection, both
were free flowing between Bowmanville Avenue and Middle Road. This shows that the
roads within the area are functioning as per their intended classification and design, and
within satisfactory speed levels.
3. Concurrence
Not Applicable.
4. Conclusion
It is anticipated that a speed limit reduction to 40 km/h along Collector type roads within
residential areas would result in greater levels of undesired driver behavior, lower speed
limit compliance and driver confusion. The costs associated with speed limit signage
changes, as required by the Ontario Traffic Manual and Provincial Regulations, would
amount to approximately $200,000. Staff do not recommend lowering speed limits to 40
km/h on Collector roads only. Staff recommend continuing the current approach of
investigation and on -going monitoring of the municipal road network and research of
alternate options and their suitability on an individual basis.
Staff Contact: Slav Potrykus, Traffic Engineering Supervisor, 905-623-3379 ext. 2315 or
SPotrykus@clarington.net.
Attachments:
Not Applicable
Interested Parties:
The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision:
Dave Bass
Laurel Kahler
Clarington Active Transportation and Safe Roads Committee