HomeMy WebLinkAboutA2020-0033 4028 Hwy 2 Comments 11-26 Bothc1twingwn
Addendum Report to
Report A2020-0033 — November 26, 2020
Planning Services
Committee of Adjustment
Date of Meeting: November 26, 2020
File Number: A2020-0033 (Addendum Report)
Address: 4028 Highway 2, Brownsville
Report Subject: Minor variance application to facilitate the construction of
a detached garage by reducing the minimum required
interior side and rear yard setback from 1.2 metres to 0.6
meres and by increasing the maximum permitted lot
coverage from 10% to 10.1 %
Recommendations:
1. That the Report for Application A2020-0033 be lifted from the table;
2. That the Addendum Report for Minor Variance Application A2020-0033 be
received;
3. That all written comments and verbal submissions were considered in the
deliberation of this application;
4. That application A2020-0033 to facilitate the construction of a detached garage
by reducing the minimum required interior side and rear yard setback from 1.2
metres to 0.6 meres and by increasing the maximum permitted lot coverage from
10% to 10.1 % be approved as it is minor in nature, is desirable for the
appropriate development or use of the land and maintains the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law, the Durham Region Official Plan and Clarington
Official Plan; and
5. That all interested parties listed in this report be forwarded a copy of Committee's
decision.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
1 Background
Page 2
1.1 Application A2020-0033 was heard at the Committee of Adjustment meeting on
August 20, 2020. The applicant had requested additional time to discuss the
proposal with Clarington staff, the Committee approved the following motion:
"That application A2020-0033 for a minor variance to Section 3.1.c and 3.6. e.
of Zoning By-law 84-63 to reduce the rear yard and side yard setback from
1.2 metres to 0.6 metres and increase the lot coverage from 10% to 13% to
permit an accessory building in the rear yard, be tabled for ninety days to
allow further discussion with the applicant with respect to the nature of the
proposal"
1.2 The application was tabled as staff had concerns regarding the size of the
proposed detached garage and the proposed setbacks to the lot lines and septic
system. In addition, staff did not receive comments from the Durham Region
Health Department.
1.3 Through consultation with the Health Department and Planning staff, the
applicant has further revised plans to reduce the size of the detached garage
satisfying Durham Health's setback requirements to the septic system (see
Figure 1). The existing detached garage is a legal non -complying structure that is
setback approximately 2 metres from the septic system, less than the required 5
metres from the septic system. The applicant wishes to demolish the existing
garage and rebuild a new one in a similar location for additional storage. The
revised plans for the proposed detached garage will not further reduce the
setback to the septic system which is acceptable to the Health Department.
1.4 In consultation with the Public Works department, the applicant will submit a
grading plan to the satisfaction of the Manager of Infrastructure Development
Engineering of the Public Works Department. The grading plan will be submitted
at Building Permit stage.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
Page 3
NaM Property line
z' _
is
is
Current
Garage
4
Septic
Syslem
Proposed Ga
:g------------------
❑r vewaylParking
Spaces
.................
Figure 1: Site Plan showing location of existing and proposed detached garage (Not to
Scale)
2 Discussion
Conformity with the intent and purpose of the Regional and Clarington Official Plans
2.1 Both the Regional and Clarington Official Plans permit the residential use of the
property. A detached garage is considered accessory to the residential use.
2.2 It is staff's opinion that the application conforms to the intent and purpose of both
the Official Plans.
Conformity with the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law
2.3 The subject property is zoned Rural Cluster (RC) which permits the residential
use and accessory structures. Section 3.1.c of Zoning By-law 84-63 provides the
regulations for accessory structures. For the subject property, the maximum
permitted height is 4.5 metres and the maximum lot coverage is 10% of the lot
area, totalling to approximately 88.98 square metres based on 2020 MPAC
Assessment data of lot area. The proposal is for a height of 4.5 metres and a
floor area of 89.6 metres (see Figure 2).
2.4 The intent and purpose of limiting lot coverage on a property is to ensure
adequate drainage on the property and that the structure does not dominate the
lot. The existing single detached dwelling and proposed detached garage is well
within the maximum permitted overall lot coverage of 30% in the Rural Cluster
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
Page 4
(RC) zone and is within the maximum permitted total accessory floor area of 90
square metres for lots less than 2 hectares in size. The subject property is one of
the smaller parcels in the surrounding area, thus the more restrictive lot coverage
regulation is applicable for the accessory structure. The proposed detached
garage still meets the total floor area requirement and would allow for greater
functionality of the parcel. The applicant will be working towards submitting a
grading plan to ensure that no adverse drainage will occur to impact adjacent
properties.
2.5 The intent and purpose of setback requirements is to ensure that there is
adequate separation from the accessory structure to the rear yard of the abutting
property, adequate space for maintenance around the building and to
accommodate positive drainage around the property. In addition, the applicant
has recently installed a fence that provides additional screening of the structure
from adjacent properties (See Figure 3 and 4). At the time of writing this report,
staff have received no comments from adjacent neighbours.
Proposed Garage
21'x46'
4.5m (14' - 9") Miid Peak
--------------------
Current Garage
20' x 32'
9' Mid Peak
Figure 2: Front elevation of proposed garage relative to current garage
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
Figure 3: View of Rear Yard from dwelling
Figure 4: View of Subject Property from Highway 2
Page 5
Desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure
2.6 The appropriate development is residential, and the proposed detached garage
is accessory to that residential use. The proposed detached garage will replace
the existing garage and continue to provide storage options for the current
owners, thus improving the usability of the property.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033 Page 6
2.7 The subject property is relatively small when considering other rural residential
lots — having an area that is less than '/4 acre. In some respects, the subject lot
size is comparable to parcels in the Urban Areas of the municipality (see Figure
5). The existing dwelling is setback approximately 23 metres from the front lot
line and the proposed detached garage will be situated in the rear yard. In
allowing for greater lot coverage and a reduction in setbacks, the proposed
detached garage will have minimal impact to the street and the adjacent
properties as there is a sufficient separation from the lot to neighbouring
dwellings.
2.8 For the above stated reasons, it is staff's opinion that the minor variances
requested are desirable for the residential use of land and building.
Figure 5: Aerial image of the subject property
Minor in Nature
2.9 The proposed detached garage conforms to both Official Plans and maintains the
intent of the regulations for accessory buildings in the Zoning By-law. The
proposed detached garage will replace a legal non -complying structure and will
be slightly larger than the existing garage. Through consultation with the Durham
Health department, the applicant will not further reduce the setback to the septic
system and the proposal will not hinder the functionality of the system. In
addition, the applicant is working towards submitting a grading plan to ensure
adequate drainage on the property.
2.10 The existing layout of the structures and septic system posed as significant
constraints when revising the location and size of the proposed detached garage.
The applicants have worked diligently to address staff and agency concerns to
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
Page 7
find suitable solutions for the property. The revised proposal will allow for a
typical sized detached accessory building on this parcel while addressing staff
and agency comments.
2.11 For the above stated reasons, it is staff's opinion that the requested variance is
minor in nature.
3 Conclusion
3.1 Based on Staff's review of the application the application conforms to the intent
and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Regional and Municipal Official Plans,
is desirable for the appropriate development or use of land and is deemed to be
minor in nature.
3.2 Given the above comments, Staff recommends approving this application for
minor variances to Section 3.1.c to facilitate the construction of a detached
garage by reducing the minimum required interior side and rear yard setback
from 1.2 metres to 0.6 meres and by increasing the maximum permitted lot
coverage from 10% to 10.1 % subject to the following conditions:
Submitted by:
Anne Taylor Scott, Principal Planner,
Development Review Branch
The following is a list of interested parties to be notified of the Committee's decision:
Tyler and Melissa Grindrod — Owner
arx
c1twingwn
Attachment 1 to Addendum Report
A2020-0033 November 26-2020
Planning Services
Committee of Adjustment
Date of Meeting: August 20, 2020
File Number: A2020-0033
Report Subject: A minor variance application to reduce the rear yard and
side yard setback from 1.2 metres to 0.6 metres and
increase the lot coverage from 10% to 13% to permit an
accessory building in the rear yard.
Recommendations:
1. That the Report for Minor Variance Application A2020-0018 be received;
2. That all written comments and verbal submissions were considered in the
deliberation of this application
3. That application A2020-0033 for a minor variance to Section 3.1.c and 3.6. e. of
Zoning By-law 84-63 to reduce the rear yard and side yard setback from 1.2
metres to 0.6 metres and increase the lot coverage from 10% to 13% to permit
an accessory building in the rear yard, be tabled for ninety days to allow further
discussion with the applicant with respect to the nature of the proposal; and
4. That all interested parties listed in this report be forwarded a copy of Committee's
decision.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
1 Application Details
1.1 Applicant/Owner: Tyler and Melissa Grindrod
Page 2
1.2 Proposal: A minor variance to Section 3.1.c and 3.6.e. of Zoning By-law
84-63 to reduce the rear yard and side yard setback from 1.2
metres to 0.6 metres and increase the lot coverage from 10%
to 13% to permit an accessory building in the rear yard.
1.3 Area of Lot: 900 square metres
1.4 Location: 4028 Highway 2 (see Figure 1)
1.5 Legal Description: Part Lot 18, Concession 2, Former Township of Clarke
1.6 Zoning: Rural Cluster (RC) Zone of Zoning By-law 84-63
1.7 Clarington Official
Plan Designation: Hamlet
1.8 Durham Region
Official Plan
Designation: Hamlet
1.9 Heritage Status: None
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
2129
�
2113
21ao
Q
2097
v
oe
0
LOT:19
LU
J
207
CON:2
?
CA
IAT:_78�
4I
z
205
2048
m
2028
2011
Go
r CV
o
co
co
co
2010
REGIONAL HIGHWAY 2
M
r—
[r7 1`
CO 00 CD
o)
r
r T �
CD n Q C]
LO
Cy
C D
�
C)
CD
Q
172
171 OD r N
LL
J
imn03 3111ASNMONG
LOT:19
coN:1
N
1093 LO
LOT: 16
CON:1
2
T
1685
v
�c
m
Property Location Map
(Newcastle Village)
- Area Subject To Minor Variance «
4028 Highway 2, Newcastle Village
A2020-0033
Figure 1— Location Map
Page 3
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
2 Background
Page 4
2.1 The applicant is seeking to construct a detached garage and would require a
minor variance to the lot coverage, side yard and rear yard setback to conform to
zoning. The proposed detached garage would replace the existing garage.
3 Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses
3.1 The subject property is located at 4028 Highway 2, which is north of Highway 2
and east of Brownsville Road (see Figure 1). The property is an interior lot,
approximately 900 square metres with an approximate frontage of 50 metres and
depth of 191.5 metres. The property is one of the smaller sized lots along
Highway 2.
3.2 The surrounding uses to the south, east, and west are residential in the form of
single detached dwellings similar to the dwelling on the subject property. To
north, the rear property line abuts open space and is zoned Agricultural.
4 Public Notice and Submissions
4.1 Pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands. In addition, the
appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner within the prescribed distance.
4.2 Staff did not receive any public enquires about this application.
5 Departmental Comments
5.1 The Clarington Engineering Services Department:
The applicant must submit a Grading Plan in support of this application. The
required Grading Plan must provide a drainage swale on the east side and rear of
the garage. The plan must demonstrate that storm drainage flow can be
accommodated within the required swales with a reduced side yard. The plan will
be subject to the approval of the Manager of Infrastructure.
5.2 The Clarington Building Division has no concerns with this application.
5.3 The Clarington Emergency Services has no fire safety concerns with this
application.
6 Agency Comments
6.1 The subject property is within an area regulated by the Ganaraska Region
Conservation Authority. The GRCA has no objection to the approval of the
application.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0033
Page 5
6.2 Comments have not been received from Durham Region Health Department.
7 Discussion
7.1 The proposed garage is significantly larger than the principal dwelling and staff
have concerns with the proposed setbacks. The applicant did not have any prior
consultation with Planning staff prior to submitting the application. The applicant
has requested additional time to discuss any proposed revisions with Planning
staff.
8 Conclusion
8.1 Given the above comments, Staff recommends this application for a minor
variance be tabled for ninety (90) days to allow Staff to discuss the proposed
accessory structure with the applicant.
Submitted by:
Cynthia Strike, Principal Planner,
Development Review Branch
The following is a list of interested parties to be notified of the Committee's decision: