HomeMy WebLinkAboutA2020-0055 3 Pine Street Commentsc1twingwn
Planning Services
Committee of Adjustment
Date of Meeting: November 12, 2020
File Number: A2020-0055
Report Subject: A minor variance application to increase to the maximum
lot coverage from 30% to 36%, reduce the lot area from
the minimum 550 square metres to 540 square metres, to
reduce the side yard setback from the required 1.8 metres
to 1.5 metres and to reduce the minimum landscaped
open space in the front yard (soft landscaping) from the
required 50% to 47% to facilitate the development of a
semi-detached dwelling at 3 Pine Street, Bowmanville.
Recommendations:
1. That the Report for Minor Variance Application A2020-0055 be received;
2. That all written comments and verbal submissions were considered in the
deliberation of this application;
3. That application A2020-0055 for a minor variance to Sections 12.2 a. ii)., 12.2.1.
b. ii) c)., c. ii). b., d. ii) of Zoning By-law 84-63 to permit an increase to the
maximum lot coverage from 30% to 36%, to reduce the lot area from the
minimum 550 square metres to 540 square metres, to reduce the side yard
setback from the required 1.8 metres to 1.5 metres and to reduce the minimum
landscaped open space in the front yard (soft landscaping) from the required
50% to 47% to facilitate the development of a semi-detached dwelling at 3 Pine
Street Bowmanville be tabled for a period of up to 60 days, to allow the applicant
time to adjust the building design to meet Public Works and Planning staff
comments; and
4. That all interested parties listed in this report be forwarded a copy of Committee's
decision.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0055 Page 2
1 Application Details
1.1 Owner/Applicant: Perry Jackman, Hollee Homes Inc. (Agent, Bobbi Ann
Brooks, Top Floor Design)
1.2
Proposal:
Minor variance to Section 12.2. a. ii).,12.2.1. b. ii) c)., c. ii).
b., d. ii) of Zoning By-law 84-63 to permit an increase to the
maximum lot coverage from 30% to 36%, to reduce the lot
area from the minimum 550 square metres to 540 square
metres, to reduce the side yard setback from the required 1.8
metres to 1.5 metres and to reduce the minimum landscaped
open space in the front yard (soft landscaping) from the
required 50% to 47% to facilitate the development of a semi-
detached dwelling.
1.3
Area of Lot:
541 square metres
1.4
Location:
3 Pine Street, Bowmanville
1.5
Legal Description:
Part Lot 33, Concession 3, Former Township of Darlington
1.6
Zoning:
Urban Residential Type One (R1) Zone and Neighbourhood
Character Overlay in Zoning By-law 84-63
1.7
Clarington Official
Plan Designation:
Urban Residential
1.8
Durham Region
Official Plan
Designation:
Living Areas
1.9
Heritage Status:
None
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0055
Page 3
48
49
121
7J 50
51
96
1.28
51 2
98
30amv JYMM
ANN STREET
58
127
60
W
Lu
:-1
CON:1
62
Ln
137
z
ui
�
w
fi
=
139
88
Lin
'141
PINE STREET
CG
74
`"
112
W
is
1
I�
114
11l
J
14`
-
115
14fi
116
1117
80
81
129
151
82
83
122
w
BASELINE
ROAD
150
MOTEL
�
100
FJ�
102
�1
104
LOP 11
�
� �
1418
Property Location Map
(Bowman ville)
.,
_ Area Subject To Minor Variance u�
3 Pine Street, 6owmanville f
3
A 0 0-0055
Figure 1 —Location Map
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0055 Page 4
2 Background
2.1 In 2019, Land Division application (LD2019-0045) to sever the property at 112
Duke Street was submitted and approved by the Region of Durham Land
Division Committee. Clarington's comments on the application indicated that the
lands were deficient in lot area for a semi-detached dwelling and that the lands
were within the neighbourhood character study area which may alter the existing
provisions for dwellings once completed.
2.2 The owner of 112 Duke Street cleared Clarington's conditions; however, it is
staffs understanding that the deed has not been registered to create 3 Pine
Street to date.
2.3 In 2018 Council approved a Neighbourhood Character Study within the
residential neighbourhoods of Elgin, Central and Memorial in Bowmanville. The
study was conducted to address concerns from residents and Council with the
compatibility of redevelopment or building additions in established residential
neighbourhoods. Specifically concerns with overall massing (lot coverage),
height, setbacks, and attached garages were reviewed through the study.
2.4 On July 6, 2020 Council approved Official Plan Amendment No. 123 and By-law
2020-050 to implement the recommendations of a Neighbourhood Character
Study in the three neighbourhoods in Bowmanville. The result was a
neighbourhood character overlay that provides alternative development
provisions for the lands within the neighbourhoods of Elgin, Central and Memorial
in Bowmanville to ensure new development is compatible with the existing
development in these neighbourhoods.
2.5 The applicant has submitted a minor variance application to address the
deficiency in lot area and to seek variances to the Neighbourhood Character
Overlay for lot coverage, side yard setbacks, and soft landscaping in the front
yard.
3 Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses
3.1 The property as it exists today an exterior lot, having an area of approximately
10,838 square metres and an approximate frontage of 17 metres on Duke Street.
The lands subject to the minor variances can be referred to as 3 Pine Street (See
Figure 1). 3 Pine Street will have a frontage of 26.9 metres on Pine Street and a
depth of approximately 20 metres and an area of approximately 540 square
metres.
3.2 The surrounding uses to the north, south, west, and east are residential in the
form of single- and semi-detached dwellings.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0055
4 Public Notice and Submissions
Page 5
4.1 Pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands. In addition, the
appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner within the prescribed distance.
4.2 Staff has received one letter of objection at the time of writing this report. The
letter of objection indicated that both the new dwelling constructed at 112 Duke
Street, and the proposed semi-detached dwelling, are not in keeping with the
character of the neighbourhood. The letter indicates that the neighbourhood
study was completed to address new development and those provisions should
be adhered to. The letter also notes that the proposed dwelling will limit the
green space on the subject lands.
5 Departmental Comments
5.1 Clarington Public Works
The Clarington Engineering Services Department has concerns with the proposed
driveways being located adjacent to each other. The result is a 9.2-metre-wide
combined driveway which does not meet Public Works standards. A 1.2 metre
separation from proposed driveways is ideal. The driveways should be
redesigned, or the dwelling design modified so the driveways are located on the
outside of the dwelling units.
5.2 Clarington Building Division
The Clarington Building Division has no concerns with this application. A building
permit is required.
5.3 Clarington Emergency and Fire Services Department
The Clarington Emergency Services has no fire safety concerns with this
application.
6 Discussion
6.1 The subject lands are within an area that recently went through a Neighbourhood
Character Study. The study resulted in a Council approved neighbourhood
character overlay that provides alternative development provisions to limit the
impact of new development on the existing neighbourhood.
6.2 Staff undertook a character analysis of the lands surrounding the subject site. The
character analysis was conducted to gather additional information on the
surrounding neighbourhood context and build forms and to inform how the
proposed variances meet the intent of the Council approved character overlay
provisions.
Municipality of Clarington
Committee of Adjustment A2020-0055
Page 6
6.3 Staff have been in discussions with the applicant and have arranged a meeting to
discuss the proposal further to address the issues identified in the character
analysis and the driveway concerns raised by Public Works.
6.4 Staff recommend tabling the application to allow for additional time to discuss with
the applicant to find solutions to the issues identified above.
7 Conclusion
7.1 Given the above comments, Staff recommends tabling this application for a
period of up to 60 days.
Submitted by.
Anne Taylor Scott, Principal Planner,
Development Review Branch
The following is a list of interested parties to be notified of the Committee's decision:
Chris and Tara Vesters