HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/09/1997
REVISED
_e!ari~9i;;n
ONTARIO
DATE: JUNE 9, 1997
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
E: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRAYERS
~ROLLCALL
~.,;..,---~,."'''
"-~"-
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
--..------------
regular meeting of
Minutes of a
May
held on
1.
I
"'l~d' '. h
Sandy AIEl a ,6275 L:1.15~ty Street Nort, _"
le, LOB 1JO - Durhintt Countrysi~enture
(Corre pondence Item D - ~ .
Norm Leigh, Manage..: vf :B'US:1.ness and Development, (j ~
Regional Municipality of Durham - Greater Toronto pfVv
Marketing Alliance;
Henry Kortek~as, 82 Sherwood Road East, Ajax, L1T 2Z2 -;9~~
Tomina Rezoning;
Jack Munday on behalf of the Bowmanville Lions ClUb~~O.. "' .
145 High Street, Bowmanville, L1C 3B9 - Report -
ADMIN-26-97; .
g/
DELJ;:GATIONS
2 .
3.
4.
5.
Ron Hooper on behalf of the Bowmanville Business In/i
Improvement Area, 5 Silver Street, Bowmanville, ,~
L1C 3C2 - Report ADM'~ __ ~',
6. Don Welsh, 4280 Mearns Avenue, Bowmanville, L1C 3K5-
Report ADMIN-26-97;
7. Clay Taylor, President, North Claringcon Ratepayers
Association, P.O. Box 346, Orono, LOB 1MO - Addendum to
Report CD-26-97; and
8. Debbie Pearl, Vice-President and CEO, International
Motorsports Group Inc., 65 Queen Street West, Suite
1000, Toronto, M5H 2M5 - Addendum to Report CD-26-97.
CORPO.RATlON OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
.0 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMAHVtLLE _ONTARIO -l1C 3"6. (905) 823.3379. FAX 623.4189
@
MC'IOI.IliO"..."t!:R
REV I SED 'y}ar/c ,{;,'947'
_6!a;r;'gli;;n
ONTARIO
DATE: JUNE 9, 1997
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRAYERS
ROLL CALL
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MJ;:ETING
Minutes of a regular meeting of Council held on
May 26, 1997
DELEGATIONS
1. Norm Leigh, Manager of Business and Development,
Regional Municipality of Durham - Greater Toronto
Marketing Alliance;
2. Henry Kortekaas, 82 Sherwood Road East, Ajax, L1T 2Z2 _
Tomina Rezoning;
3. Jack Munday on behalf of the Bowmanville Lions Club,
145 High Street, Bowmanville, L1C 3B9 - Report
ADMIN-26-97;
4. Ron Hooper on behalf of the Bowmanville Business
Improvement Area, 5 Silver Street, Bowmanville,
L1C 3C2 - Report ADMIN-26-97;
5. Don Welsh, 4280 Mearns Avenue, Bowmanville, L1C 3K5 _
Report ADMIN-26-97;
6. Clay Taylor, President, North Clarington Ratepayers
Association, P.O. Box 346, Orono, LOB 1MO - Addendum to
Report CD-26-97;
7. Debbie pearl, Vice-President and CEO, International
Motorsports Group Inc., 65 Queen Street West, Suite
1000, Toronto, M5H 2M5 - Addendum to ReportCD-26-97;
and
8. Sandy Archibald, 6275 Liberty Street North,
Bowmanville, LOB lJO - Durham Countryside Adventure
(Correspondence Item D - 4).
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVlllE .ONTARIO .uc 3"6' (9051623-3379. FAX 623.4169
@
"~C'CllO"A"("
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
_6!a;r;'gi;;n
ONTARIO
DATE: JUNE 9, 1997
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRAYERS
ROLL CALL
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
Minutes of a regular meeting of Council held on
May 26, 1997
DELEGATIONS
J.., Norm Leigh, Manager of Business and Development,
Regional Municipality of Durham - Greater Toronto
Marketing Alliance;
2. Henry Kortekaas, 82 Sherwood Road East, Ajax, L1T 2Z2 _
Tomina Rezoning;
3. Jack Munday on behalf of the Bowmanville Lions Club,
145 High St~eet, Bowmanville, L1C 3B9 - Repo~t
ADMIN~26-97;
4. Ron Hooper on behalf of the Bowmanville Business
Improvement Area, 5 Silver Street, Bowmanville,
L1C 3C2 - Report ADMIN-26-97;
5. Don Welsh, '4280 Mearns Avenue, Bowmanville, L1C 3K5,-
Report ADMIN-26-97;
6. Clay Taylor, President, North Clarington Ratepayers
Association, P.O. Box 346, Orono, LOB 1MO - Addendum to
Report CD-26-97; and
7. Debbie Pearl, Vice-President and CEO, International
Motorsports Group Inc., 65 Queen Street West, Suite
1000, Toronto; M5H 2M5 - Addendum to Report CD-26-97.
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
..; ,eM PE I=l AN C e S TR e E T . BOWMAN VlllE .OH T ARlO. 11 C 3 A6 . (10 SJ '23-3379. FAX 623.41 19
@
Ille..cu......"lll
Council Agenda
COMMUNICATIONS
- 2 -
June 9, 1997
Receive for Information
I - 1
I - 2
I - 3
I - 4
I - 5
\
I - 6
I - 7
I - 8
I - 9
I - 10
I - 11
Correspondence received from Ron W. Maurice, City
Clerk, City of York - Assistance to Southern
Manitoba;
Correspondence received from Novina Wong,
Metropolitan Clerk, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto - Proposed Legislative
Framework For a New Municipal Act - Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing Consultation
Documents;
Correspondence received from The Honourable
Al Leach, Minister of Municipal Affairs and
Housing - Bill 86;
Correspondence received from Narda Hoogkamp,
276 Mill Street North, Newcastle, L1B lJ3 -
Parking;
Correspondence received from Sheila Keating-Nause,
Senior Policy Analyst, Federation of Canadian
Municipalities - 1997 Policy Development Book;
Correspondence received from James W. Knight,
Executive Director, Federation of Canadian
Municipalities - Notice of 1997 Annual General
Meeting;
Correspondence received from David Hirsh,
President, Greater Toronto Home Builders'
Association - Parade of New Homes;
Correspondence received from Victor Doyle, Senior
Planner, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing - Minister's Order Delegating Planning
Applications Currently Before the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing;
Member Communication received from the Association
of Municipalities of Ontario entitled "News From
the Fiscal and Labour Policy Portfolio";
Correspondence received from Neal Cathcart, Reeve,
Township of Cavan - Peterborough County/City
Restructuring;
Minutes of a meeting of the Clarke Museum &
Archives held on May 6, 1997;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II} t dJ
I I/~'
I
I
I
I
I t:
I
I
I
I
Council Agenda
COMMUNICATIONS
~) /
v
/
I - 12
I - 13
I - 14
I - 15
I - 16
I - 17
~~~
(~
I - 19
- 3 -
June 9, 1997
Correspondence received from Ministerial and
Executive Services, Ministry of Citizenship and
Immigration Canada - Citizenship Ceremonies;
Minutes of a meeting of the Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority held on May 21, 1997;
Correspondence
Clerk, Town of
Flooding;
received from Bruce Taylor, Town
Pickering - Resolution re: Manitoba
Correspondence received from C. Dodds, Assistant
City Clerk, Toronto Corporate Services - Removal
of Premium Fee Charged to G.T.A. Drivers;
News Release received from the Atomic Energy
Control Board entitled "AECB Publishes Recent
Radiation Doses From Darlington and Pickering
Nuclear Stations";
Correspondence received from the Citizens' Network
on Waste Management - Recycling;
Correspondence received from John
23 Empire Crescent, Courtice, L1E
Empire Crescent, Courtice; and
Melmer,
lV7 - Speeding,
Correspondence received from Georges C. Clermont,
President and Chief Executive Officer, The Canada
Post Corporation - Flight For Freedom Literacy
Awards.
Receive for Direction
/
D - 1
D - 2
D - 3
D - 4
Correspondence
Clerk, City of
Resolution re:
received from Ron W. Maurice,
York -Requesting Endorsement
Opposition to Bill 84;
City
of a
Correspondence received from Murray Clamen,
Secretary, Canadian Section, International Joint
Commission - A Policy Statement on the
Incineration of Municipal Waste;
Correspondence received from Ronald C. Lathan,
City Clerk, City of Burlington - Resolution re:
Rights & Privileges of Pedestrians at Unprotected
Road Crossings;
Correspondence received from Sandy Archibald,
Chairperson, The Durham Countryside Adventure
Committee, 6275 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville,
L1C 3K6 - Durham Countryside Adventure;
Council Agenda
- 4 -
June 9, 1997
----..,
~,.'
f{}V
.f~1
MA-8
~,J1I: 0 p - 9
::t~.
~1 MOTIO~
'P NOTICE OF MOTION
REPORTS
.
:~
1.
2.
3.
4.
General Purpose and Administration Committee Report
June 2, 1997;
Addendum to Report CD-26-97 - Proposed Amendments to I~ I
the Noise By-law, Public Entertainment By-law and ,!~/,
Exhibitions Held for Hire or Gain By-law; IV~'lL
Report ADMIN-25-97 - Tourist Information Centre; yf~ I
Report,WD-36-97 - Canada ~ Ontario Infrastructure Worksyl~ I
Extens~on; ,
Addendum to Report ADMIN-24-97 - Property Inventory; yI~ I
and
I
I
I
I
5.
Correspondence received from Denis Kelly, City
Clerk, City of North York - Provincial Government
Bill 84 - Privatization of Fire Departments;
Correspondence received from Frank Simpson, Tyrone
Community Centre and Neal Smith, Tyrone Athletic
Association - Meeting Wednesday April 30 to
Discuss Redevelopment of the Tyrone Park;
Correspondence received from the
Rehabilitation & Sports Injuries
Replacement;
Clarington
Clinic - Sign
petition received from residents of Orono re:
Sani tary Sewers; and
Correspondence received from E. Kenneth Ranney,
6 Merryfield Court, Bowmanville, L1C 4L2 -
Prediction of Approaching Oil Crisis.
ADMIN-26-97 - Older Adul1Centre (To be
under separate cover). ~ ~ '
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
BY-LAWS
6.
97-119
distributed
being a by-law to authorize a contract between
Rogers Cantel Inc., North York, Ontario, in
respect of the Supply of Cellular Telephones and
Air Time, to the Municipality of Clarington (Item
#6 of Report #1);
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
of~1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
Council Agenda
BY-LAWS
97-120
97-121
97-122
97-123
97-l24
97-125
97-126
97-127
- 5 -
June 9, 1997
being a by-law to establish a Reserve Fund for
Tyrone Community Centre;
being a by-law to authorize the execution of an
agreement between the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs (the Province) (Report #4);
being a by-law to establish a Reserve Fund for
Bowmanville Business Improvement Area;
being a by-law to authorize entering into an
Agreement with the owners of Plan of Subdivision
18T-87056 and any mortgagee who has an interest in
the said lands, and the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington in respect of l8T-87056
(Approved by Council March 12, 1990);
being a by-law to amend By-law No. 89-184, as
amended, a by-law to prohibit noises likely to
disturb the inhabitants of the Municipality of
Clarington (Report #2);
being a by-law to amend By-law No. 78-50, as
amended, respecting the holding of certain public
entertainments, festivals and parades within the
Municipality of Clarington (Report #2);
being a by-law to amend By-law No. 91-56,
respecting exhibitions held for hire or gain in
the Municipality of Clarington (Report #2);
being a by-law to authorize a contract between the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and
Halminen Homes, Courtice, Ontario, for the
purchase of the Nantucket Sales Pavilion
(Report 1t3);
OTHER BUSINESS
BY~LAW TO APPROVE ALL ACTIONS OF COUNCIL
ADJOURNMENT
I
I
I
.
I
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
Council Minutes
May 26, 1997
Minutes of a regular meeting of Council
held on Monday, May 26, 1997, at
7:00 p.m., in the Council ChambeTs
PRAYERS
Councillor Hannah led the meeting in prayer.
, I
I
I
I
I
'.
.
.
.
.
I
I
^
II
i I
ROLL CALL
Present Were:
Mayor D. Hamre
Councillor A Dreslinski
Councillor C. Elliott
Councillor L. Hannah
Councillor M. Novak (Left the meeting from 7:40 p.m. until 7:45 p.m.)
Councillor P. PingIe
Councillor D. Scott
Also Present:
Chief Administrative Officer, W. H. Stockwell
Director of Community Services, J. Caruana (Attended until 8:08 p,m.)
Fire Chief, M. Creighton (Attended until 8:08 p.m.)
Treasurer, M. Marano (Attended until 8:08 p.m.)
DirectoT of Public Works, S. Vokes
Director of Planning and Development, F. Wu (Attended until 8:08 p.m.)
Clerk, P. Barrie
DEClARATIONS OF INIEREST
Councillor Novak stated that she would be making a declaration of interest with
respect to Item #13 of Report #1.
Councillor Elliott indicated that he would be making a declaration of interest with
respect to Item #18 of Report #1.
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
Resolution #C-391-97
Moved by Councillor PingIe, seconded by Councillor Novak
1HAT the minutes of a reguIaT meeting of Council held on May 12, 1997, be
corrected by adding the reference to Councillor Hannah as the mover and
Councillor Dreslinski as the seconder of Resolution #C-361-97; and
1HAT the minutes be adopted as corrected.
"CARRIED"
Council Minutes
PRESENTATION
;*
DELEGATIONS
I
- 2-
.
May 26,1997
Mayor Hamre displayed a plaque which was presented to the Municipality of
Clarington during the Police Services Ceremony in recognition of those
individuals who assisted the Police Department in seaTching for an abducted child
on October 9, 1996.
I
Resolution #C-392-97
I
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Scott
I
THAT the order of the agenda be altered to allow Paul Morris to address
Council at this time.
I
"CARRlEDIt
.
Paul Morris, RR. #1, Hampton, LOB lJO, addressed Council on behalf of the
Rotary Club regarding the implementation of a youth centre in the Municipality.
Mr. Morris indicated that when the Ad Hoc Committee to Assist Youth
presented their final report, three problem areas arose; a full-time facilitator,
facility to house the centre, and funding for the centre. He is pleased that, with
the lease of the Fire/Court Building to the Oshawa/Clarington Association for
Community Living, a facility for the centre has been found. In April a meeting of
teachers, parents and community leaders was held to address the important issues
surrounding youth. From this meeting, a forum has been set for May 27, 1997,
which will include 40 students from across the Municipality to discuss youth
issues. Mr. Morris advised Council that Diane Eastwood of the John Howard
Society has agreed to assume the responsibility of the Administrator of the
Centre, along with her regular duties. The centre will operate completely
separate from the John Howard Society. An advisory board consisting of
Ron Collis, Barbara Okes, Chairperson, Bowmanville Senior Public School
Council and Ruth Sorley, Bowmanville High School; has been formed to work
with Diane in heT endeavours. A youth council will be created to run the
operation and to control the facility. Questionnaires and resumes will be
distributed throughout the Municipality for all interested youth to apply. With
the building having been found and Diane Eastwood agreeing to assume the
responsibility of the administrator, funding has become less of an issue.
Contributions will, however, be sought from municipal groups. September 1997 is
the target date for a fully operation'al facility.
.
I
I
.
I
I
.
.
Terri Gray, 23 Scugog Street, Bowmanville, LIC 3H7, thanked Council on behalf
of the Clarington Project for their positive recommendation with respect to the
lease of the Fire/Court Building. The use of this building will open opportunities
for developmentally handicapped individuals of the Municipality to live and be
active within their own community.
I
Viv Woolford, 18 Hooper Sq., Bowmanville, LIC 4X7, advised Council that
earlier this month, his daughter was attacked by a dog in the Liberty Village area.
His daughter was walking her puppy when a large dog attacked it. The incident
was reported to the Police Department and to the Department of Health and the
dog was to be quarantined for 10 days. However, the dog was seen running the
neighbourhood before the 10 day period was up. Bonnie Hearn advised Council
that she witnessed the incident and she and Mr. Woolford requested that Council
take action by implementing a by-law to control dangerous dogs.
I
I
.
I
, I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
COMMUNICATIONS
I
.
I
I
.
-.
I
.
.
.
.
I
I
, I
- 3-
May 26, 1997
Correspondence Item I - 19 was distributed to Council as a handout.
Resolution #C-393-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Pingle
lHAT the communications to be received for information be approved with the
exception of Items I - 2, I - 8 and I - 16.
IICARRIED"
I - 1 Municipal Alert received from the Association of Municipalities of
Ontario entitled .Provincial Budget Consistent With Announced Changes
To Who Does What";
I _ 3 Correspondence received from The Honourable AI Leach, Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing - 1997 Ontario Budget;
I _ ,4 Minutes of a meeting of the Bowmanville Museum Board held on
April 9, 1997;
I _ 5 Correspondence received from Libby Racansky, Friends of the Farewell,
3200 Hancock Road, Courtice, LIE 2M1 - An Application For a Minor
Exception to the Regional Tree Conservation By-law;
I _ 6 Correspondence received from Donald G. McKay, Town Clerk, Town of
Whitby - Provincial Freeway Improvement Priorities, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
I _ 7 Correspondence received from C.W. Lundy, Regional Oerk, Regional
Municipality of Durham - Transit Issues in Durham and the GTA;
I _ 9 Correspondence received from Penny Waghorne, Public Affairs,
Darlington Nuclear Generating Station - Update From Darlington
Nuclear Division April 1997; ,
I - 10 Agenda received from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation AuthoTity
for a meeting held on May 21, 1997;
I _ 11 Correspondence received from Nestor Chornobay, Director, Strategic
Planning Branch, Regional Municipality of Durham - Commissioner's
Report No. 97-P-68 - 1996 Census of Population;
I _ 12 Newsletter received from Sylvia Pivko, Executive Director, Durham
Family Court Clinic - Young Offender Update;
I _ 13 Correspondence received from Kathleen Pasquet, 356 Church Street,
Newcastle, LIB lC6 - Letter of Appreciation;
Council Agenda
COMMUNICATIONS
1-2
Premium Fee
Charged to
GTA Drivers
F2I.GE
I - 8
AMO Newsletter
M06.GE
1- 16
Extension of
Canada-<>ntario
Infrastructure
Works Program
Fll.PR
- 4-
I
I
.
.
I
May 26, 1997
1- 14
Correspondence received from Ronald C. Lathan, City Clerk and
Director, City of Burlington - "Who Does What" Panel Reforms;
1- 15
Correspondence received from Carol Smitton, Committee Secretary,
Regional Municipality of Durham - Friends of the Farewell Concerns _
Groundwater Recharge Areas/Courtice North;
I - 17 Correspondence received from Terry Mundell, President, Association of
Municipalities of Ontario - AMO's Response to the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing Consultation Paper on a New Municipal Act;
I
.
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
I
I
I - 18 Correspondence received from C.W. Lundy, Regional Clerk, Regional
Municipality of Durham - Crime Stoppers Program for Transit Operators
in Durham Region; and
I - 19 Press Release received from the Clarington Museums/Clarke Museum &
Archives - Giant Second-Hand Book Sale to be held on Saturday,
June 7, 1997.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-394-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Pingle
mAT the correspondence dated May 2, 1997, from George S. Graham, Clerk
Administrator, The Township of Brock, regarding removal of premium fee
charged to GT A drivers, be received for information.
"CAR.RlED"
Resolution #C-395-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Scott
mAT the correspondence received from the Association of Municipalities of
Ontario entitled 'AMO Urges Province to Reconsider Mandatory Tax Relief
Programs", be received and referred to the Treasurer for review and preparation
of a report to be submitted to the General Purpose and Administration
Committee.
'CARRIED'
Resolution #C-396-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Pingle
mAT the correspondence dated May 14, 1997, from The Honourable
AI Leach, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, regarding the
Extension of the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works (COIW) Program, be
received for information.
"CARRIED'
I
I
I
I
I
Council Agenda
COMMUNICATIONS
D -1
COMRA Nevada
Licence
P09.MA
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D-2
Atlantic Packaging
Soil Enrichment
Program
FfJ7.wA
D-4
Memorial Hospital
Annual Meeting
C12.BO
, '
~
- 5 -
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-397-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
1HAT the Application to Manage and Conduct a Break Open Ticket Lottery
submitted by COMRA (City of Oshawa Marine Rescue Association) to conduct a
Nevada lottery at S. & D. Donut Supplies, 170 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville,
be received;
1HA T the application be approved provided the applicants comply with all
provincial and municipal requiTements; and
1HAT John Levantis and Michael Johns be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIEDII
Resolution #C-398-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
1HAT the correspondence dated May 5, 1997 from Glen Pearce, President,
Envirosearch Limited regarding the Atlantic Packaging Products Limited Soil
Enrichment Program, be Teceived;
1HAT the position of the'Municipality of C1arington of July 20, 1992 to
participate in the Paper Fiber Soil Enrichment Program be reconfirmed; and
1HAT D. Beach, District Manager, Ministry of Environment and Energy and
Glen Pearce be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-399-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
1HAT the correspondence items dated May 13, 1997 from T. Schonberg,
President, Memorial Hospital-Bowmanville, requesting appointments to the Board
of Memorial Hospital for a one-year term, be received;
1HAT Ms. Laura Sciore be appointed to this position to represent the
Municipality of Clarington;
1HAT the Regional Municipality of Durham be advised that the Council of the
Municipality of Clarington Tecommends the appointment of Ms. Jennifer
Tredinnick as Clarington's Regional representative of the Board of Memorial
Hospital; and
1HAT Laura Sciore, Jennifer Tredinnick, C. W. Lundy and T. Schonberg be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Council Agenda
COMMUNICATIONS
D - 6
Courlice Parks
Baseball Assoc.
Fireworks Display
P11.GE
D-7
Exemption From
Municipal Noise
By-law
T04.GE
~
D - 8
Port of Newcastle
Liquor licence
P09.li
- 6-
.
I
I
I
.
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-400-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT the correspondence dated May 21, 1997 from Kim Zeppieri requesting
permission to hold a fireworks display on July I, 1997 at Pingle's Farm on
Taunton Road, Courtice, be received;
THAT the Clerk be authorized to issue a permit provided that all fireworks shall
be set off by OT under the supervision of a person or persons at least 21 years of
age; and
I
.
.
I
I
I
.
I
.
I
.
.
.
.
THAT Kim Zeppieri be advised of Council's decision.
I1CARRIEDtI
Resolution #C-401-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT the correspondence dated May 21, 1997 from Wayne Johnston, General
Superintendent, Tarmac Minerals regarding night time construction on Highway
401, be received;
THAT authorization be granted to Tarmac Minerals to exceed the time limits
specified in the Municipality's Noise By-law 89-194, as amended, to facilitate
extended working hours for the construction of three detours on Highway 401
beginning May 25, 1997 for a period of approximately one month; and
THAT Wayne Johnston be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-402-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by CouncilloT Dreslinski
THAT the correspondence dated May 21, 1997 from V. Kenneth Marskell,
President, Marskell Group regarding an application for temporary extension of a
liquor licence, be received; and
THAT the Liquor Licence Board of Ontario be advised that the Municipality of
Clarington does not object to the temporary extension of the Port of Newcastle
Marina's liquor licence for the period June 21 to Jllly 4, 1997 to cover the annual
Yacht Club Dance and Sailpast to be held on June 21, 1997 and the annual
Canada Day Celebration to be held on July 1, 1997.
"CARRIED"
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
COMMUNICATIONS
D - 5
3-Way Stop at
Edward Street and
Snowden Court
T07.GE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D - 3
Charity Gaming
Clubs - Need For
Referendum
P09.GE
D-9
Resolution re:
Railways and
Road Crossings
ClO.AD
- 7 -
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-403-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT the correspondence received from Karen Jones requesting the erection of
stop signs on Edward Street between Ruddell Road and Church Street in
Newcastle Village, be received;
lHA T the correspondence be referred to the Director of Public Works for review
and preparation of a report to be submitted to the General Purpose and
Administration Committee; and
lHAT Karen Jones be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED AS AMENDED
LAlER IN THE MEEITNG"
(SEE FOLLOWING AMENDING MOTION)
Resolution #C-404-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Pingle
lHAT the foregoing Resolution #C-403-97 be amended by adding the following
new third paragraph thereto:
"IHAT the Director also review the possibility of providing additional
parking areas in municipal parks."
The foregoing Resolution #C-403-97 was then put to a vote and CARRIED AS
AMENDED.
Resolution #C-405-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
lHAT the correspondence dated May 12, 1997, from David Williams, requesting
a referendum pertaining to Charity Gaming Clubs, be received for information.
'CARRIED"
Resolution #C-406-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
lHAT the correspondence received from Stewart Findlater, Chief Administrative
Officer, Township of West Nissouri, regarding maintenance charges of railways
and road crossing conditions, be received;
lHAT the resolution of the Township of West Nissouri be endorsed by the
Council of the Municipality of Clarington; and
Council Minutes
COMMUNICATIONS
D - 10
SEND International
of Canada Request
for Financial
Assistance
Fl1.CH
D-11
. }~
Oshawa/Clarington
Assoc. for
Community Living
Fl1.CH
MOTION
NOTICE OF MOTION
COMMITIEE REPORTS
Report #1
G.PA Report
May 20, 1997
.8-
I
I
I
I
I
May 26, 1997
THAT the Minister of Transport, Alex Shepherd, M.P., and Stewart Findlater, be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Correspondence Items D - 10 and D - 11 were distributed to Council as handouts.
Resolution #C-407-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Scott
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THAT the correspondence received from Andrew Geldart, Short Term
Co-ordinator, SEND International of Canada, requesting financial assistance to
send Claire Stevenson on a twelve week Ministry in Khabarovsk Far East Russia,
be received;
THAT the request be denied; and
THAT Andrew Geldart be advised of the Municipality's grant policy.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-408-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the correspondence dated May 12, 1997, from Suzanne Nobes,
Co-ordinator, Community Relations & Volunteers, The Oshawa/Clarington
Association for Community Living, requesting the use of the ball diamond at the
Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex free of charge, be received;
THAT the request be denied; and
THAT Suzanne Nobes be advised of the Municipality's grant policy.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-409-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT the General Purpose and Administration Committee Report of
May 20, 1m, be approved with the exception of Items #12, #13 and #18.
'CARRIED'
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
REPORTS
Item #12
Architectural
Services Animal
Control Building
FI8.QU
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
Item #13
Co-Op Tender
Supply, RetTeading
Repair of Tires
FI8.QU
- 9 -
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-410-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT Report TR-46-97 be received;
THAT Thomas E. Brown Architect, Toronto, Ontario, with a total bid (including
disbursement) in the amount of $23,000.00 being the most responsive bidder,
meeting all tenns, conditions and specifications of RFP97-1, be awarded the
contTact for the architectural services for the Animal Control Building;
THAT the total funds required be drawn from the Structural Facility for Animal
Control Account #7048-00000-0501; and
THAT the by-law marked Schedule 'B' attached to Report TR-46-97, authorizing
the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement, be approved.
"CARRIED ON 1HE
FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE"
Recorded Vote
Yea
Nav
Absent
Councillor Dres1inski
Councillor Elliott
Councillor Hannah
Councillor Novak
Councillor Scott
Mayor Hamre
Councillor Pingle
Councillor Novak made a declaration of interest with respect to Item #13 of
Report #1; vacated her chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the
subject matter. Councillor Novak indicated that she has business dealings with
one of the firms who submitted a tender for the supply, retreading and repair of
tires and tubes.
Resolution #C-411-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT Report TR-43-97 be received;
THAT Attersley Tire Service Limited, Oshawa, Ontario, being the lowest
responsible biddeT, meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender
T220-97, be awarded the contract in an approximate value of $24,576.80 for the
Municipality of Clarington requirements for the supply, retreading and repair of
tires and tubes to the Municipality of Clarington, as required by the Department
of Public Works;
Council Minutes
REPORTS
Item #18
Older Adults
Centre
A20.0L
..,;:
Report #2
Q97-6 -
Concession
Refreshment
Services Orono
Park Booth
F18.QU
- 10-
I
I
I
I
I
May 26, 1997
THAT upon expiry of the initial one year contract, pending satisfactory service by
the low bidder, and pending agreement of the Durham Purchasing Co-operative
participants, that the contract be extended for a second and third year; and
THAT the funds be drawn from the various Public Works approved 1997/98 fleet.
"CARRIEDt'
Councillor Elliott made a declaration of interest with respect to Item #18 of
Report #1; vacated his chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the
subject matter. Councillor Elliott indicated that he has worked closely with John
Rice on his submission for a Seniors' Centre and also he is a membeT of the
Bowmanville Lions Club.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Resolution #C-412-97
Moved by Councillor DreslinsId, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT Report ADMIN-22-97 be referred back to the Chief Administrative
Officer to meet with the Bowmanville Lions Club to immediately determine the
issue of complete municipal ownership of the Lions Centre;
THAT, should complete ownership of the Lions Centre be possible, the Chief
Administrative Officer be authorized to obtain an appraisal of the property;
THAT the Chief Administrative Officer report to the General Purpose and
Administration Committee at their meeting of June 2, 1997; and
THAT the submission of Rice/Daros be tabled until June 2, 1997.
IlCARRlED"
Resolution #C-413-97
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor DreslinsId
THAT Report TR-47-97 be received;
THAT John Fletcher, Orono, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of $200.00
for each of the 1997 and 1998 seasons, being the highest responsible bidder,
meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Quotation Q97-6, be awarded
the Concession Refreshment Services, Orono PaTk Booth;
THAT the by-law attached to Report TR-47-97 (Schedule 'A") authorizing the
Mayor and the Clerk to execute the agreement be approved; and
THAT the funds be credited to Account #6400-00068-0000.
"CARRIED!'
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
- 11-
May 26, 1997
REPORTS
Report #3
Resolution #C-414-97
Eiram Developments
Escrowed Land
L07.EI
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Hannah
'IHAT Report ADMIN-23-97 be Teceived; and
'IHA T the Municipality return the escrowed land back to Eiram Development
Corporation.
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"CARRIED'
RepoTt #4 Resolution #C-415-97
Courtice Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
Community Complex
Official Opening 'IHAT Report CS-04-97 be received;
R05.CO
'IHAT the Courtice Community Complex Official Opening Ceremony be re-
scheduled to Saturday, September 13, 1997; and
'IHAT the Build Courtice Fundraising Committee and the Clarington Library
Board, be advised of the action taken.
"CARRIED"
Report #5
Resolution #C-416-97
Confidential
Property Matter
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Pingle
'IHAT the Confidential Report of the Solicitor, pertaining to a property matter,
be referred to the end of the agenda to be considered during a "closed" session of
Council.
"CARRIED"
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Resolution #C-417-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Novak
'IHAT the presentation of Paul Morris be received with appreciation; and
'IHAT Mr. Morris be advised that the Council of the Municipality of Clarington
looks forward to working closely with him in implementing the Youth Centre.
t1CARRIED"
Council Minutes
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Ad Hoc Committee
to Assist Youth
.""".'
""?-P!
- 12-
I
I
I
I
I
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-418-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
WHEREAS an 'ad hoc' task force of qualified volunteers from the community
was established by Council in 1995 to investigate the growing social problems of
some youth in Clarington and to make recommendations to Council;
AND WHEREAS the Ad Hoc Committee to Assist Youth tabled their report on
June 24, 1996 to Council, which was subsequently endorsed in Report CS-09-96;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AND recognizing that this Committee was subsequently asked by Council to go
beyond its originally mandate in order to develop an implementation strategy
before it formally disbanded;
AND WHEREAS that implementation strategy is now largely in place; and
NOW TIIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED TIIAT the members of the Ad Hoc
Committee to Assist Youth be thanked by correspondence from the Mayor and
Council for their considerable time and efforts in addressing the concerns of
youth in our community and our hope that they will continue to play an active
role as individuals in the implementation of their recommendations.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-419-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Novak
TIIAT the delegation of Viv Woolford be received;
TIIAT his comments be referred to the Clerk's Department for review and
preparation of a repoTt; and
TIIAT Viv Woolford and the Animal Advisory Committee be advised of
Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-420-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Scott
TIIAT the delegation of Terri Gray be received with appreciation.
"CARRIED"
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
BY-LAWS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 13-
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-421-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT By-laws 97-116 and 97-117 be referred to the end of the agenda.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-422-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT leave be granted to introduce the following by-laws, and that the said
by-laws be now read a first and second time:
97-106 being a by-law to adopt the estimates of all sums required during the year
for municipal purposes and to strike the rates of taxation for municipal
purposes for the year 1997;
97-107 being a by-law to adopt the estimates of all sums required during the year
for school boards and regional government purposes and to strike the
rates of taxation for the year 1997;
97-108 being a by-law to authorize the making of an Extension Agreement
between the Municipality of Clarington and Nelda Roxanne Dawson and
Wayne Clair Allen, pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the
Municipal Tax Sales Act;' ,
97-109 being a by-law to authorize the making of an Extension Agreement
between the Municipality of Clarington and 579276 Ontario Ltd.,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Municipal Tax Sales Act;
97-110 being a by-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law
for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle (Halminen
Homes/Kiddicorp Inv. Ud.);
97-111 being a by-law to authorize a contract between United Technologies Otis
Canada, Scarborough, Ontario, for the maintenance of the Otis Hydraulic
Passenger Elevator located at the Municipal Administrative Centre;
97-112 being a by-law to authorize a contTact between Thomas E. Brown,
Architect, Toronto, Ontario, fOT the architectural services for the Animal
Control Building;
97-113 being a by-law to authorize the execution of a Leasing Agreement
between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and
Oshawa/Clarington Adult Living Association in respect of a lease for
premises situated at 132 Church Street (Main Level), Bowmanville;
Council Minutes
BY-LAWS
OTHER BUSINESS
Regional Update
~
CommitteelBoards
Update
I
- 14-
I
May 26, 1997
I
97-114 being a by-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law
of the former Town of Newcastle (Markborough Properties); and
I
97-115 being a by-law to authorize a contract between John Fletcher, Orono,
Ontario, in respect of the Operation of the Concession Refreshment
Services, located at the Orono Park Booth.
I
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-423-97
I
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
I
THAT the third and final reading of By-laws 97-106 to 97-115 inclusive, be
approved.
I
"CARRIED"
Councillor Hannah informed Members of Council that the Regional Works
Committee will be dealing with the Infrastructure Program at their meeting to be
held on May 27, 1997.
I
I
Councillor Dreslinski informed Members of Council that the Clarke Museum
Board is holding its Second Annual Giant Second-Hand Book Sale on SatuTday,
June 7, 1997 from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
I
Councillor Hannah advised that the Conservation Authorities aTe in on-going
negotiations to take over the operation of Regional forests.
I
Councillor Novak advised that the Bowmanville Museum held a clean-up day and
the grounds are looking great.
I
The open house held at the Animal Shelter was a wonderful success and
Todd Hoffman, Chairman of the Animal Advisory Committee will be presenting a
report to Council in the near futuTe~
I
I
Councillors Novak and Hannah attended their first meeting with the SoIina Hall
Board which was very productive.
The Courtice Carnival was held last weekend and was a great success.
I
Councillor Pingle attended the unveiling of the landscape artistry at the Visual
Arts Centre on Sunday, May 25, 1997.
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes
I
I
I
OTHER BUSINESS
Pigeons in
Urban Areas
PI4.AN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Newcastle Hall
BoaTd Appointments
CI2.NE
Schedule of
Meetings
C03.CO
- 15-
May 26, 1997
Resolution #C-424-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Novak
1HAT the Clerk prepare for Committee's consideration, a report addressing the
keeping of pigeons in the urban areas of the Municipality.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-425-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Scott
1HAT Cathy Abraham, Seird DeJong and Brenton Rickard be appointed by the
Council of the Municipality of Clarington to serve on the Newcastle Village
Community Hall Board for a two year tefllL
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-426-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by CounciI1or Dreslinski
1HAT the schedule of meetings for Council and General Purpose and
Administration Committee (G.P.A.) meetings be adjusted by scheduling a Council
meeting immediately following the GPA meeting of July 7, 1997 and by cancelling
the following meetings:
Monday
Monday
Monday
July 14
July 21
July 28
7:00 p.m.
9:30 a.m.
7:00 p.m.
Council
GPA
Council
"CARRIED"
,Resolution #C-427-97
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hannah
1HAT the meeting be "closed" for the purpose of discussing a property matter.
IlCARRIEDn
Council Minutes
OTHER BUSINESS
*4~;~
CONFIRMING BY-LAW
- 16-
May 26, 1997
I
I
I
I
I
Resolution #C-428-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the actions taken during the "closed" session of Council, be ratified.
Resolution #C-429-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
I
THAT leave be granted to introduce the following by-laws, and that the said
by-laws be now read a first and second:
I
I
.97-116 being a by-law to re-enact By-law 97-85, a by-law to furtheT amend By-law
92-105, as amended (Development Charge By-law - Schedules A6 and B6
removed); and
97-117 being a by-law to re-enact By-law 97-93, being a by-law to amend By-law
92-105, as amended.
I
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C-430-97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by CouncilloT Dreslinski
THAT the third and final reading of By-laws 97-116 and 97-117 be approved.
"CARRIEDlI
Councillors Elliott and Novak made declarations of interest earlier in the meeting
and refrained from discussion and voting on the Conflrll1ing By-laws.
Resolution #C-431-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT leave be granted to introduce By-law 97-118, being a by-law to confirm the
proceedings of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington at this meeting held
on the 26th day of May 1997. and that the said by-law be now read a first and
second time.
"CARRIED"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Council Minutes _ 17-
CONFIRMING BY-LAW
Resolution #CA32-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT the third and final reading of By-law 97-118 be approved.
"CARRIED"
May 26, 1997
ADJOURNMENT
Resolution #C-433-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Pingle
THAT the meeting adjourn at 8:14 p.m.
"CARRIEDI1
MAYOR
CLERK
I
I
I
I
,I
II
I
!I
il
I
I
1,1
i
II
II
i
I
I
II
~
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
I-I
{Ii
~
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF YORK
2700 Eglinton Avenue West, City of York. Onterio M6M 1 V1 (41 6) 384-2507
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
IB]j(CIRIIW1Ji1}1
In Reply Refer to B tty G tto '
Telephone 384. e a ill
2516
May 5, 1997
MAY 8 1997
IJ{1JCCUUIWI11})
MAY 8 1997
Mayor Diane Hamre
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LlC 3A6
"U/ll!CIP~lITY OF ClARINGTON
MAYOR'S OFFICE
Dear Mayor Hamre:
AGENDA
f.4IJNtCII'AUTY Of CLARINGTON-
MAYOR'S OFFICE
I
RE: ASSISTANCE TO SOUTHERNMANlTOBA
The Council for the City of York passed the attached resolution at its meeting held on April
30th, 1997.
W ouId you please place this resolution before the next Council meeting for consideration.
Yours sincerely,
/~ .~ --"..---........) -~
6c?)~~-/~
~/ Ron. W. Maurice,
/ City Clerk
Ibg
An.
f DIST~TION -I
I ClEfiK .;L~.__-: :J
I ~~:~I~:~ T--~I
ICOPIES TfI: ~'=-J
r- '---j
!____==I=--
>--==t
. ~----==--.I- , ,
,--.-.--'1------
f';, (] (0 .7/D
- .:.-.:;~ :.::::.:~:...::::::.... ....;..:.::.~~.::.~.....""::"-
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ci2~<tv-u/~~
Wl1J~ QI:nrpnratinn nf tqe QI:ity nf !nrk
<!roundl aUramh.er
April 30, 1997
Moved by
Seconded by
Councillor Davis
Councillor Leach
iResolueil, that
WHEREAS the people of southern Manitoba have been inundated with the threat of flooding in recent
days and;
WHEREAS daily news reports have broadcast disturbing images of the hardship and destruction to
property and;
~~
WHEREAS all Canadians are. concerned for the well-being of residents of southern Manitoba
experiencing hardship due to the flooding of the Red River and;
WHEREAS many residents of the City of York have expressed an interest in providing aid and comfort
to the victims of the flooding in southern Manitoba and;
WHEREAS the City of York has considerable resources to lend to the aid and relief effort;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of York Council direct the City Manager through his
office to make available the resources of the City whereever possible to aid in the relief effort through
the use of fire halls, community centres, and the York Municipal Building as drop-off depots for food
and clothing, etc., and
FURTHER, that this resolution be forwarded to all municipalities in the G.T.A.
nnll tllat tIre $leal of tile <!torporation he l1ereto nffixeil.
.,/ ~ / .
;3p1&'4--~Jtu<-v-~v
Clerk
Mayor I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
,
I
II
,
!
II
II
II
II
~
II
f~
I
I
I
I
I
",\>\CIP-4(
fo.tiR";-"~
~ 1.11 p
"\ ~ o~
0,.0 0<<' Z
OLITAN ~ HftY 3
COUNCIL INFORMATION
METROCLERK
1-2
IZ 08 PH '91
Novina Wong
Metropolitan Clerk
Ralph Walton
Deputy Metropolff:an Clerk
The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto
55 John Street
Stn. 1071, 7th Rr" Metro Hall
Toronto, ON M5V 3C6
Fax (416) 392-2980
Telephone (416) 39 2~
metroclerk@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
http://www.metrotor.on.ca
May 9, 1997
AGENDA
1l1mlCmrrWIR1})
MAY Z 1 1997
Mayor Diane Hamre
Town of Oarlngton
40 Temperance Street
BowmanvUle, Ontario
L1 C 3A6
lIlilJN!CIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
MAYOR'S OfFICE
Dear Mayor Hamre:
I am enclosing for your Information and any attention deemed necessary, Clause No. 1 contained In
Report No. 12 of The Corporate Admlnlslralion Committee, headed .Proposed legislative Framework
for A New Municipal Act - MInistry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Consultation Documents., which
was adopted, as amended, by the CouncH of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting
held on May 7 and 8, 1997.
May I draw your attention to the amendment by CouncH found at the beginning of the Clause.
Yours truly,
(Y~
Metropolitan Oerk
',~_.- _...,_....y...~.....~...,.. ....-.--
.
I D~S1'ltj. _ UTION .
! r-' ':-'-'1;
. vL. !'\;"i, _, ..... .
! . ~'_"'.__n.._._.
1 ~.C:<. BY
I ~---
Clause sent to: Minister of Municipal Affalrs and Housing, Province of Ontario I ORiGINAL
Chairs, Regional Municipalities In Ontario 1 CC:i';,C'irJ
Mayors, Greater Toronto Area Municipalities !.----) - _ __,
Metropolitan Solicitor ,------ ___---j
Acting Chief Administrative OffICer i .. I__J
Director, Corporate Policy and Planning '-.----00-- =t=---1
Oerks, Area Municipalities : ~~-~
Oerks, Regional Municlpalltles In Ontario : -- .- -- ----.. I
i:~==~=~__~~==-]=.~_ -. .-.J
1-.:- .-!-- ;/~ti~.n'. --:
R. Walton/csb
Encl.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
!I
I
01
II
f
fl
!
II
I
II
II
I
I
I
rQ.1;i~~
\,-JQl
o.....u ~
U(ITA14 '(0
METRO CLERK
Clause embodied In Report No. 12 of The corporate Administration Committee, aa adopted by the
Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at Ita meeting held on May 7 and 8, 1997.
1
PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR A NEW MUNICIPAl ACT -
MINISlRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND
HOUSING CONSULTATION DOCUMENTS.
(The Metropolitan Council 011 May 7 and ~ 1997, amended this Clouse by adding thereto the foUowing:
"It is further recommended tIult:
(1) Metropolitan Council mquest the Province of Ontario to amend the proposed /efi.s/ative
jramewotk fOl' 0 new Mwtidpal Act
(0) by deleting Section 10, headed 'RegulatoIy Powers Limited to Own Systems and
Facilities~ 10 as to provide municipalities with the power to pass by-laWI within
their boundaries regu1Dting 01' prohibiting lJItems owned by, operated by, 01' 011
behalf of 0 petiOlI other than 0 municipality;
(b) by deleting all rejermces to the tenn 'waste management' and inlerting in lieu
thereof the tenn 'waste Telourr:e mtmagement';
(c) to allow municipalities to cteflte charitoble fountitzdonl fOl' the purpose of
supponing non-profit services, such as municipal homes fOl' the aged;
(d) to provide tIuIt the statutory monopoly set out in the Mwtidpality of Metropolitan
Toronto Act fOl' the Toronto Ti'ans/t Commission be continued; and
(e) to prollide tIuIt municipalities be granted power to regulote businesses (l1ICluding
the regulation of f<<s to be c1uuged by such businesses) to ftuther enJuuu:e the
tI1'fIQS of IIUthorit1 granted by the legislation, in particulot; the health and safety
authority;
(2) Metropolitan Council further mquest the Province of Ontario to:
(0) reconsider Its prohibition to Council delegating authority to CommIttees of
Council so tIuIt the new City of Toronto Council (after the completion of the
public consuJtation process aurently underway) htIs the opponunily to set out
powerI tIuIt CommIttees of Council wiil Iulve; and
2
(b) provide assurances that the new City of Toronto canclJI!.tinue to operate such
corporate entities as:
(i) parking authorities;
(il) utility commissions;
(iil) coach tenninals;
(iv) economic development cmporudons; and
(v) similar cmporudons as those presently operated by the Area
Municipalities; and
(3) the Metropolitan Solicitor be requested to:
(a) consult with those officials of the Federation of CmuuJ;an Municipalities (FCMJ
who are worfdng 011 this maltU and repolt bade to the Cmporrzu AdministratiOll
Committee 011 a comparisOll of the Olltllrio initiatives with other initiatives being
taken in other Provinces, highlighting any differences which may exist as well as
obtaining the opinion of FCM officials 011 the initiatives being taken /we in
Ontario; and
~
(b) review all specific legislation that peItains patticulorly to Metropolitan Toronto
and the Are4 Municipalities, take whatever musures may be deemed necessary
to ensure that such powm are CIlfl'ied /onvard in the new legislation and repolt
thereon to the Cmporrzu AdministratiOll Committee."J
lbe Corporate Administration Committee recommends the adoption of the fonowing Joint repoIt
(Aprff 14, 1997) from the ActIng Chief Administrative OffIcer and the Metropolitan soncltor; and
reports having directed that it be forwarded to Council for ita meeting scheduled to be held on
May 7, 1997:
Recommendations:
It Is recommended that:
(1) the Metropolitan CouneU endorse the recommended modifications to the Ministry of Munlclpal
AffaIrs and Housing's proposed legislative framework for a new Municipal Ad, which are set out
at Appendix ,. to this report;
(2) the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be requested to provtde further opportunItles for
municipal consultation on a new Munlclpal Ad, at such time as completed draft statutory
language Is avaBable;
(3) this report be folwarded to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, for consideration, and
circulated to the GT A Mayors and Regional Chairs, other regional governments, and to the
Association of Munlclpalltles of Ontario, for Infoonation; and
(4) the appropriate Metropolitan Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to glve effect
thereto.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
I
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
3
CouncU Reference/BackaroundlHlstorv:
On March 10, 1997, the Minister at Municipal Affairs and Housing released consultatian documents
setting out a praposecIleglslatlve framewark for a new Municipal Act (a copy at which Is appended as
Appendix "II" to this report), The Minister has Indicated that the release of these documents signalled
the commencement at a 60 day cansUtatlan period, which wit end an May 9, 1997. This report
summarizes thase aspects at the proposal thought to be slgnilicant fram the Metropolitan
Corporatian's perspective, and lists at Appendix "I" a number at suggested madlfications.
Very little at the praposecI legislative framework has beet) reduced to statutory language. making It
difficult ta respond to the Ministry's invitation ta consult an the form at the new Ad.. The comments
made In this report and In Appendix "I" are based upon the materlaJ available, and an the assumption
that BUll 03 and the new Act wtll come Inta force at the same time. Given the significance of statutory
reform at the Munlclpal Ad.. It Is recommended that the Province be requested to extend Its
consuItatlan process so that munlc!paIities will have the opportunity to comment upon the proposed
legislatian once drafting Is complete.
Overview of Cons[jfatian Documents:
The substantive portion of the consuIlatian documents consists at a 33-page outline at the proposed
Ad.. and 16 pages at selective statutory language and eicplanatory nates. It Is expected that upon
completion the draft leglslatlan wit amount to some 200 pages. and will Include recent amendments
made to the existing Municipal Act through the enactment at BUls 26 (Savings and Restructuring Act)
and 86 (including the Municipal Sections Act). proposed amendments such as are to be found In BUI
106 (Fair Municipal FInance Act). and other statutes having appllcatlan to munlclpalltles. No list of the
other statutes which are to be Incorporated Into the new Act has been flnallzecl. although It Is
understood that the Planning Ad.. the Highway Trafflc Ad.. the Development Charges Ad.. the
ExproprIations Ad.. the Envlronmenta1 Assessment Ad, and the Provinclal Offences Act will remain as
separate enactments.
It has been proposed that the new Act be divided Into nine, pans, namely:
. ~_ ", _,.;.. . .... ._..__u.
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V
General"
Munlclpal Structure
Munlclpal CouncIs
Practices and Procedures
"
Municipal Powers
Part VI
Part VII
, Part VIII
Part IX
Munlclpal FInance
Miscellaneous
Regulations"
Transition
.
the draft statutory language consists at 22 sections from these three Parts.
Munlcloal Forms. ResoonslbUlt1es:
The proposed Act substitutes "Ia.ver.tJer municipality", "upper-tler municipality" and "slngle-tier
mmIclpality" for the current method at categorizing regional municipalities. cltIes, towns. counties.
ate.. although municipalities will have dlscretian In how they describe themselves. Should BUI 103
become law. the new CIty of T oranto would be considered a single-tler municipality, unless and/or untU
the Greater Toronto ServIces Board Is established as a municipality.
4
The proposed Act will distinguish the responslbURles of cooneH from those of municipal staff:
ResponslbllRles of CouncR:
representing the residents of the municipality;
developing and evaluating the municipality's policies and programs;
ensuring that there are administrative practices and procedures in place to Implement council's,
decisions effectively;
maintaining the municipality's financial Integrity; and
carrying out other duties set out in legislation.
Responsibilities of Head of Council:
providing leadership to the councH;
presiding ~er councl meetings;
representing councH at official functions; and
carrying out other duties assigned by legislation or councR.
ResponslbRitles of Staff:
undertaking research and providing advtce to councI on the policies and programs of the
municipality;
establishing administrative pracllces and procedures to cany out councI's decisions;
keeping and preseIVIng the records of the municipality;
administering the flnanclaJ affairs 01 the rmmlcipallty; and
carrying out other duties set out In leglslatfon or assigned by councl.
The proposed Act will provide that councils will have broad discretion to detennlne their own
procedures and anangements. Municipal councRs wOOd therefore have broad discretion to arrange
their committee structures and configure thelr procedural by-laws. Many of the current statutory notice
provisions will be removed from the Act and replaced wlth ,a requirement that councls establish and
adhere to policies governing haw they will cons~ wlth the public, and In what manner councI will give
notice to the public concerning the various matters which come before it.
The proposed Act will not empower municipalities to establish bodies corporate such as local boards.
ExistIng boards would be conIInued through transltionalprovislons, or, in the case of Metropolitan
Toronto, through follow-up legislation to the CIty of Toronto Act, 1996 (881103).
The organization of administrative staff WlQd also become a local decision. The new Act. wll not
mandate particular municipal staff poslllons, but wi! set out the administrative duties and
responsibRRles of the municipality (as outlined above). This woUd leave a councI wlth broad authority
to determine what staff posRIons It requires and to appoint such staff. A single non-elected person,
however, will stili have to be designated to be responsible for the municipality's financial affairs.
MunlcioaJ Powers:
The proposed Act will be far less prescriptive than the ctmlI1t Act. ~ the current Act COIIfers
specific authority for each power to be exercised by a municipality, the proposed Act woUd take the
reverse approach and grant broad powers to municipalities, subJect to limitations which woUd be
imposed by statute or regulation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.'
I
.
I
I
I
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
I
5
Following the fannat of municipal statutes In Alberta and .Manltoba, the proposed Act would gmnt
municipalities these broad powers to be exercised In 13 "areas of authority" (also known as "spheres
of JUrisdiction"):
(a) the health, safety, protection and well-being of people and the protection of property;
(b) public utUltles;
(c) waste management;
(d) public highways, including parking and 1IallIc on highways;
(e) tmnsportatlon systems other than public highways;
(f) the natural environment;
(g) cul1ure, recreation, and heritage;
(11) economic development;
(I) nuisances. noise, odour, vibration and dust;
0> dminage, and flood control. except storm sewers;
(k) structures, including fences and signs;
(I) parking, except on public highways; and
(m) animals, and human actMtles In relation to them.
Wathln each of these areas. or with respect to any authority confelTed by anOther statute, municipalities
would have the powers of a 'natural person', and certain 'governmental powers'.'
'Natural person' powers amount, essentially, to the powers of a business corporation. These Include
the ability to enter Into contracts; purchase. own and dispose of property; hire, pay and dismiss
employees; delegate administrative responsIbUltIes; provide and charge for goods and services; and
sell or otherwise dispose of assets.
Since natural persons do not have the power to direct the activities of other persons. municipalities
would be given certain 'govemmentaI powers' to be applied to matters under their Jurisdiction, which
would Include the power to: .
regulate or prohibit, and provide for a system of licenses, permits, approvals or registrations,
and to deal dlfferently-with.dlfferent classes of persons.- busInesses,- actlvitles.- services or thlngs~- .,' , '
make grants or loans (however bonuslng restrictions wi! continue);
Impose fees and charges, and levy taxes (subject to current restrlctIons) ;
enforce by-laws; create offences, apply for injunctions, and Impose fines;
expropriate;
without court order. enter lands or buldlngswhlch are not dwellings. for the purpose of
inspecting compliance with law; .
enter private lands for certain specIlic purposes, such as erecting snow fences;
licence businesses slmlalfy to the manner provided for In the current Act; and
transfer services amongst munlclpalltles.
The powers (and duties) related to the financial aspects of municipal government wit be described in
much greater detail than the powers associated with the general areas of authority.
The consultation document Indicates that municipalities wit be given expanded powers to Impose en
addIIIona1 mUl rate on delineated areas of the community to cover costs of some services benefitting
only that area (area mtlng). The manner In which area mtlng wi! be permitted has not been finalized.
One option which would have Impact upon the new CIty of Toronto would provide that If restructuring
has occurred In a municipality. area rating will be permitted If the restructuring results In differences
In property-related municipal services. or differences In assets and llablltles brought Into the
6
restructured municipality. Under this option, if there Is no restructuring, area rating would be pennltted
only for property-related capital Installations. .
Restrictions UDOn Munlcloal Powers:
The proposed Act wlllmpose certain restrictions on the exerclse of both natural person powers and
governmental powers within certain named areas of ,authority. For example, no munlclpality would be
able, to regulate another person's facUlties by exercising a power within the 'publlc UlIltles', 'waste
management', or 'transportation systems other than public highways' areas of authority, (although
a municipality would stHI be able to regulate, for example, the location of non-owned public utBity plant
within a municipal road by exercising a power under the 'pujJIlc highways' area of authority - unless
In doing so It creates a conflict with a power of another Jurisdiction).
Unless specifically authorized, a munlclpality wll not be permitted to Incorporate a corporation, acquire
an Interest In a security of a corporation, become bankrupt or make an assignment or proposal as an
Insolvent person.
The proposed Act wll reserve to the lieutenant Governor In CooneR a very broad power to pass
regulations to restrict the authority of munlcfpalitles to pass by-laws, and speclflcaDy to engage In
commerclaI (which Is undefined) activity or to pass by-laws which are In the opinion of the LIeutenant
Governor "unnecessary", "undesirable" or which "represent duplication". A statutory amendment
would be required to maintain such a restriction for a period longer than three years from the elfectlve
date of the regtMtlon. A slmBar provision (with a two year limit) Is found In the Alberta statute.
DMslon of Powers:
1ft;
Direction will be given to Interpret the municipal powers conferred by the proposed Act broadly, so as '
to:
enable municipalities to govem their affairs as they consider appropriate;
enhance their abftity to respond to munlclpallssues; and
Include, rather than exclude, munlclpal powers that existed on the day before the new powers
became avaRable to munlclpalllles.-... -" .. '
The draft statutory language does not direct that municipal powers granted by other statutes (and not
failing wllhln the 13 areas of responslbBity) be Interpreted In the same broad manner.
. Municipal by-laws wll be subordinate to enactments Qncludlng regUations) made by the PrtNlnclal or
Federal governments. .
Unless assigned (by specific reference In a table forming part of the statute) to an upper-tler
munlcipality,lower-tler and all slngle-tier municipalities wit have power to enact by-laws In aft 13 areas
of respoc ISlbftity. The table allocates responslbftity to upper-tler municipalities elther on an exclusive
or l1OlH!Xcluslve basis, and Is tntanded to describe the current dMslon of powers In the regions (The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto does not appear In the table, since It Is expected that the new CIty
of Tororto wll be In place by the time the proposed Act becomes Iaw).
Sholjd there be a conflict between a lower-tler by-law and a by-law enacted by an upper-tler pursuant
to an assigned area of responsIbBity, the by-law of the upper-tler wB1 pravaI to the extent of the conflict.
Special provisions wit be provided where other statutes confer authority directly upon upper-tler
11lUlliclpaIItI.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
II
II
I
I
I
I
7
Conclusion:
The proposed Act will contain clear benefits for municipalities, but will not provide unrestricted
discretion or unlimited power to govern. It Is recommended that Appendix "I" to this report be
endorsed by the Metropolitan Councl and fOlW8rded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
together with a request that ~ continue so as to permit the Metropolitan Corporation the
opportUnity to comment upon completed statutory language. It Is also recommended that a copy of
this report be foIwarded to the GT A Mayors and Regional Chairs, other regional governments, and to
the AssocIation of Municipalities of Ontario, for infonnatlon.
Contact Name and Teleohone Number:
Mr. Jeffrey A. Abrams. Legal Department; 392.a530.
Appendix "I"
Recommended Modifications to the
Proposed legislative Framework for a New Municipal Act
A. Fonn and Structure
(1) Part V (Munlclpal Powers) of the proposed Act will confer the power to enact by-laws within the
13 areas of authority assigned by the Act. It Is submltted that municipal authority Is often
exercised without the need for the enactment of a by-law, especially where administrative powers
have been delegated to staff, or In the case of operating and policy decisions made by a local
board In respect of matters within Its jurlsdlcllon. The language of Part V should be modlfled so
as to clarify that the 13 areas of authority describe the subject matter within which municipalities
may carry out their natural person and governmental powers (In addition to the powers provided
by other statutes), and not merely the areas within which they may pass by-laws
It Is recommended that the proposed Municipal Act. In assigning powers within the
13 prescribed areas of authority, not restrict the exercise of such powers to the
enactment of by-laws..
(2) The Interpretation section of the proposed Act Is drafted In such a way as to Inslrucl the courts
to IntElfPl'Ell any ambiguity arising out of sections 4, 6 or 7 of the proposed Act (core sections
which introduce the powers of a natural person. and allocate the 13 areas of authority) In a
manner so as to confer broad authority on municipalities. It Is submitted that In order to give the
Interpretation section Its Intended effect, the Act should contain the simple statement that all
munlclpal powers should be Interpreted broadly.
It Is recommended that the proposed Interpretation provlslon be modified so as to
provide that municipal powers. whether they be derived from the new Municipal Act
or any other statute, be Interpreted broadly so as to:
(I) enable munIclpaIltles to govern their affairs as they consider appropriate;
(lQ enhance their abllty to respond to municipal Issues; and
(lIQ Include, rather than exclude, municipal powers that existed on the day
before the coming Into force of the new Act.
8
8. Municipal Powers and Duties
(1) Although the list of statutes to be Incorporated Into the new Municipal Act Is not yet known, It Is
anticipated that the Regional Municipalities Act and the Individual regional acts wUl be merged Into
the new Act, With the enactment of 8111103, the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Act will be
repealed. The consultation documents Indicate that provisions In the regional statutes which
relate to existing municipal powers and duties and for which the broad natural person and
govemmental powers of the new Act are not a suitable replacement, will be Incorporated Into the
new legislation. Unless provided for In follow-up legislation to the CIty of Toronto Act, 1996
(8flI103), powers and duties attributed to the Metropolitan Corporation under the Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto Act will not apply to the new CIty of Toronto unless provision Is made in the
new Municipal Act. Of particular Importance to Metropolitan Toronto is a current provision in both
the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Act and In the Regional Municipalities Act which requires
that an official plan be maintained by the governing councl.
It Is recommended that the new Act contain a provision making It a requirement that
at a minimum all single- and upper-tier municipalities maintain official plans.
(2) The proposed framework contains no suggested statutory language In respect of a munlcfpallty's
enforcement powers. There Is a concern that wlthout express statutory authority, the coons might
Interpret the new Act narrowly and in favour of existing common law rights.
It Is therefore recommended that the proposed Act make explicit provision for
munlcfpal powers to enforce by-laws.
(3) Section 10 of the proposed Act would restrict munlcfpal authority in certain areas (for example.
it would prevent the new City of Toronto from protecting the lTC's monopoly over intra-reglonal
passenger transportatlon, and limit municipal ability to prevent third-party collection of curbside
recyclables). The consultation documents indicate that the policy behind section 10 Is to prevent
municipalities from regulating in areasgovemed by provincial regulation.
It Is recommended that section lObe drafted In such a way as to meet Its narrow
policy objective 'without restricting existing municipal powers.
(4) One of the stated objectives of the proposed framework is to allow municipalities greater ftexibllty
to deal with local issues. In this regard, municipalities are considering commerclal ventures (such
as publlcjprivate partnerships) wlth private sectorllrms to decrease the cost of municipal
SEllVlces, and/or to raise revenues for the municipality. One method favoured by the private
sector In organizing such ventures is the establishment of a corporation managed by a board of
directors composed of representatives of both the private flrm and the municipal corporation,
Such corporations provide the advantage of responsive and timely decision maklng pt ocesses,
as well as protecting the municipality and the private sector partner In the event of losses arising
out of the business venture Olmlted llabfllty). The proposed Act, however, prohibits munlcIpa1ll1es
from incorporetIng companies or owning securities in a company.
It is recommended that municipalities be permitted to Incorporate companies or own
shares In companies, subject to speclflc provisions to be established by regulation
which would preserve municipal accountabDlty and ftnanclal responslbllty. such as
prOvIsIons reqUiring that:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
,I
,
II
!
,
II
r
II
~
I
II
'i
I
I
9
a certain percentage of shares always be Owned by the municipality;
meetings of the board of directors or any committees of the board be
subject to the 'open meeting' provisions of the Municipal Act;
the articles of incorporation describe the purposes of the corporation, and
that the articles cannot be amended without consent of the municipal
council;
the Munlclpal Freedom of Infonnation and Protectlon of Privacy Act have (at
least limited) application to such corporations;
the municipal auditor have access to the books and records of the
corporation, and that such records. otherwise comply with the relevant
provisions of the Municipal Act;
municlpal assets may not be tlansferred to the corporatlon except as
permitted by regulation; and
there be certain statutory clauses to be Included In shareholder agreements
(such as clauses restricting the transfer and ownership of shares).
(5) It Is also submitted that In order for municipalities to deal elfectlveIy with local Issues, they require
the ability to delegate certain non-admlnistrative functions to either a committee or a special
purpose local board. this woUd especially be so In restructured municipalities such as the new
City of Toronto, so as to distribute the workload of the municipal councIln a manageable yet
accountable manner. By way of example, municlpallties should be permitted to:
consolidate Into a new local board existing local boards which carry on slmlar actMtles;
establish committees to hear IInaI appeals from decisions made pursuant to authority
delegated to an olllcIaI (such as permit appeals); or
empower a committee to conduct public hearings which may be delegated to them, as
well as to prescribe the manner In which the hearing Is to be conducted, and the manner
.In which the committee's reconunendation Is to be communicated to the council.
It Is reconimended that munlclpalitles be permitted to establish local boards to have
certain prescribed responslbUitIes, subject to criteria to be established by regulatlon,
which might include;. - - .
restrictlons on the matters for which a local board may be created;
methods of appointment to the board;
restrictions on the transfer of assets of the municipality to the board;
matters pertaining to the financial records of the local board; and
matters pertaining to the conduct of meetlngs of the local board.
It Is funher reconvnended that In circumstances where public hearings may be
delegated to a committee of councU, that the municipal councU be empowered to
detennlne the manner in which the hearing Is to be conducted and how the
recommendation of the committee Is to be communicated to the municipal councl.
(6) In order to provide some measure of provincial control aoIer the broad natural person and
gaolemmental powers to be granted to municipalities, the proposed Act contains at section 22 a
provision which allows for the enactment of regulations restricting municipal ability to pass
by-laws. this power Is Ilustrated In subsection 22(2) by two examples, the first having to do with
matters which the lieutenant GaoIemor In CouncU conslders unnecessary, undesirable, or which
represent duplication, the second having to do with 'commercial actMty', a term which Is not
10
defined. These regulations may remain In force for a maximum of three years, after which, If the
restriction is to remain in place, the statute must be amilllded,
It Is submitted that the two Ilusllations of circumstances In which restrictive regulations may be
invoked would tend to stifle local creativity In conducting the affairs of the municipality,
Municipalities should be able to manage their affairs wtth the confldence that the Province wUl not
Interfere readily wtth municipal powers, and so the circumstances In, which such regulations may
be enacted, and their duration prior to there being a need for legislative amendment, should be
restricted,
It Is recommended that subsection 22(2) be deleted. If the subsection Is to be kept.
It Is recommended that the lUustrations be more precisely defined, especially in
describing the kinds of commercial activity which would be perceived as being
Inappropriate.
It Is further recommended that any regulation passed pursuant to section 22 be
deemed to be revoked after a period of one year from Its enactment, unless a
statutory amendment Is made to continue Its affect.
(A copy of Appendix II - "Proposed Draft legislation for the Core Parts of a New Municipal Act, Ministry
of Municipal AIIaIrs arid Housing, Winter 199T. referred to in the foregoing report, was forwarded to
all Members of CouncU and select OlficIaIs wtth the agenda for the AprI 28. 1997, meeting of the
Corporate Administration CommIttee. and a copy thereof Is also on tue in the olflce of the Metropolitan
Oerk.)
;"
(The Metropolitan Council 011 May 7 and c\ 1997, Iu1d before it during considetation of the foregoing Clause
thef~~ '
(i) a Committee Trunsmittal (April 29, 1997) from tJie Metropolitan Cle1k advising that the Corporate
AdministrtUion Committee at its meeting held 011 April 28, 1997, directed the Acting Chief Administrative
Ojficu and the Metropolitan Solkitor to nudre a presentation regarding the Proposed Legislative
Frameworlc for a New Municipal A~ in conjunction with Clause No.1 of Report No. 12 of The
CotporateAdministration Committee, headed "ProposedLegislative Frameworlcfora New MunicipalAct
_ M"Ulistly of Municipal Affairs and Housing Consultation Documents", and requesting that the item be
considered by Council as the first item of business; and
(ii) a copy of the material presented to Council by Mr. Jeffrey Abrams, Solkitor, Metro Legal, headed
"Proposed Legis/ative Frameworlc for a New Municipal Act~)
--~
~"
$<~.
"I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-3
Ministry of
Municipal Affairs
and Housing
Office of the Minister
7n Bay Street
Toronto ON M5G 2E5
(416) 585-7000
Minlstere des
Affalres municlpales
et du logement
Bureau du ministre
~]
Ontario
n7 rue Bay
Toronto ON M5G 2E5
(416) 585,7000
AGENDA
Tj~ jf: (t;rn 1l\V1 Ttm. ,)
I~ ,!J ,'"" ..r _"'"
iII'. . '.... "'''"'.. ~.'
~-- -.....4
MAY 8 1997
April 30, 1997
To all Heads of Council
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARfNGTON
MAYOR'S OFFICE
Dear Colleague:
You will recall that on October 17, 1996, I announced the legislative changes that we were
proposing to the Municipal Act, under Bill 86.
I am pleased to inform you that the provisions and relevant regulations pertaining to debt issuance
and investment have been approved and came into effect on March 6, 1997.
These changes will give your municipality the flexibility it needs to take advantage of
opportunities in the financial markets and reduce the cost of borrowing and investing.
Here is a brief outline of what the some of the changes will mean to municipalities:
1. Municipalities can continue to invest in a range of investment opportunities such as:
Government of Canada debt
Canadian municipal debt
provincial debt
deposits and similar instruments of banks, loan and trust corporations, credit unions and
caisse populaires
2. Municipalities will have the option to approve a class of work such as roads and sewers
rather than having to approve one specific project at a time. The benefit will be lower
processing and transaction costs.
3. Municipalities will now have the opportunity to provide short term loans to the broader
public sector such as hospitals, colleges and universities. This will help reduce the short
term borrowing costs for these bodies and save taxpayers money.
___4_.
~~~
_.~~
r;:;-S"WIT10N i,'
I u:... ;
. C\ft'~;\' -- f
I ,- "
I ,.., BY ~ l
:. ,tl,~...h. - t
_0--.'''';'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Our government made a commitment to reduce the cost of government and to give municipalities
the tools and flexibility to operate in ways that will be both efficient and accountable. The
changes to the debt and investment provisions of Bill 86 are another step in that direction.
Attached is a copy of the regulation for your information.
IT you require more information, please call Nancy Bardecki, Director, Municipal Finance Branch
at (416) 585-6951.
Sincerely.
Ai Leach
Minister
c.c. Municipal Associations
%:
;
\ -\
~~-=---.==\~~
,_ =-=-1
!
r',,, f I--//.: .,.",,,,,,,-.,-,,,,,-..'
'. - .-------
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
i
II
I
I
II
,
II
,
~ .
II
,
I
'I
I
I
II
I
482
TIlE ONTARIO GAZETfE / LA GAZETIE DE L'ONTARIO
(G'e3t Seal of Onurio)
(Great Seal of Ontario)
HILARY M. WESTON
HILARY M. WESTON
PROVINCE DE L'ONTARIO
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
EUZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God of the United
Kingdom. Canada and Her other Realms and Territories. Queen.
Head of the Commonwe31th. Defend<, of the Failh.
EUZABETH DEUX. par II. gr.1cc de Dieu. Reine du Royaume.Uni, du
Canada c:t de ses auU'es royaumes c1 tenilOircs. Chef du
Commonweallh. Dtfenseur de la Foi.
PROCLAMATION
PRQO.AMATION
BETTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, /996
LOI DE 1996 SUR L',wEuORATlON DES ADMINISTRATIONS
LOCALES
"
",
We. by and with the advice of the Executive Council of Ontario. name
Thursday. March 6. 1991 as the day on which sections 16 to 21 and 24
to 42. subsections 49(1) to (4) and (6) to (9). sections 50. 51. 53 and
59, subsections 67(6) to (38) and 69(5) to (41), section 71. subsections
74(2) to (5). section 76, subsections 78(7) to (10). (14) to (16) and (18)
10 (54). sections 81, 82 and 84. subsections 85(2) to (39) and sections
97,98 and 100 of the Btller Local Government Act. 1996 come into
force.
Sur l'avis du Consoil extcutif de l'Onurio. Nous fixons Ie jeudi 6
mars 1997 eomm<: tunt Ie jour oil entn:nt en vigucur les articles 16 l
21 e124l42.1es pangnphes 49(1) l (4) Cl (6) l (9),les articles SO,
51.53 el59,Ies pangnphes 67(6) l (38) et 69(5) l (41).l'article 71.
les pangnphes 74(2) l (5), I'article 76.les pangnphes 78(7) l (10).
(14) l (16) Cl (18) l (54). les articles 81,82 el 84. les pangnphes
85(2) l(39) et les articles 97, 98 et 100 d< laLai dr 1996 SIlT rami;;o.
rarion des administrations locales.
WITNESS:
TtMOIN :
TIlE HONOURABLE HILARY M. WESTON LlEUlE."lANT
GOVERNOROFOURPROV1NCEOFONT~O
L'HONORABLE HILARY M, WESTON LIEUTENANT-
GOUVERNEUR DE NOnE PROVINCE DE L'ONT~O
GIVEN at Toronto. Onurio. on Marth 5 1997.
FAIT l Toronto. en Onurio.1e 5 mars 1997.
BY COMMAND
PAR ORDRE
DJ. vlO JOHNSON
President du Conscil de gesr.ion du gouvemement
DJ. V10 JOHNSON
Chair of the Managemenl Board of Cabinct
(5945) 12
Motor Vehicle Transport Act/TruckTransportation Act
Loi sui' les transports routiers/Loi sur Ie camionnage
The following arc: applications for operating licences under me Truck Transponatioll Act. R.s.O. 1990. Chapter T.ll. andfor lhc MOIor Vehicle
Transport Aa. 1987. Chapter 35. The applicants have met the fitness requirements pursuant to Section 6 of lhe Truck. TransporrtJa"on AO an<Vor
Section 8(2) of tbe M ator V.hid. Transporr Act, J91!7 and the provincial cnnsport board and/or the Rcgisttar of MOlar Vehicles proposes to issue the
licences if no written objection is served on the applicant and filed wilb the Registrar of Motor Vehicles. within thirty days of this publication.
The following applicants have applied for Authoricy to offer a uansporution service for the caniage of Goods:
On uouven. ci.apres la liSle des demandcs de permis d'cxploiwion presenl.!cS. en venu de 1a Loi sur k camionnage. LR.O. 1990. chaplIn T.22. erJ
ou Ia Lo; tk 1987 $JU kJ lTansporu rouriers. L.C 1981. cJu:pi!~ 35. On. jug~ que ies personnes ayant prescott ces deman&::s se confonnaicnt lUX
cri1bes d'.plill1de pttvus au pangnphe 8(2) d< Ia Loi d. 191!7 SIU' ks lTanspans ra."." et I'ollia: des uanspons de l'Onllno elIou Ie regisualCUr
des vaticules autOmObiles dans lcs trente jours suivant la publication des presenleS'.
Lcs persoMes suivantes onl deman~ l' au[orisation d'offrir des services de tr3nSpOn de marchandises 1 destinatiOn.
AGn.E FREIGHT SYSTEM INC CAMERON-KNIGHT DHILLON. BOPINDER,SINGH
LEMmrr.ll. 'l'R4l'ISPORTATION BRAMPTON. ON
SERVICES INC.
B & B TRUCKDIG LLC CORNWALL. ON DISTRIB UTION
NEW HOPE. AR EMPLOYMENT
CLEAVE. RODDY. ELDON SERVICES LTD
BENIPERSAUD. DEORAM, R. OCHRE RIVER. MB BRAMPTON. ON
TORONTO. ON ERIC TRANSPORT INC.
COASTAL BULK TRANSPORT
BETON BARREITE INC. INCORl'ORA'IED LAURIER-STATION, ON
VAL-D'OR. QC DAJtI'MOtml. NS GAVIN TRANSPORTATION
BOUGIE, GASTON DALE F. BROWN TRUCKING INC. SYSTEMS LIMITED
LAVERLOCHERE. QC FOItI' ERIE. ON MOUrn' HOPE. ON
BRADT. ROGER.. G. DASMESH TRUCKING LTD. GEO. A. HALL INC.
LEAMlNGTON. ON BRAMPTON. ON ViU.ED'ANJOU.QC
I
O. Reg. 73/97
THE ONTARIO GAZETTE I LA GAZETIE DE L'ONTARIO
2. Stctians 33 and 58 of the Regulation are revoked..
Thence along that waters edge in a general C3Stcrly. southerly
and westerly direction across the mouth of the Whitetish River
U1d around the Waters edge along the shore of Moose Point.
Haystack: Harbour and continuing along lhe wau:t3 edge of Birch
Island and the westerly shore of the La Ooche Peninsula to its
intersection with the: Pill'3.lIel of Latirude 460 03' North on the
easterly shore of the La Cloche-Channel;
Thence weSt asU'onomically to the waters edge along the c3Sterly
shore of Great LJ. Cloche Island at the point of land on the
northerly side of Jumbo Bay;
Thence northerly. easterly and southerly along the waterS edge
on the northerly shore of Gre.t La Cloche lsl:!lld and the shore
of Swrgeon Bay to iES intersection with the meridian of
Longitude West:
Thence north astronomically along that meridian to the point of
commcncemcnL
PARCEL 2:
~t part of Iroquois Bay. McGregor Bay. Baie Fine and frazer Bay
of the North Channel of Lake Huron and adjoining the southerly and
westerly boundaries of the Townships of Curtin :!lid lGllamey:
Commencing ilt a point on du: WaterS edge of the North Channel
o(Ukc Huron at the intcncction wich the westerly boundary of
lGllamey Proviocial Pari: as regulated:
:~1
Thence e3.Sterly. soumerly and westerly along the wacers edge of.
the North CIwuleL the East Ch:!llnel. McOregor Bay and Baie
Fine to a point on the southerly shore of Baie Fine at the
northeast corner of Summer Resort location AE 283;
Thence South W West astrOnomically. along the cas(crly limit
of that Location to a point on the waters edge on Ihe northerly
shore oC Frazer Bay being the southeast corner of thal Location:
Thence e:l.Stcriy. southerly and westerly following the watCrS
edge :1long the northerly, easterly and southerly shores of Frazer
Bay to iu intcnc:aion with the Pan.lIel of latitude 450 S9'
Nonh:
Thence west 3.Saooomica.l1y along that Parallel'to a point at the
waters edge on the west shore of Little u Ooche Island in the
proximicy of Dinacr Point:
Thence noctherty, southerly, westerly and easterly fonowing lhe
walen edge along tile shore of Wale La Cloche Island to a poinl
11: the entrance to the: Boat Passage:
Thence in a. snight line across the mQuth of the Boat pa.ssagc to
a point at the waters edge on dIe easterly shore of the La Oache
Peninsula:
Thence northerly, _y and easterly continuiog along !he
waters edge on tile easterly shan: of the La Cloche Peninsula
beiog lbe w=erly Slore of McGregor Bay to ilS interseclion
with the northerly Iimi1 of !he District of Manitoulin:
Thence easterly doag that northcrty limit a.cross die wucn of
Iroquois Bay to its iDtcrsection with the waters edge on the
llOrtherly shore of tile North Ch:umel:
Thence coatinuing ::&Joag the waterS edge oC the Noeth Channel
to the point of corm:xnccmenc.
O. Reg. 74/97
505
I
CHRJS HOnGsoN
Miniscu of NOrlh~m Devdopmen.i and Mws
I
Dated at Toronto on March 4. 1997.
I
12191
ONTAroOREGULAnON7~
made under the
lI-lUNIClPAL ACT
I
Made: March S. 1997
Filed: Ma.rch 6. 1997
I
ELlGffiLE INVESThlENTS
I
GE.'iERAL REsnucnON ON MUNICPM. [NVE.S'Th<E'(t'
1. A municipality does not have the power lO invest under section
167 of the Act in a security n!her th:!ll a security prescribed under this
ReguLation.
I
1'P.Es000BED SOCUIlmE$
I
2. The following are prescribed. for the purposes of clause 167 (2)
(a) of the Act. as securities that a municipality may invest in:
I
1. Bonds. debencures. promissory notes or Other evidence of
'indebtedness issucQ or guarmteed by.
i. Canada or a province or territory of Canada..
I
ii. an agency of Canada or a province or territOry of Canada.
Hi. a country ocher man Canada.
I
iv. a municipality in Canada including the munici~a!i!y ('!;iling
the investment.
I
v. a school board or similar enti[)' in Canada.
vi. a local board as dcrmcd in the:: Municipal Affairs ....ct (but not
incl\lding a school board or a municipality) or a conserva4
tion authority established under the CoItS~rwuion A.uthori~
tiu Act. or
I
vii. the Municipal Finance Authority of Brici.sh ColumbiL
I
2. Bonds. debentureS. promissory noleS or other evidence of
indebtedness of a corporation if.
I
L the bond. dcbcalUrC or other evidence of indebtedness is
secured hy !he auignmen~ to a austee. as defined in the
Tru.ru~ Act, of paymcots thzt Canada or I. province or
taritosy ofCaoadabas agreed to makeoc isrequircd to make
under a federal, provincial or territarial......re.. and
I
ii. chc payments refc:m:d to in subpangnpb i ate suffICient to
meel !he amounlS payable under lbe boa<!. debenture or
odler evidence of indebtedness. including !he amounlS
payable Ol owurity.
I
3. Deposit receipts. deposit notes. certificua of deposit or invc::st~
ment.. Kci:punces or odler similu investment insuumc::nts
issued. g~aranteed or endorsed by.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
482
TIlE ONTARIO GAZETfE I LA GAZETIE DE L'ONTARIO
(Great Seal of Onurio)
(Great Seal of Onwio)
HILARY M. WESTON
HILARY M. WESTON
PROVINCE DE L'ONTARIO
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
EUZAIJETH THE SECOND, by the Gtaee of God of the United
Kingdom. Canada and Her other Realms and Territories. Queen.
Head of the Commonwealth. Defender of the Faith.
WZABETH DEUX, par la grice de Dieo. Reine du Royaurne-Uni. du
Canada et de ses aulrC$ royaumcs et tcni.toires. Chef du
Commonwealth. Dt:fenseur de la Fai.
PROCLAMATION
PROCLAMATION
BETTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT. /996
WI DE /996 SUR L'AMWORATlON DES ItDMINISTl/ATIONS
LOCALES
,.
"
We. by and with the advice: of the Executive Council of Ontario. name
Thursday. March 6. 1997 as the day on whieh se<:tions 16 to 21 and 24
to 42. subsections 49(1) to (4) and (6) 10 (9). sections SO. SI. S3 and
59. subsections 67(6) to (38) and 69(S) to (41). section 71. subsections
74(2) to (S), section 76. subsections 78(7) to (10), (14) to (16) and(I8)
to (54). sections 81, 82 and 84, subsections 85(2) 10 (39) and sections
97, 98 and 100 of the Belter Lix:al Government Act. 1996 come into
force.
Sur I'avis du Conseil exfcutif de I'Onuria. Nous fixons Ie jeudi 6
mars 1997 comme Etanllc jour ocl cnttent en vigueur Ics articles 161
21 et 241 42.Ies pangraphes 49(1) 1 (4) et (6) 1 (9). 1es anieles SO,
S 1. S3 et S9, les pangraphes 67(6) 1 (38) el 69(S) 1 (41), I'wele 71,
les pangraphes 74(2) 1 (S). I'anicle 76.les pangraphes 78(7) 1 (10),
(14) 1 (16) et (18) 1 (54). les weles 81.82 eI84.1es pangraphes
85(2) 1 (39) et Ies articles 97, 98 et 100 de laLA! dd996sur familio-
rarion des administrations locales.
WITNESS:
TtMOlH :
TIlE HONOURABLE HILARY M. WESroN LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR OF OUR PROVlNCE OFONTMUO
L'HONORABLE HILARY M. WESTON LIEUTENANT.
GOUVERNEUR DE NOTRE PROVINCE DE L'ONTMUO
GIVEN at Toronto. Ontario. on March S 1997.
FAIT l Toronto. en Onurio, Ie S mars 1997.
BY COMMAND
PAR ORDRE
DAVID JOHNSON
Prtsident du Consc:i1 de gestion du gouvemement
DAVID JOHNSON
Chair of the Managemenl Board of Cabinet
(5945) 12
Motor Vehicle Transport Act/TruckTransportation Act
Loi sur les transports routiers/Loi sur Ie camionnage
The following are applications for operating lic:enccs under the Truck Transponation Acr. R-S.O. 1990. Chapter T.22. and/or the: MOlor ~hicle
Transport Aa. 1987, Chapter 35. The applicants have met the fitness requirements pursuant to Section 6 of the Truck Trcnsponation Aa and/or
Section 8(2) of the M Olor V.hie/< TralUporr Acr.1987 and the provinciallranSpOrt board and/or the Registrar of Motor Vehicles proposes to issue the
licences if no written objection is served on me applicant and filed with the Registrar of MOlor Vehicles. within lhiny days of d1is publication.
The following applicants have applied for Authoril)' to offer a transpOnation service for the carriage of Goods:
On trouvera ci.apres la lisle des dcmandcs de permis d'cxploitation prCsen~ en vcnu de la Loi sur Ie camiOftlUJgt:. LR.O.l990. cMpirre Tol2. crJ
01.1 1a Loi de 1987 $J/J' ks rranspons rounus. LoC. 19f!1. cJaapi~e 3S. On a ju~ que Its persOMes ayanl prescn~ Cd dcmandes sc conformaient aux
rnlUes d'aptitude pttvus au paragraph< 8(2) de IaLAi d.1987 sur /<s tralUpores rouriers et "office des uonspons de l'Onuria ell.. Ie rogistraleUr
des veticulcs automobiles dans les trentc jours winDt la publication des pr&entcs.
Les pe~nnes suh"2I1tes oot deman~ I'aumrisation d"offrir des services de transport de marchandises 1 destination.
AGILE FREIGHT SYSTEM INC CAMERON.KNIGHT DHRLO~BOP~~SINGH
LEMONT. n. TRANSPORTATION BRAMPl'ON. ON
SERVICES INe.
B & B TRUCKING LLC CORNWALL. ON DISTRIBUTION
NEW HOPE. AR EMPLOYMENT
CLEAVE, RODDY. ELDON SERVICES LTD
BENIPERSAUD. DEORAM, R. <>CHRE RIVER. MB BRAMPl'ON, ON
TORONTO. ON
COASTAL BULK TRANSPORT ERIC TRANSPORT INe.
BETON BARRE'ITE INe. INCORPORATED LAUR!ER-STATION. ON
VAL-D'OR.QC DAKJ'MOUlH. NS GAVIN TRANSPORTATION
BOUGIE, GASTON DALE F. BROWN TRUCKING INC. sYSTEMS LIMITED
u..VERLOCHERE. QC FOR:!" ERIE. ON MOUNT HOPE. ON
BRADT, ROGER. G. DASMESH TRUCKING LTD. GEO. A. HALL INe.
LEAMlNGiON. ON BRAMPl'ON. ON V!LLE D'ANJOU. QC
I
O. Reg. 73/97
THE ONTARIO GAZETIE / LA GAZElTE DE L'Ol'l"TARIO
2. SettiORS 33 and 58 of the: Regulation are revoked.
Thence :1Ioog that Waters edge in a general c:lSterly. southerly
ind wcsterly direction across lhe mouth of the Wbitct1sh River
and around [he waters edge along the shore of Moose Point.
Haystack Harbour and continuing along lhe waters edge of Birch
Island and the westerly shore of the L3. Ooche Peninsula to its
intersection with the Parallel of Latitude 460 03' North on the
easterly shore of the La ClocheChannel~
Thence west astronomically to the waters edge along lhe easterly
shore of Great La Cloche Island at the point of land on the
northerly side of Jumbo Bay;
Thence northerly. c3Sterly and southerly along the waters edge
on the nonherly shore or Gre.. La Cloche Island and the shore
of Sturgeon Bay to its intersection with the meridian of
Longitude West:
Thence north asttonomicalIy along that meridian to the point of
commencement.
PARCEL 2:
That part ofIroquois Bay, McGregor Bay, Saie Fine and Frazer Bay
of the North Channel of Uke Huron and adjoining the soumerly and
westerly boundaries or the Townships of Curtin lUId Killamey:
Commencing tit a. point on the waters edge of the North Channel
of Lake Huron at lhe intersection with the westerly boundary of
Killamey Provincial Pari: as regulated:
"
Thence e3Sterly, southerly and westerly along the waters edge of.
the North Channel. the East Channel. McGregor Bay and Sue
Fine to 1 point on the southerly shore of Sue Fine at the
northeast corner of Summer Rcson Location AE 283:
Thence South 280 WCSt astronomically, along the CilSterly limit
of that location to a point on the waters edge on the northerly
shore of Frazer Bay being the southeast comer of that Location:
Thence ~terly. southerly and westerly following the waters
edge ~ong the nonbcrly, easterly and southerly shores of Frazer
Bay to iu intersection wilh the Parallel of latitude 450 59'
Nonh:
Thence west 3StrcnomictllIy along that Parallel'co a point at the
waters edge on the west shore of Little l.:1 Oochc lsland in the
proximicy of Dinner Point:
Thence: nonhetly. southerly, westerly and easterly following the
waters edge along the shore of UWe: La Ooche: lsland to a point
at the entrance to the Boat Passage:
Thence in a scn.ight line across the mouth of the Boat Passage to
a point at the wat~ edge on the easterly shore of the La Ooche
Peninsula:
Thence nonhaly, ~y and cas<crly continuing along lhc
waters edge on rbe castaly shore or the La Cloche Peninsula
beiag the wcst<rly sbon: or McGregor Bay .. its in<c:rscction
with the aonhaly limit or the Dislria or Mani<OUlin:
Thence easterly aJoag that nonherly limit uacss the waten of
Iroquois Bay to its intersection with the watCl3 edge on the
aonherty shore of me North Cha.nnel:
Thence continuing >>eng the waters edge of the Nonh Ch3l1ncl
to the point of coau::xncemenl.
O. Reg. 74/97
505
I
CHRIS HODGSON
Miniscu of Norrh~m Df:velopmf:n.'c and Min.~s
I
Dated at Tocoma on March 4,1997.
I
12197
ONTARIO REGULATION 741'J7
made under the
l'ilUNICIPAL ACT
I
Made: March 5. 1997
Filed: March 6. 1997
I
ELlGmLE INVESThlENTS
I
GE.'I'ERAL REsnucnON ON MUNICPAL INVESTIdE.Vf
1. A municipality docs not have the power to invest under section
167 of me Act in a security other than a securicy prescribed under this
Regulation.
I
PREsOUBED SECUR.mES
I
2. The rollowing arc prescribed. ror the purposes of clause 167 (2)
(a) of the Act. as securities that a municipalicy may invest in:
I
I. Bonds. debentures. promissory notes or other evidence of
. indebtedness issued or gUar.lntc:cd by.
L Canada or a province Of territory of Canada.
I
ii. an agency of Canada or a province or territory of Canada,
Hi. a country other than CilQada.
I
iv. a municipality in Canada including me municipa1i!v ;'"'!'!...<.irq
the invc:sunc:nt.
v. a school board or similar entity in Ci1nada.
I
vi. a local board as defined in the MunicipGJ Affairs Ace (but not
inclyding a school board or a municipality) or a conserva.
tion aud10ricy established under the CcnJervmiolt Aulhori-
liu Act. or
I
vii. the Municipal Finance Authority or British Columbia.
I
2. Bonds. debencures. promissory notc:s or other evidence of
indebtedness of a corporation if.
i. me bond. debenture: or ocher evidenc:c of indebtedness is
sccurc:d by the a5$,ignmcat. to a uusr.ce. as defined in the
Tnuu< Ac~ or payments that Canada or a province or
rarilD'Y orCanadahas agreed.. mak<: orisrcquired lD make
under a rcdcro, provincial or lctriaxiaISlalUtC. and
I
I
ii. Ihe payments rercacd .. in su!>paragraph i arc sufficient ..
meet the amountS payable UDda me boad. debca.wre or
other evidence of indebtedness. including the amounts
payable at maturity.
I
3. Deposit receipts. deposit noces. catifia.te:S 0( deposit or invest-
ment. 1Cci:punces at" other similu investment in.suumenu
issued. ~uaran(eed or endorsed by.
I
I
506
O. Reg. 74/97
THE ONTARIO GAZETfE I LA GAZETfE DE L'ONTARlO
1
i. a banK liSted in Sehedule I or II to the Bank ACl (Canada).
ii. a loan corporation or UUst corporation registered under the
Loan and Trust COlporation Act.
I
iii. a credit union or league to which the Cndit Union and
CaiJ.r~s Popu.lair~s Act applies. or
I
i v. the Province of Ontario Savings Office.
4. Short term securities. the tenns of which provide that the prind.
pal and interest shall be fully repaid no later than three days after
the day the investment was made. mat are issued by,
I
i. the board or govern"" of a eollege or applied ana and
teChnology established under section 5 or the Ministry of
Colleg~s and Universities Act9
.1
I
!I
1
II
~
I
ii. a degree granting institution as aulhorized under section 3 of
the Degree Granting Act. or
iii. a board as defined in the Publie Hosp;,als Act.
5. Bonds. debentures or other securities issued or guaranteed by
the International Bank for Reconsauction and Development.
fOREIGN CoUNl1UES' SECURSTlES
3. A municipality shalt not invest in a security issued. or guararueed
by a country other than Canada unless me counay's long lem1 debt
obligations are rated. at the time the investment is made.
(a) by Canadian Bond Rating Service Inc. as "AA-" or higher:
(b) by Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited as "AA(Low)" or
higher;
1
(e) by Moody's Investors Services Inc. as "Au" oc higher: or
1
(d) by Standard and Poor's lne. as "AA-" or higher.
MUNICPAUri'S OwN SECURITIES
.1
4. A municipality shall not invest in securities issued or guuanteed
by itself if mat would result in the outstanding principal of the
municipality's invcsunents in its own securities exceeding 2S per cent
of the outsunding principal of alllhe securities issued or guaranteed by
the municipality.
I
SOIooL Pu1tI'OSES
1
S. A municipality shall noC invest in a securily issued or guaranteed
by a school board or similar entity unless.
(a) the money nised by issuing the security is to be used roc school
purposes: and
I
(b) the security is to be repaid entirely with lUes or eharges levied
on pmpc:ny. with money from the government of Canada or a
province or territory of Canada or a municipality. or with I
eombinatioa of such ca.xcs. charges and money.
I
, TYPE OF CUlUtENCY
I
6. (1) A municipality shall not invest in a security thac is expressed
or payable in any CUITCncy other man Canadian dollars.
I
(2) Subsectioa (1) does not prevent a municipality from continuing
an iavc:stmen~ made before: this Regulation comes into force. that is
O. Reg. 15/97
expressed and payable in the currency of dIe United States of America
or the United Kingdom.
STATE.\terT OF INVESTMENT PoUCES AND GOAl!i
7. Before a municipality invests in a security prescribed under this
Regulation. the council of the municipaJity shaJI. if it ,has not already
done so. adopt a statement of me municipality's investment policies and
goals.
INvESTMENT REI'OIm
8. (1) if a m.unicipality has an investment in a security prescribed
under this Regulation. the council of the municipality shall require the
treasurer of the municipality to prepare and provide to the~council. each
year or more: frequently as specified by the council. an. invesunent
ccpon..
(2) The investment report referred to in subsection (1) shall contain.
(a) for each invesunent in a security presaibed under this Regu.
lation. a statement about the perfonnance of the invc:sttnent dur.
ing the period covered by the report: and
(b) such other information that the council may require or that. in the
opinion or the treasurer. should be included.
COMMENo:MENl'
9~ This RepJatioD comes into force on the day section 3S of the
Better lAcal Government Act, 1996 comes into force.
\2197
, ONTARIO REGULATION 75/97
made under the
MUNICIPAL ACT
Made: February 27. 1997
Filed: March 6. \997
Amending Q. Reg. 799/94
(Debt and Financial O~ligation Umits)
Note: Ontario Regulation 799/94 has not previously been amended.
1. (1) Subsection 4 (1) of the Ontario Regulation 799/94 is
ameuded by inserting lIor class of work", after '~rk" In the first
liDC and after "work" In the second llDe.
(2) Subsection 4 (3) of the Regulation is amended by adding "or
class of work" at the end..
(3) Subsection 4 (5) of the Regulation is reyoKed and the following
substituted.:
(5) The trc:a.surer is not required to include in the update under
subsection' (2) or the calculation under subsection (3) any amounts
recognized by the treaSurct' IS current expc:ndicures Ihat arc. or are
payable under. any of the following:
1. Lease agreements.
2. Premium noleS given Cor ("tre inst1r.U1cc..
3. Amngements to provide pensions under paragraph 46 o(
section 207 of the ACL
74
I
~. Grants for retirement allowances under section 98 ol the Act.
TIIE ONTARIO GAZETIE I LA GAZETIE DE L' ONTARIO
507
0, Reg. 75/97
5. Agreements for flre protection under paragraph 1 of section 207
of the Act.
6. Agreements for area flfC protection under clause (e) of para~
gr:1pn 31 of section 210 of the Ace
7. Agreements under the Police Services ....ct respecting policing of
the: whole: or any part of a municipality by the: Ontario Provincial
Police.
8. Agreements for .sharing the cost of services of officen: and
employees of municipalities or local boards.
9. Agreements respecting maintenance and repair of boundary
roads under section 271 of the Act.
10. AgreemenlS respecting homes under the Hamalar tile Agedtmd
"Rest Homes Act.
II. Agrn:menlS respecting water supply under paragraph 2 oC
section 207 of the Act.
12. Agreements respecting the management and operation of
systems and services under paragr:1pn S oC section 201 of the
Act.
13. Agreements for watering or oiling highways under pangra.ph 7
oC section 201 oC the Aee
O. Reg. 17/97
14. Agreements respecting bus fnnchises under paragraph 103 of
section 210 of the AcL
I
lS. Agreements for furnishing public bus tt3.0sporu.t.ian under pan-
grapn 104 of section 210 of the Act.
I
16. Agreements under the Power Corporation Act with Oncario
Hydro on its bebalf or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of
Ontario.
I
17. Agreements rcspecting mattcrs of emptoymenl of afficcrs and
employees of the municipality or a local boaed of the municipal.
i~ ~;~
I
18. AgreementS respecting regional economic development under
patagr:1pn S9 of section 2m of the Ace
I
19. AgreementS for insurance and reciprocal concracts of indemnity
or incer.insurancc providing insurance and procection under
paragraph 3. SO or SI of section 201 oC the Ace section 2S2 oC
the Ac[ or section 14 of the Municipal Conflict of lntelYSl Act.
I
(4) Subsection 4 (11) oC the Regulation is amended by adding "or
class of work" at the end.
1.. This Regulatioo comes into (orce 00 the day section 29 of the
Better lAw Governmenl Act, 1996 comes into Coree.
I
12191
I
ONTARIO REGULATION 16m
made under me
MUNICIPAL ACT
Made: March S. 1991
Filed: March 6. 1997
Amending O. Reg. 143/96
(PoWctS o( the Minister or a Commission for the
Imp(ement3.oon o( a RcstI'UCwring Proposal)
NOtc: Ontario Rcgulation 143196 has been amended by Ontario
Regulations 389/96 and 5S1/96. '
I. Section 18 oC Ontario Regulation 143/96ls amended by adding
the following subsec:tion:
(4) This section doe:s not apply to an order o( I commission that
comes jnlD effect between Febtuary 20. 1997 and July I, 1997. both
inclusive.
12/91
REGLE.\1E.'IT DE L'ONTARIO 761'J7
pris en application de 11 .
LOl StiR LES MUNICIPALITES
I
pris Ie S man 1997
d~sele6man 1991
I
modifian[ Ie R~g1. de rOne 143/96
(Pouvoirs du minime ou d"une commission visant la mise
en a:uvre d"une proposition de rescrucmration)
I
Remacque : Le R~gJemenl de rOnwio 143/96 a eo! modifie par les
R~glements de l'Onwio 389196 e[ SS7/96.
1. L'artlde 18 du R~ement del'Ontario 143/96 est maclili.! par
adjoactiQQ du pan.graphe suivant :
(4) le present article ne s'applique pas a l'ordre d"unc commission
qui entre en vigueur cntre. inclusivemenL Ie 20 (emu 1997 et Ie
1" juill<< 1997.
I
I
I
ONTARIO REGULATION 17m
made under the
MUNICIPAL ACT
Made: Febtuary 'J:/, 1997
Filed: March 6. 1997
JOINTINVESTMENTS-DESlGNATION OF
ADDmONAL PERSONS UNDER SUBSECTION
167.4 (2) OF THE ACf
1. The following ~ prescribed. for the purposes of' sub.section
161.4 (2) of the Act. as persons with whom a municipality may enter
imojoint invc.stment :lgrecments:
1. A local board as defined in section 1 o( the MU1IicipaI AffGin ACl
other than a school board.
I
2. An agent oC a loea! board described in paragraph I.
I
A1. Wol
Minister 01 Municipal Affairs tmd Horuinr
I
Dated at ToronlD on February 27, 1997.
12191
I
75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r'"
"
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
~1-1r" 1 (&u~/ka
HAY Z3 IZ DB PH '91.
'?;lU,.tCA/pttlv'~ ir!.hfV<-'; t:...
Qb7V'lOl4"rnl&- AGENDA
1-4
~t<v0rJ~ A7 ~A/11
1J!mCCmllWI!~
MAY 2 2 1997
MUNICIPALITY Of CLAl'lINGTON
MAYOR'S OFFICE
a I~ ~<> 0-1" ~ U4 ~, i Ika-un ~
~o).IJ'7-nQ~. :;;,> ~ lu .$ IS": d.a.'ltd pMknf t:L~
~ iUW~ M M:.b. f>uIwt ~t- {~.>t 0/ r~" ~M<lk~ "'-<<~ ~
~ /IJ.:> a j udt. - ~..L ik ~ ~? r/t ac-.e~2-0i"ah'" ~ t/u-:J
(}v)I/ cr 4 <<. \dI ~ POll ~ f ~}"'1' .e, trn ~ri,4. ~
P7 ~"1'1;:> M bJ-'-o P7tF>'-')-<- ~lp.l<.~ I tb;; cto /Mt ~ viii&....
.J -MtU,,~ 1;. ()lV;, e Q'IfA"'Y ~ ~ oJ.rf); uf; t'~ ti7I/">-J
) ~ d. p4 ;JJ aJVl.M r?~:"7 tiJ ~h. A~{ /fllt~~
10 ~,~ ie,~ ~L ~~ drn,?j;~ ~ ~ tk kf-
~ . .' '" - . ~. ..
f~ ~j.:.:ib-- p- p..M;. It P..t<-: /d"h Had~ L'I
/l:~i~;;c)_~~~Avb 6.":' ;2erJ.:t-.r I /u-t<<<~ t4/ tw obu 1-1 Y#.
'?fjJJ.~__~7fr.>w-.., h ptn-J ~k tk,t I~ p lbo ~'j ~N
.~ oto. Otr>~?a ~ ~vvt;t/K- -- ~ tkt- .$ fu..} (J/1#-<<j";7
. ~ ~ 'M~ it ~ .;, ~ ~,-- t2 kj /ItH~ ~ i /JJ-I-e.t~ .
~" r 11-,- .()~ ~~ - ~wfa, -::J.rbP?b-Iu
1'.5. ,..tJ7jj~A""a.. ~ p"""c{ p-..I'>..p~~ ~ ~...:. ~ - /}.M' ~
I
I
I
I
I
Councillor Bryon Wilfert
I Richmond Hill, Onrario
Presidedc
President
I Deputy 1o{ayor Jae Eadie
Winnipeg, Manitoba
.fzm Via:-Piesidept' <
I. I ~::::;l:~: Uncia
Qu<bOc (Qu&<C)
I DcuxiCmc vice-prCsident
Second V~~residen~
Mayo< Leo~ldlkllMau ,
'1 Mannon, New Brunswick
Third Vicc~President
Troisieme vice-pn:sid~t.
I "
M.yo< John U$ ,
Chillil\'3.ck, British Columbia
Past President
IP,e.idcm ,onan< '
Jam" w. Knigh,
Execuri,-e Director
rir<<t~U~ genc~
----..-
.. .w..._~._
..,.--+
,-~.,--O; , ~
\tUg.. .. ~ :~..
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-5
Federation of Canadian Municipalities
Federation canadienne d~s munidpalites
May 15, 1997
Memorandum to FCM Member Clerks/Secretary Treasurers
1997 POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOOK
,,' Ene.losedars two d6cuments:,
f'oIIcyDev~8cJOk1997:' It c6ntainsFCMPolicy Statema.ntsand
members' resOlutions tor COnsideration atthe Annual Conference in Ottawa"'
Carleton,F"riday,JuneE) ,~. MOndaY,'June-,9. .R~istered delegat~s,' who"
requested an' advance ,c6pywin fElCehfe" it under: separate' cover. Other ,
delegates, 'NiII,r~jvea',<=9py upon'(E,g!stration;at the', Conference, site.:
Pfeasenote:,additlonal orreplaceme,deopie. will be ava.ihlble'orisite"
for$20..,. "..',,'.'., ,." . , ',., .' '.
'.. , ~
ConsoIi_R~ Book1996:ltc:ontainsfederal responses to {eM'
resolutions sinCe DeCember 1995. "
Wea~k MunicipaL<Clerks/Secretary Treasurers to advise their
Councilsl~oar'ds that these documents are available for review.,
Late R..olutions , '
It is FCM policy thai late resol.utions will NOT BE ACCEPTED ON . .
" for ~e at the Conference. R~solutions received in the Secretariat. '
no later than T11ursday.M~Y2!J willbeeonsidered by the FCMExecutive
Committee. ,Resolutions ~etermii1edto bli) "em~ency" will be distributed "
to delegates at the Conterence. ,Non-emergency resolutions will be,
- -by~-~~BOa1>of7Z2"~k:nQ
i .' Sheila Ke~e ,
' , ,SeniorPoliCy Analyst ' .' "
Enclosures.
24, rue Clarence Street, Ottawa, Ontario KIN 5P3
Td'PhonefTeJephon" (613)241-5221' Fsxffllecopieur. (613l 241-7440
International OfficelBureau imernadonal:
TelephonelTeMphone:' (613) 241-8484. Fa#Telecopieur: (613) 241-7117
1",;-
.. )
,
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1,1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I President sortant
1~ w: Knight
I EuaJrive Dir<<ror
_tiittacur general
I
I
I
I',
I . --=~~- I
--. ,'.,' ,-_.-1
,'*/10-1 _-,_-~
. -Federation of Canadian Municipalities
Federation canadienne des municipalites
May 22, 1997
MemoranQ~mto FCM Members
Councillor Bryon Wilfert
. Richmond Hill, Ontario
President
Presideiu
..NOTICE OF,1997 ANNUAL GENERAl MEETING
Deputy Mayor Jac Eadie_
. Winnipeg. .Manicoba .
First Vice-President
Premier vi~presid.enr
.'.n~ccprdance.with the Federation'~ I:!y:.;!awr.equirem~nt~ we
enclose:',!;:> .,', ..' '.,'
. ,. " ,,"'... . . . ,-., ~"- ";" , ,
_ . Maire suppleant Oaude Cantin
q,u<bcc (Qu<bcc)
Dcuxieme yice-pcesidmt
Second Vice-:I?resid~t
1
'","~genda fofth~AnnLJal G~l.rvteetitJgtobeh~ld6n.
,saturday, JUne? '.~~7at08:00-irr~ress Hall A&EOf.
theO~'Congf'7ssCer,ltreilr()~..</ ' .\' ,c
; "MinUtes.Ol'the'1996'Annu8J,~ral~tiOg'"
.: ...:-.. .:_ ',_ -: '::'.~". _', ..':... 'C". d. c': ,- '. . , ... '. .. . . _, - ,- :', " , . - ,~_ .::',.... .'. Co' : _ "_, _ _ _'
Mayor Uo""ld Ildllvcau
Monaon. N~_BrunswiCk
- Thi.ri:I Vice-President
Tro~ll'ie Vi.ce:.president .
". - .'- ,. ,
.,' '--.. ,.-' -, '. ':..;
Pro~:By~awAmeodmentS:;' .
C_'.' :.- ..' ..-- ',_, 'C'."_ . > '..' :. ..: . - , _ .'. __~.:", _ .'
:-..: .
Mayor John Les
Chilliwack, British Columbia
Past President
4~-
. Finartd81StatemerltS and Audit()I'$'R~rt for the1996~9T.
fisCal yea". '
. 5:' ".,'.' , Report Qfthe ,1997 NOITIina~ng Committee'
... : ..,
PJeaseensurethatdeJegatesfrom yourmunicipalit)t (asSoci~tioii)'"
are' acquainted' with the enclosed. 'Also, note ,that' the EleCtion ot
Offlcers' will. be held~uring the Annual ,Generaf Meeting as shown
.DIS~UTION-"~ndei' Ibtm 80t theAg~nda. ','
CLERK __:.. ' '
. ACK. BY _
OR1GmAL T .
CliP H:S T :
ncl. ,:
'.,
')
"-.'
24, rue Clarence Str'eet. OttaWa. Ontano KlN'5P3 ,
Telepho"d:relephQ~e: (613) 241.5221. FaxfTel&:opiau: (613) 24.1~7<<O
International Office/Bureau international:
Tdcphoneffelephone:(GB) 241~8484-. Faxffelecopicur: (613) 241.7117
AGENDA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEDERATION OF CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES
60TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
CONGRESS HALL AlE
OTTAWA CONGRESS CENTRE
OTTAWA, ONTARIO
SATURDAY JUNE 7,1997
08:00 - 09:30
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes of the 1996 Annual General Meeting
3. Business Arising from the Minutes
4. Report of the President
5. Report of the Membership Development Committee
(Second Vice President)
6. Report of the Budget and Audit Committee
(Past President)
6.1 Financial Statements and Auditors' Report
6.2 Appointment of Auditors
7. Proposed By-law Amendments
8. Report of the Nominating Committee AND
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
8.1 Inaugural Address of Incoming President
9. Roll of Honour Presentations
10. Other Business
11. Adjournment
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
59TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
CALGARY, ALBERTA
JUNE 2, 1996
08:00 . 09:30
ITEM 1
CALL TO ORDER
President John Les called the meeting to order, welcomed delegates,
introduced the Executive Committee and declared the 59th Annual Meeting officially
convened. '
ITEM 2
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
MOTION
On a motion by First Vice President Bryon Wilfert, seconded by Past
President Laurence Mawhinney, it was proposed that the minutes of the 58th
Annual General meeting be adopted.
CARRIED
ITEM 3
BUSINESS ARISING
No business arose.
ITEM 4
REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
MOTION
On a motion by First Vice President Wilfert, seconded by Past President
Mawhinney, it was proposed that the report of the President be received.
CARRIED
.../2
ITEM 5
ITEM 6
'!
-2-
REPORT OF THE MEMBERSHIP DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
(Second Vice President)
MOTION
On a motion by Second Vice President Claude Cantin, seconded by Deputy
Mayor Grant Hopcroft, it was proposed that the Membership Committee
Report be received.
CARRIED
REPORT OF THE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
(Past President)
6.1 Financial Statements and Auditors ReDort
MOTION
On a motion by Past President Mawhimey, seconded by Rrst Vice President
Wilfert, it was proposed that the Financial Statements and Auditors Report
for fiscal year 1995/96 be approved.
CARRIED
6.2 ADDointment of Auditors
MOTION
A motion to appoint the firm of Deloitte & Touche as the Federation's
auditors for 1996/97 was defeated.
MOTION
On a motion by Mayor Rick Borotsik, seconded by Councillor George Puil,
it was proposed that the firm of Arthur Andersen & Co. be appointed as the
Federation's auditors for 1996/97.
CARRIED
...13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-4-
MOTION
On a motion by Mayor Dennis Bevington, seconded by Councillor Roelof
Heinen, it was proposed that Deputy Mayor Claude Cantin be acclaimed as
Second Vice President
CARRIED
MOTION
On a motion by Mayor Don Doncaster, seconded by Mayor Murray Westby,
it was proposed that mayor Leopold Belliveau be acclaimed as Third Vice
President
CARRIED
7.1 Inauaural Address of Incomino President
MOTION
On a motion by Deputy Mayor Hopcroft, seconded by Mayor Mike Coleman,
it was proposed that the Inaugural Address of the Incoming President be
received.
CARRIED
ITEM 8
ROLL OF HONOUR PRESENTATIONS
Recipients of the 1997 Roll of Honour Saolls were Sylvester Atkinson, Angus
Read and Ron Hayter. .
ITEM 9
OTHER BUSINESS
No other business arose.
.../5
ITEM 7
,
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE AND
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
MOTION
On a motion by Past President Mawhinney, seconded by Deputy Mayor
Hopcroft, it was proposed that the report of the Nominating Committee
recommending a slate of Officers for the 1996/97 term of office be received
as follows:
For President
Councillor Bryon Wilfert
Richmond Hill, Ontario
For First Vice President:
Deputy Mayor Jae Eadie
Winnipeg, Manitoba
For Second Vice President:
Deputy Mayor Claude Cantin
Quebec, Quebec
For Third Vice President:
Mayor Leopold Belliveau
Moncton, New Brunswick
CARRIED
MOTION
On a motion by Councillor Bev Salmon, seconded by Mayor Bill Comaskey,
it was proposed that Councillor Bryon Wilfert be acclaimed as President.
CARRIED
MOTION
On a motion by Mayor Kathy Watson, seconded by Mayor Beth Johnson, it
was proposed that Deputy Mayor Jae Eadie be acclaimed as First Vice
President.
CARRIED
.../4
I-
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-5-
ITEM 10 ADJOURNMENT
The 59th Annual General Meeting was adjoumed at 09:30.
President
Executive Director
Recording Secretary
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-7
May 9, 1997
HIlT 27
:p~ccntlIW]~Tf'
",. J-!:j
t"1M 1 4 1997
: Mayor Diane Hamr~
: Town of Clarington,
,
\, 40 Temperance Street
, Bowmanville, Ontario-
',L1C 3A6 ,--- '
\.../-
MUNICIPALITY Of CLARINGTQN
MAYOR'S OFFICE
Dear Mayor Hamre:
The Greater Toronto Home Builders' Association (GTHBA), the voice of the residential
construction industry in the Greater Toronto Area since 1921, is about to launch the
largest multi-media advertising promotion of new housing that Canada has ever seen.
The GTHBA Parade of New Homes, running May 24 - June 8, 1997, will feature 54 of our
leading builder members showcasing more than 100 model homes and presentation
centres in 28 communities throughout the Greater Toronto Area. During this 16 day event,
we will be working with our media partners and corporate sponsors (see attached) to
highlight the "new home advantage".
The Parade of New Homes is intended to build upon the relative market strength we have
experienced early in 1997. Benefits to your community will include increased local
employment and development charges and building permit revenue as well as faster
buildout of existing subdivisions.
It is worth noting that every new home built generates 2.8 person-years of employment.
Furthermore, the average new home buyer spends approximately $10.000 in the local
community in their first year of occupancy on projects such as- decorating and
landscaping, We are certain that your local business community will welcome the support.
Please find attached a list of participating builders and sites. We will forward our Official
Guidebook as soon as it becomes available. In the meantime, if you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact either myself at 416/485-4615 or Stephen Dupuis,
Executive VP, at 416/391-3445 x 302.
,
\
I
\
n--
, \ II '
. 1 \ \ 1 '"
\ \ I I \:
-1.-L_LJ_L-
'4""'''
, I
<
1
i
~
\-z -\-~' '\. rrl-l
i ~. N: . \ \ \
iO i .
\~~. ,
i I"
i , -' ~
q_ l>d:
: (t) ;:s:. cO ~ ~
;- E5 ~ ~iO:
.0 -J u o::lc::.
20 UP.JOHN ROAD. NORTH YORK" ONTARIO. M3B 2V9. PHONE (418) 39~oo344tY. F'iic (.ii~)'j (. t I~
SPONSORED BY THE GREATER TORONTO HOME B~ILDER.' A5~IATION ~
...........................
~~\(I~
~.
-
,,~.. ,
-;;-:~'l ,
._<1_,., '
'i~~l
}i'\;"'~,~
I
........... ......... .......1
THANKS!
WITHOUT YOUR SUPPORT THE
PARADE OF NEW HOMES WOULD
NOT HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE.
I
I
I
HOMES
MING PAllIWLY NEWS
....~............a.-..
.
CHRFM98
~~--
~
r 680News I
,.i ALL -- RADIO 1
. ..--.J
I
I
PUllISHING GROUP
IT 2: ~.....
w
MAJESTIC.
C5rir"'P/.:rCd,5'
I
il!]1
'IDur Bank.
Your \v.qt" l
I
t
Honeywell
~ARIO NEW HOME
_~NTY PROGRAM
., R.G~~~
cf;tJ/8
(H6\T--N..ctW)
Nl
_ Bar'k of Montreol
t-.'I
(;:j6n.7I1ze
BAZIL
Dt;vatJPMENrs INC.
tIOMOEN
II
The
BRiCK
E : :.s~~
!i1 c-.;.
The Appliance Centre
MAROUNE
.....,.u".. TOSHIBA iliilNORiHiRiI"',:J:m'INOI-
........... ................. \. .. ..........................:
:rthr..... ..'if3
tHE GAS COMMNY STOR!
,,",
'I 6f06RRPHICRllnDfH
I Ownushipt F = Fo:chold C = Condo
Type: S = Single Family T = Townhome
SD = Semi Detached HR = High Rise
I
LOCATION MAP SUBDMSlON BUilDER OWN TYPE PRICE
I Ajax E5 Walaw: Grove V' '<Wnladr. Horn", F S $199,900
Awe", NII WdIingron Lanes Ansa Homes F T $166,900
Au",,,, NI2 Wellington Lanes Gmnium Horn", F T $165,990
I Au",,,, NI3 Au",,,, GRl\'e on Bayview Townwood Homes F T $184,900
Bradfurd N2 Sumhine Hill SoImar Homes F SD $169,900
Brampton WI Mayfidd Vilbg.: Counay Homes F S $199,900
Bmnpmn W2 Nonhwind Village Rmbnd Homes F S $212,000
I Bmnpron W3 The Stan ofBmnpron V'1eWIna1k Homes F S $202,900
Brooldin Ell Vilbg.: of BrooIdin Tn...'" Homes F S $247,990
Burlingron W29 The Ordwd Mall2my Homes F S $258,990
I Burlington W30 MiIkroIt Monan:h Construaion F S $281,000
Burlington W31 Millcrcdr. Mano.. Senator Homes F SD $192,990
Cowrie<: E14 Nantudcct Halminen Homes C T $149.990
Cowrie<: EI5 Whitediffe HalIDinen Homes F S $2]5.990
I Grimsby W34 South Bc.dt Marick Homes Inc. F S $249,90l>
Innisfil N1 Crossroads Homes Lord agio Homes F S $]74,990
Maple N36 Pmside Eswes SoImor Homes F T $18(},900
I Maple N37 Twany Bmoldidd Homes F S $252,900
Maple N38 Galiko Gmnium Homes F S $374.990
Marldwn N28 Unionville Eswes MocGson Homes F S $45<1,900
Maddwn N29 c..:het Woods \TalIqmcdc Homer F S $427,880
I Ma.ddwn N30 ComdI Matwny Homes F T $159.990
Maddwn N31 Comdl Uw Devdopn....c Group F S $215.98l>
Marldwn N32 Comdl BaD.arry Homes F S $22ll,99O
I Maddwn N33 Rouge EIizw:tys Caniage Hill Homes F S $286,800
M'uissaug. W5 CrcditV:dIey in Misrissauga H & R Devdopments F S $252,900
Mississauga W4 Heriage Walk VaIcmollt Homes Inc. F S $35l>,OOO
Misrissauga W6 Windmills ofMisrissauga Geaaium Homes F S $243,990
I Missi...uga W7 Abbey Rood fvur Seuoos Homes C SD $175.990
Mississauga W8 CmIitview Hunt Oub Four Seuons Homes F S $239,990
MWissauga W9 Bcd6xd M ~ Pine & Fmn C T $139,900
MWissauga WlO The Valley at CmIit Hills Hadnoood Homes F S $238,400
I MWissauga Wl1 Woodlands of Erin Mills Four Seuons Homes C T $182,990
MWissauga Wl2 a pba: aIIc:I danieIsgmve The: Danids Corpomion C T $180,490
Mississauga Wl3 Upcown <J.ssics The: Daniels Cotpotarion C T $161,990
I Mississauga Wl4 W'1lI<bnere c- The: Danids Corpotarlon F S S306,490
Mississauga W15 Sav.nnalr The: Danids Corpomion F SD S198,49O
Mi"i~MIT W16 Glen Erin Yorkwood r.,.........w Lrd C T $154,900
Mississauga Wl7 Britannia Woods Headnvood Homes F SO $221,500
I MWissauga Wl8 Highland For.st Intr.lQ)tp Dev. (Onurio) Lrd. F S S282,900
MWissauga Wl9 Gnnd Ordwd I'iddgue Homes F S $297,900
Mississauga W2lJ F.dcn M Ed:n Ook Homes F SD S2ll4.900
I Mississauga W2] Lome M VaIcmollt Homes IDC. F S S306,500
Ncwm.rka N4 SwnmerhiIJ H & R D:v.Iopmc:nts F S $213,900
NcwmarIr.ct N5 College Manor Eswes ThomwiIIow Homes F S S2ll4,900
NewmarIc.r N6 StonehaY.n Matwny Homes F S $299,990
I NewmarIc.r N7 StonehaY.n Aspen Ridge Homes Lrd. F S $321.900
NewmarIc.r N8 Ilayview Highlands G<a:npark F SD SI68,900
NewmarIc.r N9 The: ~ of St. And..".. Sandbury Homes F S S285,99O
I NcwmarIr.ct NIl> St. Andrews on /layview ('~ogt.a.n Homes F S S352,9O()
North Yode a Notthmwn Cenrn, Tridd C HR S273,800
North Yode C2 Gand-riew Tridd C HR $498,800
o.biIe \v.22 o.kviIe Lwrier Homes F S $283,900
I o.biIc: W23 OokM 1iibu", Homes F S SI89,99O
o.biIc: '\1724 Wesa:h= RMrOala Homes F S $293,900
, 2 0 · P A It A D E 0 F N E \VI H 0 :-1 I~ S
i _
& GfDGRRPHICRl mOf" Ownuship< F = FlI'Ohold C = Condo I
Typa S = Single Family T = Townhome
SD = Semi Detached HR = High Rise I
LOCATION MAP SUBDMSlON BUll.DER OWN TYPE PRKl
Oakville W25
Wesrchesta' Merrick Homes fnc. F S $267,900
OakviIle WJ.[, The Village of Morrison Merrick Homes fnc. C HR $147.9O~
OakviIle Wrl T..&Igar on the Park A1tem. Homes F S $242.99
Oakvilk W28 Westmount Glen Orclwd Homes F S $259.9
OshaW2 E12 Osham Flddgate Homes F S $184'~
Oshawa E13 Kingmay Forest Dwbam Homes F S $148,5
Pickering EI TImberland lebovic F S $231.
Pickering E2 Discovery Pbce Tridd C HR $159.900
Piclc.ering E3 Ravines of DufIins c...k 1laIIanuy Homes F SD $184,~
Pickering E4 Riverside Es=s ConsemroryGroup F S $269.
Richmond Hill NI4 Richmond Crossing WycIiffe Homes F T $241,900
Richmond Hill N15 Roya1 a.apin Gald= Fram Building Group F T $169':1
Richmond Hill NI6 Westbrook H&RDevdopmenr. F S $274,
Richmond Hill NI7 Unyon Ridge Marick Homes Inc. F S $252.990
Richmond Hill NI8 1layview Hadr &\geport Home Corp. F S $274::1
Richmond Kill NI9 Forest HiD on 1layview Townwood Homes F S $285
Richmond Hill N20 1layview Hills on the llDugc Minoo Homes F S $329.990
Richmond Hill N21 On the IlDugc River Rmeba= Homos F S $329::1
Richmond Hill N22 1layview Hills Gn:eopark F S $349,
Richmond Hill N23 The 1layview HiD - Upper valage c..:bet Estates Homeo loe. F S $568.900
7- Sarborough C5 12m O'Shano:r HigbIands Tridd C HR $237,8~
Sarborough C4 Omni at the City Centrt: Tridd C HR $233.79
Sarborough C5 Coosuium PIwe n Tridd C HR 5272,100
, Sarborough C6 Hannony IlDckport Group C T $119,~
'"
Sarborough C7 Rouge landing Inrncorp De'L (Onoario) La!. F SD $195,90
Sarborough C8 Port Union Vilbge BrooIdidd Homes F S $234.900
Sarbomugh C9 Colonial Park Vo:wmark Homes F T $1899
Sharon N3 Sharon Hills FdtIubio: Homes I.rd. F S $429,
Stouffvilk N24 Country Walk lebovic F S $299
Thornhill N34 Grc:n lane Marick Homeo loe. F S $499,:-
Toronto CIO Upper Ikach Vilbge KrO Professionals Inc. F SO $189,5
Union>ille N25 Angus Glen Marick Homes F T $189,
Unionville N26 Angus Glen River Oaks Homes F S $357,900
Unionville N27 Angus Glen VaIIeymede Homes F S $359,:1
Uxbridge EI6 ~ Vilbge WycIifle Homeo F S $253.
Vaughan N35 Thombill FJddgare Homes F S $335,900
Warerdown W32 Gat.sbwy Park Rmeba= Homeo F S $239::1
Warerrlown W33 Woods afW:aterdawn KandFHoma F S $221
Whilby E6 Q!I<en'. Common MonaR:b Coosrruaiorr l.rd F S $295,900
Whimr E7 Williamsburg Harhwond Homes. F S $226':1
Whicby E8 Me.dnw V_ From Building Group F S $228.9
Whicby E9 Easabire Vo:wmark Homes F S $206.900
Whitby EtO Hun...... Farm in BrooIdin IG:rin Doble Propcrrics La!. F S $t85.~
Woodbridge N39 Blue Willow Crossing Arista Homes F T $197.
Woodbridge N46 Blue Willow Crossing Eden Oak Homes F S $269;900
Woodbridge N41 Rainbow Ridgl: From Building Group F S $288':1
Woodbridge N42 Bdvedere Es=s From Building Group F S $337.
Woodbridge N43 llIingron FJddgare Homes F S $359,900
22 · PARADE OF NEW HnMES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
->
COUNCIL INFORMATION
Ministry of
M.unlcipal Aft'aln
and Hou.lng
Provincial Planning Se<v\oetI -
777 Bay Sll<llh Fir
TorontoON M5G2E5
Telephone Toll Free: l-00().935.Q696
Fax Number. (416) 585-4245
MiniltUe del
Aft'aIRI munlclpaJes
et du Logement
Olnlcllon _ __ p<0YinclauX d',rn4nage<nOOl
777. "'" Bay 14' 6l3ge
T"",,*,ON M5G2E5
T~(sansfrals): 1~
T~W: (416) 585-4245
1-8
~} Ontario
Hnr 27
3 19 ~H '97
ltlIBCCIBII\YIRJ>>
May 14, 1997
~'AY Z 3 1997
MUNlCIPALllY Of ClARINGTOO
!fAVOR'S OffICE
lHiENDA
Mr. Cecil W. Lundy
Regional Clerk
Regional Municipality of Durham
605 Rossland Road East
Whitby, Ontario
LlN 6A3
Subject:
Minister's Order delegating planning applications currently before the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housin~
Dear Mr. Lundy:
Pursuant to section 4 of the Plannine: Act. please find enclosed a copy of the Delegation Order
delegating those area official plans, official plan amendments and subdivisions currently being
processed by the Ministry. The applications are enclosed with this Order which is effective
May 13, 1997.
The effect of this order is three fold.
Firstly, decision-making authority for the delegated planning applications attached to the Order
now rests with Regional Council. Secondly, we suggest that you contact all the applicants to
inform them that their specific planning application haS been delegated and is now being
processed by the Region of Durham, if possible, the person to whom all future enquiries should
be made. Thirdly, the Region is responsible for ensuring that a complete copy of the
application is available for inspection by any interested party. When the final decision is made,
the file should not be destroyed in its entirety. Rather it should be kept in its current form or
micro-tiched (or equivalent) so that a copy is always available for any future needs.
Additioually, I wish to advise Council that any applications which have already been referred to
the Ontario Municipal Board remain with the Board and are unaffected by this Order.
,
While keeping in mind that we do not now have a copy of the planning applications, any
questions you may have ab..'lUt this delegation should be directed to George Soares, Area
- 2-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Planner at (416) 585-6066. By copy of this letter, we are hereby advising all review agencies
of the delegation of these planning applications.
The delegation of these planning applications reinforces the Government's commitment to put
more decision making at the loca1level and is in keeping with the Land Use Planning and
Protection Act (Bill 20). We thank you for your co-operation in this matter and we are
confident that you will carry out this function in a responsible and effective manner.
Yours truly,
dtiJA
Victor Doyle, M.C.I.P.
Senior Planner
Provincial Planning Services Branch
Enclosure
cc
Regional Chair
Regional Planning Commissioner
Area Municipal Mayors
Area Municipal Clerks
Area Municipal Planning Commissioners
The Honourable Chris Hodgson,
Minister of Natural Resources
The Honourable Noble Villeneuve, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Th~ Honourable Nonnan Sterling, Minister of Environment and Energy
The Honourable AI Palladini,
Minister of Transportation
The Honourable Marilyn Mushinski,
Minister of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation
Metro Toronto Region Conservation Authority ,
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority
School Boards
i DiSg:5UTION
! CLERK ~__ __
, .-
j i\'''' PV ' !l
i - .....r.. ~'.
j .''''''''''~'A'
1'\.-.;.,..,:-.\....
t-----_ __ . ____
; CL) ::--: IO:
L_~ ~
i
,
,-- -- -- .-
i,'n_'~ .
--11
, 11
11
", --'--1 'I
. '-"-J j
r ------ --- --- -! 4
. ..J'
C~~::- i?o~~=lt2~ _. 11
I
I.
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONFIDENTIAL
Until filed with the
Registrar of Regulations
Flied 3S O. Reo. i / j 1"';;,-
0, MAY 14 1997 I 1
Proposed Onta~o ,7'~'
Gazelle dateJ-f /{f ij j! ! /9'1 '/
REGISTRAR Of REelJl.ATIONS
N0261.E/PA-MUN-15-BM
l-LM
REGULATION MADE UNDER THE
PLANNING ACT
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY OF MINISTER TO APPROVE PLl\NS
OF SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM DESCRIPTIONS
1. The Minister's'authority to give approval under section 51
of the Act as it read on March 27, 1995 and continued by section
74,1 of the Act is delegated to the councils listed in Schedules
1 and 2 with respect to,
(a) applications for approval of plans of subdivision
whose file numbers are set out in Schedule 1; and
(b) applications for approval or exemption of condominium
descriptions under section 50 of the Condominium Act
whose file numbers are set out in Schedule 2.
2. (1) If any of the authority delegated to the council is in
turn delegated by the council to a committee of councilor an
appointed officer under subsection 5 (1) of the Act, the council
shall forward to the Minister a certified copy of the delegating
by-law withi~ 15 days of its passing.
(2) The delegation of authority set out in this Regulation is
not terminated by reason only that subsection (1) is not complied
with.
Schedule 1
FILE ~~JMBERS OF APPLICATIONS FOR
APPROVAL OF PLANS OF SUBDIVISION
1. County of Bruce
41-T':'76l07
41-T-78131
I
2 I
41-T-82002 I
41-T-83002
41-T-83004 I
41-T-84001
41-T-89003 I
41-T-89005
41-T-89008 I
41-T-89009
41-T-89010 I
41-T-89013
41-T-89015 I
41-T-89016
41-T-89017 I
41-T-89018
41-T-89020 I
41-T-89022
41-T-89023 I
;:~ 41-T-90001
41-T-90002 I
41-T-90003
41-T-90007
41-T-90013 I
41-T-90010
41-T-90015 I
41-T-90018
41-T-91005 I
41-T-91007
41-T-9100B I
41-T-91009
41-T-91011 I
41-T-9200l
41-T-'-92002 I
I
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
II
I
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
i
II
II
11
I
'I
II
I
2. County of Grey
41-T-93001
41-T-94001
41-T-95001
41-T-95002
~-----------
42-T-21944
42-T-23265
42-T-24875
42-T-75095
42-T-78038
42-T-78058
42-T-78061
42-T-81006
42-T-84002
42-T-85008
42-T-86007
42-T-87007
42-T-87011
42-T-87012
42-T-87014
42-T-87016
42-T-87017
42-T-87018
42-T-88001
42-T-88002
42-T-88003
42-T-88008
42-T-88009
42-T-88013
42-T-88017
42-7-88019
3
----
42-T-88021
42-T-88026
42-T-88029
42-T-89005
- ~~-%!h)O 9'--
42-T-89013
42-T-89014
42-T-89019
42-T-89021
42-T-89023
42-T-90002
42-T-90004
42-T-90005
42-T-90007
42-T-90008
42-T-90010
42-T-90011
42-T-90012
42-T-90013
42-T-90015
42-T-91001
42-T-91009
42-T-91011
42-T-91012
42-T-92002
42-T-92003
42-T-93001
42-T-94001
42-T-94002
42-T-94004
42-T-94005
42-T-95001
~
~-----------~-
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
2. County of Grey
3
41-T-93001
41-T-94001
41-T-95001
41-T-95002
42-T-21944
42-T-23265
42-T-24875
42-T-75095
42-T-78038
42-T-78058
42-T-78061
42-T-81006
42-T-84002
42-T-85008
42-T-86007
42-T-87007
42-T-87011
42-T-87012
42-T-87014
42-T-87016
42-T-87017
42-T-87018
42-T-88001
42-T-88002
42-T-88003
42-T-88008
42-T-88009
42-T-88013
42-T-88017
42-T-88019
I
4 I
42-T-88021 I
42-T-88026
42-T-88029 I I
42-T-89005
42-T-89009 I
42-T-89013
42-T-89014
42-T-89019 I
42-T-89021
42-T-89023 I
42-T-90002
42-T-90004 I
42-T-90005
42-T-90007 I
42-T-90008
42-T-90010 I
42-T-90011
42-T-90012 I
42-T-90013
42-T-90015 I
42-T-91001
42-T-91009 I
42-T-91011
42-T-91012 I
42-T-92002
42-T-92003
42-T-93001 I
42-T-94001
42-T-94002 I
42-T-94004
42-T-94005 I
42-T-95001
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5
42-T-95002
42-T-95003
42-T-95004
42-T-95005
42-T-95006
42-T-95007
42-T-95008
3. County of Hastings
12-T-86008
12-T-86012
12-T-87001
12-T-87006
12-T-87014
12-T-88019
12-T-89002
12-T-89005
12-T-89009
12-T-90001
12-T-90009
12-T-90011
12-T-90014
12-T-92001
12-T-92003
12-T-92004
12-T-93001
12-T-95001
12-T-96002
I
6 I
4. County of Huron
I
40-T-25088
40-T-78125 I
40-T-80060
40-T-84001 I
40-T-86001
40-T-88001 I
40-T-88002
5. County of Lambton I
38-T-75074 I
38-T-86011
38-T-87003 I
38-T-88001
38-T-89003 I
" 38-T-89009
38-T-89010 I
38-T-89017
38-T-90001 I
38-T-90004
38-T-91003 I
38-T-92003
38-T-92004
38-T-92005 I
38-T-92006
38-T-92007 I
38-T-93002
6. County of Oxford I
32-T-24288 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
7
7. County of Peterborouqh
15-T-84006
15-T-84008
15-T-84009
15-T-85002
15-T-85003
15-T~86007
15-T-86011
15-T-87003
15-T-88004
15-T-88010
15-T-880l4
15-T-88015
15-T-88020
15-T-89005
15-T-89013
15-T-89014
15-T-89015
15-T-90003
15-T-90006
15-T-90007
15-T-90011
15-T-90020
15-T-91003
15-T-91004
15-T-91006
15-T-91008
15-T-91010
15-T-92001
15-T-92003
15-T-92004
15-T-92005
15-T-92007
15-T-94001
15-T-95001
15-T-95002
15-T-95004
15-T-96001
I
I
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8. County of Prince Edward
13-T-88002
13-T-88004
9. County of Victoria
16-T-77103
16-T-77115
16-T-78072
16-T-79039
16-T-81004
16-T-83001
16-T-85007
16-T-87002
16-T-87004
16-T-87010
16-T-88006
16-T-88009
16-T-88010
16-T-88012
16-T-88013
16-T-89001
16-T-89002
16-T-89003
16-T-89007
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9
16-T-B9010
16-T-90003
16-T-90005
16-T-90009
16-T-91002
16-T-91003
16-T-91004
16-T-92001
16-T-92003
16-T-92006
16-T-92007
16-T-93001
16-T-93002
16-T-93003
10. County of Wellington
23-T-75335
23-T-790B7
23-T-B0039
23-T-B4005
23-T-B6007
23-T-B7005
23-T-B7017
23-T-B701B
23-T-B7022
23-T-B7023
23-T-B8007
23-T-BBOIO
23-T-BB012
23-T-BB014
23-T-BB015
23-T-BB022
23-T-88023
23-T-88027
23-T-89002
23-T-89004
23-T-89010
23-T-89011
23-T-89013
23-T-89014
23-T-90002
23-T-90003
23-T-90007
23-T-90008
23-T-90009
23-T-90010
23-T-90013
23-T-90014
23-T-90019
23-T-90021
23-T-90024
23-T-90026
23-T-91003
23-T-92003
23-T-92004
23-T-92012
23-T-92013
23-T-94002
23-T-94003
23-T-95001
23-T-96001
~o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
<,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, 1
. "
11. Regional Municipality of Durham
18-T-80035
18-1-80069
12. Regional Municipality of Baldimand-Norfolk
28-1-74250
28-1-79148
28-T-82003
28-T-87003
28-1-88003
28-T-88004
28-1-88007
28-1-89002
28-T-89006
28-1-89008
28-T-89007
28-T-89008
28-1-89009
28-1-89010
28-1-89011
28-T-89012
28-,-89016
28-i-90001
28-,-90005
28-1-90006
28-T-90007
28-T-90008
28-1-90012
I 28-1-90013
28-T-90014
28-T-91001
28-T-91004
28-T-91005
28-T-91006
28-T-91012
13. Regional Municipality of Niagara
14. City of Belleville
~5. City of Brantford
16. City of Chatham
26-T-22885
26-T-76121
12-T-84005
12-T-87005
12-T-88012
12-T-88013
12-T-88014
12-T-88015
29-T-75055
29-T-88019
29-T-87007
29-T-91002
29-T-92002
29-1-92008
36-T-81002
36-T-89003
36-T-90003
36-T-90004
12
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17. City of Cornwall
18. City of Guelph
13
36-T-91001
36-T-90001
04-T-87001
04-T-87006
04-T-87009
04-T-88001
04-T-88004
04-T-89004
04-T-89005
04-T-90001
04-T-90002
04-T-92001
04-T-93001
04-T-93003
23-T-77075
23-T-86004
23-T-87020
23-T-88008
23-T-88009
23-T-88013
23-T-88018
23-T-90001
23-T-90020
23-1-93001
43-T-93002
23-T-93008
23-T-93009
19. City of London
39-T-78066
39-T-79029
39-T-79042
39-T-84002
39-T-86006
39-T-87009
39-T-87020
39-T-88020
39-T-88023
39-T-88030
39-T-88054
39-T-89003
39-T-89004
39-T-89006
39-T-89009
39-T-89026
39-T-89031
39-T-89032
39-T-89037
39-T-90019
39-T-91003
39-T-91011
39-T-92002
39-T-92005
39-T-92012
39-T-92016
39-T-92020
39-T-92024
i
39-T-93001
39-T-93004
I
:~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17, City of Cornwall
18. City of Guelph
13
36-T-91001
36-T-90001
04-T-87001
04-T-87006
04-T-87009
04-T-88001
04-T-88004
04-T-89004
04-T-89005
04-T-90001
04-T-90002
04-T-92001
04-T-93001
04-T-93003
23-T-77075
23-T-86004
23-T-87020
23-T-88008
23-T-88009
23-T-88013
23-T-88018
23-T-90001
23-T-90020
23-T-93001
23-T-93002
23-T-93008
23-T-93009
19. City of London
.""
39-T-78066
39-T-79029
39-T-79042
39-T-84002
39-T-86006
39-T-87009
39-T-87020
39-T-88020
39-T-88023
39-T-88030
39-T-88054
39-T-89003
39-T-89004
39-T-89006
39-T-89009
39-T-89026
39-T-89031
39-T-89032
39-T-89037
39-T-90019
39-T-91003
39-T-91011
39-T-92002
39-T-92005
39-T-92012
39-T-92016
39-T-92020
39-T-92024
,
39-T-93001
39-T-93004
I
:~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
19. City of London
"
39-T-78066
39-T-79029
39-T-79042
39-T-84002
39-T-86006
39-T-87009
39-T-87020
39-T-88020
39-T-88023
39-T-88030
39-T-88054
39-T-89003
39-T-89004
39-T-89006
39-T-89009
39-T-89026
39-T-89031
39-T-89032
39-T-89037
39-T-90019
39-T-91003
39-T-91011
39-T-92002
39-T-92005
39-T-92012
39-T-92016
39-T-92020
39-T-92024
39-T-93001
39-T-93004
- ,
- ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
15
39-T-93011
39-T-94004
39-T-94006
39-T-94008
20. City of North Bay
48-T-83004
48-T-85001
21. city of Owen Sound
42-T-90003
42-T-90006
42-T-91002
42-T-91005
42-T-93002
22. City of Peterborouqh
15-T-75515
15-T-87006
15-T-88023
15-T-89009
22. City of Pembroke
47-T-76204
47-T-90003
47-T-90009
47-T-93001
58-T-88006
58-T-89005
58-T-91005
58-T-91006
58-T-91007
58-T-92008
58-T-92011
58-T-92012
58-T-92014
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
24. City of Sarnia
38-T-79015
38-T-86002
38-T-86004
38-T-89001
38-T-89014
38-T-90007
38-T-90011
25. City of Sault Ste. Marie
57-T-86014
57-T-87011
57-T-88001
57-T-88007
57-T-88008
57-T-88012
57-T-88015
57-T-89001
57-T-89003
26. City of Thunder Bay
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
27. City of Timmins
28. City of Trenton
29. City of Windsor
30. Town of Orangeville
17
56-T-86005
56-T-87002
56-T-87003
12-T-85002
12-T-85003
12-T-89003
12-T-90003
37-T-89023
37-T-89028
37-T-92008
37-T-92009
37-T-92010
37-T-92011
22-T-85005
Schedule 2
FILE ~ruMBERS OF APPLICATIONS FOR
APPROVAL OR EXEMPTION
OF CONDOMINIUM DESCRIPTIONS
1. County of Bruce
41-CD-83001
41-CD-89001
41-CO-89003
41-CO-89004
41-CO-90001
2. County of Grey
42-CO-86001
42-CO-87002
42-CD-88002
42-CO-89004
42-CD-90004
42-CD-90005
42-CO-91001
42-CD-92001
42-CD-93001
3. County of Bastings
12-CD-89001
4. County of Victoria
16-CD-89003
5. County of Wellington
23-CO-87005
23-CO-87006
23-CO-89001
23-CO-94001
6. Regional Municipality of Baldimand-Norfolk
28-CO-92002
28-CO-92003
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I 19
I 7 . Regional Municipality of Niagara
I 26-CD-77028
26-CD-77029
I 26-CD-86003
26-CD-86007
I 26-CD-87007
26-CD-87010
1 26-CD-87012
26-CD-88008
I 26-CD-8900S
26-CD-89009
I 26-CD-9001S
26-CD-90001
I 26-CD-91003
26-CD-91011
26-CD-92001
1 26-CD-9S002
I 8 . City of Brantford
I 29-CD-90004
29-CD-90007
I 9. City of Brockvil1e
I 08-CD-84002
I 10, City of Chatham
36-CD-89003
I
I
I
11. City of Guelph
12.City of Kingston
13. City of London
23-C[;-84001
23-C[;-90001
23-C0-91001
23-CD-91002
23-CU-92003
23-CD-92004
I
I
-:'J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10-CD-86001
39-C-8600S
39-Cr-86008
39-([-86009
39-CD-87015
39-C!:-88002
39-CD-88013
39-C;:;-88017
39-CD-88019
39-CD-88021
39-C-88023
39-CD-88031.
39-C-88044
39-cr:-88046
39-Gl-88049
39-C[;-89003
39-CD-89014
39-CD-89026
39-CD-89028
39-CD-89029
I
I 21
I 39-CO-90012
39-CO-91002
I 39-CO-91004
39-CO-91010
I 39-CO-92016
39-CO-92017
1 39-CO-93001
39-cO-93012
I 39-cO-94002
39-CO-94005
39-CO-94006
I 39-CO-94008
I 14. City of Orillia
I 43-CO-91010
43-CO-93004
I 43-CO-93005
43-CO-93006
I 15. City of Pembroke
I 47-CO-89001
I 16. City of St. Thomas
34-CO-90001
I 34-CO-91002
I 17. City of Thunder Bay
I 58-CO-91003
I
I
18. City of Timmins
5€-CD-88001
19. City of Windsor
37-CD-89004
. /! /~
~/ '~_/'/.
/ "-;& /, " ;?"L?' /J / .'
f "IL/a/.,,// .'.1
. ... ... 1" . V' . . . . , . . V.I. . . .
MinisteF of Municipal Affairs
, and Housing
1\'I'l ' (/.-41 \
Dated at Toronto on .., tl;).. .~..,..., 1997,
.:~
?')
~L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--~~~.,
Filed as O. Reg. / l,-, 19' I~ ,
CONFIDENTIAL
Until filed with the
Registrar of Regulations
On MAY 1 4 1997
Proposed qni4no "I ;;i:.{",
:~:~~::~j~:~~-iU;~IO~S 77 '
N0262.E/PA-MUN-15-RM
l-LM
REGULATION MADE, UNDER THE
PLANNING ACT
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY OF MINISTER TO REGIONAL
MUNICIPALITIES: OFFICIAL PLANS AND 1\MENDMENTS
1. The Minister's authority under section 17 of the Act as it
read on March 27, 1995 and continued by section 74.1 of the Act
with respect to official plans and amendments to official plans
is delegated to,
(a) the council of The Regional Municipality of Durham with
respect to official plans and amendments to official
plans for the local municipalities of The Regional
Municipality of Durham whose file numbers are set out
in Schedule 1;
(b) the council of The Regional Municipality of Haldimand-
Norfolk with respect to official plans and amendments
to official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfolk whose file
numbers are set out in Schedule 2;
(c) the council of The Regional Municipality of Hamilton-
Wentworth with respect to official plans and amendments
to official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth whose file
numbers are set out in Schedule 3;
(d) the council of The Regional Municipality of Niagara
with respect to official plans and amendments to
official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Niagara whose file numbers are
set out in Schedule 4;
(e) the council of The Regional Municipality of York with
respect to official plans and amendments to official
plans for the local municipalities of The Regional
Municipality of York whose file numbers are set out in
Schedule 5.
2. (1) If any of the authority delegated to the councils in
section 1 is in turn delegated by the council to a committee of
councilor an appointed officer under subsection 5 (1) of the
Act, the council shall forward to the Minister a certified copy
of the delegating by-law within 15 days of its passing.
(2) The delegation of authority set out in this Regulation is
not terminated by reason only that subsection (1) is not complied
with.
Schedule 1
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
1. City of Oshawa
IB-OP-2930
IB-OP-2930-024
IB-OP-2930-033
2. Town of Ajax
.;
IB-OP-2593-022
IB-OP-2593-033
3. Town of Pickering
18-0P-0023-005
IB-OP-0023-013
18-0P-0023-032
4, Town of Whitby
IB-OP-0013-012
18-0P-0013-063
18-0P-0013-071
IB-OP-0013-072
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-.........-,~----.,...-
Filed as O. Reg. //;.0 I;J' itil
CONFIDENTIAL
Until filed with the
Registrar of Regulations
On MAY 1 4 1997
Proposed qn~no /'1 1iJ);~ ~
Gazette dateJ/lfit~.J /t I H :
REGISTRAR OF RE6uIATIONS
N0262.E/PA-MUN-15-RM
l-LM
REGULATION MADE UNDER THE
PLANNING ACT
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY OF MINISTER TO REGIONAL
MUNICIPALITIES: OFFICIAL PLANS AND 1\MENDMENTS
1. The Minister's authority under section 17 of the Act as it
read on March 27, 1995 and continued by section 74.1 of the Act
with respect to official plans and amendments to official plans
is delegated to,
(a) the council of The Regional Municipality of Durham with
respect to official plans and amendments to official
plans for the local municipalities of The Regional
Municipality of Durham whose file numbers are set out
in Schedule 1;
(b) the council of The Regional Municipality of Haldimand-
Norfolk with respect to official plans and amendments
to official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfolk whose file
numbers are set out in Schedule 2;
(cl the council of The Regional Municipality of Hamilton-
Wentworth with respect to official plans and amendments
to official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth whose file
numbers are set out in Schedule 3;
(d) the council of The Regional Municipality of Niagara
with respect to official plans and amendments to
official plans for the local municipalities of The
Regional Municipality of Niagara whose file numbers are
set out in Schedule 4;
I
(el the council of The Regional Municipality of York with
respect to official plans and amendments to official
plan,S for the local municipalities of The Regional
Municipality of York whose file numbers are set out in
Schedule 5.
2. (1) If any of the authority deleqated to the councils in
section 1 is in turn delegated by the council to a committee of
councilor an appointed officer under subsection 5 (1) of the
Act, the council shall forward to the Minister a certified copy
of the delegating by-law within 15 days of its passing.
(2) The delegation of authority set out in this Regulation is
not terminated by reason only that subsection (1) is not complied
with,
Schedule 1
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURIlAM
1 . Ci ty of Oshawa
18-0P-2930
18-0P-2930-024
18-0P-2930-033
"i.
2. Town of Ajax
18-0P-2593-022
18-0P-2593-033
3. Town of Pickering
18-0P-0023-005
18-0P-0023-013
18-0P-0023-032
4 . Town of Whitby
18-0P-0013-012
18-0P-0013-063
18-0P-0013-071
18-0P-0013-072
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3
I 5. Township of Brock
18-0P-2592
I 6. Township of Scugog
18-0P-2591
I 7. Township of Uxbridge
18-0P-2929-015
I Schedule 2
I REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALTON
1. City of Burlington
I 24-0P-0128-105
I 24-0P-0128-108
24-0P-0128-l42
24-0P-0218-081
I 2. Town of Halton Hills
'.
I 24-0P-Ol96
24-0P-1l96-004
I 24-0P-1l96-005
24-0P-1l96-008
I 3. Town of Oakville
I 24-0P-0207-010
24-0P-0207-012
I 24-0P-0207-013
24-0P-0207-014
I ~ . Town of Milton
24-0P-0208
I
I
I
Schedule 3
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HAMILTON-WENTWORTH
1. City of Hamilton
25-0P-0058
25-0P-0058-027
2. City of Stoney Creek
25-0P-0063
3. Town of Ancaster
25-0P-0059
4. Town of Dundas
25-0P-0190-005
5. Town of Flamborough
25-0P-0066
Township of Glanbrook
25-0P-0064
schedule 4
REGION OF NIAGARA
City of Niagara Falls
26-0P-2226-071
26-0P-2226-202
26-0P-2227-015
4
I
..
.
.
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
.
I
.
I'
I
I
I 5
2. City of Port Colbourne
I 26-oP-0035-004
I 26-0P-0035-032
26-0P-0035-053
I 26-0P-0035-0S4
3. City of St. Catherines
I 26-0P-0004-041
I 26-0P-0004-074
26-0P-0004-086
I 26-0P-0004-094
I 4. Ci ty of Thorold
26-0P-0201
I 5. City of WeIland
I 2E-OP-OIOS-071
26-0P-OIOS-072
I 26-0P-OI05-076
26-0P-OIOS-088
I 26-0P-003S-0S4
I f. Town of Fort Erie
I 26-0P-0066
26-0P-4003-040
I . . Town of Grimsby
I 26-0P-0067
26-0P-IOO4-029
I
I
8. Town of Lincoln
26-0P-0068
9. Town of Niagara on the Lake
26-0P-3118-0S2
10. Town of Pelham
2 6-0P-387 5-013
26-0P-3875-014
Schedule 5
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
1 . City of Vaughan
'.
. '.
19-0P-lSOO-210
19-0P-lSOO-3S0
19-0P-lSOO-400
19-0P-lSOO-4S0
2. Town of Aurora
19-0P-0026
3. Township of King
19-0P-OOOS-047
4 . Town of Markham
19-0P-OOlS
19-0P-0016
19-0P-0016-005
i
19-0P-0016-026
6
'.
I
.
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,'I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
1
1
7
5 . Town of Newmarket
19-0P-9429
6. Town of Richmond Hill
19-0P-0182
19-0P-0182-029
19-0P-0182-030
19-0P-0182-046
7. Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville
19-0P-0032
19-0P-0032-027
I
!
i
a~d Housing
Dated at Toronto on
~Vr~' i ;;'f.\
......... .'-.... .-(
1997.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e5,:26/97 14:e4:52 EST: ASSOCIATIOII Of'?-)
MAY-26-97 MON 02:43 PM A M 0
COUNCIL INFOBKAnON
9856234169 CLERK-Clarington Nun
FAX NO. 4169297574
. I-g
Page ee2
P. 01
Member Communication
I' ~n Assoclalion of
\ 1,";.',/\ ) Municipalities
..r _/ afOntano
For Your
Onformation
260 e IOt)r st. ElIIt, Suite 701
l'Ol'Onto,oN M"W 1Ee
T.l: (-41&) tl2.i~7S7~. fax; (<416) 929.7574
em.l(: IImo~.mo.rnunleom.eom
For immediate attention
NEWS FROM THE FISCAL AND LABOUR POLICY PORTFOLIO
ISSUE:
AMO would like to advise Its members of a number of developments in the fiscal and labour policy portfolio.
THE FACTS;
The following is a brief summary of the latest developments on fiscal and labour policy Issues, Including the status of
various pieces of legislation related to the Who Does What Initiative.
1. Bill 84: Fire Proteetkm and Prevention Act, 1996
The Fire Protection and Prevention Act received Third Reading on May 14 ,1997. While there were amendments made to
the leglslalion as a result of the standing committee hearings process, tile amendments are not expecied to have significant
implications for municipalities. The key amendments relate to hours of work, bargaining unit exclusions, enforcement and
fines and some definitional changes.
2. 8i//105: FaIr Municipal Finance Act
The Fair Municipal Finance Act. which will enable the new assessment and tax policy system to be operational by January ~
1, 1998, is sche<luled for Third Reading on Monday May 26, 1997. .Despite AMO's efforts to have the amendment withdrawn
which makes it mandatory for municipalities to provide tax reliel program for low-income seniors and persons with disabilities.
this amendment has been included in the re-printed version of the Bill. The other amendments to the Bill can be fairly
characterized as housekeeping amendments and are not expected to have major implications for municipalities. On a
positive note. the amended legislation gives municipalities a clear legislative authority to Issue an interim tax levy Of up to
50% of lasl years taxes. thereby addressing concerns from municipalities about potential cash flow problems resulting from
the late roll retu'l1 in 1998.
3. Bill 105: Police Services Amendments Act, 1997
The standing ccmmittee hearings on Bill IDS ended on May 13, 1997. AMO has learned that ~s recommendation to have
withdrawn. an amendment to Section 7 of the Police Services Act. which wouid have restricted many communities from
contracting police se!Vices from an neighboUring municipality, has been given serious attention. Clause by clause analysis
of Bin 105 will take place on Monday May 26" and Tuesday May 27". As well. AMO understands that OPP costing figures
wlll be released in early June. .
Mav 2-e. ,og7
212
05/26/97 14:e5:34 EST: ASSOCIATIon Of'?-)
MAY-26-97 MON 02:44 PM A M 0
905&234169 CLERK-CIarington Nun Page 383
FAX NO. 4169297574 P. 02
I
News 'fom the AICIl! and \.abOUf Poll<: PCll1falla
I
I
Momb~r COf11munlc.ll.t1on FYI:
4. Work proceeding on labour relations issues
AMO has learned thai the Province will be formally consulting with the municipal sector on a number of labour relations
issues. Stay tuned for lurther details.
AMO has been advised that a number of municipalities have been approached by the Canadian Union 01 Public Employees
(CUPE) regarding their concerns about AMO's position on successor rights. AMO will be meeting with representatives from
CUPE in earty June to discuss this issue and other labour relations issues af1ecting municipalities. In developing AMO's
policy positions on labour issues, it is important to remember that a primal)' goal for the Association has been 10 secure
maximum flexibility for municipalities sO they wlll be able to manage effectively in the face 01 new service responsibilities (as
a result of Who Does What), shrinking revenues (e.g_ the loss of the Municipal Support Grant of S667 million) and the
challenges of municipal restructuring. AMO has always recognized the value of municipal employees and has emphasized
the importance of protecting seniority rights. However, in order to maximize efliciency and manage costs, municipalities
need ways to ensure that unfair and unreasonable arbitration awards are minimized.
I
I
I
5. Canada-Ontario Infraatructure Works Program Phase 2
On May 2.1997. an agreement was reached between the Federal Governme~t and !he Govemment of Ontario on Phase I
2 of the Infrastructure Works Program. Given that there were vel)' few detailS available at the lime of the announcement,
municipalities were anxiously awaiting further Information about the program. On May 14, 1997. the Ministers of Municipal
Affairs and Housing and Transportation 'provided these details. In an infonnation package to all heads. of council. I
municipalities were advised of their allocation and the process for applying. .A key date to remember Is June 13, 1997.111ls
is the deadline for having applications received by the Province. Given this tight time frame, you will receive an application
fonn and program guidelines shortly. If you have not received your infonnation package or have further questions, please I
contact the COIW unit atthe Minlstl)' 01 Municipal At/airs (416)585-4040 or the Ministry of Northem Development end Mines
unit at (705) 670-7315.
For more Information contact:
Joanne Meddaaul, Palley Advlsor, Palieyand Gavernment Relations (416)929-7573 el. I
320 E-mail, Imeddaoul@amo.munlcam.carn.
Transmission problems:
Maria Pontes, Admtnlstrative Assistant, Policy and Government Relations (416)929. I
7573 exl. 326 or via E-mail: mpontea@amo.lnunicom.com.
May 2G.l~7
------..--.--.------...--...1
DIS'2U'-'~UT10N l
l....'r..,!; t
t I....LLt;,r\ -~ ----. {\
1 ~ .11.
i "Ie" 81'___.__ '~J.::l:
. .
I\f1' -.....1 ~ I r ..
L. "~'b:"~.. . '.u'_ .-' _.__n' i
1 CDPIES TD: ' i
~____ I ---1
i _i__~_
!___ I 1
!..--- -1 - . ~i I
i t=~
,---------
j
1 I
,-'- ..-----r- ~
: ______ ---- --i----,
cn. I..,
:~-~n~:~n_;=1-~>- J I
.' 11 t?k:.:f,.d.-_._.,..",,,,,
ml
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
The Corporation of A
the Township of. ~
Cavan \,npo}
p.o. Box 189, MlLLBROOK, Ontario LOA 1G~4J 28 12 39 PH '97
(705) 932-2929
I-lO
May 15, 1997
Honorable Chris Hodgson
Minister of Natural Resources
Room 6301, Whitney Block
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A lW3
Dear Mr. Hodgson:
As Reeve of the Township of Cavan, I have been quite involved with the Peterborough
County/City Restructuring exercise presently underway. I am writing this l~tter to you today on a
matter oflocal and provincial concern of which I request your immediate .att~ntion.
Contained in the Peterborough County/City Municipal Review Executive Summary and
Recommendations, dated May 1, 1997, there is one recommendation which I feel vert strongly
\viti jeopardize the conservation investment Cavan and the other 12 municipalities in the County
have made in one of our local conservation authorities. Recommendation number 31 reads: "The
Otonabee Region Conservation Authority be dissolved and its necessary planning and regulatory
responsibilities be assumed by the Upper Tier planning department."
I believe that this recommendation disregards the changes your government has implemented to
make conservation authoIities more cost-effective, more efficient and accountable, and also
disregards the strength of municipalities working together for the common good of our
environment on a watershed basis.
As 1 understand it, the provincial government has restructured conservation authorities and
defined their role and responsibilities through recent changes to provincial acts and associated
regulations. The government has identified specific grant allocations for provincial priorities
addressed on a watershed basis, and made these available only through local conservation
authorities.
I also understand that recent changes to the Conservation Authorities Act make it clear as to how
conservation authorities are formed, ex,panded or even dissolved. My municipality does not
understand why this matter needs to concern an upper tier level of government which has no
.../2
..
Hon. Chris Hodgson
May 15, 1997
Page 2.
direct link to conservation authorities. Cavan Township, given its geography, lies within three
watershed regions and therefore is directly involved with the Otonabee Region, Ganaraska Region
and Kawartha Region Conservation Authorities. I feel very strongly that the municipal
restructuring exercise is not the forum in which to discuss the dissolution oflocal conservation
authorities.
I would appreciate confirmation of the facts presented above and also your position on the
municipal restructuring process as it pertains to Ontario's conservation authorities.
Yours very truly,
Neal Cathcart,
Re??kf~/
NClny t..??C>(,/
cc: Conservation Ontario
AMO
ORCA Municipalities
GRCA Municipalities
KRCA Municipalities
!
1
,
1 :j,C~~. fj;-'
,
; qRIG}Nftt \'
l .~ ~..... ..... .....(
1 '0""1[', .,j.
~u '..U, .... .....
!--..
L._
,
-~~"..., :{
+
\'___~
-...,....-.-,--
i___n.
"~1
~-
-~""===~
,
.
.
.......-.
I
!-
i ~!
-_.,-,.--'......
'- . 7:'''C''~~
OD3 -. (5.~<<_,_;
...- .-"-.-.--- --_...---.",,~,.,,=
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I tl- v pi/'
/JPP~~
I;:f?- ~~ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
,
II
,
II
I
!
I
,
COUNCIL INFOBKATION
I-l1
.B<
1/'"
Clarington Museums
Clarke Museum & Archives
'1 ~\'
[I ,~~
'IU ---L
..,
P.O. Box 152, Orono, Ontario, LOB 1MO
(905) 983-9243 E-Mail cma-chin@durham.net
The regular monthly meeting of the Clarke Museum & Arcbives Board of Directors
was held at 7:00 PM Tuesday May 6th at the Museum in Kilby. #1997-05.
PRESENT: Past Chairman, Donna Robins; Chairman, G. Brian lung; Vice-Chairman,
Valerie St. Croix; Treasurer, Donald Igbokwe; Councillor, Ann Dreslinski
Councillor, David Scott; Recording Secretary, Gavin M. Stephenson
REGRETS: Curator, Mark Jackman; Executive Secretary, Angela Harris; Board
Member, Fran Austman
ABSENT:
Board Member, Darlene Sullivan
**97-16** Moved by Ann, Seconded by Donald, to adopt the agenda as presented.
Carried.
**97-17** Moved by Donald, Seconded by Valerie, to adopt the minutes of meeting
#1997-04 as printed.
Carried.
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
BEQUEST PROGRAMME . !D-;~~UT\O-N
I .
Donald reported that he had spoken with Mark and said that the Bequest pf<:\gfl ----
should be ready to go to council before council rises for the fall election. j ~CK. BY
i ORIGINAL T :.
,
1 ~QP\ES TO:
i
~----
-'
i --
i
'--
:=----:::==~-i=:::
7086 Old Kirby School Road. Hwy 35/115 at Region Rd. 9 Kirby. O:nt~riO"p~'~~~~-, /
- 2 -
CORRESPONDENCE
Donna read correspondence from the following:
Frederick Horvath, Property Manager, Municipality of Clarington, 40
Temperance Street, BowmanvilIe, Ontario, LlC 3A6. Regarding the
Museum's pledge of $5000.00 towards the capital construction of the
storage building. (Attached)
Gavin read correspondence from the following:
Nancy Taylor, Deputy Treasurer, Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temper-
ance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario, LI C 3A6. Regarding the letter of rep-
resentation for the auditors. (Attached)
Ann Dreslinski, Orono Town Hall Board, Municipality of Clarington, 40
Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario, Lie 3A6. Regarding the
centennial of the Orono Town Hall planning meeting on May 13, 1997.
(Attached) ."
Ann spoke briefly about the plans to commemorate the centennial of the Orono Town
Hall. She noted the problems the building has with accessibility for the disabled. The
Town Hall Board are hoping to organise one event each mont.1t at the Town Hall during
the centenary year. She invited members of the board to attend the meeting.
Brian and Donald will attend the meeting and Donna will attend if she is able to be back
in time for the meeting. Mark had previously made his intention to attend the meeting.
TREASURER'S REPORT
Donald presented the month end accounts and expenses.
**97-18** Moved by Donald, Seconded by Donna, that these accounts be paid as
presented. (Attached)
Carried.
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-:\ -
CURATOR'S REPORT
Gavin read Mark's report.
OPEN HOUSE
There were 147 people in attendance at the open house. The message cards in the time
capsule raised $40.00. Mark has had many positive post-event comments. He thanks
Angela for arranging the refreshments, and very special thanks to Valerie and Harold for
the donation of the cake.
BOOK SALE
Mark reported that attendance at the book sale was 290 raising a total of $778.00. This
works out to a $2.68 per person average.
~
For comparison the sale figures for 1996 have been included. On a yearlY sales total of
$1027.00 the per person sales averaged $0.95 in 1996.
SALES BREAKDOWN
I . -~.--_."-'.'.'.
Special:'6ijfr" . ..,~
Friday $203.00
Saturdav 208.00
Total $411.00
..~.;~;;~~'Jii~~ '1
$119.00
248.00
$367.00
Friday
Saturday
Total
COMPARISON FIGURES
I
II
e
I
II
,
I-
I
I.,,;,:';'? .1996<>1
Spring $624.00
Fall 403.00
Total $1,027.00
Ann noted that she had been involved in the Ganaraska Conservation Authority Pancake
Breakfast on the same day as the book sale and was talking to several people who had
been at the book sale prior to coming to the Conservation Authority or who were on their
way to the book sale following the Conservation Authority. She suggested. that there
might be some advantage in co-ordinating these two events next year with respect to
ad,'ertising, since the Conservation Authority advertises further into Hope Township.
UPCOMING FUNORAISING EVENTS
I
June :\rd is the launch date for the Museum's 50150 raffle. Ticket sales will continue
until the draw date November 29th at 2:00pm. The draw will be part of the Museum's
Children's Christmas work:<,hop.
- 4 -
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 6th and 7th is the next Book Sale. The sale will follow the same format as the pre-
vious sale. with the Member's sale on the Friday evening and the Public sale on the Sat-
urday. There will be volunteers needed for the Saturday sale especially in the mid after-
noon to help with packing up after the sale. One additional person may be needed for the
duration of the day if tables are set up between the buildings for additional books. This
should also help to prevent the overcrowding problems that could occur in the storage
building.
July 1st is the joint celebration of Canada Day with the Bowmanville Museum. The
event will take place at the Bowmanville site. There will be a Canada Day T-shirt pro-
motion with the Bowmanville Museum. A sponsor for the T-shirts has been arranged to
cover a portion of the cost of the shirts.
There should be a decision form the Millar Foundation in July regarding the Museum's
application for a $7000.00 grant for the restoration of the Cutter.
September 12th and 13th is the final Book Sale for 1997. This sale will follow the same
format as before.
The Museum will co-host an Antique Show and Sale in conjunction with the
BowmanviIle Museum in October_ The exact date is yet to be arranged. The sale will
take place at a site to be chosen. Neither Museum site is under consideration.
The Museum will co-sponsor a Bus Trip to the Niagara Peninsula in October with the
Bowmanville Museum.' The destination for the trip will be the new Butterfly Arboretum,
and two other stops.
Mark has projected the fundraising total for 1997 at $12,000.00.
The schedule of events and workshops for July through December will be distributed at
the June meeting and released with the June Newsletter.
OTHER MA TIERS \ NEW BUSINESS
Valerie has volunteered to contact the Ministry of Heritage to enquire about free items
for Canada Day.
Gavin mentioned the fact that if a flag is included there is currently no flagpole at the
Museum to use the flag.
Brian is willing to pick up and help set up a new cedar pole for the flag if one can be
located. The board is encouraged to try to locate a pole in time for Canada Day.
Donald has been in contact with the ClBC regarding electronic banking. He has applied
fi)r a Client Card on the Museum's behalf to acquire a PIN number for use with
electronic banking. He will try accessing the account balance.s again once this arriveJ;.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
11
II
I
I
- 5-
Brian thanked those in attendance at the Grand Opening and a special thanks to Valerie
for the Cake and to Darlene and Angela for their help in serving coffee.
**97-19** Moved by Ann, Seconded by Donna, that a letter be drafted to Fred
Horvath informing him that the $5000.00 pledge will be paid in instalments
and that the full amount will be paid by the end of the year.
Carried.
**97-20** Moved by Donald, Seconded, by David, that the next meeting of the Board
of Directors be held on Tuesday June 3rd, 1997 at 7:00 pm.
Carried.
**97-21** Moved by David, Seconded, by Valerie, that the meeting adjourn at 8:07
pm.
Carried.
Gavin M. Stephenson,
Recording Secretary
G. Brian Jung
Chairman
APRIL
Clarke Museum & Archives
For the Month Of April 1997
Bank Balances:(May 1, 1997)
Chequing
Fund Raising
Savings
Endowment
Total
--$.
CHq. Num Payee C
90 Mark Jackman
CIBC Visa Equipment Rental
91 Mark Jackman - Petty Cash
92 Xerox Canada
93 Ultramar Ltd. - Oil Orono(final}
94 B.F.B Sales Ltd.
95 Consumers Gas-kirby
96 Consumers Gas-kirby-storage
97 General Distribution Services
98 Ontario Historical Society
99 Municip.ofClgton-lnV#1690,1694
100 Grand & Toy
101 Ontario Hydro - Kirby
102 Ontario Hydro - Kirby - Storage
103 Bell
Total Month Ending 4/30/97
Category
Storage material
Administration Expences : Other, please spec
Copier Lease
Maintenance Expenses: HydrolHeatlWater
Conservation Supplies
Maintenance Expenses
Maintenance Expenses
Inventory For Resale
Membership fee
Payroll, Consumer Gas
Administration Expences : Office Suppfles
Maintenace Expenses
Maintenance Expenses
Administration Expences : Telephone
SO"M~7J
\
Page 1
43,514.91
843.00
0.00
1.227.86
45.585.77
Amount
88.55
1.44
184.7
647.13
158.47
236.24
84.96
82.74
437.74
.;20.00
8,264.15
110.76
134.5
74.34
139.37
10665.09
..
I
.
I
I
.
.
.
I
.
I
I
.
.
.
I
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
II
!
I
II
I
I
I
,
_e1a;r;;gt;;n
ONTARIO
April 21, 1997
Mrs. Donna Robbins
Clarke Museum
P. O. Box 152
Orono, Ontario
LOB 1 MO
Dear Donna:
Now that the storage building for the Clarke Museum is complete, I would like to remind
you of your pledge of $5,000.00 towards the capital construction costs of the project.
Please inform me as to the timing of this pledge to the Municipality.
Thank you in advance, I remain,
Yours truly,
./
Frederick Horvath, R.D.M.R., R.R.F.A.
Property Manager
FH:sa
pc: Nancy Taylor, Deputy Treasurer
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
'. ~ I '-ll' I. n ... N C I <; [ n fE' . 60 w Y "N'" tiE. 0 H T A III 0 .-, 'C ]" r, . I q (t" I r. 7 J ].1' q . f ~ ~ ~ ~:> .,,, q
@
May 2, 1997
Clarke Museum
c/o Donald Igbokwe, Treasurer
1 Rutherford Drive
Newcastle, Ontario
LIB 1G7
Dear Mr. Igbokwe:
._Cilari.;"g'iY;;n
ONTARIO
H:REPMAN.TR
Please fmd enclosed the representation letter, which is to be provided to the auditors in
connection with the audit of your board's financial statements.
Please sign in the appropriate location and forward to Deloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants
in the postage paid envelope.
Thank Y9U for your immediate attention in this regard.
Yours truly,
/'
{tfJfJJ1 i4
Nancy Taylor, B.B.A., C.A.,
Deputy Treasurer.
NT!hjl
Enclosures
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
V..lll...... .....Cl.. .(\OWt.("NYIII('OHIAnl(J'11CJ"(,.('JO~16~) _,):':1-'....,....
'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
@I
............1
I
I
I
I
I
f AUTlqQRITY MINUTES - MAY 21, 1997 _ PAGE 4
(3)
Staff Repon #4155-97
Planning File Traeking Report - May 1997
Res. #55
Moved by J. Gray
Seconded by C. Elliott
THAT Staff Report #4155-97 (attached as Schedule H-Ito H-3) be received for information
and filed.
CARRIED
(4)
Staff Repon #4153-97
Authority Interests in Ontario Municipal Board Heariugs/Clariugton Official Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
II
I
I
,
,
Res. #56
Moved by B. Nicholson
Seconded by J. Gray
THAT Staff RefUJrt #4153-97 (attached as Schedule H-4 to H-7) be received for information; and,
THAT staff be directed to provide an up-date on the stotus of these referrals prior to the commencement of the
Ontario Municipal Board Hearings
CARRIED
(5)
Slaff Repon #4156-97 (attached as Schedule H-8 to H-23)
Application for Construction, Port Darlington Marina
R. Anderson declared an interest in Staff Report #4156-97 as his falber owns a condominium in lbe vicinity of lbe Pon Darlington
Marina and did not take pan in discussion or voting on this matter.
R. Johnson, Vice-chairman, assumed the CIair_
Res. #57
Moved by L. Hannah
Seconded by J. Gray
THAT the application be approved, subject to the foUowing conditWns:
1. The project shall be carried out according to the plans and specijkatWns submitted in suppon of the application,
in particular, Port Darlington Marino. Hotel: Floor Plans, Elevations, Sections, Drawing AI, daJed March
10/95, as amended by the following conditUlns.
2. The owner shall instaH acceptabh flood proofing barriers ut all entrance locations into. the moin building on the
south and east bottom floor waUs.
3. The owner shall maintain a supply of sandbags on the site to use as cuMitionaI active flood proofing
protection.
4. A11 internal stairways to the first floor shall be maintained in a clear and unobstructed manner, in order to allow
for the removal of putrons and property during a flood event.
5. An disturbed areas shall be seeded, sodded or stabiliud in some other manner, acceptable to the Authority.
CARRIED
R. Anderson resU1I1ed the Cbair.
AUTHORITY MINUTES - MAY 21, 1997 - PAGE 5
~
I
,
I
.
.
.
HEARINGS - ONTARIO REGULATION #145/90
Location:
114150-97 (attached as Schedule 3- I to 3-4)
W97.079-F.C
James Stanger
To construct a new foundation and basement and a second storey addition to an existing dwelling and place
associated fill.
27 Eastbourne Beach Road
Part of Lot 27, Broken Front Concession, Whitby
Staff Report:
File No.:
Applicant:
Application:
Mr. & Mrs. S=ger were in attendance and stated that they had reviewed the staff report, but were concerned regarding Item #2 of
the recommendation, specifically entering into a Save-Hannless Agreement with the Authority; in addition to the two existing save..
HannIess Agreements with the Authority currently registered on their title. D. Wright made a brief presentation \0 the Board.
Discussion ensued.
Res. 1158
Moved by I. Harrell
Seconded by B. Nicholson
.
THAT the application be approved subject to the following conditions:
.
~;':
I. The project slul1l be carried out according w the plans and specifications submitted in support of the
application. .
2. The owner slul1l enter into a Save-Hat7llkss Agreement with the Authority, to be registered on title at the
owner's expense !!I. register a consolidated Save-Harmless Agreement with the two existing Save-Hat7llkss .
Agreements currently on tide, in a manner acceptllble to the Authority and at the owner's erpense.
3. All openings into the new fourulatilln sluI1l be located at an elevation of 254.8 feet C.G.D. or greater. Thel
elevations slul1l be certiJUd by a professwnal Ontllrio Land SUT1Ieyor or registered professiDnal engineer.
4. The owner agrees W pWee and maintain in good repair, any eroswn and sediment control measures as .
directed by Authority Sfilff. . .
5. All disturbed areas shall be seeded, sodded or stabilized in some other manner acceptable to rhe Authority.
CARRIED
Res. 1159
Moved by J. Gray
Seconded by B. Nicholson
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
.
DIRECTOR OF &....'VIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
(I)
Staff Report 114154-97 (attached as Schedule H-24 to H-25)
Oshawa Creek a\ Glenwood - Status & Pre- Tendering Report
THA T subject to receipt of a signed agreement from the /andDwner agreeing to assume the full Authority
jinanciol sluzre of the project, and subject to the availability of City of Os/wwa funding,
THAT the Central lAke Ontllrio Conservation Authority approve completion of the Os/wwa Crtek Eroswn
Control at Glen wood Project in 1997 with no funding for rhe project being provided by the Authority.
CARRIED
Council Communications for Direction
June 9, 1997
Number
Suggested Disposition
D - 1
For the direction of Council.
D - 2
For the direction of Council.
D - 3
For the direction of Council.
D-4
THAT the correspondence dated May 15, 1997 from Sandy Archibald,
Chairperson, The Durham Countryside Adventure Committee requesting
fInancial assistance for The Durham Countryside Adventure to be held
September 13 and 14, 1997, be received;
THAT the request be denied; and
THAT Sandy Archibald be advised of the Municipality's grant process.
D - 5 For the direction of Council.
D - 6 THAT the correspondence dated May 23, 1997 from Frank Simpson, Tyrone
Community Centre and Neal Smith, Tyrone Athletic Association regarding a
meeting which took place on April 30, 1997 to discuss the redevelopment of
Tyrone Park, be received;
THAT the correspondence be referred to the Director of Public Works for
review in conjunction with the report which is being prepared in regard to this
matter; and
THAT Frank Simpson and Neal Smith be advised of Council's decision.
Council Correspondence
- 2-
June 9, 1997
D - 7 THAT the correspondence dated June 3, 1997 from the Clarington
Rehabilitation & Sports Injuries Clinic requesting an amendment to the current
sign by-law, be received;
THAT the correspondence be referred to the Director of Planning and
Development for consideration in conjunction with the review of the
Municipality's sign by-law; and
THAT the C1arington Rehabilitation & Sports Injuries Clinic be advised of
Council's decision.
D - 8 THAT the petition submitted by residents requesting the installation of sewers
in Orono, be received;
THAT the petition be fOlWarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham for
their review and consideration; and
THAT Wendy Bangay, lead petitioner, be advised of Council's decision.
D - 9 For the direction of Council.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
( AUTH'ORITY M[NUTES . MAY 2[, 1997 - PAGE 6
DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES' REPORTS
(I)
Staff Report #4t52-97
Consultant Selection _ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Information Management System
Res. #60
Moved by B. Nicholson
Seconded by C. Elliott
THAT Staff Repott #4152-97 (attached as Schedule 7-1) be received for information: and,
THAT Mr. Les Bober, M.Sc. be relainedfor our 1nfontUlJion Management System Dambase development
project in the amount of $28, 700 (excluding GS1').
CARRIED
CIllEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFlCER'S REPORTS
(1)
Staff Report #4[47-97
Durham Regional Forest
R. Powell, presented Staff Report #4147-97 to the Board. I. Harrell expressed concerns on the matter and R. Anderson addressed
Councillor Harrell's questions. Discussion ensued.
Res. #6 [
Moved by L. Hannah
Seconded by R. Johnson
THAT Staff Repott 4147-97 (attached as Schednk 8-1 to 8-7) be recdvedfor ir.formaJiun.
CARRIED
Councillor Nicholson was excused from the meeting at 7:45 p.m.
DELEGA nON - URBAN DEVELOPMENT INS1TI'lITEIDURHAM CHAPTER
(2)
Staff Report #4148-97
Durham Region C.A.s - Proposed Fee Schedule - Environmental Planning and Engineering Input and Review
In attendance for the Urban Development Institute (U.D.I.) I Durham Chapter was Kelvin Whalen. Mr. Whalen made a
presentation regarding the Proposed Fee Schedule (attached as Schedule 8-10 to 8-43), stating that most members of U.D.I. Durham
Chapter were in concurrence with the rationale and in general principle could support the report. He expressed concerns regarding
several secondary issues. Discussion ensued.
Res. #62
Moved by I. Harrell
Seo:lnded by R. Johnson
THA T the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority approve and issue a separate 'PoUcy Statement' to the
V.D.1. _ Durham Clw.pter, stoting that the Fee Schedure will be reviewed annru1lly with the fuU participation of
V.D.I.; and
THAT the 'PoU., StoJement' address issues of concern relating specifically to the Central Lake Ontario
Canservation Authority and the U.D.I. - Durham Chapter.
C..uuuED
Res. #63
Moved by R. Johnson
Seo:lnded by R. Boychyn
THAT Sto.ff Repott #4148-97 (attached as Schedule 8-8 to 8-43) be received for informlllion; and,
THAT the CWCA Board of Directors adDpt the SuflllfUU1 Recommendlltion as per Page I (atto<:hed as Schedule
8-12) of the ahove repott.
CARRIED
AUTHORITY M[NUTES - MAY 2[, [997 - PAGE 7
I
.
(3)
1997 Conservation A wards
Russ Powell - Verbal report only
Mr. Powell made a presentation to the Board regarding the recent announcement made by Dofasco Inc. regarding a new long-term I
partnership with Conservation Ontario. Dofasco Inc. is donating $1,000,000 to fund an awareness campaign and also intends to
play an on-going role helping Conservation Ontario.
.
Mr. Powell slaled that plans are underway for organizing CLOCA's 2nd Annual Conservation Awards Ceremony and asked that if
any Board Member has suggestions/input and would be interested in participating on the A wards Comminee to please inform Staff..
MUNICIPAL AND OTHER BUSINESS
R. Anderson reminded Members and Staff that the 1997 Authority photograph is scheduled to take place at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, .
June 17, inunediarely prior to the Full Authority Board meeting at 7:00 p.m.
I
C. Elliott was excused from the meeting at 8:14 p.m.
R. Anderson reminded members of the Oshawa Shrine Club Grand Opening & Ribbon Cutting on June 12, 1997 and asked if any I
Authority Board Member was interested in representing CLOCA at this function. .
I. Harrell inquired about the status of the CLOCNGRCA Joint Staffmg Plan. R. Anderson stated that a report will be included in
the Agenda of the next Executive Committee meeting.. scbeduled for Tuesday. June 3, 1997 and referred to the Full Authority &Jar.
Meeting on Tuesday. June 17. 1997.
L. Hannah referred to a contamination of fill issue on SoIina Road, previously discussed at the March 18 Authority Board meeting..
D. Wright commented on Staff's position and that the issue was still before the MOEE. Discussion ensued.
ADJOURNMENT
I
Res. #64
Moved by R. Johnson
Seconded by R. Boychyn
I
THAT the meeting adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
. ~" OF P,C
:;O~
i': :Lii. ~
I~
I The Corporation
of the
Town of Pickering
I Coundllor's Offlce
I Pickering G...ic complex
. One me: Esplanade
Pid<ering. On~rio
canada
l1V6K7
IOi,ea
Tel (9051-420--4605
Fax (9051<120-6064
ITown
Tel
fax
(905)-420-2222
(905)683-2760
(905}-420-O515
I
.
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-14
May 26, 1997
HIT 30 2 ss PH t97
MurucipwnyofClarin~o~
40 Temperance St.,
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1 C A6
Please be advised that the Council of the Town of Pickering passed the following
resolution at its regular meeting of May 20th, 1997:
WHEREAS the people of southern Manitoba have been inundated with the
threat of flooding in recent days; and
WHEREAS daily news reports have broadcast disturbing 1IIlllges of the
hardship and destruction to property; and
WHEREAS all Canadians are c.oncerned for the well-being of residents ..of
southern Manitoba experiencing hardship due to the flooding of the Red River;
and
WHEREAS many residents of the Town of Pickering have expressed an
interest in providing aid and c.omfort to the victims of 'the flooding in southern
Manitoba; and
WHEREAS the Town of Pickering has considerable resources to lend to the
aid and relief effort;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Pickering Council
direct the General Manager through his office to make available the resources
of the Town wherever possible to aid in the relief effort through the use of fire
halls, c.ommunity centres, and the Pickering Municipw Building as drop-off
depots for food and clothing, etc., and
FURTHER that this resolution be forwarded to wi murucipalities in the G T A -._----____
I DIST~ION I
If you have any questions with respect to this matter, please do not h€Sital!l:. to . --- ,
=-"'d"'~"
I " -/1
i ACK. BY _
I I,
ORIGfNAl I . --
COPIES TO: V -c,
t==
l- I
,
j , -
Bruce Taylor, AMCT, CMM
Town Clerk
/elk
. . _ ;"> ,~ <11'1
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-15
[)]
Toronto
Corporate Services
City Clerk's Division
Secretariat Section
55 PH '97
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
I
I
May 26, 1997
Ms_ Marie P. Knight
Deputy Clerk
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LlC 3A6
Dear Ms. Knight:
Margaret Rodrigues
Commissioner
Sydney K. Baxter
City Clerk
Ciry H.U
100 QUef'n Street West
T orcola, Ontario MSH 2N 2
Phone: {416} 392-7031
TOO: (416) 392-7354
F.x: (416) 392-\879
Reply attention:Christine Archibald
Telephone: (416) 392-7030
Ref: 97c06-31
City Council, at its meeting on May \2, 1997, gave consideration to Clause 31 contained in Report No.6 of
ti1e City Services Committee, titled "Resolution - Municipality ofClarington - Removal of Premium Fee
Charged to G.T.A. Drivers"-
COWlcil =ived tl1e Clause for infonnation-
Yours truly_
~ -c... J) ~ J~
Assistant City Clerk
I13CNmt
,
i
I
\--
i- j
I =1 ~
~~:. ~_ 1- d LjJe:...~~;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
il
II
I
II
,
II
Atomic Energy Control Board
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-16
97-12
AGENDA
1J!m~~9~~
JIIH 2 '997
AECB publishes recent radiation doses from
Darlington and Pickering nuclear stations
llUNlCIPAlllY Of ClARING10<<
MAYOR'S OffiCE .
OTTAWA - The Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) today published the latest
edition of its information bulletin, the Radiation Monitor, showing the public radiation exposures
from tbe Dariington and Pickering nudear generQ.ti.u.g statiOll3.
The most recent AECB Radiation Monitor shows that, for the three-month period from
January I to March 31, 1997, the public radiation doses' due to the operation of the
Darlington and Pickering stations were 1.3 and 2.4 microsieverts, respectively. In comparison, a
typical chest X-ray produces a dose of approximately 70 microsieverts, while a return flight from
Toronto to Vancouver would result in an increased dose from cosmic radiation of about 20
microsieverts.
The doses indicated due to the operation of the nuclear stations are for the most exposed
persons, typically those living just outside the station boundary. Most persons in the region would
have received less, since radiation doses decrease significantly as the distance from the stations
mcreases.
Copies of the Radiation Monitor or related information may be obtained directly from the
AECB by calling 1-800-668-5284.
-30-
.+.
· The radiation dose is a measure of the quantity of radiation absorbed by the body. It is nonnalIy measured
in units of millisieverts (mSv - one thousandth of a sievert) or in microsieverts (l1SV - one millionth of a
sievert). The latter unit is used in the Radiation Monitor. . ----- -..---- - ---- -". . . .',
: O[S~-!ON I
NOTE TO EDITORS: See attached copies of the latest edition of the Radiati~n[MoW; _ ~. ..-- j
: v::; BY __ i
Contact: Robert Potvin, AECB Office of Public Information, (613) 995-5~9~[{IGltll\t I
j COPiES -('0:
;----, -11
I_-~ _....~_-~___
i I
\----- , ,
i---'--~ _~_~
\==-QiflOOa- J
r--"---.-"-..-- ---;.--.---
Government
of Canada
Gouvernement
du Canada
j____...__,.___...___._:______n. _
:--- /J10t,~(/ /- -..
_ January 110 March 31, 1991: 2.4
_ previous quarter. 1.9
_ TOTAtfOR 1991: 2.4
sa from a sin91e chest X.ray: about 10
RADIATION MONITOR
NUQ.EAR GENERATING STATIONS IN DURHAM REGION
First quarter 1997 Oanuaty 1 to March 31)
This information is provided by the Atomic Energy (onITOIBoard, Canada's nuclear regulator.
Radiation dose due to emissions from the nuclear generating stations.
Dose is reported in microsievertS (pSv), an international unit used 10 measure dose.
DARUNGTON
_ January 1 to March 31, 1991: 13
_ previous quarter. 0.9
TOTAL FOR 1997: 1.3
PICKERING
I-J
l-
I
I
I
70
Note: Natural background radiation, the annual legal limit for station emissjons, and the dose from a typical X-ray
are provided for reference. Emissions are in addition to background radiation.
The radiation doses due to emissions are for the
most exposed persons living near the station. They would
typically apply to persons living just outside the station
boundary who are at their residences 24 hours a day, who
drink local water and milk. and eat local fish and produce.
The doses were calculated using actual data from routine
analysis of air. water. milk. fish and vegetation samples, as
well as station emissior. data.
Most persons ,'Iould actually receive less than the
doses indicated because they have different eating habits'
or live farther away from the station. Radiation doses
decrease significantly as the distance from the station
increases. Persons living midway between the two
stations would therefore receive less than the doses
indicated for either of the stations.
Less than 6% of the radiation dose received from tr,e
stations was due to liqUid emissions. while the remainder
was a result of airborne emissions.
For further information, please call us at 1-800-668-5284.
Nola: Pour ohllllir une ,ersio. tro.f4isl de ce bulletin. l'tlIUItz COfIUIIlI.iquer .\Itl nous .u .umiro d.dessus.
1.1
Atomic Energy Commission de contrOle
Control Board de renergie atomique
t
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-17
,
Citizens' Network on Waste Manaaement
f
May 28, 1997
Dear Municipal Clerk,
JON 3 II 30 M '97
Have you seen the following Pepsi advertisements, encouraging consumers to switch
from cans to PET bottles for convenience? These billboards are popping up across
Ontario.
:5-
~'.6f-
Have you seen the new Coke display
appearing in local neighbourhood stores?
The Coke display is also encouraging the
purchase of soft drinks in PET bottles
instead of in aluminum cans. The display
case shown contains only one shelf near the
bottom for cans.
These promotions by the two largest soft
drink producers are alarming for those of us
concemed about the costs of the Blue Box.
PET bottles are a financial drain on the Blue Box. For example, Metro Toronto
estimates that its collection and recycling costs for PET exceed revenues from selling
PET by $1.7 million each year. Although the figures are not as dramatic for smaller
municipalities, the losses are just as significant for every municipality across the
province. If the amount of PET bottles going into the Blue Box increases, these losses
will grow.
.17 Major Street. Kitchener. Ontario. N2H 4R1 . Tel: (519) 744-7503. Fax: (519) 744-1546.
The Canadian Soft Drink Association has stated that the solution to Blue Box financial
troubles is the use of high-value aluminum cans for soft drink containers. The industry
has committed to using aluminum until 1999. How long can we expect this commitment
to last beyond 1999, when Pepsi and Coke are already encouraging a shift away from
aluminum cans to PET bottles?
Where will municipalities be left as the soft drink industry switches to PET? Your Blue
Box will be overflowing with high volume, low value PET bottles. You and your
taxpayers will be left with an increased financial burden.
We must move soft drink and other beverage containers out of the Blue Box by
requiring an effective and efficient deposit-return system. Removal of these materials
from the Blue Box into a deposit-return system will create a full producer pay system
and will make it easier to expand the refillable system for beverage containers. Only
materials that are appropriate for curbside collection and are not taken care of by
household composters should be left in the Blue Box or other curbside collection
containers.
In order to protect the future of the Blue Box, a municipal waste management strategy
should start with:
e a deposit-return system for all beverage containers;
. greater use of refillable beverage containers;
. curbside coiiection of oiher maleriais; and
. producer responsibility for the full costs of the reuse, recycling and disposal of the
materials they produce or sell.
Such a strategy will yield higher diversion and recovery rates, improve environmental
protection and save municipalities money. The attached fact sheets explain how this
can be achieved_
We are working with many groups, including municipalities, environmental and
ratepayer groups and industry, to develop proposals for an expanded refill, reuse and
return system in Ontario. Soon we will send you a report that outlines the findings we
have reached by consensus. We would be pleased to come and discuss our
proposals with you.
Yours sincerely,
----------- -
; r.L~,!STj:~~rr[ON-r.:
i ._.t.lH~ L2..2. !
! '"'' ------- 1
: ",,-,t\. 8Y_ ~
l-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I---
i O:tlGfflAt
,--
j caPlES TO:
r~
,
:--_..~ ,
j---- .._..._--'~.-J--~----.J
L_____ : I
I---~==j I
;---87 J8 -i
John Jackson
Coordinator
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
II
I
How to Improve the Future of the Blue Box
Today Blue Box is in the red - eliminate subsidies to industJy
. In exchange for permission to sell soft drinks in aluminum cans and PET, the soft drink
industry agreed to fund province-wide recycling in Ontario. This agreement, together
with provincial funding of $2.5 million each year to municipalities for recycling, led to the
birth of Ontario's Blue Box system in late 1985.
. Provincial funding of the Blue Box ended In March 1996'. Blue Box systems in Ontario
now find themselves in the red and with taxpayers paying for the losses2.
. Waste News reports that between 1985 and 1996, producers paid $41 million for the
Blue Box system, while municipal and provincial taxpayers paid over half a billion
dollars.' Municipalities paid more than 60% of this subsidy.
Implement a comprehensive deposit-return and refillables system
. Deposit-return systems have proven to be highly effective at product recovery, achieving
higher recovery rates than curbside programs:
. Deposit-return systems do not compete with curbside programs. Not only are the two
systems fully compatible, but when both systems are used together, total recovery rates
and recycling rates are higher and overall diversion costs are lower!
. A deposit-return system on all beverage containers, which comprise about 50% of the
Blue Box by volume (includes liquor and wine bottles), would increase diversion rates
and reduce Blue Box costs."
. Refillable bottle systems work best with a deposit-return system. Refillable systems
depend on the producer being able to recover large quantities of containers ior refilling.
Deposit-return systems provide an effective incentive for consumers to return their
empties and, therefore, achieve very high recovery rates.
. Refillables are environmentally superior to recyclabJes. Life-cycle analyses conducted
over the last ten years show that refillable systems yield significant reductions in
materials use, energy, and pOllution compared to one-way systems of the same material
type. Soft drink companies such as Coke and Pepsi now use refillable PET in Europe,
Latin America and South America.
. A municipal waste management strategy comprised of a deposit-return system for all
beverage containers, Blue Box collection of other materials7, and refillable soft drink
beverage containers would yield higher diversion and recovery rates, improve
environmental protection, save municipalities money and create jobs.' Taxpayer
subsidies on beverage containers would be eliminated.
Soft Drink Containers and the Blue Box
Collection of PET soft drink containers is uneconomic
. Although soft drink containers are only 1 % of the waste streamS, they take up
approximately half the Blue Box volume, making them costly to transport.'o
. PET bottles have an extremely high volume-to-weight ratio and, therefore, occupy a
disproportionately large volume in recycling trucks. This makes the cost of transporting
PET very high. The price of scrap PET today does not cover the cost of collection and
recycling."
Blue Box is too dependent on aluminum soft drink containers
. Aluminum soft drink containers generate revenues which offset transportation costs,
providing neariy 40% of the total scrap revenue of Blue Box recycling.'2 This makes
them the most economically attractive component of Blue Box materials.
. Such heavy reliance on one material for economic viability makes the Blue Box
vulnerable and its future uncertain.
. The Blue Box is susceptible to changes in the price of recycled aluminum". When
prices are high, competition for the cans increases (e.g charity drives and illegal
scavengers of Blue Box materials). When prices are low such as in 1996, the cans do
not even offset the total cost of recycling of all soft drink containers in the Blue Box.'4
. The soft drink industry has committed to using aluminum cans only until the end of
1999. How long the commitment will be extended beyond 1999 is questionable since
steel cans are now much cheaper than aluminum cans".
World wide mar1<et shifting from cans to PET
. In the U.S. the introduction of single-serving PET has led to increased PET use,
displacing aluminum cans. Evidence suggests that the Ontario market is lagging behind,
but is likely to be heading in the same direction.
. Pepsi has just launched a major advertising campaign encouraging consumers to buy a
sixpack of PET (710 ml) instead of 12 cans because it is more convenient.
'Producer pay" needed for long lenn survival of Blue Box
. A Blue Box system, with appropriate materials going into it (deposit-return for all
beverage containers) and with producers paying the full cost of using it, will protect
municipalities from being overly dependent on one material, from price fluctuations of
scrap materials, and from producers' packaging choices.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J-
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
How to Improve the Future of the Blue Box
Today Blue Box is in the red - eliminate subsidies to industry
. In exchange for permission to sell soft drinks in aluminum cans and PET, the soft drink
industry agreed to fund province-wide recycling in Ontario. This agreement, together
with provincial funding of $2.5 million each year to municipalities for recycling, led to the
birth of Ontario's Blue Box system in late 1985.
. Provincial funding of the Blue Box ended in March 1996'. Blue Box systems in Ontario
now find themselves in the red and with taxpayers paying for the losses2.
. Waste News reports that between 1985 and 1996, producers paid $41 million for the
Blue Box system, while municipal and provincial taxpayers paid over half a billion
dollars.3 Municipalities paid more than 60% of this subsidy.
Implement a comprehensive deposit-return and refillables system
. Deposit-return systems have proven to be highly effective at product recovery, achieving
higher recovery rates than curbside programs.'
. Deposit-return systems do not compete with curbside programs. Not only are the two
systems fully compatible, but when both systems are used together, total recovery rates
and recycling rates are higher and overall diversion costs are lower.'
. A deposit-return system on all beverage containers, which comprise about 50% of the
Blue Box by volume (includes liquor and wine bottles), would increase diversion rates
and reduce Blue Box costs.s
. Refillable bottle systems work best with a deposit-retum system. Refiliable systems
depend on the producer being able to recover large quantities of containers for refilling.
Deposit-return systems provide an effective incentive for consumers to retum their
empties and, therefore, achieve very high recovery rates.
. Refillables are environmentally superior to recyclables. Life-cycle analyses conducted
over the last ten years show that refillable systems yield significant reductions in
materials use, energy, and pollution compared to one-way systems of the same material
type. Soft drink companies such as Coke and Pepsi now use refillable PET in Europe,
Latin America and South America.
. A municipal waste management strategy comprised of a deposit-retum system for all
beverage containers, Blue Box collection of other materials7, and refillable soft drink
beverage containers would yield higher diversion and recovery rates, improve
environmental protection, save municipalities money and create jobs.. Taxpayer
subsidies on beverage containers would be eliminated.
Soft Drink Containers and the Blue Box
Collection of PET soft drink containers is uneconomic
. Although soft drink containers are only 1 % of the waste stream", they take up
approximately half the Blue Box volume, making them costly to transport.'o
. PET bottles have an extremely high volume-to-weight ratio and, therefore, occupy a
disproportionately large volume in recycling trucks. This makes the cost of transporting
PET very high. The price of scrap PET today does not cover the cost of collection and
recycling."
Blue Box is too dependent on aluminum soft drink con1ainers
. Aluminum soft drink containers generate revenues which offset transportation costs,
providing neariy 40% of the total scrap revenue of Blue Box recycling. I' This makes
them the most economically attractive component of Blue Box materials.
. Such heavy reliance on one material for economic viability makes the Blue Box
vulnerable and its future uncertain.
. The Blue Box is susceptible to changes in the price of recycled aluminum". When
prices are high, competition for the cans increases (e.g charity drives and illegal
scavengers of Blue Box materials). When prices are low such as in 1996, the cans do
not even offset the total cost of recycling of all soft drink containers in the Blue Box."
. The soft drink industry has committed to using aluminum cans only until the end of
1999. How long the commitmenl will be extended beyond 1999 is questionable since
steel cans are now much cheaper than aluminum cans 15.
World v.~de market shifting from cans to PET
. In the U.S. the introduction of single-serving PET has led to increased PET use,
displacing aluminum cans. Evidence suggests that the Ontario market is lagging behind,
but is likely to be heading in the same direction.
. Pepsi has just launched a major advertising campaign encouraging consumers to buy a
sixpack of PET (710 ml) instead of 12 cans because it is more convenient.
'Producer pay" needed for long tenn survival of Blue Box
. A Blue Box system, with appropriate materials going into it (deposit-retum for all
beverage containers) and with producers paying the full cost of using it, will protect
municipalities from being over1y dependent on one material, from price fluctuations of
scrap materials, and from producers' packaging choices.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Deposit-Return Systems and the Blue Box
Deposit-Return systems are convenient and cost municipal taxpayers nothing
. Deposit-return systems are widely accepted'6 and are one of the most widely applied
user pay mechanisms in Canada". Deposit-retum systems are fairer than curbside
programs because only the users pay. Only consumers who purchase the product pay
the deposit. They cari redeem the deposit when the empty container is returned.
. Deposit-return systems are convenient, especially if based on retum-to-retail. This
allows for one-stop shopping - saving energy and time, and minimizing air pollution
impacts.
. Technology has made it easier to handle the used containers. Today machines that
automatically wash and refill empty bottles'6 and reverse vending machines'. make it
convenient for retailers to handle them.
. Many deposit-return systems for beverages in Canada and the U.S. include a handling
fee to pay for the service (retailer/depot) of handling the empty containers.'" Retailers
must be properly compensated for any service they provide.
Curbside and deposit-return systems working together are the best solution
. Canadian and U.S. experience demonstrates that deposit-retum systems yield recovery
rates of 72% to 98%21. However, current curtJside collection for soft drink packaging in
Ontario is only about 54%22. The best curbside programs for beverage containers
achieve less than 70%23.
. Ontario's Blue Box now achieves only about 30% diversion of packaging waste2'. Even
with a major, ongoing communications program, considerably less than 70% diversion
(of either packaging waste or all municipal waste) is likely to be achieved, leaving at
least 30% in landfill.
. When curbside and deposit-return systems are used together, total recovery rates and
recycling rates are higher and overall diversion costs are lower.25 Deposit-retum
systems collect more materials than curbside programs, while curbside programs can
target a wider range of materials.
Soft drink containers in the Blue Box are not the solution
. Revenues from increases in the collection of aluminum usually go to the contractor not
the municipality because many municipalities have flat fee arrangements. Since 1992,
the soft drink market has been shifting from aluminum to PET"6. Ontario seems to be
going in the same direction. Aluminum soft drink cans continue to get lighter and the
price of aluminum is unreliable.2]
. Municipalities cannot rely on industry to pay its fair share. Between 1985 and 1996,
municipaliti3s paid more than 60% of. the costs of tne Blue BoX'". OMMRI/CSR still owes
$3.5 milliC!ln to municipalities for expenditures ma\:1e between 1988 and 1994.2'
3
I
References
I
I
I
I
'The Ministry of Environment and Energy will continue to fund municipal recycling programs that were
started under the provincial program before March 31, 1996 until March 31, 1998. This funding affects
35 municipalities. (Ministry of Environment and Energy, "Program Impact Summary Municipalities",
unpublished)
'For example, in the seven years of operation, the Kingston Area Recycling Corporation has made a
profit just once. and, in 1996 lost more than $800,000 in operating costs alone - a particularly bad year
(Kingston Whig-Standard, Dec. 7,1996).
Scott's Plains Recycling which runs the recycling program in Peterborough is expecting a 1996 recycling
program deficit of $800,000 because the prices of its main recycled products, paper in particular, have
collapsed despite the fact that Blue Box programs are bringing in more material at a record pace. Scott's
Plains used to get annual provincial grants of as much as $400,000 (Peterborough Examiner, December
11,1997).
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Metro Toronto taxpayers in 1996 subsidized the Blue Box program at an average cost of $63ltonne for
nearly 88,000 tonnes, for a total of about $5.5 million dollars. (Toronto Star, August 14, 1996).
'Waste News, "All bottled up: Ontario rethinks deposits", March 3,1997
.. Deposit-return systems yield higher recovery rates in the range of 72% to 98%, while the best curbside
programs collect less than 70% (James E. McCarthy, CRS Report for Congress: Bottle BlHs and
Curbside Recycling: Are They Compatible? January 27,1993.)
5Deposit-return systems have higher recovery rates, while curbside programs can target more materials.
Deposit-return systems remove potential sources of revenue from curbside programs, but also reduce
their operating costs. Overall when both systems are used together, municipalities achieve a greater
diversion of solid waste from disposal at a lower cost per tonne. (CRS Report for Congress, January 27,
1993)
A similar conclusion was reached in a more recent study. This study compared three policy options (a
disposal fee, a recycling subsidy to manufacturers and a deposit refund fee) to reduce total waste
(assumed waste comprised of aluminum, glass paper, plastic and steel) by 25%. The study concluded
that a deposit-refund was the cheapest option, but where handling fees were high, the disposal fee was
more cost-effective. The conclusion of the analysis was that the best policy approach was an optimal
mix of all three options for achieving the most cost-effective means of diversion. (Resources for the
Future. "The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste", September 1996.)
"For example, the City of Toronto estimates that a comprehensive deposit-return for all beverage
containers would increase recovery rates and permit the City to do Blue Box collection once a month
instead of biweekly, resulting in a net savings of $900,000 per year. As well, Metro Toronto has
calculated that a deposit-return system on all beverage containers would yield an increased recovery
rate for beverage containers and save over $1.6 million per year.
,. Curbside collection is well suited to the residual of materials not collected by a deposit.return system
(e.g. fibre, yard wastes and food waste not covered by household cornposters).
8. Deposit-return infraj;tructure has stimulated the creation of local small businesses across Canada.
According to the Container Recycling Institute, 150,000 jobs would be created in the U.S. with the
institution of a nation-wide deposit-return.
I
I
I
I
I
'Stuart Hartley, CSDA Vice President Ontario Region, Letter to municipalities in Ontario, April 2, 1997
"Based on city of Toronto data. (George Wheeler, City of Toronto, Deposit Return Municipal Collection
ISsues City of Toronto,' Presentation to Citizens' Network on Waste Management workshop, February
27,1997)
"PET scrap prices have fluctuated significantly over the last 5 years, from about $1501tonne in 1991 to
a peak of about $900ltonne in 1995, then plummeting to about $1501tonne In 1996. (Jan Whitelaw,
CSDA Presentation to Toronto City Services Comminp.e, Sept. 18, 1996)
" Stuart Hartley, Vice President CSDA Ontario Region, Letter to municipalities in Ontario, April 2, 1997
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n Over the last 4 years, prices for reqcled aluminum have fluctuated from a low of about $11ooltonne
(1993) to a high of $2000/tonne (1995), dropping to about $16001tonne in 1996 and 1997 (Recycling
Times, Recycling Data Associates, and Metro Toronto Works Department).
14'Metro Toronto calculated that aluminum revenues for 1996 would yield a profit of $500,000 (net afler
recycling costs for aluminum) (Toronto Star, December 17,1996). However, this would only offset the
cost of PET recycling by less than a third since the cost of reqcling Metro's 60 million PET bottles would
cost $1,7 million (U. Valiante, "Pet Cemetery", Solid Waste Management, October/November 1996).
"'Stuart Hartley, Letter to municipalities, April 2, 1997
15.A nationwide survey conducted from June 19" to July 8,1996 and reported in The Environment
Monitor indicated that 57% of Canadians feel that deposit-retum systems and refillable containers are
better for the environment than reqclable containers wl!ected at curbside.
"Deposits are used in every province in Canada for beer containers and in every province except
Manitoba and Ontario (except refillable glass soft drink bottles in Ontario) for other beverage containers.
"'Kensington Beverage Corporation of Port Coquitlam, BC has been successful in marketing a refillable
beverage system to retailers in Canada and the US, Customers return to the store with their empty
beverage containers and place them in a machine which automatically washes and refills them.
In addition to the two systems sited in references #16 and #17, a third opportunity for retailers to improve
the collection and handling of refillable bottles is to establish parking lot redemption centres at the retail
store, The retailer could contract out the operation of the redemption centre. This opportunity is most
suited to large stores with sizable lots owned by the retailer. The advantages of this kind of system is
that the grocer can save on most if not all of the costs associated with in-store recycling, including
labour, sanitation, transportation, and cost of lost sales and inventory space that would otherwise have
to be used for collection and storage containers.
"Designed like a pop machine, a reverse vending machine facilitates the collection and handling of
returned beverage containers for the retailer. Customers return their empty containers to the store and
deposit them in the reverse vending machine, The bar codes are scanned, counted and sorted
according to the store's data base and a redemption receipt is automatically issued to the customer.
This provides convenience for the retailer - less handling time and therefore, lower labour costs. For
the consumer, the advantage is that the consumer can return the bottles and receive the redemption
automatically without having to wait in line at the service counter. Costco and Fred Meyer in the U.S. are
currently using this vending equipment. (Erik J, Martin, Many Happy Returns. Store Equipment and
Design, April 1996)
5
"CRS Report for Congress, Bottle Bills and Curbside Recycling: Are they Compatible? January 27,
1993; Reiterate, A Brief Overview of Canada's Deposit Return Systems, May 1996; Province Update,
Container & Packaging Recycling Update, Vol. 6, .No. 2, Spring 1996.
I
I
I
I
I
"Provincial handling fees range from 2 cents per container (Quebec) to 5 cents per container
(Saskatchewan - 5 cents-metal; 6 cents-plastlc; and 7 cents-glass), and to 10 cents in PEl. (fees range
from 3 cents to 10 cents based on container size.) (RCO Update, Vol. 17, No.2, February 1997; A Brief
Overview of Canada's Deposit-Return Systems, Reiterate, May 1996; Province Update, Container &
Packaging Recycling Update, Vo1.6, No.2, Spring 1996)
22. Packaging recovery data tor 1995 provided by the Canadian soft drink industry (CSDA web page,
http://www.softdrink.calps6n.htm. March 1996) reveals that 53.6% of Ontario's soft drink packaging was
diverted from landfill. However, in the same year, CSDA reports that less than one third of all Ontario's
consumer packaging was diverted from landfill.
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"The Aluminum Association did a study in 1991 of curbside collection and found recovery rates for
aluminum of 24.9%, 44.9% and 59.8% for Rhode Island, Maryland, and Minnesota respectively (as
reported in CRS Report to Congress, 1993). In Seattle Washington, a city considered among the best in
the U.S. and one that has a user pay system for households, the curbside collection program captured
only 26% of aluminum cans, 49% of glass beverage containers and under 5% of PET in 1991 (CRS
Report. January 27, 1993). The Stale of New Jersey is considered to have one of the most
comprehensive curbside collection programs in the U.S. In 1990 New Jersey recycled 68% of its glass
containers, 69% of its aluminum cans and 7% of its plastic containers, for an average of 48%. (New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy as reported in CRS Report to Congress,
1993).
"Stuart Hartley, Letter to municipalities, April 2, 1997_ MOEE monitoring data for 1995 indicates a total
diversion rate for the Blue Box program of 15.6% (467,000 tonnes out of 3 million tonnes).
"CRS Report, January 27,1993.
2SFrom 1992 to 1995, the market share of aluminum beverage containers in the U.S. dropped from 54%
to 51 %, whereas the market share of PET beverage containers increased from 38% to 47% over the
same period. (Havis Dawson, "Plenty of PET," Beverage World, June, 1996).Comparable data are not
yet available for Ontario.
27'See footnote 11. The commitment to 1999 does not provide municipalities with adequate security for
major investment because of the accelerating changes in container design and material.
28'See footnote 3.
23.ln 1994, the AMRC conducted a survey of its members regarding payments owed to municipalities by
OMMRI/CSR. The survey revealed that a total of $3.5 million was reported outstanding for expenditures
between 1988 and 1994. A further $1.1 million can be added to this for a total of $4.2 million, the $1.1
million representing monies claimed to be owed to the City of Toronto, which is currently suing OMMRI/
CSR for the money.
10=99058377290
PAGE
1/1
MAY-2S-97 12:46 FROM:OH PND EAST RECEPTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
T lA
Facsimile Sheet
_____ ______4___' '-'<f'
\ ~~IST~WJTION t~
I~~:RK~~
. s ____.
I -
, 'q!GfNAl '.. .
_.,- - .
i llldO
, iJj,~
~- - ~-=~~~~~~-=-d
: '
To:
Mayor and Members of Council /
Municipality of Clarington
905-623-4169
Fax:
John Melmer
- 23 Empire Cres, Courtice
905-725-1059
From:
AGENDA -
Phone:
n ..n~.__.4"'~"'. .~__._
. .
,
,
..-.....-......----
. -
. '
__ .... -J "_'., ____.
Date: 28 May 1997
(ZJ 'cz.~_l
7 p__d__
~~~~.;g~!~ITI,li~0~1~1~~i~~,i~l~f]@!fi~1~1~;€~;~ii~;;0~~f~;.;;~;:jf1;i11);'lil'~'rf;~f:!1\;;;;.i;
I am concerned that there could be a serious accident on my street Last night there was
another incident where a speeding car crashed in the af"'...a in front of my house. This car hit
a transformer across the street from us and caused a power outage_ Luckily, no one was
hurt since it was past the time for children to be on the street...
Please note, the same type of accident {)ccurred two years ago when a car lost control in
front of me and crashed into a van that was parked adjacent to this same transformeL
FYI, there are many people who use Empire Cres as a link to Townline Rd_ and quite a
number of people within these cars speed! This has already been identified in my April 4
fax, Planning File: DEV 97-003, 18T-97002, LD194f96 & LD195f96; Clerk's File: 014.97-003
and D12 18T-97-003.
From my fax:
Please consider a request for installation of additional stop signs at the street connection
points, and a 'children playing sign" adjacent to the park.
John Melmer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. c' ,,, "'" ,cOUNCIL DIRECTION
" 0
..- "':t ~~"..~~{ THE CANADA POST
~"" J~''>'''''1\;~;\'''\'';~:~'':'';::'~' CORPORATION FLIGHT FOR
2 :;.:.t.'i,;:}.,.Y.:::"'i~"':.G:"-' FREEDOM LITERACY AWARDS
,~ ~~:-;";~~i~~~~~0} 2701 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
'~C'Z;;~,:,~:~. ^"~ SUITE N0610
'<> '" OlTAWA ON KIA OBI
'J'L,,,I'"'F'
. I - 19 .~
LES PRIX DE L'ALPHABETISATION fil
<<ENVOL VERS LA LIBERTE>> DE LA
socnITf CANADIENNE DES POSTIS
2701 PROM RIVERSIDE
BUREAU N0610
OITAWA ON KIA OBI
May, 1997
AGENDA
lllIBccmIIWm1))
MAY Z 6 1997
Dear Elected Representative:
MU~CIPflllTY OF ClARINGTON
MAVOR'S OFFICE
A recent Statistics Canada report on literacy shows that there are over 7 million Canadians
(40% of the adult population) whose reading and writing skills deny them the opportunity to
participate fully in our society. Poor literacy skills cost the Canadian economy approximately $4
billion in lost productivity each year.
We at Canada Post Corporation are committed to improving literacy in Canada and have
developed numerous partnerships and programs to meet this goal.
Nominations are currently being accepted for the fifth annual Canada Post Corporation Flight
for Freedom Literacy Awards, and I am seeking your help.
I am asking you to increase awareness of the importance of the cause of literacy and the
recognition demonstrated by the Flight for Freedom Literacy Awards among your colleagues,
associates and constituents. I also ask that you prepare a Flight for Freedom Literacy Award
submission on behalf of a worthy business, literacy organization, educator or individual who is
making a difference in your community by teaching our fellow citizens the value of good
reading and writing skills.
The deadline for submissions for the fifth annual Flight for Freedom Literacy Awards is June
20, 1997, with this year's Awards ceremony taking place on September 7, 1997 in Toronto. I
enclose information on the Awards process. Your support and promotion of these Awards will
help to ensure that we recognize those whose efforts will ultimately benefit all Canadians.
"OiST!1lUTION--q.'
Yours sincerely, U
CL[RK - r
lACK BY ;J.'~ .
ORIGlflAl <<-
COPiES TO:
ff{/f~A/pVVW/!--
IG~~rges C. Clermont
President and Chief Executive Officer
M
_ BankofMontreal
II
CIGNA
j
,
,
. . I
:,i: 11tJ.~l2...~~ r
IT g POSSIBLE-
.
'!=:; ....., T.
S---., ... l'.
:s:: National,,,,,,,
.-.;::; TlmEN ~en "
i~ neopost
50LlJT1ONSroR~tAIL1N(;
I'ERFOIl'dANCE WOltLD WI[)f:
The filial/dol Post
SHL System house
..... Mel Comp....v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-l
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF YORK
Hir~3glintf2AoBurJr'T9tity of York. Ontario M6M 1V1 Tel. (416] 394-2507 Fax (416J 394-2803
Legislative and Administrative
Services Department
Clerk's Section
AGENDA
't 'I ',.~.(rr;.aII" "'Y!' IRJD~
"-." ,. ~-il:, ~,[i \
k\."\' .' - .
v~
MAY Z 1 1997
May 20, 1997
Mayor Diane Hamre
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 3A6
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTmi
MAYOR'S OffiCE
Dear Mayor Hamre:
RE: OPPOSmON TO BILL 84
The Council for the City of York passed the following resolution at its meeting held on May 14, 1997:
"WHEREAS Bill 84 allows for the privatization of fire departments, a policy that has led to
some horrific circumstances in the United States, and
WHEREAS Bill 84 provides for the .I:eplacement. of full-time professional fire-fighters with
part-time workers with less skill and experience, and
WHEREAS Bill 84 provides call back provisions that would lead to slower response times
and reduced public safety, and
WHEREAS the Ontario Government received over 225,000 petitions asking them to
eliminate the threat to fire safety, but failed to amend these aspects of the Bill, and
WHEREAS the Bill is expected to pass third reading in the Ontario Legislature during this
Council meeting,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT this Council hereby declare its opposition to Bill
84, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this Council specifically indicate its opposition to any
policy that promotes the privatization of fire services, or the undermining of fire protection,
and
)
RE: OPPOSITION TO BILL 84
Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this motion be circulated to all municipalities in the
Greater Toronto Area, encouraging those municipalities to adopt similar resolutions
rejecting Bill 84, "
Would you please place this resolution before your next Council meeting for consideration.
Yours sincerely,
. ~~
~__"'._ ""n.' _. "u.. .__..___..,_._......,.\._\'.~
I c~~:imlT~ON . .
I
! ACV. ny ._..... _
, .
I ORIUNAL :. _.....
t.!'~~s T,~l ~ -~ . :~l
~~-'-I
,----- -\-----1
. .........:--_._.~______..:.r=~
..=.~~~~+=~
I ·
...~-.. ~... .._.._-:-.-._.-._~
.....___L'_-1
C (O:!1P.:~,-~"","J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL DIRECTION
0-2
II1III
IllmCCIB1IWl!~
JUN 4 1997
International Joint Commission
Commission mixte internationale
May 30, 1997
MllNICIPAUTY Of CLARtNGH
MAYOR'S OFFICE
Mrs. Diane Hamre
Mayor
Municipality ofClarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, ON
LlC 3A6
AGENDA
Dear Mrs. Hamre:
The International Joint Commission recently forwarded the attached policy statement on
municipal waste incineration for the consideration of the Governments of Canada and the United
States, the Province of Ontario and the Great Lakes States. The Commission endorses the
principle of virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances to the Great Lakes, as committed to
by the Governments of Canada and the United States in the Great Lakes Water Quality
Agreement, and supports the need to manage municipal solid waste facilities toward this end.
Incineration of municipal waste, if not managed appropriately, contributes to air quality
problems and can result in deposition of contaminants to the Great Lakes. The International Joint
Commission, under Article vn of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, provides advice and
recommendations to the Governments on problems and matters related to the quality of the
boundary waters of the Great Lakes system.
As indicated in the Commission's letter of transmittal to the Govertunents, we are
providing a copy of the policy statement on municipal waste incineration for your consideration.
I D",,:~Nl
GlERK ~ r
I ACK. BY
I ORiGINAl
COPIES TO:
C
Yours sincerely,
;
Murray Clamen
Secretary
Canadian Section
----
.
I
L--
,
I ____ l/;-
,-
, - . '. .f::-"""
1
Attach.
Ottawa. Washington. Windsor
loo. rue Metc.llfe Street. Ottawa. Ontario KI~ sMI (6Hl()(}::;.m..~..J
Eo'J___
A Policy Statement
on the Incineration
of Municipal
Waste
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEPl'EMBER. 1996
,
,
WINDSOR. ONTARIO
ISBN 1-895085-90-X
Photo (detail) by C. Swinehart.
EPA Great Lakes Program Office
Minnesota Sea Grant
*
Printed in Canada
on Recycled Paper
111111
International Joint Commission
Commission mixte intemationale
5ab!e 0/ Content:J
Foreword
A Policy Statement on the Incineration of Municipal Waste
Disclaimer
Background Paper
1.0 Incineration: An Option in Municipal Waste Management
2.0 Incineration and Persistent Toxic Substances: The Commoner/Cohen Report
3.0 Overview of Incineration Practices and Associated Poncies
4.0 IAOAB Interpretation of Virtual Elimination in the Context of Incineration
References
International Air Quality Advisory Board, September 1996
~t 0/ 5af,t.&
>.'
Table I Summary of Municipal Waste Management Strategies in Selected Countries
Table 2 Estimated Annual AtmospheriC Emissions of PCDD/pcDF (TEQ)' from Sources
in the United States and Canada (1993)
Table 3 Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions Umits for Combustion Products
and Acid Gases (Values Expressed as mg/Rrn' @ 11% 0,)1.
Table 4 Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions Umits Trace Metals and Organics
(Values Expressed as mg/Rrn' @ 11% 0,)
Table 5 Estimated Dioxin Emissions Into the Air in 1992 and Expected Emissions
in the Year 2000: The Netherlands
Table 6 Estimated Dioxin Emission per Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator in 1991:
The Netherlands
Table 7 Development of Emissions From Solid Municipal Waste Incineration Plants
as a Function of Time: Germany
~t o/:l-u;ure&
Figure I Ufe Cycle for Integrated Waste Management
Hi
iv
4
5
12
14
23
26
27
6
13
16
17
18
19
20
10
Joreword
As one aspect of its work under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. the Internationalloint
Commission requested its International Air Quality Advisory Board (IAOAB) to assess available informa-
tion on emissions from municipal waste incinerators and their contribution to the loadings of persistent
toxic substances to the Great Lakes basin. The IAOAB presented the following policy statement and
background paper on municipal waste incineration to the Commission in response to this request.
The Commission considered the policy statement in September 1996. In recognition that municipal
solid waste incinerators are sources of persistent toxic substances which, when emitted to the air, can
have human health implications, can be transported across national boundaries, and can be depOSited
on land and in waterbodies such as the Great Lakes, the Commission adopted the statement as its
position with respect to the incineration of municipal waste. The Commission encourages all jurisdic-
tions and interests engaged in implementing this type of municipal waste treatment to give careful
consideration to this statement as the minimum requirements for such facilities to ensure adequate
protection of the environment and human health.
'~:;r~
iv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
II
II
I
I
International Joint Commission
A PoAcy Statement on .!Jncineration 01 municipal W~te *
Preamble
I
I
I
I
I
The International Air Ouality Advisory Board (lAOAB) fully endorses the principle of virtual elimination
of persistent toxic substances to the Great lakes and supports the need to manage municipal solid waste
facilities toward this end. It further recognizes that municipal solid waste incinerators are sources of
persistent toxic substances which can be transported long distances to or from the Basin and across
national boundaries.
The lAOAB emphasizes that incineration is only one of a matrix of options and technolOgies available to
currently address management of municipal solid wastes. Any incinerator application should be viewed
in the larger context of an integrated solid waste management approach, which includes life-cycle
analysis, with a priority on reduction and recycling initiatives. The lAOAB notes that there is an inherent
conflict between the maximization of waste recycling, particularly of combustible fibre such as newsprint
and cardboard, and sustainable, stable operation of an incinerator, as removal of such materials from the
refuse significantly reduces its properties as a fuel.
The IAOAB recognizes that, if the incinerator option is chosen, facilities can be designed and operated to
reduce the amount of toxic materials (including pathogens) in the waste, to concentrate the residual toxics
in the ash and to minimize releases of same to the atmosphere. The health implications of release of fine
(less than 10 microns) particulate matter from such sources must continue to be considered.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Principles
i) Consideration or deployment of municipal incinerators should not, in any way, compromise
programs for waste reduction and recycling, which must remain the cornerstone of waste
management.
ii) Should jurisdictions elect to build new incineration facilities, these, at minimum, should be in full
compliance with the USEPA and MOEE requirements. Further, jurisdictions and proponents
should recognize that emission control technology is constantly improving and should commit to
incorporate such improvements at several points in tp.e life span of any given facility.
In keeping with the principle of virtual elimination, the lAOAB wishes to state four additional principles, namely:
Iii)
Any further deployment of this technology by any jurisdiction should be done on the basis of a net
reduction of emissions of persistent toxic substances, jurisdiction wide, from such facilities. Thus,
existing units must be further controlled to new source performance standards or decommissioned
by the year 2000. The USEPA regulations and those in some European jurisdictions contain this
requirement, which should also be embraced by the Province of Ontario.
iv)
The total amount of persistent toxic substances released by incineration facilities in a jurisdiction,
defined as the sum of those to the atmosphere and in the residuals, must also be decreased when-
ever- a new incineration facility Is permitted.
.
In September of 1996, the International Joint Commission endorsed this policy statement as its position
on municipal waste incineration.
I
v) Compliance with principle Hi) also commits individual jurisdictions to the establishment and I
ongoing maintenance of publicly accessible emission inventories characterizing all regulated
operating parameters, emissions and releases from these units.
vi) The operator and regulatory agencies must make a concerted and ongoing effort toward mean- I
ingful public involvement in all aspects of the facility. This includes significant public participation
in initial selection of the incineration option, development of a comprehensive justification and I
related environmental assessment, construction and commissioning of the facility, as well as
operation and final decommissioning. These considerations must extend beyond the facility to
encompass measurement and publication of assessments of environmental quality including
extensive ambient air quality monitoring for persistent toxic substances and other pollutants in the I
adjacent locale.
Technical Requirements
i) Operating facilities should be required to perform regular comprehensive ambient air and deposi-
tion monitoring in the vicinity of the plant and associated ash-disposal location.
ii) Emissions from the facility must be subject to continuous monitoring and manual sampling as
provided for in the USEPA regulations. If necessary, further sampling to confirm the size distribu-
tion of particulate matter in the emission stream should be conducted.
Hi) To the extent practicable for specific sites or waste flows, these units should be deSigned for
extended stable operation, which could be realized, in part, by requiring the incorporation of
electrical or other energy generation.
~
.....
iv) The toxic content of residual ash and particulate should be determined at regular intervals to
ensure associated disposal strategies are appropriate for the nature of the waste.
v) Source, ash residual and localized ambient air quality data should be collected and incorporated
into an ongoing performance review program, with provision for effective public oversight.
vi) As an operational principle, Good Management Practice, including rigorous and certified operator
training, is a must.
Fmancial Considerations
While finance is not an area of IAOAB expertise, there is a need to ensure that adequate funds are
available for:
i) continuous monitoring, appropriate maintenance activities and updating of process and control
equipment throughout the lifespan of the facility;
ii) support for ongoing independent auditing of operations as part of a public review;
ill) sound decommissioning of both the unit and any associated residual disposal site, including long
term monitoring of the integrity of any such site.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISCLAIMER
I
I
I
I
I
The following Background Paper to the International Joint Commission by its International Air Quality
Advisory Board was prepared with the support of the Commission; however. the specific conclusions
and recommendations in this background paper do not necessarily represent the views of the Interna-
tional Joint Commission.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BACKGROUND PAPER TO THE POUey STATEMENT
ON THE INCINERATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE
1.0
INCINERATION:
AN OPrION IN MUNICIPAL SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT
..!Jntroduction
The intent of this background paper is to provide an
ovelView of the infonnation considered by the Interna-
tional Air Quality Advisory Board (IAOAB) in developing
their Policy Statement on the Incineration of Municipal
Waste. To provide explidt linkage between this docu-
ment and the Policy Statement, elements of the Policy
Statement will be highlighted in a comment box at
appropriate locations of this report.
A scientific study (Commoner/CohenJ, discussed with the International Joint Commission in March 1995,
indicated the substantial role of munidpal waste indneration in the deposition of dioxins andfurans in
the Great Lakes basin. The subsequent rescinding of a ban on construction of new munidpal waste
incineration facilities in the Province of Ontario in mid-I 995 led the Commission to ask the International
Air Quality Advisory Board to assess the role of such sources in the generation of persistent toxic and
acidifying substances. In responding to the Commission, the IAOAB has sought infonnation on the
management of household waste, including the application of incineration as one of several tools or
options, from most parts of the developed world.
Counlrie:j and Option.1
A summary of the comparative extent to which the three major options are used in the management of
household waste (landfill, indneration and recycling) is presented in Thble I for Canada, the United .
States, Japan and several countries in Europe.
The table suggests that Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom largely prefer the landfill
option, with relatively low leveis of incineration and recycling. A more recent study indicated that On-
tario incinerates 4% of its MSW (municipal solid waste) compared to 16% in the US and 7fY%, in Sweden.
(Globe & Mail, 1996).
Within the European community. Sweden and Denmark are among the highest users of incineration
technology for municipal waste management. In Denmark, incineration of such waste for energy recovery
is well established, and approximately 25% of the 2.3 Mt annual collection of household waste (13% of
the total waste generated, not including garden waste) is consumed in 32 incineration plants. Approxi-
mately 30 to 40 percent of household waste is composted.
As the table suggests, incineration is also the preferred option in Japan. In 1992, Japan operated 1892
facilities to incinerate 75% of the 50.2 Mt of municipal solid waste collected annually (w.Iste Management
in Japan, 1995).
5
TABLE I Summary of Municipal 'Mlste Management Strategies in Selected Countries
Country Generation Landfill Incineration Recycling
kg/person/day % % %
Canada (1988) 1.7 82 8 10
Denmark (1990) 1.3 25 25 50
France (1990) 0.95 21 21 58
Gennany (1992) 1.4 46 36 18
Japan (1991) 0.8 10 77 13
Netherlands (1992) 1.0 42 31 27
Sweden (1991) 1.2 40 55 5
Switzerland (1992) 1.2 80 20
United Kingdom (1988) 0.8 86 7 7
USA (1991) 1.6 67 16 17
Reference: ':".n International Perspective on Characterization...: 1994
To place incineration in context, a brief overview of some of the alternative waste handling operations
follows.
Rec'JC/uu"
..:J
Recycling allows reuse of parts of the waste stream while realizing savings in energy that would otherwise
be required to manufacture them. Recycling is accepted in the developed world as an integral part of any
household waste management program. For example, in Canada, the Royal Society for National Conser-
vation report 'The Wildlife 1iusts Partnership, 1993 Stepping Stones,. noted that participation rates in
curbside recycling were very high in parts of the country. exceeding 80% in Toronto, 85% in Y.mcouver and
92% in Edmonton.
The IAOAB noted that an aggressive recycling of fibrous materials, such as newsprint and other paper
products, reduces the thennal energy content of the waste stream and, thus, its potential use as an energy
source through incineration. In this instance, the IAOAB would support use of the recycling option.
ofarul/iling
In Sweden. as well as in many other countries, the use of landfills is currently the principal alternative to
waste incineration. However, there are concerns about the impact of this practice within the European
community. 'Relatively little is known about the effects of waste disposal sites on health and the envi-
ronment. and this is notably true with respect to long-tenn effects...There is always risk that stable, toxic
substances can leach out into the surrounding area for several decades if adequate safety barriers are
not constructed. Conflicts involving other uses of the land also arise.. (Energy From 'Mlste, 1986) An
evaluation of the magnitude of the relative risks with respect to other options is oniy now beginning.
Waste gases emitted from landfills are also a Significant concern. Some studies in the United States have
shown relatively significant mercury content in such gases. Landfills are also sources of organic com-
pounds. such as vinyl chloride, which pose hazards in their own right while adding to the available
quantities of an ozone precursor (VOCs - volatile organic compounds), and greenhouse gases. Along
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BACKGROUND PAPER TO THE POUCY STATEMENT
ON THE INCINERATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE
1.0
INCINERATION:
AN OPTION IN MUNICIPAL SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT
-.9ntroJuctwn
The intent of this background paper is to provide an
overview of the infonnation considered by the Interna-
tional Air Quality Advisory Board (IAOAB) in developing
their FI::llicy Statement on the Incineration of Municipal
Waste. To provide explicit linkage between this docu-
ment and the FI::llicy Statement, elements of the FI::llicy
Statement will be highlighted in a comment box at
appropriate locations of this report.
A scientific study (Commoner/Cohen), discussed with the International Joint Commission in March 1995,
indicated the substantial role of municipal waste incineration in the depOSition of dioxins and furans in
the Great Lakes basin. The subsequent rescinding of a ban on construction of new municipal waste
incineration facilities in the Province of Ontario in mid- I 995 led the Commission to ask the International
Air Quality Advisory Board to assess the role of such sources in the generation of persistent toxic and
acidifying substances. In responding to the Commission, the IAOAB has sought infonnation on the
management of household waste, including the application of incineration as one of several tools or
options, from most parts of the developed world.
Counlrie:J and OptWn:J
A summary of the comparative extent to which the three major options are used in the management of
household waste (landfill, incineration and recycling) is presented in Table I for Canada, the United .
States, Japan and several countries in Europe.
The table suggests that Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom largely prefer the landfill
option, with relatively low levels of incineration and recycling. A more recent study indicated that Qn-
tario incinerates 4% of its MSW (municipal solid waste) compared to 16% in the US and 7f1% in Sweden.
(Globe & Mall, 1996).
Within the European community. Sweden and Denmark are among the highest users of incineration
technology for municipal waste management. In Denmark, incineration of such waste for energy recovery
is well established, and approximately 25% of the 2.3 Mt annual collection of household waste (13% of
the total waste generated, not including garden waste) is consumed in 32 incineration plants. Approxi-
mately 30 to 40 percent of household waste is composted.
As the table suggests, incineration is also the preferred option in Japan. In 1992, Japan operated 1892
facilities to incinerate 75% of the 50.2 Mt of municipal solid waste collected annually (\It.lste Management
in Iapan. 1995).
5
TABLE 1 Summary of Municipal Waste Management Strategies in Selected Countries
Country Generation Landfill Incineration Recycling
kgfperson/day % % %
Canada (1988) 1.7 82 8 10
Denmark (1990) 1.3 25 25 50
France (1990) 0.95 21 21 58
Germany (1992) 1.4 46 36 18
lapan (1991) 0.8 10 77 13
Netherlands (1992) 1.0 42 31 27
Sweden (1991) 1.2 40 55 5
Switzerland (1992) 1.2 80 20
United Kingdom (1988) 0.8 86 7 7
USA (1991) 1.6 67 16 17
Reference: 'JlI.n International Perspective on Characterization...: 1994
To place incineration in context, a brief overview of some of the alternative waste handling operations
follows.
ReCtJC/mg
~~.
" ..
. ..~
Recycling allows reuse of parts of the waste stream while realizing savings in energy that would otherwise
be required to manufacture them. Recycling is accepted in the developed world as an integral part of any
household waste management program. For example, in Canada, the Royal Society for National Conser-
vation report 'The Wildlife Trusts Partnership, 1993 Stepping Stones: noted that participation rates in
curbside recycling were very high in parts of the country. exceeding 80% in Toronto, 85% in Vancouver and
92% in Edmonton.
The lAOAB noted that an aggressive recycling of fibrous materials, such as newsprint and other paper .
products, reduces the thermal energy content of the waste stream and, thus, its potential use as an energy
source through incineration. In this instance, the lAOAB would support use of the recycling option.
clanlfi!!ing
In Sweden. as well as in many other countries, the use of landfills is currently the principal alternative to
waste incineration. However, there are concerns about the impact of this practice within the European
community. 'Relatively little is known about the effects of waste disposal sites on health and the envi-
ronment. and this is notably true with respect to long-term effects...There is always risk that stable, toxic
substances can leach out into the surrounding area for several decades if adequate safety barriers are
not constructed. Conflicts involving other uses of the land also arise: (Energy From Wolste, 1986) An
evaluation of the magnitude of the relative risks with respect to other options is oniy now beginning.
Wolste gases emitted from landfills are also a significant concern. Some studies in the United States have
shown relatively significant mercury content in such gases. Landfills are also sources of organic com-
pounds. such as vinyl chloride, which pose hazards in their own right while adding to the available
quantities of an ozone precursor (VOCs - volatile organic compounds), and greenhouse gases. Along
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
with odour, there are potential fire and explosion hazards. In recognition of this, the US Em has promul-
gated new requirements for large landfills requiring an estimation of the volume of gaseous releases and,
where appropriate, capture and combustion of such gases.
It is also becoming increasingly more difficult to develop MSVIlandfill sites which are a reasonable
distance from urban centres and acceptable to the local populace. These constraints are most keenly
felt in countries with a relatively small land mass such as Denmark and lapan. For example, over 2300
landfills are currently operating in lapan; their remaining capacity of 154 million cubic metres is projected
to be consumed by the year 2000 (Waste Management in lapan, 1995). Thus, incineration is a very
significant element of waste management in such countries.
I
I
I
I
I
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..9ncinerafion
Incineration is one of several options available in the formulation of a waste management strategy. All
strategies for waste management, with the possible exception of prevention, have potential environmen-
tal concerns. While prevention may be the most 'environmentally friendly' strategy. as practised today it
is not a complete solution. Nor is incineration. With incineration, the need for land disposal of the: I)
ash and residuals, 2) non-combustibles and other elements of the waste stream, remains.
maruu;emenf 0/ tlw W~te Stream
oIJ/e-Cyc!e Aa!g:Ji6
One of the initiatives implled through inclusion of a 'genera-
tion' entry in 'fable I is government efforts to reduce the
creation of waste and better manage the characteristics of
the generated waste. Several jurisdictions, including the
United States and Canada, have attempted to lower the
volume of waste generated through product packaging
guidelines, product stewardship efforts. and restrictions or
incentives to constrain disposable products. In addition,
household hazardous collection efforts seek to reduce the
hazardous content of the municipal refuse stream, benefiting
all options exercised thereafter.
1bday's waste management systems are complex. interre-
lated webs that can include source-separated materials
collection, materials recovery, composting. combustion, and
other processing steps. Any full evaluation of waste man-
agement systems must incorporate all aspects of the system
as well as externalities that affect and are affected by the
system and alternatives to the current system.
In the last two decades, major waste management facillty
projects using accepted technology have often been
delayed for years, in part because relevant and credible
7
environmental information was not readily available. Currently. conflicting or incomplete information
exists regarding the benefits and effects of source reduction, recycling, composting, landfilling, and
combustion of municipal solid waste (MSW).
It is now recognized that the complexities of managing municipal refuse might best be viewed through
the application of Ufe Cycle Analysis (LeA). The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
defines life-cycle analysis as,
. ...an objective process to evaluate the environmental burden associated with
a product. process, or activity by identifying and quantifying energy and
material usage and environmental releases, to assess the impact of those energy
and material uses and releases on the environment, and to evaluate and implement
opportunities to effect environmental improvements. The assessment includes the
entire life cycle of the product, process or activity. encompassing extracting and
processing raw materials; manufacturing, transportation, and distribution;
use/re-use/maintenance; recycling; and final disposal.'
This 'quantifying measure' allows particular areas of energy imbalance to be identified and dealt with,
thereby increasing the effectiveness of the entire process. Surprisingly. in many cases, the alternative
which appears most environmentally sound frequently requires a significant energy expenditure for the
extraction of materials or transportation of goods, costs which are reflected in the final price of the
goods and the total use of resources. It is crucial that such energy expenditures be included in any
quantification of the impact of any process on the larger ecosystem (1993-95 Priorities..., International
Joint Commission 1995).
.~:_~
Techniques for analyzing the environmental and economic performance of MSW management operations
traditionally have focused on individual processes rather than the entire system. In recent years, in an
attempt to consider the entire life cycle of waste, the focus has been on source reduction and recycling
options as well as on pollutant generation and energy use some distance upstrtQm of the waste disposal
system at the point of product manufacture or remanufacture.
life-cycle analysis studies and workshops centred on waste management strategies are being conducted
in all areas of the world. An international workshop entitled, 'life Cycle Assessment and Treatment of
Solid Waste,' was held in September 1995 in Stockholm, Sweden. This seminar included representatives
from Canada, Sweden, The Netherlands and the United States among others.
Gxten3wn 0/ J!C4 to munu:ipa! W~te
Among other efforts, Ufe Cycle Analysis (LeA) research to evaluate MSW management options is cur-
rently being conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USE9'.) Air Pollution
Prevention and Control Division. Stakeholders for this four year ongoing study include industry (Brown-
ing-Ferris Industries, WMX 1echnology. Inc.), local. state and federal government agencies and other
interested parties such as the Environmental Defense Fund and the National Solid Waste Management
Association. Also, data from the private sector, such as a Iife-cycle study currently undertaken by the
American Plastics Council. is to be considered and comparisons to data provided by other countries,
including Canada, are to be made. Presently. the project is in its second year and is to be completed by
August 1998.
An LCA to evaluate MSW management strategies focuses on Improving the environmental performance of
the management system for a given quantity and composition of Msw. An LCA approach:
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
provides a 'systems' view to capture tradeoffs and transfers of environmental impact from one
waste management operation to another. or from one Iife-cycle stage to another;
.
provides a framework for analyzing the environmental and economic performance of individual
MSW management unit operations and for the MSW management system as a whole;
.
allows for the analysis of multiple environmental issues. addreSSing overall energy consumption
and environmental releases rather than analyzing single energy and environmental issues individu-
ally; and
.
allows for a quantitative and objective analysis of environmental releases.
As shown in Figure I, in a major unit operation. a Iife-cycle approach can account for materials and
energy tradeoffs from waste management activities related to upstream activities. including the manufac-
ture of materials and products from virgin and/or recovered materials. An LCA can also delineate differ-
ences in waste management practices including distinctions between urban and rural locales.
The major unit operations to be included in any MSW management system are:
.
collection and transfer
separation
treatment
burial or land disposal
remanufacturing
cost, energy and resource consumption
.
.
.
.
.
Refuse collection options are divided into:
i) the collection of mixed refuse;
'i) the collection of recyclables either commingled or sorted; and,
iii) co-collection of refuse and recyclables in the same vehicle.
The design of a materials recovery facility (MRF) is also considered. Energy and resource consumption.
and environmental releases corresponding to manufacturing of a product from recyclable material
(remanufacturing) are other segments of the study. Combustion (with or without energy recovery),
composting and anaerobic digestion are other possible considerations. Landfill disposal of mixed refuse
and combustion ash is also reviewed. Source reduction is to be considered both within the bounds of
the system and in a larger more qualitative context.
The information garnered from a Iife-cycle analySis will provide communities with comprehensive, verified
information on accepted municipal solid waste options including combustion. composting. IandfilJing and
recycling.
ofl/e Cycle .Jnvenforg
The ute Cyde Inventory (LCI) of municipal waste management will include topics relating to waste gener-
ated in the residential, commercial. institutional. and industrial sectors. The LCI includes material and
energy balance calculations for multi-pollutants and media for the evaluation of different MmI manage-
ment options. Ash that is created from the combustion of MmI is also incorporated in the inventory
research.
9
Rema
Loop
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
Raw Materials Acquisition ---,
1
I
I
nufacturing I
I
I
-------. Manufacturing ~_--!
I
I
I
I
I
I
Use/Reuse/Maintenance I . Proce
__-1 Genera
(waste generation) I
I MS
I
I
i
Waste Management
r--------------II------i
1 .....
Collection ,. Processing! 1-- CompostingJ ~ Land
Recycling Combustion Disposal
T 4- 1
, ,
ss
ted
W
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'. '.:
>~~
I
: I I I
L____________~__L_____--!
Notes:
. Transportation is embedded within each of the life-cycle stages.
. Source reduction is embedded within each of the life-cycle stages and affects
the flow of materials within and between stages.
. Combustion includes incineration with or without energy generation.
FIGURE I
life Cycle for Integrated Waste Management
Reference: U.s. EPA .Ufe Cycle Study of Integrated Waste Management Studies....
10
i
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A m.",~"""",, ;'-"., Uk_I'~"",~ "d_" LCJ Ernm_" _... ~
material and energy balance calculations. Data in the LeI would be used in material and energy balance
calculations to develop emission factors for each unit operation involved in solid waste management.
The LeI data development procedures include three main steps:
i) Defining facility design specifications for each waste management operation.
2) DeveloPing Lei data for each waste management operation.
3) Allocating Lei data for each operation to individual MSW components.
(Status Report of U.s. ute-CYcle Study to Evaluate Integrated Waste Management Strategies, USEPA,
1995)
J;ndi~
In developing a solid waste management plan, strate_
gies for waste IIlinlmalizatlon and recycling are key
elements; once these elements are in place, other
options such as Incineration, wheJJ technically Justified
through application of techniques Such as Iife'CYcle
analys~ as the lowest risk and least costly means of
managing the Waste stream, can be consIdered.
If the USe of incineration can be Justified as a compo.
nent of an overall waste management plan, there are
certain minimllll\ criteria that should be incorporated
into the overall design and operation of the facUit)( The
Policy on Inclneration of MUnicipal Waste outlines those
criteria.
II
2.0
INCINERATION AND PERSISTENT TOXIC SUBSTANCES:
THE COMMONER/COHEN REPORT
"Preamble. .
In March of 1995, a workshop on 'Transition to Virtual
Elimination' sponsored by the Parties Implementation
Workgroup of the Science Advisory Board, I)C, considered a
draft report "Quantitative Estimation of the Entry of Dioxins.
Furans and Hexachlorobenzene into the Great Lakes from
" Airborne and Waterborne Sources" authored by Dr. Mark
Cohen and Dr. Barry Commoner of the Center for the Biol-
ogy of Natural Systems, Queens College, CUNY.
Flushing N.Y
"It furtJier rerognlzes'tfU,t
munlclf14'{ ,solid wa :" .'
are .5Inlrces of persis
suhstances which can he trans>
. po~liiri'g distances W ortro'm .
tliekBasln 4ndacross ""Uonal',;..:
-,:--(bou1ulades~;'-:',-r .-'. -- -,,,..-
<:." it.~_.,:,,- : :,<u<i-:;X;
The subject of the paper was sources, transport and deposition to the Great Lakes basin of two persist-
ent toxic substances, poly-chlorinated dibenzo-dioxins/furans (PCDDIDF) and hexachlorobenzene (HCBl.
This paper was the first of a two phase study to develop economically constructive ways of virtually
eliminating the entry of several major persistent toxic substances into the Great Lakes. The second
phase, examining economic issues related to the further control of these pollutants from sources, includ-
ing municipal incineration, was made available in June 1996.
'm
In considering emissions to the atmosphere, the CommonerlCohen paper identified 166 I dioxin/furan
and HCB individual emission sources, including 179 US and 17 Canadian municipal incinerators, 124 US
and 20 Canadian medical waste incinerators, 263 US and 7 Canadian hazardous waste incinerators and
28 US and 2 Canadian cement and aggregate kilns burning hazardous waste. The ranking of sources is
also roughly consistent with those developed on a national basis, as well as some European estimates,
discussed in a subsequent section. The source categories considered, and the associated dioxin/dibenzo
furan emissions are given in Table 2.
Generally. emissions from individual facilities were estimated by determining feed rates and applying an
emission factor. In some cases, the emission factors were developed from a very limited data base and
several reviewers have suggested that the resulting estimates, particularly those associated with medical
waste, are too high; however. better estimates have yet to be tabulated. The relative paucity of good
source data reinforces the Board's ongoing concern regarding the quality of the emission inventories
maintained in both countries for sources such as these.
In detennining the relative contribution of dioxins/furans to the Basin from various sources, Commoner/
Cohen found that municipal waste incinerators were the second largest contributors, at an estimated
24% of the approximate total deposition.
The largest source category identified in the report was medical waste incineration. Following release of the
report, the estimate for medical waste incinerators was found to be Significantly overvalued due to a gross
overestimation of emissions. Thus, municipal waste incinerators assume more prominence as a source.
Only 106 sources account for 85% of the total PCDDIDF deposition. This is a more manageable number
than might have been supposed should a policy of virtual elimination of releases of persistent toxic
substances. advocated in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, and by the Commission, be adopted
for such sources. The authors also note that it is now apparent that the major route of human exposure
to PCDDJDF is food - beef and dairy products in particular. This finding is again matched by European
studies, aD of which suggest that atmospheric transport and deposition is a major pathway for dioxins
entering the human food chain.
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
"1
I
.1
I
I,
I
I
'.'.".-
I
I
TABLE 2 Estimated Annual Atmospheric Emissions of PCDD/pcDF (TEO)" from
Sources in the United States and Canada (1993)
Source Class Midpoint Value Range of Emissions Percent of
of Emissions (low - high) Total Midpoint
(g TEO/yr) (g TEO/yr) Emissions
Medical Waste Incinerators "" 4,300 1,700 - 14,000 53%
Municipal Waste Incinerators 1,900 350 - 4,200 24%
Cement and Aggregate Kilns
Burning Hazardous Waste 400 130 - 1,300 4.9%
Secondary Copper Smelters 360 110 - 1,100 4.5%
Wood Combustion 260 80 - 820 3.2%
Iron Sintering Plants 230 70 - 710 2.8%
Coal Combustion 210 40 - 430 2.6%
Cement and Aggregate Kilns Not
Burning Hazardous Waste 170 50 - 530 2.1%
Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles 120 40 - 390 1.5%
Hazardous Waste Incinerators, (not
including hazardous waste bumed in cement!
aggregate kilns or HCB waste indneration) 80 20 - 250 1.0%
Sewage Sludge Incinerators 30 2 -70 0.3%
Secondary Copper Refiners 6 2 - 20 0.08%
Incineration of Waste from Chemical
Manufacturing Contaminated with HCB 3 1-10 0.04%
Vehicles Using Leaded Gasoline 2 0.2 - 20 0.03%
Vehicles Using Unleaded Gasoline I 0.4 -4 0.02%
Total 8,100 2,600 - 24,000 100%
. The toxic potency of the PCDDIPCDF congeners is commonly expressed in tenns of Toxicity EquiValency Factors (TEF). Le. the toxic
potency of a given congener relative to that of 2,3.7,8-l.etrachloro-dlbenzo-p-dioxln (2.3,7.8-TCDO). The overall toxicity of a mixture of
PCDO and PCDF congeners can be expressed quantitatively by using their respective TEFs to compute the amount of 2.3,7.8-TCOO
that is equivalent in its toxicity to that of the mixture. This quantity is expressed as amount of toxic equivalents (TEO).
.. The emissions estimates for medical waste incineration have been based. essentially, on the u.s. EPA's estiiriate of the amount of
medical waste burned in the U.s. and their recommended emissions factors. which were based on "their evaluation of emissions data
(U.s. EPA 1994A). A slightly d1fferent emissions \actor, representing a dlfferent emitted congener prolile. which reduced emiSsions
estImateS by 17.6% relative to the U.s. EPA estimate was used. The American HospIta1 Association (AHA) has submitted comments to
the US. EPA in response to the Draft Dioxin Exposure Assessment claiming that the emissions from medical waste indr\erators are
substantially less than these estimates for two main reason" (al they claim that less medical waste Is being burned than estimated by
the us. EPA; and (b) that the average emissions factor used by the U.5.-FPA (which was based on the assumption of no ponution
control) is too high as a slgnlflcant portion of the waste tndnerators now have pollution control equipment. Evaluation of the validity of
the AHA's new estimates was not possible, since the primal}' data on which they are based were unavailable.
Reference, 'Ouantitative Estimation of the Entry..... 1995 (Commoner/COhen)
:J~
WhUe the precision and accuracy of the estimates of emIssion and deposItion of dioxins and
dibenzofurans Is open to some question, the IAOAB finds that the Commoner/Cohen report Is a valuable
contributIon to targeting significant sources of these contaminants to the Great Lakes basin, particu-
larly large Inclnerators of munlc:lpal sond waste, and suggesting a pathway for this contaminant Into the
human food chain. Howevel; further research Is necessary Including the conec:tlon of further data to
reduce uncertainties In emission estimates and In the significance of potential Impacts.
13
:!~,:;"~;~t:::' .
,"" -.
\,:j\,;:~H'::Si'f~' :F~-:::
"';.r::\9J}-~~~f;(fl":):
I
I
I
3.0
OVERVIEW OF INCINERATION PRACTICES
AND ASSOCIATED POUCIES
t:,'.-:_~,_.:~
i ) Rel/iew 0/ Currenl Praclice<1 I
in municipal Wa<1le !Jncineralion
One of the lAOAB's first actions in responding to J
Commission request for an overview on incineration c
municipai waste was to engage the services of Mr. ..
Chandler. an expert in the appiication of incineratioll
technoiogy to municipal soiid waste management bot
in Europe and North America. . I
He reviewed the sources of persistent taxies in the fee
to municipal incineration units, the nature and cha~
teristics of individual combustion processes, and thl
various individual processes that collectively can form
. . a pollution control system. This latter section
dealt specifically with the treatment and removal of acid gases (HCI, NOx)' heavy metals (mercury. cadi
mium, lead) as well as the capture of dibenzo-dioxin/furan formed in the combustion process. The
performance of specific Ontario incinerators was considered, as was the average performance of US
facilities. I
His report emphasised the following points.
. The modem municipal waste incinerator is Significantly more efficient in controlling emissions ~
units operated ten to fifteen years ago. In the US, with increasing combusted volumes since the
early 1980s, specific contaminant emissions were either stable or reduced by 20% to 50%. The I
US standards should lower cumulative annual emissions by two thirds or more, with reductions .
dioxins and dibenzo furans in the vicinity of 98%.
,'.- -i ,;,.'~ ,', '/.: -,: - .-
"'."-',-"-".,,-..,
~" . ,-" - ,,"', -,
~;~:~;SLY;;0.: .~;';,
--. '.. '~"',>: ','" . .
~~
.
The new Ontario guideline will apply to all new faciiities, regardless of size; the US regulation I
excludes smaller units, as this population represents only I % of the total municipal soiid waste
incinerated nationwide.
I
. Ontario specifically excludes existing faciiities,
. whereas the US EFl'\. introduced new, albeit not as
stringent, regulations for existing units for comPliat
by the year 2000.
. Existing units in Ontario will not meet the guideiine.
values appiicable for new sources for nitrogen oxid.
(NOxl and mercury emissions.
14
I
I
I
I
. ~, -.
"
i-i-.>
New regulations require extensive continuous monitoring of
operations and testing of emissions.
A higher level of emission control in Ontario, beyond that in
the current guideline, wouid result in tipping fees in the
order of $1 OO/Mg; other waste disposal alternatives are
available at lower prices; only the largest facilities, with
energy recovery, may be economically viable.
With the assistance of Commission staff, Mr. Chandler
developed the following tables (Table 3 and Table 4), com-
paring European and North American jurisdictional stand-
ards for emissions of particulate. acid and other gases, as
well as specific toxic substances.
ii ) StatiM of ..9ncineralion tn Gurope
Many industrialized countries, including several in
Europe, have moved to reduce-incinerator emissions.
In 1994, the Dutch govemment, in response to a
determination of high dioxin concentrations in milk
originating from cows grazing near municipal solid
waste incinerators, commissioned a study of significant
sources of dloxin within their country. Emissions from
each of the major source categories were determined;
municipal solid waste, hazardous waste and hospital
waste incinerators were among the sectors considered.
Their findings roughly parallel those of Drs. Commoner
and Cohen, regarding the relative significance of
municipal waste incinerators as a source of dioxin
emissions. The Dutch program was comparably more
rigorous, in that emissions from all municipal solid
waste incinerators (9 in total) in the Netherlands were
.. . detennined by source testing in 1991 and 1992; these
data were supplemented with additional measurements from other types of incinerators and, in some
cases, by literature values.
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Netherlands total dloxin emissions to air from all sources was reported to be 484 g I-TEa in 199 I,
down from an estimated 960 g I-TEa emitted in 1989. (See Table 5) Approximately 80% of total air
emissions were linked to municipal solid waste incineration and it was estimated that three times as
many dioxins are removed via the residues (primarily ash) from these operations as via emission into the
air. Hazardous waste incineration accounted for only 3.3% and hospital incineration emissions were
found to be less than I % of the total air emission.
While recognizing that levels from municipal incinerators were unacceptable, the Dutch government
reaffirmed its commitment to municipal waste incineration with energy recovery and established a na-
tionwide target for total PCDD/DF emissions from this sector of 3-4 grams I-TEO/year by the year 2000.
Major reductions through plant closures. further emission controls on existing plants and the commis-
sioning of several new plants are planned.
15
TABLE 3
Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions Umits for
Combustion Products and Acid Gases
(Values Expressed as mg/Rm' @ 11% 0,)1.
Jurisdiction Hydrogen Hydrogen Sulphur Oxides of Particulate Carbon Hydrocarbons
(Country/State/Province) Chloride Fluoride Dioxide Nitrogen Matter Monoxide (as CH,)
European Economic Community 1991 46 2 276 28 92 18
United Kingdom 1992 (new plants) 46 2 276 46 92 18
Belgium 1991 46 2 92 28 92 18
Netherlands 1989 9 I 37 65 5 46 9
Sweden 1986 80 I 190 320 17 80
Switzerland 1991 18 2 46 74 9 46 18
Germany 1990 (mean 24 hour) 9 I 46 184 9 46 9
Germany 1990 (1/2 hour max.) 55 4 183 366 55 92 36
Denmark 1991 (mean 24 hour) 60 2 276 37 92 18
U.S.A NSPS 1995 New Facilities 27 (95%)" 55 (80%) 197 (dally) 17 various J.
Existing >35 tpd & <225 tpd 261 (50%) 147 150%) exempt 49
>225 tpd 33 (95%) 58 (75%) 263-329 19
Canada CCREM Guidelines 1988 75 (90%) 20 57/1 14
British Columbia 1991 70 3 250 350 20 55 40
Burnaby British Columbia pennit'. 55 200 40
Ontarto Peel Permit 1991 50 (90%) 20 57 33
Ontario Guideline A-7 1991 27 55 207 17
.
:~s;,it
L Reference cubic metre of dry gas at 25"C and 10 1.3 kPa pressure. Wet standard levels are converted to dry assuming
an average moisture level of 20%.
,. where percentage values are provided in brackets foliowjng the emission level. they refer to a minimum removal
efficiency required by the jurisdictlon. In most cases these condItions are enforced as the lesser of the two conditions,
either 27 mg/m' or 95% removaL
,. Various' refers to levels for different types of incineration facilities
.. Burnaby permit data taken from "Rationale for the Development of Guideline J>..7"
Reference: "State-of-the-Art Assessment of Municipal Waste Incineration: 1996
As reported in Table 5, hazardous waste and hospital incinerators contribute only a small fraction of the
total atmospheric dioxin burden. However. the Dutch use several different types of furnaces to incinerate
industrial wastes. and hospital wastes are treated differently depending on whether they are classified as
specific hospital waste (e.g. human remains) or as other hospital waste (e.g. non-contaminated waste).
Specific hospital waste is treated as a special form of hazardous waste, while other hospital waste is
frequently incinerated on-site as a batch operation with no additional flue gas cleaning; energy recovery
is usually not done. Data on the occurrence of dioxins in bottom ash are not available. but amounts are
thought to be small. It is assumed that all on-site hospital installations that are operating now will be
closed by the year 2000.
Table 6 outlines the spectrum of dioxin emissions from individual incinerators in the Netherlands. Infor-
mation was excerpted from a report by H.). Bremmer. L.M. Troost. G. ~ipers. J. De Koning, and AA. Sein
entitled "Emissions of Dioxins in the Netherlands" published by the National Institute of Public Health
and Environmental Protection and the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research in 1994.
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4
Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions Umits Trace Metals and Organics
(Values Expressed as mg/Rm' @ 11% 0,)
.<
lurisdiction (Country/State/Province) Trace Metals By Category PCDD/PCDF
ng I-TEO/Rm' ^
I II III unless noted
European Economic Community 1991 0.20 1.0 5.0
France I 991 0.05' 0.05' 5.0
Netherlands 1989 0.10 5.0 1.0
Sweden 1986 0.08 0.1 Eadon"
Switzerland 1986 0.22 1.0 5.4
Germany 1990 0.05 Cd &T1 0.05 0.5 0.1."
Denmark 1991 0.20 1.0 5.0 0.82 Eadon"
U.SA 1995 Regulations
Existing Facilities:> 35 and<225 tpd 0.07 (Cd) \.12 (Pb) 0.056 (Hg) 88 (total)
Existing Facilities> 225 tpd 0.028 (Cd) 0.34 (Pb) 0.056 (Hg) 21 total except
ESP equipped 42
New Facilities 0.014 (Cd) 0.14 (Pb) 0.056 (Hg) 9 (total)
Canada CCREM Guidelines 1988 none none none 0.5
British Columbia 1991 0.2 Hgf 0.004 As! 0.05 Pb
0.1 Cd 0.01 Cr 0.5
Burnaby permit 1983 0.2 1.0 5.0
Ontario Peel Permit 1991 point or' point or' point or' 0.5
impingement impingement impingement
Ontario Guideline 1995 0.014 (Cd) 0.14(Pb) 0.057 (Hg) 0.14
I
I
I
I
I
-
.1
I
I
I
I
7:'
I
I
NOTE:
unless specifically noted the metals contained in the various classes are as outlined below:
Generally, Hg and Cd are in dass 1. Sweden has Hg only and the old German and British Columbia standards
include TI in Class \.
dass II has As and Ni in the EC; the old German standard included Co, Cr, Ni, Se and Th with these elements
whereas the new German standard combined Co, Cr, Ni, withY. Sn, Sb, Pb, Cu, and Mn that were in dass III to
create a new combined dass III. The new Germandass II contains only Hg.
Class III for the EC is Pb, Cr, Mn and Cu; in the Netherlands, Pb and Zn is as it is in Switzerland; Germany's list Is
included above; elsewhere the class contains Pb and Cr.
^ I-TEa: The TEO determined using the single International Scheme (Table 3.2) adopted at the 7th
International Dioxin Symposium in Las 'kgas (CCME, 1989).
. the French regulations adopted the EC Directive- but tightened the cadmium and mercury emissions levels.
.. these two PCDDIF standards are measured by different methods than used in North America. Some
differences in the method make direct comparisons of emission values difficult. The German emission
value is also reported on a wet basis with a much longer averaging time than used in North America and
could actually be similar to a value on the order of 0.3 ng I-TEOJRm' @ 11% oxygen.
o requirement based on concentration at point at which emitted gases 'Impinge' on adjacent lands or
structures (not direct source measurement)
Ref""",ce: 'State-of-the-Art Assessment of Municipal Waste Incineration: 1996
17
TABLE 5
Estimated Dioxin Emissions Into the Air in 1992 and Expected Emissions
in the Year 2000: The Netherlands
Process category
Emission Emission
1991'. 2000L.2.
Ig I-TEO yr.'j IgI-TEO yr.'1
382 2-4
16 I.7
0.3 I.5
I.5 I.5
2.1 0
0.3 0.3
1.0 1.0
3.7 3.7
12 9
0.2 0.2
? ?
2.7 2.7
7.0 0.2 - 5
26 3
4.0 4.0
0.5 0.5
25 20
484 58
(maximum)
~~
Municipal solid waste incineration
Incineration of hazardous wastes
Incineration of landfill, biogas and sludge
Cable and electromotor burning
Waste incineration at hospitals
Asphalt-mixing installations ,.
Oil combustion
Coal combustion
Wood combustion ..
Crematoria
Fires
\arious high-temperature processes
Traffic
Sintering processes
Metal industry
Chemical production processes ,.
Use of wood preservatives
1bta! (fires excluded)
I.
The emission estimate in the year 2000 (with the exception of MSW incinerators) does not account
for the growth or a shift in certain categories.
\Wues lower than 10 are rounded off to first decimal place.
Emission as a result of heat generation is included in the energy generators concerned.
Much uncertainty as to the emission factors; additional research is recommended.
2.
,.
..
Reference: "Emissions of Dioxins In The Netherlands,' 1994
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
TABLE 6
Estimated Dioxin Emission per Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator in 1991:
The Netherlands
Installation Waste throughput 2. Dioxin emission (I-TEO)
Ik tonne yr"1
i!Jg tonne "1" Igyr"}
A1kmaar 1126 74. 0.8
Amsterdam-North 521 3 28 15
The Hague 45 15
AVR 331 262 234
ROTEB 895 277 92
Philips L 331 43 1.2
Roosendaal 27 42 0.8
GEVUDO . 19 81 127.
AvrAA 148 27 8.0
ARN L 296 40 3.0
75
'lbtal 2760 382
5.
6.
7.
Incineration of RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel).
WAY. 1992.
Infonnation given by Amsterdam-North.
IG1ipers, 1991.
1990 Emission factors (Slob et al.. 1992).
Incineration re-started in the course of 199 I; waste throughput over 1990 is 112 ktonnes.
Including the dioxin emission from the sludge incineration furnace.
I.
2.
3.
4.
Reference: "Emissions of Dioxins in The Netherlands: 1994
The Gennan literature reviewed treated incineration as one of the continuing and viable options in the
disposal of municipal refuse. Progress in technology available since 1970 to reduce emissions of seven
contaminants of concern at waste incineration facilities, as listed in Table 7, is reviewed. The specific
treatment and handling of distinct waste streams increasingly allows such materials to be recycled or
made highly inert. resulting in additional environmental impacts of less than 1% of the existing back-
ground levels. A number of the most toxic materials can be reduced to 'negligible' levels. From the
perspective of the authors. the real problem is no longer the lack of appropriate available technology. but
rather 'the courage to implement the right strategies of modem residue management in the light of
honest and complete ecological balances.' Immediate adoption of state-of-the-art control technology
and procedures at incineration sites is strongly encouraged.
19
TABLE 7
Development of Emissions From Solid Municipal \\aste Incineration Plants
as a Function of Time: Germany
Dust Cadmium HCr SO, NO Mercury Dioxins (TEO)
,
mgm" mgm" mgm" mgm" mgm" mgm" mgm"
1970 100 0.2 1000 500 300 0.5 40
1980 50 0.1 100 100 300 0.2 40
1990-95 I 0.005 5 20 100 0.01 0.1
Reference: "Low Fbllutant \\aste Incineration...: 1993
For Germany, information was excerpted from a paper by Professor H. \bgg and Dr. J. \ehlow entitled
"Low Fbllutant \\aste Incineration: A Systems Approach to Emissions and Residues' published in Interdis-
ciplinary Science Reviews in ] 993.
An overview of the Swedish situation was provided by Dr. Maria Ahlander of the Department of \\ater and
Environmental Studies at Unkoping University. It appears that a number of taxes have been levied to
control emissions of sulfur and carbon diOxide from coal. oil, and peat, but not for abiofuels. a Refuse is
considered to be a biofuel and is thus exempt from such taxes, although it may be subject to an oxides
of nitrogen tax, depending on the quantity of NOx emitted from a given plant.
Responsibility for household and industrial waste disposal lies with each community. In order to be
profitable, communities that rely on incineration typically purchase waste from nearby areas to provide
an adequate waste fuel stream. Currently some waste is even imported from Germany which has more
restrictive incinerator emission standards. Efforts to further recycle or to otherwise restrict the quantity
of wastes available will likely force some incinerators to close. About 10% of Swedish hazardous wastes
and apProximately 40% of household wastes are incinerated in Sweden.
..~
In 1985, in response to data on releases of significant quantities of dioxins and other persistent toxic
substances from household waste incinerators, the Swedish government declared a moratorium on the
construction of such facilities. Following extensive review and a commitment to a plan for a substantial
reduction in such releases from existing units, the moratorium was lifted.
The following are requirements set forth by the National
Energy Administration and the National Swedish Environment
Protection Board:
. The use of waste to produce energy should not conflict
with other uses that are more important to society, for
example the recycling of paper as a fibre raw material.
. It should be possible to use the energy efficiently in
existing energy systems, and on a viable financial basis.
. The proc!UCtion/recovery of energy from waste must occur
in such a way that society's goals in terms of limiting
emissions can be achieved.
(Energy From \\aste, 1986)
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
I
All three of the jurisdictions surveyed in some detail
(Holland, Germany and Sweden), notwithstanding
the determination that existing municipal refuse
incineration facilities have been sources of signifi-
cant quantities of persistent toxic substances,
particularly dioxin, have committed to continued use
of this technology. All are planning improvements in
control and operation of existing units and the
construction of new. state-of-the-art facilities to
substantially reduce total emissions throughout their
jurisdictions. Energy recovery and the
minimalization of land dedicated to waste disposal
are cornerstones of their strategy. Technical experts
remain confident that emissions of persistent toxic
substances from these units can be reduced to
background levels, while recognizing that elevated
concentrations in associated residuals will then pose
a significant concern. (Personal Communication -
Erhardt Mogensen, \\zllund Ecology Systems AIS;
February 12, 1996)
~i~
The IAOAB notes that the UnIted States and several European countries have focused on im-
proving pollution control performance or discontinuing use of existing incineration units by the
year 2000. SimUarl)l several domains have a jurisdiction-wide plan In place for this source
category, with numerical goals for the reduction of the release of specific pollutants from this
source sector withIn a specific time frame. Maintenance of an emission Inventory of reason-
able quality is inferred or stated in these plans.
To date, Ontario has not forwarded any strategy to reduce emissions from their existing munici-
pal incineratIon facilities through application of newer technology;
I,
.
<.
I:~:
I~
I
I
Management of residuals from Incineration
units with stringent emission controls is or will
be the focus of enhanced attention, as the
amount of persistent toxic substances increases
in these residuals.
21
.#
22
Jurisdictions, particularly Sweden, have
recognized the complexity introduced by
a municipal waste management strategy
that includes both recycling and incin-
eration. The impact of removai of
paper fibre from the waste streams,
with subsequent reduction in fuei value
and associated energy from waste
opportunities, was noted. In the case of
Sweden, a preference for recycling
activities in such situations is clearly
stated.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0
IAOAB INTERPRETATION OF VIRTUAL ELIMINATION
IN THE CONTEXT OF INCINERATION
i) previoIM CommiiJiJion
CommentiJ on ..!Jncineration
The Commission has noted over the last several
years that further reduction in the amount of
persistent toxic substances produced or trans-
ported and deposited in the Basin via the air
pathway is crucial to the safeguarding and
remediation of the Great Lakes. Additional
quantities of dioxin and other compounds from
sources such as municipal incinerators could be
viewed as representing an excessive burden to
the Basin. Any consideration of additional such
facilities should be rooted in the Great Lakes
Water Quality Agreement and acknowledge its
commitment to the virtual elimination of persist-
ent toxic substances, as well as being mindful of
the Commission's recommendations on the
subject of incineration.
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
In its 'Seventh Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality;. the Commission, in a section entitled
'Burning the Evidence' stated:
'The Commission has increasingly received expressions of public concern about the
number of large incinerators and their impacts on public and environmental health.
While many specific sources lie outside the basin, they are in a real sense within the
Great Lakes ecosystem. . .contributing Significantly to the load of contaminants. espe-
cially from the low-temperature incineration of industrial, commercial and household
refuse containing plastics and solvents, coated papers and many other products:
The Commission expressed strong concern about this issue in its 1993 Report on Air Quality in the
Detroit-Wmdsor/POrt Huron-Samia Region. The Commission's recommendations in that report included
the phase-out of incineration facilities, or a requirement to eliminate the production and emission of a
variety of persistent toxic and other substances, and establishment of uniform requirements for incinera-
tors in the Great Lakes region based on the principle of zero discharge. They noted that 'any strategy
towards virtual elimination and zero discharge of persistent toxic substances must address the significant
inputs from incineration... The Commission urges the stringent regulation of existing facilities throughout
North America, taking into account the need to ensure the zero discharge of persistent toxic substances
from those stacks to the Great Lakes:
23
ii) :Jhe Commi:Jjion~ Condit/eration 0/ a Virtual [:Aminalion-A-"rf'Ocu:h
In defining a path to the virtual elimination goal. the Commission's Virtual Elimination Task Force report
"Strategy for Virtual Elimination of Persistent Toxic Substances" (1993) makes the following comments
about the concept lemphasis as in original textl:
.
virtual elimination is an overall strategy that requires preventative and remedial approaches to
control or eliminate different inputs
.
the virtual elimination strategy must apply to all point and non-point sources in all media
the virtual elimination strategy must apply to new potentially persistent toxic substances (Pl'S) that
may be created, as well as existing such substances
virtual elimination must apply to persistent toxic substances already present in the Great Lakes
Basin Ecosystem...the qualifier "virtual" is appropriate as applied to eliminating the presence of
persistent toxic substances from the ecosystem
.
.
As a fundamental principle, any strategy must anticipate and prevent the deliberate input of any
additional quantities of persistent toxic substances to the ecosystem. Given the technological capability
to measure lower and lower concentrations of contaminants in the ecosystem, virtual elimination pro-
grams may never reach absolute zero. Rather the strategy is a challenge to continuously strive to
reduce the amount entering the environment, through, if necessary; remediation, treatment and
control en route to fulfilling the Agreement's virtual elimination obligation.
~
Because some of these substances already are present in the ecosystem. and because life in the Great
Lakes Basin Ecosystem is vulnerable to contamination from those imported into the region. implementa-
tion of the virtual elimination strategy requires application of a policy of zero discharge to prevent further
releases from all sources of persistent toxic substances. For new substances that meet the definition of
a persistent toxic substance. the application of the zero discharge concept is straightforward: no synthe-
sis or production and no release. The lIC recognized that minuscule quantities of persistent toxic
substances already in the environment may escape capture or interception before entering the Great
Lakes. even with the application of prevention, treatment or control measures.
The virtual elimination strategy adopts eight additional principles. as follows:
. the precautlonllIY principle. where infonnation is incomplete but there is a threat of serious,
cumulative and/or irreversible damage. measures to prevent degradation to the environment should
not be postponed
. consideration of the complete life cycle of the persistent toxic substances
. aU sources and pathways are to be considered
. application to releases to all media (air. water. land)
. applies globally
. apply an approach based on the reverse onus principle; the discharger of the persistent toxic
substances bears an active responsibility to protect the ecosystem
. involve all stakeholders, including business. industry, people and wildlife that co-habit the region,
while assuming the maintenance of a robust economy
. apply the principle of risk management to evaluate proposed options
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iU) ::lhe !J-.AQ-.AI]Appftcafion o/lhe Virlual [AmUuxtion Slraleg'j
In considering the Commission's deliberation on this goal, the IAOAB recognizes that the strategy of
virtual elimination:
I
I
I
II
I
~
.
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. must be applied to the management of municipal solid waste
. must be applied to incinerators
. must recognize that persistent toxic substances can be both created in an incinerator as well as
destroyed or captured by an incinerator
. must present practical approaches for moving toward the goal of virtual elimination through an
ongoing reduction in the amount entering the environment
. must demand the continual adaption of the best prevention, treatment or control measures avail-
able at any point in time
In developing a policy statement on incineration of municipal waste, the IAOAB adopted and applied
these virtual elimination principles and associated components throughout their policy statement. What
follows is a brief outline of specific instances of application of the virtual elimination principles, with
reference to specific subsections of the Policy Statement, which are referred to in parentheses. The
Policy Statement itself should be consulted for specific language and detail.
. endorsement of the Princlple of Vntual EliminatIon of persistent toxic substances to the Great
Lakes (preamble)
. recognition of the need to manage municipal solid waste towards this end (preamble)
. as incineration is one of several technologies available to manage municipal solid waste, in the
selection of any option a complete life-cycle analyses should be perfonned to ensure that the
total impact on the ecosystem is considered (preamble)
. in viewing this technology in a global context, new incineration facilities must, at a minimum, be in
full compliance with the USEAA, Environment Canada and state/provincial requirements. Also, as
incineration process and control technology improve on a global basis, identified enhancements to
further reduce the release of persistent toxic substances should be continually incorporated during
the life of all incineration facilities, new and existing. Such incorporation should be done on a
'reverse onus' basis, that is, on the operator's initiative. (Principle il)
. any application of incineration technology must result in a demonstrated net reduction of the
release to all pathways of persistent toxic substances on a jurisdictional basis (Principle ill and
Principle iv)
. within the incineration process, application of the principle of 'all sources and pathways' includ-
ing consideration of all releases from the process via emissions, effluent and solid residual material.
Extensive ambient air and deposition monitoring in the vicinity of the plant and at the ash disposal
location and continuous monitoring of the emissions and analysis of the residual ash further support
the principle of 'all sources and pathways.(Principle v and Technical Requirement i)
. The participation of the public in all aspects of the facility. including the review of data on the
release of persistent toxic substances via whatever pathway. supports the virtual elimination princi-
ple of involvement of 'all stakeholders' (Principle vi)
. As a further application of the principles of 'reverse onus' and 'complete life cycle: the IAOAB
added an operational principle regarding 'good management prac:tlce' (Technical Requirement
vii. The principle of 'complete life cycle: as applied to the facility. also led the IAOAB to identify
a need for adequate funds to support monitoring, maintenance, updating process and control
equipment, independent auditing, and sound decommissioning of both the site and the ash dis-
posal facility.
25
Reference:J
An International Persoective on Characterisation and Management of Residues from Municioal Solid Waste
Incineration. The International Ash Working Group; December, 1994.
Emissions of Dioxins in The Netherlands Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research,
National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection; February. 1994.
Energy From Waste (Summaryl. National Energy Administration, National Swedish Environment Protection
Board; )une, 1986.
OnulIio to aI/ow new incinerators. Globe & Mail; January 3, 1996.
Graede!. T.E. and B.R. Allenby. Industrial Ecol""" Prentice Hall Publishers, EngJewood Cliffs, New Jersey;
1995,412 pp.
1993-95 Priorities and PrO!lTf>SS Under the Great Lakes Water Ouality Am'eement. Intemational Joint
Commission; August 1995.
Persona( Communication - Erhardt Mogensen, \t!llund Ecology Systems A I S; Februaury 12, 1996.
~:lj
Ouantitative Estimation of the Entrv of Dioxins. Purans and Hexachloroben7.ene into the Great Lakes from
Airborne and Waterborne Sources. Drs. M. Cohen and B. Commoner, Center for the Biology of
Natural Systems; New York, May. 1995.
State-of-the-Art Assessment of Municioal Waste Incineration. A.J. Chandler & Associates Ltd.; February
22, 1996.
Status Reoort of U S. Life-Cvde Studv to Evaluate IntePrnted Waste Manal!'ement Stratemes. United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA); 1995.
\bgg, H. and J. 'khlow. Low fullutant Waste Incineration: A SYstems Aooroach to Emissions and Residues.
InterdisciplinaIY Science Reviews; \bl. 18, No.3, 1993.
Waste Manal!'ement in laoan Prism; Internet site - www.wrfound.org.ukl!apanMSw.html#top rRecvcling
Fact Book. Clean Japan Center; 1995).
Waste Manal!'ement in Denmark. Prism; Internet site - www.wrfound.org.uk!Danwastehome.html#top
/Waste Mana!!ement in Denmark. Danish Environmental Protection Agency; 1995).
Life CYcle ~lIdv of InteMited Waste Mana"ement StratePies: Stakeholders Reoort Februarv 1996. Re-
search Triangle Institute under contract to the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, USE9\.
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3nternationaL4.r QuaAt'JAdvi:ioNJ Board, September f 996
I
I
I
United States Section
Dr. Gary I. Foley, Co-Chairman
Director, Atmospheric Research
& Exposure Assessment Lab. IMD-75)
U.S. EPA
Catawba Bldg.
Progress Center
3210 Hwy. 54
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
j
.
II
f
.
I
I
Mr. Richard S. Artz
NOM Air Resources Laboratory
Room 3151. SSMC2, R/ElAR
1315 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Mr. Harold Garabedian
Deputy Director
Vennont Agency of Natural Resources
103 South Main Street
Waterbury, vr 05671-0402
I
'.
-I
Dr. Paul J. Uoy
Environmental and Occupational
Health Sciences Institute
Rutgers University
681 FreIinghuysen Road, 3rd Floor
Piscataway, NJ 08855-1179
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dr. Kathy Ann Tonnessen
National Park Service
Nr Resources Division
P.O. Box 25287
Denver. CO 80225-0287
Canadian Section
Dr. James W.S. Young, Co-Chairman
SENES Consultants Umited
121 Granton Drive, Unit 12
Richmond Hill, ON lAB 3N4
Dr. David V. Bates
Dept. of Health Care & Epidemiology
University of British Columbia
Mather Building
5804 Fairview Avenue
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3
Mr. David I. Besner, P. Eng.
Director of Policy and Intergovernmental Affairs
New Brunswick Dept. of the Environment
P.O. Box 6000
364 Argyle Street, 2nd Floor
Fredricton, NB E3B 5HI
Mr. Wayne D. Draper
Associate Director
Nr Issues Branch
Environment Canada
place Vincent Massey
351 St. loseph Boulevard, 11 th Floor
Hull, PO KIA OH3
Mr. Edward W. Piche
Director, Environmental Monitoring
Ontario Ministry of Environment
and Energy
125 Resources Road, West Wing
Etobicoke, ON M9P 3V6
Secretary
lohn F. McDonald
Great Lakes Regional Office
International Joint Commission
100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor
Windsor, ON N9A 613
27
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-3
1
u
~
The Corporation of the
City of Burlington
City Hall:
426 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Mailing Address:
P.O, Box 5013, Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 3Z6
Internet Address: http://wchat.on.ca/cob a 13 ~\\ '~l
Telephone: (905) 335-7835 ~1\11.1 .;)
Fax No.: (905) 335-7881
brodeurV@city.burlington.on.ca
May 13, 1997
E.Mail:
Robert Fraser
386 Delaware Avenue
Burlington, Ontario
L7R 3B5
Dear Robert Fraser:
SUBJECT: Rights & Privileges of Pedestrians at Unprotected Road Crossings
File: 750-11
The Council of the Corporation of the City of Burlington, at its regular meeting held on Monday,
May 12, 1997. adopted the following recommendation of the Community & Corporate Services
Committee, being Item No. CC-173-97:
THAT Council petition Hon. AI Palladini, Minister of Transportation, to review the
rights and privileges of pedestrians at unprotected road crossings in Ontario with regards
to enhancing pedestrian right-of-way and safety when crossing roadways at locations
where criteria for established warrants for approved Pedestrian Crossing devices are not
met;
and that a copy of this petition be circulated for comments and support to the Association
of Municipalities of Ontario, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Ontario
Traffic Conference, the Ontario Good Roads Association, the Institute of Transportation
Engineers Hamilton Chapter, the Transportation Association of Canada National
Committee, the Institute of Transportation Engineers District 7 Cariada, all other
municipalities within Halton Region, local MPP's and all municipalities with a
population of 50,000 or greater.
._---_..~-_._..-...._..'.,
If you have any questions in reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to ~~dti~J6iji~M;fION I
of the Transit & Traffic Department at 335-7779. i CLERKfV---- I
, .-;jI~1'
, 1 Ar.K BY -- L7LZUC
Yours ,. I ilRiGfNAl : _ /(...j,j...e.J..
I ~OPiES TO: . i
1
I
I
I
I
!
f--
1----- I
:-:CfD -/1;".
I'.' '-_',_" .U-..---........_.
---- -- ":......:~~..:-...:.----~--"..
.. i
,
i
~-_.
--------~
VBfjr
\council\ccsmay 13.97(8)
cc:
J. Crass, Transit & Traffic Dept.
I
I
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i".
I
I
II
I
I
I
COUNCIL DIRECTION D-4
May 15, 1997
The Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
AGENDA
ATTENTION: Mayor Hamre & Council
RE: The Durham Countryside Adventure
Dear Mayor & Council Members:
Following in the footsteps of the legendary & very successful "Great
Ganaraska Countryside Adventure", Durham Farm Fresh Marketing
Association and the Tourism Association of Durham Region have joined
forces to organize "The Durham Countryside Adventure" September 13 &
14/97.
Our Mission is to provide an experience in Durham's unique country and
culture - and the timing couldn't be better! Tourism studies show that more
and more people of all ages are looking for daytrips, rura1/eco tours and soft
adventure tours. With an ideal location just 40 minutes from Toronto, we can
offer country hospitality to a large population.
Our vision is to eventually open involvement to all eight municipalities.
However, with the left over momentum from the Ganaraska resting in this
area, it made sense for Clarington to be the focus of the "Durham
Countryside Adventure" for the first year.
It is anticipated that 2,000 to 3,000 tourists will visit Clarington during the
two day event. The direct and indirect economic benefits will be significant.
The tour will be a great opportunity to showcase the unique community &
lifestyle features which Clarington so proudly boasts in their promotions.
1::, DIST~UTION
CLERK~______
.
! ACK. BY _ .
I ORIGINAL
, oms
I
,
..-ji
"
,
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....' \,
One important goal of this joint venture, is to become fmancially viable and
self-sufficient. Jennifer Cooke and Patti Watson have availed themselves as
resource people to our committee. Many volunteers will also be involved
from Durham Fann Fresh Marketing Association, Tourism Association of
Durham and the community. However, start up fimds are required for the
first year. We are seeking fimds as a "one time only" financial support to
launch this project. The Municipality of Clarington has been a sponsor of
The Great Ganaraska in the past. Weare hoping that you will also
enthusiastically support this reorganized community partnership, as well.
We respectfully request that the Municipality of Clarington show their
support for this tourism initiative by granting $5,000.00 to be used for
promoting The Durham Countryside Adventure. In appreciation of your
support. a full page "Welcome to Clarington" ad will be placed in the
publication and gratis tickets will be made available for the Mayor and
Council members.
Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to promoting
Clarington's "country" and "culture" together this September!
.~
#
Sincerely
,
~
Sandy Arc ald, Chairperson
The Durham Countryside Adventure Committee
R.R. #5, 6275 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville LIC 3K6
Enc!. Budget, Mission Statement & Goals
~----- .
. I'
r-.----..... J
l------...-.--.-J
1_.."~'~7f]]~Z;7L,~~=_!
I
I
11
I
II
I
!I
i
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
BUDGET
Projected Income
Admission - 2,000 x $5.00/person
Participant Fee - 25 x $200/location
Advertising - 25 x $150/ad
Sub Total
Other potential income sources:
Town ofClarington
Durham Region
TOTAL
Prqjected Expenses
Staff
Administration
Training & orientation of participants
Printing -
30,000 brochures; 4,000 passbooks;
200 posters
Insurance
Wristbands/printing
Signage
Paid Advertising
Hats for Participants
TOTAL
$ 10,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 3,75000
$ 18,750.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 2,500 00
$ 26,250.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 8,000.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 1,00000
$ 26,000.00
DE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
MISSION STATEMENT
THE DURHAM COUNTRYSIDE ADVENTURE COMMITTEE
"To provide an experience in Durham's unique country and culture."
GOALS:
1. To increase agricultural awareness and appreciation of the agricultural
community in Durham Region
2. To provide hands on experiences at participants' locations.
3. To provide experiences appealing to all ages.
4. To take a commercial approach in developing a tour that would be
financially viable and self-sufficient.
5. To create awareness of Durham Region's uniqueness to the tourism
experiences & services.
I
I
II
il
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REASONS TO SUPPORT THE "COUNTRYSIDE TOUR":
1. The Agricultural Industry is second only to GM in Durham Region.
It is the fibre of our community that we promote to people in our
lifestyle slogan. Farming & farm families are alive & well in
Clarington. Let's showcase them!
AGRIC1JLTURAL STATS
from '91 Census & '93 Ontario Ag. Stats
Total Sales
Farm Capital
Total Population of Durham
Rural Population
Farm Population
Total Farms
Total Acreage in Production
$193
$2.2
409,070
77,147
6,785
2,090
337,222
Million
Billion
2. In the area of Tourism, Agri-tourism, eco-tourism and soft adventures
are growing in leaps and bounds. Many of our farm establishments are
already involved in tourism on an individual basis. However, we have
much more to offer tourists through packaging initiatives like the
Countryside Adventure. The impact on Tourism in Clarington would
be greater, as well as the spinoff effect on services like restaurants,
shops and accomodations.
3. Clarington is in a prime location, just east of Toronto & just off the 401
to offer unique attractions, services & experiences we tend to.take for
granted. Council recognized the importance of tourism for Clarington
and is one of the few municipalities in the Region to hire staff to
address this growing field that goes hand in hand with econmic
development.
4. This is the year for Clarington to shine, to "show & tell" what we are
so proud of. The goal is to eventually involve the entire Region in the
Annual Durham Countryside Adventure. However, the focus will be
on Clarington, where the left-over momentum of the Great Ganaraks
Countryside Adventure took place.
5.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The local businesses on the tour are paying to be a location for these
two days. They recognize that by joining forces, they have more to
offer consumers and are willing to pay their way.
6.
Two summer students will be employed as a result of this venture.
7.
Volunteers and youth through Girl Guides of Canada and 4H
will be valuable assets in making this tour possible.
8.
Finally, the partnership of Durham Fann Fresh & the Tourism
Association of Durham Region with other community organizations,
service clubs and commodity groups to organize "The Durham
Countryside Adventure" allows many to benefit and be proud of
their community.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
BUDGET
Projected Income
Admission - 2,000 x $5.00/person
Participant Fee - 25 x $200/location
Advertising - 25 x $150/ad
Sub Total
Other potential income sources:
Town of Clarington
Durham Region
TOTAL
Projected Expenses
Staff
Administration
Training & orientation of participants
Printing -
30,000 brochures; 4,000 passbooks;
200 posters
Insurance
Wristbands/printing
Signage
Paid Advertising
Hats for Participants
TOTAL
$ 10,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 3,75000
$ 18,750.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 2,50000
$ 26,250.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 8,000.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 1,000 00
$ 26,000.00
DE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
MISSION STATEMENT
THE DlJRHAM COUNTRYSIDE ADVENTlJRE COMMiTTEE
"To provide an experience in Durham's unique country and culture."
GOALS:
I. To increase agricultural awareness and appreciation of the agricultural
community in Durham Region
2. To provide hands on experiences at participants' locations.
3. To provide experiences appealing to all ages.
-,
4. To take a commercial approach in developing a tour that would be
financially viable and self-sufficient.
5. To create awareness of Durham Region's uniqueness to the tourism
experiences & services.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-5
.....
5100 Yonge Slreet
North York. Ontario
M2N 5V7
m
. .
.. .
- -
--
-
Tel: (416) 395-7300
Fax: (416) 395-7337
HAY Z7 9 14 AH '91
North York
CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
May 20,1997
Ms. Patti L. Barrie, Clerk
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1 C 3A6
Dear Ms. Barrie:
RE: PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT. BILL 84. PRIVATIZATION OF FIRE
DEPARTMENTS
At its meeting held on May 14, 1997, North York City Council gave consideration
to the above matter.
An Extract from the Minutes of the Meeting of Council is attached for your
information.
North York Council requests that all other municipalities in the Greater Toronto
area be encouraged to reject Bill 84.
Yours truly,
~QQ~ ~.
J-D.;is:T'~WUT'()N ",
i c':;:!'\~ /~ i
j :;;:~~~~.._'~~~ -~:J
--
....... ,.
L ORi'.i;!iAt T... 1L1Lf.<.. ':
G - ';~~::.-'- - :
I.~'!t; r.;; TO: !
,
1_~__
i
~=
!-.-
j--
.1__
~
~l.. Denis Kelly
CITY CLERK
BL:ay
Encl_
- --l
.,
--i
-"- j
-.
-
-.--
-..--
.-. i
'f
G."G92O\FORMlEr09MAY14.COR
-~~~~LO. &D. j
-- "--'-,,-::':'_'~:"-::~:-~-~_::~-".~_r
EXTRACT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF
NORTH YORK COUNCIL HELD ON
MAY 14 , 1997
I
I
I
I
I
163. Leave having been granted for the Introduction of an additional item by Councillor
Mammollti, Council considered the following:
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT - BILL 84 . PRIVATIZATION OF FIRE
DEPARTMENTS.
It was moved by Councillor Mammollti, seconded by Councilior Rizzo. that:
WHEREAS BiIi 84 allows for the privatization of Fire Departments, a policy which
has led to horrific circumstances in the United States:
Carried
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AND WHEREAS Bill 84 allows the replacement of full time professional fire fighters
with part time workers of less experience and skill;
," ~
:j"
AND WHEREAS BiIi 84 provides cell back service which will lead to slower
response time and will reduce public safety;
AND WHEREAS the Ontario Govemment received over 225,000 petnlons
requesting them to eliminate the threat of fire safety but they failed to amend these
aspects of the BiIi:
AND WHEREAS the BiIi Is expected to pass 3rd Reading in the legislature during
this Council meeting;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this Council hereby declare its Intention not
to Implement BiIi 84 and to specifically Indicate its opposition to any policy which
undermines fire protection:
l?;-!;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this motion be circulated to all
municipalnies in the Greater Toronto Area encouraging other municipalities to reject
Bili84.
It was moved by Councilior Flint, seconded by Councillor Rizzo, that this Item be
referred to staff for an analysis of BiIi 84 and a report to the Legislation and
Intergovernmental Affairs Committee as quickly as possible.
It was moved In amendment by Councillor Rizzo, seconded by Councillor DI
Giorgio, that the Fire Fighters' Association be requested to make a deputation at the
Legislation and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee meeting when this matter Is
to be considered and that the Association receive copies of all reports relating to
this matter.
A recorded vote on the amendment moved by Councillor Rizzo, seconded by
Councilior DI Giorgio, that the Fire Fighters' Association be invned to appear before
the Legislation and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee when this matter is
considered, was as follows:
FOR: Mammoliti, Severino, LI Preti, Di Giorgio, Rizzo, Berger, Filion
AGAINST: Feldman, Flint, Yuill. Minnan-Wong, Shiner
ABSENT: Lastman, Summers, Sutherland
"
'.
The motion moved by Councillor Flint, seconded by Councillor Rizzo. carried, as
amended.
I COUNCIL DIRECTION n-6
115/23/97117:21:55 41li-39f,-43B4 -) 90S li23 5717 Town Clerk Page IIB2
~ VILLAGE OF TYRONE and surroundings
t:t:ij Community C entre ~~113 12 09 P" '91
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mav 23. 1997
Stephen A. Vokes
Director of Public Works
Municipalit)' of Clarington
Dear Sir:
Re: Meeting Wednesday April 30 to discuss. Redevelopment of the Tyrone Park
Thank you for the opportunity afforded Neal Smith and I to talk to staff.
I was sorrv to find that the meeting was not as directed bv Council Resolution #C-866-96. Had it been. I feel we could
have clarified some of the issue~ prior to your report'to Council.
Staff misunderstandings that were addressed at our meeting and that I believe need repeating are:
Area serviced by Tyrone Community Park - Hampton. Burketon. Mitchell Corners, Enfield and Emliskillen.
When we refer to drawing children from these areas we are often doing so because of unique programs like
hard ball (only other program is Bowmanville). small areas without sufficient registration to field a team in
a given age group or because the community lacks the facilities to offer their own programs. We were not
implying that the we are always the sole source of these programs.
Land purchased by the TOIm circa 1990 and added to the Tyrone community park. This land has not yet been
added to the developed area due to needed grade improvements. (This is part of phase one of our plan.)
Location of existing Children's Playground We were not attempting to pass blame to the Town ror the
current situation and were pleased to hear that T o\\n staff also had ex 'Pressed concern about the location a
number of years ago. We feel that the issue is a serious one and with the 20 f 20 vision of hindsight. the
location selected \~as not the best choice. It is none the less a situation that should be corrected. ~
Staff explained some of the rational behind the exclusion ofT~Tone Park from the 1992 Municipality's Development
Charge By-law and Development Charge Policy Report. The asswnptions made at that time. were based on the input
available to staff.
There was no regular communication forum between residents and the Town to promote the necessary
information exchange. Tyrone had a history of working out their problems without approaching the Town.
It was an arrangement that seemed on the surface to be a continuwn of prior policy. The difference was that
there was no longer elected official contact with the community as in the past. Earlier years often had a
member of Council as a regular attendee at Community Centre Board meetings.
It was also assumed that the needs of neighbouring communities would be handled in a timely manner bv the creation
of facilities within their boundaries. thus redu';ing the demands on the Tyrone facility. Enniskillen being a prime
example.
The To\,n is still an unkno\\n nwnber of years away from ha\'ing a facility up and running ~ Enniskillen with
the issue of land acquisition not yet resolved. Once that hurdle is over, the type of facility must also be
resolved. Residents must be polled. volunteers recruited and an organization established for this it be a
success.
Staff also spoke to the cost of facilities in other areas and the desire to ensure the viability of these other facilities.
~one. on~. canada
85/23/97 87:22:51 416-396-4384
-}
985 623 5717 Town Clerk
Page 883
I
I
I
I
I
Amounts of $300.000 plus fOr Hampton and S 180.000.(01' Burketon were mentioned. These amounts sound reasonable
for the development of good recreational facilities.
T}mne's facilities could not be recreated for a traction of those dollars. We are proud of work the community
has done in building and maintaining our current park. The Town's support. when asked for has always bee~
positive. With this partnership the drain on tax dollars over the years has been minimal. There has not been
a constant demand for those scarce tax dollars. no "they got this so we are entitled to that". Nor are We
suggesting that to be the case today.
What we would ask is that Staff and Council consider SOme of the benefits that the proposed expansion of the Tyrone
facility would provide.
Small rural community parks can not survive by competing with one another. The question must be asked
"Can facilities in Tyrone and Enniskillen draw sufficient numbers',? Would it be a repeat of the Burketon
problem? Or worse'''Would both centers suffer the same fate? .
Would it not be better to postpone until population growth was in place to support the creation of programs
and facilities complementing each other? Sufficient numbers of participants must exist to populate teams at
all levels and in all sports. Communities must work in concert to meet the needs of their residents.
Pressure could be reduced to have a full-blown facility in Enniskillen established over the next couple of years
with some improvements to the existing school grounds and grow as volunteers gain valuable experience by
working \\;th the Tyrone group. (Involvement that started \\;th a small number of Enniskillen residents having
signed on this year). This would also reduce the likelihood of a repeat of the Burketon experience where the
community was unable to sustain the necessary commitment trom volunteers to continue the operation).
We must have sound programs for our youth today. We must continue to support and nurture the value set that these
community activities foster.
With an ever shrinking treasury we must consider "What provides the best bang for the constituents dollar".
We must continue the traditions and history of volunteer. community run programs.
Thank you for Your time and consideration.
Help us maintain the "spirit of community" that volunteer run programs provide by working with us on this project.
Frank Simpson
Tyrone Communitv Centre
Neal Smith
- -~---_._--------
..-. .~-.. ..--.,., ~
Tyrone Athletic Association
cc Town Clerk for The Mayor and Members of Council
---._._----~~
tyrone. ontano. canaaa
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-7
'~l
a' " .
, ',,-, arllJrJigu;on JUH tJ Iz 35 FH '9
! RehaibiJitatRon & SJPlortl:s i 7
1 . .
! [n~uriies Cliiniict;
: '
,
!
June 3, 1997
Mayor Diane Hamre &
Councillors of the Municipality of Cbrington
Attention: Patti Bame ;
Municipal Clerk
I
Re: Sign By-Law
'I am writing on behalf of the following businesses:
CIarington Rehabilitation & Sports Injuries Clinic
Clarington Physiotherapy
Bowmanville Family Chiropractic Centre
Bowmanville Family Foot Care Clinic
Body & Sole
LDCafed at 234 King St. E., Bowmanville above Frank Real Esfate. We would like fO replace all
the va.tious signs at the street with one professional sign which will improve the esthetics. OW'
present sign would be removed and replaced with the sign (see copy enclosed) which is presently
located at our driveway entrance and does not obstruct vision to oncoming traffic,
Doug Powless informed us we cannot put the sign where our current sign is but must affix it to the
Frank Real Estate sign. The problem is as follows; putting the sign there would double our costs
and we have no guarantee Frank Real Estate will continue to lease at 234 King St. E. It is also
visual obslIUction to oncoming traffic in this location. Secondly, we tried a sign there and this
caused great confusion with patients at both 222 King St. and 234 King St., as they would enter in
the driveway at 222 King St. We had many complaints and concerns, for safety re.asons we
muvt:d illu Ihe presenllucalion. The Fr.mk Real Estale sign is 40 SqFI, Ihe sign we wuuld like 10
put up;s 32 SqFt. This is within the by-law of 100 SqFt maximum.
234 K;., SIT.., E..,..Ilo.........ill.. 0... Lie IPS PI....JF~. (<JOS) 623.8202
.
~
Dr. Kathlynn Hoch, D.C.
~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It is obvious that remoWlg the rented signs etc. and replacing it with this sign would definitely
improve street front esthetics. We respectfu1Jy request an amendment to the currant By-Law to
allow us TO replace our current sign with a new more professional sign.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerelv
.,
G~O-S~
Carlos DeSousa
~c;Umf
Bonnie McInall
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BoOry ,
O~~4:
Don Cook
bylaw.sam
.....~;::;:::.".";:.;.~_,_.;;.;'-.:;c,-,_.:..-;;;."..'"'-'--"~.; "'","'_....
OIST~TION
CLERK ~ __
ACK. BY
ORIGfNAt
CiS TO:
'.1
i
,
.,,1
. ~~n. If
" (OO~.
~
(2
t
I
I X-
I~/
,"i I f
~~
:r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
234
KING ST_ EAST
BOWMANVILLE
fAMILY WELLNESS
ceNTRE
'0 Clarinliton RehablUlatton
& s.... 1. .: ..!_Q Chnic
623-8202
O Body & Sole
Hair Salon & Spa
623-7653
O Bawmanvlle FamHy
. Criropractlc Centre
623-8388
I'
144
O Bowmanvllle FamHy
Foot Care Clinic
623-8202
I2 (0 )
r- ~s'~
,',..,.'
'0
...
:ft.
~
0"
;)
Q
"Q
-<..
"-
~.
~
~
v
~
-
)
~
I'
4~
J
I'
<i
itS'
,,_~. ,(If)
.t ",,~ /;t) f\ ,
"~ ,
,/
2 If- c (
.1
q~
fJw.A.Pi1llQ.K\
~~
S\'/.;~. .
'" ,/..{\~(t,
V'II
~
r
10lAL IAIE6+11
Feffil'\ G-P..o U N b
ft/ ( (0g II )
(. I'
,I 3
S\ Crt-.\ 4-SY- q 10 ~ If
. II II "
t H%fS 10 ~'(p y.. 1(1")...
~ .
~ "'f; P ~FC-TloW 7')."~ ::2..y-tl
t\
~\ IN\)f\l.'DVr\L ~R€1V-ON
'S' II II 'J"
I l&rJS,- w.~ VI' 17"",. X -.:t
toTAL 10.
~.\ &f' eoYtl\(Lt7t:,; J()'~
(Newi)iA!G. I !\IS TA-L(,I\T/()r\
~070.0-0 'PSTf G-~f r::-Y.:UA
I.
i:'"~
t
. ,
/u
,J.fJ,~ tO~, $ zoo.b1> fU/,J.
U ..(N~WI>ii'\lG-' f f\lSTrTl..("~TI~
~G7o ,c-o P~Tf G-~r r:r-7f.At
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
,
.
.'
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-8
,
lhe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those ~usinesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
I pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
. runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
Itealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
, I
I~
/lddIzeM,
&/.1
)!~/
~ ~ r 's 11' tJRe/1l 0
~. ~JJr~ tf~.
}l
Oes~ ~
O/YJ;V?]
- 0 mn
'I
I I / --
IV [;
, I
~
!
I
I
, I IJ /ff1YJ e
~
I-~'
(lJEL];J
SeweR S
· 11 yj),eg-55
Q 7 7<<0 . S
. It!p' , --:- .
L c Cl l C' ({'
J tJ?- ~aa c " rI- C
/(/ ,/0; [rf rJ /-'
. ~'. .;'w"";";';,..'
. Sc:P.3 0
~..
~/3Ytf/i1t2//J 5f.J o/<-w./ V .
.
-
Lf7 1\4-'1.1 { () y . C,f2. c:=s' ~NO
t.lt II
'. (])
Sr~
I
I
/}
I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental at
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizinfll
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek will.
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sal
tary sewer, please sign ,this petition. ....
1tame
/lddtze44,
"3 rr ..9.ar.vt.
I
/J I
r (/>r# J t?~
'~
;~
!:
~_.
6a~d "10, cl
.,t/ .
k~.-1 .. >~~/~_
//. /..
'/ ~
V .~I ~/'hJk~
/;
I
~..,
~ ,
~~ P/ke lJ-'<v/lJ lJ _
3' 0 51 o IL CJ>"<) .
/
,
I
I
I
I
.I H 4f,. / 5" -r- () /-""v"-r1
52:6/ ~{} ,(?r
--
CAJLcfu
It') ~veL .S7t ...
P lCJ9-5~
5/tAJ OJV J3ac:/( ~/1'AJ}~-lolA.
I
I
II
I
I.
I
.
Sr~
/I
the Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
I pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
L runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
ealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
/lddtze44,
l7cc~'
lr{atuaJ ~
J?J, ~l)c./ A(e
~
3 d C( '7 ~nc. H 7 €oJ..lG
~.
/
<
7' C /fc.e (,t C (.-r(' [L /I d c":.
. ~ <) ft1iflSC;
/
'*'2 5 Cone tl-lj
(J!20rtJtJ
() fL-u tJ u
i.e.l
COte-6Y' 0
SSR3 f{o.\M. SI:
~th~.
;5311 (70)1) c f iJ>e ();.J 0
I
}
i
.
I
I
I
1/.
Sr~
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them I
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which.
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the I
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
1tame
0aAa.LIlL
9( ~ lIanuoAd/
,;I;h~ (Z'PoJJ
SjD""c. ~~~
()
~~.
.c .~
/. /"- I
)ic~;/ .
~-I~.;,h~
/ldMe4dt
I
I
't
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
01 II! ~ I it-
IA~,lj.
f< ~?.. &)~.
~R:r \ Y~Q ~
R R~). .j(~dJ
/2 k!JI c2 tJ KCJ A.J6 .
./7,(} tL no
lJJl d- ~,--"
tJ?('(f..(} 0
&'7'-
5 o:).{ 1'1Ivv.~
(0
J4
u
I
I
. I J ~1""mCQ,,\ kl--Q.Y'-
I
I
I V. 5r;QVL) e
I ;J $p~btrl;?/lJ.s
: ~~Wi M,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1);:;//:;- /11 'YU/Lt-(1-J.
Rob~-t ~.i
Kl~ 02-0z-1e.JG
.J\) (C~ V U'Z- A!~/ytl
{O/1(1le PI uk
Jhc /111' It.; {;-. Oac"-'o.
~
Lto pc\v,J 5 Cr I o,e:,IoJ(J
5;)70 mCL;'" ~+i 0,0(\0
4
c9-Q.01^f o. .~
'1/ /<",/<.,/,/0 f/ /1/(" pJ(-a sr/e
6(5'( Oc/JtJ/1st/!d. O~
37 ~~ Ce y"/ C. . \R of. 5 U/OI'J'C
'? ~ /}// /LL S r o/2c/,uo
.J
{Y\ t U Q; 0 10 (\ C
1tame
.4mAf'r ~
LrJ-h
Q
( d
F--~/lIE~
~---.. ",--1 . 7 I
( .. '0 to . 7 vA (At-(ur L<--
'7?JJ{~ YWda/i ~i:
l
~ ,1r'\.J h \ ----t e...
:J~\h'''n p o.Jt^~/
J -11(,2
I/""'-iy'/il ( /htl~. (~'
, -
-4/~ft:;~A"4!
~~
;4~
tG.~ 6,?l/S'f. re/
,
()rnnn
(
~ OIZct(a-
Q~/J'O
S"'J- 70 N~ Ck/7.CA-~
a~~
OltfJri/c;J -
"'
I
I
I
/I.
I
I
I
I
/I
. the Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
f developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
I
I pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and die .
iealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
I
1~-
/lddIze4<t
JA,j-
~
I'
tJCVVI'
?f3? ( g~l.{.I\-(rZ
<n
(<0 t Or2<?}?vC)
5:21{'} 1V(aAA. Si. ~C5/UJ
-2 ;; d/~ ~ '-dJ/~
~o,J)(.,S-
o~ ,0-tvT-:
6
~O.
71
NO
C v f)
Oro'"'fJ
ovv/7
I
I
I
1/.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tJ
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! . Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
/lddtze44,
5r ();ul?(!f! S,T ()<lj).t 0
::J/ c/.yV&1{ '):T'
{J.
QJL
\)'^-c....h..~S 5 SC: 0t2-crrrJ3
p~ &~/~'
Se
rrA. . OI'"OYl 0
I
11'\o..AA.. Sf. .
71 t1~fN S-r. ()f2oNO
j:::-~ 5.3io M~ ?~
t;:;\
?.3
SO
1M;V\
PFlF"R~
Pll<-I;::" . 0iRC\f\/()
.
5271
I
I
I
I
Sr~
/I
(he Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
. pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
~e land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
lealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. H you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
I~~
/
/lddtze44, J.(t>pA-e- r / 71-
r]6b~~
/' ~~-
~~
~,(>~ '-frNl oAr)... ,
.
30 I2w -f
/() t2 ~)) O/W7~O.
35j altt7tP
/:lV' ~
,J I So
4'.
~
tR>2. I
~$'r
I
I
I
/I:
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. Therun-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
1tame ~a I 7::r&l J'l! I}v
0~..{;
/lddtze44, '39bR COr'! j 0/'0110
olG ;o-"V-~ .{ly
~
f
> -:nz: ( Sf C7e->"",-'L.<=:>
~~/t.I,~
.f-(V
{"2 ~ S;; ,S;
. 5'"Y ~ ( .l....c... -l r-
~~
~rJ)-:z~ ~~
-r;rY'-~dN~
1~ ~~
/
~~\
~O~~
w
I
I
I
I
/I
the Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
. pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
lithe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
~ealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
IJ. ~~~
Is edJ tV
--{b .fl-6 ~
· D 12 OfY\OStdwk-
\.
I
/ldeVte4<t
t.J~~ ~.
{- PeJ€Q I~' 0 t:Y J1JCI
;)J 7()
O--nA'rrt-()L.
tJA (/~
3~ Sd.
~
'5 i?las'
-, r:
~ l i{7- C?~6SJY\ iRd
,
~
Sr~
I
I
/I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
1tame
~es GWGv1
~l' r;;.~1
; ~
ct-~
~~.f<~
_1:~~ ~~~
~'r( L/ ~/~~
~.~
y;;}y
/lddtze44,
~v v' II, rk..
Oeo~
5:2-11
'P~ .I "
") cy(T)~
S\-
?IJ
j1f, / / '>,/
c:P~c?
':eC"\G
@ Ci u-vkc
o
r
I
I
I
I
1/
lhe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to ha~e them
I pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the cr~ek which
I runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
ealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
L
I~~~
/lddtze44,
,
3.;2.. 0..d/ cSt-~
3~
;l SC~cL;e-
1{.
1/11 R~~
I!f? ~ ()l'/r/Vl; .
~I?I.
!y
l~
3C( ([XV;.~ ~~
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
~~~
The Town of Orono is in desperate nee tary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those inesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
. tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
.p ~! E./JO \fAt ~
lJEI L f1< ALL(.~ 7//11
~t1
/lddtze44,
/Z1l.lJ.J, QfWlJo
MJ/3 /.170
uS fljJtJUK C'/!6( (r)f{' / /1()
,
~
O.Ci-,
~
o 1VWi/IJ SJ;
r:
(2jqJopAJIuV ro~~J
.91./'-I 1l/JJ4.J}J sfoetJtiXJ. (}y.J1'.
--r
00 o5-cA--r{GtV 0 <; I
,
I
I
I
I
/I
Fhe Town of 0 rono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
Ithe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
. runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! OrQno's survival and the
tealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Oro'rio's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
_~, ~LAL44.
IJiA-.c ~ ~ ~/
/lddtze44,
{I/.u-t-d 57: () ~d.N'if _
/f"? d4_/ -P'Y ~~
~~
~
'5'"1 g
/~ ~N-r~ d. (J;~
.Loo- .
.$"f~ $.
~
/'
~~'L~$
(1\)
.'"
~
I
I
/I:
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing I
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the I
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~ .-<' I
f()~~ .z:/J-! ~.
,33c:/o JI! {) I liz/a" ^l,.l 0
/';/'10 (P ~/ A;~4,/ g~ 0~/U-(J 6!
/ /~, I
..:.?:l 2;" C ;7 &,"'.~ a / 0- -I'. @
I
1tame
&~
.I
/ldMe44.
}y~M ~,
/:; .f~,h' "il .
;JI/I ~~'&~-e1
.~':.:
... /) d
,4.()f?~ I l//,,(IJ{a
(),Qd1..n'
oiL c. c\.' "q~
0t c: ' ~ " .< r ' '//-.k-_...-; / ~-<.. ,0
~" ~1A.Q' \.(.$ Q,,)
\
It I', I J I
\;;::;'"1 &t
(I ~....<<_,_ ,~~ /:.':k
'" ' . ,-
/< !/(-l~ /J if
/(/;;:-,,/~ '/~r
,d' 7'fi~Md/
- .
'-/,41 ~.-7 {b;/.....e
a~o,.
IR rf\ I i.( ~, O^-nv./)
crj t11r1j ~I /~ .
, .
~ ~ C.1~>>J,_cL~ - G ~
')- '19 s~
I
I
I
I
I
/I
Sr~
fhe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
..pumped out several times a Y~.' And those businesses with p~oper septic be~ could be uti~g
pe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these sepnc systems runs lDto the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
lealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
Iname
I
I }1U71ll~ ~Jj
.
1
;4ddtze44,
o~
':'5<ry /11~~ '" . /7.
~
()YOrlO .
0=
~ ()(r (j ffi'V)
,
/0
Sr~
I
I
/I:
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those bUsinesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing I
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the I
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
01
.--- -
(~ <::> - C>,J J -
o6/?/J .5--r-
5/
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
~
/lddtze44,
,'?Yh~,,~
73
5
/t?:t-
,
/
/~~L;
/;2 ~~
'/14~-
fYll
.,
, ( 4nd /'t!.. (J/.! . Ifo/. r1.f.O /1/ r?
if 9 9'7 ~ t'4.. . J::4- &....A .1)
O~
'~p~
~.
r
~.S50l> ~ .If
I
I
I
I
[
I
I
I
I
Sr~
/I
I'he Town of 0 rono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
. pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
~e land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
lealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
1,/iA>I/~f/7L;~~
I ~brk; i~
I 5;\;11- (csctfje
I ~c.J,,~ ~~~~
I ~\, 1~J fA~
. Ot,.~.... 1/
/lddtze44,
tf)A~
D'w~
()/) IJ NO
(?)Nfl\..-()
o M$t'\ .f) '-
II \OE-t (JZ. ~ f {/(,:::..
C9 'P)()O
t
I
I
i.lflk
1?~-<--~/JiL f<dd1A-.
~Jf~ ~
J\\J~ w'i
~i.~, ,
/
..~
.
,1f'
f
'~."Yl:
'...~
;-'"
,.
,
Sr~
I
I
(/1
CJ Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
*
I
I
I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses. with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system, If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
. tary sewer, please sign this petition.
1tame
I!
~
o . J/6
,. / ,J~{.I.
7 / ;,:. vG?jI)..:-,
j JI2~~ ~ \:.
~ \ 'f . 95"Gt~
3c, \-\.\'-> \: fR\{..j~ V ';'c~..;
I
4//
/
."
(~~")
..1,
I ;......;.:....-1~ """)
'-.:-/ -
'/i,e1r"/
.M~,,^v'
6,\< (./7.1'- '/-::>
:--'v \ v, _
,
s4t<; t{;'\\'WL.::.r \i iL- f'.
.. \."'. - .,
('~ ~,.~ \.. .
c:--~
Cf/7 :J--~.
~A11 t:
Sc 1-1 &/V:1'"
1 c;
--t!tltJ/ v Jl G fL6P-
/} 14- .~
C-A4,f, [
J
I()~ I7tL l-
S 04 .t2.11 I L. L..1:- J) Ii (J fl.~~
. .
7 -1t,~ cfJ~
')/
I
I
I~
I
/I
M#-2-
C~(' '""Co '{.Q i;r '- t.(~N'1clc.~
()~uJD c.oVvc. ~
4t~4
.,,)<.3c>~ D~
Lc. (6 ((VI 0
.i1,d t3~~'
I#'~
d
l
WOf/ /Wvir-- f51-.' (9r~. ~
035 o/-//_d/ ~/
Y liLf ~ G Il../L fJ Ic~
aZ
J
\.
~
sS'~
I
I
/I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,~ 00 I
\C~~0) I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~;
1tame
(' l1 :"lflflg'iflfj)1C,(IJ?V
tLJL,9"~~
<;\....c....-.J C\~ o,,-&,,,v--.
~L'-1
/lddtze44,
/ 7 r- lIY.1 JJ. ()1fH.J)
")~ ri~lh ~\ ~
(p \ ),;). (-P ~ ~f>I v~(1
f!.~(-2 Q~<:i.
4S-~0
Prc~
8<6
1/)'\\~ 5C
1.-. r'\ .1 r"-
I
I
I~
I
Sr~
(l
CJ
fhe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced t9 have them
. 'pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper .septic beds could be utilizing
lithe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
tealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
I (~r.td_~.
I ~~.CVI^- \.0~
i'~ ~~
/I~
4-b (.tru,J, N 12J.. p, // ,) ({) ""........ ,(')
\ '3 ~1oA (::l- (2, ~(l1Y\ \ ~
\ J
<6 Y ~ R~ ~ ) A1-e7Vt).
7
17 q ('ttrAr.-rh :>f- GY(]Yto
It ~ /)fj,j I)) 'j C tE~.
OlforV ()
3/ (6hJu..,Jf OkM1(')J&;-tniliCl
/1)7 71/ /1.5l {yh}o t?A.Jr:
I
5'03 b 1Y\.o..vv
.(\0
I
I
(/1
CJ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabirants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
.~r, ~~ '\ ~
~, ...
watrciTop{Qv
~
-J/, O~
614?J/'O Cti
H- f~ f--
0_,,,,,= O,j.
S9a'S
:5
.5'03 ?
(flflAN. cs/o[Qy}1.
woo
..09
I
I
I
I
.,
Sr~
/I
IThe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
I pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
I health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
11tame
I 1-- L
I~.
I ~.
..(Y\,~ {(4""A'"
1'!1l~ ;J~
Icf~ W~
I/O~{).I/ ~~
l UQ f1~JJ FAo..L\q A
I I
\~U~<I. lB Oll~,.Jf
I~~~' ~ibt.l
'/7.() /Ie{ , .. fJt( r,e j
IQ ~
I
/lddtze44,
rn /1.-1
".
t
<<J.M... (!) . .
s+. u.-v
(LrL f4' (
~ J7?
~,K :17( ~.
~.
~~/ (uI'/~M:k ~ ()~)
~K R7lo fLt ~ Q
OWly
.~ .{5(f'1,~!..
t)<SVf7) .
crJ~'
~J~
1- yJ.
~
,.
I
I
I
1/.
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them I
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the I
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
~
~~ ~~~~)~\~.
~1~-
/lddIzeu
@~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(J;
(r
~~
!p/:!1}W tJ /
.
()
~~~~
6n_()-Itt.A ~
i
-@
I
I
.~
I
the Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
. pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
lithe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through,Q!9no Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
.ealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition. .
~
Jn6~~,~j~~
I ,'II
/I
rlddtze44,
~'
/- S3'/S /J1tZ /n I Sf,
dd/
~fu4: ~.
Q
(~l()
C?~, ~
.
.~~~
I
~~~_A~/f
I~ erJ~
I
0...<
'-
9/(P ...5/#VcJ I<
p~
Dr-
(\\)
"
t.,~ .
~
".J
I
I
1/:
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and I
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing I
the land for much needed parking. . The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the I
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
I
~r~~1
,&RiJNO .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
':'<
1tame
J/ gtl9 sc/fkG
,
(~~~
cf)h~"""
/lddtze44,
,
-40 l) (tit jio SIll.
SsS;J. frlAI# S/i
~/'~.
~~.
"-
S.21/g ~~..J..
dR \YUJlj) ~
GAJY7L.U
O'~
~.
-7~
~ 1-, -,<>, 'S" r-
\1~~
;:;3(']cf
fJ1IHAJ.
nf.tJtJO .
#
I
I
I
I
/I
IThe Town of Orono is in desperate need of san~tary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
I the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
tealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition. " .
11tame
~~
I
A~
3 (lu#~iJ
.~
1);= \ /t". IV \"h+ k ~ {' " d-:; ~
'L23
L-e~k"-r..r .r.,]
'JP HnV\ (de i:hA-<7
. (AA.-.{.../SDIIl NFA/..,E,
It~.~
~m4i'f ~~
I '\. - L
/ .Y1..Cyt 'VC....
I ,)J k '
I
l~i{L j)~ r/t;v
. .
l,j ~,L.
~~. J6~r.1
, ~"
I
~JCRAI...- bJ;;/...JVFR'j tJR..nA/0
~Q-' ~~
7S~;vj;// Q thOJ1Cr'.
,,33 ;7-9 C;v{I. t /~ Alo
10l~
r9;1i)
~
5{)68 l!at(']s!-
33 ItJ.lLL/jj Gi,
/11 ~ CAA.
(.14' ~r.J,;:fl IJJ
O/C.o
~j
~
()A.hl.. .,
i1'~r,~@:~~~$~~Jt~~t~$~I~~~~~'"
:", .,..
\f~
~
adoLlwoJ I
~ .......
} 1 CJ-r uJ2C H sl
(&2& /11a,::' S-I. I
(
(\)UZCU\ ()e L~k )
\ 2' -fa Y1 ;1/l~ r du:t M cJ-
~/11~
~h~~o-Sb loa r~ pCI
0- ' ~ (1/l~ &t. I
(.~7---dJ;~ 7&dv-J<-b~ I
..,;,' .' .f,! ~ \ct- \ ' 4). ~--JV;)\oW ~-(.
( rc~ fi 5'.12-3 MAl," f'r: .
( riCIJ# brf/4ri $1.2:3 -ulft# J-r I
( ~ Nd~ t)<fl( O~
, .-.;,.::- :".;.;;~:..,;~..",..,:;;?: I
(lZ~""'*J' ({d4~ .
( r ~ /"6 u.-.;, .of 0....1
\ 77 ()fy/U /~~~ I
( rJntclre ~~l 1{f)Yt?)/! J /; I
( ..~ Or~~
(. ~ t.ice.- I g lint r# 0 row oAt
c NUJ)j) Br 1J1t01 ~ ~ I
I
I
I
I
(
<.
@
I
I
I
I
I The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
I the land for much needed parking. The ron-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
I health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani.
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
I 1tame O,{}/'.-Hllol-v'r'L /I~4. ~~b ^~'r-' S-;.
I <r:ye;=: V/L L;s :!.~ 'In A t~ Jli
I
. I
I 2 T~ S 7 6
. ~.~J,
I
I
~~
/I
//
/0
5"34'
{C L
,
C ~lfAJ
1./ GL:u c/'rR; -; ( 6
-,
;/'- r" 5
ft. K ,.~?l._ (. ttIV/V"
GJ. \~'-I~~{$o1\.
\
<3..J?....c-yt/Y
~1\Cl
) " t'-:\\ 5 r
G
Sr~
I
I
~
I
The Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental 3JI
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them.
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizin.
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek whil
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a s1
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
/lddtze44,
~#/
0~
I
~
vv--.:o
~_.-c (Ill UA
/J,/ .
-.
!hI\J]/)\ J(") .
I
fl~ ~~.
'- M lO-dL-Lcvd
:/
tJ~.
t:v-<a~. -
I
I
~
-1
R~
-
()~
~
The HaIr Um~
Orono. Ontario
.
@
I
I
I
I
I
/I
IThe Town of Orono is in desperate need of sanitary sewers. It is having both an environmental and
developmental impact on Orono. Those businesses with holding tanks are forced to have them
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing
Ithe land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
tealth of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani-
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
bwee
IEFv CAsu')F,U-"
J>ARy Hi&61^LS
(iR~mbPr
It-I AlD,4 Qii'cr.AJ
/ldM.e44,
/VIA IN '5T. Otl.oiu 0
VYl~hN 5T. 0/1\';"') 0 .
Pe/~Rs' -IlKG ({]l2DlOo
U/tL- Jr 6JRcJ/1/o
o t\,j c)
Pcz
;r::ah/~,t:-'- 6,eo4.J-J
~..o o'N c>
Ih. thb~
I d /l1 C 1::> (J #,Ji t.-- JJ
I.~ ~I)
~l)
() /t hi tJ
@ eJ~
I
I
!II
CJ I
The Town ofOrooo" in d"pern.. """,'Y ..0:\\1 <w<n. J, i. ha.ing bod, m -"nmmnd md .
developmental impact on Orono. Those bus~ with holding tanks are forced to have them i
pumped out several times a year. And those businesses with proper septic beds could be utilizing I
the land for much needed parking. The run-off from these septic systems runs into the creek which
runs right through Orono Park! Your children are playing in sewage! Orono's survival and the
health of its inhabitants demand a sanitary sewer system. If you support Orono's need to get a sani- I
tary sewer, please sign this petition.
1tame /?r) f0li~/
.,.&;Aee1 d-VVGn/DI (l/Ji hf~
Sr~
57)!:;;
@
(J1~
.\'t-
O/cno
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r/ddtze44,
7 h~rk: gT ,
~
/J'k. . /I
-R. CHAt)
, G-R-o A./ 0
'2 ,c, fJo.Jy
if"l ~
e
dorJ<;-'
;t
(Y
,.
,
::Ji!\J'{'A- AR~~(0
Box 8-+1 .
~'iS Cl W I LUl) ><- kJ:>
~.
I CRn,,-Yl
JV\flr(U A-"--'I..)~ lY\c R (to.{.:'U-G
.:Eru.u Ell ;I{--
Do~ A~')+Jrq'
-j:J~~ ~
-RR- ~ C)~()
'3;). fV1,1J 5f. ORoNo
COUNCIL DIRECTION
D-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IllIlCCIBIIW1!1))
May 30, 1997
Ms. Diane Hamre AGE NO A
Mayor, Municipality ofClarington
40 Temperance St.
Bowmanville, Ont
LIC 3A6
JUN 4 1997
JIIIJt>ilCIP~L1TY OF GLARINGTOUl
,Mi\.YSlR:SJl~HC.f
Re: Prediction of Approaching Oil Crisis
Dear Ms Hamre,
A brief note in the Globe & Mail's Social Studies (May 15, 1997) states:
The world's oil supplies will begin to run out in 20 years, warns an article in the
journal Nature. Predictions that reserves might last for another 60 years are
unrealistic, writes Dr. Craig Hatfield of the University ofToledo Ohio. Since 1985,
new fmds have averaged less than nine billion barrels of oil a year, while
consumption has averaged more than 23 billion barrels. Also, some reported oil
reserves might not exist. "It bas been suggested that the increases [in reserves] are
political rather than real."
The gradual exhaustion of world oil supplies means that eventually there will be little or no
gasoline. Cars will begin to disappear. There will be a tremendous change in transportation methods
requiring thoughtful long-term planning.
In recent years, there has been much discussion regarding the effect of government deficit
on future generations. The effects of the exhaustion of oil will take place even within the present
generation. What plans are you and the Municipality ofClarington making about the approaching
oil crisis?
Yours sincerely,
)~f~
E. Kenneth Ranney, MD
6 Merryfield Crt
Bowmanville, Ont
LIC 4L2
905697 1066
kranney@accel.net
._.,"_.~
j-
i
,;
,
--~
I
----l'
, .
1._.+ .------:{
}-_.u.______-l
I -0- ------1
I -7Tz--!
,;-,,,:. I1tJ0'fT.k.u._.!
'.. -. . ._._-.----.----+--~---..,.._..-._-'
j----.-.--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_e/a;i~'9~t;;n _
ONTARIO
April 23, 1997
Mark Jackman, Curator
Clarke Museum & Archives
Box 152
Orono, Ontario LOB IMO
Dear Mark:
The Board of the Orono Town HaIl has asked me to extend an invitation to your group to join
us in organizing a series of events to commemorate the centennillI. of the Orono Town HaIl in
1998.
We sincerely hope tlwt you will be able to join us at the Orono Town HaIl on Tuesday, May
13th at 7:30 p.m. Please bring any ideas or suggestions your group may consider to
incorporate in a calendar of events for each nwnth during our centenary year.
We look forward to Clark Museum & Archives participating in this event. See you on May
13th!
Yours sincerely,
~;
/ .
,
~.. X/X-J
ANN DRESLINSKl
Orono Town Hall Board
~~
/
Ipg
CI.)nrOH^ TIC(~ :): H-IE MLJe:!l.::IPAUlY or Cl AHING TON
, ..
.\..-!
\,.,.
, ~
...:.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_elar]~g!;;n
ONTARIO
April 23, 1997
Mark Jaclanan, Curator
Clarke Museum & Archives
Box 152
Orono, Ontario LOB 1MO
Dear Mark:
The Board of the Orono Town HalI has asked me /() extend an invitation to your group to join
us in organizing a series of events /() conunemorate the centennial of the Orono Town HaU in
1998.
We sincerely hope that you will be able /() join us at the Orono Town HalI on Tuesday, May
13th at 7:30 p.m. Please bring any ideas or suggestions your group may consider to
incorporate in a calendm' of events for each month during our centenary year.
We look forward to Clark Museum & Archives parlicipating in this event. See you on May
13th!
Yours sincerely,
......----:
/ '
,
~_. X/X-J
ANN DRESLINSKI
Orono Town HalI Board
~~
/
Ipg
COIlPOHA ll()l. ..... THE MUr~'C(P^UlY or Cl AUING 1 ON
/'-.,
\ .\..
Zi:-...\
, .
..;. -,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION 1-12
1+.
Citizenship and Ciloyennete et
Immigration Canada Immigration Canada
OTTAWA
KIA ILl
Ms. Patti L. Barrie
Clerk
Corporation of the
Municipality ofClarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
LIC 3A6
MAY - 2.7"997
MAl
Dear Ms. Barrie:
The Honourabl~ Lucienne Robi11ard, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration,
has asked that I respond to your letter of March 27, 1997 concerning citizenship ceremonies.
I assure you that citizenship ceremonies will continue to be held across Canada.
Although the process of applying for citizenship is being stream-lined in an: effort to provide
better and more efficient service to the public, citizenship ceremonies will continue to be held
in citizenship offices and in local communities.. There has been some reduction in the
frequency with which ceremonies are held in areas where the number of recipients are low,
however, individuals are advised that they can wait fot a ceremony in their area or they can
choose to take part in a. <;eremony being held. in the nearest large centre. In addition,
community outreach and regular contact with offices of area MPs continue to provide the
public with citizenship services. .
The Citizenship Act requires applications fo~ the grant of citizenship to be
considered by a citizenship judge and for the judge to notify the Minister of his or her decision. .
Citizenship judges perform two roles: that of decision-maker and the ceremonial function of
administering the oath of citizenship.
In 1994, t.'J.en Minister Qf Citizenship and Immigration, Sergio Marchi
announced that the position of citizenship judge would be abolished and that Order of Canada
recipients would be asked to preside at citizenship ceremonies. About 250 of the 2370 Order of
Canada recipients have shown an interest in presiding at citizenship ceremonies and about 123
have conducted ceremonies. No new judges have been appointed since 1994, and there are
only 19 judges left out of 54. A further 9 more judges will leave by January 1998, and all
appointments will expire by August 1998.
Bill C-49 was introduced June 14, 1996, and was before the House at the time of
the election call. This legislation would have helped to reduce government expenditures, made
the citizenship process more efficient and eliminated the position of Citizenship Judge. After
the election, this government will continue to work on a strategy to address this situation.
Canada
.2.
The government is committed to continuing the tradition of celebrating
Canadian citizenship, maintaining a sense of community, and welcoming new citizens into the
Canadian family by holding citizenship ceremonies that inspire a sense of commitment to
Canada, in all Canadians.
Thank you for writing and expressing your concerns. I hope that this
information is of some assistance.
Sincerely,
~c,...,..~.-,"""",~~
Ministerial and Executive Services
r~IST~UTION !
I CltRK I~_- .
ACK. BY .__ .
ORtGfNAt T
I
I COPlES TO: ~.
,-.
i
~.
i
1---
!
I
,
I
r--- .._-~----
r--.~-- \
j---_.-I-~
G~; ..!1~:..Q:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
COUNCIL INFORMATION
CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
1-13
MINUfES - NO.5
AUTHORITY MEETING
Wednesdav. Mav 21. 1997 - 7:00 P.M.
Hnr 29 12 25 PH '97
Present:
R. Anderson. Chairman
R. Johnson, Vice Chairman
R. Boychyn
J. Drumm
C. Elliott
G.Emm
J, Gray
H. Hall
L. Hannah
I. Harrell
B. Nicholson
J .R. Powell Chief Administrative Officer
S.L. Hanson. Director of Corporale Services
D. Wright, Director Environmental Appro\'3Is & P1imning
M. Peacock, Director Environmental Engineering Services
M. Hrynyk, Superintendent
R. Hersey. Planner
L. Hatherly. Policy Development Coordinaror
M. Stauffer. Administrative AssistantIRecor Secretary.
S. Ellis, Administrative Assistant
Absent:
M. Brunelle
R. Lutczyk
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST by members on any matters herein contained.
Roger Anderson declared an interest in Staff Report #4156-97 (attached as Schedule H-8to H-23) as his father owns a condominiun:
in the vicinity of the Port Darlington Marina and did not take part in diScussion or voting on this matter.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
DIST~TION l
ClERK/..:&J__-J
ACK.BY. //._ .
-L.... /:>.. ~
ORIGIflAl A~ ...... I
COPIES TO: ~ . [
'ed.
Res. #50
Moved by B. Nicholson
Seconded by H. Hall
THAT the Authority minutes oj. Trusdlly, April 1 S, 1997, be adopted as
CARRIED
'!
PLEASE NOm: A11 backup materia1 for this information is
iavailable in the Clerk's Department.
-,.
..................
l~ .. -. ,..,
I ,oil r . 8Q,:. r:./="~~
I
I
I
I
I
Discussion ensued. I
Res. #52 Moved by l. Harrell
Seconded by B. Nicholson
THAT the matter be tabled to the next Executive Committee m~eting, scheduled on Tuesday, June 3, 1997, for I
approval; and,
THAT staff be directed ta provide specific details regturling the construction and design of the stan4ardized kiosk. I
CARRIED .
f AUT,HORITY MINUTES. MAY 21, 1997. PAGE 2
SUPERINTENDENT'S REPORTS
(I)
Staff Report #4151.97
Lynde Shores Conservation Area. Entrance Upgrades Project
Res. #51
Moved by B. Nicholson
Seconded by R. Johnson
THAT Staff Report #41S1-97 (ottached as Schedule 4-1 to 4-4) be received for information;
THA T the standardized kiosk design be approved for use at all Central Lake Ontario Conservation Areas;
THA T Staff be directed to pursue the costing and funding of the additional proposed entrance upgrades and
report back to the Board.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVALS & PLANNING
(1)
- C96,06S-F(RENEWAL)
- C97-D74-F
- C97-D77-F
. - C97-D80-F .
- C97-DSS-A.
- C97-D89-F
- C97-D90-F(18T-87034)
- C97-110-F
- C97-113-F
- C97-11S-F
- 097-D71-F
- 097-D7S-F(18T -89089)
- 097-D8Z-F
- 097-D84-C,A
- 097-D87-C(I8T-87046)
- 097-D99-F
- 097-101-F
- 097-10Z-F
- 097-109-F
- W96-250-F, W96-ZS1(2S0)-C &: W96-ZSZ(2S0)-A
(18T-90044)RENEWAL
- W97-04Z-F
- W97-DS9-F,C,k
- W97-069-F
- W97-D7Z-F
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Staff Report #4146-97 (attached as Scl1edu1e 5-1 to 5-5)
Applications for Construction, to Place Fill and to Alter aWatercourse
Res. #53
MovedbyG. Emm
Seconded by I. Harrell
THAT the folIDwing applkations be approved and the respective permits be issued:
Willsonia Industries Ltd.c/o Ashly Co. Ltd.
Reitano Custom Homes .
SUve Devecseri
NubuiJd Contracting LId.lHans Geissberger
Wiggers Custom Yadds
Ted Strikwerda
563301 Ontario Inc.
Brlan J. Bannister
The Old Timer's Truck Driving School Inc.
.Tun Murray
Dale SpinelID
Valiant Property Management
910797 Ontario 1nc.lPrem Thadani
Oshawa Golf Club limited
Scott Jeffery
Furefield Homes
Ken ThwaiJes
Brent C. Jeffery
JtzZlUS and ElizPbeth Anderson
EriK Mills Development Corporruion
Miller Paving limited
RqiolUll Municipality of Durham
ToE. Howard
JlUly Stringer
I
*'" OF PIG'
1.....0 ~
~~~
~ di:~
1-
1 The Corporation
of the
Town of Picl<ering
1 Councilor's Office
Pidcering dvk complex
lOne the Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
Canada
LtV6K7
IOirea
Tel
Fax
(905)420-4605
(905) .20-6064
ITown
Tel
Fax
(905)420-2222
(905)683-2760
(905)420-0515
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-14
May 26, 1997
Municipality of Clarington,
40 Temperance St.,
Bowmanville, Ontario
Ll C A6
Kif 30 2 55 PH "97
Please be advised that the Council of the Town of Pickering passed the following
resolution at its regular meeting of May 20th, 1997:
WHEREAS the people of southern Manitoba have been inundated with the
threat of flooding in recent days; and
WHEREAS daily news reports have broadcast disturbing images of the
hardship and destruction to property; and
WHEREAS all Canarlian. are concerned for the well-being of residents 'of
southern Manitoba experiencing hardship due to the.flooding of the Red River;
and
WHEREAS many residents of the Town of Pickering have expressed an
interest in providing aid and comfort to the victims oftlIe flooding in southern
Manitoba; and
WHEREAS. the Town of Pickering has considerable resources to lend to the
aid and relief effort;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Pickering Council
direct the General Manager through his office to make available the resources
of the Town wherever possible to aid in the relief effort through the use of fire
halls, community centres, and the Pickering Municipal Building as drop-off
depots for food and clothing, etc., and
FURTHER that this resolution be fOlwarded to all municipalities in the G..1:.A..._...-..__.__.
j DlSTRI~ION
If you have any questions with respect to this matter, please do not htf8iWf: tn l'1fl -)__
contact the Clerks Department at 420-4611. I ACK. BY ~
~ ORIGINAL .'_
~ COPIES TO:
Bruce Taylor, AMCT, CMM
Town Clerk
t==
L_.
/dk
,.
1 ,
f'1, C 10 . /10.
1
1
1
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
[I]
Toronto
Corporate Services
City Clerk's Division
Secretariat Section
If4T3D 2 ss PHt97
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
May 26. 1997
Ms. Marie P. Knight
Deputy Clerk
Municipality ofClarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowrnanville, Ontario
LlC 3A6
Dear Ms. Knight:
1-15
Margaret Rodrigues
Commissioner
Sydney K. Baxter
City Clerk
City Hall
100 QueE'n Street West
Toronto, Ontario MSH 2N2
Phone: (416) 392-7031
TOO: (416) 392-7354
Fax: (416) 392.1879
Reply attention:Christine Archibald
Telephone: (416) 392-7030
Ref: 97c06-31
City Council, at its meeting on May 12, 1997, gave consideration to Clause 31 contained in Report No. 6 of
the City Services Committee, titled "Resolution - Municipality ofClarington - Removal of Premium Fee
Charged to G.TA Drivers".
Council received the Clause for information.
Yours truly.
U.,.
--c.... J) " J ...J-;;,
.
Assistant City Clerk
fl!3CNmt
I
r
1-
~_.~_.
t= i i
; ",: fA [11e: l
'__. ~..-..:........ .- _.- ---'"'=..f
II
,
il
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-16
Atomic Energy Control Board
1JDJ~~~9~~
jUII 2 1SS7
97-12
f\GENDA
AECB publishes recent radiation doses from
Darlington and Pickering nuclear stations MU,,"CIPAL\1'I Of CtAf\'NG1~
. MA'iOl'o'S OffiCE
OTTAWA _ The Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) today published the latest
edition of its information bulletin, the Radiation Monitor, showing the public radiation exposures
from the Dariington and Pickering nuclear generating statiollS.
, ,
The most recent AECB Radiation Monitor shows that, for the three-month period from
January 1 to March 31, 1997, the public radiation doses' due to the operation of the
Darlington and Pickering stations were 13 and 2.4 microsieverts, respectively. In comparison, a
typical chest X-ray produces a dose of approximately 70 microsieverts, while a return flight from
Toronto to Varlcouver would result in an increased dose from cosmic radiation of about 20
microsieverts.
The doses indicated dne to the .operation of the nuclear stations are for the most exposed
persons, typically those living just outside the station boundary. Most persons in the region would
have received less, since radiation doses decrease significantly as the distance from the stations
Increases.
Copies of the Radia/ioll Monitor or related information may be obtained directly from the
AECB by calling 1_800-668-5284
-30-
. The radiation dose is a measure of the quantity of radiation absorbed by the body. It is normally measured
in units of millisieverts (mSv _ one thousandth of a sievert) or in microsieverts (I'Sv - one millionth of a
sievert). The latter unit is used in the Radiation Monitor. . -- -.--.--- .-..---',
.. : D;5TR~!ON 1
NOTE TO EDITORS: See attached copies of the latest edition of the Radiati4n?J(Jfl;~-- J
: ,',:~, 3\'_ i
Contact: Robert potvin, AECB Office of Public Information, (613) 995-5&9~{iGlffAt T!
'-
i Cf.?\ES -too:
,
;---j
1.1
Government
of Canada
Gouvernement
du Canada
i
\
,
c==- 1---4
, '~
>--<;an--.-. - atli! \
._ _. . .!3-
, .~ .
~___.__~~ __.__ _4.:__-----.
1----....---.:..-- -.----.:---~-._-- -
:-- /J10(;,~(?;::-_.
I~~ _.._._~'---
RADlAnON MONITOR
NuaEAR GENERATING STATIONS IN DURHAM REGION
First quarter 1997 (January 1 to March 31)
This information is provided by the Atomic Energy Control Board, Canada's nuclear regulator.
Radiation dose due to emissions from the nuclear generating stations.
Dose is reported in miaosieverts (pSv). an international unit used to measure dose.
DARUNGTON
- January 1 to March 31, 1997: 13
- previous quarter. 0.9
TOTAL FOR 1997: 13
Dose from a sin91e chest X-i'ay: about 70
PICKERING
- January 1 to March 31, 1997: 2.4
- previous quarter: 1.9
- TOTAL FOR 1997: 2.4
Dose from a single chest X-ray: about 70
Note: Natural background radiation. the annuallegallimit for station emissions, and the dose from a typical X-ray
are p/Ovided for reference Emissions are in add'1fion to background radiation.
The radiation doses due to emissions are for the
most exposed persons living near the station. They woald
typically apply to persons living just outside the station
boundary who are at their residences 24 hours a day, who
drink local water and milk. and eat local fish and produre.
The doses were calculated using actual data from routine
analysis of air. water. milk. fish and vegetation samples. as
well as station emissior. data.
Masl persons /'lould actually. receive less than the
doses indicated because they have different eating habits
or live farther away from the station. Radiation doses
decrease Significantly as the distance from the station
increases. Persons living midway between the two
stations would therefore receive less than the doses
indicated for either of the stations.
Less than 6% of the radiation dose received from tne
stations was due to liquid emissions, while the remainder
was a result of airborne emissions.
For further informatioa" please call us at 1-800-668-5284.
Nota: Pour ohtntir Ulft wniDn (ranf4isl h a iodletin. wuilIez C/Jmmuniquu am nOllS au numiro d-dess1lS.
.+.
Atomic Energy Commission de controle
Control Board de rOOergie atomique
Canada
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
COUNCIL INFORMATION
1-17
,
Citizens' Network on Waste Manaaement
f
May 28, 1997
Dear Municipal Clerk,
JUH 3 II 30 AM '97
Have you seen the following Pepsi advertisements, encouraging consumers to switch
from cans to PET bottles for convenience? These billboards are popping up across
Ontario.
~.~
Have you seen the new Coke display
appearing in local neighbourhood stores?
The Coke display is also encouraging the
purchase of soft drinks in PET bottles
instead of in aluminum cans. The display
case shown contains only one shelf near the
bottom for cans.
These promotions by the two largest soft
drink producers are alarming for those of us
concerned about the costs of the Blue Box.
PET bottles are a financial drain on the Blue Box. For example, Metro Toronto
estimates that its collection and recycling costs for PET exceed revenues from selling
PET by $1.7 rnillioneach year. Although-the figures are not as dramatic for smaller
municipalities, the losses are just as significant for every municip~lity across the
province. If the amount of PET bottles going into the Blue Box increases, these losses
will grow.
- 17 Major Street- Krtchener, Ontario - N2H 4R1 - Tel: (519) 744-7503 - Fax: (519) 744-1546-
The Canadian Soft Drink Association has stated that the solution to Blue Box financial
troubles is the use of high-value aluminum cans for soft drink containers. The industry
has committed to using aluminum until 1999. How long can we expect this commitment
to last beyond 1999, when Pepsi and Coke are already encouraging a shift away from
aluminum cans to PET bottles?
Where will municipalities be left as the soft drink industry switches to PET? Your Blue
Box will be overflowing with high volume, low value PET bottles. You and your
taxpayers will be left with an increased financial burden.
We must move soft drink and other beverage containers out of the Blue Box by
requiring an effective and efficient deposit-return system. Removal of these materials
from the Blue Box into a deposit-return system will create a full producer pay system
and will make it easier to expand the refillable system for beverage containers. Only
materials that are appropriate for curbside collection and are not taken care of by
household composters should be left in the Blue Box or other curbside collection
containers.
In order to protect the future of the Blue Box, a municipal waste management strategy
should start with:
e a deposit-return system for all beverage containers;
. greater use of refillable beverage containers;
. curbside coilection of other materiais; and
. producer responsibility for the full costs of the reuse, recycling and disposal of the
materials they produce or sell.
Such a strategy will yield higher diversion and recovery rates, improve environmental
protection and save municipalities money. The attached fact sheets explain how this
can be achieved.
We are working with many groups, including municipalities, environmental and
ratepayer groups and industry, to develop proposals for an expanded refill, reuse and
return system in Ontario. Soon we will send you a report that outlines the findings we
have reached by consensus. We would be pleased to come and discuss our
proposals with you.
Yours sincerely,
~~~;~7jJT!ON-f;
.,.\.,-..Il. f
.____....1
'''',' t
.li."...fl,.8Y_
r~
: l}i1IGffll\t
,.-
i COPIES TO:
John Jackson
Coordinator
,
I
j -"
!=-----. I J
; ~ .,~-+--~
J--~.---.. .~_..--!---_----3
r--- .---- -- -i II
I-----~_J .
;-~_._----- j j
, B7 &)rJ !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
How to Improve the Future of the Blue Box
Today Blue Box is in the red. eliminate subsidies to industry
. In exchange for permission to sell soft drinks in aluminum cans and PET, the soft drink
industry agreed to fund province-wide recycling in Ontario. This agreement, together
with provincial funding of $2.5 million each year to municipalities for recycling. led to the
birth of Ontario's Blue Box system in late 1985.
. Provincial funding of the Blue Box ended in March 1996'. Blue Box systems in Ontario
now find themselves in the red and with taxpayers paying for the losses2.
. Waste News reports that between 1985 and 1996, producers paid $41 .million for the
Blue Box system, while municipal and provincial taxpayers paid over half a billion
dollars.' Municipalities paid more than 60% of this subsidy.
Implement a comprehensive deposit-return and refillables system
. Deposit-return systems have proven to be highiy effective at product recovery, achieving
higher recovery rates than curbside programs'
. Deposit-return systems do not compete with curbside programs. Not only are the two
systems fully compatible, but when both systems are used together, total recovery rates
and recycling rates are higher and overall diversion costs are lower!
. A deposit-retum system on all beverage containers, which comprise about 50% of the
Blue Box by volume (includes liquor and wine bottles), would increase diversion rates
and reduce Blue Box costs..
. Refillable bottle systems work best with a deposit-retum system. Refillable systems
depend on the producer being able to recover large quantities of containers ior refiiling.
Deposit-return systems provide an effective incentive for consumers to return their
empties and, therefore, achieve very high recovery rates.
. Refillables are environmentally superior to recyclables. life-cycle analyses conducted
over ttle last ten years show that refillable systems yield significant reductions in
materials use, energy, and pollution compared to one-way systems of the same material
type. Soft drink companies such as Coke and Pepsi now use refillable PET in Europe,
Latin America and South America.
. A municipal waste management strategy comprised of a deposit-retum system for all
beverage containers, Blue Box collection of other materials7, and refillable soft drink
beverage containers would yield higher diversion and recovery rates, improve
environmental protection, save municipalities money and create jobs.. Taxpayer
subsidies on beverage containers would be eliminated.
Soft Drink Containers and the Blue Box
Collection of PET soft drink containers is uneconomic
. Although soft drink containers are only 1 % of the waste stream", they take up
approximately half the Blue Box volume, making them costly to transport.'o
. PET bottles have an extremely high volume-to-weight ratio and, therefore, occupy a
disproportionately large volume in recycling trucks_ This makes the cost of transporting
PET very high. The price of scrap PET today does not cover the cost of collection and
recycling. "
Blue Box is too dependent on aluminum soft drink containers
. Aluminum soft drink containers generate revenues which offset transportation costs,
providing nearly 40% of the total scrap revenue of Blue Box recycling.12 This makes
them the most economically attractive component of Blue Box materials.
. Such heavy reliance on one material for economic viability makes the Blue Box.
vulnerable and its future uncertain.
. The Blue Box is susceptible to changes in the price of recycled aluminum". When
prices are high, competition for the cans increases (e_g charity drives and illegal
scavengers of Blue Box materials), When prices are low such as in 1996, the cans do
not even offset the total cost of recycling of all soft drink containers in the Blue Box."
. The soft drink industry has committed to using aluminum cans only until the end of
1999. How long the commitment will be extended beyond 1999 is questionable since
steel cans are now much cheaper than aluminum cans 15.
Wood v.1de market shifting from cans to PET
. In the U.S. the introduction of single-serving PET has led to increased PET use,
displacing aluminum cans. Evidence suggests that the Ontario market is lagging behind,
but is likely to be heading in the same direction.
. Pepsi has just launched a major advertising campaign encouraging consumers to buy a
sixpack of PET (710 ml) instead of 12 cans because it is more convenient.
'Producer pay" needed for long tenn survival of Blue Box
. A Blue Box system, with appropriate materials going into it (deposit-return for all
beverage containers) and with producers paying the full cost of using it, will protect
municipalities from being overly dependent on one material, from price fluctuations of
scrap materials, and from producers' packaging choices.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Deposit-Return Systems and the Blue Box
Deposit-Return systems are convenient and cost municipal taxpayers nothing
. Deposit-return systems are widely accepted'" and are one of the most widely applied
user pay mechanisms in Canada17. Deposit-return systems are fairer than curbside
programs because only the users pay. Only consumers who purchase the product pay
the deposit. They can redeem the deposit when the empty container is returned.
. Deposit-return systems are convenient, especially if based on return-to-retail. This
allows for one-stop shopping - saving energy and time, and minimizing air pollution
impacts.
. Technology has made it easier to handle the used containers. Today machines that
automatically wash and refill empty bottles" and reverse vending machines'. make it
convenient for retailers to handle them.
. Many deposit-retum systems for beverages in Canada and the U.S. include a handling
fee to pay for the service (retailer/depot) of handling the empty containers.20 Retailers
must be property compensated for any service they provide.
Curbside and deposit-return systems working together are the best solution
. Canadian and U.S. experience demonstrates that deposit-retum systems yield recovery
rates of 72% to 98%2'. However. curren! curbside collection for soft drink packaging in
Ontario is only about 54%22. The best curbside programs for beverage containers
achieve less than 70%23.
. Ontario's Blue Box now achieves only about 30% diversion of packaging waste2'. Even
with a major, ongoing communications program, considerably less than 70% diversion
(of either packaging waste or all municipal waste) is likely to be achieved, leaving at
least 30% in landfill.
. When curbside and deposit-retum systems are used together, total recovery rates and
recycling rates are higher and overall diversion costs are lower!' Deposit-retum
systems collect more materials than curbside programs, while curbside programs can
target a wider range of materials.
Soft drink containers in the Blue Box are not the solution
. Revenues from increases in the collection of aluminum usually go to the contractor not
the municipality because many municipalities have flat fee arrangements. Since 1992,
the soft drink market has been shifting from aluminum to PET"". Ontario seems to be
going in the same direction. Aluminum soft drink cans continue to get lighter and the
price of aluminum is unreliable!'
. Municipalities cannot rely on industry to pay its fair share. Between 1 985 and 1 996,
municipalities paid more than 60% of the costs of tne Blue Box".. OMMRtlCSR still owes
$3.5 million to municipalities for expenditures made between 1988 and 1994!9
3
References
I
I
I
I
I
'The Ministry of Environment and Energy will continue to fund municipal recycling programs that were
started under the provincial program before March 31, 1996 until March 31, 1998. This funding affects
35 municipalities. (Ministry of Environment and Energy, "Program Impact Summary Municipalities",
unpublished)
'For example, in the seven years of operation. the Kingston Area Recycling Corporation has made a
profit just once. and, in 1996 lost more than $800,000 in operating costs alone - a particularly bad year
(Kingston Whig-Standard, Dec. 7,1996).
Scott's Plains Recycling which runs the recycling program in Peterborough is expecting a 1996 recycling
program deficit of $800,000 because the prices of its main recycled products, paper in particular, have
collapsed despite the fact that Blue Box programs are bringing in more material at a record pace. Scott's
Plains used to get annual provincial grants of as much as $400,000 (Peterborough Examiner, December
11,1997).
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Metro Toronto taxpayers in 1996 subsidized the Blue Box program at an average cost of $63ltonne for
nearly 88,000 tonnes, for a total of about $5.5 million dollars. (Toronto Star, August 14, 1996).
'Waste News, "All bottled up: Ontario rethinks deposits", March 3, 1997
.. Deposit-return systems yield higher recovery rates in the range of 72% to 98%, while the best curbside
programs collect less than 70% (James E. McCarthy, CRS Report for Congress: Bottle Bills and
Curbside Recycling: Are They Compatible? January 27, 1993.)
'Deposit-return systems have higher recovery rates, while curbside programs can target more materials.
Deposit-return systems remove potential sources of revenue from curbside programs, but also reduce
their operating costs. Overall when both systems are used together, municipalities achieve a greater
diversion of solid waste from disposal at a lower cost per tonne. (CRS Report for Congress, January 27,
1993)
A similar conclusion was reached in a more recent study. This study compared three policy options (a
disposal fee, a recycling subsidy to manufacturers and a deposit refund fee) to reduce total waste
(assumed waste comprised of aluminum, glass paper, plastic and steel) by 25%. The study concluded
that a deposit-refund was the cheapest option, but where handling fees were high, the disposal fee was
more cost-effective. The conclusion of the analysis was that the best policy approach was an optimal
mix of all three options for achieving the most cost-effective means of diversion. (Resources for the
Future, "The Cosi of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste", September 1996.)
'.For example, the City of Toronto estimates that a comprehensive deposit-return for all beverage
containers would increase recovery rates and permit the City to do Blue Box collection once a month
instead of biweekly. resulling in a net savings of $900,000 per year. As well, Metro Toronto has
calculated that a deposit-return system on all beverage containers would yield an increased recovery
rate for beverage containers and save over $1.6 million per year.
7. Curbside collection is well suited to the residual of materials not collected by a deposit-return system
(e.g. fibre, yard wastes and food waste not covered by household composters).
S:Oeposil-return infra;o;tructure has stimulated the creation of local small businesses across Canada.
According to the Container Recycling Institute, 150,000 jobs would be created in the u.S. with the
institution of a nation-wide deposil-retum.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'Stuart Hartley. CSDA Vice President Ontario Region. Letter to municipalities in Ontario, April 2, 1997
"Based on City of Toronto data. (George Wheeler, City of Toronto, Deposit Return Municipal Collection
Issues City of Toronto, Presentation to Citizens' Network on Waste Management workshop, February
27, 1997)
".pET scrap prices have fluctuated significantly over the last 5 years, from about $150/tonne in 1991 to
a peak of about $900/tonne in 1995, then plummeting to about S15O/tonne in 1996. (Jan Whitelaw,
CSDA Presentation to Toronto City Services Committee, Sept 18, 1996)
" Stuart Hartley, Vice President CSDA Ontario Region, Letter to municipalities in Ontario, April 2. 1997
" Over the last 4 years, prices for recycled aluminum have fluctuated from a low of about $11001tonne
(1993) to a high of $2000/tonne (1995), dropping to about $1600ltonne in 1996 and 1997 (Recycling
Times, Recycling Data Associates, and Metro Toronto Works Department).
".Metro Toronto calculated that aluminum revenues for 1996 would yield a profit of $500,000 (net after
recycling costs for aluminum) (Toronto Star, December 17, 1996). However. this would only offset the
cost of PET recycling by less than a third since the cost of recycling Metro's 60 million PET bottles would
cost $1.7 million (U. Valiante, "Pet Cemetery", Solid Waste Management, October/November 1996).
".Stuart Hartley, Leller to municipalities, April 2, 1997
19.A nationwide survey conducted from June 19'" to July 8,1996 and reported in The Environment
Monitor indicated that 57% of Canadians feel that deposit-return systems and refillable containers are
better for the environment than recyclable containers c0i!ected at curbside.
"Deposits are used in every province in Canada for beer containers and in every province except
Manitoba and Ontario (except refillable glass soft drink bottles in Ontario) for other beverage containers.
"Kensington Beverage Corporation of Port Coquitlam. BC has been successful in marketing a refillable
beverage system to retaiiers in Canada and the US. Customers return to the ,,'lore with their empty
beverage containers and place them in a machine which automatically washes and refills them.
In addition to the two systems sited in references #16 and #17. a third opportunity for retailers to improve
the collection and handling of refillable bottles is to establish parking lot redemption centres at the retail
store. The retailer oould contract out the operation of the redemption centre. This opportunity is most
suited to large stores with sizable lots owned by the retailer. The advantages of this kind of system is
that the grocer can save on most if not all of the costs associated with in-store recycling, including
labour. sanitation, transportation, and cost of lost sales and inventory space that would otherwise have
to be used for collection and storage containers.
"Designed like a pop machine. a reverse vending machine facilitates the collection and handling of
returned beverage containers for the retailer. Customers retum their empty containers to the store and
deposilthem in the reverse vending machine. The bar codes are scanned, counted and sorted
according to the store's data base and a redemption receipt is automatically issued to the customer.
This provides convenience for the retailer - less handling time and therefore. lower labour costs. For
the consumer, the advantage is that the consumer can retum the bottles and receive the redemption
automatically without having to wait in line at the service counter. Costco and Fred Meyer in the U.S. are
currently using this vending equipment (Erik J. Martin. Many Happy Returns, Store Equipment and
Design, April 1996)
5
2O.Provincial handling fees range from 2 cents per container (Quebec) to 5 cents per container
(Saskatchewan - 5 cents-metal: 6 cents.plaslic: and 7 cents-glass). and to 10 cents in PEL (fees range
from 3 cents to 10 cents based on container size_) (RCO Update, Vol. 17. No.2, February 1997; A Brief
Overview of Canada's Deposit-Return Systems, Reiterate, May 1996: Province Update, Container &
Packaging Recycling Update, VoL6, No.2, Spring 1996)
I
I
I
I
I
".CRS Report for Congress, Bottle Bills and Curbside Recycling: Are they Compatible? January 27,
1993: Reiterate, A Brief Overview of Canada's Deposit Retum Systems, May 1996: Province Update,
Container & Packaging Recycling Update, Vol. 6, .No. 2, Spring 1996.
22 Packaging recovery data for 1995 provided by the Canadian soft drink industry (CSDA web page,
http://www.softdrink.calpson.htm. March 1996) reveals that 53.6% of Ontario's soft drink packaging was
diverted from landfill. However. in the same year, CSDA reports that less than one third of all Ontario's
consumer packaging was diverted from landfill.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"The Aluminum Association did a study in 1991 of curbside collection and found recovery rates for
aluminum of 24.9%, 44.9% and 59.8% for Rhode Island, Maryland. and Minnesota respectively (as
reported in CRS Report to Congress, 1993). In Seattle Washington, a city considered among the best in
the U.S. and one that has a user pay system for households, the curbside collection program captured
only 26% of aluminum cans, 49% of glass beverage containers and under 5% of PET in 1991 (CRS
Report, January 27, 1993). The State of New Jersey is considered to have one of the most
comprehensive curbside collection programs in the U.S. In 1990 New Jersey recycled 68% of its glass
containers, 69% of its aluminum cans and 7"10 of its plastic containers, for an average of 48%. (New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy as reported in CRS Report to Congress,
1993).
".Stuart Hartley, Letter to municipalities, April 2, 1997. MOEE monitoring data for 1995 indicates a total
diversion rate for the Blue Box program of 15.6% (467,000 tonnes out of 3 million tonnes).
".CRS Report, January 27, 1993,
"From 1992 to 1995, the market share of aluminum beverage containers in the U.S. dropped from 54%
to 51 %, whereas the market share of PET beverage containers increased from 38% to 47% over the
same period. (Havis Dawson, "Plenty of PET: Beverage World, June, 1996).Comparable data are not
yet available for Ontario.
".See footnote 11. The commitment to 1999 does not provide municipalities with adequate security for
major investment because of the accelerating changes in container design and material.
"See footnote 3.
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
29.ln 1994. the AMRC conducted a survey of its members regarding payments owed to municipalities by
OMMRI/CSR The survey revealed that a total of $3.5 million was reported outstanding for expenditures
between 1988 and 1994. A further $1.1 million can be added to this for a total of $4.2 million. the $1.1
million representing monies claimed to be owed to the City of Toronto, which is currently suing OMMRI!
CSR for the money.
MAY-2B-S7 12,46 FROM,OH PND EAST
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECEPTION
10,99058377290
COnNCll. INFORMATION
PAGE
1/1
T lH
Facsimile Sheet
To:
Mayor and Members of Council /
Municipality of Clarington
905-623-4169
Fax;
John Melmer
- 23 Empire Cres, Courtice
905-725-1059
From:
- --.---- -----
,
. '-.--.-r----
__r.._...._:..______!
. i
AGENOft:
n..._.n"..._"..-__
. '
Phone:
_._ ..r ~ _.... +__.-J,
Date: 28 May 1997
j?J '..CZ.=i
7.. .u_.'
~1i~~!i9~~II~~~~;~.Iii~~!%~~i@.r~;:~\~1W?:~~~t~.i~!f:1.~!,)!iitM.j::1t:!tit111:~%1k~j]:ji,)i0:~t
I am concerned that there could be a serious accident on my street Last night there was
another incident where a speeding car crashed in the area in front of my house. This car hit
a transformer across the street from us and caused a power outage. Luckily. no one was
hurt since it was past the time for children to be on the street...
Please note, the same type of accident occurred two years ago when a car lost control in
front of me and crashed into a van that was parked adjacent to this same transformer.
FYI, there are many people who use Empire Cres as a link to Townline Rd. and quite a
number of people within these cars speed! This has already been identified in my April 4
fax, Planning File: DEV 97-003, 18T-97002, LD194196 & LD195196; Clerk's File: 014.97-003
and D12 18T-97-003.
From my fax:
Please consider a request for installation ofadditiooal stop signs at the street connection
points, and a "children playing sign" adjacent to the pari<.
John Melmer
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
",0 ", '"OUNCIL DIRECTION
,\ 11:,
. '- ~ \.~'
... "'~~ .. "...::>: THE CANADA POST
:; ~~).;!',,",i~'!',,~,,\::;:~";:.;.~:: CORPORATION FLIGHT FOR
<: "'~.!.'i'.,..t},.....~..,~~~~ z FREEDOM LITERACY AWARDS
~ ~~~J>';".';.:~f~~~~~ 0
2.;'t;/~.....;:- 2701 RIVF.RSIDE DRIVE
''.:i~~:t~~~t';:' , SUITE NOGIO
D~O.~'" 0,,,-" OlTAWAONKIAOBl
o /- l.~ \ Y "."
. - I - 19 f
LFS PRIX DE CALI"HABETlSATION 1.2
"ENVOL VERS LA UBERTI>> DE LA
SOCI~n: CANADIENNE DES POSTES
2701 PROM RIVERSIDE
BUREAU N0610
OTTAWA ON KIA OBI
May, 1997
AGENDA
lRlli(f;mlllID
MAY 1 6 '997
Dear Elected Representative:
J4l1~CIPALlTY OF CLARINGTON
MAYOR'S OFfICE
A recent Statistics Canada report on literacy shows that there are over 7 million Canadians
(40% of the adult population) whose reading and writing skills deny them the opportunity to
participate fully in our society. Poor literacy skills cost the Canadian economy approximately $4
billion in lost productivity each year.
We at Canada Post Corporation are committed to improving literacy in Canada and have
developed numerous partnerships and programs to meet this goal.
Nominations are currently being accepted for the fifth annual Canada Post Corporation Flight
for Freedom Literacy Awards, and I am seeking your help.
I am asking you to increase awareness of the importance of the cause of literacy and the
recognition demonstrated by the Flight for Freedom Literacy Awards among your colleagues,
associates and constituents. I also ask that you prepare a Flight for Freedom Literacy Award
submission on behalf of a worthy business, literacy organization, educator or individual who is
making a difference in your community by teaching our fellow citizens the value of good
reading and writing skills.
The deadline for submissions for the fifth annual Flight for Freedom Literacy Awards is June
20, 1997, with this year's Awards ceremony taking place on September 7, 1997 in Toronto. I
enclose infonnation on the Awards process. Your support and promotion of these Awards will
help to ensure that we recognize those whose efforts will ultimately benefit all Canadians.
OiSTmUTION -11\..1,.
Yours sincerely, n
CLERK - r
ACK BY !
ORIGfNM.
COPIES TO:
JVt(/A/f/vVVy/1--
IG:orges C. Clermont
President and Chief Executive Officer
a.
M
_ BankofMontreal
II
CIGNA
j
I
.
,
. . I
,,!; l1~ciJ2..t:.......,!
IT i:! POSSIBLE"
.
N~ ~-,.. U
L<-, T
~ ... r.
~ National """",
~ Tll:DEN ,en
~~ neopost
SOl.UTIOI'iSFOIl MIoIUNG
PERFORMANCE ,,"'ORU) WIDE
The Financial Post
SHL System house
An Mel Comp.IIY
I
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/<) MUNICIPALITY OF
V/arington
- ONTARIO
REPORT #1
REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 9,1997
SUBJECT:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF
MONDAY, JUNE 2, 1997
RECOMMEN DA TIONS:
1. RECEIVE FOR INFORMATION
a)
Report CD-26-97
Proposed Amendments to the Noise
By-law, Public Entertainment By-law and
Exhibitions Held for Hire or Gain By-law
b)
Report TR-42-97
Trades and Products from Clarington
Versus out of Town
c)
Report FD-6-97
Monthly Fire Report - April, 1997
2. PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION - IOURDAN AT CLARINGTON INC.
THAT Report PD-75-97 be received;
THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be advised that the
Municipality of Clarington has no objections to the approval of the Plan of
Condominium application submitted by Jourdan at Clarington Inc.; and
THAT the interested parties listed in Report PD-75-97 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision.
3. MONITORING THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADIUSTMENT
THAT Report PD-76-97 be received;
THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made
on May 22, 1997; and
THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
.ct. TeMPERANCE STREET. BOWMAHVlllE .ONTARIO. L1~ 3A6. (905) 623-3379. FAX 623-4169
@
IllC'CUOP4,Pf;A
Report #1
- 2 -
I
I
June 9, 199
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.
IMPLEMENTATION OF BOUNTY
THAT Report CD-25-97 be received; and
THAT a copy of Report CD-25-97 be forwarded to Barry James, Tony Speziale,
Morris Nimigon, Joe McKenna, Bill Hale, Murray Payne, Bill Hasiuk and any other
individuals who are experiencing difficulties with coyotes.
5.
1996 AUDIT REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTER
THAT Report TR-39-97 be received;
THAT the presentation by Deloitte and Touche on the 1996 Financial Statements
be acknowledged with thanks;
THAT the Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 (under
separate cover) be adopted;
THAT recommendations contained in the management letter (under separate
cover) be reviewed by staff and addressed appropriately and report back on any
necessary changes;
THAT the firm of Deloitte and Touche be appointed as the Municipality's Auditors
for the 1997 year end audit; and
THAT a copy of Report TR-39-97 be forwarded to Clarington Hydro-Electric
Commission for their information.
6.
CelLULAR TELEPHONES
THAT Report TR-48-97 be received;
THAT Rogers Cantellnc., be awarded the contract for the supply of cellular
telephones and air time as per the pricing identified on Schedule "B" of Report
TR-48-97, for the period of July 1,1997 to December 31,1999;
THAT the employee purchase program offered by Rogers Cantel Inc. be made
available to the Municipality of Clarington employees;
THAT Purchasing By-law #94-129, Section 5, Paragraph 5.06, be waived for this
transaction;
,
,
I
II
il
II
Report #1
- 3 -
June 9, 195
THAT the required funds be drawn from the respective departments' current
operating budgets; and
II
,
THAT the by-law attached to Report TR-48-97, marked Schedule "A", authorizing
the Mayor and Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved.
II
I
7. CASH ACTIVITY REPORT - APRIL. 1997
THAT Report TR-49-97 be received;
THAT, in accordance with provision of Chapter M-45, Section 79 (1) of the
Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990, the Treasurer reports the cash position of the
Municipality of Clarington for the month ended April 30, 1997, is as shown on
the schedule attached to Report TR-49-97; and
THAT Part "A" of the expenditures for the month of April, 1997, be confirmed.
8. COOPERATIVE QUOTATION QWC-17-97, SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF
CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERT
THAT Report TR-50-97 be received;
THAT Holt Culvert and Metal Products, Peterborough, Ontario, with a total bid in
the amount of $34,623.83 (plus applicable taxes), for the Municipality of
Clarington requirements, being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms,
conditions and specifications of the Co-operative Quotation QWC17-97, be
awarded the contract to supply and deliver Corrugated Pipe Culvert on an "as
required" basis, to the Municipality of Clarington; and
THAT the funds expended be provided from the approved 1997 Culvert
Maintenance Construction budget.
9. IMPERIAL Oil'S REOUEST TO EXTEND BROWNSVILLE ROAD
THAT Report WD-34-97 be received;
THAT the Residents and Property Owners on Brownsville Road and Brownsville
Court be notified immediately of the proposal by Imperial Oil to extend
Brownsville Road approximately 200 metres (650 feet) southerly;
I
Report #1
- 4 -
June 9, 191
THAT the actions taken at the "closed meeting" be confirmed.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THAT the Residents and Property Owners on Brownsville Road and Brownsville
Court be invited to attend an Information Meeting to view the proposed plans for
the Imperial Oil site and construction plans for Brownsville Road;
THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement between
Imperial Oil and the Municipality of Clarington to permit Imperial Oil to construct
the extension of Brownsville Road approximately 200 metres (650 feet) southerly
in accordance with the Municipal Standard for Road Construction and the
conditions set out in the agreement which is Schedule "A" to the proposed by-
law'
,
THAT the Brownsville Road extension be constructed for emergency access only,
as a condition of site plan approval, to the Imperial Oil site and the road be
terminated with a break-through barrier at the north limit of the Ministry of
Transportation of Ontario property (Imperial Oil site);
THAT Staff be authorized to take all actions necessary to publicize and give
notice of the proposed by-law to establish and layout and open the road
allowance; and
THAT Greg Ford, Imperial Oil, be advised of Council's decision.
:ij
10. PROPERTY INVENTORY
THAT Report ADMIN-24-97 be received; and
THAT Council declare the eight properties described in Report ADMIN-24-97 to
be surplus and offered for sale.
11. OLDER ADULTS CENTRE
THAT the Addendum to Report ADMIN-22-97 be received.
12. CONFIRMATION OF ACTIONS TAKEN DURING "CLOSED SESSION"
II
,
II
II
I
I
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee
June 2, 1997
Minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose
and Administration Committee held on Monday,
June 2, 1997 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
II
i
II
II
i
,I
Present Were:
Mayor D. Hamre
Councillor A. Dreslinski
Councillor C. Elliott (Until 11 :05 a.m.)
Councillor L. Hannah
Councillor M. Novak
Councillor P. Pingle
Councillor D. Scott
Also Present:
Chief Administrative Officer, W. Stockwell
Director of COlTlmunity Services, J. Caruana
Fire Chief, M.Treighton
Manager of Strategic Planning, D. Crome (Attended at 2:00 p.m.)
Solicitor, D. Hefferon (Attended at 11 :30 a.m.)
Property Manager, F. Horvath (Attended at 10:S5 a.m. until 1:55 p.m.)
Treasurer, M. Marano
Director of Public Works, S. Vokes
Director of Planning and Development, F. Wu
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Oreslinski indicated that she would be making a declaration of interest
with respect to Report CD-26-97 later in the meeting.
Councillor Elliott indicated that he would be making a declaration of interest with
respect to Addendum to Report ADMIN-22-97 later in the meeting.
MINUTES
Resolution #GPA-335-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration
Committee held on May 20, 1997, be approved.
"CARRIED"
G.P,& A Minutes
DELEGATIONS
.,;,,;
..::-;
(a)
(b)
I
- 2 -
I
June 2, 1997
I
Bernie Chandler, Oeloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants,
Bank of Commerce Building, 2 Simcoe Street South, P.O. Box 800,
Oshawa, L 1 H 7N1 - reo TR-39-97 - addressed Members of the Committee
and referred to his letter dated May 27, 1997 to the Municipality of
C1arington along with the 1996 Consolidated Financial Report and the
Report containing the Financial Information Return of the Corporation of
the Municipality of Clarington. He noted that the auditors' examination
of the Municipality's records included a review of the system of internal
controls, accounting procedures and other matters. He noted that the
Municipality is continuing improvement in the records and accounts and
he made further suggestions to enhance the accounting procedures,
internal controls and operations of the corporation. He thanked Staff of
the Municipality for their excellent assistance and co-operation during the
audit
I
I
I
I
Issy Jourdan, Jourdan at Clarington Inc., 9 Woodlawn Avenue East,
Toronto, M4T 1B9 - reo Report PD-75-97 - advised prior to the meeting
that he would not be in attendance.
I
I
I
(c)
Morris Nimigon, 280 King Street East, Bowmanville, L 1 C 1 P9 - reo
Report CD-2S-97 - suggested that Council, in the future, appoint a
veterinarian as a livestock valuer to save money and he also suggested
that the names of persons who make livestock claims be made public.
Councillor Elliott made a declaration of interest with respect to the
delegation of Don Welsh and the Addendum to ADMIN-22-97; vacated
his chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the subject matter.
Councillor Elliott indicated that he has worked closely with John Rice on
this submission and he is a member of the 80wmanville lions Club.
I
I
I
I
(d)
Don Welsh, Annabelle Sissons and Mavis Carlton, Clarington Older
Adults, 4280 Mearns Ave., Bowmanville, L 1C 3K5 - reo Addendum to
Report ADMIN-22-97 - Mr. Welsh advised that it has been close to ten
years since the need was first identified for a Seniors' Centre, specifically
for the use of the older residents in this area. He advised that, consistent
with all the surveys undertaken by the Committee, studies and reviews
have led to the realization ihat the site should be downtown, highly
visible, easily accessible and dedicated to seniors' activities where they
could interact with other seniors and develop and cultivate friendships.
He indicated that the Committee met on May 30, 1997 and all members
supported the Rice/Daros location as their first preference. Second choice
would be a stand-alone building located at the Garnet Rickard Complex.
He noted that the opportunity of sharing space with Community Care is a
substantial benefit to both the Municipality and to Community Care. He
advised that the cost of purchasing the lions Centre, the cost of
renovations and upgrades and the cost of the addition are not available to
the seniors committee at this time and he urged Members of Council to
approve the Rice/Daros proposal.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
1
JI
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee
June 2, 1997
Minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose
and Administration Committee held on Monday,
June 2, 1997 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
I
il
I
'I
'.
II
II
i
jl
Present Were:
Mayor D. Hamre
Councillor A. Dreslinski
Councillor C. Elliott (Until 11 :05 a.m.)
Councillor L. Hannah
Councillor M. Novak
Councillor P. Pingle
Councillor D. Scott
Also Present:
Chief Administrative Officer, W. Stockwell
Director of Community Services, J. Caruana
Fire Chief, t.CCreighton
Manager of Strategic Planning, D. Crome (Attended at 2:00 p.m.)
Solicitor, D. Hefferon (Attended at 11 :30 a.m.)
Property Manager, F. Horvath (Attended at 10:55 a.m. until 1:55 p.m.)
Treasurer, M. Marano
Director of Public Works, S. Vokes
Director of Planning and Development, F. Wu
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Dreslinski indicated that she would be making a declaration of interest
with respect to Report CD-26-97 later in the meeting.
I
Councillor Elliott indicated that he would be making a declaration of interest with
respect to Addendum to Report ADMIN-22-97 later in the meeting.
MINUTES
Resolution #GPA-335-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration
Committee held on May 20, 1997, be approved.
"CARRIED"
G,P.& A Minutes
DELEGATIONS
't
(a)
- 2-
June 2, 1997
I
I
I
Bernie Chandler, Deloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants,
Bank of Commerce Building, 2 Simcoe Street South, P.O. Box 800,
Oshawa, L 1 H 7Nl - re: TR-39-97 - addressed Members of the Committee
and referred to his letter dated May 27, 1997 to the Municipality of
Clarington along with the 1996 Consolidated Financial Report and the
Report containing the Financial Information Return of the Corporation of
the Municipality of Clarington. He noted that the auditors' examination
of the Municipality's records included a review of the system of internal
controls, accounting procedures and other matters. He noted that the
Municipality is continuing improvement in the records and accounts and
he made further suggestions to enhance the accounting procedures,
internal controls and operations of the corporation. He thanked Staff of
the Municipality for their excellent assistance and co-operation during the
audit.
I
I
I
I
(b)
Issy Jourdan, Jourdan at Clarington Inc., 9 Woodlawn Avenue East,
Toronto, M4T lB9 - re: Report PD-75-97 - advised prior to the meeting
that he would not be in attendance.
I
(c)
Morris Nimigon, 280 King Street East, Bowmanville, l1 C 1 P9 - re:
Report CD-25-97 - suggested that Council, in the future, appoint a
veterinarian as a livestock valuer to save money and he also suggested
that the names of persons who make livestock claims be made public.
I
I
Councillor Elliott made a declaration of interest with respect to the
delegation of Don Welsh and the Addendum to ADMIN-22-97; vacated
his chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the subject matter.
Councillor Elliott indicated that he has worked closely with John Rice on
this submission and he is a member of the Bowmanville Lions Club.
I
I
I
(d)
Don Welsh, Annabelle Sissons and Mavis Carlton, Clarington Older
Adults, 4280 Mearns Ave., Bowmanville, llC 3K5 - re: Addendum to
Report ADMIN-22-97 - Mr. Welsh advised that it has been close to ten
years since the need was first identified for a Seniors' Centre, specifically
for the use of the older residents in this area. He advised that, consistent
with all the surveys undertaken by the Committee, studies and reviews
have led to the realization that the site should be downtown, highly
visible, easily accessible and dedicated to seniors' activities where they
could interact with other seniors and develop and cultivate friendships.
He indicated that the Committee met on May 30, 1997 and all members
supported the Rice/Daros location as their first preference. Second choice
would be a stand-alone building located at the Garnet Rickard Complex.
He noted that the opportunity of sharing space with Community Care is a
substantial benefit to both the Municipality and to Community Care. He
advised that the cost of purchasing the Lions Centre, the cost of
renovations and upgrades and the cost of the addition are not available to
the seniors committee at this time and he urged Members of Council to
approve the Rice/Daros proposal.
I
I
I
I
I
I
G,P.& A Minutes
- 3 -
June 2, 1997
DELEGATIONS CONT'D.
II
II
Annabelle Sissons addressed Members of the Committee and noted that
C1arington stands alone in not having a seniors' centre. She urged
Members of the Committee to approve the New Seniors' Centre and
concluded by saying: "we need you - you need us!".
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
(e) Sally Barrie, Community Care, 98 King Street West, Bowmanville,
llC lR4 - reo Addendum to Report ADMIN-22-97 - informed Members
of the Committee that Community Care will need 2500 sq. ft. of floor
space in the future. Community Care sharing space with the Older Adults
Centre would be mutually advantageous. Community Care needs to be
downtown, highly visible, easily accessible with adequate parking.. She
noted that the relocation of Community Care to the lions Centre is not a
viable option.
Councillor Dreslinski chaired this portion of the meeting.
PUBLIC MEETINGS
There were no public meetings scheduled for this meeting.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Plan of Condominium Resolution #GPA-336-97
Application - Jourdan
at Clarington Inc. Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT Report PD-75-97 be received;
THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be advised that the
Municipality of Clarington has no objections to the approval of the Plan of
Condominium application submitted by Jourdan at Clarington Inc.; and
THAT the interested parties listed in Report PD-75-97 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Monitoring the
Decisions of the
Committee of
Adjustment
D1O.CO
Resolution #GPA-337-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Pingle
THAT Report PD-76-97 be received;
THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made
on May 22, 1997; and
THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
"CARRIED"
G.P.& A Minutes - 4 -
June 2, 1997
Councillor Pingle chaired this portion of the meeting.
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
Implementation Resolution #GPA-338-97
of Bounty
Moved by Mayor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT Report CD-25-97 be received; and
THAT a copy of Report CD-25-97 be forwarded to Barry James, Tony Speziale,
Morris Nimigon, Joe McKenna, Bill Hale, Murray Payne, Bill Hasiuk and any other
individuals who are experiencing difficulties with coyotes.
"CARRIED"
Councillor Dreslinski made a declaration of interest with respect to Report
CD-26-97; vacated her chair and refrained from discussion and voting on the
subject matter. Councillor Dreslinski's son is employed by Mosport.
Proposed Amendments Resolution #GPA-339-97
to the Noise By-law,
Public Entertainment Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Elliott
By-law and Exhibitions
Held for Hire or THAT Report CD-26-97 be received for information.
Gain By-law
"CARRIED"
'"
~
Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
1996 Audit Report Resolution #GPA-340-97
and Management Letter
Moved by Mayor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT Report TR-39-97 be received;
THAT the presentation by Deloitte and Touche on the 1996 Financial Statements
be acknowledged with thanks;
THAT the Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 (under
separate cover) be adopted;
THAT recommendations contained in the management letter (under separate
cover) be reviewed by staff and addressed appropriately and report back on any
necessary changes;
THAT the firm of Deloitte and Touche be appointed as the Municipality's Auditors
for the 1997 year end audit; and
THAT a copy of Report TR-39-97 be forwarded to Clarington Hydro-Electric
Commission for their information.
"CARRIED"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G,P,& A Minutes
- 5 -
June 2, 1997
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
Trades and Products
from Clarington
Versus out of Town
'.,.1
.
I
I
i
il
II
i
I
II
I
I
!
II
i
I
I
II
Cellular Telephones
!,'I
).
,;
I.
II
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cash Adivity
Report, April 1997
Resolution #GPA-341-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT Report TR-42-97 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-342-97
Moved by Mayor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Scott
THAT Report TR-48-97 be received;
THAT Rogers Cantellnc., be awarded the contrad for the supply of cellular
telephones and air time as per the pricing identified on Schedule "B" of Report
TR-48-97, for the period of July 1,1997 to December 31,1999;
THAT the employee purchase program offered by Rogers Cantel Inc. be made
available to the Municipality of C1arington employees;
THAT Purchasing By-law #94-129, Section 5, Paragraph 5.06, be waived for this
transaction;
THAT the required funds be drawn from the respective departments' current
operating budgets; and
THAT the by-law attached to Report TR-48-97, marked Schedule "A", authorizing
the Mayor and Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-343-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Scott
THAT Report TR-49-97 be received;
THAT, in accordance with provision of Chapter M-45, Section 79 (1) of the
Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990, the Treasurer reports the cash position of the
Municipality of Clarington for the month ended April 30, 1997, is as shown on
the schedule attached to Report TR-49-97; and
THAT Part "A" of the expenditures for the month of April, 1997, be confirmed.
"CARRIED"
G.P.& A Minutes
- 6-
I
I
I
I
I
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
June 2, 1997
Co-operative
Quotation
QWC-17-97, Supply
and Del iver of
Corrugated Pipe
Culvert
F16.QU
"lii
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Monthly Fire Report
April, 1997
Resolution ItGPA-344-97
Moved by Councillor Scott, seconded by Councillor Pingle
THAT Report TR-SO-97 be received;
THAT Holt Culvert and Metal Products, Peterborough, Ontario, with a total bid in
the amount of $34,623.63 (plus applicable taxes). for the Municipality of
Clarington requirements, being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms,
conditions and specifications of the Co-operative Quotation QWC17-97, be
awarded the contract to supply and deliver Corrugated Pipe Culvert on an "as
required" basis, to the Municipality of Claringlon; and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THAT the funds expended be provided from the approved 1997 Culvert
Maintenance Construction budget.
.CARRIED"
Resolution IfGPA-345-97
Moved by Mayor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Dreslinski
THAT the Committee recess for fifteen minutes.
"CARRIED"
The meeting reconvened at 10:4S a.m.
Councillor Scott chaired this portion of the meeting.
Resolution IIGPA-346-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Mayor Hamre
THAT Report FD-6-97 be received for information.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
"CARRIED"
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
I
II
~
G.P.& A Minutes
- 7-
June 2, 1997
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Councillor Elliott chaired this portion of the meeting.
I
I
Imperial Oil's
Request to Extend
Brownsville Road
i
II
I
\
j
ADMINISTRATION
Property Inventory
Resolution #GPA-347-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT Report WD-34-97 be received;
THAT the Residents and Property Owners on Brownsville Road and Brownsville
Court be notified immediately of the proposal by Imperial Oil to extend
Brownsville Road approximately 200 metres (650 feet) southerly;
THAT the Residents and Property Owners on Brownsville Road and Brownsville
Court be invited to attend an Information Meeting to view the proposed plans for
the Imperial Oil site and construction plans for Brownsville Road;
THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement between
Imperial Oil and the Municipality of Clarington to permit Imperial Oil to construct
the extension of Brownsville Road approximately 200 metres (650 feet) southerly
in accordance with the Municipal Standard for Road Construction and the
conditions set out in the agreement which is Schedule "A" to the proposed
by-law;
THAT the Brownsville Road extension be constructed for emerl!encv access only,
as a condition of site plan approval, to the Imperial Oil site and the road be
terminated with a break-through barrier at the north limit of the Ministry of
Transportation of Ontario property (Imperial Oil site);
THAT Staff be authorized to take all actions necessary to publicize and give notice
of the proposed by-law to establish and layout and open the road allowance; and
THAT Greg Ford, Imperial Oil, be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
F. Wu, Director, Planning and Development and F. Horvath, Property Manager
were present to answer questions from Members of the Committee.
Resolution #GPA-348-97
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Pingle
THAT Report ADMIN-24-97 be received; and
THAT Council declare the eight properties described in Report ADMIN-24-97 to
be surplus and offered for sale.
"CARRIED"
G.P.& A Minutes - 8 -
June 2, 1997
UNFINISHED 8USINESS
Older Adults Centre Resolution #GPA-349-97
A19.0L
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the Addendum to Report ADMIN-22-97 be received.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-3S0-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Scott
THAT the meeting be "closed" for consideration of a property matter and the
verbal report of the Town Solicitor pertaining to a legal matter.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-351-97
Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT the Committee recess for lunch until 1 :00 p.m.
"CARRIED"
....8
The meeting reconvened at 1 :00 p.m.
Resolution #GPA-352-97
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Pingle
THAT the meeting be "closed" for consideration of a property matter and the
verbal report of the Town Solicitor pertaining to a legal matter.
"CARRIED"
Members of the Committee requested clarification from Don Welsh and
Sally Barrie pertaining to their preferred location for a seniors centre. Sally Barrie
advised that Community Care will now require 2,500 sq. ft. of floor space to meet
their needs. They will share offices with the seniors but cannot move to the Lions
Centre because their present location is preferable. Don Welsh advised that the
maintenance costs associated with locating the seniors to the Lions Centre would
be financially prohibitive to the seniors and asked if the Municipality would be
willing to pay these costs on behalf of the seniors.
Resolution #GPA-353-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the meeting be "closed" for consideration of a property matter and the
verbal report of the Town Solicitor pertaining to a legal matter.
"CARRIED"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G.P.& A Minutes
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
II
I
II
j
11
I
I
11
II
i
;.1
~.
II
i
I
'I
- 9-
Resolution #GPA-354-97
Moved by Councillor Dreslinski, seconded by Councillor Hannah
THAT the actions taken at the "closed meeting" be confirmed.
"CARRIED"
There were no items considered under this section of the agenda.
Resolution #GPA-355-97
Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the meeting adjourn at 2:30 p.m.
"CARRIED"
MAYOR
CLERK
June 2, 1997
-"
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
xxxXlJti~ml(Xlf~~~2~i~xx
REPORT
Date:
JUNE 9, 1997
File #
Res. #
By-Law #
Meeting:
COUNCIL
Report #:
WD-36-97
File#:
Subject:
CANADA-ONTARIO INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS EXTENSION
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-36-97 be received;
2. THAT the Treasurer be authorized, to make application to the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, for approval under the Federal-provincial
Infrastructure Works Extension, for the Bowmanville B.I.A. Streetscape
Revitalization Projecti
3. THAT the funding for Clarington's share of costs of the project, $116,782,
be obtained from the funds due from Clarington place (Willsonia
Industries) and Markborough Properties, for the Bowmanville B.I.A. under
their agreement with the Municipality;
4. THAT Council pass the By-law attached to WD-36-97 to authorize the Mayor
and Clerk to execute an agreement with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and Housing;
S. THAT the Director of Public Works and the Treasurer review other proj ects
with the goal of being in a position. to proceed immediately with the
-projects should additional funding become available under the
Infrastructure Program, or if for some other reason the Bowmanville B.LA.
is unable to commit to the use of these fOOds; and
6. THAT, if Council approves the request of the B.I.A. for an interest free
10an of $47,997 to be .repaid over six (6) years, the funds be taken from
the Impact Escrow Reserve Fund #SOOl-S0-X.
..<.,,,.IX\......
....~~..cYCco
, -'
-
-
~
REPORT NO.: WD-36-97
PAGE 2
REPORT
1. 0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1:
No.2:
Guidelines and Requirements for the Funding of Capital
Projects Under Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works Extension
Correspondence from Ron Hooper, Bowmanville B. loA., dated June
2, 1997, regarding Proposed Bowmanville B.I.A. Streets cape
Revitalization, Phase 1
Memorandum from Franklin Wu, Director of Planning and
Development, dated February 26, 1997, regarding Willsonia and
Markborough Funds for Bowmanville Business Improvement Area
Correspondence from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, dated May 14, 1997, regarding allocation of
Federal/Provincial/Municipal Funding under 1997-98
Canada/Ontario Infrastructure Works Extension.
Proposed By-law No. 97-121.
No.3:
No.4:
No.5:
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Clarington has been given an allotment of $350,345 under the Canada-
Ontario Infrastructure Works Extension (hereinafter refe=ed to as the
Program). The cost of $350,345 is to be shared one-third by the Federal
Government, one-third by the Provincial Government and one-third by the
Municipality of Clarington.
3.0 REVJ:EW AND COMMENT
3.1 Imnortant Guidelines
The guidelines for the Program are attached for Council's information.
Some of the important guidelines are:
a) This is a. program for the 1997 construction season. The
Extension Amendment to the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure
Agreement requires that cost representing the total program
allocation be incurred by March 31, 1998.
b) The Program is meant to fund projects that would not otherwise
be undertaken by the local partner in the 1997-98 Provincial
fiscal year (April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998). Aggregate
federal funding from the Program and any other federal funding
programs cannot exceed one-third of the total eligible project
costs. Any project for which a local partner has received
grants or funding under any provincial capital program is not
eligible for funding under this Program, except to the extent
.
REPORT NO.. WD-36-97
PAGE 3
that a project is additional to the part of the project that
received such funding.
c) Local partners are encouraged to submit applications as soon
as possible for projects that can be easily and quickly
implemented. For initial allocations, applications for
funding should be submitted to the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing by June 13, 1997. Local partners should
inform the Ministry inunediately if they do not intend or are
unable to proceed with a project or to fully utilize their
allocation.
d) A Management Conunittee has been established to administer the
Extension Amendment to the Canada-ontario Infrastructure
Agreement. This conmittee consists of two members appointed
by the federal government and two appointed by the provincial
government. Upon project approval, a letter of approval will
be issued by the Management Conmittee, and a provincial-Local
Partner Agreement will be signed covering such items as
financial arrangements and payment provisions, eligible costs,
financial reporting, audit and inspection provisions, public
information requirements, the project details including the
implementation of the project, and time lines.
3.2 Bawmanville B.I.A. Street Revitalization proiect
The Bowmanville B.I.A. has approached Council and senior staff regarding
revitalization works for King Street in downtown Bowmanville. The
B. I .A.' s long term goal for the downtown area involves new asphalt
pavement, intersections with interlock pavers, new sidewalk, decorative
streetlights, increased tree planting aild a revised parking metre scheme.
The present application for infrastructure funding is for Phase I of the
Street Revitalization Program consisting primarily of sidewalk
replacement.
The detailed cost estimate for the project is included as Attachment No.
2. In summary, the proposed financing is as follows:
I. Federal and Provincial
Infrastructure contribution: $233,563
REPORT NO.: WD-36-97
PAGE 4
2.
Municipality of Clarington Contribution:
Markborough and Clarington Place Funds
(assignment re: capital streetscape
improvements)
116.782
$350,345
3.
Subtotal (Infrastructure Project)
Additional Works beyond Infrastructure
Funding:
Markborough & Clarington Place Funds
$133,218
Interest Free Loan
47.997
$531,560
TOTAL PROJECT COST
The Bowmanville B.I.A. propose to use the funds assigned to the B.I.A. as
part of the development agreements from the two groups concerned
(Markborough and Clarington Place) and Infrastructure Funds to finance
Phase I of their long .term goal.
Most importantly, the Bowmanville B. I .A. through the use of these existing
funds, will be covering the Municipality's contribution to the
Infrastructure Project. The B.I.A. is aware and concurs with this
approach. As well, they are aware that participation in this 1997/98
Infrastructure Project in no way commits the Municipality to future stages
of their overall long term vision ($2.1 million in total) .
The final aspect of the B.I.A.'s proposal involves financing the balance
of the project with an interest free loan from the Municipality (total of
$47,997) . They propose that the loan is to be repaid over a six year
period using the $10,000 per year assigned from the promotion fund
(Markborough and Clarington Place allotment). If Council chooses to grant
this request, funds could be allocated from the Impact Escrow Reserve Fund
#SOOl-50-X.
3.3 Provincial - Local Partner
As mentioned in previous sections, this project will be reviewed by the
Management Committee regarding eligible costs under the gnidelines as set
out in Attachment No. 1. Upon project approval by letter from the
Management Committee, the guidelines for the Program require that an
agreement be entered into with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing. The passing of the proposed By-law attached to this Report will
give the authority to the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement when it
is available.
REPORT NO.: WD-36-97
PAGE 5
3.4 Future Infrastructure Pro;ects
The Program requires that the local partners pay one-third of the cost of
the projects. During this continued time of restraint and zero increases
in municipal budgets, it is possible that some municipalities will decide
not to become involved with the Program or may decide to utilize only part
of their allotment. It is therefore possible that more funds will be made
available to municipalities such as Clarington. For this reason,or if the
B.I.A. for any reason is unable to commit to the use of these funds, it is
reconunended that staff be directed to examine other projects to be
undertaken under the Program with the goal of being in a position to
proceed with the projects on short notice.
3 .5 Schedu1inQ of Works
The proposed Bowmanville B.I.A. Streetscape Revitalization Project
provides for the removal and replacement of selective sections of existing
concrete sidewalks on King Street East from Scugog Street to Ontario
Street. This will mean that, if the project is approved, construction
will be taking place on King Street East in Bowmanvi1le for a second year,
tentatively conunencing September 1, 1997, to be completed October 30,
J.997. We will do everything possible to schedule the work on King Street
to reduce the inconvenience to store owners and residents as much as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~k~
Director of Public Works
~~.u. ~
Treasurer
S~-~
Administrative Officer
W. H.
Chief
SAV*ph
June 6, 1997
Attachments
23'97 15:45 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
.,.
., p. 02/2
/
Canada I Ontario Infrastructure Works
Travaux d'lnfrastructure Canada I Ontario
Guidelines and Requirements for
the Funding of Capital Projects
Under
Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works
Extension
@ Ontario
Canada
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
'3'97 15:45 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P.03/,
/'
Guidelines and Requirements for
the Funding of Capital Projects Under
Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works Extension
I. General
A Purpose
Additional capital funds are being made available by the Govemment of Canada and the
Province of Ontario. to renew and enhance Ontario's physical infrastructUre in local
communities. These funds are being made available to municipalities. community health care
organizations (CHO's). colleges and universities to generate employment, to promote a .
competitive and productive economy and to renew and enhance Ontario's physical
infrastructUre, during the 1<J97 constrUction season. We wish to join with your community
and others across the province to invest: in your most important infrastructUre repair and
renewal projects.
While the administrative processes in the Extension are similar to the original
Program. note that the scope of eligible projects is significantly different. There Is a
focus on the rehabilitation and repair of public facilities that are essential to the fu1:ure
health and prosperity of Ontario communities: transportation. health care. post-
secondary education, and water and sewage facilities. (Refer to Schedule I - Project
Approval Criteria, below, for additional information). In addition, these Guidelines apply
only to projects approved under the Extension: please refer to the Guidelines and
Application Fonns of 1994 for projects under the original Program.
The Govemment of Ontario. has allocated the federal and provincial shares of these
capital funds to specific municipalities and colleges and universities, or. to specific projects
involving municipalities and CHO's. (hereafter known as local partners). In addition. a single
allocation. to be administered by the Ministry of Transportation. will be made for provincial
highways. Hence the Program will be administered in distina portions:
Municipal Proiect Applications: The Program allows municipalities to subm~ projea
applications, based on a funding amount determined by a modified per capita allocation.
8igible projects within the municipal funding allocations include only the renewal and
repair of transportation and water and sewage systems;
M~Y 23'97 15:46 FR MM~ ROB HE~D OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819055632351
p. e4/Z' '
,
"'- -.1
,) '-"
r.
Provinci~ly Nominated Proiects: This portion of the Progr.un applies only [0 community
health organizations. and provincial and private sector transportation, water and sewage
projects. The projects have been nominated by the province based on strategic
infrastructure needs and priorities in these areas, as per the criteria that apply to each
individual sector; .
Post-Secondary Education: This portion of the Program applies only to colleges and
universities. and allows these institutions to submit project applications, based on
specified funding amounts. Each college and university sector share was determined on
the basis of current Ministry of Education and Training capital distribution methods.
B. Project Funding
Local partners will be required to contribute a minimum of one.third of the costs of each
project they propose. Provincial transportation infrastructure projects wm be funded on a
one-third Canada and two-thirds Ontario basis (Note: For these uanspon:a:tion projects,
substitute "Ministry of Transportation" for "local partner" where appropriate in the rest of
these guidelines).
Private sector contributions and donations will normally be credited to the local partner's
share 'to the extent that they add to the local partner's equity. A business case for private
sector participation will be required with the project application. The business case will include
a description of the economic benefits of the undertaking.
This is a one-year extension to the existing COIW program. The Extension Amendment
to the Agreement requires that approved projects be completed by March 31. 1998.
However, at the request of the Management Committee (see I.F. below), the Federal Minister
may provide his written agreement [0 extend the completion date and the funding of an
approved project where necessary work is delayed beyond March 31, 1998. due to unforeseen
or unavoidable circumstances. or due to prudent planning considerations.
C. Relationships to Other Funding Programs
The Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works program is meant to fund projects that would
not otherwise be undertaken by the loc~ partner in the 1997-98 fiscal year (April 1/97 to
March 31/98). Aggregate federal funding from the Program and any other federal funding
prognms c:aJ1not exceed one-third of the total eligible project costs_ Any project: for which a
local partner has received grants or funding under any provinci~ capital program is not eligible
for funding under this Program. except to the extent that a project is additional to the part of
the project that received such funding.
2
........ ..
MRY 2J'97 15:46 FR MMR ROB HERD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P.05/,
D. How to Apply
The Ministry of Transportation, Ontario has been designat:ed t:o coordinate the overall
administration. operation and communications aspects of the Extension Amendment. The
direct program administration will be carried 0\11: by the:
_ Ministry of Education and Training (colleges and universities).
_ Ministry of Health (community health care organizations - CHO's).
_ Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (municipalities in southern Ontario).
_ Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (municipalities and unincorporated areas
in Northern Ontario).
_ Ministry ofTransportation (provincial highways).
Local partners may submit applications for joint projects with other eligible participants.
Where tilis is done. one joint application is acceptable. However. the amount of each partner's
total cost responsibility. as well as, each partner's allocation dedicued to the proposed project
should be clearly identified on the joint application. These projects will be administered as ty(o
distinct projects.
Each project will require tile submission of an application form and must be site specific.
All project applications must be signed by the appropriate official (e.g.. authorized by the
municipal councilor institution) of each local partner making the application. Completed.
authorized applications should be submitted to the appropriate provincial line ministry as
shown below. The line ministry wm provide this information and any other supporting
documentation to Industry Canada.
Municipal Projects
Transportation. Water 8< Sewage:
Canada-Ornario Infrastructure Works Unit
Regional Operations Branch
Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing
11th Roor. 7n Bay Street
Toronto, Ornario M5G 2ES
T e(: 416-585--4040
Fax: -416-585-7639
Northern Coordinator:
Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works
Ministry of Northern Development & Mines
Sixth Roor, 159 Cedar Street
Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5
Tel: 705-670.7315
Fax: 705-670.7313
3
MAY 23'97 15:46 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p .e6/;
Colleges and Universities
Attention: Canada-Ontario InfrastrUcture Works
Capital and Operating Grants Branch
Ministry of Education and Training
9th Floor, Mowat Block
900 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario M7A III
Tel: -4 (6-325-40 II (for colleges)
-4 (6-325-40 15 (for universities)
Fax: -4 (6-325-1959
e-mail: bill.bailey@edu.gov.on.ca
Communit;y Health r"'re On!2l1l:zations
Attention: Canada-Ontario InfrastructUre Works
Capital & Technical Services
Ministry of Health
3rd Roor
5700 Y onge Street
North York. Ontario M2M-4K5
Tel: 416-327-7067
Fax: 416-327-7076 (please phone above # if urgent fax is being sent)
T rans~rta.tion
Provincial Highways:
Resources ManagemeM Branch
Ministry ofTransporcation
4th Roor, 30 ( St. Paul Street
St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 7M .
Tet 905-704-2600
Fax: 905-704-2626
e-mail: thompsoj@mto.gov.on.ca
Northern Ontario Access and Private
Sector Roads: .
Area Coordinator
Canada-Ontario InfrastructUre Works
Sault Ste. Marie Area Office
Ministry of Northern Development & Mines
Ste 200, Roberta. Bondar Place
70 Foster Drive
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 6V8
Tel: 70S-~S-SB36
Fax: 705-~5-5931
Further information and assistance is available from each of the provincial line ministry offices
set out above.
"
MAY 23'97 15:45 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 415 585 7292 TO 819056682051
E. Timing for Submission of Applications
('./0'. ."1
....; fl/~Jilj "'J ,":.'-'.' ,..,'.
.I (I ,,,.- ~ ./
,~ I'- I ~~ . I
All applications should be completed as soon as possible. [For initi,l allocations,
applications for funding should be submitted to the .appr..opr.fltoo-pl"ovindlUine-mini$tr-y by June
13, 1'197. local partners should inform the aiJ.ptfQPl'iate Ministry (fdentilied;inthe<pli!ceding
seCtion} immediately if they do not intend or are unable to proceed with a project or to fully
utilize their allocation. .J
F. Approval Process
). Management Committee has been established to administer the Extension Amendment
to the Canada-Ontario InfrastructUre Agreement: This Committee consists of two members
appointed by the federal govemment and t:NO appointed by the provincial govemmentJThe
federal and provinCial governments have each named a senior official as Co-chair for the
Management Committee. In addition, the federal and provincial ministers will appoint one
representative as an ex-oflicio member of the Management Committee on behalf of Ontario
municipalities.
Upon submission of an application, the appropriate provincial line ministry will review the
project proposals, in consultation with other ministries, where necessary, to determine if they
comply with program criteria. Projects will then be nominated by the provincial co-chair to the
Management Committee for approval, based on the program criteria. Local partners will be
expected to obain all necessary environmental, technical and other approvals prior to projects
being approved. Approval requires the agreement of both the federal and provincial co-chairs.
Upon project approval, a letter of approval will be issued by the Management Committee,
and a Provincial-Local Partner Agreement will be signed covering such items as financial
arrangements and payment provisions, eligible costs, financial reporting, audit and inspection
provisions, public information requirements, the project details Including the implementation of
the projects, and timelines.
In accordance with the provisions of the Extension Amendment to the Canada/Ontario
InfrastructUre Agreement, the final date for approval by the COWl Management Committee of
projects, and amendments which significantly alter the naOJre and scope of a project, is March
31,1998.
Please note that local partners may commence, at their own risk, work on a project prior
to obt:aining formal approval by the Management Committee. In these instances, eligible costs
incurred on or after April I. 1997 may be claimed retroactively only when and if the project is
approved by the Management Committee.
5
p,07/2
l,~ ,/,,/
,~
:...}
./
,
''7;
-V
MRY 23'97 15:47 FR MMR ROB HERD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 81913566821351
p . e8};:'
G. Payments
To receive program funds for approved projects, local partners must claim for eligible
costs that have been incurred and paid. However, where a local partner claims for expenses
incurred but not yet paid, the local partner will have to provide documentation of actual
payment within 90 days of the original claim. A claim fonn will be provided at the time of
project approval.
The Province will flow two-thirds of the supported eligible incurred costs to local
partners. This two-thirds includes the federal portion of the program funding. The local
parmer will be responsible for covering the remainder of the project costs.
The Extension Amendment to the Canada/Ontario InfrastructUre Agreement requires
that cost representing the total program allocation be incurred by March 31, 1998 (with the
qualification set out in See. loB, above). Therefore. local partners are encouraged to incur and
claim projects costs as soon as possible. In order to receive payment for costs incurred in the
1997-98 fiscal year, local partners must ensure that claims covering these COSts are received by
the appropriate provincial line ministry on or before March 3 r, 2000.
Local partners will be required to submit project completion reports along with their final
claim for project COSts.
H. Project Amendments
Local parmers may ask to amend the scale, scope or timing of approved projects, as well
as the projects costs (upward or downward).
Requests for amendments to approved projects must be submitted in writing to the
appropriate provincial line ministry, accompanied by:
. a description of the change, including any new environmental impacts;
. detailed reasons/rationale for the change (Please note that unsubstantiated project
cost oVerruns will not be considered for additional funding. Sufficient Justification
for upward amendments must be provided); and
. a revised Schedule 2 fonn, if the amendment relates to a cost or timing change.
Requests for amendments to projects which significantly alter the nawre, scope and cost
of an approved project should be received by the appropriate provincial fine ministry on or
before December 31. 1997, in order to be considered for Management Committee approval
by March 31, 1998.
6
MAY 23'97 15:47 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P.09/,
Allocations are not tranSferable between approved projects as of right. A decrease in
one project does not necessarily entide a local partner to a corresponding increase in another
project. Project decreases release funds which can. with justification. be the basis of a request
for an increase in another approved project.
Please note, restrictions apply to situations where a local partner has initially agreed to
fund its share of a project at a ratio greater than 1/3 of the total project costs. This approved
ratio cannot be changed at a later date because of underspending on another approved project
or because of funds remaining in the local partner's allocation. The only instance where the
amount of the originally agreed upon federal and provincial contributions can be altered
(increased) is where there are justifiable increases in the total costs of a project.
I. Project Audit
This program and all reportS related to It are subject to audit by the provincial and federal
governments. For purposes of conducting audits of specific projectS, the services of the
external auditors of local partners may be engaged. The cost of carrying out these audits will
be born by the provincial and federal governments.
Local partners will be required to maintain their accounts related to an approved project for a
period of three years beyond March 31, 1999.
J. Program Evaluation
An evaluation of this program extension will be undertaken and may include a sample of
local partner's projects as case studies for the exercise. Costs of any evaluation will be born
by the provincial and federal governments.
K. Communications
In announcing infrasrrucwre projectS funded under this Program, ceruin requirements
must be met. In all communications related to a specific approved project, Canada. Ontario
and the local partner must receive equal recognition. This applies to both local signs on the
project site and public announcements about the project.
All program communications will be prepared by a joint federal-provincial
communications group. Before any approved project is announced, local partners will be asked
........ ..
7
MAY 23'97 15:47 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P.10/;
for their input. Local partners must not. on their own. make any announcements related to the
project.
News releases will be issued for aU projects. These will be issued by the joint federal-
provincial communications group. News releases will contain one quotation from each of.
federal, provincial and local partners. Local partners will be asked to approve their local
quotations before the news release is issued. A major program objective is to demonstrate the
benefits of co-operation among governments and other public bodies.
In cooperation with the local parmer. the federal and provincial govemments will arrange
eventS to (~unch approved infrastructure projeCts or to celebrate completed projects. These
could include ribbon cuttings. news conferences or other similar events. All three partners will
be involved in any launch events.
Local partners will be responsible for having signs produced for the project site, the COSts
of which will be eligible under the program. The provincial and federal governments will issue
specific requirements for these signs. Local partners will be informed in their project approval
letter if a sign is required.
All public information related to calls for project tenders must clearly indicate that the
project is funded under this Program.
All printed material and signs will be in both official languages.
8
MAY 23'97 15:47 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. It /;
" Guide to the Application Form
Summary Information
I. Legal Name of Local Partner
The legal name of each local partner or incorporated group, and the local partner's
mailing address. postal code. contact pen;on. phone and facsimile numbers.
2. Project Name
The name that will be used to identify the project, e.g., "Development of Production Well
G 17 (Cambridge)".
3. Project Description
A full. clear description of the project outlining the nature of the undertaking. the work to
be done and the expected result, e.g., 'ConstrUction of new production well to supply
potable water to dist/ibution system with disinfection facilities".
4. Location of Project
A description by lot. concession, street address or geographic location of the project (not
the local partner's address unless this is the project site). It is mandatory that the postal
code for the project location be included in this section. If the project stretches over
more than one locale. such as a road project, then the postal code for the address
nearest the beginning or end of the work is satisfactory. If the project occun; at more
than one site, all sites should be described and postal codes should be provided for all
sites.
5. Estimated Project Cost
From Schedule 2. Project Expenditure Forecast, the total of all eligible costS related to the
project.
6. Relationship to Other Government Funding
If this project has been the subject of an application for funding from either the provincial
or federal governments please indicate this. the program involved. as well as. the current
saws of the application (e.g~ awaiting decision. approved, refused). T ota! federal funding
9
MAY 2J'97 15:47 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 8190566d~~~!
....1 Z/2
from all sources for a specific project cannot exceed one-third of the toeal eligible project
costs.
7. Proposed Start Date
The date that the first eligible costs related to the project are incurred. Note: No coSts
incurred prior to April I, 1997 will be eligible for federal/provincial funding.
8. Propose<! Completion Date
The date when the final eligible costs for the project are incurred. All projects must be
completed by March 31. 1998.. (with the qualification set out in Sec. I.B. above)
9. Estimated Person-weeks of Work Directly Created by the Project
The total number of jobs that will be created as a result of this project measured in
person-weeks of employment.
10. Estimated Long-TennJobs Created
The number of new long-term jobs, if any, expressed in person-years, that will be added
to the workforce as a result of this project being approved.
II. Signature
All applications must be signed by an authorized official(s) of the local partner. The official
must attest that the local partner has passed a resolution authorizing application for the
project.
Schedule I - Project Approval Criteria
The criteria for project consideration are outlined in the Canada-Ontario InfrastrUcture
Agreement, as amended, establishing this program. These criteria are aimed at increasing the
levels of investment in public infrastructure during the 1997198 fiscal year over and above the
levels which would have existed in the absence of the Program. As well. other criteria seek
projects which will produce significant benefits to the local. provincial and national economies.
While not all projects will be able to satisfy all requirements, local partners are
encourage<! to submit substantial proposals which will meet the widest possible range of
criteria.
10
M~Y 23'97 15:48 FR MMR Roa HERD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. l3/2
Each project must satisfy i!! of the following five criteria.
1.1 Short-tenn job creation
All projectS must create employmem: during the life of the project. Applications should
estimate the number of jobs that will be created by the project and provide an analysis of
how they arrived at these figures. The number of jobs created should be defined in terms
of person weeks (i.e. full time equivalent jobs created on a weekly basis).
ReportS outlining the actual number of jobs created will be expected once the project is
completed.
The tendering process should require COntr.lctOrs to document the actUal number of
person-weeks of work.
1.2 Incrementality
Local partners will need to demonstrate and certify that the proposed project is either
incremental to the approved 1997 capital budget, or represents accelerated capital
investment. An explanation will be required as to how the project meets the test of
Incrementality. Certifications on Incrementality will be subject to audit.
Incremental or acceler.lted investment is defined as:
. a project which the local partner has planned for the future, but the start of work
on the project will be brought forward by at (east one year; or
. a project to be implemented in 1997 but not included for funding in its approved
1997 capital budget, or a project to be implemented in the first quarter of 1998 but
not included in its approved 19';8 capital budget; or .
. a project which would not have proceeded. or would not have proceeded at the
same rate, without the funding available through this program; or
. that portion of a project to be implemented in 1997 which is additional to the part
of the project included in the approved 1997 capital budget or that portion of a
project to be implemented in the first quarter of 1998 which is additional to the part
of the project included in the 1998 approved capital budget.
Local partners must certify that the proposed project to be implemented in 1997 is not
substituting for an eligible qualifying capital investment under their approved 1997 capital
budget, and that the proposed project to be implemented in the first quarter of 1998 is
not substituting for an eligtble qualifying capital investment under their approved 1998
capital budget.
II
MAY 23'97 15:48 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
,
p. 14/2 '
1.3 InfrutrUcture
For purposes of the program extension, eligible infrastructUre means the creation,
renewal or enhancement of a physical capit:ll asset instrumental in the provision of public
services.
Eligible projects within the municipal funding allocations would include renewal and repair
of tnnsportation and water and sewage systems. but would not include the construction.
improvement, refurbishing or repair of municipal buildings such as, fire halls. police
stations, town halls. maintenance yards. ete. nor community centres or recreational
facilities such as, arenas, swimming pools, parks, playgrounds, ete.
Eligible projects for CHO's would include renewal and repair of community health care
facilities (excluding those subject to RestructUring Board review).
For colleges and universities, eligible projects within the funding allocations would include
the renewal and repair of college and university facilities, including those of their affiliated
and federated institutions, which are used for academic teaching, research and training
purposes, or in general, projects that would otherwise be deemed eligible for funding
under the Ministry of Education and Training's 1997-98 Facilities Renewal Program.
A project which is a definable phase of a larger initiative may be acceptable, (f the project
results in usable infrastructure at the time the project is completed. .The costs .
attributable to the approved project will be only those reasonably and customarily
associated with initiating and completing the design. planning and construction of the
project. .
1,4 Consistent with provincial capital planning practices
Project proposals that are brought forward must be consistent with provincial capital
planning practices, guidelines and any overall infrastructure development plan(s) affecting
the particular area or region of the province, and cannot contravene federal policies and
practices.
Work funded through the Program must comply with all federal, provincial and local
requirements relating to construction and renovation projects, as well as. comply with all
applicable labour, procurement, environment:ll and human rights legislation and standards.
1.5 Operating costs
Any additional operating costs incurred due to this project would be borne by the local
partners. including the full responsibility for the cost of the project's operation,
12
MAY 23'97 15:48 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 58S 7292 TO 8l90566820S1
P. 15/2
maintenance and repair. The project proponent shall confirm that the associated
operating and maintenance costs are supportable within the local partner's projected
budget in future years. Where projectS would expand provincially-funded programs or
facilities. the local partner will confirm that satisfactory arrangements for the increased
operating budget requirements are in place or. if necessary. confirm the appropriate
provincial ministry's approval of the required operating funding increase.
Insert an estimate of any annual operating costs that extend for the first t!HO years
beyond the project. completion date and indicate how these will be met. The reduction of
operating costs is a significant benefit encouraged by the program. These savings should
be quantified and included as support for the project proposal.
The following criteria (Application: Schedule I, pg. 2) also apply to the Program; it
is expected that projec:tS will meet many of these criteria. Local partners are
encouraged to incorporate these objectives in their project design.
1.6 Long-term job creation
ProjectS leading direccly to the creation of employment are an essential part of this
Program. Projects contributing to broad employment creation either immediately or
beyond the completion date of the proje<X are encouraged.
1.7 Enhancing economic competitiveness
Projects contributing to enhanced economic competitiveness would:
. reduce the costs or increase productivity of businesses;
. improve business opportUnities;
. provide new economic opporcunities:
. enhance the skill base;
. improve accessibnity and remove barriers to employment of skilled individuals: or
. improve pricing of public services.
1.8 Use of innovative technologies
This criteria is not applicable to corw Extension Amendment. Do not complete #3. on
Page 2.
1.9 Bringing infrastructure up to community $tlU1wds. codes and by-laws
This criterion makes a specifiC! allowance for projectS which replace or upgrade existing
infrascructure consistent with current community standards.
.. .. .. .. ..
13
MAY 23'97 15:48 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. 16/(.
The types of projects fitting this criterion Include:
. those leading to compliance with building code, fire code, health, environmental and
safeq- standards;
. those removing physical barriers to accessibility; or
. those contributing to energy and water conservation.
The program does not create or impose standards beyond those already in place.
I. [0 Enhancing long-term skills in the workforce
This criteria is not applicable to COIW Extension Amendment. Do not complete #5. on
Pagel.
[.1 [ Enhancing environmental quality and $ustainablllty
This program enables investment in infrastructure to positively affect: the environment.
This criterion can be met by projectS which:
. improve community health;
. contribute to conservation of .resources; or .
. employ technology to reduce or prevent detrimental environmental impacts or
effect system repairs or improvementS.
1.12 Innovative financing
These techniques enable a higher level of infrastrUcwre invesonent by using alternative
funding sources for service provision. .
Options may indude:
. new pricing mechanisms such as full cost recovery and other economic pricing
methods; or
. the participation of the private sector in the financing or provision of public services.
A summary of the anticipated impacts of the project is required.
1.13 Local impact
Summarize the major direct and indirect economic, social and environmem:al impacts this
project will have on your community or institution. Indicate any additional private sector
projectS or initiatives that may proceed as a result of this project proposal.
14
MAY 23'97 15:49 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P.17/,
Schedule 2 - Project Expenditure Forecast
Eligible Costs
Costs must be of a type and size which normally would be capitalized in the records of
the local parmer.
Eligible costs shall include all direct costs properly and reasonably incurred and paid solely
and specifically in relation to the confirmed project that are:
(a) invoiced against a contract for goods and services necessary for the implementation
of the project; or
(b) any other costS which are incurred and paid in the performance of the project that
are recognized and detennined as relevant by the Management Committee, such as
day labour; or
(c) direct salaries and other employment benefits of employees of the local partner
engaged solely and specifically to carry-out a project whose costs have been
approved by the Management Committee as indicated in the completed Schedule II,
including the salaries and benefits of employees of local parmers in proportion to
their ac:tUal time engaged spedfically in the carrying-out an approved project; or
(d) costs of required project signage; or
(e) any other administrative costs which have been determined and approved by the
Management Committee. with the exception of:
. general overhead. including services or works normally provided by the local
partner or any other agency of that parmer;
. the costs of any lands or any interest therein. including easements. and
. interest costS.
No claim will be paid by the federal or provincial governments unless received on or
before March 31 of the year following the fiscal year in which the costs are incurred. In all
drcumscances. claims will be received no later than March 31. 2000.
The allocations for approved infrastructUre projectS are meant only to cover net project
costs. Net project costs are the gross costs minus the GST and any other rebates.
15
MAY 23'97 15:49 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. 18/2 .
Only those direct costs incurred after April I, 1997 and detailed on the attached
Schedule to the application and approved by the Management Committee will be eligible for
payment.
Program funds may only be used to cover eligible costs directly related to an approved
project. If a local partner uses its funds from the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Works
program for any purpose which does not comply with the program eligibility criteria, or for
which the Management Committee has not granted a special exception, the local partner will
be required to return these funds to the Province of Ontario.
Cost overruns are the sole responsibility of the local partner who also has the
responsibility for completing the project. However, the Management Committee may, at its
discretion. approve additional cose-shared project funding.
2.1 Invoices Costs. Maior Contract
Estimate of major costs invoiced against a contract for goods and services necessary to
Implement the project.
2.2 Other Relevant Contract Costs
Other costs that are incurred as a result of the project that are indicated as such by the
local parmer and approved by the Management Committee. These costs may include one
time fees for professionals or specialists engaged in project planning and delivery but not
supported by an ongoing contractUal agreement.
2.3 Salaries and Employee Benefits
The salaries and employee benefits for employees engaged solely and specifically to
implement the project must be estimated and reported in order to be eligible.
2.4 Equipment
The costs of purchasing. leasing or renting equipment not covered in section 2.1 or 2.2
must be estimated and reported.
2.S Other CostS (specify)
Arty other administrative COSts not covered in sections 2.1 to 2.4 that are a direct result
of the project must be specified and indicated here.
16
MAY 23'97 15:49 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
P. 19/,
2.6 Total estimated Project Gross Cost
The total of lines 2.1 through 2.5.
2.7 GST R.ebates
Applicable GST (and other) rebate estimates are to be recorded here.
2.8 Total Project Estimated Net Cost
Une 2.6 minus line 2.7
Proposed Method of Financing
The local partner is required to complete this section of the schedule bearing .in mind the
federal and provincial funding limits.
2.9 Canada-Onario InfrastrUctUre Works CapItal (Federal and Provincial Shares)
The federal and provincial share of the eligible project costs as reported in line 2.8.
2.10 Local Parmer's Own Resources
The local partner(s) shall report the share of the total costs of the project that they will
individually bear.
2.11 Private Sector Contributions
The Program encourages the use of innovative techniques to assist the local partner in
meeting project costs. Private sector partnerships. financing and innovative pricing
techniques are some examples of initiatives that may be used.
If innovative funding initiatives are used then they must be identified and their value
reported here.
Management Committee may, at its discretion at any time during the undertaking
of a project, require additional information.
17
MAY 23'97 15'49 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. 20/;'
Schedule 3 - Federal Environmental Assessment
A separate federal environmental assessment review must be completed by a federal
officer for each project, pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA).
This is to ensure that projects do not involve unacceptable environmental effects and is a
requirement prior to any federal funding being approved. For reviews to proceed
expeditiously. discussions with the federal environmental officer and completfon of the
appropriate forms (Schedule 3a and 3b) should take place as soon as the applicant decides on a
project.
If the applicant thinks that they have an excluded project* in whIch no further
environmental assessment is necessary. they need to address Schedule 3a of the COIW
application, The top half of this sheet is to be completed by the applicant and faxed or sent to
the federal environmental officer (contact numbers listed below). The environmental officer
will, after examining the information, contact other applicable federal. departments and make a
determination regarding an exemption from further environmenttJ assessment. The decision.
rationale (according to CEM) and appropriate signatures (all responsible authorities) are
added to the second half of the same sheet and a completed copy will be sent back to the
applicant. The amount of work for an environmental assessment, which would be required by
the applicant, is dramatically reduced by identifying the status of the project at the beginning of
the assessment process.
The following information applies to projects that are not exduded. Applicants are
encouraged to consult the federal environmental officer to determine the appropriate method
for completing their environmental assessment. If the project is not excluded. or involves
other federal department trIggers*. or may produce significant effects (social or
environmental). the applicant will be sent a completed copy of Schedule 3a with the deCision
not to exclude the project and be instructed to proceed with Schedule 3b as per the attached
guidelines/inso-uctions. The timely and comprehensive assessment of a project is facilitated by
proper completion of Schedule 3b. Reference to environmental reports are suitable for
completion of Schedule 3b given that the report is attached.
To further reduce the duplication of time and effort, the federal government is attempting
to combine the provincial and federal environmental review processes. Under provincial class
legislation (where most projects will fall). the applicant is required to perform a self-assessment
as to the potential social and environmental impacts of a project. The Environmental Swdy
Report produced under this legislation is also appropriate for the federal review. However,
CEAA requires additional information which is outlined in Schedule 3b and the guidelines. By
adding this information to the provincial self-assessment report, this report would be sufficient
for bam provincial and federal reviews. Please include the report with the completed COIW
application form.
18
MAY 23'97 15:50 FR MMA ROB HEAD OFFICE 416 585 7292 TO 819056682051
p. 21 /;
If you have any questions regarding this procedure. please contact the Environmental
Officer at 416-954-6648 (fax 416-954-6654).
*NOTE Terms in bold are expl2inecj in detail in dl. glossary.
Prepared by:
Canada/Ontario InfrastructUre Works
Industry Canada
Dominion Public Building
1 Front Street West. 4th Roor
Toronto, Ontario M5J IAS
Tel: 416-973-5093
F:oc 416-954-6654
e-mail: coiw@ic.gc.ca
Canada-Ontario InfrastructUre Works
Secretariat
Ministry of T ransporution
(stRool'. West Tower
1201 Wilson Avenue
Downsview, Ontario M3M IJ8
Tel: 416-235-4-446
Fax: 416-235-5243
e-mail: gasparot@mto.gov.on.ca
May 20, 1997
V~c:otVo'\GUOOGUID&.f.WP6
19
A~licatlOnlDema
.;;.~..~.~.
"~~.-iJi~d - '~~~Gl"'-:'::" .'. "_.,1. ~~~~.."d'f:trfva
. '~,--. ~~,~ P.P. ~!"'" ...~U!!lor:rn'!-~~~ln'~~OI:l~;tol;e.lC:tl.1oC
ED~~P.UtAA::I~~nellc~.dOlve ~lMtl.VD""Ills:-at'taa'iw.l;";';'" "....L. -.'
rffi8w;I1i'~r1in~qiie:fOdi: It,wonii~ii:futnfirea;.i1F'''~M~'si~'fre~t a~
ctJrJ~c"'C:8$:a"tI.ri'tOnf!!6cin'itra~~,. _ ." __u .'~:et~'~~~,i'~J~~c':":ritffOn#~O'i;C.O~.tt)I!Si:rf.ri:~~C~d~~Hi~1
renG8~gnomenf!l Pi:!fiKiQoDll! dtl'~~mementf6d6rati ... p!~~id'i,iii;p~e.na"~IO~['30ut:nef':lel'jirb,ented6q;~;':Yi:i\iilfeZ iridi~1lfSr Ix:iU&det
ron801 fH'n.8l1ia.'d~n8,ro.'..e~0I);j:; QUf;cha'ql.leP\!lrrenu~loi::aI.--.'.:"\-'"' ;. :.,-- .' _',j ',.,..... ~~:..;_" '_",
1 Legsl Name 01 AppIieunllNom ofl'ie&el du requArant entad. PerwnfPeR.onne-ress'ouree
Mailing AddresSlAdres!Je postale
etephone NoJNo de telephone
Loglll NtmQ 01 Applfcant(1f Joint application)lNom o1I'icief du requbrant(S'i1 s"git crune demand. conjoin!.)
d: PtftOnlP8rsonnt-rHScl~
"-Ceiling Mcl'res"Adresse postale
elephone NoJNo del6laphone
Legal Name of' AppCieInt(itjolnlIpplICl1ion)lNam oCIidd du requirlnt(d nglt cfune dcmandC' c:cnJoInte}
Mailing ~Adrea;. poctaIe
dephone NoJNo de te~phocte
2 F'Rlject NameINom du 1:'rojet
3 Project Oescription1DesapfSon clu projet
4 loc:a1ionofProJecI:(lat.Conces:sIon.Slree!.~1l!H~dUprajll{Lol,r;ng..dreSSe~}
S. Estfmattd ProjectCost (lfjointappUealSon.,lndIcatI CC&tsharl ot'8lId'1partner)r
CoOt estimalifdl.l pnJjet (Sil8'egit d'uno domande conJointe. pri6re d'Indiquerla pin des c:oG1s qui t.vl.nt i dw:Iut Pln:enlire.)
I . I. I
IS. Ha'te you applledlOrathet Lmdmg ~thC prqect 1tOm eiIIer IIle I"ecleral orOntano governments? 0 YosIOul
H'yu, please ind"lOi!te (he p~ name and application status)
Avez-'lOUS P.... uno dtmande de 1inlneemenl.poul'Cll pt'Cjet au gouvememenl f6dbal 01.1 11.1 gouvemement de-fOtrtario?
O.ns I'afftrmal'Jve-. prtf;te d""mdiquer Ie nom clu programme etl8 &llullion de II ~emande.
r_r COd</Cod.
I I I I
o No/Non
7. PtopOSed Ptoject 518ft [)efef
Da~ de detlvldU pro;et envlsagH
.. _'" ComoIetian 0ateI
DaI'd"ach6vementenvisag6.
9. Estimated Pttsen-W..1c:s wonc
O_erea1edbyp_
Stmain~es estima1ive~
des emplois .. eovn terme O'iis:
10. Estimated Long.TlmI Jobc Q
1N0mbte mlmalSflfemplais 6
long tfltmfl crHs
l)lete<l u _ remptiec
o 1.Criteia fot ProJect ApprowllCriter.s d'approb8tfon du ptOjtt
o 2..8udget end Spending ForecuClPtiv\sions budg6tMec It diponclU .nvlsagios
o 3.Federal Environmental AssessmenWvaluatian envftonnemema1e fedMwl&
11. I/wc oetffy f1It the in1otmdon contained in tis appGcdon and the aached sc:hedulec is c::onect and' compleCe It [he date of submission. I ftdlerC8l'
Ihat no Ioc81 announcement telated to I\is ~ed. wUl be made untn ajointennouncementis I9PfOved by aU 'lJU'tIe levefs of govemmenllnd!hat I have
been lUthorized by a tecoMlon dated of 10 s\lbrrrit this .pplicali'anJ
(d.,,) ~....,."
JII19S1:elNous Itlestons qu~ I" renselgnements crmtenus. clan$: te. pt6sente demande It 1M annexes ci1ointes:llom ends et compltts . II date de
~mi"ion. J'lItltl5felNous altfltons en oulJe qu'lvcun. annonct: loeafe louctIanll-ce ~ AI sera etreQlJ6a nant rapprobation d\me Ill'lnonc:e car
par les troic paGers gouvemementaux el que rli. '" autaris6 1:'tr une r6solu6on dal~ du
l $oumenre fa presenle demende. (date) artenaire toea/I
/l.U\t'Icrlxtd 0ffic:le11 .tletrltn ateIOatfl
Sfgnttaiteautori3e
~tlSigMturefJfroquW-ed)l itletrltre attiDate
S' nature suppl<<nen!aite ~ C8:l1 !die
AddlTJonal Slgnahrre [If tequired)/ itIe1T".tre etefDatfl
S;~natur. su rt\mentalre c as l:cheanO
. ........
,.SC~~~I!!,1l~n~xe 1
'iv1 ". riteii3l(:lr!feres
',; ~y,"a91,:rqat,1!l97
.. .......... ".
Loc8I Pa""'lPanena.._ I"n>j;" NameJNom',," pn>jet
Crtteri. "" Project ADPRMIICrtt_ d"approbation du pro]e'
The criteria for project" approval are those specified In the Feclenst-Provincial Agreement
Les eriteres d'approbatiOn du projet sont ceux mentionnes dans faCCOfd fedlmij..provincier.
Each project must satisfy all of the follo~9 criteriaJ Chaque projel doit r8p0ndre ~ la totalite des criteres suivants.
CrilsrialCriI~res
1. ShortMterm Job Creation w Please comptete Box 9 on the Apll'licalion Form.
Crilation d'emplois .. court tenne . Priere de remplir fa case 9 du fonnUlaire de demande.
2. Incre:ment8lity CSection 1.2. Guide to the Application forml'
Apport differOnGeI (Article 1.2 . Guide pour remplir Je fonnu aire de demande)
Is this project inaemental?lEst-oe que ce p~el represente un apport diff6renliel?
o Ves/Oul 0 NoINOn
If .yes, d8$Cribe how the project meets Ihe cnl8ria:1Si out, veuillet d4crire de quelle maniere Ie projet repond aux Clitms
d'admlS$ibifi1~
3.
t_reIInfratruclute
What _ would be renewed, enhanted orCf03ted by this p,*ct and how? (Section 1.3. Gulde to the Appraca1lon Fenny
Quelle InfrBsbudure serait re~ renfon::{:e au cri6e par ce projet et comment? (Atticle 1.3 . Guide pour rempUr I, formulalre
de demande)
4,
009$ Ods p'roject comply with Bpp'lfcable federal and provincial laws and reqUirements (e.g. plannIng, engineering.
environmeritall$$OArnerrt)? Descnbe how =wi when any outstanding reqtlnments. will be met (5ec:lion 1.4.. Guide fo the
~pr_ FennY
E$t-ce qt!e ce PfOJet ",s~e Ies 101$ et exjgenees fedenlles et provfnciales en 'vigueur (per .xe~le, la planificatian,
nn~IeM, ftMiluation .nv-lI'Onnememale)? 0ktrIez comment et quand (outes In exig.nces actuelles seront resp.&e$.
(Article 1.4. Guide pour rempUr Ie fonnulaire de dernande)
5.
Are there opel"3ting costs (beyond proMc:l CG!"p1etion) related to 1his project? Please specify Wh3t those IlIre Ind how they
would be met CSeC:Uon 1.5. Guide to lfle ADorlCa1lon Fom1)f
Y 1M",1 des coeds cre~loitation (en dehon;'del:arUaJintion du proJeU 3SQcib... C8 projet1 Veulllez precisei' ee qU'ils sont
.t comment on les riglera? (Atlicle 1.5.. Guide pour rempnr Ie formufaire de demande)
ProJeded Annual Operating Costs/CoOts d'exploitation Innuels Pfiws
1997
1998
Tho 1011owi~.Criterla apply to the Canada Ontario Infrastructure Works program: each project does not have to m~t all of ~ ~
however, it IS expected thai each project will meet one or more of them.1
Les critaras $uivants s'apptiquent au progranune sur IeS travawc d1ntrastructure Canada-Qntario: chaqua projet ne dait pas n9ceSS .
rempUr taus ces cc'it~res. eependant on proveit que chaque projet remplira au moins un ou plusieurs d'entre eux. alfetnea
1. Long-Term Job Creation (Section 1.6 . Guide 10 the Application Focm) Please complete Box 1 l)" on the Application FOrm!
Criation d'emplois li long leone (Article 1.6. Guide pour templlr Ie formulaire de demande) Prrere de remplir la case 10 du fOl1'l1Ulairt:
do demande
2. Enhancing Eeonomic Compttlb"lanKcl Ranforeomant dela comp'tltlvlt6 'conomlque
Please indicate how this project contributes to enhanced competitiveness. (Section 1,7 . Guide to the Application FannY
Veuillez indiquer comment ce pmjet conlribue a remt!lioration de ia comp~titivite. (Article 1.7 - Guide pour remplir Ie forrnulaire dE
demande) .
3,
4. Bringing Inhstruc.ture Up to Communft;y Standards, Codes: and By-Lawsl
Ramenor Mnfrutrodurw .ux normes, codes et Iiglements de la COUletJvit4
How would this ~",Ject bring Infmtrudure up to current community standarns? (Sectlon '.9 - Gui~. tolho Applicalion Fonn)
Comment ce PfOjeI ram~..JI nnfrasfnJcture aux normes aetueJles de Ia c:oUedivM? (An:ScJe 1.9. Guide pour remplir Ie forrrtWlft
de ~emande) ,
5.
6. Enhancing Environmental Quality and Sustainabllltyl Renfcrcer la quafrte et Ie caracte~ durable de renvironnement.
WOUld this pttl~ct improve communlty health. contribute: Ie resoun;e conservation or use technology Ie reduce or prevent environmental
;",pacts? If so, how? (Socfjon 1.11 . Gui~e to the Appliealion FormV
Est-ce que ce projel amelrorera la sante de la coUsc:tiYile. contribuera a fa CC1nserva60n des ressource.s naturelles au 1sra appel i Ia
lechnologle pour reduire OU prjvenir Ies Incidences sur renvjroMement? Dans ce cas, comment? (Artide 1.11 - Guide pour rem;*"
Ie forrnulaire de demande)
7. Innovative Financing/Financement innovateur
Would this project use alternative sources of funds or services to get higher levels of irtfrastt\Jcture investment (e.g. private sedor
participation)? If so. how? (Section 1.12 - Guide to Ihe Application FarmV
Est-ee que ce projet utmsera d'autres sources de fonds au de services pour obtenir des niveaux plus 61eves d'investissements dans
linfrastnJcture. (Parexemple.1a participation du ~ecteurpriv9). Dans CG cas, comment:'? (Article 1.12 - Guide pour remptir Ie fonnubire
de demande)
A summ31'\' of anticipated impacts of the project is required.
Un $omtnalre de "impact Invisag6 du proJet est requls.
a. Loealtm~nmpa~locaux
(Section 1.13 a Guide to the Application FormV (At1ic:le 1.13 . Guide pour remplir le fonnufaire de demande)
-
ClJ
-0
C
'"
E
ClJ
-0
ClJ,
-0
ClJ'
...
~.
'"
E
...
0'
~"
f-~
uJ'" '
~='-:-
QQ.,
.~"
:~':fq
.: .::J:':i.
I;
>':v
'lIJ..;;2
;~:~
:c.. ""
~~;!
~.I
.,-= -.;
~~;
isPi~;
'~l
4G'E'i
'00:...",
~l;r,
~.Hu,:,:-
CilW.C'.'
, 0::0'.,
:l.";:
~(.l~~
ca'
ZCi
UJ<.
c.lD,
~,
~~r
~'.'
-,.=; .
0'"
120.
Q..""
...
'":
N'
.r:
01,
::::Ji.:
O.
...'
~.'.
-
"C""".:
N
C
o
;:
"
ell
~j
.
1
.
!
'~
'. ',.' ...~; :i;.>,-:-~....
1'" ;, :;{y" ..... ..,
i ~ :" ',cl . ';'!;'j1t!~~]t1.
" ". ",,,,, ' ' "".., (" ." I
~;: i,~) i;;iE:~',:l',i:.::: ....::.~F; .;;
. ,,'" ,;,'" '""..', 0__' "....L d ,c r"-' ,I
, ., .."'T :;:H]5fj~&!~~1
m
!!!
m
m
:!!
.
l!:
'"
:!!
1:: 2?
. .
""
C:: l!:
. .
~~
'U 0
.~
00
~~
,,-
~~
. .
"IVl
",,'"
~~
'C.e
~ ~
"21
~<(
i::~
. .
::E::E
C: C:
. .
~~
".
0""
00
, -"
go
"'-
~~
o 0
"'Vl
b..J.
-=:~
1=.5
~i
'7.-
~~
.
1-
0
'ii
E
.
1; .
. 1! .
'5 '"
~ <
~ ~
'" .
u
~ , 0
'" .
!l ~
0 0 '"
u . "
0
. ;: 0
.
'l! :!. ~
~
u . ..
c;
.!l 8 .
. .Ii
c; . .
0 E ..
u ~ '"
" ..
0 ~
. "
" .. .
0 8 0
0 .
u tS OJ
.2. E 0
. c !l.
::E 8 0
, 'ii
. 1; E
0; ~ w
0 '"
u . .
u E .
. 0; .
0
0 '" .
> 0 '"
0
" ~ :_'"
.
.~i..1 :._,~
..
~
.
"
"
.
E
~
~
a
UJ
,,,,,.::~'..:;' .
,.,2.~~~L:.~~~J
I
=
'"
~
';j
.
Vl
"-
....
.!l
<:-
.
-1l
'E
8
:;;
s
'2
~
a
o
g
.
8
.
i!
"
"
11
"
'"
-E a;
. 0
E
.
e
~
o
D
E
e CD
. z
o
'0
<!
.
fJ
D
II!
....
" '"
UJ '"
.
E
'S
~
""
u
.
~
'"
u
%
ct
-0
.
n
E
.
"
o
U
-
~
o
.
.
.
~
.
"
..
I
,
'.1'
-';f;
~i!:.
t~~:
'E
"'G
,u
o
"~:
'w
, ~,...
,'"
,0
''0
-c,
.;~
,Ii
t=
't ..
CD . ~j.:
l!
S _:~:.:
'" '"
cb '~"." :':
~
:.i: ....'
Ci ,7:(:,
~
~
..
'll
0.
<(
,-:
..,:....
;-:-~~~
. '~';i'
- ,
~~....~~
..
e
~
=
'"
is
~ ~l.:
~ ~ ~;
! ~~
~ ..1;0..
:~~,:~
,:c.
::u"
,c.
.:.t,
:~u;. ~.
~'"
:'f
;i:::
"p-~':
;;;
'"
;;;
.
..
:g
"
..
1!
~
~
;;
.!l
!
~
..,
::!!
-l!
"
!h
o
'ii
_c
"'0
eN
.!1i:
~Ii
-1l"
o!
>.3
6:2
-g]
.'C
i!~
. x
"'~
.~. ;:;,. If. ~
..' ;;g
~'~~: =..
"... fit.!!
~:~',-: 05
..
<!.
...~.:.. ~ ~
"e
5~
go.
~,
e-
-11
o~
-.
..gu
.!!5;
8:
.=
~.
. u
~~
U
c;
8
~
u
..
.
'e-
o.
'l1
;;;
E
~
o
~
..-,..
0;
w
.
~
~
~
ol:
8
~
~
E
5
~
o
E.
-!l
e
oS!
!!;
,<
'.
.'
..
u
.!2
!!
..
o
{!
"
~
~
'"
.
!!
~
e
"-
~
'li
.
!!
~
o
II
0:
~
o
.
".
c
"
.
"-
~
~
"
=
s
u
.
.
=
'"
.
c
.!2
;;
D
'"
'E
g"
.
.
.
u
!!
c
11
CD
ii
J!
$
.
c
.9
'S
:!!
o
o
"
j;
~
UJ
.
n
>
'0
"-
..J.
g
~
.
u
.3
Schedules 3a and 3b - Federal Environmental Assessment
Pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEM), a sepa"'te fede",1
environmental examination must be completed for eacl1 project in'order for applicants to
receive federal funding. The information outiined in the COIW application is necessary to
determine a) if the project, for which you are seeking support, is excluded under CEM or; b)
requires an assessment screening and if so; c) to carry out the screening expeditiously and in
accordance with CEAA. To assist the applicant in responding, key terms (bold text) are
defined below and the federal government Environment Officer is available at 416-954-6648
(tel) or 416-954-6654 (fax) to respond to questions. This portion of the application does not
have to be completed prior to applying to the prog",m, it can be completed a~r submission.
CEAA specifies certaIn types of projects as having Insignificant environmental effects,
therefore. these projectli do not require an environmental assessment (EA). Examples of these
excluded projects are identified below. If your project mil:bJ; be an excluded project, complete
sections I and 2 of Schedule 3a and fax it to the Environment Officer as soon as possible. The
Environment Officer will confirm whether or not an EA for the project is required. If the
project is excluded, it is not necessary to complete Schedule 3b of the application.
Projects that are not excluded under CEM must undergo an EA. therefore, Schedule 3b
should be completed for each project. . Before completing Schedule 3b, contact the
Environment Officer if the project is likely to involve significant environmental effects or public
controversy, or requires some other federal authorization that also biggers the requirement
for an. environmental assessment. Potential federal EA triggers (required fede",1 departmental
involvement) are identified below.
Glossarv of Terms
The following definitions should be considered In completing Schedules 3a and 3b.
Environmem:: environment means components of the Eanh and indudes land, water
and alr; all organic and inorganic matter living organisms; and the interacting natu",1 systems
that include these components.
Environmen;al effects: The EA should consider environmental efl"ecc. of the project,
malfunctions or accIdents that may occur In connection with the project, and cumulative
environmental effects that are likely to result from the project in comb/nation with other
projects or activities that have been or will be carried out, and any other matters that the
applicant considers to be relevant (e.g., disposal of materials).
Environmental errectli include:
.) any change that the project may cause In the environment, including any effect of such
change on health and socia-economIc conditions, on physical and cultural heritage, on
current use of lands/resources fol'" traditional purposes by aboriginal peoples. or on any
structure. site or thing that is of historical, archaeological, paleontological or
architecwral significance, and;
b) any change to the project that may be caused by the environment;
whether such change occurs within or outside of Canada.
Excluded project: Certain projects having insignificant environmental effects do not require
an EA under CEAA: refer to the exclusion list regulations (Section 15). The following are
examples of projects that may be excluded. under cerain circumstances: maintenance or repair
of existing physical works such as buHdings. roads. water and wastewater facilities; minor
modification of existing buildings; construction of ramps. doors and handrails to facilitate
wheelchair access, fences, sidewalks and small parking lotsi modifications of existing roads
within existing right-of-wayo; demolition of small existing buildings: and modification of existing
culvertS. Complete Schedule 3a and contaCt the fedeno! government Environment Officer if the
project may be excluded from further assessment. Additional project details may be required
to make an appropriate decennination.
Mitigation: Mitigation measUres that are technically and economically f...ible that would be
used to eliminate, reduce or control any adverse environmental effects of the project.
Monitoring and Follow-up; Monitoring programs must be developed to ensure the mitigation
mea<ures identified for the project have, In fact. been implemented. A follow-up program. to
be determined by the responsible authority, Is designed to verify a) the accuracy of the
QnvironmentaJ assessmenti and, b) the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
Project: An EA is only required for "projects" as defined in CEAA which are not excluded.
Under the COIW program, most,.if not all, proJects will be undertakings in relation to an
existing phyoical work In which case the EA should consider construction. operation.
modification/repair, decommissioning or other activities likely to occur. Projects may also be in
relation to a phyoical activity (e.g., low-level flying). where the applIcant should contact the
Environment Officer to determine jf an EA is required
Significance: This is a statement of whether. taking into account the mitigation measures that
will be implemented, the proiect Is likely to Involve adverse effects that are significant.
Environmental standards, guidelines and objectives (i.e., specifying maximum threshold levels)
can be used to establish significance. Where they do not exist, reference should be made to
the magnitUde, geographic extent. duration, frequency, irreversibility and ecological impact of
adverse environmental effects that are likely to occur.
Trigger. An EA of a project is required where a fedeno! authority provides a finandal
contribution, administers lands required for the project, or issues a license or permit enabling
the project to be carried out. Examples offedeno! regulatory approvals that trigger CEAA
include authorizations under the Fisheries Act and the NavJgab/e Waters Protection Act.
COntact the federal government Environment Officer before completi~g Schedule 3b if the
project for whIch you are seeking support requires some other federal approval that may
trigger CEM. This will enable a coordinated review to be conducted by allowing all parties to
provide input and expert advice on the project from the beginning,
, , ,'" " "',,;":'- ';,"Sc'!'l$I:lLE'~rilExE'5'<"'"''':''' " .. ...... , "/
..':.~ED~R&'EN~iRbNMEN:rA!l.AsSessM~N~~ii.60gs.... ... .,:
. . ' PRo6Essus:r=eor:RAE::tYE\i.ia;uAiIPN,O.'EN~R;0Nf<iEM~NT. . ..
Section 1/1.... Partie (To be completed by local partner JA elre completee par Ie partenaire local.)
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION IINDENTIFICATION DU PROJET
1.1 Local Partner/Partenaire local
1.2 Project Namemom du projel
1.3 Project ContacVPersonne-ressource
Phone numberlNumero de telephone
1.4 Environment ContactlPersonne-contact pour I'environnement
Section 212 ~ Partie (To be completed by local partI1er JA elre complelt\e par Ie partenaire local.)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION I DESCRIPTION DU PROJET
Describe the project, main undertaking to be camed out in each phase. and the envircnmenlalselllng Including
sensitIve environmental components that may be affected. Usl all applicable regulationsJ
Decrivez Ie proje~ les activMs ~ elre accomplies dans chaque phase, elles endrolls, y compris I.. endroits de
I'environnement qui com portent des zones sensibles, qui pourraient ~tre affectes. Indiquez tous les reglements
applicables au proje!.
.
Section 313 .... Partie (To be completed byfaderal Env. OfficerJ A elre complet6e parI'agent du federaux de renv.)
DETERMINA nON
aJ( ) The project described above is not excluded from examintalon under CEM; proceed with Schedule 3bJ
aJ( ) Le projet deait ci.dessus n'est pas exempt de rexamen en vertu de ACee; veuiUez continuer avec J'annexe
3b,
b) The project oescribed above does not require an assessment under GEM for the following reason:!
b) Le projet deait ci.-dessus n'exige pas d'evaluation en vertu d'ACEE pour ta rais.on suivante:
( ) It is a prescribed project pursuant to Exfusion Ust Regulations subsection J
( ) C"est un projet defini selon Ie Reglement sur la liste d'exclusion sous..ensemble
( ) Other (describe below)J
( l Aulre (dl!c:rivez cI-<1essous).
Signature Department! Minislere Date
SiQnature Deoartmentl Ministere Dale
'. .. .. . . ... .. ..; S(;:1l,Eqlo!~~!~NEkE~i;::~ . .::'.> , ,
. EEDERI\l'-'EN!(llW/'lMEN'tAlMlSESSMENT'P.ROCE$S.;....;:
. '. PROCE5StJS:FE!ii~D'M~UATlDN:ih~iWiROiiNEMENT..
Local partners should provide the following information for each project submitted under COIW for which an
environmental assessment (EA) ts required in accordance with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (GEM).!
Les partenaires locaux devraient foumir I'information suivante pour chaQUe proje1 soumis dans Ie cadre de TleO pour
lequel une evaluation environnemenlale (EE) est exiger'e en vertu de 13 loi canadiene sur "~lIaluatjon
environnmementale (ACEE).
Section 1/1 ~ Partie
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION IIDENTIFICAllON DU PROJET
1.1 Local PartnerlPartenaire local
1.2 Project Name/Nom du projel
1.3 Project contact/PersonnHessource
Phone numberlNumero de telephone
1.4 Environmenl ContactlPersonne-contacll'environnement
Section '))2 IfN Partie
PROVINCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I evALUATlON ENVlRONNEMENTALE PROVlNCIALE
2.1 Is the project subject to assessment under Ontario EA Process? VeslNoJ
Est-ce que Ie projet est sujet a revalutaion par Ie processus d'~valuatlon environnementale provinclale?
Qui/Non.
To avoid duplication, refer 10 EA findings prepared for 1/1e Ontario EA p""","" and attaC/1 documentation as
appropriate in completeing thls form) En completant ce formulaire, veuitlez consulter les conclusions de
I'evaluation environnementaie prbparee pour Ie processus d"Ee de l'Ontario et attachez Ia documentation
pertinente a11n d'eviter Ie d6doublement.
Sectlon 3/3 imr Partie the additional :iheets.AJtlTlSez des feuiOes tldcf1fionnel1es.
PROJECT AND EA INFORMATION I INFORMATION DU PROJET ET DE L 'EE
3.1 Describe the projectJ Decrivez Ie projet.
3.2 Describe the environment In which the project will take placeJ D6crivez l'envirof1nement OlJ 5e trouve Ie projet.
3,3 Describe the environmental effects of the projectJ Decrivez les effets du projet sur I'environnement.
3.4 Describe measures that wUl be undertaken to mitigate environmental effectsJ D~ivez les mesures qui seront
plises afin d'attenuer Ies effets sur I'snv(ronnement.
3.5 Indicate expected significance of any adverse effects after mitigationJ Mentionnez rimportance prevue de tout
effel defavorabfe apr61'attenuation.
3.6 Describe the monitoring programs for the mitigErtion measuresJOecrivez les programmec: de conlr61e des
l'efficacM des mesures d'attenuation des effets environnementaux negatifs.
Sectlon 4/4 .... Partie
PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT CONSUL TAllON I CONSULTATION AVEC LE PUBLIC ET LES GOVERNEMENTS
4.1 Was the project announced and the public consulted during the EA? How?/ Est-ce que 1e projet a eh~ annonce et
Ie public consulte pendant rEE? De quelle meniOta?
4.2 List federal and provincial agencies consulted and olher requIred permilsJ Ind'lquez les agences federales el .
pravinciales qui ont ere consultees et des awes permis exiges.
4.3 Identify' any issues raised by public or government agencies and any Ihat remain outstandingJ Indiquez toute
question souJeveepar Ie public au par las agences gouvememenlales ainsi que toute question restee en suspenso
Section 5/5 ..., Partie
EA DOCUMENTAllON EE
5.1 Attach the Ontario EA report of the project. if availab'e. and list any other environmental reports or studies
undertakenJ Attachez I'expos~ de I'EE provincial du pro]el sf disponlble, et Indiquez tout au~e expose ou etude.
.
tf additional information is required for the CEAA screening of your proposal, you ~II be contacted directly by the
federal Environment Officer J
51 ron a besoin de renseignements supplementalres pour les etudes du ACeE de votre affre, Ie representant du
gouvemement fe.:Seral communiquera directement avec vous.
This rederal e:nWonl'nental assessment process does not replace the provincial envitonmentalasses.sment proees.s. E8c;h project
proposal is subject to Ontario reQuirementsJLe processus fWtral d'evaluation envirannementale ne remplaee pas Ie processus
provincial c!evalua:ior. environnementale. Toule proposition de proJe! est assujettie aux exigences ontariennes.
8B
';?t~ t)~
BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS CENTRE
~~~rnnw~ID
JUN 0 2 1997
P.O. BOX 365
BOWMANVILLE. ONT.
L1C 3L1
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperonce Street
Bowmanvilie, Ontario
L1 C 3A6
MUNICIPALITY CF CLARINGTON
flr~AI-;C:
: DISTRiB~TION I
! 0qIGI~!A.L. fif,Jurie 02, 1997
:--_-J:
i .~~.. '; Depu~ d
-' 2.; .':._,:ountant ~
: 3) P::i. Mgr.
~ j ?2yroll elk
! 5i :.=xCoIL
Attention: Marie Morono, Clerk
RE:
PROPOSED B.I.A. STREETSCAPE REVITALIZATION. PHASE 1
5)
Dear Madame:
I.,
"
Further to our meeting we confirm we are formally applying for funding for phase one of the B.I.A. Streetscape
Revitalization Progromme.
We attoch a copy of 0 construction cost estimote for your review.
In summary we require a total of $ 531,560.00 (excluding GST).
, The proposed finoncing structure is as follows:
1.
Federol and Provincial Infrastructure Contribution.
$ 233,563.00
2,
Markborough funds
(assignment re: capitat streetscape improvements) _
$ 208,333,33
3,
Clarington Place
(assignment re: capitol streetscape improvements) _
$ 41.666,67
SUBTOTAL $ 483,563,00
We propose to finance the bolance with an interest free loon from the municipality (tolol of $ 47,997.00). LOan to
be repaid over a six year period using the $ 10,000.00 per yeor ossigned from the promotion fund (Morkborough and
Clarlngton Place allotment).
In olherwords we proposeto use the funds assigned to the B.I.A. os port of the development ogreements from the
two groups concerned and infrastructure funds to finonce phose one of our long term gool.
Most importantly we would not be odding any additionol municipoi burden or B.I.A. assessment increase as they
relate to this project.
Please odvise Of the Municipality's decision.
Sincerely
t~
Me. Ron Hooper
Chairmon Boord of Management
ATTACHMENT NO.2
... ....-',
...
'.~T";'
.:.',
PHASE ONE:B.I.A. STREETSCAPE REVITALIZATION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
1.1 Selective Demolition:
Remove selective sections of existing concrete
sidewalks and dispose of resultant debris
(approximately 4,000 sq, metres area)
1.2
Subarade Preoaration:
Re-grade existing granular sub base, Import addItional granular base
as required. Compact base in preparation for placement of concrete
(removal areas only).
1.3
Cast In Place Concrete:
Supply and install 125mm thick 25mpa concrete. 6% air entrainment
in repair areas.
1.4 Temoorarv facilities:
Baniers, protection
1.5
Cutting and patching
1.6
,. . -
. Field wpelVision, bonds, insurance
. ~~~~~:~...::::,,- '
'~~~''':fl!l~
June 02,1997;;::~/ "
. ~. ,- .,0' .-.-:.,
$150,000.00
<.- ~ ,,;;...
~~:i
.-,.,
"-':'.
$ 48,000.00.
.,
$ 161.000.00
.... $ 9,600.00"
, $45,000.00
-.;: :__:~~~;~ ~:.~~.~~ ~~- :;~~~:~ . ~,: '.
. $ 15:000:00:'" '
SUBTOTAL $ 428,600.00'
Plus 10% Contingency 42.860.00,"
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
(excluding GS1)
,~. ~. ~- -'~
:',....-.... ~
. -,'.
..:. r.:.~ ."
.......-...-.;
,~yi,?~;~~~t5i~J
.-'--"
S 471 ,460.00
:.-:::~~:-\~:' .
i..~-:-_~--<'~;~'.' .
.~-,:>:.. iJ{i~I~:'~S;':;'t
""~~tm~~
"
.-. :'~.'\':;':;;:::, -:. ~
PHASE:C>NE: B.I.A. STREETSCAPE REVITALIZATION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
";"
Page 2
June 02,1997-. - .
Soft Costs
2. 1 Survey:
Preparation of geodetic SUlVey of existing road, curb, sidewalk profile
$ 10,000.00
2.2 Consultant Fees:
Preparation of tender documents; tender administration, contract
administration, field review
$ 46,500.00
2.3 DIsbursements:
Tender document printing, courier, mileage
$ 3,600.00
2.4
Permit Fees - not applicable
$ Nil
SOFT COSTS TOTAL $ 60,100.00
(excluding GST)
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 471.460.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 531,560.00
(excluding GST) .. .
,- ':~'"
''':',-
-. -",',-'
~ "."~~'
.~...
;~:._:..-. '-.
C',
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
Memorandum
Mayor Diane Hamre and Members of Council
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P., Director of Planning & Development
26 February 1997
Willsonia and Markborough Funds for Bowmanville Business Improvement
Area
Files: DEV 88-54; DEV 89-99
This memo is prepared to update you on the funds to be received fromClarington
Place (Willsonia Industries) and Markborough Properties for the Bowmanville
Business Improvement Area under their agreement with the Municipality.
Under the agreement, three separate matters are addressed:
1. BIA Parking and Streets cape Improvements
A total of $250,000 is due from Markborough Properties and Clarington Place
as follows:
.
.
Markborough
Clarington Place
$208,333.33
$ 41,666.67
These funds are due prior to or upon issuance of building permit. Clarington
Place forwarded their share in August 1996. Markborough contemplates the
issuance of a building permit in March or April of 1997.
These funds are being placed in a separate reserve account to be
established. The funds can bedrawn down by Public Works upon
concurrence of a streetscape improvements plan by Council and the BIA.
2. Bowmanville BIA Marketing Study
A total of $25,000 is due from Markborough Properties and Clarington Place
as follows:
.
.
Markborough
Clarington Place
$20,833,33
$ 4,166.67
...2
ATTACHMENT NO.3
Mayor and Members of Council
Page 2
These funds are due upon first occupancy. For Clarington Place, this was
December 16, 1996. These funds have not been forwarded as yet but they
are secured by a letter of credit. We expect first occupancy for the
Markborough site to occur in the fall of 1997.
The purpose of the marketing study was to allow the BIA to restructure its role
in the marketplace as a result of the new retail facilities in the West Main
Central Area. The Study was to be conducted by the Municipality in
consultation with the BIA. However, if it is determined by the BIA that the
marketing strategy is not necessary, the funds can be used by the BIA for
marketing and promotion.
These funds iNill be placed in a reserve account to be drawn on by the
Planning Department or the BIA, as determined in discussions between the
Municipality and the BIA.
3. Marketing and Promotions Funds
A total of410.0QO-iS due annually from Markborough Properties and
Clarington Place as follows:
.
.
Markborough
Clarington Place
$ 8,333.00
$ 1,667.00
These funds are due upon first occupancy. The existing and allllclfJa,,,U
dates are identified in,point 2 above. However payments are due annually
over a period of 10 years to be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index for the
nine years following the first payment.
The purpose of these funds is for the BIA to market and promote the
Downtown Business Centre. Municipal staff will forward the funds upon
receipt from Clarington Place and Markborough Properties,
If you have any questions with respect to the above. please do not hesitate to contact
me.
d & ~.--'- ~L<-
Frank
*jip
CC: Bill Stockwell, Chief Administrative Officer
CC: Marie Marano, Treasurer
In Case of Transmission DifficUlties, Please Call 416-863-2101
Please Deliver To: MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
COUNCIL [NFORMAT[ON
[-
MlnlslfJoI .
Munlclpaf Affairs .
and H~slng
'OfficeoftheMirister
ino:lly.stree{:
Toronlo ON MOO 2E5
.(~-1.8) 585-7000.
~ay [4; [9in
near liead of Couilcil:
MinistUe dec
. AtfiIres tnemldpll:les
. etdUlgg~n1 .
Bureau du mlnis!ro
m"",Biy
'. _ON M5G2<5
(4161585-7000 . .
~
o"lorio
AGE.NDA
':Thegove";,,,entS'ofontari~ and Canada have reaqhed an agreement to extend the eanada-
Ontaii.; I"nfra,struCture WOrics (GoiW}Program to March 3 i. 19118. This S459 million program
to fund J<ey infrastJucture p~je<;ts.acr()ss the ProvinCe is expectedt.; create up to ] 0,000 jobs.
The COIW. eXtension will address strategic infrastructure needs and prioritieS in four,basic areas:
tiaos~~n, IieaJIh ~ post.second;uy education and water and sewer facilities. '
The proVincialatid f~eraI goveminents arc inviting your municipidity to participate in the COIW
progr.uii. Under the CQIW exteosioD, muiUclp.wties are'expected to contn"bute<lilo-third of lb.
e1igib]e capita1 costs of each project. Orthe S4S~ miition in the extended prognm, $183 million is
available for municipa1iti~ to proPose projects. Under'the terms of the extension, this $]83
' miIli"n ni\tnicipal allocation is Oltected to 'projects involVing tbe rebabilitation and repair of
tr3nSportatio~ )'iIlt"': ~ sewage ~acilities. '
ibe ~ttaclmieOt 'show; thc'toiat aUocation.':aih.qle,to your munidp~ty for the.extended
Prognm, b<Ised on tIie sajne populationlhousebold fonnbla !lsed in tbe original COIW program.
This ",,~ts Your total aIIaC8liiln, which would be cost-shared equaUy among.the province, the
.' fedeljll.~entaDdYou.rmunlcipa);ty, . . .',. .
We ask that yoU express'your intCrest in' palticipating ~thu~ iD. the COIW program by'submitting
a completed 'application fonn, which will be sent to you sho,tIy along with a set of program
.' guidelines, There is a tight deadline (March 31, 1998) set for completion of these projects.
Therefore, applications shOuld be cooipleied and received by June 13, 1997, to be considered for
fuming. '.' . . .
We are ver, p1...~ thaUhe federal aDd provincial' governmentS aie able to coOperate..;w. our
municipal]lllItneci in this.impOrtant end"'lVour to builif and renew public infrastructure in Ontario.
For further information, jl1ellSe 'contact the, COIW Unit at tbe Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing ot'(416).585-4040. . ...,. ,
Sin~e1y,
OJ rke.~'
~--
~.
...
c:
MPPs
AI p.uadini .
, Minister of Transportation and
Minister Responsible for the I___::'::~: ., ,,__. "'., '
CBnada-Oniario Infrastructure WorJ/s P?Jp~lO"" .,
Government ~fOntario Il:~R _, . :: ~_~ j
i :,~:.~:: ~'~i
1-' .'."', ". -, ,- ,
~:c'~~~~i i
, -I
E~-d~
-'~"'---. - -,/1 /J._.,
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
,~~.) :."A ;.~,
ALLOCATION OF
FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL/MUNICIPAL FUNDING UNDER
1997-98 CANADNONTAlUO INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS EXTENSION
SOUTHERN ONTARIO MUNICIPALITIES
LISTED IN UPPER TIER SEQUENCE
The attached table shows the amount which each municipality would receive WIder the program. The
dislribution is carried out in two steps. In step one, the allocation is divided among two tier municipal
unirs and single tier municipalities based on population and households. In step 2, the pooled
allocation to two tier municipal units is subdivided among all municipalities within the unit based on
capital expenditure and property tax levels. The actual formulas used in each step are as follows. The
formulas are the same as the ones used in the 1994 program except for the use of more current data.
STEP 1:
Formula used to calculate two tier municipal units and single tier
municipalities' .shares
I ,
~ Municipality's Population
2 Total province's population
r ,
+ ~ Munioipalitv's Households
2 Total Province'S Households
STEP 2:
Formula used to calculate municipalities' shares within two tier municipal
units
r ,
Munioipality's 5-year
1 Total Capital EXDenditures
2 Total UT & LT s-year
Total Capital Expenditures
r ,
1995 Municipality's
+ ~ 0Wn-9uroosc Taxation
2 Total UT & LT Municipal
Own-purpose Taxation
DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS
Municipality's 5-year Total Capital Expenditures represent the total capital expenditures incurred
fOrlhe years 1991-1995. The expenditures are net ofinter-municipal transfers.
1995 !\funicipality's Own-purpose Taxation includes own-purpose property taxes, direct water and
sewer billings and other charges on the municipal tax bilL'
DRtR Source.~:
1996 Year-End Summary of Assessment Report (Households)
Municipal Financial Infonnation Returns (1991-1995)
1994 Municipal Enumeration Reports (population)
Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
May 6, 1991
1997 CANADA - ONTARIO INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS PROGRAM
TOTAL ALLOCATION TO SOUTHERN ONTARIO MUNIClP ALlTlES
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 1998
LISTED IN IN REGION/COUNTY SEQUENCE
Municipality I Murncipalilc
Combined Federal" .-
and Provincial'
Contributions
. ......._...C.~~tribU~f;id(;.....,.
dufc!d<!nd et du
provineia.1
$
Tolal Fund3 Available'
Municipo.l to Municipalities
. ...(;o.n.~ffi.l~o.'!.'""...J~ar..I~~7:~ar".h.l.9?8),
Finaru::emcnl tolal disponibte
Contributions dts :lolL'C municipaHtes
mlmicipalitcs (mai 1997 - mar.; t 998)
$ S
.n____ _'__
Metropolitan Tomnto R
Toronto C
Etobicokc C
Scarborough C
North York C
YorkC
E.,t York B
16,641,258
4,S77,f11!)
1,106,727
1,478,S57
2,108,337
456,205
305,480
8,320,629
2,288,514
553.364
739;1.79
1,054.169
228,103
152.740
24,961,886
6,865,543
1,660,091
2,217,836
3,162,506
684,308
458,220
t:;:.:::~~1f~4:~:::'~~~~~~~':';~:.~ru;~~::~~~~.::~:~~~$~~7.~~~~~~~~~~O~~~'(r:
D nrham R 2,710,154 1,355,077 4.065,23 I
Osha"" C 727,333 363,666 1.090.999
AjaxT 330,947 165,473 496,420
Clorington T , 233.563 116.782 350 345
Pickering T 278,392 139,196 417,589
Whitby T 315,519 192.760 578,279
Brode Tp 61,689 30,845 92,534
SC\lgog Tp 68,513 34,257 102,770
Uxbridgc Tp 84,845 42,423 127,268
~~~~:~-~~Sl~~lli~f~ili~;~~~~~;:t9f.~~J=~::':~~~i.~~ffi!~~~::~~~1~~~::5~:~;+I~~:2~~~1~i-i~~4:f
H.Idimand" Norfolk R 749,398 374,699 I.l24,096
Na...:ticokc C 77,264 38,632 115..896
Ounn"ilIc T 68,605 34.303 102,908
Haldiml!Cld T 84,190 42.095 126..286
Simcoe T 97,955 48,978 146,933
DcI!llTp 57,828 28,914 86,742
Norfolk Tp 57,759 28,880 86,639
~-;~:t:.:~~;';~?=:-~:'~.~g.~~~~~~~it~~~f{fw~~~~1f=~~1fQt;:::~~=_~~f~~f1~~9.~Of':;.;:;~':~_~~~~:~:~'~~: :.-~;1atij~
H.,ltoaR 1,853,182 926.591 2,779.772
Burlington C 700,902 350,451 1,051,353
Ha:ton Hills T 165,953 82,977 248,930
MiltonT 169,789 ~4..894 254,683
OLhille T 748,524 374.262 1,122.786
:~':~.'.~:~;-~.~{~~.-~i~m~tf.g:!'iJ~t~~~~~~i;~!1~~~s~~~ltt;:~~~~~:5~~~f~1~J~~:Wii:j5~:;~~~:~~~;:~~:: :~...:~;. ~5~S~i~4':.
HJ.tt1lttOl:1 - ~Ve.ntlYorth R 3.460,931 1,730,466 5,191,397
HZI:'\itronC 1,393,545 696,772 2.090,3 I 7
.. StO:l:Y Creek C 245,138 122,569 367,707
An~T 89,695 44.848 134.543
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO. 97-121
Being a By-law to authorize the execution of an agreement
between the Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington
and The Ministry of Municipal Affairs (the Province)
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS
AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of The
Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation's seal,
an agreement between The Ministry of Municipal Affairs (the Province) and the
Municipality .
2. THAT the agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A" forms part of this By-law.
BY-LAW read a first and second time this 9th day of June, 1997.
BY-LAW read a third time and fmally passed this 9th day of June, 1997.
Mayor
Clerk
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 97-
Being a by-law to authorize the execution of
an Agreement between The Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington and The Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing (the Province)
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on
behalf of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
and seal with The Corporation's seal, an agreement between The
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (the Province) and
the Municipality.
2. THAT the agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A" forms part
of this By-law.
BY-LAW read a first and second time this 9th day of June, 1997.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 9th day of June,
1997.
MAYOR
CLERK
Kt.PUK'1' IIJ
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
COUNCIL MEETING
Date:
JUNE 9, 1997
File #
Res, #
By-Law #
Report #:
i\nMTN.25.9'1IIe #:
Subject:
TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
i
I'
I
II
II
I,
Ii
I
II
I
I
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the following:
1. THAT Report No. ADMIN.25.97 be received; and
2. THAT staffbe authorized to proceed with the purchase of the Nantucket Sales Pavilion from
Halminen Homes limited, not to exceed $58,000.00;
i'
3. THAT Council waive the Purchasing By-law 94-129, Section 5.06, FORTHWITH; and
4. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule A be approved authorizing the Mayor and
Oerk to execute the necessary agreement.
~
1.0 BACKGROUND:
1.1 During the 1997 Capital Budget, Council approved the modification of the former "pollution
control plant" located on liberty Street South immediately north of Highway #401 in
Bowmanville. Staff were prepared to modify the existing brick building that remained on the
site to house the Tourist Information Centre. The budget for modification of this site to
accommodate this use was $175,000.00.
2.0 ALTERNATIVE:
2.1 Staff were advised on May 15, 1997 that the Nantucket Sales Pavilion located on Courtice
Road is available for purchase.
Staff met with the Owners to discuss any interest that the Municipality has in the building.
Staff were very pleased with the layout and furnishings and have had further discussions with
appropriate agencies to determine if this building could be relocated to the former water
pollution control plan.
Staff have made submissions to the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and have
received approval in principle for the conceptual plan (Attachment No. I) but will require
CLOCA's full Board approval on Monday, June 16th, 1997. ../2
2.2
2.3
.,."...IX\......
,..~...~.'u,."
",--...",~".",,", -.,-",,"'"''
REPORT ADMIN-25-97
- 2 -
JUNE 9, 1997
3.0 BUDGET:
3,1 Staff have reviewed all costs associated with the relocation of the building to the site and is
detailed as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Purchase of Building (including any applicable taxes)
Utility Servicing
Moving Expenses (Building) Utilities, Police
Foundation Work
Site Work
Building Demolition
Professional Fees
Contingency
Good and Services Tax (GS1)
Total
$ 58,000
$ 23,500
$ 12,000
$ 4,000
$ 40,000
$ 8,000
$ 10,000
$ 7,500
$ 1.200
$164.200
3.2 The upset estimate for the purchase of the building is based on a building appraisal report
which indicates a value of $59,600.00.
3.3 The Treasurer has reviewed the report and concurs with the recommendations.
4.0 TIME LINE:
4.1 If Council approves the recommendations contained in this report, the following is a
deliverable work schedule.
June 16 CLOCA's approval,
June 17-18 demolition of building
June 19-23 foundations/minimum site work
June 23-25 building relocation
June 27 site servicing
June 30 open for public
July 2-25 completion of site work
5.0 NANTUCKET SALES PAVILION:
5.1 The existing sales pavilion includes display area, office, reception, meeting area, washroom,
storage, furnishings, including some office furniture, cabinetry, display counter, four flag
poles, gas heat, air conditioning and interior and exterior lighting.
5.2 A floor plan has been attached for your information (Attachment No.2).
5.3 The Owner has agreed to provide for a main sign "Tourism Office" at their expense.
6.0 THE KAITLIN GROUP LIMITED:
6.1 Acmrding to the Clarington Official Plan (Tourism Nodes & Special Policy Areas, page 79),
The !Caitlin Group, in conjunction with their lands on the north side of Highway #2 in the
area of Green Road shall enter into an agreement with the Municipality to construct a
tourist information centre within the special policy area on a site no less than 0.5 ha. in size.
In addition, the proponent shall convey said centre and lands to the Municipality for a
nominal fee exclusive of other Municipal requirements.
,./3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
,
,
!I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
REPORT ADMIN-25-97
- 3-
JUNE 9, 1997
6.2 At present there is no official agreement with The Kaitlin Group Ltd. and since in the
opinion of the Planning Department, that this development is five to ten years away, the
recommendation is being put forth to negotiate for the Nantucket Sales Pavilion owned by
Halminen Homes Limited to meet the immediate need of the Clarington Tourism Division.
7.0 ALTERNATIVE:
7.1 If negotiations are not successful with the Owner of the Nantucket Sales Pavilion, staff will
proceed with the renovations of the former office building at the Water Control Pollution
Plant and will provide a trailer in the interim to accommodate a Tourist Information Centre
if permissable by C.LO.C.A
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
aD
~
W. H. Stockwell,
Chief Administrative Officer
Frederick Horvath, R.D.MR, RRFA
Property Manager
FH:sa
Attachments
~IA Y. - 22' 97 (TJ1lJ I I 8 53
BARRY-BRYAN ASSOCIATES
TEL.9D56665256
p, DD2
ATTACHMENT NO,' TO REPORT NO, ADMIN-25-97
)l II
-r-------
---- --- _l_ '
- ~-\
. -- --... - ,
,
~. . I
~I
. i \ I
I I I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
.-~: I I
. I I I I
I: I I
II I I
\ I I l
~! ~~~~:,:
I
\~---''',''
L____.._....
I
I
)
I
STREET I
!
UBEIRl'(
)
/
SOUTH
--
:I
<>
--
II ~ II II IlL) 'l(
-....:'-....-....-.....- -....-...
./ --
--
..
. r '>,.-
--------. I~ ~
- ---- '" ~nl ~
-,Jq
~ ~i
~J,-
! ~i
. . ,q I
__J~I-
~"
"
~.
"
~~ ~
D~
~
....'
.~
. -::w
, '. ~
'. ~
'-.. '
~
~
"
"
"
"'---"''''
'"
---
-----
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
i
II
ii
l'l;n
I ,8
I~
r
;~
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~i ~~
~lihh
F.!nU~
'B~q
a'it
h!
~
~-
,..-~
'.L._~..~.
. ',:':.
_._~ ~ -- ~
.~. ".",'1'
Q
.
~
~
^T~1iHMENT N02 TO R:~: N; ^:'N 1-~,97
. , '", ,.".!l; \,; \
,\lll] j 1 199~
F -,-."- .- ":-0'" _~'~fJ UrlUIII,:Mla:lJ 1Il~:1
.~ ----E~__-T-'L_f
-
~
. IT.>
..,el
~~
lfl;!l
, <::>
""0
:-l~
:>-
Ffl
),
~
~
10
~
.
N
~
.
,. -.......
'!
olj
...
~
:1 0
I.~ ~
,0 ~
I n
I '"
S' ~
.h i
. .
"1
,
"'l
'"
~ _: 'i-
1 I....
IN I
I,' ,-----
r
~ ,.--
.'
,\
I~
I~-
...--"'---
I I . M"al..L
I ........--.--.
I
r.~~;
1~I~i
~JI
---..--,
....lL!~1i--.- : -,.~ -
_ .... ~r.= - I~'
.,'~. I
.~', I
,,~~., I
~'''''~''''~~''''~
.:.,,~ '..
t1 ".::'Il- ,.'
1:; .....,.
?<l
~
o (
"l
. / ~ G'
:(. ~v
({t. D
"!:-J;./~'
~
I
,
I
I
,
I
_..-....~
I
,
-----.,
.
I
I
,
I
,
~-S,2...9., \
Ii '" ' '
~ ~~. %
..~ n /" ~
U'~ m I
0' 0-0'
---
..
~
i/l
i,
10
.h
.
..
~
,
V. I
~. ~
~ j
o
m
R
"
~
~
,
I ~
-l ,~
I
I
I
I'
I
.U"i";.-~",
21tlIO
.-. -- ..-'
.~~_lt==~~} ,,'-0'
J ~l
____ ----~2.----t
-_._---_.~--------I'
w
H'-U'
~..-~------~_..~._~_. -~---
-
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ~ I
I
. I
I
.'. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
II
II
II
I
II
,
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 97-
Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and l-lalminen Homes,
Courtice, Ontario for the purchase of the Nantucket Sales
Pavilion.
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
I. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington with the Corporation Seal. a contract
between Halminen Homes and said Corporation.
2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A" form part of this By-law.
By-law read a first and second time this day of June, 1997.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of June, 1997.
Mayor
Clerk
THE CORPORATION or TIlE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LA W 97-
II
I
II
II
I
II
!'I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and Halminen Homcs,
Courtice, Ontario for the purchase of the Nantuckct Sales
Pavilion.
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of CIarington with the Corporation Seal. a contract
between Halminen Homes and said Corporation.
2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A" form part of this By-law.
By-law read a first and second time this day of June, 1997.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of June, 1997.
Mayor
Clerk
~
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
KU'UKI 11;)
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALI1Y OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMI'ITEE
File #
Res. #
By-Law #
Date:
JUNE 9, 1997
Report #:
A. nn'RNmJlIlIim~:.4nM1N.24-97
Subject:
PROPERTY INVENTORY
Recommendations:
!tis respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend
to Council the following:
1. THAT Report No. ADDENDUM ADMIN-24-97 be received for information.
1.0 BACKGROUND:
1.1 Further to Council request at the General purpose and Ailmin;~tration Committee meeting
of Monday, June 2, 1997, staff were asked to provide the following information regarding
Inventory Number 217, Morgan's Road Pit and Inventory Number 101, Potters Lane,
Regional Road 3.
2.0 INVENTORY NUMBER 217. MORGAN'S ROAD PIT:
Within the Clarington Official Plan, Morgans Road Pit is designated "green space". Land
designated "green space" shall be used primarily for conservation and active or passive
recreational uses.
2.1 In the former Town of Newcastle Zoning By-law Morgan's Road Pit is zoned M-3 Extractive
Industrial. Permitted uses include farm and all these uses generally associated with gravel
pits. The current zOning is not in conformity with the aarington Official Plan. When the new
Zoning By-law for the entire Municipality is completed, it is the Planning Department's goal
to rezone Morgan's Road Pit to allow passive or active recreational uses to conform to the
Clarington Official Plan.
2.2 With regard to rehabilitation, the Municipality has been active in rehabilitating the pit as per
Ministry's guidelines. This includes reseeding, replanting, vegetation cover etc. The pit has
not been used for extraction since 1995.
../2
A.C.C'EO@.....'U
u". ..e,e,"-
'-
i::,,'
";,"".:
;")<i~-'
.~ ,>;;:,.t;',', i;~(}, "
":,\~;,::l;{:/!"~!~:~::':'l~:~f:i':':,{::':' ",i/,.' .'
.: JUNE,'91997 .
,,'., -;I::,::'~(':~,:';":t::'<:fJ;~'i;Xt: "':
REPORT NO. ADDENDUM ApMIN-2+-?~ '.2 -
",',i'" ."C",
2.3
" ' ' . . '. .' ".:.",' :'il:,f.i~"""_;";:
Staff have requested the ~nistiy.ofNatural Resources to inspect the "pit" todetenmneif
. '-",:"'''','''-' ,
further rehabilitation is required or if it is complete and the license can be ~~ri~d;
""""':"i;."'-""
3.0
3.1
INVENTORY 101 . PO'ITERS LANE, REGIONAL ROAD 3:
\i'l
This block was to be transferred to the Municipality through the implementati()ri (If the
subdivision agreement for Draft Plan Subdivision 18-T-24002 (Registered Plan 10M-775).
Staff are continuing to investigate this parcel of land which was dedicated for parkland
(Attachment No.1).
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
,F1!:sa
;. ;;... "',.I.~
T'
'. :%\~ :Attat'J.ments
:'i{~i t. ,,;i
. 'i\i~<t'
,
~:-.
"
-
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT NO.1
TO REPORT NO. ADDENDUM ADMIN-24-9
~~ I rr 18 I
I
COURT I
I
~ I
I
001
I
c z,
~ ~I
'"
" (1)1
c ~I
"
::> Z,
0
Ul 81
f-- 9
c I I
I
I
I 'L Loj I
---
REGIONAL ROAD 3
I J --
I /
I
I
I -
I
I ....
I
I "-
I c
I ~ ~
"" ::5
I "
I c
"
::>
I 0
Ul
I 9 Ul
I ""
c ~
,
0-
I --
~ -
-----
I \
"
_' SUBJECT SITE
Location Map
Property Inventory
Number 101
97-025
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
I
BY-LAW NUMBER 97-119
I
Being a By-law to authorize a contract between Rogers Cantel
Inc., North York, Ontario, in respect of the Supply of Cellular
Telephones and Air Time, to the Municipality of CIarington.
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
I
I.
THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of CIarington, and seal with the Corporation Seal.
a Contract between Rogers Cantel Inc. and said Corporation; and
I
2,
THAT this agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A" form part of this By-law,
I
By-law read a first and second time this 9thday of June, 1997,
By-law read a third time and finally passed this9th day of June, 1997,
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
11
I
;1
!
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
I
BY-LAW #97-120
I'
II
J
I
I
Being a By-Law to establish a Reserve Fund
for Tyrone CommWlity Centre
I
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington considers it
desirable to establish 8 Reserve Fund for capital purposes al the Tyrone Community
Centre.
I
AND WHEREAS Chapter MAS, Seelion 163(1) or the Municipal Act R.s.O. 1990,
provides that, UEvery municipality as defined in the Municipal Affairs Act and every
board, commission, body or local authority established. or exercising any power or
authority with respect to municipal affairs under any general or special Act in an
unorganized township or in unsurveyed territory may in each year provide in the eStimates
for the esl,ablishmcnt or maintenance oCa reserve fnnd for any purpose for which it has
aUlhorily to spcnd funds. but if the approval of the council is required by law for a
capiLal cxpenditure or the issue of debentures of or on behalf of a local board, the
approval of the council of a provision in the estimates of the local hoard for a rcsetve
fund shall be ohtainedl1.
I
I
NOW THEREFORE, Be It Enacted and It is Enacted as a By-Law of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington as follows:
I
1.
THAT the Treasurer be authorized to establish a reserve fund entitled
ltRcserve F!Jnd - Tyrone Ccmmunity Centre";
I
2,
THAT the Council may, be resolution passed by a majority of members
present, direct the use of the funds for capital purpoees at the Tyrone
Community Centre~
I
3,
THAT the Treasurer is hereby authnrlzed to deposit any remaining funds
received from the Tyrone Community Centre Board to the Reserve Fund _
Tyrone Community Centre; and
I
4,
THAT the Council may by By-Law direct the use of any surplus funds for
any other purpose for which it has authority to spend monies.
I
By-Law read a first and second time this 9th day of June 1997.
I
By-Law, read a third time and finally passed this 9th day of June 1997.
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
II
I
TIlE CORPORATION OF TIlE MUNICIPAliTY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO, 97-121
I
Being a By-law to authorize the execution of an agreement
between the Corporation of The Municipality of CIarington
and The Ministry of Municipal Affairs (the Province)
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS
AS FOLLOWS:
I
1.
THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of The
Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation's seal,
an agreement between The Ministry of Municipal Affairs (the Province) and the
Municipality .
I
II
2.
THAT the agreement attached hereto as Schedule 'A' forms part of this By-law.
I
BY -LAW read a first and second time this 9th day of June, 1997.
I
BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this 9th day of June, 1997.
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORi\.TION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGWN
I
BY-LAW #97-122
Being a By-Law to establish 8 Reserve Fund
for Bowmanville Business Improvement Area
I
I
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington considers it
desirable to efoitablish a Reserve Fund for purpose marketing, parking and streetscape
improvements in the Bowmanville Business Improvement Area.
I
AND WHEREAS Chapter M.45, Section 163(1) of the Municipal Act R.5.0. 1990,
provides that, "Every municipality as defined in the Municipal Nfairs Act and every
hoard, commission, body or local authority established or exercising any power or
authority with respect to municipal affairs under any general or special Act in an
unorganized township or in unsurveyed territory may in each year provide in the estimates
for the establishment or maintenance of 8 reserve fund for any purpose for which it has
authority to spend funds, but if the approval of the couneil is required by law for a
capital expenditure or the issue of debentures of or on behalf of a local board, the
approval of the council of a provision in the estimates of the local board for a reserve
fund shall be obtained".
I
I
NOW THEREFORE, Be It Enacted and It is Enacted as a By-Law of the Corporation
(If the MUlliciplllity uf Claringtutl .us follows:
I
1.
THAT the Treasurerbe authorized to establish a reserve fund entitled
tlReserve Fund - Bowmanville Bu~iness Improvement Areall;
I
2.
THAT the Council may, be resolution passed by a majority of members
present, direct the use of the funds for parking and streetscape
improvements and/or marketing of the Bowmanville Business Improvement
Area;
I
3,
THAT the Treasurer is hereby authorized to deposit any remaining funds
received from Markhorough and Clarington Place to the Reserve Fl.Uld _
Bowmanville Business Improvement Area; and
I
4.
THAT the Council may by By-Law direct the use of any surplus funds for
any other purpose for which it has authority to spend monies.
I
By-Law read a first and second time this 9th day of June 1997.
I
By-Law read a third time and finally passed this 9th day of June 1997.
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NUMBER 97-123
I
i
III
l!
II
~ .
1"1
I
i
I,
1'1
jj
I
II
I
II
I,
I
II
I
being a By-law to authorize entering into an Agreement with the Owners of Plan of
Subdivision 18T-87056 and any Mortgagee who has an interest in the said lands, and the
Corporation of the Municipality of CIarington in respect of 18T-87056
AND WHEREAS, Council on March 12, 1990, approved draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-
87056, is now ready to proceed to finalize the subdivision agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Oarington
hereby enacts as follows:
I. THAT the Mayor and Oerk are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Oarington, and seal with the Corporation's seal,
an Agreement between the Owners of Plan of Subdivision 18T-87056,
2, THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to accept, on behalf of the
Municipality, the said conveyances of lands required pursuant to the aforesaid
Agreement.
I
I
I
BY-LAW read a first time this
day of
1997.
BY-LAW read a second time this
day of
1997,
BY-LA W read a third time <lno fin<1l1y pClsscd this
day of
1997,
I
I
I
MAYOR
I
I
CLERK
I
I
,I
,
11
I
I
~, \
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO. 97-124
being a by-law to amend By-law No, 89-1 B4,
as amended, a by-law to prohibit noises likely
to disturb the inhabitants of the Municipality
of Clarington
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems
it expedient to further amend By-law No. 89-184, as amended;
I
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY
OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
I
1.
THAT By-law No. 89-184, as amended, is further amended by:
I
(a) deleting the words "Town of Newcastle" wherever they appear and
by replacing them with the words "Municipality of Clarington";
(b)
deleting the word "Town" wherever it appears and by replacing it with
the word "Municipality";
I
!I
,
Iii
lc)
adding to the aforesaid By-law No. 89-184 new Schedule "A", "B",
"C", "0" and "E" in the form and with the content of Schedules" A.,
"B", "C", "0" and "E" attached to and forming of this By-law.
(d)
renumbering section 1 as subsection 1 (1) and by adding to it after the
words "inhabitants of the Municipality of Clarington" the following:
.or likely disturb the inhabitants of an area of primary auditory impact
in the Municipality of Clarington."
"
i
~
I
I
(e)
adding new subsections 1(2), 1(3) and 1(4) as follows:
II
i
,
II
II
I
!
"1 (2) For the purposes of this by-law an area of primary auditory
impact in the Municipality of Clarington is an area within which
the ringing of a bell, the blowing or sounding of the horn or the
unusual noise is audible to a reasonable inhabitant who is using
his land, a public street or a park owned by the Municipality of
Clarington for its ordinary purpose.
1 (3) Nothwithstanding subsection 1 (2) of this By-law, in the case of
Mosport Park, for the purposes of this By-law, the area of
primary auditory impact is defined to comprise the lands within
the Municipality of Clarington whIch are located withfrl200
metres from anv boundarY of Mosport Park. '
--~----
1 (4) For the purposes of this By-law, Mosport Park comprises those
lands and premises that are more particularly described in
Schedule. A. attached to and forming part of this By-I a"!. "
I
......
(I)
amending section 2 by:
I
(i) deleting the word and figure "paragraph 1. and by replacing
them with the words and figure "subsection 1 (1) of this By-law;
and
I
"
I
By-Law No. 97-124
Page 2
I
Iii) and by adding after the words "inhabitants of the Municipality
of Clarington" the words "or the inhabitants of an area of
primary auditory impact referred to in subsection 1 (11".
I
(g)
deleting from paragraph 3(a) the words "public place" and by
replacing them with the words "park or recreation centre owned by
the Municipality of CIarington";
I
(hi
amending section 4 by deleting the first three lines thereof and by
replacing them with the following:
I
"Notwithstanding the other provisions of this By-law, this By-law shall
not apply to a person who permits or causes the emission of sound in
connection with any of the traditional religious activities including but
not limited to celebrations of members of a religious organization or
group, a church, a synagogue or a temple, or such other activities
listed hereunder:";
I
(i)
I
deleting paragraph 4(i) and by replacing it with a new paragraph 4(i)
as follows:
"4{i) automobile and motorcycle racing at Mosport Park, provided
that the maximum Jevel of audible sound in the area of
primary auditory impact of Mosport Park measured in
accordance with subsection 7(2) of this By-law at any of the
noise monitoring locations situated within 10 metres of a limit
of Mosport Park and shown on the map contained in Schedule
.B" attached to and forming part of this By-law between the
hours of any day set out below does not exceed the maximum
level of audible sound also set out below:
I
I
I
Maximum Level
. Hours To of Audible Sound
12:01 AM 9:59 AM 45 dBA
10:00 AM 11:59 AM 60 dBA
12:00 NOON 4:59 PM 70 dBA
5 PM Midnight 60 dBA
I
(j)
I
I
renumbering paragraph 4(j) as paragraph 4(k) and by adding a new
paragraph 4(j) as follows:
"(j) concerts at Mosport Park, provided that the maximum level of I
audible sound' in the area of primary auditory impact of Mosport
Park measured in accordance with subsection 7(2) of this
By-law at any of the noise monitoring locations situated within
10 metres of a limit of Mosport Park and shown on the map I
contained in Schedule "B" attached to and forming part of this
By-law between the hours of any day set out below does not
exceed the maximum level of audible sound also set out below:
I
I
I
I
;.
.
.
.
~, '
I
By-Law No. 97-124
Page 3
Maximum Level
of Audible Sound
Hours
To
12:01 AM
10:00 AM
9:59 AM
Midnight
45 dBA
60 dBA
(k) repealing sections 7 and 8;
(I) adding new subsections 7(1) and (2) as follows:
"7(1) For the purposes of this By-law the term,
II
,:1
II
i,
I
I
II
j,.
I
I
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
(a) "Acoustic Calibrator" means an electro-mechanical or
mechanical device intended for the calibration of sound level
meters and meeting the specifications of Instrumentation for
Acoustic Calibrators set out in Schedule "B" attached to and
forming part of this By-law.
(b) "A-weighting" means the frequency weighting characteristic as
specified in Schedule "C" attached to and forming part of this
By-law and intended to approximate the relative sensitivity of
the normal human ear to different frequencies (pitches) of
sound.
lc) "A-weighted sound pressure level" means the sound pressure
level modified by application of the A-weighting. It is measured
in decibels, A-weighted, and denoted dBA.
(d) "decibel" or "dB" means a dimensionless measure of sound
level or sound pressure level in which sound levels are
measured.
(e) "dBA" means the dB level to which has been applied the
A-Weighting.
(f) "effective sound pressure" at a point means the root-mean
square value of the instantaneous sound pressure, over a time
interval, at the point under consideration as detected with a
sound level meter meeting the requirements of Instrumentations
for Acoustic Calibrations set out in the aforesaid Schedule "B".
(g) "Fast response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a
sound level meter meeting the applicable specifications of
Instruments for Acoustic Calibrations set out in the aforesaid
Schedule "B"
(h) "frequency" of a periodic quantity means the number of times
that the quantity repeats itself in a unit interval of time. The
unIt of measurement is hertz (Hz) which is the same as cycles
per second.
(i) "Quasi-steady impulsive sound" means a sequence of impulsive
sounds emitted from the same source, having a time interval of
less than 0.5 seconds between successive impulsive sounds.
(j) "Slow Response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a
sound level meter meeting the specifications for Acoustic
Calibrators set out in the aforesaid Schedule "B".
I
By-Law No. 97-124
Page 4
I
(k) "Sound" means an oscillation in pressure, stress, particle
displacement or particle velocity, in a medium with internal
forces (e.g. elastic, viscous), or the superposition of such
propagated oscillation, which may cause an auditory sensation.
I
(I) "Sound level" means an A-weIghted sound pressure ievel.
I
(m) "Sound level meter" means an instrument which is sensitive to
and calibrated for the measurement of sound.
(n) "Sound Pressure" means the instantaneous difference between
the actual pressure and the average or barometric pressure at a
given location. The unit of measurement is the micropascal
(uPa) which is the same as a micronewton per square metre
(uN/m').
I
I
(0) "Sound pressure level" means twenty times the logarithm to
the base 10 of the ratio of the effective pressure (p) of a sound
to the reference pressure (p,l of 20 uPa).
I
(2)
For the purposes of paragraphs 4(1) and 4(j) of this By-law, the
measurement procedures which shall be followed in measuring
the level of ,audible sound are set out in Schedule "E" attached
to and formIng part of this By-law.
I
(m) adding a new section 8 as follows:
I
"8. Every person who contravenes any of the provisions of
this By-law is guilty of an offense under the Provincial
Offences Act. "
I
2.
The invalidity of any section, paragraph, portion of a paragraph, clause, or
portion of a clause of this By-law is not intended to and shall not affect the
validity of any other provision of this By-law.
I
'.
3.
This By-law comes into force on the day it is passed.
I
By-law read a first and second tIme this 9th day of June, 1997.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this 9th day of June, 1997.
I
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l'
I
II
i'
"
I
II
,
,I
il
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO. 97-125
being a By-law to amend By-law No. 78-50 as amended respecting the
holding of certain public entertainment, festivals and parades within the
Municipality of Clarington
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
expedient to amend By-law No, 78-50, as amended,
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
enacts as follows:
1. By-law No. 78-50, as amended, is further amended by:
Ca) deleting the words "Town of Newcastle' wherever they appear and by
replacing them with the words "Municipality of Clarington".
(b) adding to the aforesaid By-law No. 78-50 new Schedules "A", "B", "C", "D"
and "E" in the fonn and with the content of Schedules "A", liB", "C", "D"
and "E" attached to and forming part of this By-law;
(c) adding new paragraphs 2(h), (i), (j) and (Ie) as follows:
"(h) in the case of automobile or motorcycle racing which is a public
entertainment for the purposes of this By-law. a letter signed by
the Municipality of C1arington's Director of Public Works
stating that in his opinion he is satisfied with the written
evidence provided to him by the applicant, which shall include
the written opinion of a professional engineer retained by the
applicant anti the evidence relied on by the professional
engineer, that in the professional engineer's opinion the
maximum level of audible sound measured in accordance with
this By-law at each of 4 noise monitoring locations proposed by
the applicant each of which shall be adjacent to a different
boundary of the land on which the automobile or motorcycle
racing is proposed to be undertaken shall not exceed the
maximum level of audible sound set out below at any of the
times set out below:
H!!lm;
Maximum Level
of Audible Sound
III
12:01 AM
10:00 AM
12:00 NOON
5PM
9:59 AM
11:59 AM
4:59 PM
Midnight
45 dBA
60 dBA
70 dBA
60 dBA
provided that in the case of "Mosport Park" which comprises the lands
and premises more particularly described in Schedule" A' hereto, the
noise monitoring locations shall be situated within 10 metres of a
boundary of Mosport Park shown on the Map contained in Schedule
"B" attached to and forming part of this By-law.
(i)
an agreement executed by the applicant by which the applicant
agrees with the Municipality of Clarington to save the
municipality harmless from and indemnify it in respect of all
By-Law No, 97-125 Page 2
costs, charges, expenses and liability that it may incur as a
result of the applicant's undertaking of the automobile or
motorcycle racing public entertainment, and the municipality's
undertaking of monitoring by the municipality's employees,
contractors or consultants of the level of sound or noise
generated by the automobile or motorcycle racing in question at
not more than the 4 noise monitoring locations referred to in
paragraph 2(h), and reporting to the Council of the municipality
respecting such monitoring;
0) a letter signed by the Municipality of Clarington' s Director of
Public Works of the municipality setting out his estimate of the
costs, charges, expenses and liability that the municipality will
incur as a result of the applicant's undertaking of the automobile
or motorcycle racing in question, and the municipality's
undertaking of monitoring by the municipality's employees,
contractors or consultants of the level of audible sound
generated by the automobile or motorcycle racing in question, at
the 4 noise monitoring locations referred to in paragraph 2(h),
and the aforesaid Director's estimate of the amount of money
that in his opinion should be required to be deposited by the
applicant with the municipality from which the municipality may
appropriate money in order to save the municipality harmless
from and to indemnify it in respect of the aforesaid costs,
charges, expenses and liabilities.
(k) a certified cheque payable to the Municipality of Clarington in
an amount equal to the municipality's Director of Public Works'
estimate set out in his letter referred to in paragraph 4(n) of the
amount of money that should be required to be deposited by the
applicant with the municipality from which the municipality may
appropriate money in order to save the municipality harmless
from and to indemnify it in respect of the costs, charges,
expenses and liabilities to the municipality in respect of the
matters referred to in paragraph 20). '
(d)
repealing section 6 and by replacing it with the following:
'6. For the purposes of this By-law means an engineer who is qualified in
his name to practice professional engineering and is licenced to do so
under the Professional Engineers Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P.28 as it may be
amended from time to time. "
(e)
renumbering sections 7 and 8 as sections 8 and 9 respectively and by adding a
new section 7 as follows:
'7(1) For the purposes of this By-law the term,
(a) 'Acoustic Calibrator' means an electro-mechanical or mechanical
device intended for the calibration of sound level meters and meeting
the specifications of Instrumentation for Acoustic Calibrators set out in
Schedule 'B' attached to and forming part of this By-law,
(b)
'A-weighting" means the frequency weighting characteristic as
specified in Schedule "C' attached to and forming part of this By-law
and intended to approximate the relative sensitivity of the normal
hwnan ear to different frequencies (pitches) of sound.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
By-Law No, 97-125
Page 3
I
(c) "A-weighted sound pressure level" means the sound pressure level
modified by application of the A-weighting. It is measured in decibels,
A-weighted, and denoted dBA,
I
(d) "decibel" or "dB" means a dimensionless measure of sound level or
sound pressure level in which sound levels are measured.
I
(e) "dBA" means the dB level to which has been applied the A-Weighting,
I
(I) "effective sound pressure" at a point means the root-mean square value
of the instantaneous sound pressure, over a time interval, at the point
under consideration as detected with a sound level meter meeting the
requirements of Instrumentations for Acoustic Calibrations set out in
the aforesaid Schedule "B".
I
(g) "Past response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a sound level
meter meeting the applicable specifications of Instruments for Acoustic
Calibrations set out in the aforesaid Schedule "B"
I
I
(h) "frequency" of a periodic quantity means the number of times that the
quantity repeats itself in a unit interval of time. The unit of
measurement is hertz (Hz) which is the same as cycles per second.
I
(i) "Quasi-steady impulsive sound" means a sequence of impulsive sounds
emitted from the same source, having a time interval of less than 0,5
seconds between successive impulsive sounds.
I
(j) "Slow Response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a sound
level meter meeting the specifications for Acoustic Calibrators set out
in the aforesaid Schedule "B",
II
f
II
I
[-
II
II
Ii
I
(Ie) "Sound" means an oscillation in pressure. stress, 'particle displacement
or particle velocity, in a medium with internal forces (e.g. elastic,
viscous), or the superposition of such propagated oscillation, which
may cause an auditory sensation.
(I) "Sound level" means an A-weighted sound pressure level.
(m) "Sound level meter" means an instrument which is sensitive to and
calibrated for the measurement of sound.
(n) "Sound Pressure" means the instantaneous difference between the actual
pressure and the average or barometric pressure at a given 'location.
The unit of measurement is the micropascal (uPa) which is the same as
a micronewton per square metre (uN/m').
(0) "Sound pressure level" means twenty times the logarithm to the base 10
of the ratio of the effective pressure (P) of a sound to the reference
pressure (P,) of 20 uPa).
(2) Por the purposes of paragraph 2(h) of this By-law, the measurement
procedures which shall be followed in measuring the level of audible
sound are set out in Schedule "E" attacbed to and forming part of this
By-law.
-
I
I
I
By-Law No. 97-125
Page 4
I
2. The invalidity of any section, portion of a section, paragraph, portion of a paragraph,
clause, or portion of a clause of this By-law is not intended to and shall not affect the
validity of any other provision of this By-law.
I
BY -LAW read a first and second time this 9th day of June, 1997.
I
BY-LAW read a third time and fma11y passed this 9th day of June, 1997.
I
Mayor
I
Clerk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO. 97-126
I
being a By-law to amend By-law No. 91-56
respecting exhibitions held for hire or gain
in the Municipality of CIarington
II
,
,I
I
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
expedient to amend By-law No. 91-56, as amended,
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
enacts as follows:
1. By-law No. 91-56, as amended, is further amended by:
I
(a)
deleting the words 'Town of Newcastle' wherever they appear and by replacing
them with the words "Municipality of Clarington' .
I
(b)
amending the aforesaid By-law No. 91-56 by adding thereto new Schedules "A",
"Bit, "en, liD" and "E" in the form and with the content of Schedules "A", "B",
"C', "D' and "E" attached to and fonning part of this By-law.
I
(c)
renumbering paragraphs 4(1) and 4(m) as 4(p) and 4(q) and by adding new
paragraphs 4(1), (m), (n) and (0):
I
'4(1) in the case of a concert which is an exhibition held for hire or
gain, a letter signed by the Municipality of Clarington's Director
of Public Works stating that in his opinion he is satisfied with the
written evidence provided to him by the applicant, which shall
include the written opinion of a professional engineer retained by
the applicant and the evidence relied on by the professional
engineer, that in the professional engineer's opinion the maximum
level of audible sound measured in accordance with this By-law at
each of 4 noise monitoring locations proposed by the applicant
each of which shall be adjacent to a different boundary of the land
on which the concert is proposed to be undertaken sball not exceed
the maximum level of audible sound set out below at any of the
times set out below:
Hours
To
Concerts - Maximum
Level of Audible Sound
12:01 AM
10:00 AM
9:59 AM
Midnight
45 dBA
60 dBA
provided that in the case of "Mosport Park" which comprises the lands
and premises more particularly described in Schedule "A" hereto, the
noise monitoring locations sball be situated within 10 metres of a
boundary of Mosport Park shown on the Map contained in Schedule "B"
attached to and fonning part of this By-law.
(m) an agreement executed by the applicant by which the applicant
agrees with the Municipality of CIarington to save the municipality
harmless from and indemnify it in respect of all costs, charges,
expenses and liability that it may incur as a result of the
applicant's undertaking of the concert referred to in 4(1), and the
municipality's undertaking of monitoring by the municipality's
employees, contractors or consultants of the level of audible sound
generated by the concert in question at not more than the 4 noise
monitoring locations referred to in paragraph 4(1), and reporting
to Council of the municipality respecting such monitoring;
I
By-Law No. 97-126 Page 2
(n) a letter signed by the Municipality of Clarington's Director of
Public Works of the municipality setting out his estimate of the
costs, charges, expenses and liability that the municipality will
incur as a result of the applicant's undertaking of the concert in
question, and the municipality's undertaking of monitoring by the
municipality's employees, contractors or consultants of the level
of audible sound generated by the concert in question, at the 4
noise monitoring locations referred to in paragraph 4(1), and the
aforesaid Director's estimate of the amOl!l1l of money that in his
opinion should be required to be deposited by the applicant with
the municipality from which the municipality may appropriate
money in order to save the municipality hannIess from and to
indenmify it in respect of the aforesaid costs, charges. expenses
and liabilities;
I
I
I
I
(0) a certified cheque payable to the Municipality of Clarington in an
amount equal to the municipality's Director of Public Works'
estimate set out in his letter referred to in paragraph 4(n) of the
amount of money that should be required to be deposited by the
applicant with the municipality from which the municipality may
appropriate money in order to save the municipality hannless from
and to indemnify it in respect of the costs, charges, expenses and
liabilities to the municipality in respect of the matters referred to
in paragraph 4(n); and.'
I
I
I
(d)
renumbering sections 8, 9 and 10 as sections 9, 10 and 11, respectively.
I
(e) adding a new section 8 as follows:
'8(1) For the purposes of this By-law the tenn,
I
(a) 'Acoustic Calibrator' means an electro-mechanical or mechanical device
intended for the calibration of sound level meters and meeting the
specifications of Instrumentation for Acoustic Calibrators set out in
Schedule 'B' attached to and fonning part of this By-law,
I
(b) 'A-weighting" means the frequency weighting characteristic as specified
in Schedule 'C' attached to and fonning part of this By-law and intended
to approximate the relative sensitivity of the nOnna! human ear to different
frequencies (pitches) of sound.
I
I
(c) "A-weighted sound pressure level' means the sound pressure level
modified by application of the A-weighting. It is measured in decibels,
A-weighted, and denoted dBA.
I
I
(d) "decibel" or "dB" means a dimensionless measure of sound level or sound
pressure level in which sound levels are measured.
(e) "dBA' means the dB level to which has been applied the A-Weighting.
(f) "effective sound pressure" at a point means the root-mean square value of
the instantaneous sound pressure, over a time interval, at the point under
consideration as detected with a sound level meter meeting the
requirements of Instrumentations for Acoustic Calibrations set out in the
aforesaid Schedule "B".
I
(g) "Fast response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a sound level
meter meeting the applicable specifications of Instruments for Acoustic
Calibrations set out in the aforesaid Schedule 'B'.
I
I
I
I
1'1
By-Law No. 97-126 Page 3
(h) "frequency" of a periodic quantity means the number of times that the
quantity repeats itself in a unit interval of time, The unit of measurement
is hertz (Hz) which is the same as cycles per second.
(i) "Quasi-steady impulsive sound" means a sequence of impulsive sounds
emitted from the same source, having a time interval of less than 0,5
seconds between successive impulsive sounds.
(j) "Slow Response" means a dynamic characteristic setting of a sound level
meter meeting the specifications for Acoustic Calibrators set out in the
aforesaid Schedule "BII.
(1<) "Sound" means an oscillation in pressure, stress, partiCle displacement or
particle velocity, in a medium with internal forces (e.g. elastic, viscous),
or the superposition of such propagated oscillation, which may cause an
auditory sensation.
(I) "Sound level" means an A-weighted sound pressure level.
(m) "Sound level meter" means an instrument which is sensitive to and
calibrated for the measurement of sound.
(n) "Sound Pressure" means the instantaneous difference between the actual
pressure and the average or barometric pressure at a given location. The
unit of measurement is the micropascal (uPa) which is the same as a
micronewton per square metre (uN/or).
(0) "Sound pressure level" means twenty times the logarithm to the base 10
of the ratio of the effective pressure (P) of a sound to the reference
pressure (P,) of 20 uPa),
(2) For the purposes of paragraph 4(1) of this By-law, the measurement
procedures which shaII be followed in measuring the level of audible
sound are set out in Schedule "E" attached to and forming part of this
By-law.
2. The invalidity of any section, portion of a section, paragraph, portion of a paragraph,
clause, or portion of a clause of this By-law is not intended to and shall not affect the
validity of any other provision of this By-law.
Mayor
BY-LAW read a first and second time this 9th day of June, 1997.
BY-LAW read a third time and fmally passed this 9th day of June, 1997.
Clerk
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 97-127
Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and Halminen Homes,
Courtice, Ontario for the purchase of the Nantucket Sales
Pavilion.
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY
ENACfS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Oerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Oarington with the Corporation Seal, a contract
between Halminen Homes and said Corporation.
2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A" fonn part of this By-law.
By-law read a first and second time' this 9 day of June, 1997.
Mayor
By-law read a third time and finally passed this 9 day of June, 1997.
Oerk