HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-3-94
" ~,
$ ~~
THE I1)N OB TDB M>f>$ZCIFRLITY fTI+'
~~~
,:,
MeetiAg:
GENERAL PtPt)8E ARD ADMINISTRP~iTION CO1~AtIT'1'13E File'#,,~:~"` ~x-E
, Res.# - c~`-Ql`'~'
:;Date:
; JANUARY 3, '•1993
.
BY-Law #
Report#: wfl,.3-9d fits#: n_07_aa-06
Subject:. ' PETI'PIt~ FAA![ RESIDEBTS OF GI~ABBEY D~RIyBy C(R~'PICB
Rewmmendatlons: a
;~
It ` i
is respect€ully reeomsflended that the General Purpose anti 'I
Adminiatration'Cemmttee reeomm8nd to Council the fallowing:°
i
1. THAT-. Report WD-3-94 be received;
2. TEAT a copy of Report WD-3-94 be forwarded to"Mr. JohA $tezik
' and the Durham Regional Police; and
3. THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to ctist:uss the
traffic concerns-with Mr. John Stezik and the Barham Regional
Ponce to determine their willingness to-participate ,in a
s, Neighbourhood Speed Watch Program and to discuss other
concerns regarding traffic oa Glenabbey Drive.
." REP
L O ORT
ATTAGHM'S
No. 1: ,Rey Map
No. 2s Map Showing Fnture Streets ~'°
~ £;
_~~ _
F
~ _
~
r~"",
,..
s
x
1Q18
,t.: .
®~ ~:.
" "•. - 1H66 WFrtLW RLYCIE.9IhP
REPORT NO.: WD-3-94 PAGE 2
No. 3: Correspondence dated December 7, 1993, from John
Stezik, Concerned Citizens for a Safe.
Neighbourhood, enclosing Petition
No. 4: Speed Comparison Table
2.0 SACRGRODND
2.1 At a meeting held on December 13, 1993, Council passed
Resolution #841-93:
"THAT the petition dated December 7, 1993, and
the delegation of John Stezik regarding
traffic flow on Glenabbey Drive between
Townline Road and Prestonvale Road in
Courtice, be received;
THAT the petition be forwarded to the Director
of Public Works for review and preparation of
a report to be submitted to the General
Purpose and Administration Committee; and
THAT John Stezik be advised of Council's
decision."
3.0 RSVIEW AND CONl0311T
3.1 .Report WD-8-92. January 20, 1992
The residents' concerns were previously presented to the
General Purpose and Administration Committee on January 20,
1992,~in Report WD-8-92, which recommended:
"1. THAT Report WD-8-92 be received;
1019
RBPORT NO.: WD-3-94 PAGR 3
2. THAT requests for all-way stops to act as speed control
devices at the intersections of Auburn Lane/Pebblebeach
Drive; Glenabbey Drive/Pinedale Crescent; Glenabbey
Drive/Bruntsfield Street; Glenabbey Drive/Auburn Lane;
Glenabbey Drive/Robert Adams Drive; and Robert Adams
Drive/Hampstead Gate which are unwarranted based on
Provincial guidelines be denied
2. THAT Durham Regional Police be provided with a copy of
Report WD-8-92 and be requested to strictly enforce the
existing Maximum 50 ]an/hour speed zones on Glenabbey
Drive and other residential collector type roadways in
the Courtice area;
4. THAT the request to lower the speed limit on Glenabbey
Drive from 50 Ian/hour to 40 km/hour be denied;
5. THAT the request to prohibit heavy trucks from entering
Glenabbey Drive be denied; and
6. THAT the concerned residents listed at the end of Report
WD-8-92 be advised of Council's decision and be provided
with a copy of Report WD-8-92."
3.2 Urban Collector Roads
Glenabbey Drive, a major urban collector road through a
rapidly growing. residential area, has a traffic volume of
approximately 3,600 vehicles daily with an average speed of
47.59 ]an per hour, a 50 percentile speed of 49.44 km per hour,
and an 85 percentile speed of 57.61 ]~ per hour. The 85
percentile indicates that 85$ of motorists are driving at or
below this speed while 15~ are travelling above this speed.
~1'~
RI3PORT NO.: WD-3-94 PAGES 4
The Roads and Transportation Association of Canada describes
urban collector roads as typically moving 1,000 - 12,000
vehicles per day with design speeds of 50 - 80 km per hour and
average running speeds of 30 - 70 km per hour. Glenabbey
Drive is within these typical guidelines and does not. carry
"excessive" traffic according to engineering guidelines.
3.3 Future Traffic Patterns
If further residential development occurs on Glenabbey Drive,
east of Prestonvale Road, traffic volumes will increase on the
east-west collector. A long range proposed road network in
Courtice includes the "possible" upgrading of Prestonvale Road
to an Arterial Class roadway with an interchange at Highway
401. The Prestonvale Road interchange, if or when it is
created, would divert most of the through traffic southerly
and reduce volumes on Glenabbey Drive.
3.4 weed Comparisons
A speed comparison table (Attachment No. 4) shows a number of
areas where speed studies have been performed. The table
shows the posted speed and the actual results. The
comparative results indicate that Glenabbey Drive does have a
moderate speeding problem (85 percentile of 8 km per hour over
the posted speed), but is comparable or less than some other
areas. The Trulls Road location just south of Mitchell
Corners Public School has an 85 percentile of 68 km per hour
(858 percentile of 18 lan per hour over the posted speed).
Generally motorists tend to believe that:
a) driving "a little above the limit" is acceptable;
121
REPORT NO.: WD-3-94 PAGE 5
b) posted speed limits are arbitrary limits. set by
governments and can be ignored. You .can drive without
checking your speedometer and operate at a speed which
you perceive as being safe for the surrounding
conditions; and
c) .residents do not complain about my speed through their
neighbourhoods, the police are simply out to meet their
quotas.
3.5 Enforcement of the Maximum Sneed
Recommendation No. 2, contained in Report WD-8-92, requests
that the Durham Regional Police strictly enforce the maximum
speeds on Glenabbey Drive. The problem with this
recommendation is that the Durham Regional Police do not have
the resources to enforce the maximum speed on Glenabbey Drive
and other similar streets in Durham Region to the extent which
is required to satisfy the concerns of the residents.
Therefore, from the residents' viewpoint, this is not a
solution.
3.6 Development of a Pilot "Neighbourhood Speed Watch Program"
A program exists in Georgia, U.S.A., which encourages the
residents to assist in a form of public education. The
program was designed to reduce the speeds of motorists in
self-contained subdivisions that experience little or no
.through traffic with an 85 percentile of 10 miles per hour or
more (16 km per hour) above the posted speed.
Although Glenabbey Drive as a collector road does not fit the
"local traffic" description or have as large a speeding
problem, it does carry basically the same through traffic
every working day.
1(~Z2
REPORT NO.: WD-3-94 PAGE 6
All-way stops are not the answer. Artificially lowering the
speed to 40 km per hour so motorists may reduce their speed to
50 km_per hour is not the answer. Public education and.
community involvement similar to "Mothers Against Drunk
Drivers" and "Neighbourhood Watch" have shown that they can
make a difference.
The Public Works Department would like to work with the
residents of Glenabbey Drive and the Durham Regional Police to
develop a modified version of the "Neighbourhood Speed Watch
Program" and attempt a pilot program on an experimental basis
if the residents are willing to actively participate. At the
same time, any other ideas which the residents or the Police
Department may have could be discuased.
The program to be developed will rely on community spirit and
peer pressure to increase awareness and foster a sense of
responsibility among motorists and thus achieve better
compliance with residential speed limits. The program must
make motorists feel that speeding in residential
neighbourhoods is a socially unacceptable behaviour. If the.
program is successful, it may reduce motorists' speeds on
other residential streets, in addition to the immediate
"neighbourhood speed watch" area.
3.7 Intersection of Glenabbey Drive and Robert Adams Drive
This intersection of two (2) collector roads does not meet the
warrants for an all-way stop. An .all-way stop may be
warranted sometime in the future as intersection volumes
increase. It is suggested that this issue be discussed with
the residents, along with the proposed "Neighbourhood Speed
Watch Program" and other concerns which the residents may
have.
1n~~
REPORT NO.: WD-3-94 pAGE 7
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 From the above, it is concluded that enforcement of the
maximum. speed by the Durham Regional Police, by itself, will
.not satisfactorily address the concerns of the residents on
Glenabbey Drive. It is, therefore, recommended that the
concept of a "Neighbourhood Speed Watch Program" be discussed
.with the residents and with the Durham Regional Police.
Respectfully submitted,
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee,
Walter A. Evans, P.Eng.
Director of Public Works
RDB*WAE*ph
December 16, 1993
Attachments
pc: Mr. John Stezik
125 Glenabbey Drive
Courtice, Ontario
L1E 2B7
Durham Regional Police
16th Division
77 Centre Street North
Oshawa, Ontario
L1G 4B7
`.
Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., AMCT
Acting Chief
Administrative Officer
124
,~
~~
~~
~_~
Te porary
D ad-end
rricades
....
I
i ~,,
-~:.
~\
r
-" ~ /
~~ ~~
o
~'
a
-~ ~~~
~~~n i C`
1 Q~~~of R
Drove
~~~
D~
Q~
J ~
l~
I ~J ~
~~
~ ~'~ ~' Drive
%~
bbey
\e~~
G
I-~- ~ ; i'
~~ ~~ iris
~ way_ No 2- _-
~~ ~~ _ ~~I! J I~
Si~IBJ
SI ATE.
D~;~e _i
a~ ~~
0 0
a
~~
~~
0
a I i~~,.., I / /~
~_
I~__~;~/
-~ ;
- ,~
---.--
i/ ; ;~
,. = ~o ~~
ed 'portion ~ i - ; 2\ i
ert Adams _
~~i ~ ----
- _ '~ ~
/~I
V (
~~
~~~
J
I
C:~ATTACHS~DARL~SWCDURT2
DRAWN BY: J~4 DATE: DEC. 1993
ATTACHMENT N0. ,
~~WD-3-94
~' ^
i Glenab ~~
II ~--~ w
I
J u
J
~ Re iono oad 22
1'
0
J~
~~
~~
I
~I
~0
~~
C ~,~~
FUTUR GLENABBEY
F TORE ALL WAY STOP
IN ERSECTI
~0 E AMS DRIVE EX
POSSIBLE FUTURE
401 ;PRESTONVALE RU.
INTERCHANGE
SION
ION
DRAtiVN BY. JMI~DATE: DEC. _1.9._93
ATTACHMENT N0.2
WD-3-94
!: }
BLOOR STREET
FUTURE EXTENSION
. ,-.
1
- - COUNCIL DIRECTION
~~,.~.,~,~ '",:' . CEC L'.`= ~J`'Ol AM X93 ~. " .-° December 7; 1993
Diane Hamre
Mayor ATTENTION PdUhICiP,'~LITY Gf tm:c &; itc
v
Municipality of Clarin
ton
f~ CLARIPiGTO`~ Dscuss 4Jilh
b FECE;vEL~
40 Temperance Street _ ~,Eas~a~s,,~er
Bowmanville, Ontario OEC 0 9 ~ ~^,~ _~~ ~~~ ~~~-
_
--~
~_ _---------a
-- -
~.._.
I Rc3
Mayor Hamre, -.__ _._ _ __ .__1._._.._.____~.. _. ~ .a______ ____. __. .
Re: TRAFFIC FLOW -Glenabbey Drive, Courtice, Ontario
The attached list of people are concerned about the traffic flow along
Glenabbey Drive between Townline Road and Prestonvale Road in Courtice.
Our specific concerns are for the safety of the residents of Glenabbey Drive
but especially of our children who play in the neighbourhood and walk across
the intersections.
We feel there are 2 serious problems with the traffic on Glenabbey Drive:
1. Speeding and Lhreckless Driving.
2. Excessive volume (for a residential street).
Both of these problems increase the risk of personal injury. Mix these with
a 'young' neighbourhood filled with children and the result is a
DEADLY COMBINATION.
We .ask you, as our elected representative to Office, to find a solution that
will address these problems. We respectfully request a reply that outlines a
plan to address these problems by Tuesday, January 4, 1994.
We trust that you will give this serious consideration and your immediate
attention. Glenabbey Drive is a residential street, NOT a speedway to the 401
Highway.
Please send correspondence to:
CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR A SAFE NEIGHBOURHOOD
cJo Johrl Stezik V
125 Glenabbey Drive
Courtice, Ontario ATTACHMENT N0. 3
LIE 287 WD-3-94
Attachment n Q' / '
1L)27 v"
SPEED COMPARISONS
LOCATION POSTED
SPEED
DATE AVERAGE
SP88D 50
PBRCBNT]:LS 85
PERCENTILE
Glenabbey Dr. 50 06/17/92 41.72 47.31 56.93
06/18/93 42.79 47.28 57.91
10/01/92 47.59 49.44 57.61 after signs
Strathallan Dr. 50 05/12/93 40.75 43.55 52.01 Wed.
05/13/93 42.85 46.38 53.24 Thu.
05/14/93 41.49 44.63 51.77 Fri.
05/15/93 39.23 42.17 49.18 Sat.
05/16/93 36.57 40.48 49.01 Sun.
Sandringham Dr. 50 06/17/92 41.10 42.58 54.58
Prestonvale Rd. 50 09/05/91 45.56 51.73 63.51
Trolls Rd. 50 11/24/93 52.02 56.60 67.47
11/25/93 54.25 58.46 68.25 School
Simpson Ave. 50 09/12/92 50.17 46.99 57.78
09/13/92 50.48 49.32 SB.29
11/25/92 47.75 49.89 56.80
Leakard Rd. 60 12/01/93 65.98 67.01 81.00
12/02/93 65.83 66.44 80.94
Concession 7,
Darlington 80 11/24/93 75.08 77.14 93.38
11/25/93 78.05 81.24 94.28
December, 1993
ATTACHMENT N0. 4
WD-3-94
1 17
t~ i:r, ~~